And her masters, seeing that the hope of their gains was gone, having seized Paul and Silas, dragged [them] into the market before the magistrates;
Paul's word to the evil spirit set a slave girl free, and in the same moment ended her owners' income. No one argues with the gospel here. The owners seize the preachers and march them to the market-place. The reason is money.
The attack on the missionaries now changed shape.
C. H. MackintoshBut no sooner was Satan repulsed as the serpent, than he took the character of a lion. Craft having failed, he tried violence.
The words for the owners' lost hope are worth a close look.
William KellyLiterally, "gone out"; it would seem in allusion to the going out of the demon.
Lost money set off the riot. One writer names the sin behind it and points out the exact title given to the officials of this Roman colony.
William KellyCovetousness is a mainspring of the world's activity, "covetousness, which is idolatry" (Col. 3:5). The men whose hope of gain vanished with the cast-out spirit seized Paul and Silas with no legal right. They dragged them into the market-place, where you would find the local rulers then, even more than now. Notice that only here does the inspired historian call the magistrates in Philippi by the Greek word that answers to praetors. This is striking evidence of exact accuracy. The city was a colony, and a colony was just Rome on a small scale, with its two chiefs.
One writer turns the owners' reaction on his own hearers.
W. T. P. WolstonThe fact is, if you want to touch a man of the world most effectively, the spot to touch is his pocket. There is scarcely a man here tonight who cannot be touched through his pocket. These men were touched there, for when Paul commanded the spirit, he came out of the girl. She was, in fact, delivered from the power of the devil, and that is what you need, my friend... it is a solemn truth that the man who is not under the power of the gospel is under the power of Satan.
The owners' complaint never mentions the girl herself.
A. J. PollockWhen her employers saw that the hope of making gain through this spiritist medium was gone, they decided to vent their rage on the servants of the Lord. They said nothing about the young woman, or about the real reason for their anger.
Instead of admitting the loss, the owners took the pose of civic-minded men. One writer traces the pattern behind the switch.
The Christian's FriendIt is worth noticing that, whatever his efforts, Satan cannot hide his true character. What was the cause of the enmity of these accusers of the apostles? Simply and only the loss of their gains, because the girl had been healed. But notice: they do not say a single word about this. Instead they come forward pretending to care for the peace of their city, like public benefactors. And to gain their object they bring a series of false accusations. As our Lord said of Satan, "When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies." (John 8:44.)
The charge they brought also played on Roman pride.
William KellyThis was calculated, and no doubt intended, to stir up the mob. They felt Roman pride and privilege all the more keenly because they were not purely Roman. Such people put up with each other's religions, but they were jealous of anything that looked like an attack on them. The appeal worked.
The seizure looks like a defeat. Read to the end of the chapter, and it becomes the route by which the gospel reaches a jailer's house.
J. N. DarbyBut God makes use of all this to direct the progress of His own work, and give it the form He pleases. There is the jailer to convert, and the magistrates themselves must confess their wrong towards the messengers of God. God gathers out the assembly, a flock (as the letter written to them shows) full of love and affection... The enemy was mistaken here. If he stopped their work at Philippi, he sent the apostles to preach elsewhere.
- Gain lost. The spirit went out of the girl. The owners' hope of gain went out with it. Lost income, not any teaching, started the riot.
- Gain exposed. Commentators name the real motive: covetousness, which is idolatry. Touch a worldly man's pocket and you find where he lives.
- Gain disguised. The owners say nothing about the girl or their lost money. They pose as protectors of the city and bring false charges instead.
- Gain aimed. Their charge stirred Roman pride in a Roman colony, and the crowd and the magistrates went along.
- Gain overruled. Satan meant it as a defeat. God made it the road to the jailer, to a loving church at Philippi, and to preaching further afield.
and having brought them up to the praetors, said, These men utterly trouble our city, being Jews,
Paul and Silas had just cost these men their income. A spirit had gone out of their slave girl, and the profits went with it. Yet the owners say nothing about money in front of the magistrates. They dress the complaint up as public concern: two Jews are disturbing our city.
One writer looks past the slave owners to what drives them.
William KellyThe enemy failed in his effort to mix himself up with God's work. So he falls back on his ordinary and natural way of fighting it: human interests and passions. Greed is one of the driving forces of the world's activity — "covetousness, which is idolatry" (Col. 3:5). These men lost their hope of gain when the spirit was cast out. So they broke the law themselves, seized Paul and Silas, and dragged them into the market-place, where the local rulers of that day could be found — even more so then than now. Only here does the inspired historian use for the magistrates of Philippi the Greek word that matches the Roman title praetors. This is a striking mark of accuracy: the city was a colony, and a colony was simply Rome on a small scale, with its two chief officers.
Their real grievance was money. In front of the magistrates they present themselves as good citizens instead.
C. E. StuartVirtuous, law-abiding people indeed! Worthy citizens of Philippi! This is the character they now put on. What had they cared about Roman law, or about the preaching of Paul and Silas, as long as their pockets were untouched? But now their source of income had dried up, and out they came in this new disguise. Satan can disguise himself as an angel of light when it suits his purposes.
The accusers bring two charges. One is true but proves nothing. The other has no evidence behind it.
The Christian's FriendNo one doubted that Paul and his companions were Jews. But there was no evidence at all that they had disturbed the city — except through the casting out of the evil spirit. The second charge could not be proved either: that they taught customs which Romans were not allowed to accept or practise. None of that mattered to the accusers, as long as they could get these preachers of the gospel condemned.
The word "Jews" was chosen with care. It touched the pride of a city that prized its Roman standing.
William KellyThis was calculated, and no doubt intended, to stir up the mob. The crowd was all the more touchy about Roman pride and privilege because they were not purely Roman themselves. Men who could count as Romans tolerated other religious groups among themselves, but they were jealous of anything that looked like an attack on them. The appeal worked.
The wording at Philippi is not original. The same complaint follows the message wherever it goes.
J. N. DarbyThis is an old accusation, and one which always comes from the wrong side. Pontius Pilate could find no fault in Jesus. Even so the priests and the rulers insisted all the more: "He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place," Luke 23:5. What do they say against Paul and Silas at Philippi? "These men are Jews, and they are disturbing our city," Acts 16:20. And at Thessalonica? "These men who have turned the world upside down have come here also," Acts 17:6.
The charge said troublemakers. Compare it with what these men had brought into the city.
W. W. FeredayBut "these men" had carried the gospel of the grace of God into Philippi. They were telling men and women who lived in the darkness of paganism, and who were rushing to destruction, about the Saviour who died for the ungodly. They were putting immense blessings within reach of the people, all "without money and without price." No truer friends ever visited the city. Yet these preachers stood before the magistrates charged with being troublemakers, and were flogged at once and thrown into prison!
The accusation succeeded, and God used its success to shape the work in that city.
J. N. DarbyBut God makes use of all this to direct the progress of His own work, and give it the form He pleases. The jailer is to be converted, and the magistrates themselves are to admit they were wrong about the messengers of God. A church is gathered out — a flock full of love and affection, as the letter written to them shows... The magistrates are forced to come and plead with Paul. Such is the result of the tumult. The enemy was mistaken here.
- Money first. The lost profit from the slave girl is the whole cause of the anger, yet greed never appears in the indictment.
- Mask second. The accusers pose as loyal, law-abiding citizens. They had cared nothing for Roman law until their pockets were touched.
- Mob third. Naming the prisoners as Jews in a proud Roman colony was aimed at the crowd, and it worked.
- A standing charge. The same complaint met Jesus before Pilate and Paul at Thessalonica. It always comes from the wrong side.
- Trouble turned to blessing. These "troublemakers" had brought the city the gospel free of charge. Out of the riot came a converted jailer, magistrates who admitted their wrong, and a church full of love.
and announce customs which it is not lawful for us to receive nor practise, being Romans.
In Philippi, a Roman colony, a slave girl is healed and her owners lose the money she earned for them. The charge they bring against Paul and Silas says nothing about money — it accuses two Jews of spreading customs Romans are not allowed to accept.
The accusation is careful to sound public-spirited. One writer points out how suddenly these men discovered a concern for Roman law:
C. E. StuartRoman law forbade interfering with a country's own religion. Now Paul and Silas were preaching Christ. So an accusation, an indictment, was ready to hand... Virtuous, law-abiding people indeed! Worthy citizens of Philippi! That is the character they now took on. Had they ever cared about Roman law, or about the preaching of Paul and Silas, while their pockets were safe? But once their source of gain dried up, they came out in this new guise.
Another writer sets their real motive beside the story they told:
The Christian's FriendWhat was the cause of the enmity of these accusers of the apostles? Simply and solely the loss of their gains, because the girl had been healed. But notice: they do not say a single word about that. Instead they come forward looking like men concerned for the peace of their city, as public benefactors. And to get what they want they present a series of false accusations.
The last two words of the charge are the sharp end of it. They were chosen to work on a particular audience:
William KellyThe accusers aimed this at the crowd, and no doubt meant to stir them up. The crowd was all the more touchy about Roman pride and privilege because they were not pure Romans. Men who could call themselves Romans might put up with other religions among themselves. But they resented anything that looked like an attack on them. The appeal worked.
Naming the two men as Jews worked the same lever from the other side:
G C WillisRemember that Philippi was a Roman colony. Many of its citizens were Romans, descended from Roman soldiers. They were very proud of being Romans, and they despised and hated the Jews... Paul was a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee, the strictest group among the Jews. His upbringing made him very proud of his race, and taught him to hate and despise those he called "sinners of the Gentiles."
Commentators differ here. Some hold the whole thing was a pretext with no substance:
Leslie M. GrantTheir accusers first denounce them because they were Jews, secondly because they said they were greatly troubling the city, and thirdly that they taught customs which these men alleged were unlawful for Romans to receive or observe. They have no specific charge of criminal activity.
Another writer allows that the second half of the charge had a legal edge to it, which is exactly why it could be used:
F. W. GrantThe prejudice against Jews was great. The last part of the charge held a certain amount of truth, and it had power to rouse the fanaticism of Romans. "Even under the republic, the letter of the Roman law opposed bringing in foreign religions. The law did allow exceptions, as with the Jews themselves. But its spirit condemned any change in worship that might unsettle the minds of the citizens, or stir up a noisy uproar."
The charge of disturbing the city was not new. It had come before, and it would come again:
J. N. DarbyThis is an old accusation, and one that always comes from the wrong side. Pontius Pilate could find no fault in Jesus. Still the priests and the rulers insisted all the more: "He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place" (Luke 23:5). What do they say against Paul and Silas at Philippi? That these Jews are disturbing the city. And at Thessalonica? "These men who have turned the world upside down have come here also" (Acts 17:6).
The charge was the reverse of the truth:
W. W. FeredayBut "these men" had carried into Philippi the gospel of the grace of God. They told men and women about the Saviour who died for the ungodly. These people were living in the darkness of paganism and hurrying to destruction... No truer friends of the people ever visited that city. Yet the preachers stood before the magistrates charged as troublemakers, and were flogged at once and thrown into prison!
The charge succeeded, the beating followed — and God used the whole thing:
J. N. DarbyBut God makes use of all this to direct the progress of His own work, and to give it the shape He pleases. There is the jailer to be converted. The magistrates themselves must confess that they were wrong about the messengers of God. God gathers out the assembly, a flock full of love and affection, as the letter written to them shows... The magistrates have to come to Paul and beg. That is the result of the riot. The enemy miscalculated here.
- Motive — the anger came from lost income; not a word of that reaches the courtroom.
- Mask — men who never cared about Roman law now pose as its defenders, because they lost money.
- Lever — the wording played on Roman pride and contempt for Jews, and the crowd responded.
- Label — the same complaint met Jesus before Pilate and Paul at Thessalonica. Men bringing the greatest blessing wore the label of public nuisance.
- Outcome — the enemy miscalculated. The riot converted a jailer, humbled the magistrates, and left a church full of love.
And the crowd rose up too against them; and the praetors, having torn off their clothes, commanded to scourge [them].
One accusation was enough for Philippi's magistrates: they skipped the trial and had Paul and Silas beaten with rods. Commentators ask why the city turned violent so fast, and why God allowed it.
The men who dragged Paul to court had lost their income. They said nothing about money, and one writer notes how fast greed dressed itself up as civic duty.
C. E. StuartRoman law did not allow anyone to interfere with a country's religion. Now Paul and Silas were preaching Christ. So a charge was ready and waiting... Virtuous, law-abiding people indeed! Worthy citizens of Philippi! That is the character they now took on. What had they ever cared about Roman law, or about the preaching of Paul and Silas, as long as nobody touched their pockets? But once their source of gain dried up, they appeared in this new guise.
Nobody examined the evidence. One writer traces where the pressure really came from.
J. N. DarbyThe motives were purely human, the influence was Satan's. The motives put before the magistrates were nothing but false pretexts. They worked on the pride and the fear of the authorities, who wanted peace. It was the enemies who disturbed that peace, not the Christians... The magistrates ask nothing more. The accusers had stirred up a crowd fighting for its privileges.
Commentators differ on how far the magistrates went with their own hands. The Greek word settles whose clothes came off, and it exposes the officials' own lawbreaking.
William KellyWe need not agree with Bengel that the two chief magistrates stripped Paul and Silas with their own hands. But the special word used, and the whole sense of the passage, rule out the idea that the magistrates tore their own clothes. They certainly gave the command to beat them with rods, though no court had condemned them. That was an open violation of Roman law, and it left the magistrates open to severe punishment if anyone had brought a case.
The same writer notes the exact title Luke uses here: praetors, the two chief magistrates of a Roman colony.
The beating goes back to an earlier choice. Paul had refused the help of the spirit in the slave girl.
C. H. MackintoshNature might have judged otherwise. But faith judges that the servant of Christ was far more in his right place in prison for the truth's sake than outside at his Master's expense. True, Paul might have saved himself. He could have been an honoured man, publicly owned as "a servant of the Most High God." He only had to accept the girl's testimony and let the devil help him in his work. But he could not do this, and so he had to suffer.
Nothing about the trial was legal. Yet one writer shows how God used the whole injustice to reach one man in that prison.
The Christian's FriendEvery form of law was twisted in this trial... So Satan seemed to have won a great victory. But why did the Lord allow His servants to be beaten like this? What follows gives the answer. In that prison there was a poor soul whom God, in His eternal counsels, had chosen in Christ... The unjust accusations, the violence of the crowd, the illegal action of the magistrates — these were simply His tools for carrying out His purpose. In this way the word of the gospel reached the jailer's home, and blessed him and his household. Satan, in all he did, was only the blind instrument of God's will.
Enduring the beating was not the end of the story. The wrong done to them still had to come into the open.
William KellyNow that they had endured all this, one thing needed to be proved. Paul and Silas were not criminals, justly punished with flogging and prison and the stocks. The guardians of the law themselves were guilty of open, obvious and inexcusable wrong against the preachers of the gospel... There was not the least sign of resentment. There was no wish to hurt these officials, or to squeeze anything out of men who now lay wholly in the power of those they had injured without cause.
- Pretext. The accusers posed as defenders of Roman law. The real grievance was their lost income, and opposition to the gospel often wears a respectable disguise.
- Pressure. Nobody persuaded the magistrates; false pretexts and fear of an uproar pushed them. No one examined the evidence.
- Price. Paul had already turned down the enemy's help. The flogging was the cost of that refusal. Faith counts prison for the truth better than freedom at the Master's expense.
- Purpose. God used the twisted trial, the mob and the illegal sentence. They carried the gospel to the jailer's household.
- Proof. In the end the wrongdoers, not the beaten men, stood exposed. The truth came out without a trace of resentment or revenge.
And having laid many stripes upon them they cast [them] into prison, charging the jailor to keep them safely;
The magistrates at Philippi had Paul and Silas beaten in public and locked away. The verse lists many blows, a prison, and an order to the jailer — and it raises one hard question: why did God allow this?
The beating was not the end of a legal process; it came instead of one. The men who ordered it were the ones breaking the law:
William KellyIt is certain that they gave the command to beat them with rods, though the men had not been condemned. This was an open violation of Roman law. It left the magistrates themselves open to severe punishment, if anyone had brought proceedings against them.
Paul had a way out. The slave girl's spirit kept calling him a servant of the Most High God. He could have let that praise stand.
C. H. MackintoshTrue, Paul might have saved himself. He might have been an honoured man, owned and acknowledged as "a servant of the Most High God." He only had to accept the slave girl's testimony and let the devil help him in his work. But he could not do this, and so he had to suffer.
The order was to hold them securely. The jailer went further — the inner cell, the stocks. One writer takes that as a window into the man himself:
H. H. SnellThey were brought to the prison, with a charge that the jailer would "keep them safely." But we are told that "he put them into the inner prison and fastened their feet in the stocks." That shows us they had no favour with the jailer at that time. It is enough to show us the condition of his heart. He did not know God's love, and did not feel it. So his heart had none of that love for fellow believers which always marks those who are born of God.
Judged by appearances, Satan had won. Looked at from God's side, the sentence delivered Paul to an address God had already chosen.
The Christian's FriendIn that particular prison there was a poor soul whom God, in His eternal purpose, had chosen in Christ. He was therefore the object of God's mercy and grace… But the time had now come, in God's purpose, to bring this hardened soul out of darkness into His marvellous light. The unjust accusations, the violence of the crowd, the illegal action of the magistrates — these were simply the instruments for carrying out God's purpose. By these means the word of the gospel reached the jailer's home, for the blessing of himself and his household. In everything he had done, Satan was only the blind instrument of God's will.
Count the results of that riot, and the arithmetic runs against the people who started it:
J. N. DarbyBut God makes use of all this to direct the progress of His own work and give it the form He pleases. There is the jailer to be converted, and the magistrates themselves are to confess their wrong towards the messengers of God. The assembly is gathered out, a flock (as the letter written to them shows) full of love and affection… The enemy was mistaken here. If he stopped their work at Philippi, he sent the apostles to preach elsewhere.
By midnight, the men with the wounded backs were praying and singing, and the other prisoners were listening. Commentators return to that scene for what it teaches about where joy actually comes from:
C. H. MackintoshFaith can sing as sweetly in a dungeon as at a prayer meeting. It does not matter where we are, as long as we have God with us. His presence lights up the darkest cell and turns a dungeon into the very gate of Heaven. He can make His servants happy anywhere. He can give them victory over the most hostile circumstances. He can make them shout for joy where human nature would be overwhelmed with sorrow.
- Struck. The blows came before any verdict. The magistrates ordered rods for men they had not condemned, and broke the Roman law they were meant to enforce.
- Chosen. Paul could have escaped all of it by accepting the slave girl's testimony and letting the devil help his work. He refused, and the beating was the price.
- Sealed. The order was to keep them safely. The jailer added the inner cell and the stocks. That extra cruelty exposed a heart that had never known God's love.
- Sent. The prison was an address, not an accident. One chosen soul was there, and the injustice carried the gospel into his house.
- Sung. Faith can sing in a dungeon, because God's presence turns it into the gate of Heaven. The enemy's apparent win converted a jailer, shamed the magistrates, and gathered a church.
who, having received such a charge, cast them into the inner prison, and secured their feet to the stocks.
The jailer here does more than his orders require. He picks the deepest cell and the stocks, and locks himself in with the message that will save him.
The word behind "stocks" describes a wooden frame that clamped the legs, and it appears elsewhere in Scripture as an instrument of affliction.
Morrish Bible DictionaryStocks in which the feet were shut up. Job 13:27; Job 33:11; Acts 16:24.
The "inner prison" was the innermost cell, past the guards — the hardest place to escape from and the worst place to be. One writer fills in what that meant for two men whose backs had just been torn open:
A J PollockNot content with putting them into the inner prison, he placed their feet fast in the stocks. Their backs were cut and bleeding. They were weak from loss of blood. This was a horrible Eastern prison of the first century, very likely with no daylight, overrun with vermin, and with no sanitation at all. Their feet were fast in the stocks, which held them in one position. It allowed neither comfort, rest, nor sleep.
His orders were to keep them secure. What he did went further, and reads like a man enjoying his work.
W. T. P. WolstonThe jailer seems to take a brutal pleasure in his treatment of them. He does not say, "Come along; I am sorry I must lock you up." Instead he appears to serve the master he had then with delight. He "put them into the inner prison and fastened their feet in the stocks."
The cell and the stocks came at the end of a process with no legal footing. The beating came before any trial.
William KellyIt is certain that they ordered the men to be beaten with rods, though no court had condemned them. That was an open violation of Roman law. If anyone had brought a case, the magistrates themselves would have faced severe punishment.
The injustice was not left buried. Later the magistrates tried to release the two men quietly, and Paul refused to slip away.
William KellyBut now that they had endured this, it was right that one thing be proved. Paul and Silas were not evildoers, justly punished with scourging and prison and the stocks. The guardians of the law were the guilty ones. Their unrighteousness against the preachers of the gospel was flagrant, obvious, and inexcusable.
It looks as if the enemy had won and the mission was over. Commentators point instead to one soul inside that prison.
The Christian's FriendTo all appearance, Satan had gained a notable victory. But why did the Lord allow His servants to be beaten like this? The answer comes in what follows. There was a poor soul in that prison. In the eternal counsels of God he had been chosen in Christ, and so he was the object of God's mercy and grace... The unjust accusations, the violent crowd, the illegal action of the magistrates — these were only the means of accomplishing God's purpose. By them the word of the gospel came into the home of the jailer.
The one who drove this attack got the opposite of what he wanted.
C. H. MackintoshHow little the devil expected such a result from the imprisonment of the Lord's servants! He was outwitted. The tables turned on him. He meant to hinder the gospel, and look — he was made to help it on. He hoped to get rid of two of Christ's servants, and instead he lost one of his own.
In that cell the stocks did not have the last word.
C. H. MackintoshWhat are stripes or stocks, or prison walls, or gloomy nights? They are only a dark background that makes the living grace in them shine out, bright and beautiful. Talk of circumstances! It is little any of us know of trying circumstances. The small annoyances of daily life are often more than enough to make us lose our balance. Paul and Silas were in trying circumstances indeed.
Paul later wrote to the believers at Philippi about his chains. They already knew what his chains could do.
Hamilton SmithHis chains had become a way of reaching men in the highest positions. The believers knew this already. When he was with them at Philippi, he could sing praise after being thrown into the inner prison, and there his chains became the way of reaching a sinner at the lowest social level. The stocks, the dungeon, and the midnight darkness all served to carry the gospel further.
- The stocks — feet clamped fast in the deepest cell. His orders were to keep them secure. He went further, and made them as uncomfortable as he could.
- The injustice — men beaten before any trial, an open breach of Roman law. Paul would not let the magistrates bury it quietly.
- The target — the enemy seemed to have shut down the work. But the one soul God was after was already inside that prison.
- The song — stripes, stocks and midnight did not silence them. They became the dark background that showed off the grace in them.
- The result — the enemy meant to cost the gospel two servants, and lost one of his own instead. The stocks carried the message into the jailer's house.
And at midnight Paul and Silas, in praying, were praising God with singing, and the prisoners listened to them.
At Philippi, Paul and Silas had been beaten, thrown into prison, and locked in the stocks. How could two men in that state spend midnight praying and singing, and what did the other prisoners hear?
That jail had heard plenty of noise at night. One writer sets the usual sound beside this one.
C. E. StuartPrisoners had no doubt shouted many curses in that place. They were powerless to do more than curse, or to threaten those who had imprisoned them. But with Paul and Silas how different! For "at midnight they prayed and sang praises to God." Prayer might not seem out of place. But praises — who would have expected them? These were clearly no weak efforts to cheer each other up, or to put a brave face on their troubles. For the prisoners heard them. Those whose feet were fast in the stocks, unable to move or even shift their position, were the freest in spirit that night.
One Greek word lies behind "singing hymns." Older translations render it "sang praises." The same word turns up in two other scenes.
Morrish Bible DictionarySinging and praise belong together. At the first Lord's Supper they "sang a hymn" — the Greek word is hymneo — Matthew 26:30. Translators render the same word "sang praises" to God when Paul and Silas were in prison, Acts 16:25. And the Lord sings praise among His people, Psalm 22:22; Hebrews 2:12.
The verse names two things they did: they prayed, and they sang. One writer sees in that pair the work of a priest.
W. T. P. WolstonSuppose someone had passed by outside that night, not knowing the circumstances. He would have concluded that they were having a good time in there. But what were the facts? The stocks held their feet fast. Their backs were sore and bleeding from the beating they had received. They were hungry, cold, and without comfort — and yet they were not only praying, but praising. They were showing the character of holy priests, and were soon to act as royal priests. As holy priests they were turning to God in prayer and intercession, and offering up to Him praise and thanksgiving. They were able to thank and bless the Lord in the worst circumstances.
The verse does not record what they asked for. One writer pictures the prayer men like this would make.
W. T. P. WolstonI do not think their prayer was, "Lord, let us out." I believe they prayed, "Lord, turn this to Your glory. Turn this to the salvation of souls. Turn this to the blessing of precious souls in this prison. And, O Lord, keep those who have believed, and especially Lydia — keep them firm."
The verse ends by noting that the prisoners were listening. To Roman ears, the sound was something new.
Numerical Bible NotesWhat a new sound it must have been! Suppose it had happened in a Christian land — however poorly any land deserves that name. We would think of the memories such a sound would stir in even the hardest hearts. But here there were no memories to stir. It was a new gospel of gladness going out, which those old Romans knew nothing of in such circumstances. They could die well, as we know. They faced death stern and grim, with a song on their lips too, as heroes and patriots. But all that was inspiration from earthly sources, and nothing strange to men. Here was inspiration of another kind. It was a new sound, not of this world, and it held the listeners by its confidence and joy in a God they could not see.
The jail looked like the enemy's victory. One writer reads that night the other way round.
Edward DennettSatan had stirred up the city against these servants of the Lord. He thought he had won a great victory by getting them imprisoned. But God would have the glory over the enemy, and so He filled the mouths of Paul and Silas with praise in the very seat of the enemy's power. God had given them songs in the night. Those songs went up like sweet incense before His throne, and a testimony went with them that bore fruit for eternity.
- Pain. Bleeding backs, a locked cell, feet in stocks, midnight. Nothing in the setting explains the sound that came out of it.
- Prayer. Prison walls could not hold their prayers in. One writer thinks they asked for God's glory and for the new believers, not for release.
- Praise. One Greek word covers the hymn at the Lord's Supper and the song the Lord sings among His people. This is worship, not a way to keep spirits up.
- Priesthood. Prayer for others and praise to God is the work of a holy priest. The worst circumstances do not stop it.
- Prisoners. Someone was always listening. A joy the Roman world knew nothing of became a testimony that bore fruit for eternity.