And its thickness was a hand-breadth, and its brim like the work of the brim of a cup, with lily-blossoms; in capacity it held three thousand baths.
This verse gives three details about Solomon's great bronze basin: the thickness of its wall, the lily shape of its rim, and the water it could hold. Each detail matters, because the priests washed at this sea before they served.
One writer turns the figures of this verse into sizes we can picture.
Leslie M. GrantThe Sea answers to the laver of the tabernacle, but again, how much higher! It was 10 cubits in diameter (about 15 feet) and its height 5 cubits (7½ feet). … The priests washed in the Sea, symbolizing moral cleansing necessary for carrying out their service. The sea contained 3000 baths of water, which amounts to over 12,600 gallons. Being a hand-breadth thick (about 4 inches), its weight must have been great.
One writer hears in that scale an echo of a psalm about God as the source of life.
The TempleThe larger reservoir, the Bronze Sea, suggests the idea of a greater fulness and more abundant supply…
The Bronze Sea made by Hiram for Solomon, standing by the Temple of God, reminds us of the words of the Psalmist, "With you is the fountain of life."
Compare this verse with 1 Kings 7:26 and the numbers differ. Commentators explain the gap as the difference between full capacity and normal contents.
Morrish Bible Dictionary1 Kings 7:26 states that it "contained 2000 baths." This probably means the amount of water usually put into it. 2 Chronicles 4:5 says "it received and held 3000 baths," which may signify its full capacity. The dimensions of the basin do not seem to agree with this capacity. But its exact shape is not given. It may have bulged out a good deal in the middle.
The wording quoted here follows an older translation; the ESV reads simply "It held 3,000 baths."
The huge figure pictures how much God has provided for cleansing His people. One writer follows that thought into a later scene in Revelation.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe molten sea is typical of that cleansing which His people need and which is so graciously provided by the Lord Himself. The immense quantity of water contained in the molten sea suggests the unlimited provision grace has made. In Revelation 4:6, we read that before the throne was a sea of glass like crystal. This sea of glass is an allusion to the molten sea in Solomon's temple. But it is not a sea of water, but of glass like crystal, because the redeemed in glory no longer need cleansing. They have entered upon a perfect and fixed state of holiness.
The one ornament in this verse is the lily-shaped rim. One writer links it to the Song of Songs, where the lily pictures the one the King loves.
C. StanleyDo you notice the brim of the molten sea? What are those flowers? Flowers of lilies. It is said in the Song of Songs, "As a lily among brambles, so is my love among the young women." And again, "He grazes among the lilies." Does not all this say, "I must wash your feet, according to what you are in my sight; what I have made you."
Another writer ties the lily to Israel's future and to the character it pictures.
W. W. FeredayThe brim of the molten sea had flowers of lilies worked into it. This carries our minds into the Song of Songs, where we have the various fruits of grace that will be displayed in Israel after their reconciliation. In that book the King repeatedly likens His people to lilies. A beautiful comparison, certainly. It tells of purity and lowliness, two features always delightful to the eye of the Lord.
One writer sets the sea beside the altar, and draws out what the difference means when a believer fails.
C. H. MackintoshAt the altar I see bronze together with blood; at the sea I find bronze together with water. Both point to Christ. The blood that makes expiation and the water that cleanses both flow from a crucified Savior…
But the bronze sea contained water, not blood. Those who came to it had already proved the power of the blood and therefore only needed the washing of water…
A priest under the law, whose hands and feet had become defiled, did not need to go back to the bronze altar, but forward to the bronze sea… So now, if a believer fails, if he commits sin, if he contracts defilement, he does not need to be washed again in the blood as at the first, but simply needs the cleansing action of the Word…
Does this make little of defilement? The very opposite! Did the provision of a sea, with its 3000 baths of water, make little of priestly defilement? Did it not rather prove how much was made of it?
- Scale. The temple sea dwarfed the tabernacle laver. Its greater size speaks of greater fulness and more abundant supply.
- Capacity. The 3,000 baths here is the sea's full capacity. The 2,000 of 1 Kings is the amount usually kept in it.
- Supply. That immense quantity pictures the unlimited provision grace has made for cleansing God's people.
- Character. The lily rim recalls the Song of Songs: purity and lowliness. He washes His people according to what He has made them in His sight.
- Use. The sea held water, not blood. One already cleansed goes forward to wash, not back to the altar. And a sea that size shows how much God makes of defilement.
And he made ten lavers, and put five on the right and five on the left, to wash in them they rinsed in them what they prepared for the burnt-offering; and the sea was for the priests to wash in.
Solomon's temple courtyard held water in two kinds of vessel: ten basins and one great bronze "sea." The basins rinsed the sacrifice, the sea washed the priests — and commentators find two lessons in that difference.
One writer notes that the animal had no impurity of its own to remove. Its washing showed something else:
H. L. RossierThe bronze sea served to cleanse the priests. The ten basins — five on the right of the court and five on the left — served to "rinse off what was used for the burnt offering." In Leviticus 1:9 we see that the priest washed the inner parts and the legs of the victim with water. This type must correspond to a future reality — to the offering of Christ to God in perfect purity. He who offered Himself as a pleasing aroma was holiness itself. He had no need to be washed. But the type had to be washed, to show the perfection of the offering of Christ.
Another writer takes the inner parts and the legs as a picture of a life pure both inside and out:
The TempleThe inner parts and legs of the burnt offerings were washed. So they became a picture of Him whose inward thoughts, feelings, purposes, and desires were always pure and holy. His walk and ways were blameless and undefiled, and He "offered Himself without blemish to God."
There were ten basins but only one sea. Every priest came to the same water. One writer draws from that a single source of cleansing for God's people — and from the ten basins, the absolute purity of Christ:
H. L. RossierThe "molten sea" washed the priests. They all had access to this one way of being cleansed from the defilement of their walk. Christ, made sin, is the source of cleansing for His own; His Word is the means. Ten basins were needed to wash the victims; these were, we do not doubt, symbolic of the absolute purity of Christ.
The priests did not wash once and finish. They came back day after day, and one writer applies that washing to believers who serve God now:
C. H. Mackintosh"The sea was for the priests to wash in." The priests came day after day to wash their hands and feet. That kept them always fit for their priestly work. This is a striking type of God's spiritual priests — of all true believers whose works and ways need to be cleansed by the action of the Word. Both the bronze basin in the tabernacle and the bronze sea in the temple pointed forward to that "washing of water with the word." Christ is carrying it on now by the power of the Holy Spirit.
The sea held water, not blood. A defiled priest did not repeat the sacrifice:
C. H. MackintoshA priest under the law, whose hands and feet had become defiled, did not need to go back to the bronze altar, but forward to the bronze sea. He did not need to apply the blood again to make him a priest. He only had to wash with water, so he could carry out his priestly duties. So now, if a believer fails, if he commits sin, if he picks up defilement, he does not need washing in the blood again as at the first. He simply needs the cleansing action of the Word. Through it the Holy Spirit applies to the soul the remembrance of what Christ has done… "The one who has bathed does not need to wash, except for his feet, but is completely clean."
The same writer adds that this provision never made defilement seem small. A sea holding thousands of gallons of water proved the opposite: how serious a single stain was in God's judgment.
Another writer traces the line forward to a scene where washing has ended:
A. J. PollockThe bronze basin of the wilderness gave place to the molten sea of the temple… At last the church is taken to glory, and the Lord's people are beyond the reach of defilement. Then we have the sea of glass… They no longer wash in the basin. They no longer need foot washing. They are no longer in a defiling scene. They stand on a sea of glass. It stands for a state of fixed and absolute holiness, in a scene where nothing that defiles shall ever enter.
- The offering washed. The basins cleansed the sacrifice. The animal needed no cleansing of its own; the washing displayed the perfection of Christ's offering.
- Inside and outside. The basins rinsed the inner parts and the legs: pure thoughts and desires, blameless walk and ways.
- The priest washed. The sea was the one source every priest came to, day after day, before he could serve.
- Water, not blood. Failure sends the believer forward to the cleansing of the Word, not back to the altar for a fresh sacrifice.
- Washing finished. Water gives way at last to a sea of glass — a fixed holiness where nothing defiling can enter and no one needs washing.