and I prayed unto Jehovah my God, and made my confession, and said, Alas Lord! the great and terrible щGod, keeping covenant and loving-kindness with them that love him, and that keep his commandments
Daniel had been reading Jeremiah's prophecy about the years Jerusalem would lie in ruins. His response was not celebration but confession. His prayer names God before it names a single sin. Everything that follows rests on that opening address.
What should a believer do with a prophecy that has not yet come true?
William KellyFrom the beginning of the chapter we learn that there is no reason to wait till a prophecy is fulfilled before profiting by it. Daniel did not wait. He learned the number of the years not by a special message given to him but "by books" — from the word of Jehovah that came to Jeremiah the prophet... Such was the effect on a man who judged the present in the light of God's word and prophecy: not political speculation, but confession and humiliation and intercession before God.
This kind of understanding is not reserved for prophets.
J. N. DarbyDaniel was a prophet, but here God gave him no special revelation. So we are told that he understood by books. He was simply one of the faithful studying prophecy. God gives him a direct revelation later. But at this point faith alone was acting, and he only came to understand what God had already spoken about His people. All is revealed in the Bible, and in searching it we can, like Daniel, know and understand what God has already written about His people.
Confession gave Daniel a clearer view of God, and of His promise to those who keep His word.
Hamilton SmithTurning to God in confession, Daniel gets a deep sense of the greatness, holiness and faithfulness of God. Moreover, he realises that God is true to His word and, if His people will only cherish His Name and keep His word, they will find mercy.
The words "who keeps covenant and steadfast love" are not decoration. They settle who is to blame for the ruin.
Edward DennettTwo things stand out in Daniel's prayers: confession, and the justification of God in what He had done with His people. In the address to God in verse 4, he lays the basis for justifying God... God could not fail to keep His covenant with His people. So the conduct of the people themselves must have been the cause of all the discipline that had overtaken them. And this sinful conduct is what Daniel went on to spell out.
Which covenant did Daniel stand on?
F. B. HoleNowhere in the Bible do we find a finer example of thorough confession and prayer, though Ezra's prayer in Ezra 9 comes close to it. He made no reference to the covenant of promise made with Abraham. He stood before God on the ground of the covenant of the law of Moses, and of the later ministry through the prophets. About this he confessed complete breakdown and disaster, though he himself was less involved in it than anyone of his day.
The confession he makes is not only his own.
J. N. DarbyDaniel had been led captive when very young, and he had taken no part in the actual sin of Israel. There was, therefore, no ground for self-accusation. But the fact is, there is no such thing as a Christian separated from the interests of his brothers and sisters... If Christ identifies Himself with all that the people have done from the beginning, Daniel too can say, "We have sinned." He takes his place with them all, as one people, though he had shared in none of these sins.
What made Daniel free to pray for others?
The Bible TreasuryDaniel was qualified for intercessory prayer by the purity of his own ways... His enemies themselves said, "We shall not find any ground of complaint against this Daniel unless we find it in connection with the law of his God." And in a foreign land, surrounded by enemies and traps, his practice was to pray... No cloud in his own relationship with God — he is free to intercede for the state of God's people — a type in this of the great Intercessor.
The marks of true confession come clearly to light here.
F. B. HoleTrue confession owns the evil. It offers no excuse and no softening. It owns that God's judgments and discipline are right. It pleads that God would grant deliverance, according to His word: "not... because of our righteousness, but because of Your great mercy." Let us cultivate these excellent features in our day. We too can ask for nothing on the ground of merit, but only on the ground of mercy.
- Word — Daniel acted on a prophecy before it came true; any believer can search what God has already written.
- God — turning to God gives a sense of His greatness, holiness and faithfulness; the address comes before the accusation.
- Covenant — God cannot fail to keep His covenant, so the fault must lie with the people; Daniel says so.
- "We" — Daniel had no share in the nation's guilt, yet he takes his place inside it; no believer stands apart from God's people.
- Mercy — a clean walk left him free to intercede, a picture of the great Intercessor; even so he asked nothing on the ground of merit.
we have sinned, and have committed iniquity, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled, even turning aside from thy commandments and from thine ordinances.
Daniel is a captive in Babylon. When he turns to God in prayer, he does not start with a request. He starts by confessing. And the pronoun is startling. A man with no recorded fault says "we." He piles up word after word until a whole nation's guilt lies open before God.
Daniel does not choose one word for the nation's failure. He stacks four. One commentator shows what that pile-up tells us about the man praying.
C. KnappSin, iniquity, wickedness, rebellion — he uses every one of these words, as if to exhaust the list. He wanted to own their failure in full before God. "We," he says, not "They." Back in chapter two he linked his companions with himself in what was to their credit. He is just as ready now to line himself up with his people in their guilt. This is morally very beautiful. He was a blameless man, blameless even by his enemies' own judgement. Yet in the deepest lowliness of mind he joins himself to his captive countrymen in the national guilt.
Daniel could have pointed to names — kings, priests, false prophets. He does not. His confession looks past them to the state of the people as a whole.
Hamilton SmithHe does not try to lay the blame for the division and scattering on certain people. Some of them may indeed have acted in a high-handed way, twisted the truth and led many into error. This, we know, was the case with the kings, priests and false prophets. But looking beyond the failure of individuals, he sees and owns the failure of God's people as a whole. He says, "We have sinned … our kings, our princes, our fathers, and … all the people of the land."
If Daniel was not personally guilty, on what ground does he confess as though he were? One writer points to Christ, who identifies Himself with His people.
J. N. DarbyDaniel was taken captive when he was very young. He had taken no part in Israel's actual sin. There was no ground for self-accusation. But the fact is, there is no such thing as a Christian separated from the interests of his brothers and sisters… Christ identifies Himself with all that the people have done from the beginning. So Daniel too can say, "We have sinned." He identifies himself with them all, in the unity of the same people, though he had shared in none of these sins.
The verse before this one calls God the keeper of His covenant. Daniel then says the people turned aside from His commandments. If God has not failed, then the people have.
Edward DennettGod could not fail to keep His covenant with His people. So the people's own conduct must have been the cause of all the discipline that had come upon them. And it is this sinful conduct that Daniel now goes on to specify… In every variety of expression, he makes the fullest confession of their many transgressions. They had made their sin worse by refusing to listen to the prophets whom God, in His patience and tender mercy, had sent… The guilt lay alike upon every class.
Saying "we have sinned" is not the same as repentance. Scripture shows both kinds of speaker. The difference is whether the person hates the sin and gives it up.
G. C. WillisMany people in Scripture take the place of saying, "I have sinned." Yet not all of them receive cleansing. This is very remarkable. Take David, Nehemiah, Job, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, Micah, the prodigal son, and the thief on the cross. These all took the place of sinners, and all received cleansing or blessing. But look at Pharaoh, Balaam, Achan, Saul, Shimei, and Judas. These all confess they have sinned, yet they perish… There was no hatred of the sin. There was no desire to turn from it and give it up. There was no true repentance.
Daniel has owned everything. He has no merit left to plead, and he asks for none.
F. B. HoleThe marks of true confession come clearly to light here. Daniel admits the evil without excusing it or softening it. He fully owns that God's judgments and discipline are right. He pleads for deliverance according to God's word, and asks "not because of our righteousness, but because of your great mercy"… We too can ask for nothing on the ground of merit, but only on the ground of mercy.
- Own it. Daniel stacks four charges: sinned, done wrong, acted wickedly, rebelled. He exhausts the list instead of trimming it to something bearable.
- Say "we." A blameless man lines himself up with the guilty instead of standing above them. Christ identifies Himself with His people, and Daniel does the same.
- See the whole. He looks past the people who led Israel astray, and owns the failure of God's people as a whole.
- Test it. Pharaoh, Saul and Judas said they had sinned, and still perished. Confession without hatred of the sin is not repentance.
- Plead mercy. With every excuse gone, the only ground left to ask on is God's great mercy — never our own righteousness.
And we have not hearkened unto thy servants the prophets, who spoke in thy name to our kings, our princes, and our fathers, and to all the people of the land.
Daniel is praying for his people, and his confession names more than broken rules. Verse 6 owns that Israel would not listen to the prophets God sent, and it spreads that guilt over every rank, from the kings down to ordinary people.
The confession builds in stages. Verse 5 owned that the people had left God's written word. This verse adds that they also refused the men He sent to speak.
C. KnappIt was from "God's word written" that His people had departed, he acknowledged in verse 5; in the verse following he confesses yet more. They had refused the spoken ministry of the prophets sent to speak to them in God's name, calling them back to obedience to His commandments, His precepts, and His judgments. They had added sin to sin.
Something in us resists anyone who names our faults out loud. That instinct was alive then and is alive now.
Hamilton SmithNothing is more striking than the way the people of God have kept on persecuting the prophets. It was so in that day, and it is so in this. We do not like to have our conscience disturbed by hearing of our failures. Admitting that we are wrong, or have done wrong, is too humbling to religious flesh — unless we keep it vague and general. So the prophet who stirs the conscience — who reminds God's people of their sins — is never popular. The mere "teacher" gets a warm welcome. Gaining knowledge at a teacher's feet is pleasing to the flesh. Having a great teacher among us tends to lift us up. But who wants a prophet to wake the conscience by telling us of our failures and sins?
Daniel's confession leaves no class of person out. And God's patience is what sent those prophets in the first place.
Edward DennettHe offers no excuse for the enormity of his people's guilt, and he does not try to soften it. Instead he makes the fullest confession of their many sins, in every way he can put it. They had made their sin worse by refusing to listen to the prophets. God, in His long-suffering and tender mercy, had sent those prophets to their kings, their princes, their fathers, and to all the people of the land (v. 6). The guilt lay alike upon every class.
Daniel went into exile as a boy, and the kings he names had died long before. He took no part in the sin. He still says "we."
J. N. DarbyDaniel had been carried away captive when very young, and he had taken no part in the actual sin of Israel. There was, therefore, no ground for self-accusation... He identifies himself with them all, in the unity of the same people, though he had not shared in any of these sins... Those kings were no longer in existence, but he saw the whole thing together: "we have not listened to your servants the prophets."
Blame is easy to place on the few whose actions scatter God's people. One writer warns that this is exactly what hides the real cause.
Hamilton SmithFocusing on the human instruments used to break up the people of God may blind us to the true cause. The real cause was the low condition that went along with our high claims. We may have had no definite part in the folly and high-handed action of the few. Their action scattered the people of God at that moment. But we have all had our part in the low condition that made the break-up necessary.
Daniel prays for the whole nation, not only for the few exiles beside him. And half a confession is worth nothing.
The Bible TreasuryDaniel brings "all Israel" before God — the people as a whole. This was faith and love, for in fact only a remnant of Judah and Benjamin was in Babylon... It is a mere cheat if we confess only some of our sins, and perhaps not the greatest. God will have it all out, so that He may forgive.
- Refused. The sin here is not breaking a rule but shutting the ear. Israel left God's written word, then turned away the living voices He sent after it.
- Patient. God sent those prophets in long-suffering and tender mercy. That is what makes refusing them an added sin, not a first one.
- Unpopular. We welcome the teacher who adds knowledge. We do not want the prophet who wakes the conscience — then or now.
- Everyone. Kings, princes, fathers, and all the people of the land — the guilt lay alike on every class.
- "We." Daniel was taken away as a boy and had no part in the sin. He still claims the guilt as his own — and a confession that keeps back part of the truth is no confession.
Thine, O Lord, is the righteousness, but unto us confusion of face, as at this day, to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, in all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their unfaithfulness in which they have been unfaithful against thee.
Daniel prays for a nation in exile, and this verse is the hinge of his confession. He puts everything right on God's side and everything shameful on the people's side — from Judah and Jerusalem to the tribes scattered in every land.
Daniel's prayer does two things at once. It admits the sin, and it clears God's name in the punishment.
Edward DennettThe two prominent features of Daniel's supplications are confession and the justification of God in what He had done in His dealings with His people... God could not fail in keeping His covenant with His people. So the conduct of the people themselves must have been the cause of all the discipline that had come upon them... He offers no excuse for how great his people's guilt was, and he does not try to lessen it. In every variety of expression he makes the fullest confession of their many sins.
Daniel says "us," though he was carried off to Babylon as a boy and had no part in the sins that ruined the nation.
J. N. DarbyDaniel had been led captive when very young, and he had taken no part in the actual wrongdoing of Israel. There was, therefore, no ground for self-accusation. But the fact is, there is no such thing as a Christian separated from the interests of his brothers and sisters... If, then, Christ identifies Himself with all that the people have done from the beginning, Daniel also can say, "We have sinned" (vv. 5-7).
The exile had obvious human causes — bad kings, foolish decisions, a Babylonian army. Daniel names none of them.
Hamilton SmithDaniel takes hold of a deeply important principle. When division and scattering have happened, we must accept these evils as coming from God, acting in His holy discipline. They are not simply brought about by particular acts of folly or wickedness by individual men... Daniel loses sight of the folly and wickedness of individual men. He mentions no names. He does not speak of Jehoiakim or "his abominations which he did." He does not mention Zedekiah and his folly, or the ruthless violence of Nebuchadnezzar. Looking beyond these men, he sees in the scattering the hand of a righteous God.
The verse reaches past the exiles in Babylon to tribes long gone from sight. Daniel still prays for them as one people.
Arend RemmersA large part of the people of Israel did not return to Palestine from the Babylonian captivity with Zerubbabel, Ezra and Nehemiah. They stayed scattered across the whole earth. Yet God-fearing Israelites always kept alive the thought that the twelve tribes were one people, even after the division under Rehoboam. Elijah the prophet built an altar with twelve stones "according to the number of the tribes of the sons of Jacob" (1 Kings 18:31). Daniel prayed for all Israel and not for Judah only (Dan. 9:7).
Daniel calls God righteous in the scattering. Later he leans on that same righteousness to ask for mercy.
Hamilton SmithWhen we set our faces toward God, we look to the One who can not only divide but unite, not only scatter but gather, not only break up but heal (Hosea 6:1). Man indeed can scatter, and divide, and break up, but he cannot gather again, and unite, and heal. God can do both, and do both righteously. This is clearly seen in Daniel's confession... Then for a third time he appeals to the righteousness of God. But this time it is to bless and show mercy. He says, "O Lord, according to all Your righteousness, I beg You, let Your anger and Your fury be turned away" (v. 16).
Two verses later Daniel says mercies and forgivenesses belong to God. Shame comes first, then mercy — and that order is a pattern for anyone praying over a ruin they helped cause.
The Bible TreasuryGod has granted us an incomparably higher order of blessing and privileges. Remembering that, we have far greater reason than those much more faithful and humble men of God to bow down before God in dust and ashes... and to say, "O Lord, to us belongs open shame, because we have sinned against You." But then we also, like them, may go on: "To the Lord our God belong mercies and forgiveness, though we have rebelled against Him." First the "because," then the "although."
- Righteousness — His. Daniel makes no excuse for the sin. God kept His covenant, so the fault must lie with the people.
- Shame — ours. Daniel had no part in the nation's sins. Still he says "we" and "us," and will not stand apart from his people's ruin.
- The hand — His. Daniel names no kings, no fools, no invaders. Behind the scattering he sees God's discipline, not just the mistakes of men.
- The reach — all Israel. Daniel's one prayer holds the whole nation together — near and far, in sight and long lost.
- The plea — that same righteousness. Daniel calls God righteous in scattering. Then he asks that same righteousness to turn His anger away, because mercies and forgivenesses belong to God too.
O Lord, unto us is confusion of face, to our kings, to our princes, and to our fathers, because we have sinned against thee.
Daniel is praying for a nation in exile, and he begins by owning its sin as his own. Verse 8 is the heart of that confession: shame belongs to the people, from the kings down, because they sinned against God — what older translations call "confusion of face."
Daniel went into captivity as a boy. He had no hand in the sins that wrecked the nation, yet he refuses to stand apart from it.
J. N. DarbyDaniel had been led captive when very young, and he had taken no part in the actual iniquity of Israel. There was, therefore, no ground for self-accusation. But the fact is, there is no such thing as a Christian separated from the interests of his brothers and sisters... He identifies himself with all, in the unity of the same people, though he had not shared in any of these sins: "O Lord, to us belongs confusion of face, to our kings," and so on. These kings were no longer in existence, but he saw the whole thing together.
The verse names kings, princes and fathers. Daniel does not use that list to push the blame onto them.
Hamilton SmithHe does not try to pin the blame for the division and scattering on certain people. Some of them may indeed have acted in a high-handed way, twisted the truth and led many into error. But he looks beyond the failure of particular people. He sees and owns the failure of God's people as a whole... He himself was not responsible, and much time had passed. Even so, he does not ignore the division and scattering, and he does not blame people long since gone from the scene. Instead he identifies himself before God with the people of God.
Daniel wants light from God. He does not start by asking for it.
J Wilson SmithHe wants light, but he begins by confession. He goes down. He conceals nothing. He had learned that to the God with whom he had to do "all things were naked and open," and who, above all else, seeks in those who come to Him openness, truth, and sincerity.
Half-confession is treated as no confession at all:
The Bible TreasuryIt is a mere cheat if we confess only some of our sins, and perhaps not the greatest. God will have it all brought out so that He can forgive.
Verse 8 hands shame to the people; the very next sentence hands mercy to God. That second half is what makes the prayer possible at all.
Edward DennettIn verse 8 Daniel confesses again that shame belonged to every class of the people because of their sins. Then he says, "To the Lord our God belong mercies and forgivenesses, though we have rebelled against Him"... In that one sentence Daniel had reached the only foundation he could rest on as he prayed for his people. If he had known only the law, he could not have hoped to be heard.
The order of the two matters:
The Bible TreasuryWe can say, "O Lord, to us belongs confusion of face, because we have sinned against You." But then we too, like them, may go on, "To the Lord our God belong mercies and forgiveness, though we have rebelled against Him." First the "because," then the "although." Take the second without the first, and you have plain lawlessness.
What made Daniel's confession real is what makes ours real.
F. B. HoleThe marks of true confession come clearly to light here. Daniel owns the evil without trying to excuse it or soften it. He owns that God's judgments and discipline are right, and he pleads for deliverance, according to God's word, "not... for our righteousnesses, but for Your great mercies." Let us cultivate these features in our day. We too can ask for nothing on the ground of merit, but only on the ground of mercy.
- Sinned — Daniel names the cause with no excuse: the people sinned against God. Kings, princes and fathers all share the shame.
- Owned — Daniel had no share in the nation's collapse, yet he says "we." He will not separate himself from his people or blame leaders now dead.
- Uncovered — Confessing only the safer sins is a cheat. God wants it all out, and then He forgives.
- Answered — Shame belongs to us, mercies and forgivenesses belong to the Lord. That second clause, not any merit, is the only ground on which Daniel dares to keep praying.
- Ordered — First the "because," then the "although." Claim mercy without owning shame, and grace turns into licence. Own shame without mercy, and there is no hope.
With the Lord our God are mercies and pardons, for we have rebelled against him;
Daniel prays as an exile, for a nation that has rebelled. His words set two things side by side: the shame that belongs to his people, and the mercy that belongs to God.
A note on wording: these writers used an older translation. It has "mercies and forgivenesses" in the plural. Where the ESV reads "for we have rebelled," it has "though we have rebelled." Several comments below turn on those details.
One writer sets the two owners side by side. Shame runs through every generation of the people; mercy and forgiveness stay with God.
Hamilton SmithOpen shame belongs to every class and each generation of Israel, from the fathers onwards. But "mercies and forgivenesses" belong to the Lord our God. Not only is God righteous, but He is merciful and full of forgiveness. In spite of this the nation had rebelled and again aggravated their guilt.
The reason Daniel gives sounds backwards. He asks for mercy on the ground that his people are guilty.
J. N. DarbyThis is an unusual reason. But he had such a conviction of the goodness of God that he says: in God there is not only the justice that punishes — though we have sinned, there is mercy… It is as if he said, nothing will do for me, nothing will meet my case, but mercy… The prophet draws it as a conclusion: there is sin; well then, mercy alone can meet it.
Daniel does not say forgiveness. He says forgivenesses — and one writer presses on that choice of word.
C. E. StuartWhat encouragement after failure! Righteous He is. Daniel owned it and proved it. His life as an exile showed it, for he shared in the fortunes of his people. But mercies and forgivenesses belong also to God, so grace can be shown when failure is complete. Forgivenesses! Let us mark the language here. The prophet did not write forgiveness, but forgivenesses. He can forgive not one sin only, but many. The blood of Christ is the ground on which one sin is pardoned. On that same ground God can forgive many sins — yes, all sins — for all who seek it.
Daniel is praying for a guilty people. So what does he have left to rest his prayer on?
Edward DennettIn that one sentence — "To the Lord our God belong mercies and forgivenesses" — Daniel reached the only foundation he could rest on as he prayed for his people. If he had known only the law, he could not have hoped that God would hear him. But he also knew the Lord his God as far as God had shown Himself in grace — to Moses, to David, and to Solomon when the temple was built on Mount Zion. From then on that temple stood as the expression of royal grace. So the prophet leaned on God as known in grace. And only a heart that knows that grace can unburden its sins and sorrows.
In the older wording, verse 8 gives a reason: because we have sinned. Verse 9 then gives a concession: although we have rebelled. One writer warns against reversing that order.
The Bible TreasuryGod has granted us a far higher order of blessing and privileges. So we have far greater reason than those much more faithful and humble men of God to bow down before Him in dust and ashes, "remembering from where we have fallen." We too should say, "O Lord, to us belongs open shame, because we have sinned against You." But then we also like them may continue, "To the Lord our God belong mercies and forgiveness, though we have rebelled against Him." First the "because," then the "although." The second without the first would be simple antinomianism.
Antinomianism is the idea that grace makes obedience unnecessary.
Daniel went into exile as a boy. He had no hand in the nation's sin. Yet he says we.
J. N. DarbyDaniel went into captivity when very young, and he had taken no part in Israel's actual sin. There was, therefore, no ground for self-accusation. But the fact is, no Christian stands apart from the interests of fellow believers… Christ identifies Himself with all that the people have done from the beginning. So Daniel too can say, "We have sinned."
- Belongs. Shame belongs to the people. Mercy and forgiveness belong to God. Rebellion moves nothing from one column to the other.
- Plural. Not "forgiveness" but "forgivenesses." The blood that pardons one sin pardons them all.
- Foundation. The law alone gave Daniel no hope. He prayed resting on God as known in grace, because only mercy can meet sin.
- Order. "Because we have sinned" first, "although we have rebelled" second. Reverse them and grace becomes an excuse.
- We. Daniel had no share in the guilt. Still he said "we have sinned." A heart shaped by Christ does not separate itself from God's people.
and we have not hearkened unto the voice of Jehovah our God, to walk in his laws, which he set before us through his servants the prophets.
Daniel's prayer reaches its lowest point here. After naming sin, rebellion and shame, he names the root of it all. Israel would not listen to the voice of its God. They would not walk in the laws He gave them through prophet after prophet. The strange thing is who says this. Daniel had done none of it, yet he says "we".
Everything Daniel has confessed gathers into this one line. One writer sets out its three parts.
Hamilton SmithHere Daniel sums up the sin of Israel. The nation had not obeyed the voice of the LORD; they had broken His laws and disregarded the prophets.
The verse ties the laws to the prophets. One writer explains why God sent them.
J. N. DarbyIsrael failed, as all have failed except Christ, who was perfect in every way. God still tests man, however. He sends prophets to call the people back to the law. So "the Law and the Prophets were until John." Under God's government of the world, obedience was the way of happiness for man. That is why the prophets called them back to obedience as the way of man's happiness.
Israel refused to hear the messengers. One writer traces that refusal to something still with us.
Hamilton SmithDaniel does not try to soften their sin. On the contrary, he owns that they made it worse. They refused to listen to the prophets. God had sent those prophets from time to time to call them back to Himself. Nothing is more striking than to see how the people of God, in that day as in this, have kept on persecuting the prophets. We do not like our conscience disturbed by hearing of our failures. Admitting that we are wrong, or have done wrong, is too humbling for religious flesh — unless we keep it vague and general. So the prophet who tries to reach the conscience, who reminds God's people of their sins, is never popular. People welcome the mere "teacher" with applause. Gaining knowledge at a teacher's feet is rather pleasant to the flesh.
Daniel had the least to confess of anyone in Babylon. Yet he never says "they".
William KellyHe took the place of humble confession before God. He became the voice of the people, their representative, spreading out their sins before God. Perhaps there was not another soul who did so; certainly there were not many. It is rare indeed to find many souls taking the place of real confession before God. In Babylon, those who were most guilty felt it least, while the man who was most free from guilt was the one who spread it out most honestly before God.
Another writer adds that a confession trimmed down to what suits us would insult the God we are confessing to.
J. N. DarbyThe act may well be imperfect. But on the principles of faith there must be identification with the people — a full confession before God. Suppose I thought a partial confession could get my sins forgiven, in the sense of lifting God's chastening. Or suppose I thought I could have that without ever feeling how serious the sins were. It is plain I would be mocking the just government of God.
Verse 10 stands right next to the confession that mercy and forgiveness belong to God. One writer shows why that order matters for anyone who prays like this.
Edward DennettDaniel confesses again that shame belonged to every class of the people because of their sins. Yet, he goes on to say, "to the Lord our God belong mercy and forgiveness" — even though they had rebelled against Him, even though they had not obeyed His voice through the prophets. In that one sentence Daniel had reached the only ground on which he could rest his intercession. Had he known nothing but the law, he could have had no hope of being heard. But he also knew his God in grace, and only grace lets the heart pour out its sins and sorrows before God.
One writer points to this prayer as the pattern for our own confession.
F. B. HoleThe marks of true confession come clearly to light here. Daniel acknowledges the evil and does not try to excuse it or soften it. He fully owns that God's judgments and discipline are right. He asks God to deliver His people, according to His word, "not because of our righteousness, but because of Your great mercy." Let us cultivate these fine features in our own day. We too can ask for nothing on the ground of merit, only on the ground of mercy.
- Voice — The failure named here is not first idolatry or politics; it is a refusal to obey the voice of the LORD.
- Prophets — The prophets were the repeated call back to that voice, holding out obedience as the way of blessing.
- Conscience — Rejecting them was the aggravation, and the reason is still with us: a teacher who informs is welcomed, a prophet who disturbs the conscience is not.
- "We" — The man with the least to confess confessed the most, refusing partial confession as a mockery of God's righteous government.
- Mercy — Owning disobedience is only bearable next to the truth that mercy and forgiveness belong to God; that, not merit, is the ground of every plea.
And all Israel have transgressed thy law, even turning aside so as not to listen unto thy voice. And the curse hath been poured out upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God for we have sinned against him.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And he hath performed his words, which he spoke against us, and against our judges that judged us, by bringing upon us a great evil; so that there hath not been done under the whole heaven as hath been done upon Jerusalem.
Daniel prays as an exile in Babylon, looking back on a ruined city and a scattered nation. He traces that ruin to God Himself, which raises a hard question: can the fall of God's own city be God keeping His word?
The earlier verses confess the sin. This verse states what came of it, for the people and for the rulers over them.
Hamilton SmithVerses 11, 12. So the curse announced in the law had fallen on them. God had confirmed the words He had spoken against the nation by bringing this great evil upon them.
If God is this exact with a threat, what does that say about a promise?
William KellyOh, what foolishness is ours that could ever doubt a word of God! And what has God given us all this for? Only that we may know that if that word stands in what is evil, how much more in what is good. If God carries out His threats to the letter, can His promises fail for an instant?
Daniel had guilty kings and a violent conqueror he could have blamed. He names none of them.
Hamilton SmithHe speaks of "the Lord our God… bringing upon us a great evil"; and again, "the Lord watched upon the evil, and brought it upon us." So Daniel loses sight of the folly and wickedness of individual men. He mentions no names. He does not speak of Jehoiakim, or of "his abominations which he did." He does not speak of Zedekiah and his folly. He does not point to the ruthless violence of Nebuchadnezzar.
Nor does he soften the language, and the same commentator notes this is not unique to Daniel.
Hamilton SmithThese men of God do not soften their strong statements about God's dealings in discipline. They do not even say that God has "allowed" His people to be scattered, or "permitted" them to be driven away. They say plainly that God Himself has driven the people away and brought the evil.
The verse ends by measuring the disaster against everything else under heaven.
Edward DennettDaniel will hide nothing. God had only confirmed His words in bringing so great an evil on His people, and there was never a greater evil under the whole heaven than what fell on Jerusalem. The evil came on them exactly as written in the law of Moses.
Daniel says "we" all the way through the prayer. The sins he confesses were the nation's, not his own.
Arno C. GaebeleinVerses 11-14 set out the deserved curse as written in the law of Moses. Throughout this prayer we see how fully he identified himself with the sins, the failure, the shame and the judgment of the people of God. This is remarkable. He speaks of the nation's sins, their rebellion, their transgressions of the law and their wicked deeds as if they belonged to him.
The "great evil" of verse 12 was meant to turn the nation back. Verse 13 says it did not. (The quote below uses an older wording of verse 14: "the Lord watched upon the evil.")
J. N. Darby"Yet we have not entreated the favour of the Lord our God, turning from our iniquities and gaining insight by Your truth" (v. 13). That is, we have not only transgressed. When the chastening came, we did not turn to the Lord with a true heart, to turn us from our iniquities. Here sin reached its height. "Therefore the Lord has watched upon the evil and brought it upon us" (v. 14), as He watched over the good to bless. How terrible, when the government of God watches over evil to make it come upon His people!
- Word. God had spoken against the nation. The fall of Jerusalem confirmed His own words — and the God who keeps a threat keeps a promise.
- Hand. Daniel names no king and no invader. He traces the scattering to God Himself, and refuses even the softer words "allowed" and "permitted".
- Weight. The judgment on Jerusalem was without equal under heaven. It landed exactly as the law of Moses had written it.
- Owner. Daniel says "we" for sins that were not his, taking the nation's sin, shame and judgment as his own.
- Warning. God sent the evil to turn them back. They did not turn — and there sin reached its height.
As it is written in the law of Moses, all this evil is come upon us; yet we besought not Jehovah our God, that we might turn from our iniquities, and understand thy truth.
Daniel names the worst part of Israel's ruin: the disaster came just as the law of Moses had warned, and still no one prayed. Why does trouble leave so many people unchanged, and what links turning from sin to understanding God's truth?
The failure Daniel confesses here is not the original sin but the response to its punishment. One writer calls this the lowest point of the whole confession. He reads the next verse as its result, quoting verse 14 from an older translation.
J. N. DarbyWe have not only broken the law. When the chastening came, we did not turn to the Lord with a true heart, so that we might be turned from our iniquities. Here sin reached its height. "Therefore the Lord has watched over the evil and brought it upon us" (v. 14) — as He watched over the good to bless. How terrible, when the government of God watches over evil to make it come upon His people!
Daniel could have stopped at admitting the nation's guilt. Instead he adds a worse detail: nobody sought God even after the blow fell. Hiding nothing is what makes his prayer a model.
Edward DennettDaniel went to the very bottom. He viewed all the sins of his people in the light of God's holiness. He justified God, and owned that the judgment which had come on Jerusalem, Judah, Israel, kings, princes, and people was only what they righteously deserved. So it is a pattern confession for all time, for believers and for sinners alike. Only remember that grace is known even better now (see 1 John 2:1-2; 1:9). And if it is better known, that is one more reason to confess thoroughly and openly.
The verse ties two things together: turning from sin, and gaining insight into God's truth. One commentator applies that link to people who find the Bible impossible to understand.
C. KnappHe fully justifies God. Then he adds this to his confession: they had not turned to Him in prayer, asking to be freed from their moral state and to understand His truth (v. 13). And is not this in large measure the reason why so few today understand God's truth — His Word? To most it seems a sealed book, passed from one to another with the admission that it cannot be understood. (See Isaiah 29:11-12.) But how could it be otherwise? Men — and Christian men at that — fail to cry to God for light. They are unwilling to turn from their worldly ways, or to break with their ungodly company. Here lies the real reason why most professing Christians today fail to understand the Scriptures.
Daniel was taken to Babylon as a boy and had no share in the sins that ruined Jerusalem. Yet the prayer never says "they."
J. N. DarbyDaniel was led captive when very young, and he had taken no part in the actual sin of Israel. There was therefore no ground for self-accusation. But the fact is, there is no such thing as a Christian who is separate from the interests of his fellow believers. This could not be… Since Christ identifies Himself with all that the people have done from the beginning, Daniel too can say, "We have sinned." He joins himself to them all, as one of the same people, though he had shared in none of these sins.
Commentators do not leave this in the past. One writer holds Daniel's words up as a mirror: trouble accepted calmly, truth left unstudied. He keeps the verse's older wording, where "entreated the favor of the LORD" reads "made our prayer before the Lord."
Hamilton SmithHas this solemn verse no voice for the people of God in our own day? The people of God are scattered and divided because of their sins. Yet how calmly, even contentedly, they look at this division! What is more, God's truth is little understood at the moment, and there is little desire to understand it. Oh that the state of God's people would stir us so deeply that we must make our prayer before the Lord our God, turn from our iniquities, and set our faces to understand the truth of God!
- The blow. The disaster came exactly as written, so the punishment itself was proof that God keeps His word.
- The silence. The worst sin was not the first offence. It was the refusal to pray once the chastening came.
- The hardening. When God's people will not turn, His government watches over the evil to bring it on them. Once it watched over the good to bless.
- The turning. Daniel's confession hides nothing and justifies God. He says "we" though he shared none of the guilt. That is the pattern for anyone confessing sin.
- The understanding. Turning from sin and understanding God's truth stand or fall together. Where people will not break with their ways, the Bible stays a sealed book.
And Jehovah hath watched over the evil, and brought it upon us; for Jehovah our God is righteous in all his works which he hath done; and we have not hearkened unto his voice.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
-- And now, O Lord our God, who broughtest thy people forth out of the land of Egypt with a strong hand, and hast made thee a name, as it is this day, -- we have sinned, we have done wickedly.
Daniel's long confession has already agreed that God's judgments are just. Now, before he asks for anything, he reaches back past the exile to the event that made Israel a nation. He names God as the One who brought His people out of Egypt. In the same breath he admits that this redeemed people has sinned.
Daniel does not confess a recent lapse. By naming the exodus, his confession stretches across the entire national story.
Hamilton SmithIn the first place, Daniel, in his day, could look back over one thousand years of failure among the professing people of God. In his confession he goes back to the time when God brought Israel out of Egypt, and from that time he says, "We have sinned, we have done wickedly."
Mentioning the mighty hand is not a change of subject. It is the sharpest thing Daniel says against his own people.
Hamilton SmithThere was yet a further aggravation of their guilt which Daniel confesses. The people who had sinned and done so wickedly were the redeemed of the Lord. They were the people He had brought out of Egypt with a mighty hand. God had won renown through them, and now these same people had dishonoured Him by their sin. God's redeeming power on behalf of Israel had spread His fame among the nations. Israel's sin had made the Gentiles blaspheme His Name. So God vindicated His glory by driving Israel back into bondage.
Having admitted the sin, Daniel has nothing left to offer from his people's side. He holds onto one thing only: God's name. That is why his next words ask for God's own city.
J. N. Darby"O Lord, according to all your righteous acts, let your anger and your wrath turn away from your city Jerusalem, your holy hill" (v. 16). The words of Daniel are quite touching. He deeply felt that it was the sin of the people that had brought down all the evil. Even so, he repeats, It is a question of Your name; he says nothing about the name of the people.
There is a striking confidence under the self-accusation. Commentators note that Moses prayed in the same spirit, though the two men start their appeal at different points.
J. N. DarbyDaniel's faith outreaches their sin, and rests on God's faithfulness; so did that of Moses — only here he goes back to Moses and Egypt; Moses also goes back to the fathers.
Daniel does not leave one excuse standing. He measures his nation's history by God's holiness and agrees with the verdict. What he does here is not for Israel only.
Edward DennettYet again he mentions another thing that makes their guilt worse. They had sinned and done wickedly against the very One who had redeemed them with a mighty hand out of the land of Egypt, and had won renown for Himself (v. 15). Daniel went to the very bottom. He viewed all the sins of his people in the light of God's holiness. He justified God, and owned that the judgment which had overtaken Jerusalem, Judah, Israel, kings, princes, and people was only their righteous due. It is therefore a pattern confession for all time, whether for saints or for sinners. We only need to remember that grace is now known even more fully. That is one more reason for thoroughness and openness in confession.
Anyone can copy this prayer. Its marks are plain, and so is the ground it stands on.
F. B. HoleThe things that mark true confession come clearly to light here. Daniel admits the evil without any excuse or softening. He owns that God's judgments and discipline are right. He asks God to grant deliverance according to His word, pleading "not… for our righteousness, but for your great mercy." Let us cultivate these excellent features in our day. We too can ask for nothing on the ground of merit, but only on the ground of mercy.
- Redemption — Daniel begins where Israel began. God brought them out of Egypt with a mighty hand, and that act won Him a name among the nations.
- Reproach — that same redemption makes the sin worse. God won renown through this people, and their sin then shamed His Name.
- Reach — Daniel's confession covers a thousand years of failure. He does not limit the guilt to his own generation.
- Refusal — he pleads no merit at all; the motive he presses is God's own name and God's own city, not Israel's worth.
- Result — his confession justifies God and rests on His faithfulness. It is a pattern for anyone who comes to God asking for mercy.
Lord, according to all thy righteousnesses, I beseech thee, let thine anger and thy fury be turned away from thy city Jerusalem, thy holy mountain; for because of our sins, and because of the iniquities of our fathers, Jerusalem and thy people [are become] a reproach to all round about us.
Daniel has just spent fifteen verses owning his nation's sin and clearing God of all blame for Jerusalem's ruin. Now he asks for something, and his plea rests on a surprise: not the nation's record, not even mercy at first, but God's own righteousness.
Watch what Daniel puts first in his prayer.
Hamilton SmithDaniel has confessed the sin and failure of God's people, and he has justified God in all His ways. Now he turns to prayer and pleads with Him. Surprising as we may find it, his first plea is the righteousness of God, and later the "great mercies" of God. He realises that mercy must rest on righteousness. In verse 14 he had already owned the "righteousness" of God in bringing all this sorrow on the people. Now he asks that in righteousness God would turn His anger and fury away from Jerusalem.
He could argue that way because of something God had already done.
Edward DennettThe prophet had a right to plead the Lord's righteousness. Jehovah had put His name in the sanctuary Solomon built. He had also accepted Solomon's prayer at its dedication. In this way He bound Himself to hear the prayers of His people when their sins had humbled them before Him. So in this plea Daniel counted on all that Jehovah was as revealed to Israel, and on His faithfulness to His own word. Nothing gives the soul so much courage as grasping God's righteousness, or sets it so completely free in God's presence.
Notice whose city it is in Daniel's prayer. He never calls Jerusalem ours.
J. N. DarbyThe words of Daniel are quite touching. He felt deeply that the sin of the people had brought down all this evil. Still, he repeats: it is a question of Your name. He says nothing about the name of the people. He had truly felt their misery and sin, and he was humbled for it. But he insists on this point: Jerusalem is the city of God. As he confessed the sins of his fathers, he could not bear the thought of the city of God lying in ruins. Those sins were the cause, so God must forgive them before He can restore the city.
The same instinct shows in two more words: "Your people."
Edward DennettIt is very touching to see the way Daniel uses the term "Your people." God had in fact written Lo-ammi ("not my people") on Israel. But faith would rebuild the link, and so it refuses that name of reproach.
Daniel names the sins, then leans on something outside the people altogether.
J. N. DarbyGod Himself becomes the motive. Faith sees the sins of the people. Yet the glory of God identifies itself with such a people, so faith can claim deliverance from the results of those sins. This very glory makes forgiveness necessary, for God has identified Himself in goodness with the people. And if God is to act for His name, He must deliver Jerusalem, for there was no other place on earth that bore His name.
Read the whole prayer and you will not find Daniel asking for one thing for Daniel.
C. KnappNote that the prophet forgets himself. He makes not one single request for himself. He prays only for others. And even when he prays for them, he thinks not so much of their blessing, or relief from oppression, or even their return to the land. God's honour is uppermost in his thoughts.
The point is not to admire Daniel, but to pray like him.
Hamilton SmithThe subjects of his supplication are the city, the holy mountain, the sanctuary and the people of God. He is not pleading for himself, his own interests, or the particular needs of his companions in captivity. His whole heart is taken up with the interests of God on earth. If only we knew more of the spirit of Daniel! If only our hearts were so filled with what is nearest and dearest to the heart of Christ that we rose above all personal and local needs. Then we could cry to God for His Church, His Name, His house and His people, confessing the common failure and feeling the common need.
- Righteousness first. Daniel asks God to act "according to all your righteous acts" — the same righteousness he had just owned in the judgment. Mercy rests on righteousness, not against it.
- A bound God. He could plead it because God had put His name in the sanctuary and promised to hear a humbled people. Grasping that leaves the soul free and bold before Him.
- "Your," not "ours." City, mountain, people, sanctuary — Daniel hands each back to God. Faith refuses the label of rejection and holds the link.
- Sin owned, then removed. The ruin came from the sins of the people and their fathers. God had to forgive those sins before the city could rise again.
- God's name as the motive. No other place on earth carried that name. So His glory itself argues for Jerusalem's rescue — and this prayer asks nothing for the one praying.
And now, our God, hearken to the prayer of thy servant, and to his supplications, and cause thy face to shine upon thy sanctuary that is desolate, for the Lord's sake.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Incline thine ear, O my God, and hear; open thine eyes and behold our desolations, and the city that is called by thy name for we do not present our supplications before thee because of our righteousnesses, but because of thy manifold mercies.
Daniel has spent a lifetime in exile. He has just confessed his nation's sin. Now he asks God to look at the ruined city and the ruined sanctuary. The striking thing is the reason he gives God for hearing him — and the reason he refuses to give.
Verses 16 to 19 are the request part of Daniel's prayer. The order of his pleas matters. He starts with God's righteousness, and only later comes to God's mercy:
Hamilton SmithDaniel has confessed the sin and failure of God's people. He has also justified God in all His ways. Now he prays in the form of a request. Surprisingly, as we might think, his first plea is the righteousness of God, and only later the "great mercy" of God. He realises that mercy must be based on righteousness. He had already owned the "righteousness" of God in bringing all this sorrow on this people (verse 14). Now he pleads that in righteousness God would turn His anger and fury away from Jerusalem.
Daniel will not ask on the ground of what his people deserve. His confession makes no excuses either:
F. B. HoleThe marks of true confession come to light here. Daniel admits the evil with no attempt to excuse it or play it down. He owns that God's judgments and discipline are right. Then he asks God to grant deliverance, according to His word, "not … because of our righteousness, but because of Your great mercy." Let us cultivate these excellent features in our day. We too can ask for nothing on the ground of merit, but only on the ground of mercy.
What gives the words their weight is the man saying them. He had the least to answer for and said the most:
A. J. PollockDaniel's confession is touching in the extreme. In it he owns the sin of his people as his own sin, even sins committed long before he was born. Since a youth he had been captive, though put at times in high office and standing in great favour. He had seen the Babylonian Empire crumble in a night. Now an old man, at the very end of his career, he shines never brighter than when on his knees in this chapter.
Each request names a different ruin and gives its own reason why God should act. Verse 17 asked for the sanctuary. Verse 18 widens the view:
Edward DennettNext he brings up the sanctuary in all its ruin. He asks God to cause His face to shine on His sanctuary, and the ground of that request is "for the Lord's sake" — an appeal that could not be refused. In the next verse (18) the subject of his petition is "our desolations, and the city that is called by Your name." For this he urges yet another plea: "We do not present our pleas before You because of our righteousness, but because of Your great mercy."
Notice the pronoun Daniel chooses for the city. It is not the one you would expect from a Jew mourning his homeland:
Hamilton SmithIt is striking that when he pleads for the city, the mountain, the sanctuary and the people, he does not see them in relation to himself or the nation. He sees them as belonging to God. He does not say our city, or our sanctuary, or our people, but "Your city," "Your holy mountain," "Your sanctuary," and "Your people." Rising above all the failure, he turns to God and pleads, "We are Yours."
Daniel has set merit aside. So he needs another reason why God should act, and he finds it in God Himself:
J. N. Darby"O my God, incline Your ear and hear … for we do not present our pleas before You because of our righteousness, but because of Your great mercy" (v. 18). "Delay not, for Your own sake, O my God, because Your city and Your people are called by Your name" (v. 19). Daniel makes God Himself the motive. The glory of God identifies itself with such a people. So faith that sees the sins of the people can still claim deliverance from the results of those sins. That very glory makes the forgiveness necessary, since God has identified Himself in goodness with the people… But if God is to act for His name, He must deliver Jerusalem. There was no other place on earth that bore His name.
Read the whole request and one absence stands out. Daniel, a captive far from home, never mentions his own case:
Edward DennettThese are the three pleas Daniel urges before the Lord — His righteousness, His own sake, and His mercies… Here was the secret of his strength. He cared most of all for the name of his God, and for God's interests in His sanctuary, His city, and His people. He has not one single thing to ask for himself, or even for his fellow captives… So this is a prayer worth studying often, by anyone who wants, in any measure, to share God's heart about the sad state of His church in the world.
- Righteousness first. Daniel pleads God's righteousness before he pleads His mercy, because mercy must rest on righteousness. The God who was right to send the ruin is the God he asks to turn His anger away.
- Merit disowned. The one thing he refuses to bring is his own record; we can ask for nothing on the ground of merit, only on the ground of mercy.
- Yours, not ours. He says "Your city," "Your sanctuary," "Your people." He rises above the failure and pleads the one thing still true: we belong to You.
- The name as the argument. With merit gone, God Himself becomes the motive. The city bears His name, so acting for His name means delivering it.
- Nothing for himself. Not one request in this prayer is personal. That was the secret of its strength, and it is the pattern for anyone who carries God's people on their heart today.
Lord, hear! Lord, forgive! Lord, hearken and do! defer not, for thine own sake, O my God! for thy city and thy people are called by thy name.
Daniel has just spent a long prayer confessing the sins of his nation. Verse 19 is where that prayer breaks into short, urgent cries. What can a man plead when neither he nor his people have anything good to offer God?
The verse does not introduce a new request. It collects everything already said and presses it home.
Edward DennettThese, then, are the three pleas Daniel urges before the Lord — His righteousness, His own sake, and His mercies. Having laid these out in His presence, he gathers up all his desires and pours them out in one last earnest entreaty: "O Lord, hear; O Lord, forgive. O Lord, pay attention and act. Delay not, for your own sake, O my God, because your city and your people are called by your name." Here was the secret of his strength. He was concerned most of all for the name of his God, and for His interests in His sanctuary, His city, and His people.
The order of Daniel's arguments is unexpected. He asks for pardon only after he has agreed with God's verdict against his people.
Hamilton SmithSurprising as it may seem to us, his first plea is the righteousness of God, and later the "great mercies" of God. He realises that mercy must be based on righteousness. He had already agreed that God was righteous in bringing all this sorrow on this people (verse 14). Now he asks God, in that same righteousness, to turn His anger and fury away from Jerusalem.
When Daniel says "for your own sake," he hands God a reason to act that has nothing to do with Israel's record.
J. N. DarbyGod Himself is made the motive. Faith sees the sins of the people, and it sees them because of the glory of God — a glory that links itself with such a people. That faith can claim deliverance from the results of these sins. This very glory makes the forgiveness necessary, since God has linked Himself in goodness with the people... But if God is to act for His name, He must deliver Jerusalem, for there was no other place on earth that bore His name.
A devoted servant might have set himself above the guilty. Daniel does the opposite.
James BoydThere is a wholesome flavour about this confession coming from such a devoted servant of the Lord. There is no "I thank you that I am not like other men." Such words would not fit in the mouth of a man like Daniel... He has not one word to say for himself or for his nation. But he has a great deal to say for God, and for the honour and glory of His holy Name. What he wants done for his nation by way of deliverance is for the Lord's sake.
One word keeps returning in Daniel's closing appeal — your.
Hamilton SmithNotice how he pleads for the city, the mountain, the sanctuary and the people. He does not see them as tied to himself or to the nation. He sees them as belonging to God. He does not say our city, or our sanctuary, or our people, but "your city," "your holy mountain," "your sanctuary," and "your people." Rising above all the failure, he turns to God and pleads, "We are yours."
Daniel asked God not to delay. God did not.
Edward DennettBefore Daniel had finished praying, the answer to his cries came — at least as far as God revealing His mind about the things Daniel had prayed for... Let us remind ourselves again that God's ear is always open to the prayers of His people. As John wrote, "If we ask anything according to His will, He hears us," and it was so in this case. Daniel was in the secret of God's mind, and God delighted in His servant's supplications. Every word went up before Him like sweet incense, for in truth they were His own desires, born in His servant's heart.
One writer turns this prayer into a wish for us.
Hamilton SmithIf only we knew more of the spirit of Daniel. If only our hearts were so filled with what is nearest and dearest to the heart of Christ that we could rise above all personal and local needs. Then we could cry to God for His Church, His Name, His house and His people, confessing the common failure and feeling the common need.
- Confess — Daniel first agrees that God was right to judge. Mercy must rest on righteousness.
- Plead — Daniel lays out three grounds — God's righteousness, God's own sake, God's great mercies. Not one of them is Israel's merit.
- Name — the city and the people bear God's name. His glory is tied to their rescue.
- Forget yourself — Daniel asks nothing for himself. He calls nothing "ours." The city, mountain, sanctuary and people are all "yours."
- Receive — the answer came before he stopped speaking. He was praying desires God Himself had planted in him.
And whilst I was speaking, and praying, and confessing my sin and the sin of my people Israel, and presenting my supplication before Jehovah my God for the holy mountain of my God;
Daniel is at the end of a long prayer over the ruin of Jerusalem. This verse is his own summary of the moment God broke in. It tells us three things at once: what he confessed, who he prayed for, and how far his words had got before the answer came.
The verse begins with "my sin" before it reaches the sin of the nation. That order is striking in a man whose enemies could find no fault in him at all.
C KnappDaniel's enemies say, "We shall not find anything against this Daniel, except we find it against him concerning the law of his God." Yet this same Daniel says, "I was confessing my sin" (Dan. 6:5; 9:20). Man saw nothing to condemn. Daniel knew God's eye saw much. And, like the honest man that he was, he records with his own hand that he had sins to confess to God.
He then joins his sin to "the sin of my people Israel." He had not caused the ruin he was mourning. Still he refused to stand apart from it. Commentators apply this to how believers should treat the failures of God's people in any age.
J. N. DarbyIn the spirit of love, of patience, and of humiliation, we have always to take the place of those who have sinned. See Daniel. Daniel himself was righteous, yet he confesses the people's sin as his own, saying, "O Lord... we have sinned, and have committed iniquity... to us belongs confusion of face." The remnant should confess the sin and evil of those who have sinned. They had no share in the sin, but they must share its consequences, suffering in all the affliction with true sympathy and fellowship.
Notice what he pleads for: the holy hill in Jerusalem, where the temple stood. Not his release, not his safety, not even first of all the comfort of his people.
C KnappNotice that the self-forgetting prophet asks nothing at all for himself. He prays only for others. And even when he prays for them, he thinks not so much of their own blessing, or their relief from oppression, or even their return to the land. God's honour is uppermost in his thoughts. He speaks of the city as "your city," "your holy mountain," "your sanctuary that is desolate," and only then of "the people that is called by your name." Summing up his exercises, he ends with, "presenting my plea before the LORD my God for the holy hill of my God."
The next verse dates the moment by the evening oblation — the evening sacrifice at the temple. But that temple lay in rubble.
Edward DennettThe evening oblation was the perpetual burnt offering. God appointed it to be presented morning and evening, without a break. The temple had been destroyed, so no one could offer it any longer. But Daniel stood before God in the value of that offering. That is, he identified himself in spirit with all its sweet fragrance, as what made him acceptable and made his prayers effective. So it is with our prayers now, when by faith and in the power of the Holy Spirit we rest completely on what Christ is, and on all the value of His sacrifice, before God.
Daniel says "while I was speaking" — and then says it a second time in the next verse, as if he cannot get over it.
J. N. DarbyHe repeats twice, "while I was speaking"; he had not finished before Gabriel appeared and cut it short by delivering the prophecy that follows.
Daniel's words were not simply his own.
Edward DennettDaniel was in the secret of God's mind, and God delighted in His servant's prayers. Every word of them went up before Him like sweet incense. In truth, they were His own desires, which He had planted in His servant's heart.
What Daniel prayed about shapes what he is told. His burden was Israel and Jerusalem, so we must read the famous answer that follows the same way.
William KellyNotice, all his thoughts are about Israel and about Jerusalem. The prophecy is not about Christianity, but about Israel. There is no understanding it, unless we hold this fast... Then, in verse 24, the prophecy begins. It has to do with Daniel's people — "upon your people." It speaks of a special period, marked out in connection with Israel's full deliverance.
- Confession starts at home. A man no one could accuse still says "my sin" — because God's eye sees what human eyes miss.
- Confession widens. From "my sin" he moves to "the sin of my people," taking the place of the guilty without having shared the guilt.
- Confession empties self. He asks nothing for himself; his one plea is for the holy hill, and God's honour is what drives it.
- Confession rests on sacrifice. The temple lies in ruins, yet Daniel prays in the value of the evening burnt offering. That, not his own goodness, is his acceptance.
- Confession is answered mid-sentence. Gabriel arrives before the prayer ends, and the answer stays on the subject Daniel raised: his people and his city.