2 Kings 18:13–19:37

2 Kings 18:13 · Darby

And in the fourteenth year of king Hezekiah, Sennacherib king of Assyria came up against all the fortified cities of Judah, and took them.

Hezekiah spent fourteen years reforming Judah, and then Sennacherib took every fortified city he had. Why did the heaviest blow fall on a godly king just after his best years?

The Fourteenth Year

The date is not a throwaway detail. One writer defends it against the common claim that a scribe miscopied the number:

"Fourteenth" agrees with Isaiah 36:1; and it is the only number that will harmonize with Isaiah 38:5. It may be for lack of faith that men try hard to make Scripture square with secular history, or what claims to be history. A date in the Bible may not come out even with Babylonian or Assyrian chronology. It may disagree with some untrustworthy pagan inscription. At once commentators cry "Transcriber's error" — as if monuments and clay tablets that are only half read must correct the word of God!

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Trouble After Blessing

The invasion came after the reform, not before it. That order looks backwards, and it handed Hezekiah's critics an easy argument:

A great work had been done throughout Judah, restoring the ruined features of the worship of the true God. Yet no sooner was it finished than the enemy came to swallow them up! People who judged by circumstances instead of Scripture would stumble at once. Was it not plain that Hezekiah had done wrong in rejecting the traditions of his fathers? Was God now chastening him and them for his rash reformation?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer turns that timing into a warning for anyone enjoying a season of blessing:

One would have thought all was over — the idols broken, and plenty of fruit and good works... But after he is established in the indescribable grace of God, even then, as one may say, the real struggle begins... In the same way, Satan often brings up his armies in seasons of sweetest enjoyment. He camps around us and watches for every opportunity to win us to himself. It is very strange, but we often find it so, that we are more off our guard at such a time of blessing than at any other.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Rod Or Test

Why did God allow the invasion? Commentators answer in two ways. One separates Judah's case from Israel's:

The Lord did not send him because of any guilt on Judah's part, as was the case with Israel, but it was to be a test of the faith of the godly king Hezekiah.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another reads it as the long tail of the nation's earlier sin still working itself out under God's government:

Because of their former sins, Israel had become subject to the Assyrian, whom God had called "the rod of His anger." They had now been restored to righteousness under Hezekiah. Even so, God in His wise yet gracious government may have seen fit to let them suffer for a while for their past. In this way they would fully realise, by bitter and humiliating experience, what a serious thing it is for a people to turn from the living God to idols.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Strength That Failed

Hezekiah answered the loss of his cities by buying the invader off. That was a step down from where he began:

For fourteen years he had walked with God and prospered. Then, for the first time, failure appears in his course. Instead of driving back the invasion of the king of Assyria, as he once would have done, he tries to buy it off. At the beginning of his reign, with no visible resources, he had freed himself from the king of Assyria and did not serve him. Now he is established in success and surrounded with power on every side. Yet he cannot hold that position, and he admits he is powerless. He had taken it when nothing but faith supported and authorised him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What Was Left

Everything outside the walls was gone. One writer lists what they still had:

All Judah sacked, the Assyrian army besieging the only city still standing... Did they have any resource, this weak "remnant that is left"? Yes, indeed! They still had the Lord's temple, His beloved city, Mount Zion, the son of David and his throne, the prophet who carried the word of God. They still had far more than David himself had in the cave of Adullam! The flesh might lose heart; faith could not in any way.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Looking Forward

One writer looks beyond this invasion to a future one:

The Assyrian who came in Isaiah's day to take Jerusalem is the type of the final Assyrian who threatens the land and the people with destruction.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- After. The attack comes after the revival, not before it. Blessing is no guarantee of calm. We drop our guard just when we feel most settled.

- Fourteenth. The date stands. It agrees with Isaiah's record, and a pagan inscription is no reason to rewrite Scripture.

- Rod. Commentators differ on the cause. One sees a test of a godly king's faith. Another sees the nation still bearing the weight of its old idolatry under God's government.

- Faltered. With no resources, the king refused to serve Assyria. With power on every side, he paid it off. His strength had been faith, not walls.

- Left. Only Jerusalem remained. The temple, the city, David's throne and the prophet's word were left — and that was more than enough for faith.

2 Kings 18:14 · Darby

And Hezekiah king of Judah sent to the king of Assyria to Lachish, saying, I have sinned; retire from me I will bear what thou layest upon me. And the king of Assyria laid upon Hezekiah king of Judah three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold.

Hezekiah had thrown off Assyrian rule. Now Sennacherib has taken every fortified city of Judah, and the king who trusted God sends a message of surrender to Lachish. He agrees to pay whatever Assyria demands. Was this humility, or was it a failure of the faith that had marked him from the start?

The confession in his own words

Hezekiah says "I have done wrong" — not to God, but to the invading king. One commentator takes the words as the king's own verdict on himself. He reads the tribute figure as a measure of what the misstep cost.

So I judge that we have his own confession. Whatever the piety of the king may have been, offence was mixed in with it. I do not think Hezekiah would have said, "I have done wrong," if God had been fully guiding him… This was a very heavy tax. It was a war tax. It was compensation for the trouble and expense the king of Judah had put him to… It was not the old tribute, but a great deal more. Such is the effect of an immature action even from a faithful man.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the failure lay

Commentators differ on where the failure began. One writer calls this Hezekiah's first false step, and traces it to fear.

Hezekiah takes his first false step in the very thing that marks his walk above all else — his trust… When he saw all the cities of Judah fall into the hands of the king of Assyria, his heart failed him… Fear gripped him. Like Peter, he looked at the wind and lost sight of the Lord. He compared himself to the king of Assyria, instead of comparing the king of Assyria to the Lord.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The weight pressing on him

The same writer sets Hezekiah's fatal illness at this same moment. Two blows landed together.

By this fact, we can measure the depth of the trial this man of God had to pass through. On one side, the invasion of his whole country except for Jerusalem. On the other, a fatal illness — and this at the very time when he had restored the worship of the true God to his people, wiped out idolatry, and freed Judah from Assyrian bondage! No wonder his faith wavered under such a trial.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the payment cost the house of God

Hezekiah promised to bear whatever Assyria imposed. The next verses show where he found the money.

We never gain by hasty acts. We cannot deliver ourselves, and we are not meant to… Hezekiah suffered, and so did God's house — a grievous thing in his eyes… "At that time Hezekiah cut off the gold from the doors of the temple of the Lord, and from the pillars which Hezekiah king of Judah had overlaid." This was all the harder because he was the one who had sought to bring them back to something like their former splendour. Now it was all undone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Too soon, and under God's hand

The invasion was not just politics. One writer suspects the revolt came too soon, and sees the nation still under discipline for sins committed long before Hezekiah's reforms.

It seems this attempt to throw off the yoke of Assyria came too soon; or perhaps the good king went beyond his faith… His desire was right. But in his zeal for the prosperity and glory of his kingdom, he may have gone ahead of God's time… Because of their former sins, Israel had become subject to the Assyrian, whom God had called "the rod of His anger." Even though Hezekiah had restored them to righteousness, God in His wise yet gracious government may have seen fit to let them suffer a while for their past. In this way they would fully realise, by bitter and humiliating experience, what a serious thing it is for a people to turn from the living God to idols.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The tribute bought nothing

Sennacherib took the silver and marched on Jerusalem anyway.

Hezekiah found that the tribute he sent to the king of Assyria was no guarantee of protection from attack. He could have kept the gold and silver, and Assyria still would not have defeated him — as he learned by experience when he trusted the Lord. The king of Assyria proved himself treacherous by sending a great army against Jerusalem.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Assyria's own record of it

Excavated inscriptions supply Sennacherib's side of this same transaction.

The explorations brought to light the annals of Sennacherib, written by himself or at his direction… His account of his first campaign, when a tribute satisfied him, matched 2 Kings 18 in the most striking way. The details agreed — the names of places, especially Lachish, and the amount of tribute received.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure. Invasion on one side and a fatal illness on the other made this the deepest trial of Hezekiah's life.

- Panic. Under that pressure he compared himself to Assyria instead of comparing Assyria to the Lord.

- Price. Panic cost him more than the old tribute, and it cost God's house the gold he himself had put on its doors.

- Pointlessness. The payment bought nothing; the enemy pocketed it and came for Jerusalem anyway.

- Purpose. Behind Assyria stood God's own hand. He was disciplining a nation for old idolatry, even under a good king.

2 Kings 18:15 · Darby

And Hezekiah gave all the silver that was found in the house of Jehovah, and in the treasures of the king's house.

Sennacherib's armies have taken Judah's fortified cities. Hezekiah had restored the temple; now he strips it to pay the invader — faith, failure, or both?

The Price and Where It Came From

The price was a heavy fine, and paying it meant undoing Hezekiah's own work on the temple. One writer ties the fine to Israel's earlier turn to idols:

Because of their former sins, Israel had become subject to the Assyrian, whom God had called "the rod of His anger." Under Hezekiah they were restored to righteousness. Even so, God in His wise and gracious government may have seen fit to let them suffer for a while for their past. In that way they might fully realise by bitter and humiliating experience what a serious thing it is for a people to turn from the living God to idols. So poor Hezekiah pays the heavy fine imposed on him — "three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold." To get this enormous amount, he had to almost strip bare the house of God he had just restored. He stripped his own palace too, taking the treasures and utensils of silver and gold from both.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

A Moment of Weakness

One writer sets this moment beside Peter walking on water and looking at the storm:

In His government, God allowed the king of Assyria to take the fortified cities of Judah. Good king Hezekiah had a moment of weakness. His eye was on the great forces of Sennacherib, like Peter with his eye on the strong wind. He "gave him all the silver that was found in the house of the LORD and in the treasuries of the king's house," and even stripped the doors of the temple to show that he was under the king of Assyria. It was indeed a moment of weakness, not the normal attitude of this godly man.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What is missing from the record is any prayer. Another writer notices the silence and compares it with what happens a chapter later:

We do not read that Hezekiah appealed to the Lord at this time, so this may have been a time when his faith wavered... This would be humiliating to him. We cannot help wondering whether he could have avoided it by earnestly asking the Lord to step in. Later he did ask, and the Lord worked a miracle: He delivered Jerusalem and sent the king of Assyria away in humiliating defeat.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Which Loss Hurt Most

The verse names two treasuries: God's house and the king's. They did not weigh the same for Hezekiah:

We never gain by hasty acts. Hezekiah had acted ahead of the Lord, at the wrong moment, and now he meets His rebuke and His chastening. "And Hezekiah gave him all the silver that was found in the house of the LORD." This was a sore trial to a pious man. It was not only that Hezekiah suffered, but God's house suffered — a grievous thing in his eyes. For Hezekiah, I am sure, the treasures of the king's house were small compared with the LORD's house. "At that time Hezekiah cut off the gold from the doors of the temple of the LORD, and from the pillars that Hezekiah king of Judah had overlaid." This was harder still. He himself was the man who had sought to bring them back to something like their former splendour, and now it was all undone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Money Bought

The payment did not end the threat. One writer weighs what all this effort actually gained:

The pious king also did what he could to fortify himself. He sent the humblest message to the proud Assyrian, gave him all the silver in the LORD's house, and stripped off the gold from its doors and pillars for him. It was all in vain. There was little of the simplicity, strength, or wisdom of faith in all this. No wonder God's blessing was not with him there, and the enemy grew bold enough to demand everything.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer goes further: the silver need never have left the temple.

Hezekiah might have kept the gold and silver, and Assyria still would not have defeated him. He learned this by experience as he trusted the Lord.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Failing at Your Strongest Point

Hezekiah stood out for his trust, and trust is exactly where he slipped. One writer turns this into a warning for everyone:

So the truest saint, the man most known for his trust, may fail in that very thing. It is exactly where God gives us grace to stand out that we have to watch. Satan has a grudge against us. He will try to break us down in the very thing in which God has given us grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure. God's government let Sennacherib advance, so that a people who had turned to idols would learn by experience what that costs.

- Panic. Hezekiah had a moment of weakness. He watched the Assyrian army instead of God, and the record shows no prayer before he paid.

- Price. The temple silver went first. The grief was that God's house suffered — at the hand of the man who had restored it.

- Pointlessness. The payment bought nothing. Stripping the temple only emboldened the enemy to demand everything.

- Pattern. The man famous for trust failed in trust — the grace you are known for is the very point where you must watch.

2 Kings 18:16 · Darby

At that time Hezekiah stripped the doors of the temple of Jehovah, and the posts that Hezekiah king of Judah had overlaid, and gave them to the king of Assyria.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

2 Kings 18:17 · Darby

And the king of Assyria sent Tartan and Rabsaris and Rab-shakeh from Lachish, with a strong force, against king Hezekiah, to Jerusalem. And they went up and came to Jerusalem. And when they were come up, they came and stood by the aqueduct of the upper pool, which is on the highway of the fuller's field.

Hezekiah had just emptied his treasury and stripped the temple doors to pay off Assyria. This verse shows what the money bought him. Not peace, but three of Sennacherib's highest officers marching up to Jerusalem with an army. They stop at a named spot outside the wall, and the whole scene turns on one question: where does Judah's trust lie?

The Price That Bought Nothing

The tribute in verse 14 was meant to make the invader go away. It did not.

The tribute Hezekiah sent to the king of Assyria was, he found, no guarantee of his protection from attack. Hezekiah might have kept the gold and silver and still not be defeated by Assyria, as he found by experience in trusting the Lord. The king of Assyria proved himself treacherous in sending a great army against Jerusalem.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Worse, the payment invited what followed. Sennacherib treated Hezekiah's submission as weakness worth testing.

Returning to the chapter before us, we find the king of Assyria refused to be put off. He liked his three hundred talents of silver and his thirty talents of gold well enough. And he saw that stripping the temple was only an encouragement to make greater demands. So he pushes his advantage... And so he decides to try. He sends the Tartan, the Rabsaris and the Rabshakeh from Lachish to King Hezekiah with a great army. The target now is not the fortified cities, but Jerusalem.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three Officers, Three Offices

Tartan, Rabsaris and Rabshakeh are not personal names. They are ranks. Sennacherib sent the top of his army and his household as one delegation.

The king of Assyria had besieged and conquered Lachish. Now he sends his servants. The Tartan is the general at the head of his armies. The Rabsaris is the chief chamberlain, whose duties are not too well known. The Rabshakeh is the political head of the king's household and his spokesman on important occasions. They stand before Jerusalem, and Hezekiah's servants, Eliakim, Shebna and Joah come out to them. Apart from this moment, our account agrees almost word for word with the one in Isaiah 36 and 37.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Rabshakeh does all the talking in the verses that follow. His command of Hebrew has led to a guess about his background.

This is a title. It means "chief cupbearer." Sennacherib sent the officer who held it to Jerusalem, along with the Tartan (general) and a Rabsaris. He was the chief spokesman. Because he could speak the Jews' language, he is thought to have been either a convert to the Jewish faith or a Jew who had abandoned it.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Same Ground Where Ahaz Stood

The conduit of the upper pool is more than scenery. Ahaz had already turned down God's word on that same spot thirty years earlier.

That was the place where Ahaz despised the gracious word of the Lord spoken through Isaiah some thirty years before. Now, in the same place, the Assyrian hurled rude insults at the Lord and the king.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Faith Is Invisible to the Enemy

The speech that follows this verse goes straight at Hezekiah's confidence. The Assyrian is shrewd about politics and blind about God.

There is a great deal of truth in the world's talk. So far Rabshakeh was quite right. The king of Egypt was only a reed; and the Assyrian could see very well how empty it was to trust Egypt. But the Assyrian could not see the wisdom of trusting in the Lord... Now you see how the world's wisdom becomes folly the moment it comes near God. Wise enough about Egypt — that was plain. But the moment he thinks of God: foolishness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Past Compromise Hands the Enemy Ammunition

The Rabshakeh's taunt drew on Judah's own history. He had seen its high places and altars, and he drew his own conclusion.

But here is a very serious thing to consider. Judah's unfaithfulness had given the enemy an occasion to blaspheme the true God and to deny His existence. Since you had high places and altars, these were the Lord for you, he says. He knows the Lord only by the idols which Judah had made its gods. He had the right to say to them, You have the same kinds of gods I do, and you serve them in the same way.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Paid, and still besieged. The silver and gold bought no protection; Hezekiah could have kept it all and been no worse off.

- Paid, therefore besieged. Stripping the temple told Assyria that more pressure would win more, so Sennacherib pressed harder.

- Ranks, not names. Tartan, Rabsaris and Rabshakeh are the general, the chief chamberlain and the king's spokesman. Sennacherib aimed his whole top table at one city.

- Old ground, old question. Ahaz had already refused God's word at the conduit of the upper pool. The place puts the same question to Judah: who do you trust?

- A blasphemy Judah had earned. Years of high places let the enemy speak of the Lord as one idol among many. Compromise handed him the taunt.

2 Kings 18:18 · Darby

And they called to the king. Then came forth to them Eliakim the son of Hilkijah, who was over the household, and Shebnah the scribe, and Joah the son of Asaph, the chronicler.

Assyria's top officers stand outside Jerusalem's wall and call for the king, but Hezekiah does not come out. Three of his officials come out instead, and their names and offices carry far more weight than this one errand.

Three officers meet three officers

The three men Assyria sent to the wall each held high office:

The king of Assyria had besieged and captured Lachish. Now he sends his servants. First the Tartan, the general at the head of his armies. Then the Rabsaris (chief chamberlain), whose duties are not well known. Then the Rabshakeh, the political head of the king's household and his spokesman on important occasions. They stand before Jerusalem, and Hezekiah's servants — Eliakim, Shebna and Joah — come out to them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Hezekiah did not go out to them himself:

The leader of the Assyrian army (called the Rabshakeh) called from outside Jerusalem to talk with Hezekiah. Hezekiah sent three of his trusted men to hear what the Rabshakeh had to say. Of course, walls and barred gates protected the city.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Eliakim, the man named first

The man named first held the highest place, and Isaiah gives him a far larger future:

Son of Hilkiah, and chief of the household of Hezekiah… Eliakim must have held a high office. Scripture names him before the scribe and the recorder. In Isaiah 22 God calls him His servant. God would set Shebna aside, and clothe Eliakim and raise him up as governor. Eliakim was to have the key of David, and to open and shut with real power. He is here a type — a picture — of Christ when He comes to take His place over Israel.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Isaiah's words about this same man go far beyond any palace office:

"In that day I will call my servant Eliakim the son of Hilkiah… And I will place on his shoulder the key of the house of David. He shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut, and none shall open"… Here we cannot fail to see the type — the picture — of Christ replacing the Antichrist.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Shebna, under God's sentence

The second man on the list came to the wall with God's judgment already spoken over him:

Treasurer to Hezekiah. God denounced him through the prophet Isaiah. It seems he later became scribe or secretary.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The charge against him was simple. He lived for himself:

The close of the chapter shows us the unworthy Shebna set aside. He had crept into the place of chief minister, next to the throne. He lived only for himself. Even beyond death he sought nothing but his own name and glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The ground they stood on

Judah's kings had faced God's word on this same spot before, about thirty years earlier:

That is the place where Ahaz despised the gracious word of the LORD spoken through Isaiah some thirty years before. Now, in that same place, the Assyrian hurled insults at the LORD and the king.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Envoys who were afraid

These three men did not handle the meeting well. When they asked Rabshakeh to switch languages, they handed him a new weapon:

It is true that Hezekiah's servants were weak here. Nothing could be won by trying to appease the enemies of the Lord. It is always good to remember that they are enemies. Ask no favours of them, and expect none. But these three men were alarmed. They feared the effect on the Jewish people, so they begged him not to speak in the Jews' language where the people could hear… That suggested an idea to him. It gave him a new weapon, a new argument, a new way of appealing to the people. He might never have thought of it if the fears of Hezekiah's servants had not put it into his head.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The king's chosen answer

Hezekiah had already decided how the meeting would end. His men were to give no answer:

How, then, does Hezekiah meet all these proud words? With the silent dignity of faith. "The king's command was, 'Do not answer him.'" That was how the king carried himself in front of the people. In fact, that is always how faith carries itself: calm, composed and dignified before men, while ready at the same time to sink into the dust in humility before God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Summons. Assyria sends three top officers to the wall of Jerusalem: a general, a chamberlain and a spokesman. They call for the king himself.

- Servants. Hezekiah stays behind barred gates. He sends three trusted men out instead: Eliakim over the household, Shebna the scribe, and Joah the recorder.

- Spot. They stand where Ahaz once brushed aside God's word through Isaiah. Now the same ground hears the Assyrian insult God and the king.

- Stumble. Fear made these three men weak. Their plea to change the language only handed Rabshakeh a new weapon: he appealed straight to the people.

- Successor. Eliakim heads the list, and Isaiah 22 lifts him higher still. God clothes him and gives him the key of David, so that he opens and shuts and no one can reverse it. Shebna, who lived for his own name, comes down. Commentators see in that exchange a picture of Christ taking His place.

2 Kings 18:19 · Darby

And Rab-shakeh said to them, Say now to Hezekiah, Thus says the great king, the king of Assyria What confidence is this wherein thou trustest?

The Assyrian army has taken Lachish, and now the king's spokesman stands before Jerusalem. He demands to know what Hezekiah is leaning on. The question sounds like a military assessment. It goes straight at the one thing the Assyrian cannot see — a king's trust in an invisible God.

Who Speaks, and for Whom

Three Assyrian officials come to the wall. Only one of them speaks.

The king of Assyria, who had besieged and conquered Lachish, sends his servants. The Tartan is the general at the head of his armies. The Rabsaris is the chief chamberlain, whose duties are not well known. The Rabshakeh is the political head of the king's household and his spokesman on important occasions. They stand before Jerusalem, and Hezekiah's servants, Eliakim, Shebna, and Joah, come out to them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"The Great King" — Pride on Display

The king of Assyria calls himself "the great king." His demand about trust comes from a mind that can picture only visible support.

The first part of the Rabshakeh's speech deals with Hezekiah's trust in the Lord. We have seen that trust marking his devotion... Here the enormous pride of the Assyrian comes into the open. Could Hezekiah, stripped of his territory, shut up in Jerusalem like a bird in a cage, resist the Assyrian army? The last thought that occurs to the enemy is that someone might trust in an invisible God. He never imagines that Hezekiah might live by other principles, or have other help than the world's.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Right About Egypt, Blind About God

Part of what the Assyrian says is true. Egypt was a broken support.

How little the natural man understands the ground of the trust of faith! You say you have "strategy and power for war." Nothing of the sort. It was God who had the strategy; it was God who had the power against the Assyrian... There is a great deal of truth in the world's talk. So far Rabshakeh was quite right. The king of Egypt was only a reed. The Assyrian could see very well how empty it was to trust Egypt. But he could not see the wisdom of trusting in the Lord... Wise enough about Egypt: that was plain. But the moment he thinks of God — foolishness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The charge may have been aimed at something Hezekiah never claimed.

The Rabshakeh then declared that "the great king, the king of Assyria" demanded to know where Judah put its confidence. He accused Judah of speaking "mere words" in claiming they had plans and power for war. It may be a question whether Judah had said this or not... He assumed Judah might have enlisted Egypt for help, as Israel had done before. But Hezekiah had not expressed any confidence in Egypt.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Taunt Had a Foothold

The enemy could sneer at Judah's God because Judah's own history had blurred the difference between the Lord and the idols around them.

But here is a very serious thing to consider. Judah's unfaithfulness had given the enemy an occasion to blaspheme the true God and to deny His existence. Since you had high places and altars, these were the Lord for you, he says. He does not know the Lord except through the idols Judah had made its gods.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Assyrian threw Hezekiah's own reform back at him as a charge. Hezekiah had pulled down the high places — the local shrines where people worshipped.

He did not realise that the very fact of Hezekiah's removal of the high places was evidence of his trust in the living God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Answer Faith Gives

How does Hezekiah answer a speech like this?

This was indeed putting Hezekiah's faith to the test — faith must pass through the furnace. It will not do to say that we trust in the Lord; we must prove that we do, and prove it when everything seems to be against us. How, then, does Hezekiah meet all these lofty words? In the silent dignity of faith. "The king's command was, 'Do not answer him.'"

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Question God Answers

The taunt targeted Hezekiah, but it landed on God. He replied in His own time.

Rabshakeh, speaking to the men of Judah, accused Hezekiah of deceiving his own people by his confidence that the Lord would deliver them. Would the Lord deliver Jerusalem? Yes! Assyria soon found that the Lord, whom they claimed had sent them against Jerusalem, was a God of awesome power and judgment. He would judge them for their lying claim to represent Him. But He delayed His intervention for a time, as a test of Hezekiah's faith.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- The question: the Assyrian's demand exposes his own pride. It never crosses his mind that anyone could rest on an invisible God.

- The blindness: he was right about Egypt and wrong about the Lord. Worldly wisdom stays sharp until it reaches God. Then it turns to folly.

- The foothold: Judah's past unfaithfulness gave the enemy his opening to blaspheme. He knew the Lord only through the idols Judah had adopted.

- The evidence: the reform thrown at Hezekiah as a charge was in fact the proof of his trust in the living God.

- The answer: faith passes through the furnace and replies with silence. God Himself answered the challenge aimed at Him.

2 Kings 18:20 · Darby

Thou sayest -- but it is a word of the lips -- There is counsel and strength for war. Now on whom dost thou rely, that thou hast revolted against me?

Sennacherib's officer Rab-shakeh stood outside Jerusalem and asked Hezekiah's men one question: what is this confidence resting on? The verse turns the siege into a contest of trusts: how do you answer a man who calls your faith mere talk?

Where the counsel and strength really lay

Older translations read the taunt as a claim to have "counsel and strength for the war," which the officer dismisses as "mere words." He treats Hezekiah as a bluffer. But the sneer missed its target. Hezekiah never claimed that counsel and strength as his own.

How little the natural man understands the ground of the trust of faith! "And have counsel and strength for the war." Nothing of the sort. It was God who had counsel; it was God who had strength for the Assyrian... There is a great deal of truth in the world's talk. So far Rab-shakeh was very right. The king of Egypt was only a reed. The Assyrian could see very well how empty it was to trust Egypt. But the Assyrian could not see the wisdom of trusting in Jehovah... now you see how the world's wisdom is folly whenever it comes near to God. Wise enough about Egypt — that was plain. But the moment he thinks of God, foolishness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the enemy assumed Egypt

The officer's question assumes the answer must be an ally you can see, and that Hezekiah's revolt had a visible backer. His assumption tells us more about him than about Hezekiah.

after-note: DELETE

Here the Assyrian shows his overwhelming pride. Hezekiah had lost his territory and was shut up in Jerusalem like a bird in a cage. Could he resist the army of the Assyrian? The last thought that occurs to the enemy is that a man may trust in an invisible God. It never crosses his mind that Hezekiah might have other governing principles, other help than the world's. If he were trusting in someone, it must be Egypt. Egypt was exactly the enemy his campaign was aimed at, and he thought Hezekiah had revolted because he was expecting Egypt's help... The world can never understand that Christians are not seeking to be allied with the world.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The old verdict: "vain words"

Rab-shakeh was not the first to call God's promises empty talk. Pharaoh said the same of the message Moses brought him.

He knew nothing of "the LORD, the God of the Hebrews" — the great "I AM." So he treated everything Moses and Aaron had said to him about sacrificing to God as "vain words." The things of God must always seem empty, useless and meaningless to the unsanctified mind of man. People may use His name as part of the flippant vocabulary of a cold and formal religion, but they do not know Him. To a believer's heart His precious name holds everything he could ever need or desire. To an unbeliever it has no meaning, no power, no value.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the whole speech amounts to

Behind the diplomacy, the whole speech is one long boast. The officer puts himself in the place of God.

If I may summarise the speech of Rab-shakeh, he says to them, "It is no use relying on the LORD. If Hezekiah tells you that you may rely on the LORD he is deceiving you... I am the one who is mighty and I am resolved to take you to a land better than yours. Nobody has been able to resist me, so I am the lord, and the LORD you are relying on is nothing."

Modernised from Charles BrachotteOriginal wording

Hezekiah's reply

Hezekiah did not argue back. One writer reads that silence as faith under test.

This was indeed putting Hezekiah's faith to the test — faith must pass through the furnace. It will not do to say that we trust in the Lord; we must prove that we do, and that when everything seems to be against us. How, then, does Hezekiah meet all these lofty words? In the silent dignity of faith. "The king's command was, 'Do not answer him.'" That was how the king carried himself in the eyes of the people. And that is always the bearing of faith: calm, self-possessed, dignified in front of men. At the same time, faith is ready to sink into the dust of self-abasement before God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same counsel is drawn out as advice a reader can take for himself:

His trust in God was being questioned by the enemy, who was defying and mocking him. What should he do? Let the enemy talk, but himself keep quiet, looking humbly to God... Let him say so, Hezekiah, and just trust in your God whom the enemy does not know!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Charge. The officer calls Hezekiah's confidence mere talk. Pharaoh said the same of Moses. That is the standing verdict of a mind that does not know God.

- Owner. Hezekiah never claimed counsel and strength for himself. Both belonged to God, so the taunt hit nothing.

- Blind spot. The Assyrian was shrewd about Egypt and foolish about God. Worldly wisdom turns to folly the moment it comes near Him.

- Rival. Trust in an invisible God never crosses his mind, so he offers himself instead as the power worth trusting.

- Answer. Faith proves itself under test by silence before men and self-abasement before God.

2 Kings 18:21 · Darby

Now behold, thou reliest upon the staff of that broken reed, upon Egypt, on which if a man lean, it goes into his hand and pierces it so is Pharaoh king of Egypt to all that rely upon him.

Rabshakeh, an Assyrian officer, stands outside Jerusalem's wall. He demands to know what Hezekiah is relying on, then answers his own question: Egypt. His insult turns on a picture: a walking stick made of a cracked reed. It fails the man leaning on it, and drives a splinter through his hand.

The Question Behind the Taunt

The Assyrian can only picture help that he can count. So he names the one ally that makes sense to him.

The enemy's very last thought is that a man may trust in an invisible God. He never imagines that Hezekiah might have other governing principles, other help than that of the world. If he were trusting in someone, it must be in Egypt.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The World Can Be Right and Still Be Wrong

The speaker is not wrong about Egypt. He is only wrong about God.

There is a great deal of truth in the world's talk. So far Rabshakeh was quite right. The king of Egypt was only a reed. The Assyrian could see very well how empty it was to trust Egypt. But he could not see the wisdom of trusting in the LORD... Wise enough about Egypt: that was plain. But the moment he thinks of God — foolishness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Staff That Wounds the Hand

The picture is not of a support that gives way. It is of a support that wounds the man who leaned on it. And the verse ends with a rule for everyone who trusts Pharaoh, not for Hezekiah alone.

Egypt gave no help to Israel. It only wounded them badly, like a staff that breaks under the weight of the man leaning on it and pierces his hand. Whenever God's people turn to Egypt for help and form ungodly alliances, they do so to their own hurt and shame. Egypt is the picture of the world.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Was the Accusation Even True?

The charge missed the king himself. Still, Rabshakeh had not made it up out of nothing.

He mixed truth into insolent, deceitful, and profane reproach of every kind. There were those (not Hezekiah) who really did look to Egypt for help. But the aim of it all was to drive the Jews to despair, and to carry out the designs of Assyria.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer traces where the guess came from:

He assumed Judah might have enlisted Egypt for help, as Israel had done before (ch.17:4). But Hezekiah had not expressed any confidence in Egypt.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where Hezekiah Did Slip

The king was not leaning on Egypt. But his trust had already faltered in another direction.

Israel's terrible disaster through Shalmaneser's invasion no doubt shook his confidence. Then Hezekiah saw all the cities of Judah fall to the king of Assyria, and his heart failed him... Fear gripped him. Like Peter, he looked at the wind and lost sight of the Lord. He compared himself to the king of Assyria, instead of comparing the king of Assyria to the Lord.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why Egypt in Particular Offends God

Egypt was not a neutral choice. It was the country God had rescued them from.

This reliance on Egypt was especially offensive to God. He had delivered them from that very people by His judgments at the start of their national history. It is just as offensive to God when a Christian goes back to the world-system. God delivered him from it and from its coming judgment. Yet he leans on its power or its wisdom, instead of finding his resource in God as emergencies arise.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Right Reply to the Voice at the Wall

Hezekiah's order was to say nothing back. One writer takes that, and what the king did next, as the pattern for any believer under pressure.

"Do not answer him," and "spread it before the LORD." Silence and prayer. When Satan throws out a flood of unbelieving questions, do not answer him, but spread it all out before the Lord. Nothing at such a time can hold up the soul except complete dependence on God... And the Lord did hear, and did save, and did deliver.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- The reed — Egypt is a staff of cracked cane. It promises support, collapses under weight, and drives a splinter into the hand.

- The wound — leaning on the world does not just disappoint. It injures. Those who turn to it for help do so "to their own hurt and shame."

- The half-truth — the enemy was right about Egypt and wrong about God. The world can spot a false hope and still call real faith foolishness.

- The misfire — Hezekiah was not leaning on Egypt. His real slip was fear: he measured himself against the enemy instead of measuring the enemy against the Lord.

- The answer — silence toward the accuser, and everything spread out before God. The reed pierces. Only complete dependence holds — and the Lord heard, and saved, and delivered.

2 Kings 18:22 · Darby

And if ye say to me, We rely upon Jehovah our God is it not he whose high places and whose altars Hezekiah has removed, saying to Judah and Jerusalem, Ye shall worship before this altar in Jerusalem?

Rabshakeh, the spokesman of the king of Assyria, stands outside the walls of Jerusalem. He turns Hezekiah's greatest reform into evidence against the king: if you trust the LORD, why did you pull down His high places and His altars? The taunt raises the question behind the whole siege. Who truly knows the God of Israel, and what does trust in Him look like?

A Reform Twisted Into a Crime

The act Rabshakeh held up as proof of disloyalty was the king obeying a command of God. One writer points to the passage Hezekiah was following:

Rabshakeh's words sounded very plausible. He knew how weak Egypt was, and the Jews were inclined to trust Egypt. Isaiah had already warned the people about it. He completely misread Hezekiah's action in destroying the high places. Far from being an offence against the Lord, it was full obedience to His word in Deuteronomy 12:1-6. So many earlier kings, even the good ones, had overlooked this commandment of the Lord. Hezekiah had been obedient and faithful.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Notice the method. Truth and lies are mixed, and the king's best deed becomes robbery of God:

Insults, lies, and irreverent abuse of every kind are mixed here with some truth. There were people (not Hezekiah) who did look to Egypt for help. But the aim of it all was to drive the Jews to despair and to carry out the designs of Assyria. So the king's own piety, his zeal for Jehovah in throwing down the altars of false gods, is cunningly twisted into a charge of robbing Jehovah of His honour. And it was Jehovah, he pretended, who had given his master orders to come up against Hezekiah. The enemy knows how to give his own wicked schemes a religious look, as easily as he can blacken the most faithful of God's servants. What a mercy to have the unerring standard of His word to test and be tested by!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Man Who Could Not Tell God From an Idol

Behind the taunt lies real ignorance. Rabshakeh judged Israel's God by the only kind of religion he knew:

Rabshakeh could not tell the difference between the idols and Jehovah. To him Jehovah was only an idol, one out of many. Since Hezekiah had broken down all the idols, he imagined these were different forms of Jehovah's worship. That was the heathen idea of God… So he taunts king Hezekiah's ministers with having destroyed the worship of Jehovah.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The nation's own past handed him the argument:

But here is a very serious thing to consider. The unfaithfulness of Judah had given the enemy an occasion to blaspheme the true God and to deny His existence. Since you had high places and altars, these were the Lord for you, he says. He does not know the Lord except by the idols which Judah had made its gods. He had the right to say to them, You have the same kinds of gods I do, and you serve them in the same way.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

One Altar, and What It Pictures

The reform left one altar standing in Jerusalem:

Hezekiah had honoured God by destroying this idolatrous worship and returning to the true worship of having one altar, a symbol of Christ.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The accusation runs backwards. The same writer states the reversal:

He did not realise that the very fact of Hezekiah's removal of the high places was evidence of his trust in the living God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the World Still Talks This Way

The enemy could not imagine trust in a God no one can see. One writer brings that into the present:

The last thing that occurs to the enemy is that someone may trust in an invisible God. It never crosses his mind that Hezekiah might have other governing principles, other help than that of the world… The world can never understand that Christians are not seeking an alliance with the world. And there is nothing surprising in this scepticism when we look at the condition of Christendom all around us. Is religion threatened with danger? Is it under attack or persecution? The Christian world at once turns to the governments of this world to escape it or to be rescued from it… The unbeliever is justified when he says to us, "But 'if you say to me, We trust in the LORD our God' — in actual fact, you are not trusting Him any more than we are!"

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Right Reply to a Slander

Hezekiah's answer to the charge was not argument:

The enemy was questioning his trust in God, defying him and mocking him. What should he do? Let the enemy talk, but himself keep silent, looking humbly to God. The enemy was saying, The Lord is with me against you. Let him say so, Hezekiah, and just trust in your God whom the enemy does not know!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Obedience misread. Taking away the high places obeyed Deuteronomy 12:1-6. It was no insult to God. The enemy read the best act of the reign as the worst.

- Disobedience exploited. Judah's earlier unfaithfulness gave the enemy his opening. He knew the Lord only by the idols Judah had made. So he could claim their God and his were alike.

- Obedience as proof. Removing the shrines was the very proof that Hezekiah trusted the living God. The one altar left standing pictured Christ.

- Obedience unrecognised. The world cannot grasp trust in a God it cannot see. A church leaning on worldly support makes that doubt sound reasonable.

- Obedience silent. Hezekiah let the taunt stand and looked to God, trusting the One his accuser did not know.

2 Kings 18:23 · Darby

And now, engage, I pray thee, with my master the king of Assyria, and I will give thee two thousand horses, if thou canst set the riders upon them.

Sennacherib's army surrounds Jerusalem, and his spokesman the Rabshakeh makes a strange offer: two thousand horses, if Judah can find riders for them. Behind the sneer lies a real question — what is a people to do when the enemy can count its soldiers and cannot see its God?

Bribe and Sneer Together

The offer is a trap dressed as a gift. It works on two feelings at once.

The Rabshakeh offered then a bribe of 2000 horses if Judah would pledge allegiance to the king of Assyria (v.23). He adds a warning. They could not drive back even one Assyrian captain, even if they trusted Egypt. So he knew how to appeal both to their greed and to their fear.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Taunt About Resources

The point of the wager is that Judah has no cavalry to put on the horses. That jibe has outlived Assyria; it is still aimed at anyone whose strength is out of sight.

He dwells in you, and you in Him; that is where the world has no knowledge, and that is how the world is no match for a Christian. It does not know his resources. No — it will taunt him about it, just as the Rabshakeh taunted Hezekiah when he said, "I will give you two thousand horses, if you are able on your part to set riders on them."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Right About Egypt, Blind About God

The same speech mocks Judah for leaning on Egypt. On that score the Assyrian was correct — Egypt was worthless. His error came one step later.

There is a great deal of truth in the world's talk. So far the Rabshakeh was very right. The king of Egypt was only a reed, and the Assyrian could see clearly the emptiness of trusting Egypt. But the Assyrian could not see the wisdom of trusting in the Lord... You see how the world's wisdom becomes folly the moment it draws near to God. Wise enough about Egypt — that was plain. But the moment he thinks of God, foolishness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

An Ally Who Cannot Be Counted

Why offer horses at all? Because horses are the only help the Rabshakeh can imagine. In his mind, a king with no cavalry must be leaning on someone else's.

Hezekiah had lost his land and was shut up in Jerusalem like a bird in a cage. Could such a man resist the Assyrian army? The last thing the enemy thinks of is that a man may trust an invisible God. It never crosses his mind that Hezekiah might live by other principles, with other help than the world's. If he were trusting in someone, it had to be Egypt.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Horses Are Not Safety

Scripture had already settled what a war-horse is worth. Israel's kings were even told not to collect them.

Israel's king was warned not to gather horses for himself, nor wives, nor gold (Deuteronomy 17:14-20)... Solomon himself tells us in Proverbs 21:31 that "the horse is made ready for the day of battle." He adds what he later quite forgot: "but the victory belongs to the Lord."... But David wrote before Solomon began to reign, "The war horse is a false hope for salvation, and by its great might it cannot rescue" (Psalm 33:17)... In days of danger the Lord is worth more to His people than regiments of cavalry.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What Weakness Looked Like

On the surface, the Rabshakeh's sums added up. That is what makes the next scene worth looking at.

Note, then, this remarkable scene. Go to the sanctuary. There you see one poor, weak, lonely man on his knees, pouring out his soul to Him who dwelt between the cherubim. No military preparations, no reviewing of troops... everything looks like weakness. On the other side, see a mighty conqueror leading a huge army flushed with victory, all of them eager for plunder. Surely, one might say, humanly speaking, it is all over with Hezekiah and Jerusalem.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Answer of Silence

Hezekiah never takes the bet, and he never argues back.

His trust in God was being questioned by an enemy who was defying and mocking him. What should he do? Let the enemy talk, and keep quiet himself, looking humbly to God. The enemy was saying, The Lord is with me against you. Let him say it, Hezekiah, and simply trust in your God, whom the enemy does not know.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Bribe — Two thousand horses, offered for Judah's allegiance, aimed at greed and fear at once.

- Blind — The enemy offers horses because horses are all he can count. Trust in an invisible God never crosses his mind.

- Half-right — He is right about Egypt and wrong about God. The world's wisdom turns to folly the moment it touches God.

- Worthless — Two thousand horses for nothing would still be a false hope. In danger the Lord is worth more than regiments of cavalry.

- Quiet — One man on his knees against a victorious army looks like certain defeat. His answer is not argument but silence and trust.

2 Kings 18:24 · Darby

How then wilt thou turn away the face of one captain of the least of my master's servants? And thou reliest upon Egypt for chariots and for horsemen!

Rabshakeh, the Assyrian king's spokesman, stands outside Jerusalem's wall and lists every reason Hezekiah should surrender. Now he counts up the odds: one junior officer of Sennacherib's army against all the horsemen Judah can muster — so where is Judah's strength?

What the Assyrian could not imagine

The Assyrian assumes Hezekiah must be leaning on some visible power. Egypt is the only one he can think of.

Here the Assyrian lays bare his formidable pride. Hezekiah had lost his territory and was shut up in Jerusalem like a bird in a cage. Could he resist the Assyrian army? The last thought that occurs to the enemy is that someone may trust an invisible God. He cannot imagine that Hezekiah has other governing principles, other help than the world's. If he were trusting in someone, it must be in Egypt.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Two thousand horses and no riders

The offer just before this verse — horses supplied free, if Judah can find men to ride them — is not generosity. It works on two feelings at once.

The Rabshakeh then offered a bribe of 2,000 horses if Judah would pledge allegiance to the king of Assyria (v. 23). He adds a warning. They would not be able to drive off even one captain of the Assyrians, though they put their trust in Egypt. So he knew how to appeal both to their greed and to their fear.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The horses in the taunt carry their own sting. Israel was never meant to own them, and Egypt was where they came from.

Horses were forbidden to Israel (Deuteronomy 17:16). They were brought from Egypt (1 Kings 10:28)… The Assyrian armies were famous for horses (1 Kings 20:20, 25; 2 Kings 18:23).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Right about Egypt, wrong about God

Rabshakeh's assessment of Egypt is accurate. His blunder comes the moment he turns the same reasoning on Israel's God.

How little the natural man understands the ground on which faith rests! "Do you think that mere words are strategy and power for war?" Nothing of the sort. It was God who had the counsel; it was God who had the strength against the Assyrian. This proud servant of a proud king says, "Behold, you are trusting now in Egypt, that broken reed of a staff, which will pierce the hand of any man who leans on it." There is a great deal of truth in the world's talk. So far Rabshakeh was quite right. The king of Egypt was only a reed. The Assyrian could see how empty it was to trust Egypt. But he could not see the wisdom of trusting the Lord… Wise enough about Egypt: that was plain. But the moment he thinks about God — foolishness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why leaning on Egypt stings

Egypt was no neutral ally. God had rescued His people out of Egypt, which is what makes running back to it for horses so serious.

This reliance on Egypt was especially offensive to God. He had delivered them from that very people by His judgments, at the start of their national history. God has delivered the Christian from the world-system and from its coming judgment. It is equally offensive to Him if that Christian goes back to the world, relying on its power or its wisdom instead of finding his resource in God as emergencies arise.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The answer that was given

Hezekiah's people never replied to the arithmetic. That silence was ordered, and it was the right weapon.

Do we need to reason with him, to enter into argument, or even conversation, or to answer him at all? Our first parents proved the point only too well, to their own ruin and that of their descendants. The man of faith is not tempted to answer him. "But the people were silent and answered him not a word, for the king's command was, 'Do not answer him.'" It is only a matter of keeping quiet and leaving the enemy to his threats or his sweet words… God uses this open attack of the Assyrian against Himself and against His anointed to strengthen and revive the people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Trust questioned. The Assyrian hunts for the visible power Hezekiah leans on. That he trusts an invisible God never enters his mind.

- Trust priced. He offers horses as a bribe and one captain as a threat, hitting greed and fear at once — yet horses were forbidden to Israel from the start.

- Trust half-understood. The world can be right that Egypt is a broken reed and wrong in the same breath about trusting God.

- Trust misplaced. Going back for help to the power God rescued you from is what offends Him — then and now.

- Trust silent. The people answered not a word, and God used the attack itself to strengthen and revive them.

2 Kings 18:25 · Darby

Am I now come up without Jehovah against this place to destroy it? Jehovah said to me, Go up against this land and destroy it.

Sennacherib's field commander has already mocked Judah's hope of help from Egypt. Now he plays his highest card: the God of Israel Himself, he says, ordered this invasion — so what happens to a man who uses God's name falsely?

The Speech Before the Claim

Rabshakeh's earlier arguments were not stupid. One writer notes that the enemy judged Judah's politics well enough. He only lost his footing when the subject turned to God.

There is a great deal of truth in the world's talk. So far Rab-shakeh was very right. The king of Egypt was only a reed. The Assyrian could see very well the emptiness of trusting in Egypt. But the Assyrian could not see the wisdom of trusting in Jehovah. "But if you say to me, We trust in Jehovah our God" — now you see how the world's wisdom is folly whenever it comes near to God. Wise enough about Egypt: that was plain. But the moment that he thinks of God — foolishness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Claim of Divine Commission

Verse 25 is the third and boldest step in a build-up. The same writer notes that more than three officials heard it.

He takes first the folly of trusting in Egypt, and there he was right. Second, that they had only to look for Jehovah's vengeance, since they had been destroying Jehovah's altars. Third, that he had come up as a servant of Jehovah to do His will and to avenge Himself on Jerusalem… But it was not merely Eliakim and Shebna and Joah who heard; it was Jehovah. Rab-shakeh had no idea that the Lord God was listening. He had no idea that the Lord God would answer quickly. For he had now dared to use that name for deliberate blasphemy. He had dared the authority of Jehovah where it was known. He had dared God!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Half-Truth Underneath

Rabshakeh spoke Hebrew. That has led some to think he knew Israel's Scriptures from the inside.

Rab-shakeh is a title, meaning 'chief cup-bearer.' Sennacherib sent this officer to Jerusalem, and he was the chief spokesman. Because he could speak the language of the Jews, some think he was either a convert to the Jewish faith or a Jew who had abandoned it. If so, he may have known Isaiah 10:5-6, for he says, "Moreover, is it without the LORD that I have come up against this place to destroy it? The LORD said to me, 'Go up against this land and destroy it.'"

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

God really was using Assyria. But a tool God uses is not a servant God sends, and that difference decided Assyria's fate.

God used Assyria as the rod of His anger to discipline Israel (Isaiah 10:5-6) and other nations. But Assyria was only the instrument in God's hand for carrying out His judgments. He did not understand this, so he boasted as if his own power made him so successful in his military campaigns… Therefore the Lord said, "Shall the axe boast itself against him who chops with it?… as if the rod should shake itself against him who lifts it up."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Using God's Name as a Weapon

Verse 25 adds one more pressure — the suggestion that heaven had changed sides. One writer draws the line straight into the present.

More than this, he wanted them to think that even the Lord was against them, for he tells them that the Lord told him to go against the land and destroy it (v.25). So, in common with many religious men today, he did not hesitate to use the Lord's name deceitfully.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Answer Delayed, Then Given

Jerusalem was not rescued that hour. The silence had a purpose, and so did the eventual reply.

Would the Lord deliver Jerusalem? Yes! Assyria soon found that the Lord they claimed had sent them against Jerusalem was a God of awesome power and judgment. He would judge them for their deceitful claim to represent Him. But He delayed His intervention for a time, as a test of Hezekiah's faith.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Instrument. God really did use Assyria as the rod of His anger. That much of the boast rested on Isaiah 10.

- Overreach. A tool that boasts has forgotten it is a tool. The axe cannot boast against the man who chops with it.

- Blasphemy. Rabshakeh claimed God had sent him. That turned his speech into deliberate misuse of God's name — a trick many religious people still use.

- Listener. Rabshakeh aimed his speech at three officials on a wall. But God Himself was listening, and that settled the outcome.

- Answer. God delayed, testing Hezekiah's faith, then judged the very power that had claimed to speak for Him.

2 Kings 18:26 · Darby

And Eliakim the son of Hilkijah, and Shebnah and Joah said to Rab-shakeh, Speak, we pray thee, to thy servants in Syriac, for we understand it, and talk not with us in the Jewish [language] in the ears of the people that are on the wall.

Three of Hezekiah's officials break in on the Assyrian spokesman. Switch languages, they ask, so the crowd on the city wall cannot follow. The small move shows what they feared, how the enemy read them, and who else was listening.

Two Languages at the Wall

The request turns on a real difference between two languages. The officials knew Aramaic. Most of the people on the wall did not.

In 2 Kings 18:26, Ezra 4:7 and Isaiah 36:11 the word appears as "the Syrian language" or "tongue"… Aramaic is the language of Aram. It covers the language of Chaldea and that of Syria. Mesopotamia, Babylonia and Syria were its proper home… In 2 Kings 18:26 and Isaiah 36:11 the heads of the people asked Rabshakeh to speak to them in Aramaic. That way the uneducated would not understand what was said.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The ESV calls it "the language of Judah"; other translations say "the Jews' language". Neither is the name we use today.

The term Hebrew language does not, however, occur in the Old Testament. There it is called the language of the Jews, as in 2 Kings 18:26, or the lip of Canaan, as in Isaiah 19:18.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Request Born of Fear

The three men are not acting in faith. They are managing a crisis, and they start by asking a favour of the enemy.

It is true the servants of Hezekiah were rather feeble. Pleading with the enemies of the Lord wins nothing. It is always well to remember that they are enemies. Ask no favours of them, and expect none. But these three men were alarmed. They were afraid of the effect on the Jewish people, so they begged him not to talk in the Jews' language where the people could hear… It gave him a new weapon, a new argument, a new way of appealing to the people. He might not have thought of it if the fears of Hezekiah's servants had not put it into his head. The very thing they feared, and asked him not to do, gave him the idea of doing it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Enemy Reads Their Fear

The man they are pleading with is a professional. "Rabshakeh" is his office, not his personal name, and he hears in their request exactly what they did not mean to tell him.

Rabshakeh (a title, not a name), Sennacherib's commander-in-chief, was the speaker. He was a skilled diplomat, and delivered his crafty speech in "the Jews' language."… They little knew the cunning Rabshakeh. He gained an advantage from their fear… He does his best to frighten the ordinary people. He hoped to stir up rebellion in the city, and so take it without a siege.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

By limiting the audience they showed him where the weak point lay. He shifted his attack from the officials to the crowd behind them.

The three servants of Hezekiah asked Rabshakeh to speak in the Aramean language. They did not want the common people to hear his words in Hebrew (v. 26). They should have realised their request would be useless. In fact it only encouraged Rabshakeh to speak louder to all the people on the wall… If he could not persuade the leaders of the people, he would do his utmost to weaken the people themselves.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Silence as the Answer

The danger they feared was real. Faith meets that same danger another way.

Rabshakeh speaks in Hebrew to the people on the wall. Hezekiah's servants beg him to speak in the Syrian language. He refuses with words of defiance and contempt. The danger of seeing the people become discouraged may have filled Hezekiah with anguish. But the same danger leaves the believer's soul calm and at peace. He has only to keep silence. His trust in God answers everything.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Listener No One Counted

The officials worried about who on the wall could hear. One listener never entered their calculations.

Eliakim and the others begged him to speak Aramean instead of the Jewish tongue. Their pleas only drew out more daring insolence… The blasphemer taunted them, asking whether the Lord would deliver Jerusalem. He never thought who was listening. Not only Eliakim, Shebna and Joah, not only the men on the wall, but the Lord Himself heard him. It was now His affair. Then at last the faith of Hezekiah begins to shine again, for it was his command not to answer him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Languages. Aramaic belonged to Syria and Babylonia, and only the educated knew it. The "Jews' language" is what we call Hebrew, the speech of everyone on the wall.

- Fear speaks first. The three officials feared what the speech would do to the people, so they asked a favour of an enemy. Ask no favours of enemies, and expect none.

- Fear arms the enemy. Their fear handed a trained negotiator a new weapon. He shouted louder instead, shifting his attack from the leaders to the ordinary people.

- Faith keeps silence. The same danger that brings anguish leaves a trusting soul calm. Hezekiah's answer was to say nothing and leave it with God.

- Someone else was listening. Changing the language could not change the real audience. The Lord Himself heard the taunt, and from then on it was His affair.

2 Kings 18:27 · Darby

And Rab-shakeh said to them, Is it to thy master and to thee that my master sent me to speak these words? Is it not to the men that sit on the wall, that they may eat their own dung and drink their own urine with you?

Two Assyrian officers and a king's spokesman stand outside Jerusalem's wall. Hezekiah's ministers ask them to switch to a language the crowd cannot follow, and the refusal that comes back shows who the spokesman is really aiming at.

The Speaker and the Language

"Rabshakeh" is not a personal name. Writers note it is an office, and that his fluency in Hebrew is itself a puzzle worth asking about.

This is a title. It means 'chief cup-bearer.' Sennacherib sent the officer who held it to Jerusalem, along with the Tartan (general) and a Rab-saris. He was the chief spokesman. Because he could speak the Jews' language, people think he was either a convert to the Jewish faith or a Jew who had abandoned it.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The language in question was everyday Hebrew, and he chose it on purpose.

The Hebrew language, common to the Jews. Rab-shakeh was asked to speak in the Syrian language (Aramaic). But he wanted the people of Jerusalem to understand him, so he spoke in Hebrew.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Request That Handed Him a Weapon

The three officials were afraid, and their fear showed the enemy where to press.

There was nothing to be gained by pleading with the enemies of the Lord. It is always good to remember that they are enemies. Ask no favours of them, and expect none. But these three men were alarmed. They were afraid of the effect on the Jewish people, so they begged him not to talk in the Jews' language where the people could hear. And what could that do but draw out from Rab-shakeh a stronger appeal and more boasting than ever… It suggested an idea. It gave him a new weapon, a new argument, a new way of appealing to the people. He might not have thought of it if the fears of Hezekiah's servants had not put it into his head. The very thing they feared and asked him not to do gave him the idea of doing it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Going Over the Leaders' Heads

His answer names a different audience. He is not bargaining with ministers. He is working on the crowd.

They should have realised their request would be pointless. In fact it only encouraged the Rabshakeh to speak louder to all the people on the wall. He urged them to hear the words of the great king of Assyria. If he could not persuade the leaders of the people, he would do his utmost to weaken the people themselves.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The goal behind the tactic was to take the city without the cost of a siege.

He does his best to frighten the ordinary people, "shut up like a bird in a cage," as Sennacherib's own inscription states. He hoped to stir up rebellion in the city, in order to take it without laying siege to it. But he laboured in vain; "the people held their peace, and answered him not a word: for the king's commandment was, saying, Answer him not."

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Filth as a Weapon

The crude detail in the verse is part of the attack, not an accident.

Rabshakeh became very abusive and shouted a vulgar appeal to the people. It needs no further comment.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

One Listener He Never Counted

He named his hearers — and left out the most important one.

Rab-shakeh stood and shouted in their own language to the people on the walls. The blasphemer had no idea who was listening to his mocking demand, whether Jehovah would deliver Jerusalem. Eliakim, Shebna and Joah heard him. So did the men on the wall. But so did Jehovah Himself. It was now His affair.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Response of Faith Is Silence

Faith's answer to the taunt is no answer at all.

Hezekiah's servants beg the Rab-shakeh to speak in the Syrian language. He refuses in words of defiance and scorn. The danger of seeing the people discouraged may have filled Hezekiah with anguish. But that same danger leaves the believer's soul calm and at peace. He has only to keep silent. His trust in God answers everything.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Title, not name. "Rabshakeh" is an office, not a name: chief cup-bearer. His fluent Hebrew hints that he once had ties to Israel's faith.

- The plea. Asking the enemy for a favour showed fear, and fear showed him where to strike.

- The weapon. He turned that request into a new argument, shouting past the ministers to the people on the wall.

- The aim. Frighten the people, stir up rebellion, take the city without a siege — and he failed.

- The listener. Above the officials and the men on the wall, the Lord heard every word. It was now His affair, and the people's part was silence.

2 Kings 18:28 · Darby

And Rab-shakeh stood and cried with a loud voice in the Jewish [language], and spoke and said, Hear the word of the great king, the king of Assyria!

Hezekiah's officials had just asked Rabshakeh to speak Aramaic, so the people on the wall would not understand him. He answered by shouting to those very people in Hebrew — which shows what an enemy gains when God's people let him see their fear.

How Their Fear Armed Him

Hezekiah's three officials meant well when they asked for Aramaic instead of Hebrew. One writer notes that their fear backfired:

These three men were alarmed. They were afraid of the effect on the Jewish people, so they begged him not to talk in the Jews' language where the people could hear... It suggested an idea. It gave him a new weapon, a new argument, a new ground for appealing to the people. He might not have thought of it if the fears of Hezekiah's servants had not put it into his head. The very thing they feared and asked him not to do gave him the idea of doing it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer draws a hard rule out of it: an enemy is an enemy. "Nothing was to be won by pleading with the enemies of the Lord... Ask no favours of them, and expect none."

Going Over the Leaders' Heads

Turned down by the officials, Rabshakeh changed his audience:

They should have realised their request would be useless. In fact it only made the Rabshakeh speak more loudly to all the people on the wall. He urged them to hear the words of the great king of Assyria. If he could not persuade the leaders of the people, he would do his best to weaken the people themselves.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer explains who was speaking, and how the speech ended:

"Rabshakeh" is a title, not a name. Sennacherib's commander-in-chief was the speaker. He was clearly a skilled diplomat, and he delivered his cunning speech in "the Jews' language"... He does his best to frighten the ordinary people. He hoped to stir up rebellion inside the city, so as to take it without having to lay siege to it. But he worked for nothing: "the people were silent and answered him not a word, for the king's command was, 'Do not answer him.'"

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

One More Listener Than He Counted

He aimed the shout at the men on the wall. It reached further:

Rabshakeh stood and cried out in their own tongue to the people on the walls, warning them against their king... The blasphemer had no idea who was listening to his taunting question about whether the Lord would deliver Jerusalem. It was not only Eliakim, Shebna and Joah, and not only the men on the wall, but the Lord Himself. It was now His affair.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Is the Great King?

Rabshakeh calls his master the great king. One writer sets that title beside the city he is shouting at:

God had set His name in Jerusalem, where Solomon built the temple. This was God's centre on earth, and of it we read, "Great is the LORD and greatly to be praised in the city of our God! His holy mountain, beautiful in elevation, is the joy of all the earth, Mount Zion... the city of the great King" (Psalm 48:1-2). Were Hezekiah and the Jews to willingly leave that city and go to another land "like their own land"?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the Loud Voice Was Selling

Notice how he dresses the demand up as an invitation:

Listen to the king of Assyria. He will let you live in peace. Then he will carry you off to "a land like your own land, a land of grain and wine, a land of bread and vineyards"... No doubt you will be in slavery too, but the Assyrian will see to it that you are happy! Satan has always spoken like this to the hearts of men. Woe to the one who listens to him, for the prince of this world never makes a man happy.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Answer of Silence

The same writer contrasts the king's distress with the believer's rest:

The Rabshakeh speaks in Hebrew to the people on the wall. Hezekiah's servants beg him to speak in Aramaic. He refuses with defiance and scorn. The danger of the people losing heart may well have filled Hezekiah with distress. But that same danger leaves the believer's soul calm and at peace. He has only to keep silence. His trust in God answers everything.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear speaks. Asking the enemy for a concession showed him where the weak point was, and he aimed at it.

- Volume targets. Unable to move the officials, he raised his voice to reach the people, hoping to divide the city from its king.

- Titles boast. He announced "the great king" outside the city that Scripture calls the city of the great King.

- Offers flatter. He wrapped the threat in a promise of grain, wine and bread — and the promise ended in slavery.

- Faith is quiet. The people answered not a word, and that silence was the one reply their king had commanded.

2 Kings 18:29 · Darby

Thus says the king Let not Hezekiah deceive you; for he will not be able to deliver you out of the [king's] hand.

Assyria's commander Rabshakeh stands outside Jerusalem's wall and shouts past Hezekiah's negotiators to the people listening above. His message is simple: your king is lying to you, and he cannot save you.

Words Aimed at the Crowd

Hezekiah's officials begged Rabshakeh to stop using the language the crowd understood. Their nervousness backfired. One writer shows how their plea handed the enemy an opening he had never thought of.

It is true that Hezekiah's servants were weak. Pleading with the enemies of the Lord would win nothing. It is always well to remember that they are enemies. Ask no favours of them, and expect none. But these three men were alarmed. They were afraid of the effect on the Jewish people. So they begged him not to talk in the Jews' language where the people could hear. What could that do but draw out from Rabshakeh a more forceful appeal and more boasting than ever… It suggested an idea. It gave him a new weapon, a new argument, a new way of appealing to the people. He might never have thought of it if the fears of Hezekiah's servants had not put it into his head.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Attack on the King

The first move is against Hezekiah himself. Break the people's trust in their king, and his call to trust the Lord falls with him. One writer also names the voice behind the offer that follows.

And now Rabshakeh attacks the person of the king. Hezekiah is a deceiver, a seducer (vv. 29, 32). He is lying to you when he urges you to trust in the Lord (v. 30). Do not listen to Hezekiah (vv. 31-32). Listen to the king of Assyria (v. 28). He will let you live in peace. Then he will carry you away to "a land like your own land, a land of grain and wine, a land of bread and vineyards" (v. 32). That land is just as full of good things as the land of Canaan. That is where you will find real abundance. No doubt you will be in slavery too, but the Assyrian will make sure you are happy! Satan has always spoken like this to the hearts of men. Woe to anyone who listens to him, for the prince of this world never makes a man happy.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"He Will Not Be Able to Deliver You"

Rabshakeh made a flat prediction. One writer answers it head-on, and says why the answer took time to come.

Rabshakeh, speaking to the men of Judah, accused Hezekiah of deceiving his own people by his confidence that the Lord would deliver them. Would the Lord deliver Jerusalem? Yes! Assyria found very soon that the Lord was a God of awesome power and judgment. They had claimed that He sent them against Jerusalem, and He would judge them for that deceitful claim of representing Him. He delayed His intervention for a time, as a test of Hezekiah's faith.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

An Unnoticed Listener

Rabshakeh thought his audience was the men on the wall and the three officials below. He had miscalculated who else was within hearing.

But it was not only Eliakim and Shebna and Joah who heard; it was Jehovah. Rabshakeh never imagined that the Lord God was listening, or that the Lord God would answer very soon. He had now dared to use that name for deliberate blasphemy. He had defied the authority of Jehovah where people knew that name. He had defied God!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Silence as the Answer

The shouting was meant to break the people's nerve, and that danger pressed on the king. One writer contrasts it with what the same danger does to a soul that trusts God.

The danger of seeing the people become discouraged may have filled Hezekiah with anguish. But the same danger leaves the believer's soul calm and at peace. He has only to keep silent. His trust in God answers everything.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What Grieved the King

Hezekiah had already lost silver, gold, and the treasures of the temple. None of that broke him.

If the king's ministers were foolish, the people at least were wise, and the people were wise because the king was wise… He heard it, and he tore his clothes. It was not for the loss of his three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold. It was not even for the stripping of the house of Jehovah. But now Jehovah was insulted. Now there were appeals to the people in the Jews' language to weaken their confidence in Jehovah. This touched his heart.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Listen — the officials' fear of being overheard gave Rabshakeh the idea of shouting to the crowd. Fear of what the enemy may hear can arm him.

- Deceive — the first target is the king's good name. Call Hezekiah a liar, and his appeal to trust the Lord loses its force.

- Deliver — God answered the boast that Hezekiah could not rescue them. He waited first, and the waiting tested Hezekiah's faith.

- Overheard — Rabshakeh thought he was speaking to men on a wall. God was listening to the name he had just used for blasphemy.

- Silence — the wise answer was to say nothing. What grieved Hezekiah was not his stripped treasury but God's honour insulted.

2 Kings 18:30 · Darby

Neither let Hezekiah make you rely upon Jehovah, saying, Jehovah will certainly deliver us, and this city shall not be given into the hand of the king of Assyria.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

2 Kings 18:31 · Darby

Hearken not to Hezekiah; for thus says the king of Assyria Make peace with me, and come out to me; and eat every one of his vine and every one of his fig-tree, and drink every one the waters of his own cistern;

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

2 Kings 18:32 · Darby

until I come and take you away to a land like your own land, a land of corn and wine, a land of bread and vineyards, a land of olive-trees and of honey, that ye may live and not die; and hearken not to Hezekiah, when he persuades you, saying, Jehovah will deliver us.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

2 Kings 18:33 · Darby

Have any of the gods of the nations delivered at all his land out of the hand of the king of Assyria?

An Assyrian officer stands outside Jerusalem's wall and argues from a track record: no nation's god has stopped Assyria yet. His question counts Israel's God among them, and it puts God's honour at stake.

Just One More Idol

The whole taunt rests on one mistake about who God is.

Rabshakeh could not distinguish between the idols and the Lord. The Lord to him was only an idol — one out of many idols. Hezekiah had broken down all the idols, so he imagined they were different forms of the Lord's worship. That, after all, was the pagan idea of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

But the nations he lists never had what Judah had.

None of those nations was depending on the only true God. But Hezekiah honestly sought the grace and guidance of the God of all the earth. None of the gods of the nations had been able to deliver those nations from Assyria. So, the Rabshakeh argued, how could Hezekiah expect the Lord to deliver him?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the Insult Came From

Judah's own past had handed the enemy his talking point.

Here is a very serious thing to consider. Judah's unfaithfulness had given the enemy an occasion to blaspheme the true God and to deny His existence. Since you had high places and altars, these were the Lord for you, he says. He does not know the Lord except by the idols which Judah had made its gods.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Aimed at the Weakest Listeners

He backed the taunt with a lie, then took his appeal straight to the people.

Rabshakeh falsely claimed that the Lord had told the Assyrian king to destroy Jerusalem. Then he made his appeal against Hezekiah to the citizens within hearing. He clearly knew their leaning toward idols, so different from their king's. Many of them were secretly trusting in false gods and not in the Lord. So the reminder that the gods of many other cities had failed to deliver was likely to carry weight with them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

An Unseen Listener

Three men on the wall heard him. So did Someone he never counted on.

Eliakim, Shebna and Joah were not the only ones who heard. The Lord heard too. Rabshakeh never imagined that the Lord God was listening. He never imagined that the Lord God would answer quickly, now that he had dared to use that name for deliberate blasphemy. He had dared the authority of the Lord where it was known. He had dared God!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Response That Wins

Losing his silver and gold had not made Hezekiah tear his clothes. This blow did.

He heard it, and he tore his clothes. It was not for the loss of his three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold. It was not even for the stripping of the house of the Lord. But now the Lord was insulted. Now there were appeals to the people in their own language to weaken their confidence in the Lord. This touched his heart.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The people gave the taunt the one reply it could not work against.

It is simply a matter of keeping silent and leaving the enemy to his threats or his smooth talk. The people trust the words of the king, their leader, and imitate his faith. The Assyrian attacks God openly, and His anointed king too. God uses that attack to strengthen and revive the people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Question Answered

Hezekiah grants the enemy's facts and overturns his conclusion.

He does not try to make the difficulty look small. He admits that the kings of Assyria have laid waste all the nations and their countries. But why did those nations fall? Because their gods were not like the Lord. They did not know what it was to put their case into the hands of the living God who made heaven and earth. This was the secret of their overthrow.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Mistake — The taunt treats the Lord as one more local god. The speaker could not tell Israel's God from the gods Assyria had already beaten.

- Opening — Judah's own high places handed the enemy his evidence. His loudest appeal went to the people already trusting false gods in secret.

- Listener — The words carried further than the wall. The God whose name he used for blasphemy was listening, and He would answer.

- Silence — The king told the people not to reply. He took the insult to God instead of into argument, and the attack revived them.

- Answer — Those nations fell because their gods were not like the Lord. Hezekiah put his case in the hands of the living God who made heaven and earth.

2 Kings 18:34 · Darby

Where are the gods of Hamath and of Arpad? Where are the gods of Sepharvaim, Hena, and Ivvah? and have they delivered Samaria out of my hand?

Rabshakeh speaks for the king of Assyria, and he is standing below Jerusalem's wall. He lists cities his master has beaten, asks where their gods are, and ends with Samaria — a city Assyria had already taken.

Jehovah counted as one more idol

Rabshakeh's question has a mistake built into it. He had already mocked Hezekiah for pulling down the altars and high places. One commentator explains how he could think that way:

Rabshakeh could not tell the difference between the idols and Jehovah. To him Jehovah was only an idol, one among many. Hezekiah had broken down all the idols, so he imagined they were different forms of Jehovah's worship. That was the heathen idea of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Jehovah is the name older writers use where the ESV has "the LORD". Judah's own record had given Rabshakeh that impression:

He does not know the Lord except by the idols which Judah had made its gods. He had the right to say to them, You have the same kinds of gods I do, and you serve them in the same way. And now you are saying: As for us, we trust in the Lord! Which Lord, tell me? The Lord of the high places, or the Lord of the altar you have just set up?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Aimed at the weakest listeners

Rabshakeh chose this argument for one audience in particular. He shouted it at the men sitting on the wall:

He appealed to the citizens within hearing, against Hezekiah. He knew well how much they leaned towards idols, so unlike their King. Many of them were secretly trusting in false gods and not in the Lord. So the reminder that the gods of many other cities had failed to deliver was likely to carry weight with them. Still, Hezekiah's command to the men to keep silence held, and they answered him not a word.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the list proves nothing

Every name on it was a genuine defeat. The argument still collapses, because of what those nations had been leaning on:

What of the gods of Hamath, Arpad, Sepharvaim, Hena and Ivvah? And what of Samaria? All of these had fallen to the bondage of Assyria. The answer is simple. None of those nations was depending on the only true God. But Hezekiah honestly sought the grace and guidance of the God of all the earth.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Gods that could not see

Rabshakeh asks where those gods are. One writer sets them beside the living God, and describes those who trusted them:

These gods could be seen, but could not see. God was the living God, who dwelt in heaven. These had the form of living creatures, but without life, and were found on earth. He acted as He pleased. These could not act at all. They began in the craftsman's imagination and owed their shape to the workman's skill. "Their idols are silver and gold, the work of human hands" — worthless objects, apart from the value of the metal they were made of. How could a dying creature make a living God to save him? Man could mould the metal into human form. He could shape it after the noblest of God's creatures on earth. But where was the life, where the will, where the power? "Those who make them become like them; so do all who trust in them." They might look like living souls, while in reality they were dead before God — however devoted and good they appeared.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One listener he had not counted

Rabshakeh thought he was debating three nervous officials. He was not:

It was not merely Eliakim and Shebna and Joah who heard; it was Jehovah. Rabshakeh never imagined that the Lord God was listening, or that the Lord God would answer quickly. Yet now he had dared to use that name for deliberate blasphemy. He had dared the authority of Jehovah where it was known. He had dared God!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The reply that was no reply

Hezekiah's men kept silence. One writer sets Hezekiah's anguish beside the calm of the believer who trusts God:

The risk of seeing the people lose heart may have filled Hezekiah with anguish. But the same danger leaves the believer's soul tranquil and peaceful. He has only to keep silence. His trust in God answers to everything.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- The list. Rabshakeh names Hamath, Arpad, Sepharvaim, Hena, Ivvah and Samaria. He asks where their gods were — real defeats, turned into one argument against trusting God.

- The flaw. Every nation on the list had trusted something other than the only true God. Hezekiah sought the God of all the earth, so the list proved nothing about him.

- The blindness. Rabshakeh could not tell an idol from Jehovah. Judah's own high places had taught him that confusion.

- The target. Rabshakeh aimed his speech at the men on the wall. Many of them secretly trusted false gods, so his argument was likely to bite.

- The answer. The gods on his list could be seen but could not see. The God he insulted was listening — and Judah's answer to Rabshakeh was deliberate silence.

2 Kings 18:35 · Darby

Which are they among all the gods of the countries, who have delivered their country out of my hand, that Jehovah should deliver Jerusalem out of my hand?

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

2 Kings 18:36 · Darby

But the people were silent and answered him not a word; for the king's command was, saying, Answer him not.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

2 Kings 18:37 · Darby

And Eliakim the son of Hilkijah, who was over the household, and Shebna the scribe, and Joah the son of Asaph, the chronicler, came to Hezekiah with their garments rent, and told him the words of Rab-shakeh.

Rabshakeh has finished his speech. The three men Hezekiah sent to meet him walk back through the gate with torn clothes and hand his words to the king. They bring back no reply of their own, and that silence matters as much as the report.

The Men Hezekiah Sent

These three officials had already asked Rabshakeh not to speak in the Jews' language, so the crowd on the wall would not understand him. That plea handed him his best weapon.

It is true that Hezekiah's servants were weak. There was nothing to gain by trying to appease the enemies of the Lord. It is always well to remember that they are enemies. Ask no favours of them, and expect none. But these three men were alarmed. They feared the effect on the Jewish people, so they begged him not to talk in the Jews' language where the people could hear. And what could that do? It only drew from Rabshakeh a more violent appeal and more boasting than ever… The very thing they feared and asked him not to do gave him the idea of doing it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The job titles in this verse also mark a change in Hezekiah's court.

God's judgment on the pride and arrogance of Shebna would make room for a true servant of Jehovah. Isaiah 22:20-21 says God would call His servant Eliakim the son of Hilkiah, clothe him with Shebna's robe, hand him Shebna's government, and make him a father to the people of Jerusalem and to the house of Judah. Notice that Shebna is the one called "over the house" in Isaiah 22:15. But in Isaiah 36:3, 22, and Isaiah 37:2, Eliakim is "over the house," and Shebna is named after him as "the scribe." So during the reign of Hezekiah, Eliakim rose and Shebna fell from his very high position.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Who Else Was Listening

Rabshakeh had aimed his taunt at men on a wall. His audience was larger than he knew.

The blasphemer taunted them, demanding to know whether Jehovah would deliver Jerusalem. He never thought who was listening. Not Eliakim, Shebna and Joah only, nor the men on the wall as well, but Jehovah Himself. It was now His affair. And then at last the faith of Hezekiah begins to shine once more, for his command was to give the man no answer.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Torn Clothes, Not Clenched Fists

Torn clothes might look like anger. Grant reads them as the opposite.

The people answered nothing, for Hezekiah had so instructed them (v. 36). That left the whole matter in God's hand. They could wait for His time to intervene as He saw fit. Eliakim, Shebna and Joah brought to Hezekiah the report of what Rabshakeh had said. They did so in a spirit of self-judgment, with their clothes torn. There was no bitter hatred in it, and no self-confidence. Instead there was the lowly humility of men who knew they had no power of their own. Their one concern was that God Himself would step in for them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the Report Did to the King

The report reaches Hezekiah. Earlier losses had not moved him like this.

Hezekiah bows as a man who trusts in Jehovah. He heard the report, and he tore his clothes. It was not for the loss of his three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold. It was not even for the stripping of the house of Jehovah. But now Jehovah was insulted. Now there were appeals to the people in the Jews' tongue to weaken their confidence in Jehovah. This touches his heart. He tore his clothes and went in sorrow to plead before the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why No One Argued Back

Rabshakeh promised the people comfort inside slavery. Rossier hears a familiar voice behind the offer.

No doubt you will be in bondage too, but the Assyrian will see that you are happy! Satan has always spoken like this to the hearts of men. Woe to him who listens to him, for the prince of this world never makes a man happy. Do we need to reason with him? Do we need to argue with him, or even talk with him, or answer him at all? Adam and Eve proved that only too well, to their own ruin and the ruin of their descendants. The man of faith is not tempted to answer him… He need only keep silent and leave the enemy to his threats or his honeyed words. The people trust the words of the king, their leader, and imitate his faith.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Mishandled — The three officials tried to handle Rabshakeh themselves. Their nervous plea only handed him a fresh weapon.

- Overheard — More than the men on the wall heard the blasphemy. Jehovah heard it, and the matter became His own affair.

- Torn — The torn clothes read as self-judgment and humility, not rage — men who knew they had no power of their own.

- Carried — They carried the words to the king instead of arguing. He grieved over an insulted God, not over lost treasure.

- Silent — Threats and honeyed promises get the same answer: silence, trust, and the matter left in God's hand.

2 Kings 19:1 · Darby

And it came to pass when king Hezekiah heard [it], that he rent his garments, and covered himself with sackcloth, and went into the house of Jehovah.

Rabshakeh, the Assyrian king's messenger, had stood outside Jerusalem's wall and mocked both Hezekiah and the God of Israel. The king's answer was mourning clothes and the house of the Lord.

Straight to God, Not to the Council

The order of Hezekiah's actions is the lesson. He did not first assemble his military staff, and he did not even send for the prophet first.

In deep humiliation and sorrow the godly man went to the house of the Lord and sent messengers to Isaiah. This is most blessed. He did not call a council of his advisers — a meeting of the captains — to talk the matter over. He did not send first to the prophet either. Faith knows a better way than that. He went straight into the presence of the LORD, and the sending to Isaiah was secondary. Many of our failures as His people happen because we do not go to the LORD first.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Two Halves of One Response

The torn robe and the sackcloth are only one side of what he did.

He tore his clothes and put on sackcloth, the symbol of repentance and self-judgment. This was negative, but he also took the positive action of going into the house of the Lord. There he would find positive help. No doubt the Lord guided him when he sent Eliakim, Shebna, and the elders of Israel to Isaiah the prophet.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the Sackcloth Meant

One writer ties the sackcloth to the source of Hezekiah's power.

What gave him such rare power in this fight was the feeling that he was nothing — that "an arm of flesh" was of no use. In a word, it was the Lord or nothing... Faith enabled Hezekiah to withdraw from the scene and make it entirely a question between the Lord and the king of Assyria. It was not Sennacherib and Hezekiah, but Sennacherib and the Lord. This tells us the meaning of the sackcloth. Hezekiah felt himself to be utterly helpless, and he took the place of helplessness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Real Distress, Real Confidence

Faith here is not calm detachment. The torn clothes were genuine grief, and the grief itself moved him in the right direction.

This confidence did not shut out anguish. The extreme danger did press on the heart. They do wear sackcloth and tear their clothes as a sign of affliction, of humiliation, and of mourning. But the danger drives Hezekiah and his people towards the house of God and towards the words of God. They go there for counsel, strength, and comfort... But one thing is enough for the afflicted remnant, and it ought to be enough for us. The Lord is there, and the defiance is against Him, not against us.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why He Tore His Clothes

Hezekiah had plenty of reasons to grieve that day. One of them cut deeper than the rest.

He heard it, and he tore his clothes. It was not for the loss of his three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold. It was not even for the stripping of the house of the Lord. But now the Lord Himself was insulted. Now there were appeals to the people in their own language to weaken their confidence in Him. This touched his heart. He tore his clothes and went before the Lord in sorrow to plead with Him... He goes to the Lord; they are sent to the Lord's servant. This was right. He looks in prayer to God Himself, and he expects an answer through His servant.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Failure Behind the Crisis

Hezekiah had already tried another way. He emptied the temple of its silver and gold to buy off Sennacherib. It bought him nothing but a bolder enemy.

The godly king did what he could to strengthen his defences. He sent the most humble message to the proud Assyrian. He gave him all the silver in the Lord's house, and stripped off for him the gold from its doors and pillars. But it was useless. There was little of the simplicity, strength, or wisdom of faith in all this. No wonder the blessing of God was not with him there. No wonder the enemy grew bolder and asked for everything.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The insults themselves became the cure:

All this reviling brought back Hezekiah's trust in the Lord. He saw that appeasing this world was of no use. All his trust must be in the Lord his God, as it had been before, even if he had been caught off guard for a moment.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Threat. Buying off the enemy failed and only made him bolder. The insults that followed drove Hezekiah back to the trust he had set aside for a moment.

- Torn. Torn clothes and sackcloth were the sign of repentance and self-judgment — real grief, not a calm face.

- Temple. He went to the house of the Lord before he went to his advisers or even to the prophet. Going to God first is the step we most often skip.

- Transfer. Sackcloth meant he took the place of helplessness. The fight was no longer Sennacherib against Hezekiah, but Sennacherib against the Lord.

- Touched. What tore his clothes was not the silver and gold Assyria had taken, but the insult to God Himself.

2 Kings 19:2 · Darby

And he sent Eliakim, who was over the household, and Shebna the scribe, and the elders of the priests, covered with sackcloth, to the prophet Isaiah the son of Amoz.

The Assyrian king's officers had mocked the God of Israel outside Jerusalem, and the report reached Hezekiah. He did not call a war council. He sent two of his highest officials and the senior priests, all in sackcloth, to the door of a prophet.

God First, the Prophet Second

One commentator points to what the king did not do first:

And Hezekiah also tore his clothes. In deep humiliation and sorrow the godly man went to the house of the Lord and sent messengers to Isaiah. This is most blessed. He did not call a council of his advisers. He did not call a meeting of the captains to talk the matter over. He did not send first to the prophet. Faith knows a better way than that. He went straight into the presence of the LORD, and the sending to Isaiah was secondary. Many of our failures as His people happen because we do not go to the LORD first.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Hezekiah and his messengers each had their own errand:

He goes to Jehovah; he sends them to Jehovah's servant. This was right. He looks in prayer to God Himself, and he expects an answer through His servant.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Prophet, Not the High Priest

Priests went in the group, but not to the head of their own order:

As the evil among the people grew, God always found an emergency man for Himself. Through that man He could speak to their consciences. We see this clearly in 2 Kings 19:2 and 2 Kings 22:12-14. In the first case, Hezekiah sends two of his officers, along with the elders of the priests, all covered with sackcloth. They go to Isaiah about the blasphemous words of the proud Assyrian. Note that "the elders of the priests" made up most of the group. Yet Hezekiah did not send them to the High Priest of the day. He sent them to a man quite outside their order — the son of Amoz.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The same writer draws out what this says about the priesthood, and what God does after such a failure:

They show us that the priesthood had completely lost its original place as the channel between Jehovah and His people… But God never rebuilds an order of things that has failed in the hands of men. In His great grace He goes on to something better. Everything that man has handled so badly will be perfect in Christ on the day He appears.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Two Named Officials

Their titles mark a shift in the royal household that Isaiah had already announced:

God's judgment on the pride and arrogance of Shebna would make way for a true servant of Jehovah. Isaiah had said, "In that day I will call my servant Eliakim the son of Hilkiah" (Isaiah 22:20). Note this: Isaiah 22:15 calls Shebna "over the house." But in Isaiah 36:3, 22, and Isaiah 37:2, Eliakim is "over the house," and Shebna comes after him as "the scribe." So during the reign of Hezekiah, Eliakim was rising, and Shebna was falling from his very high position.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Sackcloth With a Direction

The sackcloth had a meaning, and Hezekiah joined it to a positive step:

When Hezekiah heard the report, he tore his clothes and put on sackcloth, the symbol of repentance and self-judgment. This was negative, but he also took the positive action of going into the house of the Lord. There he would find positive help. No doubt the Lord guided him when he sent Eliakim and Shebna and the elders of Israel to Isaiah the prophet.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the Remnant Still Had

Judah was down to a weak remnant, yet that remnant was not empty-handed:

Did they have any resource, this weak "remnant that is left" (v. 4)? Yes, indeed! They still had Jehovah's temple, His beloved city, Mount Zion, the son of David and his throne, and the prophet who carried the word of God. They still had far more than David himself had in the cave of Adullam! The flesh might become discouraged; faith could not. In the middle of this indescribable disaster, faith had everything that gave it firm assurance… Faith listens to the voice of the prophet, and closes its ear to the blaspheming voice of the enemy's servant.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- First — Hezekiah went to God before he sent to Isaiah. Many failures start by reversing that order.

- Then — He prayed to God Himself, and he looked for the answer through God's servant. Both belong together.

- Past the priest — Priests went in the group, yet Hezekiah sent them past their own high priest to a prophet. That order had failed in men's hands.

- Raised and lowered — Eliakim now stands where Shebna once stood. The proud official sinks; God raises the servant He names.

- Still enough — The remnant had lost almost everything. It still had the temple, David's throne, and the prophet who carried God's word. Faith counted that as enough.

2 Kings 19:3 · Darby

And they said to him, Thus says Hezekiah This day is a day of trouble and of rebuke and of reviling; for the children are come to the birth, and there is not strength to bring forth.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

2 Kings 19:4 · Darby

It may be Jehovah thy God will hear all the words of Rab-shakeh, whom the king of Assyria his master has sent to reproach the living God; and will rebuke the words which Jehovah thy God has heard. Therefore lift up a prayer for the remnant that is left.

The king of Assyria's officer has stood outside Jerusalem's wall and mocked both the king and the God of Israel. Hezekiah does not answer him back. He sends a message to the prophet Isaiah instead. The verse raises three questions. Whose name was really insulted? Why does Hezekiah say only "it may be"? And who are the people he calls "left"? (The commentators quoted here say "reproach" where the ESV says "mock.")

Whose Honour Is at Stake

The striking thing about the message is what Hezekiah leaves out of it. He does not plead his own danger.

And equally beautiful is his message to God's prophet. He does not mention himself in the danger of Jerusalem. It is the honour of the Lord that is at stake; the honour of the living God is at stake. The Assyrian had defied the God of Israel. Indeed, Hezekiah's comfort was that the Lord had heard it all and knew it all. What lessons and what comforts are here for us also! Then he requests prayer.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"The Living God"

That title is doing real work in the verse. It says which God Assyria has insulted, and what makes Him different.

The Living God. — He directed attention to the living God. That speaks of one, and only one, divine Being. There are not two living Gods. Now their fathers had understood what this name meant. It marked out their God, the Lord Jehovah, as completely different from the idols of the nations. Those had no life. "They have mouths, but do not speak; eyes, but do not see. They have ears, but do not hear; noses, but do not smell. They have hands, but do not feel; feet, but do not walk; and they do not make a sound in their throat" (Psalm 115:5-7). This heaps scorn on the idols, on their makers, and on their worshippers.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Small Faith, Full Answer

"It may be" is a cautious phrase. One writer reads it as the mark of a faith that was real but small. The answer did not depend on the size of that faith.

Hezekiah was not a man of great faith. But he saw that the profane king of Assyria was not only challenging him. He was reproaching the God of Israel... Even if Hezekiah's faith was small, the Lord answered his cry, for the glory of His Name was in question.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

"The Remnant That Is Left"

Hezekiah describes his own people by a word of weakness. He makes no larger claim for them than the facts allowed.

Then, second, he turned to the prophet, through whom God had been speaking. He confessed the low condition of himself and his people. He spoke of them as "the remnant that is left." He recognised the unity of all Israel. The ten tribes had now gone into exile. He did not fall into the trap of assuming that the two tribes he ruled were more than a "remnant," left by the mercy of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer asks what that weak remnant still had. The list is long.

Did they have any resource, this weak "remnant that is left" (v. 4)? Yes, indeed! They still had the Lord's temple, His beloved city, Mount Zion, the son of David and his throne, the prophet — bearer of the word of God... The flesh might become discouraged. Faith could not be discouraged at all. In the middle of this indescribable disaster, faith had everything that gave it firm assurance, everything that comforted it, everything that made it rejoice in the affliction: Immanuel, the presence of God with His people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Two Directions at Once

Hezekiah does two things in the same hour, and the order matters: he prays himself, and he asks God's servant to pray.

He goes to the Lord; they are sent to the Lord's servant. This was right. He looks in prayer to God Himself, and he expects an answer through His servant... And the answer is immediate. "Say this to your master. This is what the Lord says: Do not be afraid of the words you have heard. The servants of the king of Assyria have blasphemed Me with them."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Defied — The insult struck at God, not at Hezekiah. He never mentions his own danger; it is the honour of the Lord that is at stake.

- Living — The God they mocked is the one living God, unlike the lifeless idols of the nations.

- Weak — Hezekiah calls his people only a remnant. Yet that remnant still held everything worth having.

- Hesitant — "It may be" is the language of small faith, and God answered it anyway, because His own Name was in question.

- Answered — He prayed, and he asked the prophet to pray. The answer came at once: do not be afraid.

2 Kings 19:5 · Darby

And the servants of king Hezekiah came to Isaiah.

An Assyrian army stands outside Jerusalem, and Hezekiah has sent his chief officials to the prophet Isaiah. This short verse is the moment they arrive, and everything hangs on the answer they carry back.

Prayer First, Then the Prophet

The order of Hezekiah's actions matters. He did not send to Isaiah instead of praying; he prayed, and sent.

He goes to the Lord; they are sent to the Lord's servant. This was right. He looks in prayer to God Himself, and he expects an answer through His servant… And the answer is immediate.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer points out what Hezekiah did not do first, then turns it on us.

He did not call a council of his advisers. He did not gather the captains to talk the matter over. He did not send to the prophet first. Faith knows a better way than that. He went straight into the presence of the LORD, and the sending to Isaiah was secondary. Many of our failures as His people happen because we do not go to the LORD first.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Weak Saints, One Resource

This kind of helplessness comes back again and again.

Similar distress has been often repeated in the history of the Church. A climax arises that finds saints of God pathetically weak in meeting the attacks of the enemy. What is their resource? Only the grace of God. So Hezekiah asked Isaiah to pray. He asked that God would rebuke the words of the Rabshakeh, and preserve the small remnant of Israel still left in the land.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Rabshakeh was the Assyrian king's spokesman.

The Honour of God's Name

Notice who is missing from Hezekiah's message.

And equally beautiful is his message to God's prophet. He does not mention himself in the danger of Jerusalem. It is the honour of the Lord that is at stake; the honour of the living God is at stake. The Assyrian had defied the God of Israel. Yes, Hezekiah's comfort was that the Lord had heard it all and knew it all. What lessons and what comforts are here for us also! Then he requests prayer.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Hezekiah's own faith was not strong. That did not decide the outcome.

Hezekiah was not a man of great faith, but he discerned that the ungodly king of Assyria was not only challenging him, but was reproaching the God of Israel… Even if Hezekiah's faith was small, the Lord answered his cry, for the glory of His Name was in question.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What the Weak Remnant Still Had

The remnant looked stripped of everything. One writer lists what they still had.

Did they have any resource, this weak "remnant that is left" (v. 4)? Yes, indeed! They still had the Lord's temple, His beloved city, Mount Zion, the son of David and his throne, and the prophet who carried the word of God. They still had much more than David himself had in the cave of Adullam! The flesh might lose heart. Faith could not, for in the middle of this indescribable disaster faith had everything that gave it firm assurance, everything that comforted it, and everything that made it rejoice in the affliction: Immanuel, the presence of God with His people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer names the one fact that steadies them.

But one thing is enough for the afflicted remnant, and ought to be enough for us: the Lord is there; it is He, not ourselves, who has been defied.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Answer Sent Back

Isaiah's reply was short, and it came in a set order.

The divine answer through Isaiah was brief. Do not be afraid. The blessed assurance for faith first — Fear not! The promise of deliverance is the second thing in Isaiah's answer.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

God's own hand in it stayed out of sight.

When the servants brought this message to Isaiah, the prophet did not hesitate to tell them what the Lord said… God took account of the words that had blasphemed Him (v.6). God would work behind the scenes. He would cause the king of Assyria to hear a rumour that drove him back to his own land. There he would die by the sword among his own people (v.7). His own sons killed him (v.37).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Go first. Hezekiah went into God's presence first. Sending to Isaiah came second.

- Own the weakness. God's people are often too weak to meet the enemy's attacks, and their only resource is the grace of God.

- Plead His name. He left himself out of the message. The reproach was against the living God, and that is what he asked prayer about.

- Small faith, real answer. His faith was small, but the Lord answered his cry, because the glory of His name was in question.

- Wait for the word. The reply was brief and immediate. First "do not be afraid", then the promise. God kept it with a rumour and a sword Hezekiah never touched.

2 Kings 19:6 · Darby

And Isaiah said to them, Thus shall ye say to your master Thus saith Jehovah Be not afraid of the words that thou hast heard, wherewith the servants of the king of Assyria have blasphemed me.

The king of Assyria had sent his servants to Jerusalem with words that insulted God Himself. Hezekiah tore his clothes, went to the house of the Lord, and sent to Isaiah for a word from God.

Prayer First, Prophet Second

The order of Hezekiah's actions is part of the lesson.

In deep humiliation and sorrow the godly man went to the house of the Lord and sent messengers to Isaiah. This is most blessed. He did not call a council of his advisers or a meeting of the captains to talk the matter over. He did not send first to the prophet. Faith knows a better way than that. He went straight into the presence of the LORD, and the sending to Isaiah was secondary. Many of our failures as His people happen because we do not go to the LORD first.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Assurance First, Promise Second

Notice what God gives before anything else.

God's answer through Isaiah was brief: "Do not be afraid." The blessed assurance for faith comes first — do not be afraid! The promise of deliverance comes second in Isaiah's answer.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Whose Quarrel It Is

God does not say the words insulted Hezekiah. He says they reviled Him. That moves the weight of the crisis off the king and his city. One writer draws this out as the one thing that is enough for a weak and humbled people:

This confidence did not shut out anguish. The extreme danger did press on the heart. They do wear sackcloth and tear their clothes as a sign of affliction, humiliation and mourning. But the danger drives Hezekiah and his people to the house of God and to the words of God, to receive counsel, strength and comfort... But one thing is enough for the afflicted remnant, and it ought to be enough for us. The Lord is there. It is He, not we, whom the enemy has defied.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Small Faith Answered

The answer came for a reason that lay outside Hezekiah himself.

Hezekiah was not a man of great faith. But he saw that the godless king of Assyria was not only challenging him. He was also insulting the God of Israel... Even if Hezekiah's faith was small, the Lord answered his cry, for the glory of His Name was in question.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Threats Answered by Events

What happened next matched the prophet's message exactly.

The word of the Lord is fulfilled to the letter. News came that Tirhakah, king of Ethiopia, who had seized Egypt, was advancing against the king of Assyria. His own aim was exactly the conquest of Egypt, so he left suddenly to meet Tirhakah.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer traces how God did it, and how the king of Assyria finally died:

When the servants brought this message to Isaiah, the prophet had no need to hesitate. He told them to report the words of the Lord to Hezekiah: he was not to be afraid of the boasting words from Assyria, for God took account of those words which had blasphemed Him (v.6). God would work behind the scenes, causing the king of Assyria to hear a rumour to drive him back to his own land, where he would suffer death by the sword among his own people (v.7). His own sons killed him (v.37).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Story Is Told at Length

Scripture gives Hezekiah a lot of space. One writer explains why.

Scripture tells Hezekiah's life at length. In his reign, Sennacherib's attack on Jerusalem pictured a still greater deliverance from a future king of Assyria. God so controls the evil and the passions of men that He makes them serve His purpose. He gives a hint of what He will yet do for His own glory.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Words heard. The enemy's words were real and frightening. Hezekiah did not answer them. He carried them into God's presence first, and only then sent to the prophet.

- Words claimed. God calls the insult an attack on Himself. The enemy defied Him, not the frightened people of Jerusalem.

- Word given. The reply leads with "do not be afraid"; assurance for faith comes first, the promise of deliverance second.

- Word honoured. Hezekiah's faith was small, but the glory of God's Name was at stake, so the Lord answered his cry.

- Word fulfilled. A rumour, a retreat, a sword in his own land. God did it all behind the scenes, to the letter. It points on to a greater rescue still to come.

2 Kings 19:7 · Darby

Behold, I will put a spirit into him, and he shall hear tidings, and shall return to his own land; and I will make him to fall by the sword in his own land.

Hezekiah's officials have carried the king's distress to Isaiah. The prophet sends back God's reply: do not fear, because the invader is already sentenced. In one verse God says how He will turn back the greatest army of the day — by a rumour, a retreat, and a sword at home.

The insult against God

The comfort here rests on one fact: the taunts were aimed at God, not at Hezekiah. One writer says the same holds for us today:

But one thing is enough for the afflicted remnant and ought to be enough for us: the Lord is there; it is He, not ourselves, who has been defied. So let us say like Hezekiah: perhaps the Lord will hear the words of the one who reproaches the living God, and punish the words He has heard. And the Lord will answer us.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Small faith, answered for the sake of God's name

God answered, though the king who cried to Him was no giant of faith. What moved God was the honour of His own name:

Hezekiah was not a man of great faith. But he saw that the godless king of Assyria was not only challenging him. He was reproaching the God of Israel... Even if Hezekiah's faith was small, the Lord answered his cry, for the glory of His name was in question. So we have God's own reply to the king.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God works out of sight

God promises no army and announces no wonder. His means are a spirit put in a man and a piece of news. Rabshakeh, the Assyrian general, was still at Jerusalem:

God would work behind the scenes. He would make the king of Assyria hear a rumour that drove him back to his own land. There he would suffer death by the sword among his own people (v.7). His own sons killed him (v.37). So Hezekiah had relief for a short time. The rumour made Rabshakeh leave Jerusalem, because the king of Assyria had another battle front at Libnah (v.8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Fulfilled to the letter — first the retreat

The rumour was war news, and it reached a king whose own plan it ruined:

The word of the Lord is fulfilled to the letter. Tirhakah, king of Ethiopia, had seized Egypt, and he was now advancing against the king of Assyria. Egypt was the very thing the Assyrian had set out to conquer. So the news made him leave at once to meet him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Then the sword at home

The second half of the sentence took longer. First the army fell, and then the king:

God's answer was not long delayed. "And that night the angel of the Lord went out and struck down 185,000 in the camp of the Assyrians. And when people arose early in the morning, behold, these were all dead bodies." The result was that the king retreats in dismay. He returns and lives in Nineveh. But as the Lord had sent a blast upon him in Palestine, so now he must fall in his own land. "And as he was worshiping in the house of Nisroch his god, Adrammelech and Sharezer, his sons, struck him down with the sword and escaped into the land of Ararat. And Esarhaddon his son reigned in his place." So every word of the Lord was accomplished.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A picture of a greater rescue

Commentators also read the whole rescue as a picture of a later one. A type is an earlier person or event that pictures someone greater:

Hezekiah is in this way a type of the true Immanuel, of Him before whom the Assyrian, the destroyer of Israel, will fall. This is a very important history, as it foreshadows the events of the last days.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

("Immanuel" means "God with us.")

Summary

- Words. The Assyrian's taunts reproached the living God. The defiance hit Him, not Hezekiah.

- Word. God answered through the prophet, and His word was fulfilled to the letter.

- Wind. God's first move stayed out of sight — a spirit put in a man, and news from Ethiopia.

- Withdrawal. The news did its work. The invader broke off and went home, just as God said.

- Wound. The sword found him at home, in the hands of his own sons. Every word God spoke that day came true, and the whole rescue points to a greater one still ahead.

2 Kings 19:8 · Darby

And Rab-shakeh returned, and found the king of Assyria warring against Libnah; for he had heard that he had departed from Lachish.

Rabshakeh had stood at Jerusalem's wall, shouting threats at the city. Now he returns and finds his king gone from Lachish to Libnah — a move commentators read as the first visible step of what Isaiah had promised.

God working behind the scenes

Isaiah had already told Hezekiah what was coming. The king of Assyria would hear something, and go home. One commentator ties that promise to this verse:

God would work behind the scenes. He would make the king of Assyria hear a rumour that drove him back to his own land. There he would suffer death by the sword among his own people (v.7). His own sons killed him (v.37). So Hezekiah was given a short respite. The rumour made Rabshakeh leave Jerusalem, because the king of Assyria had another front of battle with Libnah (v.8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Nothing supernatural is on show. A general moves and a spokesman follows. God's hand is in the troop movements themselves.

The news that pulled him away

The army that drew him off came from the very region he was aiming at:

The word of the Lord is fulfilled to the letter. Tirhakah, king of Ethiopia, had seized Egypt. News came that he was marching against Sennacherib, whose own aim was exactly the conquest of Egypt. So Sennacherib set out at once to meet him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The route God had already fixed

The two place names matter. Both lie on the low country route, not at Jerusalem. God had said the Assyrian would never come before the city:

He was not to come into the city. He was not even to besiege it. He was not to shoot an arrow there, nor to come before it with shield, nor to build a siege ramp against it. By the way that he came, by that same way should he return. Now that way had clearly been along the low country, the great highway between Syria and Egypt. From Lachish, in the south-west of the land, Sennacherib first sent to demand the surrender of Hezekiah and his people. From Libnah, when about to move south to meet Tirhakah, King of Ethiopia, his last insulting message was sent (2 Kings 19:8-9).

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Another writer names the officers the king sent instead. "Rabshakeh" is a title — the chief cup-bearer:

It is clear as light in the three accounts in Scripture that the great king never besieged Jerusalem. He was content to send his servants and a large part of his army from Lachish. The general in command (Tartan), the chief chamberlain (Rab-saris) and the chief cup-bearer (Rab-shakeh) did come to Jerusalem, and the last of them insulted Hezekiah, threatened the worst horrors of a siege in the hearing of those sitting on the wall, and blasphemed Jehovah as if He were powerless like the other gods. It is no less clear that Rabshakeh returned to his master, who had gone from Lachish to Libnah, and sent a message to Hezekiah again — shorter and yet more blasphemous.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The stages of one man's humbling

Read from the end of the story, this quiet turning back is only the first stage of Sennacherib's humbling:

What a humiliation, and yet how simple! First came a rumour in his own land, after the blast that Jehovah would send in His land. Last of all, he himself was kept for a far more humiliating fate, in front of his own subjects in his own land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Relief, not victory

The withdrawal did not end the pressure on Hezekiah. From Libnah came a letter, and the insult sharpened. Earlier the Assyrian had told the people not to let Hezekiah fool them; now he goes after their God directly:

Now he says to Hezekiah, "Do not let your God, on whom you rely, deceive you" (v. 10), likening Him to the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." The Assyrian king was blocked in his plan and wounded in his pride. The rage that filled him now shows itself in its true character. It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Hezekiah takes the letter to God. One writer notes how this second visit differs from the first:

Hezekiah goes up to the house of the Lord a second time. It is no longer a question of humiliation, as it was the first time. It is a direct attack on the name of the Lord whom Hezekiah honours. God must take account of this letter. The king places God's cause into God's own hands, but he knows that to honour His name, the Lord will save His humbled people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Word first — Isaiah promised the Assyrian would hear something and go home. This verse is that promise starting to happen, with God working behind the scenes.

- Rumour next — news of Tirhakah's advance struck the very region Sennacherib was aiming at. The word of the Lord came true to the letter.

- Route fixed — Lachish and Libnah lie on the low country highway. God had said the invader would not shoot an arrow at Jerusalem. The great king never even besieged it.

- Respite only — the retreat bought Hezekiah a short breathing space, not peace. From Libnah came a letter treating his God as a deceiver — a direct reproach against the living God. Hezekiah put God's cause into God's own hands.

- End certain — first a rumour, then a retreat, and at last death by his own sons' swords at home. The humbling God announced came in stages, and it came in full.

2 Kings 19:9 · Darby

And he heard say of Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, Behold, he has come forth to make war with thee. And he sent messengers again to Hezekiah, saying,

News reaches Sennacherib that Tirhakah, king of Cush, is marching against him. Instead of turning to meet that threat, he fires off one more demand at Jerusalem. This verse is the hinge of the story. The distraction God promised has arrived, yet the enemy's mouth only grows louder.

Who Tirhakah was

Tirhakah was a real ruler, named on ancient monuments as well as in the Bible. The ESV calls him king of Cush; older translations call the same land Ethiopia, which is the name the writers below use. His clash with Assyria pulled Sennacherib's attention away from Jerusalem.

Tirhakah or Taharka (the Tehrak of the monuments) came into conflict with Assyria in the fourteenth year of Hezekiah. Sennacherib was attacking Libnah when he heard that the king of Ethiopia had come out to fight against him. Sennacherib sent a second threatening letter to Hezekiah; but God miraculously destroyed his army in the night.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A rumour God had promised

Isaiah had already told Hezekiah what would happen. The king of Assyria would hear news that sent him home. The report about Tirhakah is that promise arriving.

"Do not be afraid of the words you have heard," said Isaiah. "The servants of the king of Assyria have used them to blaspheme Me. Behold, I will put a spirit in him. He will hear news, and he will return to his own land. And I will make him fall by the sword in his own land" (vv. 6-7). The word of the Lord came true to the letter. Tirhakah, king of Ethiopia, had seized Egypt. News came that he was advancing against Sennacherib, whose own goal was that very conquest of Egypt. So Sennacherib left at once to meet him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God did not need an army to move an army. A report was enough.

God would work behind the scenes. He would cause the king of Assyria to hear a rumour that drove him back to his own land. There he would suffer death by the sword among his own people (v.7). His own sons killed him (v.37).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Pressed, but not finished

A new enemy at his back could have made him drop the smaller target. Sennacherib does the opposite.

But Sennacherib, king of Assyria, was not finished with Jerusalem. News came to him that the King of Ethiopia was coming to make war against him. Even so, he was still determined to subdue Jerusalem. He sent messengers again to Hezekiah, arrogantly telling him, "Do not let your God in whom you trust deceive you, saying, Jerusalem shall not be given into the hand of the king of Assyria" (v.10).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The target shifts to God Himself

The first message tried to separate the people from their king. This one attacks the God the king trusts.

He had previously sent his spokesmen with this message to the people: "Let not Hezekiah deceive you … neither let Hezekiah make you rely on the Lord" (2 Kings 18:29-30). Now he says to Hezekiah, "Let not your God, on whom you rely, deceive you" (v. 10), likening Him to the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Hezekiah's second visit to the house of the Lord

The king goes back to the same place, but not in the same frame of mind. The first time he came humbled. This time the insult falls on his God.

Hezekiah goes up to the house of the Lord a second time. It is no more a question of humiliation like the first time, but one of a direct attack on the name of the Lord whom Hezekiah honours. God must take account of this letter. The king places God's cause into God's own hands, but he knows that to honour His name, the Lord will save His humbled people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The proud instrument put back on its leash

The last word here does not belong to Sennacherib. God answers the raging king directly.

With that work done, he must go back humbled and beaten, for he had gone beyond the task he was given... "But I know your sitting down, your going out, your coming in, and your raging against Me. Your raging against Me and your arrogance have come up into My ears. So I will put My ring in your nose and My bridle in your lips, and I will make you go back by the way you came."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Rumour. God said Sennacherib would hear news that turned him around. The report of Tirhakah's advance is that word coming true.

- Refusal. The distraction did not soften him. Pressed from behind, he still meant to take Jerusalem, so he sent messengers again.

- Reproach. First he attacked the people's trust in Hezekiah. Now he attacks Hezekiah's trust in God, ranking the living God with idols he had already smashed.

- Return to God. Hezekiah goes up a second time, not to plead his own weakness but to hand the insult over to the One insulted.

- Restraint. The ring and bridle image says who was in charge all along: the raging king goes home by the road he came on.

2 Kings 19:10 · Darby

Thus shall ye speak to Hezekiah king of Judah saying Let not thy God, upon whom thou reliest, deceive thee, saying, Jerusalem shall not be delivered into the hand of the king of Assyria.

Sennacherib had marched away from Jerusalem, but he refused to leave the city alone. So he sent a letter ahead of him, aimed at what walls cannot protect: Hezekiah's confidence in God's promise that Jerusalem would not be handed over.

From Attacking the King to Attacking God

This taunt repeats an earlier one, but the target has changed. One writer traces the shift from the speech made to the people to this letter sent to the king.

Before he left, Sennacherib sends a written message to Hezekiah. He had earlier sent his spokesmen to the people with this message: "Do not let Hezekiah deceive you … do not let Hezekiah make you trust in the LORD" (2 Kings 18:29-30). Now he says to Hezekiah, "Do not let your God in whom you trust deceive you" (v. 10). He likens Him to the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." He had been blocked in his plan and wounded in his pride. Now the rage that filled the Assyrian king shows itself in its true character. It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Charge of Deceiving, Turned Around

The letter accuses God of misleading His own people. One writer points out where the real deception lay.

This proud enemy of God called on the people of Judah not to let Hezekiah deceive them, but to refuse to believe him. Sennacherib's own aim was to have Judah let him deceive them into thinking that God was no better than the idols of the nations.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

His confidence rested on his record:

None of the nations had been able to resist Assyria. So Sennacherib was fully confident that the God of heaven and earth could not deliver Jerusalem either.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Tool That Thought It Acted Alone

The letter left out one fact: where Sennacherib's victories had come from.

Sennacherib is notorious for his reviling letter to Hezekiah, which he sent "to reproach the living God." He had been successful against the cities of Judah, but God did not allow him to enter Jerusalem. He had beaten many lands whose gods were made by human hands. That success filled him with pride and arrogance, so he did not stop at blaspheming the God of Israel. He had hardly realised that he was only God's instrument for punishing the nations. He thought all his victories came from his own strength and skill, and he raged foolishly against the living God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Silence, and a Letter Spread Out

Hezekiah does not write back. One writer treats his response as a pattern for anyone under attack, and likens Rabshakeh, the Assyrian spokesman, to Satan himself.

How terrible is the host of hell that Satan brings at such a time, to test the faith of the child of God. What threats, what shouting, what blasphemy, what trickery. Rabshakeh's rage is an exact picture of Satan's hatred. "Do not answer him," was Hezekiah's command… The king had the wicked unbelieving letter read to him. Then he "went up to the house of the LORD and spread it before the LORD." Hezekiah's conduct in this fierce trial shows two points of immense value to the tried soul. "Do not answer him," "and spread it before the LORD." Silence and prayer. When Satan throws out a flood of unbelieving questions, do not answer him, but spread it all out before the Lord.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

Why God Answered

The letter made God's own name the issue. That is the ground Hezekiah prays on.

Hezekiah goes up to the house of the LORD a second time. This time it is not a matter of humbling himself, as it was the first time. Now it is a direct attack on the name of the Lord whom Hezekiah honours. God must take account of this letter. The king places God's cause into God's own hands. But he knows that the Lord will save His humbled people, in order to honour His name.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

He wrote without knowing what God had already told Hezekiah:

The proud king of Assyria did not know what lay ahead of him, though the Lord had already told His servant Hezekiah… This was a direct challenge to Israel's God, and God was not slow to take it up.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A Judgment Still to Come

One writer reads this history as pointing forward to a destruction still to come:

The history we have seen in the earlier chapters is only a testimony to the total destruction that awaits the final Assyrian and his armies. That destruction will come in the latter day, upon the mountains of Israel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Taunt — First came the word to the people: "Do not let Hezekiah deceive you." Then came the letter: "Do not let your God in whom you trust deceive you." The quarrel was really with God.

- Target — By calling God a deceiver, Sennacherib wanted Judah to see Him as no better than the idols of the nations.

- Tool — He never grasped that he was only God's instrument for punishing the nations. He took borrowed success as proof of his own strength.

- Trust — Hezekiah answered the enemy with silence. He spread the letter out before the Lord. Silence and prayer.

- Triumph — The attack struck at God's name, so God took the challenge up Himself. One writer also sees here a preview of the final Assyrian's overthrow.

2 Kings 19:11 · Darby

Behold, thou hast heard what the kings of Assyria have done to all countries, destroying them utterly; and shalt thou be delivered?

Sennacherib's letter makes one argument: no nation has survived Assyria, so why would Jerusalem? Behind that logic sits a question about God Himself — is He one more local god who will fail like the rest, and who is the king really insulting?

The Letter's Higher Target

The first taunt went out to the people, telling them not to let Hezekiah fool them. The letter changes target.

He had already sent his spokesmen to the people with this message: "Do not let Hezekiah deceive you … do not let Hezekiah make you trust in the LORD." Now he says to Hezekiah, "Do not let your God in whom you trust deceive you." He is likening Him to the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." Blocked in his plan and stung in his pride, the Assyrian king is full of rage. That rage now shows its true character. It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Record of Conquest Turned Into an Argument

Assyria's success was real, and it had already done its work on the man boasting about it.

He had been successful against the cities of Judah, but God did not allow him to enter Jerusalem. He had won against many lands whose gods were made by human hands. That success filled him with pride and arrogance, and he went as far as blaspheming the God of Israel. He had little idea that he was only God's instrument to punish the nations. He thought all his victories came from his own strength and skill, and in his folly he raged against the living God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Rod That Boasted

The letter never mentions who stood behind those earlier conquests. God had a use for Assyria, and that is not the same as greatness.

The Lord used him to beat down the pride of Israel. "However, he does not mean so." He only wants to feed his own pride. Israel should have stood for their true boast, the Lord Himself, and looked to Him in humility to plead their cause. Instead they sought what the nations sought, and their God gave them up to this proud and cruel enemy. But if the Lord disciplines His own people for their faults, He will surely punish the overbearing wickedness of His enemies.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Comparing God to Things That Cannot Save

The force of "shall you be delivered?" depends on counting Israel's God among the gods Assyria had crushed. The comparison fails as soon as you ask what those gods were.

Sennacherib went on to say that the gods of many nations had not saved those nations from destruction by Assyria. So, he argued, Judah could not depend on their God to save them. He had little idea that the gods of the nations — his own nation included — were helpless idols, while the God of Israel created all things.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Hezekiah's Second Visit

The king writes no reply. He goes back to God, and not for the same reason as the first time.

Hezekiah goes up to the house of the Lord a second time. The first time, the question was one of humiliation. This time it is a direct attack on the name of the Lord whom Hezekiah honours. God must take account of this letter. The king places God's cause into God's own hands. He knows that the Lord will save His humbled people, to honour His name.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Contempt Turned Back

God's reply turns the contempt around. The king who despised Zion hears Zion despise him.

The Assyrian came full of his proud confidence. That very thing drew out the arm of the Lord in defence of His despised city. The Assyrian despised Zion, so God speaks by the prophet — and it is Zion that despises the Assyrian. For, as we have already observed, God speaks according to His thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Same Boast Heard Again

Sennacherib was not the last man to talk this way. One writer traces the same boast to a later ruler, and on to the last days.

The words that prophecy puts in his mouth are the words spoken by Rabshakeh, the servant of Sennacherib, and by the king in his letter to Hezekiah. The same boastful spirit that marked Sennacherib later marked Antiochus Epiphanes… and it will appear in full in the king of the north in the last days.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Reproach — The letter's real target is God's name, not just Hezekiah's confidence. It treats Him as one more defeated god.

- Rod — Assyria's record of conquest was borrowed power. He was God's instrument to punish the nations, and he mistook that for his own strength and skill.

- Comparison — The argument only works if God belongs with the idols. Those gods were helpless things; the God of Israel made all things.

- Response — Hezekiah does not reply to the letter. He brings the matter to God and puts God's cause in God's own hands.

- Reversal — His proud confidence drew out God's arm in defence of the city he despised. In the end, that city despises him.

2 Kings 19:12 · Darby

Have the gods of the nations which my fathers have destroyed delivered them Gozan, and Haran, and Rezeph, and the children of Eden that were in Thelassar?

Sennacherib's second message to Hezekiah came as a letter. Verse 12 is its main argument: four conquered peoples, listed as proof that no god had ever stopped Assyria. The question is whether Israel's God belongs on that list at all.

The letter's real target

Sennacherib writes to Hezekiah, but the insult aims higher. He had already told the people not to rely on the Lord. Now he tells the king the same thing, and the list of ruined nations is his proof.

Now he says to Hezekiah, "Do not let your God, on whom you rely, deceive you" (v. 10). He puts Him on a level with the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." The Assyrian king was blocked in his plan and wounded in his pride. His rage now shows its true character. It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The places on the list

Two of the names would have hit home in Jerusalem. Gozan was no distant rumour — Israel knew it first-hand.

Region in Mesopotamia, to which some of the Israelites were carried captive. The "river Gozan" may mean the river at Gozan, and most identify this with the river Habor, now Khabour.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Telassar is different. Today no one knows where it stood.

City where "the children of Eden" lived, whom the Assyrians had conquered. The names listed with it suggest Telassar was in Mesopotamia, but no one has identified it.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Where the reasoning breaks

Sennacherib's reasoning was simple. He had beaten every nation he faced, so he drew the obvious conclusion.

None of the nations had been able to resist Assyria. So Sennacherib was fully confident that the God of heaven and earth could not deliver Jerusalem either.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

But the list does not compare like with like. Every god on it was the same kind of thing — including the one Sennacherib himself served.

He had no idea that the gods of the nations, including his own, were helpless idols. Israel's God, unlike them, created all things.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Who destroyed those cities

Sennacherib treated the fallen cities as proof of his own strength. God says He had planned them long before. The conqueror was only a tool in His hand, and that tool has now gone beyond its orders.

He might insult, whether himself or through his servants. Still the great king of Assyria had to learn that God knew all about him. God had made him only the instrument of His own dealing with the nations. Once that work was done, he had to go back humbled and struck down, for he had exceeded his commission... "Have you not heard that I determined it long ago? I planned it from days of old. Now I have brought it to pass, that you should turn fortified cities into heaps of ruins."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

(The older translation Kelly used reads "Have you not heard long ago I have done it"; the sense is the same.)

An opponent he had never fought

Sennacherib had beaten kings before. He had never faced one who fought the way Hezekiah did.

He had met the kings of Hamath and Arpad, and others. But when he did, it was on his own terms and in his own way. He had never met an opponent like Hezekiah. In fact, Hezekiah's uncommon power in this contest came from the sense that he was nothing. He knew that "an arm of flesh" was of no use. In a word, it was the Lord or nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Faith concedes the facts

Hezekiah never disputes the history in verse 12. He grants every conquest and then names the one thing those nations lacked.

Hezekiah puts the matter entirely into the Lord's hands, and withdraws from it himself. He does not try to make little of the difficulty — he admits that "the kings of Assyria have laid waste all the nations and their countries" — but why? Because their gods were not like the Lord. Those nations never knew what it is to put their case into the hands of the living God who made heaven and earth. This was the secret of their overthrow.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Reproach. The list of ruined nations is not just a record of the past. It tries to place the living God among the false gods Assyria had already destroyed.

- Record. Gozan was a real place, and Israelite captives had been taken there. Telassar is lost to history. The boast was true as far as it went.

- Reasoning. Sennacherib compared things that were never alike. The idols he had beaten, his own included, were made. Israel's God made heaven and earth.

- Reversal. Those fortified cities fell because God had decided it long before. The conqueror was only His tool, and he had gone past his orders.

- Response. Hezekiah admits every fact in the letter and still refuses to argue. He puts it into God's hands, and the fight becomes Sennacherib against the Lord.

2 Kings 19:13 · Darby

Where is the king of Hamath, and the king of Arpad, and the king of the city of Sepharvaim, of Hena, and Ivvah?

Sennacherib's letter to Jerusalem ends with a list of kings who once ruled Hamath, Arpad, Sepharvaim, Hena and Ivvah. Not one of them survived Assyria, and the letter treats that as proof that Jerusalem's God will fail too.

The logic of the taunt

Sennacherib is not guessing. He reasons from a record of victories, and one writer sums up the conclusion he drew.

None of the nations had been able to resist Assyria. So Sennacherib was fully confident that the God of heaven and earth could not deliver Jerusalem either.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God ranked with the idols

Sennacherib is not only mocking dead kings. One writer shows whose company he puts the God of Israel in.

Now he says to Hezekiah, "Let not your God, on whom you rely, deceive you" (v. 10). He likens Him to the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." The Assyrian king was blocked in his plan and wounded in his pride. The rage that filled him now shows itself in its true character. It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the kings were missing

The taunt had a grim answer behind it. Assyrian records tell what became of the king of Hamath.

The records show the great cruelty of the Assyrians. They were less humane than the Babylonians. They impaled some of their victims, burnt others, and they even flayed the king of Hamath alive.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Hamath had a history with Israel long before Assyria arrived.

Toi, king of Hamath, sent congratulations to David on his victory over Hadadezer. It was more than a hundred miles further north than Dan, but it became tributary to Solomon and he built store cities there. It afterwards fell into the hands of the Assyrians.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The flaw in the comparison

Hezekiah's prayer denies nothing on Sennacherib's list. It admits the conquests and then explains why those nations fell.

Hezekiah puts the matter entirely into Jehovah's hands, and retires out of it himself. He does not try to make little of the difficulty. He admits that "the kings of Assyria have laid waste all the nations and their countries." But why? Because their gods were not like Jehovah. They did not know what it was to put their case into the hands of the living God who made heaven and earth. This was the secret of their overthrow.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Who really toppled those kings

Sennacherib counted those victories as his own work. A writer points to the hand that was really behind them.

The Assyrian thought he was only doing his own will in punishing Samaria and Jerusalem. He said, "By the strength of my hand I have done it, and by my wisdom, for I am prudent. I have removed the boundaries of the peoples, and have robbed their treasures, and I have put down the inhabitants like a strong man" (Isa. 10:13). He did not understand that he was only the rod of God's anger, used to carry out God's judgment on His rebellious and idolatrous people. So the Lord said to him, "Shall the axe boast itself against him who chops with it… as if the rod should shake itself against those who lift it up" (verses 5, 15). This proud boasting of the Assyrian only brought the judgment of God upon them (verse 12).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What to do with a letter like this

Hezekiah does not write back. He takes the letter somewhere else.

Sennacherib sends the king another message, this time as a letter. Again Hezekiah goes with it straight to the LORD. He read it and went up into the house of the LORD and spread it before the LORD. What blessing there would be in the lives of all God's people! What wonderful evidence of His power and His love we might have — if only we took everything that happened to us at once into the presence of God and spread it before Him!

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- The boast. Sennacherib listed the kings who had vanished. That list was his proof that the God of heaven and earth could not deliver Jerusalem either.

- The blunder. He placed the God of Israel among the false gods he had destroyed. That turned a political threat into a direct reproach against the living God.

- The borrowed power. He was only the rod of God's anger, carrying out God's judgment. The axe was boasting against the hand that used it. That boast brought God's judgment on him.

- The distinction. Hezekiah never disputed the conquests. He answered that those nations' gods were not like the Lord. Those nations never knew what it was to place their case in the hands of the living God.

- The habit. Hezekiah carried the letter into God's house and spread it out. That is the pattern: take everything that happens to us straight into God's presence.

2 Kings 19:14 · Darby

And Hezekiah received the letter from the hand of the messengers, and read it; and Hezekiah went up into the house of Jehovah, and spread it before Jehovah.

Sennacherib's second message came in writing. It was meant to break the nerve of a king already under siege. Hezekiah carried that letter up to the temple and laid it open before God. Few scenes in Scripture show so plainly what faith does with a threat.

The letter reproached God, not just the king

The insult in the letter went higher than Hezekiah.

Earlier he had sent his spokesmen to the people with this message: "Do not let Hezekiah deceive you … do not let Hezekiah make you rely on the LORD" (2 Kings 18:29-30). Now he says to Hezekiah, "Do not let your God, on whom you rely, deceive you" (v. 10). He puts Him on the same level as the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." Blocked in his plan and wounded in his pride, the Assyrian king now shows his rage in its true character. It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why he went up a second time

Hezekiah had already been to the house of the LORD once in this crisis. This visit had a different character.

Hezekiah goes up to the house of the Lord a second time. The first time, it was a question of humbling himself. This time, it is a direct attack on the name of the Lord whom Hezekiah honours. God must take account of this letter. The king puts God's cause into God's own hands. He knows the Lord will save His humbled people, to honour His own name.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Spreading it out means stepping out

Unrolling the letter in the temple was one man stepping out of a fight and handing it to God.

What gave Hezekiah such uncommon power in this contest? He sensed that he was nothing. He knew that "an arm of flesh" was of no use. In a word, it was Jehovah or nothing. This shows itself above all in the act of spreading the letter before the Lord. Faith enabled Hezekiah to step out of the scene and make it entirely a question between Jehovah and the king of Assyria. It was not Sennacherib and Hezekiah, but Sennacherib and Jehovah.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Silence toward the enemy, speech toward God

Hezekiah sent no reply back to the enemy. Two things he did in this trial become one method for anyone under attack.

They read the wicked, unbelieving letter to the king. Then he "went up to the house of the LORD and spread it before the LORD." How Hezekiah behaved during this fierce trial gives the tried soul two points of immense value. "Do not answer him," and "spread it before the LORD." Silence and prayer. When Satan throws out a flood of unbelieving questions, do not answer him, but spread it all out before the Lord. At such a time nothing can sustain the soul but complete dependence on God.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

The habit this verse recommends

What Hezekiah did with one letter sets a pattern for everything that comes into a believer's life.

Sennacherib sends the king another message, this time as a letter. Again Hezekiah goes with it straight to the LORD. He read it, went up to the house of the LORD, and spread it before the LORD. Think of the blessing there would be in the lives of all God's people! Think what wonderful evidence of His power and His love we might have, if we took everything that happened to us straight into the presence of God and spread it before Him!

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

The letter he did not spread

The same king who beat Assyria on his knees later fell to a friendly visit from Babylon. The difference lay in what he did with the letters.

When the king of Assyria sent letters to him, "he went up to the house of the LORD and spread them before the LORD." So he conquered. When summoned to prepare for death, "he turned his face to the wall and prayed to the LORD." So he was raised up. But when the ambassadors from the king of Babylon came to him, "he showed them the house of his precious things." SO HE FELL. … If he had gone and spread Merodach's letter before the Lord, the world's flattery would have had no hold on him. Its angry threats had already failed to move him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- The reproach. The letter mocked Hezekiah, but its real insult was against God. Sennacherib ranked the living God with the idols he had destroyed.

- The refusal. Hezekiah did not reply to the sender. Silence toward the enemy and speech toward God are the two moves this account teaches.

- The spreading. By opening the letter in the temple, Hezekiah stepped out of the quarrel. It now stood as Sennacherib against the LORD, not Sennacherib against him.

- The habit. What he did with one letter is meant for everything: carry it straight into God's presence and lay it open there.

- The letter unspread. The letters from Babylon never reached the temple floor. Threats never beat Hezekiah; flattery did.

2 Kings 19:15 · Darby

And Hezekiah prayed before Jehovah and said, Jehovah, God of Israel, who sittest [between] the cherubim, thou, the Same, thou alone art the God of all the kingdoms of the earth thou hast made the heavens and the earth.

Assyria had crushed nation after nation, and now a letter told Hezekiah that his God could not save him. He sent Sennacherib no reply — he carried the letter into the temple and prayed to the God enthroned above the cherubim.

A letter aimed at God

The letter did more than threaten a city. Sennacherib made a claim about the God Hezekiah trusted.

Now he says to Hezekiah, "Do not let your God, in whom you trust, deceive you" (v. 10). He compares Him to the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." The Assyrian king was blocked in his plan and wounded in his pride. His rage now shows itself for what it really is. It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Silence toward man, speech toward God

Two things stand together here. The enemy gets no answer, and Hezekiah lays the letter out before God. One writer turns both into a pattern for any believer under attack.

"Do not answer him," "and spread it before the LORD." Silence and prayer. When Satan throws out a flood of unbelieving questions, do not answer him, but spread it all out before the Lord. Nothing at such a time can hold up the soul except complete dependence on God.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

Where the prayer starts

Notice what Hezekiah does not ask for first.

Then Hezekiah prayed. In his prayer he did not first plead for help. Instead he beautifully gives God His place of absolute pre-eminence and dignity (v. 15). Does this not remind us of the instructions of the Lord Jesus about how to pray? — "Our Father in heaven, hallowed be Your name." The word "Father" speaks of God's primacy. "In heaven" speaks of His supremacy. "Hallowed be Your name" speaks of His dignity, as set apart from all others.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Enthroned above the cherubim

The mercy seat lay between the cherubim, and God had set His throne there among His people. One writer carries that place through to the believer's own conflict.

And how he pleads with the Lord who dwells between the cherubim! It is written, they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb. Yes, the mercy seat between the cherubim is our place of victory. The enemy, with all his power, was completely defeated.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

The same seat is a throne of majesty.

It is His place and throne of majesty, and He allows nothing there contrary to it (see Isaiah 37:16). Yet it is also where He dwells among His people, in the place of glory, because He has set His throne there. He governs them and speaks to them there.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God alone over all the kingdoms

Hezekiah calls God the God of Israel and in the same breath the God of all the kingdoms and the Maker of heaven and earth. That claim explains why the other nations had already fallen.

Hezekiah puts the matter entirely into the LORD's hands, and steps out of it himself. He does not try to make the difficulty look small. He admits that "the kings of Assyria have laid waste all the nations and their countries." But why? Because their gods were not like the LORD. They never knew what it is to put their case into the hands of the living God who made heaven and earth. This was the secret of their defeat. What triumphant faith! What bold, confident pleading!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Hezekiah leaves the case with God, yet he is not in doubt about the outcome.

The king places God's cause into God's own hands, but he knows that to honour His name, the LORD will save His humbled people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

How this prayer relates to ours

Hezekiah used the names God had made known in his day. That sets a limit for Christians praying now.

Prayer should always match the revelation given to God's people. What suited Solomon and Hezekiah would not be fitting for us. We should not address God as the God of Israel, nor speak to Him as dwelling between the cherubim.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Reproach — Sennacherib's letter put the living God on a level with the gods he had destroyed. The quarrel was God's before it was Hezekiah's.

- Retreat — the king met the threat with silence and carried the letter into the temple. Dependence on God, not argument, holds a soul up.

- Reverence — the prayer opens with who God is, not with the crisis. It says "hallowed be Your name" before it asks for anything.

- Reliance — the nations fell because their gods were not like the LORD. Hezekiah hands the whole case to the God who made heaven and earth, and steps aside.

- Result — the appeal rests on God's honour. Because His name is at stake, He saves His humbled people.

2 Kings 19:16 · Darby

Incline thine ear, Jehovah, and hear; open, Jehovah, thine eyes, and see; and hear the words of Sennacherib, who hath sent him to reproach the living God.

Sennacherib, king of Assyria, sent Hezekiah a letter saying his God could not save Jerusalem. Hezekiah spread it before the LORD and asked Him to listen and to look, for what was at stake was the honour of the living God.

The letter carried straight to God

Hezekiah did not write a reply. He took the letter into the house of the LORD and spread it out before God:

Sennacherib sends the king another message, this time in the form of a letter. Again Hezekiah goes with it straight to the LORD. He read it and went up into the house of the LORD and spread it before the LORD. What blessing there would be in the lives of all God's people! What wonderful proofs of His power and His love we might have, if everything that happened to us were taken at once into the presence of God and spread out before Him!

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

He sent no answer of his own:

Instead of answering the letter himself, he committed it entirely to the Lord. Could the Lord be trusted to answer? Yes, indeed! If we too commit such things to the Lord, instead of fighting or arguing, can we not trust the Lord to answer better than we might imagine?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Asking God to hear and to see

The two requests — incline your ear, open your eyes — are the language of someone who has stopped relying on himself:

So, in giving God His place, we take the place of totally dependent creatures. In that dependence Hezekiah begged the Lord to bend His ear, to hear and take note of the words of Sennacherib. By those words the Assyrian was reproaching the living God Himself (v. 16).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Israel's neighbours prayed to gods that could be seen. One writer sets those gods beside the God of Israel:

God Jehovah was unseen, yet seeing all that went on. These gods could be seen, but could not see. God was the living God, who dwelt in heaven. These had the form of living creatures, but without life, and were found on earth. He acted as He pleased. These could not act at all... They have mouths, but do not speak; eyes, but do not see. They have ears, but do not hear.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The living God

The phrase Hezekiah uses marks out one Being and rules out every rival:

The Living God. — To the living God He directed attention. That speaks of one, and only one, Divine Being. There are not two living Gods. The name defines their God, the Lord Jehovah, as completely different from the idols of the nations. Such idols had no life.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

An insult aimed at God

Sennacherib put the God of Israel in the same class as the gods he had destroyed:

Now he says to Hezekiah, "Do not let your God in whom you trust deceive you" (v. 10). He is comparing Him with the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." ... It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God answered by taking up Hezekiah's own words and putting His own name to them:

The faith of this humble, self-abased man had brought the Lord God of Israel and the king of Assyria into direct contact. So the same Lord God of Israel graciously led the man covered with sackcloth into the rich spoils of victory over his enemy. Hezekiah had said, "He has sent to reproach the living God"; the Lord replies, "Whom have you reproached? — the Holy One of Israel."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The sanctuary as the battlefield

With an army at the gates, Hezekiah did the opposite of other kings:

The proud king of Assyria was at the gates of Jerusalem with a mighty conquering army. You would expect to find Hezekiah among his men of war — buckling on his armour, strapping on his sword, mounting his chariot. But no. Hezekiah was different from most kings and captains. He had found a place of strength that Sennacherib knew nothing about. He had discovered a field of battle where he could conquer without striking a blow.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Spread it. Hezekiah's first move was to spread the threatening letter before God instead of answering it himself. Do the same with every trouble.

- Depend. Asking God to bend His ear and open His eyes gives God His place. It puts us where we belong: totally dependent.

- Living. The title "living God" marks Him off from every idol. The gods people could see could not see; the unseen God sees everything.

- Reproach. Sennacherib treated Israel's God as one more conquered idol. The insult flew past Hezekiah and struck God.

- Answered. God took up Hezekiah's own words and named Himself as the One reproached. The man in sackcloth won a battle he never had to fight.

2 Kings 19:17 · Darby

Of a truth, Jehovah, the kings of Assyria have laid waste the nations and their lands,

Hezekiah has spread Sennacherib's second letter open before God in the temple, and here he agrees with his enemy. Assyria really has flattened nation after nation — so why does saying so strengthen his case instead of weakening it?

Faith Names the Difficulty

Hezekiah does not argue with Sennacherib's record of conquests. He grants it, and then supplies the reason those nations fell.

Hezekiah puts the matter entirely into the Lord's hands, and withdraws from it himself. He does not try to make little of the difficulty — he admits that "the kings of Assyria have laid waste the nations and their lands" — but why? Because their gods were not like the Lord. They did not know what it was to put their case into the hands of the living God who made heaven and earth. This was the secret of their overthrow. What triumphant faith! What bold, confident pleading! Where, we may ask, was the difficulty that such faith would not overcome? Faith that deals with the One who made heaven and earth thinks little of an army, however large. Faith can see vast numbers of angels, and mountains covered with chariots of fire, defending those who can trust the Lord.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

So the very fact the enemy uses as a threat becomes the evidence for Hezekiah's plea.

The Flaw in the Assyrian's Argument

Sennacherib reasoned from a long list of defeated gods to one more defeated god. Commentators point out what that reasoning never took into account.

Sennacherib further declared that the gods of many nations had not saved those nations from destruction by Assyria. So Judah could not depend on their God to deliver them either. How little he realised that the gods of the nations — including his own nation — were helpless idols. The God of Israel, in contrast, created all things.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

By his own reasoning, his own god was an idol too.

An Insult Aimed at God

Sennacherib addressed the letter to a king. His real target was higher, and writers trace the shift in his own words.

Earlier he had sent his spokesmen with this message to the people: "Do not let Hezekiah deceive you… and do not let Hezekiah make you rely on the Lord." Now he says to Hezekiah, "Do not let your God, on whom you rely, deceive you." He is likening Him to the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." The Assyrian king was blocked in his plan and wounded in his pride. The rage that filled him now shows itself in its true character. It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Whole Trial Handed Over

Having stated the facts, Hezekiah leaves them where he laid them.

And so the whole trial is cast into the bosom of the Lord. Isaiah gives the answer now, just as he did before. "Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, 'Your prayer to me about Sennacherib king of Assyria I have heard.'" Trust in the Lord is never in vain. It is impossible to trust Him too much.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Silence Toward the Enemy, Speech Toward God

Two of Hezekiah's decisions belong together: he refused to answer the taunts of Rabshakeh, the Assyrian spokesman, and he took them to God. Writers apply both to the believer under attack, and show how Satan copies that same method.

When the king heard the wicked, unbelieving letter, he "went up to the house of the Lord and spread it before the Lord." Hezekiah's conduct during this fierce trial shows two points of immense value to the tried soul. "Do not answer him," and "spread it before the Lord." Silence and prayer. When Satan throws out a flood of unbelieving questions, do not answer him, but spread it all out before the Lord. Nothing can sustain the soul at such a time except complete dependence on God. As Rabshakeh spoke of the surrounding nations, so Satan points to this one and that; they once claimed to be the servants of God, and where are they now? And you are no better, he says.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

A Habit Worth Copying

What Hezekiah did with one letter fits everything that happens to us.

Suppose we took everything that happens to us at once into the presence of God and spread it out before Him. What blessing there would then be in the lives of all God's people! What wonderful evidences of His power and His love we might have!

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Truly — Hezekiah opens by conceding the enemy's facts. Faith does not shrink the difficulty; it states it plainly to God.

- Because — those nations fell because their gods were helpless idols. Assyria's record proves the weakness of idols, not the weakness of God.

- Whom — the letter insulted the living God, not just a king. That is why the quarrel passes out of Hezekiah's hands.

- Spread — silence toward the accuser, speech toward God. Read the letter, then lay it open before Him and leave it there.

- Heard — God's answer came back through Isaiah. Trust in the Lord is never wasted, and no one can trust Him too much.

2 Kings 19:18 · Darby

and have cast their gods into the fire; for they were no gods, but the work of men's hands, wood and stone; therefore have they destroyed them.

Hezekiah does not argue with the Assyrian king's boast that no nation's god had saved it. He agrees — the burned gods were never gods at all — which leaves one question: is the God of Israel in that class?

Owning the Enemy's Record

Hezekiah does not soften the report of Assyria's conquests. One writer asks why those nations fell, and finds the answer in the God they never turned to.

Hezekiah puts the matter entirely into the Lord's hands, and steps out of it himself. He does not try to make the difficulty look small — he admits that "the kings of Assyria have laid waste all the nations and their lands" — but why? Because their gods were not like the Lord. They did not know what it is to put their case into the hands of the living God who made heaven and earth. That was the secret of their overthrow.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Made Things Cannot Save

The phrase "the work of men's hands" is the whole argument in four words. A thing that had to be manufactured has no life to give, and one writer presses the absurdity of a mortal producing a rescuer.

Their origin lay in the craftsman's imagination, and their shape came from the workman's skill. "Their idols are silver and gold, the work of human hands" — worthless objects, apart from the value of the metal they were made of. The work of human hands: what could they do for man? How could a dying creature make a living God to save him? What need has a man of a God he can manufacture himself? Man could mould the metal into human form, shape it after the noblest of God's creatures on earth — but where was the life, where the will, where the power?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Sennacherib's Fatal Comparison

Hezekiah raises the burnt idols for a reason. Sennacherib had put the God of Israel among them. One writer draws out what that comparison amounted to.

Now he says to Hezekiah, "Do not let your God in whom you trust deceive you" (v. 10), likening Him to the false gods that he, the Assyrian, had destroyed. It was a direct "reproach" against the "living God." The Assyrian king was blocked in his plan and wounded in his pride. The rage that filled him now shows itself in its true character. It is the God of Israel whom he opposes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Prayer That Begins with God

Before Hezekiah gets to idols, armies or rescue, he says who God is. The order of his sentences is itself instruction.

Then Hezekiah prayed. He did not begin by pleading for help. Instead, he beautifully gives God His place of absolute pre-eminence and dignity: "O LORD, the God of Israel, enthroned above the cherubim, you are the God, you alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth; you have made heaven and earth" (v. 15). Does this not remind us of the Lord Jesus' instructions on how to pray? — "Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name." "Father" speaks of God's primacy. "In heaven" speaks of His supremacy. "Hallowed be your name" speaks of His dignity, set apart from all others.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same writer follows Hezekiah's admission through to what he asks for.

He admits that the king of Assyria had conquered other nations and lands. That king burned their gods in the fire, since they were only idols of wood and stone (vv. 17-18). But Hezekiah was appealing to the only true God to save Jerusalem from this arrogant king. He did not limit his reason to Jerusalem's need for deliverance. Rather, he wanted all the kingdoms of the earth to know that God is the LORD, and He alone.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God's Cause in God's Hands

Hezekiah's second visit to the temple has a different character from his first, and the shift explains why the prayer is answered.

Hezekiah goes up to the house of the Lord a second time. It is no longer a matter of humbling himself, as the first time, but of a direct attack on the name of the Lord whom Hezekiah honours. God must take account of this letter. The king places God's cause into God's own hands, but he knows that to honour His name the Lord will save His humbled people. "So now, O LORD our God, save us, please, from his hand, that all the kingdoms of the earth may know that you, O LORD, are God alone" (v. 19).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Admit — Hezekiah grants every conquest Assyria claims. Faith does not have to shrink the problem before bringing it to God.

- Distinguish — those gods fell because human hands made them. A dying man cannot make a living God to save him.

- Locate the insult — Sennacherib put the God of Israel on the list of gods he had already burned. That taunt was a reproach of the living God.

- Order the prayer — God's place comes first and the plea second — pre-eminence, supremacy, dignity, then the need.

- Aim higher than rescue — Hezekiah asks for more than Jerusalem's safety. He asks that every kingdom on earth learn that the Lord alone is God.

2 Kings 19:19 · Darby

And now, Jehovah our God, I beseech thee, save us out of his hand, that all the kingdoms of the earth may know that thou, Jehovah, art God, thou only.

Assyria's king had sent a letter mocking the God of Israel. Hezekiah brought it to the house of the Lord, and here he asks to be saved — but the reason he gives is God's name, not his own safety.

Where the Prayer Begins

Before he asks for anything, Hezekiah says who God is. One writer links that order to the way the Lord Jesus taught people to pray:

Then Hezekiah prayed. In his prayer he did not first plead for help. Instead he gives God His place of absolute pre-eminence and dignity: "O LORD, the God of Israel, enthroned above the cherubim, you are the God, you alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth; you have made heaven and earth" (v.15). Does this not remind us of what the Lord Jesus taught about how to pray? — "Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name." "Father" speaks of God's primacy. "In heaven" speaks of His supremacy. "Hallowed be your name" speaks of His dignity as apart from all others.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Reason He Gives

Hezekiah had already been to the house of the Lord once in this crisis. His second visit had a different character:

Hezekiah goes up to the house of the Lord a second time. This time it is not about humbling himself, as the first visit was. This time the name of the Lord whom Hezekiah honours is under direct attack. God must take account of this letter. The king places God's cause into God's own hands. But he knows that the Lord will save His humbled people, to honour His own name.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer notes how wide Hezekiah makes his reason for asking:

He did not limit the reason for this to Jerusalem's need for deliverance. Rather, he wanted all the kingdoms of the earth to know that God is the LORD, and He alone. Is it possible that God could ignore a plea like this? Certainly not!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Other Nations Fell

Assyria really had destroyed nation after nation. Hezekiah admits it, then turns the fact into his case:

Hezekiah puts the whole matter into the Lord's hands and steps out of it himself. He does not try to make the difficulty look small. He admits that "the kings of Assyria have laid waste the nations and their lands." But why did those nations fall? Because their gods were not like the Lord. They never knew what it was to put their case into the hands of the living God who made heaven and earth. This was the secret of their overthrow. What triumphant faith! What bold, confident pleading!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Leaving God Room to Act

Hezekiah wore sackcloth instead of armour. One writer reads that as his confession that he could do nothing himself:

The Lord will never refuse to come into a difficulty, if only we let Him act and do not rob Him of His own glory... Others have noticed that grace enabled Hezekiah to step out of the difficulty altogether. He covered himself with sackcloth instead of putting on his armour. That very act declared that he could not cope with the king of Assyria. His posture in the house of the Lord said this — God or nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Answer That Matches the Plea

Hezekiah defended God's honour. One writer shows how God answered in kind:

If Hezekiah carries his God's interests on his heart when the enemy attacks, the Lord answers him. He will not let the world insult "the virgin daughter of Zion," since she is the bride of the Great King... So God defends the character and honour of His beloved ones, guilty but humbled, when they defend His own honour and character.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Habit Behind the Prayer

Hezekiah took the letter and spread it out in God's presence. One writer turns that action into a pattern for everyone:

Again Hezekiah goes with it straight to the LORD. He read it and went up into the house of the LORD and spread it before the LORD. Think what blessing there would be in the lives of all God's people! Think what wonderful evidence of His power and His love we might have — if we took everything that happened to us straight into the presence of God and spread it out before Him!

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Spread it out. The threat came as a letter. Hezekiah did not answer the man. He took the letter to God and spread it open before Him.

- God first. Hezekiah names who God is before he asks for anything. Primacy, supremacy, dignity — then the need.

- Step aside. Sackcloth instead of armour said "God or nothing." God will enter any difficulty, as long as we let Him act and do not rob Him of His glory.

- His name, not our rescue. Hezekiah asks for more than Jerusalem's survival. He asks that all the kingdoms of the earth may know God — a plea God will not ignore.

- He honours those who honour Him. Hezekiah guarded God's honour. God answered by guarding His people's honour — the city He calls the bride of the Great King.

2 Kings 19:20 · Darby

And Isaiah the son of Amoz sent to Hezekiah, saying, Thus saith Jehovah the God of Israel That which thou hast prayed to me concerning Sennacherib king of Assyria I have heard.

The Assyrian army stands outside Jerusalem, its king has sent a letter mocking the God of Israel, and Hezekiah has laid that letter open in the temple. Verse 20 is heaven's reply, and it comes through a prophet, with the words every praying person longs to hear.

The Form of the Answer

Earlier in the crisis Hezekiah had asked Isaiah to pray for him. This time he asked no one; the prophet arrived anyway.

We do not read on this occasion that Hezekiah sent to Isaiah for help. But God at once sent word by Isaiah to assure Hezekiah that his prayer was heard (v.20). He added much more to encourage and strengthen the faith of the godly king.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators note the shape of this differently. One writer contrasts it with an instant reply, pointing out that God chose to route His answer through His servant rather than speak directly into the sanctuary:

Hezekiah did spread Sennacherib's letter before the Lord, but instead of an instant answer, the reply is sent to him by Isaiah (2 Kings 19:20).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What God Heard

The prayer God heard asked for more than the rescue of one city.

In such dependence Hezekiah begged the Lord to listen closely to the words of Sennacherib. By those words Sennacherib was reproaching the living God Himself (v.16)... but Hezekiah was appealing to the only true God to save Jerusalem from this haughty king. He did not confine the reason for this to Jerusalem's need for deliverance. Instead, he wanted all the kingdoms of the earth to know that God is the Lord, and He alone. Is it possible that God could ignore a plea such as this? Certainly not!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Trust Is Never Wasted

Isaiah's answer hands the whole trial to God. One writer draws from it a rule with no limit.

And so the whole trial is placed in the hands of the Lord. Isaiah gives the answer, as before, so now. "Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel: Your prayer to me about Sennacherib king of Assyria I have heard." Trust in the Lord is never in vain. It is impossible to trust Him too much.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Stepping Out So God Can Step In

God lets Himself be brought into a difficulty, but not on any terms.

The Lord will never refuse to be brought into a difficulty, if only He is allowed to act, and is not robbed of His own glory... It has been observed that Hezekiah was enabled, by grace, to withdraw from the difficulty altogether. He declared his inability to cope with the king of Assyria by the very act of covering himself with sackcloth instead of putting on his armour... The faith of this humble, self-abased man had brought the Lord God of Israel and the king of Assyria face to face. So that same Lord God of Israel graciously led the man covered with sackcloth into the rich spoils of victory over his enemy. Hezekiah had said, "He has sent to reproach the living God"; the Lord replies, "Whom have you reproached? — the Holy One of Israel."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Who Really Governs

This decree settles the fate of an empire. It also shows who decides such things.

Such was the decree of God, for even in the case of enemies God is just as firm, and governs just as thoroughly, as He does among His friends. It is not man who governs in any case, but God... It is not a question of which party has the most strength or the most wisdom. It is never so in the world, for God acts according to His own sovereignty... The very fact that the Assyrian came full of his proud confidence was what drew out the arm of the Lord in defence of His despised city.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Ground of the Rescue

The answer closes with a promise, and with the reason behind it.

And what a beautiful answer to Hezekiah's prayer, sent through the prophet! The Lord had heard, He had seen. He knew everything that had happened and every word that had been spoken. The message ends with the reassuring word, "I will defend this city, to save it, for My own sake, and for My servant David's sake."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard — "I have heard" is God's verdict on the prayer. Trust in Him is never wasted, and He cannot be trusted too much.

- Heard because he stepped back — Hezekiah wore sackcloth instead of armour and left the fight to God. God never refuses a trouble He is brought into, as long as He is free to act.

- Heard through a servant — Hezekiah asked no one this time, yet Isaiah came with the answer.

- Heard by the God who governs — the reply is a decree about an empire. God governs, not man, and strength does not decide.

- Heard for His own sake — God defends the city for His own sake and for His servant David's sake. Hezekiah had asked that all kingdoms would know the Lord alone is God.

2 Kings 19:21 · Darby

This is the word that Jehovah has spoken against him The virgin-daughter of Zion despiseth thee, laugheth thee to scorn; The daughter of Jerusalem shaketh her head at thee.

Sennacherib's army had taken the fortified towns of Judah, and his message mocked the God of Israel. Hezekiah prayed, and this verse opens God's reply. It does not begin with armies or angels. It begins with a woman laughing at the invader.

The reply to a prayer

Hezekiah had no military answer to the invasion, and he did not pretend to one. That surrender made room for God to act.

The Lord will never refuse to be brought into a difficulty, if only we let Him act and do not rob Him of His own glory… Others have noted that grace enabled Hezekiah to step out of the difficulty altogether. He covered himself with sackcloth instead of putting on his armour. That very act declared that he could not cope with the king of Assyria. His attitude in the house of the Lord said this — God or nothing. The faith of this humble, self-abased man had brought the Lord God of Israel and the king of Assyria into direct contact. So that same Lord God of Israel graciously led the man in sackcloth into the rich spoils of victory over the enemy.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The virgin daughter of Zion

The title God gives the city seems impossible. Jerusalem was frightened, weak and far from faithful.

"The virgin, the daughter of Zion." Was there no fear then? Was there no anguish of heart? How could this be said truthfully? Because God speaks according to His own thoughts. God looks at Zion as something the Assyrian's foot had never defiled. She was a virgin daughter of Zion, and God never meant that the Assyrian should walk there. He had allowed him to ravage elsewhere. But Zion, however unfaithful Zion might be, was not set aside for the hand of the Assyrian. Zion might even fall in war, but the Assyrian himself must fall.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The scorn turned around

The scorn in this verse is not Jerusalem's own boast. God puts these words in her mouth, and they run against everything the eye could see.

The Assyrian came full of proud confidence, and that very fact drew out the arm of Jehovah in defence of His despised city. But when He speaks through the prophet, because the Assyrian despised Zion, it is Zion that despises the Assyrian.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Honour for honour

Hezekiah had prayed for God's name, not just for his own survival.

If Hezekiah carries the interests of his God on his heart when it comes to the enemy, Jehovah answers him. He will not let the world reproach "the virgin-daughter of Zion," because she is the bride of the Great King… So God defends the character and honour of His beloved ones, guilty but humbled, when they defend His own honour and character.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The real target

The verse is God's verdict on a man. The next words name his real offence.

Verse 21 uses strong words indeed… We are not meant to copy them in the way we deal with enemies of the truth today. But this is God's Word about what was a righteous response at that time to a man who was a wicked enemy of God. For God questions Sennacherib, "Whom have you mocked and reviled? Against whom have you raised your voice and lifted your eyes to the heights?" The answer is most solemn — "Against the Holy One of Israel."

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A picture of a later rescue

Commentators also read the episode forward — a proud king, a humbled remnant, a city that shakes its head.

We may see in Sennacherib a sample of "the wilful king"… Hezekiah too, covered with sackcloth, may be seen as a sample of the righteous remnant in the last days. They cry for deliverance from the hand of the mighty oppressor. Then the Lord shall "bring them into the wilderness and speak tenderly to them," and "the virgin, the daughter of Zion, shall shake her head at him who made the earth to tremble and shook the kingdoms."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Helplessness first. Hezekiah put on sackcloth instead of armour. He stepped out of the fight, and God and Sennacherib stood face to face.

- Naming next. God calls a trembling, unfaithful city "the virgin daughter of Zion." He speaks according to His own thoughts, not according to her state.

- Reversal follows. The Assyrian despised Zion. In God's word Zion despises the Assyrian, and the mockery comes back on him.

- The principle behind it. God defends the honour of His people, guilty but humbled, when they defend His honour.

- The reach of it. Sennacherib's real offence was against the Holy One of Israel. Commentators see in his fall a picture of a last oppressor, and of a remnant rescued the same way.

2 Kings 19:22 · Darby

Whom hast thou reproached and blasphemed? and against whom hast thou exalted the voice? Against the Holy one of Israel hast thou lifted up thine eyes on high.

The Assyrian army stands outside Jerusalem. God answers the taunts Himself, and He does it with a question. It names the one Sennacherib had insulted. A military crisis becomes a matter of who God is.

The Question and Its Answer

God does not argue with Sennacherib's boast about chariots. He asks who the target was, and the answer settles everything.

God questions Sennacherib: "Whom have you mocked and reviled? Against whom have you raised your voice and lifted your eyes to the heights?" The answer is most solemn — "Against the Holy One of Israel" (v.22). Through his messengers Sennacherib reproached the Lord. He told Him in effect that Assyria had enough chariots to leave God helpless against him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Name He Insulted

This is not just a formal title. It says what God is.

The name "Holy One of Israel" means that the God of Israel is completely separate from all evil. His eyes are too pure to look at evil. The seraphim say the same thing when they cry out in front of His throne: "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts."

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

The title also carries a signature. It belongs above all to the book of Isaiah, and the prophet who used it most is the very man delivering this message to Hezekiah.

In the Old Testament God is spoken of as "The Holy One of Israel" only about 37 times. Just 30 of these occur in Isaiah, so it is the characteristic title of God in his book.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Rod That Turned on the Hand

Sennacherib's success was real. He never understood where it came from. When he lifted his eyes on high, his usefulness ended.

The Assyrian in his foolishness had lifted up his eyes against the Holy One of Israel. He had been the rod of the wrath of God. God had given him this power long before. But he had become proud of his success, and he had not feared to lift himself up against God. He had said: "I have come up… I will cut down… and I will enter… I have dug… I have dried up…" Yet it was the Lord who had decreed the ruin of the nations and of His people by this means.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The pattern is wider than one king. It is how God has often dealt with proud powers.

God uses the pride and wickedness of the wicked to chastise His people. Afterwards He destroys the instrument. The Assyrian, God's rod to strike Israel, glorifies himself against God, who breaks the rod.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

When Faith Puts God and the Enemy Face to Face

Hezekiah had already named the real offence himself. God's reply takes up his own words. It came to a man who had refused to fight in his own strength.

As others have observed, grace enabled Hezekiah to step out of the difficulty altogether. He showed he could not cope with the king of Assyria. He did it by covering himself with sackcloth instead of putting on his armour. His posture in the house of the Lord said this — God or nothing. The faith of this humble, self-abased man had brought the Lord God of Israel and the king of Assyria into direct contact. So that same Lord God of Israel graciously led the man in sackcloth into the rich spoils of victory over the enemy. Hezekiah had said, "He has sent to reproach the living God"; the Lord replies, "Whom have you reproached? — the Holy One of Israel."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Word Carried Out to the Letter

The sentence pronounced in this chapter was not a threat left hanging. It landed twice — outside Jerusalem, and later in Nineveh.

"That night the angel of Jehovah went out and struck down a hundred and eighty-five thousand in the camp of the Assyrians. When they got up early in the morning, they were all dead bodies." As a result the king retreats in dismay. He returns and lives in Nineveh. But as Jehovah had sent a blast upon him in Palestine, so now he must fall in his own land… So every word of Jehovah came true.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Defence That Reaches Further

Zion here is weak, mocked, and told her God cannot save. One writer sees the same picture in the church.

If it is so with Jerusalem, how much more so with the Assembly, the Bride of Christ. She is a weak remnant among ruins, lacking the power to bring to birth. She is brought so low that the enemy can say, "Do not let your God, in whom you trust, deceive you." Yet she is precious to Christ, who will make her sit with Him on His throne.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Reproach. God's question is not empty words. He makes Sennacherib see who he had really insulted — the Holy One of Israel, not a small city.

- Reality. That title means God stands completely apart from all evil. The seraphim cry out the same holiness at His throne. So the insult could not stand.

- Rod. Sennacherib's power was lent to him. Once the instrument boasted against the hand that wielded it, God broke the rod.

- Reply. Hezekiah's sackcloth said "God or nothing." That faith brought the Lord and the Assyrian face to face. God then answered him in his own words.

- Rescue. One night settled it. Sennacherib later fell in his own land. Every word God spoke here came true.

2 Kings 19:23 · Darby

By thy messengers thou hast reproached the Lord, and hast said, With the multitude of my chariots have I come up To the height of the mountain, to the recesses of Lebanon, And I will cut down its tall cedars, the choice of its cypresses; And I will enter into its furthest lodging-place, [into] the forest of its fruitful field.

God's reply to Sennacherib does not argue — it quotes the king's own boast back to him, and the boast is all about himself. He claims Lebanon's heights and its tallest trees, which raises two questions: whose forests were they, and who gave him the power to reach them?

The Boast Delivered by Messengers

Sennacherib never spoke to God directly. He sent messengers, and God takes their words as aimed at Himself. One commentator spells out what the boast claimed:

Through his messengers Sennacherib reproached the Lord. He told Him, in effect, that Assyria had enough chariots to make God helpless against him. Sennacherib's proud boasting continues through verse 24. He said he would cut down the tall cedars of Lebanon and its cypress trees, leaving the whole country defenceless against his power.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Speech Made of "I"

Read the boast and one word carries it. God's answer sets that list of claims beside the truth about who had decided the outcome:

He had said: "I have come up … I will cut down … and I will enter … I have dug … I have dried up …" (verses 23–24). Yet it was the Lord who had decreed the ruin of the nations and of His people by this means (verses 25–26).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the Cedars Stand For

The verse ends with a phrase older translations rendered "the forest of his Carmel." One reference work explains the reading:

The 'forest of his CARMEL' in 2 Kings 19:23 and Isaiah 37:24 reads, in the margin and in the Revised Version, 'forest of his fruitful field.' It does not refer to any forest connected with Carmel.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The ESV reads "its most fruitful forest." The trees he threatens also carry a meaning of their own in Scripture:

In Scripture the cedar always stands for power or high position, if not pride. When the king of Israel would pour contempt upon the king of Judah, he compared himself to a cedar and Judah's king to a thistle (2 Kings 14:9). The Psalmist uses it to express the prosperity of the righteous, "He shall grow as the cedar in Lebanon" (Psalm 92:12). When judgment comes upon the great of the earth, the prophet Isaiah says it is the day of Jehovah upon the cedars of Lebanon (2:13).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Borrowed Power, Forgotten Owner

The forests and waters in the boast were not Sennacherib's. Neither was the power that crushed the cities. God's reply, in the verses that follow, turns the whole speech inside out:

How withering indeed if only the king of Assyria had paid attention to it! Had he not heard long ago that God had made the forests of Lebanon and the waters the king boasted of drying up? It was the God who made these things who had given Sennacherib his power to crush fortified cities into heaps of ruins. … Though these nations gave way to Assyria, Assyria would yet give way and perish like the grass. How useless her boasting was then!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Other writers press the same point using Isaiah's picture of a tool:

He did not understand that he was only the rod of God's anger, used to carry out God's judgment on His rebellious and idolatrous people. So the Lord said to him, "Shall the axe boast over him who hews with it… as if a rod should wield him who lifts it?" This proud boasting of the Assyrian only brought God's judgment down on them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A Shadow of a Later Boaster

Commentators see more here than the fall of one ancient kingdom. They read Sennacherib as a shadow of a later ruler God will also bring down:

The total fall of the haughty Assyrian's kingdom followed a few years after. God is able to bring down those who walk in pride. How blessed to hear His voice and know His love! Real as that fall was, it was no more than a shadow of the great chief of the eastern nations in the last days. In the same way, Judah's rescue and blessing under the son of David of that day was only the witness of a brighter age and a more lasting glory. Then Jehovah will lift up the one who was low and bring down the high one.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast. Sennacherib's message claimed his chariots were many enough to leave God helpless. He would also strip the land of its tallest trees.

- Target. He aimed his words at Jerusalem. God took them as reproach sent to Himself by the king's own messengers.

- Borrowed. Every item in the boast belonged to God. He made the forests and the waters, and He gave Assyria its power to crush fortified cities.

- Answer. An axe cannot brag against the hand that swings it; the rod that lifts itself against its owner is the rod that gets broken.

- Shadow. In Scripture the cedars of Lebanon stand for power and pride. Their fall previews the day when God brings the high one low and lifts up the one who was low.

2 Kings 19:24 · Darby

I have digged, and have drunk strange waters, And with the sole of my feet have I dried up all the streams of Matsor.

In God's reply through Isaiah, the Lord quotes Sennacherib's own bragging back to him. Here the boast peaks. The Assyrian king claims he can find water anywhere and dry up any river in his path. Who made those waters? And who gave him the strength he is so proud of?

A Boast Built Out of "I"

The whole speech God quotes is a run of first-person claims. One writer lines them up, then names the One who had decided what would happen.

He had been the rod of God's wrath. God had given him this power long before. But he had become proud of his success, and he was not afraid to lift himself up against God. He said: "I have come up … I will cut down … and I will enter … I have dug … I have dried up …" (vv. 23-24). Yet it was the Lord who had decreed the ruin of the nations and of His people by this means (vv. 25-26).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Water He Never Made

Sennacherib treats rivers as things he can handle. God replies by naming their Maker.

God's answer to him comes in verses 25-28. How withering indeed if only the king of Assyria had paid attention to it! Had he not heard long ago that God had made the forests of Lebanon and the waters the king boasted of drying up? It was the God who made these things who had given power to Sennacherib to crush fortified cities into heaps of ruins. … Though these nations gave way to Assyria, Assyria would yet give way and perish like the grass. How futile was her boasting then!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same writer explains the point of the boast: the king meant to leave "the whole country defenceless against his power" (Leslie M. Grant).

The Tool That Praised Itself

Assyria really was winning. The king misread why. Isaiah had already answered him with a picture from a workshop.

The Assyrian thought he was only doing his own will in punishing Samaria and Jerusalem. He said, "By the strength of my hand I have done it, and by my wisdom, for I am prudent … I have removed the boundaries of the people, and have robbed their treasures" (Isa. 10:13). He did not understand that he was only the rod of God's anger, used to carry out God's judgment on His rebellious and idolatrous people. So the Lord said to him, "Shall the axe boast itself against Him that hews with it … as if the rod should shake itself against them that lift it up" (verses 5, 15). This proud boasting of the Assyrian only brought God's judgment upon them (verse 12).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Nothing Hidden, Nothing Unanswered

The king boasts as if no one were watching. God's reply shows otherwise.

God knew Assyria's dwelling place and all her activities, including her rage against God Himself (v. 27). If she had kept her hostility to the nations she conquered, she might not have fallen so soon. But she added blasphemy against the God who had exalted her. So God would put His hook in her nose and His bridle in her lips and turn her back the way she had come (v. 28). So God may use one nation to punish another. But when that nation is then puffed up with pride, God knows how to bring it down to a humiliating level.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Preview of a Larger Enemy

Commentators also read this episode as a pattern for something still ahead.

The history in the earlier chapters is only a testimony to the total destruction that awaits the final Assyrian. His armies will fall with him, in the latter day and upon the mountains of Israel. This will be all the more striking because God will first let him capture Jerusalem. He will kill some of the men and treat some of their women with contempt. Jerusalem must pay the penalty of its sins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Borrowed strength. The campaigns behind the boast were real. But God gave Sennacherib the power to crush those fortified cities.

- Borrowed water. He claimed to dig wells and dry up rivers. God made that water, and the forests too.

- Borrowed role. He was the rod in God's hand for carrying out judgment on His people. A rod that shakes itself at the arm lifting it is only boasting against its Maker.

- Borrowed time. God knew his comings and goings and his rage. The hook in the nose and the bridle in the lips send the boaster home like an animal.

- Borrowed script. Commentators see the whole scene as a shadow. A final proud invader will rise, and God will destroy him just as fully.

2 Kings 19:25 · Darby

Hast thou not heard long ago that I have done it? And that from ancient days I formed it? Now have I brought it to pass, that thou shouldest lay waste fortified cities [into] ruinous heaps.

Sennacherib had just finished boasting. He listed the cedars he cut down and the waters he dried up. God answers by claiming those conquests as His own work, planned long ago. Whose plan was the great king really carrying out?

God's Answer to the Boast

The king boasts in verses 21–24. Verse 25 is God's reply. It takes from him the one thing he was proudest of: the credit for his own success.

God gives His answer in verses 25-28. How crushing it would have been, if only the king of Assyria had paid attention to it! Had he not heard long ago that God had made the forests of Lebanon and the waters the king boasted of drying up? The God who made these things is the One who had given Sennacherib power to crush fortified cities into heaps of ruins.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Planned From Days of Old

The words "long ago" and "from days of old" put God's plan first and the events second.

God does not shape His thoughts to fit circumstances as they come up. His thoughts and plans control the circumstances. What a blessing to know that He is Master of all things! Even "the wrath of man praises Him, and the rest of that wrath He holds back." Nothing else can give the smallest comfort while we live in such a scene of confusion as the one around us.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

A Rod in Another's Hand

God had a purpose in sending the Assyrian against His own people. The Assyrian himself knew nothing about it.

God sent the Assyrian to discipline His people because of their sins. The Assyrian had no idea what God was doing. His heart was full of pride, and he was set on destroying and conquering nations. He never realised that he was only God's instrument, carrying out God's will against those nations because of their evil deeds.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God may use a man without approving him. The ruined cities were part of God's plan. The insults thrown at Jerusalem were not.

The great king of Assyria could insult as much as he liked, by his own mouth or by his servants. Still he had to learn that God knew all about him, and had made him only the instrument of God's own dealings with the nations. Once that work was done, he had to go back humbled and struck down, because he had gone beyond his orders. Would God approve his rage against Himself?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Gives Empires Their Power

If God raised Assyria up, then no empire rises on its own strength.

It is not man that governs in any case, but God. God is sovereign, and so He acts according to His own will. It is not a question of the party that has the most strength or the most wisdom. It is never so in the world, for God acts according to His own sovereignty. Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome did not gain world empire because they were stronger than others.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same hand that lifts a nation up can set it down, and pride is what triggers the reversal.

So God may use one nation to punish another. But when that nation then swells with pride, God knows how to bring it down to a humiliating level.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Story Is Told at Such Length

Hezekiah's reign fills an unusual amount of space in the record. There is a reason for that beyond the history itself.

The record gives much of Hezekiah's life, because in his reign Sennacherib's attack on Jerusalem was a picture of a still greater rescue from a future king of Assyria. God controls the evil and the passions of men so completely that He makes them serve His purpose. Through them He gives a hint of what He will yet do for His own glory.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Purpose. What Sennacherib called his achievement, God called His own plan. Circumstances do not shape God's thoughts; His thoughts control the circumstances.

- Permission. Sennacherib did not seize his power. The God who made Lebanon's forests gave him strength to level fortified cities.

- Pride. He was an instrument who never knew it, believing he was doing his own will while carrying out God's.

- Punishment. He went beyond his orders and raged against God Himself. The hand that raised Assyria up knew how to bring it low.

- Preview. God let the rescue of Jerusalem stand in the record as a picture of a greater rescue still to come.

2 Kings 19:26 · Darby

And their inhabitants were powerless, They were dismayed and put to shame; They were [as] the growing grass, and [as] the green herb, [As] the grass on the housetops, and grain blighted before it be grown up.

Sennacherib had boasted about the cities he destroyed. God's answer turns the boast inside out: the people of those cities had already lost their strength, like thin grass on a roof that dries up before it can stand.

God's Answer to the Boast

Whatever Sennacherib achieved, God was doing through him. The peoples he beat had lost their strength before he arrived.

The Assyrian, the great king, might insult God, whether himself or through his servants. Even so, he had to learn that God knew all about him. God was making him only the instrument of His own dealing with the nations. When that work was done, he had to go back humbled and struck down, because he had gone beyond what God sent him to do. Would God approve his rage against Himself?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Rod Can Be Broken

A tool gets no credit for the work, and no promise of safety. One writer starts with the Midianites, who once overran Israel, and then turns to Isaiah 10, where God calls the Assyrian the rod of His anger.

The Midianites did not know that it was Jehovah who had delivered Israel into their hands. In reality they were only the rod that it pleased Him to use to punish His people. As with the Assyrian (Isa. 10): "Ah, Assyria, the rod of my anger; the staff in their hands is my fury," and so on. When He has finished with His rod, He can break it or burn it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Grass on a Roof

Grass in the thin dust on a flat roof has no root. It is green for a morning and gone by noon. One writer draws out what that picture says about people under God's judgment.

Isaiah uses the same illustration of grass on the housetops to show God's judgment on His enemies. He says, "They were like plants of the field and like tender grass, like grass on the housetops, blighted before it is grown." It is a figure to show the effect of judgment on the haters of Zion. Under the wrath of God, it would soon be clear that they were cut off from the sources of nourishment and life. So they would wither away like grass that has no depth of soil. There would be no fruit, then, for God or man — nothing for the mower or for the binder of the sheaves.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Two Kinds of Strength

Hezekiah had worked hard on the city's defences. Then he told his people where their real strength lay.

Hezekiah did all he could to defend the city. He cut off the water, built walls, raised towers, made darts and shields, and appointed captains. Then he spoke his comforting message. "Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid or dismayed before the king of Assyria and all the horde that is with him, for there are more with us than with him. With him is an arm of flesh, but with us is the LORD our God, to help us and to fight our battles." No wonder the people rested on the words of Hezekiah. They are good and helpful words to rest on in faith in all our warfare down here.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Shadow of Something Larger

The Assyrian empire fell soon after this. One writer reads that fall as real history, and also as a shadow of something later.

The total fall of the haughty Assyrian's kingdom followed a few years later. Those who walk in pride God is able to humble. How blessed to hear His voice and know His love! Real as it was, however, it was no more than a shadow of the great chief of the eastern nations in the latter day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Purpose — God was dealing with the nations; the Assyrian was only the instrument in His hand.

- Instrument — When God has finished with a rod, He can break it or burn it.

- Rootless — Grass on a housetop is cut off from soil and water: green for an hour, then withered, with nothing left for the mower.

- Strength — With the invader was an arm of flesh; with Hezekiah's people was the LORD their God, to help them and fight their battles.

- Shadow — God humbled this proud king within a few years, and his fall is only a shadow of a greater oppressor still to come.

2 Kings 19:27 · Darby

But I know thine abode, and thy going out, and thy coming in, And thy raging against me.

God has just quoted Sennacherib's boasts back to him — what he had climbed, cut down, dug and dried up (vv. 23–24). His answer begins with knowledge, not a threat: God has watched the whole campaign and heard the rage behind it.

The boaster's "I" met by God's "I know"

One writer sets the verse beside the speech it answers. The king's account of his career is one "I" after another. God answers with an "I" of His own.

The Assyrian in his foolishness had lifted up his eyes against the Holy One of Israel. He had been the rod of God's anger. God had given him this power long before. But he had grown proud of his success, and he was not afraid to lift himself up against God. He had said: "I have come up … I will cut down … and I will enter … I have dug … I have dried up …" But it was the Lord who had decreed the ruin of the nations and of His people by this means.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Known — and only ever an instrument

The knowledge God claims is not bare surveillance. It exposes what the king never grasped: that his victories were a commission, and he had gone past it.

He could insult all he liked, himself or through his servants. Still, the great king of Assyria had to learn that God knew all about him. God had made him only the instrument of His own dealings with the nations. That work done, he must go back humbled and struck down, for he had gone beyond his commission. Would God approve his rage against Himself?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The item that sealed his fall

The list covers the king's whole life — where he settles, and everything he does. The last item is the one that decides his case.

God knew Assyria's dwelling place and all her activities, including her rage against God Himself (v. 27). If she had confined her hostility to the nations she conquered, she might not have fallen so soon. But she added blasphemy against the God who had exalted her. So God would put His hook in her nose and His bridle in her lips, and turn her back by the way she had come (v. 28). God may use one nation to punish another. But when that nation is then puffed up with pride, God knows how to bring it down to a humiliating level.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Who else was listening

Earlier in the siege, the Assyrian officer Rabshakeh had spoken to Hezekiah's three officials. One writer points out who else heard him.

But it was not only Eliakim and Shebna and Joah who heard; it was the Lord. Rabshakeh never imagined that the Lord God was listening. He never imagined that the Lord God would answer so soon. But now he had dared to use that name for deliberate blasphemy. He had defied the authority of the Lord where it was known. He had defied God!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rage on a rein

God let the Assyrians' words run a long way. One writer marks where the limit lay.

How much fury against God's people they show! What boasting about former victories they make! What blasphemy and railing against God they are permitted to utter!… Their rage was ungoverned. Their fury seemed unbridled. Yet God still kept control, and in His own time reined them in.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why this was the answer Hezekiah needed

Hezekiah had spread the invader's letter out before God. It did not go unread.

The invader's letter, with all its boastings, all its threats, all its scoffs, all its revilings, is laid down quietly before the Lord. It has reached the right address. The Lord declares about its writer: "I know your sitting down and your going out and coming in, and your raging against me."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A pattern for a later deliverance

This rescue points past itself. One writer sees in Hezekiah a picture of someone greater.

So Hezekiah is a picture of the true Immanuel, the One before whom the Assyrian, the destroyer of Israel, will fall. This is a very important history, as it foreshadows the events of the last days.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Known — God had watched the king's every move. His conquests were a commission, not the fruit of his own greatness.

- Heard — the officer's speech and the invader's letter both had a listener the Assyrian never counted on.

- Weighed — of everything on the list, the raging against God brings the sentence. Conquest alone would not have brought him down so soon.

- Bridled — fury that looked out of control was never out of God's control. He reined it in at His own time and turned the king back by the way he came.

- Answered — the letter Hezekiah laid before God reached the right address. The same story looks on to the last days, when the Assyrian falls before the true Immanuel.

2 Kings 19:28 · Darby

Because thy raging against me and thine arrogance is come up into mine ears, I will put my ring in thy nose, and my bridle in thy lips, And I will make thee go back by the way by which thou camest.

God now speaks straight to Sennacherib, the Assyrian king, and the charge is that heaven has heard his fury. A hook, a bridle, a forced retreat — the images answer the question this chapter raises: who is in charge when a world power marches on God's people?

An Instrument That Overstepped

The Assyrian believed the campaign was his own. God's reply says otherwise. He knew the man's every move, and He was using him for purposes that were not his own.

The great king of Assyria could insult all he liked, whether by himself or by his servants. He still had to learn that God knew all about him, and was making him only the instrument of His own dealings with the nations. That work done, he had to go back humbled and struck down, for he had gone beyond his commission. Would God approve his rage against Himself?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Serving God's purpose gave the Assyrian no licence. One writer connects this to Isaiah's earlier word, which calls Assyria the rod of God's anger:

God used Assyria as the rod of His anger to discipline Israel (Isaiah 10:5-6) and other nations. But Assyria was only the instrument in God's hand for carrying out His judgments. He did not understand this, so he boasted as though his military campaigns had succeeded by his own power.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Hook and the Bridle

Both images come from handling animals. A hook through the nose and a bit in the mouth mean the creature no longer picks its own direction. One writer sets the verse beside God's words to Gog, another enemy God addresses in Ezekiel:

God's answer is: "…I will put My hook in your nose, and My bridle in your lips, and I will turn you back by the way you came" (Isaiah 37:29). Compare these words with God's words to Gog in Ezekiel 38:4: "I will turn you back, and put hooks into your jaws, and I will bring you forth."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Older translations say "bridle in your lips" where the ESV says "my bit in your mouth," and "arrogance" where the ESV says "complacency."

Rage Under God's Control

From the walls of Jerusalem the army looked unstoppable. In fact it was on a leash.

What fury against God's people they show! What blasphemy against God they are allowed to utter!… Ungoverned as their rage was, and unbridled as their fury seemed, God still kept control, and in His own time reined them in.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why God Stepped In For Zion

This sentence on Sennacherib is also God's answer to Hezekiah. The king had carried God's honour on his heart.

If Hezekiah keeps the interests of his God on his heart when the enemy threatens, the Lord answers him. He will not allow the world to insult "the virgin-daughter of Zion," since she is the bride of the Great King… So God defends the character and honour of His beloved ones, guilty but humbled, when they defend His own honour and character.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Carried Out To The Letter

God named the road the king would take home. That is how it happened: a retreat, and then death in his own city.

So the king retreats in dismay and returns to live in Nineveh. But as the Lord had struck him in Palestine, so now he must fall in his own land. "As he was worshipping in the house of Nisroch his god, Adrammelech and Sharezer his sons struck him with the sword." So every word of the Lord was carried out.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Same Hook On Other Men

One writer finds the same hook in King Saul's hunt for David. God turned Saul aside against his will, though his heart never changed.

The mightiest man is only a reed in the hands of the Almighty. Saul must prophesy; he is no stronger than his servants, though his evil heart still held its purpose against David. But God put a hook in his nose and turned him in a way he would not go, as He did with the Assyrian in a later day (see 2 Kings 19:28).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators also read the episode as a picture of something still to come.

The past Assyrian returned to his own land, and there was killed by his sons… A future Assyrian, after partial success, is to come up a second time, and there and then be overwhelmed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard — The rage that rang round Jerusalem's walls reached God's ears. Nothing said against Him is missed.

- Held — The Assyrian was "only the instrument in God's hand," yet he boasted as if the victories were his own.

- Hooked — Hook and bit are images from handling animals. The invader keeps his fury but loses his freedom of movement. God "still kept control, and in His own time reined them in."

- Home — He goes back by the road he came, then falls to his sons' swords in the house of his god. "Every word of the Lord was carried out."

- Honour — God defends "the virgin-daughter of Zion" because Hezekiah first defended God's name. Guard His honour, and He guards yours.

2 Kings 19:29 · Darby

And this [shall be] the sign unto thee They shall eat this year such as groweth of itself, And in the second year that which springeth of the same; But in the third year sow ye and reap, And plant vineyards and eat the fruit thereof.

Assyria's army had surrounded Hezekiah's city, stripped its fields, and wrecked its farming year. God answers with a sign about crops instead of armies: it says nothing direct about the enemy's defeat, only about eating, sowing and planting.

A sign Hezekiah did not ask for

This sign came before Hezekiah asked for anything. One writer draws two things out of it.

Hezekiah had already received the sign of the enemy's final overthrow (2 Kings 19:29-31) without asking for it. God had kept this remnant alive with no human help, and from it He would form the new Israel. Here Hezekiah learns by what means this remnant would be saved.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Food from a field nobody sowed

For two years they would eat what the land gave on its own. Grain dropped at the last harvest would come up untended. One writer explains why.

They would continue in the land to eat that year "such as grows of itself," a volunteer crop. Clearly they had not been able to sow any crop, so they could not count on a harvest. But God would provide what they needed. The same would be true in the second year, most likely because conditions were still unsettled. But in the third year they were to sow and reap, to plant vineyards and eat of their fruit (v.29). So for three years Jerusalem had the assurance of safety from the enemy's attacks.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A promise hides inside that farming calendar. Nobody plants a vineyard in occupied land. If they will plant in the third year, the enemy will be gone.

The three years read as a picture

The three years rise in stages: scraps, then stronger growth, then harvest and wine. One writer reads that rise as the remnant's own story.

after

In the first year they would eat what grew from the fallen grain. It was a poor harvest, but it would keep them from dying of hunger. As prophecy, it is the story of how the remnant at Jerusalem was preserved. In the second year the growth would be stronger. In the third year the harvest and the fruit of the vine would come... The Lord would establish the remnant of Judah again, and fill them with His blessings.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Life coming up out of death

Grain comes up in a ruined field where nothing should be growing. One writer sees more than survival in that contrast.

In glowing colours the Holy Spirit shows us this striking sign, shining in vividness and freshness against the dark background of the enemy's overwhelming devastation of the land... Here, again, we find resurrection pictured.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Rooted downward before fruit appears

The next verse turns the harvest picture into a promise for the survivors. Watch the order, and watch who does the work.

God tells them that their small remnant who have escaped the offence of Assyria would "take root downward and bear fruit upward" (v.30). A stable character of being properly rooted would result in fruit "upward", that is, fruit for God... "The zeal of the Lord of hosts will do this." How good for Jerusalem to depend on Him!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

From a besieged city to the weak today

One writer carries the sign past Jerusalem and applies it to the church.

If this is true of Jerusalem, how much more of the Assembly, the Bride of Christ. She is a weak remnant in the middle of ruins. She lacks the power to bring to birth, and she is brought so low that the enemy can say, "Let not your God, in whom you trust, deceive you." But she is precious to Christ. He will make her sit with Him on His throne, and will plant her forever in the courts of God like a tree covered with blossom and fruit.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Unasked — Hezekiah never asked for this sign. God gave the proof of the enemy's overthrow before the king requested it.

- Unsown — For two years, food would come up from grain no one planted. A city under siege could not sow, so God supplied what they needed.

- Unhindered — By the third year they would plant vineyards again. Jerusalem had three years of promised safety from the enemy.

- Rooted — The survivors would take root downward, then bear fruit upward. Roots come first, then fruit for God.

- Raised — Writers see resurrection pictured in the sign. What God did for a ruined city, He will do for every weak remnant He means to plant and make fruitful.

2 Kings 19:30 · Darby

And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah Shall again take root downward, and bear fruit upward;

Sennacherib's army surrounded Jerusalem, the land lay stripped, and Hezekiah had laid the Assyrian king's threatening letter before God. God's answer promises the survivors new roots and new fruit — but what does that growth picture, and who makes it happen?

The sign in the soil

God ties the promise to a sign spread over three harvests. One writer walks through what each of those years meant for the people shut in the city.

The Lord then gives Hezekiah a sign of His deliverance: in the first year they would eat what grew from the fallen grain — a poor harvest, but enough to keep them from starving. Prophetically, this is the history of the preservation of the remnant at Jerusalem. In the second year there would be strength of growth; in the third year the harvest and the fruit of the vine would come. … The Lord would establish the remnant of Judah again and fill them with His blessings.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Roots first, then fruit

The order of the two directions matters. What goes down out of sight comes before anything worth seeing above ground.

Continuing His prophecy of blessing to Judah, God tells them that their small remnant who have escaped the attack of Assyria would "take root downward and bear fruit upward" (v. 30). A settled, properly rooted condition would result in fruit "upward" — that is, fruit for God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Escaping, not imprisoned

An army stood outside the walls, so a promise about survivors leaving the city raises a question. The same writer asks what they are escaping from.

The remnant of Judah would not be so shut up in Jerusalem as to be prisoners there. It is not escaping from Mount Zion, but escaping from Sennacherib. "The zeal of the LORD of hosts will do this." How good for Jerusalem to depend on Him!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Whose work this is

That zeal belongs to God alone. One writer shows where it comes into view.

Further, it comes to light in God's sovereignty, which preserves a remnant in days of darkness and failure, and while the enemies of the people of God are attacking them. Scripture records this in 2 Kings 19 and in Isaiah 37.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Life out of death

Isaiah records the same promise. One writer asks what such a sign, given to a wrecked land, actually pictures.

How well suited the language is here. In glowing colours the Holy Spirit shows us this striking sign, shining with freshness against the dark background of the enemy's devastation of the land… "And the surviving remnant of the house of Judah shall again take root downward and bear fruit upward … the zeal of the LORD of hosts will do this" (Isa. 37:30-32). Here, again, we find resurrection pictured.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A pattern for a later day

One writer reads Hezekiah's crisis as a sample of something still ahead.

Hezekiah, too, covered with sackcloth, may be viewed as a sample of the righteous remnant in the latter day, crying for deliverance from the hand of the mighty oppressor… Then indeed "the surviving remnant of the house of Judah shall again take root downward and bear fruit upward … the zeal of the LORD of hosts will do this."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The comfort for a small company

One writer carries the comfort past Jerusalem, to the church in its weakness.

If it is so with Jerusalem, how much more so with the Assembly, the Bride of Christ — a weak remnant among ruins, lacking the power to bring to birth, and so brought low that the enemy can say, "Do not let your God in whom you trust deceive you." Yet she is precious to Christ, who will make her sit with Him on His throne, and will plant her forever in the courts of God like a tree loaded with blossom and fruit.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Remnant. God speaks the promise to survivors — a people cut down by Assyria, not a nation at full strength.

- Root. Growth starts downward and unseen; a settled rooting is what comes first.

- Fruit. Only then does anything show above ground, and it is fruit for God.

- Escape. The survivors are not locked inside Jerusalem. They walk out free from Sennacherib — they are not fleeing Zion.

- Zeal. None of it is Judah's achievement. God's own zeal does this — which is why one writer sees resurrection in the sign, and a rescue still to come.

2 Kings 19:31 · Darby

For out of Jerusalem shall go forth a remnant, And out of mount Zion they that escape The zeal of Jehovah [of hosts] shall do this.

The Assyrian army had surrounded Hezekiah's city, and this verse closes God's answer sent through Isaiah: survivors will come out of Jerusalem, and God's own zeal will bring it about. Two questions follow: who are these survivors, and what is this zeal?

The Remnant That Goes Out

God's promise covers two things: escape, and what grows afterwards.

Continuing His prophecy of blessing to Judah, God tells them that their small remnant who have escaped the offence of Assyria would "take root downward and bear fruit upward" (v.30). A stable character of being properly rooted would result in fruit "upward", that is, fruit for God. "For out of Jerusalem shall go forth a remnant, and out of Mount Zion they that escape" (v.31 — JND trans.). The remnant of Judah would not be so shut up in Jerusalem as to be prisoners there. It is not escaping from Mount Zion, but escaping from Sennacherib... How good for Jerusalem to depend on Him!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The siege would lift, and the survivors would live in the open land again, planted rather than penned in.

The remnant of Judah should be established anew by the Lord, and filled with His blessings.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What "Zeal" Means

The word for zeal can also be read as jealousy. Kelly notes both renderings, and names who does the work:

The hour of freedom and victory for Israel has come, and it is the LORD who has done it all. But this is not like ordinary war. The noise of human fighting and bloodshed will end... Truly, "the zeal (or jealousy) of the LORD of hosts will perform this."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer applies the same line to a far bigger task:

Bringing the whole earth under God's rule will be a huge task. But as our scripture says, "The zeal of the Lord of Hosts will perform this." We can well rejoice that it will be so.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why God Acted

The reason God gives lies in Himself, not in Judah.

Therefore the Lord declared that the king of Assyria would not come into Jerusalem, nor even shoot an arrow there... Before he was able to get that far, God would intercept his progress, and make him return by the same way he came. For God would defend the city to save it. Why? For His own name's sake and for the sake of David, God's servant (vv.33-34).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God links His own honour to the honour of His people:

Hezekiah carries his God's interests on his heart when the enemy is in question. So the LORD answers him that He will not let the world insult "the virgin daughter of Zion"; she is the bride of the Great King... So God defends the character and honour of His loved ones, guilty but humbled, when they defend His own honour and character.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Picture of Something Later

Writers see a preview here of God's action at the end:

Isaiah 36-39 tell the story of Sennacherib's invasion, its outcome, and the deadly sickness of Hezekiah, which came before it. This teaches the remnant how they should wait on the Lord. In substance, this deliverance is a picture of what will happen with the Assyrian in the last days.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

In the same reading, Hezekiah himself stands for a later group:

Hezekiah too, covered with sackcloth, can be seen as a sample of the righteous remnant in the last days. They cry for rescue from the hand of the mighty oppressor.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Living On This Promise

The same comfort reaches past Jerusalem. A weak and despised people can still be precious to Christ:

If this is true of Jerusalem, how much more of the Church, the Bride of Christ. She is a weak remnant among ruins, without strength to give birth, and brought so low that the enemy can say, "Let not your God, on whom you rely, deceive you." Yet she is precious to Christ. He will make her sit with Him on His throne, and will plant her forever in the courts of God like a tree loaded with blossom and fruit.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Zeal starts it. The word can also be read as jealousy. God's own zeal is the cause of everything the verse promises.

- Zeal frees them. The remnant goes out of Jerusalem free from Sennacherib. They were never prisoners of Zion — only of the siege.

- Zeal roots them. Rescue is not the end. The survivors take root downward and bear fruit upward — fruit for God.

- Zeal defends His name. God acts for His own name and for His servant David, not for Judah's record. He takes an insult to Zion as an insult to Himself.

- Zeal will do it again. Commentators read this rescue as a picture of a future one. Hezekiah in sackcloth stands for a faithful remnant at the end.

2 Kings 19:32 · Darby

Therefore thus saith Jehovah concerning the king of Assyria He shall not come into this city, Nor shoot an arrow there, Nor come before it with shield, Nor cast a bank against it.

God's answer to Hezekiah's prayer is not a general promise of help. It is a list of four things the king of Assyria will never do — and God said it while the Assyrian army stood outside the walls.

A decree with exact boundaries

God measured the promise out item by item. Everything the people could see from the wall said the opposite.

The Assyrian would not enter the city, shoot arrows into it, or build a siege ramp against it. Yet the enemy army was surrounding it at that very moment. But God intervened because of His name, and because of David His servant, toward whom He would revoke neither His covenant nor His promises.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the Assyrian could not touch this city

The words "this city" carry the weight. God treated Jerusalem differently from the places He let the Assyrian ravage, and not because its people were better.

God looks at Zion as something the Assyrian's foot had never defiled. It was a virgin daughter of Zion, and God never meant that the Assyrian should walk there. He had allowed him to ravage elsewhere, but Zion — however unfaithful Zion might be — Zion was not reserved for the hand of the Assyrian. Zion might even fall in wars, but the Assyrian himself must fall. This was God's decree. Even with His enemies God is just as absolute, and governs just as fully, as He does among His friends. It is not man that governs in any case, but God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The invader as a tool in God's hand

Sennacherib thought the campaign was his own project. He was wrong about who was holding him.

The Assyrian himself did not realise this. He "does not intend it so." He meant to ravage Jerusalem as well as Samaria, doing to them what he had already done to many of the surrounding peoples. As we know from the historical Scriptures, though he distressed and threatened Jerusalem, he did not take it. He was only like an axe or a rod in the hand of the Lord, and could not dictate to the One who wielded him.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Kept to the letter

God's words ruled out even laying siege — and the army's end came far from the city it had threatened.

Sennacherib's army, remember, was not destroyed at Jerusalem. 2 Kings 19:32-33 plainly shows this. He was not to come into the city. He was not even to lay siege to it... By the way that he came, by that same way he should return. Now that way had clearly been along the low country, the great highway between Syria and Egypt... Then in one night, at a place not named, his army was cut down by a sudden plague, for 185,000 were destroyed by angelic power.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Nothing was left hanging. After the angel struck the camp and the king was later killed by his own sons in his temple, one commentator sums up the whole account in a line:

So every word of Jehovah was accomplished.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the promise asked of them

Such a promise asked something of the people. It asked for stillness, and that was not God's word in every later crisis.

In Hezekiah's time God told them, "in quietness and in trust shall be your strength." The Assyrian would not even build a siege ramp before Jerusalem. They were to stay perfectly calm and firm; and the army of Assyria was destroyed. But when a certain time of judgment had come, in Jeremiah's time, then the man who went out of the city to the Chaldeans, their enemies, would save himself.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A shadow of something later

Commentators read the episode as a picture of a later invasion, and they read the picture differently at one point. One traces the same fixed limit forward:

At the time of the end God will again limit the scourging power of the king of the North, the Assyrian, against Jerusalem... Like Sennacherib, he is permitted to bring his armies to the very gates of the Holy City, but it appears that at that time he is not allowed to capture the city.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another holds that the final invader will get further than Sennacherib did before his end:

This will be the more striking because he will first be allowed to capture Jerusalem... Jerusalem must pay the penalty of its sins. The Assyrian, the king of the north in the book of Daniel, will then withdraw southwards for other ambitions. He will come up again, and by then Jehovah will have owned His people Israel. He will be put down and destroyed for ever.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Boundary spoken. God answers prayer with a measured decree: no entry, no arrow, no shield, no siege ramp. He sets these limits for His own name's sake and for David His servant.

- Boundary unseen. The army was already surrounding the city when God spoke, so they had to trust the promise against the evidence, not because of it.

- Boundary held. The invader was an axe in God's hand; he could threaten, but he could not dictate to the One wielding him.

- Boundary proved. He never even besieged Jerusalem. Angelic power cut his army down in a single night, far from the city.

- Boundary honoured. God had fixed the limit, so He asked His people for stillness. Commentators note that stillness was wrong in Jeremiah's day, when God's word was judgment, not defence.

2 Kings 19:33 · Darby

By the way that he came, by the same shall he return, And shall not come into this city, saith Jehovah.

The army of Assyria had already taken the walled towns of Judah, and now it surrounded Jerusalem. God's answer to the siege is not a peace deal but a route home for the invader, with a promise that no arrow, no shield and no siege ramp will ever reach the city.

A promise Spoken Under Siege

The striking thing about this word is its timing. It was given while the threat it denied was visible from the walls.

The Assyrian should not enter the city, nor shoot arrows into it, nor cast a bank against it; and yet the enemy army was surrounding it at that very moment. But God intervened because of His name, and because of David His servant, toward whom He would revoke neither His covenant nor His promises.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Four Things He Will Not Do

God lists the steps of a siege one by one and denies each one. The invader is stopped before he can even begin.

So the Lord declared that the king of Assyria would not come into Jerusalem, nor even shoot an arrow there. In fact, he would not come against it with a protecting shield nor build a siege mound against it (v.32). Before he was able to get that far, God would intercept his progress, and make him return by the same way he came.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Turned Back Like an Animal on a Lead

Sennacherib does not choose this retreat. God gives the reason, and it is personal: the king's rage against Him.

He might insult God, in person or through his servants, but the great king of Assyria had to learn that God knew all about him. God was making him only the instrument of His own dealing with the nations. Once that work was done, he had to go back humbled and struck down, for he had gone beyond his orders... "But I know your sitting down, and your going out, and your coming in, and your raging against me. Your raging against me and your arrogance have come up into my ears. So I will put my ring in your nose, and my bridle in your lips, and I will make you go back by the way by which you came."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Verse Rules Out

This verse is exact, and its exactness settles a question about another passage. Some read Psalm 76 as a picture of the night Assyria's army fell.

Could the overthrow of Sennacherib have been the fulfilment of Psalm 76? In a measure it may be viewed as foreshadowing it. In measure only we can say, for Sennacherib's army, let us remember, was not destroyed at Jerusalem. 2 Kings 19:32-33 plainly shows this. He was not to come into the city. He was not even to lay siege to it. By the way that he came, by that same he was to return, and that way had clearly run along the low country, the great highway between Syria and Egypt... Then in one night, at a place not mentioned, his army was more than decimated by a sudden plague, for 185,000 were cut off by angelic action... His soldiers fell we know not where, while Asaph, who wrote the psalm, foretells a victory shown at Jerusalem, for there God broke the arrows of the bow, the shield, the sword, and the battle.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A Deliverance That Points Forward

Commentators differ over how far this rescue reaches. Some stop at Sennacherib. Others say the prophecy of a besieged and rescued Jerusalem still waits for its full answer.

Some apply the siege Isaiah describes to Sennacherib, who was only a foreshadowing of the enemy to come. They cannot get past Isaiah's own prediction — which came true — that Sennacherib would not come into the city of Jerusalem, nor shoot an arrow there, nor come before it with a shield, nor cast a bank against it... In fact this siege is the one at the close of this age. Then the great alliance of the north-eastern nations will be broken, after an earlier success against the Jews.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Such a Word Asks of You

A promise this exact calls for a matching response. In Hezekiah's day that meant standing still. Later, in Jeremiah's day, safety lay in walking out to the enemy.

The path of faith does not always look the same. In Hezekiah's time the people were told, "In quietness and in confidence shall be your strength," and the Assyrian should not even cast a bank before Jerusalem. They were to stay perfectly calm and firm; and Assyria's army was destroyed. But the time for judgment came in Jeremiah's day. Then the man who went out of the city to the Chaldeans, their enemies, would save himself.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. God announces the outcome while the army still stands at the gate: no arrow, no shield, no siege ramp.

- Leash. The invader is God's instrument. He went beyond his orders, so God turns him back by the road he came.

- Precision. The words are exact. Sennacherib never laid siege to the city, and his army fell somewhere else.

- Reach. Commentators see this rescue as a picture of a fuller deliverance of Jerusalem still ahead.

- Response. A promise this exact called for quietness and confidence. Faith's path changes when God's dealings change.

2 Kings 19:34 · Darby

And I will defend this city, to save it, For mine own sake, and for my servant David's sake.

Sennacherib's army stood around Jerusalem, and the city had no strength to break out. God promised to defend it, and He gave two reasons. Neither reason was anything in Jerusalem or in Hezekiah.

A promise given while the enemy was still there

God made this promise while the siege was still in place. His reasons were His own name and His word to David.

The Assyrian would not enter the city, shoot arrows into it, or build a siege mound against it. Yet at that very moment the enemy army was surrounding it. But God stepped in because of His name, and because of David His servant. He would take back neither His covenant nor His promises (vv. 32-34).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"For my own sake"

God's first reason is His own name. When He acts on that ground, the weakness of the person He rescues is no obstacle.

It is in us God shows what He is. You say you are the most feeble and miserable. Yet it is you God would choose, if He wanted to show the immense riches of His grace. He cannot stop in this goodness. It is not humility to limit His goodness by saying we are too little and unworthy. He forgives for the sake of His own name. He restores and leads for His own name's sake. He begins, continues, and finishes up to heaven itself, and always for the sake of His name.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"For the sake of my servant David"

David had been dead a long time. What survived him was God's promise. That is what the people under siege could lean on, since they had nothing of their own to offer.

They with their fathers have failed, but God had made promises to David. Where they could not speak of themselves, they could tell of the promises. David had died, but the promises held good: his children had failed, but God's words could not.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

That commitment to David's house is described elsewhere as a lamp God refused to let go out — a covenant that held back deserved judgment on kings who had earned it.

The Lord remembered the house of David and his covenant, and because of that covenant the deserved judgment was held back.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The prayer that this verse answers

Hezekiah had taken Sennacherib's letter into the house of the Lord. He did not plead his own record there.

Hezekiah goes up to the house of the Lord a second time. This time it is not a question of humbling himself, as it was the first time. It is a direct attack on the name of the Lord whom Hezekiah honours. God must take account of this letter. The king places God's cause into God's own hands. But he knows that the Lord will save His humbled people, to honour His name. "So now, O Lord our God, save us, please, from his hand, that all the kingdoms of the earth may know that you, O Lord, are God alone."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The word carried out to the letter

God kept this promise overnight. Sennacherib's own end followed, far from Jerusalem.

"And that night the angel of the Lord went out and struck down 185,000 in the camp of the Assyrians. And when people arose early in the morning, behold, these were all dead bodies." The result was that the king retreats in dismay. He returns and lives in Nineveh. But as the Lord had sent a blast on him in Palestine, so now he must fall in his own land… So every word of the Lord came true.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A rescue that pictures a greater one

One writer reads this rescue as a preview of something larger.

Real as it was, it was no more than a shadow of the great ruler of the eastern nations in a day still to come. In the same way, Judah's deliverance and blessing under the son of David of that day only pointed to a brighter time and a more lasting glory. Then the Lord will lift up the one who was low and bring down the high one.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — His name. God did not defend Jerusalem because the city deserved it. He acted because of His own name, and He forgives, restores and leads on that same ground still.

- Gift — His promise. The second reason was a promise made to a man long dead. When the living could say nothing for themselves, they could still point to what God had said to David.

- Ground — His covenant. God kept the house of David as a lamp He would not put out, and that covenant held back the judgment they had earned.

- Prayer — His honour. Hezekiah handed God's cause back to God and asked that all the kingdoms would know Him. The answer came on that same ground.

- Result — His word stands. One night ended the siege. The whole rescue is a shadow of a greater deliverance under a greater son of David.

2 Kings 19:35 · Darby

And it came to pass that night, that an angel of Jehovah went forth, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians a hundred and eighty-five thousand. And when they arose early in the morning, behold, they were all dead bodies.

Assyria's army stood outside Jerusalem, and its king had mocked the God of Israel. Hezekiah prayed, and before sunrise the whole threat was gone — a rescue for one city, and a picture of how God deals with proud power.

Prayer answered in God's own timing

God's answer did not come at once, and the delay is part of the lesson.

God is wonderfully patient with the cruelty and arrogance of His enemies. That does not mean He is indifferent, as many would like to think. He gives time for repentance. But when it is clear that men will not change, sudden and awesome judgment falls from a righteous God. Hezekiah had trusted God, and though the answer seemed slow in coming, it did come in God's time. In one night the angel of the Lord killed 185,000 men in the camp of Assyria! What a shock to those who remained!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One angel was enough

One night ended a boasting king's campaign and started him toward his own judgment.

How foolish the great men of this world can be! They boast in their own achievements and challenge the Almighty God without a thought… One angel from the Lord was enough to destroy the best of Assyria's army. One angel was enough to send Sennacherib back to his own land, to meet the judgment God had reserved for him, just as Isaiah the prophet had said.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Hezekiah's real resources

Hezekiah's strength that night was not in his soldiers, and Sennacherib had misjudged who he was fighting.

Sennacherib had never counted on meeting such an opponent. He had never thought that his letter would be read by the eye of the living God. He expected to meet flesh and blood, sword and spear, as he had always been used to meeting. But look — a man of faith prays, God hears, and out goes the angel of the Lord, and in a moment mows down 185,000 men… So we see something of Hezekiah's vast resources. He knew the value of being alone with God. He felt more comfort and real power in the secret of God's presence than when surrounded by troops of armed warriors. He knew something of the reality of the words the Apostle later wrote: "When I am weak, then I am strong." And we may say this: if Sennacherib's army had been millions instead of thousands, the angel of the Lord would have thought just as little of sweeping them all off the face of the earth in a moment. When the Lord decides to act for His people, in answer to their prayers, He takes no account of anything or anyone.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Discovered in the morning

The blow fell in the dark, and daybreak revealed it. Morning carries that meaning right through Scripture.

The Old Testament speaks of the morning many times. Look at those verses, and you cannot miss how much they matter for us today. The night of Egypt's slavery ended "when the morning appeared" (Exodus 14:27). The power of the idol Dagon lay completely overthrown in the "morning" (1 Samuel 5:4). The Assyrian army lay completely defeated "in the morning" (2 Kings 19:35). How wonderfully the Lord Jesus speaks in John chapter 16 about the joy His own would have on that resurrection morning! Their sorrow would become joy. So the joy of victory "comes in the morning."

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

The king who escaped that night

Sennacherib himself was not among the dead. Surviving that camp was not the same as escaping God.

Perhaps Sennacherib realised that Hezekiah's God was greater than he himself was. He left Jerusalem with the rest of his army and returned to Nineveh. But there he did not turn to the true God, as his experience told him he ought to. Instead, while he was worshipping in the temple of Nisroch, his false god, two of his own sons killed him. They escaped to the land of Ararat. Nisroch was no protector of his deluded worshipper. But the living God was behind this judgment on Sennacherib. Though the wheels of God's government grind slowly, their results are absolutely certain.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A preview of a later judgment

This night is more than history. It sets a pattern for a judgment still to come.

That night the judgment stroke fell. The whole Assyrian army of 185,000 men was struck down by the angel of the LORD. As prophecy, it stands for the end of the Assyrian. He will enter Israel's land during the great tribulation, and he will perish like Sennacherib's army.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Provocation. Boasting against the Almighty is not clever. It is foolish, and Sennacherib's challenge is what invited the blow.

- Prayer. Hezekiah prayed and left the case with God. Being alone with God gave him more real power than armed troops around him.

- Power. One angel was enough. Millions would have been no harder, because when God acts for His people He takes no account of numbers.

- Patience. God gives time for repentance, so His answer can seem slow. But the results of His government are certain, as Sennacherib found in his own temple.

- Preview. Daybreak showed Assyria destroyed. That morning points on to the Assyrian's end in the tribulation, and to joy that comes in the morning.

2 Kings 19:36 · Darby

And Sennacherib king of Assyria departed, and went and returned, and abode at Nineveh.

The army that had crushed city after city breaks camp and goes home. No soldier of Judah had drawn a sword. Commentators read this retreat as God keeping His word to the letter. They also ask what the journey home cost the king himself.

Every word kept

God had told Hezekiah that the invader would go back the way he came, and would fall in his own land. One writer sees the retreat as the first half of that word coming true:

The result was that the king retreats in dismay. He returns and lives in Nineveh. But as Jehovah had sent a blast upon him in Palestine, so now he must fall in his own land… So every word Jehovah spoke came true.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Led away like an animal

The prophecy had pictured God putting a hook in the invader's nose and a bridle in his lips. One writer sets the two kings side by side at the moment the camp broke up:

He would win a glorious victory over the foe, but he would do so without leaving his sweet retreat in the sanctuary. He would make the temple his council chamber and make his military plans on his knees. So he conquered — so he won a silent victory. The king of Judah was on his knees. At the same time God was bringing the king of Assyria back to his own land with a hook in his nose and a bridle in his lips, like a wild beast. This is a striking example of what pride always leads to.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

An instrument that overreached

Assyria's earlier conquests were under God's control. Her blasphemy against God Himself ended the campaign:

If she had limited her hostility to the nations she conquered, she might not have fallen so soon. But she added her blasphemy against the God who had raised her up. So God would put His hook in her nose and His bridle in her lips, and turn her back by the way she had come (v.28). God may use one nation to punish another. But when that nation is then puffed up with pride, God knows how to bring it down to a humiliating level.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the city was left standing

The reason Jerusalem survived is not found in its walls or in Hezekiah's merit. Two writers point to the same ground given in the prophecy, that God acted for His own name and for the sake of David:

The Assyrian was not to enter the city, shoot arrows into it, or build a siege ramp against it. Yet the enemy army was surrounding it at that very moment. But God stepped in for the sake of His name, and for the sake of David His servant. He would not take back His covenant or His promises to David (vv. 32-34).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Home, but not changed

Going back to Nineveh was not the same as turning to God. Sennacherib's own experience had shown him what he should do:

Perhaps Sennacherib realised that Hezekiah's God was greater than he was. He left Jerusalem with the rest of his army and returned to Nineveh. But there he did not turn to the true God, as his experience told him he ought to.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Missing from the monuments

Assyria's own inscriptions say nothing about this defeat. One writer is not surprised:

As far as we know, no record of this has turned up among the dug-up remains of Assyrian libraries and monuments. And no wonder! These ancient kings wanted the public to forget their defeats and humiliations, just as men do today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A rehearsal of something larger

This rescue also points forward. One writer sees a clue in how much space Scripture gives to Hezekiah's reign:

Scripture tells Hezekiah's life at length for a reason. In his reign, Sennacherib's attack on Jerusalem was a foreshadowing of a still greater deliverance from a future king of Assyria. God so controls the evil and the passions of men that they serve His purpose. He gives a hint of what He will yet do for His own glory.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Rage — God used Assyria against other nations. Her rage against God Himself ended her run. When a tool God uses grows proud, He knows how to humble it.

- Retreat — The victory was silent. Hezekiah planned on his knees in the temple while the invader went home with a hook in his nose, like a wild beast. God kept every word: the king never entered the city, he went back the road he came, and he later fell in his own land.

- Reason — Jerusalem stood for the sake of God's own name and of His servant David. Its walls did not save it.

- Refusal — He reached Nineveh with all the proof he needed. He still did not turn to the true God, and his own records hid the defeat.

- Rehearsal — The retreat sketches a greater deliverance still to come. God turns the evil of men into a preview of His own glory.

2 Kings 19:37 · Darby

And it came to pass, as he was worshipping in the house of Nisroch his god, that Adrammelech and Sharezer [his sons] smote him with the sword; and they escaped into the land of Ararat. And Esarhaddon his son reigned in his stead.

The verse ends the account of Assyria's invasion in a single sentence. The king who had mocked the idea that any god could rescue Jerusalem dies at the hands of his own sons, bowing before his idol — and God had said in advance that it would happen.

A word spoken in advance

God had already said how this king would die:

This is what the Lord says: Do not be afraid of the words you have heard, with which the servants of the king of Assyria have blasphemed Me. Behold, I will put a spirit in him, so that he shall hear a rumor and return to his own land, and I will make him fall by the sword in his own land. The king of Assyria little realised what God had prepared for him, because in his pride he had dared to insult the Almighty.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

This verse is where that word came true. William Kelly ties the two blows together — one abroad, one at home:

The king retreats in dismay — he returns and lives in Nineveh — but as the Lord had sent destruction on him in Palestine, so now he must fall in his own land... So every word of the Lord came true.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Struck down where he felt safest

The place of his death is part of the message. C. H. Mackintosh points to the one thing this king had never done:

He might naturally have hoped for security at least in the temple of his god. But no. He did not know what it was to cover himself with sackcloth in the presence of Him who dwells between the cherubim. So this was the treatment he received at the shrine of the god he worshipped... Such will be the end of all those who exalt themselves against the Lord and His people.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The god who could not deliver

H. L. Rossier shows the king's own taunt turned back on him:

His sons strike him with the sword as he bows down in the house of Nisroch his god. He had said to Hezekiah: The Lord will not deliver you; and now his god Nisroch was unable to deliver him while he was worshipping before him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Slow wheels, certain result

Leslie Grant notes that the king knew better, and reads the murder as God's government rather than accident:

But there he did not turn to the true God, as his experience told him he should. Instead, two of his own sons killed him while he was worshipping in the temple of Nisroch, his idolatrous god. They escaped to the land of Ararat. Nisroch was no protector of his deluded worshipper. But the living God was behind this judgment on Sennacherib. Though the wheels of God's government grind slowly, their results are absolutely certain.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The names in the verse

Nisroch was an Assyrian idol with a temple in Nineveh. Older translations send the murderers to Armenia rather than Ararat, and a Bible dictionary explains why:

This name appears in the Authorised Version in 2 Kings 19:37 and Isaiah 37:38 as the place to which two sons of Sennacherib fled after killing their father; but in both passages the Hebrew word is Ararat... Armenia lies west of the Caspian Sea.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The murder came later, back in the capital, and it left a trace outside the Bible as well:

Sennacherib lived after that in Nineveh. There his own sons murdered him. An Assyrian cylinder in the British Museum contains a record of this deed.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A picture of something later

Kelly reads this real fall as a picture of a later one:

The total fall of the haughty Assyrian's kingdom followed a few years later. Those who walk in pride God is able to humble... Real as it was, however, it was no more than a shadow of the great chief of the eastern nations in the latter day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — God had said this king would hear a rumor, go home, and fall by the sword in his own land. The verse is that word coming true.

- Worship — He died bowing to Nisroch, in the one place he thought was safe. He had never bowed in sackcloth before the God who dwells between the cherubim.

- Weakness — His taunt was that the Lord could not deliver Hezekiah; his own god could not deliver him.

- Wheels — God gave him time, and he still did not turn. The wheels of God's government grind slowly, but the result is certain.

- Warning — Named men, a named shrine, a museum record: a real death. It also casts a shadow of the proud ruler God will yet humble.