Thou shalt love then Jehovah thy God, and keep his charge, and his statutes, and his ordinances, and his commandments continually.
Moses is speaking his last words to Israel on the edge of the promised land. The word "therefore" looks back at what God had already done for them, and everything He now asks — charge, statutes, rules, commandments, kept always — rests on one thing: love.
The chapters before this one press obedience again and again. One writer traces the flow of the book and notes what chapter 11 adds:
So obedience is pressed on them in a most moving way. And in Deuteronomy 11 love is pressed too, in the presence of His wonderful ways of mercy as well as judgment. All of this was so that they might enjoy the good land.
Love is not an extra requirement laid on top of the commandments. Moses names it first because it drives the rest. That order was also the road to enjoying the good land.
The verse names love first, then the keeping. A commentator explains why that order matters, and what Israel's own history proved:
This chapter shows the results of obedience, set against the consequences of disobedience. It begins with the command to love the Lord their God (v.1). That love is, of course, the power that drives them to keep God's statutes. Yet, though told many times to love the Lord, Israel did not respond to this. For love cannot be legislated, as Israel learned by experience. It must be spontaneous and voluntary.
If love is the engine, rules must do some other job. One writer says plainly what that job is:
No person becomes obedient by good rules. What is it then that produces it? The heart must be filled with right motives; and what brings this about? Love for a person gives a sense of duty to him, and acts on the heart. This makes obedience easy. Rules are never the power but only the tests of obedience in certain cases.
The same writer adds that where the heart loves, even a wish of God's with no direct command shapes what we want. Where love is missing, everything is soon forgotten.
Some readers flinch at a verse like this. They hear any call to keep commandments as a way of earning standing with God. One commentator answers that objection:
Is there anything of the legal element in this? Not a trace. Love and legality have nothing in common; they are as far apart as the poles… Suppose it were taught that we must earn the high position and relationship of children of God by our obedience. Then the solemn charge of legality would be fair. But to attach such a label to Christian obedience is, we repeat, a serious moral mistake. Obedience could never come before sonship. But obedience should always follow sonship.
If no one can force love, the command raises an obvious problem: how is it ever kept? One writer sets the demand of the law beside what God has done to produce the love He asks for:
The law, with all its threats, could not get this from the mere child of Adam. God has obtained it by His work of grace in our hearts. The law demanded love from man, but never got it. But God has obtained it by revealing His great love to us in the death of His only begotten Son: "We love Him because He first loved us." We do not love Him because threats of wrath force us to. This never produced love in any human heart. Terror it did produce, but not love. Love produces love where that love is valued.
The verse does not say keep them now, or keep them at first. It says always. The verses right after it recite what God did in Egypt, at the Red Sea, and in the wilderness. A commentator explains why Moses turned to memory here:
Moses felt it was of the very highest importance to keep all the mighty acts of the Lord clearly before the hearts of the people, and to engrave them deeply on their memory. The human mind wanders and the heart is unsteady. Israel had seen God's solemn judgments on Egypt and on Pharaoh. Even so, they were in danger of forgetting them, and of losing the impression those judgments were designed to make and were so well suited to make.
- Love first. The verse opens with love, not with the list. Love is the power that drives obedience, and everything after it depends on it.
- Love cannot be legislated. It has to be spontaneous and free. God told Israel many times to love Him, and they never did.
- Rules test, love drives. Rules are never the power of obedience, only its test. Love for a person makes obedience easy.
- Love is drawn out, not forced. Threats never made a heart love God. God's love, shown in the death of His Son, does — "We love Him because He first loved us."
- Then obedience, always. Obedience never comes before sonship; it follows sonship. And it holds out when God's mighty acts stay fresh in memory.
And know ye this day ...; for [I speak] not with your children who have not known, and who have not seen the chastisement of Jehovah your God, his greatness, his powerful hand, and his stretched-out arm,
Moses speaks to adults who lived through Egypt, the Red Sea and the desert years, not to their children, who know the story second-hand. So what should a person do with what he has seen God do?
The verse follows a call to love God and keep His commands. One writer shows what that call rests on.
This chapter develops further the great teaching that marks this book: obedience springing from love to the LORD. It begins with a "therefore." The last verse of the previous chapter shows that the LORD had kept the promise made to the fathers of the nation. Then once more the chapter reviews the mighty acts of the LORD: His miracles and acts done in Egypt, what He did at the Red Sea, and what He did to them in the wilderness — therefore you shall love the LORD your God… What He had done and what He was going to do for them called for the love and obedience of His people. May we heed the same call.
One writer works out who these hearers were and how young they had been when it all happened.
Moses spoke to those who had seen the many displays of God's power and grace to Israel (v.2). These were under twenty years of age when they saw these things. They should certainly have remembered it all well. God worked signs in Egypt. He brought Israel safely through the Red Sea and destroyed the Egyptians in the waters. He did much more in the wilderness, including the judgment of Dathan and Abiram, whom the earth swallowed up when it opened (vs.3-7). They themselves — not a previous generation — had witnessed all this.
The appeal of this chapter rests on mercy and judgment alike. It also has a goal in view.
So obedience is pressed most movingly. Deuteronomy 11 presses love too, in the presence of His wonderful ways of mercy as well as judgment, so that they might enjoy the good land.
Verses 2 to 7 run through Egypt, the Red Sea, the wilderness, and a judgment that fell inside the camp. All that recalling had one purpose.
In a word, then, Moses called their attention to God's actions outside or inside, abroad or at home. It was all for one purpose: to impress on their hearts and minds a deep sense of the moral importance of obedience. This was the one great aim of all the rehearsals, all the comment, all the appeals of the faithful servant of God who would soon be taken from them. For this he ranges over centuries of their history. He selects, groups, comments, takes up this fact and leaves out that, as the Spirit of God guides him.
It seems strange that people who watched the plagues and the sea could ever need reminding. Yet the reminder was urgent.
Moses felt it was of the very highest importance that all the mighty acts of the LORD should stay clearly before the hearts of the people, deeply engraved on their memory. The human mind wanders and the heart is unsteady. Israel had seen the solemn judgments of God on Egypt and on Pharaoh. Even so, they were in danger of forgetting them. They could lose the impression those judgments were designed and perfectly fitted to make on them.
The children in this verse had not seen it. Another writer traces what happens when that gap is never filled.
Here, in Judges, a generation arose that did not know the Lord and did not know His works… The fathers and mothers carried the responsibility of passing on to the children the great events of Israel's history and the Lord's blessings to them. So if a generation arose that did not know the Lord or His works, it points to a lapse in the teaching of the fathers and mothers… They did not know the Lord, and they did not know His works, so it was very easy for them to give up. They had nothing to hold on to.
- Seen — Moses speaks to the people who watched God act in Egypt, at the sea and in the desert. They did not inherit the story; they were there.
- Remembered — memory is the weak link. The mind wanders and the heart is unsteady, so even eyewitnesses can lose the impression those acts were meant to make.
- Loved — the chapter's "therefore" makes God's acts the reason for love. Obedience springs from love, and what He has done and will do calls for both.
- Obeyed — every look back over their history serves one aim. Mercy or judgment, outside the camp or inside it, all of it presses the moral importance of obedience.
- Told — what one generation saw, the next only hears. Where parents fail to pass it on, children grow up with nothing to hold on to and give God up easily.
and his signs and his acts which he did in the midst of Egypt unto Pharaoh the king of Egypt, and unto all his land;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and what he did unto the army of Egypt, unto their horses, and unto their chariots, over which he made the water of the Red sea flow as they pursued after you, and Jehovah destroyed them unto this day;
Moses is speaking to people who watched it happen — the sea closing over Egypt's horses and chariots. Why did a whole generation need to be told about something their own eyes had seen?
Moses is not adding information. He is fighting forgetfulness. One commentator gives his reason.
Moses felt it was of the very highest importance that all the mighty acts of the Lord should be kept before the hearts of the people, and engraved deeply on their memory. The human mind wanders and the heart is unsteady. Israel had seen God's solemn judgments on Egypt and on Pharaoh. Even so, they were in danger of forgetting them, and of losing the impression those judgments were designed and perfectly fitted to make on them.
Moses aims this at people who were there. One commentator works out who they were.
Moses spoke to those who had seen the many displays of God's power and grace to Israel (v. 2). These were under twenty years of age when they saw these things. They should surely have remembered well all the signs God worked in Egypt. He brought Israel safely through the Red Sea and destroyed the Egyptians in the waters. Then came all He had done in the wilderness, including the judgment of Dathan and Abiram when the earth opened. They themselves — not a previous generation — had witnessed all this.
The verse names horses and chariots — the height of Egypt's military strength.
What was all the power of Pharaoh and of Egypt in the presence of the Lord God of Israel? In one hour it all sank into hopeless ruin and destruction. All the chariots of Egypt, all the pomp and glory, the courage and might of that ancient and famous nation — the depths of the sea overwhelmed it all.
The waters came over them "as they pursued after you." That pursuit is the reason for the judgment.
Why? Because they had dared to meddle with the Israel of God. They had set themselves against the eternal purpose and counsel of the Most High. They sought to crush those on whom He had set His love. He had sworn to bless the seed of Abraham, and no power of earth or hell could possibly cancel His oath. Pharaoh, in his pride and hardness of heart, tried to block what God was doing. He only meddled to his own destruction.
"Destroyed them to this day" describes something final, not just something past. One commentator reads that overthrow as a picture of the believer's deliverance.
At the Red Sea, God acts in power according to the purposes of His love. As a result the enemy, who was chasing the people hard, is destroyed with no way back… The blood shelters us from the judgment of God. Then His power acts for us and delivers us from the power of Satan, the prince of this world. The blood keeping us from the judgment of God was the beginning. The power which raised us up with Christ set us free from the whole power of Satan who followed us, and from all his attacks and accusations.
Another writer turns the same history on the reader.
"When He makes bare His arm, who can withstand His might?" The chariots and the horsemen of Egypt, and the waters of the Red Sea, were as nothing to the Lord. He "brought the sea upon them and covered them." "Your eyes," said the Lord, "have seen what I did in Egypt." Yes, cries the Christian, and our eye of faith has seen His power and His grace. He has delivered us from the present evil world. We once groaned under its bondage, almost despairing of freedom.
Verse 4 sits inside a chain — Egypt, the sea, the wilderness, Dathan and Abiram — and the chain has a destination.
Whether Moses pointed them to God's actions outside or inside, abroad or at home, it was all meant to impress their hearts and minds with a deep sense of the moral importance of obedience. This was the one great aim of all the retellings, all the comment, all the urging of the faithful servant of God who would soon be taken from them.
- Seen. The hearers were eyewitnesses, not a later generation living off reports. They had watched God act in Egypt and at the sea.
- Forgotten. The heart is unsteady. Even the mightiest acts of God fade unless we keep them in view.
- Powerless. Egypt's horses and chariots were her finest strength. In one hour the whole boast of the nation went under the water.
- Judged. Egypt fell for chasing the people God had set His love on. No power on earth could cancel His oath to bless them.
- Freed. The overthrow left the enemy with no way back. It pictures the believer set free from the power that once held him.
-- and what he did unto you in the wilderness, until ye came to this place;
Moses is speaking at the border of Canaan. He asks the people to look back at what God has done — the plagues in Egypt, the sea closing over Pharaoh's army, and then this: what God did to them on the road, right up to the spot where they now stood. Why must a nation about to be given a land first remember a desert?
Moses is talking to people who were there. One writer notes how young they were when it happened:
Moses spoke to those who had seen the many manifestations of God's power and grace to Israel. They were under 20 years of age when they saw these things. They should certainly have remembered all the signs God did in Egypt, how He brought Israel safely through the Red Sea and destroyed the Egyptians in the waters, and all He had done in the wilderness. They themselves — not a previous generation — had witnessed all this.
Why would people who lived through those years need reminding? One commentator points at the human heart, not at the size of the events:
Moses felt it was of the very highest importance to keep all the mighty acts of the Lord before the hearts of the people, and to engrave them deeply on their memory. The human mind wanders, and the heart is unsteady. Israel had seen the solemn judgments of God on Egypt and on Pharaoh. Even so, they were in danger of forgetting them, and of losing the impression those judgments were designed and well fitted to make on them.
Verses 3 and 4 describe God acting against Egypt. Verse 5 turns inward, and the next verse names Dathan and Abiram. The same writer shows who is named here, and who is left out:
It was not only what the Lord had done to Egypt and to Pharaoh that the people were called to remember, but also what He had done among themselves. How subduing to the soul was the judgment upon Dathan and Abiram and their households! And for what? For their rebellion against what God had appointed. In the account given in Numbers, Korah the Levite is the prominent figure. Here he is left out, and Moses names the two Reubenites instead. They were two ordinary members of the congregation. Moses wants to reach the whole body of the people by setting before them the terrible result of self-will in two of their number.
Egypt, the sea, the desert, the camp — Moses gathers it all for one end:
Whether their attention was turned to God's actions outside or inside, abroad or at home, it all had one purpose. It was to impress on their hearts and minds a deep sense of the moral importance of obedience. For this he ranges over their history for centuries, selecting, grouping, commenting, taking up this fact and leaving out that, as guided by the Spirit of God.
"Until you came to this place" marks the end of a road with a clear start. One writer places the desert between two fixed points, and says what God does there:
He does not bring us into the desert until we are out of Egypt. Until Christ has met God for us, He does not bring us into the desert at all. We have trials and exercises there, but it is redemption that brings us into it; our path flows from that. Redemption was at the beginning, Canaan at the latter end; the wilderness comes between the two. Through the wilderness we have God with us, and for us, not charging anything to us, but exercising our hearts.
The review is not an end in itself. Another commentator follows the line from God's acts to the love they call for:
The great teaching that marks this book is obedience springing from love to the Lord. This chapter develops it further. It begins with a "therefore." Once more the mighty acts of the Lord are reviewed. His miracles and acts done in Egypt; what He did at the Red Sea and what He did to them in the wilderness — therefore you shall love the Lord your God. What He had done and what He was going to do for them called for the love and obedience of His people. May we heed the same call.
- Seen. They were not hearing a story second-hand. They had watched God act in Egypt, at the sea, and in the desert.
- Forgotten. Even events that size fade. The mind wanders and the heart is unsteady, so the acts had to be engraved on memory again.
- Home. Verse 5 moves from what God did to enemies to what He did among His own people. Two ordinary men are the warning.
- Purpose. Moses picks every item, from Pharaoh to the camp, for one end: to press home the moral importance of obedience.
- Love. The chapter's "therefore" turns the whole review into love. What God had done, and what He was about to do, called for it.
and what he did unto Dathan and Abiram, the sons of Eliab, the son of Reuben, -- how the earth opened its mouth, and swallowed them up, with their households, and their tents, and all the living substance that belonged to them, in the midst of all Israel.
Moses is pressing a new generation to obey, and his argument is memory. They had seen God act abroad, and they had seen Him act inside their own camp. This verse is the judgment at home: the ground split open under two men of Reuben while all Israel watched.
Dathan and Abiram belonged to Reuben. One writer looks at what became of that tribe and finds the reason here:
Reuben is the firstborn, and so entitled by nature to the leadership. But because of sin, he was not to have that place of honour. In these forty years of wandering his numbers dwindle. At the end we see him weaker than at the beginning. Looking at his history for a reason for this, we come to the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram, who were of this tribe. They wanted to be leaders. Under the pretence of claiming the people's rights, they rebel against God's authority in Moses, turn back in heart to Egypt, and complain about the trials of the way. Swift judgment overtakes them — the earth opens and swallows them up. How many, like these children of Reuben, rebel against God's authority in pure self-will and complain about the trials of the way! They only weaken themselves and their brothers. Instead of their independence lifting them up, it has brought them low.
Numbers and Deuteronomy do not name the same men here. One writer sees a purpose in that:
In the history given in Numbers, Korah the Levite is the main figure. But here Moses leaves him out and names the two Reubenites — two members of the congregation. He is seeking to reach the whole body of the people. He sets before them the terrible result of self-will in two of their number — two ordinary members, as we would say, and not just a privileged Levite.
The two accounts also raise a question about Korah himself:
Numbers 26:10 seems to say that the earth swallowed up Korah. But Numbers 16:32 speaks only of the "men who belonged to Korah." In Deuteronomy 11:6 and Psalm 106:17-18 only Dathan and Abiram are named as swallowed up. There was an exception in the case of Korah: his children were not included in the punishment (Numbers 26:11).
One writer sets out the moments before the ground gave way:
There stand Korah and his company with their censers in proud presumption, daring the judgment of God. In the doorway of their tents, see Dathan and Abiram with their wives, their sons, and their little children. What a moment of suspense for the assembled thousands of Israel! Then comes the sentence of death — not a common death, but a death unheard of before. At once the earth opens, they go down alive into the pit, they perish from among the congregation. They had spoken wicked words against the Lord's anointed and stood there in defiance. Their judgment came suddenly, and there was no remedy.
Moses is not telling a story for its own sake. One writer states the point of the whole chapter:
Deuteronomy 11 sums up the whole matter. It gives the practical conclusion that the lawgiver keeps before their eyes. They were to remember what rebellion must end in. That is why he points to the fate of Dathan and Abiram. The earth swallowed them up because they had openly turned away from God and fought against Him.
Moses recalls what God did far away and what He did in the camp. One writer names the aim behind both:
In a word, then, whether Moses called their attention to God's actions outside or inside, abroad or at home, it was all for one purpose. It was to impress on their hearts and minds a deep sense of how morally important obedience is. This was the one great aim of all the retellings, all the comment, all the appeals of the faithful servant of God who was so soon to leave them. For this he ranges over centuries of their history. He selects, groups, comments, takes up this fact and leaves out that, as the Spirit of God guides him.
- Cause. Self-will dressed up as a claim of rights. These men wanted leadership and rejected God's authority in Moses.
- Reach. The judgment took their households, their tents, and everything they owned.
- Naming. Moses leaves out the Levite and names two ordinary members of the congregation. The warning is not for "leaders only."
- Witness. All Israel watched it happen. The generation about to enter the land had seen where rebellion ends.
- Purpose. Moses recalls God's acts abroad and at home for one reason — to press home how much obedience matters.
For your eyes have seen all the great work of Jehovah which he hath done.
Moses has just listed what God did — the plagues in Egypt, the sea closing over Pharaoh's army, forty years in the desert, the ground splitting open under two rebels. He ends by pointing not at those events but at the men listening: their own eyes saw it all, and on that fact he builds everything he asks of them.
This verse is the last link in a chain of reasoning that began several verses earlier and ends in a command to love.
The main teaching of this book is obedience that springs from love to Jehovah, and this chapter develops it further. It begins with a "therefore." ... Then Moses reviews the mighty acts of Jehovah once more. His miracles and acts in Egypt, what He did at the Red Sea, what He did to them in the wilderness — therefore you shall love the LORD your God. They were also to love Him and keep His words in view of the land they were about to possess. What He had done and what He was going to do for them called for the love and obedience of His people.
What their eyes had seen was not only God's power against Egypt. The last item on Moses' list happened inside the camp, among their own people.
Deuteronomy 11 sums up the whole matter. It gives the practical conclusion that the lawgiver keeps before their eyes. They were to remember what rebellion must end in. So he points to what happened to Dathan and Abiram. The earth swallowed them up because they openly abandoned God and fought against Him.
One detail here is easy to miss: which names Moses chooses for the example.
In the account given in Numbers, Korah the Levite is the prominent character. Here Moses leaves him out and names the two Reubenites instead. They were two members of the congregation. Moses is seeking to work on the whole body of the people by setting before them the terrible consequence of self-will in two of their own number — two ordinary members, as we should say, and not just a privileged Levite.
It seems strange that a man who watched the sea swallow an army would need reminding of it. Moses knew better.
Moses felt it was of the highest importance to keep all the mighty acts of Jehovah before the hearts of the people, engraved deeply on their memory. The human mind wanders and the heart is unsteady. Israel had seen God's solemn judgments on Egypt and on Pharaoh, yet they were still in danger of forgetting them. They could lose the impression those judgments were designed and well fitted to make on them.
The next verse joins keeping the commandments to being strong enough to take the land. That link raises a question about which commands we keep.
Note the beautiful moral link between those two clauses: "Keep all the commandments" — "that you may be strong." Unreserved obedience to the word of God brings great strength. It will not do to pick and choose. We are prone to this. We take up the commandments and rules that suit us. But that is self-will. What right have we to select certain rules from the word and neglect others? None whatever. What business has a servant to decide which of his master's commands he will obey? None at all. Each commandment carries the master's authority, and so it claims the servant's attention.
Nobody alive today watched the Red Sea divide. Yet one writer holds that the appeal still reaches us, through a different way of seeing.
"When He bares His arm, who can stand against His might?" The chariots and the horsemen of Egypt, and the waters of the Red Sea, were as nothing to the Lord. He "brought the sea upon them and covered them." "Your eyes," said the Lord, "have seen what I have done in Egypt." Yes, cries the Christian, our eye of faith has also seen His power and His grace. He has delivered us from the present evil world. We once groaned under its bondage and almost despaired of freedom.
- Seen — Moses speaks to the generation that watched God act. Their own memory is the ground of his appeal.
- Therefore — what God had done, and what He was about to do, called for love first and obedience flowing out of it.
- Warned — the list ends close to home. Dathan and Abiram were two ordinary men, and their fate shows the whole congregation where self-will leads.
- Forgotten — the human heart is unsteady and loses even the deepest impressions, so these acts must stay in view.
- Strengthened — unreserved obedience is what makes a people strong enough to go in and take the land God promised.
Keep then all the commandment which I command you this day, that ye may be strong, and enter in and possess the land, whither ye pass over to possess it;
Moses is ending his long review of Israel's history, and this command rests on all of it. The people before him had seen God act in Egypt, at the Red Sea, in the wilderness, and at home, where the earth swallowed the rebels Dathan and Abiram.
One writer explains why Moses ends here with rebellion and its outcome:
Deuteronomy 11 sums up the whole matter. It is the practical conclusion that Moses keeps before their eyes. They were to remember what rebellion must end in. So he points to the fate of Dathan and Abiram. The earth swallowed them up because they openly turned away from God and fought against Him... The rest of the chapter is full of the most earnest warnings and bright promises. In the land, everything would turn on whether they obeyed or disobeyed.
Another writer names the one aim behind the whole review:
In a word, Moses pointed them to what God did abroad and to what He did at home. It all had one purpose: to impress on their hearts and minds how morally important obedience is... He presses the whole story on the conscience of the people, with remarkable force and clearness. It strengthens the ground of Jehovah's claim on their unqualified obedience to His holy commandments.
The verse joins two things: keeping the commandment, and being strong. One writer works out what that link rules out. (He quotes an older translation, "all the commandments"; ESV reads "the whole commandment".)
Notice the beautiful moral link between those two clauses: "Keep all the commandments" — "That you may be strong." Unreserved obedience to the word of God brings great strength. It will not do to pick and choose. We are prone to this. We take up the commands and rules that suit us; but this is really self-will... What business has a servant to decide which of his master's commands he will obey? Surely none whatever; each commandment stands clothed with the master's authority... and the more closely he obeys every command, however small, the stronger his position becomes. He also grows in his master's confidence and esteem.
The land was already promised. They still had to go in and take it, and obedience was the condition.
When Israel was about to enter the promised land, Jehovah again required obedience to the word as the condition of victory (Deut. 11:22-23). He asked for more than obedience to the commandments. They also had to take actual possession (ver. 24, 25). It is the same for believers now. Obedience to the word, and entering spiritual blessings by faith, are both needed if they are to possess them in experience. God's sovereignty in blessing His people does not clash with their responsibility to obey His word. By grace God has made every spiritual blessing secure in Christ for all His people. Even so, every man reaps what he sows.
The blessing runs on into the next verse: long life in the land. But how much of the land they enjoyed depended on where they walked.
Once more, all this presses their responsibility home to them. They are the objects of God's delight and love. They should imitate Him and love Him in the obedience of practical holiness, as they remember His judgments on His enemies. In this way they would keep all the blessings and glories of their inheritance. Their years would be long, like the days of heaven on earth. God would give them the whole land, but only what their feet walked on would really be theirs in practice.
One writer turns the same call toward the reader's own Master today.
Now, should we not seek to refresh the heart of our blessed Master by a loving obedience to all His commandments? Only think, reader, what a privilege it is to give joy to the heart of that blessed One who loved us and gave Himself for us... He delights in our keeping His commandments. That thought should stir our whole moral being. It should lead us to study His word, to find out more and more what His commandments are — so that we may do them.
- Therefore — The command rests on what they had already seen God do. Memory, not bare authority, is the ground of obedience.
- Strong — Full obedience makes a person strong. Picking and choosing among God's commands is self-will in disguise.
- Go in — God promised the land, yet they still had to enter it. His gift and our obedience do not clash.
- Possess — Only the ground their feet walked on became theirs in practice. Owning is one thing; enjoying is another.
- Prolong — Obedience was the turning point in the land. It kept the inheritance, and made their years like the days of heaven on earth.
and that ye may prolong your days in the land which Jehovah swore unto your fathers to give unto them and unto their seed, a land flowing with milk and honey.
Moses is summing up everything he has told Israel. Then comes the practical conclusion: keep the commandments, and your days in the promised land will be long. The verse holds two things together — a land God swore to give, and a life in it that depended on how the people behaved.
The chapter pulls the whole argument together and sets a choice in front of the people.
Deuteronomy 11 sums up the whole matter. It is the practical conclusion which the lawgiver keeps before their eyes. They were to remember what rebellion must end in... The rest of the chapter gives the most earnest warnings, and bright promises too. Disobedience or obedience would be the turning point in the land. The mount of blessing and the mount of curse were there on the other side of Jordan.
The verse just before this one ends with the words "that you may be strong." Strength is tied to obedience. And the tie covers every command, not a chosen few.
There is great strength gained by unreserved obedience to the word of God. It will not do to pick and choose. We are prone to this, prone to take up certain commandments and precepts which suit ourselves; but this is really self-will. What right have we to select certain precepts from the word, and neglect others? None whatever. To do so is, in principle, simply self-will and rebellion. What business has a servant to decide which of his master's commands he will obey? Surely none. Each commandment carries the master's authority, and so it claims the servant's attention. The more fully the servant obeys... the more he strengthens himself in his position and grows in his master's confidence and esteem.
Notice what obedience secures here. Not the land itself — God had already sworn that — but the length of days spent enjoying it.
Moses sets obedience before them again. Obedience is the great end of this book: God placed Israel under the condition of obedience so that they would keep on enjoying the promises. He reminds them that by obeying they would prolong their days in the land they were going up to take.
The oath itself stands on different ground. God made it to Abraham long before the law, and its terms were wider than anything Israel has yet held.
In sovereign grace He appeared to Abraham and said, "In you all the families of the earth shall be blessed... all the land that you see I will give to you and to your offspring... To your offspring I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates." God has never yet fulfilled these promises in full. Israel has never lived in the whole stretch of land described here... Though they have been unfaithful to God, He will not be unfaithful to them, but will make good all His word.
The two words describing the land carry plain meanings. They also set it against the country Israel had left.
The land is a good land and a large one, flowing with milk and honey. It is not a land of narrowness, as Egypt is... There is all "fatness," which is the literal meaning of the word for milk, and all sweetness, as the honey implies. Salvation for us must issue in satisfaction, or it is not salvation.
Commentators differ on how far to press these images. One reads them as pictures of what feeds God's people now.
Milk speaks of the Word of God (1 Peter 2:2). Honey symbolises the ministry of the Word of God (Song of Songs 4:11) — the sweetness believers have gathered from the Word and pass on to others.
Everything in the chapter rests on one condition. One writer weighs what that condition asked of them.
It was not a heavy yoke laid upon them, but the sweet privilege of treasuring up the precious commandments of the Lord their God in their hearts, and breathing the very atmosphere of His holy word. All was to hinge upon this. Canaan was a good, highly favoured land, flowing with milk and honey. The Lord's eyes always rested on it in loving interest and tender care. All its blessings, all its precious fruits, all its rare privileges were to be theirs for ever, on the one simple condition of loving obedience to the word of their covenant God.
- Sworn first. The land came by an oath to Abraham — grace, not reward. God has not yet made it good in full.
- Held by obedience. Obedience did not buy the land. It kept Israel enjoying what God had already promised.
- Whole, not partial. Strength comes from obeying without reserve. Picking which commands to keep is self-will dressed up as service.
- Fat and sweet. "Milk" means richness and "honey" means sweetness. The land was wide, not narrow like the Egypt they had left.
- Light yoke. The condition was not a burden but a privilege: to keep God's word in the heart and live in its atmosphere.
For the land, whither thou enterest in to possess it, is not as the land of Egypt, from whence ye came out, where thou sowedst thy seed, and wateredst it with thy foot, as a garden of herbs;
Moses names the one difference that matters between the land Israel left and the land ahead: where the water comes from. Behind the farming lies a bigger question — will life be run from below, by effort we control, or received from above?
Egypt's fertility came from the river. Where the ESV says "irrigated it," older translations read "watered it with your foot" — the daily work of moving that water onto the fields.
Egypt was watered by the foot. That is, her people did the ordinary work of drawing off the water of the Nile onto their fields and gardens. Their river was everything to them. All they needed was to be busy around its banks, and they could supply themselves out of it. But Canaan was to be tilled by the Lord. He would water it from heaven Himself. His heart would care for it, and His eyes would rest on it from one end of the year to the other.
Turpin describes the labour behind that phrase.
I believe what the Spirit of God refers to, when He speaks of their watering their land with their feet, is this: the only source of ancient Egypt's fruitfulness was the Nile. When the river overflowed its banks, they had to cut channels for it to run into and irrigate the soil. This was done with the foot. But what trouble and labour all that involved!
The difference is not only in climate but in where people look for supply.
What a vivid contrast between Egypt and Canaan! Egypt had no rain from heaven. It was all human effort there. Not so in the Lord's land. The human foot could do nothing there, and there was no need. The blessed rain from heaven fell on it. The Lord Himself cared for it and watered it with the early and latter rain. The land of Egypt depended on its own resources. The land of Canaan depended wholly on God — on what came down from heaven. "My river is my own" was the language of Egypt. "The river of God" was the hope of Canaan. The habit in Egypt was to water with the foot; the habit in Canaan was to look up to heaven.
Egypt did depend on God — the rain fell too far away for anyone there to notice it.
While the mercy of God feeds that land by the rain of a far country, no rain comes, or rarely falls, in Egypt. The rain falls far off. The people know nothing about it. It comes rolling down as a mighty river, and that unbroken stream supplies steady plenty to the land. It is, so to speak, independent of heaven. I do not mean it really is independent, but that it is watered not from the clouds but from the river. In their thoughts the people do not look up for it, but down. Canaan is a land of dependence. Egypt is a land of independence, figuratively.
The next step is to take credit for what God gives.
The river itself is their all. They can even credit to themselves what is the gift of God: "My river is my own, and I made it" (Ezek. 29:3).
The comparison Moses picks — a vegetable plot kept alive by hand — is deliberately small.
Egypt's water came only from below. The spiritual meaning is obvious. The world does not know God's blessing, only the treadmill — a poor substitute.
The rain from heaven came with a condition attached.
The distinction was therefore very marked. In the one, fruitfulness came through human means. The other depended entirely on its supply from heaven. The rain had to come from above to water the land, and the Lord made this depend on the people's obedience. They were to listen to His voice and obey His commandments — yes, they were to love and serve Him.
Commentators read the two lands as a picture of two kinds of blessing available now.
This pictures the spiritual inheritance of Christians today. They are blessed with every spiritual blessing in heavenly places in Christ. The people of the world have earthly, material blessings instead. So we depend, not on our surrounding circumstances, but on the blessing of God from heaven.
Turpin notes that the world around us answers to both of Israel's old locations at once.
He contrasts Egypt with the land. This world is to us both Egypt and the wilderness; it is Egypt in its moral character, and the wilderness in its experience... I believe the first part of this passage points to the fact that everything you have in the wilderness has trouble attached to it. There is no such thing in this world as a day without clouds.
- Foot. Egypt's crops lived on water lifted from the Nile by hand. People managed the supply themselves.
- Down. The rain that fed that river fell far away. So Egypt looked down at the water, not up to God, and called the gift its own.
- Up. The promised land had no such river. It drank rain from heaven, so its habit was to look up.
- Obedience. The rain from above came to a people who were to listen to the Lord, love Him and serve Him. Privilege carried responsibility.
- Now. Commentators apply the same contrast to us. Our supply is not what we can manage here, but every spiritual blessing in heavenly places in Christ.
but the land, whereunto ye are passing over to possess it, is a land of mountains and valleys, which drinketh water of the rain of heaven,
Israel is about to cross into a new country, and this verse describes it by contrast. The land ahead is nothing like Egypt: there people watered the fields by hand, here the rain comes down from heaven.
Egypt drew its water from its own river. Canaan had no such river to draw on. One writer draws out what that meant for daily life in each place.
What a vivid contrast between Egypt and Canaan! Egypt had no rain from heaven. It was all human effort there. It was not so in the Lord's land. There the human foot could do nothing, and there was no need. The blessed rain from heaven fell on it. The Lord Himself cared for it and watered it with the early and latter rain. The land of Egypt depended on its own resources. The land of Canaan depended wholly on God — on what came down from heaven. "My river is mine own," was the language of Egypt. "The river of God" was the hope of Canaan. The habit in Egypt was to water with the foot; the habit in Canaan was to look up to heaven.
The shape of the ground matters. A land of hills and valleys cannot be watered from a river, so its people must look up for rain. God chose such a land for a people who were to live in dependence on Him.
Egypt was the land of independence. Its river watered it, and the sources of that river were so far off that people could all but forget them. Israel's land was a land of mountains and valleys, drinking the water of the rain of heaven. It was a dependent land, and its dependence was obvious. Because it was cast on God in this way, it was the very land He chose for a people who were in the same way to depend on Himself, and so to know His gracious and continual care… Israel's mountains were like a constant prayer to God, and the dews of heaven settled on them.
The verse names valleys as well as hills. One writer sets it beside an earlier description of the same land.
When God spoke of His earthly people possessing the land to which He would bring them, He said that it was "a land of hills and valleys" (Deuteronomy 11:11); but He also spoke of "fountains and springs, flowing out in the valleys and hills" (Deuteronomy 8:7). So there is provision to refresh our souls, whatever our circumstances.
Everything hung on rain, so everything hung on the people's walk with the One who sends it. One writer traces what happened when that link broke.
Obedience was therefore the appointed means for giving the early and later rain. That rain was most needed if their blessing was to continue and be enjoyed. So came the needed warning to take care. Strange gods, and other things put in place of the Lord, His land, and His things, must have no place with them. If they did, judgment would follow. One special form of that judgment shut up the heaven and withheld the rain, so that blessing ceased.
Depending on rain was no hardship. It was the privilege, because God Himself did the watering.
How perfectly beautiful! Only think of God watering the ridges and settling the furrows! Think of His stooping down to do a farmer's work for His people! Yes, and delighting to do it! It was the joy of His heart to pour His sunbeams and His refreshing showers on the "hills and valleys" of His beloved people.
The two countries also picture two ways of living. One writer applies the promised land to what Christians have now.
The land of their inheritance was not like Egypt. Egypt depended on men's methods of irrigation, watered by "foot." Israel's land was a land of hills and valleys, dependent on rain from heaven (vs. 10-11). This pictures the spiritual inheritance of Christians today. They are blessed with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ. That is unlike the earthly, material blessings of the people of the world. So we are dependent, not on our surrounding circumstances, but on the blessing of God from heaven.
- Contrast. Egypt's people watered their fields by hand from their river. Canaan had no such resource and had to take its water from above.
- Design. God chose this ground on purpose: a dependent land for a people who were to live in dependence, with that dependence written into the landscape.
- Gift. No foot could work up this water. It came down as rain, with God Himself doing the farmer's work and delighting in it.
- Condition. Obedience brought the rain. Turning to other gods shut the heaven and stopped the blessing.
- Reach. Hills and valleys mean supply at every level of life. The blessing is held in heaven, not in our circumstances.
a land which Jehovah thy God careth for; the eyes of Jehovah thy God are constantly upon it, from the beginning of the year even unto the end of the year.
Moses is describing the country Israel is about to enter, and he sets it side by side with the Egypt they left behind. The difference is in who supplies the water. That difference shapes how Israel must live.
A river fed Egypt, and the people guided its water with their own feet. Canaan had no such thing, and one commentator draws out what that meant for the two nations' habits.
What a vivid contrast between Egypt and Canaan! Egypt had no rain from heaven. It was all human effort there. The Lord's land was different. The human foot could do nothing there, and there was no need. The blessed rain from heaven fell on it. The Lord Himself cared for it and watered it with the early and latter rain. Egypt depended on its own resources. Canaan depended completely on God — on what came down from heaven. "My river is mine own," was the language of Egypt. "The river of God" was the hope of Canaan. The habit in Egypt was to water with the foot; the habit in Canaan was to look up to heaven.
The dependence was not a drawback God tolerated. It was the reason He chose that land for that people.
Egypt's river came from sources so far off that the people could practically forget all about them. Israel's land was different. It was a land of mountains and valleys, drinking the water of the rain of heaven. It was dependent by its very nature, and its dependence was plain to see. Cast upon God like this, it was the land He chose for a people who were to depend on Him in the same way, and so to know His gracious and continual care. Israel's mountains were like a constant prayer to God. The dews of heaven settled on them and brought down the rain the land constantly needed.
"Cares for" does not mean distant supervision. One writer dwells on how low God stoops to give this care.
How perfectly beautiful! Only think of God watering the ridges, and settling the furrows! Think of His stooping down to do the work of a farmer for His people! Yes, and delighting to do it! It was the joy of His heart to pour His sunbeams and His refreshing showers upon the "hills and valleys" of His beloved people.
The watching runs from the year's first day to its last. That is a comfort, but it cuts both ways: nothing escapes those eyes, including the need for correction.
Could those watchful eyes overlook their need? No, certainly not. But their need might be, sadly, of chastening, and He would give it. Israel's land might suffer where Egypt escaped… The presence of the Holy One with us must mean discipline. But it is a Father's discipline of the "son in whom He delights."
God promised the rain. But He tied it to how the people lived.
Obedience, then, was the appointed means for giving the early and later rain. That rain was what they most needed if their blessing was to continue and be enjoyed… So how important it was to obey in a way that matched the position and privileges God had given them. How important to remember the word of the Lord, trusting His promised care, crowned by the truth that the eyes of the Lord would always be on the land. Surely such a promise meant blessing would not fail, if the people lived up to their privileges.
Israel was later scattered and the land left desolate. Even so, one writer reads this verse as a promise that still stands over that ground.
If the everlasting love of God is still toward Israel, His eyes are still upon the Land and the Temple. The land may be desolate and trampled under foot by the Gentiles. But it is still "a land that the LORD your God cares for. The eyes of the LORD your God are always upon it, from the beginning of the year to the end of the year" (Deut. 11:12). Again, the word came to Solomon: "I have consecrated this house that you have built, by putting My name there forever. My eyes and My heart will be there for all time" (1 Kings 9:3).
The picture reaches past a plot of ground. One writer asks where God's eyes rest now, and answers his own question.
I ask you tonight, what is the spot where God's eyes are always held? Where is it? Is it not the one spot where Jesus is? I know no other place on which His eye rests always except that. That, then, is the place He gives you and me for our home. He gives it to us to be the home of our hearts. The land that He cares for is the spot that holds His own affections.
- Dependence. Human effort watered Egypt. Rain from heaven watered Canaan. God chose a dependent land for a dependent people.
- Care. "Cares for" means God stooping to do a farmer's work for His people, and delighting to do it.
- Eyes. Continual watching supplies every need — and notices when the need is chastening.
- Obedience. God promised the rain, but obedience was the channel He appointed for it.
- Permanence. Those eyes have not moved. They are still on the land, and always on the one spot where Christ is.
And it shall come to pass, if ye hearken diligently unto my commandments which I command you this day, to love Jehovah your God, and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul,
Moses gives this promise about a land with no great river — a land that lives on rain from heaven. The "if" at the start of the verse ties the whole harvest to one thing: whether the people will love and serve God with all their heart.
The promise only makes sense against the picture drawn a few verses earlier. Egypt fed itself; Canaan had to receive.
What a vivid contrast between Egypt and Canaan! Egypt had no rain from heaven. It was all human effort there. It was not so in the Lord's land. The human foot could do nothing there, and there was no need. The blessed rain from heaven dropped upon it. The Lord Himself cared for it and watered it with the early and latter rain. The land of Egypt depended on its own resources. The land of Canaan depended wholly on God — on what came down from heaven. "My river is my own," was the language of Egypt. "The river of God" was the hope of Canaan. The habit in Egypt was to water with the foot; the habit in Canaan was to look up to heaven.
The verse does not treat obedience as an extra. It is the arrangement God set up for getting the rain into the land at all.
Obedience, then, was the appointed means for giving the early and later rain. That rain was needed if their blessing was to continue and be enjoyed. The book of Deuteronomy sets out the mind of the Lord about how the people were to live in the land. It is rightly called the book of obedience.
The verse names commandments, but what it asks for is love. The rest of Deuteronomy makes that plain.
Deuteronomy 6:4-5 shows that the Lord our God requires the affection of the whole heart. Deuteronomy 11:13-15 shows that if they would only love the Lord with all their heart, they would have everything they could wish for. Thus the important thing is to love the Lord... If we realise this then it will be easy to serve Him.
What God asks and what God gives fit together. Each side has its own part.
Nothing could be simpler, nothing more blessed. It was Israel's high and holy privilege to love and serve the Lord; it was the Lord's prerogative to bless and prosper Israel. Obedience was sure to bring happiness and fruitfulness. All their supplies were to come down from heaven. So as long as they walked in loving obedience, plentiful showers dropped upon their fields and vineyards.
Israel's later history is the test case. The rain stopped — and the withholding itself had a purpose.
The Lord's original promise to Israel was this: if they would obey His commandments, love Him, and serve Him with all their heart and soul, He would give the rain for their land in its season. But Israel had forfeited that promise by their disobedience and their departure from their God. So God withheld both the early and the latter rain as chastisement. This is a lesson for every age. God never withholds from His people except to draw out their sense of need, and to teach them that He alone is the source of blessing.
Christians do not live under Israel's terms. Even so, the same lesson holds for them.
Now, in all this there is deep practical instruction for the church of God. Although we are not under law, God calls us to obedience. As grace enables us to give a loving, hearty obedience, we are blessed in our own spiritual state. Our souls are watered, refreshed and strengthened.
Another writer applies the picture of the land to the Christian's inheritance:
This pictures the spiritual inheritance of Christians today. We are blessed with every spiritual blessing in heavenly places in Christ. That is unlike the earthly, material blessings of the people of the world. So we depend not on our surrounding circumstances, but on the blessing of God from heaven.
- Rain, not river. Canaan had no Nile. Everything depended on what came down, so the whole nation lived with its face turned upward.
- Obedience opens heaven. It was the appointed means for the early and latter rain. That is why Deuteronomy is called the book of obedience.
- Love is the real command. Behind the statutes stands one requirement: the affection of the whole heart. Get that right, and everything they could wish for was theirs.
- Drought teaches. When Israel turned away, God withheld the rain. He never withholds except to draw out a sense of need and show that He alone is the source.
- Still watered from above. Christians are not under law. Yet loving obedience still leaves the soul watered, refreshed and strengthened — by blessing from heaven, not from circumstances.
that I will give rain to your land in its season, the early rain and the latter rain; and thou shalt gather in thy corn, and thy new wine, and thine oil;
Moses is describing daily life in a land with no great river. There the harvest depends on rain, and God alone sends it. The promise of grain, wine and oil answers the words just before it: God gives this supply to a people who love and serve Him.
A few lines earlier, Moses contrasts the country Israel left with the country they were entering.
What a vivid contrast between Egypt and Canaan! Egypt had no rain from heaven. It was all human effort there. It was not so in the Lord's land. There the human foot could do nothing, and it did not need to. The blessed rain from heaven fell on it. The Lord Himself cared for that land and watered it with the early and latter rain. Egypt depended on its own resources. Canaan depended completely on God — on what came down from heaven. "My river is my own," was the language of Egypt. "The river of God" was the hope of Canaan. The habit in Egypt was to water with the foot; the habit in Canaan was to look up to heaven.
The two rains named here are not a poetic doubling. Each does a different job in the farming year.
Moses described the land before them as a good land of plenty where they would "eat and be full." The Lord would supply in its season the rain they could not do without. The "early" rain would prepare the soil for autumn sowing. The "latter" or spring rain would swell the grain for ripening and harvest.
God promises the rain, but the promise has an "if" attached. This book presses the point.
So obedience was the appointed means for the giving of the early and later rain. They needed that rain most, so that their blessing might continue and be enjoyed. Deuteronomy sets out the mind of the Lord about the people's conduct in the land, and rightly bears the name the book of obedience. That is why they needed the word, "Take heed to yourselves." Strange gods, and other things put in the place of the Lord, His land and His things, must have no place with them. Such things bring judgment. One special form of that judgment shut up the heaven and withheld the rain, so that blessing ceased.
God does not stay at a distance from the fields.
How perfectly beautiful! Only think of God watering the ridges, and settling the furrows! Think of His stooping down to do the work of a farmer for His people! Yes, and delighting to do it!
The verse names three products. One writer shows how much they cover.
See how full the blessing was that God set before Israel. "The grain, the wine, and the oil" are joined together again and again in Deuteronomy and other scriptures. They take in the produce of the field, the vineyard and the orchard. All of it yields its increase in blessing from Him of whom it is said, "The earth is the Lord's, and the fullness thereof."
One writer observes that oil is added to grain and wine especially in this book, and connects that with what the people were about to enter.
I have noticed that while the corn and the wine are mentioned once or twice in the first four books of the Bible, in Deuteronomy "oil" is added, suggesting perhaps that these things are to be enjoyed in the power of the Spirit of God, for Deuteronomy prepares the people to go into the land.
Israel did not keep the condition, and the rain stopped. What God does next shows why He withholds.
But Israel disobeyed and turned away from their God, and so forfeited this promise. As discipline, God withheld both the early and the latter rain. Now, though, it was His thought to do good to Jerusalem and to His people. So He encourages them to seek His face for a return of their former blessing. He chose to bless them now out of His own pure grace... only He would have them learn their dependence on Him for the blessing they sought, so that He might bring them into a fit state to receive it. This is surely a lesson for all dispensations. God never withholds from His people except to draw out their sense of need.
One writer draws out what the early rain pictures.
The rain speaks of that which comes from above — all that ministry of Christ which the Spirit of God brings from above to refresh and gladden the heart. The word is really "early-rain," and refers to the soft and gentle rain that refreshes the ground in seed time (Deut. 11:14).
- Dependence. Human effort watered Egypt. Canaan had to look up to heaven, and there God's people could not live without Him.
- Condition. Obedience was the appointed means for the rain. Deuteronomy is the book of obedience, and turning to other gods brought the judgment that shut up the heaven.
- Gift. God stoops to water the ridges and settle the furrows — and He delights to do it.
- Fullness. Grain, wine and oil cover field, vineyard and orchard — the whole harvest comes from Him whose earth it is.
- Restoration. Israel forfeited the promise. But God withholds only to draw out a sense of need, and He offers the blessing again out of pure grace.
and I will give grass in thy field for thy cattle; and thou shalt eat and be full.
The promise of Deuteronomy 11 ends with a picture of full stomachs — grass for the animals, food enough for the people. Everything in it hangs on where the water comes from, and on the heart of the people who receive it.
The nearby verses set Canaan against Egypt. One commentator draws out the contrast:
What a vivid contrast between Egypt and Canaan! Egypt had no rain from heaven. It was all human effort there. Not so in the Lord's land. The human foot could do nothing there, and there was no need. The blessed rain from heaven fell on it. The Lord Himself cared for it and watered it with the early and latter rain. The land of Egypt depended on its own resources; the land of Canaan depended wholly on God — on what came down from heaven. The habit in Egypt was to water with the foot; the habit in Canaan was to look up to heaven.
So the grass in the fields is not the reward of good farming. It comes down from God.
The One who sends the grass is not a distant supplier. He takes up the work Himself, and enjoys it:
Only think of God watering the ridges and settling the furrows! Think of His stooping down to do the work of a farmer for His people! Yes, and delighting to do it! It was the joy of His heart to pour His sunbeams and His refreshing showers on the "hills and valleys" of His beloved people. It refreshed His spirit, and brought praise to His Name, to see the vine, the fig tree and the olive flourishing. It refreshed Him to see the valleys covered with golden grain, and the rich pastures covered with flocks of sheep.
Grass for the livestock comes before food for the people, and that order says something about how God has made us. Writing on the same pattern in Psalm 104, one commentator sees deliberate design:
So the grass grows for cattle and plants for the service of man. God is intent on maintaining the creature whom He has set in dignity on the earth as His image and likeness, to know Him and to be for Him. And that is why He made him the most dependent of all — because he is master of all. Where is there a creature made for frailty and long helplessness like a human baby? Where is there one so defenceless by nature — with neither tooth nor claw nor strength nor speed, and his very skin bare to the wind — as man in his prime? It is spirit in him that is to show itself, and does, but by recognising his dependence and his careful use of all God's gifts.
The rain was not automatic. It was fastened to how the people lived, which is why the whole book keeps returning to one theme:
Obedience was the appointed means for giving the early and later rain. That rain was what they most needed if their blessing was to last and be enjoyed. The book of Deuteronomy sets out the mind of the Lord about the people's conduct in the land, and people rightly call it the book of obedience.
The promise has a shadow side, and Israel lived in it for long stretches:
But on the other hand, when Israel forgot the Lord and abandoned His precious commandments, the heaven became brass and the earth iron; barrenness, desolation, famine and misery were the sad companions of disobedience. How could it be otherwise? "If you are willing and obedient, you shall eat the good of the land; but if you refuse and rebel, you shall be eaten by the sword; for the mouth of the LORD has spoken."
Centuries later, Elijah announced a drought with startling confidence. One writer traces that boldness straight to this passage:
The Lord had said through Moses, "Take care lest your heart be deceived, and you turn aside and serve other gods and worship them; then the anger of the LORD will be kindled against you, and he will shut up the heavens, so that there will be no rain, and the land will yield no fruit." Now they had turned aside under Ahab. They were serving and worshipping other gods. So Elijah expected God to do what He had said He would do in that situation. He asked Him to do it; he expected Him to do it; he boldly announced that He would do it. That was faith.
This was not just farming policy for one nation:
Now in all this there is deep practical instruction for the church of God. We are not under law, yet God calls us to obedience. When grace enables us to give a loving, hearty obedience, we are blessed in our own spiritual state. Our souls are watered, refreshed and strengthened, and we bring forth the fruits of righteousness which are by Jesus Christ, to the glory and praise of God.
- Look up — Canaan had no Nile. Rain from heaven was the only water, so the habit of the land was to look up rather than to work the foot-pump.
- He stoops — the grass is God doing the farmer's work Himself, watering ridges and settling furrows, and delighting in it.
- Down to the cattle — the promise reaches the livestock before the people, because man is made master of all and therefore most dependent of all.
- Tied to the heart — obedience was the appointed means of the early and later rain; Deuteronomy is the book of obedience.
- Still true — turn aside to other gods and the heavens shut. Elijah counted on that word under Ahab. We are not under law, but obedience still waters the soul.
Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside and serve other gods, and bow down to them,
Moses has just described a land that lives on rain from heaven, not on human irrigation like Egypt. Then comes the sudden warning: the danger to a blessed people starts inside, in a heart that can be deceived.
The verse lists three things in order. One writer refuses to treat that order as accidental.
"Take care lest your heart be deceived, and you turn aside and serve other gods and worship them." Sad progress downward! The heart deceived. This is the beginning of all decline. "And you turn aside." The feet are sure to follow the heart. So there is deep need of keeping the heart with all diligence. The heart is the fortress of the whole moral being. As long as you keep it for the Lord, the enemy can gain no advantage. But once you give it up, all is really gone. Then comes the turning aside. The secret departure of the heart shows itself in practical ways: "other gods" are served and worshipped. The slide downhill is terribly fast.
The warning fits the land Israel was entering. Everything there came down from above.
The land of their inheritance was not like Egypt. Egypt depended on men's methods of irrigation, watered by "foot." Israel's land was a land of hills and valleys, and it depended on rain from heaven (vs.10-11). This pictures the spiritual inheritance of Christians today. They are blessed with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ, unlike the earthly, material blessings of the people of the world. So we depend, not on our surrounding circumstances, but on the blessing of God from heaven.
What could deceive a heart in such a rich land? One writer looks at what happens when need disappears.
But, alas! then as now, and now as then, the very fullness of the blessing they enjoyed might make them forget the gracious hand that gave it... Trial and need wake a man up to his need of God. But when he lacks nothing, he can easily lose the sense that he still depends on God... In this condition the gods that man's own heart has invented look more attractive than the glorious God. He is our Creator; He is not our creature. And so Israel can go after the idols of Canaan.
"Other gods" sounds like an ancient danger, tied to carved images. The same writer answers that the outward form was never the point.
Idolatry takes various shapes. So the question is not the shape of the thing, but the thing itself. It is not the outward form, but the root or principle behind it. We read that "covetousness is idolatry," and that a covetous man is an idolater. That is, a man who wants more than God has given him is an idolater. He is guilty of the very sin of Israel when they made the golden calf and worshipped it... Our treacherous hearts can turn away from the living God and set up some other object beside Him. What is this but idolatry?
The next verse names the penalty: no rain, no fruit. One writer reads that dry ground as a picture of something else.
And may we not see a striking picture here? The barren land and the desolate wilderness show a soul out of communion, through disobedience to the precious commandments of Christ. Such a person has no refreshing communication with heaven. No showers come down. No unfolding of the preciousness of Christ to the heart. No sweet ministry of an ungrieved Spirit to the soul. The Bible seems a sealed book. All is dark, dreary and desolate.
Centuries later Elijah prayed this verse back to God. Israel under King Ahab had done exactly what Moses warned about.
The Lord had said through Moses, "Take care lest your heart be deceived, and you turn aside and serve other gods and worship them. Then the Lord's anger will burn against you. He will shut up the heavens, so that there is no rain, and the land yields no fruit" (Deut. 11:16-17). Now they had turned aside under Ahab. They were serving and worshipping other gods. So Elijah expected God to do what He said He would do in that situation. He asked Him to do it; he expected Him to do it; he boldly announced that He would do it. That was faith.
- Heart — Deception starts inside; the heart is the citadel, and the feet always follow it.
- Heaven — Israel's land lived on rain from above, a picture of people who depend on God, not on their circumstances.
- Harvest — The very fullness of blessing can dull the sense of need that keeps a soul looking up.
- Idols — Any object we set up beside God takes His place; covetousness counts as idolatry, so the warning reaches past carved images.
- Drought — A shut heaven pictures a soul out of communion: no showers, no fresh sight of Christ, a Bible that seems sealed. Elijah proved God meant every word of it.
and Jehovah's wrath kindle against you, and he shut up the heavens, that there be no rain, and that the ground yield not its produce, and ye perish quickly from off the good land which Jehovah is giving you.
Moses has just described a land that drinks rain from heaven, and now he names the price of forgetting who sends it. This is not drought as bad weather but drought as a verdict. The chain that ends in an empty harvest and a lost land begins in the heart.
The force of this warning depends on the country Israel was entering. One writer contrasts it with a land that could count on its own river:
But this was not the case with the Lord's land — "the land of hills and valleys." If heaven yielded no supplies, everything was parched and sterile. Israel could not say, "My river is my own." No; they were always taught to look up. Their eyes were to be always on the Lord, just as the Lord's eyes were always on them. So if anything hindered the exchange between heaven and earth, the land of Canaan felt it with painful intensity.
The sentence opens with a condition, and the condition is inward before it is ever visible. Commenting on the words that lead into this verse, one writer traces the steps in order:
"Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and you turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them." A sad downward progress! The heart deceived. This is the beginning of all decline. "And you turn aside." The feet are sure to follow the heart. So there is deep need to keep the heart with all diligence. It is the fortress of the whole moral being, and as long as it is kept for the Lord, the enemy can gain no advantage. But once it is surrendered, everything is really gone. Then comes the turning aside. The outward ways prove that the heart has secretly left. "Other gods" are served and worshipped. The slide down the slope is terribly rapid.
"Shut up the heavens" is a picture. The same writer shows what it would mean on the ground — hunger, and no contact between heaven and earth:
What barrenness and desolation there must be when heaven is shut up! No refreshing showers coming down, no dewdrops falling, no communication between heaven and earth. How often Israel had tasted the awful reality of this! "He turns rivers into a desert, springs of water into thirsty ground, a fruitful land into a salty waste, because of the evil of its inhabitants."
(The last lines are Psalm 107, in ESV wording.)
This drought says something about the people, not about God's generosity:
We know well that it is not God's desire that His people should suffer. He is not stingy, and if the rain is withheld, the fault lies with His people and not with Him. He had stressed this for them, so that they understood clearly that when heaven was "shut up" it was in chastening.
Centuries later this warning became a prayer. The prophet Elijah asked God for a drought and announced it would come. One writer explains where that confidence came from:
Now they had turned aside under Ahab. They were serving and worshipping other gods. So Elijah expected God to do what He said He would do in those circumstances. He asked Him to do it; he expected Him to do it; he boldly announced that He would do it. That was faith.
Some writers read the later barrenness of the land as this very sentence still standing. One traces it to this verse by name, and sees even the land's long emptiness serving a purpose:
The reason why the land "flowing with milk and honey" became barren and sterile is found in Deuteronomy 11:17. God threatened the people: if they did not keep His commandments, He would withhold the latter rain and reduce the land to sterility. The threat was carried out, and for centuries there was no latter rain in Palestine. In this way the land has been kept for the people. The Turk conquered the land and held it for centuries. He had no reason to settle a land that was practically desert and could not support its inhabitants.
The same picture reaches beyond Israel's fields. One writer turns it inward, from the land to the soul:
And may we not see a fitting and striking picture in the barren land and the desolate wilderness? It pictures a soul out of communion, through disobedience to the precious commandments of Christ. Such a person has no refreshing communications with heaven. No showers coming down. No unfolding of the preciousness of Christ to the heart. No sweet ministry of an ungrieved Spirit to the soul. The Bible seems a sealed book; everything is dark, dreary and desolate.
- Heart first. A deceived heart is where the decline begins; the feet follow, and only then does the sky change.
- Heaven next. A shut heaven means no showers and no exchange between heaven and earth — the supply line itself is cut.
- Harvest next. A land with no river of its own had to look up; when heaven gave nothing, everything was parched.
- Home last. Commentators read the land's long barrenness as this warning carried out. Even conquerors saw no reason to settle a desert.
- Chastening, never stinginess. If rain is withheld, the fault lies with the people, not with God. The same drought can settle on a soul out of communion, where the Bible itself seems sealed.