Having therefore this purpose, did I then use lightness? Or what I purpose, do I purpose according to flesh, that there should be with me yea yea, and nay nay?
Paul promised the Corinthians a visit, then changed his route. His critics said the change exposed the man: he says yes one day and no the next.
The attack was aimed at his reliability, not his route.
Now those who were opponents used even this change of plans as a ground of attack. They insinuated that it showed Paul was a man of lightness and shallowness of purpose: that he had no depth of character: that he would say one thing today and another thing tomorrow. The Apostle knew this, and so he asked the question of verse 17. Was he a man swayed merely by fleshly impulse, so as to be pulled easily in this direction or that — saying yes today, and no tomorrow?
Behind the whispering, one writer sees an enemy at work.
He had let them know his original plan at Corinth. Later he told them he had changed it, but at the time he gave no reason. Satan cleverly used that silence to do harm. He never stops trying to sow discord among brothers, and his special aim then was to shake, if possible, the confidence of these Corinthian believers in Paul.
Older translations ask, "did I use lightness?" where the ESV has "Was I vacillating?" The old word names a specific fault.
The word "lightness" in verse 17 means fickleness. Was he fickle-minded? Was it merely the lightness and fickleness, a changing yes, yes, followed by no, no?
The change had a reason, and the reason was mercy.
Paul says it was not lightness. It was not uncertainty either. He stayed away from Corinth to spare them, and he wrote to them instead of going. He says, "not yes and no," not changing, not the lightness of a mere foolish human mind... He had intended to go by Corinth into Macedonia, and come back again by them, but he says, I will not do that now... And here he asks, "Did I use lightness?" No, it was another thing.
The second half of Paul's question asks whose will set the route. His critics assumed it was his own.
Had he shown weakness or unsteadiness in forming or dropping his purpose?... Some at Corinth were clearly not ashamed to draw such conclusions from appearances. But they judged in this way after the flesh, and measured Christ's chosen vessel by themselves. They did vex his spirit, but they would find that they condemned no one but themselves. Whatever they concluded from the facts, he would prove to their shame that he was neither the plaything of impulse nor the slave of his own will. His glory was to watch quickly and readily for his Master's eye.
The real target is our habit of quick faultfinding. The cure is a truth about who holds the will and the power.
The apostle here seeks to shame this hasty faultfinding into permanent silence. He reminds his brothers of a solemn truth we so easily let slip at all times: for the doing of good things, both the will and the power belong to God alone. Purposes, even when formed by an apostle and with the worthiest end, are subject to the changing operation of that will. So with someone like Paul there could be neither "yes" nor "no" in any final sense.
Paul does not stop at clearing his name. He answers in a way that steadies them.
See how the apostle meets the charge of fickleness against himself. It shows the skill of divine wisdom. Suppose it is so — I am fickle, but He whom I preach is not; in Him is stability, in Him is yes, in Him is amen. The servant would exalt his Master, even seemingly at his own expense... He draws them away from looking at him. He turns them to the blessings they shared with him as believers in Christ... Even the most satisfying answer to the charge would have done nothing to establish their souls.
Scripture records this upset plan for a reason.
Even an apostle, you see, had his plans disarranged and upset, and God led him to record that fact for us in Scripture. God did not order the change, but He overruled it for final blessing. Guidance may reach the servant in many ways. If the servant misses direct guidance, he may still find that God overrules even his mistakes for blessing.
- Charge. Critics turned a cancelled visit into evidence of a shallow character.
- Word. "Lightness" means fickleness. Paul stayed away for a different reason: to spare them.
- Will. He was neither the plaything of impulse nor the slave of his own will. The will and the power belong to God, so God may change even an apostle's plan.
- Turn. He does more than defend himself. He lifts their eyes to the One he preached, in whom there is stability, yes and amen.
- Use. Even an apostle had his plans upset. God overruled the change for blessing, and He can overrule our mistakes too.
Now God [is] faithful, that our word to you is not yea and nay.
Paul promised a visit to Corinth, then changed his route. Some took that as proof his word meant nothing, so he points them to God's own character and to the message they heard from him.
The suspicion at Corinth was about motive, not just travel. Paul's reply reaches past his travel plans to the nature of God.
Had he changed his mind for no good reason? Or were his first plans insincere? Was he indifferent about what plans he made and changed? No, he had really wanted to go to Corinth soon. In this matter he appeals to the very nature of God: as He is true, so their first word had been dependable, not "yes and no."
Older English versions translate the word here as "true." The thought is God's faithfulness, and that note runs on through the New Testament.
The New Testament puts special emphasis on the faithfulness of God… During the riot at Ephesus Paul experienced God's compassions. After this he could again write to the Corinthians about God's faithfulness (2 Corinthians 1:18; "true" in the King James Translation). So we could trace God's faithfulness through the New Testament: He is faithful (Heb. 10:23; Heb. 11:11) and remains faithful (2 Tim. 2:13).
Paul does not argue about his schedule. He asks the Corinthians to test him by what they heard him preach, and to let their own consciences give the verdict.
As usual, he turns straight from himself to Christ. It is as if he said: Judge me as you will. But ask yourselves meanwhile who and what this man is whose character and conduct you are examining. And how do we stand to each other in the sight of God? Content to be nothing in himself, he is still a witness and messenger of God. Suppose they did find him fickle, or that he seemed to waver. What had they gathered from his words when they heard him? To them and to their consciences he will appeal… Let them judge his ways by his teaching, and bring that teaching to their own consciences in the presence of the Lord. Tested by that standard, they would find him, if in appearance a deceiver, yet still true.
Commentators differ on what Paul is defending. Some point to the content of his preaching, others to the way he preached. Either way, the message rests on someone unchanging.
When he says, "Our word to you has not been Yes and No," he seems to be pointing to the way he preached. Then in the following verse he mentions the great theme of his preaching — Jesus Christ, the Son of God. In Him everything has been firmly established for God. In Him is eternal stability.
The gospel cannot blow hot and cold, because God has staked Himself on it — most of all at the cross.
In a spirit of grace, he turns from their veiled attacks on him to the doctrine he preached… The gospel has no shift of purpose and no uncertainty, whatever people may think of the man. God Himself is pledged to it and concerned in it. His glory and His grace are not more bound up with it than His truth and righteousness… Did He compromise His word? He accomplished it, letter and spirit, to the full. Did He abandon His holiness? Never was His complete separation from evil so clearly shown… There is no inconsistency in the work that the gospel rests on, and none in the preaching of it. Instead, it brings into harmony every fact and thought that nothing else could reconcile. Our only absolute consistency is in Christ and His cross.
Paul's argument works only if a man's life and his message match.
The character of the message is seen in the messenger, as Paul urges elsewhere. A "yes and no" preacher would not commend his preaching as a trustworthy "yes" (2 Cor. 1:17-19). A man who is not himself subject to God could not expect to lead others into subjection to God.
The same writer traces this steadiness to the company Paul kept.
To be with God must mean having God with us, and bringing His unchanging character into our ways. So the apostle, preaching no "yes and no" but a "yes and amen" Christ, can say of himself that with him also there is no "yes and no."
- Charge — Corinth read a changed travel plan as a changed character. Paul faces the suspicion instead of ignoring it.
- Anchor — He appeals to God's faithfulness. Older versions render the word "true"; the point is that God stays faithful.
- Evidence — He moves the test from his movements to his message. Their own consciences can judge whether his preaching ever wavered.
- Guarantee — The gospel cannot be "yes and no." God has pledged His own glory, grace, truth and righteousness to it at the cross.
- Result — The unchanging message shapes the man who carries it. Walking with God brings His unchanging character into our own ways.
For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, he who has been preached by us among you (by me and Silvanus and Timotheus), did not become yea and nay, but yea *is* in him.
Paul promised the Corinthians a visit, then changed his plans, and some of them called him unreliable. He answers by pointing away from himself to the Christ he preached among them with Silvanus (Silas) and Timothy.
One writer notices what happens the moment Paul mentions Christ.
Now here we have an example of what we see in Paul: the moment he touches a certain string, off he goes on that string. His mind was so full of Christ that, if he touches that, he goes away into it all; it is so here. He mentions Christ, and away he is into a whole range of truth in Him.
Paul names two men who preached with him. One writer explains what that shows, and where the certainty of their message came from.
Notice that the apostle links others with himself. The grace and truth that came through Jesus Christ always enlarges the heart and gives lasting fellowship. The glory of the Person proclaimed answers to the certainty guaranteed. Doubt, difficulty, hesitation, or inconsistency can have no place in the Son of God, now the glorified Man, who suffered on the cross for the annulling of sin. The apostle and his companions knew and preached no other doctrine.
"Yes and no" is the language of someone who might mean either. Christ is not like that.
This leads the thoughts of the Apostle to Christ, the perfect pattern for all Christian conduct. Paul and his fellow-workers preached "the Son of God, Jesus Christ." With this glorious Person there is no uncertainty. There is no "Yes and no," no "It may be," or "It may not be." The truth set forth in Him, and by Him, does not change. In Him all was "Yes" — sure and certain.
Another writer draws out why a lesser message could be uncertain but this one cannot.
And He whom Paul's testimony set forth among them was not yes and no. Doubt and uncertainty may attach to a lesser name or an imperfect message. But the preaching of the Son of God is the declaration of positive and final Truth. In Him is "yes." He is the Word made flesh, attested by the Spirit as the Doer of the Father's will. He is the living and lasting affirmation of the finished love of God.
Man is fickle with God. Christ was not.
Man is fickle. With him it is often yes on one occasion and no the next. Moreover man is contradictory when it is a question of God and His will. Again and again he breaks down, and so cancels all that God desires for him. His reply to God's will is always "No." In Christ we find the opposite, for "in Him was yes." He said "Yes" to every purpose and desire of God.
A preacher's life should match his preaching. One writer finds that link beautiful in Paul.
It is beautiful to see how he insists that his life took character from his preaching, even in such details as he is speaking of. He himself, with Silas and Timothy, had preached the Son of God among them. Was He preached as One in whom there was yes and no, the author of a merely conditional and uncertain blessing? Certainly not. All in Him was certainty.
The same standard holds for preaching in any age.
Having such a theme, Paul's preaching was marked by a rock-like definiteness and certainty. The same definiteness and certainty should mark all preaching of the Word today. Preachers who follow the latest opinions can, by their very position, only preach ideas. Those ideas rest on the newest pronouncements of speculative science, which are for ever changing. Their word is emphatically "yes and no." Strongly affirmed today, their statements will be denied before many years have passed.
- Accusation — Some called Paul fickle for cancelling a visit. He answers by turning to Christ, and one mention opens a whole range of truth.
- Person — He preached "the Son of God, Jesus Christ." The glory of that Person guarantees the message.
- Certainty — In Him there is no "It may be" or "It may not be." A lesser name might carry doubt; this preaching is positive and final truth.
- Yes — Man's answer to God's will is "No." Christ said "Yes" to every purpose and desire of God.
- Consistency — Paul's life took its character from his preaching. Preaching that rests on an unchanging Christ should be just as rock-like today.
For whatever promises of God [there are], in him is the yea, and in him the amen, for glory to God by us.
Paul answers the charge that his preaching wavered. He does it by pointing away from himself to Christ. However many God's promises are, they all hold firm in Him.
Human teachers hedge and qualify. Paul did not, and the reason lies in the Person he preached.
He states plainly that his preaching, and that of his companions, had none of the wavering or conflict common to the schools of human opinion. The reason is that all truth finds its proof in Christ's Person. It has become yes in Him... Here all is sure, unclouded and settled. The gospel, as Paul preached it, allows no doubtful answer, and no double dealing. That is because it is revealed in the Second man. He has set aside the first man, with his darkness and doubt, as well as his guilt and corruption.
Behind that lies a deeper contrast: man against Christ.
Man is fickle. With him it is often yes one time and no the next. What is more, man is contradictory when it is a question of God and His will. Again and again he breaks down, and so cancels all that God desires for him. His reply to God's will is always "No." Christ is the opposite, for "in Him was yes." He said "Yes" to every purpose and desire of God.
God had spoken to Abraham and to Israel, but He did not leave the promises in human hands. He placed them in Christ.
God had made promises, whether to Abraham unconditionally, or to Israel at Sinai on the condition of obedience. But in Christ there were not promises, but the Amen to God's promises, their truth and realisation. Whatever promises there had been on God's part, the Yes was in Him, and the Amen in Him. God has established — deposited, so to speak — the fulfilment of all His promises in the Person of Christ. Life, glory, righteousness, pardon, the gift of the Spirit, all is in Him; it is in Him that all is Yes and Amen. We cannot have the effect of any promise whatsoever outside of Him.
That is why the promises have a single centre rather than many recipients.
So that, God acting in the way of promise, all the promises find their centre in Christ. "Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, 'And to offsprings,' referring to many, but referring to one, 'And to your offspring,' who is Christ" (Galatians 3:16)... So Christ is the Heir, the Seed, to whom the promise was made.
The verse uses two words. Commentators read them as two distinct things: agreement, then completion.
Not only was the Yes found in Him, but the Amen also. He does not only agree to all the will of God expressed in His promises. He goes on to carry it all out, and bring it all to full and final completion. In Him the thing is done, and shall be done, until a great Amen can be put to all God's pleasure, so that God is glorified... What glorious stability and security is here!
Some read the two words as facing in two directions. Kelly quotes Bengel: "Yes with respect to God who promises, Amen with respect to those who believe" (William Kelly).
The verse does not stop with Christ. It ends with a people, and one writer ties that ending to the gift of the Spirit.
Note the power and blessing of these two little words, "by us." Could anyone say this of us unless we had the Holy Spirit, giving us the blessed knowledge and awareness of our place? He has planted us in Christ. He has anointed us. He has sealed us for the day of redemption, and given the guarantee of it in our hearts.
Others draw out the worship side of that phrase: the Amen comes back from those who have heard.
He is Himself the end and chief object of all promise. In His glory as Mediator He has become the channel of supply to all who receive the grace of God in truth. He is also the means of their answering praise. These promises are made certain in the Person of the Son and declared to the faith of God's chosen ones. To them the church now sets the seal of her Amen. In worship she says back, to the glory of God the Father, what the lips of Jesus have first spoken to her heart.
This is not only doctrine. It steadies believers when everything around them looks uncertain.
Christ tells it out in our hearts that in Him is the Yes and Amen to all the promises. That thought gives immense strength in a cloudy day like the present, when the world clouds and troubles us on every side. But turn to Him, and all in Him is "Yes and Amen." He makes good all the promises.
- Man's No. Man is fickle and contradictory. He breaks down again and again, and his answer to God's will is "No."
- Christ's Yes. The Son says Yes to every purpose of God, and the gospel about Him allows no doubtful answer.
- Christ's Amen. He does not only agree. He carries every promise through to completion, until a great Amen can be put to all God's pleasure.
- Nothing outside Him. God has deposited life, glory, righteousness, pardon and the Spirit in His Person. No promise reaches us apart from Him.
- Glory by us. God seals and anoints believers. So His glory comes "by us," and the Amen comes back to Him in worship.