Daniel 7:18–27

Daniel 7:18

But the saints of the most high [places] shall receive the kingdom, and they shall possess the kingdom for ever, even to the ages of ages.

Daniel's vision is full of beasts, thrones and burning judgment. The angel gives him the short answer: empires rise and fall, but God's saints receive a kingdom that never ends — and one question presses, who are these saints?

A word of comfort about the end

The angel explains what Daniel has just seen: how the long rule of the Gentile empires ends for God's people.

Daniel now learns, for his comfort and ours, how the times of the Gentiles finally end for the people of God. These empires may oppose the people of God and blaspheme God, "but" the end will be the triumph of God's people.

Hamilton Smith

Kings out of the earth, a kingdom that has no successor

Earlier in the chapter the beasts came up out of the sea. Here they arise out of the earth, and the change of picture matters.

In verse 3 these kings, the beasts, come up from the sea; here they arise out of the earth. The first passage shows them as they appear and take governmental power, climbing to their thrones out of the surging waves of the peoples. This verse shows them in their origin, "out of the earth," in contrast with Him who will come out of heaven to take His royal power... So the verse adds, "But the saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom," and after that there is no other, for they will possess it for ever and ever.

Edward Dennett

From "Most High" to "high places"

The title translated "Most High" is plural in the original. Commentators tie it to a sphere above this world.

The term "most High" appears in verses 22, 25 and 27 as well as verse 18. Except in verse 25, where it is the title God Himself will be known by in the future, it is plural. So the exact rendering is the saints of the "high places." Few question that the term "heavenly places" in Ephesians comes from this expression in Daniel... Both terms speak of a heavenly sphere, a sphere outside this world, to which certain saints belong.

The Christian's Friend

This reading also explains a contrast that runs through the chapter.

Some, like the beasts and their subjects, belong in their whole character to the earth. Others are the people of God, who own the God of heaven and so belong to heavenly, or high, places... Here we learn a further truth. The people of God of all ages, all those who through the history of the world have been in touch with heaven, will share with the Son of Man in His glorious reign.

Hamilton Smith

The church and Daniel's saints

Readers often take these saints to be the church. Commentators differ.

People have often supposed that this refers to the Church, and there is no doubt that the Church will possess the glory this passage speaks of. But the Church is not the subject of Daniel's prophecy, any more than of the Psalms. There is no need to limit the title of heavenly saints, or saints of the high places, to the Church. No one can question that Old Testament saints, who lived and died before the Church was founded, will share with the Church the glory of reigning with Christ in His kingdom. The same is true of the saints whose blood will be poured out around Jerusalem in the coming crisis.

W. Trotter

The kingdom and judgment

God's intervention brings two results for the saints.

First, God gives judgment to the saints of the high places; second, the saints take the kingdom. Notice the special title "of the high places." The little horn persecutes the saints on earth and prevails against them until the Ancient of days comes. But God gives judgment only to the saints of the high places. "Do you not know," says the apostle, "that the saints will judge the world?"

J. N. Darby

Two companies, two spheres

Verse 18 and verse 27 do not say the same thing.

Turning back to Daniel 7:18 and 27, we find two classes. There are "the saints of the Most High," who "receive the kingdom and possess the kingdom forever, forever and ever." And there are "the people of the saints of the Most High," who receive the kingdom under the whole heaven. The first are the heavenly saints who will reign on high over the earth. The second are the people of Israel on earth during the millennium.

C. E. Stuart

Summary

- Beasts — the four kingdoms rise "out of the earth." That is their origin, and it is their limit.

- But — one small word turns the vision. After the opposition and the blasphemy comes the triumph of God's people, told to Daniel for his comfort and ours.

- High places — the title is plural in the original. These are saints of a heavenly sphere, outside this world.

- Share — the Son of Man does not reign alone. God's people of every age reign with Him, and He gives judgment to them.

- For ever — no kingdom follows this one. The saints hold it for ever and ever, while their people hold the kingdom under the whole heaven.

Daniel 7:19

Then I desired to know the certainty concerning the fourth beast, which was different from them all, exceeding dreadful, whose teeth were of iron, and its nails of brass; which devoured, broke in pieces, and stamped the rest with its feet;

Daniel had already been told that the four beasts are four kings. Still, he could not leave the fourth one alone. He asks for the truth about that beast, and his question raises three issues: which power is this, why is it unlike the rest, and what does it mean for God's people?

Nine verses for one beast

Count the verses. That alone shows where the weight of this chapter lies.

When Daniel wanted to know what the vision meant, one verse explained all four beasts (verse 17). But it takes nine verses to describe the fourth beast and its doom (verses 19-27).

A. J. Pollock

The kingdom Daniel asked about

The angel's reply names the power. One writer explains which empire it was, and what made it "different."

In answer to Daniel's questions, the angel explains the vision of the fourth beast. We are plainly told that it stands for "the fourth kingdom on earth." We know this was the Roman Empire. It was "different from all kingdoms" because it took a form of government that combined rule by one man with rule by the people, already pictured in the iron and clay of the image. Its rule reached almost everywhere, so it could well be said to "devour the whole earth." By treading down and breaking in pieces, it conquered the nations and crushed those who refused to submit.

Hamilton Smith

Iron teeth, bronze claws

The metals in Daniel's question carry meaning.

Iron is a symbol of hardness... Iron also marked the kingdom of Rome. When that kingdom is pictured as a beast, it has great iron teeth (Dan. 7:7, 19). And in the great image the character of the kingdoms goes down from gold to silver, then to bronze, then to iron and clay, which would not hold together.

Morrish Bible Dictionary

The same teeth and nails belong to a man the world is waiting for.

What the world wants is a man who can tame, or at least subdue, the savage nature of the people... Such a man will be found in this beast. He will have plenty of wisdom to deal with difficult questions. He will have enough power to make people respect his judgments, for his teeth will be of iron and his nails of bronze. He will devour, break in pieces, and no one will be able to resist him. This is the man the world is looking for, and this is the man the world shall get.

James Boyd

Breaking in pieces, from first to last

One writer picks out two words from Daniel's question as the mark of this empire's whole story. He then says who the "saints" of this chapter are not.

Notice the words "broke in pieces." This feature has marked the history of the Roman empire from first to last. The "saints" here are not the saints who belong to the Church — not the Christians of today. They cannot be, because we will all be taken out of the scene. We will be with Jesus, in glory, before this scripture can be fulfilled. But in that day God will have some saints on earth.

W. T. P. Wolston

Writers also look on to a future stage of this empire.

At a time still future, the Roman Empire will revive. It will be ten loosely united nations led by the "beast"... This revived kingdom wages war with the believers of that time, until the Lord "appears" to judge it.

Various

Why the answer talks about God's people

Daniel asked about an empire. The reply keeps turning to the saints — something the vision itself had not mentioned.

There are two parts to the interpretation. Verses 17 and 18 are general. Then, for the fourth beast (verses 19-28), there is more detail... Notice here that the interpretation adds something of the highest interest, which was not in the vision it explains: what concerns the saints. In telling the prophet what the vision meant, God could not leave them out.

J. N. Darby

A repetition that is not a repetition

Daniel's words here restate what he had already described. That near-repeat is itself a lesson in how to read Scripture.

Daniel then went on to ask more closely about the fourth beast. Notice that, while he repeats what he had seen in verses 7 and 8, he adds two things not mentioned before... These additions show that there are no mere repetitions in Scripture. The connection, or the purpose, is different; or, as here, a further revelation deepens the interest. So no scripture that seems the same as another should ever be passed over lightly. Where something seems repeated, that should invite all the closer study, to receive the fresh light being given.

Edward Dennett

Summary

- Asked — Daniel presses for the truth about one beast. God answers with nine verses, where the other three empires got one.

- Named — the answer calls it the fourth kingdom on earth: Rome. It was unlike the rest, and it crushed all who would not submit.

- Armed — iron stands for hardness. Iron teeth and bronze claws picture a power, and at last a man, that no one can resist.

- Added — Daniel's retelling gives details the vision never gave. When Scripture seems to repeat itself, look closer.

- Answered — into a question about empires God brings His own people. He could not leave them out.

Daniel 7:20

and concerning the ten horns that were in its head, and the other that came up, and before which three fell even that horn that had eyes, and a mouth speaking great things, and whose look was more imposing than its fellows.

Daniel had just heard the outline: four beasts, four kings, and a kingdom that ends up with the saints. He wanted more, so he asked about the fourth beast's ten horns and the small eleventh horn that rose among them.

Daniel presses for detail

Daniel will not settle for an outline. He asks again, and this time he describes the horn more fully than before.

These visions of the future stir up in the prophet the deepest concern to understand what they mean. His desire is granted... But Daniel longs for still clearer and fuller understanding: "Then I desired to know the truth about the fourth beast... and about the ten horns..." The prophet is not only seeking a fuller explanation of these details. He also gives a fuller account than before of what he had seen in this little horn.

W. Trotter

The answer names what each part of the vision means, and how the last king's rule ends.

The interpretation goes into this special matter. The fourth beast was the fourth kingdom. The ten horns were ten kings that would arise. The little or eleventh horn was another king that would rise afterwards, the mightiest of all. But his kingdom would last only a time, times, and half a time. Then the judgment of God would close it, and the whole power under the heavens would pass to the saints of the Most High.

J. G. Bellett

A small horn that takes over the beast

The horn starts as nothing much. Three of the ten fall before it, and from then on it sets the tone for the whole empire. (Older translations read "more stout than his fellows." The ESV says the horn "seemed greater than its companions.")

Three of the horns (kingdoms) fell before this horn, which, small at the beginning, becomes in appearance bolder than his fellows, and at last rules among the horns. And you will see, as we go on, that this horn takes over all the power of the beast. At the very least it stamps the whole with its character. The horn gets the power. The conduct of this little horn decides the conduct of the beast. And the horn is also the cause of the beast's destruction.

J. N. Darby

Eyes like a man's — a counterfeit of Christ

The horn's strength is not raw force. What marks it out is intelligence, and the picture that results is a twisted copy of Christ.

It has eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things. It is marked by immense intelligence — not by brute force. Compare the description of the Lord, the Lamb that was slain. He has seven horns and seven eyes — that is, the perfection of intelligence and of power. In this case it is not so. The power outwardly looks much greater. It has ten horns instead of seven — a monster instead of perfection. The result is a grotesque exaggeration of the power and wisdom of Christ. Wretched man, energised by Satan, will claim it for himself.

William Kelly

A mouth speaking great things

The second mark is speech, and those words bring the empire down.

This is not simply a power driven into action by its passions. It is not a conqueror who goes about ravaging everywhere. There was something more in the ways of this little horn: extreme arrogance, intelligence, design, planning, and reflection... "A mouth speaking great things" means enormous boasting, and this is what marks this horn in particular. It is because of the words this horn spoke that the beast was destroyed.

J. N. Darby

The same figure in Revelation

Commentators tie this horn to the beast of Revelation, and to its "eighth" head.

The seventh head continues for a short time only. We may understand him as a person of importance and in control when the empire first reappears. Then the "little horn" — Satan's nominee — takes his place. He rises up with a "look... bolder than his fellows," and three kings fall before him, as Daniel 7:20 predicts. But the eighth, despite his dazzling splendour, does not last long. God steps in, and he "goes to destruction."

F. B. Hole

Summary

- Ask. Daniel refuses a general answer. He asks for the truth about the horns, and his own question describes the little horn more fully than before.

- Eyes. Its mark is intelligence and design, not brute force. It is a grotesque copy of the Lamb's seven horns and seven eyes.

- Mouth. Its boasting comes from arrogance, not blind passion. Those very words bring the beast down.

- Takeover. Small at first, it plucks up three kings. Then it stamps the whole empire with its own character.

- End. His splendour is real, but short. God steps in and ends his rule, and the saints receive the power under the whole heavens.

Daniel 7:21

I beheld, and that horn made war with the saints, and prevailed over them;

Daniel asks the angel for more about the fourth beast. The answer widens the picture. This time the prophet sees the horn at war with God's own people — and winning. The verse raises two hard questions — how can the saints be beaten, and how long can it last?

The vision revisited

The prophet has seen this horn before. Here he sees it again, with new detail — this time from the side of those who suffer under it.

Then Daniel asks more closely about the fourth beast. He repeats the vision, but with added details. Now he speaks of the saints. He tells us he saw that the one pictured by the little horn persecuted the saints, and for a limited time was allowed to prevail against them. This triumph over the saints lasted "until the Ancient of Days came." Then the saints judged those who had prevailed against them.

Hamilton Smith

Who the horn is

The chapter gives enough marks to identify him. One writer traces them one by one.

Several details about the little horn of our chapter help us identify him. First, he arises after the ten kings, and he is different from them, though Daniel does not say how. Second, "he shall subdue three kings" — three out of the ten who are on the scene when he arises. Next, he clearly gains the power of the whole empire, for it is "his dominion" that is taken away when the judgment sits. Last, verse 25 says the very same things about him that Revelation 13:5-7 says about the first beast. So the conclusion cannot be escaped: the little horn is none other than the head of the revived Roman empire in Western Europe in the last days.

Edward Dennett

Who the saints are

Which believers are in view here? Not the ones a Christian reader might first assume.

The "saints" here are not the saints who belong to the Church — not the Christians of today. We will all be taken out of the scene before this scripture can be fulfilled; we will be with Jesus, in glory. But in that day God will have saints on earth. The Spirit of God will work again among the Jews, and it is against them that this horn aims all its hatred and energy.

W. T. P. Wolston

Prevailed against — but never handed over

What does God allow into this ruler's hand? Not His people.

The horn thinks to change times and laws, and so interferes with God's rights among His ancient people. Scripture says it is these "times and laws" that are given into his hand, for God's anger against Israel was not yet at an end. The mistake is common that "the saints" are given into the hands of this wicked prince. Daniel says he makes war with the saints (verse 21) and prevails against them. But this is a very different thing. God permits tribulation and persecution; but He never gives His own into the enemy's hand. His sheep are in His own hand; and He never leaves — no, never forsakes them, even if He allows their death in a terrible form.

The Bible Treasury

Until the Ancient of Days

The prophet is not simply told that God will judge human pride. He is given a limit.

The little horn not only makes war with the saints, but prevails against them up to a certain time — that is, until the coming of the Ancient of Days. This is more definite than the truth that God will judge man's audacity. We are no longer looking at public history and general principles, but at explanations for the saints, given through the prophet. The coming of the Ancient of Days is what ends the little horn's power over the saints.

J. N. Darby

From the defeated to the throne

The next verse turns the picture around. What should a share in Christ's rule do to the way believers live now?

The saints share in Christ's rule, and in His judgment too. "Judgment was given to the saints of the Most High (or high places), and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom" (Dan. 7:22). What a privilege and dignity for us who believe in His name! Yet how ready we are to forget it, and to sink to a merely human level! The Corinthians are painful proofs of this. They forgot the great truth that the saints are to reign with Christ one day, and so they accepted ease and honour in the present world.

W. W. Fereday

Summary

- War. The little horn is the last head of the revived Roman empire. Four marks identify him: he rises after the ten kings, subdues three, gains the whole empire's power, and matches the beast of Revelation 13.

- Prevail. He is allowed real success against God's people — not a token setback, but genuine defeat for a season.

- Limit. The times and laws are given into his hand; the saints are not. God permits persecution, but never hands His own over to the enemy.

- Until. His success runs only to a set point. The coming of the Ancient of Days ends his power over the saints.

- Reign. Judgment is given to the saints, and the kingdom becomes theirs. That certainty should keep believers from settling for ease and honour now.

Daniel 7:22

until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most high [places]; and the appointed time arrived, and the saints possessed the kingdom.

The chapter's fourth beast has a small horn that speaks great things and wages war on God's people — and wins. Verse 22 is where that war stops. It raises three questions: what ends it, who receives the judgment, and which "saints" are meant.

A note on wording: the writers below use older translations. Those read "judgment was given to the saints of the Most High." Their argument turns on that word "to." The ESV has "judgment was given for the saints of the Most High."

The horn's success has a deadline

The word "until" is the most important word in the verse. It sets a boundary on a persecution that, from inside it, looks unstoppable.

The little horn not only makes war with the saints, but prevails against them up to a certain time — that is, until the coming of the Ancient of Days. Here we get something more definite than that God will judge the boldness of man. We are no longer occupied with public history and general principles, but with explanations for the saints in the person of the prophet. It is the coming of the Ancient of Days that puts an end to the power of the little horn over the saints.

J. N. Darby

The same writer names what does not end it.

If God permits the beast to overcome the saints, that lasts only until Christ, the Ancient of Days, comes. It lasts until judgment is given to the saints of the Most High, and until they get the kingdom. What puts an end to the authority of the beast is the coming of the Ancient of Days, and not the preaching of the gospel.

J. N. Darby

The One who comes

In this verse the Ancient of Days is the one who comes. One writer takes that as a clue to who He is.

He prevails until the Ancient of Days came. Here we see that the Son of Man is the Ancient of Days, because we know that the Son of Man comes. Then a total change takes place: judgment is given to the saints of the high places, and the time has come that the saints possess the kingdom.

J. N. Darby

Three events, not one

The verse is often read as a single moment, but the writers separate its parts and count them.

In chapter 7 he is seen as a little horn... and in the same chapter we also have the period fixed for the end of the persecution of the saints, "until the Ancient of Days came" (v. 22), as distinct from the time when He sat upon the throne (v. 9)... In fact three things are marked: the coming of the Ancient of Days; the judgment given to the saints of the high places; and the time when the saints shall take the kingdom.

J. N. Darby

Two companies of saints

The verse uses two descriptions. It says "the saints of the Most High," which several writers render "the saints of the high places." Then it says only "the saints." The writers treat that change as deliberate.

So in verse 22, when the kingdom is mentioned, it is not said "the saints of the high places," but simply "the saints possessed the kingdom"... Judgment is given to the heavenly saints, and the kingdom is given to the saints. The first of these two events belongs to the heavenly saints alone. The second is wider. The saints on earth share in it according to their condition, and this does not exclude the saints in heaven according to their condition.

J. N. Darby

Views differ on who these saints are. One writer warns against reading the church into a book that is not about it, though he grants the church a share in the glory.

It has been common to suppose that the Church is here referred to; and there can be no doubt that the Church will possess the glory this passage speaks of. But the Church is not the subject of Daniel's prophecy... and there is no need to limit the title of heavenly saints, or saints of the high places, to the Church.

W. Trotter

Another writer identifies the persecuted saints as an earthly people in a day still to come.

The "saints" here are not the saints who belong to the Church, not the Christians of the present moment. In that day God will have some earthly saints. The Spirit of God will work again among the Jews. It is against them that all the hatred and energy of this horn is directed.

W. T. P. Wolston

Judged — or judging

The most striking word is "given." What the saints receive is not a verdict against them but a seat.

How remarkable is the language of Scripture! We all thought that by and by we were going to be judged; but even the book of Daniel says that, far from the saints being judged, they are going to be the judges.

W. T. P. Wolston

One writer makes this a test of how believers treat each other now.

They ought really to have known that "the saints will judge the world." This fact had been stated in the Old Testament... Had they really known it, they would not have dragged one another into pagan law courts. If we really knew it, we would perhaps avoid certain things that we do.

F. B. Hole

Summary

- Until — the horn wins, but only up to a date God has fixed; "until" is the whole comfort of the verse.

- Coming — preaching the gospel does not end the persecution. The Ancient of Days ends it by coming, and the Son of Man who comes is Him.

- Given — the saints are handed judgment; no one passes judgment on them. Those the horn overpowered become the judges.

- Two companies — judgment belongs to the heavenly saints. The kingdom reaches wider, and writers differ over who these saints are.

- Therefore — people who will judge the world should not run to the world to settle their quarrels. What you know about the future should shape how you live now.

Daniel 7:23

He said thus The fourth beast shall be a fourth kingdom upon the earth, which shall be different from all the kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.

Daniel asked what the fourth beast meant, and the angel answers plainly: it stands for a kingdom. Two questions remain — which empire is meant, and whether its devouring lies behind us or still ahead.

The angel's plain interpretation

The angel does not leave the symbol open. He names a kingdom, then describes how it governs, how far it reaches, and what it does to those who resist.

The angel explains the vision of the fourth beast. We are told plainly that it represents "a fourth kingdom on earth." This we know was the Roman Empire. It was "different from all the kingdoms" because it took a form of government that combined rule by one man with rule by the people. The iron and clay of the image had pictured this beforehand. Its rule was almost universal, so it could well be said to "devour the whole earth." By treading down and breaking in pieces, it subdued the nations, and crushed those who refused to submit. So we have a picture of the Roman Empire in the day of its first power.

Hamilton Smith

Why a kingdom is shown as a beast

Why picture a government as a wild animal? Daniel's own book answers, and the rule in view is Gentile rule — the rule of the nations outside Israel.

We need not travel beyond Daniel's book to learn that Gentile rule is simply bestial in God's sight. The same powers that were shown to Nebuchadnezzar as metals in Dan. 2 were shown to Daniel as wild beasts in Dan. 7. Rev. 13, 17, referring clearly to the time of the end, confirm this. Scripture speaks of the last great united monarchy of Christendom as a beast out of the sea, and out of the abyss. The symbol means that Gentile power, and especially in its last phase, is completely without conscience and without God.

W. W. Fereday

"Different from all the kingdoms"

The difference is not only in ferocity. Two details mark it out: what this empire is made of, and how many rulers it ends with.

Nothing but the Roman Empire matches the feet of iron and clay. Nothing else offers a parallel to the ten toes in one picture and the ten horns in the other. Their only true meaning is ten kings reigning together. No other power that ever held sway can be so truly compared to iron that "breaks to pieces and shatters all things," or to a ravenous beast of no known kind with great iron teeth that "devoured and broke in pieces and stamped what was left with its feet." Then the Germanic clay entered. It shows the brittleness of independent will, in contrast with the old Roman way of holding together around one centre. That self-will broke up the empire in the past, and it will come to a head in the tenfold division of the future, in that revival of the empire which Daniel 7 assumes before judgment falls, and which Revelation 17 reveals plainly.

William Kelly

Fulfilled, yet not finished

Verse 23 describes something history records. The verse after it forces a decision about time.

Next we are told that "the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise" (v. 24). This is the crucial point in the interpretation. Verse 23 refers without doubt to the past. So the question arises: are these ten kings past or future? Some argue for what many call the historical interpretation, and hold that the prophecy has already been fulfilled. There is a fatal objection to this theory. Once this fourth kingdom is judged, the kingdom of the Son of man at once succeeds it and takes its place (vv. 13, 14, 26, 27; compare also Dan. 2:43-44). What event in the past, we may well ask, could answer, even in the smallest degree, to what those Scriptures speak of?

Edward Dennett

The language reaches forward

Commentators differ over how much of this verse is history and how much is still coming. One writer reads its trampling and breaking as a scene still to come.

We have watched the Beast treading down the earth and breaking it in pieces (Dan. 7:23) — a display of senseless brute force — and his partner in crime, the Antichrist, morally darkening and deceiving the world.

Walter Scott

Where the devouring ends

The prophecy does not stop at conquest. It follows this empire to its last ruler, and to what heaven does about him.

We have a crowd of detailed predictions of an unmatched kind. There are the many horns in the last empire at its close. There is the bold presumption and restless ambition of its last chief, who from a small beginning ruled the rest. Not content with trampling down the saints, he rose up in blasphemy against God and His rights. That called out summary and final judgment on all, and heaven acted to establish the everlasting kingdom of power and glory.

William Kelly

Summary

- Named — the angel calls the beast a kingdom, and commentators identify it as Rome.

- Bestial — Scripture draws it as a wild animal, because it rules without conscience and without God.

- Different — iron strength mixed with brittle self-will, ending in rule shared by ten kings.

- Unfinished — verse 23 describes what history saw. The ten kings are still ahead, since the Son of Man's kingdom takes over the moment this one is judged.

- Judged — the devouring ends in blasphemy against God, then in judgment. Heaven then sets up the kingdom that lasts.

Daniel 7:24

And as to the ten horns, out of this kingdom shall arise ten kings; and another shall arise after them; and he shall be different from the former, and he shall subdue three kings.

The angel now gives Daniel the plain meaning of what he saw. The ten horns on the fourth beast stand for ten kings. After them an eleventh rises, unlike the rest, who puts down three of them. Does this belong to history, or is it still ahead?

Ten Horns Mean Ten Kings

The angel does not leave the symbol open. Horns stand for kings, and the fourth empire ends divided.

Daniel shows the Roman Empire divided into ten kingdoms — "out of this kingdom ten kings shall arise." After this another little horn comes up, the same as the beast in Revelation. He subdues three kingdoms and wields the whole power of the empire, and God judges that empire because of his blasphemy.

T. B. Baines

Never Yet Seen in History

Writers press a simple historical test against the verse. Rome, as the world has known it, never matched this description.

"It had ten horns," and these are ten kings (verse 24). This was never true in the past. The Roman empire was under one government. It is true that in the last days of its power many of the emperors shared the running of their vast lands with others. But there was never anything like what Daniel saw in his vision. Here we have ten horns — ten kings — and one rising among them to become their leader and head. What does this prove? It proves that this vast power, scattered and broken for so long, still has a history ahead of it. Scripture cannot be broken. Every word of it must come true.

W. W. Fereday

Commentators differ on how far past history already pictured this. Some allow a partial application, while holding that the main fulfilment is still ahead:

The fourth or Roman power is just as clearly divided into ten horns, ruling at the same time, with one small horn at its rise that pulls up three of them by the roots. That horn is as remarkable for its intelligence as for its pride and blasphemous boldness. Here, though, we stand before something that still awaits its fulfilment, even if we admit a partial application to past history. By its lawlessness that horn brings on more than the loss of rule that God allowed to fall on the earlier beasts. It brings direct, distinct, divine judgment when God's kingdom appears in the person of the Son of Man.

William Kelly

Why the Eleventh Is "Different"

The angel says the newcomer is unlike the ten. The difference lies in what he stands for.

He is different from the ten kings because they stand for different kingdoms. This king stands for a special power that rises up among the ten kingdoms, and he gains his territory by subduing three of them. It is "his dominion" that judgment deals with at the end (verse 26). So it seems certain that the little horn, while subduing three of the kings, gains power over the whole empire.

Hamilton Smith

From Three Conquered to Ten United

Subduing three is the start, not the finish. Commentators read the remaining seven as drawn in behind him.

The conclusion is unavoidable: the little horn is none other than the head of the revived Roman empire in Western Europe in the last days. So the little horn rises after the ten kingdoms are formed. He subdues three of them, whether by military strength or by other means. Then the other seven join with the three he has conquered in one vast confederation, and the little horn becomes its imperial head.

Edward Dennett

A Man, Not a System

Some have read the horn as a system rather than a man. The reply points to what the horn does: it speaks, and it conquers.

But the great words of the horn bring down judgment on the beast, and this assures us still more that the horn is a person. A system of government cannot be held responsible; for that you must have a living being. Nor could we think of ten systems of government, an eleventh of which subdued three, as is said of the "horn." But if a real king is meant, nothing is more natural.

Frederick W. Grant

Not to Be Confused With Others

Prophecy shows more than one evil figure. Writers warn against merging them into one.

This person must not be confused either with the Antichrist on the one hand, or with the little horn of Dan. 8:9 on the other. Antichrist is a religious leader more than a political one. His kingly power seems to be limited to the land of Israel, where the people will accept him as the promised Messiah (Dan. 11:36). He will be in league with the Western chief, no doubt, but must not be confused with him. Scripture plainly says that the little horn of Dan. 8 rises out of one of the four divisions of Alexander's empire.

W. W. Fereday

Summary

- Ten — The horns are ten kings arising out of the fourth kingdom, ruling side by side rather than in succession.

- Eleventh — After the ten, another rises who is different from them. He is a living person, not a system. Only a person speaks the great words that bring judgment.

- Three — His climb begins by putting down three kings; that conquest is the doorway, not the destination.

- Whole — Having taken three, he gains the whole empire; at the end judgment falls on his dominion.

- Future — No past form of Rome matched this picture. The verse points ahead to a confederacy still to come, which ends under God's direct judgment.

Daniel 7:25

And he shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most high [places], and think to change seasons and the law; and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and a half time.

Daniel has seen four beasts, and out of the fourth rises a small horn. Here the angel says plainly what that horn will do — against God, against His people, and against their sacred calendar — and how long God will let him do it.

A ruler who defies God

What Daniel hears of him first is not cruelty but blasphemy. One writer traces that back to what the man is inside:

His moral character comes out next, in the words, "And he shall speak great words against the Most High." Like every person who is not born again, his mind is hostile to God. But in his wild contempt for God he goes further: he dares to stand in open defiance.

Edward Dennett

Why he attacks God's people

The same writer links hatred of God to hatred of His people, and shows what God allows through it:

As a result — for whoever hates God must also hate His people — he will "wear out the saints of the high places"… in his bold attempt to wipe the name of God off the face of the earth. So God will let the patience of His people on earth be tested… He allows them to fall at this time into the hands of their enemy for their chastening and purifying. But though their enemy, as Satan's instrument, may sift them, not one single grain of wheat shall fall to the ground.

Edward Dennett

What "times and laws" are

The phrase sounds vague until you ask what a Jewish reader would have heard in it. One writer ties it to the rebuilt temple and its feasts:

This little horn will "think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand." By then the Jewish temple will have been rebuilt, though in unbelief, and with it the rules of the law and the various feasts. These are the "times and laws" this king will think to change — that is, to do away with. Their very existence testifies that God exists, whatever the people who keep them are like. That is unbearable to a man who wants to take God's place for himself.

Edward Dennett

What is handed over — and what is not

Much depends on the small word "they." Two writers read it as the times and laws, not the people:

The saints of the Most High were the people the prophet knew and cared about… This wicked power wears out the saints of the high places, and thinks to change times and laws; and they shall be given into his hand. The saints are not what is given up, for God never hands them over to the enemy. He may let saints be troubled for a while, but He never lets them go. It is the times and laws that are given up for a time.

William Kelly

Another writer measures the trouble and marks off what the enemy can never touch:

The sufferings of God's chosen people during the great tribulation last 1260 days, and Satan could not make it 1261 however much he wanted… "Times and laws" (religious institutions) may be given into his hand, but not God's people.

W. W. Fereday

"Saints of the Most High" — a title about heaven

The word for "Most High" is not the same in both halves of the verse. The one joined to "saints" is plural, and some translations render it "the high places":

Two different words are translated "Most High," one singular and one plural. The plural means "the high (places)."… Here the subject is government only. It is the government belonging by right to the heavens, and to Him who reigns there, that must be owned — in the face of a power that denies it, sets itself up against it, and will own no power but its own on the earth.

J. N. Darby

The measured length of the trouble

Jewish usage explains the odd phrasing of the time limit:

A "time," it is said, was the word the Jews used for the period from one yearly sacrifice or festival to the next. So it came to mean a year of 360 days. "Times" would stand for two years, and the "dividing of time" for half a year. So we have three and a half years in which this little horn gets his way and stops all Jewish worship.

The Bible Treasury

Writers differ on whether the three and a half years also picture a longer stretch of history:

Comparing the different phrases for the same period in Revelation makes it perfectly certain that three and a half years were meant… there is no objection to allowing a longer application in a general way, as long as the crisis itself is not set aside.

William Kelly

How it ends

The horn's career does not fade away. One event ends it:

The persecutions end with the coming of the Ancient of days and judgment given to the saints.

J. N. Darby

Summary

- Words first. The horn's course begins in speech against God — open defiance, not just unbelief.

- Then war. Hatred of God becomes hatred of His people; the saints are worn down, yet not one grain of wheat is lost.

- Then worship. What he abolishes is the "times and laws" — the feasts and ritual whose very existence testifies that God is.

- But not the saints. It is the times and laws that are given into his hand. God never lets His own out of His own hand.

- And not for long. A time, times and half a time is three and a half years. God fixed that limit, and it closes when the Ancient of Days comes and gives the kingdom to the saints.

Daniel 7:26

And the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end.

Daniel has just watched a ruler boast against God and wear down His people for three and a half years. Now a court sits and takes his rule away, which raises three questions: who judges, whose rule falls, and what "consumed and destroyed" means.

The court that sits

The verse opens with a court session, not a battle. One writer describes whose throne this is, and what brings the sentence:

Afterwards the thrones are set, and the Ancient of days sits. It is a session of judgment, the throne of Jehovah's judgment; it is not said where, but its effect is on earth. The words of the little horn are the occasion of the judgment being carried out. The scene of judgment forms part of the vision of the fourth beast, and relates especially to it.

J. N. Darby

Commentators differ here. Another writer denies that the boasting is what makes the court sit:

Nowhere in this chapter, I think, does Daniel tell us that the judgment sits in heaven because this little horn boasts and blasphemes. I grant that the Judge, because of such blasphemy, has the fourth beast slain. He also has the dominion of the little horn itself consumed and destroyed. But that, I believe, is all we learn from either verse 11 or 26.

J. G. Bellett

Whose dominion

The verse says "his dominion," and the pronoun matters. One writer answers who that "his" is, and what the court is responding to:

But the judgment sits to take account of all this pride. The dominion of the little horn is consumed and destroyed. We may notice here that it is in fact the little horn that in the end wields the supreme power. It is his dominion which is destroyed.

J. N. Darby

Consumed and destroyed — one blow, not a long decline

Some readers hear in the English word "consume" a power fading away over centuries. One writer answers from the original languages:

The idea of "the Consumption" rests on a mistake about the meaning of Scripture and its language. Neither Daniel 7:26 nor 2 Thessalonians 2:8 means a gradual weakening of strength, though our English word "consume" may suggest it. "Destroy" is the true force of the Aramaic and of the Greek.

The Bible Treasury

The phrase "to the end" is then read as measuring completeness rather than duration — the judgment is exhaustive, leaving nothing of the dominion behind:

It means that the effect of the judgment will be thorough, not a slow process, nor repeated acts of vengeance.

William Kelly

Who carries out the sentence

If the end is one blow, someone must strike it. One writer names who does, and when:

This is instant and extreme judgment, carried out by the Lord in person. If anything were needed to confirm it, the plain phrase "the appearance of His coming" does so. So does the important addition of "Jesus," the Lord Jesus.

William Kelly

Why this ending differs from the others

Babylon and Persia lost their empires but lived on as peoples for a while. The fourth power ends another way:

Babylon lost its dominion and yet lasted for some time, and Persia did the same. But the destruction of the fourth beast will be complete. The others were granted longer life after their empire fell. Here the judgment and the destruction go together.

J. N. Darby

Where it sits in the timetable

The verse before gives the horn a set period. One writer places it in Daniel's own timetable and says what follows it:

The horn speaks great words against the Most High, wears out the saints of the Most High, and thinks to change times and laws. These are given into its hands for a time, times, and half a time — that is, for the last half week of Daniel's seventy weeks, just before the Lord comes and the judgment falls.

Frederick W. Grant

Summary

- Court — A court sits before anything falls. Thrones are set, the Ancient of Days takes His seat, and the effect lands on earth.

- Cause — The charge is pride. The court takes account of the horn's boasting and of the saints he has worn out.

- Confiscation — The dominion removed is the little horn's own. He is the one who ends up holding supreme power, so the sentence falls on him.

- Completeness — "Consumed and destroyed to the end" is not slow decay. The force of the original word is destroy. Earlier empires lost their rule and lived on; this one loses both at once.

- Christ — The Lord Himself carries out the sentence when He appears, at the close of the last half-week. So the pressure on His people has a fixed end, not an endless one.

Daniel 7:27

But the kingdom and the dominion, and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heavens, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most high [places]. His kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.

Daniel's night vision does not end with the terror of the fourth beast. It ends with a handover of power that lasts for ever. Three questions follow: who are "the saints of the Most High"? Who are "the people" of those saints? And who is the "Him" that all dominions obey?

What Comes After the Beast

This verse answers the judgment of the verses before it. The little horn's rule ends, and something takes its place on the same stage — the earth.

Judgment has been passed on the little horn. His dominion has been taken away, consumed and destroyed to the end. Then "the kingdom and the dominion and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High." This is the kingdom of the Son of Man. It is set up on earth after the judgment and removal of the last of the four world empires.

Edward Dennett

Whose Kingdom

The verse gives the kingdom to a people, then calls it His kingdom. Edward Dennett reads the closing words as pointing back to Christ: the gift never stands apart from the Giver. He quotes an older translation here, which reads "whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom" where the ESV has "his kingdom."

In verse 27, though, it is "the people of the saints of the high places" who come into prominence. They are the ones the kingdom is given to. Yet it is not apart from Christ. At the end of the verse it says, "Whose" (that is, Christ's) "kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey Him." It is His kingdom. He is simply pleased in His grace to join "the people of the saints of the high places" with Himself.

Edward Dennett

Saints of the "High Places"

The title "saints of the Most High" carries a margin reading: saints of the "high ones," or high places. William Kelly links that wording to a New Testament phrase, and then names who will share the reign.

The margin says, the saints of the "high ones." That is where the New Testament expression "heavenly places" comes from. … When dominion is given to Him, He will not take it alone. All who have ever waited for this kingdom, in every age, will come with Him. That will be the time when He shows His risen ones. Abraham, Enoch, David — whoever they may be who have known Him by faith — will be there in changed and glorified bodies, and will reign with Him.

William Kelly

"The People of the Saints"

Verse 27 does not repeat the wording of verse 18. It adds two words — the people. Commentators read that addition as deliberate. It marks off a second company with a different portion.

"The people of the saints" must be kept distinct from "the saints" themselves. The Jewish people are meant. "The greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven" is destined for them. But they are not said to reign, and they have nothing to do with the heavenly side of the kingdom.

W. W. Fereday

Writers divide the reigning saints into classes in different ways. They agree on where this earthly people stands:

God calls Israel back to the land for blessing. Israel is the people of these heavenly saints, and theirs will be the highest place on earth in the Millennial age. Jerusalem will yet be the earth's chief city, after the great cities of the nations have been judged.

An Outline of Sound Words

All Dominions Serve and Obey

The last clause widens the view from one nation to every power on earth. Hamilton Smith traces the line: the kingdoms pass under one people, and through that people the nations come to worship.

After the judgment of the beast and his kingdom, all the kingdoms of the earth will pass under the rule of the people of the saints of the Most High — God's earthly people, the Jews. Then, through the people of God, all the peoples of the earth will be brought to serve and worship Him, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom.

Hamilton Smith

A Kingdom With No Successor

Four empires rose and fell in this chapter. What replaces them ends the sequence — no fifth beast follows.

Just as the heir to a kingdom is taught and prepared for the throne he is to occupy, so God is educating His saints now to share the kingdom of the world which is to belong to Christ.

William Kelly

Summary

- Given, not seized. The kingdom comes as a gift, after the beast's rule is destroyed. It is the kingdom of the Son of Man, set up on earth.

- Given to saints. In the margin, "saints of the Most High" reads saints of the high places. Christ will not take dominion alone. He shows His risen ones, and they reign with Him.

- Given through a people. "The people of the saints" is a second company: the Jewish people. Theirs is the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven, and the highest place on earth.

- Given for all. Through that people, all the peoples of the earth come to serve and worship Him. The reach is every dominion, not one nation.

- Given for ever. It is still His kingdom. The saints hold it because He joins them to Himself in grace. No earthly power comes after it.