2 Peter 1:1–21

2 Peter 1:1 · Darby

Simon Peter, bondman and apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have received like precious faith with us through [the] righteousness of our God and Saviour Jesus Christ

Peter opens with a name, a title and a greeting, but every word carries weight. A fisherman calls himself a slave, and he traces his readers' faith back to the righteousness of "our God and Savior Jesus Christ."

The writer and the name he chooses

Peter signs with his old name and his new one, and he puts the lowlier of his two titles first.

He gives his old name, Simon (Symeon in the Greek), followed by the new name the Lord gave him, Peter. He calls himself a servant first, before he mentions his apostleship. The word servant is the same word Paul used of himself: a slave. Clearly Peter valued being a servant more than being an apostle.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

He does not hide the old name that carried his failure.

In this later letter Peter does not hide his Jewish name, the name of his nature with all its failure. Yet he puts the lovely name "bondman" before his title as apostle. That name shone in his eyes more than ever. It is needed and good for believers to think about it, delight in it, and make it their own.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A faith of equal standing — apostle and beginner alike

The writers here quote an older translation: "like precious faith." The phrase does not measure how strongly someone believes. It measures what they believe.

"Like precious faith" raises no question about the measure of faith in those who believe. It says that what they believe is just as precious for the simplest Christian as for an apostle — in its source, its agent, its object, and its result. It is the full revelation of God in Christ, and not only a message from God, as it had been from the start.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Note the verb: they obtained it. Nobody earned a place on that level.

If we have received precious faith, it is the same faith that Simon Peter had, the bondman and apostle of Jesus Christ. Faith is not a reward for service that deserves it. It is not the result of any natural process in the soul. God gives it, a gift in sovereign love.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Who the letter is written to

Peter is writing to people who once held to the religion of Israel, and he is writing to believers, not to a mixed crowd.

He is not appealing to sinners, or to people who merely claim the Christian name, but to believers in the middle of that profession. "The precious faith" is the faith of Christianity, in contrast to Judaism, which these believers had once belonged to.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"The righteousness" — God keeping His word

This is the hinge of the verse, and readers often get it backwards. The righteousness named here is God's faithfulness to promises He made long before.

The apostle describes his fellow believers as having obtained the same precious faith he had. It came through God's faithfulness to the promises made to the fathers, for that is the force of the word "righteousness" here. The faithfulness of the God of Israel had given His people this faith — that is, Christianity — which was so precious to them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

So the order runs one way: righteousness produces the faith, not faith the righteousness.

It is strange that anyone should confuse "faith through righteousness" with "righteousness through faith"; but they do… The apostle is really speaking of the precious faith of Christianity replacing Judaism, which had now come to an end. It came through the righteousness of the One who had stepped in to keep His prophetic Word, and to hold up the hearts of the true Israel with His abundant loving mercy. This is divine righteousness displayed, not handed over to us.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

"Our God and Savior Jesus Christ"

In Greek, one article covers both titles here.

No scholar who has weighed the construction carefully denies that leaving out the second article can join two persons in one action, where the phrase does not describe a single person. The context must decide which is meant… I am inclined to believe that in Peter's letters, as in Hebrews, the inspired writer meant to strengthen his readers in the great truth that Jesus was the Jehovah of Israel, the true God, no less than the Father.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The point for the reader is simple: the One who made the promises is the One who came and kept them.

You have this faith through the faithfulness of Him who was the Jehovah of Israel, and who was also the Saviour who came down and walked in this world. God has been righteous and faithful. So, in spite of the nation's sin, you have this faith in God's own blessed Son.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — the "righteousness" here is God keeping His promises to the fathers. It is not righteousness credited to the believer. Righteousness produces the faith, not the other way round.

- Person — one phrase holds both: "our God and Savior Jesus Christ." Jesus is the Jehovah of Israel, who came down and walked in this world.

- Gift — believers obtain this faith; they never earn it. It is no reward for service and no product of the natural mind. God gives it in sovereign love.

- Reach — the phrase levels the ground. What the lowliest believer trusts is the same in source, agent, object and result as what an apostle trusts.

- Result — the man who received it signs as bondman before apostle. He writes to believers who must hold this faith among people who only claim the name.

2 Peter 1:2 · Darby

Grace and peace be multiplied to you in [the] knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord.

Peter opens this letter with a greeting that sounds routine, yet he writes to believers facing false teachers and a predicted turning away from the faith. The question is practical: how does a Christian get more grace and more peace?

Grace and Peace Defined

One writer defines both words by what they do when trouble grows:

Grace is the favour and power that lifts us above present circumstances. Peace is the calm of confidence by which to pass through all circumstances. Both are wished to the saints in multiplied measure. As evil multiplies around us, so grace and peace may be multiplied in full sufficiency to meet the need. But this is found only in the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord: nothing can substitute for this.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer starts from where the believer already stands:

Grace is the present favour of God, and peace is the present standing place of the soul. He wishes those blessings to be multiplied. There is where the soul stands: in perfect peace with God, in the present acceptance of God, and in His favour. Peter wishes their grasp of it multiplied.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why "Multiplied"

The word "multiplied" is rare in New Testament greetings, and where it appears matters:

This form of greeting using the word "multiplied" is confined to the two letters of Peter and the letter of Jude. It is not without significance. When believers suffer, as seen in the First Letter of Peter, they can count on God to multiply grace and peace. But Second Peter and the letter of Jude look forward to the last days, the end of the age, with its predicted turning away from the faith. For those days God promises to multiply grace, peace and mercy to His own.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Knowledge as the Channel

So what does this knowing do for a believer? One writer names both a support and a safeguard:

The knowledge of God and of Jesus is the centre and the support of faith. It feeds faith, and in it faith is developed and enlarged by God. This knowledge also guards faith from the empty imaginings of deceivers. But there is a living power with this knowledge — a divine power in what God is to believers — as He is revealed in this knowledge to faith.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What Kind of Knowing

The Greek word behind "knowledge" here is not the ordinary one. The prefix makes the difference:

The two words differ because the preposition epi is added to gnosis, "knowledge" (or its verb). That prefix strengthens it, making it "a deeper and more intimate knowledge and acquaintance."

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

But this fuller knowledge carries a warning. One writer puts it bluntly:

2 Peter 2:20-22 shows the solemn fact that such a full knowledge might be only in the flesh. It can end in a last state worse than a first, or total ruin… The faith, Christianity, is so rich in knowledge of the greatest interest that the natural mind may deceive itself. Where the conscience is not before God, and the soul is not purified by obedience to the truth, it can easily pick up much knowledge that only puffs up instead of building up… In a word there is no repentance toward God, but intellectualism.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Kept by Knowing Him, Not by Knowing the Danger

You might expect the safeguard against false teachers to be a close study of their errors. One writer points elsewhere:

The grace that lets us escape the corruptions of Christendom is not found in merely knowing the evil. It is found in the knowledge of God and all we have in Him. The peace we need in the middle of lawlessness does not come from trying to fight and crush the lawlessness. It comes from being kept under the rule of Jesus "our Lord", the One to whom we owe allegiance. The sheep escape the traps of the stranger by knowing the voice of the Shepherd.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

How the Multiplying Happens

So how does the increase actually come? One writer ties it to the daily walk:

How is this grace and peace to be multiplied? "In the knowledge of God." The intensifying of that grace and peace can only come as we walk with God. Show me a person who is walking with God, and I will show you one who gets grace multiplied day by day. Walk closely by Christ, and you will get the peace that He came to give multiplied day by day.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Knowledge — the channel. Grace and peace grow in knowing God and Jesus our Lord. Nothing else can take its place.

- Knowledge — the depth. This is not casual acquaintance. It is a deeper, more intimate knowing, and it guards faith from deceivers.

- Knowledge — the counterfeit. The same full knowledge can sit in an unchanged heart and puff up rather than build up; 2 Peter 2:20-22 shows where that ends.

- Knowledge — the growth. The multiplying keeps pace with the walk: closeness to Christ day by day is what increases the supply.

- Knowledge — the shield. In an age of turning away, safety lies not in mastering the errors but in knowing the Shepherd's voice.

2 Peter 1:3 · Darby

As his divine power has given to us all things which relate to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that has called us by glory and virtue,

Peter opens his last letter with what believers already have. God's own power has given them everything they need for life and godliness. Two questions follow. What does "all things" include? And what does it mean that God calls us by, or to, His own glory and excellence?

Everything Needed, Nothing Withheld

One writer names some of what God has given, and stresses that nothing is left out:

We have not only received life. With it we have received all the things needed to show that new life in practical Christian living and godly behaviour... A few moments' thought would remind us of some of the gifts God's power has given us: the Holy Spirit living in us, the Word of God written for us, the throne of grace opened to us, to name only three. We have received not some but ALL things that have to do with life and godliness. So we are sent out fully equipped. Nothing is lacking on God's part.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer counts trial and sorrow as part of that supply:

There is no limit at all in what God gives us... Whatever comes, whether trial, difficulty or sorrow, we as believers can never think it is random. It comes from Him... This is part of what He calls "all things that pertain to life and godliness," because trial and difficulty make up the very path where we must live out that life and keep up that godliness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Life and Godliness: Source and Display

These two words are not a repetition:

Life is of course the living spring of spiritual existence, and only the One who gives it can keep it going. Godliness is the practical showing of that life, and so a reflection of God's own character. The first has to do with God's side of things, the second with our own side.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer traces the order: life first, then likeness:

Eternal life is a life that enjoys God and is suited to God... The first thing is a life that comes from Him, and is taken up with nothing but Him. Then comes godliness, God-likeness.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

How the Power Reaches Us

One writer ties this power to what faith knows of God:

But there is a living power with this knowledge — a divine power in what God is to believers, as He is revealed to faith in this knowledge. This divine power has given us all that belongs to life and godliness. Through the real knowledge we have of Him who has called us, this power becomes available and effective for everything that belongs to life and godliness.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Called by Glory and Virtue

Older translations read "by glory and virtue" here. Writers who follow that reading take glory as the goal set before us, and virtue as courage:

So we have here the call of God to pursue glory as our object, winning the victory by virtue — spiritual courage — over all the enemies we find in our path. This is not a law given to a people already gathered together. It is glory set before us, to be reached by spiritual energy.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer draws out the practical pull of both words together, noting they were rendered "by God's own glory and by virtue":

The glory of God in the future has the most powerful influence among the traps of the present. So God has revealed that glory as our hope, through Christ and with Christ, to lift the soul above everything that attracts it or drags it down. He has called us by His own glory, and by the virtue, or moral courage, that refuses to indulge self, which is against the will of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Calling: Not for the Innocent

Adam, the first man, was never called in this way:

Calling does not apply to an innocent creature, but to a fallen one. Calling means that God speaks to take that creature out of the state he is in, and put him into a better one. Adam was to magnify God by honouring Him where he was, and by enjoying what God had given him all around, not by reaching for something unseen or greater.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Power Against Every Opposing Power

Three powers stand against the believer, and one stands far above them:

We have to face the power of the flesh within, the power of the world around, and the power of the devil against us. But the power of God is far above every power set against us, and it is for us. In this power it is possible to live the life of godliness.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Power — the starting point is God's own power, not ours. It works in us and gives us all we need for life and godliness.

- Provision — the gift is all things, not some: the Spirit, the Word, access to God, and even trial as the road where we live that life out.

- Pair — life is God's side, the spring; godliness is our side, the likeness to Him that shows.

- Path — we reach that power by knowing Him; the call comes by glory ahead and courage for the road.

- Purpose — with flesh, world and devil against us, no believer can plead lack. Nothing is missing on God's part.

2 Peter 1:4 · Darby

through which he has given to us the greatest and precious promises, that through these ye may become partakers of [the] divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.

Peter has just said that God's divine power has given us everything we need for life and godliness. Verse 4 shows how that power reaches us: through promises. It also shows what they produce — a share in God's own nature and a real escape from the world's corruption.

Promises Larger Than Israel's

One writer traces these promises back further than Israel's history:

What are these promises? They are certainly not the ones God made to the fathers. Those were great. But the promises spoken of here are "precious and very great." We have to go back into eternity to find out what they are. They come to us so that we may become partakers of the divine nature. No doubt they include all that God purposed in His own mind to bring us into, all He has promised us in Christ Jesus.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Peter names some of them later in the letter, and they hang together with God's call:

Calling and promise always go together. If God calls, He calls with some purposed blessing in view. Later in the letter Peter points to these promises: the promise of the Lord's coming, and the very great promise of "new heavens and a new earth" (2 Peter 3:4, 13).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Share With a Limit

There is a limit to what we share, and one writer draws it:

In 2 Peter 1:4 we are made partakers of divine nature — the words do not say of the divine nature — and by promise this is our own state. But we are not love, for Love is sovereign goodness, and that we cannot be. We love as sharers in divine nature too, but we can never be sovereign goodness.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same writer refuses the idea of being brought into Godhead, "which is incommunicable as supreme, because we are creatures," while insisting that "the moral elements of what He is God can communicate in giving us life in Christ."

Born of God, Then Formed by God

Does the verse describe new birth, or something after it? One writer answers from Peter's readers:

Every true believer is "born of God" and in that sense shares in the divine nature (see 1 John 3:9)... But the meaning of our passage is not that the things given to us make us born again. Peter was writing to people who were already "born again" (1 Peter 1:23). The meaning is that these things lead us into a practical, experienced partaking of the divine nature. In one word, love is the divine nature. So verses 5 to 7 describe the believer's growth as reaching its high point in love.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer holds the two together and describes the daily side of it:

God makes us partakers of the divine nature at conversion, when we are born again. But Peter shows us the sweet result of tasting what the Lord is and walking with Him... He brings us into the atmosphere that suits God. We breathe the air He breathes, and so we become spiritual... First we get the capacity to enjoy God. Then, as we walk with Him, that enjoyment deepens.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

How Promises Change a Person

The change comes from what fills the soul:

So God makes us partakers of the divine nature in a moral sense. His power acts in us and fixes the soul on what He has revealed. What a precious truth! What a high privilege! It makes us able to enjoy God Himself, and everything good with Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer rules out a well-known teaching about holiness:

The victorious life does not come from some fixed "holiness experience" that wipes out the old nature. That teaching is completely against Scripture. The heart must be taken up with Christ and with the glory by which He has called us. Then the divine power, the Holy Spirit in us, acts, and victory over sin follows.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Escape

The verse names sinful desire as the root, and there is only one way out:

All the corruption in the world is the fruit of lust. The word "lust" covers every desire that springs from man's fallen nature. The law of Moses came in and put a restraint on those desires. But the law did not hold lust back; men's lusts broke through its restraints... God brings us believers to share in the divine nature, and holiness springs from that nature. So we are lifted out of the corruption and escape it... there is no other way of escape than this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

This escape is more than being held back:

We not only refuse to give in to it. Our hearts are taken up elsewhere, and the enemy's work on the flesh is held off. The desires we could never clean out of ourselves are removed. The heart's corrupt tie to the thing it wanted comes to an end. It is a real deliverance.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — the promises come with God's call. They reach back into what He purposed in eternity, and they go far beyond what He promised the fathers.

- Shared — we partake of divine nature, but we never become God. We love, yet we can never be sovereign goodness.

- Formed — new birth makes us partakers. Walking with the Lord makes it practical, and love is where the growth arrives.

- Occupied — the promises fix the soul on what God has revealed. No special experience wipes out the old nature.

- Freed — lust is the root of the world's corruption, and the divine nature is the only way out. The heart is not just held back; it is taken up elsewhere.

2 Peter 1:5 · Darby

But for this very reason also, using therewith all diligence, in your faith have also virtue, in virtue knowledge,

Peter has just said that God has given us everything we need, and that we share in the divine nature through His promises. Verse 5 turns to what we must now do with that gift. The first word is not "relax" but "diligence".

"For this very reason"

The opening phrase points back to the gift. One writer says the older English wording weakens it:

It is not "And besides this." It is an energetic call for what is due to the grace of God. That grace gave the remarkable blessing of sharing a divine nature through faith in His very great and precious promises. Even a mind ruled by the flesh draws a conclusion from the power and certainty of divine grace. It sees that there is room for earnest and practical purpose of heart in the believer. But Scripture enlarges the argument, warns against sloth and easy-going, and summons us to constant diligence on all sides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why diligence matters

A new nature is a living thing, and living things need care.

The divine nature the believer has received loves the will of God. It is a holy nature, so it hates the corruption that is in the world through lust. But that divine nature grows and develops in the life of the child of God, and that growth needs all care and diligence. Suppose Christians say they have a new nature, are born again, and saved by grace. Then they go on living according to the old nature, enjoying the world and its sinful pleasures, without showing godliness and virtue. They are not only in a very unscriptural position, but on dangerous ground.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What "supplement" means

Older Bibles read "add to your faith virtue." One writer says that picture of adding misleads: virtue is to be found inside faith, and knowledge inside virtue.

This is not addition in the ordinary sense of the word. Verse 5 should read, "For this very reason, using also all diligence, in your faith have also virtue, in virtue knowledge," and so on. You are perfect when you do not lack any of these qualities. Someone may give you an apple to taste, because you are a good judge of apples; you taste it and say, It is very nice, but it lacks sweetness. So you may say of a Christian, "He is a nice Christian, but he lacks self-control." The Christian is to show the divine nature in all its qualities.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Virtue means courage

The word "virtue" here means courage, not politeness. It is the backbone that lets a believer refuse.

Virtue is that energy and courage of soul that knows how to refuse as well as to choose. Moses did that. He "refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter, choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin." You have the faith that connects you with God, and you believe in what you cannot yet see. But now you must add virtue. That is the courage which knows how to say "No" to the thousand things that come up day by day, and to press on without wavering in the pathway set before us.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why does virtue come first? Without it the rest have nothing to stand on.

This self-government — this virtue, this moral energy — is deliverance from evil, and it makes communion with God possible. It is the one thing that gives reality to all the rest. Without virtue we are not really with God. Can divine power develop itself in the looseness of the flesh? And if we are not really with God — if the new nature is not acting — knowledge is only the puffing up of the flesh. Patience is only a natural quality, or else hypocrisy. It is the same with the rest.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

And knowledge in virtue

Courage on its own can do damage. It needs a guide.

In virtue we are to have knowledge. Virtue gives great strength to a person's character. But strength must follow knowledge — and that means the highest and best knowledge of all, the knowledge of God and His will. Otherwise it may become a dangerous thing.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The alternative to diligence

What happens if the adding stops?

If this blessed adding is missing, there is sure to be a going back. There is no such thing as standing still. If we are not progressing, we are going backwards. "To the one who has, more will be given… but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away." If there is no desire to press on, to go on with the Lord, what is left? Only a return to the things the Lord called us out of in days gone by.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Because — "for this very reason" looks back to what God has already given. Grace is the reason for diligence, never an excuse for sloth.

- Growth — the new nature is alive, and living things grow only with care. A new nature claimed with an old lifestyle is dangerous ground.

- Supply — the call is not to bolt on extras but to lack nothing: every quality of the new life showing in the believer.

- Virtue — courage that says "No" comes first. Without it, knowledge only puffs up; with it, the knowledge of God and His will aims that strength.

- Backwards — with no adding there is no standing still. We only drift back to what the Lord called us out of.

2 Peter 1:6 · Darby

in knowledge temperance, in temperance endurance, in endurance godliness,

This verse sits in the middle of a chain of qualities that begins with faith. Older translations call two of them "temperance" and "patience"; the ESV reads "self-control" and "steadfastness", and both words carry more than they first seem.

Growth, not a stack

Many read the chain as if each quality sat on top of the last like bricks. The wording points elsewhere:

The familiar passage in 2 Peter, "Add to your faith, virtue," and so on, is not really addition. To put it in numbers, it is multiplication. It is, "Have in your faith, virtue." That is, let courage mark your faith; let knowledge mark your courage; let self-control mark your knowledge, and so on.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That turns the whole list into a test of completeness, not a ladder to climb:

The thought is having all the qualities that belong to the perfect thing. You are perfect when you do not lack any of these qualities. Someone may give you an apple to taste, because you are a good judge of apples. You taste it and say, It is very nice, but it lacks sweetness. So you may say of a Christian, "He is a nice Christian, but he lacks temperance."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Self-control is wider than appetite

The next quality, self-control, is often narrowed to food and drink. One writer widens it:

The word "temperance" in 2 Peter 1:6 means much more than people usually take it to mean. They apply it to a habit of moderation in eating and drinking. No doubt it fully involves this, but it involves much more. In fact, the Greek word the inspired apostle uses can be translated "self-control." It gives the idea of someone who keeps himself well reined in at all times.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where does that restraint come from? One writer traces it to truth taking hold of the heart:

The very first thing, as we learn the truth, is to recognise the claim the truth has on us. That is its discipline: it separates us from other things and so gives us self-restraint, the power to command ourselves. We may be sure that we can command nothing else if we do not begin here. "In knowledge," therefore, we are to find "temperance," self-restraint. The truth is to govern us, and so to give us the power of self-government. The heart must be in the knowledge, not the head only.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Knowledge without it endangers others

Peter places self-control immediately after knowledge, and commentators see the reason in what unrestrained knowledge does to people around us:

If knowledge alone rules us, we can easily become creatures of extremes. A believer who sees things very clearly can act in a way that endangers the welfare of less discerning brothers and sisters, as Romans 14 and 1 Corinthians 8 show us. So we need temperance.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Endurance: the passive side

Self-control and endurance work in opposite directions:

Temperance will keep me from saying or doing something that will wound you. Patience will keep me from being upset by anything you may do that is likely to wound me. Temperance is active, patience is passive!

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The suffering in view here is suffering we did not deserve:

There is suffering for righteousness, if not for Christ's name, and it is never far from a Christian's path for long. So he needs the self-control that supplies "endurance." He is not to flinch if he is called to suffer, however unjustly. It is natural to complain about this, but how unworthy it is! Would it be any satisfaction, or real relief, if one deserved it?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Godliness: company kept with God

The verse ends with godliness. One writer explains it as likeness that grows from the company we keep:

"And to patience godliness" — God-likeness. You walk through this world possessing the divine nature. See that you display it, show it! Show me a man's company, and I will show you what kind of man he is. If you are keeping company with God you will be a godly person, for we all resemble the thing we are occupied with. It comes out in a thousand details of our everyday life.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

We lose this link most easily under pressure — and that is when we need it most:

Nothing matters more for the soul than keeping our links with God and our Lord Jesus fresh and in constant use — links of reverence and affection, of dependence and obedience. Yet work presses hard on us, and so do the course of the age, the deceitfulness of riches, the disappointment at loss, and desires for other things. That makes the danger from any earthly preoccupation great.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- In, not on. Read it as "in knowledge, self-control": each quality colours the next. The test is whether anything is missing, not how high you have climbed.

- Knowledge governs. Truth first lays its claim on the heart. Whoever cannot command himself will command nothing else.

- Self-control restrains. The word reaches far past eating and drinking: it means self kept well reined in. It also keeps our clear knowledge from harming believers who see less.

- Endurance bears. Self-control stops me wounding you. Endurance keeps me steady when others wound me — suffering I did nothing to deserve.

- Godliness walks. The chain ends in company kept with God. It shows in a thousand ordinary details, and we hold it fast when work, loss and desire pull hardest.

2 Peter 1:7 · Darby

in godliness brotherly love, in brotherly love love

Peter's list of Christian qualities ends with two words many readers treat as the same: brotherly affection and love. The verse treats them as different. So what does love have that brotherly affection lacks?

Two Different Words

The verse ends with two terms that older English wording tends to blur.

Scripture distinguishes between "love" and "brotherly love." The original uses distinct words for them. Love is "agape," and brotherly love is one word, "philadelphia." "Philadelphia" is more like friendly love. The Authorised Version tried to express this with the phrase "brotherly kindness." But it is more than that. It includes kindness, but it is love — love in the shape it takes between brothers and sisters. Perhaps the best rendering is "brotherly affection."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Supplying, Not Stacking

The word behind "add" is closer to furnishing a quality than piling one item on another. Commentators point out the difference this makes to how we read the whole list.

This is not addition in the ordinary sense of the word. Having all the qualities of the perfect thing is the thought. You are perfect when you do not lack any of these qualities. A person may give you an apple to taste, because you are a good judge of apples; you taste it, and say, It is very nice, but it lacks sweetness. So you may say of a Christian, "He is a nice Christian, but he lacks self-control." The divine nature in all its qualities is to be seen in the Christian.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Godliness Needs Warmth

Godliness on its own can go cold.

Dry godliness — if one may speak so — won't do. With godliness we must have the warmth of Christian friendship, brotherly affection. Sometimes a machine moves stiffly and roughly, and may not move at all, when a few drops of oil would make it run right and smooth. Love among believers works the same way. It overcomes the difficulties of the day, conquers coldness and apathy, and goes out winning the hearts of the saints to serve them.

Modernised from E. J. ThomasOriginal wording

Where Brotherly Affection Stops

Make brotherly affection the highest goal, and believers themselves become the measure.

Brotherly love is a most sweet and precious fruit of grace. That is entirely true. It is precious in the heart that is filled with it, and precious as it grows between us. But it is not love in the full sense. We are told to add love to brotherly love. The reason is simple. In brotherly love, brothers and sisters are the object. When it is genuine and pure, it does flow from grace. But in us it easily takes on the character its object gives it. It tends to limit itself to the people it is taken up with, and to be ruled by its feeling toward them. It tends to stop in its objects. It avoids anything that might hurt them or spoil the pleasantness between them. So it makes them the measure of the Christian's conduct.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Love brings God into the room, and that changes what love will tolerate.

Love will not tolerate evil. That is because it is God's presence, and because we feel His presence and look to Him in it. In mere brotherly kindness, the brother is the object before my mind. So I put man before God, cover up evil, keep the kindness going, and so far shut God out. Love is His active presence, though it will be shown in love to man; but it gives to God all His rights.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Practical Test

The difference shows up when the two pull in opposite directions.

These last two qualities are not the same. "Love" is a great deal more and deeper than "brotherly kindness." The latter makes one's brother the prominent object; the former tests everything by God and His will and glory. So you may find a Christian very full of brotherly love, but sadly at fault when the test of love comes. Love feels and insists that the first of all duties is that God should have His way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Love Widens the Circle

Love reaches wider than the circle of believers, and plays no favourites inside it.

With brotherly love we are also to have love — divine love. Otherwise our love may go no further than our brothers and sisters, instead of flowing out in the largeness of the love of God to the world around. Also, brotherly love may easily sink into partiality and mere human affection.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Where affection waits to be drawn out, love carries its own source.

In brotherly kindness there is an object for my love that draws it out, but love is a nature, and it looks for an object on which to spend itself.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Supply, don't stack. The list is not arithmetic. All these qualities belong in one character, and it is complete only when none of them is missing.

- Godliness first. Godliness comes before affection for people. But dry godliness won't do. Brotherly affection is the oil that keeps it moving.

- Affection has a ceiling. When fellow believers are the object, they become the measure. Kindness then starts covering what should be faced.

- Love brings God in. Love is deeper than affection. It tests everything by God's will, and it will not shut Him out to keep things pleasant.

- Love reaches further. Love has its own source. It does not wait to be drawn out, it plays no favourites, and it flows past the circle of believers to the world outside.

2 Peter 1:8 · Darby

for these things existing and abounding in you make [you] to be neither idle nor unfruitful as regards the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ;

Peter has just listed the qualities that mark Christian life. Here he turns that list into a test: what do these qualities produce, and why is their outcome tied to knowing Christ?

What "These Things" Are

Peter's first condition is that these qualities are "yours." They belong to the person, not to the occasion.

Notice that these things are to be in us and abound. They are not like garments put on us, for then they could be taken off on occasions. Like fruit, they are the product and expansion of the divine life within. If they abound in us, they prove us to be neither "barren" — or "idle" — "nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Being and Abounding

Being present is not enough. Peter asks for increase, and increase has a source: a heart occupied with Christ.

But the apostle was led to seek more. He urges that these things should "abound" also. They do so where Christ dwells in the heart by faith… Christ is and must be the spring and strength of the heart for all that is acceptable to God. The exercise of the heart in the full confidence of Christ's love promotes growth in what is good. So these things are not only really present in the Christian. They also abound through dependence on His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Word Behind "Barren"

The first of Peter's two words describes a person who is doing nothing. (The ESV renders it "ineffective.")

What is the effect? They "make you not idle nor unfruitful for the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ." It was a change for the worse when the older version put "barren" in place of "idle." That change led many readers and preachers to guess what the difference could be between "barren" and "unfruitful." But there is no room for doubt or difficulty. Translators render this first word "idle" elsewhere, and they should do so here.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Idleness Is Unworthy

Idleness is not just a missed opportunity. God has given the believer a new nature and a new relationship, and idleness fits neither.

How unworthy to be idle! We stand in such a blessed relationship, and grace has given us a new nature so excellent that it turns away every evil thing. How unworthy to be fruitless, if we are branches in the True Vine! The Father prunes such branches so that they may bear more fruit (John 15:2; 1 Peter 1:17). "By this my Father is glorified, that you bear much fruit and so prove to be my disciples" (John 15:8).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fruit for God, Blessing for Others

The fruit of this life runs in two directions.

Here the Apostle sets out the blessed effects of having these qualities. He also sets out the serious consequences for the one whose life lacks them. A life marked by these qualities would be a full and abundant life. This matches the Lord's desire that His sheep should not only have life but have it abundantly (John 10:10). So too our knowledge of the Lord Jesus would not be barren and unfruitful. A life of practical godliness bears fruit for God. It also brings usefulness and blessing to people.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Knowledge of Christ as the Goal

Peter measures all this fruit by one standard: "the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ."

The end of every dealing of God with our souls is to make Christ better known to us. If a Christian goes on in the exercise of these three verses, you find about that person the fragrance of Christ. Peter felt that everything was sheer loss that did not lead the saints to a deeper knowledge of Christ. What puts us nearer to Christ has this effect: we feel how unlike Christ we are. It also draws us away from the world, so that we are more fit in character to pass through it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — these qualities are not clothing put on from outside. They grow out of the divine life already within.

- Grown — Peter wants them abounding, not just present. They abound where Christ dwells in the heart by faith.

- Idle — the older word "barren" hid the plain sense. The failure Peter warns against is doing nothing.

- Fruitful — such a life is full and abundant. It bears fruit for God and brings blessing to people.

- Christ known — the whole line ends in knowing Him better. That is the aim of every dealing God has with us.

2 Peter 1:9 · Darby

for he with whom these things are not present is blind, short-sighted, and has forgotten the purging of his former sins.

Peter has just listed the qualities a believer must add to faith and grow in. This verse turns the picture over. It describes the believer who lacks them. The loss is not eternal life. It is sight, and memory. Commentators press hard on what a Christian can forget and still be saved.

Blindness in a believer

Peter aims the word "blind" at a Christian. One writer starts with the small word that links this verse to the one before, then names the cause:

"For" is the true connective here, not "but." How sad that such a description should apply to one bearing the Lord's name! ... What a fall from divine privilege to be "blind," or even short-sighted! It is the lack of spiritual perception. It comes from neglecting communion with God. It is the result of habitual indifference and self-seeking, which slights Christ and grieves the Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Short-sighted: only what is near

The verse calls him "nearsighted." The eye still works, but only on what is close:

The next word, "shortsighted," explains it. The heavenly things, the things far off, are no longer what the eyes of the heart look at. So the things that are near, the things before all mankind, absorb the mind. It is a worldly spirit actively at work after the things of the world, and not those which the Father loves.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What he has forgotten

One writer presses the question: what has such a person actually forgotten?

You will say this is a backslider. Not at all! He is confident about his eternal salvation... Has he forgotten that his old sins were purged away? Not a bit! He has forgotten that he was purged away from his old sins — his habits and ways of life when unsaved. So he has turned back to them again and got back into the world. He has lost the sense of what Christianity is, as a heavenly thing.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Another writer makes the point with a picture from home:

It is a question of practice. Suppose my child is dressed to go with me to pay a visit, but he runs out into the mud. "Oh," I say, "you have forgotten that you were dressed to go with me."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The cost: peace inside, purity outside

One writer weighs the inward loss:

It is not that a soul here denies the truth of the gospel, or opposes his justification by faith in Christ and His work. But the enjoyment of peace with God is gone. This is because the Holy Spirit no longer gives present witness to his spirit that he is a child of God. Instead He testifies to his inconsistent and evil state.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer follows where this ends:

The one who lacks these qualities of the godly life falls into spiritual blindness, even though he possesses life. He will not only lose sight of coming glories; he will forget the mighty work by which he has been purged from his sins. If we fail to live the life of godliness, we shall lose sight of the coming glory, we shall slip back into the world around us, and fall into the very sins from which we have been cleansed.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

How the state creeps in

How does the knowledge of Christ stop bearing fruit? Not by open attack, but by drift:

For the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ to be unfruitful goes against its very nature. The apostle says the only way it can happen is by forgetting it. It is impossible to live in these things without corresponding fruit. It is impossible to be in the sun without reflecting its beams. If we are not reflecting them, we must have got out of them... A soul in the joy of a Saviour's love would resist an open assault by the enemy. But other things can slowly wean that same soul away from that joy — the call of imagined duties, the necessary occupation with the things of the world, the cares of this life, and the deceitfulness of riches.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The safeguard

So what keeps a believer clear-eyed?

How easy it is to drop into a state of spiritual blindness and forgetfulness! No amount of knowledge, either of doctrine or of the letter of Scripture, will preserve the soul from this awful condition. Nothing but "the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ" will avail. This knowledge grows in the soul as we "give all diligence to add to our faith" the various graces the apostle refers to.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight. Blindness here is lost spiritual perception. Its cause: neglected communion with God, habitual indifference, self-seeking.

- Range. Short-sightedness pushes heavenly things out of view. Near things fill the mind — the world's objects, not the Father's.

- Memory. He has not forgotten that his sins were purged; he has forgotten that he was purged away from them, and has gone back to his old habits.

- Cost. He does not deny the gospel, but his enjoyment of peace with God is gone, and the coming glory is out of sight.

- Recovery. Doctrinal knowledge cannot guard the soul. Diligence in adding these graces feeds the knowledge of Christ, and that keeps the eyes clear.

2 Peter 1:10 · Darby

Wherefore the rather, brethren, use diligence to make your calling and election sure, for doing these things ye will never fall;

Peter has just listed the qualities that should grow in a believer's life, and now he draws his conclusion: be all the more diligent. But if God has already called and chosen us, what can we add to make that sure? (The commentators quote older translations, where "make your calling and election sure" is the ESV's "confirm your calling and election.")

Sure to Whom?

The first thing to settle is where the uncertainty lies. It is not in God.

He speaks next of making our calling and election sure. But is this not sure already? As far as God, who has called and elected us, is concerned, it is sure. To be conscious of our calling and election, and sure of it, needs diligence. We must walk in the path the Holy Spirit has described so beautifully through the pen of Peter. Those who walk this way will not stumble, and at last, "there will be richly provided for you an entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ."

after_note: DELETE

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

God's Side and Ours

Peter divides the work. One part is God's, the other is ours — and neglecting ours has a cost.

The calling and election is not of us, but of God; but the making it sure is not of God, but of us. The apostle clearly implies too, that if neglected we cannot wonder should we stumble or fall. Let us then challenge ourselves whether or not we are habitually making good what God has done for us.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why the Two Words Stand Together

Peter names two things, calling and election, but he asks for one kind of diligence. They are not two separate securities to be won one at a time.

Calling and election are united in the one thing to be secured, in the security they sought. They could not secure one without the other. They formed one object in the apostle's mind in the diligence he recommended. God had chosen; God had called them. Since God had chosen and called them, the diligence he recommended was to make this settled in their minds, and not uncertain.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Sure to the People Watching You

Your own certainty is only half of it. The people watching you have nothing to go on but your life.

"But," you say, "how can we make our calling and election sure?" Who called us? Our Father. Who chose us? Our Father. But this does not do for other people. Who are you to make your calling and election sure with? With the One who called you? The One who chose you? Not a bit, but to yourself, and to everyone who watches you, everyone who could say, "You a called person? You do not look a bit like it. You a chosen person? No one would think so." You are to make it clear to the eyes of everyone else that you have been called of God like this.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What "You Will Never Fall" Does Not Mean

The promise attached to the diligence needs care. Peter is not raising the question of losing salvation.

Read these verses carefully and notice that we do not read here of "falling away."

after_note: DELETE It says, "If you practice these qualities you will never fall." The believer may fall, though he does not fall away. Fall from what? From communion with God, from the pursuit of the excellent Christian qualities described in verses 5, 6, and 7 of our chapter. Fall to what? To spiritual blindness, to a dull heart, and to forgetting the wonderful cleansing and forgiveness that grace has made his own.

Frank Binford Hole

Written by a Man Who Had Fallen

The man who wrote "you will never fall" had fallen himself, and never forgot it.

In one letter he says, "kept by the power of God through faith to salvation" (1 Peter 1:5). In the next letter he urges us to add to our faith: virtue, knowledge, self-control, patience, godliness, brotherly kindness and love... and says, "If you practice these qualities you will never fall." He always had the memory of his fall in his soul. The man who has fallen and been put right by God is just the one who can help those who may be getting a little astray... The one who has fallen, and been thoroughly broken and restored, is just the one the Lord will trust and use.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- God's part. The calling and the election are His alone, and on His side they are already settled — nothing you do adds to them.

- Your part. The making sure is yours. Diligence turns it into settled certainty in your own mind.

- One object. One diligence secures calling and election together, never one without the other.

- Your witnesses. What is sure inside must show outside. No one watching you should be able to say you do not look like a chosen person.

- Your safety. Falling here means falling out of communion into blindness and forgetfulness, not falling away. Peter himself fell, and God restored him to steady others.

2 Peter 1:11 · Darby

for thus shall the entrance into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ be richly furnished unto you.

Peter has been urging diligence, and he ends with a promise. It raises two questions: what is the "eternal kingdom," and how can one believer's entrance be richer than another's?

Every Believer Enters

The promise is not that some get in and others are shut out. Older translations read "an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly," and writers press the word abundantly rather than the word entrance.

The vitality and fruitfulness which mark the diligent believer not only give proof of his calling and election in the present, but are also full of promise for the future. Ahead of us lies "the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ," and though every Christian will enter that kingdom, it is the fruitful Christian who will have an abundant entrance, as verse 11 makes plain.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Kingdom Is Not Heaven

One distinction shapes this verse: the kingdom and heaven are not the same thing.

The "eternal kingdom" is not heaven. No one gains heaven as the result of diligence or fruitfulness; nor do some gain an abundant and others a meagre entrance there. There is no entrance into heaven except through the work of Christ. That work is perfect, and it is available alike to all who believe. So all who enter at all enter in the same way and on the same footing, without distinction.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Home And Business

The same writer explains the difference with a picture drawn from family life — a father who sorts his three sons into jobs by ability, yet seats them all alike at his own table.

The place we shall have in heaven will not be based upon our qualities or our efforts; we are accepted in the Beloved if we are accepted at all... But there is the kingdom, pictured in my illustration as the business sphere. The Lord Jesus in that day is going to use His saints in the administration of His kingdom. He is going to give ten cities to one, five cities to another, as stated in that well-known parable in Luke's Gospel. Here there is going to be a difference.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What Actually Secures It

Since "these things" of verses 5 to 7 are what the promise hangs on, it matters which things they are. They are not the public gifts that put a person in front of others.

Every believer will be in the kingdom, but only those who live the life of godliness will have an abundant entrance. The Apostle is not speaking of preaching or teaching or the exercise of gifts, which are not given to all, and which may give prominence before others. He is speaking of the secret life of godliness, which is open to all... Those who are gifted, and much before the public eye, have most reason to beware. In the middle of constant engagements, constant preaching, and public work before men, they must not neglect the secret life of godliness before God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Road Without Obstacles

One writer describes what this walk does for the traveller: a clear conscience and an open road.

Walking in the ways of God, we have part in that kingdom. We enter it with assurance and without difficulty. We do not feel the hesitation of soul felt by those who grieve the Holy Spirit, get a bad conscience, and allow themselves things that do not fit the character of the kingdom... The way is open before us: we see into the distance, and we go forward, with no obstacles in our way.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Now Or Then?

Commentators differ on the timing. One writer sees the entrance as present, not future.

He is clearly not speaking of a future entrance, but of what is present. The kingdom is the public sphere of Christianity. Anyone who truly enjoys Christ enters it in an abundant fulness of reality and blessing. He enters now what is everlasting.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer sees a foretaste now of a kingdom that never ends.

Here again it is not a predicted fact that stands out, but the full realisation even now by the soul that walks blamelessly before God... One is in this way able to anticipate in rich measure the eternal kingdom... It is not pictured as a display of glory in reigning over the earth for a thousand years, blessed as that will be, but as what never changes. Scripture also reveals that His servants will serve Him, see His face, and reign for ever and ever.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Arriving In Full Sail

One writer turns this into a daily question, using a ship coming into harbour.

Will your entrance and mine be an abundant entrance? Shall we enter like a trim and well-fitted ship coming into port in full sail? Shall we rather enter as a battered and tattered wreck? The answer to that is going to be given by each of us in the spiritual diligence — or the spiritual sloth and carelessness — that marks us day by day.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Entrance — every believer enters the kingdom. The promise is about how you arrive, not whether you get in.

- Ground — the work of Christ alone brings anyone into heaven, on the same footing for all. This verse does not turn salvation into a wage.

- Character — what makes the entrance abundant is the quiet life of godliness, open to all. It is not public gift or platform.

- Path — that walk keeps the conscience clear and the road open, so the kingdom's door opens wide.

- Arrival — will you come into harbour in full sail, or as a wreck? Today's diligence writes the answer.

2 Peter 1:12 · Darby

Wherefore I will be careful to put you always in mind of these things, although knowing [them] and established in the present truth.

Peter writes this letter knowing his death is near. His work is not to unveil something new but to keep old truth alive in his readers' memory — "the truth that you have," which older translations call "the present truth."

A reminder, not a new revelation

The verse opens with "therefore," pointing back to what Peter has already taught. One writer sees a plain duty in it, binding on anyone who serves the Lord.

He makes no claim to originality, or to teaching new things. But saints needed reminding of these things. If he did not do it, this would be negligence — a serious thing for every servant of the Lord to take to heart. Saints may know such things, and may even be established in the present truth. Still, they constantly need reminding of things of eternal value.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why people who know still need reminding

They already know these things, and still Peter repeats them. The problem is not ignorance.

But in practice believers face influences that damage them. These influences distract the spirit and attract the flesh. So believers are like watches that need winding up again and again. It is not enough to know the present truth and to be established in it. That is why the apostle is always ready to put them in mind of these things.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer suggests a scene from the Gospels may lie behind this concern.

The apostle clearly knows how quickly we forget the great practical truths of Christianity. Three times in these four verses he speaks of putting the saints in remembrance. Possibly he is thinking of what happened on the resurrection day. The angel said to the disciples, "Remember how he told you." Then we read, "And they remembered his words." The Lord Himself had spoken of these great events, yet they had forgotten what He said.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What "the present truth" means

Peter says his readers are established in this truth. One writer explains the phrase by comparing two ages of light.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Another writer traces a pattern through Scripture. In every age faith took hold of what God was saying then.

Cain and Abel were each tested by the truth of sacrifice, urgent in their day, which faith valued and unbelief despised. Enoch and Noah both accepted the older truth. But God tested each of them by what He revealed in their own day, and they stayed faithful to it... The Christian begins with redemption by the blood of the One who gives us eternal life. In every case faith shows its power by taking hold of "the present truth." It still values everything made known before, because all of it was God's doing and God's communicating.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the enemy targets

Knowing the truth and being established in it are not the same thing.

How quickly we forget "the present truth." The devil cares little how much truth we know, so long as he can keep us from being established in "the present truth." That truth is our present standing before God. It is everything given to us that pertains to life and godliness, together with the kingdom glories to which this life leads.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why he wrote it down

Peter knew his death was near, so he put this in writing. One writer sees God providing here for readers Peter would never meet.

He would take pains, so that after his departure they could call these things to mind at any time. He was providing for them in this way in this letter, and by God's goodness providing for our needs at the same time. How wonderful is the mercy that has given us a plain word which stays within our reach at all times — not tradition, which is uncertain and open to corruption.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Remember — Peter offers nothing new. He repeats what his readers already know, and calls it negligence to do less.

- Because we forget — even people who heard the Lord speak forgot His words. We are like watches that need winding.

- The present truth — the full light of Christianity, after the dim and fitful gleams of earlier ages. Nothing about God is now held back.

- Established, not just informed — the enemy shrugs at how much truth we know, so long as we are not settled in it.

- Written, so it lasts — Peter's provision for life after his death is a plain word, always within reach, instead of tradition that can be corrupted.

2 Peter 1:13 · Darby

But I account it right, as long as I am in this tabernacle, to stir you up by putting [you] in remembrance,

Peter's readers already know the truth and stand firm in it. Yet while he is still alive, he says it is right to keep reminding them — so why does settled knowledge need stirring, and why does he speak of his body as a tent?

Why Reminding Is Right

Peter does not repeat himself because his readers are ignorant. He repeats because what we know does not stay fresh on its own.

But in practice believers meet influences that damage them, distract the spirit and attract the flesh. So they are like watches that need winding up again and again. It is not enough to know and to be established in the present truth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

For Peter, reminding is a duty. To skip it would be a fault in him.

He makes no claim to originality, or to teaching new things. But the saints needed reminding of these things. If he did not do it, that would be negligence — a serious thing for every servant of the Lord to take to heart. They may know such things. They may even be established in the present truth. Still they constantly need reminding of what has eternal value. The phrase "present truth" surely means what God has revealed in this age of His grace, in contrast to what He revealed before.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Stirring Up, Not Adding On

Peter's aim is to stir them up. That points to a ministry aimed at the heart and conscience, not at adding facts.

Take note of this! We may listen to talks or read articles that contain no truth new to us. Let us not despise them for that. The main work of a teacher may be to teach the truth of Christianity. That truth is old in itself, but it is mostly new to those he teaches. The main work of a pastor or shepherd is to reach the hearts and consciences of believers. He applies to them the things they have been taught. He stirs them up and keeps them alert and watchful. Do not most of us need the second ministry more than the first? Our more urgent need is probably to practise what we already know, rather than to add to what we know.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Present Truth Under Attack

Why press truth they already hold? The answer has to do with opposition.

Every Christian is bound to believe that the great enemy sets himself most against whatever God has in hand now. Anyone who believes that can easily see how important this care for the saints is. It was always so… In every case the power of faith shows itself by taking special hold of "the present truth." It still values everything made known before, because it was all God's doing and God's communicating.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Body as a Tent

Some translations read "tabernacle" here — a tent, pitched for a journey and taken down at its end.

Nor did Peter grow weary of this work of reminding the saints of the truth. He thought it entirely fitting as long as he lived on earth. And life on earth, at its longest, is very brief for any of us. His natural body was only a tabernacle, a temporary tent, which he would shortly put off, according to the Lord's word in John 21:18-19.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Writers note that the same picture shapes how Scripture speaks of dying at all:

As we have seen, the apostle Peter calls death the "putting off of his tabernacle" (2 Peter 1:14). Paul's language is similar, and if comment is needed, it may supply it: "if the earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved" (2 Cor. 5:1). [ESV: "if the tent that is our earthly home is destroyed"]

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

A Short Time, and a Lasting Provision

Knowing his time was short did not make Peter passive. It made him write — so the reminding would outlast him.

So, as long as he was in the tent of the body, he would seek to do this. He had all the more reason: the Lord Himself had told him he would soon put off his tent… He would therefore be diligent, so that after his departure they could call these things to mind at any time. In this letter he was providing for them. Through God's goodness, he was providing for our needs at the same time. How wonderful is the mercy that has given us something better than tradition, with its uncertainty and its openness to corruption — a plain word that stays within our reach at all times.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Do We Need Stirring?

That leaves a question for every reader.

We may sometimes think it is not worth going over the same things again and again. Not so Peter. And if our hearts are only put in remembrance of these things, thank God. It will be blessed fruit to our account in the days to come. Do we not need stirring up? We do. Satan does his utmost to hinder our souls.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Tent — Peter's body is only a temporary tent. The housing is short-term, so the work inside it is urgent.

- Winding — believers are like watches that need regular winding. Knowing the truth is not enough on its own.

- Stirring — the aim is stirred hearts, not new facts. Practising what we know is the more urgent need.

- Guarding — the enemy attacks what God has in hand now. So faith grips the present truth, and still values all that came before.

- Writing — the tent comes down, so Peter wrote. His reminder outlives him and reaches us as a plain word, always within reach.

2 Peter 1:14 · Darby

knowing that the putting off of my tabernacle is speedily [to take place], as also our Lord Jesus Christ has manifested to me;

Peter writes as a man with a date in view. He knows his time on earth is almost over, and he says so calmly, because the Lord Jesus Himself had told him.

The body as a tent

Peter kept reminding believers of the truth, and he had a reason to keep at it. His body was only a tent — a temporary shelter he would soon put off.

Nor did Peter grow weary of this ministry of reminding the saints of the truth. He thought it entirely fitting to do so as long as he lived on earth, which at the longest is very brief for any of us. His natural body was only a tabernacle, a temporary tent, which he would shortly put off, according to the Lord's word in John 21:18-19.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Paul uses the same picture, which shows this is not a private turn of phrase but a shared way of speaking about death.

As we have seen, the apostle Peter calls death the "putting off of his tabernacle" (2 Peter 1:14). Paul's language is similar, and if comment is needed, it can supply it: "if the earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved" (2 Cor. 5:1).

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

(Older translations render 2 Corinthians 5:1 as above; the ESV reads, "if the tent that is our earthly home is destroyed.")

What the Lord had shown him

Peter's certainty rests on a promise the Lord made him. The way he would die mattered as much as the fact that he would die.

But the Lord promises Peter that when he is old he will stretch out his hands, and another will tie his belt and carry him where he does not wish to go. So Peter could no longer boast of his own strength or courage. As a helpless old man he would receive a remarkable privilege from God. He would not only die for Christ's sake, which in younger days he had tried to face and failed at shamefully. He would die the very death the Lord had suffered, with its long agony and shame. For the Lord, as we are clearly told, spoke as He did to show not death so much as the kind of death by which Peter was to glorify God. After saying this, He says to him, "Follow Me."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Calm in the face of a cruel end

This is the same man who once failed shamefully when death drew near. His tone here is steady.

The calmness with which he speaks of his approaching martyrdom, a cruel one, is much to be noted. It was only the putting off of his tabernacle (2 Peter 1). This was not making light of death. If any man ever felt the power of death as wielded by the devil, the terror he can bring by it, and his own utter weakness in its presence, it was Peter. But by the time he wrote his Epistles, Christ had by death brought to nothing the one who had the power of death, and had taken away its sting.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why Peter had to be told at all

Nobody needs God to tell him he will die. Peter did need telling, and that says something about what Christians were expecting.

Now Peter looked on to the hour of his death. The Lord Jesus had hinted at his death and the manner of it, as recorded in John 21:18-19. By this time he knew it was to take place shortly. Is it not striking that Peter should need to be told that he is going to die? What a testimony to the fact that not death, but the coming of the Lord, is really the hope of the Christian.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The timing matters too. The news came only at the very end, so it could not push back the hope of the Church.

Notice also that the Spirit of God in the word never mentions Peter's death, so that the Church could know anything about it, until he was just at the point of departure. Then Peter says the Lord had told him that he must "put off this tabernacle." Besides, Peter might have died any day. Though he was not a young man when the first epistle appeared, the Spirit of God kept him from writing about it then. So it could not affect the Church's hope.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A short time turned into diligence

Knowing his time was short did not make Peter passive. It made him repeat himself on purpose, because he judged his readers needed it.

But in practice believers are exposed to influences so harmful, so distracting to the spirit and so attractive to the flesh, that they are like watches needing to be wound up regularly. It is not enough to know and to be established in the present truth. Hence the apostle's readiness always to remind them of these things (verse 12). Here he repeats it as their urgent need while he lived, and in view of his speedy departure.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What he left behind was not a chain of officials but a document.

He knew that shortly the Lord's words about putting off his earthly tabernacle would be fulfilled (John 21:18-19), and so he commits "the present truth" to writing, so that after his departure we would have the truth in a form always within reach. It is noticeable that he appoints no apostolic successor to maintain the truth, nor does he throw the saints upon the church: he gives them the written word of God as the sole authority for their belief.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Tent — Peter calls his body a tent. It is a temporary shelter he will soon put off, not a permanent house.

- Shown — He is not guessing. The Lord had told him how he would die, and that kind of death was how he would glorify God.

- Calm — Peter once failed shamefully when death came near. Now he calls a cruel death the putting off of a tent, because Christ has taken away its sting.

- Exception — Peter had to be told he would die. Death was not what Christians were waiting for; the Lord's return was. The news came at the very end, so it did not touch that hope.

- Written — A short time left made Peter work, not withdraw. He put the truth in writing and left believers Scripture rather than a successor.

2 Peter 1:15 · Darby

but I will use diligence, that after my departure ye should have also, at any time, [in your power] to call to mind these things.

Peter knew his death was near, and he chose to leave a letter rather than a successor. Two questions follow: what was the "effort" he promised, and what are "these things" he wanted his readers to keep?

"Departure" — Peter's word for his own death

Peter does not say "when I die." He calls his death a departure; older translations read "decease" here.

The word for death in 2 Peter 1:15 is "decease," literally exodus, "departure": "After my departure."

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The same term appears where Moses and Elijah speak with Jesus about His coming death — a scene Peter himself witnessed.

"Departure" (ἔξοδος): compare Acts 13:34, for Luke's use of εἰσόδος, "entry." The word "exodus" is found again in 2 Peter 1:15.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The promised effort: this letter

Peter had urged diligence on his readers earlier in this chapter. Here he practises it himself.

See what use Peter made of what he knew, and how he practised the diligence he has pressed on others in this chapter. He goes on to press home the reality and certainty of the coming kingdom. He never stops to say just what he planned to do. It is very evident, however, that what he planned and accomplished was the writing of the Epistle that we are now reading. He did it under the guidance and inspiration of the Holy Spirit. By means of it we can now at any time call to mind these things, though Peter's voice is long since silent.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What "these things" are

The phrase points back to verses 5 to 7, and Peter will not let it go.

"To have these things always in remembrance." "These things" appear five times. So our souls cannot over-estimate the value and the worth of verses 5, 6, 7, which the apostle points back to five times over. The Lord grant we may have them always in remembrance, yes, have them engraved on the tablets of our hearts. Peter felt there was no apostolic succession, no one to do the work he was doing, after his death. So he says, I leave you my epistle, something that may always be a blessing and a help to your souls.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The written word, not successors

Who would guide these believers once Peter was gone?

Peter writes to believers of his own nation, scattered through Pontus. He says, "I will make every effort" — that is, by writing the epistle — "so that after my departure you may be able at any time to recall these things" (2 Peter 1:15). So he commits their future to the guidance of the written word, not to apostolic successors. Paul does the same. He speaks to the elders of the church in Ephesus and warns them of the difficulties and dangers ahead. He says, "And now I commend you to God and to the word of his grace" (Acts 20:32).

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why writing, not tradition

Why write at all? The alternative was teaching passed on by word of mouth.

Can anything more plainly show the absurdity of trusting tradition, even of early days, when we have the sure light of God's word? Yet all of it justifies our apostle in his zeal. He left nothing for the building up of the saints to such a haphazard channel. He wrote all that was needed to help, guard, and stir them, in words taught by the Spirit. In this way they would come face to face with Him who inspired these exhortations.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"At any time" — what it means for you now

The phrase "at any time" reaches past Peter's first readers to us.

Peter wrote to them so that they would be able to return to his letter and receive its help again in the future. The same principle applies to the whole of the Word of God. God has given it to us so that we can turn to it for the instruction or correction we often need. Today we can keep several translations of the Bible on our phones. So Peter's statement is true in the plainest sense: at any time we can call to mind the instruction in God's Word. Do we take advantage of this?

Modernised from Mark GrassoOriginal wording

A dying man thinking about others

Peter knew what was coming for him. His thoughts turn to the people he would leave behind.

Peter knew that he must soon put off this tent of his body, as the Lord had shown him. With a true shepherd's heart and care he thinks of the Lord's blood-bought sheep. So he would all the more fully warn them, urge them, and remind them, so that after he was gone they might have those things always in remembrance. Though they knew them already, he would still put them in mind, and press on them what would sustain them, leading them on in diligence, so that they might be kept from falling while here.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Departure — Peter calls his death an "exodus," a departure, and he knows it is near.

- Diligence — the effort he promised is the letter itself, written under the Spirit's guidance.

- Deposit — "these things" are verses 5 to 7, named five times, to be engraved on the heart.

- Not descendants — he leaves the flock to the written word, not to successors. Tradition is a haphazard channel.

- Daily — because he wrote, we can recall these things "at any time." Do we take advantage of it?

2 Peter 1:16 · Darby

For we have not made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, following cleverly imagined fables, but having been eyewitnesses of *his* majesty.

Peter writes to believers who had seen their promised King rejected and crucified, and he rests their hope on something he saw with his own eyes. Everything in the verse turns on that: the kingdom is real, because three men saw it in advance.

Why they needed the reminder

A hope that seems to have failed is easily re-explained as a picture. One writer asks whether Peter's readers felt that pull.

Peter was writing to people who had cherished the hope of Messiah's kingdom from their fathers' days, and who had lived to see Him rejected and crucified. Were they tempted then to wonder about the prophecies of His glorious and actual kingdom, covering both earth and heaven? Were they only figures of speech — glowing, poetic descriptions of what was after all just a spiritual and invisible state in heaven?

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A sample of the glory

Peter's answer is an event on a mountain — the transfiguration — and where the Gospels place it matters.

In each Gospel that tells of it, the transfiguration comes right after a promise. Some standing there would not taste death before they saw the kingdom of the Son of Man. And Peter, when speaking of this scene, declares that it was a display of the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. He says that the sight of His majesty confirmed the word of prophecy to them, so that they knew what they were talking about... It was a sample of the glory in which He would later come, given to confirm the faith of His disciples in view of His death, which He had just announced to them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Power, coming, glory

Peter names power and coming. One writer matches those two words, and the glory, to the three Gospel accounts.

If we turn to Mark 9, we find the Lord saying in verse 1, "there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the kingdom of God after it has come with power." In Matthew 16:28 it is, "until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom." Third, in Luke 9:30-31, we find Moses and Elijah, "who appeared in glory". Peter speaks of these three marks — the power, the coming and the glory of the Lord — referring to the three different characters of the transfiguration in the Gospels.

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

More than a spectator

Peter's word for eyewitness is not the usual one.

Here our apostle testifies to it as one of the chosen three who actually saw the glory and heard the Father's voice about the Son. He uses a word found in the New Testament only in Peter. The word can carry a wide meaning, but it says more than "eyewitness". The Greeks used it for those admitted to the highest level of their secret religious rites.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "majesty" contained

Peter had known Christ in weakness. On the mountain he saw the same Person in power.

He had spoken of things seen as well as things heard. The apostles Peter, John and James were together eyewitnesses of the majesty of Christ, the three of them forming a complete witness to His glory. They had known Christ in weakness and humiliation; they saw Him too in His power and majesty. The scene on the mount of transfiguration was a foretaste of His coming, for His coming will be in power and majesty. That power will change our bodies of humiliation into conformity to His body of glory. It is the power by which He is able even to subject all things to Himself (Philippians 3:21).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The same charge today

The charge Peter denied is still made. Now it is aimed at the prophets.

Look around the Christian world and ask people! Ah, they say, there is no prophecy. They say the book of Isaiah must be cut into three or four parts to get rid of the idea of prophecy. In the second part it names a man like King Cyrus, and nobody, they claim, can speak about a person in advance. It is impossible; there is no prophecy. Cleverly devised myths! they say.

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

What certainty does to a believer

Certainty about that glory changes how this world looks.

When faith grasps the glory of Christ in the world to come, all the glitter and brightness of this world will fade into darkness. We will then value it at its true worth.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen, not spun. Peter answers the doubt with an event, not an argument.

- Seen in sample. The transfiguration showed the coming glory in miniature. It steadied the disciples right after the Lord announced His death.

- Seen in three marks. Power, coming and glory match the three Gospel accounts of that one scene.

- Seen by three. Peter, James and John saw it together, and three witnesses make the testimony complete.

- Seen, therefore settled. What Peter saw makes the promise sure. A heart sure of that glory stops overvaluing this world's glitter.

2 Peter 1:17 · Darby

For he received from God [the] Father honour and glory, such a voice being uttered to him by the excellent glory This is my beloved Son, in whom *I* have found my delight;

Peter points back to a mountain, where a voice out of the light named Jesus as the beloved Son. The verse raises three questions: who spoke, what Jesus received, and why it still matters.

Glory Given, Not Only Glory Shining

Peter does not say the Lord's own glory broke out. He says the Lord received something.

It was not the glory that belongs to Him in Himself. The point was not glory shining out of Him, but glory given to Him. "He received honor and glory from God the Father."

Modernised from C CrainOriginal wording

The Father Guards His Son's Place

Moses gave the law. Elijah called Israel back to it. Both were great men, and on the mountain someone tried to place them on a level with the Son.

It was the Father's voice out of the excellent glory. "He was still speaking when, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them, and a voice from the cloud said, 'This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him.'" The Father then showed His jealousy for the honour of His Son. He would not allow anyone to put the law-giver or the law-restorer on that level. They were servants, to be honoured in the place He gave them. But His beloved Son! — there were His delights. Christ went down in infinite love to suffer as man, and as man to be exalted. Yet in His Father's eyes the glory of the eternal Son was precious beyond all human thought.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three Names for One Source

Peter piles up phrases: from God the Father, from the excellent glory, from heaven. Each phrase names the same source from a different side. The scene also stands against the way men treated Him.

Men heaped dishonour and shame on Christ. In contrast, He received honour and glory from God the Father. All others have come short of the glory. In contrast, here was One whom "the excellent glory" greeted as the beloved Son of the Father. The voice the Apostle heard came from heaven, and all heaven agrees with the Father's delight in Christ. The whole scene lets us into the secret of heaven's delight in Christ, and of how precious the Son is to the Father.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Delight That Was Never New

The Father's words announce nothing that started that day. (The ESV reads "with whom I am well pleased"; older translations render it "in whom I found my delight.")

Soon His departure in Jerusalem would prove that the city He wept over saw no beauty in Him to desire. It hid its face from Him, the way people turn away from someone, and treated Him as struck down by God and afflicted. But here the voice out of the glory declares, This is my beloved Son in whom I found My delight. So it had been in eternity before creation. So it was when the world was made by Him, in all the dealings of providence, in the secret working of grace with people, and in the public government of Israel under the law.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Working Sample of the Kingdom

Peter did not tell this story only as a memory. He used it as proof about the future.

Peter, speaking of this scene in 2 Peter 1:16, says it was a display of the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. He says that the sight of His majesty confirmed the word of prophecy to them… It was a sample of the glory in which He will come later. It was given to confirm the faith of His disciples, who now faced the death He had just announced to them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Standing Inside the Light

The disciples did not watch the cloud from outside. They went into it, and that changes what this verse offers us.

Peter tells us that this voice came from the excellent glory… Now Peter and the others had entered into the cloud. So we get the wonderful fact that saints have the privilege of standing in the glory the voice comes from, and there, in that glory, sharing the delight of the Father in His beloved Son. We are called not only to the fellowship of God's Son, Jesus Christ, but to have fellowship with the Father. God the Father admits us to share His satisfaction in His beloved Son.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Received. The Father gave Him honour and glory. This was not His own glory breaking out.

- Source. It came from God the Father, from the excellent glory, and from heaven — one delight stated three ways.

- Contrast. Men gave Him shame. The Father gave Him honour, and would not let even Moses or Elijah rank beside Him.

- Duration. The delight the Father declared on the mountain is not new. It reaches back before creation and runs through all His dealings since.

- Reach. The disciples entered the very cloud the voice came from. So the scene ends with an invitation: share the Father's satisfaction in His Son.

2 Peter 1:18 · Darby

and this voice *we* heard uttered from heaven, being with him on the holy mountain.

Peter closes his case for the coming kingdom with a memory. He was with Jesus on a mountain, he heard a voice out of heaven, and he offers what he saw and heard as the proof.

Seen and heard

Peter's case rests on the ordinary tests of a reliable witness. One writer sets out what qualifies him to speak.

To assure them of this, he reminds them of two things. He had seen it himself on the mountain where Jesus was transfigured. He had also heard the voice from the excellent glory: "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." In one word, he had seen and heard, and this is what qualifies a competent witness.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The weight falls on the voice

The transfiguration is the day the disciples saw Jesus in glory on the mountain. Out of that whole scene, Peter singles out one part for his readers.

Every part of the scene before their eyes was a magnificent testimony to the future kingdom of the Son of Man. They saw that kingdom on a small scale. Later the Lord will come and set it up in visible grandeur, at its appointed time, before the whole universe. But the emphasis clearly falls on "this voice we heard," carried out of heaven, when we were with Him on the holy mountain.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the voice came from

Peter names three sources of the honour Jesus received.

Men heaped dishonour and shame on Christ. In contrast, He received honour and glory from God the Father. And the voice the Apostle heard came from heaven; all heaven agrees with the Father's delight in Christ. The whole scene lets us into the secret of heaven's delight in Christ. It shows how precious the Son is to the Father. The honour and glory He receives comes "from God the Father", "from the excellent glory", and "from heaven".

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Near the glory, not inside it

The word "heard" marks the disciples' position. Moses and Elijah entered the cloud. The disciples stayed outside it and listened.

The disciples were not in heaven. As one of them says, "we ourselves heard this very voice borne from heaven." They did not enter the cloud of the excellent glory with Moses and Elijah. Yet they saw it, and they have spoken of it. They have testified to us that they have been "eye-witnesses of His Majesty."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Why the mountain is holy

Peter calls the place holy for what happened there. One writer shows how that scene differs from other places where we see Christ.

The Apostle may well speak of such a spot as "the holy mountain". Above the earth, and apart from the world, God lets us share with the Father in His delight in Christ. It is not what Christ is to sinners: we learn that in the sorrows of the plain below and the sufferings of the cross. Nor is it what Christ is to His tried saints: we learn that in the upper room. On the holy mountain we learn what Jesus is to the Father, to glory, and to heaven.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The words Peter leaves out

The Gospel accounts of the same voice add "hear Him," and Peter does not repeat those words here. Commentators differ on why. One reads the omission as evidence that Peter had taken the correction to heart.

The voice comes, as Peter says, "from the excellent glory: This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." Notice that in the Gospels God added the words, "Hear him." Peter needed those words then. He was lowering his Master while lifting up Moses and Elijah. He learned his lesson, however, and here, quoting the Father's words, he leaves out "Hear him." By this time he had learned to listen to no voice but the voice of Jesus.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Another writer sees no lapse of memory and no self-correction, but a deliberate focus.

Our apostle leaves out the clause that the Gospel writers carefully record. It is not that he could forget it, or would forget it. He leaves it out to bring forward the Father's good pleasure in Him, His beloved Son.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen — Peter had both seen and heard, and that is what makes a competent witness of the power and coming of the Lord Jesus.

- Heard — the stress falls not on the whole scene but on the voice: "this voice we heard," carried out of heaven.

- From heaven — Christ's honour came from the Father, from the excellent glory, and from heaven. All heaven shares the Father's delight in Him.

- Holy — the mountain is holy for what happens there. Above the earth and apart from the world, we learn what Jesus is to the Father.

- Outside the cloud — the disciples stood near the glory, not inside it. They passed on what they heard, and Peter learned to listen to no voice but the voice of Jesus.

2 Peter 1:19 · Darby

And we have the prophetic word [made] surer, to which ye do well taking heed (as to a lamp shining in an obscure place) until [the] day dawn and [the] morning star arise in your hearts;

Peter has just described the mountain where he saw the Lord's majesty and heard the Father's voice. Now he sets two lights side by side — a lamp in a dark place, and the dawn with its star — and the question is why one gives way to the other.

The word made more sure

The older translation read "a more sure word of prophecy." The ESV reads "more fully confirmed," and Gaebelein explains why that difference matters.

"We have also a more sure word of prophecy" should be rendered, "We have the word of prophecy made more sure." The word of prophecy is, of course, in the Old Testament. But is it not sure enough already? Why make it more sure? It should be understood as attesting, or confirming, the word of prophecy. The transfiguration confirmed the prophecies in the Old Testament.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

It confirmed prophecy because everything the prophets promised stood there together, in living people.

On the holy mount God let chosen witnesses see, as a living scene, the central point to which all prophecy tends — the coming and kingdom of our Lord Jesus. Moses represented the dead saints, raised. Elijah represented the saints taken to heaven without dying. And there was the Lord Jesus, the head and centre of all blessedness and glory. Besides, there were saints in natural unchanged bodies: Peter, James and John. The whole group was like a seal, confirming what the prophets had given the people of God to expect.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A lamp in a squalid place

The word behind "dark place" is stronger than dimness.

The word translated "dark" in the original means "squalid" or "filthy." This world, with all its clever inventions and elegant splendour, is only a squalid place in God's sight. Every Christian taught by Him sees it the same way. The only real light in the squalor comes from the lamp of prophecy. Men dream up an empty "millennium" they will produce out of the present filth. The lamp of prophecy brings us into the light of God's purpose and His coming work of both judgment and salvation. It lets us see the squalor of the world that is, and the glory of the world to come.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why heeding it changes your walk

Prophecy is not just information. It shows where the world is heading, and that changes what you hold on to.

The power of prophecy is that it lays bare what is going on in the course of this world, and takes it into judgment. If I know that judgment is coming, and that the weeds are to be burned, I shall not have anything to do with the weeds.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Dawn in the heart, not on the world

The verse does not say "until the day of the Lord arrives." It points somewhere else.

Here prophecy is compared to the lamp shining in a squalid place, and the heavenly hope to daylight — above all to the person of Christ as the day-star. Notice it is not "till the day come," or "till the arrival of the day of the Lord." It is "till the day dawn and the day-star arise in your hearts." It is the heart getting hold of the heavenly hope. It is the heart now having Christ as its constant hope, and so in the spirit and light of the day before it shines on the earth by and by.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The day star: a Person

The lamp shows the world's evil and where it is heading. The dawn and the star bring something else into view.

The lamp is excellent for casting enough light on this dark world, its evil and its doom. They did well to pay attention to it, "till day dawn and a morning star arise in your hearts." That is, until they enjoy the bright heavenly relationship which Christianity, fully understood, gives us now in Christ. And until they hold the heavenly hope of His coming to bring us into the Father's house.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where readers differ

Commentators differ on the last phrase. Some tie "in your hearts" to taking heed, not to the rising of the star.

There is a difficulty connected with this verse. One suggested rendering removes it: "We have also the prophetic Word confirmed, to which you do well in taking heed (as to a lamp that shines in an obscure place, until the day dawn and the morning star arises) in your hearts." It does not mean that the morning star is to arise in the heart of the believer. It means that we should take heed to prophecy in our hearts. And how the entire prophetic Word, that blessed lamp, is needed in these darkening days!

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Confirmed — the transfiguration did not replace prophecy. It sealed it, showing in living people what the prophets promised.

- Lamp — prophecy is light for a place God calls squalid, showing both what this world really is and what is coming.

- Heed — if the weeds are to be burned, loosen your grip on them now.

- Dawn — the verse moves the sunrise indoors: not the day breaking over the earth, but light breaking in the heart.

- Star — the better light is a Person — Christ as the constant hope. Commentators differ on whether "in your hearts" goes with the star's rising or with the heeding.

2 Peter 1:20 · Darby

knowing this first, that [the scope of] no prophecy of scripture is had from its own particular interpretation,

Peter says there is one thing his readers must grasp "first of all" about the prophetic word. Does his sentence forbid ordinary people to interpret the Bible for themselves, or does it say something else about how prophecy holds together?

The Word Behind "Private"

Much of the difficulty comes from one disputed word. Commentators say its plainest sense is not "private" but "its own":

"Its own" is the simplest, strictest and most common use of the disputed word, and it is the only sense that fits the context. It is hard to see why the King James Version and the Revised Version chose "private," except that they did not know what to make of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Read that way, the verse is not about who may interpret. It is about how a prophecy must be read:

No prophecy of Scripture is its own interpreter: you cannot interpret it by taking it on its own. That is the plain translation.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the Verse Does Not Say

Older translations say "private." Some have used that word to keep the Bible out of ordinary hands. Commentators answer plainly:

Rome has used the word "private" to hold up its terrible lie that no private individual should ever interpret Scripture. As a result Rome discourages the reading of God's Word in every way... Only the prophetic Word is in view here... In interpreting prophecy, prophetic Scripture must be compared with prophetic Scripture. Prophecy must be taken as a whole.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

That reply sets two limits. Peter has prophecy in view, not the whole Bible. And the liberty at stake is the soul's freedom to hear God for itself:

Taking single texts away from their context has often been disastrous for interpretation, as we all know. But it has nothing at all to do with the so-called "right of private judgment," which is better called the liberty of the soul to hear for itself what the Spirit makes known to everyone.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Every Prophecy Is a Part, Not a Whole

The positive teaching is that prophecy is one connected body, because one mind produced it. Verse 21 supplies the reason for verse 20:

It is instead a warning against treating each prophetic saying as if it stood alone — a self-contained statement to be interpreted apart from the whole body of prophetic teaching. All prophecy is connected and related, and can only be understood in connection with the whole. It was never spoken by the will of man, but by the inspiration of the Spirit of God. He used different men in different ages, but His one mind runs through it all.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Where All the Lines Meet

If prophecy is one whole, it must have one destination. Commentators name it as the kingdom and glory of Christ:

They were all parts of one whole, with one and the same object: the kingdom of God. Each event was a step towards that object, a link in the chain of God's government that led to it. No link can be explained unless you grasp the aim of the whole — the revealed aim of God's counsels in the glory of His Christ.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A prophecy still speaks into a local event. But that event is never the whole story:

Local circumstances of the moment give the occasion for a prophecy, but it forms part of a great whole, and Christ the King is the centre of that whole. Taking it on its own is like cutting a branch off a magnificent tree that it belongs to.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Prophecy of Scripture" Is a Particular Thing

Peter's phrase is careful. Not every predictive word in the Bible falls under it — a point that keeps the rule from being stretched too far:

He does not deny that many a prophecy had its scope only in one particular, passing event important enough to call for it... Take the dreams of Pharaoh in Genesis, and of his two officials before that. Take the prophecies of Agabus in the book of Acts about the famine and about the apostle Paul. Many such prophecies are recorded in the Old Testament. Yet none of them is a prophecy of Scripture in the sense meant here.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Cost of Getting It Wrong

Reading a prophecy on its own is not just a mistake in method. It changes what the heart waits for:

Those who look for prophecy to be fulfilled before the Lord comes for us miss the joy of waiting for Christ. They see a close likeness between a prophecy and some passing event, but they do not know what it is to watch for the bright and morning star.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- One Author. Prophecy never came by the will of man. One Spirit spoke through many writers in many ages, and one mind runs through it all.

- One Body. Because the Author is one, no prophecy is self-contained; each is a link, and a link cut from the chain cannot be read.

- One Centre. It all points to the kingdom and glory of Christ. That is why one local fulfilment never uses up a prophecy.

- One Misreading. "Private" never banned ordinary readers from the Bible. Commentators call that a misuse of the word: Peter is talking about how prophecy is read, not about who may read it.

- One Result. Tie prophecy to passing events and you lose the waiting heart. Read it as one whole and you watch for Christ Himself.

2 Peter 1:21 · Darby

for prophecy was not ever uttered by [the] will of man, but holy men of God spake under the power of [the] Holy Spirit.

Peter has just called the prophetic word a lamp shining in a dark place. Now he says where that word came from: not from a human being, but from God through men the Spirit carried along.

Not Produced by Human Will

The first half of the verse rules out one source. Prophecy is not a talent a gifted person can develop.

The will of man could never produce prophecy. Only God knows the future, and He has spoken about the future.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

One writer weighs the scope of what prophecy covers against what man's will could ever reach:

Man's will resists all this. Even if it were ever so eager to help, who is able except God to take in a range so vast, deep, and high? So the only possible power is that of the Holy Spirit. In His great love for man's blessing, God chose to tell us beforehand of those coming glories of Christ, just as through holy men He also predicted His sufferings.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Carried Along

Peter's phrase "carried along" points past the writers to Someone else.

Notice how verse 21 speaks of inspiration. "Holy men of God" spoke and wrote "moved by" or "borne along by" the Holy Spirit. They put their pens to paper under His power, so He is the real Author of what they wrote.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Holy Men of God

Peter's phrase "men spoke from God" also tells us who these writers were. (Older translations read "holy men of God.")

Those who wrote the books of the Bible were holy men of God, acknowledged by Him as His instruments. Moses was such a man of God (Psalm 90:1), as was Elijah, who could say, "the LORD... before whom I stand" (1 Kings 17:1). They stood before God, conscious that He was constantly looking on them.

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

Another writer notes how far their words ran past their own understanding:

By the Holy Spirit He moved them to speak far above the measure of their understanding. They took no place of authority, but in the lowliness of faith searched their own writings, wanting to find God's interpretation of them (1 Peter 1:10-12).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Instruments With Their Own Voice

The Spirit did not turn these men into machines. Their personalities still show on the page.

He brings down the exalted one and lifts up the lowly one, putting them on one common level. He uses them as He finds them, making them the channels of His thoughts and not their own. Yet here is the remarkable fact: He never does violence to their individual character. Peter remains Peter and Moses remains Moses. Their abilities show in their writings. Their style is there. Everything there speaks of the man, yet nothing there fails to speak of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From Inspired Men to an Inspired Book

Peter writes here about men who spoke. One writer adds that inspiration does not stop with the speakers.

It is a distortion of the truth to say that the writers were inspired, but not the writings. If 2 Peter 1:21 supports the first, the claim for the second is even more explicit and directly to the point in 2 Timothy 3:16... Not only were the men inspired, but so, according to the apostle Paul, is the result.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same conclusion is reached from the other direction: if what was said was inspired, writing it down loses nothing.

In 2 Peter 1:21 we get the claim in definite terms... for surely if the spoken prophecies were inspired, their being written down would not be less authoritative.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

How This Governs Reading

Verse 21 gives the reason for verse 20. Man had no hand in where prophecy came from, and one writer draws the consequence:

If man had no part in originating prophecy, then certainly mere man is not the interpreter of it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Because one Spirit carried every prophet, no prophecy stands on its own.

No single prophecy must be read alone, as if it stood apart from the rest. Read each one in connection with the whole plan of it in the Word. "For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man" — so it is not the expression of the many minds of men. "But men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit" — there is One perfect mind throughout it.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Source — Prophecy did not rise out of human will. Only God knows the future, so only God could give it.

- Carried — "Carried along" means borne by another. The Spirit's power, not the writer's skill, produced the words, so He is the real Author.

- Vessels — The men were holy men of God, owned by Him as His instruments. They spoke far beyond what they understood.

- Preserved — The Spirit never crushed the man. Peter stays Peter and Moses stays Moses, yet every line still speaks of God.

- Result — One mind runs through the whole Bible. So read each prophecy with the rest, and take Scripture as God's authority, not man's.