Acts 7:41–43

Acts 7:41 · Darby

And they made a calf in those days, and offered sacrifice to the idol, and rejoiced in the works of their own hands.

Stephen is on trial, and instead of defending himself he retells Israel's story. He reaches the moment when Moses was still up the mountain and the people made themselves something to worship. Two questions follow: why would a rescued people want a metal animal, and why were they glad about it?

The Idol Came Out of Egypt

They did not invent the shape. They copied it from the nation they had just left, and that made it look respectable.

Israel took the worship of the calf from their old masters, the Egyptians. That remarkable people were generally clean, even in their idolatry. Israel adopted Apis, the bull, who represented Osiris. To tell the truth, at first glance there seems little harm in it. People more respectable than Israel had worshipped at his shrine for centuries, with no visible harm. Where was the sin? Aaron might think. It was a clean and useful animal, and it represented the valuable principle of Prosperity. Yet God looks down out of the heavens full of anger. He deals with His own people differently from the rest of the world: "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Sacrifice Offered in God's Own Name

Stephen says they sacrificed "to the idol." Yet Aaron announced the event as a feast to the LORD.

reason: "blessing" loses original's "sanctification"; 46-word sentence split Call the sin holy, and the abomination will be held in religious awe. They dedicated the image to God — the God who had commanded them to make no image and to bow down to no image. Calling the festival by Jehovah's name did not change what it really was.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Rejoicing in What Their Own Hands Made

Notice what they were glad about — their own work.

The spirit of false worship is to rejoice in the work of one's own hands — "they made a calf... and rejoiced in the work of their own hands." But in true worship, God Himself is the glory of the worshipper. It is in Him that the soul makes her boast.

Modernised from James L. HarrisOriginal wording

The demand in the previous verse belongs with this joy.

It is governed by sight instead of faith, for Israel said, "Make for us gods who will go before us" (40). And it rejoices in its own works instead of the work of God, for after making an idol they "rejoiced in the works of their own hands" (41).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Bowing to a Calf Lowers the Worshipper

The damage did not stop with the idol. It reached the people who bowed to it.

The people are clearly taught that in making any image and bowing down to it, they lowered and corrupted themselves. So when they made the golden calf, the Lord said to Moses, "Go down, for your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves." It could not be otherwise. The worshipper must be lower than the object of his worship. So in worshipping a calf, they put themselves below the level of the beasts that perish.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The First Sin That Set the Course

This was the first thing Israel did after promising to obey.

This has been called Israel's original sin... First of all, it is the first action of the people recorded after they solemnly agreed to the covenant in Exodus 24. It was their first move on the new footing, in their new standing as a people "under the law." Then, that blow was aimed at the very throne of God itself. It went straight against the first item of the law they had pledged themselves to obey: "You shall have no other gods before me." Again, original sin is besetting sin — the first swing of the pendulum, deciding all the swings to come.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Same Principle, Not Only in Israel

This principle did not die with the calf.

It is said of the people when they made the golden calf, "they rejoiced in the work of their own hands." The Galatian error — adding the law to Christ — is the same in principle. It is what the human heart naturally feels, as though people could serve God with their hands, as if He needed something. The apostle knew of no middle way between the grace of God in Christ and idolatry.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Absence. They made the calf while their leader was out of sight; unbelief wants a guide it can see.

- Borrowed. The form came from Egypt, so it looked harmless and respectable.

- Relabelled. They sacrificed under God's name, but calling a sin holy never changes what it is.

- Self-admiring. "Rejoiced in the works of their own hands" marks false worship: the maker praising his own product instead of boasting in God.

- Decisive. This first departure set the course; the first swing of the pendulum decided all the swings to come.

Acts 7:42 · Darby

But God turned and delivered them up to serve the host of heaven; as it is written in [the] book of the prophets, Have ye offered me victims and sacrifices forty years in the wilderness, O house of Israel?

Stephen has just described the golden calf, and now he tells the court what God did next: He turned away and left Israel to the idolatry they wanted. That raises two hard questions — what does it mean that God "gave them over", and why does God say they never sacrificed to Him in forty years of desert life?

Idolatry climbs

Israel made the calf with their own hands, and it did not satisfy them for long. One writer traces how that hunger grows. He also points out that the charge here is not Stephen's own words but Amos's:

The 'calf', the abomination of Egypt, did not satisfy Israel. They craved objects higher than the works of their own hands, whatever charm that has for man's vain heart. Once they yielded to the snare, Israel had to outdo Egypt. So "God turned away and gave them over to worship the host of heaven." Idolatry that grovels in the dust still reaches for higher things, and puffs itself up with its heavenly imaginations. Stephen is not the authority for so withering a charge, but Amos (Amos 5:25-27). These words stand in the prophets' Book. Would an Israelite contradict them too, or charge Scripture itself with saying blasphemous things about Israel?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Being given up is the sentence

"God turned" is not God losing interest. Writers describe this handing-over as a deliberate act of God's government, and one of them extends the same principle to the very generation Stephen was addressing:

They fell away from God until God gave them up. The words come three times: God gave them up to impurity (v. 24); God gave them up to shameful passions (v. 26); and, because they did not want to keep God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind (v. 28)… To be given up is the act of God in judicial judgment. He gave up the Gentiles in this way, and we see what man became. We also know that when the Jews had fully rejected the testimony of the Holy Spirit, God gave them up, for the present, as a people.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

Sacrifices God would not count

God's question about the forty years is not asking for information. Israel kept up the tabernacle, God's tent of worship, and He still refuses what they brought:

When the Spirit of prophecy announced their coming captivity, He does not go back to the wicked kings of Israel, nor to the shameless sons of David who ruled Judah. He goes back to the idolatry in the wilderness — at the very time when Israel openly honoured the tabernacle of Jehovah and the priesthood of Aaron. But all that time God saw how hollow the animals and sacrifices they brought in His name were. In their hearts, in secret, they carried the tent of Moloch and the star of the god Raiphan.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two names on one altar

Commentators differ on how much sacrifice went on in the desert at all. One doubts that Israel offered much beyond the official ritual. He also shows how easily they put God's name over an idol:

As to their idolatry, I doubt whether Israel offered God a single sacrifice through all the wilderness years, apart from the official ones… They likely kept the official sacrifices up, or could have; and on the whole, what they did offer they claimed was for the Lord. When they made the golden calf, Aaron announced, "Tomorrow is a feast to Jehovah."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Amos speaks centuries later

Stephen quotes a prophet who lived hundreds of years after the wilderness. That gap is part of the lesson:

God's judgment is sure, even if it seems to sleep. Long afterwards the prophet Amos passes sentence for the sin committed in the desert. Whatever made the sin worse later on, it is the first sin that decides. Evil never gets better and never works itself out. It easily can grow worse, and it always does… Patience may go on for ages, in ways that faith admires; but judgment, however long delayed, is certain.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same road, walked again

This is not only an old story about Israel. The same writer sees it repeat wherever people grow tired of a Deliverer they cannot see:

By nature people are even more idolatrous than doubting. Unbelief is the mother of both these enemies of God and His truth. People love to have gods that go before them. They find the true Deliverer tiresome, and He soon slips out of mind: "we do not know what has become of him." Is not the wilderness history prophetic?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- They turned first. The calf was only the start. Once Israel took that first step, they reached past their own handiwork to the stars above them.

- Then God turned. Being handed over is not neglect. It is judgment: God leaves people to the gods they preferred.

- Worship turned hollow. God saw through the sacrifices they offered in His name while they carried Moloch secretly in their hearts.

- His name turned into cover. Aaron could call a calf-feast a feast to Jehovah; God's name over an idol changes nothing for God.

- The sentence still came. The first sin left unjudged decides the case, and judgment long delayed is judgment still certain.

Acts 7:43 · Darby

Yea, ye took up the tent of Moloch, and the star of [your] god Remphan, the forms which ye made to do homage to them; and I will transport you beyond Babylon.

Stephen is on trial, accused of speaking against the holy place and the law. His answer quotes Amos and goes back to the desert, where Israel carried hidden idols and set the exile in motion.

The gods named in the verse

Stephen quotes the Greek translation of the Old Testament. That is why the name here is not the one in the Hebrew text of Amos. (Older versions spell the name "Remphan" and say "tabernacle" instead of "tent.")

The name of a god in Acts 7:43, which Israel had worshipped (but some Greek manuscripts read Rephan). Stephen was quoting Amos 5:25-26 from the Septuagint, which has Raephan. In the Hebrew the name of the god is Chiun, but why the translators changed the name is not known.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Sacrifices in public, idols in private

The charge is not that Israel abandoned the outward system. They kept it up, and carried the forbidden shrines at the same time.

When the Spirit of prophecy announced their coming captivity, He does not go back to the wicked kings of Israel. Nor does He go back to the shameless sons of David who ruled Judah. He goes back to the idolatry in the wilderness. On the outside, at that very time, they honoured the tabernacle of Jehovah and the priesthood of Aaron. But God saw all along how hollow their offerings and sacrifices in His name were. In their hearts, out of sight, they took up the tent of Moloch and the star of the god Raiphan. They had made these forms to worship them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why this answered the accusation against Stephen

His accusers rested their case on the holy place and the law. The verse he quotes shows that neither one ever kept Israel from idols.

Worshipping God by the ritual of the law was no security against idolatry. Stephen proved it from the words of Amos the prophet. Amos goes back to the days of Moses in the wilderness. There he finds the sin that carried them off, after long patience, to the lands of captivity. "The holy place and the law" did nothing for God's glory then, and they do nothing now. This was his answer to their boast, and his defence against their accusation.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From a calf to the host of heaven

Verse 43 follows the golden calf, and it marks a step further down. God let them have what they wanted, and their appetite grew.

Man, unbelieving man, is so quick to abandon the living God. He does it despite the daily standing witness of His power and grace. He does it despite the solemn judgments God sends before all eyes from time to time. He is just as quick to take up the idolatry that he had known, only a short time before, to rule the high and mighty, the refined and learned — the world, in short, where he himself had been a slave… The calf, the abomination of Egypt, did not satisfy Israel either. They craved objects higher than the works of their own hands, whatever the charm of those works to man's vain heart. Once they yielded to the snare, Israel had to outdo Egypt. So "God turned away and gave them over to worship the host of heaven."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Beyond Babylon" — sentence passed on the first sin

Stephen names Babylon as the far edge of the exile. The reason for that wording is uncertain; the reason for the exile is not.

The prophet reminds them when and where their idolatry began: in the wilderness… Stephen says beyond Babylon, and so it turned out, perhaps to mark it off from the Babylonian captivity. Such was the result of the old sin in the wilderness. No doubt that sin was worse at the end. The dark stream kept gathering more water as it flowed… Still, God always goes back to the source. At last He declares that the final blow came because of the first departure.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The gap in time changes nothing. Babylon was not an accident.

The failure in the wilderness is connected here with the Babylonian captivity, though a great number of years came in between. The whole thing failed there. Babylon was the necessary result of that failure in the wilderness.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The root: Egypt still in the heart

Redemption out of Egypt had happened. The images they carried show what had not happened.

The Israelites had not worshipped Jehovah for forty years in the wilderness; but they had carried symbols of Molech and Chiun (or Remphan) and worshipped them. The root of their idolatrous course was that they had never in heart made a clean break from Egypt.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Root. The images in this verse expose a heart that never left Egypt, even after God brought the nation out.

- Hidden. The same people who honoured the tabernacle and the priesthood carried Moloch's tent out of sight. Public worship and private idolatry ran side by side.

- No shield. The law and the holy place gave no protection against idols. That was Stephen's reply to men who accused him while boasting in both.

- Downward. A calf made by their own hands did not satisfy them, so God gave them over to the host of heaven. Once they gave in, Israel had to outdo Egypt.

- Sentence. God traces the exile "beyond Babylon" back to the first sin in the desert. Long patience delays the blow. It does not cancel it.