and has made of one blood every nation of men to dwell upon the whole face of the earth, having determined ordained times and the boundaries of their dwelling,
Paul stands before the philosophers of Athens and cuts against everything they assumed about themselves. Every nation came from one source, and the God they did not know set the seasons and borders of each. Older translations read "of one blood," and the writers quoted below use that wording.
The unity of the human family and the unity of God stand or fall together. Commentators point out that the Greeks held the opposite on both counts, and that the two errors fed each other.
"And has made of one blood": here again Paul is at odds with man's ideas, above all with the Greek belief in many gods. The unity of the human race is a truth that goes with the truth of one true God. Men saw that each race had its own national god. So the lie of many gods was tied to the matching claim of many independent races of men, and encouraged it. This was a favourite idea of the pagan world. They held that they had sprung from the earth in some remarkably foolish way, while at the same time maintaining that each was independent of the other.
The same writer adds that the Jews fell into the same vanity, though they alone held the revelation that settles it:
The one origin of man goes with the unity of God, just as the claim of separate races goes with their separate patron gods. As the Jews fell away, their self-exalting vanity helped that falsehood along. Yet God had entrusted the revelation of this twofold truth to them alone, and Christianity alone applied it fully and carried it out according to God.
One writer reads the verse as flattening every claim of rank. Even the limits God set were meant to make people feel their dependence.
He goes on to put man in his place before Him. The one blood that all men share levels every distinction that Jew and Greek alike prided themselves on. What is more, He fixed their times and the very boundaries of their dwellings. He withheld His care from no creature He had made. He appointed all this so that men would feel their limits and dependence, see the divine ordering of things around them, and in their need feel after Him and find Him.
The "allotted periods" cover the whole life of a nation. And God's care went on even toward peoples who had forgotten Him.
It is true that all nations from their beginning forgot God. No one showed that evil more than the people whose conscience Paul was now appealing to. Despite their willing ignorance, God took an interest in their actual circumstances. He fixed the appointed seasons of their national life, its progress and its fall, along with the boundaries of their dwelling.
The scattering of the nations is traced back to the tower at Shinar, where mankind tried to stay together and make a name for itself.
For up to the flood mankind was only one community, and, whatever their growing corruption and violence, no strange gods were set up against God. Nor had God started government as a human institution holding authority from Him. When He did, it was left neither to fate nor to chance, but He determined the seasons, and the limits of their dwelling.
The verse runs on into a purpose. One writer turns from nations to what God wants for each single person.
But God's ordering of the nations was far from being all His care. His heart went out in grace to every soul of man. In losing God, man had lost the one centre his heart must have, and the basis of all true morality... But God remained the God of goodness and mercy, ready to hear and forgive.
Another writer draws the encouragement out of the next clause: the search is not hopeless.
But God has dealt with men as He has so that they might seek the Lord, if it may happen that they will feel after Him and find Him. Paul adds that He is not far from every one of us, showing that if anyone honestly seeks God, God will reveal Himself.
If God set the borders, then crossing them has a cost. One writer applies the verse directly to why nations go to war.
This verse makes it clear that the earth's surface is enough for men to live on, and that God has set the boundaries of the nations. Suppose men had respected these God-appointed boundaries and had been content with the "place in the sun" He gave them. Then there would have been no wars. But they found no satisfaction in what they had, and they refused to feel after God for it. So they cast greedy eyes on their neighbours' portion and broke the boundaries God appointed. From this comes the bloodshed and the sorrow.
Another writer adds a caution. This shared origin proves less than people assume.
The idea that all men are brothers has some truth in a creatorial sense, since God has "made of one blood all nations of men" (Acts 17:26). It is not true in any other sense. The Scriptures draw the sharpest line imaginable between the believer and the man of the world.
- One source. Every nation traces back to one origin. That truth stands or falls with the truth of one God. Many gods and many separate races were always the same lie.
- One level. From one source follows one level: the shared blood wipes out the distinctions Jew and Greek both prized.
- One hand. From that level ground God assigns the parts: the seasons of a nation's life, its rise and fall, and its borders.
- One aim. God arranged it all so that people would feel their limits and seek Him. He is near enough for anyone who truly seeks to find Him.
- One warning. Break the boundaries He set, and war follows. Commentators also warn that a shared Creator does not erase the line between the believer and the man of the world.
that they may seek God; if indeed they might feel after him and find him, although he is not far from each one of us
Paul stands before the thinkers of Athens and tells them why God arranged human history as He did. The verse raises two hard questions. If God is so near, why has man not found Him? And what does it mean to grope after someone standing at your elbow?
Paul has just spoken of nations, appointed times and set borders. One writer looks past the nations to God's care for each person.
God's arranging of the nations was far from being all His care. He felt graciously for every soul of man, who in losing Him had lost the only and necessary centre for the heart... For man was fallen from God, and sin reigned in death... But God remained the God of goodness and mercy, ready to hear and forgive. But man must seek Him, conscious of sin, misery, and darkness.
The same writer ties this aim to the ordinary kindnesses of life:
It was not only the passing testimony to His goodness in the gift from heaven of rains and fruitful seasons... but also to appointed seasons, and the boundaries where the various nations live. All of it was under God's hand, with particular favours given to each. And in it all there was at least a whisper to seek after God.
Behind "feel their way" is a word about hands, not thoughts.
The word psēlaphaō is "to feel after with the fingers, handle." It is used of what can be touched. It occurs only in Luke 24:39; Acts 17:27; Hebrews 12:18; 1 John 1:1.
The word tells you who Paul had in mind. One writer used that point with a man who could not "feel" that he was saved:
I pointed out that the word feel is only once found in the New Testament, and that is in Acts 17:27... The word does not belong to the Christian, you see, but to the heathen who have no written revelation. Our word is "faith," or "believe." We do not know because we feel; we believe God's Word, and so we know.
Paul does not say that man is near God. He says God is near man. One writer presses that difference.
Man has gone far from God, and his great desire is always to increase the distance, but God has not gone far from man. The distance lies in alienation of heart and mind... But God pursues him in the grace and love of His heart. He is ready to fall on his neck and cover him with kisses the moment that man, in the sorrow of his soul, turns round and begins to feel after his Creator, whom he has so heartlessly abandoned.
Paul's wording here is cautious. One writer weighs that groping against the gospel that came later.
We may enter into the apostle's cautious language: "if by any means they might feel after and find Him..." Compared with the gospel after Christ's work, it was groping in the dark, except where the True Light was shining.
Another writer answers those who call this groping a misfortune.
People often speak of the heathen as groping after the light and unable to find it. They call it their misfortune, not their sin, because they are held down by circumstances too hard for them. That is not really so. The truth is, "There is none that seeks after God."... It is man not seeking God, but trying to escape from God, and he has escaped, so to speak, into the darkness. The darkness is the darkness of resisted light, not the absence of light.
Commentators differ in emphasis here. One reads the closing words as an open door:
Paul adds that He is not far from every one of us. If a person honestly seeks God, God will reveal Himself.
Another answers a question about a man with right beliefs and a decent life:
"Right convictions and good practice" is not gospel. Is he born again? Acts 17:27 does not say a word about the Spirit's acting... People confuse the ground of responsibility with sovereign grace in saving.
Man's duty to return to God stands. But the door does not stay open:
Man is a lost sinner. By his love of sin he has strayed from his Maker into hopeless darkness. He is always under responsibility to return to God, who has a righteous claim on the love and obedience of all His creatures... His patience with sinners will not last for ever. Some day men may wish to "find" Him, and will discover that He is no longer "near."
- Purpose. God set the times and borders of every nation with one personal aim: that people would seek Him.
- Groping. "Feel after" is a word for hands in the dark. It is real seeking, but blind — nothing next to the light now given.
- Nearness. God never moved away; the distance is man's alienation of heart, and God pursues him across it.
- Excuse. The darkness is resisted light, not missing light. So man's failure is guilt, not misfortune.
- Urgency. Commentators differ on how far seeking gets. They agree the verse sets out man's responsibility, not the gospel. And God's patience has an end.
for in him we live and move and exist; as also some of the poets amongst you have said, For we are also his offspring.
Paul spoke in a city full of altars and philosophers. He told them God is not far off, and used their own poets to argue against the idols all around him.
Each phrase of the verse marks a different layer of our reliance on God:
In fact, man's very existence is bound up with God, however little he realizes it. "In Him we live:" He is the source of our life; "and move:" He sustains all of our activities; "and have our being:" our existence is totally dependent upon Him.
One writer draws out how complete that hold on us is, and notes what Paul is not discussing here:
He surrounds us — in Him we live and move and are! The last of these says it most fully. He sustains us. He carries us, more completely than an infant in its mother's arms, for His arms never open to let go... He is not here considering the effect of the fall, nor yet man's responsibility, but the place given him in God's design. From there he will be better able to judge how far he has departed.
Yet closeness is not the whole truth about Him:
The words "in Him we live and move and have our being" show how near God is. Yet Paul preached Him as the One above all, the Lord of heaven and earth.
The quoted line was not invented for the sermon. It came from writings the audience could check for themselves:
The apostle rises far above natural philosophy. He views man in his relation to God, with an awareness of it that no other living being on earth has... Revealed truth states that relation in the clearest terms, and its echo sounded even where the true God was not known. So the apostle could quote the Greeks themselves, centuries before he spoke: "For we are indeed his offspring." These exact words appear in the astronomical poem of Aratus, a Cilician like himself, the Phaenomena, which still exists today. They appear again, with only one letter different, in the Stoic Cleanthes' hymn to Zeus, which also still exists.
There is an irony in the choice of witness:
So the apostle turns the admission of their own poets against themselves, or more exactly against their idolatry. Strange to say, the poets, however fanciful, are wiser than the philosophers. How often they stumble in their dreams on truths they would never have imagined!
"Offspring" means we come from God as creatures. It is not the same as being His children:
Only by faith in Christ Jesus do we become children of God, but all men are His offspring as His creatures. This being so, we ought not to think of God as something less than ourselves, or as the work of our own hands; and we should be those who seek after Him.
One writer traces this back to how man was made:
Scripture derives the soul of man, as man, from the inbreathing of God, apart from His dealings of saving mercy in Christ. In this sense, as the apostle applied it (Acts 17:28), all men, even the heathen, are His offspring. In Him all live.
Paul builds on a point his hearers already accepted:
If we are the offspring of God, as the Athenians boasted, idol-worship must be wrong. The Deity could not be like an image of stone, wood, or metal. If men are the offspring of God, God cannot be like a lifeless idol. The deduction was plain indeed. No one could refute it. It dealt a death-blow to idolatry.
Paul presses the point gently rather than with scorn:
If man alone of the creatures on earth is God's offspring, how can anyone maintain that the divinity is like a work of man's craft and imagination in gold, silver, or stone? "We ought not" to think so, he says graciously... A lifeless block that man shapes cannot be, or properly represent, the God who made him and all things.
- Source. "In Him we live" — God is the origin of life. "Move" — He sustains all our activity. "Have our being" — our existence depends wholly on Him.
- Sustainer. He surrounds and carries us more closely than a mother holds her child, because His arms never open.
- Near. God is close to every person. Yet Paul preached Him as Lord of heaven and earth, not a God the world contains.
- Kin by creation. All men are His offspring as creatures, since God breathed the soul of man into him. Only faith in Christ Jesus makes anyone His child.
- Therefore no idols. Since we come from God, God cannot be something we manufacture. Paul drew that conclusion from Athens' own poets, Aratus and Cleanthes, who proved wiser than its philosophers.
Being therefore [the] offspring of God, we ought not to think that which is divine to be like gold or silver or stone, [the] graven form of man's art and imagination.
Paul stands in Athens, a city crowded with statues. He has just quoted the city's own poets back to his hearers. From that borrowed line he draws one conclusion: if we came from God, God cannot be something we make.
Paul takes words his hearers already accepted and turns them against their idols.
So he turns the acknowledgment of their own poets against themselves, or rather against their idolatry. Strange to say, the poets, however fanciful, are wiser than the philosophers... How clearly this showed the folly of their boasted reason! What could be simpler or more conclusive? Since we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that our hands can make God. This is in effect what their practice amounted to. Gods of silver and gold were the offspring of men's art and imagination.
Whatever man is, his Maker cannot be less.
From the viewpoint of creation, this is true. So it was foolish to think of God as comparable to gold, silver or stone images, the work of human artistry. If men — living, moving, intelligent beings — are God's offspring, then certainly God is at least as living and intelligent as they are!
The word points back to something in man's making. It is not his body, which he shares with animals. It is what God breathed into him.
Men are God's offspring, but not because they have a body, as all animals have. It is not even because they have a soul and spirit, as animals also have, suited to their place and function in creation. They are God's offspring because they have an inner man that came straight from God by His inbreathing... This is why man alone of all creatures on earth has an immortal soul, for good or for harm beyond calculation. It is also why he must give account to God. But here the apostle used this relationship to show how foolish it is to represent God with an idol. The relationship comes from the special nature of the immaterial part of man.
Paul says this to a crowd of idol-worshippers, so the word must cover more than believers.
Only by faith in Christ Jesus do we become children of God, but all men are His offspring as His creatures. This being so, we ought not to think of God as something less than ourselves, or as the work of our own hands. And we should be those who seek after Him.
The word can sound like family language. One writer tests it against the line just before it:
The word "offspring" seems to denote relationship, but does it?... In quoting their poets, the apostle uses "offspring" to mean that they received their being: "In Him we live and move and have our being." The thought behind "offspring" is creaturehood, not relationship.
The word in the verse does not name God. It points to what is divine.
theios, that which is "divine": it is not like gold, silver, or stone, and so on, Acts 17:29. The word is translated "divine" in 2 Peter 1:3-4.
Gold, silver and stone fail twice over. The material is God's creature, and the shape is man's invention.
When man carves these materials with his skill and imagination, he only adds absurdity to absurdity. For the material was itself a creature of God, and the shape given to each was man's fancy and manufacture. "God is spirit," and so can be everywhere at once.
Paul says "we ought not," not "you ought not." His words here are gentler than Isaiah's on the same subject.
"We ought not" so to think, he says graciously, not forgetting that Israel too had to bear the sterner irony of Isaiah. A lifeless block that man shapes cannot be the God who made him and all things. It cannot properly represent Him either.
Paul removes every false likeness of God — and there is one likeness he does not remove.
But there is a true and perfect image of the invisible God, Jesus the Lord... He revealed God in His being and His character, and in the relationship of Father, as He the eternal Word and Son knew Him... And He is the only safeguard from false gods and from idols — from idols of the mind no less than material images.
- Origin. God breathed into man an inner life no animal received. That is why man is God's offspring.
- Argument. Since we came from God, God cannot come from us; the idols were the offspring of human art and imagination.
- Limit. All people are His offspring as creatures; only faith in Christ Jesus makes anyone a child of God.
- Reason. What links man to God is spirit, and no carving of gold, silver, or stone can picture that.
- Answer. Every false image falls, and one remains. Christ is the true image of the invisible God, and the safeguard from idols of the mind as well as of stone.