And the report concerning them reached the ears of the assembly which was in Jerusalem, and they sent out Barnabas to go through as far as Antioch
News that non-Jews at Antioch were turning to the Lord reached Jerusalem. The answer was not a letter but a man. Why send him, and what did his visit settle for every church after?
The verse says "the church in Jerusalem." Scripture speaks of one church in a city, however many believers were in it.
J. N. DarbyWhat were churches or assemblies? These were local. The apostle could say, "To the church of God that is in Corinth." It represented the whole unity of the body in that place. Even in one place, there could not be two bodies of Christ. In Acts 11:22 we have the assembly that was in Jerusalem, though it was very large; in Acts 13 the assembly that was at Antioch. All Scripture clearly shows there was one assembly in a place, which was God's assembly.
Barnabas came to look and to report. Notice what he did not carry with him.
F. W. GrantStill, the new work is not to drift into independence from the old. Jerusalem itself is to acknowledge and accept it, as it accepted the reception of Cornelius and his company at Caesarea. So when the report reaches the Jewish capital, they send Barnabas to go as far as Antioch — a well-chosen representative. He does not go with authority, and he does not try to use any. When the apostles visited Samaria, they had something lacking to supply. Barnabas has no such task among these Syrian brothers. They have clearly received the Spirit, as the believers at Caesarea did, without needing apostles or the laying on of hands.
Others make the same distinction by noting who sent him and for what: the sending was for investigation, and any ministry he did at Antioch was his own gift in exercise, not a commission from a church.
Other AuthorsThe church at Jerusalem sent Barnabas (Acts 11:22), but this again was on an errand of investigation, and not for ministry. He exercised his ministry, but was not sent by any church for this.
The visit did more than produce a report. It joined the first Gentile church to the place where everything had begun, and no one guarded a territory.
J. N. DarbyThe church in Jerusalem did send Barnabas to Antioch. That church held a special position, as we have seen, since all the apostles were there. But he was not sent there as an evangelist. He went for that church, to visit believers who had already come to know the Lord. They had heard from men who preached, sent out by nothing except persecution. So the first church of the Gentiles and the church in Jerusalem — the church where everything had begun — were identified with each other. There was none of the jealousy that talks about "my field of work." The church in Jerusalem sends Barnabas where others had worked, and Barnabas is more than happy to find Paul. They all had one object: Christ and the good of souls.
The choice was fitting. A cold examiner could have chilled the work; the man sent was suited to judge it fairly and to reassure those who had sent him.
William KellyBarnabas then, who was of Cyprus, though a Levite, comes to Antioch on his mission of inquiry. Nor can we imagine one more admirably chosen, if a warm heart devoted to Christ were wanted to judge fairly of the work in Antioch and to reassure those in Jerusalem adequately.
What made him fit was not his office but living faith. That is why he could tell a real work of God when he saw one.
The Christian's FriendWhen news of this striking work reached the assembly at Jerusalem, they sent Barnabas — clearly to inspect and report. When he arrived and saw the grace of God, he rose above all his Jewish leanings and prejudices. He accepted the work as God's work with all his heart, and joined in helping to minister to the new believers. We gather two things. The Spirit controlled him, and his faith was alive and active, so that he embraced the truth of God's purpose to bless the Gentiles. That is how he detected that the work he had come to examine was a genuine work of grace.
The preachers Barnabas came to inspect held no office. They were ordinary believers, sent out by nothing but persecution.
J. N. DarbyLet us remember this: the first spread of the gospel among the nations did not come through official preachers. It came through ordinary Christians. No man sent them out; love for Christ moved them. And in the providence of God, the free activity of Christians became the occasion of Paul's mission.
Once endorsed, that city took on a role Jerusalem had held.
Morrish Bible DictionaryAntioch, not Jerusalem, now became a centre for spreading the gospel. It did not depend on apostolic authority. Yet it did not break the unity of the Spirit by forming a separate church.
- News. Word of the conversions reached Jerusalem, and the church there did not ignore it. It sent a man.
- Sent. Barnabas went as a representative on an errand of inquiry; he carried no authority and did not try to exercise any.
- Seen. He was chosen because he could see: a warm heart, living faith, and eyes that knew real grace when it appeared among Gentiles.
- Joined. The visit tied the first Gentile church to Jerusalem, with no jealousy over territory on either side.
- Sent out. Ordinary believers, not officials, began the work. Antioch then became a centre for the gospel, without becoming a separate church.
who, having arrived and seeing the grace of God, rejoiced, and exhorted all with purpose of heart to abide with the Lord;
At Antioch, large numbers of non‑Jews turned to the Lord. News reached the church in Jerusalem, and they sent Barnabas to see what was happening. This verse records what he saw, how he felt, and the one sentence of counsel he gave.
Barnabas came to see, and what he saw was grace.
J T MawsonThe grace they had received, and were still receiving, from the Lord could be seen. It touched every part of their lives, and Barnabas was glad when he saw it. It is a good thing when the grace of God is seen. There is nothing so delightful to the anointed eye as the grace of God. It pleases the eye and rejoices the heart. There is no sight like it on earth.
Barnabas had no part in this work. Others had preached, and the blessing was theirs.
F. B. HoleBarnabas came and at once recognized a true work of the grace of God. God had used others for this, not himself or the leaders in Jerusalem. Instead of being jealous, he was glad, and he helped the work forward by his encouragement. But then he was a good man, full of the Holy Spirit and of faith, so he did not care about his own reputation but about the glory of Christ. The working of God's grace was the great thing with Barnabas, no matter who God used to bring it about.
Barnabas could have taken charge at Antioch. He did not.
Numerical Bible NotesHe does not come with authority, and he does not try to use any. He has no task, as the apostles had on their visit to Samaria, of supplying anything lacking in these Syrian believers... Barnabas sees the grace of God in them, and is glad, and simply urges them all to cleave to the Lord with purpose of heart — a word that is never out of place. Here it is his character that is described, not his office.
The ESV says "remain faithful to the Lord." Older translations say "cleave to the Lord," and the writers quoted here use that older wording. So what does cleaving look like day to day?
George BellFruitfulness comes from abiding in Christ. What does that really mean? It may be easier to understand if we put it like this: "Keep close to the Lord! Draw everything you need from Him." In Acts 11:23 a servant of the Lord named Barnabas urged the believers "that with purpose of heart they would cleave to the Lord." The word "cleave" is also the same word as "abide" in the original.
What sort of purpose did Barnabas call for? The word he used answers that.
J. A. TrenchThe word for "purpose" means, from the verb behind it, what I set before myself, and so propose and determine... It is "purpose of heart" in Acts 11:23, and in five other places it describes the purposes of God's heart: Rom. 8:28; Rom. 9:11; Ephesians 1:11; Eph. 3:11; 2 Timothy 1:9.
That decision will be tested.
The Christian's FriendWe must be ready for the test that is sure to come to everyone who confesses the name of Jesus and owns Him as Saviour and Lord. Usually it comes first as a flood of persecution, raised to terrify the heart and crush the spirit. If that does not succeed, the enemy tries to draw the heart away from Christ and lure it into some carefully prepared trap.
Barnabas told them to cleave to "the Lord." Mawson asks why he chose that title.
J T MawsonHe did not say "Cleave to the Shepherd" or "Cleave to the Saviour." Why? The Shepherd will cleave to us with an almighty hand. That is how He holds His sheep despite every threatening enemy, and those He saves are safe for ever. But as Lord we must cleave to Him if we are to bear true witness to Him in this world, for all the grace we need is in Him... we are in enemy country, and we must keep close to the base of our supplies.
Barnabas's call rests on something that had already happened at Antioch.
The Christian's FriendNotice carefully the words the Spirit of God uses to describe their conversion — they "believed, and turned to the Lord." This is very beautiful and instructive. It gives the true key to, and the basis of, the words Barnabas spoke to them soon after — he "exhorted them all, that with purpose of heart they would cleave to the Lord." This exhortation assumes that they had first "turned to the Lord," and grows out of it.
- Seen — Grace at Antioch was not a report but a sight. It had changed every part of their lives, and that is what Barnabas looked at first.
- Glad — He rejoiced over fruit that gave him no credit. Christ's glory mattered more to him than his own name.
- Sent, not superior — Jerusalem sent him, and he encouraged instead of commanding. Scripture praises his character, not his office.
- Cleave — The word means to stick close, the same word as "abide": keep near the Lord and draw everything from Him.
- Purpose — Not a mood but a settled decision. Pressure and enticement will both come to test it. And it only makes sense for people who have already turned to Him.
for he was a good man and full of [the] Holy Spirit and of faith; and a large crowd [of people] were added to the Lord.
The church at Jerusalem sent Barnabas to Antioch, and the verse stops to describe him. One small word — for — makes his character the reason so many were added to the Lord.
One writer defines goodness by what fills a person's mind. We become like whatever occupies us.
J T MawsonBarnabas was a good man, full of the Holy Spirit and of faith. I wish we had a few more men like that! What kind of man is a good man? The man who is taken up with evil is not a good man, even if he is set on putting it right. What occupies a man affects him. The good man is taken up with good. He will look for what is good in his brothers and rejoice when he sees it. He will help to produce it in them by ministering Christ to them and praying for them.
Scripture uses two different phrases about the Spirit. The difference matters here.
C E StuartJohn the Baptist, Elizabeth, Zacharias, the hundred and twenty on the day of Pentecost, Peter, those assembled together, and Paul were filled with the Holy Spirit (Luke 1:15, 41, 67; Acts 2:4; 4:8, 31; 9:17; 13:9). The six deacons, on the other hand, with Stephen and Barnabas, are said to have been full of the Spirit (Acts 6:3, 5; 7:55; 11:24). Filled with the Spirit is used in both Old and New Testaments of those fitted for special service... Full of the Spirit seems characteristic of the general tenor of the life.
Barnabas came as the representative of the church at Jerusalem. What he did not do with that standing is the point.
F. W. GrantHe does not go with authority, and he does not seek to exercise it. Unlike the apostles on their visit to Samaria, he has nothing in hand to supply what is lacking in these Syrian brothers. They have plainly received the Spirit, as the believers at Caesarea did, without the need of apostles or the laying on of hands. Barnabas sees the grace of God in them, and is glad, and simply urges them all to cleave to the Lord with purpose of heart — a word never out of place. It is his character that is dwelt on here, not his office: "he was a good man, full of the Holy Spirit, and of faith." The effect of this shows in the progress of the work there.
The work at Antioch began without him and without the leaders who sent him. His reaction shows what the verse means by a good man.
F. B. HoleGod had used others for this work, not him and not the leaders in Jerusalem. Instead of being jealous, he was glad, and he helped the work forward by his encouragement. But then he was a good man, full of the Holy Spirit and of faith, and so he did not care about his own reputation but about the glory of Christ... The working of God's grace was the great thing with Barnabas, no matter through whom it was done.
The verse ties what Barnabas was to how many were added. One writer draws out the hard side of that link.
Samuel RidoutThis is the result of the ministry of a man full of the Spirit. Power is shown in results. A man may be accurate and yet cold, without a particle of spiritual strength, and no blessing comes from his constant work. The reason is plain: for believers to be added to the Lord, the servant must, at least in some measure, be full of the Spirit.
At Antioch the message reached non-Jews as well as Jews. The title given to Christ there makes a demand on everyone who turns to Him.
F. B. HoleHe is Lord, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles... They preached the Lord Jesus, and people turned to the Lord. If I turn to the Lord I shall at once admit myself to be under His authority. My place is submission to His mighty Word.
- Good — what occupies a man shapes him. The good man looks for good in others and works to produce it in them.
- Full — "full of the Spirit" describes the steady tone of a whole life; "filled" marks people taken up for a special service.
- Character — the verse praises what Barnabas was, not any office he held. He came with no authority to press and nothing to supply.
- Glad — God used others before him, and it did not trouble him. He wanted the glory of Christ, not his own name.
- Added — when the servant is full of the Spirit, fruit follows. And converts are added to the Lord, which means coming under His authority.
And he went away to Tarsus to seek out Saul.
The work at Antioch was growing fast, and Barnabas was the man leading it. Then he left that wide-open field and travelled to Tarsus to find Saul, the man he had once introduced to the believers in Jerusalem.
Barnabas could have held on to a large work. One writer turns his choice into a question for every worker.
William KellyHere is another trait that marks this "good man." It marks the real working of the Holy Spirit too, both in sending him to Antioch and now in his going off to Cilicia. Is this how we feel and act when the Master honours us by using us in a large field of service? Do we, in the middle of it, remind ourselves of another who might be even more effective? Or does jealousy still get in the way? Does it still play its dark and deadly part, to the dishonour of Christ and the loss of souls inside and outside?
Barnabas had been encouraging the new believers. His journey shows he knew that encouragement was not enough.
C. E. StuartExhortation, however, is not enough to build up souls in the faith, helpful and necessary as it is in its place... Believers, however, need teaching as well. Now, Barnabas evidently felt that teaching was not his special line of service. Would he, then, keep the converts at Antioch under his influence, limited to his ministry alone? No. He wanted them to advance and be established in the faith. And knowing where to find one qualified to teach, he went off to Tarsus in Cilicia to look for Saul.
Another writer turns that into a rule for us all.
Norman AndersonLet us not be selfish in our service; let us recognise our own limitations, and then recognise the qualities and abilities of others.
There is no angel here, and no recorded word from the Spirit.
William KellyAs there was need in the church at Antioch, he goes and finds him. He had a conviction that this was the instrument the Lord would use for good. So we see this. In some cases we have the angel of the Lord. In others we have the Spirit of the Lord speaking directly. And we also have, simply, the holy judgment of the gracious heart. We must not treat this as a merely human arrangement. It was right, and God recorded it so that we might see it and profit from it.
Barnabas acted on his own reading of the need.
The Bible TreasuryThe work is enlarging, and help is needed in this field. Barnabas knows the one whom he introduced to the church in Jerusalem, and he knows what he is... The disciples do not send for Saul. This "good man" judges Saul to be fitted to help in this work.
The verse names one city, and the choice was not random.
C. E. StuartBarnabas found Saul in his native city. Saul had gone back there after his first and short visit to Jerusalem, following his conversion. Barnabas seems to have had no difficulty in persuading him to leave that place of learning and help the work forward in the capital of Syria.
There is a lesson here for anyone waiting for a place in the Lord's work.
The Christian's FriendWe may safely assume that bringing Saul to Antioch was his introduction to his mission. We may learn from the way it happened that there is no need to push ourselves into the Lord's work. If we wait quietly on Him, wanting to know nothing but His will, the time will come when our path will be unmistakably shown to us. Saul had waited, even though Christ in glory had appeared to him. Now his directions reached him. They did not come by the extraordinary method of his conversion, but through the invitation of a fellow servant. Saul was in communion with his Lord's mind, and that invitation came to him with the force of a divine command.
Some read a later chapter of Acts as Paul's ordination. One writer answers from this passage.
W. T. P. WolstonHe had been recognised as a teacher for a long time. We get this in the eleventh chapter... Paul had been preaching and teaching long before what you have recorded in the thirteenth chapter of Acts. So far from that scene carrying the thought that at that moment he was ordained for apostolic work, his own writings set that aside.
- Need. A growing work needed more than Barnabas could give. Teaching was not his line, and he would not limit the converts to his own ministry.
- Humility. He went looking for the man most likely to outshine him. Kelly asks whether jealousy would have kept us working alone.
- Judgment. No angel, no vision, no summons from the assembly. Just the holy judgment of a gracious heart — and God recorded it for our profit.
- Waiting. Saul was already called by the glorified Christ. Even so, he did not push himself forward. His orders came as a fellow servant's invitation.
- Fruit. This quiet journey opened Saul's mission and set a teacher beside an encourager at Antioch.
And having found [him], he brought him to Antioch. And so it was with them that for a whole year they were gathered together in the assembly and taught a large crowd and the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch.
A crowd of new Gentile believers in Antioch had no teacher until Barnabas went to Tarsus and came back with Saul. Out of their year of teaching came a name the world had never used before.
Barnabas had a growing work in his hands. He went to find a man who might do it better.
William KellyIs this how we feel and act when we stand in front of a large field of service where the Master honours us by using us? Do we, while we are in the middle of it, remind ourselves of someone else who might be even more effective? It was not so with Barnabas.
The two men worked together for a year. Neither treated the gathering as his own.
William KellyIt was Christ's flock, not the flock of either of them, and His love moved them both, as it no doubt moved others too, to care for it. In those days no one said that the assembly was his own. They served in it with more love and holiness, because they always remembered that it is God's, and not man's.
Teaching was the third thing Antioch received, and each stage had built on the last.
C. E. StuartPreaching the gospel had been started and carried on by men of Cyprus and Cyrene. Encouragement had its place and produced much fruit after Barnabas first reached Antioch. Now teaching started, and great blessing followed. We read that "they taught a great many people." So these different gifts appeared. Each one was needed before souls could be fully established in the faith, yet they were quite distinct in character.
Several firsts belong to this city.
Church HistoryAntioch was a city second only to Jerusalem in the early history of the church. What Jerusalem had been to the Jews up to this point, Antioch now became to the Gentiles. From then on it held a leading place in spreading Christianity among the nations. Here the first Gentile church was planted. And here our apostle began his public ministry.
The city had a name for inventing insults. This time its habit produced something better than it knew.
William KellyThe place once so famous for its nicknames was now to give a name that will never perish. It is a name of immeasurable sweetness and blessing, since it connects Christ with those who are His. It was, no doubt, a Gentile title. There would be no particular force in giving it to Jews, for all Jews claimed to be looking for Christ. What a wonderful change for these poor Gentiles to know Christ for themselves, and to be called after Christ! It was all ordered by God.
Neither the Jews nor the believers themselves picked the word.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe Jews certainly did not give this name; the Gentiles invented it. Antioch was famous for its readiness to jeer and hand out names; it was known for its witty sayings. So they coined a new word, "Christianoi" — Christians. It is used only by outsiders. Jews and Gentiles alike were called by this name, so it bears witness to the oneness of Jew and Gentile in Christ.
The neighbours chose the label from what they could see.
Mark GrassoThe disciples in Antioch were such eager, faithful and true followers of the Lord Jesus that, like Paul, they imitated Him. As the Lord blessed the ministry of Paul and Barnabas in that city, Christ lived in the believers there in a real way. They spoke and acted so much like Him that the world gave them the title "Christians" — which means "of the same character as Christ."
The nickname did not stay in the street.
F. B. HoleHere we have the Spirit of God accepting and approving the name Christian as applied to believers. It was first used as a descriptive nickname at Antioch. It came into general use later, and now it is formally accepted by the Spirit of God. We may therefore accept it, and as Christians we glorify God even as Christ Himself did.
So what should believers call themselves?
Samuel RidoutInstead of the confusion of many names, Scripture gives us only the One Name: the name of Christ. It is a name above every name, the beautiful name, and it is put on all God's people without distinction. They are called Believers, Disciples, Christians, and Saints. But not one of these names is ever used to mark off one part of the Body of Christ from another. On the contrary, they serve as links to bind them all together.
- Grace first. Antioch became to the Gentiles what Jerusalem had been to the Jews: the place where the first Gentile church was planted.
- Then help. Barnabas refused to guard his own field and travelled to Tarsus to fetch the man who could serve it better.
- Then teaching. Preaching came first, then encouragement, then a full year of teaching — souls need all three to be fully established.
- Then the name. Outsiders watched, saw Christ's character in them, and coined a word that covered Jew and Gentile alike.
- Then the keeping. The Spirit adopted the street nickname as Scripture's own name for believers — one name for all, needing no other.
Now in these days prophets went down from Jerusalem to Antioch;
Antioch was a young church, and Barnabas and Saul were teaching there. Then prophets come down from Jerusalem — which raises two questions: what was a prophet in the early church, and why did the new work need a visit from the old centre?
The account gives no date. One writer notes that the historian leaves the timing open, and sets these visitors beside the teaching already going on in the city:
C. E. StuartHe was a prophet, named Agabus — a prophet in the ordinary sense of the word, that is, one who foretells future events. At what precise moment he visited Antioch is not stated. The historian leaves it undetermined. "In these days," he writes, leading us to conclude that while Saul and Barnabas were happily engaged in teaching, Agabus and others appeared in the city.
These men travel down from Jerusalem, and the tie holds. The new Gentile church did not stand alone:
J. N. DarbyAs yet all is linked with the work at Jerusalem, although extending now to the Gentiles... Still everything takes place in connection with Jerusalem, from where some prophets come down and announce a famine. Sending relief to Jerusalem shows and strengthens the links between the flock and Jerusalem as a centre. Jerusalem was the religious capital of Judaism — and of Christianity too, if we look at Christianity as beginning with the Jewish remnant who believed in Jesus as the Christ.
These men did not stay in the city that knew them. Their journey shows how God means His gifts to be used:
F. B. HoleThe end of this chapter lets us see how freely servants of God, such as prophets, moved between the various churches. Gifts are granted in the church to be used in a universal way, not merely a local one.
The traffic then ran the other way. What Antioch had received in spiritual things it repaid in practical ones:
Michael HardtHere the Gentile believers in Antioch give back for the spiritual gift they received from the Jewish believers in Jerusalem, by sending relief for their material needs. This passage beautifully shows how different members of the same body act in harmony. And this is not confined to one place; it shows in the way believers in different places walk together.
Prophets appear here for the first time in the Christian company. One writer weighs how large that gift was, and how small a part prediction played:
Numerical Bible NotesThis is the first time the New Testament mentions Christian prophets. Yet they seem not to have been few in number, and in the list of gifts Christ gave to the Church they stand second only to the apostles themselves. Prophecy also, as we shall find elsewhere, is in a special way characteristic of Christianity... Prediction was never more than a fairly small and changing part of it.
Another writer draws a line between the revealing of new truth and the character of that ministry:
A. J. PollockA large part of the Old Testament prophet's ministry was given to bringing the mind of God concerning the state of the people and calling them to repentance. It was not only foretelling but also forth-telling. So it was with the New Testament prophets. Special revelation has completely passed away with them. But we still have the prophetic character of their ministry, and "the one who prophesies speaks to people for their upbuilding and encouragement and consolation" (1 Corinthians 14:3). How much of this may be sought today to real profit.
Antioch already had two able teachers. It welcomed the prophets as well, and acted on what it heard:
William KellyIt is a joy to see this. The free activity of the Spirit began the work and founded the assembly in Antioch. That same free activity was no more uneasy at the special gifts ministering among them than it distrusted what the Lord had done through simple believers evangelising as they could. It was not Barnabas and Saul only who laboured there, but prophets came down from Jerusalem... How deeply interesting is the faith and love that responded to this! It was no charity appeal. They did not wait for a call from saints already impoverished by their generous love after the great Pentecost. They believed in the coming scarcity, and thought of the saints in Jerusalem as truly "one body."
- Linked. The prophets came down from Jerusalem, so the new Gentile church at Antioch stayed tied to where the work began.
- Loaned. Servants of God moved freely between churches. A gift given in the church is for everywhere, not for one place only.
- Listed. Christian prophets appear here first. Among Christ's gifts they stand second only to the apostles, and prediction was always the smaller part.
- Living. Prophecy was forth-telling as much as foretelling. Special revelation has passed away, but its character remains: upbuilding, encouragement and comfort are still worth seeking.
- Loving. Antioch trusted the warning and gave before anyone asked, counting the saints in Jerusalem as truly one body with themselves.
and one from among them, by name Agabus, rose up and signified by the Spirit that there was going to be a great famine over all the inhabited earth, which also came to pass under Claudius.
Prophets come down to Antioch from Jerusalem. One of them, Agabus, announces a coming famine before there is any sign of it. Luke records the warning and its fulfilment. The verse raises two questions: what was this gift, and what did the believers do with it?
Agabus appears only twice in the New Testament. Both times he speaks of trouble ahead. What marks his message is not his own insight but its source.
Morrish Bible DictionaryA prophet who came from Jerusalem to Antioch. He foretold "a great famine over all the world," which "took place in the days of Claudius." Acts 11:28. He also foretold that Paul would be bound at Jerusalem and delivered to the Gentiles; which also came to pass. Acts 21:10. In the first passage Agabus "signified by the Spirit" that there would be a great famine. In the second he said, "Thus says the Holy Spirit." This shows that the prophetic spirit in man was under the direct guidance of the Holy Spirit, who now dwells in the Christian.
Agabus is called a prophet. The gift behind that word covered far more than predicting events.
Numerical Bible NotesThis is the first time the New Testament mentions Christian prophets. They do not seem to have been few in number. In the list of gifts Christ gave to the Church, they come second only to the apostles themselves. Prophecy also, as we shall find elsewhere, is in a special way characteristic of Christianity. No one passes it on by succession. It springs out of close fellowship with God. It discloses His mind, so as to bring souls into His presence... Prediction was never more than a small and changing part of it. Yet prediction is what we find in the prophesying of Agabus, on the only two occasions where he appears in the history.
The phrase translated "all the world" is more exactly the inhabited or habitable earth. One careful translation of the passage brings this out, and also flags a small textual point about the emperor's name.
William Kelly"and signified by the Spirit that a great famine was about to be over all the habitable [earth]; which came to pass under Claudius." {"Caesar" is added in Text. Rec.}
Luke's note about Claudius ties the story to a datable event. Records outside the Bible describe the same disaster.
C. E. StuartHere let us mark the first note of time given us in the Acts. The famine predicted by Agabus came to pass in the reign of Claudius. History outside the Bible tells us that it took place in the fourth year of his reign, which was AD 44... A severe famine struck Judaea and the neighbouring countries in AD 44. It pressed hard on the people of the land. Helena, the widowed queen of Adiabene, was then living at Jerusalem, and she sent to Alexandria for corn, figs, and other food to relieve the suffering. She ministered to the Jews. The Antiochian Christians ministered to the saints in Judaea.
A famine warning invites people to protect themselves. The believers at Antioch heard it and thought about others.
J. T. MawsonWhat do these Christians do? Do they say, "We had better lay in a store of corn. We had better save for a rainy day and make sure we are well provided for"? No. They say, "When this famine comes it will go very hard with these dear disciples at Jerusalem. We had better think of our brothers' need and make a collection for them." They were not thinking about themselves. It was not a question of how the famine would affect them. It was a question of how it would affect others.
Agabus did not stay in Jerusalem. His journey shows how the gift was meant to work.
F. B. HoleAt the end of this chapter we see how freely servants of God, such as prophets, moved between the various churches. God grants gifts in the church to be used in a universal way, and not just a local one. So through Agabus, a prophet from Jerusalem, the church at Antioch heard of a coming famine. It took steps in advance to meet the expected need of the saints in Judaea. This early, the Gentile believers already had the opportunity to show love towards their Jewish brothers.
- Source — Agabus spoke "by the Spirit." Later he said, "Thus says the Holy Spirit." The prophet's mind was under the Spirit's direct guidance.
- Gift — these are the first Christian prophets named in the New Testament, ranked next after the apostles. Predicting the future was only a small part of a gift meant to disclose God's mind.
- Reach — the famine spread far beyond Judaea and struck in the reign of Claudius. That is the first note of time in Acts, around AD 44.
- Response — the believers at Antioch did not stockpile for themselves. They asked how the famine would hit others, and they sent help in advance.
- Result — a warning carried from Jerusalem to Antioch came back as practical love from Gentile believers to Jewish ones. Gifts are for the whole church, not one city.
And they determined, according as any one of the disciples was well off, each of them to send to the brethren who dwelt in Judaea, to minister [to them];
A warning of coming famine reached the young church in Antioch. Before anyone went hungry, the disciples there sent money. Two questions follow. What moved them to give to believers far away? And what set the size of each gift?
No one asked Antioch for money. Judea sent no request, and the famine had not yet started.
William KellyHow deeply interesting is the faith and love that answered this! No one had preached a charity sermon. They did not wait for a request from believers who were already poor through their own generous love after the great Pentecost, which first saw the church here on earth. They believed the shortage was coming, and they thought of the believers in Jerusalem as truly "one body." Perhaps we may apply 1 Corinthians 12:26 here: if one suffers, all suffer, and as they feel with each other, they also help… It is a blessed thing to act from heavenly motives in earthly duties.
The measure was not a fixed sum, and it was not the same from every person. An older translation also shows what the sending itself was called:
William KellyAs each of the disciples had the means, they decided that every one of them would send help [literally, for service] to the brothers living in Judea.
That standard also sets a limit. Giving measured by what a person has will not create a new need to solve an old one.
Hamilton SmithLet their giving be "according to what a person has." There is no thought of meeting one person's need by pushing another into need. That would only lift the burden off one person by laying it on someone else.
The famine would cover the whole world. Antioch stood in its path too, so the disciples were sending away supplies they might soon need themselves.
W. W. FeredayThe coming trouble was to be "a great famine over all the world." So Antioch was in danger as well as Judea, and yet they sent their gifts. That was unselfish love. It is a stronger and longer-lasting bond than church rules, however well meant those rules may be.
Most believers in Antioch were Gentiles, that is, non-Jews. The believers in Judea were Jews. So the striking thing here is which way the money travelled.
C. E. StuartWe have seen how the disciples in the earliest days at Jerusalem shared everything they had. But at that time they all belonged to one nation, the Jews. This case was different. Many of these givers had once been Gentiles, and they now decided to help those who had been Jews. This was a step forward in putting Christian teaching into practice. The dividing wall of hostility (Ephesians 2:14) really had come down, and they knew it and showed it.
Help ran both ways between these two cities. What Antioch sent was a return, not a one-way gift.
Michael HardtHere the Gentile believers in Antioch give something back for the spiritual gift they had received from the Jewish believers in Jerusalem: they send relief for their material needs. This passage is a beautiful picture of how different members of one body act in harmony. It is not limited to one place. It shows in the way believers in different places walk together.
Why was Judea so poor? In the earliest days in Jerusalem, believers sold property and shared everything. That did not last, and it left them with little when the famine came.
F. B. HoleSelling their possessions left many believers very poor when the famine came years later. That opened the way for the relief sent by Gentile churches (see Acts 11:27-30), which did so much to bind together the Jewish and Gentile parts of the church of God.
- Word. They believed the warning, and belief turned at once into action. No one asked them, and no one preached a collection sermon.
- Will. They chose to give at the very moment their own city faced the same famine.
- Measure. Each gave in line with what he had — a standard that never solves one need by creating another.
- Reach. Former Gentiles supported former Jews, showing the old wall between them had come down.
- Result. Spiritual help from Jerusalem came back as material help, and it bound two very different groups into one.
which also they did, sending it to the elders by the hand of Barnabas and Saul.
Acts 11 begins with Peter defending the gospel going to Gentiles. It ends with those same Gentiles sending famine relief to Jewish believers in Judea, carried to the elders by Barnabas and Saul.
No appeal came from Jerusalem. The gift answered a word from God about a famine that had not yet arrived.
William KellyHow deeply interesting is the faith and love that responded to this! It was no charity sermon. They did not wait for a call from the saints in Jerusalem, who had already been made poor by their generous love after the great Pentecost that first saw the assembly here on earth. They believed in the coming scarcity, and thought of the saints in Jerusalem as truly "one body."
Earlier in Acts, believers had shared goods among themselves — but they were all of one nation. Here the givers and receivers came from opposite sides of an old divide.
C. E. StuartWe have seen how the disciples in very early days at Jerusalem had all things in common. But all of them were then of one nation, Jews. In this case it was different. It was Gentiles, as many of them had been, who now determined to minister to those who had been Jews. This marked a development in the practical understanding of Christian teaching. The dividing wall between them was indeed broken down, and they were conscious of it, and showed it.
One detail in the warning shows what the gift cost the givers.
W. W. FeredayThe threatened trouble was to be "a great famine over all the world." So Antioch was in danger too, not only Judea, yet they sent their gifts. That is unselfish love. This bond is greater and lasts longer than church rules, however well meant those rules are.
The passage sets the measure for the giving: each according to his ability. Later generations have lowered it.
F. W. GrantIn those fresh days everyone gave "according to his ability," and how much love — divine love — was expressed in it! How different it is in the many sad days of decline since then! Then it has to be said instead: "everyone a little of his surplus, and the richest in proportion least of all!" The heart that is in a thing, or is not in it, either degrades it or makes it spiritual.
Elders appear here for the first time, and with no introduction. Where they came from, the record does not say.
William KellySaul (as he is still called) and Barnabas become the channels for bringing the contributions to the elders, who have not been named before. We are not told how these elders were appointed, or even whether anyone appointed them formally. Among the Gentiles we know that the apostles chose and installed them, as we shall see a little later. Scripture does not say whether the same was true among the Jews. But we clearly see that some men held this responsible place among them, as others did in the Gentile churches later.
Two things stand out about the men chosen: the order of their names, and that they went together.
F. A. HughesThey sent it by the hand (some translations read hands, but that letter s should not be there) of Barnabas and Saul. Later on we read Paul and Barnabas, but here at the start of his service he is content to be named last. It is a good thing not to seek first place in our service… I grant you fully and simply that our service is individual. It is to our own Master that we stand or fall. But I would not want to take up any service where I felt I did not have the fellowship of my fellow believers.
Antioch was now a centre of its own. Yet the account keeps turning back to Jerusalem, and this gift is the thread between them.
J. N. DarbyBut it was important that this assembly should not be cut off from the one at Jerusalem, so the account suddenly takes us back to that city. That assembly is still lovingly recognised… Now the fruits of love strengthen the union.
- Warned — a prophet's word, not a plea from the poor, set the giving in motion. They gave on the strength of what God said was coming.
- Weighed — "according to his ability" made each person's own means the measure. Giving sinks when people hand over only what they can spare.
- Willing — Antioch faced the same famine and gave anyway. That is what makes the love unselfish.
- Wall down — former Gentiles supporting former Jews showed in practice that the old dividing wall was gone.
- Welded — the relief tied the new assembly at Antioch to Jerusalem, and the fruits of love strengthened that union.