In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon unto Jerusalem, and besieged it.
The opening line of Daniel reads like dry record-keeping: a date, a king, a siege. Yet it marks a turning point in the Bible's story of the world. Here the throne at Jerusalem loses its place, and rule over the earth passes into Gentile hands.
Daniel dates the siege to Jehoiakim's third year. Jeremiah dates the same campaign to the fourth. One writer points to two different ways of counting:
Whatever the difficulties in the word of God may be, they really arise from a lack of light.
Nebuchadnezzar's arrival was no accident of politics. The warnings had run for generations:
Again and again, warnings came to the people of Israel and the kings of Judah. Their evil and idolatrous ways would bring the chastening hand of God upon them. They took no notice. Then the prophet Isaiah announced plainly that judgment would fall... Despite this message, the evil grew. It reached its height under Hezekiah's son, the wicked Manasseh... At last, in the reign of Jehoiakim, God fulfilled the words He had spoken through Isaiah. The government passed from the Jew to the Gentile. From then on the Jews will be under Gentile rule, until the times of the Gentiles close with the coming reign of Christ.
Any city can be besieged. What made this one different was whose city it was:
Daniel 1 opens with a solemn statement. The king of Babylon besieged and took Jerusalem. He carried king and people away captive, and took the vessels of the House of God to Babylon. This is very important to notice, as it gives us the ground on which the prophecies of Daniel proceed. The throne of David was the throne of Jehovah (1 Chron. 29:23), and Jerusalem was the city of God, the city of the Great King (Ps. 48:2, 8). God's intention from the first has been to administer the earth through the people of Israel. Israel is His centre. Jerusalem is His chosen seat of government, and the house of David its earthly rulers.
The loss went deeper than land and buildings:
Here is the startling fact. The government God had set up in Israel was now to continue no longer. With it went the visible sign of His presence. God Himself stripped them of their name as His people. From now on they were "Lo-Ammi," not My people. That was their sentence, as far as He was concerned — whatever His grace might finally intend. For His "gifts and calling" are irrevocable.
This siege was the first of several, and it started a period that has not yet ended:
Now here began "the times of the Gentiles." Chapter 1 of this prophetic book says that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it. In 2 Kings 24 and 25 we read of three separate successful campaigns against Jerusalem by this same Nebuchadnezzar. The last was the complete and decisive one. Since then Israel has been subject to Gentile rule. Its kings have been only vassals.
The scene could crush anyone who wanted to live for God. One writer names that feeling, then answers it:
Look at this state of affairs from nature's point of view. It is quite enough to discourage the heart, dampen the spirit and paralyse all energy. Jerusalem in ruins, the temple trampled down, the Lord's vessels in the house of a false god, and Judah carried away captive. Surely the heart would feel inclined to say there is no use in it. Why hold up the standard of practical discipleship and personal devotion any longer? That would be nature's reasoning, but it is not the language of faith. There is always a path along which the true disciple can run, even if he has to run alone.
- Cause. Judah's ruin was not bad politics. Generations ignored God's warnings, and judgment came in the reign of Jehoiakim.
- Transfer. The throne at Jerusalem was God's own throne on earth. The siege moved world government from the Jew to the Gentile.
- Sentence. God also took away their name as His people: "not My people." Yet His gifts and calling still stand.
- Duration. This was the first of three campaigns. It began the times of the Gentiles, which end only when Christ reigns.
- Response. The scene invites despair, but faith always has a path to walk in, even if it must walk alone.
And the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, and a part of the vessels of the house of God; and he carried them into the land of Shinar, to the house of his god; and he brought the vessels into the treasure-house of his god.
One sentence marks the end of an era. Judah's king is handed over. The holy vessels of God's house are carried east into a pagan temple. So who did this — Babylon's army, or God Himself?
The verse does not say Nebuchadnezzar took Jehoiakim. It says the Lord gave him. That wording carries the weight of the whole book.
The first two verses introduce the Book. They briefly show the ruin of Israel. They show the government of the earth — seen in royal power — passing from the king of Judah to the king of Babylon. These verses describe that solemn act plainly as the Lord's doing, for we read, "The Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah" into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar.
The temple vessels were not lost by accident. God let them go, and the kings of Judah had already dishonoured them.
The Lord had given Jehoiakim into Nebuchadnezzar's hand. He had abandoned His house in Jerusalem so completely that He allowed the sacred vessels of the temple to be taken into the land of Shinar. The sins of the kings of Judah had already profaned those vessels. So God's lampstand at Jerusalem was removed for a time. It was removed in judgment, because it had stopped giving out divine light to guide and bless people in the moral darkness of this world.
"Shinar" is not a neutral address. Scripture gives the place a fixed character.
Sadly we read "some of the vessels of the house of God … he brought them to the land of Shinar" (Daniel 1:2). Precious vessels, set apart for the service of God's house, now found in the house of a pagan's god! Scripture first shows us Shinar in Genesis 10, 11 and 14 as a place marked by rebellion. There man challenges the rights of God and makes a name for himself. It is a kingdom of war and conflict. This is the character of the scene where His people were found, under God's governmental dealings.
What Nebuchadnezzar did with the vessels reveals him. He stored them as loot in the house of his god — and that hints at the rulers who come after him.
At once we see the character of this Gentile king, for we read that he "placed the vessels in the treasury of his god." He has no true knowledge or fear of God. He has no real sense of the sacred character of these vessels. This is a warning sign of the godless character of the Gentile rulers during the times of the Gentiles.
Nebuchadnezzar came against Jerusalem more than once. God's eye rests on this first raid.
There had been three deportations. The last one did the most damage: the temple was burnt, and very large numbers were led captive. But the seventy years of captivity count from the first one, which we would call relatively unimportant. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar had taken the vessels of the Temple to Babylon. He even put them into the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before. True, some kings had taken silver from the treasury, and even from the doors of the temple, to buy off the king of Assyria. Ahaz and Hezekiah did this. But the holy vessels had never been touched.
A ruined house and stolen vessels could crush anyone's devotion. They do not have to.
Blessed be God! There is always a wide space where true devotion can grow. There is always a path the true disciple can walk, even if he has to walk it alone. It does not matter what the outward state of things may be. Faith has the privilege of depending on God, feeding on Christ, and breathing the air of heaven — as fully as if everything were in perfect order and harmony.
What went into Shinar did not stay there. The same objects measured both the loss and the recovery.
When Judah was restored, all these objects came back — 5,400 of them (Ezra 1:9-11). That was the most striking feature of the journey home that brought the remnant of the people back to their land. At the start of these seventy years one thing stands out. The glory of the temple, the glory of its service of worship to the Lord, had itself gone into captivity.
- Given — the Lord handed Judah over; Babylon's strength did not win it. Rule over the earth passed from Judah's king to Nebuchadnezzar.
- Profaned — the kings of Judah had already dishonoured the vessels. God left His house before Babylon ever entered it.
- Shinar — the vessels land in a place marked by rebellion, where man makes a name for himself. A king with no fear of God stores them among his idol's treasures.
- Counted — the seventy years date from this small raid. No one had ever touched the holy vessels before.
- Returned — 5,400 vessels came home as the mark of restoration. Until then, faith still had a path to walk, even alone.
And the king spoke unto Ashpenaz the chief of his eunuchs, that he should bring of the children of Israel, both of the royal seed and of the nobles,
Jerusalem has fallen, and Nebuchadnezzar's first order is not about walls or tribute but about young men — the best-born and best-taught of the beaten nation. Behind his command to Ashpenaz lies an older word from God, and a purpose the king knew nothing about.
Long before Babylon marched, Isaiah carried a warning to King Hezekiah. One writer traces this verse straight back to that warning, and notes the mercy God folded into the judgment.
God sent Isaiah to him with this message: "Hear the word of the LORD of hosts… And some of your own sons, who will come from you, whom you will father, shall be taken away, and they shall be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon" (Isaiah 39:5-7). The opening verses of our chapter reveal the fulfilment of Isaiah's prediction. But what we want to call attention to is this: in fulfilling His own word in judgment, God remembered mercy. It is out of these very descendants of Hezekiah that He raised up witnesses for Himself in the middle of Babylon's idolatrous corruptions.
The verse calls Ashpenaz the chief eunuch. That word ties the scene to an older prophecy, and it also described a post of trust in the palace.
One thing prophesied against Israel was that their sons would become eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon. 2 Kings 20:18; Isaiah 39:7. Daniel and his companions were an instance of this coming true, for they were put in the care of "the master of the eunuchs." Though the word saris means "eunuch," it is often translated "chamberlain" and "officer," because eunuchs held such positions of trust.
Nebuchadnezzar did not gather servants at random. He picked the best minds of a beaten nation, and he had a use for them.
When Nebuchadnezzar first came against Jerusalem, Daniel and his three friends were carried captive among many youths of royal or noble birth. They were counted as men of exceptional intellectual ability — the pick of the nation in wisdom and understanding. The shrewd Babylonian king intended to strengthen his position with the cleverest men of conquered nations. He would work them into the army of magicians — the men who dealt with demon powers, and gave him guidance by their occult practices.
God allowed the captivity for His own purpose. The king had a purpose of his own for these captives, and the two collided.
God permitted Nebuchadnezzar to carry them away as captives, and by that He was accomplishing His own purpose. But Nebuchadnezzar, now holding power over them, tried to make them serve his will. So a conflict arose at once between the thoughts of God and the thoughts of the king of Babylon… In one word, he wanted them to stop being Jews and to become Chaldeans, and to mix into their new religion the light they had received from the words of God.
These captives are the faithful remnant of their people. The court wanted them; it did not want what made them different.
The king of Babylon's efforts to use the people of God for his own ends bring this godly remnant to our notice. He would try to decorate his court with the leaders of God's people — the king's seed, the princes, and those who were good-looking and marked by wisdom, knowledge and science. The religious world will use the people of God for its own glory. But it cannot tolerate their God, their obedience to His word, or their separation from its own evils. So the world would gladly wipe out every trace of their link with the true God.
The captives included men of the royal family. With David's descendants carried into a foreign palace, the line looked finished.
Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem, as God allowed in His governmental ways. Zedekiah was the last of the house of David to sit on his throne, and he was blinded. It looked as if the lamp of David had been put out for good… The royal seed went into captivity in Babylon (Dan. 1:3). No one of the house of David reigned in Jerusalem.
- Word kept. Isaiah warned Hezekiah that his sons would serve as eunuchs in Babylon's palace. The order to Ashpenaz is that word coming true.
- Mercy inside judgment. Out of those same descendants God raised up His witnesses in the heart of an idolatrous empire.
- Two plans. God allowed the captivity for His purpose. Nebuchadnezzar took these captives for his own, and the clash starts here.
- World's offer. The world will take the gifts of God's people. It will not take their God, their obedience, or their separation.
- Lamp not out. The royal line went into exile and no son of David reigned in Jerusalem — yet God was not finished with that family.
youths in whom was no blemish, and of goodly countenance, and skilful in all wisdom, and acquainted with knowledge, and understanding science, and such as had ability in them to stand in the king's palace, and whom they might teach the learning and the language of the Chaldeans.
Daniel and his friends arrive in Babylon as prize captives. They are hand-picked for their looks and ability, then put through a course designed to turn them into useful Babylonians. It raises a question every believer meets: what happens when the world wants your gifts but not your God?
Nebuchadnezzar was not being kind. He was investing. He took the finest captives his conquest had produced and expected a return on them.
Captive Jews were brought into Babylon, that splendid treasure-house, and among them Daniel and his three companions, as told in Daniel 1:3-6... The great Nebuchadnezzar meant to get out of his captives all the profit and progress that their scientific ability and learning could produce. He was just like the leaders of the nations today.
At Babylon, Daniel had two things to learn: a literature and a language. Commentators differ over which language was meant.
At Babylon Daniel and his companions had to acquire "the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans," that is, their ancient literature and language. What was that language? In Dan. 2:4 we find that the wise men answered the king in the Syriac language, that is Aramaic... this is held to be not the learned and court language, but the common language of the people.
Older translations say "understanding science" here; the ESV has "understanding learning". The word is the ordinary word for knowledge, and it appears in only one other place in the Bible.
In both the Hebrew and the Greek the words mean "knowledge," and are usually translated that way. They are rendered "science" only in Dan. 1:4, where "knowledge" and "wisdom" are also mentioned, and in 1 Tim. 6:20, where it is science, or knowledge, "falsely so called." In Daniel this no doubt refers to the speculations of the Magi. In the letter to Timothy it refers to the philosophers or Gnostic heretics, whose "knowledge" had no real foundation.
Babylon wanted what these young men could give. It did not want their God.
The world is always ready to make the people of God its servants, and to draw light from their knowledge. But it cannot tolerate them if they stay faithful to their God, obeying His word and keeping a holy separation from evil... He would have them, in a word, stop being Jews and become Chaldeans, and mix into their new religion the light they had received from the word of God. That is where philosophy comes from, even in Christian times — the philosophy Paul earnestly warns us against, as being "according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ" (Col. 2:8).
The plan reached every part of them.
To conform to their world, the minds of these men are to be trained in the learning of the Chaldeans. Their tongues are to speak the Chaldean language. Their bodies are to be fed with the king's delicacies, and their names changed to those of heathen gods.
The plan targeted young men at a vulnerable age, far from home. Its aims were not neutral.
Daniel was sent to the Babylonian university to learn and read the language and literature of the Chaldeans. The teens and early twenties are years full of special danger. These youths had been taken captive and were now far from home and from parental control and influence. The educational system of Babel was not designed to train young men to be spiritual, godly men. Its purpose was different: to train men for its own empire and glory, and to make them good Babylonians. Young people need to know that today. The educational system of this world does not exist to make them good Christians.
The qualities listed in this verse were already in them when they arrived. Babylon recruited character it had not produced.
Nebuchadnezzar was a mighty ruler. But there was something in these men that was morally greater than anything found in Nebuchadnezzar... It is clear that there was moral formation in these men before they reached Babylon.
They sat the king's course. But their real teaching came from somewhere else, and the results showed it.
But that is not all. There was the positive blessing of God in giving them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom... God prepared each of them for what he would afterwards have to fill. God was their teacher, and the trial of their faith was a needed, essential part of their training in His school. Then, when they stood before the king, none was found like them.
- Chosen — Babylon picked the best of God's people for the profit their ability could bring. The world still does the same.
- Claimed — the aim was to make them stop being Jews and become Chaldeans: minds, tongues, food and names all reshaped.
- Taught — "the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans" was a real literature and a real language; the "science" of the verse is the ordinary word for knowledge, the word Paul later ties to knowledge "falsely so called."
- Formed — the king admired what Babylon had not put there: moral formation that was in them before they arrived.
- Surpassed — God was their real teacher, and the trial of their faith was part of His school, so no one in the king's court matched them.
And the king appointed unto them a daily provision of the king's delicate food, and of the wine that he drank, to nourish them three years, that at the end thereof they might stand before the king.
Babylon's offer to its brightest captives sounds generous: the finest food, the best training, and a place at court at the end. That is what made it dangerous.
The king "assigned" their food. The same word turns up in another story, and one writer points it out while explaining the great fish that swallowed Jonah:
"Prepared" does not mean the fish was created specially for this purpose — though that would be an easy matter for the Maker of the sea and the dry land. It simply means the fish was "appointed" for this service. Translators render the same word this way in Daniel 1:5, of the food intended for Daniel and his companions.
The training was not neutral. Three years of the king's food and the king's lessons had one goal: to leave changed men standing in his presence:
The king, therefore, would have these captives fed with his own food and drinking his own wine. Fed from his resources for three years, they might at the end of it stand in his presence (v. 5). He would have them, in one word, stop being Jews and become Chaldeans. They were to mix into their new religion the light they had received from God's own words. This is where philosophy comes from, even in Christian times. Paul gives a serious warning against that philosophy, as being "according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ" (Col. 2:8).
The schooling had its own agenda, and it was not the agenda of the God of Israel:
Daniel was sent to the Babylonian university to learn and read the language and literature of the Chaldeans... The educational system of Babel was not designed to train young men to be spiritual, godly men. It had an altogether different agenda. Its purpose was to train men for its own empire and greatness; to make them good Babylonians.
For men who had lost their homeland, the offer was hard to turn down:
In exchange for their loss of nationality, these captives are offered a most alluring prospect in a foreign land. They shall have a free course of the best education in the land. The king shall pay for the finest provision to meet their daily needs. And in the end they shall have a high position in the king's palace.
The danger was not the luxury but the source of the food:
"But Daniel resolved that he would not defile himself with the king's food, or with the wine that he drank." By nature they would have received such food with thankfulness. But faith acts, and refuses it. The food was connected with the false gods of the country, being part of the daily food of an idolatrous king... Christianity comes in and delivers the conscience from anxiety about such things. "Eat whatever is sold in the meat market," Paul says, "without raising any question on the ground of conscience." The same holds at a feast. But if someone pointed out that certain food had been offered to idols, the Christian was not to eat it — for the sake of the one who said it, and for conscience' sake. The Jew, however, had to keep complete separation.
The pattern of wisdom, food and titles has a modern counterpart:
Those who are destined for a place as religious leaders in the Babylon-like corruption of Christendom must be trained in the religious schools of this world. They must, as it were, be taught "the learning and the language of the Chaldeans." They must benefit from the resources the world provides — "a daily portion of the king's food." And last of all, they must accept such titles and dignities as the world can give.
Refusing the king's table cost them nothing. Their real supply came from somewhere else:
This led Daniel and his friends to decline these luxuries and be content with the simplest food and drink. God honoured the separation they practised in this matter, and He "gave them learning and skill in all literature and wisdom," as we see in verse 17. The knowledge they had came not from man but from God.
Their captivity fulfilled a prediction spoken long before by the prophet Isaiah. Yet judgment was not the whole story:
The opening verses of our chapter reveal the fulfilment of Isaiah's prediction. But here is what we want to point out: in fulfilling His own word in judgment, God remembered mercy. Out of these very descendants of Hezekiah He raised up witnesses for Himself in the middle of Babylon's idolatrous corruptions.
- Appointed — The king "assigned" their daily food. Scripture uses that same word of the fish appointed to swallow Jonah.
- Aim — The three years of food, wine and learning were meant to turn Jews into Chaldeans. Babylon would mix its own religion with the light they had from God.
- Allure — The offer was free education, the finest daily food, and a high place at the end. The bait was generosity, not force.
- Answer — The food came from an idolatrous king's table. Faith refused what nature would have taken with thanks.
- Aftermath — God honoured their separation and gave them learning and skill in all literature and wisdom. Their real training came from Him. Out of judgment He raised up witnesses in the heart of Babylon.
Now among these were of the children of Judah, Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah.
Jerusalem had fallen, the temple treasures were in Babylon, and the captives now stood inside a pagan palace. So why does Scripture pause to name four young men of Judah — and what happens to their names in a city full of idols?
The capture of these young men was not an accident of war. God had warned Hezekiah about it generations earlier — and He used the same event for mercy.
Hezekiah once received the messengers from the king of Babylon. Their attention flattered him, so he showed them all the treasures of his kingdom. Isaiah was then sent to him with this message: "Hear the word of the Lord of hosts: Behold, the days are coming, when all that is in your house... shall be carried to Babylon. And some of your own sons... shall be taken away, and they shall be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon" (Isaiah 39:5-7). The opening verses of our chapter show Isaiah's prediction fulfilled. But note this: in carrying out His own word in judgment, God remembered mercy. Out of these very descendants of Hezekiah He raised up witnesses for Himself in the middle of Babylon's idolatrous corruption.
Each Hebrew name said something about the God of Israel. That is why Babylon replaced them.
Daniel means "God is my judge"; Hananiah, "Beloved of the Lord"; Mishael, "Who is as God"; Azariah, "The Lord is my help." These beautiful names were soon changed to names with pagan meaning, to blot out the very memory of Jehovah. Daniel becomes Belteshazzar (Bel's prince); Hananiah becomes Shadrach (lit up by the sun-god); Mishael becomes Meshach (who is like Shach — Venus); and Azariah becomes Abednego (the servant of Nego).
The new name came with honour attached. One writer sees it as the first move in a longer campaign — flattery first, force later.
Daniel's name was changed to Belteshazzar, which means "Bel's prince," or "he whom Bel favours." This may have been a snare of Satan. By giving him a name and a place of honour tied to the chief god of the land, it would draw Daniel away from the worship of the one true God — and away from loyalty to the God whose name was woven into the name his parents gave him in Israel. The enemy of God and of our souls is that cunning. By both flattery and force he seeks to turn us from loyalty to Christ, whose blessed name is called on us — "Christians." The enemy tries flattery on Daniel and his friends first. When this fails to seduce them into idolatry, he tries the burning fiery furnace and the lions' den.
Israel as a nation had failed as God's witness. Yet the light did not go out; it moved to Babylon.
The people of Israel were God's witnesses in a world wholly given over to idolatry (Isaiah 43:10). God had set them in a high position to shine for Him, but their unfaithfulness cost them that place. Yet He never lacked a small remnant true to His name and His interests. Here, in the capital city of this king who sat in darkness, four of these lights shine out. The light that was despised in Jerusalem is now radiant in Babylon.
The king of Babylon wanted these young men at his court — on his terms.
He would seek to decorate his court with the leaders of God's people. He wanted the royal line, the princes, and men who were good-looking and marked by wisdom, knowledge and learning. The religious world will use the people of God for its own glory. But it cannot tolerate their God, their obedience to His word, or their separation from its own evils.
Every outward support for their faith was gone. They obeyed anyway.
They had lost every privilege of the temple, and the temple itself lay in ruins. They were captives at the mercy of a pagan king, pressed with every sort of alluring temptation. Yet they held the Nazirite's place of true separation through obedience to the word of God. No doubt Daniel's faith and energy acted on his companions and led them to follow him in the path of God's will. But if so, the others were willing to follow. All four are striking proof that God's grace is enough to sustain His servants in the worst circumstances imaginable.
- Named — Scripture names four young men of Judah at the moment judgment falls. God remembered mercy while He carried out His own word.
- Renamed — Each Hebrew name declared something about God. Babylon swapped them for the names of its idols to erase the memory of Jehovah.
- Courted — The world wanted their wisdom and their looks for its court. It did not want their God or their obedience to His word.
- Tested — Flattery came first. The fiery furnace and the lions' den came later. The honour on offer was the opening move, not the last one.
- Shining — The light despised in Jerusalem shone in Babylon. God's grace holds His people when every outward support is gone.
And the prince of the eunuchs gave them names to Daniel he gave [the name] Belteshazzar, and to Hananiah, Shadrach, and to Mishael, Meshach, and to Azariah, Abed-nego.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not pollute himself with the king's delicate food, nor with the wine which he drank; and he requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not have to pollute himself.
Daniel is a young captive in Babylon. Others changed his name and set the king's food in front of him, but the one decision still left to him shapes the whole book. (Older translations read "purposed in his heart," the wording the writers below comment on.)
Where a purpose is formed decides whether it lasts.
A great statement this! Had he not so purposed, no Book of Daniel would have found a place in our Bibles. Notice first that the Spirit of God in the record disowns his heathen name and uses his original one, which means "God is Judge." The man clearly lived in the light of his name. So notice, second, that he purposed not in his head, the seat of intelligence, but in his heart. The heart is the seat of affection toward God, before whom he walked. This is the kind of purpose that stands firm and does not vary.
Where does a heart like that come from?
What was the secret of his boldness? "Daniel purposed in his HEART." His heart was won for Jehovah. His soul revolted against the blind superstition of idol worship. At all costs he would take his stand. No one can tell how the heart is won like that. We cannot whip ourselves into devotedness. It is good when a young Christian is sorry for his lack of heart for the Lord and turns to Him in prayer for it to be different.
The problem was not the quality of the meal. It was what the meal was tied to, and what God's law had already said.
Naturally they would have received such food with thankfulness. But faith is at work, and refuses it. The food was connected with the false gods of the country, since it was part of the daily food of an idolatrous king. Even in their own land, and apart from idols, God insisted on separating clean things from unclean. Much that the Gentiles prized was disgusting to a Jew. The law was strict about these defilements, and Daniel, as a Jew, was under its obligations. Christianity comes in and frees the conscience from worry about such things.
The stand was not a safe one.
It was a bold stand to make. A tyrannical king might easily have decided to kill the bold youth. He had dared to insult the king's gods and to despise the very food the king himself ate.
One writer imagines the excuse Daniel could have made.
He might, very naturally, have said to himself, "There is no use in one poor feeble captive seeking to maintain a place of separation. Everything is broken up... I may as well fit in with the condition of things around me." But no; Daniel was on higher ground than this. He knew it was his privilege to live as close to God in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar, as within the gates of Jerusalem.
He had already decided. Still, he asked rather than announced.
He acts with great discretion. He asks the chief of the eunuchs that "he might not defile himself." He does not irritate and antagonise the man by telling him that he had already purposed in his heart that "he would not defile himself."
What if the official had said no?
It is certain that if the request had been refused, they still would not have eaten that meat. But we see in verse 9 that God had already been at work behind the scenes: He had brought Daniel into favour and tender love with the chief of the eunuchs. Daniel's heart was right before God, and God moved the eunuch's heart to protect His servants.
This stand over food comes first in the book for a reason.
In a word, Daniel is faithful in all that makes up a complete separation from the world... and this conduct of faith, which looked blameworthy on the surface, meets the approval of God. The personal behaviour of Daniel is the basis of and introduction to the revelation of the whole book. It is the same with us. Separation from the world means a decided refusal to take our portion in what it offers. That puts us in a position to receive those communications from God.
The same table is set today, in a different form.
The king is a fitting picture of the one who wants to feed your mind with the food of this world... Today the god of this world sets his food before us through every kind of media. Satan wants to feed the mind with trash and filth.
- Heart, not head. Daniel formed his purpose in his affections, not his intellect. That is why it held when he had lost everything else.
- Refusal first. The food was tied to idols and banned by God's law. Faith's first move was to refuse what nature would have received with thanks.
- Request, not defiance. Daniel settled it in private, then asked the official instead of provoking him.
- Favour prepared. God had already turned the official's heart toward Daniel before Daniel ever asked.
- Revelation follows. This first stand opens the rest of the book. A life kept separate is a life ready to receive what God has to say.
And God granted Daniel favour and mercy before the prince of the eunuchs.
Daniel, a captive teenager in Babylon, had just decided in private not to eat the king's food. This verse shows what God was doing at the same time, in the heart of the official who held his life in his hands.
The official could have refused the request Daniel makes in the next verses. Commentators point out that God had settled the outcome before Daniel ever opened his mouth. (Older translations say "favour and tender love" here; the ESV says "favor and compassion.")
It is certain that even if the official had refused, they still would not have eaten that meat. But we see in verse 9 that God had already been at work behind the scenes: "God had brought Daniel into favour and tender love with the prince of the eunuchs." Daniel's heart was right before God, and God moved the eunuch's heart to protect His servants.
This was not a one-off favour. God deals this way with men in power, and Babylon's own emperor would learn it the hard way.
Proverbs 21:1 says, "The king's heart is a stream of water in the hand of the LORD; He turns it wherever He will." Even Nebuchadnezzar himself had to experience that.
The Old Testament tells this story once before, about another young Hebrew carried off to a foreign court. Writers link the two men — and mark where their paths differ.
We think again of the similar case of Joseph. Sold into Egypt, and living in Potiphar's house, "he found grace" in his master's sight. But, like Daniel, he refused the world's food and wine. Unlike Daniel, he was thrown into prison. There the Lord also "gave him favour in the sight of the keeper of the prison." "When a man's ways please the LORD, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him." And so the prince of the eunuchs granted Daniel's request, despite his fear of his lord the king and the possible danger to his own life.
This favour rested on a decision already made. Any argument for bending the rules got nowhere with these men.
Such arguments, if used, carried no weight with these godly men. The test only makes their devoted character clear. They refuse to let expediency or human reason direct them, and they will make no compromise. They do not forget who they are. Israel has failed, and they suffer under the chastening of God. Yet they are still the people of the true God, and they owe Him whole-hearted allegiance. They are ready to submit to the Gentile king, and rightly so. But they will not disobey the word of their God.
Knowing the official liked him, Daniel could have pressed his advantage. He did the opposite — he asked, and he offered a fair test.
There was in him not only great firmness of purpose but also a wise and humble spirit in making it known. God had acted on his behalf, bringing him into favour with the prince of the eunuchs and with Melzar his subordinate, yet he did not presume on this and speak proudly. Instead he stated his desire. He asked that he and his friends be given the plainest food for ten days as a test, and that the result settle the matter.
What God did in the eunuch's heart belongs to something larger than one meal.
God prepares and orders everything for the well-being of those who walk faithfully, whatever their circumstances. He turned the heart of the chief of the eunuchs in favour of Daniel and his three companions. The eunuch, who had them in his charge, came to have a great regard for them... Daniel refused to eat meats from the table of a pagan monarch, and this act of faith, which looked wrong, meets the approval of God. Daniel's personal behaviour is the basis of and introduction to the revelation of the whole book. It is the same with us. Separation from the world means a settled refusal to take our portion in what it offers. It puts us in a position to receive those communications from God. Their fullness is in the written word, yet we never receive them except through His direct teaching.
- Purpose. Daniel settled the matter in his heart first. Expediency and human reason argued for compromise, and he refused them.
- Providence. God moved the official's heart before Daniel ever asked. God secured the outcome, not Daniel.
- Precedent. Joseph found the same grace in Egypt. The rule holds: when a man's ways please the Lord, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him.
- Poise. Daniel did not trade on God's favour. He asked with a humble spirit and proposed a ten-day test, letting the result settle the matter.
- Preparation. This separation opens the whole book. The man who refuses the world's portion can receive what God has to say.
And the prince of the eunuchs said unto Daniel, I fear my lord the king who hath appointed your food and your drink; for why should he see your faces worse liking than the youths who are of your age? and ye would endanger my head with the king.
Daniel had asked to be excused from the king's food, and the officer over him answers with fear rather than anger: his own head is at risk if these young men look thin. A right decision now carries a real danger, and the danger falls on another man too.
The officer's fear for his own head was not invented. Refusing the king's table defied an absolute ruler. The danger reached past the four young men to the staff who cared for them.
These captives, whatever it cost them, are determined to obey God rather than men. Defying the king like this might have cost them their heads. That would surely have been their fate if word of it had reached the king. Nothing but the direct intervention of God could have saved them. But their minds were made up. They agreed completely that it was better to lose their lives than to break the clear commandment of the living God. Besides all this, when the day came for the four to stand before the king, the men answerable for their healthy appearance might have faced a death sentence.
The officer speaks of the food and drink the king assigned. For Daniel the issue was not diet or self-denial.
Some interpreters have lowered this noble stand of Daniel to mere natural morality. He was "refusing," they say, "to indulge himself in the delights of the table, or touch the intoxicating cup." Countless lectures and sermons against drink have been built on it, and that hides the deep spiritual meaning of what he did. We believe Daniel refused the king's food and wine, not because there was anything wrong or dangerous in them, but because pagan kings usually offered them to their idols.
The verse before says God had already brought Daniel into favour with this same officer. So the officer's fear meets a favour God had given first.
Again we are reminded of the similar case of Joseph. He was sold into Egypt and became a member of Potiphar's household, and there "he found favour" in his master's sight… "When a man's ways please the Lord, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him." So the chief of the eunuchs granted Daniel's request through Melzar, despite his fear of his lord the king and the possible danger to his own life.
Another writer draws the same conclusion from the outcome: the request was made to a man, but the granting of it came from elsewhere.
It is important to see that although the request was made to the chief of the eunuchs, it was God who caused that request to be granted.
The officer's fear was a real barrier, but not a closed door.
The eunuch was unwilling to lose his life on their account. But when faith is at work, grace opens a way forward for it among the obstacles. Melzar is approached and agrees to give them vegetables for a trial period. Daniel was a righteous man who lived by faith and trusted his God to vindicate him in this matter.
Another writer states the same principle elsewhere, and warns where unbelief leads.
A difficulty may be a real one. But if we are on the path of God's will, it becomes an obstacle only to the unbelief of our hearts. Faith counts on God and does what He wills, and difficulties are nothing before Him. Unbelief can always find excuses, and excuses that look well founded too. They have only this one fatal defect: they leave God out.
Daniel had God's favour with this officer, but he did not use it as leverage against the man's fear.
There was in him not only great firmness of purpose but also a wise and humble spirit in making it known. God had acted on his behalf, bringing him into favour with the prince of the eunuchs and with Melzar his subordinate, yet he did not presume on this and speak with pride. Instead he stated his desire, and asked that he and his friends be given the plainest food for ten days as a test.
The officer feared the king. The four captives had God, not the king, filling their sight.
They were in the hand of God, who took care of their bodies. He had a purpose in their being in Babylon, and until that purpose was fulfilled they were as safe from harm as the elect angels in heaven. God filled the vision of their souls, not Nebuchadnezzar. The king's anger may be like the roaring of a lion. But when the question lies between him and the living God, the faithful believer's soul does not hear the king's roar.
- Purpose. Daniel's refusal was not about diet or self-control. Pagan kings usually offered their food and wine to idols, and that is why he refused the king's table.
- Risk. The officer's fear was real — his own head was at stake, and the young men could have paid with their lives.
- Favour. God had gone ahead of the objection, giving Daniel favour with the very man who now voiced the danger.
- Manner. Firm purpose was joined to a humble request; Daniel did not trade on his favour or speak proudly.
- Fear. Where the fear of God fills the soul, the king's anger loses its voice, and a real difficulty stops being an obstacle.
And Daniel said to the steward, whom the prince of the eunuchs had set over Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah,
Daniel has decided not to eat the king's rich food. The chief official refused him out of fear for his own life, so Daniel now turns to the next man in the chain.
The name in this verse may not be a name at all.
One under whom Daniel and his companions were placed in Babylon, Daniel 1:11–16. The Hebrew has the article, and it is thought to be a title, such as 'the steward', rather than a proper name.
Daniel does not force the closed door. He goes lower down the chain, and a way opens there.
The eunuch was unwilling to lose his life on their account. But when faith is at work, grace opens a way forward for it through the obstacles. Daniel approaches Melzar, and he agrees to give them plain food for a trial period. Daniel was a righteous man who lived by faith and trusted his God to vindicate him in this matter.
Daniel had already settled the matter in private. What he says out loud is a request, not an announcement of a decision already made. That wording keeps the official on his side.
The secret of Daniel's strength was that his heart was right with God. As we read, "Daniel resolved that he would not defile himself with the king's food." He acts, however, with great discretion. He asks the prince that "he might not defile himself." He does not irritate and antagonise the man by telling him that he had already resolved in his heart that "he would not defile himself."
God had already given him standing with these men, and he does not trade on it.
There was in him not only great firmness of purpose but also a wise and humble spirit in making it known. God had acted on his behalf. He brought Daniel into favour with the prince of the eunuchs and with the steward under him. Yet Daniel did not presume on this and speak proudly. Instead he stated his desire. He asked that he and his friends might eat the plainest of food for ten days as a test, and that the result should settle the matter.
Writers draw a wider lesson from the way Daniel handled it.
Let us learn a lesson from this incident. Separation from defilement is always God's path for His saints, but much depends on the spirit they show as they take it. If they take it in a harsh or proud spirit, rather than a gentle and humble one, their testimony to others will count for nothing. Daniel and his friends sought their separation, and kept it, in the right spirit.
Daniel names the terms himself. He offers a ten-day trial on plain food, and stakes the outcome on God.
We see in verse 12 that these men, these sanctified vessels, were prepared to face the test. "Test your servants for ten days." There certainly was a risk in this. It says of Barnabas and Paul that they "risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Acts 15:26). These men had enough courage and trust in God to take the risk. Give us ten days for the matter to be proved. They had wonderful faith in God. They were bold enough to propose the terms, and their terms were accepted.
Daniel spoke to a steward, but the answer came from higher up.
It is certain that even if they had been refused, they still would not have eaten that meat. But we see in verse 9 that God had already worked behind the scenes: "God gave Daniel favor and compassion in the sight of the chief of the eunuchs." Daniel's heart was right before God, and God moved the eunuch's heart to protect His servants.
The same test reaches past the dinner table. What we feed on shapes us.
If we feed on the things of this world — its amusements, politics, television and so on — our spiritual health will be poor.
- Purpose first. Daniel's strength lay in a heart already settled with God before he said a word to anyone in Babylon.
- Then discretion. He asked rather than declared, and did not antagonise the man who held the power to refuse him.
- Then a second door. The senior official said no; Daniel went to the steward, and grace opened a way through the obstacle.
- Then a risk. He named the terms himself — ten days, plain food, a visible result — and staked the outcome on God.
- Then the real answer. The steward agreed, but God had already moved the hearts of those over him. The answer came from above, not from Babylon.
Prove thy servants, I beseech thee, ten days; and let them give us pulse to eat, and water to drink;
Daniel had already decided that he would not eat the king's food. The officer in charge saw real danger in the request, so Daniel offered a plan: a short trial, plain food, and a result anyone could check.
The officer explains the danger. Daniel's answer is not an argument but a test.
The prince explains the difficulty and danger in granting Daniel's request. At once Daniel proposes a ten days' test of a diet in accordance with their law. This suggestion is a striking proof of Daniel's faith in the living God. The result proves that his faith is not in vain.
Daniel could have leaned on the goodwill he already enjoyed, or pressed his case as a right. He does neither.
He had not only great firmness of purpose but also a wise and humble spirit in making it known. God had acted for him. He had brought him into favour with the prince of the eunuchs and with Melzar, the officer under him. Yet Daniel did not trade on this and speak proudly. Instead he said what he wanted, and asked that he and his friends might eat the plainest food for ten days as a test.
The issue was never nutrition. It was where the food came from, and what God required of a Jew.
By nature they would have received such food with thanks. But faith is at work, and so they refuse it. It was connected with the false gods of the country, being a part of the daily food of an idolatrous king. Even in their own land, and apart from idols, God insisted on a division between clean and unclean things. Much that the nations valued was detestable to a Jew. The law was strict about these defilements, and Daniel, as a Jew, was bound by it. Christianity comes in and delivers the conscience from anxiety as to such things.
Daniel picks the humblest food in Babylon. That choice says something in itself.
Not fine food, but food that spoke of humbling themselves before God, was what a true heart felt to be suited to them. It was the kind of food that the lowest person in that proud and luxurious city might have looked down on.
Daniel is the one under authority, yet he is the one who names the terms.
We see in verse 12 that these men, these Sanctified Vessels, were prepared to face the test. "Test your servants for ten days." There was a venture in this. It says of Barnabas and Paul that they "risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Acts 15:26). These men had enough courage and trust in God to make the venture. They had wonderful faith in God. They were bold enough to propose the terms, and their terms were accepted.
Ten days is a short time for any change to show on a young man's face.
Daniel asked that he and his companions might eat vegetables and drink water for ten days as an experiment. The prince of the eunuchs agreed to it. Ten days was not a long time for a food experiment to show much result. But at the end of the ten days Daniel and his three companions looked "better in appearance and fatter in flesh" than those who ate the king's food and drink.
One writer sees in the vegetables and water a picture of what feeds a believer today.
The vegetables and the water speak of feeding on Christ in the power of the Spirit. The food would look the same day after day, yet we need never grow tired of it. Christ taken in by us in the power of the Spirit will produce what is morally "ten times better" (v. 20) than anything the world can show.
What was true for these men is true for any reader of the Bible.
If we, too, are to understand the Scriptures, I believe that we must travel the path of separation from the world. Nothing destroys spiritual understanding more than simply drifting along with the stream of men's opinions and ways.
- Purpose. Daniel settled the matter in his heart first. Verse 12 turns that purpose into a request anyone could act on.
- Proposal. He asks instead of demanding. He is firm in conviction and humble in manner, and he does not trade on the favour God had given him.
- Proof. "Test your servants" was a venture. He was bold enough to set the terms, and his terms were accepted.
- Provision. Ten days is too short for plain food to work wonders by itself. The better faces proved that his faith was not in vain.
- Product. Plain food pictures feeding on Christ, which produces what is "ten times better" than anything the world can show. Separation from the world keeps spiritual sight clear.
then let our countenances be looked upon before thee, and the countenance of the youths that eat of the king's delicate food and as thou shalt see, deal with thy servants.
Daniel has already refused the king's rich food. Here he turns that refusal into a test anyone can check, and he leaves the verdict to the official in charge. How do you hold a conviction without picking a fight? And what happens when faith invites inspection?
The proposal here is no burst of temper. It rests on a decision Daniel had already made inside, and he words it so the official has no reason to take offence.
The secret of Daniel's strength was that his heart was right with God. We read that Daniel had settled it in his heart that he would not defile himself with the king's food. He acts, however, with great care. He asks the official only that he might not defile himself. He does not irritate or provoke the man by telling him that he had already settled it in his heart that he would not defile himself.
Firmness and courtesy ran together in Daniel. God had already given him favour with the men over him, yet he still asked rather than assumed.
He had great firmness of purpose, and also a wise and humble spirit in making it known. God had acted on his behalf. God brought him into favour with the chief official and with Melzar, the man under him. Yet Daniel did not trade on this or speak proudly. Instead he stated his desire and made his request: that he and his friends be given the plainest of food for ten days as a test, and that the result should settle the matter. God was with them, and so He kept them from the defilement that would otherwise have been theirs.
Setting the terms of your own trial takes nerve. Daniel and his friends put their appearance on the line and let someone else judge the outcome.
We see in verse 12 that these men, set apart for God, were ready to face the test: test your servants for ten days. There was a real venture in this. Scripture says of Barnabas and Paul that they "risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Acts 15:26), and these men had enough courage and trust in God to take that venture. Give us ten days to prove the matter. They had wonderful faith in God. They were bold enough to propose the terms, and their terms were accepted.
Commentators read this boldness as proof of faith. The ten-day test showed what Daniel believed about the living God.
The official explains the difficulty and danger in granting Daniel's request. At once Daniel proposes a ten-day test of a diet that keeps their law. This suggestion is a striking proof of Daniel's faith in the living God. The result proves that his faith is not in vain.
They did not leave the details open. They named the food they wanted, and they expected it to work.
They were also completely sure that the food they asked for would produce the right results. We need to take that to heart. They did not question what they should eat. They said plainly: give us vegetables to eat and water to drink.
A palace official said yes. Writers here look past him to the hand behind the decision.
It is important to see that although Daniel made the request to the chief official, it was God who caused that request to be granted.
Daniel invites the official to look at them. But there must be food first, or there is nothing to see.
They needed food if they were to say, at the end of the ten days in which they had refused the king's food, "let our appearance ... be observed by you". For us the food we need is the Word of God.
Plain food looks dull from the outside. Yet it produced more than the palace table could.
Feeding on Christ in the power of the Spirit is what the vegetables and the water picture. The food may look the same day after day, yet we never need to grow tired of it. Christ taken in by us in the power of the Spirit will produce a moral result "ten times better" (v. 20) than anything the world can show.
- Purpose first. This request rests on a decision already settled in the heart. Daniel's strength was that his heart was right with God.
- Then manner. Daniel joined firm purpose to a wise and humble spirit. He stated his desire instead of demanding it, and he did not trade on past favour.
- Then venture. Inviting inspection after ten days was a real venture. They had courage enough to propose the terms themselves, and their terms were accepted.
- Then God. The official said yes, but God caused the request to be granted. God also kept them from the defilement that would otherwise have been theirs.
- Then evidence. Faces show what a person eats. Feed on the Word and on Christ, and the result is "ten times better" than anything the world's table can offer.
And he hearkened unto them in this matter, and proved them ten days.
Daniel and his three friends had asked to be excused from the king's rich food, and the official feared for his life if they came out looking worse than the rest. In verse 14 the steward agrees, and the ten-day trial begins — but who moved him, and what was on trial?
The steward's "yes" looks like a small concession from an official. But writers trace it further back — to God, at work before Daniel ever spoke.
It is certain that they still would not have eaten that meat, even if the answer had been no. But verse 9 shows that God had already worked behind the scenes: "God gave Daniel favor and compassion in the sight of the chief of the eunuchs." Daniel's heart was right before God, and God moved that official's heart to protect His servants.
The permission came through a steward named Melzar. One writer sees the same hand at work in an earlier servant sold into a foreign house.
Joseph's case is similar. He was sold into Egypt and joined Potiphar's household, where "he found favor" in his master's sight... And so the chief of the eunuchs granted Daniel's request through Melzar, that he and his companions be tested for ten days. He did this despite his fear of the king his master, and despite the danger to his own life.
Daniel had already settled the matter in his own heart. How he put it to the official was another thing.
He acts with great discretion. He asks the chief official that "he might not defile himself." He does not irritate or provoke the man by telling him that he had already decided in his heart that "he would not defile himself."
The distinction goes deeper than tact. It touches what drove him, and what he thought was at stake.
He did not say he would not eat. He asked that he might not. It was not will but conscience. Sometimes we come to such tests with our own will at work, and then we have to go through God's discipline. If we came to them along the line of conscience, God would stand by us. The matter in question was not necessarily evil, but something that did not fit their position as Israelites. In those eastern courts there were many evil practices, but it was not from such things that they were seeking deliverance; it was from things that did not suit a Sanctified Vessel.
The four young men set the terms themselves and staked the outcome on them. That took nerve.
We see in verse 12 that these men, these Sanctified Vessels, were ready to face the test. "Test your servants for ten days." There was a real venture in this... these men had enough courage and trust in God to make the venture. Give us ten days to prove the matter. They had wonderful faith in God. They were bold enough to propose the terms, and their terms were accepted.
Ten days is a short window for food to show on anyone's face.
Ten days was not a long time for a food experiment to show much result. But at the end of the ten days Daniel and his three companions looked "better in appearance and fatter in flesh" than those who ate the king's food and drink.
The ten days belonged to a longer preparation for the work each of these men would later carry.
God prepared them, each for the place he would later fill. God was their teacher, and the testing of their faith was a needed, essential part of their training in His school.
One writer reads the food question much wider than the dinner table.
This exercise touches more than the food we eat. It raises the question of what we are feeding on for our souls. If we feed on the things of this world — its amusements, politics, television and the rest — our spiritual health will be poor.
And the spirit of the request matters as much as the stand itself.
Separation from what defiles is always God's path for His people, but much depends on the spirit they show as they take it. If they take it in a harsh or proud spirit, instead of a meek and humble one, their testimony to others counts for nothing.
- Purpose first. Daniel settled the matter in his heart before he ever spoke. The talk with the steward only carried out a decision already made.
- Request, not demand. He asked to be excused instead of announcing a refusal. That was conscience at work, not self-will, and it made the "yes" possible.
- God moved the man. Behind the steward's yes stood God, who had already given Daniel favour with the chief official — the same grace Joseph found in Egypt.
- Faith took the risk. Proposing the ten days was a venture. They named the terms and trusted God for the result, in a window too short for food alone to show.
- A school, not a stunt. God used the trial to train men for later service. It leaves us one question: what are we feeding on?
And at the end of ten days their countenances appeared fairer and were fatter in flesh than all the youths that ate of the king's delicate food.
The ten-day trial is over, and the outcome is public. Four young men on plain food look healthier than those fed from the king's table. Was it the diet, or was it God — and what does the result mean for anyone who has to say no to the world around them?
The result rests on a request these men had the nerve to make under real risk. (Where older translations say "pulse," the ESV reads "vegetables.")
We see in verse 12 that these men were prepared to face the test. "Test your servants for ten days." There certainly was a venture in this. It says of Barnabas and Paul that they "risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Acts 15:26). These men had enough courage and trust in God to make the venture. They had wonderful faith in God. They were bold enough to propose the terms, and their terms were accepted.
Ten days of vegetables and water does not transform anyone's appearance. The short timeframe points past the food to God, who supported them.
And see how God came in and supported Daniel. Ten days was not a long time for a food experiment to have much result. But at the end of the ten days the faces of Daniel and his three companions were better in appearance and fatter in flesh than those who took the king's food and drink.
The official in charge had taken a personal risk in allowing the test. By the end he had no room left to argue.
"When a man's ways please the Lord, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him." So the chief of the eunuchs granted Daniel's request, in spite of his fear of the king and the possible danger to his own life. God had sustained and prospered His servants in their path of faithfulness to His will. They had kept themselves undefiled among the Babylonian temptations and corruptions around them. Even the steward could not deny that they had flourished on their simple diet, and from then on he gave them vegetables.
The manner of a stand can ruin it. How these men held their ground mattered as much as the ground itself.
From this incident let us learn a lesson. Separation from defilement is always God's path for His saints. But much depends on the spirit they show as they take it. Take it in a harsh or proud spirit, instead of a meek and lowly one, and the testimony to others is cancelled out. Suppose our spirit in taking it is marked by "Keep to yourself, do not come near me, for I am too holy for you." That was the spirit of the Pharisees in our Lord's day. Then we shall be helping on the evil we claim to be separating ourselves from. Daniel and his friends sought their separation, and kept it, in the right spirit.
The end of the ten days proves a promise God made about Himself. Their gain did not stop at their looks.
Daniel passed the test of the ten days and God made him and his friends succeed in their purpose. The truth of that Scripture, "those who honor me I will honor" (1 Sam. 2:30), received another triumphant illustration. Daniel's godliness was great gain — in fact he was ten times better (v. 20). Of course there was responsibility and dedicated hard work in his studies. But in everything he looked to his God to sustain him.
The blessing was not only physical. Understanding the Scriptures comes along the same road of separation, and that road is still open.
If we, too, are to understand the Scriptures, I believe that we must travel the path of separation from the world. Nothing destroys spiritual understanding more than drifting with the stream of men's opinions and ways.
The plain fare they chose has its counterpart for us, and it produces the same visible difference.
Feeding on Christ in the power of the Spirit is what the vegetables and the water would speak of. The food may look the same day after day. Yet we need never grow tired of it. Christ taken in by us in the power of the Spirit will produce what is morally "ten times better" (v. 20) than anything the world can show.
- Ventured — Daniel proposed the terms of the test himself. It took courage and trust in God to stake ten days on obedience.
- Sustained — ten days were far too short for diet to explain the outcome. God supported them in their path of faithfulness.
- Vindicated — even the official running the trial could not deny the result, and he let the arrangement stand.
- Honoured — God proved again that "those who honor me I will honor." Godliness turned out to be real gain, not loss.
- Fed — the same road is ours. Separation keeps spiritual understanding alive, and feeding on Christ produces what the world cannot match.
So the steward took away their delicate food, and the wine that they should drink; and gave them pulse.
The ten-day trial is over, and the official in charge keeps the new arrangement. He takes the rich royal food and wine away for good, and the plain diet stays. What began as a risky test by young captives is now their settled way of life in a foreign king's palace.
Older translations call the plain food "pulse" and name the official "Melzar." The food first:
Any species of grain or seeds used for food. Daniel 1:12, 16.
And "Melzar" may not be a name at all:
One under whom Daniel and his companions were placed in Babylon, Daniel 1:11-16. The Hebrew has the article, and it is supposed to be a title, such as 'the steward,' rather than a proper name.
Gratitude for such food would have been natural. Something else settled the matter.
They could naturally have received such food with thanks; but faith acts, and they refuse it. It was connected with the false gods of the country, since it was part of the daily food of a king who worshipped idols… The law was strict about these defilements, and Daniel, as a Jew, was under its obligations. Christianity comes in and frees the conscience from anxiety about such things.
The food they asked for instead carried its own message.
Daniel at once shows himself decided for the true God. The question for him was not whether to do in Babylon what Babylon did, but what the will of God required of Israel… A true heart felt that their right food was not "pleasant bread," but food that spoke of humbling themselves before God — such food as the lowest person in that proud and luxurious city might have looked down on.
The official who allowed the test had every reason to refuse it. His own life was at risk, and God moved him anyway.
"When a man's ways please the Lord, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him." So the prince of the eunuchs granted Daniel's request through Melzar, despite his fear of his lord the king and the danger to his own life… God had sustained and prospered His servants in their path of faithfulness to His will, as they kept themselves undefiled among the seductions and corruptions of Babylon around them. Even Melzar could not deny that they had flourished on their simple diet, and from then on he gave them pulse.
Daniel met the risk with a deadline.
At once Daniel proposes a ten days' test of a diet in line with their law. This suggestion is a striking proof of Daniel's faith in the living God. The result proves that his faith is not in vain.
The refusal was right. How they carried it mattered just as much.
Separation from defilement is always God's path for His saints, but much depends on the spirit they show as they take it. If they take it in a harsh or haughty spirit instead of a meek and lowly spirit, their testimony to others will be ruined. Suppose our spirit in taking it says, 'Stand by yourself, do not come near me, for I am holier than you.' That was the spirit of the Pharisees in our Lord's day. With it we shall be helping along the very evil we claim to be separating from. Daniel and his friends sought their separation, and kept it, in the right spirit.
Their bodies showed what they had been eating. The same rule holds for the soul, and there is no middle ground.
If we are not feeding on Christ, the world will attract us. There is no vacuum. If we are not feeding on spiritual food, that is, on Christ, we shall find ourselves feeding on things in the world, and spiritual leanness will follow. The substance formed in these men as a result of the food they fed on was obvious to everyone around them.
The refusal shaped more than Daniel's diet.
If we too are to understand the Scriptures, I believe we must travel the path of separation from the world. Nothing destroys spiritual understanding more than drifting along with the stream of men's opinions and ways. Daniel was separated from what, for a Jew, dishonoured God, and God blessed him with wisdom and understanding.
- Purpose. Daniel was decided for the true God: the king's food belonged to idol worship, and God's law ruled it out for a Jew.
- Venture. Daniel risked a visible, measurable trial — ten days — because he trusted the living God to back obedience.
- Vindication. God made the official willing and prospered His servants, so Melzar could not deny the result.
- Permanence. The concession became the custom. The steward took the royal food and wine away, and the plain food stayed.
- Understanding. Separation from the world is the path along which God gave Daniel wisdom — walked in a meek spirit, never a superior one.
As for these four youths, God gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom; and Daniel had understanding in all visions and dreams.
God's gift here falls on four young captives who had just refused the king's food. Two questions follow: where does real learning come from, and why did Daniel receive more than the other three?
Verse 17 comes after their refusal of the king's food. Commentators read the gift as God's answer to a choice already made. They quote an older translation, which reads "knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom" where the ESV has "learning and skill in all literature and wisdom."
The middle verses of Daniel 1 show that their education and technical training lasted three years — very like a university course today. It included eating rations from the king's table. That food was no doubt connected with the idol worship the king practised. This led Daniel and his friends to decline these luxuries and be content with the simplest food and drink. God honoured the separation they practised in this matter, and He "gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom," as we see in verse 17. The "science" they had came not from man but from God.
Nothing about their circumstances had improved. They were still exiles under a foreign king.
Obedience to the word of God, faith in the living God, and separation from the defilements of Babylon are the outstanding marks of these godly men. Such men have the understanding of the mind of God. It is true that the Lord had given them into the hands of the king of Babylon. But that did not stop Him from giving understanding of His mind and purpose to those who were faithful to Himself.
The four still sat through the whole course. Yet the gift reached wider than spiritual insight alone.
It is very clear that God gave these four "children" knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom because of their separation in heart and life from the defiling evils around. It is always true that the closer we walk with the Lord, the more fully He shares His mind with us. And notice: this is not only what people usually mean by "His mind." It is in all learning and wisdom. Students today, even Christian students, are too often misled. They think that for gaining human "learning and wisdom" they depend on their own effort and power. The result is that their student years are often marked by spiritual decline, if not by openly turning away.
God was fitting each man for work that lay ahead.
God prepared them, each for the place he would later fill. God was their teacher, and the trial of their faith was a needed, essential part of their training in His school.
God's servants are not left to manage on their own.
All the equipment needed for the service entrusted to them came from Himself. … By divine teaching these servants of the living God left far behind, in wisdom and understanding, all the magicians and astrologers in the whole realm of the king.
The verse then divides. All four received learning and wisdom. Only Daniel understood visions and dreams. One writer ties that extra gift to the mission waiting for him.
At the close of the verse Daniel stands out from his companions. We are told — no doubt because of his special work and mission — that he had understanding in all visions and dreams. This also teaches us something. In all the circumstances and experiences God leads His people through, He is forming them as vessels for His service. On the human side, a disaster had struck Daniel. On God's side, as He plainly shows, this seeming disaster was simply the tool He had chosen. By it He formed Daniel for his mission: to carry His testimony into the court of the mighty Gentile king.
One writer applies this to our own reading of Scripture.
If we too are to understand the Scriptures, I believe we must travel the path of separation from the world. Nothing destroys spiritual understanding more than drifting along with the stream of men's opinions and ways. … Faith is the only means and power of spiritual understanding. Faith puts us and keeps us under the Lord's authority, and separate from this evil age. Daniel kept himself separate from what, to a Jew, dishonoured God, and God blessed him with wisdom and understanding.
- Refusal first. The gift of verse 17 comes after they refuse the king's food. God honoured the separation they had already practised.
- Gift, not achievement. Even their ordinary "learning and wisdom" came from God, not just the spiritual part.
- Gift shaped to task. God prepared each man for the place he would later fill. The trial of their faith was an essential part of that training.
- One given more. Daniel alone received understanding in visions and dreams, because a wider mission in the king's court lay ahead.
- Result open to us. The same road runs today. Faith keeps us separate from this evil age, and there God gives wisdom and understanding.
And at the end of the days that the king had said he should bring them in, the prince of the eunuchs brought them in before Nebuchadnezzar.
The training in Babylon is over. The official who had charge of these captive young men now walks them into the throne room of the most powerful king on earth. What God has given them is about to be tested in public.
One writer sees here the pattern of every test. It comes when we least expect it, and it makes public what was already inside.
We meet with examination days when we least expect them. Where my soul is, and what I have been busy with, is declared then. The place these captive students get is a great encouragement. The world is before you, and I know very well how tempting it is for Christian young men and women to fall in with its ways. Sometimes they think they must do so to get on in the work they are doing. I am glad to see that the godliest of them all were at the top of the class in Babylon.
The king set the course, but someone else was teaching. The pressure of those years was God fitting each man for the work he would later carry.
There was the positive blessing of God, in giving them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom. And of Daniel we are told that he was given understanding in "all visions and dreams." God prepared each of them for the work he would later fill. God was their teacher, and the trial of their faith was a needed, essential part of their training in His school.
By any ordinary reading, exile to a foreign court was a disaster. Read from God's side, it was the road that brought Daniel to the exact post God had for him. Only faith reads events that way.
On the human side, a calamity had fallen on Daniel. On God's side, as Scripture makes plain, this calamity was only the instrument He had chosen to shape Daniel for his mission. That mission was to carry His testimony into the court of the mighty Gentile king. But faith alone can rise above all secondary causes. Faith alone ties everything to the hand of God and rests quietly in Him. Faith is sure of His infinite wisdom and love, and sure that every outcome will be according to His own perfect will.
Babylon's wise men were not merely clever. Their learning drew on another kind of source. The king himself gave the verdict.
The day came when they and others were brought in before the king to have their learning tested. Nebuchadnezzar found them "ten times better than all the magicians and enchanters that were in all his kingdom." Much of Babylon's "learning" came through arts by which men dealt with demonic powers. So Daniel and his companions were up against a "learning" that comes from Satanic sources, as well as against what clever men had worked out. And the verdict, given by the pagan king himself, was that the knowledge and learning and wisdom that comes from God was ten times better.
The result was more than success in an exam. One writer ties it to a promise God had already made.
As a result, these faithful men became witnesses for God. We read that they stood "before the king." God was true to His own word: "those who honour Me I will honour" (1 Samuel 2:30).
God's approval did not replace effort. Another writer holds the two together: hard work and dependence on God.
Of course his studies took responsibility and dedicated hard work. But in everything he looked to his God to hold him up where he was. God approves the faithful conduct of the four young men. They prove superior to all the king's servants, who had learned the dark sciences of this world.
- Tested. Examination days come when we least expect them. What a life has quietly been built on is what shows up in public.
- Trained. The captivity that looked like ruin was God's school. He was preparing each man for the work he would later fill. The trial of their faith was part of the course, not a break in it.
- Given, not gained. Their wisdom did not come out of Babylon's curriculum. It came from God, alongside real study and hard work.
- Weighed. Nebuchadnezzar measured them against Babylon's best, including learning that came from demonic sources. The king himself called God's wisdom ten times better.
- Honour returned. They honoured God when it cost them, and God honoured them by setting them before the king. That is the shape of the chapter: tested, trained, gifted, weighed, honoured.
And the king spoke with them; and among them all was found none like Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah and they stood before the king.
Three years of training in Babylon end with a test, and the king runs it himself. Four young captives who had kept themselves separate face every other student. The king finds none like them.
One writer pictures the end of the three-year course as a college exam day.
"Daniel had understanding in all visions and dreams," and at the end of the three years at college he is tested. The examination day came, and these four young men came out at the top of the class. When they came in, the king spoke with them. They had apparently to go through an examination before the king.
The four could have described their advantage in the words of a psalm.
They might each have used the language of the Psalmist: "Your commandment makes me wiser than my enemies, for it is ever with me. I have more understanding than all my teachers, for your testimonies are my meditation. I understand more than the aged, for I keep your precepts" (Psalm 119:98-100). May all the young Christians of today take this lesson to heart!
Their advantage was not natural talent sharpened by study. Their captivity did not cut them off from God's mind.
Obedience to the word of God, faith in the living God, separation from the defilements of Babylon are the outstanding marks of these godly men. Such have the understanding of the mind of God. We read, "As for these four youths, God gave them learning and skill in all literature and wisdom, and Daniel had understanding in all visions and dreams" (v. 17). It is true the Lord had given them into the hands of the king of Babylon. Even so, He still gave understanding of His mind and purpose to those who were faithful to Himself.
Their testing was not a break in their training. It was part of it.
There was the positive blessing of God, in giving them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom. And of Daniel we read that God made him understand "all visions and dreams." God prepared them, each for the place he would later fill. God was their teacher, and the trial of their faith was a needed, essential part of their training in His school.
Babylon had renamed all four men. Yet at their moment of triumph the text calls them by their Hebrew names.
It is striking that they take their place among those who stand before Nebuchadnezzar (verse 19). Their moral superiority over all the king's magicians and astrologers is clear. And the record gives them their names according to Israel... As the king spoke to them, he would no doubt use the names given to them by the prince. But when the Spirit of God points out their superiority, He gives them their names according to the stock of Israel.
The men they were measured against were not just clever students. Babylon's learning had another root.
Men in Babylon gained a great deal of their "science" through various arts that dealt with demonic powers. So Daniel and his companions were in competition with a "science" that comes from satanic sources, as well as with what clever men had worked out. And the verdict, pronounced by the pagan king himself, was that the knowledge and science and wisdom that comes from God was ten times better.
Tests like this still come, and they show what a person has been living for.
I believe we meet with examination days when we perhaps least expect them. That is when it becomes clear where my soul is and what I have been occupied with. The place these captive students get is a great encouragement. The world is before you, and I know very well how tempting it is for Christian young men and women to fall in with its ways instead. Sometimes they think it is necessary to get on in the business they have in hand. To me it is very good to see that the godliest of the lot were at the top of the class in Babylon.
- Refusal — they kept clear of Babylon's defilements. The verse is the outcome of that obedience, not of natural ability.
- Gift — God gave the knowledge and skill. Captivity did not stop Him giving understanding to those faithful to Him.
- Trial — the testing of their faith was an essential part of God's school. It prepared each man for the post he would later fill.
- Verdict — a pagan king compared them with learning drawn from satanic sources. He ranked God-given wisdom ten times better.
- Standing — the godliest came top of the class in Babylon. Where the Spirit records their superiority, He calls them by their Hebrew names, not Babylon's.
And in all matters of judicious wisdom, as to which the king enquired of them, he found them ten times better than all the scribes [and] magicians that were in all his realm.
Daniel and his three friends had turned down the king's food and drink. After three years of Babylonian training, Nebuchadnezzar tested them himself. His verdict settles the question the chapter has been building toward: where does real wisdom come from?
The four young men were not up against ordinary scholars. The Hebrew word behind the second group's title points to a specific trade:
In Daniel 1:20; 2:2, 10, 27; 4:7; 5:7, 11, 15 the Hebrew word is ashshaph, meaning "enchanter, magician" — someone who practised occult arts. This word occurs nowhere else.
That changes the contest. Babylon's learning was not just clever human study, and the king's verdict weighs both kinds of knowledge at once:
The day came when the king called them in with others to test their science. Nebuchadnezzar found them "ten times better than all the magicians and enchanters that were in all his kingdom." Much of Babylon's "science" came through various arts by which men trafficked with demonic powers. So Daniel and his companions were competing with a "science" that comes from satanic sources, as well as with what clever men had worked out. And the verdict, pronounced by the heathen king himself, was that the knowledge and science and wisdom that comes from God was ten times better.
The gap did not come from harder study. It goes back to a choice they made earlier, about food:
The middle verses of Daniel 1 show that the educational and technical training lasted three years — very like a university course today. It included eating rations from the king's table, and those rations were doubtless connected with the idolatrous rites he practised. This led Daniel and his friends to decline these luxuries and be content with the simplest food and drink. God honoured the separation they practised in this matter, and He "gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom," as we see in verse 17. The "science" they had came not from man but from God.
The exam covered whatever the king chose to ask — his own subjects, his own standards. Devotion to God did not make these students impractical:
I believe we meet examination days when we least expect them. What comes out then is where my soul is and what I have been occupied with. The world is before you, and I know very well the temptation it is to young Christian men and women to fall in with its ways. Sometimes they think it is necessary to get on in the business they are in. To me it is very good to see that the godliest of the lot were at the top of the class in Babylon... Give me a saint who is devoted through and through. In the long run you will find he is ten times better than the most instructed worldly man, because he has light from God.
The result went beyond good marks. God had made a promise about people who honour Him, and He kept it:
As a result, these faithful men became witnesses for God, for we read that they stood "before the king." God was true to His own word, "Those who honour Me I will honour" (1 Samuel 2:30). So it came about that in all matters of wisdom and understanding the king found these faithful men ten times better than all the men of the world.
This was no one-off. The same gap shows up where the world's rulers faced Christ Himself:
Compared with the magicians and astrologers, the four men, taught of God, were ten times better. There is nothing surprising in this. The same thing meets us in stronger form in 1 Corinthians 2. There we read that the rulers of this world knew nothing of God's wisdom, so much so that they "crucified the Lord of glory." But the simplest believer, indwelt and controlled by the Spirit of God, judges, or discerns, "all things."
What made the difference in Daniel has a counterpart now, and it is a daily one:
The vegetables and the water speak of feeding on Christ in the power of the Spirit. The food may look the same day after day, yet we need never grow weary of it. Christ taken in by us in the power of the Spirit will produce what is morally "ten times better" (v. 20) than anything the world can show.
- Refusal first. The gap in this verse starts with a refused meal. God honoured that separation and gave the knowledge and skill.
- Gift, not talent. Their learning came not from man but from God, so the credit for the result never belongs to the classroom.
- Occult competition. Their rivals were enchanters who trafficked with demonic powers. So "ten times better" judges two sources of knowledge, not two study methods.
- The world's own exam. Babylon's king set the questions on Babylon's subjects — and the godliest were top of the class.
- Honour returned. "Those who honour Me I will honour." Four captives ended up standing before the throne. The same contrast holds today: the simplest believer, led by the Spirit, discerns all things.
And Daniel continued unto the first year of king Cyrus.
The book's first chapter ends with a date, not a scene. That one line carries Daniel across the whole of Babylon's rule and into the empire that followed — so what is it there to prove?
(The commentators below quote an older wording of the verse: "Daniel continued even unto the first year of king Cyrus.")
The date is not decoration. It marks the empires that rose and fell while one man stayed at his post.
So he lived to see the fall of the huge empire that Nebuchadnezzar ruled. He served under Darius the Mede, and he saw the arrival of Cyrus. More than one hundred and fifty years earlier, Isaiah had prophesied of Cyrus (see Isaiah 44:28; Isaiah 45:1-3) as the one who would be the means of restoring Jerusalem and the temple.
The verse marks how far Daniel reached, not when he died. Later chapters place him after this date, so the line serves another purpose.
It is not merely an account of certain circumstances, set down before the book introduces the various revelations or facts it gives one after another. Here we have the preparation for the place Daniel was to keep. And then the book carries us, as it were, on to the end. It shows Daniel continuing through the whole term of the Babylonian monarchy, and even into the beginning of the Persian. It does not mean that Daniel only lived to the first year of king Cyrus, because the latter part of the book shows us a vision after that date.
Dennett draws the same limit from chapter 10, and adds a note on Daniel's age. The verse, he says, "makes it certain that he lived to a good old age, exceeding, at any rate, the limits of seventy years."
Daniel went into exile long before Jerusalem fell. That explains how young he was, and how long he lasted.
This prophet was taken to Babylon nearly twenty years before the last Babylonian attack on Jerusalem and the sack of the city. He outlived the captivity, which lasted seventy years, and went on to the third year of the reign of Cyrus, the founder of the Persian Empire (Dan. 10:1). So he must have been taken captive when very young, and could not have shared the nation's guilt to any great extent. But this very fact gives weight and solemnity to his confession of national sin (Dan. 9).
Daniel did not just survive these changes. One writer points to God's care over him, and to what lay behind his steady course.
And God maintained the rights of His servant. When other kings died, Daniel continued and prospered (5:31, 6:1-3). The change of the ruling dynasty made no difference at all to Daniel's life; he went on smoothly, continuing to do the things that pleased God. What a man he was! This again was the result of his prayer life, the righteousness in his life, and his desire for the furthering of the interests of God.
The shape of the book itself teaches something. Notice where Daniel stands in the first chapter, and where he stands in the last.
It is very beautiful to see Daniel alone in the first chapter, and Daniel alone in the last chapter of his book. All the glory of this world passes before us, but the man who stands for God alone at the beginning is the man who will be alone at the end. "But go your way till the end; for you shall rest, and stand in your lot at the end of the days." The world is triumphing now, in this brief day of man. But those who are separate to God now will stand alone in that day of blessing.
A good beginning is not the whole story. One writer sets this closing note beside Paul, who reached the end of his course.
This calls for spiritual stamina. We cannot flee from what is wrong. We cannot pursue what is right. Neither is possible without the spiritual strength that comes from a purpose of heart to refuse everything that is not of Christ Himself. Paul could say, "I have finished my course." And we read that "Daniel continued even unto the first year of King Cyrus" (verse 21). The last verse of the book says of him, "you… shall… stand in your lot at the end of the days".
- Purpose — Strength to refuse wrong and pursue right comes from one settled purpose of heart: to refuse all that is not of Christ.
- Prayer — His prayer life and righteousness held him steady, so a change of dynasty made no difference to how he lived.
- Span — Taken captive very young, he outlived the seventy-year captivity. He saw Babylon fall, served under Darius, and met the Cyrus Isaiah had named long before.
- Preface — The verse does not record his death. It is a marker that carries the reader to the end, and chapter 10 shows him still receiving visions in the third year of Cyrus.
- Finish — He stands alone in chapter 1 and alone in the last chapter. A good start is not enough; the book holds out continuing to the end.