And much discussion having taken place, Peter, standing up, said to them, Brethren, *ye* know that from the earliest days God amongst you chose that the nations by my mouth should hear the word of the glad tidings and believe.
The church leaders met in Jerusalem over one burning question. Did Gentile believers have to be circumcised and keep the law of Moses before God would save them? Peter answers with no opinion of his own, but with something God had already done through him.
Peter stood up only after a long argument. One writer draws a lesson from the fact that the Holy Spirit recorded that argument at all.
Verse 7 tells us there was much debate or questioning. No doubt it was sad and humbling that they argued like this, even in front of the apostles. But the fact is plain, and the Holy Spirit records it calmly. That should convince quite a few people how far their idea of church order differs from the earliest history. Even in the apostles' days we see how liberty prevailed, though the flesh took advantage of it. Destroying that liberty because people abuse it would be a cure worse than the disease.
Peter dates God's choice to a time already well past. One writer pins the phrase to a definite moment.
In Acts 15:7 Peter speaks of God choosing him to preach the gospel to the nations from the earliest (or ancient) days. He no doubt means the beginning of the church at Pentecost.
Peter held keys, and keys are for opening. One writer counts two doors that Peter opened with them.
The main use of keys is to open doors. So in Acts 2 God chose Peter to preach the first sermon after the Holy Spirit came down from heaven. Three thousand people were brought to repentance, and baptised at once in the Saviour's name. But these were Jews only. In Acts 10 the same apostle preached Christ for the first time to a Gentile gathering. The happy result: everyone gathered in Cornelius' house believed.
Peter reminds them of what they already knew. He was the apostle sent to the Jews, yet the first Gentiles heard the gospel from him. One writer reads that as honour God placed on Peter.
That gives us the particular work of Peter. My aim has been to show how God put honour on that blessed servant of His. It was by his mouth that the Jews, as a whole, heard the gospel in its fullness and received the Holy Spirit... Peter was used to preach to the Gentiles first of all; and Paul, I would note, was used to write to the Jews last of all. Both came at just the right time. This shuts out all thought of independence, since some might have thought Peter was out of his place. He was the apostle of the circumcision. Yes, but for all that, it was by his mouth that the Gentiles first heard the gospel.
Peter argues from history, not theory. One writer explains why Acts keeps returning to one Gentile household.
The fact was that God had already decided the point in principle by what He did in the case of Cornelius. We can now understand why so much space is given to that case in the Acts; for this is the third time it is brought before us.
The strict party in the church expected Paul to defend the Gentiles. They did not expect Peter to do it.
How sweet is the grace of God, and what an unexpected blow to the claims of the Pharisees who believed! And this from Peter! If Paul had said it, there would have been less to wonder at. The apostle of the Gentiles (so they were inclined to think) would of course speak up for the Gentiles. But what about Peter? What led the great apostle of the circumcision to speak like this? And to say it in front of the twelve apostles, in Jerusalem itself?
- Chosen — Peter traces the Gentile mission to God's choice, not to any plan or preference of his own.
- Sent — God sent Peter to the Jews, yet his mouth opened the door to the nations too. Acts 2 and Acts 10 are the two openings.
- Heard — the Gentiles heard the word of the gospel from him, and they believed.
- Settled — God had already decided the question in Cornelius' house. That is why Acts tells the story three times.
- Free — the truth came out through open debate; people may abuse that liberty, but destroying it is a cure worse than the disease.
And the heart-knowing God bore them witness, giving [them] the Holy Spirit as to us also,
A dispute had broken out. Did Gentile believers have to be circumcised and keep the law of Moses? Peter answered with a fact, not an argument: God Himself had already spoken. The verse turns on what God knows (the heart) and what God gave (the Holy Spirit). Then comes the short phrase that levels everything — "just as He did to us."
Peter did not open a new debate. He pointed back to the house of Cornelius, where Gentiles had received the Spirit years before.
There was much "disputing," or "discussion," and then Peter made a decisive pronouncement, by referring to the case of Cornelius, in which he had himself been involved. He pointed out that the heart-knowing God had borne witness to these Gentile converts by giving them the Holy Spirit — the same gift He had given to the Jewish believers on the Day of Pentecost. God had cleansed these Gentiles, as Peter's vision of the great sheet showed. He purified their hearts by faith, not by any ceremonial washing. In fact God had already settled the point in principle by what He did with Cornelius. We can now see why Acts gives so much space to that case; this is the third time it comes before us.
The title Peter uses for God is the hinge of his case. Men could only judge by what they saw. God knew what was inside these Gentiles, and He said so.
Ordinarily the Spirit came after faith. It was God who knew the faith of their hearts, bearing witness to them as His by the outward sign. They occupied the same level with the apostles and the saints of Judea.
That title carried weight in an argument about freedom, and the following verse names what God had seen there.
Our apostle claimed the same grace for the believing Gentiles when he pleaded the cause of their liberty against those who sought to put them under law: "And the heart-knowing God bore them witness, giving the Holy Spirit just as to us also, and made no difference between us and them, having cleansed their hearts by faith."
"Bore witness" is the language of evidence. Peter names what God put on record.
Here again the gift of the Holy Spirit is quoted as the voucher upon which the Jewish Christians acted in their first reception of their Gentile brothers to a recognised position in the new community.
The witness was not given to good intentions in the abstract. Cornelius was already a God-fearing man, yet something had to be heard and believed before the Spirit came.
He needed to hear the word of truth, the gospel of his salvation; and that gospel went out once Christ had finished His work. Without this, as the fruit of Christ's work, the Holy Spirit could not be given. But as Cornelius and the rest listened, the heart-knowing God bore them witness; and they received the Holy Spirit as the Jewish saints did at Pentecost.
The event did not reveal every truth about the church. It did settle one thing beyond argument.
Peter's vision and the admission of Cornelius only showed that in every nation the one who feared God was acceptable to Him. In a word, the favour of God was not limited to the Jews. There was no need to become a Jew to share the salvation that is in Christ… The Holy Spirit — the seal of Christian blessing among the Jews, the fruit of redemption accomplished by Jesus — was given to Gentiles as to Jews. The Jews might be astonished at it; but there was no resisting God.
Peter stated this truth himself. Later he acted as though the old line still stood.
It might seem a small matter for Peter to treat the Jewish believers as Jews and the Gentile believers as Gentiles. That was the practice of his nation in past centuries. But in doing so, Peter was actually denying what he himself had established in preaching the gospel — that God now put no difference between Jews and Gentiles.
- Witness. God did not send an opinion into the debate. He had already given His verdict at Cornelius's house, and Peter only reported it.
- Heart. Peter calls Him the God who knows the heart: He read faith where men saw only an uncircumcised Gentile.
- Gift. The proof He chose was the Holy Spirit Himself — the voucher the first believers acted on when receiving Gentiles.
- Ground. The gift rested on Christ's finished work and on the gospel heard and believed. Without that, God could not give the Spirit.
- Equality. "Just as He did to us" removes the difference — Peter's own later conduct denied the truth he had established.
and put no difference between us and them, having purified their hearts by faith.
Peter speaks these words in a heated debate at Jerusalem: do Gentile believers need circumcision and the law of Moses? He answers from what God had already done at Caesarea, and that raises a deeper question — what makes a person clean before God?
The argument was about ordinances. Peter answered by pointing to what God had already done without them.
Peter reminds the assembly how God had chosen him first to bring the gospel to the Gentiles. God had given the Spirit to Cornelius, though he was not circumcised. God Himself had testified to them by the Holy Spirit, just as He had to the believing Jews. He had made no difference between them, purifying their hearts by faith. ... For did not they themselves believe that they had been saved by the grace of the Lord Jesus, and not by ordinances?
So what ended the difference? Commentators point back to the cross.
Peter receives a threefold testimony of God's purifying the Gentiles by faith, instead of separating Israel by circumcision. The cross had changed everything, and put no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile. The Jew had lost his old superiority according to the flesh. Both alike were now open to far better blessings in Christ by faith.
Could legal ceremonies have done this work instead?
Would the objectors argue that purification by legal ceremonies was necessary? Such things could really only serve to sanctify the flesh. But God looks at the heart. Now He had purified the hearts of those Gentiles by faith... So the ground was being cut away from under their feet — and by the apostle to the Jews.
So what does this cleansing remove?
Faith in our Lord Jesus Christ as made known in the gospel produces a moral cleansing in the heart, the seat of the affections, cleansing it from the defilement that belonged to it as inherited from Adam.
Faith is never empty. It receives something.
Now when God's word enters the soul by faith, it deals with the conscience in a purifying way; it awakens a sense of sin, and produces repentance toward God. That is why Peter speaks of cleansing our hearts by faith (Acts 15:9)... It was God's word which worked in His grace. It was received not as men's word, but as what it truly is — God's word, which also works effectively in those who believe (1 Thess. 2:13).
If God has already done the cleansing, adding legal demands is not caution. It is opposition.
God Himself had worked to remove the difference between Jewish and Gentile believers. He purified their hearts by faith, not by ordinances. Could they dare to ignore the immense significance of this? If so, they were tempting God. They were opposing what He Himself had done, and putting a yoke on the neck of Gentile believers which Israel had never been able to bear.
The speech left Peter with nothing extra to claim for his own nation.
Peter thus formally abandoned all special claims for himself and others of his nation. He was from then on content to be numbered with those of foreign race as together sinners saved by grace.
Yet holding a truth and living it are two things. Peter later drew back from eating with Gentiles. One writer says that in doing so, "Peter was actually denying what he himself had established in preaching the gospel — that God now put no difference between Jews and Gentiles" (William J Hocking).
- Heart — ceremonies could only reach the flesh. God looks at the heart, so He worked where only He can see.
- Faith — His word received by faith did the cleansing. It dealt with the conscience, not with circumcision or law-keeping.
- No difference — the cross changed everything. The Jew's old advantage was gone, and both alike now had far better blessings in Christ.
- No yoke — adding legal demands after God has cleansed tempts God. It loads on a burden Israel itself could never carry.
- No special claims — Peter ends by saying that Jews are saved just as Gentiles are. The same truth must then show in who believers will eat with.
Now therefore why tempt ye God, by putting a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear?
Peter breaks a long, heated debate at Jerusalem with one question: why are you testing God? Some believers wanted non-Jewish converts circumcised and placed under the law of Moses. Peter answers by calling that law a yoke — one his own nation had never managed to carry.
Peter does not argue about details. He asks what their own experience had already taught them. One writer sets out his questions.
Had He said anything about some extra work that Moses had to do in them? And what did their own experience tell them about the yoke of the law? Would they lay on these new disciples what they and their fathers had found impossible to carry? That would be tempting God, not pleasing Him: forcing on them what He had plainly set aside in His ways.
The demand looked small: one ceremony. In fact it bound a man to the whole legal system. That system came in with glory, but it brought condemnation, not rescue.
Their prejudice was itself a real disbelief of God's word and acts, and worse still if they held on to it. It put a yoke of law on the neck of the disciples that no one, past or present, could bear: a circumcised man was in debt to keep the whole law. The law was brought in with glory, yet it is a ministry of death and condemnation.
The word Peter chose was a farming picture, and one writer had watched the reality of it.
Many years ago I remember seeing the huge South African wagons drawn by twelve or even sixteen oxen yoked in pairs. They were magnificent beasts with mighty horns, but they seemed to groan as they lumbered forward with heads pressed down by the yoke. They looked very uncomfortable — but no more so than many a sinner whose conscience is weighed down under the holy law of God.
The fault was never in the law itself. One writer points to what happens when the law meets the human heart.
To a conscience awakened by the entrance of divine light, what can be more unbearable than the bondage of law? … Paul has told us how the law's own prohibitions stirred up in him the desire it condemned. The commandment was holy, just, and good. Yet when it came to him as it really is, sin came back to life and he "died" (Rom. 7:9). Before that, he had been so little aware of that sin that it seemed dead. This is the powerlessness of law.
Jesus had already invited the people that this weight was crushing. Sincerity made the load heavier, not lighter.
He addressed His invitation especially to "all who labor and are heavy laden." He meant those who were sincerely and devoutly trying to keep the law. That law, as Peter said, was "a yoke … that neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear." The more sincere they were, the heavier their load under that yoke. … They could now exchange the burdensome yoke of the law for the light and easy yoke of Christ. They would learn from Him things the law could never teach them.
This is not only ancient history. One writer asks what God Himself wanted for people the gospel had already freed.
God did not want to put a yoke on the neck of people whose hearts the gospel of peace had set free. He would rather urge them to stand firm in the liberty of Christ, and not be trapped again under a yoke of slavery. … How could we ever admit the thought that those whom God had received in grace He would rule by law? Impossible.
And the burden has not lightened with the centuries:
So we see that whether in the days of Peter and Paul or in our own day the yoke is the same; the slavery and the bondage have not changed in the least. We find the same groans of despair both now and 1900 years ago.
- Tested — Laying the law on people God had already accepted is not zeal. It is tempting God, by forcing back what He had set aside.
- Yoked — One ceremony put a man in debt to keep the whole law. That system is a ministry of death and condemnation.
- Unbearable — The law is good. The weakness shows when it meets the human heart, where its own bans stir up what they forbid.
- Exchanged — Christ does more than lift the heavy yoke. He offers His own, light and easy, and teaches what the law never could.
- Repeated — The same mistake returns wherever believers received in grace are then ruled by law. The groans have not changed in 1900 years.
But we believe that we shall be saved by the grace of the Lord Jesus, in the same manner as they also.
At the Jerusalem council the young church faced a question that could have split it in two: did Gentile believers have to become Jews to be saved? Peter's closing sentence reversed the question and put Jew and Gentile on the same footing.
Some teachers were telling Gentile converts they must be circumcised, as the law of Moses required. One writer shows what that demand really meant.
Under the law, circumcision tied a person to Judaism. By asking for it, these teachers were trying to put back the dividing wall that God had broken down. There is no such wall in the church. We who belong to the church stand on a completely new basis, because whether Jew or Gentile we are made one new man... So these men came down and said, in effect, "You will have to make these people second-rate Jews. You'll have to bring them into our legal system, or they'll never be saved."
Before speaking of grace, Peter appealed to Jewish experience of the law itself — a yoke their fathers could not bear. Loading it onto Gentile necks was not merely unwise; it was testing God.
God did not want to "put a yoke on the neck" of people whose hearts the gospel of peace had set free... Could we ever accept the thought that God would receive people in grace and then rule them by law? Impossible. Peter says, "We believe that we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will." Both groups were now to be "saved through grace" — the Jews, who had received the law, and the Gentiles, who never had. And they were not only "saved" by grace. They were to "stand" in grace (Rom. 5:2) and to "grow in grace" (2 Peter 3:18). To teach anything else was to put God to the test.
The striking thing is the direction of Peter's comparison. He does not measure the Gentiles by the Jews; he measures the Jews by the Gentiles.
The way verse 11 reads is remarkable. It does not say, "they, the Gentiles, will be saved just as we Jews will," but, "we will be saved just as they will." The Gentiles could be saved on no ground but grace, and the Jew must come in on this ground too.
That reversal costs the Jewish believer his position of privilege. He is only too glad to lose it.
He does not say, "They will be saved just as we will." No — he says, "We will be saved just as they will": on the same ground, on the same pattern, in the same way. The Jew comes down from his high position of privilege, only too thankful to be saved, just like the poor Gentile, by the precious grace of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Who said this matters. Peter was the apostle sent to the Jews, and so the last man the law party expected to argue against them.
How sweet the grace of God is, and what an unexpected blow to the claims of the Pharisees who believed! And this came from Peter! If Paul had said it, there would have been less to wonder at. The apostle to the Gentiles (so they were inclined to think) would of course speak up for the Gentiles — but Peter? What made the great apostle to the Jews speak like this? And say it in Jerusalem itself, in front of the twelve apostles?
Peter's words expose a confusion in the people pressing the law. They were unclear about their own salvation, not just about the Gentiles'.
Peter goes further still in verse 11. The attitude of these teachers showed that they were not clear about the principles of their own salvation... Jewish believers would be saved in the same way as Gentiles: only through the grace of the Lord Jesus, not by adding circumcision or law-keeping. Since this is true, no one could ask Gentiles to keep Old Testament laws and ceremonies.
The principle still holds wherever a Jewish person believes today. Commentators point out that the entrance is the same one:
In doing so, they take the same ground as the Gentiles; as Peter says — "We (the Jews) shall be saved, even as they" (Acts 15:11).
- Yoke. God had set these hearts free by the gospel. He does not then rule by law those He has received in grace, and teaching otherwise puts God to the test.
- Grace. Salvation comes through the grace of the Lord Jesus. Believers then stand and grow in that same grace. It is never a starting point that rules take over later.
- Reversal. Peter does not say Gentiles are saved like Jews. He says Jews are saved like Gentiles — same ground, same way.
- Speaker. Peter was the apostle sent to the Jews. He said this in Jerusalem, and it left the law party with nothing to stand on.
- Result. The dividing wall is gone. Jew and Gentile come in by one door. Adding circumcision or law-keeping to that door only shows confusion about your own salvation.