Acts 7:17–36

Acts 7:17 · Darby

But as the time of promise drew near which God had promised to Abraham, the people increased and multiplied in Egypt,

Stephen stands before the Jewish council and retells his nation's story. He reaches the moment when God's promise to Abraham is almost due. The verse sets two things side by side. As God's word came near to fulfilment, the people grew fast — and their life in Egypt grew hard.

The Promise Sets the Clock

Israel's whole future rested on a word God spoke to one man — before that man had a single child.

The God of glory thought of His people in Egypt and in the wilderness, before the holy place or even the law. He will never give Israel up until He has made good His promise — the promise He guaranteed when Abraham had no child. God called Abraham alone, and blessed and increased him. How wrong they all were, then, to make so much of themselves and of their privileges, and so to slight His grace and Himself. … As Abraham went about as a stranger in Palestine, so his descendants first appear as slaves in a land not their own. This was no brief moment: in round numbers 400 years passed from the birth of the child of promise until God judged the nation that held them in slavery.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Growth Beyond Nature

The increase was not slow drift. It was so steep that a king took notice. (Older translations word the verse "grew and multiplied".)

We find these two words, "growing and multiplying", used of the children of Israel. They occur in Stephen's address to the Jewish council. The sons of Jacob went down into Egypt, seventy-five people, and in a short space of time they grew and multiplied to a miraculous degree. This increase was so striking that it attracted the attention of Pharaoh, the king of Egypt. He was alarmed, and he took drastic measures to stop the marvellous increase. That increase was God's gift to His chosen ones as the descendants of Abraham. God had promised that they would be as many as the stars in heaven and the sand on the seashore.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

The pressure that followed did not stop them. It shaped them into something new.

God, however, took them in hand and allowed them to feel the scorching heat of Egypt's furnace. "But the more they were oppressed, the more they multiplied and the more they spread abroad" (Ex. 1:12). In that furnace of affliction they were welded together as a nation. They entered Egypt a feeble and divided family: they left it a compact and powerful nation.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why Opposition Arrived Then

A new king who did not know Joseph rises just as deliverance draws near. That timing is no accident.

It is always so. There is always war between God and the enemy. It rages most fiercely where His people are involved, and when a clear display of divine mercy is close at hand. God's approaching favour to Israel drew out the hostility of Satan. He stirred up a fitting tool for his malice in the ruler of the world of that day, "another king who did not know Joseph." … The order to destroy the boys failed. It failed not only through human pity, but through the fear of God. He honoured those who honoured Him, and He brought His enemies to nothing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Lowest Point Before the Highest

At this moment Israel's circumstances look like proof that the promise had failed.

As the time drew near for this promise to be fulfilled, you might have expected the children of Israel to grow in might and power and prominence. But instead of rising, they stand at what is perhaps the lowest point of their national history. God had allowed them to become slaves under the tyranny of this king who did not know Joseph.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Waiting on a Promise Today

Israel's wait in Egypt has a parallel now. What should we expect as a promise draws near?

Here the people are in Egypt, waiting for God to carry out the promise He had made to Abraham. … Their position then is very much like ours today. A promise has been left us of entering into our heavenly part at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Some have hoped that as this event draws near, a wonderful revival will take place among those who look for Him… But do we not rather see something different in places like the messages to the seven assemblies? The nearer we are to that moment, the more we need to hold fast His word and not deny His name… Like Israel here, we may find our liberties more and more restricted before we are taken out of this world.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise first. God's word to Abraham, given when he had no child, is what drives the whole story — not Israel's standing or merit.

- Promise grows. Seventy-five people became a multitude. No natural process explains it. God was making good His pledge of descendants like the stars.

- Promise provokes. Approaching mercy drew out hostility. The king's cruelty was the enemy's answer to God's timing — and it failed.

- Promise hides. At the very hour of fulfilment the nation looked finished — slaves, with their sons condemned. Low circumstances are not proof that God's word has failed.

- Promise holds. Believers waiting for the Lord's return should expect the same pattern. Expect pressure, not visible improvement — and a call to hold fast His word.

Acts 7:18 · Darby

until another king over Egypt arose who did not know Joseph.

God's promise was moving toward its fulfilment, and Israel was growing fast in Egypt. Then the throne changed hands. Stephen marks the turn with one short clause about a king who had no regard for Joseph. Everything that follows in his speech — slavery, the order to kill the boys, Moses — flows from it.

"Another king" — a different dynasty

Stephen's word for "another" points to kind, not just count. Writers on the Greek apply it to this verse:

The word expresses "a different kind." … In Egypt there arose a different king who did not know Joseph, Acts 7:18; this doubtless refers to one of a different dynasty.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Not knowing Joseph as a moral state

One commentator reads "did not know Joseph" as a choice rather than ignorance:

As the years passed, a great change came over the whole situation. A new king rose up, who "did not know Joseph." This may not mean he was unaware that Joseph had existed. It may mean that he saw him as an intruder and an oppressor, and ignored him altogether.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer draws out what that ignoring shows about the king himself:

The statement that he "did not know Joseph" is deeply significant. Joseph in Egypt was a type — a picture — of Christ in His earthly glory, and so not to know him is the mark of a moral state. Pharaoh in fact is the god of this world, and as such must of necessity be in opposition to the Lord's people.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Ingratitude in the land Joseph had saved

Egypt owed her wealth to Joseph. One writer reads the new king's stance as ingratitude on a national scale:

That land was thus the ungrateful, the rebellious. She had departed from Joseph, and so from God Himself, from Him who had filled her storehouses with plenty, and her throne with honour and strength. Egypt was the world in miniature — the great deserter from its rightful Lord and gracious Benefactor. … Joseph's memory had been despised, and all that remained to Joseph was put to work at the brick kilns.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Enmity rising as the promise draws near

Stephen places the new king right after the words about the promise drawing near. One writer sees the timing as the point:

It is always so. There is always war between God and the enemy. Nowhere is it fiercer than where His people are concerned, and when a clear display of divine mercy is close at hand. God's approaching favour to Israel drew out the enmity of Satan. He stirred up a fitting instrument for his malice in the prince of the world of that day, "another king who did not know Joseph."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

And the attack failed at every turn:

These verses are a compact summary of Exodus 1:7-20. That chapter gives the details of Pharaoh's cunning, aggressive and ruthlessly cruel efforts to crush them. God defeated those efforts just as strikingly, for, say or do what he might, "the people multiplied and grew very strong." The order to destroy the boys failed. It failed not only through human pity, but through the fear of God, who honoured those who honoured Him, and brought His adversaries to nothing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Bondage inside the promise

The slavery this king began was no breakdown in God's plan:

Here we see grace in its first workings: a nation's small beginning in the seventy souls who came into Egypt with Jacob, set against their astonishing and unstoppable increase. Even the bondage they come into had already been announced to them. What seemed most against them was really the working out of the promise for them. The hand of power works in disguise, yet faith can see right through it. It is essentially the same story, whether told of the nation of Israel or of any of the Lord's redeemed.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Why Stephen retells it

Stephen is retelling a history his hearers boasted in. One writer explains why it condemned them:

He recites to the Jews a history they could not deny, a history they boasted in, yet it condemned them completely. They were doing as their fathers had done. Two people stand out in Stephen's account, in connection with the goodness of God towards Israel at this period — Joseph and Moses. Israel had rejected them both, handed Joseph over to the Gentiles, refused Moses as judge and leader. In cases the Jews could not deny or argue with, it was the history of Christ as well.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Different. This king was not just the next one. The word means one of another kind — a new dynasty.

- Forgetful. "Did not know Joseph" reads as deliberate disregard of the man who had filled Egypt's storehouses. Here is the world's ingratitude to its Benefactor in miniature.

- Hostile. The king who ignored Joseph then crushed Joseph's people. Not knowing God's man and fighting God's people go together.

- Timed. The enmity flared just as the promise drew near. A coming display of mercy always draws out the enemy's malice.

- Defeated. Every move against Israel failed. God had announced the bondage in advance, so what looked most against them was His promise at work.

Acts 7:19 · Darby

*He* dealt subtilly with our race, and evil entreated the fathers, casting out their infants that they might not live.

Stephen is on trial for his life, and he answers by retelling Israel's history. He arrives at Egypt, where God's promise to Abraham stood nearest and His people stood lowest — why does God allow that?

The promise near, the people low

The exodus was drawing near. Yet the nation looked nothing like a people on the edge of rescue.

You might have thought that as the time drew near for God to keep this promise, the children of Israel would be growing in might and power and prominence. Instead, their national standing did not rise. They are seen at what is perhaps the lowest point in their national history. God had allowed them to become slaves under the tyranny of this king who did not know Joseph. They seemed so much at his mercy that he decided to wipe them out. He ordered every baby boy to be thrown into the river.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Craft before cruelty

Pharaoh's policy was not blind rage. It solved two problems for Egypt at once.

There is a clear double tyranny over the people. It guards against two dangers. Israel might rise to first place in the land, or they might escape altogether, and then the Egyptians would lose their labour. So the order went out to kill all their males. In this way the nation would stay in slavery, unable to escape, and would still supply slaves to do the work of the Egyptians. Their oppression and misery made them cry out loud in their distress. Meanwhile the faith of individuals who took hold of God and refused to obey the king's command shows how God works through His people when they count on Him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The war behind the throne

The verse calls the king's dealing shrewd. That cunning served someone else's purpose, and it still failed.

It is always like this. There is always war between God and the enemy. It rages most fiercely where His people are concerned, and when a clear display of divine mercy is about to come. God's approaching favour to Israel drew out the hatred of Satan. He stirred up a fitting tool for his malice in the prince of the world of that day, "another king who did not know Joseph". These verses are a compact summary of Exodus 1:7-20. That passage gives the details of Pharaoh's cunning, aggressive and utterly cruel efforts to hold them down. God defeated those efforts just as plainly, for whatever Pharaoh said or did, "the people multiplied and grew very strong". The order to destroy the boys failed, not only through human pity, but through the fear of God. He honoured those who honoured Him, and brought His opponents to nothing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the babies

The target was narrow and deliberate. Kill the boys, and a promised line ends with them.

The attempt to destroy all the male children comes next. Satan, who is a murderer from the beginning, showed his cunning and power in this way. He wanted to destroy the seed of Abraham so that the coming of the Promised One would be impossible. The murder of Abel was his first attempt. Here is an attempt on a larger scale, followed by many others. See Exodus 14; 2 Chronicles 21:4, 17; 22:10; Esther 3:6, 12, 13; Matthew 2, and others.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What Stephen was driving at

This is not history for its own sake. Stephen is building a case, and it points at the men judging him.

Then he starts at the very beginning of the nation's existence, dating it from Abraham. He goes over its history down to the days of Moses. He points out that twice over their ancestors made the great mistake of rejecting the one God had appointed for their deliverance. First it was Joseph. Next it was Moses… With these facts in front of them they might well pause. They might well consider carefully what they were doing, and where they might be drifting. The mistake they made over Joseph they had repeated over Moses. What were they doing now?

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The same pattern for us

Nearness to promised deliverance is no guarantee of easier days.

Their position at that time is much like ours today. A promise remains for us — we will enter our heavenly portion at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ… Like Israel here, we may find our liberties shrinking more and more before He takes us out of this world. The conflict between light and darkness goes on without a pause. The enemy will do his best to end all testimony to Christ in this world.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise — The nearer rescue came, the lower Israel sank. Their worst hour was the hour before their rescue.

- Craft — Pharaoh's edict was cold policy: keep the labour, kill the future. Israel could then neither rise nor escape.

- Enemy — Behind the king stands Satan's hatred. It flares up whenever God is about to show mercy.

- Failure — The scheme collapsed. The people multiplied instead, and the fear of God defeated a king's command.

- Warning — Stephen shows a pattern: Israel twice rejected the one God sent to save them. His judges must ask what they are doing now.

Acts 7:20 · Darby

In which time Moses was born, and was exceedingly lovely, who was nourished three months in the house of his father.

Stephen is on trial, and he answers by retelling Israel's own history. Now the story reaches Moses. He is born under a royal death sentence, and faith reads God's purpose in the face of a newborn.

Born under the decree

A new king had turned on Israel and aimed his cruelty at their infants. Moses arrives at exactly that moment.

The enemy had raised up a suitable instrument, another king over Egypt who did not know Joseph. Suffering became Israel's portion. The king aimed a deadly blow at the promise by striking at their babies... At that critical moment Moses was born, fair to God. A glorious career lay ahead of him, however dark its beginnings. He too came under the sentence of death, and after three months of care in his father's house, he was cast out like the rest.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Beautiful in God's sight"

The phrase Stephen uses is not ordinary admiration. It reads literally "fair to God" — older translations say "exceedingly lovely" — and it stands apart from the good looks the world prizes.

This world offers different types of beauty. Saul was "handsome and tall; there was not a man among the people of Israel more handsome than he." Eliab also had a fine appearance that caught Samuel's eye. But such beauty by itself is worth nothing except in men's eyes. There is another beauty. In men of faith it may go together with outward beauty, and God values it as the reflection of character. It is the beauty of a pure soul or of simple faith. It is the shining out of a heart that shuts out evil and sin, a heart without deceit. This is the beauty of the little child Moses, of whom the Word says he "was exceedingly lovely," literally, "fair to God" (Acts 7:20).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

His parents read something in the newborn's face. Later in the same chapter, men look at another face very differently.

It means that when he was born there was an expression in his face that faith read. "Beautiful to God" is the word. There was a certain beauty in him that awakened the faith of Amram and Jochebed, and they obeyed it. Was there not a beauty in the face of the dying Stephen? Should not his murderers have obeyed it? They stand in moral contrast to Moses' parents. Under the finger of God they saw the purpose of God and hid the child.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Faith on small evidence

A baby's appearance looks like thin ground for defying a king.

Here we have a remarkable simplicity of faith in Moses' parents, which acts on grounds that to most would seem slight enough — the beauty of the child. God still answers it, for it was faith in Him; and how largely He answers, for this is Moses the deliverer! Is there not here one of the natural signs of the mind of God, which we are so unskilled at finding? The poor and unlearned perhaps read such signs best, and people easily confuse them with mere superstition... but God makes no mistake, and wherever faith is, He will honour it.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Three months in his father's house

Hiding the child put two loyalties in conflict, and the parents knew which one came first.

Such is God's valuation of the actions of the father and mother whose natural affection for this son given to them rose up against the king's decree. They recognised that they owed loyalty to an earthly ruler. But by faith they acknowledged a higher loyalty to their God, and this proud tyrant was accountable to Him too. Trusting in God, they were able to rise above the fear of man that brings a snare... and they hide their child from the tyrant and a hostile world.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Providence alone is not enough

The verse begins a career marked at every step by remarkable circumstances — and those advantages turn out not to be the qualification.

The providence of God raised up a fitting instrument for His merciful purpose. But even Moses had to learn dependence on Him, and that neither the advantages of his person, nor his training in Egypt's wisdom, nor the court influence of Pharaoh's daughter, could achieve that purpose to His glory... But no: that would have been man's method and the world's wisdom, to the credit of Moses' genius and prudence, and in no way a foreshadowing of Christ.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The greater Deliverer

The child called beautiful to God pictures Another. The likeness holds, but so does the contrast.

Moses, as we have seen, was by birth exposed to the death sentence that lay on the sons of Israel in Egypt. Faith saw him "fair to God," but that did not exempt him. And what do we learn of the One whom Moses pictured? Every moral beauty shone out from that blessed One's wonderful Person, to the full delight of the Father's heart. Yet neither His own people nor the world at large saw any beauty in Him. There was no room for Him in the homes or the hearts of men.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Timing. The king decreed death for Israel's babies. At that exact moment the deliverer was born — dark beginnings, glorious career.

- Beauty. "Fair to God" is not Saul's handsomeness but the beauty God values; faith read it in the baby's face.

- Faith. Slight evidence was enough, because the faith rested in God. He honoured it, and the child became Moses the deliverer.

- Allegiance. Three months of hiding meant owning a higher loyalty than the king's, and rising above the fear of man.

- Christ. Moses was beautiful to God, and his parents saw it. The greater Deliverer, in whom every beauty shone for the Father, was the One men saw no beauty in.

Acts 7:21 · Darby

And when he was cast out, the daughter of Pharaoh took him up, and brought him up for herself [to be] for a son.

Moses was born under a royal death sentence, put out to die, and then raised as a son by the daughter of the king who signed it. What is a position like that for?

Cast Out Under a Death Sentence

The phrase "when he was exposed" reads "cast out" in older translations. One writer traces the decree behind it, and names what kept Moses hidden for the three months before it:

The enemy had raised up a suitable instrument, another king over Egypt who did not know Joseph. Suffering became the portion of Israel, and a deadly blow was aimed at the promise in the person of their babies. The king's command was to expose them so that they would not survive. At that critical moment Moses was born, beautiful in God's sight, with a glorious career ahead of him, however dark its beginnings. He too came under the sentence of death. After three months of care in his father's house, he was cast out like the rest. But we have the highest authority for saying that his parents hid him for those three months "by faith," whatever their natural affection (Hebrews 11:23). "They were not afraid of the king's edict."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rescue From the Palace

Pharaoh's own house took the child in. One writer reads this as the plan against Israel turned back on itself:

Who would have thought it? The man who had said, "If it is a son, you shall kill him," and again, "Every son that is born you shall cast into the Nile," had one of those very sons in his own court — and such a son. The devil's own weapon defeated him. He was using Pharaoh to frustrate the purpose of God. And God used that same Pharaoh to nourish and bring up Moses, who was to be His instrument in overthrowing the power of Satan.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Raised as Her Own Son

"As her own son" was not a figure of speech. Adoption into that house carried a future with it:

From that time Pharaoh's daughter claimed the child, "and he became her son." She raised him from infancy to manhood as her own son. And what was the result? By the age of forty he was within direct reach of the throne of Egypt, with every prospect of taking it. Pharaoh had no son, and Pharaoh's daughter had no children. If she died, her adopted son would without doubt have come to the throne of Egypt and ruled the leading nation in the world at that moment.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Cost to the Mother

The rescue that gave Moses a palace took him from the woman who bore him. One writer refuses to read that home as faith's reward:

While they had faith they hid him — they kept their beautiful child. At the end of three months they cast him out; they "could hide him no longer." Had they not come to the end of their faith?… But a home in Pharaoh's house is not presented to us as an answer to faith… One sees the desire of the heart granted — the child's life; but see what the mother loses. She is a hired nurse to Pharaoh's daughter. When the child is grown she loses him, and another woman names her child and has him for her son.… Faith was powerful as long as faith was there. When faith was gone, God's mercy was there, and it showed more clearly than in the day of faith.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Providence and Faith

Moses later refused the title this verse gave him. That refusal sets faith against every argument built on providence:

Providence had placed him in a distinguished position, unsought and unexpected. Educated to match it, he was "learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians," and mighty in words and deeds. Why not use his ability and his wisdom? Why not use the influence his high rank gave him, and his nearness to the most princely people in the realm? Why not wisely and thankfully turn such obvious gifts of providence to the service of God's people?… But no! Faith at once disposes of all such reasoning built on providences.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer names what that path would have proved:

But no: this would have been man's method and the world's wisdom, to the praise of Moses' genius and prudence, and in no way a foreshadowing of Christ.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cast out — Moses came under the same death sentence as every Hebrew boy. His parents hid him three months by faith, not fearing the king's edict.

- Taken up — rescue came from the very house that issued the decree. The plot against God's people preserved their deliverer.

- Brought up — as her own son, Moses grew up within reach of Egypt's throne. Its learning and influence were his for the taking.

- Given up — his mother gained his life but lost her son. One writer reads the palace as mercy after faith had run out, not as faith's reward.

- Walked out — providence carried him in, but faith led him out. Refusing the title made Moses a picture of Christ rather than a monument to his own genius.

Acts 7:22 · Darby

And Moses was instructed in all [the] wisdom of the Egyptians, and he was mighty in his words and deeds.

Stephen is on trial for his life. Instead of defending himself, he retells Israel's story. Here he stops at the young Moses, raised in Pharaoh's palace with the finest education the world could offer. Do natural ability and training make a person fit for God's work?

Rare Gifts

Stephen credits Moses with words and deeds, not just learning.

Stephen said: "Moses was instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and he was mighty in his words and deeds." This tells us that he was what the world would call a man of genius. Many men are good talkers — they have gifts of speech, but are hardly men of action. Other men show their ability in what they do. Their actions are wise and powerful, but their powers of speech are small. The man who shines in both areas is a rarity.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Egypt's learning was no small thing, and it set Moses up for a brilliant future.

Moses was plainly a very clever man. He was "instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians," and the Egyptians were not fools. It would puzzle our builders to do what they did — to put up the Pyramids… He was a scientific, accomplished, intellectual man; but more than that, "he was mighty in his words and deeds."… That man had everything in his favour. He had the world before him. He was not only the king's favourite, and the adopted son of Pharaoh's daughter, but was within reach of the throne.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Not God's Credentials

Everything looked ready. God sent His man away for forty years instead.

Nature would say, What a fitted, prepared instrument God now has at hand! But this is exactly the thought that falls short of the mind of God. He will not, and does not, accept the qualifications of Egypt. He sends Moses to school (as we would say) for forty years. There he is fitted and prepared and qualified for the work God has for him to do. God's instruments must learn in God's school. There is no buying rank in His army; everyone must rise from the ranks.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

The work ahead needed what no education could supply.

All this learning was of no use to him as the deliverer God chose. It was of no use to him as the king in Jeshurun (a name for Israel), guiding the course of the people of God in the wilderness. The "wisdom of Egypt" would have been baffled to make a way through the Red Sea, and had no resource at all to meet the demands of the wilderness. Egypt's learning could not have provided the ability to bring water out of the rock or provide the manna to meet the needs of that vast host in the wilderness.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What Faith Saw

Moses was well able to weigh his own prospects. That is what makes his choice remarkable.

No one can deny that Moses was capable of rightly judging the situation. He was instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and he was mighty in his words and deeds. Yet he looked, not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen. His eye was on the kingdom of God. He waited for the Messiah. He knew that the purposes of God centre in Christ, and that Israel was their inner circle on earth. So his affections were not with the court of Egypt, nor on the most brilliant future it could open to a man of his energy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Man Who Said He Could Not Speak

There is a puzzle here. The man Stephen calls mighty in words later told God he could not speak well. One writer explains it this way:

Knowing something of human nature in ourselves, we think it was not that he had really lost his powers of mighty speech. Instead, the forty years of discipline in the desert had completely broken his self-confidence. But he had also become taken up with himself, and so he was unwilling to answer God's call and commission.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Using What You Were Given

None of this shuts ordinary people out of God's service.

Few of us have had an education like this, but then very few are needed for such great work. The point here is not secular education, but ability for the particular service God has appointed for us… It does not matter how clever we are by nature. If God is not using us, our efforts will be in vain. Nor does it matter how simple we may be. If God uses us, we will do His will. The question is, Are we using what God has given us to serve Him?

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Gifted. Moses had learning, speech and action together — a rare mix in one man. And the wisdom he learned in Egypt was real wisdom, not primitive.

- Positioned. That training put him within reach of Pharaoh's throne, with the world in front of him.

- Rejected. God did not accept Egypt's qualifications for His work. He sent Moses to His own school for forty years.

- Powerless. Egypt's wisdom could not open the Red Sea, draw water from the rock, or feed a nation in the desert.

- Redirected. Moses knew what he was giving up, and still fixed his eye on the unseen kingdom of God. The question left for us is whether we are using what God has given us to serve Him.

Acts 7:23 · Darby

And when a period of forty years was fulfilled to him, it came into his heart to look upon his brethren, the sons of Israel;

Stephen is on trial before the council. He answers by retelling Israel's own history — the story of how God's people kept refusing the deliverers He sent. Here the story reaches a turning point. Moses, raised in Pharaoh's palace, reaches forty and looks toward the slaves he was taken from.

Three periods of forty years

The number is not decoration. Stephen's speech splits Moses' life into three blocks of forty years. Some have claimed he invented numbers the books of Moses never give. One commentator does the arithmetic.

It is claimed that Acts 7:23, 30, 36 mentions three separate periods of forty years, and that only the last appears in the books of Moses. But turn to Exodus 7, and we are told that "Moses was eighty years old… when they spoke to Pharaoh" (v. 7). These eighty years agree exactly with Stephen's account. Moses was forty when it came into his heart to visit his brothers, and he spent forty years after that in Midian. Stephen makes the age of Moses one hundred and twenty years altogether. Deuteronomy 31:2 and 34:7 say he died at the age of one hundred and twenty. Now, where is there any discrepancy?

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

What "it came into his heart" tells us

Nothing outside him pushed him toward it. The desire began in his own heart, and one writer says that is the right order.

Then he went out from the palace and looked at the burdens of his brothers among the brick-kilns (Exodus 2:11). This was the second stage in his life of devotion and single-heartedness, while he was still in Egypt and everything outside him was against him. "It came into his heart," we are told, to do this (Acts 7:23). And it is good, and the fruit is pleasant, when affection is the parent of service.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The word for "visit" means more than a friendly call. And forty years in a palace had not erased who his people were.

In all the forty years he had been moving in the court of Pharaoh, it now appears that he never forgot that those despised slaves were his brothers. One may imagine him looking round at the glitter of that court and at those who moved in it. In his heart he was thinking, "these are not my brothers."… We find that the word visit comes from the same root as the word for oversight. It seems as though he was already overseeing his own district, the future sphere of his service.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Faith, not providence

Moses could have kept his place as the son of Pharaoh's daughter. He refused it. One commentator explains what led him out.

But divine providence is no guide for faith; nothing but the word is. Providence brought him in, and from there faith led him out. "By faith Moses, when he was grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter… He considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt, for he was looking to the reward" (Hebrews 11:24-26).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A right heart, a premature hand

The visit was right. What came next was too early. One writer separates the zeal from the timing.

This was zeal for his brothers, but it was "not according to knowledge." God's time had not yet come for judging Egypt and delivering Israel, and the intelligent servant will always wait for God's time. Moses "had grown up." He was "instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians." And further, "he supposed that his brothers would understand that God was giving them salvation by his hand." All this was true. Yet he ran ahead of the time, and when someone does this, failure must be the result.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The pattern Stephen is really drawing

Stephen is not giving a history lesson. He is showing the men in front of him that they have done again what their fathers did.

So Moses was an outcast for many long years. His own unworthy brothers drove him out as much as the angry king of Egypt did. They loved him less the more he loved them. They forgot the promised deliverance, and they set no value on the man who gave up everything for their sake. Israel denied the one who was in that day the type of the Holy and Righteous One. It was nothing new.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where Moses went next matters too.

All of this is personal history. Yet Stephen plainly uses it as a type of Christ. When Christ presented Himself to His own people as their Deliverer, they rejected Him. Indeed, the flight of Moses into the land of Midian is a marked type of where our Lord stands now toward Israel and the world… But, like Moses, our Lord will return to deliver His people on earth, just as Moses returned from Midian and led Israel out.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Heart — The move began inside him: "it came into his heart." Affection came first, and service was its fruit.

- Cost — Providence put Moses in the palace; faith took him out of it. He counted reproach with God's people as greater wealth than Egypt's treasures.

- Timing — The desire was right, the hand was early. God's servant waits for God's hour, and running ahead ends in failure.

- Refusal — The more he loved them, the less they loved him. The deep wound came from his own people, not from Egypt.

- Picture — Rejected, Moses withdrew to Midian and came back as deliverer. That is the pattern of Christ, and the pattern Stephen presses on his hearers.

Acts 7:24 · Darby

and seeing a certain one wronged, he defended [him], and avenged him that was being oppressed, smiting the Egyptian.

Stephen is on trial for his life, and instead of defending himself he retells Israel's story. He stops at the day Moses, then forty, killed an Egyptian to save a Hebrew: was that faith or impatience, and why tell it to a court about to kill him?

Love that stood with his own people

Moses acted here for his own people, at his own cost. One commentator ties that action to what devotion to God actually looks like.

Holiness toward God always means separation from evil. It also means standing with His people, in heart and in the way you live. But now faith is tested, and its path never runs smooth for long. … Hating unrighteousness, he punished the oppressor of his brother. He took no thought of what it would cost him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A right heart, a questionable deed

Stephen's words are warm: Moses defended the man and avenged him. But commentators differ over the deed itself. Some hold that the love behind it was beyond blame while the act was not, and they note how Scripture leaves it:

The Spirit could not blame the love that moved the hand of Moses. But neither could He justify the act. God has left it there, as He always knows how to do. He leaves what came from Himself to tell its own story. What did not come from Himself stands before the spiritual judgement of those who trust Him. Any other book would offer some kind of apology here, or even a long argument, to clear God of all share in what was far from His own holiness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer still calls it faith, while faulting the timing:

He had learned the wisdom of Egypt, but not yet the wisdom of God. He showed zeal for his brothers, but it was not according to knowledge. He attempted a deliverance before the time. Yet it was an action of faith.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The wrong strength for the right work

Stephen had called Moses mighty in deeds. That very strength was the problem. One writer names whose plan was moving that day:

"Mighty in deeds," and acting for the people of God too — but acting in his own natural strength, not as one sent by God. That explains what followed. Moses was thinking about how Moses was going to deliver the people. … God had to teach him that He accepts service only in the power and strength that come from Himself, not in the strength or wisdom of Egypt.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

How God trains a servant

The same writer contrasts this confident rescuer with a man who later knew what it means to be sent by God:

Before, when he went out in his own natural strength, the failure he met hit him hard. Now he has learned how small he is, and he says, "Who am I?" And it is always so. When a believer senses that God has sent him on a mission, he always feels the deepest humbling of spirit. God may bring this about through painful discipline of soul, but the aim of His training is to break down self-confidence.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The deliverer nobody recognised

This is why the story sits in Stephen's speech. The rescue was real, and the people refused it. His judges had just done the same on a far larger scale:

The people had no readiness of heart. They gave no generous response to the devotion that would have served them, and they saw nothing of the mind of God at all. They drove their appointed deliverer out among strangers. Israel was now doing the same to One who had come down from a far more wonderful height. God had borne witness to Him beyond anything ever given before, and He had come to bring a much mightier deliverance.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The sting is in where the rejection came from. Not from Egypt:

So too with Moses. The words that made him flee — "Who made you a ruler and a judge over us?" — came from one of his own brothers, not from an Egyptian. The rejection came from among his own people, not from outside. So it had been with Jesus too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Heart. The love that moved his hand was beyond blame, whatever is said of the blow.

- Hand. Commentators differ: some say the act could not be justified, others call it faith acting before the time. The strength on show was Egypt's, not God's.

- School. God breaks down self-confidence before He sends anyone. The bold rescuer became the man who asked, "Who am I?"

- Refusal. A real deliverer stood in front of them, and they saw nothing. The wound came from his own brother, not from the oppressor.

- Pattern. Stephen's judges were repeating what their fathers did — now against a far greater Deliverer, and against far greater proof.

Acts 7:25 · Darby

For he thought that his brethren would understand that God by his hand was giving them deliverance. But they understood not.

Stephen is retelling Israel's story to men who are about to stone him. Here he pauses on a moment that failed. Moses acted for his brothers, and they missed who he was. The verse holds two things at once. Moses was sure God had chosen him. His people were too blind to see it.

A call Moses did not invent

His conviction rested on something God had made known to him.

God had sent conviction into Moses' heart both of sin and of righteousness. He saw how far Pharaoh's palace stood from the rest of God. He heard and understood the word of promise. God had made it known to him — we are not told how — that Israel was His people. He also made known that the day of their deliverance was near, and that He would keep His word of promise by Moses' own hand.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Right conviction, wrong moment

What Moses believed was true. But he acted before God's time, and that decided the outcome.

This was zeal for his brothers, but it was "not according to knowledge." God's time had not yet come to judge Egypt and deliver Israel. The servant who understands God will always wait for God's time. Moses had grown up. He was "instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians." And "he supposed that his brothers would understand that God was giving them salvation by his hand." All this was true. Yet he ran ahead of God's time, and when a man does that, failure must be the result.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The lesson God was teaching runs deeper than timing. It concerns the source of the strength a servant uses.

"Mighty in deeds," he acted for the people of God. But he acted in the energy of the flesh, not as one sent by God, and that explains what followed. Moses was thinking about how Moses would deliver the people... But no — "they did not understand." Moses had another lesson to learn. God had to teach him that He would be served only by the power and strength that come from Himself, not by the strength or wisdom of Egypt... When a person acts in the energy of the flesh, there is always disappointment and surprise when our efforts fail.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why they did not understand

The failure was not only in the deliverer. Israel had lost the expectation God Himself had given them.

They had fallen, not only in their circumstances, but in their souls. Faith was at work in very few of them, so few expected a deliverer or valued a man who had faith in God. They were dark and dead toward God. They felt how hard men can be. The hope God had given to Israel had almost vanished from their souls. They expected no deliverance close at hand, yet they should have been looking for it. The fourth generation was already running its course. In that generation, as the Lord had said, this long-afflicted people were to leave a judged Egypt and come into the promised land again.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Stephen brings this up at all

Stephen is not giving a history lesson. He holds a mirror up to the council in front of him. And he marks the one difference that makes their sin far worse.

His brothers, however, did not understand, because they did not share his faith. So they rejected him as their deliverer. They wanted to keep going their own wrong way... In Acts 7, God leads Stephen to make these points clear. He shows that when the Jews rejected the Lord Jesus, they were doing again what their fathers had done with Moses — but on a far more serious scale. In the Lord Jesus there was not the slightest element of imperfection. In Moses there was distinct failure. His desires were right: his action wrong.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Two comings, one pattern

Moses came twice. Commentators read the two visits as a shape that Israel's history is still following.

He left the palace and, perhaps, the throne, and came to his own to take up their cause. It all points to Him who left the glory and came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. When Moses came the first time to his brothers to deliver them, "they did not understand." But they understood when he came the second time. In the same way Israel will understand when He who is greater than Moses comes the second time.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Understood — Moses' conviction was real. God had told him that deliverance would come by his hand. Being right about God's purpose is not the same as being right about God's timing.

- Unseeing — Israel's blindness was their own fault. God's own word had told them when to expect rescue, and they had stopped looking.

- Undone — work begun before God's time ends in failure and in "disappointment and surprise." Only strength that comes from God can serve God.

- Underlined — Stephen tells this failure for a reason. His hearers had repeated their fathers' sin against a Deliverer in whom there was no failure at all.

- Understood at last — Israel missed Moses the first time and understood him the second. Commentators see in that the hope still held out to Israel.

Acts 7:26 · Darby

And on the morrow he shewed himself to them as they were contending, and compelled them to peace, saying, *Ye* are brethren, why do ye wrong one another?

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Acts 7:27 · Darby

But he that was wronging his neighbour thrust him away, saying, Who established thee ruler and judge over us?

Stephen is on trial, and he answers by retelling Israel's own history back to the men judging him. He has reached the day Moses stepped between two fighting Hebrews, and one of them shoved him aside.

The force of "thrust him aside"

One writer weighs the Greek word behind the push:

The word is aposato = driven away. You can see its force in Acts 7:27, "thrust him away." It means complete refusal.

Modernised from Scripture QuarterlyOriginal wording

The man in the wrong — and Moses' own haste

Moses was trying to reconcile two men. It was the aggressor, not the victim, who turned on him:

It was the unworthy dealing of his brethren which broke up all hope for the present. The man who was in the wrong was also the one with the bitter feeling — as is always the case. Moses loved both men and would gladly have made peace between them. Yet it was the wrongdoer who taunted him with the words, "Who made you a ruler and a judge?" The Israelite's own proud spirit was quick to read pride into others… Moses had certainly been hasty, and the Lord judged it. But he was right in the main. So the Lord left the completing of Israel's deliverance not to another, but to him, when the right time came.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Good motives read as ambition

The taunt read Moses as a man grabbing power. Both times he stepped in for Israel, they misread him:

Moses was not understood when he took a stand with Israel against their oppressors. He was not understood either when he tried to restore or build unity among Israelites. All they could see was selfish motives. The man who wronged his neighbour pushed Moses away with the cutting words, "Who made you a ruler and a judge over us?" He then asked whether Moses would kill him as he had killed the Egyptian. That warned Moses that his killing of the Egyptian was known, and that Egypt's authorities would hear of it… Israel was not ready to be delivered for another forty years, and Moses had to learn on his own what would fit him for public service.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What actually drove Moses out

Exodus leaves the impression that Moses ran from Pharaoh. Stephen ties the flight to the wrongdoer's words instead:

Reading Exodus, we get the impression that his main motive was the anger of Pharaoh. Acts 7:29 casts a different light on it. "Then Moses fled at this saying" — the saying of the wrongdoer — "Who made you a ruler and a judge over us?" So it was rejection by his own people that cut him to the quick. Forty years later they all had to discover that it was GOD who made him a ruler and judge over them. For the time being, though, they had lost him.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The pattern Stephen is exposing

Moses is the second refused deliverer in the speech. His hearers were finishing the list:

In Acts 6 and 7, Stephen was the last great witness. He summed up their history: they had rejected every deliverer God ever sent. They had sold Joseph into Egypt. They had asked Moses, "Who made you a ruler and a judge?" They had killed the Just One, as their prophets had foretold. And now they resisted the Spirit of God! A broken law, stoned prophets, a slain Christ, and a resisted Spirit closed the tale.

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

A picture of Christ refused by His own

One writer reads Moses here as a picture of Christ, and says the rejection had to be part of it:

The world sentenced Moses to death, and he was taken out of it. Then he had to take his place as a man rejected by his own people. Otherwise he would not be a true picture of the Deliverer here. The world casts him out, and his own people reject him, as they rejected our Lord… They say, "Who made you a ruler and a judge over us?" and Moses fled into Midian, rejected by his own people. It is in that character that we have to do with the Lord Jesus Christ now.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. The push in "thrust him aside" means complete refusal, not hesitation.

- Refused by whom. The blow came not from Egypt but from his own people, and from the very man who was in the wrong.

- Refused for what. He came to make peace between two of his own people, and they read his care as a grab for power.

- Refusal's cost. Those words, not Pharaoh's anger, drove Moses into forty years of exile, and left Israel without their deliverer.

- Refusal reversed. Forty years later they all had to learn who made Moses a ruler and a judge: God did. Jesus meets the same reversal — refused by His own, and now the Deliverer.

Acts 7:28 · Darby

Dost *thou* wish to kill me as thou killedst the Egyptian yesterday?

Stephen is on trial before the council, retelling Israel's own history back to them. He reaches the day Moses stepped between two Israelites who were fighting, and verse 28 is the sneer he got back.

The Taunt

Moses came to his own people seeking their good, and the man in the wrong turned on him.

The man who did wrong to his neighbour — it is always so — resented the love that sought their good, and pushed Moses away. He did worse still. "Who," said he, "made you a ruler and a judge over us? Do you want to kill me as you killed the Egyptian yesterday?"

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The man turns yesterday's killing into a threat. The one in the wrong is the first to resent a judge.

The Wound From Inside

Stephen makes a point of who spoke these words. The blow did not come from Egypt.

Stephen made it very plain that the Jewish rulers of his day were repeating the sin of their forefathers in a worse form... So too with Moses. The saying that made him flee, "Who made you a ruler and a judge over us?" came from one of his own people, and not from an Egyptian. The rejection came from among his own people, and not from outside. So it had been with Jesus too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Secret Out

The second half of the taunt does more than insult. It tells Moses that his act is known.

All they could see was selfish motives. The man who did wrong to his neighbour shoved Moses away with the cutting words, "Who made you a ruler and a judge over us?" His next words asked whether Moses would kill him as he had killed the Egyptian. They warned Moses that his killing of the Egyptian was no secret, and would not stay hidden from Egypt's authorities. He fled the country and became a stranger in a strange land for no short time.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God's Answer to the Question

The man meant his question as a put-down. Stephen answers it a few verses later, and the answer is God.

True, at first they rejected his authority. The wrongdoer "thrust him away, saying, Who made you a ruler and a judge over us?" But we also read, "This Moses, whom they rejected, saying, 'Who made you a ruler and a judge?'—this man God sent as both ruler and redeemer by the hand of the angel who appeared to him in the bush."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A man's refusal settles nothing about God's appointment.

A Picture of Christ

One writer sets Moses' rejection beside what Israel was doing to Christ at that very moment.

The people had no readiness of heart. They made no generous response to the devotion that would have served them. They saw nothing of the mind of God at all. They drove out their appointed deliverer to live among strangers. Israel was doing the same thing now to One who had come down from a far more wonderful height, with witness from God beyond anything ever given before, and who came to carry out a much mightier deliverance. But the warning was plain. The Moses they now boasted in had been an outcast for forty years, cut off from the people who still had to admit that God really had raised him up to be their ruler and their judge.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Not Yet Ready

Moses had misjudged both the moment and his own people.

The time of deliverance had not come. So far Moses was mistaken. He had not yet fully judged himself; without realising it, he was off his guard in using his strength in words and deeds. The people had to sink lower — they had to cry to God under their bitter burdens... Moses thought his own people would understand that God was giving them deliverance through him. But they did not understand. And this is a far more searching trial than any fear of Egyptian anger.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Refused. The insult comes from a fellow Israelite, not an Egyptian — his own people push the deliverer away.

- Exposed. The words reveal that Moses' killing of the Egyptian is public knowledge, and he runs.

- Appointed. The scornful question gets its answer in verse 35: the man they rejected was the one God sent as ruler and redeemer.

- Repeated. Stephen's hearers were doing to Christ what their ancestors did to Moses — driving out their own deliverer.

- Not yet. Moses had not yet judged himself, and the people had not yet cried to God — forty years as an outcast came first.

Acts 7:29 · Darby

And Moses fled at this saying, and became a sojourner in the land of Madiam, where he begat two sons.

Stephen's account reaches the moment when Moses leaves Egypt. His own people had rejected him, and he spent the next forty years as a foreigner in Midian. Two questions sit inside that one verse. What drove him out? And what was God doing in those forty silent years?

What drove him out

What made Moses run? The answer shifts depending on which account you read.

Moses stepped in, and the immediate result was his flight from Egypt and forty years in Midian. Reading Exodus, we certainly get the impression that the main motive with him was the anger of Pharaoh. Acts 7:29 casts a different light on it: "At this retort Moses fled" — the retort of the wrongdoer, "Who made you a ruler and a judge over us?" So his rejection by his own people was what cut him to the quick. Forty years later they all had to discover that it was GOD who made him a ruler and judge over them, but for the time being he was lost to them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Where the blow comes from decides how deep it goes.

The sharpest wound, like the lowest blow, comes from God's people: when man rules among them and not God, Satan works underneath it all and at his worst.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Forty years of unlearning

Egypt had already trained him. The wilderness had a different lesson.

Yet it was all useful discipline for Moses. He must learn of God alone in the wilderness. The wisdom of Egypt must be, as it were, unlearned: God does not choose to honour it for His deliverances. The wisdom He uses must come down from above.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same pattern shows up in another life much later.

Moses needed forty years at the back of the desert to fit him to lead God's people out of Egypt and through the wilderness. No doubt God used his education in Egypt in forming the vessel for His service, but the forty years were needed to empty the vessel of what had filled it during its forming. It was the same with Saul of Tarsus. He needed three years in Arabia to be emptied of what he had picked up in the schools of this world, and then filled in the school of God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The man who came out

Listen to how Moses speaks after Midian.

Moses spent forty years in the wilderness doing, as it were, nothing. Then in Exodus 3 God says to him, "Come, I will send you." Moses answers, "Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the children of Israel out of Egypt?" Now that God is sending him, he feels the weight of that responsibility deeply, and he shrinks from it. Before, he went out in the energy of the flesh, and the failure he met bitterly disappointed him. Now he has learned his own insignificance, and he says, "Who am I?"

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The two sons

The verse mentions two sons but does not name them. One of those names says where Moses' heart still was.

Moses had to flee from his brothers. They would have valued his using the world's influence for them, but cared nothing for his going down in love to share their affliction. No fact marks the difference more clearly than this: he called his son Gershom, "a stranger," while Joseph called his eldest Manasseh, "forgotten." Moses had in no way settled down in Midian. His affections were with his poor brothers, and he looked for the day when deliverance would come for them by his hand.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That name is handed on to everyone who reads it.

The "stranger" son does not become a resident of the land where he is born. These things should need no interpreter for any of our hearts. May God only grant that we be more Gershoms in the land of Midian — strangers in a world where, if Christ can find a bride, He cannot find a home.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Why Stephen tells it

Stephen is building a case, and his hearers are standing inside it.

He goes over the nation's history from its beginning with Abraham down to the days of Moses. He points out that twice over their ancestors made the great mistake of rejecting the instrument God had designed for their deliverance. First it was Joseph. Next it was Moses... With these facts in front of them they might well pause and weigh what they were doing, and where they might be drifting.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The exile itself proves fruitful.

The hour of Messiah's rejection is only the occasion for a higher glory and a closer relationship with those who meanwhile believe. It is like the stranger in the land of Midian, who becomes the father of two sons. He did not have them in Egypt, with the sons of Israel around him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Rejected — Pharaoh's anger was not the deepest wound. His own people's words sent Moses away, and the sharpest wounds come from those you came to help.

- Exiled — Forty years in Midian looked like waste. It was God emptying a vessel that Egypt had spent forty years filling.

- Renamed — He named his son Gershom, "a stranger." Joseph had named his son "forgotten." Moses never settled, and his heart stayed with the brothers who threw him out.

- Remade — The man who once acted on his own now asks "Who am I?" — the mark of someone God is about to send.

- Repeated — Stephen traces the same rejection twice, in Joseph and in Moses, so his hearers would stop and ask where they were drifting.

Acts 7:30 · Darby

And when forty years were fulfilled, an angel appeared to him in the wilderness of mount Sinai, in a flame of fire of a bush.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Acts 7:31 · Darby

And Moses seeing it wondered at the vision; and as he went up to consider it, there was a voice of [the] Lord,

Stephen's defence has reached Moses in the desert: a bush on fire that never burns up, and a voice out of the flame. What did God mean Moses to see in that sight, and where does He choose to appear?

A Sight Made for the Work Ahead

God fits the sign He gives to the work He is sending a man to do:

When the conquest of Canaan was the question, what could encourage more than a man with his sword drawn, the captain of the Lord's army? When the work was to bring the people through a wild, howling desert, what sign could fit better than a bush blazing yet never burning up? And more than the sign itself, there was "the favour of Him who dwells in the bush."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The bush pictured the people themselves:

"And the angel of the LORD appeared to him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush. He looked, and behold, the bush was burning, yet it was not consumed. And Moses said, 'I will turn aside to see this great sight, why the bush is not burned'" (Ex. 3:2-3). This was truly "a great sight" — a bush burning, yet not burnt. The palace of Pharaoh could never have offered such a sight. But it was a gracious sight as well as a great sight. It showed clearly the condition of God's chosen people. They were in the furnace of Egypt, and the Lord reveals Himself in a burning bush. But as the bush was not consumed, neither were they, for God was there.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Wondering, Then Drawing Near

The verse moves in two steps: Moses wondered, then he drew near. One writer treats that second step as an act of obedience.

May we not turn aside at times to gaze more closely at His person, while we trace the acts of His life, or the secrets of His love and truth? It is part of the obedience of faith to do so… The sight Moses turned to look at was great and mysterious too. Yet with bare feet he could still look and listen. Had he not done so, he would have gone away with no blessing. But he listened, until he found that the "I AM" was in the bush, and that "the God of Abraham" was there too. A strange place for such glory to make its home! But so it was.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Name the Voice Uses

God names Himself by three men who had been dead for centuries. That name says something about where they are now:

God says at the bush, "I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." But if He stood in that relationship to them then, they must exist for Him to be so. He could not be the God of the dead — dead in the sense the Sadducees meant, where the dead no longer exist at all. They must be alive in some sense, alive to Him, and so they are.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Why Moses Trembled

The voice was full of promise, yet it left Moses afraid.

Before redemption, even a saint trembled when brought into God's presence. His voice does declare Him the God of promise, the God of the fathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Even so, "Moses trembled, and did not dare to look." Until redemption, peace is impossible.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That trembling was no failure. One writer sees it as what made Moses ready:

What a difference it must make to anyone to deal with God personally and directly. God assures him that this is his God — the God of his fathers — and this once bold man trembles before Him. Later God used Isaiah to tell us the man He will look to: one who trembles at His word (Isa. 66:2). Forty years have taken Moses from boldness to trembling, and now he is fit to go out in God's service.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Holy Ground Far From Jerusalem

Stephen's hearers prized the temple courts above every other place. By quoting this desert scene, he answered them:

Notice the force of his quoting the call to take off his sandals. Holy ground is where God shows Himself. It was not Jerusalem only. That is how the Lord settled it with Moses in Midian, and later with Joshua when he crossed the Jordan. Their making an idol of the temple courts was out of place.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight — A bush on fire yet unburnt fitted the work ahead. It pictured God's people in the furnace, not consumed, because He was with them.

- Turning — Wonder alone blesses no one. Moses drew near to look; had he not, he would have gone away with no blessing.

- Voice — God named Himself the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. If He is still their God, then they must still be alive to Him.

- Trembling — Before redemption even a believer trembles in God's presence. Forty years turned a bold man into a trembling one — and that is the man God sends.

- Ground — Wherever God shows Himself is holy ground. So the temple courts were never the one place to find Him.

Acts 7:32 · Darby

*I* am the God of thy fathers, the God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob. And Moses trembled, and durst not consider [it].

On trial for speaking against the temple and the law, Stephen answers his judges by retelling their own history. At the burning bush the voice names itself by three men long dead, and the bold man who once killed an Egyptian stands shaking.

Who Spoke from the Bush

Stephen says an angel appeared to Moses in the bush, yet the voice that follows claims the name of God. The account itself will not keep the two apart.

Stephen speaks of the "Angel of the Lord," who appeared to Moses from inside a bush. But in Exodus 3 that very Angel becomes, a moment later, God Himself, saying, "I am the God of Abraham," and so on. No mere angel could make the place too holy for Moses to stand on with his shoes still on. No mere angel could be too much for his eyes to look at. That would be giving the glory of God to another.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

A Name Made of Promises

God does not introduce Himself to Moses by power, or by law, or by anything Israel had achieved. He gives the names of three men to whom He had made promises.

Moses was told to unloose his sandals from off his feet, and heard the divine voice say, I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob. It was for the fathers' sakes, to whom He had pledged His promise and whose God He was. But He had also heard His people's cry under bitter oppression, and came down to deliver them. They indeed groaned and sighed because of the bondage; but they had not the faith to cry to Him. Yet their cry came up to God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel's slaves had not earned this attention, and one writer presses that point hard:

The words the Lord spoke to Moses are the expressions of His sovereign grace. What had they earned? What could they do to secure His intervention? Nothing whatever. They were in Egypt, a crowd of miserable slaves, given more or less to idolatry, a sinful people. It was grace which looked upon them and heard their cry. It was grace which came down to deliver them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why Moses Trembled

The words Moses heard were promises, not threats, and still he could not look. Commentators tie his fear to timing.

Before redemption, even a saint trembled in God's presence. His voice declares Him the God of promise, the God of the fathers Abraham and Isaac and Jacob. Even so, "Moses trembled, and did not dare to look." Until redemption, peace is impossible.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer traces the fear to conscience:

God's presence was bound to have this effect on the heart, while He was not yet known as the Justifier. The moment it becomes a question of appearing before God, conscience speaks up and bears witness that we are sinners.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Holy Ground Far from Jerusalem

Stephen's accusers claimed he had insulted the holy place. His answer points to a desert far from the temple, where God spoke and the ground turned holy.

Notice the force of Stephen quoting the command to take off his sandal. Holy ground is wherever God reveals Himself. It was not merely Jerusalem. So the Lord decided with Moses in Midian; so afterwards with Joshua when he crossed the Jordan. Their idolising of the temple courts was out of place.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The God of Men Long Buried

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had been dead for centuries when God spoke at the bush. Jesus later settled a dispute with these same words.

The Lord Jesus quoted these words, and with them He silenced the unbelieving Sadducees, who rejected the teaching of the resurrection (Matthew 22:31-32).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The whole argument turns on the present tense.

God says at the bush, "I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." If He was their God then, they must exist for Him to be so. He could not be the God of the dead — in the Sadducee sense of death, the non-existent. They must be in some sense alive, alive to Him, and so they are.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The Man God Can Send

Forty years earlier Moses had been the bold one. His trembling now is not a failure.

This once bold man trembles in the presence of God. Later God used Isaiah to tell us the sort of man He will look to — one who trembles at His word. Forty years have taken Moses from boldness to trembling, and now he is fit to go out in God's service. We can be sure that when God uses a man who trembles at His word, mighty things will happen.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise first. God names Himself by the fathers, and He had given them His promise. The bond rests on His word, not on Israel's record.

- Grace, not merit. The people He claimed were slaves, sinful and half given to idols. Nothing they did earned His coming.

- Trembling, not peace. Moses could not look. Conscience speaks the moment a sinner faces God, and God was not yet known as the Justifier.

- Holy ground anywhere. Wherever God reveals Himself, the place is holy. Midian counted as much as Jerusalem, so Stephen's accusers had no case.

- Living, not dead. Men dead for centuries still had God as their God. That one phrase answered those who denied the resurrection.

Acts 7:33 · Darby

And the Lord said to him, Loose the sandal of thy feet, for the place on which thou standest is holy ground.

Stephen is on trial for speaking against the temple. His defence takes the council out to a burning bush in a desert, far from Jerusalem, where God called the ground under Moses' feet holy. So what makes ground holy? And why must a man's sandals come off before God will say another word to him?

What makes ground holy

Stephen does not argue his case. He just repeats what God said in Midian. That choice carries the whole defence: holiness does not belong to a building. It belongs to God's presence.

Notice the force of Stephen quoting the call to take off the sandal. Holy ground is where God shows Himself. It was not only Jerusalem. So the Lord settled it with Moses in Midian, and later with Joshua when he crossed the Jordan. Their treating the temple courts as an idol was out of place... The case of the Jews who falsely charged Stephen with blasphemous words against the holy place was even more desperate and groundless... The only holy place God owns now, as faith too accepts, is above where Christ is.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Bare feet first

God says this before He tells Moses anything else. Dennett draws out what a person must grasp before God will speak further.

But God must remind him how holy His presence is. "Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground." This is the first lesson everyone who comes near God must learn: to recognise His holiness. True, He is a God of grace, of mercy, and love. But He is all these because He is a holy God... Our feet must be bare. We must remember how holy the God is with whom we have to do. Without that we can never receive the gracious messages of His mind and will.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same principle covers every place where God settles among His people:

The place of God's presence is holy, and only bare feet may walk there. God lives among His people, and His presence gives their assembly a character of holiness. That holiness is the basis of every holy affection and every holy activity. The character of the dwelling place takes its stamp from the character of the Occupant.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why Moses trembled

In the verse before, Moses shakes and dares not look. Kelly links that fear to one fact: redemption had not yet happened. He hears the same warning again before Joshua's war in Canaan.

Before redemption, even a saint trembled when God brought him into His presence... "Moses trembled and did not dare to look." Until redemption there can be no peace... From the very start God declares that His holiness must never be violated. It is no less so when God calls Israel under Joshua to a fight with no compromise against the Canaanite living in the land... The same opening warning comes first in both pictures: redemption carried out for His people, and war against Satan in their midst.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the removed sandal said about man

The bare foot says something about man himself. One reference work sets it beside the son in Jesus' story who comes home and receives shoes.

Shoes appear as early as Exodus 3:5, when God told Moses to take off his sandals, because the ground he stood on was holy, for God was there (Acts 7:33). God said the same to Joshua (Joshua 5:15). It showed that man had no welcome yet into the presence of God. He had no standing there yet, whatever goodness and kindness God might show him. Under grace he gains a standing: the prodigal received shoes, and he was welcome and at home.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Standing on holy ground today

Holiness does not only keep people at a distance. One writer on this verse shows what a rescued person learns in that place.

Grace brings us into the place of holiness, and into joy in God's holiness. There the soul learns its deepest lessons about what sin is. It sees not only its own nothingness, but how opposite to God it is. There it learns that salvation must be grace from first to last... The moment God rescues us from the world, He brings us to stand in the place of holiness, and He deals with us accordingly.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Presence makes the place. Ground is holy because God is there — a bush in Midian, the ground where Joshua stood, not only Jerusalem.

- Holiness comes first. The sandals come off before God gives Moses his task. Recognising His holiness is the opening lesson for anyone who comes near.

- The bare foot marked distance. It showed man had no standing before God yet, however kind God was being.

- Grace gives the standing. The returning son receives shoes. Grace rescues us from the world, sets us on holy ground, and teaches us there that salvation is grace from first to last.

- The holy place has moved. The only holy place God owns now is above, where Christ is — and faith accepts that.

Acts 7:34 · Darby

I have surely seen the ill treatment of my people which is in Egypt, and I have heard their groan, and have come down to take them out of it; and now, come, I will send thee to Egypt.

Stephen is on trial, accused of speaking against the temple and the law. He answers with Israel's own story: at the burning bush God sees, God comes down, and God sends back the very man Israel had pushed away.

God's eyes and ears

The words come in a set order, and one writer walks through it:

First, God reveals His name: "I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham," and so on (v. 32). Second, His grace: "I have seen, I have seen the afflictions of my people," and so on (v. 34). How blessed to be sure of this: not one sorrow of His people, not one groan, escapes His full knowledge. Then we get the formal commission: "And now come, I WILL SEND YOU into Egypt."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The groaning God heard was not a prayer. One writer shows how far Israel was from turning to God at that moment:

He had also heard His people's cry under bitter oppression, and came down to deliver them. They did groan and sigh because of the bondage; but they did not have the faith to cry to Him. Yet their cry came up to God. He heard their groaning, and remembered His covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob. They had forgotten that covenant, long sunk in the darkness and idol worship of their cruel masters.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"My people"

God calls a nation of brick-makers His own. That title is not a reward for anything found in them:

Here the absolute, free, unconditional grace of the God of Abraham shines out in all its own brightness. Nothing holds it back — not the "ifs" and "buts," not the vows, resolutions, and conditions of man's legal spirit. God had come down to show Himself, in sovereign grace, to do the whole work of salvation, and to keep His promise made to Abraham and repeated to Isaac and Jacob. He had not come down to see whether the subjects of His promise were in such a condition as to deserve His salvation. It was enough for Him that they needed it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Come down to take them out for Himself

How the phrase is translated decides what the rescue is for:

"To deliver" was true as well. But the literal wording says far more. It gives not just relief from the oppressor's hand, but the positive purpose — and what can surpass that? If this is often overlooked, in teaching and in practice, that makes it all the more important to insist on… Here it is God taking Israel out for Himself… For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that He might bring us to God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

(Kelly renders the phrase "am come down to take them out for Myself"; the ESV reads "I have come down to deliver them.")

"And now come, I will send you"

The call is not an order shouted from a distance:

"Come now therefore, and I will send you" (Ex. 3:10). God's moment has arrived. Earlier Moses wanted to go without waiting for God's time, but now he is about to hesitate. God does not say "Go" but "Come." It is with Him, in His company and fellowship, that Moses is sent.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

Forty years earlier Moses had tried to rescue Israel in his own strength, and failed:

Third, He told Moses that he was to be the servant. He was commissioned to face the mighty king, Pharaoh, and deliver the children of Israel out of his hand… What he had tried to do in his own wisdom and strength, and failed to do, he is now to do in the wisdom and power of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why Stephen tells it

For the men judging Stephen, everything turns on who God sends:

God had seen the affliction of His people, and the time had come for Him to deliver them. Now He was sending Moses to do it — the same Moses whom Israel had refused forty years earlier, saying, "Who made you a ruler and a judge?" The same thing can be said of Israel's refusal of the Lord Jesus. He will yet be their welcomed Deliverer.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen. God knows every sorrow and every groan of His people. Israel's groaning was despair, not prayer — and it still reached Him.

- Owned. He calls slaves "my people" before delivering them — grace acting on need, not on merit.

- Come down. The rescue is God's own move, and its aim is positive: not just out of Egypt's hand, but out for Himself.

- Sent. "Come, I will send you" — the man who once acted in his own strength now goes in God's, and goes in God's company.

- Refused first. The man Israel refused is the man God sent back. One writer sees the same pattern in Israel's refusal of Christ, the Deliverer they will yet welcome.

Acts 7:35 · Darby

This Moses, whom they refused, saying, Who made thee ruler and judge? him did God send [to be] a ruler and deliverer with the hand of the angel who appeared to him in the bush.

Stephen answers the council by recalling the sneer their own ancestors threw at Moses. The verse turns on two titles: the one Israel denied him, and the one God gave him.

Judge Refused, Deliverer Sent

The taunt in Egypt named Moses "ruler and judge." God sent him back as ruler and redeemer. The writers below use the older word for it: deliverer. The power behind him was different too.

So Moses, commissioned now by God, returns to Egypt and begins again the work he had attempted forty years before — but this time God is using him, whereas before he seemed prepared to do it himself. He does not return as a ruler and a judge, but as a ruler and a deliverer (v. 35). Nor does he think this time he will do it by his own hand. He knows now that it will be by the hand of God in the power of His angel. At his first attempt he killed one Egyptian and partly delivered one Israelite. How long would he have taken to deliver the nation by his own efforts, killing one Egyptian at a time and delivering one Israelite?

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The Forty Silent Years

Between the refusal and the sending lie forty years in the wilderness. They were not wasted. They made the man.

The same God was now at work. He brought Moses by providence into the house of Pharaoh's daughter, and He brought him out of it by faith. Even then He did not use him for the deliverance of His people, though he was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians. First Moses had to unlearn man as well as himself. He had to come to know, alone in the wilderness for forty long years, what God is. Then, and only then, was he fitted by God to be a ruler and a deliverer.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

By the Hand of the Angel

Stephen adds how God sent him: "by the hand of the angel who appeared to him in the bush." Commentators identify that Angel with God Himself. He moved in grace toward a people who had earned nothing.

The angel of Jehovah who spoke to Moses out of the burning bush reveals His name. It shows that the Angel of Jehovah is God. He calls Himself the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob… The words Jehovah spoke to Moses are the expressions of His sovereign grace. What had they deserved? What could they do to secure His intervention? Nothing whatever. They were in Egypt, a crowd of miserable slaves, given more or less to idolatry, a sinful people. It was grace which looked on them and heard their cry. It was grace which came down to deliver them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Habit Stephen Names

Joseph, then Moses — Stephen is tracing a pattern and leaving his hearers to see themselves in it.

He starts at the very beginning of the nation's existence, dating it from Abraham. He goes through its history to the days of Moses. He points out that twice over their ancestors made the great mistake of rejecting the instrument God had designed for their deliverance. First it was Joseph. Next it was Moses… The mistake they made with Joseph they had repeated with Moses. What were they doing now? They were repeating that mistake.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The Greater Ruler and Redeemer

Moses is a shadow. That same question came back a second time, aimed at Jesus. God's answer was the same answer, on a far greater scale.

That generation denied Him, saying, "Who made you a ruler and a judge?" Even so, God raised Him to be a more blessed Redeemer, and a more glorious Ruler of the kings of the earth. God has appointed Him to be Judge of the living and the dead. He will also fulfil every hope of Israel according to the prophets.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Moses came to his people twice. Writers read that pattern as a picture of Christ's two comings.

He left the palace, and perhaps the throne, and came to his own to take up their cause. It all points to Him who left the glory and came to His own, and they did not receive Him. When Moses came the first time to his brethren to deliver them, "they did not understand" (Acts 7:25). But they understood when he came the second time, as Israel will understand when He who is greater than Moses comes the second time.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Refused. "Who made you a ruler and a judge?" was Israel's verdict on the man God had chosen. Stephen quotes it back to men making the same mistake with Jesus.

- Prepared. Forty years in the wilderness taught Moses to unlearn Egypt and himself. Only then was he fit to be a ruler and a deliverer.

- Sent. God sent the rejected man back with a new title. Not judge, but deliverer — the same task, done now in God's power, not his own hand.

- Backed. He went "by the hand of the angel" of the bush. That Angel is God Himself, moving in pure grace toward slaves who deserved nothing.

- Returning. Rejection never cancels God's choice. God raised the One they denied to be Redeemer and Ruler. Israel will understand Him at His second coming, as they understood Moses when he came again.

Acts 7:36 · Darby

*He* led them out, having wrought wonders and signs in the land of Egypt, and in the Red sea, and in the wilderness forty years.

Stephen is on trial, and his defence retells Israel's story from Abraham down to Moses. The man the nation pushed aside is the same man who led them out with wonders and signs.

The power behind the wonders

The verse credits Moses with the miracles. So where did the power come from?

Nobody denies that Moses stands in the front rank of great and good men. But God is the one who made His presence unmistakable and respected. He worked mainly through Moses, though sometimes without him, across that long stretch of wilderness patience and power, rich in wonders and full of instruction... What could Moses have done in the desert without God for one day, let alone forty years?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Signs as God's seal on a rejected man

Moses had been driven out by his own people. The miracles were not decoration. They were God's seal on the man Israel had refused.

Stephen goes on with the story of how a commission came from God to that rejected man. It was sealed with the broad seal of wonders and signs. In that day those signs proved his commission to another generation. Now no miraculous signs could prove it, however far they went beyond the old ones.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Refused first, ruler and deliverer after

Rejection came before the deliverance, not instead of it. And Israel's refusal did not stop in Egypt.

Then Stephen recalls the history of Moses, who turned his back on all the glory of Egypt to help his own people whom he loved. But Israel thrust him away. They refused the one God had sent to be a ruler and a deliverer. In the wilderness they would not obey him. In their hearts they turned back to Egypt. So again they resisted the man God was with.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Stephen does not stop with Moses.

In his address Stephen had pointed out that Joseph's brothers refused him, yet he became their saviour, and in the end they all had to bow down to him. He also reminded them that Israel rejected Moses at first, yet he became both ruler and deliverer of Israel. Now he testifies to a similar but far greater thing about Jesus. The Just One whom they had murdered is to become their Judge — and at last, for those who receive Him, their great and final Deliverer.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A history that becomes a charge

Twice the nation had rejected the man God chose to save it. Stephen's history is also a charge against the men judging him.

He starts at the very beginning of the nation, dating it from Abraham, and goes through its history down to the days of Moses. He points out that twice over their ancestors made the great mistake of rejecting the instrument God had appointed for their deliverance... So in rejecting Moses, they rejected God as well. With these facts in front of them they might well stop and think carefully about what they were doing, and where they were heading.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Forty years of care, and what it produced

The verse stretches the miracles across forty years. Those years exposed the people who watched them.

God brought the Israelites out of Egypt by great signs and wonders. For forty years He fed them and cared for them tenderly on their wilderness journey. Yet they made no progress in the knowledge of God. They never showed the slightest sign of thankfulness for the deliverance He had given them when they were slaves in Egypt, or for the countless mercies they received daily from His hand.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

The three spans of forty years

Some have objected that Stephen invents a chronology the Old Testament never gives. The reply is that the numbers add up exactly.

Turn to Exodus 7 and we are told that "Moses was eighty years old... when they spoke to Pharaoh." These eighty years agree exactly with Stephen's account. Moses was forty years old when it came into his heart to visit his brothers, the children of Israel, and he spent the next forty years in Midian... So Stephen makes the age of Moses one hundred and twenty years in all. Deuteronomy 31:2 and 34:7 say that he died at the age of one hundred and twenty. Now where is there any discrepancy?

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Summary

- Refused. The man Israel pushed away was the man God sent back; rejection never cancelled the commission.

- Sealed. Wonders in Egypt, at the Red Sea and in the desert were God's seal on the messenger they had refused.

- Sustained. No man could carry a nation through the desert for one day, let alone forty years. The power was God's throughout.

- Repeated. Joseph, then Moses, then Jesus: Stephen shows a nation that keeps rejecting the deliverer God provides.

- Greater. The pattern ends in the One they murdered: Judge of those who refuse Him, final Deliverer of those who receive Him.