Acts 2:1–13

Acts 2:1 · Darby

And when the day of Pentecost was now accomplishing, they were all together in one place.

Fifty days after the resurrection, a small group of believers waited in Jerusalem. The Lord had told them to wait for the Spirit, and this verse catches them on the day the waiting ended.

The Fiftieth Day, Counted Out Long Before

The verse says the day of Pentecost "arrived"; older translations read "was fully come." One writer explains where the feast got its name, and what that day filled up:

The wording here has an unusual note of fullness, one we hear nowhere else. This feast alone has seven sabbaths in between to mark it out. It is the feast of weeks. Among Greek-speaking Jews, the number fifty gave this feast its name, so it is called "Pentecost." What then was fulfilled when the day of Pentecost was fully come? The Father made good His promise. It was that matchless promise about which the Lord Himself had said, "It is to your advantage that I go away." What could outweigh the blessedness of His presence with His disciples on earth? The gift was another Advocate — not just gifts, but Himself baptising them. This was no longer a hope but an accomplished fact.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Feast Pictured — and Why Two Loaves

The offering for this day was two loaves baked with leaven. One writer traces what each feast pictured, and why there were two loaves:

Here we have the day of Pentecost in picture, and what began then. There was a new grain offering of two wave loaves baked with leaven. In Acts 2 we have the fulfilment. The Holy Spirit gathers God's people together and presents them before Him, joined to all the preciousness of Christ in life, death, and resurrection. The Passover is His death. The wave sheaf is His resurrection. The two wave loaves baked on the fiftieth day are the Holy Spirit forming the Church of God. But why two loaves? There are not two Churches of God on earth, one Jewish and one Gentile. When God asks for witness, His usual way is two witnesses. Christ was risen — the wave sheaf. Christians — the two wave loaves — are able witnesses to the power of His resurrection.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

"All Together in One Place"

Old manuscripts differ here. Some read "with one accord," others "together." One writer weighs which word belongs in the text, and what it means:

In the second occurrence, Acts 2:1, I see no reason to doubt that the disciples were assembled in the same place together. But here we also find the word homou, the corrected reading in place of homothumadon, "with one accord." Homou properly refers to place: "at the same place." It can also mean simply "together," even where the sense of place is lost. So the believers were waiting for the promise of the Father, as the Lord had instructed. All the facts point to their being gathered in one place at this time, when the Spirit baptised them in the wondrous grace of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One Mind, Then One Place

The verse does not name the place. One writer takes their being in one place as the result of something inward:

Those on whom the Spirit came were a praying people, in this resembling their Lord. They were also people of one accord, and as a result in one place. The one place is not named: it may have been the upper room of Acts 1, but more probably, in view of the crowds that heard the Spirit-given utterances, some court of the temple, such as Solomon's porch. At any rate the thing was real and powerful and could not be hidden.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Their prayers were not a side detail:

Acts 2 relates the fulfilment of this promise, in answer to the spirit of dependence shown in their united prayers.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Start of Something That Had Never Existed

One writer calls that day a birthday, and explains why earlier believers were not part of it:

The start of the Church is deeply interesting, because it shows how the saints were drawn together. The Church's first group was small indeed, but from that day a deeper and larger work would go on. The Spirit of God came down, and that formed His Assembly. So I say it again: the day of Pentecost was the birthday of the Church of God, because it had never existed before. From Abel onwards individual saints and servants of God had existed, but they were not in the Church. John the Baptist and the thief on the cross died too early. The Lord Jesus had not yet risen to be the Head of the Church, and no one could yet be united to Him.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted — Pentecost was the fiftieth day, numbered from the wave sheaf; God kept His own calendar to the day.

- Promised — what was "fully come" was the Father's promise. He sent not just gifts, but the Spirit Himself — a fact, not a hope.

- Pictured — Passover pointed to Christ's death and the wave sheaf to His resurrection. The two leavened loaves stand for the Spirit forming the church, God's witnesses to the risen Christ.

- Gathered — one place and one mind. They prayed, they agreed, and so they were together when the Spirit came.

- Begun — the Church started that day. It was small at first, and it had never existed before.

Acts 2:2 · Darby

And there came suddenly a sound out of heaven as of a violent impetuous blowing, and filled all the house where they were sitting.

The day of Pentecost opens not with a sermon but with a sound. It came before anyone saw or said anything. Three questions follow: where did the sound come from, what does "mighty rushing wind" really mean, and why did it fill the whole house and not just the people?

From heaven

The first fact recorded is the direction. One writer sees in that starting point the church's point of control:

The Holy Spirit of God is the real uniting force that has bound the church together as a living organism. He came down from heaven with this in view. The Spirit did not come from any earthly religious centre, but "from heaven." Heaven then is the point of control for the Church of God. Can we doubt that if the Spirit came from heaven, it was with a view to attaching us to Christ who is in heaven?

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The same writer ties the origin of the sound to the place Christ had just gone:

This sound comes from heaven because Christ was there. It did not come from the temple but from heaven, stamping the mark of what is heavenly on this company.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

A blowing, not a storm

One writer says the usual translation of this Greek word gives the wrong picture:

It is like the sound of a powerful sustained breathing: that is how I think the words should be understood. Everyone agrees the word means "blowing" or "breathing" rather than "wind," which is what the ordinary versions have. A storm cannot supply the symbols here. To stay consistent, "sustained" is a better word than "rushing"... The idea it suggests is a power that inspires and gives life, though it is more than human — a heavenly power. It is not fitful or, as we say, impulsive. It lifts and carries on with divine energy.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer draws out what a blowing that keeps on means. He also sets it apart from the breathing in John 20:22:

The sound heard here was like "a rushing mighty wind," and another translation says it was "a violent impetuous blowing." That word "blowing" suggests "it kept on blowing." This would teach us that the Spirit was beginning something here that was to continue. "Violent" would suggest irresistible power. Again, the word "blowing" means a breathing, though it is not the word translated "breathed" in John 20:22. There it was the inbreathing of life; here it is the inbreathing of power.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Felt, never seen

Why compare the Spirit to moving air at all?

The coming of the Holy Spirit of God is likened to "a rushing mighty wind." This would show that the Spirit's power is irresistible. We have heard of winds reaching such high speed that they tear up giant trees by the roots as if they were rows of bowling pins. The word for wind and the word for spirit are the same in Greek. The wind cannot be seen, but its power is felt; so the influence of the Holy Spirit can be felt, and yet not seen in bodily form.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The house and each one

The next verse adds tongues of fire resting on each person. One writer keeps the two signs apart:

This was a wholly new thing, so signs came with it. They were of two kinds: the violent blowing that filled all the house, and the divided tongues as of fire that sat on each one. So the Spirit showed His presence in a general way for the whole house, and in a special way as power of testimony for each.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer sees the filled house as God moving in to dwell on earth again:

But when the day of Pentecost had fully come, this earth became once more a dwelling place for God in the person of the Holy Spirit. That sound like a rushing mighty wind filled all the house where the disciples of Christ were sitting in Jerusalem. From that moment the Spirit has never been absent from the earth for a single moment. God had come to earth to dwell on it for the third time in the world's history. How favoured is this earth! A globe so small, yet God's habitation is found on it!

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Which house?

Commentators differ over the building itself. One holds that the crowd's arrival points away from a private room:

The one place is not named. It may have been the upper room of Acts 1. But crowds heard the Spirit-given words, so more likely it was some court of the temple, such as Solomon's porch.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Others locate it in an ordinary upper room and find the contrast with the temple the whole point:

The temple, so magnificent, was left desolate (Matt. 23:38). Though the priests were very busy, all was hollow; the substance was gone. But in the upper room the Spirit was the glory. A poor place by comparison, yet the scene of the divine presence.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Source — the sound came from heaven, not from any religious centre on earth. That makes heaven the church's point of control, and ties it to Christ above.

- Sound — the word means a sustained blowing or breathing, not a storm. It is power that lifts and carries on, and it keeps on blowing.

- House — that blowing filled the whole house: God took up a dwelling place on earth again, and has not left it since.

- Each — the filled house speaks of His presence with the whole company. The tongues resting on each person speak of power for testimony.

- Power — the wind cannot be seen, yet its force is felt. The Spirit works the same way: unseen, and impossible to resist.

Acts 2:3 · Darby

And there appeared to them parted tongues, as of fire, and it sat upon each one of them.

After the sound of the rushing wind comes something to see: fire-like tongues, split apart, resting on every person in the house. Commentators ask why tongues, why fire, and why one for each.

A Twofold Sign

The wind and the tongues were two signs, not one sign repeated. One writer shows what each of them marked:

This was an entirely new thing, so signs came with it. These signs had a twofold character. There was the violent blowing which filled the whole house. There were also the divided tongues as of fire which sat on each one. So these signs showed the Spirit's presence in a general way for the whole house, and in a special way as power for testimony for each.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Not a Dove

The Spirit had come on Jesus in a very different form. One writer explains the change from the character of the ones He came upon:

The way the Spirit came was quite different in the two cases. On the Lord He came like a dove. With the disciples the form was "divided tongues as of fire." Why the difference? He came upon the Lord Jesus in a form suited to the character of that blessed One whom He was sealing. Christ was the meek and lowly One. What better picture of meekness than a dove? As for the disciples, they were to be witnesses, as the Lord had told them. So the sign for them was tongues.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Divided, Because the Message Divides No Longer

The tongues were split, not single. That detail is read as a map of where the message was headed:

The divided tongues meant testimony — the power of God in testimony, the word in testimony. Such testimony carries everything before it, just like fire, which destroys and judges all that comes in its way. And it was not merely one tongue, but each one divided into many, which sat on each disciple. The idea was this. The Spirit of God was there. The testimony of God in grace was no longer for the Jew alone. It was to go out to the ends of the earth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Grace Reaching Where Judgment Had Scattered

The many languages point back to Babel, where God had scattered human speech in judgment:

The judgment of God had inflicted these various languages on them. It had broken up their ambitious project at the tower of Babel, where they joined together to build a unity of their own. But the grace of God went out exactly where His judgment had placed them. If a crushing blow laid their pride in ever so many separate ditches, the grace of God went out to those ditches. It blessed them where they lay, and raised them out of their fallen state.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fire, and What It Burns

Fire stands for judgment. One writer notes that this sign was never seen again, and follows what the word did when it reached the crowd that day:

These tongues were seen on that occasion, and we never read of them being seen again... And "as of fire" may foreshadow the effect of the word of God. The word discerns the thoughts and intentions of the heart (Heb. 4:12)... Fire is an emblem of judgment. The three thousand bore witness to the power of the word to act on consciences before night closed on that eventful day. Cut to the heart, they cried out in agony of soul, "Brothers, what shall we do?" The word reaches the conscience now, and it acts as judge within. Light shines in, and shows a person what he has never seen and judged before.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Another writer ties the fire back to the cross:

We find also that they were "as of fire." What does this imply? Simply that grace reigned through righteousness. There was that in man which called for judgment; and the cross had fully met it; there sin had been judged. This testimony was to be founded on the cross, and therefore the divided tongues "as of fire."

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

One Spirit, on Each One

The verse says the tongues appeared, but that it rested on each of them. The singular is not an accident:

There were not many spirits present. There was only One, for the word says "it sat upon each of them"... So they received power from the Spirit to speak a variety of languages. They spoke in many different ways, but one Power directed them all.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The cross met the judgment that sin called for, so grace now reigns through righteousness.

- Gift. One Spirit came, not many. The older reading "it sat upon each one" holds the many voices under one directing Power.

- Reach. The tongues were divided because the testimony was no longer for one nation alone. Grace went out to the very places where God's judgment at Babel had scattered men.

- Result. Fire pictures the word that judges even as it blesses. It cut hearts open that same day, and three thousand cried out to ask what they should do.

- Rest. The wind filled the whole house; the tongues rested on every person. God was present among His people, and each one had power to speak for Him.

Acts 2:4 · Darby

And they were all filled with [the] Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues as the Spirit gave to them to speak forth.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Acts 2:5 · Darby

Now there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, pious men, from every nation of those under heaven.

The Spirit has come, and the disciples are speaking in other languages. Luke stops to tell us who was in the city to hear them, and that crowd explains both the shape of the miracle and the proof of it.

Three Groups in One City

This verse names one of three groups in the city that day.

Let us look first at the different groups brought before us. There are the one hundred and twenty formed this day into the Church — God's assembly. There are the Jews standing around them — the "Jews, devout men from every nation under heaven" (v. 5), those to whom Peter afterwards preached. Finally, there are those Peter refers to in his address — "all who are far off," a well-known Bible term for Gentiles. So we have the threefold division the Spirit of God makes elsewhere — the Church, the Jews, and the Gentiles (1 Cor. 10:32). Together they represent the whole world.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Not a Coincidence

The crowd in the city was not there by chance.

What a remarkable event! What a striking coincidence! In His infinite wisdom and perfect grace, God arranged for people from every nation on the face of the whole earth to be in the city of Jerusalem at that exact moment. So even if the twelve apostles failed to carry out their commission, all could still hear the precious news of God's salvation. And each would hear it in the very dialect their mothers used when they first whispered the words of a mother's love into their infant ears.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why "Devout" Matters

These men were not chasing novelty. That is what makes their verdict count.

The tongues were certainly used to catch the attention of the Jews from other countries, who flocked to Jerusalem for this feast, or were otherwise staying there. What confounded these strangers from so many lands was that each one heard the disciples speaking in his own language. The residents and visitors in Jerusalem, whose piety gave them weight, were the last people to welcome religious innovation. Yet they judged the languages to be real. To them the evidence was overwhelming. It would have been impossible if the variety of languages had not been a plain and certain reality, and of that they were competent judges.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No one asked these men for a verdict.

Devout men at Jerusalem gave unsolicited testimony about what came from the lips of the disciples. These devout Jews, from every nation under heaven, heard and testified that the words of the Galilean company were in the language each of them was born into. Whatever language each disciple spoke, it was as grammatically correct and as clear in meaning as those devout Jews could have spoken themselves. It was no meaningless jargon, no babbling, no gibberish, but intelligent language, which some in that crowd could confirm to others was their own native speech.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The Reach of "Every Nation Under Heaven"

This reach marks a change from the way the law came.

So God overcame the confusion brought in at Babel (Gen. 11), though the time had not come to remove it altogether. He intended the gospel for every creature. God gave the law in one language, and to only one people. But the gospel of God's grace, God's precious testimony about His Son, could not be limited that way. Gentiles and Jews were equally needy, and all should have the offer of the Saviour.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Starting at the Worst Place

The nations were gathered in the one city that had crucified Him.

This reminds us again of that far greater announcement of grace. It sends a message of repentance and forgiveness, to be preached in the name of Christ among all nations. But that message is to begin "at Jerusalem." It is to all nations, for all are guilty, but it begins at the blackest spot in all the world. There is no mention of the terrible guilt of the city, and no mention of the bold and blasphemous hatred of its leaders. In sovereign, unconditional grace, God proclaims forgiveness in the Name of Jesus to the very city that nailed Him to the Cross.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Gathered. God brought people from every nation to Jerusalem at that exact moment. The news of salvation could then reach all of them at once.

- Grouped. Three groups stand in the chapter: the new assembly, the devout Jews of verse 5, and those "far off." Together they picture the whole world.

- Grounded. The men least likely to welcome religious novelty were the ones who judged the languages real. No one asked them to say it.

- Given. The law came in one language to one people. The gospel could not be limited that way, so God overcame Babel's confusion to reach every creature.

- Grace. The reach is to all nations because all are guilty — yet it starts at the very city that crucified Him.

Acts 2:6 · Darby

But the rumour of this having spread, the multitude came together and were confounded, because each one heard them speaking in his own dialect.

A sound from heaven drew a crowd of visiting Jews to the spot. Each man there heard his own home speech from the mouths of Galileans — so where does the wonder lie, and why languages at all?

What drew them

No one arranged this gathering. A sound reached them, and the surprise came after they arrived.

The sound drew them to the spot. There they heard the disciples speaking in the tones and accents that belonged to each one. Many of them were far from home. In that country Aramaic was the language of the common people, and Greek was fairly well understood as the language of trade in that day. Yet they heard voices that spoke to them in their own mother tongue, and told of the mighty works of God.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Not language only, but dialect

The gift fitted each hearer more closely than a national language would. It also turned an old event in Genesis on its head.

News of what had happened spread, and the crowd came together. They were bewildered, because each one heard the disciples speaking in his own language. This completely reversed what happened at the tower of Babel (Gen. 11). There the Lord confused the language of the people so that they would not understand one another's speech. And it was not only that each heard in his own tongue, but in his own dialect.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Where the miracle lay

Some explanations shift the wonder from the disciples to the listeners. Others reduce the speech to excited noise. Writers have long answered both.

Some have tried to find in the account the same kind of senseless jargon... others argue for a highly excited or ecstatic style of speech, suited to telling out the marvels of grace... The older rationalists supposed it was no other than their native tongue. Others, from Gregory of Nyssa and Cyprian to Erasmus and men of our own day, added to this the strange idea that the Spirit caused the crowd of foreigners to hear, each in his own tongue! But Gregory of Nazianzus rejects that notion. It makes the marvel lie with the hearers rather than the speakers, and that is contrary to the clear statement of Scripture.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Babel's judgment met by grace

God's judgment at Babel left the nations divided by speech. Grace does not undo that division; it goes out to men where the judgment left them.

God's judgment had inflicted these various tongues on them. It had completely broken up their ambitious plan to join together and build a unity of their own through the tower of Babel. But the grace of God went out exactly where His judgment had placed them. If a crushing blow laid their pride in many separate ditches, then the grace of God went out to those ditches. It blessed them where they lay, and raised them out of their fallen state.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A sign for every race and tongue

The many languages marked a change. They showed who God's word was now going out to.

But the languages were as real as they were different from their mother tongue, or from any language learned in the ordinary way... God had given His law to Israel, and that law was in itself the expression of man's moral duty. What could testify more clearly that He was now about to make known His grace in the gospel to every race and tongue? ...This was not the wiping out of difference in language. Nor was it the power that will one day make the whole earth of one lip and the same speech. It was grace lifting its objects and instruments above the effects of that judgment at Babel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God speaks so men understand

God had already made dealings between nations hard. Luke then gives three words for the crowd, and each answers to something different.

By an exercise of His power He had made dealings between nations difficult, in some measure. By power joined with grace He made provision that different nations, and those speaking different tongues, should hear about His Son and about salvation in their own language, with nothing to hinder them. Bewildered, amazed, and in doubt (or, perplexed) — this is how Luke describes the crowd. Bewildered, when each man heard his own language. Amazed, as they remembered that those addressing them were Galileans. Perplexed, since they could not understand what it meant. Something new, something strange, had undoubtedly happened.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Sound gathers. The noise from heaven brought the crowd. The languages held them.

- Language reaches. Not just a national tongue, but each hearer's own dialect. It was the speech he was born into, so no one could call it someone else's message.

- Speakers, not hearers. The wonder was in the Galileans who spoke, not in the ears that heard. Explanations that reverse this contradict the account.

- Grace follows judgment. Babel scattered men by confusing their speech. Now God's grace goes to the very ditches His judgment dug, and blesses men where they lay.

- Law to one, grace to all. The many tongues announced the change: God gave His law to one nation, and now He makes His grace known to every race and tongue.

Acts 2:7 · Darby

And all were amazed and wondered, saying, Behold, are not all these who are speaking Galilaeans?

The crowd at Pentecost did not doubt what they heard. They could not explain it. Their question turns on one word — "Galileans" . It shows what they expected of such men, and what God had just done through them.

What the crowd felt

Luke stacks three reactions on top of each other, and each has its own cause:

Confounded, amazed, and in doubt (or, perplexed) — this is how Luke describes the crowd. Confounded, when they heard each man his own language. Amazed, as they remembered that those who addressed them were Galileans. Perplexed, since they could not understand what it meant.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why "Galileans" was the sting

The word was not a compliment. Galilee had a reputation, and its people gave themselves away when they spoke:

It is likely that the Galileans pronounced words differently, or that the language spoken in Galilee was not as refined as the language spoken at Jerusalem. That is what gave Peter away when he spoke. But the voice of that same Peter, under the power of God, was mighty on the day of Pentecost. Even so, the hearers said, "Are not all these who are speaking Galileans?" They were surprised to hear such men speak in foreign tongues. They were all the more surprised because no prophet was ever expected from there, nor any good thing from Nazareth.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The kind of people God uses

That the speakers were country people is not an embarrassment in the story. It is the point:

God will have a wonderful witness going out from His House. But He will have that witness carried out by His own witnesses. And His witnesses are for the most part the poor and feeble of this world. So in Acts 2 we read, "Are not all these who are speaking Galileans?" Galileans, of course, were the simple country folk — the peasantry. And Peter, "an unlearned and ignorant man," was their leader.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Real languages, not ecstatic noise

Some have argued that the tongues at Pentecost were unintelligible sounds. The crowd's own words rule that out — foreigners recognised their own speech:

But there is an awkward difficulty in the way of calling them imaginary tongues. All the different nations whose languages these were understood them. "Are not all these who are speaking Galileans? And how is it that we hear, each of us in his own native language?" And then Peter speaks to the Jews in theirs. Now this fact is the substantial point of the whole affair. It was what struck the multitude. It converted three thousand people. The Church begins its existence, and it was formed because this multitude understood what was said.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Others have suggested the miracle happened in the ears of the listeners, not in the mouths of the speakers. One early answer rejects that:

Gregory of Nazianzus rejects that idea. It places the marvel with the hearers rather than the speakers, and that goes against the clear statement of Scripture. So do all these empty theories.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Babel answered

Commentators link this scene to the scattering of languages at the tower of Babel. One traces the reversal to Christ's own lowliness:

There had been a Man on earth who never thought of Himself, but only of God and His glory. He "humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross." As a result, God has put Him in the place that man in Genesis 11 could not reach. And the Holy Spirit comes down and reverses the judgment of Genesis 11 for a time. The difference of language did not disappear. But the divine grace and power that will one day make the whole world speak one language lifted the disciples above the effects of Babel's judgment. They had never learned those languages, yet they could speak in as many languages as their hearers had.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Astonishment is not yet belief

Three thousand people joined the believers that day. One writer names the cause, and it was not the wonder of verse 7:

This happened because the word spoken and received was the incorruptible seed. It did not happen because the preacher spoke it in a language new to him, one he had never learned in the ordinary way. The living and energetic word of God awakened sleeping consciences. The speeches in other tongues only awakened surprise and wonder in the hearers. That wonder converted no one, and it left the great mass in Jerusalem more hardened than ever.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Summary

- Amazed at whom. The languages confounded the crowd. The speakers amazed them. The meaning left them perplexed. Their amazement came from remembering these men were Galileans.

- Galileans. Their accent once gave Peter away. People expected no prophet and nothing good from their region. Yet that same voice was now mighty.

- Chosen weakness. God's witnesses are for the most part the poor and feeble of this world; "unlearned and ignorant" Peter led them.

- Real speech. Foreigners heard the language they were born in. The marvel was in the speakers, not in the ears. For a moment, grace lifted the disciples above Babel's judgment.

- Wonder is not faith. The tongues produced surprise. The incorruptible word produced the three thousand. Those who only marvelled went away harder than before.

Acts 2:8 · Darby

and how do *we* hear [them] each in our own dialect in which we have been born,

The crowd in Jerusalem had come from many countries, and each person heard the message in the speech he grew up with. Their question raises two things at once: what this miracle was, and why God chose to work it this way.

The word behind "language"

Two different Greek words for speech run through this chapter, and each fits a different point.

The two words dialektos and glossai are by no means synonymous. When the Spirit wished to express the language of each individual, the first was the right word. When the point was the sum total of many different languages, the second was the fitting expression.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That distinction shows in what the crowd actually heard.

It was not only that each heard in his own tongue, but in his own dialect.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Real languages, not strange sounds

So where did the miracle happen — in the speakers, or in the hearers?

Interpreters have given strange and conflicting explanations of this. There is no need to notice them. Though it was a miracle, the fact is simple. It is plain that this crowd of people of many languages heard these men, who were obviously Galileans, speaking in these tongues. The miracle, as someone long ago remarked, was with those who spoke, not with those who heard; and therefore the speakers used real languages.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

That fact carried the whole day.

But treating them as imaginary tongues runs into an awkward difficulty. All the different nations whose languages these were understood them. Now this fact is the substantial point of the whole affair. It was what struck the crowd. Three thousand people were converted by it. The Church begins its existence; it took form because this crowd understood what was said.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why "Galileans" made it astonishing

Galilean speech was easy to recognise, and people looked down on it. It had once given Peter away.

The Galileans probably had a different way of pronouncing words. Or the language spoken in Galilee was not as refined as the language spoken in Jerusalem. That is why people detected Peter by his speech. Matt. 26:69, 73; Mark 14:70. But the voice of that same Peter was mighty on the day of Pentecost, under the power of God. The hearers still said, "Are not all these who are speaking Galileans?" Acts 2:7.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Grace reaching people where judgment had left them

God divided human language at Babel and scattered a proud project. Pentecost does not undo that scattering. Grace works through it.

The judgment of God had inflicted these various languages on them. It had shattered their ambitious plan to join together and set up a unity of their own through the tower of Babel. But the grace of God went out exactly where His judgment had placed them. If a crushing blow had laid their pride in ever so many separate ditches, then the grace of God went out to those ditches. It blessed them where they lay, and raised them out of their fallen state.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God speaking so the heart can hear

God gave the law one way and announced the good news another.

The Holy Spirit enabled the messengers of grace to deliver their message in the very tongue in which each was born. What precious proof that God wanted to reach man's heart with the sweet story of grace! The law from the fiery mountain was not published like that. When God was telling what man ought to be, He spoke in one tongue; but when He was telling what He Himself was, He spoke in many.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The choice of each person's birth-language was tender, not just practical.

The God of all grace would have each one hear of full salvation. And hear of it in those very words in which his infant ears had listened to the earliest whispers of a mother's love — in "his own native language." It did not matter whether the language was soft or harsh, refined or rough. The Holy Spirit would use it to carry the precious message of salvation right home to the poor heart.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What it set in motion

The many languages of the world were also a practical problem for the men sent out with the message.

In the time of the apostles, so many different languages in the earth were a serious obstacle. They made it hard to carry out their commission to go into all the world and preach the gospel quickly and easily. But at the very start these servants of the Lord saw that this difficulty was nothing when met by the energy of the Spirit of God. In a moment He was able to give the disciples power to speak to men in their own dialect about "the mighty works of God."

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Summary

- Dialect, not just language. The wording marks the dialect each hearer knew from birth, not just a national tongue.

- Miracle in the speakers. The wonder was on the lips of the disciples, so what they spoke were genuine languages.

- Unlikely speakers. God showed His power through the very men the crowd looked down on.

- Grace to the ditches. Where judgment at Babel had scattered people into many tongues, grace went out and found them there.

- Straight to the heart. God gave the law in one language, but told what He Himself is in many — reaching each heart in the language it was born into.

Acts 2:9 · Darby

Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and those who inhabit Mesopotamia, and Judaea, and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia,

The crowd at Pentecost names itself by homeland, and the list starts in the far east — Parthia, Media, Elam — then moves west. Behind those names lie centuries of Jewish scattering, and the list raises one question: why did God answer it with many languages?

The sweep of the list

The names are not a random cluster. The order runs across the map, and that careful spread is itself the proof that many separate languages were in use, not just a few.

These strangers came from many lands, and each one heard the disciples speaking in his own language. That is what confounded them. Aramaic, or Greek and Latin, may have spread widely across the then known world. Even so, this list is careful and varied. It runs from the north-east to the west and south, which seems to be why Judea comes between Mesopotamia and Cappadocia. So it is pointless to tell anyone who believes such a list that the inspired writer means no more than a few distinct languages.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Reading the map

Two of the names in this verse are easy to misread today. "Asia" here is not the continent, and not even the whole of Asia Minor.

In the New Testament this word does not mean the part of the earth now called Asia. It does not cover the whole of Asia Minor either. It means only the western part of Asia Minor. Attalus III Philometor, king of Pergamos, left that region to Rome in 133 B.C. The province, with Ephesus as its capital, included Caria, Lydia, and Mysia. In Acts 2:9-10 "Asia" does not include Cappadocia, Pontus, Phrygia, or Pamphylia. All of those belong to Asia Minor.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Cappadocia is worth marking. The same district reappears later in Scripture as an address for a letter.

Cappadocia: a district in the east of Asia Minor. Visitors from there were at Jerusalem at the feast of Pentecost. Peter includes this district when he addresses his first letter to the scattered Jews. Acts 2:9; 1 Peter 1:1. The district extended as far east as the Euphrates.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Israel's old exile in the audience

Shalmaneser carried Israelites off to the cities of Media after Samaria fell. Men from that region stand in this crowd.

The Medes are first mentioned when Shalmaneser took Samaria and carried away the Israelites. He placed some of them "in the cities of the Medes." 2 Kings 17:6; 18:11... There were some bearing the name of Medes present at Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

That detail answers the claim that the ten tribes vanished from history.

On the great day of Pentecost we find "devout men" in the audience who came from the very regions to which the ten tribes were deported.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Languages the crowd understood

Each group heard its own homeland's language, so this was no burst of excited noise. The hearers themselves are the evidence.

But one awkward fact stands in the way of calling these imaginary languages. All the different nations whose languages they were understood them... Now this fact is the substantial point of the whole affair. It was what struck the crowd. Three thousand people were converted by it. The Church begins its existence, formed because this crowd understood what was said.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Babel undone

Once God scattered people by confusing their speech. Here the same variety of speech becomes the road back to them.

In Acts 2 we see the blessed One coming down in infinite grace. He meets man in the very circumstances where his sin had placed him. The Holy Spirit enabled the messengers of grace to give their message in each hearer's own native language. This is precious proof that God wanted to reach man's heart with the sweet story of grace! The law from the fiery mountain was not announced like this. When God was telling what man ought to be, He spoke in one language. When He was telling what He Himself was, He spoke in many.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A disputed link with prophecy

Elam has its own promise in the prophets. Commentators differ over whether Pentecost fulfilled it, and one writer refuses the link outright.

"But it shall come to pass in the latter days, that I will bring again the captivity of Elam, says Jehovah." Here mercy triumphs at last over judgment... God will show His goodness towards Elam when the kingdom comes. Calvin and others refer its fulfilment to Acts 2:9. That only shows how little such men enter into either the old or the new.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Scattered — the names run from Parthia in the north-east westward across the map. They belong to one people long dispersed among the nations.

- Named — the list is precise, not decorative. "Asia" means one Roman province in western Asia Minor. Cappadocia reappears as an address of Peter's first letter.

- Present — men from the very regions of the northern deportation stand in this crowd, so those tribes were never lost to history.

- Understood — the hearers, not the speakers, prove the miracle. Real nations recognised real languages, and three thousand were converted.

- Reversed — God once divided speech to scatter people. Now He uses many languages to gather them. The law came in one language; the news of what God is came in many.

Acts 2:10 · Darby

both Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt, and the parts of Libya which adjoin Cyrene, and the Romans sojourning [here], both Jews and proselytes,

The list of nations sweeps west across Asia Minor into Africa, then on to the capital of the empire. It ends by naming the hearers: born Jews and converts from other nations. Why name so many places at all?

The map behind the names

The verse reaches Africa with the Libyan country around Cyrene. Cyrene had already appeared in the Gospel story.

A Greek city, the capital of the classic Cyrenaica, in the north of Africa, and the people of the same place. Some from there were present on the day of Pentecost, and they had a synagogue in Jerusalem. Simon, who carried the cross of the Lord, was a Cyrenian.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Genuine languages, not noise

The order of the list is itself an argument.

What confounded these strangers from so many lands was that each one heard the disciples speaking in his own language. Aramaic, Greek and Latin may have spread widely over the world of that day. Even so, this list is careful and varied. It runs from the north-east to the west and south. (That seems to be why Judea comes between Mesopotamia and Cappadocia.) It is pointless to tell anyone who believes such a list that the inspired writer means only a few distinct tongues.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Grace reaching the places judgment made

Notice the direction of the miracle. The speakers were Jews; the languages were those of the nations among whom Israel had been scattered.

God caused those who received the Holy Spirit to speak in the different tongues spread over the Gentile world. He did not cause all the converts to speak the Jewish language. Instead, He caused the Jews, gathered from their dispersion among all nations, to speak the tongues of the Gentiles. It was a magnificent witness of the grace that was going out to the Gentiles to meet them where they were. The judgment of God had inflicted these various tongues upon them. It had completely broken up their ambitious project at the tower of Babel — joining together to build a unity of their own. But the grace of God went out exactly where His judgment had placed them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Each in the language of his childhood

Every person there heard the message in the speech he first learned.

In Genesis 11 divided tongues were sent in judgment. In Acts 2 divided tongues were sent in grace. The blessed God of all grace would cause each one to hear of full salvation. Each would hear it in the very words in which his infant ears had listened to the earliest whispers of a mother's love — in his own native language. It did not matter whether the language was soft or harsh, refined or rough. The Holy Spirit would use it to carry the precious message of salvation right home to the poor heart. Divided tongues had once been given to scatter in judgment. Now they were given again to gather in grace — not around an earthly tower, but around a heavenly Christ.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Jews and proselytes

The verse ends with two groups. The second, proselytes, had joined Israel's faith.

The name given to anyone from among the nations who embraced Judaism. The name may be said to be a Greek word, formed from a verb meaning "to come to." The Greek Old Testament uses it where the Hebrew has "the stranger" who lives among you. If all the males in the family were circumcised, such people could eat the Passover and offer a burnt offering or sacrifice.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the audience that day was still gathered inside Israel's circle. But who was already in view?

Still, those who heard and believed the gospel that day were Jews and proselytes only. The Lord had stretched out His hands in vain to a disobedient and contrary people. Those hands were already pointing to all the nations, who also would hear.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Visitors from Rome

The last group named is the visitors from Rome, called "strangers" in the older wording below.

There were "strangers" from Rome at Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost. No doubt they heard the gospel there. Some may have been converted and carried the gospel back with them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

That leaves a striking gap in the record of how the church in the capital began.

God in His wisdom ordered that no apostle should plant the gospel in the imperial city. Rome cannot truly boast of a church that began with an apostle, as Jerusalem, Philippi, Corinth, Ephesus and many smaller places can. We know that on the day of Pentecost, when God first gave the Holy Spirit, there were Roman Jews staying in Jerusalem who heard the gospel there.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Scattered. Babel broke humanity into languages as a judgment; the nations listed here are the map that judgment left behind.

- Reached. Grace went out exactly where that judgment had placed them. Jews spoke the tongues of the Gentile world, not the other way round.

- Personal. Each hearer got the message in the language of his childhood. Polished or rough, the Spirit used every language.

- Bounded, for now. The believers that day were still Jews and proselytes only, yet the sign already pointed to all the nations who would hear.

- Carried home. Visitors from Rome heard, and the gospel travelled back with ordinary people. No apostle founded the church in the imperial city.

Acts 2:11 · Darby

Cretans and Arabians, we hear them speaking in our own tongues the great things of God?

The crowd in Jerusalem came from every part of the known world, and each person heard his own native language. Two questions press on this verse: what were the disciples saying, and why did God choose this sign?

The subject they spoke about

The crowd was made up of Jews and proselytes — Gentiles who had joined the Jewish faith. They name the theme themselves, and one writer draws out what that theme was.

The mercy of God was now about to reach great numbers of people, in the very languages that men of old had been condemned to, in His just displeasure. People were present from every quarter. Most of them were Jews, or Jewish proselytes. What do you think the Lord's servants spoke about? About Jesus, and not about themselves. That day "the wonderful works of God" was their glorious theme. In many languages they opened up the truth of His love, the wonderful death of His Son, and the way God was glorified by that death.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Many languages, because God was telling what He is

The law came in one language. Here the message goes out in many, and the reason lies in what God was announcing.

The Holy Spirit enabled the messengers of grace to deliver their message in the very tongue in which each was born. This is precious proof that God wanted to reach man's heart with the sweet story of grace! The law from the fiery mountain was not given this way. When God was telling what man ought to be, He spoke in one tongue; but when He was telling what He Himself was, He spoke in many. Man's pride and folly had built a barrier. Grace broke through it, so that every man could hear and understand the good news of salvation — the wonderful works of God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Real, identifiable languages

Some say the disciples spoke only a few widely known languages. The careful roll-call of countries in verses 9 to 11 rules that out.

These strangers came from many lands. What confused them was that each one heard the disciples speaking in his own language. Aramaic, Greek and Latin may have spread widely over the known world. Even so, the list here is careful and varied, running from the north-east to the west and south. It is pointless to tell anyone who believes that list that the inspired writer means no more than a few distinct languages. The residents and visitors in Jerusalem did not judge so. They were devout men, so their judgment carried weight, and they were the last people to accept anything new in religion. To them the evidence was irresistible.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Writers here quote the older wording "the wonderful works of God"; the ESV reads "the mighty works of God."

Understanding on both sides

The disciples knew what they were saying. The crowd knew what they were hearing. One writer makes that double clarity the test of the real gift.

They were bearing witness to Christ and His death and resurrection. Of course they knew exactly what they were saying. But by a miracle they could say it in a language they did not normally know. Their hearers too understood what they were saying. Expect these two things wherever the true gift of tongues is in use. In effect this would reverse, in a wonderful way, what God did at the tower of Babel, when He confused men's languages (Genesis 11:5-9). In the church there would now be understanding and fellowship between nations that had long been far apart.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Not the same as the tongues at Corinth

Not every later use of tongues matched this day. Commentators set what happened here apart from the gift at Corinth.

The gift of speaking in a tongue (in 1 Corinthians) was an entirely different thing. Those who heard it did not, like those in Acts 2:11, hear in their own language. They could not understand what was said unless it was interpreted.

Modernised from Other AuthorsOriginal wording

The travellers who carried it home

The verse names Cretans and Arabians last. Crete comes up again years later, when Paul left Titus on the island.

Neither Paul nor Titus is said to have planted the gospel in Crete. From Acts 2:11 it seems very likely that the good news reached the island almost from the great day of Pentecost. It was a question therefore for Titus to follow up that setting of things in order which the apostle began.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Judgment. At Babel God confused men's languages and scattered them. The many languages heard in Jerusalem were the result.

- Grace. God met men where judgment had left them. He spoke one language when telling man his duty, and many when telling what He Himself is.

- Theme. The content was not the speakers but the Saviour: God's love, the death of His Son, and God glorified in that death.

- Test. Real languages, spoken with understanding and heard with understanding: that is the mark of the true gift.

- Result. Cretans and Arabians went home with the news. The gospel reached Crete almost from the day it began.

Acts 2:12 · Darby

And they were all amazed and in perplexity, saying one to another, What would this mean?

At Pentecost the crowd heard people from Galilee speaking their own home languages. No one could deny it, and no one could explain it, so they turned to each other and asked what it meant.

Three reactions, three words

Luke uses more than one word for the crowd's state. Each word has its own cause.

Confounded, amazed, and in doubt (or, perplexed) — this is how Luke describes the crowd. Confounded, when each man heard his own language. Amazed, as they remembered that those speaking to them were Galileans. Perplexed, since they could not understand what it meant. Something new and strange had clearly happened. What did it mean? That was the impression made on many who were there… No one denied that something unusual had happened. Yet no one could give a good explanation.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why the languages at all

The many languages were God's doing, and He had a reason for them.

God was now speaking to them through people, through vessels guided by the Holy Spirit. When God speaks, He wants souls to hear and understand… He had once used His power to make communication between nations difficult, at least in some measure. Now, by power joined with grace, He made sure that people of different nations and different languages would hear about His Son, and about salvation, in their own language, with nothing in the way.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The answer to their question

So what did it all mean? One writer sets the crowd's question and its answer side by side.

So we see this great crowd gathered together in Jerusalem. They were full of amazement at what they were hearing about the wonderful works of God, each in his own language. They ask, "What does this mean?" And the answer is, "Jesus Christ is exalted and glorified." Peter makes this fact known to them in his powerful speech.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

The same writer names the root of their confusion. It never crossed their minds that these wonders came from the One recently crucified, now in supreme power at God's right hand. They were wrong about Christ, so they could not read what was in front of them.

Where the natural mind stops

Their confusion was not stupidity. The natural mind has a limit, and this went far past it.

No wonder these strangers in Jerusalem were amazed and perplexed at such an event. No natural man can understand the origin or the working of such divine power. In honesty, he can only express perplexity; in mockery, he can only make some absurd suggestion such as "they are full of new wine."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Asking honestly, or sneering

The crowd split in two. One writer suggests why some of them laughed: they were local men who could not follow the foreign languages.

But others — most likely Jews born in the land, who did not understand the different languages — mocked…

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Both groups saw the same thing.

Those who hear are amazed — as well they might be — and say, "What does this mean?" Some ask honestly, What does this mean? — and it is a most blessed thing to ask honestly what God means — yet, sadly, others mocked. How sad, my friend, to be counted among the mockers, either then or now. Do not forget that if you mock in the day of His grace, God can do the same in the day of your calamity. (See Prov. 1:20-33.)

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Peter answers both groups

The question of verse 12 was not left hanging. Peter cleared away the slander first, then supplied the explanation from their own Scriptures.

As usual, men arrange themselves into more than one class — some astonished, others hostile and scornful. Peter takes the lead in explaining with seriousness and clarity. He plainly denies the unworthy charge of drunkenness. The early hour alone should have silenced it. It was really what Joel spoke of — not the fulfilment as it will be in the last days, but an outpouring of that kind.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Undeniable. No one in the crowd argued about the facts. They all heard the languages. Their problem was not evidence but explanation.

- Deliberate. God had once made communication between nations hard. Here He reached past that barrier, so every nation present heard about His Son in its own language.

- Unreachable. Perplexity is the honest limit of the natural mind. It cannot trace where such power comes from or how it works.

- Divided. One event, two responses: honest questions and mockery. It is a blessed thing to ask honestly what God means.

- Answered. Peter gave the meaning they lacked. Jesus Christ is exalted and glorified, and what they saw and heard was the proof.

Acts 2:13 · Darby

But others mocking said, They are full of new wine.

The day of Pentecost drew a crowd, and the crowd split in two. Some asked what Galileans speaking foreign languages could mean, while others sneered and blamed the wine.

Two Reactions in One Crowd

Luke describes a mixed audience. One group missed the miracle for a reason the others did not share.

Confounded, amazed, and in doubt (or, perplexed) — that is how Luke describes the crowd. Confounded, when they heard each man his own language. Amazed, as they remembered that those who addressed them were Galileans. Perplexed, since they could not understand what it meant. Something new, something strange, had undoubtedly happened. What did it mean? That was the impression made on many who were present. But others mocked, saying, "They are filled with new wine." These were very probably native-born Jews, who did not understand the different languages. No one disputed that something unusual had happened. Yet no one could give a satisfying explanation.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What "New Wine" Meant

The word for new wine can mean fresh grape juice. Peter's reply settles how the mockers meant it.

In classic Greek this word normally means the sweet unfermented juice of the grape. Even so, it is certain, from Acts 2:13 compared with verse 16, that this is not its New Testament sense... The context shows that the wine meant here was well known to make people drunk. Mere irony! some object. But if the sneer of the Jewish scoffers had been ironical, would an apostle have replied so seriously, "These people are not drunk, AS YOU SUPPOSE" — not merely as you say?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Peter's Reply: The Time of Day

The mockers thought they had an easy explanation. One plain fact undid it.

"Full of new wine," the mockers had said — an easy solution, as they thought, of that strange and startling sight which they witnessed. But the charge was easy to refute, and its folly was plain. The time of day should have made the accusers keep silent — it was only the third hour. Men were not in the habit of getting drunk by nine o'clock in the morning. The disciples were not drunk with wine. They were filled with the Spirit.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why They Could Not See It

The real cause of what they saw was not in Jerusalem at all.

Peter declared that the exaltation of Christ explained everything: "Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God... He has poured out this that you yourselves are seeing and hearing." The Lord Jesus was above; that is why there was power below. But it never entered their minds that the marvels of the tongues came from the One who had been crucified so recently. He was now in supreme power at the right hand of God.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Why the Mistake Was Possible

The charge was false. But one writer asks why such a mistake could be made at all.

On the day of Pentecost the crowd mistook the Spirit's action in the apostles for the effects of wine. This shows that the action of wine on the natural man imitates or counterfeits the action of the Spirit of God in the believer. In fact, when any of the early Christians were filled with the Spirit, they were lifted out of themselves. They became vessels for the expression of the Spirit's power, whether in testimony or in praise.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Since the two can look alike, another writer draws a warning for us.

If we are set on being Spirit-filled, we should guard against anything that would imitate it without being it. We should never mistake excitement for the Spirit's anointing... Do not confuse the natural excitement of wine with the Spirit's power, which takes a man outside of himself.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

The Taunt Turned Around

In one sense the mockers stumbled onto the truth without knowing it.

The disciples were so full of joy and power that some mocked and said, "They are filled with new wine." They were indeed full of new wine, but it did not come from this earth. It was the new wine of heaven.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A Warning to Scoffers

The two responses in the crowd are still the two responses today. One of them carries a cost.

Some ask honestly, "What does this mean?" It is a most blessed thing to ask honestly what God means. But others mocked. How sad, my friend, to be counted among the mockers, either then or now. Do not forget that if you mock in the day of His grace, God can do the same in the day of your calamity.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- The cause — Christ exalted at God's right hand explains the whole scene. It never crossed the mockers' minds, so the power below made no sense to them.

- The charge — "new wine" here means wine that makes people drunk. Peter's reply, "as you suppose," shows he took the insult as a real charge, not a joke.

- The reply — nine in the morning was answer enough; they were not drunk with wine, they were filled with the Spirit.

- The counterfeit — wine's excitement imitates the Spirit's power. The two can look alike, so never mistake excitement for the Spirit's work.

- The choice — one crowd, two responses: honest inquiry or mockery. Honest inquiry asks what God means; mockery in the day of grace risks God doing the same in the day of your calamity.