Daniel 1:1–6

Daniel 1:1 · Darby

In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon unto Jerusalem, and besieged it.

The opening line of Daniel reads like dry record-keeping: a date, a king, a siege. Yet it marks a turning point in the Bible's story of the world. Here the throne at Jerusalem loses its place, and rule over the earth passes into Gentile hands.

The date and its accuracy

Daniel dates the siege to Jehoiakim's third year. Jeremiah dates the same campaign to the fourth. One writer points to two different ways of counting:

Whatever the difficulties in the word of God may be, they really arise from a lack of light.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A judgment long announced

Nebuchadnezzar's arrival was no accident of politics. The warnings had run for generations:

Again and again, warnings came to the people of Israel and the kings of Judah. Their evil and idolatrous ways would bring the chastening hand of God upon them. They took no notice. Then the prophet Isaiah announced plainly that judgment would fall... Despite this message, the evil grew. It reached its height under Hezekiah's son, the wicked Manasseh... At last, in the reign of Jehoiakim, God fulfilled the words He had spoken through Isaiah. The government passed from the Jew to the Gentile. From then on the Jews will be under Gentile rule, until the times of the Gentiles close with the coming reign of Christ.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the siege of this city matters

Any city can be besieged. What made this one different was whose city it was:

Daniel 1 opens with a solemn statement. The king of Babylon besieged and took Jerusalem. He carried king and people away captive, and took the vessels of the House of God to Babylon. This is very important to notice, as it gives us the ground on which the prophecies of Daniel proceed. The throne of David was the throne of Jehovah (1 Chron. 29:23), and Jerusalem was the city of God, the city of the Great King (Ps. 48:2, 8). God's intention from the first has been to administer the earth through the people of Israel. Israel is His centre. Jerusalem is His chosen seat of government, and the house of David its earthly rulers.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

"Not My people"

The loss went deeper than land and buildings:

Here is the startling fact. The government God had set up in Israel was now to continue no longer. With it went the visible sign of His presence. God Himself stripped them of their name as His people. From now on they were "Lo-Ammi," not My people. That was their sentence, as far as He was concerned — whatever His grace might finally intend. For His "gifts and calling" are irrevocable.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The clock that is still running

This siege was the first of several, and it started a period that has not yet ended:

Now here began "the times of the Gentiles." Chapter 1 of this prophetic book says that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it. In 2 Kings 24 and 25 we read of three separate successful campaigns against Jerusalem by this same Nebuchadnezzar. The last was the complete and decisive one. Since then Israel has been subject to Gentile rule. Its kings have been only vassals.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

A dark scene and the answer of faith

The scene could crush anyone who wanted to live for God. One writer names that feeling, then answers it:

Look at this state of affairs from nature's point of view. It is quite enough to discourage the heart, dampen the spirit and paralyse all energy. Jerusalem in ruins, the temple trampled down, the Lord's vessels in the house of a false god, and Judah carried away captive. Surely the heart would feel inclined to say there is no use in it. Why hold up the standard of practical discipleship and personal devotion any longer? That would be nature's reasoning, but it is not the language of faith. There is always a path along which the true disciple can run, even if he has to run alone.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Judah's ruin was not bad politics. Generations ignored God's warnings, and judgment came in the reign of Jehoiakim.

- Transfer. The throne at Jerusalem was God's own throne on earth. The siege moved world government from the Jew to the Gentile.

- Sentence. God also took away their name as His people: "not My people." Yet His gifts and calling still stand.

- Duration. This was the first of three campaigns. It began the times of the Gentiles, which end only when Christ reigns.

- Response. The scene invites despair, but faith always has a path to walk in, even if it must walk alone.

Daniel 1:2 · Darby

And the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, and a part of the vessels of the house of God; and he carried them into the land of Shinar, to the house of his god; and he brought the vessels into the treasure-house of his god.

One sentence marks the end of an era. Judah's king is handed over. The holy vessels of God's house are carried east into a pagan temple. So who did this — Babylon's army, or God Himself?

Who Handed Judah Over

The verse does not say Nebuchadnezzar took Jehoiakim. It says the Lord gave him. That wording carries the weight of the whole book.

The first two verses introduce the Book. They briefly show the ruin of Israel. They show the government of the earth — seen in royal power — passing from the king of Judah to the king of Babylon. These verses describe that solemn act plainly as the Lord's doing, for we read, "The Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah" into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the Vessels Went Too

The temple vessels were not lost by accident. God let them go, and the kings of Judah had already dishonoured them.

The Lord had given Jehoiakim into Nebuchadnezzar's hand. He had abandoned His house in Jerusalem so completely that He allowed the sacred vessels of the temple to be taken into the land of Shinar. The sins of the kings of Judah had already profaned those vessels. So God's lampstand at Jerusalem was removed for a time. It was removed in judgment, because it had stopped giving out divine light to guide and bless people in the moral darkness of this world.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Shinar — Where They Were Taken

"Shinar" is not a neutral address. Scripture gives the place a fixed character.

Sadly we read "some of the vessels of the house of God … he brought them to the land of Shinar" (Daniel 1:2). Precious vessels, set apart for the service of God's house, now found in the house of a pagan's god! Scripture first shows us Shinar in Genesis 10, 11 and 14 as a place marked by rebellion. There man challenges the rights of God and makes a name for himself. It is a kingdom of war and conflict. This is the character of the scene where His people were found, under God's governmental dealings.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

The Treasury of His God

What Nebuchadnezzar did with the vessels reveals him. He stored them as loot in the house of his god — and that hints at the rulers who come after him.

At once we see the character of this Gentile king, for we read that he "placed the vessels in the treasury of his god." He has no true knowledge or fear of God. He has no real sense of the sacred character of these vessels. This is a warning sign of the godless character of the Gentile rulers during the times of the Gentiles.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why This Small Raid Counted Most

Nebuchadnezzar came against Jerusalem more than once. God's eye rests on this first raid.

There had been three deportations. The last one did the most damage: the temple was burnt, and very large numbers were led captive. But the seventy years of captivity count from the first one, which we would call relatively unimportant. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar had taken the vessels of the Temple to Babylon. He even put them into the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before. True, some kings had taken silver from the treasury, and even from the doors of the temple, to buy off the king of Assyria. Ahaz and Hezekiah did this. But the holy vessels had never been touched.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Faith When Everything Is Broken

A ruined house and stolen vessels could crush anyone's devotion. They do not have to.

Blessed be God! There is always a wide space where true devotion can grow. There is always a path the true disciple can walk, even if he has to walk it alone. It does not matter what the outward state of things may be. Faith has the privilege of depending on God, feeding on Christ, and breathing the air of heaven — as fully as if everything were in perfect order and harmony.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Vessels Came Back

What went into Shinar did not stay there. The same objects measured both the loss and the recovery.

When Judah was restored, all these objects came back — 5,400 of them (Ezra 1:9-11). That was the most striking feature of the journey home that brought the remnant of the people back to their land. At the start of these seventy years one thing stands out. The glory of the temple, the glory of its service of worship to the Lord, had itself gone into captivity.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — the Lord handed Judah over; Babylon's strength did not win it. Rule over the earth passed from Judah's king to Nebuchadnezzar.

- Profaned — the kings of Judah had already dishonoured the vessels. God left His house before Babylon ever entered it.

- Shinar — the vessels land in a place marked by rebellion, where man makes a name for himself. A king with no fear of God stores them among his idol's treasures.

- Counted — the seventy years date from this small raid. No one had ever touched the holy vessels before.

- Returned — 5,400 vessels came home as the mark of restoration. Until then, faith still had a path to walk, even alone.

Daniel 1:3 · Darby

And the king spoke unto Ashpenaz the chief of his eunuchs, that he should bring of the children of Israel, both of the royal seed and of the nobles,

Jerusalem has fallen, and Nebuchadnezzar's first order is not about walls or tribute but about young men — the best-born and best-taught of the beaten nation. Behind his command to Ashpenaz lies an older word from God, and a purpose the king knew nothing about.

A Prophecy Coming True

Long before Babylon marched, Isaiah carried a warning to King Hezekiah. One writer traces this verse straight back to that warning, and notes the mercy God folded into the judgment.

God sent Isaiah to him with this message: "Hear the word of the LORD of hosts… And some of your own sons, who will come from you, whom you will father, shall be taken away, and they shall be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon" (Isaiah 39:5-7). The opening verses of our chapter reveal the fulfilment of Isaiah's prediction. But what we want to call attention to is this: in fulfilling His own word in judgment, God remembered mercy. It is out of these very descendants of Hezekiah that He raised up witnesses for Himself in the middle of Babylon's idolatrous corruptions.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Master Of The Eunuchs

The verse calls Ashpenaz the chief eunuch. That word ties the scene to an older prophecy, and it also described a post of trust in the palace.

One thing prophesied against Israel was that their sons would become eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon. 2 Kings 20:18; Isaiah 39:7. Daniel and his companions were an instance of this coming true, for they were put in the care of "the master of the eunuchs." Though the word saris means "eunuch," it is often translated "chamberlain" and "officer," because eunuchs held such positions of trust.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Pick Of The Nation

Nebuchadnezzar did not gather servants at random. He picked the best minds of a beaten nation, and he had a use for them.

When Nebuchadnezzar first came against Jerusalem, Daniel and his three friends were carried captive among many youths of royal or noble birth. They were counted as men of exceptional intellectual ability — the pick of the nation in wisdom and understanding. The shrewd Babylonian king intended to strengthen his position with the cleverest men of conquered nations. He would work them into the army of magicians — the men who dealt with demon powers, and gave him guidance by their occult practices.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Two Purposes In Collision

God allowed the captivity for His own purpose. The king had a purpose of his own for these captives, and the two collided.

God permitted Nebuchadnezzar to carry them away as captives, and by that He was accomplishing His own purpose. But Nebuchadnezzar, now holding power over them, tried to make them serve his will. So a conflict arose at once between the thoughts of God and the thoughts of the king of Babylon… In one word, he wanted them to stop being Jews and to become Chaldeans, and to mix into their new religion the light they had received from the words of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What The World Wants From God's People

These captives are the faithful remnant of their people. The court wanted them; it did not want what made them different.

The king of Babylon's efforts to use the people of God for his own ends bring this godly remnant to our notice. He would try to decorate his court with the leaders of God's people — the king's seed, the princes, and those who were good-looking and marked by wisdom, knowledge and science. The religious world will use the people of God for its own glory. But it cannot tolerate their God, their obedience to His word, or their separation from its own evils. So the world would gladly wipe out every trace of their link with the true God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Royal Line Carried Off

The captives included men of the royal family. With David's descendants carried into a foreign palace, the line looked finished.

Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem, as God allowed in His governmental ways. Zedekiah was the last of the house of David to sit on his throne, and he was blinded. It looked as if the lamp of David had been put out for good… The royal seed went into captivity in Babylon (Dan. 1:3). No one of the house of David reigned in Jerusalem.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Summary

- Word kept. Isaiah warned Hezekiah that his sons would serve as eunuchs in Babylon's palace. The order to Ashpenaz is that word coming true.

- Mercy inside judgment. Out of those same descendants God raised up His witnesses in the heart of an idolatrous empire.

- Two plans. God allowed the captivity for His purpose. Nebuchadnezzar took these captives for his own, and the clash starts here.

- World's offer. The world will take the gifts of God's people. It will not take their God, their obedience, or their separation.

- Lamp not out. The royal line went into exile and no son of David reigned in Jerusalem — yet God was not finished with that family.

Daniel 1:4 · Darby

youths in whom was no blemish, and of goodly countenance, and skilful in all wisdom, and acquainted with knowledge, and understanding science, and such as had ability in them to stand in the king's palace, and whom they might teach the learning and the language of the Chaldeans.

Daniel and his friends arrive in Babylon as prize captives. They are hand-picked for their looks and ability, then put through a course designed to turn them into useful Babylonians. It raises a question every believer meets: what happens when the world wants your gifts but not your God?

The king's shortlist

Nebuchadnezzar was not being kind. He was investing. He took the finest captives his conquest had produced and expected a return on them.

Captive Jews were brought into Babylon, that splendid treasure-house, and among them Daniel and his three companions, as told in Daniel 1:3-6... The great Nebuchadnezzar meant to get out of his captives all the profit and progress that their scientific ability and learning could produce. He was just like the leaders of the nations today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the words mean

At Babylon, Daniel had two things to learn: a literature and a language. Commentators differ over which language was meant.

At Babylon Daniel and his companions had to acquire "the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans," that is, their ancient literature and language. What was that language? In Dan. 2:4 we find that the wise men answered the king in the Syriac language, that is Aramaic... this is held to be not the learned and court language, but the common language of the people.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Older translations say "understanding science" here; the ESV has "understanding learning". The word is the ordinary word for knowledge, and it appears in only one other place in the Bible.

In both the Hebrew and the Greek the words mean "knowledge," and are usually translated that way. They are rendered "science" only in Dan. 1:4, where "knowledge" and "wisdom" are also mentioned, and in 1 Tim. 6:20, where it is science, or knowledge, "falsely so called." In Daniel this no doubt refers to the speculations of the Magi. In the letter to Timothy it refers to the philosophers or Gnostic heretics, whose "knowledge" had no real foundation.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Wanted for their gifts, not their God

Babylon wanted what these young men could give. It did not want their God.

The world is always ready to make the people of God its servants, and to draw light from their knowledge. But it cannot tolerate them if they stay faithful to their God, obeying His word and keeping a holy separation from evil... He would have them, in a word, stop being Jews and become Chaldeans, and mix into their new religion the light they had received from the word of God. That is where philosophy comes from, even in Christian times — the philosophy Paul earnestly warns us against, as being "according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ" (Col. 2:8).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The plan reached every part of them.

To conform to their world, the minds of these men are to be trained in the learning of the Chaldeans. Their tongues are to speak the Chaldean language. Their bodies are to be fed with the king's delicacies, and their names changed to those of heathen gods.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A curriculum with an agenda

The plan targeted young men at a vulnerable age, far from home. Its aims were not neutral.

Daniel was sent to the Babylonian university to learn and read the language and literature of the Chaldeans. The teens and early twenties are years full of special danger. These youths had been taken captive and were now far from home and from parental control and influence. The educational system of Babel was not designed to train young men to be spiritual, godly men. Its purpose was different: to train men for its own empire and glory, and to make them good Babylonians. Young people need to know that today. The educational system of this world does not exist to make them good Christians.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

What Babylon did not put there

The qualities listed in this verse were already in them when they arrived. Babylon recruited character it had not produced.

Nebuchadnezzar was a mighty ruler. But there was something in these men that was morally greater than anything found in Nebuchadnezzar... It is clear that there was moral formation in these men before they reached Babylon.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Two schools, one result

They sat the king's course. But their real teaching came from somewhere else, and the results showed it.

But that is not all. There was the positive blessing of God in giving them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom... God prepared each of them for what he would afterwards have to fill. God was their teacher, and the trial of their faith was a needed, essential part of their training in His school. Then, when they stood before the king, none was found like them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Chosen — Babylon picked the best of God's people for the profit their ability could bring. The world still does the same.

- Claimed — the aim was to make them stop being Jews and become Chaldeans: minds, tongues, food and names all reshaped.

- Taught — "the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans" was a real literature and a real language; the "science" of the verse is the ordinary word for knowledge, the word Paul later ties to knowledge "falsely so called."

- Formed — the king admired what Babylon had not put there: moral formation that was in them before they arrived.

- Surpassed — God was their real teacher, and the trial of their faith was part of His school, so no one in the king's court matched them.

Daniel 1:5 · Darby

And the king appointed unto them a daily provision of the king's delicate food, and of the wine that he drank, to nourish them three years, that at the end thereof they might stand before the king.

Babylon's offer to its brightest captives sounds generous: the finest food, the best training, and a place at court at the end. That is what made it dangerous.

The Word "Assigned"

The king "assigned" their food. The same word turns up in another story, and one writer points it out while explaining the great fish that swallowed Jonah:

"Prepared" does not mean the fish was created specially for this purpose — though that would be an easy matter for the Maker of the sea and the dry land. It simply means the fish was "appointed" for this service. Translators render the same word this way in Daniel 1:5, of the food intended for Daniel and his companions.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What the Three Years Were For

The training was not neutral. Three years of the king's food and the king's lessons had one goal: to leave changed men standing in his presence:

The king, therefore, would have these captives fed with his own food and drinking his own wine. Fed from his resources for three years, they might at the end of it stand in his presence (v. 5). He would have them, in one word, stop being Jews and become Chaldeans. They were to mix into their new religion the light they had received from God's own words. This is where philosophy comes from, even in Christian times. Paul gives a serious warning against that philosophy, as being "according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ" (Col. 2:8).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The schooling had its own agenda, and it was not the agenda of the God of Israel:

Daniel was sent to the Babylonian university to learn and read the language and literature of the Chaldeans... The educational system of Babel was not designed to train young men to be spiritual, godly men. It had an altogether different agenda. Its purpose was to train men for its own empire and greatness; to make them good Babylonians.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

An Offer Hard to Refuse

For men who had lost their homeland, the offer was hard to turn down:

In exchange for their loss of nationality, these captives are offered a most alluring prospect in a foreign land. They shall have a free course of the best education in the land. The king shall pay for the finest provision to meet their daily needs. And in the end they shall have a high position in the king's palace.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the Food Was a Snare

The danger was not the luxury but the source of the food:

"But Daniel resolved that he would not defile himself with the king's food, or with the wine that he drank." By nature they would have received such food with thankfulness. But faith acts, and refuses it. The food was connected with the false gods of the country, being part of the daily food of an idolatrous king... Christianity comes in and delivers the conscience from anxiety about such things. "Eat whatever is sold in the meat market," Paul says, "without raising any question on the ground of conscience." The same holds at a feast. But if someone pointed out that certain food had been offered to idols, the Christian was not to eat it — for the sake of the one who said it, and for conscience' sake. The Jew, however, had to keep complete separation.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Same Pressure Today

The pattern of wisdom, food and titles has a modern counterpart:

Those who are destined for a place as religious leaders in the Babylon-like corruption of Christendom must be trained in the religious schools of this world. They must, as it were, be taught "the learning and the language of the Chaldeans." They must benefit from the resources the world provides — "a daily portion of the king's food." And last of all, they must accept such titles and dignities as the world can give.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What the Refusal Produced

Refusing the king's table cost them nothing. Their real supply came from somewhere else:

This led Daniel and his friends to decline these luxuries and be content with the simplest food and drink. God honoured the separation they practised in this matter, and He "gave them learning and skill in all literature and wisdom," as we see in verse 17. The knowledge they had came not from man but from God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Judgment With Mercy Inside It

Their captivity fulfilled a prediction spoken long before by the prophet Isaiah. Yet judgment was not the whole story:

The opening verses of our chapter reveal the fulfilment of Isaiah's prediction. But here is what we want to point out: in fulfilling His own word in judgment, God remembered mercy. Out of these very descendants of Hezekiah He raised up witnesses for Himself in the middle of Babylon's idolatrous corruptions.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Appointed — The king "assigned" their daily food. Scripture uses that same word of the fish appointed to swallow Jonah.

- Aim — The three years of food, wine and learning were meant to turn Jews into Chaldeans. Babylon would mix its own religion with the light they had from God.

- Allure — The offer was free education, the finest daily food, and a high place at the end. The bait was generosity, not force.

- Answer — The food came from an idolatrous king's table. Faith refused what nature would have taken with thanks.

- Aftermath — God honoured their separation and gave them learning and skill in all literature and wisdom. Their real training came from Him. Out of judgment He raised up witnesses in the heart of Babylon.

Daniel 1:6 · Darby

Now among these were of the children of Judah, Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah.

Jerusalem had fallen, the temple treasures were in Babylon, and the captives now stood inside a pagan palace. So why does Scripture pause to name four young men of Judah — and what happens to their names in a city full of idols?

Judgment carried out, mercy remembered

The capture of these young men was not an accident of war. God had warned Hezekiah about it generations earlier — and He used the same event for mercy.

Hezekiah once received the messengers from the king of Babylon. Their attention flattered him, so he showed them all the treasures of his kingdom. Isaiah was then sent to him with this message: "Hear the word of the Lord of hosts: Behold, the days are coming, when all that is in your house... shall be carried to Babylon. And some of your own sons... shall be taken away, and they shall be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon" (Isaiah 39:5-7). The opening verses of our chapter show Isaiah's prediction fulfilled. But note this: in carrying out His own word in judgment, God remembered mercy. Out of these very descendants of Hezekiah He raised up witnesses for Himself in the middle of Babylon's idolatrous corruption.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Names that announced their God

Each Hebrew name said something about the God of Israel. That is why Babylon replaced them.

Daniel means "God is my judge"; Hananiah, "Beloved of the Lord"; Mishael, "Who is as God"; Azariah, "The Lord is my help." These beautiful names were soon changed to names with pagan meaning, to blot out the very memory of Jehovah. Daniel becomes Belteshazzar (Bel's prince); Hananiah becomes Shadrach (lit up by the sun-god); Mishael becomes Meshach (who is like Shach — Venus); and Azariah becomes Abednego (the servant of Nego).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The new name as bait

The new name came with honour attached. One writer sees it as the first move in a longer campaign — flattery first, force later.

Daniel's name was changed to Belteshazzar, which means "Bel's prince," or "he whom Bel favours." This may have been a snare of Satan. By giving him a name and a place of honour tied to the chief god of the land, it would draw Daniel away from the worship of the one true God — and away from loyalty to the God whose name was woven into the name his parents gave him in Israel. The enemy of God and of our souls is that cunning. By both flattery and force he seeks to turn us from loyalty to Christ, whose blessed name is called on us — "Christians." The enemy tries flattery on Daniel and his friends first. When this fails to seduce them into idolatry, he tries the burning fiery furnace and the lions' den.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Four lights in the dark city

Israel as a nation had failed as God's witness. Yet the light did not go out; it moved to Babylon.

The people of Israel were God's witnesses in a world wholly given over to idolatry (Isaiah 43:10). God had set them in a high position to shine for Him, but their unfaithfulness cost them that place. Yet He never lacked a small remnant true to His name and His interests. Here, in the capital city of this king who sat in darkness, four of these lights shine out. The light that was despised in Jerusalem is now radiant in Babylon.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

What Babylon wanted from them

The king of Babylon wanted these young men at his court — on his terms.

He would seek to decorate his court with the leaders of God's people. He wanted the royal line, the princes, and men who were good-looking and marked by wisdom, knowledge and learning. The religious world will use the people of God for its own glory. But it cannot tolerate their God, their obedience to His word, or their separation from its own evils.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Faith away from every support

Every outward support for their faith was gone. They obeyed anyway.

They had lost every privilege of the temple, and the temple itself lay in ruins. They were captives at the mercy of a pagan king, pressed with every sort of alluring temptation. Yet they held the Nazirite's place of true separation through obedience to the word of God. No doubt Daniel's faith and energy acted on his companions and led them to follow him in the path of God's will. But if so, the others were willing to follow. All four are striking proof that God's grace is enough to sustain His servants in the worst circumstances imaginable.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Named — Scripture names four young men of Judah at the moment judgment falls. God remembered mercy while He carried out His own word.

- Renamed — Each Hebrew name declared something about God. Babylon swapped them for the names of its idols to erase the memory of Jehovah.

- Courted — The world wanted their wisdom and their looks for its court. It did not want their God or their obedience to His word.

- Tested — Flattery came first. The fiery furnace and the lions' den came later. The honour on offer was the opening move, not the last one.

- Shining — The light despised in Jerusalem shone in Babylon. God's grace holds His people when every outward support is gone.