But we make known to you, brethren, the grace of God bestowed in the assemblies of Macedonia;
Paul turns to a practical matter: money collected for believers in need. Rather than order Corinth to give, he first reports what God had done in the churches of Macedonia, and files it all under one word: grace.
The verse does not begin with Macedonian generosity. It begins with something given to them. One writer asks where their readiness came from. He rules out the obvious answer.
Where did this readiness come from? Was it the natural kindness of the human heart bubbling up? The apostle traces it all back to its right source — God. It was the grace of God given to the churches of Macedonia.
Corinth was a wealthy city. Macedonia was not. The first response came from the poorer region. One writer sees God's hand in that.
God took care that the first to respond would not be saints in the wealthy city of Corinth. They were saints in the long-ruined and poor district of Macedonia instead. In this way the work would be of God's grace, and in no way a matter of worldly circumstances… They gave no gifts out of their surplus. It was faith working by love, while they were going through a great trial of affliction.
Their poverty was deep, yet their giving was rich. That pairing shows how God weighs a gift.
The Lord has shown us that the size of the gift is in no way the test of what is good in God's sight. He showed how the two small coins of a poor widow, worth next to nothing, can be more to Him than all the treasure piled up by the wealthy. In fact, out of their deep poverty, those the apostle speaks of here were showing the riches of their open-handed generosity. This is what makes generosity worth noticing. It is not so much what is given as what remains to the giver.
Paul is dealing with money here, and he calls it grace. That word transforms whatever it touches.
How wonderfully "the grace of God" changes everything it takes up! And what can it not reach in its wide embrace?… See here what happens to money. Among people it is only "dirty money," a special target of the covetousness which is idolatry. Here it becomes the means of exercising faith in love, to the glory of God and the great blessing of His children.
"We want you to know" reads like a report meant to travel. One writer meets an objection to that kind of telling.
The grace of God has been on remarkable display in the assemblies of Macedonia. It stands on record for all time, so that not only the Corinthians but we ourselves might be stirred up by it. Some of us might think that retelling the devotion of others, in order to stir up slow believers, appeals to low motives and is not a worthy thing to do. Here, though, we find the Spirit leading the apostle to do that very thing. So we never need be afraid of telling how the grace of God has worked in others. Such accounts show us the grace of God as something real and practical. They also convict us of our own shortcomings. Both results are well worth having.
Rivalry and party spirit had torn Corinth apart. Praise of another region could have deepened that. Paul uses it the other way.
The praise he gives here to the Macedonian churches is meant to stir his brothers in Achaia to a loving jealousy. And the way he words that praise shows them how the honour now granted to Macedonia may rest on them just as much. For if the Macedonians had done well, it was by "the grace of God," who gives yet "more grace."
If giving is grace, is it then optional? One writer answers plainly.
Grace — the way this word is used here has the same meaning as giving. It does not make giving optional. Giving is a privilege and at the same time a responsibility. It is a visible expression of our love for God. It also expresses our fellowship with Christians who are suffering distress.
- Grace given — Their generosity did not spring from natural kindness. Paul names God as the giver before he names a single Macedonian gift.
- Grace tested — God let the poorest and hardest-hit believers respond first. No one could put it down to easy circumstances.
- Grace measured — God weighs what is left with the giver, not the size of the gift. Deep poverty produced rich generosity.
- Grace reported — What God works in one group goes on record, to stir others and to convict them.
- Grace multiplied — Paul wanted Corinth to catch the same fire. The God who gave grace in Macedonia gives yet more grace.
that in a great trial of affliction the abundance of their joy and their deep poverty has abounded to the riches of their [free-hearted] liberality.
Paul is collecting money for poor believers in Judea, and he points wealthy Corinth to an unlikely model: the poor churches of Macedonia. Their giving overflowed anyway, joining three things that rarely go together — deep trouble, deep joy, and deep poverty.
Paul does not point to the Macedonian character or to a good year in their economy. He points to what God did among them, and one writer notes that even the choice of Macedonia was deliberate.
God took care that the first to respond should be believers not in the wealthy city of Corinth, but in the long-ruined and poor region of Macedonia. In this way the work would be of God's grace, and in no way a matter of worldly circumstances… Scripture tells us plainly here of their poverty right down into the depths. They gave no gifts out of surplus. It was faith working by love, while they were going through a great trial of affliction. Their joy overflowed in the face of trouble, and their deep poverty, instead of appealing to others for help, overflowed into the riches of their open-hearted generosity.
Where the ESV reads "generosity," older translations have "liberality." One writer says the word points to the state of the heart, not the size of the gift.
In 2 Corinthians 8 and 9, where Paul encourages his readers to do good works, we find a special kind of simplicity of heart. The word "liberality" appears three times here, and the literal reading is "simplicity."
By totals, the Macedonians would rank near the bottom of any list of givers. Paul calls their gift a wealth of generosity instead. One commentator explains how so small a sum earns that word, and what crisis prompted the collection.
While suffering a great trial of affliction, they had abundance of joy alongside abundance of poverty. This resulted in "the riches of their liberality." Whatever the depth of their poverty, and however little they could give, their willingness to give what they could was "riches of liberality" in the sight of God. The occasion was that of a famine in Judea (Acts 11:27-30), and Gentile believers wanted to send help to the believers there.
The verse stacks up three conditions that cancel each other out in ordinary life.
Several circumstances combined to make the giving of the Macedonians very noteworthy. First, they were very poor. The apostle speaks of their "deep poverty." Second, they were very persecuted, for they were in "a great trial of affliction." Third, they were very joyful, since he refers to "the abundance of their joy."
The same writer names the claim behind all giving, and then points to what loosened their hands.
God does not merely claim what we can spare, but all that we have, because He claims us… What moved them to their liberality was the abundance of their spiritual joy. They had by faith so real and joyful a grasp of the things of heaven that they could afford to be generous with the things of earth.
Nothing outside them squeezed this offering out. One writer contrasts their giving with the machinery people use to raise money.
Love does not calculate what it can spare, nor what it can achieve. The heart moved by love thinks not of its own trials or deep poverty, but of those it hears are suffering in some special way, and it acts at once… There were no earthly incentives here. There was no pressure from agents, no rivalry of donations, no moving appeals to crowds, no published lists to shame or to stimulate, no personal or party aims of any kind.
One writer applies this verse to the believers at Philippi. He turns their poverty and their joy into a diagnosis of our own tight-fistedness.
The devotion of the Philippians here was all the greater because they were very poor. We learn this from 2 Corinthians 8:2. They also had been in much affliction themselves, and they had experienced much joy in the Lord. All this is very instructive for us. Often we are unsympathetic and stingy. The reason is that our own experiences of suffering and of spiritual refreshment are so very shallow.
- Grace first. The overflow started with God. He chose the poorest region, not the richest city. Nobody could mistake this giving for good fortune.
- Grace as joy. Affliction did not empty them. Joy in heavenly things filled them, and that fullness made them free with earthly things.
- Grace as simplicity. Older translations say "liberality," but the literal sense is simplicity — an undivided heart, not a big bank balance.
- Grace reaching outward. Love did not calculate what it could spare. Nothing pressured them: no agents, no rivalry, no published lists.
- Grace measured by God. However little they could give, God counted it wealth. The measure of a gift is the heart behind it. Shallow giving points to shallow experience of both suffering and joy.
For according to [their] power, I bear witness, and beyond [their] power, [they were] willing of their own accord,
The Macedonian churches were poor and under pressure, yet Paul backs their giving with his own word — "I testify." Verse 3 measures that giving twice — by what they could afford, and by what they could not — and calls it all their own choice.
The first measure is demanding on its own. The second one costs the giver things they actually needed:
Paul himself could bear witness that they gave according to their power. This in itself was a big thing. It means they first met all their proper living expenses in an upright way, and then gave to the limit of what they could. They did more than this, however. They gave beyond their power. That is, they went without what they could fairly have counted as proper living expenses, so that they could give to the Lord and His people. And they did this in the most willing-hearted way. They begged Paul to accept the money and take responsibility for getting it to the saints. They had caught the spirit the people showed when Israel was about to build the tabernacle. Someone reported to Moses, "The people bring much more than enough for doing the work that the LORD has commanded us to do" (Exodus 36:5).
Pridham grades three kinds of giving. Only the top one needs more than good management to explain it:
To give out of abundance is to be charitable only in a natural way. To give in fair proportion to one's means is, in a Christian, to act as a faithful steward of the Lord. But to give beyond one's power is a sign that love has, at faith's bidding, taken over the direction of the soul for a while. It leaves conscience an astonished but unprotesting witness of its acts. Such was the temper of these open-handed Macedonians. With no prompting but their own hearts, they eagerly poured out their sympathetic help on suffering brothers in Christ who were, by birth, foreigners to them.
The words "of their own accord" rule out the usual pressures that raise money. Kelly lists them one by one:
Nor does love calculate what it can spare or what it can achieve (v. 3). The heart moved by love does not think of its own trials or deep poverty. It thinks of those it hears are suffering in some special way, and it acts at once. At least the apostle testifies about the Macedonian saints. They gave of their own accord, up to their means and beyond their means. There were no earthly incentives here. There was no pressure from agents, no rivalry of donations, no moving appeals to crowds, no circulated lists to shame or to stir people up, and no personal or party aims of any kind. It is the grace of God from first to last.
Paul held up the poorest churches as the example for the wealthy Corinthians. God arranged that order on purpose:
God took care that the first to respond were not the saints in the wealthy city of Corinth. They were the saints in the long-ruined and poor district of Macedonia. This way the work would be of God's grace, and in no way a matter of worldly circumstances… They gave no gifts out of surplus; it was faith working by love, while they were going through a great trial of affliction. The circumstances of Macedonia might have seemed completely unfavourable. That made it all the clearer that their generosity came from a divine source.
Nobody pressed them, so the push came from somewhere else. They also treated the chance to help as a privilege:
Paul had not urged them to this as a duty. No message from God through a prophet pushed them. God's love acted on their hearts as new creatures in Christ, and beyond their power they gave for this purpose… They considered it a favour to share in this ministry… The favour was not in giving when asked, but in being allowed to help in the matter at all.
Behind the money there was an earlier gift. They had already handed over themselves:
Behind their gifts to the saints there was the blessed fact that they had already given themselves to the Lord. This made it simple to carry out the will of God by putting themselves into the hands of the Apostle to minister their gift. Joy in the Lord led them to give themselves wholly to the Lord for His will, and so to give to those who are the Lord's. Their service in material things had a spiritual motive.
- Self first. They gave themselves to the Lord before they gave anything else. Every gift after that followed the person.
- Then means. Giving "according to their power" meant they covered their living costs, then released all that was left.
- Then beyond. Going past their power meant going without what they could fairly have kept. Love was steering, not calculation.
- Freely. No appeals, no published lists, no rivalry, no shame. Paul calls their giving their own decision.
- Poor on purpose. God let the poorest churches lead. Then nobody could put the result down to easy circumstances.
begging of us with much entreaty [to give effect to] the grace and fellowship of the service which [was to be rendered] to the saints.
Paul points the Corinthians to the churches of Macedonia. One strange detail drives his point: churches that gave more than they could afford had to beg for permission to help. Why was giving a favour to them? And what did they want a share in?
Usually the one raising money asks the givers. Here it went the other way round.
But this is not all. Nobody asked the Macedonian saints. They were the ones asking Paul and his companions. They pleaded hard for the grace and the fellowship of ministering to the saints — that is, to be allowed a share in the grace or favour of caring for the suffering saints of Judea.
No one pressured them. What they begged for was not the right to be generous once asked. It was the right to be included at all.
Paul had not urged them to this as a duty. No prophetic message from God pushed them. God's love acted on their hearts as new creatures in Christ, and they gave beyond their power for this purpose. These Macedonian believers were so urgent about it that they begged the apostle for the grace and the fellowship of the ministry to the saints. They counted it a favour to share in this ministry… The favour was not in giving when asked. It was in being allowed to help in the matter at all. They felt the apostle granted them the favour when he accepted their part in this ministry.
The word for "favor" in the verse is also the word for grace. That choice carries weight.
Here the word grace has the same meaning as giving. That does not make giving optional, for it is a privilege and at the same time a responsibility. It is a real, visible expression of our love for God, and of our fellowship with Christians who are in distress. This is the same word used for our fellowship with the Lord, which stresses this character of giving.
Some older English versions add extra words to this verse. One writer explains why the shorter reading matters.
Notice that the Authorised Version, following the common Greek text, contains the words "that we would receive." That also brings in the added words "take upon us" in verse 4. The best authorities do not support the first addition, and the second is needless and indeed worse. Both additions weaken and falsify the sense. The sense is that the Macedonian saints might have the grace and fellowship of the service done for the poor saints — not the mere idea that the apostle would receive their collection and hand it out.
The word behind "taking part" is the Bible's word for fellowship. It reaches much further than money.
In Scripture this word means association, and having things in common… A believer brought into that association has the same aims and goals before his soul as the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ have: the gospel for the world, the welfare of the saints, and maintaining the truth. Out of this flows the fellowship of the saints one with another. Acts 2:42; 2 Cor. 8:4; Gal. 2:9; 1 John 1:3-7.
The saints in this verse were real people in a real emergency. Gentile believers — believers who were not Jews — asked to be part of the answer.
The occasion was a famine in Judea (Acts 11:27-30), and Gentile saints wanted to send help to the saints there. Philippi and Thessalonica were leading assemblies in Macedonia. They were willing to give more than they were able, and they urged the apostles to accept this for the poor saints.
- Grace begins it. The word for grace is also the word for giving. That is why Paul calls a collection a "grace."
- Grace asks. Nobody asked them. They did the asking, and they had to plead with Paul to let them in.
- Grace counts it a privilege. They did not count it a favour to give when asked. The favour was being allowed to help at all.
- Grace shares. "Taking part" means association — having things in common, and sharing the aims of the Father and the Son.
- Grace lands somewhere. It ended in real help for real people in a famine, sent by believers in Macedonia to the poor saints in Judea.
And not according as we hoped, but they gave themselves first to the Lord, and to us by God's will.
Paul is writing about churches in Macedonia. Their giving went past everything he had hoped for, and here he names the reason. The surprise was not how much they gave. It was the order: they gave themselves first, and everything else followed.
The word "first" carries the weight of the verse. One writer asks what it means to give yourself to the Lord, and what that rules out.
This is very important: there is such a thing — or this verse would not be in Holy Scripture — as giving your own self to the Lord. You may say, "How?" By truly, prayerfully, honestly recognising the claim the Lord Himself has over you. If I confess that I myself am the Lord's, that carries everything else with it. They did not give a tenth of their income and leave the remaining nine-tenths to themselves. They said, "I will give myself to the Lord. I am His slave. I am under His orders." Then everything I have is the Lord's.
One writer reads "not as we expected" as an understatement. He traces this giving to a source deeper than natural kindness.
This is not the kindness of nature. It is divine love at work in the new man. That is how its genuineness is tested, because Christ must have the first place with this nature. It works by the sense of right and wrong that only the new man has, and Christ is the measure and motive of that sense. "Not as we hoped," says Paul, speaking of their active love — it was more than he hoped.
They gave themselves to the Lord first, and their help to people came under God's will. One writer sees in that pattern a reflection of how Christ gave Himself.
Is not this the reflection, yes, the reproduction, as far as it goes, of Christ's love in giving Himself? He gave Himself for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God. It was all this and more to God and for us, as nothing else could be. Had they not caught a vivid impression of the Saviour's love? In that love God always had the first place, however great His compassion for people. Their love for the saints follows, and it is shaped by what always motivated Christ: the will of God. Their giving did agree with His will, of course. But more than that, His will was the source of the self-sacrifice.
The verse ends "by the will of God to us." Paul includes himself and his fellow workers in what the Macedonians handed over.
Paul and his fellow-servants had surely told the believers about the great need in Judea. The Macedonians did not just help as the apostle hoped; they went beyond it. Is this not a matter of laying both themselves, and therefore all they have, at the feet of the Lord and of the apostles, for the will of God alone to direct? What precious and proper effect of the grace of God in souls!
Nobody pushed these givers. One writer lists what was missing from the whole transaction, and what they counted as the privilege.
Paul had not urged them to do this as a duty. No prophetic message from God drove them. God's love acted on their hearts as new creatures in Christ, and they gave beyond their power for this purpose. These Macedonians were so eager that they begged the apostle for the favour of sharing in the service to the saints. They counted it a favour — not the favour of being asked to give, but of being allowed to help at all. Here is the secret of ready service. The Lord had their hearts first, and then all they had was for Him.
The verse puts self-surrender first. So other good things cannot take its place, however genuine they are.
We believe the one great essential to all true devotedness and service is to yield ourselves to the Lord. It is not first work, or first pray, or first learn. No, you may know all about the doctrine of deliverance and still be a poor slave to your own selfishness. You may be no use at all to others. And the lack is not great knowledge. It is sadly clear everywhere that knowledge, even of the things of God, puffs a person up. It can go hand in hand with little power and great barrenness.
- Grace starts it. What moved these givers was not natural kindness. It was divine love at work in them, with Christ as its measure and motive.
- Self is the gift. They did not hand over a slice and keep the rest. They recognised the Lord's claim over themselves, and everything else followed.
- Order is the secret. Not first work, first pray, or first learn — first give yourself; that is where ready service comes from.
- God's will is the direction. Their service to people flowed out of surrender to the Lord. They laid themselves and all they had at His disposal.
- The result runs past expectation. In Christ's own self-giving, God had the first place. Giving shaped by that pattern went beyond their means and beyond Paul's hopes.
So that we begged Titus that, according as he had before begun, so he would also complete as to you this grace also;
Titus had already started a collection among the Corinthians, and Paul now urges him to go back and finish it. Two questions follow: why does a good start need finishing, and why does Paul call a gift of money an act of grace?
One writer says why Titus was the right man to send back, and what these Corinthians should now do with the memory of their own failure:
"Accordingly, we urged Titus that as he had started," and so on. Grace provokes grace. Titus had already been active in this work of love while among them. Now he carries this second letter, and Paul asks him to crown his earlier work. He is to set vividly before these Corinthians the bright and attractive opportunity now offered to their zeal. Let them dwell no longer on their own disgrace. Let them hurry instead to wipe out its memory by throwing themselves into the work of love.
The verse says Titus had "started" this before. What stalled was not their willingness but the doing:
Paul had asked Titus, when he came to Corinth, to encourage the Corinthians in "the same grace also." A year earlier Titus had clearly begun this, telling the Corinthians of the need. They gladly promised to help (v. 10). So Paul asked Titus to "finish" this work in them. Apparently, though, even at the second visit of Titus they still put it off.
Kelly names what moved Paul to press it now:
This worked on the heart of the apostle. It moved him to urge Titus to carry out what he had earlier begun among the Corinthians, when he delivered the first letter. (v. 6.) Paul's love for them held a holy jealousy. He did not want their love to slacken, or an early promise to wither in the bud.
Paul asks Titus to go, but Titus needs no pressing. One commentator notes how the words should be translated, and what they show of Titus's own heart:
The Achaians were ready to promise, and Titus was ready to go. If he went, it was only to finish what he had begun before, when he was last with them. That is how we should translate it: "as he had begun before, so he would also finish." (8:6.) He went when Paul asked him, but he went of his own accord. His heart anticipated the apostle's request.
Paul does not call the collection a duty or a tax. He calls it an act of grace. Kelly sees in that word the reach of grace itself:
How wonderfully "the grace of God" changes everything it takes up! And what can it not reach in its wide embrace? … See here what happens to money. Among men it is only "filthy lucre," a favourite object of the greed that is idolatry. Yet it becomes the means of exercising faith in love, to the glory of God and the great blessing of His children.
Paul sends Titus to "complete" the work, but he will not force the giving. His aim reaches past the money to the motive:
But he is careful to insist that he does not speak as one giving a command. He does not want them to treat it as a mere matter of obligation. … Paul is therefore seeking to reach and stir proper motives, not simply to make them give.
Titus's errand begins a carefully arranged process. The rest of the chapter names the other men who shared in it:
The apostle sent Titus to stir up the Corinthians to this grace. He also sent another brother, whose praise in the gospel was known in all the assemblies. The assemblies had chosen this brother to travel with the apostle about the collection. (v. 16-21.) Another brother was sent too, who had been found diligent in all things. … The apostle took such care that everything should be done openly, and for the glory of the Lord.
- Grace spreads. One act of love stirs the next: grace provokes grace.
- Grace begun must be grace finished. Titus had started this a year before. The Corinthians promised, then delayed. Paul sends him back to finish it.
- Grace is carried by willing hands. Titus accepted the request, but he went of his own accord; his heart ran ahead of the appeal.
- Grace renames the money. What men call "filthy lucre" becomes a way to exercise faith in love, to God's glory and His children's blessing.
- Grace is not commanded. Paul urges; he does not order. He aims at the motive, not the amount, and sends approved men to handle the gift openly.
but even as ye abound in every way, in faith, and word, and knowledge, and all diligence, and in love from you to us, that ye may abound in this grace also.
Paul has just pointed to the churches of Macedonia, who gave out of deep poverty. Now he turns to Corinth, a church rich in gifts. He names five things they already excel in, then asks for a sixth. He calls the collection for believers in need a "grace."
Paul names faith, speech, knowledge, diligence and love before he asks for anything. The ESV reads that last item as his love for them; other translations read it as their love for him. One writer takes the second sense, and sees the list doing two things at once.
To the gifts he had recognised in them earlier, Paul now adds "diligence," and a love returning toward himself. Paul names all these gifts first to the praise of Him who gave them. He names them next to stir up in the hearts of those addressed a feeling of godly self-respect, and a desire to excel themselves by abounding yet further in this grace of kindness toward fellow believers.
The word Paul uses for the collection is the same word used for God's grace. That choice of word changes what giving is.
Giving is spoken of as a grace, you notice, and this indeed it is, if rightly considered and carried out. It becomes a powerful way of expressing the working of the grace of God in blessing. If our own hearts are filled to overflowing with blessing from God, we are bound to overflow ourselves in giving to others. Is it not true that we know in our heads, and say with our lips, a good deal more than we express in large-hearted giving?
Another writer draws out what that word means for our sense of duty.
Here the word grace means giving. Grace does not make giving optional, because it is a privilege and at the same time a responsibility. It is a tangible expression of our love for God and also of our fellowship with Christians who are suffering distress.
Corinth had everything except this. The force of the appeal is in the word "also."
The apostle urges the Corinthians too, as he had urged Titus. They had their part now, and as God had enriched them with everything else, were they to fail in this grace? No, He looks for them to abound in it also. Yet he is careful that it should not be by command but of grace.
There was a delay behind the appeal. The Corinthians had promised to help believers in Jerusalem, then stalled.
Believers in Jerusalem were in dire need. The extremely poor believers in northern Greece (Macedonia) gave generously (2 Cor. 8:3–4), and the Corinthians (in wealthy Achaia) had promised to do the same. However, this was 'a year ago' (8:10; 9:2), and until this point nothing had come of it (8:7; 9:1–5).
The very next verse says he is not issuing a command. That restraint protects what giving is.
If we gave only because God commanded us to, our giving could no longer be spoken of as grace. We would be giving under the compulsion of law. No, the eagerness and zeal of the Macedonians was meant only to stir them up. The giving Paul asked for was to be an expression and proof of the sincerity and genuineness of their love. Love always delights to give.
What made the Macedonians give was not their means.
They were very poor, but their deep poverty did not limit their gifts. They gave with joy and abounded in the riches of generosity... And the secret of it was that they had given themselves first to the Lord. All else was the outflow of this self-surrender.
Two verses later Paul points to Christ Himself. One writer, quoting an older translation of that verse, sees this as the real power behind the appeal.
Paul adds, You know "the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, for our sakes became poor, that we through His poverty might be rich." ... "You know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ" is irresistible as a moral motive. It is also a new power in us, which binds the heart to Himself in a similar expression of grace.
- Grace received. Paul lists faith, speech, knowledge, diligence and love "to the praise of Him who gave them." Everything Corinth had was a gift.
- Grace named. The collection carries the same word as God's grace. Giving is "a privilege and at the same time a responsibility."
- Grace overflowing. A heart "filled to overflowing with blessing from God" overflows to others. The Macedonians gave that way because they "had given themselves first to the Lord."
- Grace uncommanded. Paul refuses to order it. Under command, "our giving could no longer be spoken of as grace." It becomes proof of love instead.
- Grace patterned. The measure is Christ, who became poor to make us rich — a motive one writer calls "irresistible."
I do not speak as commanding [it], but through the zeal of others, and proving the genuineness of your love.
Paul is collecting money from the churches for poor believers in Jerusalem, and he has just pointed to the Macedonians, who gave freely out of deep poverty. Now he refuses to use his authority: he will not order the Corinthians to give, but says what the giving is for.
Paul will not command. One writer shows what a commanded gift would lose.
Verse 8 shows that the Apostle did not wish to be understood as issuing a command on the subject. If we gave only because God commanded us to, we could no longer call our giving grace. It would be done under the compulsion of law. No, the eagerness and zeal of the Macedonians was only meant to stir them up. The giving he asked for was to express and prove that their love was sincere and genuine. Love always delights to give.
Some things God does command. One writer draws that line, then gives two reasons why Paul presses hard without ordering.
The Lord has given a new commandment as the law of His own house (John 13:34; 1 John 2:8). It places a lasting duty on every believer, yet it is never imposed by force. We are commanded to believe the gospel and confess the name of Jesus, and the only other outcome is ruin. But the practical love of believers must come freely if God is to accept it. An example may stir it up, and urging may awaken it, but it bears fruit only by its own inner power. The apostle refuses to give an order, yet he keeps pressing them, and he gives two reasons. He does not want their fellow believers in Macedonia to outdo them in this happy contest. And he wants to give them a special chance to prove that their love is sincere.
Paul had every right to instruct them. He set that right aside and let the Macedonians do the persuading.
The apostle exhorts the Corinthians too, as he had Titus. They had their part now, and as God had enriched with everything else, were they to fail in this grace? No, He looks that they should abound in it also. Yet he is careful that it should not be by injunction but of grace. "I say this not as a command, but to prove by the earnestness of others that your love also is genuine." What a blend of tenderness, sensitivity and faithfulness!
The aim was not simply to collect the money. Paul was after the motive behind the gift.
But he is careful to insist that he does not speak as commanding this: he does not want them to treat it as a mere duty. The example of the Macedonians, which he has described, was one of wholehearted willingness. On the other hand, there is the question of proving that the love of the Corinthians is sincere. So Paul is seeking to reach and stir the right motives, not simply to make them give.
If love is being proved, then the size of the gift is not the measurement. What Paul had just praised in Macedonia settles that.
The Lord has shown us that the size of the gift is in no way the test of what is good in God's sight. He has shown how the two small coins of a poor widow, worth one penny, can be more to Him than all the treasures piled up by the wealthy. In fact, the people the apostle speaks of here were showing, in their deep poverty, the riches of their free-hearted generosity. This is what makes generosity noteworthy. It is not so much what is given as what remains to the giver. What the apostle valued was not the largeness of the gift, but the heart displayed in it.
The Corinthians already loved Paul, and he had gladly said so. This gift would carry that love somewhere it had not yet gone.
He has gladly acknowledged how warm their love is towards himself. What he wants now is to see how far that love can spread, in active kindness towards people they knew only by the report of their faith. He longs to see them recognise, in a practical way, their calling and their bond with one another, as members of the one body of Christ. In his earlier letter he reminded them of this truth as teaching. Now he seeks to draw it out in practice through their giving.
That proof was not meant to stay private. Among the stated purposes of Christian giving, one writer lists this verse alongside the close of the chapter:
to prove the reality of our love: "I speak not by commandment, but by occasion of the forwardness of others, and to prove the sincerity of your love … Therefore show them, and before the churches, the proof of your love, and of our boasting on your behalf" (2 Cor. 8:8, 24).
- Not commanded. Paul refuses to order the gift. A forced gift stops being grace and becomes law.
- Not pressured. In place of an order he sets an example — the eagerness of the Macedonians — meant to stir motive, not to extract money.
- Proved. Giving is the test that shows whether love is real. Love that never moves the hand leaves nothing to prove it.
- Measured differently. The test is not the size of the gift but the heart in it — what remains with the giver, not what leaves.
- Sent outward. Their love was already warm toward Paul. Now it was to reach believers they had never met.
For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that for your sakes he, being rich, became poor, in order that *ye* by *his* poverty might be enriched.
Paul is urging the Corinthians to give generously. Then he lifts the appeal to its highest ground. The verse asks us to weigh three things: when Christ was rich, what His poverty cost, and what riches it bought for us.
Other Christians can set an example of giving. But example alone cannot produce it.
The working of God's grace in other Christians may stir us. But only the supreme working of God's grace in Christ can give us the mainspring and motive we need, if the grace of generous giving is to mark us. To that mainspring we come in verse 9.
Christ outclasses every other giver.
To awaken this love the Apostle reminds them that in Christ we have the supreme example of giving. The rich may give out of their abundant riches. Others, like the believers in Macedonia, are in deep poverty themselves, yet give out of their abundant joy. But in Christ we see One who was rich, and who for our sakes became poor, to give others the true riches.
The life of Jesus on earth was not rich. So the wealth must belong to a time before He came, and that says something about who He is.
He was rich and He became poor. A man I spoke with denied the eternal deity of our Lord Jesus Christ. He argued that He began His existence in the manger at Bethlehem. My answer was this text. If what he professed to believe was the truth, then our Lord never was rich before He was poor, and our text is a lie. There was none poorer than He on the day He was born in David's city — a manger was His cradle, and a stable His shelter... And if any ask how that could be, the one and only answer is this: He was God before He became man. Take His Deity out of the verse, and it loses all its meaning.
Wealth and poverty here are about resources: having everything, then having nothing.
His grace truly cannot be measured. Yet we can hold two measures beside it: the infinite glory of His person in itself, and the depth of the humiliation He accepted for us... Wealth means full means and resources. Poverty means having none of them. As a divine person our Lord had no need for Himself, and every resource at His command for others. He was rich indeed, yet for our sakes He became poor — not in outward fact only, but in spirit, to the very fullest... He is the perfect pattern of One who depended on His Father and never used a single thing for Himself in all His life.
That poverty reached its lowest point at the cross.
In His deep poverty He had our eternal wealth on His heart. He reached the point of His utmost poverty when He was alone, bearing God's judgment against our sin through those hours of total darkness. That point secured our everlasting blessing.
There is a difference between the glory that is His alone and the riches He won as Man and can hand over.
As the eternal Son of the Father, He has a glory all His own. It is His essential Godhead glory in which no creature can have part. But as Man in this world He has won honours, glories and riches. These He can share, and does share, with His own redeemed and loved ones. And with these "great riches" He enriches all who trust Him as their Saviour. "All things are yours," the apostle says.
Those riches have names.
And what infinite wealth has come to us through His great poverty! He has enriched us in righteousness, in eternal life, in holiness, in the gift of the Holy Spirit, in sonship, in the possession of all things, in union with Christ, and in fellowship with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ. And when He comes again we will find our eternal home with Him in the Father's house, where we shall see Him as He is, and be like Him.
Paul's exact wording is worth noticing. He writes to people who are already believers, and aims the truth straight at their behaviour.
Notice how fitting the apostle's language is. He does not say "for our sakes," but "for yours." He is not preaching the doctrine of salvation here. He is helping and warning people who have already believed through grace. General statements of doctrine are what our faith rests on. Applying that same doctrine to particular cases is the proper food of love.
- Rich — the wealth was His before Bethlehem; take His deity out of the verse and it means nothing.
- Poor — poverty is the utter lack of resources, and He who had everything at command used not one thing for Himself.
- Deepest — at the cross, in the darkness, He bore God's judgment against our sin.
- Rich again — His Godhead glory stays His alone. The riches He won as Man He shares: righteousness, eternal life, sonship, the Father's house.
- Therefore give — the example of generous Christians can stir you; only the grace of Christ can move you.