And the matter was good in mine eyes; and I took twelve men of you, one man for a tribe.
Israel stood at the edge of the promised land, and the people asked Moses to send spies in first. The verse sounds like a small administrative note, but it tells us what a leader felt about a plan God had never made.
True, in the history given in Numbers, the Lord told Moses to send the spies. But why? Because of the moral condition of the people. Here we see the characteristic difference and yet the lovely harmony of the two books. Numbers gives us the public history. Deuteronomy gives us the secret source behind sending the spies... We could not fully understand the subject if we had only the history given in Numbers. It is the touching commentary given in Deuteronomy which completes the picture.
What the second account exposes is not a new fact but a motive.
Then comes the account of the inner motives for the sending of the spies. This is well to note, as we would not have discovered it from the book of Numbers. This is not a repeat of the story. It leads us into things that were secret — what was working in the people and holding back their blessing. The main point to notice is that the people had no spirit of obedience. They lacked it because they had no faith in God.
If God told Moses to send them, how could sending them be wrong? Commentators answer by separating the act from the wish behind it.
The wrong was not in the act of sending them when they were told, but in the wish to send them at all. The wish was the fruit of unbelief; and the command to send them was because of that unbelief.
A command given on those terms still has to be obeyed. What comes out of it then tells its own story.
God commands many things, and we are bound to do them as soon as He commands them. His ways are displayed in how they turn out. Yet the only reason for them is our lack of faith. So the outcome gives full confirmation to the faith of the faithful, the faith of the remnant. But unbelief reaps what it has sown.
Moses had just passed on God's word to go up and take the land. Then he found himself pleased with a plan to inspect it first.
Deuteronomy 1:21 gives the answer. There we find the word of the Lord God: "Go up, take possession" — not search it. The people say they will send men to spy out the land. This is disobedience. Moses is pleased with their proposal. Was it faith to be pleased? Why listen to the people when God had said, "Go up and take possession"? It is at least weak to encourage others in a faithless path. Still, God heard their words and tested the people. Now He gives the command, "Send men."
The same writer notes how ordinary this failure is: saints "overlook the path of faith and give way to circumstances, even to being pleased with what is not according to the word of God."
The search took forty days. It settled nothing that God's word had not already settled.
But look — they search the land for forty days, only to prove that God's word about it is true. It was really unbelief that sent out these spies. Do I need to search and see whether God is true? Certainly not. Have I any reason to doubt Him? Not at all.
Commentators point out what unbelief then did with the difficulties it found.
At first the report brought to Moses is in a right spirit. But the difficulties show up at once, and unbelief measures them by man instead of by God.
The lasting warning is about a habit: investigating instead of obeying.
The Lord sanctioned it, but it was still the working of unbelief. Instead of going on in simple faith, how often we raise a cloud of questions to get a human estimate of a thing. In the end we only find that the walls are up to heaven. Instead of doing the thing that has to be done, we look at every question and difficulty anyone can raise. And so it ended in their not going into the land at all.
- Motive. Numbers tells us the spies were sent. Deuteronomy tells us why — the plan came from the people's own hearts, not from God's word.
- Root. What they lacked was not information but obedience. They lacked obedience because they had no faith.
- Permission. God's command to send them came because of the unbelief; a granted wish is no proof the wish was right.
- Pleasure. Moses was pleased with a plan that set aside God's word, "Go up, take possession." To encourage others down a faithless path is itself weakness.
- Result. Forty days of searching only confirmed what God had already said. Raising questions instead of taking steps ended with Israel never entering the land.
And they turned and went up into the mountain, and came to the valley of Eshcol, and searched it out.
Moses is retelling Israel's story at the edge of Canaan. Here he reaches the search of the land. The trip went well: the land was good, the fruit was real, the report was true. So why was the search needed at all — and why did it end in disaster?
The Book of Numbers records the mission. Deuteronomy opens up what was going on inside the people.
Then comes the relation of the inner motives for the sending of the spies. This it is well to note, as we should not have discovered it from the Book of Numbers. What we have here is not a repetition; it leads us into things secret — what worked in the people and hindered their blessing. The chief point to observe is that there was not a spirit of obedience in the people, and this they lacked because there was no faith in God.
Israel wanted men sent ahead before they walked into the land. Moses liked the plan, and God allowed it.
"You came near to me, every one of you, and said, We will send men before us." And Moses adds, "The saying pleased me well." The LORD sanctioned it, but still it was the working of unbelief. Instead of going on in simple faith, how often do we raise a cloud of questions to get a human estimate of a thing! Then at last we find out that the walls are up to heaven. Instead of doing the thing that needs doing, we look at all the questions and difficulties anyone can raise. And so it ended in their not going into the land at all.
Eshcol was a real place, and the record fixes where it lay.
It is called both a brook and a valley, because the one ran in the other. It is now called a Wady, and these are very common in Palestine. It was near Hebron, the place explored by the spies, and from where they carried the huge bunch of grapes.
The men came back praising the land. That raises a question about the whole errand.
"... and brought us word again, and said, It is a good land which the LORD our God gives us." How could it be otherwise, when God was giving it? Did they want spies to tell them that the gift of God was good? Certainly they ought not. A simple faith would have argued like this: "Whatever God gives must be worthy of Himself; we want no spies to assure us of this."
Still, the mission gave Israel something new. They tasted Canaan while they were still outside it.
The report of Canaan had reached them through Moses long before this. The spies also bring back a report of it: surely it was a good land, flowing with milk and honey. But they did more, something which Moses their redeemer from Egypt had never done: they presented a cluster of grapes and said, this is the fruit of it. They offered a sample, a first-fruits... He gives an earnest as well as a report. He did so in Israel's days by the spies... and He does so in this age of ours among His elect by the gospel and the indwelling of His Spirit. The Spirit gives the soul enjoyment of the things reported in the word, like a sample or foretaste.
Notice what Moses leaves out of his account. The ten discouraging voices are not mentioned at all.
He confines himself to that portion of their testimony which was according to truth. He says nothing about the ten unbelieving spies. This is in perfect keeping with the scope and object of the book. Everything is brought to bear, in a moral way, on the conscience of the people. He reminds them that they themselves had proposed to send the spies. The spies had placed the fruit of the land before them and testified to its goodness. And yet they would not go up... There was no excuse whatever.
- Asked. The idea came from the people. Deuteronomy tells us that; Numbers does not.
- Allowed. God sanctioned the plan, but He did not approve the heart behind it. The asking was permitted; the motive was unbelief.
- Confirmed. Eshcol proved God right. The land was good, as He had said, and no report from men could make His word truer.
- Tasted. The fruit they carried back was a sample of the land, enjoyed before they arrived. The Spirit gives believers that kind of foretaste now.
- Refused. They held the fruit in their hands and still would not go up. That left them without excuse, and out of the land.
And they took of the fruit of the land in their hand, and brought it down unto us, and brought us answer, and said, The land is good that Jehovah our God hath given us.
Moses is retelling the story of the spies, and he repeats only the true part of their report. The weight of the verse falls on what came next: the people heard that the land was good and still refused to go up.
This account adds what the earlier one leaves out.
What we have here is not a repetition; it leads us into things secret — what worked in the people and hindered their blessing. The chief point to observe is that there was not a spirit of obedience in the people, and this they lacked because there was no faith in God.
Where did the idea of sending spies come from in the first place?
This spying out the land started with the people, not with God. We need not wonder, then, that it ends badly. Yet God sanctions it: how much may He have to sanction in this way — things that must be, because of what we are! And how much trial does our unbelief make necessary for us! He had told them all they needed to know of the goodness of the land, and assured them of His gift of it to them.
The spies call it a land "that the LORD our God is giving us." Older translations read "has given us." Either way, the land is theirs before they set foot in it.
Here was their authority to take possession at once. The Lord their God had given them the land, and set it before them. It was theirs by His free gift, the gift of His sovereign grace… There was no need of spies. Faith never wants to spy what God has given. It argues that what He has given must be worth having. It argues too that He is able to put us in full possession of all that His grace has given.
The men did not only describe the land; they carried something out of it down into the desert. That is more than a report.
The report of Canaan had reached them through Moses long before this, and the spies bring a report of it too… But they did more. They did something that Moses, their redeemer from Egypt, had never done. They presented a cluster of grapes, and said, this is the fruit of it. They offered a sample, first-fruits… It is part of the divine plan to give earnests as well as reports. This is essential and not accidental.
The fruit itself was proof no one could argue with.
There was no disputing the report of the spies; these grapes told of the goodness of the land. It was a land that produced such fruit. So when the Holy Spirit brings the earnest to us of our joy and glory, who would dispute it? Who does not feel that it is worth anything along the way to get there? The earnest is so sweet!
Ten of the spies also brought back a discouraging account. Moses does not repeat a word of it.
He confines himself to that portion of their testimony which was according to truth. He says nothing about the ten unbelieving spies. This is in perfect keeping with the scope and object of the book. Everything presses, in a moral way, on the conscience of the people… The spies had placed the fruit of the land before them and testified to its goodness. Still they would not go up.
Strip away the bad report, and the refusal stands exposed with no excuse left.
Israel's problem was never a lack of information. It was fear.
Instead of taking courage to go forward, they complained against the Lord. They did so because the spies told them the people of the land were greater and taller than the Israelites. Why then did they refuse to believe His word about His promise to put down their enemies? Their fear and apprehension defeated them before they took one step forward. Do we not also defeat ourselves by our fears of what might happen, even when we have the Lord's word for acting?
The answer is not stronger nerves, but a heart set on what God has given.
Suppose we can say, "This is the fruit of the land which the Lord has given us." Suppose our hearts' affections are dwelling on the land. Then all the strength of the Anakim is as nothing… But the moment we lose the awareness of what is ours, the moment we forget that the Lord has given us the land, difficulties and trials fill our mind. They become too great for us.
- Gift. The land was theirs by God's free gift before they entered it. Faith does not inspect what God has already given.
- Report. Moses described the land long before the spies went. God's word about it was already enough.
- Sample. God gave more than a report: fruit came down into the desert, a first taste of the land ahead.
- Refusal. They had gift, report and sample in hand. They still would not go up. Unbelief has no excuse left.
- Application. Fear beats us before we move. A heart settled on what God has given makes even the strongest enemy look like nothing.