Belshazzar the king made a great feast to a thousand of his nobles, and drank wine before the thousand.
This verse opens the last night of the Babylonian empire — not with the army outside the walls, but with the party inside them. Why does Scripture record this feast, and what turned it into a funeral?
The verse sets the scene for everything that follows. One writer sees in it a worse fault than anything in Nebuchadnezzar's reign.
Coming now to our chapter, we see a still worse moral feature of Gentile rule. Idolatry and pride of power — empty boasting — had marked Nebuchadnezzar. Belshazzar is known for something else: the public insolence of daring impiety, breaking out in open wickedness and profanity. The occasion for this outburst of sin is described in the first verse. It was a night of feasting, wild partying, and no restraint. Every evil passion of man's corrupt heart was stirred up and fed.
He is called "the king," yet the top reward he offers is only third place in the kingdom.
Why the third ruler? Because Belshazzar was the second ruler. His father was in fact the king. But his father was not in Babylon at that moment, and Belshazzar shared the throne with him.
The confidence behind the feast came from the city that hosted it.
It must have been a marvellous assembly. The banquet took place in one of the many palaces that adorned the city regarded as the mistress of the earth. Babylon stood on a broad plain, and was exactly square. Its walls ran fifteen miles in each direction. They were 300 feet high and 75 feet broad, with a hundred bronze gates set in them... The king and the people thought no power could touch them, in heaven or on earth. But they were wrong. They had forgotten God. One hundred and fifty years before, He had said through one servant, "Fallen, fallen is Babylon" (Isa. 21:9).
Commentators note that history and Scripture explain the night from two angles. One records an unguarded moment an army could exploit; the other records what the king did with it.
History may tell us that it was a yearly festival, when loose living ran unchecked. That gave the attacking army a good chance to seize an unguarded moment and put its long preparations to use. Scripture shows us the king wrapped in the false security that comes before destruction. He used the occasion to insult the God of Israel. Rash, blinded man! It was the eve of his ruined dynasty, and of his death.
The verse ends with the king drinking, and the next verse begins with his sacrilege. The link between the two is not accidental.
At this feast impiety broke out, apparently let loose by the effect of drink on the king. It was "when he tasted the wine" that he gave the command to bring the golden vessels of the temple of God into the feast. Up to a point a man can control the evil passions of his heart. But when some evil influence makes him lose control of himself, all the wickedness of his heart comes out.
The warning reaches past kings to anyone who drinks:
Wine has led many a man to ruin... Once the soul comes under the influence of strong drink, there is no depravity it will not sink to. Its victims worship it, while it damns them.
One writer reads chapters three to six as one sequence, each with its own sin.
In chapter 3 you have Nebuchadnezzar setting up the idol; in the fourth he exalts himself, but God brings him low. The fifth chapter is the scene of Belshazzar's impiety and sacrilege in bringing in the vessels of the Lord and drinking out of them — a most daring insult to God. What is the result? Belshazzar is judged... The third chapter gives us idolatry; the fourth, self-exaltation; the fifth, impiety; and the sixth, apostasy.
One writer reads the feast as more than a story from the past:
The fact of Belshazzar's feast, with its splendour and sudden doom, stands as history and as warning. But how few believe it is a picture of what is still to come? In the day of the Lord the same sudden judgment will overtake the boasting and splendour of this world of pleasure and greatness.
- Governing — Belshazzar is called king, yet he shared the throne with his father; the most he could offer was third place in the kingdom.
- Guarded — fifteen-mile walls and bronze gates made Babylon feel untouchable. God had announced its fall 150 years earlier.
- Loosened — the wine did not create the evil in Belshazzar's heart. It only removed the restraint that hid it.
- Graded — idolatry, then self-exaltation, then impiety, then apostasy. Chapter five is the step where insult to God goes public.
- Gone — the feast was the eve of his death. Scripture keeps it as a picture of splendour struck down without warning.
Belshazzar, while he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels that Nebuchadnezzar his father had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that the king and his nobles, his wives and his concubines, might drink in them.
Belshazzar's feast is already loud with wine when the king turns a royal party into an act of defiance. He calls for the gold and silver cups Nebuchadnezzar had taken from the temple in Jerusalem, and two questions follow: why the wine matters, and why God still counts those cups as His.
The command comes while the king tastes the wine. One writer sees the drink releasing what was already in the man.
An outburst of impiety marked this feast, apparently let loose by the drink's effect on the king. It was "when he tasted the wine" that he commanded the golden vessels of God's temple to be brought into the feast. Up to a point a man can control the evil passions of his heart. But when some evil influence makes him lose control of himself, all the wickedness of his heart comes out.
Another writer asks what really made the king drunk.
Was he intoxicated? With the pride of wicked presumption, certainly — and the wine he drank inflamed it. Giving in to wine, and to the joy this earth offers, is bound to feed the heart's worst desires.
God had let these cups go to Babylon with His captive people. That did not hand over ownership.
The holy vessels were holy still in God's eyes, however polluted they had been by the sins of His kings and priests. They had been used in the house where He had put His name for ever, the house where His eyes and His heart would always be (1 Kings 9:3). True, in judgment He had let them share the captivity of His people. But He could not let the Gentile king and his immoral companions defile them. That would not fit with all that He was and all that He purposed.
The sin was misuse: holy things put to a use they were never meant for.
He and his lords drank out of those holy vessels to their gods of gold and silver and wood and iron, desecrating the vessels of Jehovah. He was putting them to an improper and unholy use; they were sanctified; they belonged to Jehovah.
Displaying the captured cups at the feast made a claim about whose God had won.
Belshazzar had thrown down a challenge before the eye of God. Bringing the golden vessels from the temple, the house of God, into that feast was the same as saying to Jehovah: "My gods are better than you. My gods helped the men who took your golden vessels and brought them here." That is what he meant.
Belshazzar was not Nebuchadnezzar's son in the ordinary sense. Two writers handle this differently. One is careful about the exact family link:
It seems beyond question that Belshazzar could not have been his son. It is possible that he might have been his grandson, though this is not certain. The term "father," therefore, as is often the case in Scripture, is used in the sense of ancestor, or forefather.
Another points to the monuments, which also explain why Belshazzar later offers Daniel third place, not second.
The monuments have revealed that he was the son of Nabonadius, or Labynetus, and was reigning with his father. Nabonadius was defending the kingdom outside in the open country. He was defeated, but not killed. His son was under siege inside the city, and was killed that night while holding a festival to the gods. This explains why Belshazzar promised Daniel the third place of rule in the kingdom.
A concubine was a wife of lower rank. Their presence at the table is noted as evidence of a practice that ran well beyond Israel.
Esther 2:14 and Daniel 5:2 show that concubinage was a custom also among the heathen. Christianity does not allow such evil. It recognises marriage as established by God, and so the sanctity of the marriage tie in those whom God joins together.
One writer sets this act in a sequence of three steps in Babylon's abuse of power.
The abuse of power in Babylon has three distinct characters, seen in three successive steps of evil: idolatry, profaneness, and self-exalting apostasy. First, there was idolatry in Nebuchadnezzar setting up the statue of gold on the plains of Dura. Second, profaneness in Belshazzar, who brings out the vessels of God's captive temple. Third, apostasy in Darius, who set himself up to be God.
- Trigger. The wine did not create the impiety; it removed the self-control that had been hiding it.
- Ownership. Captivity never cancelled God's claim. The vessels stayed "holy still in God's eyes," so drinking from them misused what belonged to Him.
- Defiance. Parading the captured cups said in public that Babylon's gods had beaten Israel's God. Belshazzar died that same night.
- History. "Father" here means forefather. The monuments name Belshazzar as the son of Nabonadius, ruling beside him — which explains the offer of third place, not second.
- Pattern. Idolatry, then profaneness, then apostasy — Babylon's power ran downhill in three steps, and this verse is the middle one.
Then they brought the golden vessels that were taken out of the temple of the house of God which was at Jerusalem; and the king and his nobles, his wives and his concubines, drank in them.
Belshazzar gave the order in the verse before. Here his servants obey it. They carry the cups from God's house in Jerusalem into a royal drinking party. Two questions follow. Why did God record a party at all? And what made these cups so dangerous to touch?
The verse names the company at the table. Still, the drinking is not why this feast reached the Bible.
Wine and earthly pleasure feed the heart's worst desires, and the company around the king shows that this night was no exception. Yet if this had been only an ordinary party, however wild, no inspired pen would have recorded it. The crowning sin of it was the direct insult which Belshazzar offered to the God of Israel, the God of heaven. The holy vessels were holy still in God's eyes. The sins of His kings and priests had polluted them, yet they had been used in the house where He had put His name for ever, and where His eyes and His heart should be always (1 Kings 9:3). True, in judgment He had let them share in the captivity of His people. But He could not let the Gentile king and his immoral companions defile them. That would not fit with all that He was and all that He purposed.
These cups had a purpose. The king put them to the opposite use.
Until now people had treated the vessels of God's house with some fear and honour. Now the king profanes them and makes them serve his lusts. God had appointed them to bear witness that His priestly nation was set apart, and to mark His own worship among His people. The king turns them into toys for his amusement.
Bringing the cups out sent a message, and the message was for God.
Belshazzar had thrown down a challenge before the eye of God. He brought into that feast the golden vessels taken from "the temple, the house of God." It was the same as saying to Jehovah: "My gods are better than you. My gods helped the men who took your golden vessels, and brought them here." That is what he meant. Nebuchadnezzar had carried these golden vessels from the house of the Lord. Now they stood on show as trophies of the Babylonian victory over Jehovah's people, and so over Jehovah.
But how did Babylon get hold of those cups in the first place?
But who was the king of Babylon? Nebuchadnezzar was only the whip that the Lord had chosen and used to discipline His guilty, law-breaking people Israel. … God raised up Nebuchadnezzar for that purpose. He was the head of gold in the great statue you read of in the second chapter of this book of Daniel. God used him to punish His chosen people on earth, who had turned away from Him.
Compare the two reigns and you see a family sliding downhill, not climbing.
It shows the great moral decline in the great Babylonian empire. Nebuchadnezzar had surely handled the golden vessels of the house of the Lord with great care. He stored them away, afraid to misuse them. His grandson sent for these vessels to drink wine from them with his prostitutes and to praise his idols.
The safest-feeling hour of the reign was in fact its final one.
Scripture shows us the king wrapped in a false sense of safety. Such safety comes just before destruction. He used the occasion to insult the God of Israel. Rash, blinded man! It was the eve of his ruined royal line, and of his death.
The scene is old. The same sin can repeat itself in the Christian world, where no wine cup is in sight.
Paganism once held the ground. What has taken its place in Christendom carries something like the contempt for God that Belshazzar showed. There the great and serious sin is using the revealed word of God to gain and enjoy the world's pleasures and honours. That is doing in a spiritual way what Belshazzar and his court did in a physical and vulgar way. … The Babylon of old was taken and destroyed all at once, in the middle of the revelry. In the same way the mystic Babylon will be thrown like a great millstone into the sea.
- Holy. The cups belonged to God's house. Captivity never changed that. They were holy still in His eyes.
- Handled. Cups that once marked His worship became toys at a king's party.
- Hollow. The trophies proved nothing. Nebuchadnezzar was only the whip God used to discipline His own people.
- Hardened. The grandfather stored the vessels away in fear. The grandson drank from them. The family's story is decline, not progress.
- Hour. A false sense of safety filled that hall. The feast proved to be the eve of his death.
They drank wine, and praised the gods of gold and of silver, of brass, of iron, of wood, and of stone.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
In the same hour came forth fingers of a man's hand, and wrote over against the candlestick upon the plaster of the wall of the king's palace and the king saw the part of the hand that wrote.
Belshazzar's feast is still going, and the vessels taken from God's temple are in his guests' hands. Then God answers without a word, and the scene leaves two questions: why only fingers, and why the king cannot read his own language.
The writing answers the king's insult. God does not let it pass, and He does not wait.
Such contempt for God must bring down His judgment. At once God takes up the challenge. Quietly, without voice or vision, God makes His presence unmistakably felt. The fingers of a man's hand silently write the sentence of judgment on the wall of the king's palace. Despite the king's drunken state, his conscience is struck at once.
God uses the least He could use. It is enough to break the king and stun his lords.
So it was in that great festive hall in Babylon, and the result is one of the most dramatic scenes on record. No legion of angels appeared, and there was no visible display of divine power. Just the fingers of what looked like a man's hand appeared. They wrote four words on the plaster of the wall, right opposite the lampstand, where they were most visible. The proud king was reduced to a shivering mortal, and his lords were astonished.
The verse says the king saw the hand. It does not say he read the words — and commentators note that the letters were in his own language.
The king saw the part of the hand. His conscience, though hardened by depravity, was reached for the moment. The writing on the plaster was perfectly plain, since it stood there in Chaldean characters. Yet the king still did not understand its meaning. He was blinded by the god of this world, whose complete slave he was — as is every man until God gives light to his heart. So writing in his own language gave him no definite sense of what was meant, though he trembled before the hand that wrote his doom.
The prophets had announced Babylon's fall long before this night. Even so, judgment came with a sign first.
But the sentence of instant, unavoidable judgment made itself heard at once. For the cup of wickedness was full. The mouth of the Lord had long proclaimed the punishment of Babylon's king (Isaiah 13; Jeremiah 25, etc.). Yet even then the stroke does not fall without a solemn sign from God.
This is not the only place where God writes with His own hand. The Bible records three times, and each one wrote something different.
It is interesting to notice the three occasions on which the finger of God wrote. The law on tablets of stone. The judgment of the ungodly Belshazzar and of Babylon on the plaster of the wall — Daniel 5:5. The grace of God written in the dust by our Lord — John 8:6.
The material matters too. And the scene points on to a later judgment.
But now in Daniel we again have "the finger of God." We find it to be the finger of doom, written on plaster that easily crumbles. God made His presence known by showing the tips of His fingers, and it scared the life out of Belshazzar. The final hour of judgment will come. Then "the dead, great and small," will be "standing before the throne" (Revelation 20:12). What will their feelings be? We are reminded of that word, "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God" (Hebrews 10:31).
Belshazzar is not the last to face this. The same sentence hangs over a later Babylon.
This chapter reveals the blasphemous character of the end of the Babylonian monarchy. Blasphemy and rejection of God's truth are all around us on every side. There is a "Mene, Mene, Tekel" for apostate Christendom. There is one for that final form of Babylon too, revealed in Revelation 17 and 18.
- Challenge. Belshazzar insulted God with the temple vessels. God answered in the same hour — quietly, without voice or vision.
- Hand. God sent no angel army. Only part of a hand appeared, opposite the lampstand where the light made it most visible.
- Blindness. The king saw the hand and shook. Yet he could not read words in his own language — sight without understanding.
- Warning. The prophets had long foretold Babylon's doom. Even so, the stroke did not fall without a solemn sign first.
- Finger. The finger that wrote the law on stone and grace in the dust wrote doom here on crumbling plaster. It will write again for the final Babylon.
Then the king's countenance was changed, and his thoughts troubled him, and the joints of his loins were loosed, and his knees smote one against another.
Belshazzar had turned a royal feast into an open insult to the God of heaven. Then fingers appeared on the wall, and the king who had defied Him shook from head to foot before he could read a word.
The king had insulted God on purpose. The reply came without thunder.
Such contempt for God must bring down His judgment. God takes up the challenge at once. He uses no voice and no vision, yet He makes His presence felt beyond all doubt. The fingers of a man's hand write the sentence of judgment on the wall of the king's palace, and they write in silence. The king is drunk, yet conscience strikes him at once. His face shows his terror. His thoughts trouble him, and he trembles from head to foot.
Another writer looks at what actually appeared on the wall, and at the warning it carries.
No army of angels appeared. There was no visible display of divine power. Only the fingers of a man's hand could be seen, writing four words on the plaster of the wall, right opposite the lampstand, where they showed up best. The proud king became a shivering man, and his lords stood astonished... In Daniel the finger of God is the finger of doom, written on plaster that crumbles easily. When the final hour of judgment comes and the dead, great and small, stand before God, what will they feel? We are reminded of that word: "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God" (Hebrews 10:31).
Belshazzar could not read a single word on that wall. He still knew who was behind it.
This was no dream in the night. It was a silent warning of terrible meaning, in the middle of their wild partying and their defiance of the living God... The king needed no one to explain it. His conscience, eaten away by evil, trembled before the hand that wrote his doom. He did not know a word of what was written. Deep down he felt that the One whose hands no one can stop was dealing with him.
Even a man like Belshazzar carried knowledge he could not escape.
But even he — wicked as he was — had a conscience. He knew about the power that had driven Nebuchadnezzar from his throne and made him live like an animal for a time... What a change! In the middle of his banquet he had dared to insult the God of heaven. Now, at the sight of this mysterious hand, fear and dread took hold of his soul, and he trembled from head to foot. He had braced himself to challenge the almighty God. The moment God took up that challenge, his heart failed — before the blow had even fallen — in dread of the judgment coming.
The collapse of Belshazzar's limbs was not only personal panic. Writers link it to words spoken about Babylon's fall long before Belshazzar was born, in Isaiah 45 — a passage addressed to Cyrus, the Persian ruler God named in advance. Note that the older translation used here reads "the joints of his loins were loosed, and his knees smote one against another," which the ESV renders "his limbs gave way, and his knees knocked together."
In the opening verses of Isaiah 45, the prophet speaks to Cyrus on God's behalf, though Cyrus had not yet been born... The details given in verses 1-3 came true exactly, as the book of Daniel records. As we read those verses, we see Belshazzar, and "his limbs gave way, and his knees knocked together" (Daniel 5:6). We see the great gates of Babylon opened and broken. Then the fall of the great city puts Babylon's hidden treasures into the hands of Cyrus.
The same trembling can end in two very different places. One writer sets Babylon beside Nineveh, another city that heard a prophet's warning.
One invisible power wrote those solemn words on the wall of Belshazzar's banqueting hall — "Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin" — and made his knees knock together. That same power used the words of the prophet to move the heart of the king of Nineveh and to enter his conscience. The king of Nineveh and his lords trembled, just as Belshazzar and his great men had trembled at Babylon. But their fear, unlike the fear of Belshazzar and his great men, led to a repentance they would never regret.
One writer reads the scene as a picture of God coming into a life built on pleasure.
The party is at its height. Everything is bright and cheerful, the laughter is loud, and the contempt for God is at its worst. Then, all of a sudden, God steps in. Everyone knows how completely worldly things collapse when God comes in. Bring the Lord into a worldly scene, and what happens? He spoils it. That is a solemn thought! This is what sin does, and it is conscience answering as if God were an intruder.
- Challenge. Belshazzar insulted the God of heaven. God took up the challenge at once, with no voice and no vision — only fingers writing on crumbling plaster.
- Conscience. He could not read one word of the writing. His conscience still trembled, and deep down he knew who was dealing with him.
- Collapse. The proud king had a hall full of lords behind him. One hand appeared, and he became a shivering man before the blow had even fallen.
- Confirmation. God had announced Babylon's fall through Isaiah long before it came. The shaking king, the broken gates and the treasures passing to Cyrus all matched it.
- Contrast. Nineveh's king trembled too, and his fear ended in repentance. Belshazzar's ended in nothing. Fear alone saves nobody.
The king cried aloud to bring in the magicians, the Chaldeans, and the astrologers. The king spoke and said to the wise men of Babylon, Whosoever shall read this writing, and shew me the interpretation thereof, shall be clothed with purple, and have a chain of gold about his neck, and shall be the third ruler in the kingdom.
Belshazzar has just seen a hand write on the plaster of his palace wall. His first reaction is a shout for the men who read signs for a living. So where does a frightened man turn when God interrupts him? And can the world's best minds read what God has written?
The shout is the sound of a man collapsing. His own conscience reacted before anyone had read him a syllable.
His conscience, eaten away by depravity, trembled before the hand that traced his doom. Yet he did not know a word of what was written. He felt at once that the One whose hand no one can stop was dealing with him... His fright made him forget his dignity, and "the king cried aloud to bring in the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the soothsayers." But it was all useless. The highest rewards are offered, but a spirit of deep sleep closed every eye.
The problem is not the panic but where he sent it. God had written; the king called for everyone except God.
Instead of crying to God for His mercy and pardon, the king "cried aloud to bring in the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the soothsayers." He offered them great rewards if they could interpret the writing of God on the wall. Not one of the world's wise men could read God's writing, but God had His interpreter at hand. Daniel, faithful as always, refused the king's gifts. He rebuked his contempt for the knowledge of God and his profanity. Then he read the words that spoke of God's judgment and explained their meaning to the king. Belshazzar's sin was not ignorance, but deliberate profanity, a challenge to the living God. He paid the penalty for inviting God's anger.
These writers use an older translation. Where the ESV has "enchanters," they say "astrologers." The word behind both is rare, and it names a trade.
In Daniel 1:20; 2:2, 10, 27; 4:7; 5:7, 11, 15 the Hebrew word is ashshaph, meaning "enchanter, magician" — one who practised occult arts. This word occurs nowhere else.
The problem was not the alphabet. The words on the wall were ordinary; the failure lay in the men.
Once more the wise men of Babylon were called in, but only to show their incompetence and ignorance again. We are told that there was nothing unusual about the four words. They were not words from some unknown, barbaric tongue. But on that occasion they were God's words, and so they lay far outside the understanding of these servants of the world and its false gods. Paul states the fact in 1 Corinthians 2:14, and here it is strikingly illustrated. As "natural" men they had no power to understand the things God had written.
Another writer presses the same failure further, and turns it into a test for the reader.
The language of the writing on the wall was no further beyond the astrologers of Babylon than it was beyond Daniel. If anything, it was less so. The words were as familiar to a Chaldean as to a Hebrew. But the wise men of Babylon, the scribes of Belshazzar's court, were not able to interpret them. They were morally incapable... If we test a thing by any test but Christ, we shall misinterpret it.
The reward is oddly specific. He offers third place in the kingdom, not second.
Why the third ruler? Because Belshazzar was the second ruler. His father was the real king. But his father was not in Babylon at that moment, and Belshazzar shared the throne with him.
One writer places that third place beside Joseph's second:
Daniel had the third place and Joseph had the second place, but Christ has the pre-eminence (Dan. 5:7, 16, 29; Gen. 41:39-43).
- Conscience — the writing frightened the king before he understood it. He trembled at a hand whose message he could not read.
- Direction — fear sent him to enchanters instead of to God for mercy. His sin was not ignorance but deliberate defiance of the living God.
- Incapacity — the four words were ordinary. The wise men failed because God's words lie outside the reach of men who serve the world and its false gods.
- Reward — Belshazzar offered purple, a gold chain and third place. He could offer no more, because he himself was only second, sharing the throne with his absent father.
- Pre-eminence — Belshazzar offers Daniel third place, Joseph held second, and the first place belongs to Christ alone.
Then came in all the king's wise men, but they could not read the writing, nor make known to the king the interpretation.
The hand has finished writing, and Belshazzar's first instinct is to send for the experts. Babylon's whole class of trained experts files into the hall — and fails twice over. They cannot even read the four words, let alone explain them.
One writer points out that the words themselves were ordinary. What made them unreadable was whose words they were.
Once more the king called in the wise men of Babylon, and once more they showed nothing but incompetence and ignorance. We are told that there was nothing unusual about the four words. They were not words from some unknown, savage language. But on that occasion they were God's words, so they lay completely outside the understanding of these servants of the world and its false gods. This clearly illustrates what the Apostle Paul says in 1 Corinthians 2:14. As 'natural' men they had no power to understand the things God had written.
The same failure had happened long before, in the days of Pharaoh, king of Egypt. Another writer draws one rule from both scenes:
God will speak in a vision to Pharaoh, by writing on the wall in Belshazzar's day... but, as in past days, so now, the wise men of this world get it completely wrong when they try to interpret the Word of God... People's natural pride in their own intellect blinds them to a simple fact: only God can interpret what God says.
Writers differ on what exactly stopped them. One suggestion is that the script itself was foreign:
Writers have suggested several reasons why the wise men could not read the writing. The letters may have been the ancient Hebrew characters. Daniel knew that script, but they would not.
Another writer says the language was no problem at all:
The writing was in the Chaldean language, so it was not that the king's wise men did not understand the words. What they could not unfold was the connection, the application, and the meaning. They had no clue to it, so the words seemed to them disconnected and meaningless.
Either way, the outcome is the same. Men can stare straight at what God has said and take nothing from it.
The king's highest rewards bought him silence. One writer contrasts Belshazzar with his experts. His conscience reacted, though he could not read a word:
His conscience, eaten away by evil, trembled before the hand that wrote out his doom, though he did not know a word of what was written. He felt at once that the One whose hands no one can stop was dealing with him... In his fright he forgot his dignity and cried aloud for the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the soothsayers. But it was all useless. He offers the highest rewards, but a spirit of deep sleep closed every eye.
The king is shaken, and fear can look like a good sign. One writer warns that it often is not:
The effect on this godless man was enormous. We rejoice when sinners are impressed, stirred, troubled, and troubled more deeply still. But the devil is always eager to remove these impressions... Sometimes what moves people like this is not fear of God but fear of the consequences of sin — the fear that comes on a deathbed — pure fear of hell and damnation.
The most telling thing about this verse is who is missing. Every qualified man in Babylon is in the room. The one man who could help is not, and the king does not know he exists.
The fact that Daniel was a stranger to Belshazzar says a great deal. Whatever the pride and daring of the great Nebuchadnezzar, in his day Daniel sat in the king's gate — ruler over the whole province of Babylon, and chief of the governors over all the wise men. His degraded and fallen descendant did not know Daniel at all.
Another writer measures how deep that obscurity went:
One thing is clear. Years had passed, and Daniel had dropped completely out of public notice. His name was so unknown at court that the queen had to give a full account of him and his powers.
- Written — God put His words in plain sight. Nothing about them was strange or hidden.
- Unread — natural men have no power to take in God's words. Writers differ on whether the script or only the meaning stopped them.
- Unbought — the highest rewards in the kingdom could not buy one line of meaning.
- Unchanged — the king trembled but did not repent. Fear of consequences is not fear of God.
- Unknown — the one man who could read it had dropped out of sight. The court that needed him did not know his name.
Then was king Belshazzar greatly troubled, and his countenance was changed in him, and his nobles were confounded.
The feast has stopped, the writing stands on the wall, and every expert in Babylon has just failed to read it. His fear now grows worse, not better, and for the first time his guests share it.
Belshazzar's alarm did not begin here. It started when he saw the writing, and it rose higher when the men he summoned had nothing to say.
The king's eye was fixed on the handwriting, and the effect was immediate — on him, and on his noble guests too. He cried aloud. Then, finding that his own resources could not explain what the writing meant or why it came, he was troubled even more, so that his lords were astonished.
The failure was not a language problem. The words on the plaster belonged to the everyday speech of Babylon.
The king's wise men did understand the words, for the writing was in Chaldean, the language of Babylon. What they could not unfold was the connection, the application, and the interpretation. Without the clue, all those separate words seemed to them disconnected and meaningless.
Commentators trace the failure to something deeper than a lack of skill.
The king called in the wise men of Babylon once more, and again they only showed their incompetence and ignorance. We are told that there was nothing unusual about the four words. They were not words from some unknown, foreign language. But on that occasion they were God's words, so they were far beyond the understanding of these servants of the world and its false gods. This is a striking illustration of what the Apostle Paul states in 1 Corinthians 2:14. As "natural" men they had no power of understanding the things God had written.
In his terror the king did call for help. Who he called for shows where his heart lay.
Instead of crying to God for His mercy and pardon, the king called loudly for the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the fortune-tellers. He offered them great rewards if they could interpret God's writing on the wall. Not one of the world's wise men could read God's writing, but God had His interpreter at hand… Belshazzar's sin was not ignorance. It was deliberate contempt for holy things, a challenge to the living God, and he paid the penalty for inviting God's anger.
Writers draw a hard warning from this verse: being shaken is not being saved.
The king got no help from his wise men… "Then King Belshazzar was greatly alarmed, and his color changed, and his lords were perplexed" (v. 9). The effect on this godless man was tremendous. We rejoice when sinners are impressed, stirred, and troubled, and then troubled still more. But the devil is always eager to get these impressions removed, and in this case I do not think the effect lasted long. Sometimes what moves men like this is not fear of God, but fear of the consequences of sin. It is the fear produced on a deathbed, sheer fear of hell and damnation.
God did not write to torment the room. The silence of the wise men was clearing the way for someone who could speak.
But help is at hand. What God wrote was not meant to stay on the palace wall as a meaningless, unreadable ghost of fear. It was meant to be read and understood. But the king and his nobles must also learn whose hand it was that traced those words on the plaster of the king's palace. They must also come to see the madness of their drinking parties, and how serious an insult they had offered to the Writer.
- Challenge. Belshazzar had defied the living God on purpose. His sin was not ignorance but deliberate contempt, and this verse begins God's answer.
- Collapse. His fear rose a second time when his own resources gave out. The deepest alarm came not from the writing but from the silence that followed it.
- Clueless. The wise men knew the language and still could not read the message. God's words lie beyond the reach of the natural mind, however clever it is.
- Counterfeit. Terror filled the whole hall, yet nobody repented. Fear of consequences is not fear of God, and such impressions fade fast.
- Clarity. God never wrote to leave men only frightened. He silenced every substitute so that His own servant could make the message plain.
-- The queen, by reason of the words of the king and his nobles, came into the banquet-house. The queen spoke and said, O king, live for ever! let not thy thoughts trouble thee, neither let thy countenance be changed.
Belshazzar's feast has turned to terror. A hand has written on the wall, his wise men cannot read it, and the king is shaking. Into that hall walks a woman who was not at the table, and the first thing she offers is a calming word and a name.
The king's wives were already at the feast, so commentators take this "queen" to be someone else — most likely the king's mother.
The queen, hearing of the king's terror, comes into the feast. It seems she had no part in this godless scene. Some suggest she was not the king's wife, since his wives were at the feast (verses 2, 3). Probably she was the queen dowager. She clearly knew Daniel well, and she knew the great events of Nebuchadnezzar's reign.
One writer draws a lesson from the guest list itself.
Daniel is not seen at the feast. Someone else is absent too — the queen, the king's mother. She had not his strength, but she had much of his spirit. The king is ignorant of the man of God who was then in his dominions. He also takes no notice of what God had done in the same dominions in his father's days. But the queen has memories and knowledge of these things, and she is a stranger to his feast.
She came "because of the words of the king and his lords" — the panic had travelled through the palace. Behind her hurry, one writer sees God's purpose.
But God meant the king to have the writing explained, and He meant His own chosen vessel to explain it. The instrument was at hand to bring Daniel to Belshazzar's notice. She had taken no part in the wild party of that night. But the report of the sight that had startled the king and his guests spread through the palace and reached her ears. She knew all that had happened in the reign of Nebuchadnezzar. She knew the service Daniel had given, and the position he received as a result. So she hurried to the king's help.
Daniel had faded from public life, and the king's advisers had failed.
The queen at once thinks of the Hebrew captive Daniel. She comes into the banqueting hall and reminds the king that such a person still exists in the kingdom. She says, "Let Daniel be called, and he will show the interpretation." Whoever else had forgotten him, she clearly had not. His present obscurity did not shake her confidence that he could unravel the mystery.
Her entrance also exposes what the room could not do for itself:
The world's greatness and glory come to an end, and its wisdom fails completely as well. The day that is fast approaching will make this plain. When God is acting, the world's wisdom is folly and thick darkness. It takes someone entirely outside the world's course and ways to make known the mind of God, whether in grace or in judgment. In the hour of deep distress, the queen tells the king that one man in his kingdom has light and wisdom beyond all others. This separate and now hidden servant, given the mind of God, appears again — not as a guest at the unholy, God-defying feast, but as the one who makes known God's judgment on it.
She opens with a wish for the king's long life. Set against the night that followed, it reads very differently.
She comes and says to the king in verse 10, "O king, live forever." What an empty wish! Poor man, he died that night.
Her next words tell him not to let his thoughts alarm him or his color change. One writer finds a warning in that comfort.
The queen-mother now tries to calm her son's anxiety — just as the devil would calm an awakened sinner today.
- Outside the feast — the king's wives were at the table; the queen was not. She "had no part in this godless scene."
- Outside, and further out still — Daniel is absent too. He was "the man of God who was then in his dominions," and the king did not know him.
- Outside is where wisdom is — when the world's wise men fail, "it takes someone entirely outside the world's course and ways to make known the mind of God."
- Memory brings him in — one person had not forgotten Daniel, and her memory put God's chosen servant in front of the king.
- Comfort from inside the room — her "O king, live forever" went to a man who died that night, and her "let not your thoughts alarm you" did what the devil does to an awakened sinner.
There is a man in thy kingdom in whom is the spirit of the holy gods; and in the days of thy father, light and understanding and wisdom, like the wisdom of the gods was found in him; and the king Nebuchadnezzar thy father, [even] the king thy father, made him master of the scribes, magicians, Chaldeans, [and] astrologers;
The writing on the wall has stopped the feast, and Babylon's wise men cannot read it. Then a woman who was not at the table walks in. She tells the terrified king about a man he has never met.
Commentators identify her as the queen-mother. She had kept clear of the whole scene.
The king's alarm keeps growing, and his lords are astonished. Into the banqueting hall comes the queen — surely the queen-mother, if we compare verses 2 and 10. Her sympathies were not in the feast. She reminds the king of someone who was even further outside and above it all: a man the godless king had never met in person.
Two people are missing from that hall.
Daniel is not seen at the feast. And there is another who is absent too — the queen, the king's mother. The king knows nothing of the man of God who was then in his territory. He has also forgotten what God did in that same territory in his father's days. But the queen remembers and knows these things, and she is a stranger to his feast.
The queen calls Nebuchadnezzar the king's father. One writer notes he was in fact Belshazzar's grandfather — and Belshazzar had never met the man his grandfather had promoted.
Clearly Belshazzar knew nothing about Daniel. He had entirely forgotten — if he ever heard it — that his grandfather Nebuchadnezzar had raised him to the place next to himself. Nebuchadnezzar made him "ruler over the whole province of Babylon and chief prefect over all the wise men of Babylon," and "Daniel remained at the king's court" (Dan. 2:48-49). Godless men do not like godly men, and usually do not know them. … But Daniel was there all the time, separate, devoted to God, having His mind, and ready to reveal it at the right moment.
The queen's praise is real, but her words are Babylonian.
After years had passed, Daniel had dropped completely out of public notice. In court circles his name was so unknown that the queen had to give a full account of him and of his powers, though she still treated them as being "the wisdom of the gods."
Nebuchadnezzar had spoken about Daniel in the same style. One writer weighs what such wording admits and what it does not:
Nebuchadnezzar may speak to him in a pagan style. He may credit the wisdom of the Most High God in him to his own gods. But he still admits that there is something special and unusual in Daniel.
The title the queen recalls put Daniel over Babylon's learned classes. He had earned it.
These Chaldeans were a particular class of learned men, forming with others the Magi, or wise men of Babylon. Daniel 5:11 says Daniel was made their chief, or "master" as older translations put it. No doubt this was because they had discovered he had more wisdom than all of them. When the king called in the Chaldeans and the rest to interpret the writing on the wall, Daniel was not among them. We may be sure he kept himself well away from such people.
The failure of Babylon's experts clears the stage.
The world's greatness and glory not only come to an end; its wisdom fails completely. … When God is acting, the world's wisdom is folly and thick darkness. It takes someone entirely outside its course and ways to make known the mind of God, whether in grace or in judgment.
The queen's memory brings a forgotten man forward at the exact hour he is needed.
But God meant the king to have the writing explained — and only by His own chosen servant. The means to bring Daniel to Belshazzar's notice was at hand.
Belshazzar is not the last man to want the person he had ignored.
This scene has often been repeated in the history of men's souls. When eternity confronts an ungodly man, he turns to the godly man for light, help, and comfort if possible. … You will want him yet — that God-fearing, holy, separate man who lives for Christ. … But what a wonderful thing it is that God has His witnesses even in Babylon.
- Forgotten. Daniel had ruled a province, yet Belshazzar had never met him. Godless men rarely know the godly people living near them.
- Remembered. The one person who stayed away from the feast was the one person who remembered God's servant.
- Gifted. She praises a real gift in pagan words — "the spirit of the holy gods." She admits something unusual is in Daniel, but never names the God who gave it.
- Proven. His title as chief of the magicians came from wisdom greater than theirs. He kept himself apart from that whole company.
- Needed. When the world's wisdom fails, God's answer comes through the man the world had shelved. He keeps such witnesses even in Babylon.
forasmuch as an excellent spirit, and knowledge, and understanding, interpreting of dreams, and shewing of hard sentences, and solving of problems, were found in the same Daniel, whom the king named Belteshazzar. Now let Daniel be called, and he will shew the interpretation.
The king's court has just failed him: the writing stands on the wall and no one can read it. Into that silence the queen names one man, and lists what marks him out: an excellent spirit, knowledge, understanding, and the skill to interpret dreams, explain riddles, and solve problems.
She was not at the feast herself. Commentators work back from the earlier verses of the chapter to identify her.
The queen hears of the king's terror and comes into the feast. She seems to have had no part in this godless scene. Some suggest she was not the king's wife, since his wives were already at the feast (verses 2 and 3). She was probably the queen dowager, the widow of an earlier king. She clearly knew Daniel well, and she knew the great events of Nebuchadnezzar's days.
The queen has to explain who Daniel is. So the king did not know him.
The fact that Daniel was a stranger to Belshazzar speaks volumes. Whatever the pride and daring of the great Nebuchadnezzar, Daniel sat in the king's gate. He was ruler over the whole province of Babylon, and chief of the governors over all the wise men. His degraded and fallen descendant did not know Daniel.
Others trace the same pattern further, and explain why it repeats.
The men of this world will take all the help that the man of God can give them in earthly things. But with him they never feel at home. A wide gulf lies between the worldly man and the man of God, and neither is fully happy in the other's company. So whatever service the servant of the Lord gives in a moment of difficulty, the world soon forgets both him and his service.
The court thinks of Daniel only after its trained experts fail.
When God is acting, the world's wisdom is folly and deep darkness. It takes someone completely outside the world's course and ways to make God's mind known, whether in grace or in judgment. In the hour of deep distress, the queen tells the king that one man in his kingdom has light and wisdom beyond all others.
Notice where such a man is found: not among the king's advisers, but among the captives.
But in His own ways, God humbles the wise men of the world and lifts up the despised captive. Wisdom is found with God's people, even in captivity.
The phrase heads the queen's list, before knowledge and understanding. One writer weighs a man's spirit against his gifts:
An excellent spirit was in him. That is a very fine quality, dear friends. A man's spirit is infinitely more valuable than what he says. I may say, by God's help, many a nice thing, and you may hear, enjoy, and then forget it. But if I have done anything nasty to you, you will never forget it. Oh, to be a Daniel in spirit! We shall never be prophets. We are not called by God in that way, but we can all cultivate an "excellent spirit."
The queen's last credential is that Daniel could untie knots — and the king repeats it back to him. The ability was never his own.
Yes, the truth of God is unveiled by the servants of God. He reveals, and they proclaim the truth.
The queen calls him by both names, Daniel and Belteshazzar. The second was imposed on him as a boy in Babylon.
Along with this, Daniel and his three companions are given new names. It seems the aim was to wipe out the memory of the true God by giving them names taken from the idols of Babylon.
- Forgotten. Under Nebuchadnezzar, Daniel ruled the whole province of Babylon. Belshazzar did not even know him. The world uses God's servants in a crisis, then forgets them.
- Remembered. The one person who stayed out of the feast was the one who knew where to find help.
- Outside. The king's own experts failed. The answer had to come from a man outside the world's course and ways.
- Captive. God humbles the world's wise men and lifts up the despised captive. His people hold wisdom even in captivity.
- Spirit. The verse lists knowledge, understanding, and the skill to solve problems. The excellent spirit comes first. It is the one item any believer can cultivate.
Then was Daniel brought in before the king. The king spoke and said unto Daniel, Art thou that Daniel, of the children of the captivity of Judah, whom the king my father brought out of Judah?
A royal banquet has turned to terror. Writing has appeared on the wall, the king's wise men cannot read it, and the queen has named one man who can. Verse 13 brings that man in — and the king's own words show he has no idea who stands in front of him.
Years have passed since chapter 4. Daniel has slipped out of public life.
It is quite clear that, with the years gone by, Daniel had dropped right out of public notice. At court his name was so unknown that the queen had to explain in full who he was and what he could do. Even so, she still called his powers "the wisdom of the gods."
Forgetting God's servant is the world's habit, not a one-off.
It is astonishing how quickly the great people of the earth forget the Lord's faithful servant. The man of the world does not understand the man of God, so he forgets him almost as soon as he loses sight of him… The men of this world will take all the help the man of God can give them in the things of earth, but they can never feel at home with him… So they call for the Lord's servant only when things are at their worst.
Belshazzar has to ask whether this is the right man. That question says more about the king than about Daniel.
Clearly Belshazzar knew nothing about Daniel. He had quite forgotten — if he ever heard it — that his grandfather Nebuchadnezzar had raised Daniel to the place next to himself, and made him ruler over the whole province of Babylon and chief of the governors over all its wise men (Dan. 2:48-49). Godless men do not like godly men, and usually do not know them. They are not in touch with them. So Belshazzar, the grandson of Nebuchadnezzar, did not know the man his grandfather had put at the head of affairs only a few years before. This fact speaks volumes about Belshazzar. Nebuchadnezzar may have been very proud, but he saw the moral worth of the captive Daniel, as his rise to second ruler in the kingdom showed. His corrupt grandson had ignored that Daniel even existed. But Daniel was there all the time, separate, devoted to God, knowing His mind, and ready to make it known at the right moment.
The word behind the old rendering "Jewry" is simply the name of Daniel's homeland.
Same as Judaea in Luke 23:6; John 7:1. In Dan. 5:13 it refers to Judah.
But the name itself carries the story of a nation's collapse. It belongs to the period after the land had lost its independence.
Before long the word Jewry, or Judaea, came into use. Ezra 5:8 speaks of the province of Judaea. That shows how the land had passed under the control of a foreign power, after Nebuchadnezzar had destroyed the Temple. The only bit of true godliness was found in a small, weak remnant. In Daniel 5:13 we read that Belshazzar spoke to Daniel as the man his father had brought out of Jewry.
Belshazzar calls Nebuchadnezzar his father, but a generation stands between them. Scripture often uses "son" this way, and that family link carried political weight.
Scripture calls Belshazzar the son of Nebuchadnezzar, but that often means grandson. Many think Nabonadius married a daughter of Nebuchadnezzar. Reports say he seized the throne without right, and such a marriage would have strengthened his hold on it.
The king labels Daniel a captive from a conquered land. That is where God works.
So Daniel comes in before the king. The king had heard of Daniel's wisdom in interpreting dreams in the days of Nebuchadnezzar, but it seems he had no wish to know this captive Jew himself. Yet in His ways God humbles the wise men of his world and lifts up the despised captive. Wisdom stays with God's people, even in captivity.
- Forgotten. Years of silence left Daniel unknown at court. The queen had to explain from scratch who he was.
- Fetched. The world calls for God's servant only when its own resources fail. It wants the help, not the man.
- Labelled. The king names him by his lowest title: a captive from Judah, whom his own grandfather carried off.
- Unmoved. Through all the neglect Daniel was still there, separate, devoted to God, ready the moment the call came.
- Exalted. God humbles the wise men of the world and lifts up the despised captive. Wisdom stays with His people, even in captivity.
And I have heard of thee, that the spirit of the gods is in thee, and [that] light and understanding and excellent wisdom is found in thee.
A hand has written on the wall and broken up Belshazzar's feast, and every wise man in Babylon has failed to read the words. The king now turns to a man he has never met, and repeats to his face the reputation he has only heard second-hand.
The failure of the astrologers was not a delay in God's plan. It cleared the stage, so that the message could only come through the one man God had prepared.
Belshazzar was already panic-stricken, and now he was more troubled still. Even his courtiers were astonished. But God meant the king to have the writing explained, and it had to be done by His own chosen vessel. The instrument was at hand to bring Daniel to Belshazzar's notice.
The king had a full court of trained experts, and they were useless at the one moment that mattered. The light he asks Daniel for is light his own system could not produce.
The world's greatness and glory come to an end, and more than that, its wisdom fails altogether. That will be plain in the day now fast approaching. When God is acting, the world's wisdom is folly and deep darkness. It takes someone outside the world's whole course and ways to make known the mind of God, whether in grace or in judgment. In the hour of deep distress, the queen tells the king that one man in his kingdom has light and wisdom beyond all others. He had already proved his worth by interpreting the dream that troubled Belshazzar's forefather Nebuchadnezzar.
Notice how the king describes his knowledge of Daniel: it is all report. He rules the empire Daniel lives in, and still knows him only by hearsay.
It is plain that Belshazzar knew nothing about Daniel. He had quite forgotten — if he ever heard it — that his grandfather Nebuchadnezzar had raised Daniel to the place next to himself... Godless men do not like, and usually do not know, godly men. Godless men are not in touch with godly men. So Belshazzar did not know the man his grandfather had placed at the head of affairs only a few years before. This fact speaks volumes about Belshazzar. Nebuchadnezzar's pride may have been great, but he had recognised the moral worth of the captive Daniel... but his depraved grandson had ignored his very existence. Yet Daniel was there all the time, separate, devoted to God, having His mind, and ready to reveal it at the right moment.
The king wanted the interpretation, not the man. God turned that around.
The king had heard of Daniel's wisdom in interpreting dreams in the days of Nebuchadnezzar. But he seems not to have wanted any personal acquaintance with this captive Jew. However, in the ways of God, He humbles the wise men of his world and exalts the despised captive. Wisdom is found with God's people, even though in captivity.
"The spirit of the gods is in you" is not the language of a believer. It is Babylon's religious language, used of wisdom that came from the Most High God. Nebuchadnezzar had spoken the same way:
He may speak to him in a heathen style. He may credit his own gods with the wisdom that the Most High God had put in him. But he does still admit that there is something special and unusual in Daniel.
So the compliment is real and worthless at once. Belshazzar sees the difference in Daniel and never asks where it came from.
This is not only ancient history. A frightened man wants the person he has ignored for years — that scene keeps coming back.
This scene has often repeated itself in the history of men's souls. When eternity confronts an ungodly man, he turns to the godly man for light, help and comfort if he can get it... It is very likely, my unsaved friend, that you live quite close to a godly man. He could help you grasp the truth, and yet you know nothing about him. You give him a wide berth; close quarters is the very thing you avoid. You will want him yet — that God-fearing, holy, separate man... But what a wonderful thing it is that God has His witnesses even in Babylon.
- Failure. Babylon's wisdom collapses at the moment the king needs it most. When God acts, the world's cleverness is only darkness.
- Vessel. God intended the king to have the writing explained, but only through the man He had prepared.
- Captive. God humbles the wise men of the empire and lifts up the despised prisoner. Wisdom sits with His people, even in captivity.
- Hearsay. Belshazzar knows Daniel only by report, because godless men do not know godly men. He sends for Daniel in an emergency, not out of any interest in him.
- Compliment. "The spirit of the gods is in you" gives Babylon's gods the credit for what the Most High gave. The world can admit the difference and still miss its source.
And now the wise men, the magicians, have been brought in before me, that they should read this writing, and make known unto me the interpretation thereof; but they could not shew the interpretation of the thing.
Belshazzar has called in every expert in Babylon to read the writing on the wall, and they have failed. Here the king admits it, which raises the question commentators keep asking: why could they not read it?
The king had offered a huge reward, and still no one could help. One writer describes the failure:
Upon the wall before the king the part of a man's hand is seen tracing letters and words on the plaster. He cannot read the writing, and neither can any of the company feasting with him. The Chaldeans, soothsayers, and astrologers are called in, but it is useless. They could neither read the writing nor make known the interpretation. Yet the reward for the man who could do this was scarlet clothing, a chain of gold for his neck, and the position of third ruler in the kingdom.
Commentators differ on the reason. One suggestion is a technical one — the script itself was foreign to them:
The king's wise men failed in two ways: they could not read the writing, and they could not make known its interpretation to the king. The letters may have been the ancient Hebrew characters. Daniel knew them, but the wise men would not.
Another writer sees no puzzle in the words themselves:
Once more the wise men of Babylon were called in, but only to display again their incompetence and ignorance. We are told that there was nothing unusual about the four words. They were not words from some unknown, foreign language. But that day they were God's words, and so they were far outside the understanding of these servants of the world and its false gods.
If the letters were readable, the barrier sat somewhere else. One writer locates it in what the scholars of Babylon were, not in what they knew:
There was nothing in the language of the writing on the wall beyond the astrologers of Babylon any more than beyond Daniel. Not so much, I might say. At least the words were as familiar to a Chaldean as to a Hebrew. But the wise men of Babylon, the scribes of Belshazzar's court and kingdom, were not able to interpret them. They were morally incapable.
Do not turn that failure into a theory that God hides His meaning. One writer says the same difficulty runs through all of Scripture:
Notice, as to this writing seen on the wall, what was the great difficulty of it? The language was Chaldean, and those who saw the hand and the characters were Chaldeans. It is not God's way, when He communicates anything, to put it in an obscure form. It would be a monstrous theory that God gives a revelation and makes it impossible for the people it is meant for to understand it. What is it that makes all Scripture so difficult? It is not its language. The real difficulty of Scripture is that its thoughts are infinitely above our natural mind. We must give up self in order to understand the Bible.
What was missing instead was relationship with the One who was speaking:
The words were plain enough. All of it should have been intelligible, and would have been, if the souls of the Chaldeans had been in communion with the Lord. I do not mean that Daniel could understand it without the power of the Spirit of God. But for understanding the word, it is an immense thing to have communion with the God who is making His mind known to us.
The king's first move was to his experts, not to God:
Instead of crying to God for His mercy and pardon, the king "cried aloud to bring in the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the soothsayers." He offered them great rewards if they could interpret the writing of God on the wall. Not one of the world's wise men could read God's writing, but God had His interpreter at hand.
The same failure had already happened in Egypt:
God will speak in a vision to Pharaoh, by writing on the wall in Belshazzar's day, by "great plainness of speech" in our day. But now, as in days gone by, the wise men of this world are completely at a loss when they try to interpret the Word of God. So Pharaoh appeals to the "magicians of Egypt and all its wise men," only to find "there was none to interpret" his dreams. Man's natural pride of intellect blinds him to a simple fact: only God can interpret what God communicates.
- Plain. God does not send messages He means to hide; the letters on that wall were not the obstacle.
- Powerless. Babylon's best minds faced plain words and came away empty, prize untouched.
- Personal. Their failure was not academic but moral: souls out of communion with God cannot read what God writes.
- Prepared. While the experts failed, God already had His interpreter waiting in the kingdom.
- Present. The same holds now: God still speaks plainly, and what He communicates only He can interpret.
But I have heard of thee, that thou canst give interpretations, and solve problems. Now if thou canst read the writing, and make known to me the interpretation thereof, thou shalt be clothed with purple, and have a chain of gold about thy neck, and shalt be the third ruler in the kingdom.
A hand has written on the wall of Belshazzar's banqueting hall, and his wise men cannot read it. So the king turns to a forgotten captive, and offers him Babylon's highest honours for one reading of the writing.
Daniel's reputation had reached the palace long before Daniel did. The king had heard the reports and had never once acted on them.
He had known, as noted before, of Daniel's services, but he had not cared to know him personally. The godless king had no wish to know the servant of God. He sent for him only now, in his desperation, for help in the hour of his need.
The pattern outlasts Babylon. People keep a distance from those who know God — until fear closes in.
This scene repeats again and again in the history of people's souls. When eternity confronts an ungodly man, he turns to the godly man for light, help, and comfort if possible. This proves that godliness is profitable in this life and in the one to come... It is very likely, my unsaved friend, that you live quite close to a godly man. He could help you grasp the truth, and yet you know nothing about him.
The king's offer rests on one condition: if you can read the writing. Every trained specialist in Babylon had already tried and failed.
The world's greatness and glory come to an end, and its wisdom fails completely. This will be plain in the day that is fast approaching. The world's wisdom is folly and thick darkness when God is acting. It needs someone outside its whole course and ways to make known the mind of God, whether in grace or in judgment.
That failure is not an accident of the story. It is how God arranges the scene.
In the ways of God, He humbles the wise men of his world and exalts the despised captive. Wisdom is found with God's people, even though they are in captivity.
The ESV calls the promised robe purple. Older translations say "scarlet." One writer explains why purple is the right word.
Purple is found in Scripture chiefly with Gentiles, only once or twice including Israel. ... In Daniel 5:7, 16, 29, the margin is correct — purple, not scarlet. Scarlet is nowhere found with the Gentile.
The oddest detail is the ceiling on the offer. The king offers third place, not second — and that small word turns out to be a mark of accuracy.
The king offered the third place in the kingdom as a reward. That is a bit of circumstantial evidence, the kind so dear to a lawyer's heart and so convincing in a court of justice. Belshazzar reigned together with his father, Nabonidus. The associate monarch is not named in Daniel 5. It is believed he was away on military business at the time. Two places belonged to these two kings, and so came the promised reward of a third place in the kingdom.
For a long time Belshazzar's name did not appear in any record outside the Bible. That gap is now closed.
The monuments have now cleared away what, with respect to this king, had seemed to make Scripture and the historians disagree.
Belshazzar did keep his word. He gave Daniel the reward promised in this verse.
Whatever Daniel's attitude, he could not let his public promise of reward to the interpreter come to nothing. Men who are false to God are often true to one another in their very selfishness. This reward was Belshazzar's last act as king. That same night he was killed, and Darius the Mede received the kingdom.
- Forgotten. Daniel had dropped out of court life. The king had heard of him but never wanted to know him, and sent for him only in desperation.
- Summoned. The world's trained wisdom collapses when God acts. The message has to come from someone outside the world's ways.
- Purple. The promised robe is the colour Scripture links with Gentile rule. It was the highest dignity Babylon could give.
- Third. The strange limit fits history. Belshazzar was himself only second, ruling beside his father — and his name, once missing from the records, has now been found.
- Worthless. The honours were real, and the king kept his promise. They lasted one night. That is the true measure of what the world can offer.
Then Daniel answered and said before the king, Let thy gifts be to thyself, and give thy rewards to another; yet will I read the writing to the king, and make known to him the interpretation.
Belshazzar offers Daniel purple, a gold chain and third place in the kingdom. Daniel hands the payment back, then reads the writing anyway.
Daniel is not bargaining for a better price. He has no use for what the king holds out.
Look at his independence. How truly independent God's man is in any day. Nor does he want any reward. "Let your gifts be for yourself, and give your rewards to another." He does not want the world's gifts. Not one bit. He is dependent on the Lord alone. He receives everything from the Lord for himself, and he has something for everybody else down here. He is faithful to man in this chapter. Even so, he was made "the third ruler in the kingdom" — and that kingdom ended the same night.
The king held the power of life and death over him. It made no difference to a man who knew who had sent him.
Daniel was standing before the sovereign of all the kingdoms of the earth. This was an absolute monarch, who held the power of life and death over all his subjects. But Daniel was the servant of the God who was the source of Belshazzar's brief power. So, conscious of his mission, he neither feared the king nor was tempted by his offered rewards. … It was a noble preface, fitting for the messenger of God to the wicked king.
Years earlier Daniel had brought Nebuchadnezzar a dreadful message too. He spoke then in a very different tone.
He had not answered Nebuchadnezzar like this. He thought about the dark and painful shadow that was to fall across that monarch's life. Compassion filled him, and he said, "My lord, may the dream be for those who hate you and its interpretation for your enemies." But here the dishonour done to the living God stirs his indignation deeply. For the moment he seems to lose sight of the commanding position held by this monster of wickedness… Nebuchadnezzar had been in complete darkness, and so deserved pity. But Belshazzar was sinning against the light that had shone in God's dealings with that king.
The insult here was the drinking party, held with vessels taken from God's house in Jerusalem.
Those gold and silver vessels taken out of the temple in Jerusalem pointed, in one way or another, to the adorable person of the Lord Jesus. Daniel found it intolerable that profane lords and wives should drink wine out of them to praise the gods of gold and silver… He does not show Belshazzar the same respect: "Let your gifts be for yourself, and give your rewards to another." Jehovah's Christ was attacked, and the indignation was just.
Daniel had accepted promotion from Nebuchadnezzar before, so this refusal is not a rule about titles.
Daniel's answer in verse 17 is very striking. Earlier, at the end of Daniel 2, Daniel had accepted the honours placed on him; now he treated them with disdain. The meaning of the four fateful words had clearly already reached his heart. He knew that God had rejected Belshazzar, and that his kingdom was about to crash in ruin. So the honours Belshazzar offered were worthless.
Refusing the fee did not soften the message. What follows is a harder word, not a gentler one.
Daniel answers as the occasion demanded… But first he gives a most painful word of admonition. In a few words he sets before him the history of Nebuchadnezzar and God's dealings with him. He reminds him too of his own complete indifference, and worse, of his reckless insults against God… He sets before him what that scene was in the eye of God. For this is what sin, what Satan, always seeks to hide. To the Babylonian court it was a magnificent feast. The trophies of their victories and the supremacy of their gods made it greater still. But what was their gorgeous revelry in the eye of God?
Daniel's composure did not appear that night. It took shape decades earlier, when he first decided what he would not touch.
Daniel and his companions entered the place of the Gentiles with one purpose of heart: they would not defile themselves with the king's food. He did not know what this might cost him, but this was his purpose… And so at Belshazzar's feast. He had nothing in common with the feast — not a bit… He was as much a conqueror in the day of the feast as he was in the day of the lions' den.
- Sent, not hired. Daniel refuses payment because he is on an errand. The God who gave Belshazzar his brief power is the God he serves.
- Free, therefore fearless. A man who wants nothing from the king cannot be bought or frightened. Wanting nothing from the world is what makes plain speech possible.
- Measured by light. Nebuchadnezzar sat in darkness and drew Daniel's pity. Belshazzar sinned against light already given and drew his indignation. God's messengers do not use one tone for every hearer.
- Worthless honours. Daniel had accepted Nebuchadnezzar's promotion. He scorns this one because the kingdom behind it will not survive the night.
- The message still goes out. "Nevertheless, I will read the writing" — refusing the reward held nothing back from the king. Daniel showed him the feast as God saw it.
O thou king, the Most High God gave Nebuchadnezzar thy father the kingdom, and greatness, and glory, and majesty;
A hand has just written on the wall and stopped Belshazzar's feast. Daniel refuses the king's gifts and starts not with the riddle but with a history lesson: before he reads the sentence, the king must hear where his empire came from — and that it was a gift.
Daniel does not use Israel's covenant name for God here. He uses a title that speaks of supremacy over every rival power on earth.
I have been looking into the force of the Hebrew words for Most High. Clearly, in the end it points to God in the millennium as the supreme God revealed at that time, to the exclusion of all that is false. This is the force of the word. It means One who holds the place of the one true God, above all others and to the exclusion of them, exalted as supreme in government. Jehovah, as we know, is the God who is in relationship with Israel. But He is the supreme God, the Most High.
The empire was Nebuchadnezzar's, yet Daniel traces the whole of it back to a giver. Commentators draw out the principle that every ruler holds power on loan from heaven.
It is worth noting that in this chapter Daniel speaks more than once of "the God of heaven." That shows that the first Gentile ruler with supreme power held his authority as something delegated from heaven. We believe this is the fact behind the Apostle's instruction in Romans 13:1. The power in existence in his own day was the fourth one mentioned in our chapter. But whoever the Gentile powers may be at any given moment, they hold their authority as delegates of "the God of heaven."
The history lesson is not a delay. Daniel reads the charge sheet before the sentence.
If God is about to strike, He will have the grounds of His action explained. It is a striking feature of His ways, above all in the Old Testament, that before He acts in judgment He is careful to state His reasons. He does this so that He may be clear when He speaks, and justified when He judges… So here Daniel laid out the charge against the king. He showed him that he had ignored all the warnings of the past, and had sinned against light and knowledge… At such a solemn moment there must be no mistake. So Daniel set the king before the judgment seat of God before he explained the writing.
The greatness described in this verse is real. What went wrong was not the size of the kingdom but what the king did with it.
Before he explains the writing, Daniel rebukes the king by reminding him of God's dealings with Nebuchadnezzar. The Most High God had given Nebuchadnezzar a worldwide kingdom with absolute power. But the king used it for his own glory, and God humbled him for his pride. Belshazzar knew all this. Yet despite this warning, he had not humbled his heart.
Daniel calls Nebuchadnezzar "your father." Commentators identify him as Belshazzar's grandfather, so the grandson inherited the story along with the throne.
Belshazzar knew all about God's dealings with his grandfather, and that fact makes him all the more responsible. Where much has been given, much must surely be required. Belshazzar began his reign with more light than his grandfather had, so his godless conduct is all the worse… Apart from the witness of the heavens and the earth, and whatever could be learned from God's providential dealings with His creatures, Nebuchadnezzar had no light at all. That lasted until He brought the captive Jews from Jerusalem, and the king came into contact with Daniel and his three companions. But the same could not be said of Belshazzar.
What was true of Babylon did not stop there. Commentators apply it straight to the government a reader lives under now.
Let me say in passing that it is very helpful for us as Christians to see that there is no power in this world except what God has ordained. That would settle a thousand difficulties for you if you bowed to the Word of God. It is not a question of whether the power is good or bad… How is it that we are now living under the power of the fourth beast? God has put power into the hands of the Gentiles, and the Gentiles are answerable to Him for the way they use it. Our part is simply to recognise the power, and to see God behind the one who governs.
- Given. The Most High God handed Nebuchadnezzar the kingship, greatness, glory and majesty. That title means the God who is supreme over every rival power, and supreme in government.
- Held. A gift is held on trust. Rulers are delegates of the God of heaven, so our part is to recognise their authority and see God behind it.
- Misused. Nebuchadnezzar used the gift for his own glory, and God humbled him for that pride.
- Known. Belshazzar knew the whole story from the start. More light made his conduct worse, not more excusable.
- Answered. God states His reasons before He strikes. So Daniel lays out the charge first — the gift, the warning, the knowledge — and only then reads the writing.
and for the greatness that he gave him, all peoples, nations, and languages, trembled and feared before him whom he would he slew, and whom he would he kept alive; and whom he would he exalted, and whom he would he humbled.
Daniel stands before King Belshazzar. His first move is not to read the writing on the wall. He reminds the king where his grandfather's vast power came from. The verse shows human authority at its height. It also asks who gave that power, and what happens to the man who forgets.
Before Daniel reads the writing, he takes the king back through his family history. The greatness in this verse is not flattery.
Before doing so, he rebukes the king by reminding him of God's dealings with Nebuchadnezzar. The Most High God had given to Nebuchadnezzar a universal kingdom with absolute power. But the king had used it for his own glory and God had humbled him for his pride. All this Belshazzar well knew, and yet, despite this warning, he had not humbled his heart.
Babylon's king stood apart from the rulers who followed him.
The Persian king was himself under the laws of his kingdom. Those laws could still be enforced even when he wanted them set aside in certain cases. The Grecian king was not altogether beyond the control of his generals. But Nebuchadnezzar was himself above all the laws of his kingdom. His rule was completely despotic. And this power he had directly from God, to whom alone he was answerable, though he knew Him not.
One writer traces both the reach of that power and the one limit on it.
He was "a king of kings," because of the power, strength and glory of his kingdom, which he had received from God. His rule reached everywhere, and his authority was absolute. There were no restrictions on his authority, and what he commanded was done. Only God could hinder him. He did so when He rescued His faithful servants from the fiery furnace, into which the king in his rage had thrown them.
Commentators trace Babylon's place above the later empires to one fact: this kingdom came straight from God's hand.
Nebuchadnezzar's kingdom was a direct gift from God. As Daniel said, "You, O king, the king of kings, to whom the God of heaven has given the kingdom, the power, and the might, and the glory." No one could say this of the three kingdoms that followed. They come on the scene in a providential way, allowed by God, for the government of the earth and according to His ordering. But their rulers were in no sense the direct holders of power, as Nebuchadnezzar was. He was nearest God in this outward sense, so his responsibility was all the greater.
One writer explains why God gave this power as the "God of heaven" rather than from His throne at Jerusalem.
God acts as "the God of heaven" when He gives power to the Gentiles. As "God of the earth" His throne was at Jerusalem, and will be when He again makes Himself known in that way. But His earthly throne has been set aside, because of the sin of those who had been the responsible holders and agents of His authority. So He now acts as "God of heaven," and gives authority to the Gentile king.
The verse stands as the high-water mark of one man's greatness, and the next verses record his collapse. One writer draws the plain human lesson while working through the passage.
"But when his heart was lifted up" (that is always the way when men get power, their hearts are lifted up), "and his spirit was hardened so that he dealt proudly, he was brought down from his kingly throne, and his glory was taken from him."
Yet the comparison Daniel draws does not end in Nebuchadnezzar's favour being lost. Commentators note that the grandfather, for all his cruelty, ended better than the grandson.
Nebuchadnezzar had been guilty of much sin. He had been proud and self-satisfied, despite warning, and God humbled him as no king nor man ever was because of it. But he had acknowledged throughout his wide realm his own sin and the mighty wonders of the King of heaven. Before this bright end, even in his most reckless days, when all trembled before him and he killed whom he would and kept alive whom he would, he never went as far as the act of contemptuous profanity now committed by his grandson.
This power also explains why Daniel's calm is remarkable.
Daniel was standing before the ruler of all the kingdoms of the earth. He stood before an absolute monarch, one who held the power of life and death over all his subjects (see v. 19). But Daniel was the servant of the God who was the source of Belshazzar's brief power. Conscious of his mission, he did not fear the king, and the rewards the king offered did not tempt him.
- Given, not gained — Nebuchadnezzar's unlimited authority came straight from the God of heaven. The empires that followed rose by His providence instead.
- Given, so owed — standing nearest God in this outward sense made his responsibility greater, not smaller. He answered to God alone.
- Given, then abused — he used the power for his own glory, and God humbled him for his pride.
- Given, yet limited — no man could restrain him, but God could, and did, at the furnace.
- Given, and ignored — Belshazzar knew this whole story and still did not humble his heart. Daniel recited it before reading his doom.
But when his heart was lifted up, and his spirit hardened unto presumption, he was deposed from the throne of his kingdom, and they took his glory from him;
The writing on the wall is still unread, and before Daniel explains it he tells Belshazzar the story of the king before him. This verse is the turning point of that story: the man God had given everything began to treat it as his own.
Daniel does not rush to the interpretation. First he sets out how God had already dealt with Nebuchadnezzar. One writer sees a fixed pattern of God's ways here.
If God was about to strike, He would make sure the grounds of His action were explained. This is a striking feature in His ways, above all in the Old Testament. Before He acts in judgment, He is careful to state the reasons for it. So He is clear when He speaks and justified when He judges.
Nebuchadnezzar's kingdom, majesty and honour all came from God's hand. One writer explains why a man in that position lifts himself up.
God had entrusted this power to Nebuchadnezzar. He had blessed the king beyond measure in the things of this life. As a result pride takes hold of him. It takes hold despite the warning given in the interpretation of the dream, and despite the clear prediction of what was to come. The heart gets blinded by the things it sees… If God, in His providence, lifts a man up, then the man lifts himself up. All is then lost… Man is guilty, so power cannot be entrusted to him without his lifting himself up against God who gave it. He makes himself the centre instead of God.
The damage sits inside the man: his spirit was hardened. One writer lists this verse among the places where older translations use "mind" for that same word:
Rendered in the older version as "mind": Proverbs 29:11 — a fool utters all his mind. Ezekiel 11:5 — I know the things that come into your mind. Ezekiel 20:32 — that which comes into your mind. Daniel 5:20 — his mind hardened in pride. "Understanding": Isaiah 11:4. "Courage": Joshua 2:11.
God did not just shake his throne. He took the king off it and stripped his glory away. The height of the pride set the depth of the fall.
Never had a man been more lifted up in pride than this king, and no proud man was ever brought so low.
God's correction aimed at more than punishment. One writer traces what it produced in the king, quoting his confession in an older translation:
Notice this; it is a broad and bold confession of the judgment that had come on him because of his pride. He had passed through deep waters under God's correcting hand. And so he said: "I Nebuchadnezzar praise and extol and honour the King of heaven, all whose works are truth and His ways judgment: and those who walk in pride He is able to abase." Remember that this is the effect of personal humbling, "toward me," said the once proud monarch. But he had been abased, emptied, brought to the dust. Now, visited again with mercy, his lips are full of the praise of his Corrector.
Belshazzar already knew this story. That is the whole force of the account: it makes his position worse than his grandfather's, not better.
Belshazzar knew well how God had dealt with his grandfather, and this fact makes him all the more responsible. Where much has been given, much must be required. Belshazzar began his reign with more light than his grandfather had, so his godless conduct is all the more blameworthy.
The difference between the two kings is not the size of the failure but the response to correction.
Nebuchadnezzar had also failed, though not to the same extent. But under God's chastening he humbled himself. He owned Him as the source of his authority, and as the almighty Ruler in heaven and on earth. He extolled and honoured Him as the King of heaven. Belshazzar was blind to all the teachings of the past. He sinned more deeply still, magnifying his idols above the God who held his breath in His hand.
- Gift. God handed Nebuchadnezzar his kingdom, his majesty and his honour. He held none of it by his own strength.
- Pride. When God lifts a man up, the man lifts himself up. What he sees blinds his heart, and he puts himself at the centre in God's place.
- Fall. No one was ever more lifted up in pride than this king, and none fell so far.
- Mercy. Emptied and brought to the dust, the king came back praising the God who corrected him. Mercy visited him after the humbling.
- Warning. Belshazzar knew all of this and still would not humble himself. More light means more responsibility.
and he was driven from the sons of men, and his heart was made like the beasts, and his dwelling was with the wild asses; they fed him with grass like oxen, and his body was bathed with the dew of heaven; till he knew that the Most High God ruleth over the kingdom of men, and that he appointeth over it whomsoever he will.
Daniel stands before Belshazzar at the ruined feast. Before he reads the writing on the wall, he tells the king a family story. The greatest ruler on earth lost his mind and lived out with the animals. Why did God do that to a king He had raised up? And why did Belshazzar need to hear it before his own sentence?
Daniel does not begin with the writing. He begins with history, because God explains Himself before He strikes.
When God is about to strike, He makes the grounds of His action known. This is a striking feature of His ways, especially in the Old Testament. Before He acts in judgment, He carefully states His reasons, so that He may be clear when He speaks and justified when He judges.
The sentence matched the man. A king who did not know God was put among creatures that cannot know Him.
Nebuchadnezzar had to take his place among the beasts of the field. These have no idea of God. Man has, for he has a conscience in him. The great difference between a man and a beast is this: man recognises God, the beast does not. But "Man in his pomp yet without understanding is like the beasts that perish." The unconverted man does not know Him. However learned or intelligent he may be, he has no true knowledge of God.
(Psalm 49:20, ESV.)
Of all animals, this one is named. The wild donkey takes no master.
Piream comes from pere, the wild donkey. That is what man is born as (Job 11:12), and it is his obstacle to finding wisdom. Free and independent, he will not put up with a yoke or a restraining hand. Nebuchadnezzar forgot, in the pride of his heart, the One who had raised him up. So he "was driven from among the children of mankind, and his mind was made like that of a beast, and his dwelling was with the wild donkeys." He was put with the creatures his moral state resembled… The one who lasts is the one who recognises the hand that raised him, and submits to it.
The sentence had a limit and a purpose. God kept the throne for the king while he was out in the fields.
In the mercy of God a limit was placed to his madness, and his kingdom was made sure to him "with a band of iron and brass." God had given him the kingdom at the start, and by His power He kept it safe for him. All the while its degraded ruler, with a beast's heart given to him, herded with the cattle of the field. His hair grew like feathers, his nails like a bird's claws. And so for seven years he continued to exist, until he was ready to own that "the Most High God rules the kingdom of mankind and sets over it whom He will." God would give the kingdom back when he learned that the heavens rule.
God restored the king. The lesson did not stop with him.
It is the pride of power which forgets God, which levels man with the beast that has none. Nebuchadnezzar claims the great city over which he rules as built by his own power and for his own glory. In the same hour he is driven to the beasts, until he has learnt his lesson. Then he is restored, but the lesson remains. Sadly, it will not prevent the doom of the Gentile empires. It stands as a warning for the one who has the secret of the Lord.
Belshazzar knew all of this already. That knowledge is what left him without excuse.
Nebuchadnezzar had been in deep darkness, and so he was to be pitied. Belshazzar was sinning against the light that had already shone in God's dealings with that king.
This truth is not just ancient history. It shapes how believers treat the governments over them.
If our nation punishes crime, the believer is to submit to the authorities, as Romans 13:1 teaches, and not protest what the government does. … For it is God who "rules the kingdom of mankind and sets over it whom He will." Popular vote does not decide this matter, for God has already decided what the popular vote will be, and He is concerned about all nations.
- Given. God gave Nebuchadnezzar the kingdom at the start. Nothing in his greatness began with himself.
- Grabbed. Pride took the gift and claimed the credit. That pride levels a man with the beast that has no thought of God.
- Grounded. God drove him out among the wild donkeys, animals that take no yoke. He was put with the creatures his heart already resembled.
- Granted back. The word "until" carries mercy. The madness had a limit. God kept the throne for him, and gave the kingdom back when he owned that heaven rules.
- Given to whom He wills. Belshazzar heard the whole story and stayed proud. Knowing it saves no one. God still sets up whom He will over every nation.
And thou, Belshazzar, his son, hast not humbled thy heart, although thou knewest all this;
Daniel has just retold how God humbled the proud Nebuchadnezzar and then restored him. Belshazzar knew that whole story, and it changed nothing in him.
Scripture calls Belshazzar his son. The family link is looser than that.
We cannot date Nebuchadnezzar's successors exactly. But it seems beyond question that Belshazzar was not his son. He may have been his grandson, though even that is not certain. So the word "father" here means ancestor, or forefather, as it often does in Scripture. Whatever his exact relation to Nebuchadnezzar, he cannot have been far removed from that king. He knew well the judgment that had fallen on him (v. 22).
The charge turns on the words "though you knew all this." Belshazzar started with more light than his forefather, and it counted against him.
Belshazzar knew well how God had dealt with his grandfather, and that makes him all the more responsible. Where much has been given, much must surely be required. Belshazzar began his reign with more light than his grandfather had, so his godless conduct is all the more blameworthy. Nebuchadnezzar had only two things at first: the witness of the heavens and the earth, and whatever he could gather from God's providential dealings with His creatures. Beyond that he had no light, until God brought the captive Jews from Jerusalem and he met Daniel and his three companions. The same was not true of Belshazzar.
The contrast running through the verse is between two men under the same hand. Nebuchadnezzar failed too — but he took the correction.
Nebuchadnezzar had failed too, if not so badly. But under God's chastening he humbled himself. He owned Him as the source of his authority, and as the all-powerful Ruler in heaven and on earth. He praised and honoured Him as the King of heaven. Belshazzar was blind to all the teaching of the past. He sinned far worse. He set his idols above the God who held his very breath in His hand, and so lifted himself up against the Lord of heaven.
Daniel does not read the writing first. He lays out the case, and that order reflects something about how God acts.
God's ways have a striking feature, seen again and again in the Old Testament. Before He acts in judgment, He takes care to state the reasons for it. So He is clear when He speaks and justified when He judges. So here Daniel laid out the case against the king. He showed him that he had ignored all the warnings of the past and had sinned against light and knowledge. In the end he had lifted himself up against the Lord of heaven and polluted the holy vessels of His house. This shows what the king meant when he called for those vessels. It was no wild impulse under the heat of wine. It was a deliberate, calculated insult to God.
Knowing put his sin in a different class, and the sentence fell at once.
Did that godless Belshazzar know no better? Had he never heard how God had dealt with his father? No — "And you his son, Belshazzar, have not humbled your heart, though you knew all this." That same night he was slain. Judgment did not delay its stroke on a man so openly defiant. Nebuchadnezzar worshipped other gods, yet even he never dared to defile the vessels of God as Belshazzar did… Belshazzar sinned with his eyes open, for he knew better, and he was slain that night.
The question reaches past one king. Does anyone profit from the light God gives?
But does man ever really profit by the light his Creator gives him in grace? Think of Israel. What effect did God's mighty works have on them, done in their sight by His mighty hand in Egypt and in the wilderness? Divine and sovereign grace worked in men like Joshua and Caleb. Apart from them, no lasting good came of it at all, and the works might just as well never have been done.
- Knew. Belshazzar's guilt rests on one word. He had the full record of God's dealings with his forefather, so he could not plead ignorance.
- Knew more. He started with more light than Nebuchadnezzar ever had, so God required more of him. Much given, much required.
- Knew, yet unbowed. Nebuchadnezzar took his chastening and honoured the King of heaven. Belshazzar knew more and lifted himself up instead.
- Knew, so deliberate. Calling for the temple vessels was no drunken whim. It was a calculated insult, so God spelled out the charge before the sentence.
- Knew, and fell that night. Deliberate sin met immediate judgment. Light you receive but never use leaves you without excuse.
but hast lifted up thyself against the Lord of the heavens; and they have brought the vessels of his house before thee, and thou and thy nobles, thy wives and thy concubines, have drunk wine in them; and thou hast praised the gods of silver and gold, of brass, iron, wood, and stone, which see not, nor hear, nor know; and the God in whose hand thy breath is, and whose are all thy ways, hast thou not glorified
Belshazzar has just used the sacred cups from God's temple as party goblets. Before Daniel reads the writing on the wall, he reads the king's life. The charge is not drunkenness. It is defiance. The king praised gods that cannot see, and ignored the God who holds his breath.
The title Daniel uses is deliberate. God no longer governed openly from a centre on earth, so this book names Him by where He governs from now.
During the times of the Gentiles, God no longer governs openly and directly from a centre on earth. His government takes a hidden form, and it comes from heaven. That is why this book calls God "the God of heaven" four times, "the King of heaven" once, and "the LORD of heaven" once.
Belshazzar's court saw a spectacular banquet. Daniel's words strip the evening down to what it actually was.
He brings before him what that scene was in the eye of God. For this is what sin, what Satan, always seeks to hide. In the eyes of the Babylonian court, it was a magnificent feast. Reminders of their military victories and the supremacy of their gods made it greater still. But what was their splendid party in the eye of God? What did it mean to Him that they proudly paraded the vessels of His service to boast of the triumph of Babylon and her idols?
The idols in the verse cannot see, hear or know. But the charge reaches past the statues themselves.
Now, notice, behind all these various idols stands the one who is the god of this world — Satan. The man who is doing his own will is only doing Satan's will, and is in his service… But the king had willingly let himself be the devil's tool. So a dispute stood between him and God. That is why he hears from Daniel's lips, "And the God in whose hand your breath is" (notice that), "and whose are all your ways, you have not glorified." It is a solemn, grave charge, but absolutely true.
Older translations say "you have not glorified" here; the ESV says "you have not honored."
The phrase about breath is not poetry. It names the owner of the life Belshazzar was spending at that table.
Everything that makes a man what he is comes from, and belongs to, Another. No man has anything that he can truly call his own. The prophet Daniel pressed this truth on guilty Belshazzar on the last night of a wasted life. "The God in whose hand your breath is, and whose are all your ways, you have not glorified" (Dan. 5:23). The same strong words would fit many other people just as well.
Belshazzar was not acting in ignorance. He knew how God had dealt with Nebuchadnezzar, the king before him, and even that king never went this far.
And this was not ignorant desecration, but boasting against the God of Israel. They praised gods of gold, silver, bronze, iron, wood, and stone. Even a piece of wood, or a stone, was better than God… Nebuchadnezzar worshipped other gods, yet he never dared to desecrate the vessels of God, as this Belshazzar did. The first man put God above all gods. This one ignores the proof of His power, and all that God was known to be, and insults Him to the utmost. They use the vessels of God to keep the devil's feast. Then comes the hand and writes on the wall… Belshazzar sinned in open defiance, for he knew better, and he was killed that night.
Daniel reads the charge before he reads the writing. The order is not accidental.
If God was about to strike, He will make the grounds of His action clear. This is a striking feature of His ways, above all in the Old Testament. Before He acts in judgment, He is careful to state the reasons for it… So here Daniel laid out the charge against the king. He showed him that he had ignored all the warnings of the past and had sinned against light and knowledge. In the end he had lifted himself up against the Lord of heaven, and had polluted the holy vessels of His house. This shows clearly what the king meant when he ordered those vessels to be brought in. It was no wild whim of a man heated with wine. It was a deliberate, studied insult against God.
- Whose heaven — God no longer ruled openly on earth, so Daniel calls Him "the Lord of heaven." He still governs, just not from a centre here.
- Whose breath — Another hand held the life Belshazzar was spending at that table. Nothing he had was his own.
- Whose vessels — he toasted gods of metal, wood and stone that cannot see, hear or know. Satan stood behind them.
- Whose light — he knew what God had done to the king before him, and that king never dared this. Knowing better made the defiance worse.
- Whose verdict — God explains the grounds before He strikes. Daniel reads the charge first, and explains the writing second.
then from before him was sent the part of the hand, and this writing hath been written.
Daniel has just told Belshazzar why his feast fell silent: he insulted the God who holds his life in His hand. This verse links the king's act to the hand on the wall, and names who sent it.
Daniel does not read the writing until he has named the crime.
If God was about to smite, He will have the grounds of His action explained. This is a striking feature in His ways, especially in the Old Testament. Before He acts in judgment, He is careful to state the reasons, so that He may be clear when He speaks and justified when He judges. So here Daniel presented the indictment against the king. He showed him that he had ignored all the warnings of the past and had sinned against light and knowledge. In the end he had lifted himself up against the Lord of heaven, and had polluted the holy vessels of His house. This shows plainly what the king meant when he ordered these vessels to be brought. It was no mere wild impulse under the heat of wine, but a deliberate and studied insult against God. So Daniel wanted the king to understand this: God sent "the part of the hand" to write on the wall in connection with this very act.
The hand came "from his presence" — from the One Daniel had just described as holding the king's breath.
The man who is doing his own will is simply doing Satan's, and is in his service... But the king had willingly yielded himself to be the devil's tool, so that a controversy between him and God existed. So he hears from Daniel's lips, "the God in whose hand is your breath" (mark that), "and whose are all your ways, you have not honored." A solemn and grave charge, but absolutely true. My friend, is this true of you too? Take care... "Your breath" too is in His hand. The little string of life has only to be broken, and you pass from time into eternity.
Another writer draws the same charge out from a different angle — nothing a man has is his own to spend as he likes.
Now all that makes man what he is, is derived from, and belongs to, Another. No man has anything that he can properly call his own. This truth was pressed upon guilty Belshazzar by the prophet Daniel on the last night of a wasted life.
What the guests saw was small, and it was enough.
No legion of angels appeared. There was no visible display of divine power. Only the fingers of what looked like a man's hand could be seen, writing four words on the plaster of the wall, just opposite the lampstand, where they showed most clearly. The proud king became a shivering mortal, and his lords were astonished.
The same writer sets this scene beside the time God wrote the law. The surface He writes on carries the message.
Our thoughts travel back to Exodus, where we read of the law being given, written with "the finger of God" on tablets of stone. It was fitting material, for stone cannot be twisted or bent, though it can be broken. Here the finger of God is connected with demand upon guilty men... But now in Daniel we again have "the finger of God," and we find it to be the finger of doom, written on plaster, that easily crumbles. God showed His presence by showing the tips of His fingers, and it scared the life out of Belshazzar. The final hour of judgment will come, and "the dead, small and great, stand before God" (Revelation 20:12). What will they feel then? We are reminded of that word, "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God" (Hebrews 10:31).
The letters were in the king's own language. The problem was not the script.
Since the writing was in the Chaldean language, it was not that the king's wise men did not understand the words. It was the connection, application, and interpretation that they could not unfold. Without the key, the words looked to them like scattered pieces, disjointed and meaningless.
One writer puts the failure deeper than language or skill:
It should all have been clear to them. It would have been, if the souls of the Chaldeans had been in communion with the Lord. I do not mean that Daniel had no need of the Spirit of God's power to understand it. But for the understanding of the word, it is an immense thing that we have communion with the God who is making known His mind to us.
The empire's fall was already fixed. Yet God still gave a sign first.
But the sentence of instant, inevitable judgment at once made itself heard. The cup of iniquity was full. Long before this, the mouth of the Lord had announced the punishment of Babylon's king (Isaiah 13; Jeremiah 25, and elsewhere). Yet even the stroke does not fall without a solemn sign from God.
- Cause — The hand was not random. God sent it because the king insulted Him with the vessels of His house, sinning against what he already knew.
- Sender — It came from the God who holds every man's breath and owns all his ways.
- Size — No army, no blazing glory — only fingertips on crumbling plaster. The proudest man alive fell apart.
- Script — The words were in his own language, yet unreadable; God's writing needs God to interpret it.
- Space — Even with the sentence settled, God still gave a sign before the stroke fell. The warning is the mercy.
And this is the writing that is written MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN.
Only four words broke up Belshazzar's feast. Every guest could see them, yet the wisest men in Babylon stood helpless. The problem was not translation. It was a message from God that only God could open.
The king's advisers did not fail at language. One writer points to the real difficulty:
Since the writing was in the Chaldean language, it was not that the king's wise men did not understand the words. It was the connection, application, and interpretation that they could not unfold. Without the key, so many separate words would look to them scattered and meaningless.
Another writer traces that locked meaning back to its author:
Even if someone had read that sentence out, no one could have known its meaning apart from God's teaching. Each word appears to have had a hidden meaning, which God revealed to Daniel. The kingdom was "divided," and given to the Medes and Persians (Peres). So, as always, God alone can interpret what He has caused to be written.
Daniel did more than give the dictionary sense of the four words. The repeat of the first word carries its own message:
Daniel does not just translate the words on the wall. He gives out the mind of God that they were meant to convey. He could not have done this unless God had spoken to him directly. If translated according to their meaning, the words are "numbered," "weighed," and "divided"; but no human cleverness could have discovered their divine significance... The first word came twice. The reason is surely found in Joseph's words to Pharaoh: "And the doubling of Pharaoh's dream means that the thing is fixed by God, and God will shortly bring it about" (Genesis 41:32).
The first word deals with time. The One who gave Babylon its power also set the day it would end:
God Himself had entrusted the rule of the earth to Nebuchadnezzar as a responsibility, and He alone decided how long his kingdom would last. So when Daniel told Belshazzar, "God has numbered your kingdom, and finished it," he meant that God had set the end of Babylon's rule and it had now come. Its days were numbered, and they were over.
The second word moves from the calendar to the scales. One writer takes the verdict past Belshazzar to everyone else, with one exception:
Being weighed and found wanting was true of Belshazzar, and it is true of you and me too, my friend. It is true of everyone. There is only One of whom it was not true, and that was the blessed Lord Jesus Christ. He was put into God's balances and was found full weight... You and I have been found wanting. The things we ought to have done, we have left undone, and the things we ought not to have done, we have done. That is man.
The last word passes sentence on the kingdom. The timing is what strikes: Daniel gave the verdict while the party was still going:
Daniel at once sees God in the matter. The king had insulted God in what was connected with His worship... Nothing appeared at the time to make it even likely. I point this out for a reason. It is another proof of how completely false the maxim is, that we must wait until prophecy is fulfilled before we can understand it... It was His last solemn warning before the blow fell, and the interpretation was given before the Persians broke into the city — when there was not a sign of ruin, but all was gaiety and mirth.
The same sentence has an address for every reader — and an answer:
Keep this in mind. The awful sentence that struck terror into the heart of the self-indulgent king of Babylon has, in fact, been passed on the entire human race. It falls on each individual son and daughter of fallen Adam: "You are weighed in the balance and found wanting." Has the reader fully accepted this sentence against himself?... If so, Christ is for you. He died to put away sin and to bear your many sins. Only trust Him, and all He is and has is yours.
- Read — The wise men saw the writing; they could not unfold its connection and application. God alone can interpret what God has written.
- Doubled — The first word repeated marks a settled matter: what is fixed by God, God shortly brings to pass.
- Numbered — Babylon's rule was a trust with a term. The God who gave the kingdom set the day it ended.
- Weighed — The scales test the man. Every person is found wanting; only Christ was put in God's balances and found full weight.
- Divided — Daniel gave the verdict while the music still played. Prophecy is meant to be believed before the blow falls, not explained after.
This is the interpretation of the thing MENE, God hath numbered thy kingdom, and finished it;
A hand has written four words on the palace wall, and Belshazzar's feast has stopped dead. Daniel now explains them, starting with the first: MENE. The real question is not what the letters spell. It is who set the length of Babylon's reign, and what it means that the count has run out.
(Note: the quotes below use an older translation. It reads "God has numbered your kingdom, and finished it." The ESV reads "God has numbered the days of your kingdom and brought it to an end.")
Daniel does more here than translate an inscription. One writer notes that the plain meaning of the words was not the message, and that the first word came twice for a reason:
Notice that Daniel does not simply translate the words that had been written. He gives out the mind of God that they were meant to convey. He could not have done this unless he himself had received a direct message from God. Taken at their plain meaning, the words are "numbered," "weighed," and "divided." But no human cleverness could have discovered their divine meaning, and that is what Daniel explains. The first word was repeated. The reason is surely found in Joseph's words to Pharaoh: "And the doubling of Pharaoh's dream means that the thing is fixed by God, and God will shortly bring it about" (Genesis 41:32).
The words were plain enough. Their message was not, and only God could give it:
So the kingdom was 'numbered' and finished. It is like when we say of a person, 'his days are numbered.' … And so, as always, God alone can interpret what He has caused to be written. The prophecy came true: the city and the kingdom were taken that same night.
The end of Babylon was not an accident of politics. Daniel had told Nebuchadnezzar years earlier that another empire would follow his:
The king is then told what "Mene," or "numbered," means: God has numbered his kingdom and finished it. Years before, Daniel had told Nebuchadnezzar that God had given him "a kingdom, power, strength, and glory." But he also warned him that another kingdom would rise after his. For sixty-eight years the kings of Babylon had held supreme power over the whole known world. Now the end of the Babylonian Empire had come. Its days were numbered and its world rule was over.
Belshazzar was Nebuchadnezzar's grandson. God had made a promise about that family line, and the timing of the sentence fits it. God did not cut the dynasty short, nor let it run on forever:
Nebuchadnezzar abused the authority the God of heaven had given him, and that could not be forgiven. As to grace beyond our understanding, and his eternal relationship with God, I am persuaded it could be forgiven, and was. But the royal position could not continue past his grandson. God had promised that the kingdom would stay in his family to the third generation (Jeremiah 27:7), and He keeps His word. So He bore patiently with their cruel and idolatrous ways. He waited until bearing any longer would have made Him look indifferent to their shameless tyranny and wickedness. In the end He stepped in with judgment only when He was openly insulted and challenged to fight the powers of darkness.
Notice what Daniel never says to this king. There is no "repent, and it may yet be reversed":
God's patience with the "head of gold" was at an end. So there is no call to repent, nothing but the announcement of God's verdict and the judgment that comes with it.
The sentence fell on a kingdom, but it reached one man's life. And a man can hear the exact words and still not take them in:
MENE meant numbered. The king knew that word, and he knew that TEKEL meant weighed and UPHARSIN meant divided. Numbered, weighed, and divided. "What has that to do with me?" the king might have said. He was soon told. "This is the interpretation of the thing: MENE; God has numbered your kingdom, and finished it." Your history is over. You have come to the end of your rope. God has numbered your kingdom on earth, and finished it. Belshazzar heard this, but I do not think he believed it.
Commentators also read the scene as a warning that outlives Babylon:
This chapter shows the blasphemy that marked the end of the Babylonian monarchy. Blasphemy and the rejection of God's truth are all around us. There is a "Mene, Mene, Tekel" for a Christendom that has turned away from God, and for that final phase of Babylon shown in Revelation 17 and 18.
- Numbered. The word has its everyday sense — "his days are numbered." But only God could unlock what it meant.
- Doubled. MENE came twice. Joseph's words to Pharaoh explain why: a doubled word means God has settled the matter and will act soon.
- Granted. The count was God's to set. After sixty-eight years of world rule, and a promise kept to the third generation, the time ran out.
- Patient. God bore with cruelty and idolatry to the last possible day. He acted only when waiting longer would have looked like indifference.
- Finished. By then no call to repent was left, only a verdict. The king heard it and did not believe it, and the city fell that same night.
TEKEL, Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting;
Only a few words appeared on Belshazzar's wall, and each one carried a sentence. "Tekel" is the word that gives the reason for his fall — a verdict on a man, not just on an empire, weighed in scales God has never put away.
The middle word explains why the kingdom had run out of time. It names a test the king had already been through.
The next word "Tekel," meaning "weighed," tells this godless king why his empire had reached its end… God had weighed his actions in scales that never err, and found them wanting.
The standard was not other kings. It was the trust God had handed to Babylon's throne, and an earlier king had answered that trust in a very different way.
If God had handed the rule of the earth to Nebuchadnezzar and to the kings after him, then He held them responsible for the way they used that trust. Now the verdict falls on Belshazzar. Nebuchadnezzar had failed too, though not as far. But when God disciplined him, he humbled himself and acknowledged that his authority came from God… Belshazzar was blind to everything the past had taught. He sinned worse, lifting his idols above the God who held his very breath in His hand, and so he lifted himself up against the Lord of heaven. His time of testing was over.
Daniel read the sentence while the party was still going. Nothing in the room hinted that the empire was about to fall, and that is why God sent the message.
Nothing showed it at the time. There was no sign that made it even likely… This was God's last solemn warning before the blow fell. Daniel gave the meaning before the Persians broke into the city, when there was not a sign of ruin and everything was bright and merry.
The warning left the king hours, not years.
The warning changed nothing in Belshazzar. He gave Daniel high honours, as though his kingdom would carry on, even though Daniel had already refused them. He wore those honours for just a few short hours, because that night the judgment fell as predicted.
This weighing did not begin or end with Belshazzar. There is a reason no one can pass it, and the word "glory" holds the clue.
God is a God of knowledge, and He weighs our actions (1 Sam. 2:3). He weighed the proud king of Babylon and found him wanting (Dan. 5:27). And "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." The Old Testament word for "glory" means "weight," and comes from a word meaning "to be heavy." So by God's standard, all fall short of the full weight that alone can glorify Him. There is only One who, when He was tested, was found full and true weight.
The verdict fell on one man. But put anyone else in the same scales — King David, or Peter, or Paul — and what would happen?
That is said of the king of Babylon only. But was there ever a mere child of Adam of whom it could not be said?… Put in one scale what a ruler among men should be, and in the other what even David, the son of Jesse, really was. What does the man after God's own heart have to confess?… What about Peter? What about Paul? Have they not all been found wanting?
If the verdict is true of everyone, what should a person do about it? The answer is not to add weight to your own side of the scale.
"TEKEL, you have been weighed in the balances and found wanting." That was true of Belshazzar, and it is true of you and me too, my friend. It is true of everyone. There is only One of whom it was not true, and that was the blessed Lord Jesus Christ. God put Him in His balances and found Him full weight… You and I have been found wanting. We have left undone the things we ought to have done, and we have done the things we ought not to have done… If that is the case — and you have found it out — what should be done? You will need to reject your own works and rest on Christ.
- Weighed. "Tekel" means weighed. God tested Belshazzar's actions in scales that cannot err, and that is why his empire ended that night.
- Wanting. God measured him against a trust. Nebuchadnezzar humbled himself under God's hand; Belshazzar lifted himself up against the Lord of heaven.
- Warned. The sentence came while the feast was still bright and the city looked safe. Belshazzar answered that last warning by handing out honours, as if the kingdom would go on.
- Wide. The same scales weigh everyone. God's standard is His own glory, and all fall short of it — David, Peter and Paul included.
- Weight. Only Christ weighed full in God's balances. The way out of the verdict is to give up your own works and rest on Him.
PERES, Thy kingdom is divided, and given to the Medes and Persians.
Three words appeared on the wall at Belshazzar's feast. This verse gives the last one — the word that hands Babylon's empire to another people. Daniel says it to a king whose city was still bright with celebration, and it came true.
The words "Peres" and "Upharsin" look different. One writer explains the link:
The third word is "Peres." It is another form of "Upharsin" — both are different parts of the same verb — and it means "divided." The king's contempt for God brought judgment on him at once.
Knowing the language was never the problem. Daniel gave something no scholar could reach:
Daniel does not just translate the words that had been written. He gives out the mind of God that they were meant to convey. He could not have done this unless God had spoken to him directly. Translated by their plain meaning, the words are "numbered," "weighed," and "divided." But no human cleverness could have found their divine meaning, and that is what Daniel explains.
Daniel offers the king no way back, and the sentence reaches past him to his whole kingdom:
The next word, PERES, holds judgment — the public judgment that follows Belshazzar's failure to use the power entrusted to him in governing the earth. God's patience with the "head of gold" was over. So there is no call to repentance. There is only the announcement of the result of God's verdict, and the judgment that comes with it. Altogether this narrative, as has been well said, shows us the final character of the wickedness of the ruling power of the nations, set against the God of Israel. It also shows us the judgment that falls as a result on the kingdom of which Babylon was the head.
The book of Daniel speaks of a line of empires. This verse names the one that takes over from Babylon:
We need not go further than this book of Daniel to find the names of these empires. Chapter 5:28 tells us, "PERES, your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians." There is the answer at once. We find the Babylonian kingdom tottering and about to fall. Scripture tells us that the Medes and Persians follow it. Nothing simpler or more certain.
Some have tried to count the Medes and the Persians as two separate empires. The same writer says this verse settled that question in advance:
Trying to separate the Median and the Persian parts, so as to make them the second and third empires, is desperate and unworthy. Daniel 5:28 was clear beforehand, and so were Daniel 6:8, 12, 15... The bear in chapter 7 matches the ram in chapter 8, which had two horns, the kings of Media and Persia. They are plainly not two Beasts, but one combined power.
Nothing in the room suggested the empire was ending:
It was not that anything appeared then. Nothing was seen at the time that made it even likely. I call attention to this, because it is another proof of how completely false that maxim is — that we must wait till prophecy is fulfilled before we can understand it... It was His last solemn warning before the blow fell. Daniel gave the interpretation before the Persians broke into the city, when there was not a sign of ruin, but all was celebration and laughter.
The conquerors named here were already outside the city as Daniel spoke. The king's answer shows he did not believe him:
At that very moment the Medes and the Persians were besieging Babylon... The king thought it could not be taken. But God had prophesied its fall, and now announces the fact. And what takes place? Does Belshazzar bow down in repentance? Alas, no!... The proof of his unbelief was this. He proclaimed that Daniel should be the third ruler in the kingdom, though he had just heard that his kingdom was finished. He did not believe it. But it came true.
Writers read Belshazzar's night as more than ancient history:
Belshazzar's feast, with its splendour and sudden doom, stands as a matter of history and warning. But how few believe it is a picture of the surprising judgment that will overtake the boasting and splendour of this world of pleasure and greatness, in the day of the Lord? The same unerring scriptures that record the past just as surely declare the future. Woe to those who refuse to listen and fail to escape before it is too late.
- Divided — "Peres" and "Upharsin" are two forms of one verb that means "divided." The plain sense was never hidden.
- Revealed — translation alone gave nothing. Daniel could say what God meant only because God told him.
- Ended — this word carries no call to repent. God's patience with the "head of gold" was over.
- Named — this verse names the kingdom that follows. It fixes the Medes and Persians as one empire, the second in Daniel's line.
- Sudden — the sentence came while the feast was still bright. Commentators read that suddenness as the pattern of the judgment still to come.
Then Belshazzar commanded, and they clothed Daniel with purple, and [put] a chain of gold about his neck, and made proclamation concerning him that he should be the third ruler in the kingdom.
Daniel had just read the writing on the wall and told the king that his kingdom was finished. Belshazzar answered with a reward — robe, gold chain, and third place in a realm that had hours left to run.
The promise of reward had been public, and the king kept it. One writer sees a strange integrity in that:
One thing more is added: Belshazzar's last act as king. Whatever Daniel's attitude, he could not let his public promise of a reward to the interpreter come to nothing. Men who are false to God are often true to one another in their very selfishness.
Why third place, and not second? History gives the reason, and one writer treats it as quiet proof that the account is genuine:
The king offered the third place in the kingdom as a reward. That is the sort of circumstantial evidence lawyers love, and that convinces a court. Belshazzar reigned together with his father, Nabonidus. This joint monarch is not named in Daniel 5. It is believed he was away on military business at the time. Two places already belonged to these two kings, so the reward promised was a third place in the kingdom.
The colour of the robe is worth noticing. Some older translations print "scarlet" here and put "purple" in the margin. One writer says the margin has it right:
Purple is found in Scripture mainly with Gentiles, and only once or twice with Israel. In Daniel 5:7, 16 and 29 the margin is correct: purple, not scarlet. Scarlet is never found with a Gentile.
Dressing a man for high office in a doomed kingdom is not generosity. It is a reply. Belshazzar answered the message with a ceremony:
He has been telling me my kingdom is coming to an end, says the king, but I do not believe it. I do not believe my kingdom is over. Blow the trumpet. Put a gold chain round Daniel's neck. Proclaim that I have decided he shall be the next man to me in the kingdom — my kingdom is still going on. So he thought, and so he acted… The proof of his unbelief was this. He proclaimed that Daniel was to be the third ruler in the kingdom. Yet he had just heard that his kingdom was finished. He did not believe it. But it came true.
One writer puts the tragedy of the verse in a single line:
The king makes much of the messenger, but seems to pay little attention to the message. Even so, that night the judgment fell.
Before speaking, Daniel had told the king to keep his gifts. One writer points to what had changed:
Daniel's answer in verse 17 is very striking. Earlier, at the end of Daniel 2, Daniel had accepted the honours placed on him. Now he treated them with disdain. It was clear that the meaning of the four fateful words had already reached his heart. He knew that God had rejected Belshazzar, and that his kingdom was about to crash into ruin. So the honours offered were worthless.
He had come into the banquet as a man with nothing at stake in it:
He had no connection with the feast — none at all. In the day of it he was, as we have seen, a separated man. But he was called to it, and he entered the banqueting hall as a conqueror. The king there promised to make him the third ruler in the kingdom. "Let your gifts be for yourself, and give your rewards to another," said the servant of Christ. He was just as much a conqueror on the day of the feast as he was on the day of the lions' den.
The reward was real, and it was brief:
The warning produced no change in Belshazzar. He gave Daniel honours as though his kingdom would continue — even though Daniel had refused them. Daniel wore those honours for just a few hours, because that night the judgment fell as predicted.
Daniel's rank is worth setting beside two others:
Daniel had the third place and Joseph had the second place, but Christ has the preeminence.
- Warned. The king heard a clear message of judgment and answered it with a ceremony instead of repentance.
- Rewarded. He kept his public promise in full — proof that a man can be honest with people while remaining false toward God.
- Refused. Daniel had already turned the gifts down. God had rejected the kingdom, so its honours were worth nothing to him.
- Revealed. He named a third ruler over a kingdom that God had just declared finished. No words could show unbelief more clearly.
- Removed. The robe and chain lasted only hours. Daniel took third place, Joseph took second, and the preeminence belongs to Christ alone.
In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain.
That very night the feast ended, the writing on the wall came true, and the empire of Babylon changed hands. Commentators read the verse on three levels: the end of one proud man, prophecy fulfilled to the letter, and a sample of how God deals with world powers.
Daniel had told Belshazzar, hours earlier, what the writing meant. What makes his death so severe is that he was not ignorant. He knew how God had dealt with his father, and he insulted God anyway.
But was this ignorant desecration? No — it was boasting against the God of Israel. They praised the gods of gold, of silver, of bronze, of iron, of wood, and of stone. In their eyes even a piece of wood or a stone counted for more than God. Did that godless Belshazzar know no better? Had he never heard of God's ways with his father? No — "And you his son, Belshazzar, have not humbled your heart, though you knew all this." That same night he was slain. Judgment did not delay its avenging blow on one who so boldly insulted God.
Verse 29 and verse 30 sit side by side. The king rewards Daniel and makes him third ruler. That only makes sense if he expects the kingdom to go on.
He has been saying that my kingdom is coming to an end, says the king, but I do not believe it. Blow the trumpet, put a gold chain round Daniel's neck, and proclaim that I have decided he shall be the next man to me in the kingdom — my kingdom is still to go on. So he thought, and so he acted. But we read, "That very night Belshazzar the Chaldean king was killed." The man was plainly an unbeliever, despite the clear warning he had and the testimony of God in the writing on the wall.
Prophecy had already named the man who would take Babylon, and the open gates he would find.
Scripture prophesied the fall of Babylon. It says that Cyrus was God's shepherd, and that He had taken hold of him to subdue nations. God would loosen the belts of kings, to open the double doors before him. The gates would not be shut. The bronze gates would be broken and the iron bars cut through (Isaiah 45:1-2). The suddenness of the attack is mentioned too: "ruin shall come upon you suddenly, of which you know nothing" (Isaiah 47:11). We also find that it was on the night of Belshazzar's revelry that the king was slain.
The city thought itself safe behind its walls. But the attackers went under them, not through them.
The river Euphrates ran right through the centre of the city, guarded by great bronze gates, so that no one could enter by water. Cyrus, the Persian leader, used a very simple trick. The Euphrates bends near Babylon, so he cut a new bed for the water a few miles upstream. When darkness came, he opened the sluices and turned the river into this new channel. The riverbed was then practically dry where it passed Babylon. The Persian troops marched quietly along it, under the bronze gates, and took the city.
For a long time critics treated this verse as proof that Daniel was unreliable. No record of Belshazzar existed outside the Bible.
Years ago, learned critics claimed that the book of Daniel was largely legendary and written several centuries after the events it described. They regarded Belshazzar as an imaginary figure, since they found no reference to him in surviving records. Later, however, archaeologists dug in these ancient ruins and found his name on a clay tablet. That shattered this claim, like many other unbelieving claims. It appears that, following an ancient custom, he shared the kingship with his father. His father was away at the time, so in practice he was king in Babylon just as it fell to the rising power of Medo-Persia.
The verse also settles a question of prophecy. Daniel had told the king his kingdom would go to the Medes and Persians. Verses 30 and 31 record the handover.
Daniel gave Belshazzar the meaning of the final word: "PERES, your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians." So the Medo-Persian kingdom was to follow that of the Chaldeans. And that is how it turned out, for we read in verses 30 and 31: "That very night Belshazzar the Chaldean king was killed. And Darius the Mede received the kingdom." This is perfectly plain and conclusive. We are not left to guesswork — not even to the testimony of secular history. The second great Gentile empire was that of the Medes and Persians.
The fall is not only history. It carries weight for prophecy too.
God thus judged the first of the kingdoms of the Gentiles, and this was the monarchy of Babylon. The event was of the highest importance for history, and of no less weight for prophecy. The moral features that marked Belshazzar's rule will reappear in the future Babylon spoken of in Revelation.
Wolston presses it on anyone who assumes there is always time later:
But, you say, some men turn to the Lord on their deathbed. I do not deny it. But who gives you the assurance? You may spend your life in the service of sin, living only for this world and neglecting eternity. Who tells you that you will still be able to turn to the Lord at the last hour and have everything settled? Take warning: Belshazzar died that night, and you may die this night.
- Knowledge: God did not judge Belshazzar for ignorance. He knew how God had dealt with his father, and he defied Him anyway.
- Refusal: His last royal act was to promote Daniel to third ruler. He never believed the kingdom was finished.
- That night: God did not postpone the sentence. The warning and its fulfilment fell inside the same evening's feast.
- Precision: Scripture named the conqueror, the dry river channel and the open gates in advance. A clay tablet later confirmed even the king's name.
- Pattern: The first Gentile empire ended here. Commentators see its pride as a preview of the Babylon of Revelation.