Acts 10:1–48

Acts 10:1 · Darby

But a certain man in Caesarea, -- by name Cornelius, a centurion of the band called Italic,

The book turns a corner here. Until now the message has gone to Jews and Samaritans. Here Luke names a Roman officer in the garrison town of Caesarea. With him, the gospel reaches the Gentiles.

A change long announced

Cornelius is named at a turning point. God had announced this change long before, and His people had been slow to act on it:

This change was momentous, and the circumstances around it carried unmistakable marks of divine authority. Yet the Lord Himself had announced it long before (Luke 24:47), to disciples whose ears were unwilling and therefore did not understand. Peter had stated it plainly too (Acts 2:39), though he seems to have grasped little of the force of what he then said... But He would not have the activity of His grace wait any longer for the dull sons of men. His message of love to the lost must run out in power. And the great apostle to the Jews must be the one to open the gates of the kingdom officially, not to Jews only but to Gentiles also. The moment was come; the man with whom to begin appears.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Centurion of the Italian cohort

Cornelius holds a rank in the Roman army. Its structure explains the words Luke uses:

A "legion" was a body that contained within itself all the grades of the army... Every legion at times contained 10 cohorts of 600 each; every cohort 3 maniples of 200; and every maniple 2 centuries of 100. So we get the name centurion, meaning commander of 100 men, as in Acts 10:1, 22. ... A cohort is translated "band" in Acts 10:1.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Caesarea — chosen, and chosen late

God chose both the moment and the messenger. Two earlier preachers had already passed through this city:

The first Gentile to receive the call was Cornelius, an officer in the Roman garrison at Caesarea. Toward God, he was devout and a man of prayer. Toward people, he was generous and kind, and this to a conquered nation. In choosing such a man, and not a character like the Philippian jailer, God showed consideration for Jewish feeling. Philip and Saul had both already visited Caesarea, yet neither seems to have preached the gospel there (Acts 8:40; Acts 9:30). In this we see the sovereignty of God. He has His own time and His own instruments for carrying out His work in every place.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The kind of man he was

The next verse says he feared God "with all his household" — older translations read "with all his house," the phrase this writer uses:

He feared God "with all his house." There are very few people of whom that can be said. "With all his house" would include his servants and children... This Gentile centurion, then, could not have been an unconverted man, for an unconverted man has no fear of God before his eyes. Cornelius, on the contrary, was a prayerful man, a man in whom the Spirit of God had worked, and had produced spiritual desires in his heart. He is a type of hundreds and thousands of Gentiles today. He was an awakened man — anxious, devout, prayerful, and God-fearing; but had you gone and asked him if his sins were forgiven, he would not have dared to say so.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A man can be a real work of God and still not know forgiveness. That is why Peter had to come:

He was already a converted man, though a Gentile. But he did not know the salvation proclaimed in the gospel. That is why Peter was to be sent for, as Peter himself afterwards explained (Acts 11:13-14)... The devout centurion was only entitled to know his sins forgiven on God's message of grace through the blood of Jesus.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Peter carried the keys

Everything in Peter's background made him an unlikely choice — and the right one:

God entrusted the keys of the kingdom of the heavens to a home-born Jew, from the city of Bethsaida on the western shore of the Lake of Galilee. He had already used them to admit Jews into the kingdom on the day of Pentecost. Soon he would use them again, to admit Gentiles in the house of the centurion Cornelius at Caesarea. There seems a fitness in this... A home-born Jew was the fitting instrument to open the door of the kingdom to them. In doing so he acted against Jewish teaching, national feeling, and the habits of a lifetime (Acts 10:28). But the Holy Spirit guided what he did. No one could have suspected Peter of favouritism toward Gentiles.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- The door. God announced this opening long before. His servants were slow to use it. The delay ends here, and this verse names the man He starts with.

- The doorkeeper. God sends Peter, a Jew acting against the habits of a lifetime. No one could accuse him of favouring Gentiles.

- The doorstep. Caesarea was a Roman garrison town, and Philip and Saul had passed through it before. God chose the time and the messenger.

- The man at the door. A commander of a hundred men. His fear of God reached through his whole household, servants and children included.

- What he still lacked. He was devout, generous, praying — already a work of God. Yet he could not say God had forgiven his sins. That assurance comes only through the message of grace by the blood of Jesus.

Acts 10:2 · Darby

pious, and fearing God with all his house, [both] giving much alms to the people, and supplicating God continually,

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Acts 10:3 · Darby

-- saw plainly in a vision, about the ninth hour of the day, an angel of God coming unto him, and saying to him, Cornelius.

A Roman officer in Caesarea is praying in the middle of the afternoon. A messenger from God stands in his room and calls him by name. Three questions follow: why this hour, why an angel, and why a man who already feared God still needed someone sent to him.

The hour of prayer

The hour matters. Commentators link it to Israel's set time of worship. They also note whom God had His eye on: a Gentile soldier outside that nation.

An angel appeared to Cornelius while he was praying at the ninth hour. That hour had long been set apart for the evening sacrifice on the altar, and in Jerusalem it was known as the hour of prayer (Acts 3:1). The centurion learned that God, known to Israel as the LORD of Hosts, had noticed and cared for the Gentile soldier. Grace had really reached him in the gift of spiritual life, though he was neither an Israelite nor a convert to the Jewish religion.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Not a dream

The verse says he "saw clearly." One writer stresses the daylight, then the surprise: God used the apostle sent to the Jews to reach the Gentiles.

He sees an angel of God in a vision, but not a vision of the night. It was broad daylight, in the afternoon. He was not asleep either. When he asks, he learns that God has not forgotten his prayers and alms. God tells him to fetch Simon Peter from Joppa. The great apostle to the Gentiles wrote at the end to teach the slow minds of believing Jews. In the same way, at the beginning God commanded the great apostle to the Jews to bring the gospel to the Gentiles. Does this beautiful interlacing offend you? If so, it shows how little you have grasped God's ways, which leave no room or excuse for human independence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Devout — and still needing the gospel

If Cornelius was already praying and God already answering, what was missing? One writer draws a line between a soul turned to God and a soul that knows its sins forgiven.

The Spirit of God is careful to make known the godly life of Cornelius. He was already a converted man, though a Gentile. But he did not know the salvation proclaimed in the gospel. That is why Peter had to be sent for, as Peter himself later explained (Acts 11:13-14). Otherwise he could only have hoped for his soul in the mercy of God… The devout centurion could know his sins forgiven only through God's message of grace, by the blood of Jesus.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

An angel who would not preach

The angel knows the message, yet delivers only an address in Joppa. One writer explains why God left the preaching to a man.

The angel, you notice, did not cut a long story short by telling the message to Cornelius himself. Only a man who has himself received grace can tell the message of grace properly. So Peter must be called. God took notice of the prayers and alms of Cornelius, because they expressed his heart sincerely seeking God. If, after hearing the gospel, he had ignored its message and gone on with his prayers and alms, it would have been a different matter. Then they would not have "ascended as a memorial before God."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Fear when God comes near

Cornelius is frightened. One writer treats that fear as normal and reads it as the voice of conscience, not a flaw in the man.

He was in prayer, and clearly saw a vision, about three o'clock in the afternoon, of "an angel of God coming in to him, and saying to him, Cornelius." He was frightened. So is every man when God gets near to him… There never yet was a man who was not afraid when the Lord drew near. Conscience tells him — just what conscience told me — that a sinner in his sins is not fit for God.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Prayers that waited for their answer

The angel comes at last, on one particular afternoon. One writer turns the gap between praying and being answered into encouragement.

We are apt to suppose that our breath in prayer is lost if an answer is not received at once. But exercise of heart in prayer is never fruitless, though the result may be long delayed. "Your prayers and your alms have ascended as a memorial before God," Cornelius was told. We do not know how long God kept him waiting before sending Peter with the answer. It may have been years (Acts 10)… There is a time as well as a way of answering, and it rests in the wisdom and grace of God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- The hour — the ninth hour was the time of the evening sacrifice, Jerusalem's hour of prayer. God met a Gentile soldier who stood outside Israel.

- The seeing — no night dream. It was broad daylight, and he was wide awake. God cut across human independence by sending the apostle to the Jews to the Gentiles.

- The man — Cornelius was already converted, and God had heard him, yet he did not know the salvation announced in the gospel.

- The messenger — the angel gave an address but preached nothing. Only someone who has received grace can tell the message of grace.

- The waiting — God kept his prayers, perhaps for years. The timing and manner of the answer rest with Him.

Acts 10:4 · Darby

But he, having fixed his eyes upon him, and become full of fear, said, What is it, Lord? And he said to him, Thy prayers and thine alms have gone up for a memorial before God.

A Roman officer at Caesarea sees an angel while he prays, and hears that God has noticed his life. Two questions follow: what does it mean for prayers and gifts to go up "as a memorial before God," and where did Cornelius stand with God before Peter arrived?

The hour of prayer

The timing matters. Cornelius was praying at the hour Israel linked with the evening sacrifice. Right then, a Gentile soldier learned he had been under God's eye all along.

An angel appeared to Cornelius while he was praying at the ninth hour. That hour had long been set apart for the evening sacrifice at the altar, and Jerusalem knew it as the hour of prayer (Acts 3:1). The centurion now learned that God, known to Israel as the Lord of Hosts, had watched over and cared for the Gentile soldier. Grace had really reached him in the gift of spiritual life, though he was neither an Israelite nor a convert to the Jewish religion. God had heard his prayers and carefully noted his gifts to the Jews, and both had gone up as a memorial before God.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Fear when God comes near

He stared at the angel and asked what it meant. Writers treat that fear as the normal response when God comes near.

He was frightened; and so is every man when God gets near to him. Sinner, you will get frightened when you sense that God is drawing near to you. Jacob was afraid when God came near that night by the river, when he was alone. The shepherds were afraid when God sent the angels to tell them the Saviour was born. Cornelius was afraid. No man ever escaped fear when the Lord drew near. Conscience tells him — just what conscience told me — that a sinner in his sins is not fit for God.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Not a way to earn favour

Some read Cornelius as a religious man trying to buy God's approval with prayers and alms — his gifts to those in need. The angel's words rule that out.

What right have we to imagine that Cornelius was praying, fasting, and giving alms to earn salvation? None at all... The angel told him that his prayers and his alms had gone up as a memorial before God. Is this not clear proof? These prayers and alms were not the trappings of self-righteousness. They were the fruit of a righteousness based on the knowledge he had of God. Surely the fruits of self-righteousness and legalism could never have gone up as a memorial to the throne of God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Alive to God, yet still to be saved

If God accepted his prayers, why did he still need Peter? Because being made alive and being saved are two different things.

He feared God, and his prayer and his alms came up as a memorial before Him. He was no more unconverted than the disciples were before Pentecost, or the Old Testament saints... Yet he needed to hear words from the apostle by which he and all his house should be saved (Acts 11:14). Salvation is more than being made alive. It is knowing you hold that deliverance through the work of Christ, which the gospel now announces. Cornelius may have been safe before; he was saved after he received the message of grace and the gift of the Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Prayers kept on file

The prayers had already gone up, long before the answer arrived.

We easily think we waste our breath in prayer if no answer comes at once. But exercise of heart in prayer is never fruitless, even though the result may be long delayed. The angel said to Cornelius, "Your prayers and your alms have ascended as a memorial before God." We do not know how long he waited before God sent Peter with the answer. It may have been years (Acts 10)... There is a time as well as a way of answering, and that rests in the wisdom and grace of God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why the angel stopped short

The angel confirms that God has heard, then hands the errand to a man. He never preaches the message himself.

Another point worth noticing is that angels are not mentioned as preaching the gospel. When God sent the angel to Cornelius to guide him in his search for truth, the angel did not preach the gospel to him. He told him to send for a man. Cornelius heard of the Saviour not from the mouth of the mighty angel but from the lips of a sinner saved by grace.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Noticed — God had been watching a Gentile soldier, and told him so at the hour of Israel's evening sacrifice.

- Genuine — Prayers offered to earn God's favour never rise to Him. His rose, so they were the fruit of what he already knew of God.

- Waiting — Prayer is never wasted breath. Cornelius may have prayed for years before the answer came. God chooses both the time and the way of answering.

- Incomplete — Being alive to God is not the same as being saved; he still had to hear the words Peter would bring.

- Human — The angel could announce that God had heard, but the good news itself had to come from a man who had been saved by it.

Acts 10:5 · Darby

And now send men to Joppa and fetch Simon, who is surnamed Peter.

Cornelius prays and gives to the poor, and now an angel stands in his room — yet the angel does not tell him about Christ. He tells him to send forty miles down the coast for a man named Simon Peter.

The angel points to a man

The angel carries directions, not the good news itself.

God sent the angel to Cornelius to guide him in his search for truth. The angel did not preach the gospel to him, but told him to send for a man. Cornelius heard of the Saviour not from the mouth of the mighty angel, but from the lips of a sinner saved by grace. Again, the angel of the Lord directed Philip to intercept the Ethiopian official. Philip, not the angel, preached Jesus to him, and did it with great effect. So we see that in service a man in grace enjoys a privilege that angels are denied.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The choice of house tells its own story.

The Lord keeps closely to His own methods and appointments. He goes ahead of the messengers from Caesarea to the house of Simon the tanner by the sea. That house is the lowly birthplace of a wide and far-reaching movement in His ways with men.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why a devout man still needed Peter

Cornelius already prays and gives generously. So why does he need anyone at all? Commentators separate a godly life from the knowledge of salvation.

The Spirit of God is careful to make known the godly life of Cornelius. He was already a converted man, though a Gentile. But he did not know salvation proclaimed in the gospel. That is why Cornelius had to send for Peter, as Peter himself explained afterwards (Acts 11:13-14): otherwise he could only have hoped for his soul in the mercy of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God does not leave a seeking heart where it is.

He had some light and he lived up to the light that he had, and God sent him more. The Lord instructed Simon Peter to carry the full light of the gospel to him. God's word gives light when it enters, and Cornelius had to hear words by which he and all his house would be saved.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Why Peter, of all people

Some writers tie the choice of Peter back to the promise Jesus made him about the keys.

Peter had been given "the keys of the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 16:19). He had used those keys on the day of Pentecost to admit the chosen from among the Jews. Now it is his to admit this chosen company from among the Gentiles.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Commentators differ. One writer says the Scriptures do not settle it:

It is generally taught that Peter used the keys on the day of Pentecost, and when he preached to Cornelius and his household (Acts 10). People assume that the Lord gave this commission to him alone, and that His words were fulfilled on those occasions. However, this cannot be proven from the Scriptures. And Peter himself does not refer to any special authority when he preaches on the day of Pentecost or in the house of Cornelius.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What was new

One errand marked a turn in God's dealings with the Gentiles.

Here is a new and important fact. God was thinking about the Gentiles, and desired to admit them to the assembly without their becoming Jews or submitting to the law.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Sent for words, not works

Cornelius must send for a man who will speak to him.

The gospel is preached to Cornelius in the same way: "Send men to Joppa, and call for Simon, who is also called Peter. He will tell you words by which you and all your house will be saved." You may be saved by "words"; by "works" never. What does God mean by words? It is the story of the work of another, the love and goodness of another, the life and death of another. It tells how God has raised Him from the dead and put Him into glory. You hear, and believe, and are saved before you know it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

(Wolston uses an older translation of Acts 11:14; the ESV reads "a message by which you will be saved.")

No delay

Cornelius did not sleep on the angel's message.

Look at this earnest seeker! As soon as the angel has gone, he obeys the instructions God gave him. He feels that not a moment is to be lost... The moment this man hears God's word, he sends off his three servants on their forty-mile journey along the coast to Joppa... God loves to meet an anxious soul, and often does it straight away.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent. God answered a praying man by sending an angel with one instruction: send for Peter.

- Spoken. The angel could direct but could not preach. The good news came from the lips of a sinner saved by grace.

- Supplied. Cornelius feared God and gave generously, yet did not know the salvation the gospel proclaims. He lived up to the light he had, and God sent him more.

- Opened. Peter, holder of the keys of the kingdom, was the man sent for, though commentators differ on whether the Scriptures settle that.

- Saved. The messengers travelled forty miles for a man with a message. Gentiles came in by hearing words, not by becoming Jews or by works.

Acts 10:6 · Darby

He lodges with a certain Simon, a tanner, whose house is by the sea.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Acts 10:7 · Darby

And when the angel who was speaking to him had departed, having called two of his household and a pious soldier of those who were constantly with him,

The angel leaves, and nothing looks different — a Roman officer in Caesarea has orders to fetch a stranger from another town. What Cornelius does next, and whom he picks to do it, says a great deal about him and about how God works.

A small errand in a new work of God

Cornelius sent three men on an errand. One writer sets that small act against the new thing God was doing:

Here is a new and important fact. God was thinking about the Gentiles, and desired to admit them to the assembly without their becoming Jews or submitting to the law. Cornelius was a truly devout man, humble, and fearing God. He acts at once on the angel's word. He calls two of his servants and a devout soldier, tells them everything that had happened, and sends them to call for Peter.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the angel handed the message to a man

Notice what the angel did not do:

Here is another point worth noticing. Angels are not mentioned as preaching the gospel. When God sent the angel to Cornelius to guide him in his search for truth, the angel did not preach the gospel to him. He told him to send for a man. Cornelius heard of the Saviour not from the mouth of the mighty angel, but from the lips of a sinner saved by grace. So we see how in service a man in grace enjoys a privilege denied to angels.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Obedience without delay

There is no gap between the angel leaving and the men leaving. One writer makes that speed the point:

Look at this earnest seeker! No sooner has the angel departed than he obeys the instructions God gave him (Acts 10:7-8). He feels that not a moment is to be lost. And, my reader, can you afford to wait another day to settle the concerns of your soul? The moment this man hears God's word, he sends off his three servants to Joppa, a forty-mile journey along the sea-coast. Travelling was not very fast in those days, and they no doubt stayed somewhere for the night (Acts 10:9). But Cornelius was not kept waiting long. God loves to meet an anxious soul, and often does it straight away.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The men he chose

Why send for Peter at all, instead of going to Joppa himself?

The angel tells him not to go to Joppa himself, but to send men to bring Simon Peter from there, and gives directions for finding him. This was the occasion when Gentiles were publicly admitted into the kingdom of heaven. So it was important that Peter should present the gospel to many of them together. Cornelius chose two household servants and a devout soldier he could depend on to carry the message to Peter.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why would a soldier be called devout? Look at the man he served:

He feared God "with all his house." There are very few people of whom that can be said. "With all his house" would include his servants and children.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Three men, three witnesses

The three who set out from Caesarea had a part beyond carrying a message:

Man's will had to be shut out, as well as man's wisdom. What could do that better than the vision of Cornelius on one side and the vision of Peter on the other? The "three men" from Caesarea, and the six believers who came with Peter from Joppa, bore witness to their agreement, which was of high value and unmistakable meaning. Men were largely used here, and they were deeply involved, but in a way that showed every honest mind that God was the moving spring in it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The soldier's small place and large share

The verse mentions the soldier in passing. One writer keeps his eye on him:

The "devout soldier" with two household servants has his lowly but valuable place. He was soon to share the blessing, and so was the devout centurion he waited on so closely. That blessing is marked by the power of grace. It brings down people far higher than Cornelius, and lifts up people far lower than the Roman soldier. It unites all believers, even here below, in one heavenly and unbreakable relationship to Christ.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. The angel gave directions, not the gospel. He sent Cornelius to a man, because the news of the Saviour comes from the lips of someone saved by grace.

- Obedience. As soon as the angel left, Cornelius acted — no delay, no thinking it over; God loves to meet an anxious soul quickly.

- Messengers. He sent men he could depend on — two from his house, one from his guard. Their witness later confirmed that God was behind the whole thing.

- Household. The verse calls the soldier devout. His master feared God with all his house, and that house included his servants.

- Share. The soldier who carried the message shared the blessing. Grace lifted a Roman soldier and a Roman officer into one relationship to Christ.

Acts 10:8 · Darby

and related all things to them, he sent them to Joppa.

An angel has just told Cornelius, a Roman officer, where to find a man named Peter. Peter is some forty miles away in the port town of Joppa. Verse 8 records what Cornelius did with that instruction — and how one errand opened the way for the gospel to reach non-Jews.

No Delay

The timing of this errand comes with a question for the reader.

Look at this earnest seeker! No sooner has the angel departed than he obeys the instructions God gave him (Acts 10:7-8). He feels that not a moment is to be lost. And, my reader, can you afford to wait another day to get the concerns of your soul settled? The moment this man hears God's word, he sends his three servants off to Joppa, a forty-mile journey along the sea-coast. Travel was not very fast in those days, and no doubt they stayed somewhere for the night (Acts 10:9). But Cornelius was not kept waiting long. God loves to meet an anxious soul, and often does it at once.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Behind the speed was the state of his heart:

To this interesting Gentile, then, the gospel of Christ was to be declared. The angel told him to send for Peter, who was then at Joppa, staying with Simon a tanner. His obedience was prompt, his heart simple before God. He sent off two household servants with a devout soldier.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Telling Them Everything

Cornelius does not send the men off with a bare order. He passes on the whole account first. And the errand belongs to something new — God reaching Gentiles apart from the Jews.

Independently of the Jews, He sends His angel to Cornelius. His prayers and alms are recognised as being acceptable to God. He is told to send men to Joppa to call for Simon, who, the angel tells him, was staying with one Simon, a tanner. He would tell him what he ought to do. Here is a new and important fact. God was thinking about the Gentiles. He desired to admit them to the assembly without their becoming Jews or submitting to the law. Cornelius is a devout man, humble, and fearing God. He acts at once on the word of the angel. He calls two of his servants and a devout soldier, tells them all that had happened, and sends them to call for Peter.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why Send for a Man at All

The angel could have explained the gospel on the spot and spared everyone the journey. He did not. The reason lies in who may carry such a message.

No difficulty arose here, for Cornelius did at once what he was told. The angel, you notice, did not cut a long story short by telling Cornelius the message himself. The message of grace can only be rightly told by a man who is himself a subject of grace. So Peter must be called.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Men He Chose

Three messengers go, picked from his household and his guard. Cornelius stays behind — and the group waiting with him is part of why Peter had to come.

He is told not to go to Joppa himself, but to send men to bring Simon Peter from there, with directions where to find him. This was the occasion of openly admitting Gentiles into the kingdom of heaven. So it was important that Peter should present the gospel to many of them together. Cornelius chose two household servants and a devout soldier he could depend on to carry the message to Peter (vv.7-8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Human Hands, Divine Spring

Two visions and three messengers, and still no one could claim the plan was his own. The men who ran the errand also shared in what they carried.

But it was of the greatest importance that man's will should be shut out as well as man's wisdom. What could be more effective for this than the vision of Cornelius on the one hand and that of Peter on the other?... Men were much used here, and were concerned in the deepest way. But it was all done so as to show every honest mind that God was the moving spring in it all. The "devout soldier" with the two servants has his lowly but valuable place. He was soon to share the blessing, and so was the devout centurion he waited on so closely. That blessing is marked by the power of grace which brings down one far higher than Cornelius, and lifts up one far lower than the Roman soldier. It unites all believers, even here below, in one heavenly and unbreakable relationship to Christ.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent at once. The messengers were on the road as soon as the angel left. Obedience that waits for tomorrow is not obedience.

- Sent informed. Cornelius told his men the whole story first. They carried a message they understood, not just an order.

- Sent for a man. The angel did not preach. Only a man who has himself received grace can rightly tell the message, so Peter had to be called.

- Sent by choice. He picked two servants and a soldier he could rely on, since Peter had to come and preach to a group of Gentiles together.

- Sent into blessing. The soldier who ran the errand came to share the blessing himself. Grace brings down the highest and lifts up the lowest, and joins all believers to Christ.

Acts 10:9 · Darby

And on the morrow, as these were journeying and drawing near to the city, Peter went up on the house to pray, about the sixth hour.

At midday Peter goes up on a roof in Joppa to pray, while messengers sent to fetch him come near the town. Two prayers run side by side here: a searching Gentile forty miles away, and an apostle who still thought God's blessing ran along Jewish lines.

The hour and the place

One writer explains what the sixth hour meant to a Jew, and how close the messengers already were:

The messengers had nearly covered the thirty miles between the two towns. Peter, unaware of the special work waiting for him, had gone up to the roof of Simon's house to pray. It was about the sixth hour, the hour of noon. The third, the sixth and the ninth hours were hours of prayer with the Jews. Hungry, and while waiting for food to be prepared, he fell into a trance.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Prayer without a temple

Here there is no temple and no set meeting place — only a roof. The setting had changed, but the man's dependence on God had not.

Peter still lived in that dependence on God which he had voiced when the seven were chosen for their service in Jerusalem... That is certainly what he was doing now, when God was giving him a special mission. He had withdrawn to be alone before Him. It was not a question of going to the temple as once, or even to a place of prayer. The housetop was enough; but it is well, when forms vanish, if the Spirit remains and grows stronger, as here.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer sets this hour beside an earlier night in Peter's life.

Peter went up to pray on the housetop, and he did pray. In the next chapter he says, "I was in the city of Joppa praying." It was the sixth hour, noonday — not the time people usually go up to pray. Once the Lord told Peter to watch and pray, and he did not, so he fell. Now we find him praying, and the Lord speaks to him in a vision.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Two men praying, neither aware of the other

God was at work at both ends of this story at the same time.

In this chapter you have Cornelius on the one hand, praying at Caesarea, and another man praying forty miles away, on the housetop. Both are being prepared by God for each other. He sends to the anxious man an angel and says, in effect, I know what you want, Cornelius; you will get what you want. And He says, by the vision, to Peter on the housetop, I want you to get rid of all your old Jewish ideas... So He prepares the servant before he meets the troubled Gentile to whom he is to carry the gospel news.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Readying the preacher, not the hearer

The delay was not on the seeker's side. God had to ready the messenger first, and He did it while Peter prayed.

There was more difficulty here, for he was still bound by his Jewish thoughts, and from these he had to be delivered. The hearers were ready, but the preacher had to be made ready to go. The record is that he "went up upon the housetop to pray," so he was in the right attitude to receive the necessary guidance. There was not only a praying seeker but a praying servant also. Hence remarkable results followed.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What he had not yet grasped is spelled out plainly: redemption was accomplished, the Spirit had come, and Peter himself had preached at Pentecost — yet the thought that people of other nations should share fully in Christian blessing had not dawned on him.

Michael Hardt

Joppa, twice over

This same port had seen an earlier servant sent to other nations.

Two servants of the Lord, one a prophet and the other an apostle, went to that place. God entrusted both with a message to the Gentiles. The prophet of the Old Testament carried a warning of judgment. The apostle of the New carried a message of salvation, grace and peace through Jesus Christ. The prophet went to Joppa in disobedience to the will of God, but the apostle under the guidance of the Spirit. Their gracious Master had to train them both in His school for their service.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Timing that leaves no room for doubt

The messengers reach the gate just as the vision ends.

Now we see the servants of Cornelius arriving at the precise moment to fix the divine instructions in Peter's mind. The thing was of God, and Peter was irresistibly carried forward.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Prayer — Peter went alone to God at noon, one of the Jewish hours of prayer. A roof served where the temple once did.

- Preparation — the seeker was ready first. God used this hour to ready the preacher, who still clung to his old Jewish thinking.

- Pairing — God was making two praying men ready for each other, forty miles apart, and neither of them knew it.

- Precision — the messengers arrived just as the vision closed. Peter could not mistake whose work this was.

- Pattern — one prophet fled Joppa rather than go to the nations. At the same port, God trained an apostle to go.

Acts 10:10 · Darby

And he became hungry and desired to eat. But as they were making ready an ecstasy came upon him

Peter goes up on a flat roof at noon to pray. Hunger interrupts him, and while they prepare the food God gives him a vision that will change who hears the gospel.

Noon on the Rooftop

The setting matters. Noon was one of the set hours of Jewish prayer, and what came over Peter matched something that happened to Paul.

The thirty-mile journey between the two towns was nearly over. Peter knew nothing of the special work ahead of him. He had gone up to the roof of Simon's house to pray. It was about the sixth hour, the hour of noon. The third, the sixth, and the ninth hours were hours of prayer with the Jews. He was hungry, and while he waited for food, he fell into a trance (or, an ecstasy came upon him). Paul was in a similar state at the temple (Acts 22:17) when the Lord appeared to him. The Spirit of God was now about to teach His servant the special service that lay before him.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What a Trance Is

The Greek word behind "trance" appears elsewhere in the Bible. Those other uses show what state Peter was in.

The word is ekstasis, 'ecstasy.' In it the mind is, as it were, carried beyond the body. It is translated 'astonishment' in Mark 5:42, and 'amazement' in Acts 3:10. It is translated 'trance' when Peter saw the sheet let down from heaven. It is 'trance' again when Paul in the temple saw the Lord and heard Him speak to him. Acts 10:10; Acts 11:5; Acts 22:17. The Greek Old Testament uses the same word for the deep sleep of Adam and of Abram. Gen. 2:21; Gen. 15:12.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer ties this state to the Lord's training of His servant.

It is interesting to see how the Lord prepares His servant in this chapter. He let him fall into a trance: he was not asleep; he was in a trance.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Hunger Held Back

Hunger set the timing here. One writer traces what God did with Peter's appetite.

Though he became very hungry, God did not allow him to eat. While they were preparing a meal, he fell into a trance. He saw heaven opened, and a vessel like a great sheet, knotted at its four corners, let down from heaven to earth.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two Men, One Plan

Peter was not the only one God was preparing. An anxious man named Cornelius was waiting elsewhere for an answer, and neither man knew about the other.

God is preparing both men for each other. He sends the anxious man an angel, and says, in effect, I know what you want, Cornelius; you will get what you want. And by the vision He says to Peter on the housetop: I want you to get rid of all your old Jewish ideas. You must have your old ideas and prejudices knocked out of your head, and you must go and do what I tell you.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

One commentator notes where the greater difficulty lay. It was not with the hearers.

Next comes the account of God's preliminary dealings with Peter by means of a trance. There was more difficulty here. Peter was still bound by his Jewish thoughts, and God had to free him from them. The hearers were ready, but the preacher had to be made ready to go. The record is that he "went up on the housetop to pray," so he was in the right attitude to receive the necessary guidance. There was not only a praying seeker but a praying servant also.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What Peter Still Had Not Grasped

Peter had already preached at Pentecost. Yet a whole dimension of God's purpose was still closed to him.

Peter is staying with Simon, a tanner, in Joppa. He does not yet know that God wants to use him to open up the kingdom of heaven to the "nations", that is, to believers from a non-Jewish background… The work of redemption was complete. The curtain of the temple had been torn. The Holy Spirit had come to dwell on the earth, and Peter himself had preached a great message on the day of Pentecost. But he had not yet seen that Gentiles would be invited too, that they would share fully in Christian blessing, and that they would belong to the church of God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Prayer first. Peter prayed at the sixth hour, noon, one of the set Jewish hours of prayer. Guidance came while he prayed.

- Hunger held. Peter was hungry and food was coming, but God did not let him eat. The vision came in that gap.

- Trance, not sleep. The word means an ecstasy: the mind carried beyond the body. Scripture uses the same word for Paul in the temple and for the deep sleep of Adam and Abram.

- Preacher prepared. The hearers were ready already. The preacher, still bound by his old thinking, was the one who needed preparing.

- Prejudice removed. Peter had preached at Pentecost, yet still had not grasped that people of every nation would share fully in Christian blessing. Here God began to show him.

Acts 10:11 · Darby

and he beholds the heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending, as a great sheet, [bound] by [the] four corners [and] let down to the earth;

Peter went up on a housetop to pray, and while he prayed heaven opened above him. What came down was a sheet holding every kind of creature. The question it raises is whether God's mercy has any edge left.

A servant made ready

Before Peter could go anywhere, God had to deal with Peter himself.

God first dealt with Peter through a trance. There was more difficulty here, for he was still bound by his Jewish thoughts, and God had to free him from them. The hearers were ready, but God had to make the preacher ready to go. He "went up on the housetop to pray," so he was in the right attitude to receive the guidance he needed. There was not only a praying seeker but a praying servant also.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Heaven opened

Heaven does not open here to show a Person. It opens to lower something.

On the third occasion the heaven is not opened above nor for Christ. It opens to help Peter grasp the tremendous change that comes from the work of redemption accomplished on the cross… The curtain of the temple had been torn. The Holy Spirit had come to dwell on the earth. Peter himself had proclaimed a great message on the day of Pentecost. But he had not yet seen that Gentiles should be invited too, should fully share in Christian blessing, and be part of the church of God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Contents with no sorting

The law of Moses sorted animals as clean or unclean by their hooves and habits. The sheet sorts nothing.

How strange it must have seemed to a man taught from his earliest days in the principles of the Mosaic ritual! He saw a vessel coming down from heaven, and "in it were all kinds of animals and reptiles and birds of the air." He did not only see the vessel, so filled; he also heard a voice saying, "Rise, Peter; kill and eat." How wonderful. No examination of hooves or habits! There was no need of it. The vessel and its contents had come from heaven. That was enough… but the tide of divine grace was rising above all such fences, to take into its mighty compass "all kinds" of objects.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Four corners, no banks

The four corners of the sheet carry their own meaning.

It was a great sheet "let down by its four corners", which gives us the thought of what is universal. The vessel coming down would show Peter that the gospel was to go out to everyone.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Mercy had reached outsiders before this. What is new is that it now has no edge.

The great sheet set out the worldwide scope of the grace of God today. In former times the river of God's mercy kept overflowing its banks. It overflowed to Rahab the Canaanite, Ruth the Moabitess, Naaman the Syrian, and a whole city full of Ninevites. But there are no banks for it to overflow in this day. It is like a shoreless ocean, flowing free to all mankind. It brings those whom it reaches to better blessing than Israel ever knew.

Modernised from Other AuthorsOriginal wording

What made the difference

Peter did not learn this once. The lesson came three times over.

Peter receives a threefold testimony that God purifies the Gentiles by faith, instead of separating Israel by circumcision. The cross had changed everything, and put no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile… From the open heaven light streamed on the cleansing power of the blood of Jesus. Grace declared that the uncleanness was gone — the uncleanness the law given at Sinai had condemned strictly for a time… A Jew until then could no more eat an unclean animal than he could eat with a sinner of the Gentiles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the vessel pictures

Commentators differ on what the sheet pictures. Some take it as the church.

The vessel comes down from heaven and returns there again. It is the Church, heavenly in origin, and heavenly in destination. Those within it are alike those whom God has cleansed, and no one must call them common.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer disagrees:

Some have imagined this to be the Church, but I do not believe that is the thought here. Peter was not the vessel through whom God was going to bring out the truth of the Church — that was given to Paul. I believe the vision taught Peter that the Cross had done away with all the barriers that once stood between Jew and Gentile.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Taken back up

The sheet does not stay on the ground. It goes back up, and that raises a question for the reader.

God takes it back again, and that is just what one would expect. Nothing goes into heaven except what comes out of it… There is nothing in either you or me that fits us for heaven… The contents of the vessel show us that there is no limit to the grace of God. His grace meets and saves the most unlikely, and those who seem the least suited.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Prepared — the hearer was ready before the preacher was. God freed Peter from his own thinking on a rooftop, then sent him.

- Opened — heaven opens here not to show Christ, but to lower a lesson Peter had not yet grasped.

- Unsorted — no hooves examined, no habits checked. The vessel came from heaven, and that settled it.

- Unbanked — mercy once overflowed to a Rahab or a Naaman; now it runs like an ocean with no shore.

- Returned — the sheet goes back up. Only what comes from heaven goes there, so grace cleanses the unlikely and carries them home.

Acts 10:12 · Darby

in which were all the quadrupeds and creeping things of the earth, and the fowls of the heaven.

Peter is praying on a rooftop, hungry, when he sees a sheet let down from an open heaven. The point is what is inside it: creatures of every kind, clean and unclean together. Why would God fill that vessel with animals a Jew was forbidden to touch?

A Sight No Jew Could Stomach

The shock is the mixture. Clean and unclean lie there together, so Peter cannot pick his way around the problem.

The great sheet which Peter saw descended out of an opened heaven. It embraced within its folds all kinds of creatures, both clean and unclean. It was received up into heaven. Peter was told to satisfy his hunger by eating, and he might have done this by selecting a clean animal for his food. Yet they were all jumbled up together, so he declined. He was told, however, that God could cleanse the unclean. In fact He had done so, and what He had cleansed Peter was not to call common. This happened three times, so that its meaning might sink into Peter's mind.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the Animals Stand For

Peter had always read Leviticus 11, the chapter of clean and unclean animals, as a rule about food. In the vision God shows him it is about people.

Up to that time he seems to have taken this eleventh chapter of Leviticus, and scriptures like it, only literally... But now, under the direct teaching of God, he finds that these beasts, birds and creeping things stand for men who are completely unclean in themselves. Yet by divine grace the precious blood of Jesus can cleanse them.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

One writer sorts these creatures into three kinds of people: the refined, the despised and the rebellious.

Domesticated animals would speak of the classes of men who are cultured and refined. Creeping things would speak of the more despised classes, in lowly and humbled places. The beasts of the earth remind us of men in their wild, rebellious state. This third class is even more common than the others.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The Old Test of Cleanness

Under the law, a Jew judged an animal by its hoof and its habits. The vessel came from heaven, and that alone settled the question of what was in it.

How wonderful. No examination of hoofs or habits! There was no need of this. The vessel and its contents had come from heaven. This was enough... It did not matter what was in the vessel, if God had cleansed it. The Author of the Book of Leviticus was about to lift the thoughts of His servant above the barriers that book had put up. He was raising them into all the magnificence of heaven's grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why the Rules Changed

Why could the old distinction go? The answer is what happened at the cross.

The cross had changed everything, and put no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile... It was no longer a question of the law, or of becoming a convert to the Jewish religion, or even of holding on to the edge of a Jew's robe. From the open heaven, light streamed down on the cleansing power of the blood of Jesus. Grace declared that the uncleanness was gone — the uncleanness that the law given at Sinai had condemned so strictly for a time.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Down from Heaven and Back Again

The sheet came down from heaven and went back up again. Another writer asks what the sheet full of creatures means.

What is the meaning of that? Nothing goes into heaven but what comes out of it. How am I to get there? That is a serious question. If there is no work of God in my soul and yours, let us not dream of heaven.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What the Vessel Itself Pictures

Commentators differ here. Some read the sheet as a picture of the church, gathering Jew and Gentile into one.

The vessel is a picture of the church. The four corners represent the four corners of the earth. The clean animals it contained are the Jews; the unclean, the Gentiles. But all in that vessel are cleansed... Believing Jews and Gentiles are redeemed by blood, saved by grace, washed and sanctified. God's purpose is to put them all into one body.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Others hold that the church was not Peter's subject at all.

Some have imagined this to be the church, but I do not believe that is the thought here. Peter was not the vessel through whom God was going to bring out the truth of the church — that was given to Paul. I believe the vision taught Peter that the cross had done away with all the barriers that had once stood between Jew and Gentile.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- From heaven — The vessel and its contents come down out of an opened heaven. That origin settles everything. No one examines hoofs or habits.

- All kinds — Clean and unclean lie jumbled together on purpose. Peter cannot pick and choose; he must face the whole question.

- Not food, but people — The beasts, creeping things and birds stand for men who are unclean in themselves. The blood of Jesus can cleanse them.

- The cross — The change rests on what Christ did at the cross. Grace declares the old uncleanness gone, and puts no difference between believing Jew and Gentile.

- Taken up again — What came out of heaven goes back to heaven, cleansed. The test for every soul is whether God has done that work in it.

Acts 10:13 · Darby

And there was a voice to him, Rise, Peter, slay and eat.

Peter is praying on a rooftop in Joppa at midday, and he is hungry. Heaven opens, and a sheet comes down full of every kind of creature. Then a voice tells him to kill and eat. For a man raised on Leviticus 11, the order was unthinkable, and the rest of the chapter turns on what he does with it.

A hungry man at prayer

The setting is ordinary. It is the usual hour of prayer, Peter is hungry, and food is cooking downstairs. Then he sees clean and unclean animals side by side in one sheet.

It was about the sixth hour, the hour of noon. The third, the sixth, and the ninth hours were hours of prayer with the Jews. He was hungry, and while he waited for food, he fell into a trance... Peter saw what looked like a sheet let down from heaven by its four corners. It held all kinds of four-footed animals, creeping things, and birds of the air. To him these were clean and unclean beasts, all mixed together. A strange sight for one brought up in the strict rules of Judaism!

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

No inspection of hoofs

The law gave Israel a test for sorting clean animals from unclean. The voice skipped the test and rested everything on where the sheet came from.

How strange it must have seemed to a man taught the principles of the law of Moses from his earliest days... to hear a voice saying, "Rise, Peter; kill and eat." How wonderful. No examination of hoofs or habits! There was no need of this. The vessel and its contents had come from heaven. This was enough... God would teach him that true cleanness — the cleanness heaven demanded — no longer meant chewing the cud, dividing the hoof, or any such ceremonial marks. It meant being washed in the blood of the Lamb, which cleanses from all sin.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The beasts stood for people

The lesson was not about food. Peter had read Leviticus 11 as a list of animals. God now showed him what it pictured.

It seems that up to then he had read this eleventh chapter of Leviticus, and scriptures like it, in a literal way only... But now God teaches him directly. He finds that these beasts, birds, and creeping things stand for people who are completely unclean in themselves. Yet by divine grace they can be cleansed by the precious blood of Jesus.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

What the sheet pictures

The sheet came down from heaven and went back up again. That whole journey — down, filled, and up — carries the meaning.

The great sheet which Peter saw came down out of an opened heaven. It held within its folds all kinds of creatures, both clean and unclean. Heaven received it back again... We can see in the vision a fitting picture of the gospel. It comes from an opened heaven. It gathers a crowd into its folds, and among them are many Gentiles who were unclean under the ceremonial law. But grace cleanses all of them, and in the end they are taken up into heaven.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Peter's objection

Peter answers a direct command from heaven with a flat refusal. So where did the wide grace of the gospel come from?

Even at this hour Peter had no thought of what the voice commanded from heaven, and he dared to object to it in the vision. The free grace that marks the gospel owed nothing to the hearts or minds of its most blessed preachers. God's word proves beyond doubt that what matters to us more than anything else, for time and eternity, came from God alone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the order could be given

The command had a basis. The same writer points back to the cross, and to what the blood of Jesus settled.

The cross had changed everything. It put no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile... Light streamed from the open heaven on the cleansing power of the blood of Jesus. Grace declared that the uncleanness was gone which the law given at Sinai had condemned so strictly for a time... The Saviour speaks from heaven, where a distinction like Jew and Gentile has no place... Until now a Jew could no more eat an unclean animal than he could eat with a sinner of the Gentiles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Heaven speaks first. The sheet came down from an opened heaven, so no test of hoofs or habits was needed — its source settled the question.

- A new test. Clean no longer meant split hoofs or chewing the cud. It meant being washed in the blood of the Lamb.

- People, not food. The creatures stood for people — Gentiles counted unclean — gathered in and cleansed by grace.

- The cross is the reason. It put no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile. It ended the separation the law had enforced.

- Grace was God's idea. Peter objected to the very command he would soon obey. The reach of the gospel came from God, not from the men who preached it.

Acts 10:14 · Darby

And Peter said, In no wise, Lord; for I have never eaten anything common or unclean.

Peter is praying on a rooftop when a voice from heaven tells him to kill and eat, and the man who calls the speaker "Lord" flatly refuses. His refusal comes from a lifetime under the law — so what happens when God moves on and our training does not?

The words "common or unclean"

The two words Peter uses carry a double weight in the New Testament, covering both food and people.

It may mean 'unclean' in reference to animals forbidden by the law as food, or to Gentiles in contrast with Jews, Acts 10:14, 28; they were not sanctified.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A refusal made out of loyalty

God had to prepare Peter for this. His "no" came from loyalty to the law he had kept all his life, not from rebellion.

God prepares Peter's heart for a mission he was, until then, in no way ready for. But God wanted the Gentiles… Peter fell into a trance and saw what looked like a great sheet let down from heaven to earth, full of all kinds of four-footed animals… and birds of the air, which it was not lawful for the Jews to eat. A voice said, "Rise, Peter; kill and eat." Peter, faithful to Judaism, refuses; he had never eaten anything common or unclean.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the cross changed

The sheet was not really about food. It announced that the cross had ended the separation the law had built.

Peter receives a threefold testimony that God purifies the Gentiles by faith, instead of separating Israel by circumcision. The cross had changed everything. It put no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile… Until then a Jew could no more eat an unclean animal than he could eat with a sinner of the Gentiles. But the sheet came down from heaven and went back up there. In time it taught Peter the immense change that hinges on the cross.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A new test of what is clean

The law judged an animal by its hoof and its habits. The vision leaves one question: has God cleansed it?

Peter had learned the principles of the law of Moses from his earliest days. How strange it must have looked to him to see a vessel coming down from heaven, and to hear a voice saying, "Rise, Peter; kill and eat." How wonderful. No examination of hoofs or habits! There was no need of this. The vessel and its contents had come from heaven. This was enough… It did not matter what was in the vessel, if God had cleansed it… He would teach His servant that true cleanness — the cleanness heaven demanded — no longer meant chewing the cud or dividing the hoof, but being washed in the blood of the Lamb, which cleanses from all sin.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not the preacher's idea

Peter's objection settles one thing: grace reaching the nations was not a human idea. Its leading preacher argued against it.

Even the least attentive reader of the inspired story can see how far the saints, or even the apostles, saw the grace of the gospel in advance. Up to this hour Peter had no thought of what the voice commanded from heaven. In the vision he dared to object to it. The gospel in its free grace owed so little to the hearts or minds of its most blessed preachers.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's patience with a slow servant

The vision came three times, and the repetition itself is part of the message.

The answer came: "What God has made clean, do not call common." To make it all the more emphatic, this happened three times, and then the vessel went back up into heaven. So the Lord was patient with His servant's conscience and taught him about the new work of grace now in hand. Distinctions of birth were to hold no longer. God would bring uncircumcised Gentiles in and bless them on common ground with the believing Israelite.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Taught, and still able to fail

Peter obeyed this vision. Later he still failed to live by what he had been taught.

We may do certain things because of pressure, but this is always wrong… The Lord showed Peter the vision in Acts 10. The Lord Himself taught him that what God had sanctified he should not call unholy. Peter preached in the house of Cornelius. Even after all that, he failed in this respect. Can such a well taught man fail about this truth? Yes, that can happen. It can happen to the best one, and so it can happen to me and to you.

Modernised from Alfred E. BouterOriginal wording

Summary

- Command. A voice from an open heaven tells a hungry Peter to kill and eat — food the law of Moses had always forbidden him.

- Refusal. His "no" is the loyalty of a man faithful to Judaism, who had never once eaten anything common or unclean.

- Cleansing. The old test of hoofs and habits is gone. One question is left: has God cleansed it?

- Reach. The cross put no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile. No one may call a person unclean whom God has purified.

- Holding it. Peter argued with the Lord before he learned this, and failed to live by it later. A well taught believer can still slip on truth he already knows.

Acts 10:15 · Darby

And [there was] a voice again the second time to him, What God has cleansed, do not *thou* make common.

Peter is praying on a rooftop in Joppa when he sees a sheet full of creatures his Bible had told him never to touch. A voice tells him to eat, he refuses, and the reply settles who decides what is clean.

The Standard Changes

The old test asked what an animal was. The new word asks what God has done with it. One writer sees grace rising over every fence the ritual had built:

The Jew might shelter behind the narrow fences of the Jewish ritual and say, "By no means, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common or unclean." But the tide of divine grace was rising in majesty above all such fences. It gathered "all kinds" of objects into its mighty sweep and carried them up to heaven, on the authority of those precious words, "What God has made clean, do not call common." It made no difference what was in the vessel, if God had cleansed it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

An Apostle Argues Back

Peter refused the command outright. The word of this verse came back to him as a rebuke, and he needed it more than once:

He had gone unwillingly at first — he had even dared, so to speak, to argue with the Lord in the vision of the great sheet… But again and again he received the rebuke, "What God has made clean, do not call common"; and at last he profited by the lesson.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Animals Mean People

Peter had read the rules about clean and unclean animals at face value. God taught him to read them differently:

Up to that time he seems to have taken this eleventh chapter of Leviticus, and scriptures like it, only literally… But now God teaches him directly. He finds that these beasts, birds and creeping things stand for men utterly unclean in themselves, yet whom divine grace can cleanse by the precious blood of Jesus.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

Why God Could Say It

The change rests on the cross, and the voice comes from an opened heaven:

The cross had changed everything, and put no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile… Light streamed from the open heaven on the cleansing power of the blood of Jesus. Grace declared that the uncleanness Sinai had strictly condemned for a time was gone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Vision Pictured

Commentators differ over what the sheet itself represents. One reads it as a picture of the gospel's whole course — where it starts, whom it gathers, where it ends:

The great sheet which Peter saw came down out of an opened heaven. It held within its folds all kinds of creatures, both clean and unclean. It was taken up into heaven… We can see in the vision a fitting picture of the gospel. It comes from an opened heaven. It gathers into its folds a crowd, and among them are many Gentiles who were counted unclean under the law. But grace cleanses all of them, and in the end they are taken up to heaven.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another rejects the idea that the sheet stands for the church, and keeps the focus on the lesson Peter needed:

Some have imagined this to be the Church, but I do not believe that is the thought here… I believe God gave the vision to teach Peter one lesson. The Cross had done away with every barrier that once stood between Jew and Gentile. The grace of God was going out to each alike, and the same cleansing power was to bring both into blessing.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Said Three Times

The voice came three times, and that was patience with a hesitating servant:

The answer came: "What God has made clean, do not call common." To press it home, this happened three times, and the vessel was taken up again into heaven. So the Lord in His grace bore with His servant's scruples and taught him about the new work of grace now in hand. Distinctions of birth were to hold no longer. Uncircumcised Gentiles were to come in, blessed on the same ground as the believing Israelite.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Word Peter Lived By

The lesson stayed with Peter and shaped how he treated Gentile believers:

He remembered the Lord's words at Joppa : "What God has made clean, do not call common." With thanks he recognised these uncircumcised men as brothers in Christ. He not only had open fellowship with them in the assembly. In everyday life too, he ate with the Gentiles.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Cleansed by God. The question is never what was in the sheet, but whether God had cleansed it.

- Cleansed by blood. The creatures stood for people unclean in themselves. The blood of Jesus makes them clean.

- Cleansed at the cross. At the cross God made no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile.

- Cleansed, though he argued. Peter said no. The word came three times before he learned it.

- Cleansed, therefore welcomed. Peter remembered Joppa and ate with Gentile believers as brothers.

Acts 10:16 · Darby

And this took place thrice, and the vessel was straightway taken up into heaven.

Peter sees a sheet let down from heaven, full of every kind of creature, and a voice tells him to eat. He says no, so the scene runs three times before the sheet goes back up — and this verse turns on those two facts: the three repeats, and the return.

Why three times

Saying it three times made it emphatic, and it left room for God's patience with a servant who kept objecting:

The answer came, "What God has made clean, do not call common." To make it all the more emphatic, this was done three times, and "the thing was taken up at once to heaven." So the Lord graciously bore with His servant's objections and taught him about the new work of grace now in hand. Distinctions of the flesh were to hold no longer. Uncircumcised Gentiles were to be brought in and blessed on the same ground as the believing Israelite.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What the threefold testimony taught

The message went beyond food. It touched who could be counted clean before God:

Peter receives a threefold testimony that God is purifying the Gentiles by faith, instead of separating Israel by circumcision. The cross had changed everything, and put no difference between believers, Jew or Gentile. The Jew had lost his old superiority according to the flesh. Both were now open alike to incomparably better blessings in Christ by faith… A Jew until then could no more eat an unclean animal than he could eat with a Gentile sinner. But the sheet, which came down from heaven and was taken up there, taught Peter in due time the immense change that hinges on the cross.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The vessel taken back up

The sheet does not vanish. It goes back where it came from, still holding its contents — a round trip some read as a picture of the gospel itself:

This happened three times so that the significance of it might sink into Peter's mind. We can see in the vision a fitting picture of the gospel. It comes from an opened heaven. It gathers a crowd into its folds, and among them are many Gentiles who were ceremonially unclean — but all of them cleansed by grace, and taken up into heaven at the end.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how far to press this. Some see the church in the vessel that comes down and goes up. Others reject that reading:

Some have imagined this to be the Church, but I do not believe that is the thought here. Peter was not the vessel through whom God was going to bring out the truth of the Church — that was given to Paul. I believe the vision was given to teach Peter one lesson. The Cross had done away with all the barriers that previously existed between Jew and Gentile, and the grace of God was going out to each alike.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Not from Peter's mind

Peter objected to the very message he would soon preach. That fact tells us where the gospel came from:

Even up to this hour Peter had no thought of what the voice commanded from heaven, and in the vision he dared to object to it. The free grace at the heart of the gospel owed so little to the hearts or minds of its most blessed preachers. The word of God proves beyond dispute that what matters to us more than anything else, for time and for eternity, came from God alone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The end of the food rules

The vision also closed an era, and with it the rules about food:

This was done three times to emphasise its importance (Acts 10:9-16). The age of law was over. Its regulations must not be carried into Christianity. The cross had broken down the dividing wall between Jews and Gentiles. With it, of course, the rules about avoiding certain foods were done away (Eph. 2:14-15).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Three times. God says it three times so it sinks in. He bore with His servant's objections until the lesson held.

- Cleansed. God is purifying Gentiles by faith, not separating Israel by circumcision. The cross put no difference between believers.

- Taken up. The sheet goes back to heaven with all it holds. Some read this as a picture of the gospel: heavenly in source, wide in reach, heavenly in the end.

- Law closed. The age of law was over. Its food rules must not be carried into Christian living, since the cross broke down the wall between Jew and Gentile.

- Not Peter's idea. Peter objected to the message before he preached it. Free grace came from God alone, not from the minds of those who announced it.

Acts 10:17 · Darby

And as Peter doubted in himself what the vision which he had seen might mean, behold also the men who were sent by Cornelius, having sought out the house of Simon, stood at the gate,

Peter is in Joppa, turning over a vision he cannot explain. While he thinks, messengers from a Roman officer are already standing at the gate below. The verse holds two halves of one act of God that have not yet met. It shows how God guides a servant who is still in the dark.

Why the Vision Puzzled Peter

The vision had ended, yet its meaning still escaped Peter. One commentator points to old habits of thought as the cause, and shows what finally cleared it up.

At first Peter doubted what all this meant, because old prejudices die slowly. But while he kept thinking it over, the messengers from Cornelius arrived and cleared it up. The Spirit told him plainly to go with them and so carry the Gospel to the seeking Roman. God would save the "unclean" Gentile.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the Vision Was Teaching

Peter could not read the vision while he was staring at it. One writer explains what it was teaching, and who God chose to carry it out.

But Peter could not interpret the vision. While he was wondering what it meant, the men sent from Cornelius stood before the gate… I believe Peter now begins to get some idea of what the Lord means by the vision. It was to teach him that with God there was from now on to be no distinction between Jew and Gentile. Peter had been a good Jew up till this time… and Peter was the man God chose to begin this work and to call in the Gentiles, even though Paul was clearly the Apostle to the Gentiles.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Knock at the Gate

Harder thinking did not solve Peter's puzzle. An invitation from a Gentile did, and the Spirit then made the way plain.

Under God, the great apostle Peter owed the answer to his vision to a Gentile's invitation. But the Spirit is the agent of all blessing, understanding, and power in the believer, and so His place stands out here (verses 19, 20). It must be a divine impulse, not a conclusion worked out by reasoning. For us and for all, this is a lesson of priceless value.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Precision of the Timing

The messengers arrive neither early nor late. They reach the gate just as the vision ends, while Peter is still weighing it. One writer sets this beside an earlier moment in Acts, when Philip met the chariot of an Ethiopian traveller.

In Acts 8 we saw how exactly God timed Philip's meeting with the Ethiopian's chariot. Now we see the servants of Cornelius arriving at the precise moment to settle God's instructions in Peter's mind. The whole thing was of God, and it carried Peter forward with a force he could not resist.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Two Ends of a Meeting No Man Could Arrange

Nothing in the world of that day made such a meeting likely. Someone else had to arrange it.

But for this to happen, Peter and Cornelius must meet, and Peter must bring Cornelius the Gospel. A Jew and a Gentile to meet! Who could arrange that? Who could persuade Peter to agree to it? God must do it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

God gave each man his own vision, and witnesses stood on both sides. Neither man could claim he had arranged the meeting.

But it mattered above all that man's will should be shut out, and man's wisdom with it. What could do this better than the vision of Cornelius on one side and the vision of Peter on the other? The character of each man gave special weight to what they saw and heard. The "three men" from Caesarea and the "six brothers" who came with Peter from Joppa confirmed that the two visions agreed, and that agreement carried great weight and a clear meaning. God used men a great deal, since they were the ones most deeply concerned, but in such a way that every honest mind can see that God was the driving force in it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Puzzled. Old prejudice dies slowly, so the vision alone left Peter in doubt.

- Providence. The messengers reach the gate at the exact moment needed, as Philip once met the Ethiopian's chariot. God's timing settled the matter in Peter's mind.

- Prompting. The answer came by divine impulse, not by reasoning it out. The Spirit moved Peter forward.

- Purpose. The vision taught that God now makes no distinction between Jew and Gentile. Peter was the man chosen to open that door.

- Proof. Two visions, three messengers, six witnesses left no room for man's will or man's wisdom. God alone was the driving force.

Acts 10:18 · Darby

and having called [some one], they inquired if Simon who was surnamed Peter was lodged there.

Three men from Caesarea stand outside a house by the sea and call out for a man they have never met. They ask for Simon, called Peter — and at that very moment Peter is inside the house, puzzling over a vision he cannot explain.

The timing

The call at the gate came while the vision was still fresh. One commentator counts the separate strands of that day, each one standing on its own:

Peter also told them how the three men from Cornelius, a Gentile, stood in person before the house in Joppa at that very moment. He told them how the Spirit said to go with them without asking a question. Such a threefold cord could not be broken, each part was independent of the other, and all of them from God. For Cornelius in Caesarea had a vision no less than Peter in Joppa. But Peter had more than that. While he was still thinking about the vision, the Spirit directed him to go with the messengers of Cornelius. This was before he knew that the three men were asking for him at the gate.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

An address God knew

The men had a name, a host, and a house by the sea. They found all three without trouble. One writer sets this beside the way Ananias found Saul:

Peter's address at this time was the house of a Christian, Simon the tanner, by the seaside. Ananias had no difficulty in finding Saul. The messengers of Cornelius found the house and the man they were sent to just as easily. The Shepherd knows the sheep. The Holy Spirit can point out the place and the house where they will be found. Some may be strangers to the people right around them on earth. If saints, they are, however, under the watchful eye of One in heaven — a comfort for any in such a position on earth.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why they had to ask for a man at all

An angel had already spoken to Cornelius. The angel could have told him everything and saved the journey. Instead Cornelius had to send for a man:

The angel, you notice, did not cut a long story short by telling the message to Cornelius himself. Only a man who has himself received grace can tell the message of grace rightly. So Peter must be called.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The house they were asking for

The men ask for Simon called Peter at the house of another Simon, a tanner. One writer notes how the Jews viewed that trade: "Tanning as a trade was considered unclean by the Jews" (Arno Clemens Gaebelein). Another writer sees the Lord going ahead of the messengers to that address:

The Lord goes ahead of the messengers from Caesarea to the house of Simon the tanner by the seaside. That house is the lowly birthplace of a wide and far-reaching movement in His ways with men.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Answered before he was asked

Peter did not hear the men's question first. Before their voices reached him, the Spirit had already told him they were there and what to do:

Understandably Peter was in doubt, wondering why the vision was given. But he had not long to wait for an answer, for the men sent from Cornelius were at the gate asking for him. He does not go because they ask, however, but at the direction of the Holy Spirit. The Spirit tells him about the three men looking for him. The Spirit tells him to go with them without personal reservations, for God had sent them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Who opened the door

So no one could later claim credit for the door that opened:

So it was made plain, beyond doubt, that it was God who opened the door to the nations just as to the Jews — not man, not the church, not even the apostles. That is how the gospel itself worked and was preached. But even the believer is slow to grasp the full meaning of what he has really received. He depends entirely on God's word and Spirit to give him growth and progress.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- God prepares. The Lord goes ahead of the messengers. Peter learns from the vision while the men who need him are still on the road.

- God times. The call at the gate comes at the moment Peter is puzzling. Vision, messengers and the Spirit's word make one threefold cord.

- God knows. A name, a host, a house by the sea. The messengers find their man as easily as Ananias found Saul. The Shepherd knows His sheep.

- God sends men. An angel could have said it all. But only a man who has received grace can tell of grace — so they ask for Simon.

- God opens. Peter moves at the Spirit's word, not at a stranger's knock. God opened the door to the nations, not man.

Acts 10:19 · Darby

But as Peter continued pondering over the vision, the Spirit said to him, Behold, three men seek thee;

Peter is turning over a vision he cannot yet explain. Three messengers stand at the gate below, and into that unfinished thought the Spirit speaks.

Peter caught mid-thought

One writer explains the value of going back over what we have heard, and where that shows up in Peter's life.

It is often a valuable thing to go over again in our minds the Scriptures we have recently read, the substance of a talk we have heard, or some experience we have been through. That way we make sure we have taken in its special message. We do not often think of Peter as a man given to reflection. Yet twice we find him doing so at critical moments in his life. "And Peter remembered how Jesus had said to him ... And he broke down and wept" (Mark 14:72).

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

The second time is here, with the vision. (Older translations of Mark 14:72 read "when he thought about it, he wept.")

Not an angel, but the Spirit

This word does not come to Peter through an angel, and one writer shows why that matters.

Notice "the Spirit said" — it is not an angel who speaks. When it is a question of dealing with the soul, and carrying the truth to the soul, the Spirit speaks. The Holy Spirit whispers to Peter, and what does He say? "Behold, three men are looking for you. Rise and go down and accompany them without hesitation, for I have sent them" (vv. 19, 20).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

"I have sent them"

The Spirit does not report what God has arranged. He claims it as His own work, and one writer says this settles who the Spirit is.

What a clear message to Peter, when the Spirit followed up his vision by applying it! Nothing could be plainer than the divine authority with which the Spirit speaks and acts, here as elsewhere — "I have sent them": He is God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a conclusion, but an impulse

Peter could have reasoned it out: a vision he could not explain, three men at the gate, therefore go. One writer says the Spirit's leading does not work like that.

But the Spirit is the agent of all blessing, intelligence, and power in the believer. So His place here stands out (vv. 19, 20). It must be a divine impulse, and not a mere deduction of reasoning: for all of us this is a lesson of great value. At first, visible signs and extraordinary power announced His presence and showed the new truth of His action in man. But the reality remains, and He remains with us for ever. In divine wisdom, those outward signs are no longer given.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two ends of one plan, timed together

Peter was praying when the word came. One writer shows how reasoning can stall obedience.

Peter was not serving as Philip was, but praying, and that was a good condition to be in for the Spirit's voice to be heard. The Spirit said, "Go, do not doubt." How often we find a matter put before us, and our minds start to think and reason. Before we know where we are, we have a thousand reasons not to do the thing pressed upon us... He sent the three men and then He awakened Peter. The whole thing was timed together. They went down to the house of Cornelius, and there was great blessing for the Gentiles.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

The Spirit's word reached Peter before the men ever asked him. As another writer puts it, he goes "not in response to their asking, however, but by the direction of the Holy Spirit" (Leslie M. Grant).

What the vision was for

Only now does the meaning of the vision begin to open to Peter.

God does not send an angel — a servant — to call Peter and tell him about the messengers standing at the gate... How beautiful this is. I believe Peter now begins to get a hint of what the Lord means by the vision. It was to teach him that with God there was from now on to be no distinction between Jew and Gentile. Under the law, God had forbidden the Jew to mix with the Gentile. Now the Lord taught Peter that that day had gone by — that what God had cleansed, he was not to call common.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Kelly adds that God gave two visions, one to Cornelius and one to Peter. This was designed so that "man's will should be excluded as well as man's wisdom." Every honest mind could then see "that God was the moving spring in it all" (William Kelly).

Summary

- Ponder — Peter is caught thinking. Twice in his life a turning point came while he went back over something the Lord had said.

- Spirit — the voice that breaks into that thought is not an angel's but the Spirit's. He speaks when truth has to reach a soul.

- Sent — "I have sent them" is the language of divine authority. The Spirit claims the errand as His own.

- Impulse — guidance here is a divine impulse, not a conclusion reached by reasoning. The outward signs have ceased, but the Spirit Himself remains.

- Open — one man obeyed mid-thought, and the door opened. With God there is now no distinction between Jew and Gentile.

Acts 10:20 · Darby

but rise up, go down, and go with them, nothing doubting, because *I* have sent them.

Peter is in a house in Joppa, turning over a vision he cannot explain. Three men sent by Cornelius, a Gentile, stand at the gate below. Then the Spirit speaks. He gives a command and a reason: "I have sent them." That reason settles who opened the door to the nations.

The Spirit Himself Speaks

Notice who speaks to Peter here.

He does not learn this lesson at once. He was puzzled about what the vision he had seen could mean (v. 17). But while Peter was thinking about the vision, the Spirit told him that three men were looking for him. Notice that it is the Spirit who speaks, not an angel. When it is a question of dealing with the soul, and carrying the truth to the soul, the Spirit speaks. The Holy Spirit whispers to Peter.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Not Reasoning, but a Divine Impulse

Peter never worked the answer out for himself.

But the Spirit is the agent of all blessing, intelligence, and power in the believer; so this passage puts His place in full view (vv. 19, 20). It must be a divine impulse, not a conclusion drawn by reasoning. For us and for all, this is a lesson of priceless value. At first, no doubt, visible signs and extraordinary power announced His presence and showed the new truth of His work in man. But the reality remains, and He remains with us for ever. In His wisdom, God no longer gives those outward signs.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sent by the Spirit, Not Summoned by Men

Two calls reach Peter at the same moment — one from the men at the gate, one from above.

He does not go because they ask him, however. He goes at the direction of the Holy Spirit. The Spirit tells him about the three men looking for him, and tells him to go with them with no reservations of his own, because God had sent them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One hand set both ends of the errand moving. That is the help for anyone who hesitates over a clear duty.

Peter was not serving as Philip was, but praying, and that was a good state to be in to hear the Spirit's voice. The Spirit said, "Go, do not doubt." How often a duty comes before us, and our mind starts to think and reason. Before we know where we are, we have a thousand reasons not to do the thing pressed upon us. The Spirit said to Peter, "Do not doubt, you go. I have sent the three men." He sent the three men and then He awakened Peter. The whole thing was synchronised.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Separate Witnesses, One Hand

Peter later had to account for what he did, and he told this story. Three separate strands ran together in it.

Peter told them also how the three men from the Gentile Cornelius stood in person before the house in Joppa at that very moment. He told them how the Spirit told him to go with them without a question. Such a threefold cord could not be broken; each part was independent of the other, and all of them from God... But Peter had something more. While he was thinking about the vision, the Spirit directed him to go with the messengers of Cornelius. That was before he knew that the three men were asking for him at the gate.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Opened the Door

The Spirit gave the order. That settles who takes the credit for what followed.

This made it plain, beyond doubt, that God opened the door to the nations as fully as to the Jews. It was not man, not the church, not even the apostles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The command also began to open up the vision to Peter himself.

I believe Peter now begins to get an inkling of what the Lord means by the vision. It was to teach him that from now on there was to be no distinction with God between Jew and Gentile. Peter had been a good Jew up till this time. But the special thought of the Church is this: "there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcised nor uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave, free; but Christ is all, and in all" (Col. 3:11).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent — the reason behind the command is "I have sent them." Peter goes at the Spirit's direction, not because the men below asked him.

- Spoken — no angel brings this word. The Spirit Himself speaks to Peter, because carrying truth to a soul is His work.

- Synchronised — one hand sent the messengers and woke Peter, so the two ends of the errand met.

- Settled — the order is a divine impulse, not a conclusion Peter reasoned out. The outward signs have gone, but the Spirit remains with us for ever.

- Sealed — vision, messengers and the Spirit's word form a cord no one can break. God opened the door to the nations, not man and not the church.

Acts 10:21 · Darby

And Peter going down to the men said, Behold, *I* am he whom ye seek what is the cause for which ye come?

Peter has just seen a vision he cannot explain. While he is still turning it over, three strangers stand at Simon's gate, and the question he asks them opens the gospel to the nations.

Obedience Before Understanding

Peter does not go down because three men knocked. He goes because the Spirit told him to:

Peter obeyed the Spirit's word. He went down, met the men, introduced himself as the one they were asking for, and asked why they had come. Now he heard about Cornelius in Caesarea. An angel had told Cornelius to send for Peter, to hear words from him.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The order matters. The command came before the explanation, and Peter moved anyway:

How often a matter comes before us, and our minds start to think and reason. Before we know where we are, we have a thousand reasons not to do the thing pressed upon us. The Spirit said to Peter, "Do not doubt, you go. I have sent the three men." He sent the three men and then He awakened Peter. The whole thing was synchronised.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

The Voice That Sent Them

Cornelius sent the men. But the Spirit claims the sending as His own, and that claim says who He is:

What a clear message to Peter, when the Spirit followed up his vision by applying it! And nothing is plainer than the divine authority with which the Spirit speaks and acts, here as elsewhere. "I have sent them" — He is God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Slow Learner Still Learning

Peter's question is honest. He genuinely does not yet know why these men are at the door, and writers are candid about how far he still had to go:

But let us follow Peter down from the housetop. He goes to the door and asks the men, "What is the reason for your coming?" Peter interests me very much, although he is so slow at his work. He had not yet fully grasped this new direction in God's ways.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Something had to give way in Peter before the gospel could reach a Roman:

At first Peter doubted what all this meant, because old prejudices die slowly. But while he kept thinking it over, the messengers from Cornelius arrived and made the situation clear. The Spirit told him plainly to go with them and so carry the Gospel to the seeking Roman. The "unclean" Gentile was to be saved.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Two Prepared Parties Meeting

Both ends of the road were ready before the men knocked:

At once Peter goes down. There are the men at the door. They have found out where Simon lives. They are looking for the evangelist — and meanwhile God has prepared the evangelist to carry His message to an anxious soul.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

God, Not Man, Opening the Door

Peter asks the question, but he did not invent the errand. God arranged events so that no one could take the credit:

But it was of great importance to shut out man's will as well as man's wisdom. What could do this better than the vision of Cornelius on the one hand and the vision of Peter on the other? … Their agreement carried high value and unmistakable meaning, confirmed by the "three men" from Caesarea and the "six brothers" who went with Peter from Joppa. Men had a large part, since they were the ones most deeply concerned, but in a way that shows every honest mind that God was the moving spring in it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The conclusion is direct:

This made it plain, beyond doubt, that God opened the door to the nations just as He had to the Jews — not man, not the church, not even the apostles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent. The Spirit speaks with divine authority: "I have sent them." He is God, and the errand at the gate is His.

- Synchronised. He moved the messengers first and woke Peter second; the two halves were timed to meet.

- Obeyed. Peter went down before he understood, instead of collecting a thousand reasons not to.

- Slow. He was still learning this new direction in God's ways, because old prejudices die slowly. Yet he obeyed before he understood.

- Opened. Two visions, three men and six brothers from Joppa all point one way: God opened the door to the nations — not man, not the church, not even the apostles.

Acts 10:22 · Darby

And they said, Cornelius, a centurion, a righteous man, and fearing God, and borne witness to by the whole nation of the Jews, has been divinely instructed by a holy angel to send for thee to his house, and hear words from thee.

Three messengers from Caesarea stand at a tanner's gate in Joppa. In one sentence they sum up their master: a Roman officer, upright, God-fearing, respected by the Jews, and sent to Peter on an angel's orders. Every word of that report counts. Peter must cross a line no Jewish believer had crossed yet, and a man this good still had to send for someone to speak to him.

The testimony carried by the messengers

This is not just flattery from his own servants. It is the verdict of the nation he policed.

The message delivered by the men from Caesarea was to the point. For a Roman officer in a garrison town, the good report of the whole Jewish nation was no small thing. It meant even more that his own household could testify he was a righteous man who feared God — as his soldier attendant plainly was too.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The praise came from people who had every reason to resent him.

It is beautiful to see how the Lord sends His messenger to one whose outward character was blameless: even the Jews bear record of him, that he was a just man, and one who feared God, in spite of the fact that he was a Gentile, and a Roman, and very likely oppressing them while carrying out the laws of his master, the Emperor of Rome — still the whole nation said he was a just man. He did not have the gospel, it is true; but he was now to get it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why God started here

When the gospel first went out to non-Jews, God picked the first hearer with care.

When God was going to send the gospel of His grace to the Gentiles, whom does He pick as the first vessel to hold His treasure? It is not a scandalous man: it is not a blasphemer, or a cursing man. That would have been to awaken Jewish opposition. He selects a man about whom the Jews had already issued a "good report," since he was a "devout man."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What lay behind the good character

So where did that character come from?

God had clearly begun a good work in him. There was life in his soul, because otherwise his works could not have been acceptable to God. He had some light and he lived up to the light that he had, and God sent him more.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Yet his soul was still unsatisfied.

To think that a man with no spiritual life could live like this is absurd. Cornelius was born of God and lived like it, though he did not yet have peace. God was now about to meet the wants and longings of his soul by fully revealing His grace in the gospel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Words, not works

The messengers repeat one small word: their master is to hear words from Peter.

Peter was to tell him "words," by which he and all his house should be "saved." The law demands works from men. The gospel brings words to men, and those words lead them to salvation if they believe them. Note also that they were not "saved" until they had heard the gospel and believed it. Yet without doubt God had already worked in the hearts of these people, and that work led them to seek after God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Having life from God and knowing salvation are two different things.

He was no more unconverted than the disciples were before Pentecost, or the Old Testament saints. … Yet he needed to hear words from the apostle, by which he and all his house should be saved. Salvation is more than being made alive. It is knowing for yourself the deliverance won by the work of Christ, which the gospel now announces. Cornelius may have been safe before; he was saved after he received the message of grace and the gift of the Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why an angel did not preach

An angel gave the instruction but withheld the message.

Why this method? Why did not the angel tell him straight away about the dead and risen Saviour? The answer is very simple. The privilege of preaching Christ belongs only to those who have themselves tasted redeeming grace. In the same way an angel directed Philip towards the court official in Acts 8:26.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Human will kept out of it

God arranged the whole meeting so that no man could claim it as his own idea.

It was of the greatest importance to shut out man's will as well as man's wisdom. … God used men a great deal, since they had the deepest stake in it. But He used them in a way that showed every honest mind that God was the moving spring in it all. The "devout soldier," along with the two household servants, has his lowly but valuable place. He was soon to share the blessing, and so was the devout centurion he waited on so closely.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Reputation — a whole nation praised a Roman officer, and his own household said the same.

- Chosen — God opened the door to the Gentiles through a man whose good name silenced Jewish objections.

- Life — his fear of God was fruit, not polish. He had light, he lived up to it, and God gave him more.

- Messenger — an angel could point Peter out, but not preach. Only those who have tasted grace can tell of Christ.

- Words — the law asks works from men; the gospel brings words. Cornelius was devout already, but not saved until he heard and believed.

Acts 10:23 · Darby

Having therefore invited them in, he lodged them. And on the morrow, rising up he went away with them, and certain of the brethren from Joppa went with him.

God has just told Peter in a vision not to call common what He has made clean. Now three Gentile visitors are standing at his gate. He invites them in for the night. The next day he travels with them, and he takes witnesses along. This is the first practical step in pulling down a wall that had stood for centuries.

Obedience Without Delay

Peter did not sit and puzzle over the vision. He acted on it at once, and his first act was hospitality.

Under the law, God had forbidden Jews to mix with Gentiles. Now the Lord taught Peter that those days were over. What God had cleansed, he was not to call common. He began to act on that truth at once, for we read that he called the men in and gave them a bed for the night.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Until now Peter had been right to keep apart. One commentator notes that as a Jew, Peter "had rightly never kept company with any Gentiles" (C. E. Stuart). The change came only when God Himself taught him otherwise on the roof at Joppa.

Why He Took Companions

Peter did not travel alone. The men with him were there to report later what they had seen.

Of course Peter was ready to go. He had the messengers put up for the night in the home of his host. The next day he went back with them to Caesarea, along with other brothers from Joppa. This was wise. Peter knew his Jewish brothers would need some witness in a matter of such huge importance to Jewish minds. He was very glad he had done this when he was later challenged for going into a Gentile's home and eating with Gentiles.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

This care was not Peter's usual way.

We have seen that Peter was impulsive, eager and careless. It is striking to see how careful he became here. He took six brothers with him to be witnesses of what God was about to do.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Nothing Done in Secret

The witnesses did more than supply evidence. Peter would not settle a hard question on his own.

By this wise act he made sure there were plenty of witnesses of what actually happened. He also removed any suspicion that he had acted behind his brothers' backs. He did nothing in secret, and he did not try to settle a hard question apart from fellowship with his brothers.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

It paid off later. When Jerusalem debated the question, the objectors "ended by admitting God's work among the Gentiles, and glorifying God for it" (F. B. Hole).

God Behind Every Human Step

Three messengers from one city, six companions from another. The numbers shut out any thought that a man arranged this.

But it was of the highest importance to shut out man's will as well as man's wisdom. What could do this better than the vision given to Cornelius on the one hand and the vision given to Peter on the other? ... The two visions agreed, and the 'three men' from Caesarea and the 'six brothers' who came with Peter from Joppa confirmed that agreement. It carried great weight and a clear meaning. Men had a large part in it, since they were deeply involved. But it was all done in a way that showed every honest mind that God was the moving spring in it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No human authority opened this door. One writer puts it plainly: "it was God, not man, not the church, not even the apostles, who opened the door to the nations just as to the Jews" (William Kelly).

The Privilege of Going Along

One writer wishes he had made that journey himself.

I have often said I would have liked to be the seventh man to go down with Peter that day, and see the wonderful tide of blessing that was about to roll into the house of Cornelius. ... It was clearly a two days' journey from Joppa to Caesarea, and four days had passed from the time the men were sent off for Peter, until he returned with them to Caesarea.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Cleansed — God told Peter not to call common what He had made clean. Peter obeyed at once and opened his door to Gentile guests.

- Cautious — the impulsive Peter turned careful. He took six witnesses so that a huge question would not rest on his word alone.

- Open — Peter settled nothing behind his brothers' backs. That openness later won over his critics in Jerusalem.

- Confirmed — two visions, three messengers, six witnesses. Human hands were everywhere, yet God was the moving spring in it all.

- Company — the six who went along with Peter saw a tide of blessing roll into a Gentile home. Going where God is working is its own reward.

Acts 10:24 · Darby

And on the morrow they came to Caesarea. But Cornelius was looking for them, having called together his kinsmen and [his] intimate friends.

Peter reaches Caesarea and walks into a house already full of people. Cornelius, a Roman officer, believed the message God had sent him, so he called together his relatives and closest friends to wait for a man he had never met.

Confidence That Prepared the House

Cornelius does not wait to see whether a Jew will enter a Gentile's house. He counts on it, and fills the room before Peter arrives.

Would a Jew obey the summons of a Gentile? Would Peter enter under his roof? Some might have questioned that. Cornelius, however, did not. Not a shadow of a doubt existed in his mind, and he had reckoned on an immediate response. And he was not mistaken. Peter arrived as soon as he could well have been there — the fourth day after the angel's visit — and found a warm and full welcome. The centurion's relatives and close friends had gathered to meet him... For the first time Peter had crossed the doorway of a Gentile's home.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Sharing Light He Did Not Yet Have

Cornelius did not yet have the light himself. He was only sure it was coming — and that was enough to make him send for others.

When someone is interested in a truth they are not clear about, they want another person to come and hear about it too. I should not be surprised if there are men in this hall who are not clear about the gospel themselves. Yet they have said to others, "Come along with us; we will go and hear what this preacher has to say." That was exactly Cornelius' position. He had not got the light himself, but he could say, "I know I am going to get it. I have had a message from God, and light is coming." So he fills his house with his friends and relatives.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A Question Put To Us

Kelly turns this from a fact about a Roman soldier into a question for readers who know far more than he did.

Dear reader, have you nothing to learn from the zeal of this Roman centurion? We saw his settled piety and devotion before (verses 2, 22). Are we to have less zeal because we are more familiar with the grace and truth that came by Jesus Christ? That would be a sorrowful fruit. It would come not from better light, but from indifference of the flesh and worldly ease. These block the proper working of divine affections — the affections by which others may live and our own souls grow through the knowledge of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The First Gentile Congregation

This gathering marks a first in history. The surprise is which apostle was sent to speak.

Cornelius, his relatives, and close friends are the first Gentiles to hear the glad tidings of the grace of God. Paul was above all the apostle sent to the nations. Yet Peter is the one chosen to speak the word to them first. For this purpose God brings him the whole way from Joppa to Caesarea, so that he may tell Cornelius words by which he and all his house should be saved.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

What It Settled, And What It Did Not

Writers are careful about how much weight to place on the scene. It changed everything about Gentile access, but it was not yet the full teaching about the church.

When Peter received Cornelius and his friends into the assembly, it may be said to pave the way. Even so, it did not announce the glorious truth of the true nature, calling, and destiny of that assembly. Paul, already called, was to unfold that in due course... These events showed that in every nation anyone who feared God was acceptable to Him. They also showed that no one had to become a Jew to receive the salvation that is in Christ Jesus, with eternal glory... The doctrine was not preached, because it was not yet known, but the thing itself was enacted.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Waiting. Cornelius did not hedge. He calculated when Peter could arrive and had the house ready on the day, with no doubt that a Jew would come.

- Widening. He sent for relatives and close friends before he had one word of the gospel himself. Expecting light, he widened the circle.

- Zeal. We know God's grace better than Cornelius did. That should make us more eager, not less, that others may live.

- First. This household is the first group of Gentiles ever gathered to hear the good news. Peter, not Paul, is the one sent to speak it.

- Foundation. Caesarea acted out one truth: no one needs to become a Jew to be saved. The fuller teaching about the church came later, through Paul.

Acts 10:25 · Darby

And when Peter was now coming in, Cornelius met him, and falling down did [him] homage.

Peter arrives at the house of Cornelius, a Roman officer. At the door, Cornelius falls at his feet. Two questions follow: what was he doing, and why did Peter stop him at once?

The meeting at the door

Cornelius came out to meet the man he had sent for, and then went down at his feet. One writer explains why he did it.

It was all the more remarkable, since a Roman normally never bowed to the ground before a stranger. But the angel's message had raised this lowly, devout man's expectation so high that he failed to separate the preacher from the truth he was sent to make known. So he was ready to pay more honour than was fitting to the man God had told him to send for.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the word "worshiped" means

The word behind "worshiped" here is proskuneo. On its own it does not tell us whether the honour is divine or social.

The word most often used for worship is proskuneo. It comes from pros and kuneo, "to fawn or crouch," and "to kiss." Its first use in Scripture is in Genesis 18:2 [in the Greek Old Testament] when Abraham bows to the ground… It takes in all acts of outward honour, such as kneeling and bowing to the ground. People paid such honour to kings and other superiors, and also to a divine person, or to someone they regarded as such… So the word in itself does not decide whether the homage goes to God (which is its most constant use) or not. In most passages it could be translated "do homage."

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

Reverence pushed past its limit

One writer names both the reverence behind the act and the mistake in it.

Fully expecting Peter, Cornelius had already gathered his relatives and close friends to hear the word of God. However, out of deep reverence for the things of God, he made the serious mistake of falling at Peter's feet to worship him. Some men would proudly accept this, but not Peter, who knew that only the Lord is to be worshipped. Peter lifted him up, telling him to stand, for he was just like Cornelius, a mere man, and not God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer sees the mistake and the wonder in it together: "He carried his reverence too far; still it was no small thing that the haughty Roman should fall at the feet of a humble Galilean fisherman" (F. B. Hole).

The refusal as evidence about Christ

Peter's refusal was not a one-off. Paul refused the same honour, and one writer draws a conclusion about Jesus from that.

It is remarkable that the Spirit of God has put it on record. Men offered homage to both Peter and Paul, and both stopped it at once and with force. "Stand up: I myself also am a man," was Peter's command to Cornelius when that centurion threw himself at his feet (Acts 10:26)… These were true men. They would not let anyone think they were more than men. They would not accept adoration even for a moment, because adoration belonged to God alone. From these events in the lives of His servants we learn by inference that Jesus was God when He accepted the adoration of Thomas. If not, what was He?

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

A rebuke to honour claimed in Peter's name

One writer turns the scene on those who claim to hold Peter's place today.

Oh, you who claim to be Peter's special and exclusive successor, are you not ashamed? Why are you of all men the furthest from his ways and the most opposed to his spirit? You have silver and gold, which he did not. But you deny and corrupt the faith he preached. And the lowliness he showed even to a Gentile who was not yet baptised is the most solemn rebuke to your pride, while the cardinals adore you again and again, each one falling down before you and kissing your slippered toe. Can the contrast be more complete? And this is "succession"!

after_note_none: DELETE

William Kelly

Summary

- Homage. The word here covers any deep bow — to a king or to God. Peter's answer, not the word itself, settles what the act meant.

- Expectation. Cornelius meant well. He could not separate the preacher from the truth the preacher came to bring.

- Refusal. Peter lifts him up instead of taking the honour. He stood there as a man and nothing more.

- Contrast. God's servants forbid such honour. Jesus received it — and that says who He is.

- Rebuke. Peter showed lowliness to a Gentile who was not yet baptised. That judges every later claim to his place that takes the homage he refused.

Acts 10:26 · Darby

But Peter made him rise, saying, Rise up *I* myself also am a man.

Peter reaches Caesarea, and the Roman who sent for him falls at his feet. Peter will not take it: he lifts the man up and tells him they are both only men.

Why Cornelius fell down

An angel had told Cornelius to send for Peter. By the time Peter came through the door, his hopes had risen so high that he honoured the messenger as if he were the message.

It was all the more remarkable, since a Roman would not usually bow to the ground in greeting a stranger. But the angel's message had lifted the humble and devout mind of Cornelius to such a pitch of expectation that he failed to separate the preacher from the truth he was sent to make known. So he was ready to pay more honour than was right to the man God had told him to send for. On the other hand, the dignity that goes with the truth fits with the deepest humility. It even produces and increases that humility, in proportion to the power grace gains over the soul.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What his bowing meant

The Greek word for what Cornelius did covers a wide range of bowing. By itself it does not tell you whether God or a man is in view.

The word most often used for worship is proskuneo, from pros and kuneo, "to fawn or crouch," and "to kiss."... It covers all acts of outward honour, such as kneeling and bowing to the ground — the wide sense the word "worship" once had in English (see 1 Chronicles 29:20). People paid such honour to kings and other superiors, as well as to a divine person, or one regarded as such... So the word in itself does not tell us whether the homage goes to God (which is its most common use) or not. In most passages you could translate it "do homage."

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

Peter puts them both on one footing

Peter does not lecture him. He gets him on his feet and states the one fact that ends the confusion.

Cornelius falls at the feet of this messenger, who he knew was God's messenger to his soul. This only shows how earnest the man was. "But Peter lifted him up, saying, 'Stand up; I too am a man.'" You are a man, and so am I: we are on the same level.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The contrast with Christ

The same scene happens twice, with two different apostles. Both men push the honour away, and their refusal tells us something about Christ, who did not.

It is remarkable that the Spirit of God has put it on record that men offered homage to both Peter and Paul, and that both of them stopped it at once and with force... These were true men. They would not let anyone think they were more than men, and they would not accept adoration even for a moment, since it belongs to God alone. From these incidents in the lives of His servants we learn, by inference, that Jesus was God when He accepted the adoration of Thomas. If not, what was He? Let the objectors supply the answer.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The same mistake, quieter forms

The same pull is still at work. We lean on the people God uses instead of on Christ.

We all recognise the tendency to make much of man. Without knowing it, we fall into idolatry. We give the glory to some instrument God in His grace has seen fit to use, instead of to Himself. We lean too heavily on the hand that would point us to Christ. Too often we make priests of the very people who remind us that we are all priests... When loved and honoured servants of Christ are taken away, one lesson at least we may learn is not to make too much of them — to "cease from man" — to cling more simply to Christ alone.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

How Cornelius takes the correction

The correction did not cool Cornelius down. It turned the whole room toward God.

He accepted Peter's gentle rebuke, "I too am a man." Yet he knew God was at work, and that they must hold the meeting as in His presence. So he set himself and the whole audience "here present before God," ready to hear from the preacher "all things that God has commanded you." They were ready to hear ALL. Plenty of people do not mind hearing pleasant and comforting things, but they object to the sterner announcements the gospel makes.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- The mistake. Cornelius's eagerness blurred the line between the preacher and the truth he carried. A Roman ended up on the floor in front of a man like himself.

- The act. People bowed like that to kings as well as to God, so the act by itself proved nothing.

- The lift. Peter's answer was not a rebuke from above but a hand that raised Cornelius to his own level: you are a man, and so am I.

- The contrast. Peter refused what Paul refused too. Christ accepted it — and that tells us who He is.

- The result. Cornelius took the correction. He set the whole room before God, ready to hear everything God commanded.

Acts 10:27 · Darby

And he went in, talking with him, and found many gathered together.

Peter walks into a Roman officer's home in Caesarea, still talking with his host. Inside, a room is already full of people. For a Jew, entering that house was unlawful. What Peter found inside shows why God sent him through the door anyway.

The First Gentile Doorway

Everything turned on one question: would Peter actually walk in?

Would a Jew obey the summons of a Gentile? Would Peter enter under his roof? Some might have questioned that. Cornelius, however, did not. Not a shadow of a doubt existed in his mind... The centurion had gathered his relatives and close friends to meet him. What a sight it must have been! For the first time he had crossed the threshold of a Gentile's home. And for the first time in the world's history, Gentiles came together to hear the gospel of God's grace.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

A Wall God Himself Had Built

A rule had kept Jew and Gentile apart. It did not begin with human pride.

Notice that God has "broken down" the wall He Himself had raised long ago. It would have been sin for anyone else to break it down. The LORD said to His people, "You shall be holy to me, for I the LORD am holy and have separated you from the peoples, that you should be mine" (Leviticus 20:26). The godly gloried in this... So Peter was right to tell Cornelius that it was unlawful. A Jew could not visit or mix with anyone of another nation. But such distinctions belong to the past. God's present work is forming the one body. God now proclaims peace to those far off and those near, and both draw near to the Father.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

So what was left for Peter to do?

Now that the true light shines, the old distinction is gone. It was not so at the beginning; it is no longer in force. If God was entitled to set up such a difference, He was just as free to annul it... Peter came "without objecting," as was fitting for him. For what has faith to do in such circumstances but obey?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Peter Saw Once He Obeyed

On the roof Peter had puzzled over a vision he could not explain.

Peter lifts him up, and they go into the house together. Peter finds "many persons gathered." The house was full of souls that God was going to bless... Peter has learned his lesson now; he has the key to the difficulty he pondered over on the roof. When he had gone down and obeyed, he saw quite clearly that the grace of God was going out to the ends of the earth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why the Room Was Full

Cornelius did not wait alone. He had no clear light yet, and still he filled his house with friends and relatives.

You will always find it this way. Someone is interested in the truth but not clear about it, and they want another person to come and hear about it too... That was exactly Cornelius' position. He did not have the light himself, but he could say, "I know I am going to get it. I have had a message from God, and light is coming." So he fills his house with his friends and relatives.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Those gathered were not a random crowd.

He was also sure that this was of God. So he had no doubt Peter would come, and he had called together many people who, like himself, were seekers after God... They were ready to hear everything God had to say. Plenty of people do not mind hearing pleasant and comforting things, but object to the sterner announcements the gospel makes.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Grace That Takes Whole Households

Cornelius was the first of a series.

We must not pass over in silence this energy which embraced whole houses and brought them under the Christian faith. We only see it, however, when it is a question of bringing in the Gentiles. But Cornelius, Lydia, and the jailer of Philippi are all witnesses to this power.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Door. Peter crossed into a Gentile home for the first time. Gentiles had never before gathered to hear the gospel.

- Wall. God Himself raised the wall between Jew and Gentile. Only God could take it down.

- Obedience. Peter obeyed before he understood. The meaning of the rooftop vision followed him through the door.

- Gathering. Cornelius had no light yet, but he knew it was coming. So he filled his house with friends and relatives.

- Household. What began in one Roman home spread to whole families as the gospel went to the nations.

Acts 10:28 · Darby

And he said to them, *Ye* know how it is unlawful for a Jew to be joined or come to one of a strange race, and to *me* God has shewn to call no man common or unclean.

Peter is standing inside a Roman officer's house, where his upbringing said he had no business being. He names that barrier out loud, then tells the room why he crossed it.

The Barrier Peter Names

The rule Peter names was not written in Israel's law. It was the custom of his day, and God's own dealings had already reached past it.

Peter tells the people gathered there that they knew the rule. It was unlawful for a Jew to keep company with someone of a foreign nation, or even to come as a friend to his home. Israel's law had not said exactly this, but it was how the Jews of that time understood it. The Lord sent Elijah to stay with a Gentile widow (1 Kings 17:9). More importantly, God sent Joseph and Mary with the child Jesus to Egypt, where keeping this Jewish rule would be impossible. The Lord Himself also spoke kindly to a Samaritan woman. She was surprised at this, because the Jews had no dealings with the Samaritans (John 4:9). But Peter's rigid thinking had to give way to what the Lord showed him: he must not call any man common or unclean, whatever nation he belonged to.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the Vision of Animals Meant

Peter had seen a vision of creatures the law forbade him to eat. The animals were never the real subject.

God forbade Israel certain creatures only because of what they pictured, not because there was any evil in the creature itself. In a vision the Lord told Peter to eat all kinds of animals. Peter objected, but the Lord insisted. Then he realised that the unclean animals stood for people — that is, Gentiles. Peter says in Acts 10:28 that God had shown him he should not call any man unclean. Before the cross, Israel kept strictly apart from Gentiles, since they counted Gentiles unclean. But the sacrifice of Christ cleanses all who trust Him as Saviour, whether Jew or Gentile.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Who May Cancel the Distinction

Peter does not treat the old separation as a mistake. He treats it as finished, and points to the One who ended it.

Peter had entered not only the house but the room where Cornelius had his company waiting to hear the gospel. He explains first what they all knew, then what God had just shown him. They knew that for a Jew to be familiar with a Gentile was unlawful. As for Peter, God had shown him that he was not to call any man common or unclean. Now that the true light shines, the old distinction is gone. It was not so at the beginning; it is no longer in force. If God had the right to set up such a difference, He was just as free to cancel it... In such a case, what is faith to do but obey?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Prejudice as the Real Obstacle

What slowed Peter down was not the truth itself. It was something in him.

Prejudice — that sad hindrance then, now, and always — stood in the way. He needed his mind enlarged to take in God's purpose for the Gentiles. To someone trained inside the Jewish system, admitting Jews into the kingdom seemed one thing, and admitting Gentiles quite another... but now all was changed. The middle wall was broken down — the barriers were swept away. It was a wonderful lesson for him to learn on the roof of Simon the tanner's house. There he learned for the first time that "God shows no partiality," and that what God has cleansed no one may call common.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Obedience Before Full Understanding

Peter obeyed before he understood. The puzzle he had turned over on the roof cleared only after he acted.

Peter has learned his lesson now; he has got the key to the difficulty that he pondered over on the roof. When he had gone down and obeyed, he saw quite clearly that the grace of God was going out to the ends of the earth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

When Peter Later Drew Back

Years later Peter went back on the freedom he states here. Paul challenged him with his own earlier way of life.

Paul began his protest by asking Peter a question about his earlier way of life, before the sudden change. Peter had given up the strict Jewish customs for the freer life of the Gentiles, as he himself had stated in Acts 10:28. How could he now retreat from that position without contradicting himself? Such a retreat amounted to saying that, after all, Gentiles should live by the customs of the Jews.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Barrier — The line Peter names was the custom of his day, not a plain command of the law. God had already reached past it.

- Vision — The forbidden animals stood for people. Peter thought he was hearing a lesson about food; it was a lesson about Gentiles.

- Authority — The God who once set the distinction up is free to cancel it, so the old rule is not broken but ended.

- Obedience — Peter obeyed first and understood later. Only then did he see grace going out to the ends of the earth.

- Consistency — Light once received can still be dropped. Paul measured Peter's later retreat against the very truth Peter states here.

Acts 10:29 · Darby

Wherefore also, having been sent for, I came without saying anything against it. I inquire therefore for what reason ye have sent for me.

Peter has just walked into a Gentile's house. His upbringing told him a Jew must never do that. He explains to the crowded room why he came anyway, and then asks why they sent for him.

The Rule Peter Names

Peter tells the room they already know a Jew may not visit a foreigner. One writer notes that this was accepted custom, not the letter of Israel's law. He points to times when God Himself went past it:

Peter tells the gathered audience that they knew it was unlawful for a Jew to keep company with a foreigner, or even to visit his home. This was not exactly what Israel's law had said, but it was the meaning the Jews had accepted by then. The Lord sent Elijah to stay with a Gentile widow (1 Kings 17:9)... Also, the Lord Himself spoke kindly to a Samaritan woman. She was surprised at this, for Jews had no dealings with Samaritans (John 4:9). But Peter's rigid thinking had to give way to what the Lord had shown him: he must not call any person common or unclean, whatever nation he came from. That is why he came at once, without objection.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Behind the custom stood a real separation. One writer notes who put it there, and who alone could remove it:

Notice that God has "broken down" the wall which He Himself put up long ago (it would have been sin for anyone else to do so). The LORD said to His people, "I the LORD am holy and have separated you from the peoples, that you should be mine" (Leviticus 20:26)... So Peter was right to tell Cornelius that it was unlawful for a Jew to visit, or keep company with, someone of another nation. But such distinctions belong to the past.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Coming Without Objection

Peter came "without objection". One writer asks what else faith can do once God has spoken:

If God had the right to set up such a difference, He was just as free to cancel it. He had shown this to Peter, preparing him for Cornelius. God had told Cornelius to send for Peter, and Peter had come at that word "without objection", as was fitting for him. For what has faith to do in such a case but obey? If Christ Himself was, beyond all others, the Obedient Man, then the apostles stood apart from other people as much by the measure of their obedience as by their gift and power.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Prejudice That Had To Go

Peter still had something to learn. One writer names what stood in the way:

Prejudice — that sad hindrance then, now, and always — stood in the way. To someone raised under the Jewish system, it seemed one thing to let Jews into the kingdom, and quite another to let Gentiles in... That is how it had been in the past. But now everything was changed. The middle wall was broken down — the barriers were swept away.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why Ask At All?

A room of anxious people was already waiting for him. One writer admits the question puzzles him:

I must say that I never quite understood that question. I cannot understand a man, who knows the grace of God, and is in the presence of anxious people, asking, "I ask then why you sent for me?" I think, if I got into such a gathering, I should know, and I would say, I know what you want; you want the gospel: the Lord help me to give it to you.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Answer God Had Already Prepared

Peter's question draws out Cornelius's story. Neither man could have staged the other's half:

Cornelius answers his question by telling him how he saw the vision of the angel in response to his prayer, and how he was told to send for Peter. Peter's own vision fully confirmed that this was miraculous, so there was no possibility of deception here... So God Himself had arranged this gathering in the home of Cornelius, and they were ready to hear all that God had commanded Peter.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Servant, Not A Lord

One writer turns Peter's readiness into a warning:

Listen, you who want to honour Peter truly, so that you may be saved from the destructive superstitions of his false successors. See how quickly he comes, with not a word to say against it, when Cornelius asks. Ah! It is not Peter who demanded or received worldly pomp and human honour. It is you who have lost the word of truth, the gospel of salvation, and who are ruled by dark and evil traditions that make God's word of no effect.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent by God. God raised the wall between Jew and Gentile, so only God could take it down — and He did.

- Sent for by man. An angel told Cornelius to send for Peter, and Peter's own vision confirmed the call from the other side.

- Came without objection. Once God has spoken, faith has one task: obey. Prejudice, however deep, must give way.

- Asked before he preached. One writer admits he never understood why Peter asked, with anxious people in front of him waiting for the gospel.

- Stayed a servant. No pomp, no conditions — Peter comes at a foreigner's request and asks nothing for himself.

Acts 10:30 · Darby

And Cornelius said, Four days ago I had been [fasting] unto this hour, and the ninth [I was] praying in my house, and lo, a man stood before me in bright clothing,

A Roman officer stands in his own house, explaining himself to Peter. His account goes back four days — to an hour of prayer, and a visitor in bright clothing who told him to send for a man.

A Seeker Tells His Own Story

Peter does not begin by preaching. He asks a question first. What comes back is a man's own account of the last four days.

Then he probes Cornelius, and tries to find out the state of his soul. He says, "I ask then why you sent for me." It is a good thing to let a soul who is anxious about divine things speak out for itself. Cornelius tells his own story... Here you have another indication of Cornelius's moral state; he was fasting as well as praying, pouring out his soul to God.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Hour and the Visitor

The time he names was not random. It was the fixed afternoon hour of Jewish worship — and God met a man there who had no claim on that worship.

An angel appeared to Cornelius while he was praying at the ninth hour. That hour had long been set apart for the evening sacrifice on the altar, and Jerusalem knew it as the hour of prayer. God, the centurion learned, had observed and cared for the Gentile soldier. Grace had really reached him in the giving of spiritual life, though he was neither an Israelite nor a convert to the Jewish religion... Never before had a heavenly visitor appeared in that house. So Cornelius was frightened at first, and asked, "What is it, Lord?"

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Fasting, Prayer, Giving

Cornelius fasted as well as prayed — a detail some older translations keep in this verse. He had likely never heard Jesus teach, yet his life fell into a shape the Bible already describes.

Cornelius may not have heard of the Sermon on the Mount, but his practical righteousness quite matched what is laid down there. Verse 1 of Matthew 6 speaks of "righteousness" in general. The verses that follow give its branches: giving to the poor, praying and fasting.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Messenger Who Could Not Preach

The man in bright clothing spoke, but he did not tell Cornelius about Christ. He gave an address in Joppa and left.

Another point worth noticing is that angels are not mentioned as preaching the gospel. God sent the angel to Cornelius to guide him in his search for truth. The angel did not preach the gospel to him, but told him to send for a man. Not from the mouth of the mighty angel but from the lips of a sinner saved by grace did Cornelius hear of the Saviour... So we see how in service man in grace enjoys a privilege denied to angels.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Words, Not Works

Cornelius was already a generous, praying man. Yet when God opened the door to the nations, His word to Cornelius was not do more, but listen.

To be saved, he was not told to do works. He was to hear words when Peter came: "He will speak to you." Later Peter tells the story in Jerusalem. He says the angel had told Cornelius, "Send to Joppa and bring Simon who is called Peter; he will declare to you a message by which you will be saved, you and all your household." Mark that now! ... Many souls think that if they are to be saved, it must be by works of some kind. But when God opens the way to the Gentiles, He rules out the thought of works.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What Was Still Missing

God had noticed him and cared for him. Yet he still had no assurance — and that gap is why Peter had to come.

He was an awakened man — anxious, godly, prayerful, God-fearing. But if you had gone and asked him whether his sins were forgiven, he would not have dared to say so. Up to that moment the testimony of the Gospel had not gone out, and forgiveness had not been preached to the Gentiles.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sought. Cornelius was praying at the set afternoon hour of Jewish worship. God met him there, though he belonged neither to Israel nor to its religion.

- Seen. His giving, praying and fasting are the branches of righteousness the Sermon on the Mount describes. God noticed that life before Peter arrived.

- Sent. The angel in bright clothing carried an address, not a gospel. Telling a sinner about the Saviour is a privilege God gives to redeemed people, not to angels.

- Spoken. God told him not to do works but to hear words — and those words would save him and his whole household.

- Saved. Prayerful, generous and awakened, he still could not say his sins were forgiven. That came only when the message reached him.

Acts 10:31 · Darby

and said, Cornelius, thy prayer has been heard, and thy alms have come in remembrance before God.

In Caesarea, Cornelius repeats to Peter what an angel had told him: God had taken notice of a Gentile soldier's prayers and his gifts to the poor. Two questions follow. What was he asking for? And if God had already heard him, why send for a preacher?

What He Was Praying For

The angel does not say what the prayer was about. One writer reads it from the man's situation: an outsider to Israel who wanted light.

Before he heard Peter's address, it would have been wrong for Cornelius to say that he was forgiven. It would be just as wrong for you and me now, if we believe on Jesus, to say we do not know it. Cornelius did not know this great blessing, but it is clear that he longed for it with all his heart. He tells Peter that the angel had said to him, "Cornelius, your prayer has been heard." What does that mean? That God read his heart, and knew what he desired — light. Remember that he was not a convert to the Jewish religion. He had not embraced Judaism. The Jews plainly thought well of him, but he had never put himself under the law.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Prayers and Alms as Fruit, Not Payment

Was Cornelius buying God's favour with his giving and praying? One writer argues the opposite.

What right have we to imagine that Cornelius was praying, fasting, and giving alms in order to earn salvation? None at all — at least if we let the inspired account govern us. We have no other way of knowing anything about this truly excellent and interesting man. The angel told him that his prayers and his alms had gone up as a memorial before God. Is this not clear proof? These prayers and alms were not the trappings of self-righteousness. They were the fruit of a righteousness based on the knowledge he had of God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer asks what God does with the prayers of an ungodly man.

When did the prayers and alms of an ungodly man ever "come up for a memorial before God"? Such are "dead works," as worthless, if not as offensive, as wicked works.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Heard — But Still Not Saved

God accepted his prayer and still sent him for a message. His next task was not more devotion, but listening.

To be saved, he was not told to do works. He was to hear words, when Peter came. "He shall speak to you."... Many souls think that they must be saved by works of some sort. But when God opens the way to the Gentiles, He rules out the thought of works.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why the Angel Did Not Preach

An angel had the man's attention and could have finished the business on the spot. Instead he gave him an address in Joppa. The prayers God accepted were never a substitute for the gospel.

The angel, you notice, did not cut a long story short by telling the message to Cornelius himself. Only a man who is himself a subject of grace can rightly tell the message of grace. So Peter must be called. God valued the prayers and alms of Cornelius, because they expressed the sincere seeking of his heart after God. Suppose that, after hearing the gospel, he had ignored its message and gone on with his prayers and alms. That would have been a different matter. Then they would not have "come up for a memorial before God."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Comfort for Anyone Still Waiting

We are not told how long Cornelius waited for an answer. The silence was not a refusal, and no honest prayer is wasted.

Exercise of heart in prayer is never fruitless, though the result may be long delayed... and we do not know how long he waited before God sent Peter to him with the answer: it may have been years (Acts 10). As with Daniel, so with Cornelius, and so with us, God chooses both the time and the way of answering, and that choice rests in His wisdom and grace.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

And God has a track record of getting the message through:

God never fails an expectant heart... He sent a Philip to the eunuch in the desert of Gaza. He sent a Peter to the centurion, in the town of Caesarea. He sent a Paul to a seller of purple, in the suburbs of Philippi. And He will send a message to the reader of these lines, if he is truly earnest in seeking God's salvation.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard — God read the heart behind the prayer. Cornelius wanted light; he was not claiming a forgiveness he did not yet have.

- Remembered — his prayers and gifts were not a payment to God. They were fruit growing from what he already knew of God.

- Still lacking — Being heard is not the same as being saved; he was sent for words, not more works.

- Answered by a man — An angel could name the need but not preach the remedy; grace is told by someone who has received it.

- Waited for — The delay may have been years; the timing belongs to God, and He has never failed a heart that expects Him.

Acts 10:32 · Darby

Send therefore to Joppa and fetch Simon, who is surnamed Peter; he lodges in the house of Simon, a tanner, by the sea [who when he is come will speak to thee].

Cornelius is repeating an angel's instructions back to Peter: a town, a name, and a house by the sea. The striking thing is what the angel did not do — he gave an address instead of a message.

An angel points; a man preaches

An angel stood in front of Cornelius and could have told him everything. Instead Cornelius had to send to another town for a man. The reason has to do with who is fit to carry this message.

The angel, you notice, did not cut a long story short by telling the message to Cornelius himself. Only a man who has himself received grace can tell the message of grace rightly. So Peter must be called.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The address is a humble one, and that detail matters. While Cornelius was sending his men, God was already at the far end of the journey, working on the man they went to fetch.

The angel does not preach the gospel to Cornelius, but sends Peter to him for this. That is how closely the Lord keeps to His own methods and appointments. The Lord goes ahead of the messengers from Caesarea to the house of Simon the tanner by the sea. That house is the lowly birthplace of a wide and far-reaching movement in His ways with men.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A tanner's house by the sea

The address itself hinted at what was coming. A tanner made leather out of animal skins. Peter was already lodging where a strict Jew would have hesitated to stay.

The end of the previous chapter tells us that Peter stayed in Joppa in the house of Simon the tanner. Was he breaking with his Jewish law and customs? The Jews considered tanning an unclean trade.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The leading apostle lived in a working man's house, not a palace. One writer turns that against people who claim first place in the church today.

Scripture tells us that he stayed a good many days in Joppa at the house of a certain tanner who had his own name, Simon. Does this say nothing to those who easily believe that they too stand "first" in the church of God in our day? According to Scripture, no true apostle ever had, or ever sought, wealth or rank because of his office.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sent for words, not for works

Cornelius was a praying, generous man. Yet the angel did not tell him to add another good deed. He was to fetch someone who would talk to him.

To be saved, he was not told to do works. He was to hear words, when Peter came. "He shall speak to you." … Many souls think that if they are to be saved, it will be by works of some sort. But when God opens the way to the Gentiles, He rules out the thought of works. He says to this anxious man: send for My messenger, who shall "tell you words."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

(Wolston quotes an older translation. It ends the verse with the words "who, when he comes, shall speak to you." The ESV ends it at the tanner's house.)

God prepared the preacher first

The errand looked simple from Caesarea. At the other end it meant a Jew walking into a Gentile home. God had already prepared Peter for that step.

Now that the true light shines, the old distinction is gone. It was not so at the beginning; it is no longer in force. If God was entitled to set up such a difference, He was just as free to cancel it. So He had shown this to Peter, as special preparation for Cornelius, whom God had directed to send for Peter.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Obedience the same hour

Cornelius had nothing but a name and an address. He acted on it at once, and one writer reads that speed as the mark of a serious man.

As soon as Cornelius hears from God what he is to do, he does it. This shows the earnestness and the fervour of the man. "So I sent for you at once," he says to Peter. He will not wait a day. He does not say, I will think about it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent, not spoken. The angel withheld the message and gave an address instead, because only a man who has received grace can tell it.

- Sent to a tanner's house. The angel named a humble place, a trade the Jews counted unclean — the unlikely starting point of a far-reaching work.

- Sent ahead. God reached the tanner's house before the messengers did. He was preparing the preacher while the hearer was still sending.

- Sent for words. The angel told Cornelius to listen, not to achieve. That rules out the idea of being saved by what we do.

- Sent at once. He obeyed at once on the strength of a name and a place. He would not wait a day.

Acts 10:33 · Darby

Immediately therefore I sent to thee, and *thou* hast well done in coming. Now therefore *we* are all present before God to hear all things that are commanded thee of God.

Peter has just walked into a Gentile home in Caesarea, and he asks Cornelius why he sent for him. The answer is this verse: a room full of people, waiting, with no plan of their own except to hear what God has to say.

A meeting God arranged

Cornelius is not describing a lucky coincidence. Two visions had brought two strangers into one room.

In answer to his question, Cornelius tells him how he saw the vision of the angel in response to his prayer, and how he was told to send for Peter. The vision given to Peter fully confirmed that this was miraculous. So there was no chance of deception here, unlike the case with many who claim to have had visions. God had carefully arranged the gathering in the home of Cornelius, and they were ready to hear all that God had commanded Peter.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Present before God

Cornelius had just taken a gentle rebuke from Peter: the preacher was only a man. Yet he still knew whose presence the room stood in, and he asked for the whole message, not part of it.

He had accepted Peter's gentle rebuke when Peter said, "I myself also am a man." Yet he knew that God was at work, and that the meeting was to be held in His presence. So he placed himself and everyone there "here present before God," ready to hear from the preacher "all things that God has commanded you." They were ready to hear ALL. Plenty of people do not mind hearing pleasant and comforting things, but they object to the sterner things the Gospel says.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

That kind of listener is rare.

There was no holding back, and no wish to leave out any part of the counsel of God. What a contrast with this day of itching ears!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Only a channel

Cornelius expected words God had commanded Peter to say, not Peter's own opinions.

Now, we know that Cornelius understood very clearly what was happening. Peter was coming to speak to him. Peter was God's messenger to him, sent to deliver God's word to him. Peter would be only the channel. The word he longed for was coming through him, and it would not be the word of a mere man.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

There is a small point in the wording here. Older versions end the verse "commanded of God"; one writer explains why "of the Lord" is the better reading.

Many had come together, and they were present in the sight of God to hear all that the Lord had commanded Peter — for that is how we should read it here, not "of God." To the Apostle, this scene and this company must have been of unusual interest. For the first time he had crossed the threshold of a Gentile's home.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The right condition for hearing

How you listen matters as much as what you hear. A perfect message can still be lost on the wrong heart.

So a certain state of soul is needed for listening rightly — an upright condition before God. Without it, the plainest message can be misunderstood and twisted. Cornelius and his friends are an example of this. He said to Peter, "Now therefore we are all here in the presence of God to hear all that you have been commanded by the Lord." To neglect the how is as fatal as to forget the what. So the hearer must always seek to be in the right condition to receive the message. He must also remember that only God's word is without error, and that everything brought to him claiming to be from God must be tested by the perfect standard of the Scriptures.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Preachers feel the difference such a room makes.

I know nothing more cheering to someone who loves souls than an audience like this, all eager to hear. Before Peter began to preach, he knew there was not a single uninterested soul in that company, no one putting it off, no one mocking... Eager listeners make earnest preachers. Longing hearers make it easy to preach.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What came of it

That readiness did not go unanswered.

Such an attitude of soul brings blessing. The whole company listened eagerly to Peter's testimony about the Lord Jesus. In less than an hour (probably) every person there received the forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Arranged — Two visions brought Peter and Cornelius together. The meeting was God's doing, not man's.

- Before God — Cornelius put himself and the whole room in God's presence. The preacher was only a man.

- All — He asked for everything God commanded, with nothing held back. Many want the comforting parts and object to the sterner ones.

- How — How you listen matters as much as what you hear. A wrong heart ruins the plainest message, and every message must be tested by Scripture.

- Blessing — Within about an hour that whole listening company had forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit.

Acts 10:34 · Darby

And Peter opening his mouth said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons,

Peter is standing inside a Roman officer's house, a place he had always believed a Jew must not enter. His first words there correct his own thinking about God: who He accepts, on what basis, and how far the gospel now reaches.

A Prejudice Peter Had to Unlearn

Older translations render Peter's words as "God is no respecter of persons." He is not stating something he had always believed. He is dropping something he had believed wrongly.

Peter's opening words then are precious… Clearly he had himself thought that God was a respecter of persons, because his upbringing gave Israelites a higher place in God's sight than all other nations. In the church of God all of this must be completely levelled, and God used this miraculous way to press that truth on Peter.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Grace Without Borders

"In every nation" is not about geography for its own sake. It marks how far God's blessing now reaches.

It is a question now of the grace of God going out world-wide; wherever there is a soul looking to God, that is the soul God will bless… Peter knew full well that Jesus was Lord of the Jews, but it never seemed to have sunk into his soul before that He was Lord of all.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

"Accepted" or "Acceptable"?

One word here needs care. Writers say "accepted" is not the best rendering.

Peter now knows the truth. He has learned the lesson of the great sheet. As he says, in every nation anyone who fears Him and does what is right is "accepted" with Him — or, as it should be, "acceptable," or "well pleasing to Him." Acceptance rests on completely different ground, as we learn from Ephesians 1:6. This was a completely new lesson to Peter.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why God Began with This Man

Cornelius feared God and did what was right. Commentators read that as a real work already begun in him, not as a man earning his way in.

It is plain that the call did not go out to a pagan idolater. Peter speaks here of a man who already feared God and did what is right. Cornelius was not an unconverted soul. He truly feared God, and he was full of prayer and giving to the poor. Of course, self-righteous prayer or giving could not have commended him to God… In going out to the Gentiles, it was wise and most gracious of the Lord to begin with someone no Jew could deny was godly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Restraint of a Genuine Faith

Cornelius already knew the message God had sent to Israel. So why did he not claim it for himself?

Cornelius knew the gospel had gone out to the children of Israel. But he was a humble believer, and that is exactly why he did not claim the blessing for himself. The very essence of faith is this: you do not run ahead of God. You receive what He sends, and in the way He sends it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

How Far the Statement Goes — and Where It Stops

Peter's words open a door. Writers are careful to mark what those words do not yet say.

Peter has at last seen that God shows no partiality. In every nation anyone who fears Him and does what is right is accepted with Him. This goes no further than admitting that blessing is for Gentiles as truly as for Jews. The truth of the one body had not yet been made known, and Paul was the honoured administrator of it… Peter went no further than admitting Gentiles to an equal place with the Jews: "God gave them the same gift as He gave to us."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Principle Turned on the Reader

What Peter learned about God cuts both ways for the reader.

Without respect of persons, God tells you that you are a sinner, and without respect of persons that His grace is toward you.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The same rule shapes how believers treat one another.

But "God shows no partiality" (Acts 10:34). And God's Word must govern the Church. She does not make it; she is taught by it. It says, "If you show partiality, you are committing sin" (James 2:9).

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Unlearned — Peter had once thought God ranked nations. His upbringing put Israel above the rest, and God levelled it.

- Acceptable — the better rendering is "acceptable" or "well pleasing." Acceptance itself rests on different ground, taught in Ephesians 1:6.

- Prepared — God began with a man already fearing Him and praying, someone no Jew could call ungodly.

- Restrained — Cornelius knew the message sent to Israel, yet he would not claim it. Faith receives what God sends. It does not run ahead of Him.

- Extended — the verse gives Gentiles an equal place, and no more. The God who shows no partiality forbids partiality in His people.

Acts 10:35 · Darby

but in every nation he that fears him and works righteousness is acceptable to him.

Peter had just seen a vision that overturned a lifetime of religious training, and now he stands in a Roman officer's house and says what he has learned. Two questions follow: does God treat all nations alike, and can anyone be "acceptable" to Him before hearing about Christ?

A prejudice broken

Peter's opening sentence is a confession as much as a statement. It reveals what he had believed until that morning.

Peter's opening words then are precious: "Truly I understand that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears Him and does what is right is acceptable to Him." Clearly he had himself thought that God showed partiality, for his upbringing had given Israelites a higher place in God's sight than every other nationality. In the church of God all of this must be completely levelled. God used this miraculous way of pressing such truth on Peter.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The word behind "accepted"

Older English translations end this verse with "accepted." That can sound like a settled standing before God. One writer corrects the word, and points to different ground for a Christian's acceptance.

Peter now knows the truth. He has learned the lesson of the great sheet, as he says: "But in every nation he that fears Him and works righteousness is accepted with Him." It should be "acceptable," or "well pleasing to Him." Acceptance is on totally different grounds, as we learn from Ephesians 1:6. This was an entirely new lesson to Peter.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The ESV already reads "acceptable to Him."

What the verse is not saying

Some have read this line as proof that sincere living earns salvation without the gospel. One writer answered that idea head-on.

"So to live that he might be saved" at once shows ignorance of the ways of God in grace — in fact, of the gospel, as regards Christ's work. "Right convictions and good practice" is not gospel. Is he born again? Acts 17:27 does not say a word about the Spirit's acting. Acts 10:35 says only that the man who is such and such is accepted. It was merely that blessing was not confined to the Jews, as is clear when you read the passage.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where the fear and the righteousness came from

If God finds anything pleasing in a person, where did it come from? One writer traces it back to God Himself.

He now fully realizes that in every nation he that fears God and works righteousness is acceptable to Him. How could He indeed ignore what is but the fruit of His own work in the soul, wherever it is found?

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Acceptable, and still needing to be saved

Cornelius already prayed and gave to the poor. Yet he still had to send for a preacher. One writer draws a line here between being alive toward God and being saved.

But it is a mistake to suppose that Cornelius was a mere self-righteous formalist before Peter went to his house in Caesarea. He feared God, and his prayer and his alms came up as a memorial before Him. Cornelius already had eternal life. Yet he needed to hear words from the apostle, so that he and all his house should be saved. Salvation is more than being made alive. It is the conscious possession of the deliverance the gospel now announces, won through the work of Christ. Cornelius may have been safe before; he was saved after he received the message of grace and the gift of the Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's own instruction to him was not to do something, but to hear something. The promise quoted comes from Acts 11:14, which the ESV renders "a message by which you will be saved."

What God tells Cornelius to do is to listen to "words, whereby you and all your house shall be saved." Many souls think that if they are to be saved, it is by works of some kind. But when God opens the way to the Gentiles, He rules out the thought of works. He says to this anxious man: send for my messenger, who shall "tell you words."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The door opened without a detour

This verse had a practical outcome: a non-Jew did not have to become a Jew first. One writer also marks the limits of what Peter's vision revealed.

Peter's vision did not reveal the assembly as the body of Christ, neither did the admission of Cornelius. They only showed that in every nation the person who feared God was acceptable to Him. In a word, the favour of God was not limited to the Jews, and no one needed to become a Jew to share the salvation that is in Christ.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Levelled. Peter's upbringing had placed Israel above every other nation. In the church of God that ground must be level.

- Acceptable. The word means "acceptable," or "well pleasing," rather than "accepted." A Christian's acceptance stands on totally different ground.

- God's fruit. What God finds pleasing in a man of any nation is what He Himself produced in that soul; He will not ignore His own work.

- Words, not works. Cornelius already prayed and gave, yet God told him to send for a preacher. Words to hear, not works to do.

- Door open. The result: no one has to become a Jew first. The favour of God is not fenced within one nation.

Acts 10:36 · Darby

The word which he sent to the sons of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ, (*he* is Lord of all things,)

Peter is standing in the house of Cornelius, a Roman officer. He sums up God's whole message to the world — peace, through Jesus Christ — and then adds five words that break every boundary he grew up with.

God Is the Preacher of Peace

The verse does not say people must find peace. It says God sent the word and preached it. That reverses the way many people think about getting right with God.

How often are souls urged to make their peace with God! The truth is that Christ has made peace, and God has been proclaiming it in the gospel for more than 1800 years. The poor sinner has only to believe... Nothing but the blood of Christ, the Son of God's love, could make peace with a holy and righteous God. But the work is done and God has accepted it. Now God Himself proclaims it, and He wants you to receive it. "Preaching peace by Jesus Christ," said the apostle Peter in the house of Cornelius.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Peace Through Jesus Christ, and Nothing Else

Peter names one source of peace: Jesus Christ. That matters for anyone who keeps checking their own progress for proof of peace.

So many live in miserable uncertainty because they do not rest in absolute faith on God's foundation. They are taken up with themselves instead of building on Christ alone. They are looking to experience rather than to a risen Saviour... God did not send peace to the children of Israel by spiritual experiences or by religious exercises. He does not send it to us Gentiles that way either. He sends peace by Jesus Christ alone.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why Cornelius Had Heard It but Not Taken It

Peter tells Cornelius he already knows this message. His own honesty was what kept him from claiming it.

You can see that a man might be godly and still not know the privileges of Christianity... Cornelius was not ignorant of this word. He had also heard that God was preaching peace through Jesus Christ. But it was "to the children of Israel." So why did Cornelius not get peace? For a beautiful reason. He was just and upright, and he knew he was not in the favoured circle of Israel. So he judged it was not for him.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Parenthesis That Opens the Door

The words in brackets are not decoration. They are the hinge the whole scene turns on.

He reminds them that they knew of the word of God sent to Israel by Jesus Christ. He is the One who preached peace in the middle of the strife and confusion of the nation. The parenthesis he adds, "He is Lord of all," shows that the message was not for Israel alone.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Peter had seen this majesty with his own eyes, and the memory breaks into his sermon.

Then we have the short but delightfully expressive parenthesis — "He is Lord of all." The apostle had heard the voice "from the excellent glory" telling the Father's delight in Christ. He had been an eyewitness "of His majesty." So he breaks off his talk to Cornelius, as it were, to express his heartfelt appreciation of the universal supremacy of his Lord.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Lordship Erases the Distinction

Peter had preached Jesus as Israel's Messiah. Under the title "Lord," the national line disappears — and a personal demand appears.

He is Lord, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles. His place as Messiah did apply more to the Jew, who had the holy writings, with their prophecies announcing the coming of the Messiah. But when we consider Him from the point of view of His Lordship, then all other distinctions vanish. He is Lord of the Jew, but He is equally Lord of the Gentile... If I turn to the Lord I shall at once admit myself to be under His authority. My place is subjection beneath His mighty Word.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why Death Settles the Question

Commentators tie this universal title to the resurrection. The risen Christ is beyond the borders that divide people here.

Jesus, risen from the dead, is Lord of all, not merely of the Jews. He is the Lord of all men and all things, for all things are put under His feet... Jesus, walking through this world, was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. But risen from the dead, the Saviour has no national limits. There is no Gentile or Jew beyond the grave. Here there are geographical distinctions that mark people off from one another. Beyond the grave there are none — and that is where the Lord of glory is.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

It also reaches into the future.

He is Lord of all, and you, my friend, will have to give an account to Him hereafter.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent — God is the one who sends and preaches. Peace is not something people negotiate; it is news delivered.

- Made — the peace preached was already made by the blood of Christ. Believing it, not producing it, is the sinner's part.

- Through Christ — not through feelings, progress, or religious effort. Peace is only as steady as the foundation it rests on.

- Lord of all — those bracketed words carried the message past Israel's borders. They reached a Roman officer's house, and everyone since.

- All means you — if He is Lord of all, He is your Lord: today for peace, and one day for an account.

Acts 10:37 · Darby

*ye* know; the testimony which has spread through the whole of Judaea, beginning from Galilee after the baptism which John preached --

Peter is in the house of Cornelius, telling a room of Gentiles that they already know the story. The verse says where that story ran and when it began — so why did Cornelius still need Peter to come?

News they had already heard

Peter opens with news, not with new facts. God had sent that word to Israel — yet these Gentiles had heard it too.

The grace of God was now about to flow richly beyond the boundaries of Israel. Yet God had sent that word about Jesus Christ, Himself present among men, to the children of Israel only. Still, that word had spread widely through Galilee and Judea. Cornelius and his friends lived in those parts, so they knew all about it. They knew well the things that happened in the life and death of Jesus of Nazareth.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Judea, and the Galilee it started from

"Judea" here does not mean one small province. The word covers the whole land.

"Judea." This seems to stand for the whole land of Israel, as it clearly does in Acts 10:37, and in the Gospel at Luke 6:17, Luke 7:17, and Luke 23:5.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The starting point matters. Peter names a district in the north that people despised, a region named after the Gentiles.

This message was spoken of throughout Judea. It began from despised Galilee of the Gentiles, after the baptism which John preached. We read of it in Mark 1:14-15, where the Lord Himself called men to repent and believe the gospel. It is the only salvation for the Jew — and for the Gentile when he is called later, as Cornelius now began to be.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Dated from John's baptism

Peter dates the start from John's baptism. Commentators differ on which stretch of ministry the phrase covers. One reading ties it to the moment John went to prison:

The public testimony, or preaching, of our Lord began after John's imprisonment, and it began from Galilee. But this passage shows that before that He was gathering disciples by private teaching, and His disciples were baptising.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another reading points back to an earlier work in the south that the Gospels do not record:

Early in His ministry He preached the gospel so widely that in Judea He "was making and baptizing more disciples than John" (John 4:1). We have no record of this huge campaign, and the scale of its success was amazing. Peter appears to point to it when he says that the word God sent, preaching peace by Jesus Christ, spread throughout all Judea (Acts 10:37).

Modernised from H. P. BarkerOriginal wording

Knowledge without salvation

Cornelius already had the facts. So what did a God-fearing man like him still lack?

He had the fear of God, and faith in Him. He even knew certain facts about Christ's ministry on earth. Yet he was not saved until he heard and believed the good news of the risen Christ and forgiveness in His name. Then God delivered him right out of the old world system that had held him, and brought him to Himself.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What he lacked was not information but permission.

As Acts 10:37 tells us, he knew very well the word that had spread through all Judea and was sent to the children of Israel. What he wanted was to learn on authority that God meant the same word of His grace for himself, a Gentile, and for others like him. He wanted it in all the freeness and fullness of the gospel. He did not dare take it without God's approval. He saw it clearly enough for Israel, whom he honoured as the old and chosen people of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Known. Peter starts from what his Gentile hearers already knew. The life and death of Jesus were public news across the land, not a private tradition.

- Begun. The message dates from John's baptism and started in Galilee — a despised region named after the Gentiles.

- Bounded. God sent that word to Israel, and it ran through Judea — a name that here covers the whole land, not one province.

- Not enough. Cornelius knew the account, but knowing it did not save him. He had to hear and believe the message of the risen Christ and forgiveness in His name.

- Released. He needed authority to claim as a Gentile what he had only ever seen as Israel's. Peter's visit gave him that.

Acts 10:38 · Darby

Jesus who [was] of Nazareth how God anointed him with [the] Holy Spirit and with power; who went through [all quarters] doing good, and healing all that were under the power of the devil, because God was with him.

Peter is in the home of Cornelius, a Gentile, telling the people there what Jesus did in Judea. He sums up a whole public life in one line: God anointed Him, He went through the land doing good, and He broke the devil's hold on people.

Peter's Summary of a Life

The audience matters here. Peter is speaking to non-Jews, and the love he describes did more than speak:

Peter carefully adds that Jesus is Lord not of the Jews only but of all. Jesus of Nazareth is the object of faith, whom God anointed with the Holy Spirit and power. He had come — the One that everyone anointed by God in figure had pointed to. The love of God to sinful man was clear in Him, and that love worked real deliverance; for He went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, because God was with Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Anointing

What did the anointing do for a Person who was already perfect?

The Holy Spirit's coming down on the Lord Jesus did not in any sense add to His perfection. He was as perfect before as afterwards; but it was in connection with His service on earth. It was God, as it were, setting His mark upon Him, and sealing Him for His work.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

There is a reason He waited for it:

It was not that anything was lacking in Jesus. In the first place, as God, He could have done all things, but He had humbled Himself, and had come to obey. So only when called and anointed does He present Himself in public.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"And With Power"

One writer looks closely at the word Peter uses for "power":

Here we have a definite, official designation of our Lord, and more is added: "with power." Could the horn of oil used to anoint David be what suggested the power? The word for power here is not the one usually translated "authority." It is the ordinary word for strength or might. So our Lord was not only designated for His work, but also qualified for it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Going About Doing Good

Put His course beside every other man's:

Others "loved the darkness" (John 3:19); He "loved righteousness" (Hebrews 1:9). Scripture says of men, "no one does good, not even one" (Rom. 3:12); but He "went about doing good" (Acts 10:38). Men were marked by "following their own sinful desires" (Jude 16, Eph. 2). He came for one thing: to do the will of God (Heb. 10:9).

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Healing All Oppressed by the Devil

The healings measure how far His power reached — and how man answered it:

Here was One, a man, wielding power enough to deliver man from all the effects of sin. The sick He healed — healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him — power working in goodness. And what was the effect? They would not have Him. On earth the Lord had power to remove the effects of Satan's power. But behind those effects was man's heart, and it could ask Him to depart.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"For God Was With Him"

This last clause guards against a false picture of God — as if the Son were kind and the Father were not:

Some people have the idea that Jesus came into the world to do a work that would turn God's heart towards man. They link goodness, grace, kindness and love with Jesus, while they see God as hard and demanding. That thought needs to go, for it is neither the gospel nor the truth of God. Jesus was here, but God sent Him... He went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, but it was because God was with Him.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

The Pattern for Us

The verse is not only a record. It is also a shape for Christian life:

The Holy Spirit has joined us who are Christians to Christ. We are made and shaped for this: to be down here in this world reproducing what Christ is... I once heard a complaint from one dear sister. The Christians she knew, she said, seemed to think of nothing but going to meetings, and never seemed to have time to do any good works. I wonder if we are like that? How many poor do you care for and visit?

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

Summary

- Anointed — God marked and sealed Jesus for His work. The anointing added nothing to His perfection; it fit the servant's place He had taken.

- Empowered — "With power" means strength for the task, not just a title. He was designated, and He was also qualified.

- Good — In a world where no one does good, His whole course was doing good. That is love that acts, not love that only speaks.

- Delivering — His power reached every effect of sin and the devil's oppression. Yet the very people He healed could still ask Him to leave.

- Sent — "God was with Him" tells us the kindness was God's own. He was not a Son softening a hard Father. And that life is now the pattern we are left here to reproduce.

Acts 10:39 · Darby

*We* also [are] witnesses of all things which he did both in the country of the Jews and in Jerusalem; whom they also slew, having hanged him on a cross.

Peter is standing in a Gentile home — a house of people outside Israel. He tells them the story of Jesus. They had heard the reports from a distance, but no one had ever offered them a share in Him. His summary of that life ends on a tree.

The Weight of "We Are Witnesses"

Peter is not passing on a rumour. He is telling what he saw. Everyone in the region could have seen the same things. So he can appeal to what his hearers already know.

He went about doing good, and Peter and his companions were witnesses of it; yet He was killed, hanged on a tree. All of this was public, well-known fact — he could say to his audience, "You know." But Cornelius and his relatives and close friends had never before heard that they had any interest in that blessed One. They knew His path among the Jews, and how He was presented to them; but they were Gentiles!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The evidence was open and public. So no one could plead ignorance for the rejection that followed.

The love of God for sinful man was clear in Him, and that love brought real deliverance. He went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, because God was with Him. He was the true Messiah. But in Himself and in His work He was more than that beyond all measure, and His rejection showed it most clearly. Yet there was ample testimony to Him before that rejection, so that man was without excuse.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Life That Says "God With Us"

One writer hears in Peter's summary the name Matthew opens his gospel with. He reads the whole sermon as three steps.

In the space of one short verse (Acts 10:38) Peter brings out the truth that Matthew opens with and unfolds in his gospel: "They shall call his name Immanuel (which means, God with us)." The preaching in the house of Cornelius brings three great truths before us: first, "God with us"; then "God for us"; and third, "God in us." God with us was the whole life of Jesus... Peter does not accuse his hearers of any share in the crime of killing Jesus. Even so, he states the truth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Goodness Answered With Murder

The verse puts kindness and killing side by side without explaining the jump. Commentators locate the reason not in Jesus but in the human heart.

Why did man reject Christ, except that man hated God? That was the only reason men killed Christ in this world. They hated God, and therefore they hated Him. They hated the light... And this is their sin, that they have put the Light out of the world... Even Pilate said, "I find no guilt in him." The world has sinned against God in crucifying and killing Jesus. They hated God. So when God sent His Son into the world in love, they turned Him out.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why "On a Tree" and Not Simply "Killed"

Peter does not just say that Jesus died. He says how: on a tree. That way of dying carried a specific meaning in the law of Moses.

The curse the law pronounced was a perfectly just sentence... In the days of Moses, the curse belonged in a special way to the one who died as a lawbreaker by hanging on a tree. Many a person in ancient times read Deuteronomy 21:23 and may have wondered why the curse went with death on a tree, and not with death by any other means, such as stoning or the sword. Now we know. In due time the Redeemer was to bear the curse for others, honouring the law by hanging on a tree.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Guilt and God's Purpose in One Event

Peter's wording changes with his hearers. To Israel he presses home their guilt. To scattered believers he points to the same tree where Jesus bore their sins.

Peter brings home to Israel their guilt in crucifying the One whom God has made both Lord and Christ... When speaking to Cornelius, Peter referred to the Jews hanging Jesus on a tree. But when writing to the Jews scattered abroad he said, "He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree." Israel was guilty. Yet there was also "the definite plan and foreknowledge of God," and the wonderful grace that dealt with the question of our sins so that we might be forgiven.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen — Peter preaches as an eyewitness. His hearers already knew the facts, so no one could call the rejection ignorance.

- Good — the life summed up here is "God with us": going about doing good, healing all oppressed by the devil.

- Hated — men met that good with death. The reason lies in man, not in Christ: they hated the light and put it out of the world.

- Cursed — "on a tree" is not a small detail. Deuteronomy 21:23 marked that death as the place of the curse, and there the Redeemer bore it.

- Purposed — the same cross exposes human guilt and carries out God's definite plan, so that God could forgive our sins.

Acts 10:40 · Darby

This [man] God raised up the third day and gave him to be openly seen,

Peter is standing in a Roman officer's house in Caesarea. He is speaking to Gentiles about a Jewish Messiah they knew only from a distance. His summary turns on one line. Men killed Jesus; God raised Him and let Him be seen — but only by a small circle.

God's answer to man's verdict

The verse follows Peter's words about men killing Jesus and hanging Him on a tree. Two opposite acts stand side by side. The second is God's reply to the first.

Here we get the second wonderful truth, that is, God for us. The One whom man refused, God raised up, and put into glory.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

News they had not yet heard

Peter had just told this household that they already knew the public facts about Jesus. The resurrection was different. People at the time denied it.

The death of Jesus had been a public spectacle, and everybody knew about it. Only a few had seen His resurrection. Common report denied it, and the religious authorities backed that denial, as we learn from Matthew 28:11-15. So Peter now announced the astonishing news. God had raised the crucified Jesus from the dead. He and his fellow apostles had seen Him themselves, eaten with Him, and received from Him a command about what they were to preach to others.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"Not to all the people"

The word "people" here is not humanity in general. In Peter's speech it means one nation. That limit points to something God was starting.

"Not to all the people" — notice that "the people" here always means the Jewish people only. God was now forming a new people altogether.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who actually saw Him

The list of those who met the risen Christ is worth reading against the list of those who condemned Him. The two lists do not overlap.

The risen Lord showed Himself to certain of His disciples (John 21:1), but not to any of His enemies. He appeared to men like Peter and John, Thomas and Cleopas. He did not appear to Annas and Caiaphas, Pilate and Herod, or to any of their followers.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

The risen Christ ate and drank with His followers. Those meals met a need — but not His own.

He whom they killed on a tree ate and drank with His own after He rose from the dead. He did not need the food. They needed the testimony that He was alive from the dead — a truly risen Man, who had loved His own in the world, and loved them to the utmost.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why it holds the gospel together

If this one fact fails, nothing else in the message stands.

The resurrection is what the gospel turns on and what clinches it. If unbelief still holds out against its testimony, what could be clearer? Man hates both the love and the truth of God, and will not be saved at any price.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the raising says about the cross

The resurrection is not only a wonder in itself. Read backwards, it tells you what God thought of the death that came three days earlier.

At the moment of His death Christ accomplished atonement. He bore the sinner's sins, and was made sin so that we might escape its consequences. He sacrificed Himself, and so infinitely glorified God. What was the result? God raised Him up. So I can tell you of a risen, triumphant, victorious Saviour. That is the Saviour I know. He triumphed over sin, Satan, death, the grave, and the power of darkness; and as the risen man He lives before God.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Man's verdict — men killed Him and hanged Him on a tree. That is where Peter's account starts.

- God's reversal — the One man refused, God raised up and put into glory.

- God's proof — the raising shows that the atoning death satisfied God. The Saviour Peter preaches is alive and victorious.

- God's witnesses — He appeared to a chosen few: His own, not His judges. They ate and drank with Him because they needed the certainty.

- God's new people — "the people" means the Jewish nation. That limit shows God was forming a new people, which is why a Roman household is hearing this at all.

Acts 10:41 · Darby

not of all the people, but of witnesses who were chosen before of God, *us* who have eaten and drunk with him after he arose from among [the] dead.

Peter is in the home of Cornelius, a man who is not Jewish, telling him what God did with the Jesus that men had killed. One detail stands out: God did not show the risen Christ to everyone, but only to a few chosen men who ate with Him after He rose.

"Not to all the people"

The word "people" here does not mean everyone. Peter uses it in one narrow sense, and that sense points to something new God was doing.

"The people" here always means the Jewish people only. So the risen Christ appeared "not to all the people" — because God was now forming a new people altogether.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why His enemies never saw Him

Before the cross, everyone saw Jesus. After it, no enemy did. The reason was mercy, not fear.

If our Lord had publicly appeared to His enemies, it would have meant destruction to them. Instead of confronting them with their evil deeds, to their utter confusion and destruction, He commissioned His disciples to preach the gospel, beginning at Jerusalem, the very city of His murderers.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

That silence toward His adversaries is not permanent. One writer names the men on both sides of the line and points to the day when the second group will see Him too.

The risen Lord showed Himself to some of His disciples, but not to any of His enemies. He appeared to men like Peter and John, Thomas and Cleopas, but not to Annas and Caiaphas, Pilate and Herod, or any of their followers. His enemies judged Him unjustly, and He humbly submitted to that judgment. Yet by His own word before the Jewish council (Matthew 26:64), they will still "see the Son of Man" on the day He appears, when He comes with clouds of glory and majesty to judge all evildoers.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Witnesses chosen by God

The verse says God chose these witnesses. One writer asks what that word can mean once God is the one choosing.

Does not the use of the word here prove its meaning? Used in connection with God, it is impossible to attach any idea to it beyond that of selection or appointment.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The choice was also practical. Proof of a resurrection needs witnesses who knew the man before he died.

There were good and necessary reasons why outsiders could not see or confirm His resurrection. In the main it called for chosen witnesses who knew Him well... How could any reasonable person expect unbelieving Jews or Gentiles to record such a wonder, to His glory and to their own certain condemnation? Yet thousands of unbelievers were brought to believe, and suffered for their faith without flinching.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Eating and drinking with a risen Man

A ghost story collapses at a shared meal. And the point of those meals was not His hunger.

The One they killed on a tree ate and drank with His own people after He rose from the dead. He did not need the food. They needed the proof that He was alive from the dead — a real, risen Man, who had loved His own who were in the world, and loved them to the very end.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The narrow circle, the wide message

The meals narrow the circle further. They tell us who these witnesses were, and why no one could join them later.

The only people who ate and drank with Jesus after His resurrection were the apostles. Others saw Him, but these were the chosen witnesses of the resurrection... The apostles, then, were to be eyewitnesses of Christ's resurrection. That is an important fact, because it shows the office was temporary in character, and could not be revived in later times.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Peter spoke as a man who was there. From that one fact he drew the heart of the gospel.

There was no doubt about His resurrection; the preacher himself had seen Him, and had eaten and drunk with Him... His death met the claims of God, while His resurrection displayed His absolute victory over death, and sin, and all the power of Satan.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Chosen. "Chosen by God" can only mean God's own selection and appointment. The witnesses did not volunteer.

- Spared. Mercy kept the risen Christ from His enemies. A public appearance would have destroyed them, so He sent preachers to them instead.

- Certified. He ate and drank, not because He needed food, but because they needed proof. A real Man stood before them, alive.

- Commissioned. The men at those meals were the apostles, and that eyewitness office could never be repeated.

- Sent. A private appearing produced a public message. God showed the risen Christ to a few so that everyone could hear about Him.

Acts 10:42 · Darby

And he commanded us to preach to the people, and to testify that *he* it is who was determinately appointed of God [to be] judge of living and dead.

Peter is preaching in a Roman officer's house, speaking to Gentiles for the first time. God has appointed the crucified Jesus as Judge of the living and the dead — so why does the first sermon to Gentiles open with a courtroom?

"The people"

Peter's word for his audience, "the people," has a narrow meaning. The next line breaks it open.

"God raised Him up the third day and showed Him openly, not to all the people, but to witnesses chosen of God, even to us." You see, "the people" is used here throughout for the Jewish people only. For now God was forming a completely new people. But was it only to the people? He commanded us to preach to the people. What does he mean by that? The Jew, of course. Not so. "To Him all the prophets bear witness, that through His name whoever believes in Him…" So we find light beginning to dawn on this going out of the gospel to every creature — to the Gentile as much as to the Jew.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Judge they crucified

The announcement lands hard because of who this Judge is.

First, the Jesus whom men crucified is appointed by God to be the Judge both of the living and the dead. His crucifixion was the act of both Jew and Gentile. Cornelius must have been familiar with the details. He must have known some who took part in it, and he may even have been involved himself. He knew about His shame, His dishonour, and His apparent failure. Well, the despised Jesus is to come forth in due time as the universal Judge. The destinies of all men rest in His hands. What an astounding declaration! It is enough to overwhelm every enemy with terror!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why judgment came first to Gentiles

Peter is not the only preacher who starts here. Paul does the same at Athens, and one writer explains why.

It is striking that Peter names this office of the Lord first, and Paul names it second at Athens — the office He holds after death and resurrection, of being the appointed Judge of all men. In both cases they were giving testimony to Gentiles… With the Jew there were other and greater and nearer glories in the Messiah. The Jews had neglected and despised the responsibilities of those glories, and so those glories were taken up with them. On the Gentiles no such deposit as the law or the oracles of God rested. So in the first chapter of Romans we find creation and its testimony. Here we find the office of Judge of living and dead, together with the power of pardon in the Lord's name when it is received.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Where the title comes from

What gives this Man the right to judge? And what comes before the day He judges?

It is His victory, as Man, over death that gives Him the title to judge (see John 5:21-27). But before the day when He will judge comes the day in which He saves.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Two judgments, not one

The verse names two groups. Writers here read them as two judgments at two different times.

He shall come to judge the living and the dead (Acts 10:42; 2 Tim. 4:1) — not the living and the dead at the same time, but the living first, the dead afterwards. The judgment of the living stretches over a considerable span of time. The judgment of the dead comes at the close of all, before the eternal scene where all judgment ends.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Pardon in the Judge's own name

The next verse turns this sentence of judgment into an offer. Everything rests on who makes it.

But second, before this Judge takes His seat on the judgment throne, all the prophets bear witness that there is forgiveness offered in His name. That forgiveness is received by "whoever believes in Him." Forgiveness through the name of the Judge! Could anything be more stable and satisfying than that? The Judge has become the guarantor for sinful men, so the believer in Him receives forgiveness of sins before the day dawns when the great court for the living and the dead will sit.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The offer reaches every kind of person, and what it gives lasts for ever.

Peter's "whoever" is universal. It goes out to men without distinction of class or colour. He who forgives their sins is the appointed universal Judge, so they are clear of condemnation for ever. If the Judge justifies, who is he that condemns? He must have the last word about every man.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Commanded — the apostles did not invent this message. God ordered them to announce that the crucified Jesus now holds every human destiny in His hands.

- Appointed — His right to judge rests on His resurrection, the victory over death He won as Man.

- Living and dead — commentators read this as two judgments, not one: the living first, the dead at the close.

- Whoever — "the people" meant the Jews. The next line widens the offer to anyone who believes, Gentile as much as Jew.

- Forgiven — the Judge offers pardon in His own name before the court sits. If the Judge justifies you, no one can condemn you.

Acts 10:43 · Darby

To him all the prophets bear witness that every one that believes on him will receive through his name remission of sins.

Peter is preaching in the house of Cornelius, a Roman officer. His closing sentence gathers up everything before it: every prophet points to one Man, and forgiveness through His name is open to anyone who believes.

The United Witness of the Prophets

Peter does not offer a new idea. He points his hearers back to the prophets.

Peter's last words to Cornelius and those gathered in his house appeal to the united witness of all the Old Testament prophets. Christ Jesus, the blessed Man, clearly fulfilled their prophecies about the Messiah of Israel. Yet they did not only prove that He is Judge. They also showed that whoever truly believed in Him, Jew or Gentile, would receive forgiveness of sins. Marvellous message of grace!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Peter had only just learned this himself, and it changed how he read the prophets.

With this new-born conviction in his soul, Peter now reads the prophets in fresh light and with other eyes. He is full of the truth himself, and he speaks with the utmost simplicity to Cornelius. Cornelius and his household hear the blessed word. "To him all the prophets bear witness." It was one concurrent evidence... There is no question of a Jew, but "everyone who believes in Him." Sadly, the Jews did not believe in Him. But whoever did believe, Jew or Gentile, "receives forgiveness of sins." Cornelius had not known this, and no one could have known it until the work of redemption was done. Believers who lived before Christ were just as safe before His work as they were afterwards, but that work put them on the ground of conscious salvation before God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Everyone — Grace Without Borders

One word in the verse rules out every exception. Older translations render it "whosoever."

Peter's "whosoever" is universal. It goes out to people of every class and colour. The One who forgives their sins is the same One appointed to be Judge of all, so they are clear of condemnation for ever. If the Judge justifies, who is there to condemn? He must have the last word about every man.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

One writer traces this width back to the resurrection.

Jesus, risen from the dead, is Lord of all, not merely of the Jews... Jesus, walking through this world, was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. But risen from the dead, the Saviour has no national limits. There is no Gentile or Jew beyond the grave. Here on earth, geography marks people off from one another. Beyond the grave there are no such lines, and that is where the Lord of glory is.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Through His Name

Peter says forgiveness comes "through his name." One writer explains what that phrase rules out.

As believers, we are not forgiven because of anything that we are, or because of any experience, however real. That would be for our own sakes. We are forgiven because of what God has found in Christ and His work — "for His Name's sake"... Peter carried out the Lord's commission. He told the Gentiles that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins. So forgiveness of sins is nothing we achieve. God proclaims it to us through the Lord Jesus, and we receive it by faith in Christ.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Believing Is All That Is Asked

Peter gives an anxious man no ritual and no programme. He points him to a Person.

When the messenger reaches the troubled soul, this is what he says: Believe in God's Son. Believe in the One whom the world has refused, and whom God has taken into glory. He tells him that all the prophets bear witness to this blessed truth: from Christ he will receive forgiveness of his sins. All he has "to do" is believe in Him.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Forgiveness First, Then the Seal

God answered before Peter had finished the sentence. The Spirit came at the very words that promised forgiveness.

"Everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins through His name. While Peter was still saying these things, the Holy Spirit fell on all who heard the word." What! Without baptism? Without laying on of hands? Without prayer for them? Yes — without any of these things, and without more delay. Even while the apostle Peter is still preaching those very words, God gives them all the Holy Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Witness — every prophet points one way. Peter's message is not an invention but "one concurrent evidence" that meets in Christ.

- Name — forgiveness rests on the worth of His name, never on what the believer is or feels.

- Everyone — the promise crosses class, colour and nation, because the risen Lord has no national limits.

- Believe — the only thing asked of the troubled soul is to trust the One God has glorified.

- Receive — Cornelius simply believed, and received forgiveness. The Spirit fell while Peter was still speaking, before any ritual.

Acts 10:44 · Darby

While Peter was yet speaking these words the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who were hearing the word.

The scene is Caesarea, in the house of Cornelius, a Roman officer — a Gentile, an outsider to Israel. Peter is still speaking when God acts. The Spirit comes on people who had not been baptised, prayed over, or made Jews first.

A Sermon God Interrupted

Peter never finished. The moment his hearers took in the word about forgiveness, God answered it.

Whatever more Peter meant to say was never spoken, for the Holy Spirit at once fell on all who heard the word. A blessed interruption! How I wish we knew more of this in our preaching today. The truth is that Peter's audience drank in his testimony word by word as he gave it. So they received divine forgiveness on the spot. So comes the gift of the Spirit, whom God gives to all forgiven ones, and to them only. This is God's order for Christianity until the end: first, the forgiveness of sins; second, the gift of the Holy Spirit; and third, baptism.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

His last words had been about forgiveness for anyone who believes in Jesus.

This was his last word to the assembled company. It is the first time we find the word "whoever" in this book. He had nothing to say to this Gentile company about repentance and baptism. His message was interrupted. They believed and the Holy Spirit fell on them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

No Ritual, No Waiting

Everything that had accompanied earlier gifts of the Spirit is missing here.

Nowhere in the ways of God with man does His grace sparkle with greater brilliance than in this scene. The Gentile had no claim on Him and no link with Him. Yet he hears the gospel in all its fullness, and the Holy Spirit falls on the believer. There was no baptism first, as in the case of the Jew (Acts 2:38). There was no prayer, as in the case of the Samaritans (Acts 8:15). There was no laying on of hands, as in the case of the converts to Judaism at Ephesus (Acts 19:6). The hearing of faith secured the blessing as the words Peter spoke fell from his lips.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Three things happened at once.

There was no interval, no waiting, no laying on of hands. Hearing, believing and receiving the Holy Spirit all went together.

Modernised from Other AuthorsOriginal wording

Why God Did It This Way

At Pentecost the order was baptism first, then the gift. Here God reversed it — and commentators trace the wisdom in that.

This is very different from what we saw on the day of Pentecost, for there they were baptised first. Every one of them was baptised. They believed on Jesus for the forgiveness of sins, and then they received the gift of the Holy Spirit. But here the Spirit came while Peter spoke the word, and these were Gentiles. No doubt there was great wisdom in it. Who would have been bold enough? Perhaps Peter. But there were Jewish believers there too. What would they have thought?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer sees a further reason in the different histories of the two groups.

They were not called on to be baptized first, as Jews had been (ch. 2:38). Instead God here showed His full acceptance of Gentiles in a public way that could not be mistaken. Gentiles had not been guilty of openly rejecting the Messiah, as Israel had been. That is why Israel was required to reverse that stand against Christ openly, by baptism, before God could accept them openly.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"All Who Heard the Word"

Two words in the verse carry weight. The first is all.

Here, in the case of Cornelius the Roman centurion and his friends, there was again no distinction between believer and believer. Notice the word, ALL!

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The second is heard. It means more than sitting in the room.

Some present may have been gazing about the room at Cornelius' fine furniture and the pictures on the wall. Some may have been studying the fashion of some lady's latest hat. Others may have been lost in thought about their business or their pleasures. Only those who heard the Word were blessed.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

What Began Here

What fell on that room was a baptism of the Holy Spirit, and it had happened once before.

This baptism of the Holy Spirit took place with Jewish believers at Pentecost (see Acts 1:5; Acts 2:1-4). It took place with Gentile believers at the call of Cornelius and his friends (Acts 10:44; Acts 11:15-17). The baptism of the Spirit sets aside everything that belongs to the flesh. Natural distinctions, such as Jew or Gentile, and social positions, such as slave or free, have no place in the one Body.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. Peter was speaking about forgiveness for whoever believes. God used that word, not a ritual.

- Faith. They took the word in as Peter spoke it. Hearing, believing and receiving the Spirit all happened at once.

- Gift. The Spirit was given without baptism, without prayer over them, without any hand laid on them — grace with nothing added.

- Order. At Pentecost baptism came first. Here God gave the Spirit first, showing His acceptance of Gentiles in a way no one could mistake.

- Reach. God included all who heard. In the one Body, the difference between Jew and Gentile no longer counts.

Acts 10:45 · Darby

And the faithful of the circumcision were astonished, as many as came with Peter, that upon the nations also the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out

Peter is still speaking in a Roman officer's house when God interrupts the sermon. The Jewish believers who came with him are stunned. God has poured out His Spirit on people outside Israel. Why was this such a shock? On what terms did God give the gift? And what did it settle for the church?

Why they were amazed

The men who came with Peter were Jewish believers. What they saw broke a barrier between nations. One writer links their shock to the sign that came with it — the same sign the Jewish believers had received earlier.

The Jewish believers who came with Peter were astonished to see God pour out His Spirit on Gentiles. Jewish disciples had spoken in other languages (Acts 2:4) when they received the Spirit. Now the Gentiles do the same. This shows that the barriers between nations are broken down, and that people of every nation can now understand one another. It is the result of the value of the sacrifice of Christ.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God opened this door, not the church and not the apostles. One writer also notes which apostle God used to do it.

This made it plain, beyond doubt, that God opened the door to the nations just as He had opened it to the Jews. It was not man, nor the church, nor even the apostles who did it... And it was fitting that God used a man who was clearly one of the twelve apostles, and not the man already called and appointed as the apostle to the Gentiles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The moment the gift came

These Gentiles believed the message as they heard it. One writer describes how fast God answered that faith.

Cornelius and his friends did believe. Faith was present in their hearts before they ever heard the message. Hearing it, their faith instantly embraced it, and God marked that fact by giving them the gift of the Holy Spirit at once. Their faith leapt forward like a flash of lightning, and the thunder-clap of the Holy Spirit followed straight after.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Nothing was required first

In the other cases in Acts, something had to happen first. Here, nothing did.

The Gentiles were far away from God. The greater the distance, the more freely His grace comes out to those who have no claim on Him. The scene sparkles with the brilliance of the grace of God. The rebellious Jew must repent and be baptised in public. The Samaritan, with his false religion, hears the gospel, believes it, and is baptised in the name of Jesus. But he must wait for the apostles to come down, pray for him and lay their hands on him, before the Holy Spirit comes. The Gentile was far off, and as a nation had no link with God — and that is where you and I come in. He hears the truth, believes the gospel, and receives the Holy Spirit on the spot, with none of these steps first.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What "the gift" means

The word for gift here is the same word used of what the Jewish believers received at Pentecost.

This is dorea, the gift of the Holy Spirit. Scripture uses this same word for the gift of the Holy Spirit which Cornelius received (Acts 10:45). And Peter says of that gift that it was the same thing they had themselves received at Pentecost (Acts 10:47).

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

One writer points out how rare this pouring out was, and what it settled about equality.

The act was never repeated after the one we read of in Acts 10:45. It took place on two occasions only, and the historian describes it in only two chapters of Acts (2 and 10)... God poured the Spirit out first on believers from among the Jews, and then on believers from among the Gentiles. This put the Gentiles on completely equal ground with the Jews, since each group received the gift direct from God. The Holy Spirit has never been poured out again.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

What it settled

God sealed these Gentiles by His own act. That settled what the Jewish believers had to accept.

It mattered that the Jewish believers should go along fully with the mighty work of God's grace, which sealed believing Gentiles just as it sealed believing Jews... This left no room for circumcision or the law. All is of grace reigning through righteousness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Poured — God gave Gentiles the same gift He gave Jewish believers at Pentecost; Scripture uses one word, dorea, for both.

- Poured freely — no baptism, no laying on of hands, no waiting: the Spirit came the moment they believed the message.

- Poured on outsiders — those furthest from God received the freest grace; that is where non-Jewish believers today come in.

- Poured before witnesses — God opened the door, not the apostles and not the church; Peter's Jewish companions saw it and agreed.

- Poured, so nothing was added — God had sealed them by grace, and that left no room for circumcision or the law.

Acts 10:46 · Darby

for they heard them speaking with tongues and magnifying God. Then Peter answered,

Peter was still preaching in the house of Cornelius, a Roman officer, when the Holy Spirit fell on his Gentile listeners. What the Jewish believers with him then heard astonished them, and it settled a question that shaped the whole future of the church.

Proof that could be heard

This proof was not a private feeling. Peter's companions could hear it for themselves, and he had brought them as witnesses.

They believe the testimony sent to them about the worth of Jesus' name in the forgiveness of sins. As a result the Holy Spirit fell on all those who heard the word... What follows proves that they had received this incomparable Gift: "For they were hearing them speaking in tongues and extolling God." The evidence that they had received the Holy Spirit was plain to the ear and eye of Peter and of his Jewish brothers. He had been careful for his reputation, so he took six brothers down with him. They were to take note of what happened and join him in testifying about it, as they do before the objectors at Jerusalem in Acts 11.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why this sign, and why here

God gave the Gentiles the same sign He gave at Pentecost. This time it came with none of the conditions the Jewish believers had known.

On Pentecost water baptism was a condition of receiving the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38) and the forgiveness of sins. In Samaria the apostles Peter and John, according to the wisdom of God, had to lay on hands. But here the Holy Spirit came upon the Gentiles without water baptism and without the laying on of hands. Nor was there any process of seeking, surrendering, self-examination, giving up, or praying for it. By the hearing of faith, in believing the message of the gospel, the Holy Spirit fell on them. Then Cornelius, his relatives and friends spoke with tongues and magnified God. This showed that every barrier between Jew and Gentile had gone, and that God gave the Gentiles nothing inferior to what came upon the believing Jews on the day of Pentecost.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Hearers, not preachers

At Pentecost the tongues marked out the men who proclaimed Christ. Here the roles are reversed.

In both cases the tongues given publicly authenticated the gift of the Holy Spirit. But the occasions differed. In Jerusalem the persons publicly authorised were preachers and witnesses of Christ... In Caesarea it verified not the preachers, but the people who received the preaching.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

The Spirit first, then the water

Here the Spirit came first and baptism followed after. That raises a question: what decides who belongs to Christ?

But the believing Gentiles, as we see, received the Holy Spirit while hearing the word, as most — perhaps all of us — have done; and baptism follows. Who could refuse the outward sign to the obvious recipients of that divine seal? Their gifts of speaking with tongues and magnifying God proclaimed the more precious gift of the Spirit, which never passes away. His seal is the true ground why those who have it should be owned as members of Christ's body. It is not church knowledge in them, and still less the will or consent of other men.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Magnifying God

The tongues carried words, and those words praised God.

In Acts 10:46 Cornelius and his relatives and close friends magnified God. They had just heard the gospel from Peter's lips, and the Holy Spirit came upon them... And Christ may still be magnified today in the body of the humblest and weakest believer, for His strength is made perfect in weakness. Christ may be magnified with praise, prayer, and witness to Himself... Christ may be magnified even in our daily work in the house, or shop, or office, or the care of the children.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Not a pattern to chase

One writer compares all three times in Acts when the Spirit came in this way. Each time He came on a group, and no one had asked for Him.

It is significant that in all three cases it is companies and not single people. Further, God gives the Spirit without the believer seeking for His indwelling... Clearly there is no thought at all in Scripture of Christians begging God for days and weeks for a baptism of the Spirit and the gift of tongues. God continues to give the Spirit to believers, for He is an absolute necessity to their spiritual life. But the gift of tongues seems to have been confined to the beginning of Christianity.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. The proof was audible. Six Jewish witnesses could report what they heard, and they backed Peter up at Jerusalem.

- Equal. God gave the Gentiles the same sign He gave at Pentecost. Nothing lesser, and no barrier left between Jew and Gentile.

- Received. At Jerusalem tongues marked out the preachers. At Caesarea they marked out the hearers who believed.

- Sealed. The Spirit came by the hearing of faith: no seeking, no ritual, no waiting. Baptism only followed what God had already done.

- Magnified. They used the gift first to praise God. That use has never ended: Christ can be magnified in the weakest believer's ordinary day.

Acts 10:47 · Darby

Can any one forbid water that these should not be baptised, who have received the Holy Spirit as we also [did]?

Peter is still speaking when the Holy Spirit falls on a room full of non-Jews. His question about water asks something larger: can anyone stand in God's way? Three questions that shaped the early church meet here — whom God receives, on what evidence, and what baptism is for.

God Acts First

No apostle laid a hand on anyone. The gift came first, and that timing was the whole argument.

Peter says to them, "Can anyone withhold water?" He had every right to grant this public privilege to the Gentiles whom the Spirit had baptized. Water baptism is not brushed aside here, and it is not made a command or condition. God had given the Spirit first, and no human hand had any part in it. That shut the mouths of the Jewish believers, who were always quick to object. They would have forbidden water if God had not so plainly given these Gentiles the unspeakable gift of the Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same gift settled a second question: whether these Gentiles must first become Jews.

God then gives the Holy Spirit to the Gentiles, without their becoming Jews or being circumcised. From then on the Christian assembly could not refuse them. God had received them, and had put His seal on them. Peter commands them to be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the Order Was Reversed

At Pentecost the Jews were baptized first and received the Spirit after. Here the order flips, and one writer finds God's wisdom in the change, not a whim.

Where is the blessed wisdom and consistency in God's ways here? The Jew is baptized and then receives the Holy Spirit. The Gentile receives the Holy Spirit and then is baptized. The reason was this. To a Jew it was a most painful thing. In becoming a Christian he had crossed a frightening gap that cut him off from Judaism. He had to step out of everything he had belonged to before and stand under the banner of the crucified One. Therefore he must be baptized... They must bow to Him whom they had crucified — bow to Him who was the nation's shame.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same order also tests a claim made about baptism itself.

When the Gentiles receive the Spirit, the insistence on baptism as a condition drops. God takes things into His own hands, as one may say. The Spirit falls on Cornelius and those with him while they are still listening to Peter. No hint of baptism has yet been given... Some teach that baptism is the "sacrament of regeneration." On that view Cornelius received the Spirit while still unregenerate — before any new birth — because he had not yet been baptized.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What "Received the Holy Spirit" Means

Peter's words tie these Gentiles to what the first believers received. So what is it to receive the Holy Spirit?

Does "receiving the Holy Spirit" mean only divine power coming on people? Old Testament believers had known that power, yet we never read that any of them received the Holy Spirit. Does it mean a gift of spiritual abilities, such as tongues or miracles? Some who had received the Spirit did share in those at times. But in truth it was far more. What they received was the Holy Spirit Himself. And nothing less than this is the common privilege of believers since the day of Pentecost.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Baptism as a Privilege, Not a Command

The shape of Peter's question is itself an argument. He asks whether anyone may hold water back. Nobody asks that about a duty.

There was a command to baptize, but no command to be baptized... When we read how they gave it, we find the clearest evidence of this. It was not a matter of obedience but of granting a privilege — entrance into the outward, professing assembly of God on earth. "What hinders me from being baptized?" says the officer of Candace. His question rules out any thought of obedience. He speaks of being let in, and he counted that a privilege. So with Cornelius: "Can anyone withhold water for baptizing these people, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?"

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Door Opened to the Nations

Peter holds the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and this is the second time he turns one.

Then Peter says, we cannot keep these people out of their privileges... No, he says, they are forgiven, they have the Holy Spirit, and the House of God on earth must open to them. Here Peter uses the keys of the kingdom of heaven a second time. He opens the door again as he brings in the Gentiles. He has no authority to let people into heaven. But he does let them into the kingdom of heaven on earth, where people profess Christ, and he does it, I understand, by the door of baptism.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- God moves. The Spirit fell with no apostle's hand involved. God settled the case before any man could rule on it.

- God gives. Cornelius did not just receive power. He received the Holy Spirit Himself, the shared privilege of believers since Pentecost.

- God seals. He put His seal on uncircumcised people, and the church could no longer refuse them.

- God grants. Baptism here is a privilege given, not a duty demanded. Peter asks who could hold it back — not who must obey.

- God opens. Peter uses the keys a second time, and the door into the visible house of God on earth swings open to the nations.

Acts 10:48 · Darby

And he commanded them to be baptised in the name of the Lord. Then they begged him to stay some days.

Peter was still preaching in the house of Cornelius when the Holy Spirit fell on the Gentiles listening to him. Only then came the order to baptize — which raises three questions: who is commanded, who does the baptizing, and what "in the name of Jesus Christ" means here.

Water after the Spirit

God has not always worked in this order.

At Pentecost the believing Jews had to be baptized before they received the gift of the Spirit. In a solemn way they had to take the place of death with Christ toward everything they had trusted before... But the believing Gentiles, as we see, received the Holy Spirit while hearing the word, as most of us — perhaps all — have done. Baptism then follows. Who could refuse the outward sign to those who had clearly received that divine seal?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The difference turned on what each group had done with Christ.

They did not have to be baptized first, as the Jews had (Acts 2:38). Instead God showed here His full acceptance of Gentiles in a public way that could not be mistaken. Gentiles had not been guilty of rejecting the Messiah in public, as Israel had. So Israel had to reverse that earlier stand against Christ in public, by baptism, before God could accept them in public.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A privilege conferred, not a duty imposed

The word "commanded" is easily misread as an order aimed at Cornelius. Look at who is being told to act.

Baptism is the act of the person baptising, not of the person being baptised. The one being baptised cannot do it for himself. He is outside, and cannot receive himself in. So it is written, "He commanded them to be baptised in the name of the Lord." ... It is not obedience... he cannot baptise himself. But there is more. Peter asks, "Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptised, who have received the Holy Spirit as well as we?" Then he commanded them to be baptised. It was a privilege given to them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer shows where the New Testament places the command.

There was a command to make disciples of all nations, and to baptize them, but no command to people to be baptized. Acts 10:48 is no exception. It says instead that he "commanded that they should be baptized in the name of the Lord." Privilege and blessing are not matters of command. They come from divine grace.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Peter directed it — he did not perform it

The apostle who had just preached is not the one who went down to the water.

It seems they were baptized in the name of Jesus Christ not by Peter, but at his direction. One or more of the brothers with him did it (v. 48). There was neither vanity nor superstition in getting it done by Peter. Still, in obedience to the Lord, he took care that it was done properly... It already mattered that everyone should know this: an ordinary believer has the right to baptize even in a great apostle's presence, and the act took no value from office or gift.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"In the name of the Lord"

Some have taken the wording here as replacing the fuller formula given to the apostles. Commentators answer that baptism is always to someone, and the two are not rivals.

Baptism is always to some person or thing. The disciples found at Ephesus had been baptised to the baptism of John (Acts 19:3). The Israelites had been baptised to Moses. Those baptised in Acts were baptised to the name of the Lord Jesus as Saviour and Lord. There is no reason why this cannot be joined with the words found in Matthew. A person may be baptised in the name of the Lord Jesus to the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the water pictures

So what does the water stand for? It is not the thing that gives life.

Scripture never treats baptism as the sign even of the giving of life. It is the sign of death with Christ to sin, and of sins washed away for those who are already made alive.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The days he stayed

The closing invitation looks like ordinary hospitality. For Peter, staying in a Gentile home was far more.

The vision on the housetop at Joppa had taught Peter to call no man common or unclean just because of his nationality. So, for the first time in his life, he stayed with people who had been Gentiles, and stayed for some days. For him the wall of separation had come down.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Seal first. God gave the Spirit before any water touched them, so no one could argue about who belonged.

- Seal decides. Peter's question settles it: no one may refuse the sign to people God has already sealed.

- Seal, then privilege. Baptism is given, not demanded. The command falls on those who baptize.

- Seal outranks office. Ordinary believers did the baptizing in an apostle's presence; the act drew no value from rank or gift.

- Seal breaks the wall. Peter stayed on under a Gentile roof — the separation he had kept all his life was gone.