2 Chronicles 14–16

2 Chronicles 14:1 · Darby

And Abijah slept with his fathers, and they buried him in the city of David. And Asa his son reigned in his stead. In his days the land was quiet ten years.

Asa comes to the throne of Judah, and the first thing recorded of his reign is ten years without war. The question the chapter raises is where that quiet came from, and what a king does with a gift like it.

Rest that begins in grace

Before anything else, commentators trace Asa's reign back to God's commitment to David's line.

We come to the account of Asa's happy reign, introduced by the pure grace of God. As 1 Kings 15:4 says, "But for David's sake the LORD his God gave him a lamp in Jerusalem" — and that lamp was Asa. All is blessing for Asa in the first part of his reign — and we shall see the cause for this — but in 2 Chronicles 16 we shall also find the cause of his decline.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

A boy king and a quiet land

The quiet followed a clear-out of idols, and one writer notes how young Asa was when he did it.

He did what was right in the sight of the Lord. He took away the foreign altars, the high places and the images, and cut down the groves. He also commanded Judah to seek the Lord. The land was quiet. The Lord blessed him and the land for the faithful work that had been done. … It was a remarkable work for one so young. Asa was probably not yet twelve years old when he became king.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same writer traces false worship to its root, and sets the alternative beside it.

Man cannot live without religion. If he does not have the religion of the true God, he will invent a false religion to satisfy his conscience and answer his instincts. When man's own will becomes his god, Satan masters him and triumphs. And on the other hand, what rest there is in separation from evil and in the worship of the holy God, the true God! The Word insists on this point here: "In his days the land had rest for ten years."

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

His name matched his reign

Asa's name is itself a comment on these years.

His name, "healing," or "cure," reads like a prophecy of the reform, and the rest that followed it, brought about by him during the earlier part of his reign. He made a most excellent beginning.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The quiet was spent building

Tearing down idols was only half of Asa's work.

He was no mere image-breaker. If he had the zeal to break down the images, he also had the wisdom to build fortified cities. Exposing evil is good, but it is truth in the soul that protects it from the enemy's invasion.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Another writer sets Asa beside David at rest.

How did Asa make use of this rest? He did not act like David, who thought of resting while his own men were in the field. Instead, he used the quiet God granted him to defend himself against the enemy outside.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The same wisdom now

One writer applies these ten years to our own quiet seasons.

Believers today are also wise to use times of peace well. They can store up the Word of God in their hearts as a protection from the attacks of the enemy, which are sure to come in time. So Asa's prosperity urges us to learn to prosper spiritually while we still have the chance.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One writer points to churches that slept through their own years of rest.

It would have been good for the sixteenth-century churches if they had been as wise after the Reformation. In the rest that followed, they could have built and fortified themselves in their defence of "the faith once for all delivered to the saints." But sadly, they slept. When the armies of worldliness, ritualism and rationalism appeared at their borders, they were unprepared and powerless to drive them back.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Where the story ends

The verse opens with Abijah's burial, and one writer sets Asa's whole reign in the line of kings.

Abijah, who came to the throne next and had more faith, struck a severe blow against Jeroboam and Israel. It was the same with Asa in 2 Chronicles 14. Ethiopia's vast armies fell before him, and he was blessed when he listened to Oded the prophet in 2 Chronicles 15. But in 2 Chronicles 16 he relied on Syria against Israel, and God struck him with a lingering death.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not earned. Asa's reign opens in grace, given for David's sake. The ten years of rest are God's blessing on faithful work, not a lucky interval.

- Cleared. The quiet follows the clearing out of false worship; separation from evil is what brings rest to a land or a heart.

- Healing. The king's name means "healing," and his early reign reads like that name worked out in public.

- Built. Asa did not treat the quiet as leisure. He pulled down idols, then built walls: exposing evil is one thing, giving the soul truth is another.

- Kept or lost. Peace is a window, not a guarantee — those who sleep through it are overrun, and Asa himself later leaned on Syria instead of God.

2 Chronicles 14:2 · Darby

And Asa did what was good and right in the sight of Jehovah his God;

Asa came to the throne of Judah after generations of drift into idol worship. His reign opens with a verdict, not a list of achievements: what he did was good and right — but in whose eyes, and could he hold that verdict to the end?

The Standard Is God's Sight

The wording is careful. It does not say Asa did what seemed good to himself. The same phrase is used of a later king, Hezekiah, and one writer shows where the standard sits:

Of Hezekiah we read, "And he did what was right in the eyes of the LORD." Yes, while everything around him was wrong, he did what was right. And note: not in his own sight, not in his own opinion, but in the sight of the Lord. This, then, is the foundation principle of our lesson. God can raise up a man, can enable His child, to do what is right in the sight of the Lord, while everything around is wrong.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Good and Right in Action

The verse does not leave "good and right" vague. What follows shows Asa dealing with the cause of Judah's trouble, not only its effects:

Idolatry was the cause of the trouble and conflicts among the people in Israel. King Asa got right down to the root of the trouble by removing idolatrous altars, images and groves. Then, having removed what was offensive to God, he commanded his people to get right with God, to seek Him, and to do His will.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Asa was not clearing away his own mess. The high places he pulled down had been standing for decades:

His faithfulness involved the constructive work of commanding Judah to seek the Lord and to observe the law. But some destructive work was no less important. He removed the high places and incense altars, which came in during Solomon's time and which Rehoboam and Abijah kept going.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Pulling Down and Building Up

Tearing down what is wrong was only half of Asa's work. One writer notes his name, and what he built next:

His name, "healing," or "cure," reads like a prophecy of the reform he brought about in the earlier part of his reign, and of the rest that followed… But he did not stop there; he did more… He was no mere image-breaker. If he had the zeal to break down the images, he also had the wisdom to build fortified cities. To expose evil is very well, but to supply the soul with truth is what protects it from the invasion of the enemy.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Rest Given, Rest Used

The quiet years that followed were God's gift, and Asa spent them building. One writer applies that to us:

What instruction Asa's attitude gives us! When God gives us rest, it is so that we may concentrate all our activities on preparing ourselves against the attacks of the enemy. The enemy will not be slow to return. Our means of defence and our fortresses are the Word and nothing but the Word. Let us use the time when no storms are battering us. Let us ground ourselves in the Word and draw from it our strength to withstand.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Limits of a Good Verdict

Later chapters say the high places were not taken out of Israel. One writer traces this to a compromise Asa made over cities he had taken:

In one point only he had dealt in a somewhat compromising way with the cities he had acquired in Israel. No doubt he was yielding to some political idea… "But the high places were not taken out of Israel." Cautions like this never have the results the Christian was hoping for.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The verdict of verse 2 did not protect Asa from a later fall. One writer marks where his last years went wrong:

A sad decline in his last days — the king of Judah finds his refuge in the king of Israel instead of in the Lord. For the moment all seems to go well, because God does not judge everything at once… In his old age he became diseased in his feet.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Standard — God's eyes set the measure of "good and right," not a man's own opinion. He can enable a person to live that way while everything around is wrong.

- Root — Asa did not just treat the symptoms of Judah's decay. He removed the altars, images and groves behind it, then told the people to seek God.

- Build — Zeal to tear down evil needs the wisdom to build. Exposing what is false does not by itself supply the soul with truth.

- Rest — The quiet God gave was material for work: fortify while the land is still before you, because the enemy will return.

- Finish — One compromise left standing, and one late turn to a human king instead of the Lord, marked Asa's decline. A strong start is not a guaranteed ending.

2 Chronicles 14:3 · Darby

and he took away the altars of the strange [gods] and the high places, and broke the columns, and cut down the Asherahs;

Asa became king of Judah, and his first recorded act was to tear down places of worship. That raises two questions: what were these altars, high places, pillars and Asherim, and why was destroying them the right thing to do?

What Asa Tore Down

Older translations call the Asherim "groves," but the word does not mean a stand of trees. One dictionary weighs the evidence:

On the whole it seems most probable that they were wooden symbols of a goddess, in the form of images or pillars, or mere stems of trees set into the ground. In 2 Kings 23:7 we read that women wove "hangings" for the groves. But these were literally "houses" or "tents," which implies that they enclosed the groves, probably for immoral purposes, since immorality was almost constantly associated with idolatry. The many references to the idols, images, and groves show how far Israel had departed from the living God and fallen into idolatry.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why The High Places Had To Go

High places were shrines on hilltops. Not all of them belonged to foreign gods, so why did every one of them have to go?

The Israelites were to destroy all the high places of the pagan nations, and so show their hatred of their wicked ways. But human nature is no better in those who are near to God than in those who are far from Him. The time soon came, sadly, when Israel chose high places for themselves. Some of these were for idolatrous worship, and some for the worship of Jehovah. But all the high places were offensive in His sight, whatever the motives of those who set them up. They were the expression of self-will, of hearts not subject to His commandments.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Another writer reads these shrines as a sign of where the people's hearts were:

Keeping up groves and high places in Israel was always the evidence that the people had not properly prepared their hearts to seek the Lord God of Israel. He is the only true God, and He had put His name at Jerusalem.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Striking At The Root

Idolatry did more than offend God. One writer names it as the cause of the fighting among God's own people:

The cause of the trouble and conflicts between the brothers in Israel was the introduction of idolatry. King Asa got right down to the root of the trouble by removing idolatrous altars, images and groves. Having removed what was offensive to God, the king commanded his people to get right with God, to seek Him, and to do His will.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Tearing Down And Building Up

Asa did not stop at tearing down. He also built:

He was no mere image-breaker. If he had the zeal to break down the images, he also had the wisdom to build fortified cities. To expose evil is very good, but it is truth put into the soul that guards it from the enemy's invasion. They redeemed the time, as Ephesians 5:16 tells us to do: "making the best use of the time, because the days are evil." So God was with them.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Why Idols Keep Coming Back

One writer sets Asa's action against what the northern kingdom had done, and explains why false worship always finds its way back:

In Judah, Asa was the first king who, at the beginning of his reign, passed judgment on the high places and broke them down. Jeroboam had done the opposite: he made the high places a religious institution for the ten tribes, and even set up a special priesthood there, against the worship of the Lord at Jerusalem. This is always what follows when men abandon the God who has revealed Himself in His Word. Man cannot live without religion. If he does not have the religion of the true God, he will invent a false religion to satisfy his conscience and answer his instincts. Atheism itself is a religion. It hands man over, bound hand and foot, to superstition — that is to say, to the worship of demons and to anarchy. When man's own will becomes his god, Satan masters him and triumphs.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

That is why the work has to be repeated:

He takes away the strange gods; for we keep finding them again. It takes energy to cast them out and to keep them from returning.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Root. Idolatry was the root of the fighting among God's people. Asa struck there first, not at the symptoms.

- Rival. The Asherim were wooden symbols of a goddess, linked with immoral practice. They showed how far Israel had drifted from the living God.

- Rule. Even shrines meant for worshipping the Lord offended Him. They came from self-will, not from obedience to His commandments.

- Rebuild. Exposing evil is good, but Asa also built and fortified. Truth put into the soul is what keeps the enemy out.

- Return. Idols come back. A heart that refuses the true God invents a false one, so clearing them out takes ongoing energy.

2 Chronicles 14:4 · Darby

and commanded Judah to seek Jehovah the God of their fathers, and to practise the law and the commandment.

Asa's reform in Judah did not stop at tearing down idols. He also charged the whole nation to seek God and obey Him — which raises a hard question: can a command make anyone seek God?

Clearing the Ground First

The order of Asa's actions matters: he removed what stood in the way before he told anyone to seek God.

Idolatry was the cause of the trouble and conflicts between the tribes in Israel. King Asa got right down to the root of the trouble by removing idolatrous altars, images and groves. He first removed what was offensive to God. Then he commanded his people to get right with God, to seek Him, and to do His will.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why the Idols Were There at All

One writer explains why people invent gods when they lose the true one.

Man cannot live without religion. If he does not have the religion of the true God, he will invent a false religion to satisfy his conscience and answer to his instincts. Atheism itself is a religion too. It hands man over, bound hand and foot, to superstition — that is, to the worship of demons and to anarchy. When man's own will becomes his god, Satan masters him and triumphs... And, on the other hand, what rest there is in separation from evil and in the worship of the holy God, the true God!

Modernised from Henri RossierOriginal wording

The same writer notes that Asa was the first king of Judah to break down the high places at the start of his reign, places earlier kings had tolerated and which the northern tribes had turned into a rival institution with its own priesthood.

Seeking the God of Their Fathers

One writer ties this seeking to obedience, and to what it brought the kingdom.

He sought the God of his fathers in obedience to His commandments, in contrast to the ways of the ten tribes (v. 4). So the Lord established the kingdom under him. Judah brought him presents, because they recognized the value of his honorable example... Christians cannot count on material wealth as the fruit of their devotion to the Lord. Yet that devotion will give them true spiritual wealth, which is far better.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Tearing Down and Building Up

The charge to "keep the law and the commandment" shows that tearing down was only half the work. One writer even reads Asa's name as a sign of what was coming.

Asa's name, meaning "healing" or "cure," reads like a prophecy of the reform he carried out, and the rest that followed, in the earlier part of his reign. He made a most excellent start... He was no mere destroyer of idols. If he had the zeal to break down the images, he had also the wisdom to build fortified cities. Exposing evil is very good, but filling the soul with truth is what protects it from the enemy's attack... So God was with them. The king's words and example encouraged the people, and they threw themselves gladly into the blessed work of building and fortifying.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

What a Command Can and Cannot Reach

Commentators differ over the word "commanded." One treats it as the king pointing his people back to God. Another asks whether a command can reach that deep.

How obvious the spread of idolatry, how much it had grown, that it took a law to put it down! ... Did you ever know idolatry, or any sin, put away by commandment? It may hide its head. Idolaters may appear to throw their idols away to the moles and the bats, but it still exists, and repressive laws only strengthen it. Its seat is in the heart and the idol is only the outward symbol, the visible index of the heart's enmity against God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same tension appears when a later king faced a similar moment and took a different route.

There was beautiful harmony between king and people. All was done willingly by every one. It was not as with [Asa], who "commanded Judah to seek the Lord God of their fathers" (2 Chron. 14:4). Instead of commanding, the king consults with the people here.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Clear. Asa dealt with the root, not the symptom. The altars, high places, images and groves came down before he called anyone to seek God.

- Seek. A person who does not worship the true God will invent a substitute. The heart will not stay empty.

- Obey. Seeking is not a mood. Asa sought the God of his fathers in obedience to His commandments, and that marked him off from the ten tribes.

- Build. Zeal to break down images is not enough. Filling the soul with truth keeps the enemy out, so Asa built as well as tore down.

- Rest. Separation from evil and the worship of the holy God bring real rest. But a command cannot reach that far. Sin's seat is in the heart, so a law may only drive the idol out of sight.

2 Chronicles 14:5 · Darby

And he removed out of all the cities of Judah the high places and the sun-images; and the kingdom was quiet before him.

Asa became king of Judah and began by pulling down the shrines earlier kings had left standing — and the result was a kingdom at rest. Two questions follow: why were the high places offensive even when people worshipped the true God there, and why does a later chapter say they were not removed?

What the High Places Were

Asa also removed the incense altars, which older translations call "sun-images." The shrines he cleared away were not all idol shrines. At some of them people worshipped the God of Israel — and that is where the offence lay.

The Word alone must govern God's people in all matters relating to worship, as indeed in everything else. God would choose His own centre of worship, and there His people must come with their burnt offerings and sacrifices... But all the high places were offensive in His sight, whatever the motives of those who set them up. They were the expression of self-will, of hearts not subject to His commandments.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why They Kept Coming Back

Asa broke down what his predecessors had tolerated. One writer explains why people build such shrines, then points to the word this chapter keeps repeating. He quotes an older translation, which says "quiet" where the ESV says "rest."

In Judah he was the first king who, at the beginning of his reign, passed judgment on the high places and broke them down... Man cannot live without religion. If he does not have the religion of the true God, he will invent a false religion to satisfy his conscience and answer to his instincts... And on the other hand, what rest there is in separation from evil and in the worship of the holy God, the true God! The Word insists on this point here: "In his days the land was quiet ten years" (v. 1). "The kingdom was quiet before him" (v. 5). "The land had rest... the Lord had given him rest" (v. 6). "The Lord... has given us rest on every side" (v. 7).

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Tearing Down and Building Up

The quiet was not an end in itself. Asa's name and his next move point the same way. Breaking things down was only half his work.

His name means "healing," or "cure." It reads like a prophecy of the reformation he carried out in the earlier part of his reign, and of the rest that followed. He was no mere image-breaker. If he had the zeal to break down the images, he also had the wisdom to build fortified cities. To expose evil is very well, but to furnish the soul with truth is what protects it from the invasion of the enemy.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Another writer applies this to our own quiet times, and names our only real fortress.

When God gives us rest, it is so that we may put all our activity into arming ourselves against the attacks of the enemy. The enemy will not be slow to return. Our means of defence and our fortresses are the Word and nothing but the Word.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Apparent Contradiction

This verse says Asa took the high places out of all the cities of Judah. A later verse says they were not taken away. The commentators handle this in two ways. One points to how old evils keep coming back:

He takes away the strange gods; for we continually find them again. It takes energy to cast them out and keep them from returning.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another locates the problem in the people rather than in the king:

So it had been with Asa, too. In 2 Chronicles 14:5 we have seen that he "removed out of all the cities of Judah the high places and the sun-images." Then, in 2 Chronicles 15:17, we read that "the high places were not removed from Israel."... All this is easy to explain. Let us remember that God never contradicts Himself. Under the reign of these kings, purification had been only partial and temporary. Evil sprang up again everywhere, because nothing had ever reached the conscience of the people.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Why Chronicles Tells the Bright Side

The two books are not telling the same story with different facts. They have different aims.

This book emphasises grace as the only means of maintaining the royal line. At a time of complete decline in the kingdom, it always highlights the good that grace has produced, even if it lasted only a moment. It shows that grace covers a multitude of sins. It is different when the subject is responsibility, as in the book of Kings. There God reveals the evil in its full extent and shows us why judgment was necessary.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Self-will. God chose His own centre of worship. A high place was offensive whatever the motive, because it expressed a heart not subject to His commandments.

- Substitute. A person cannot live without religion. Drop the true God, and you will invent a false one to quiet your conscience.

- Rest. Separation from evil and the worship of the true God brought the quiet this chapter names four times.

- Rebuild. Asa broke down the images and then built walls. Exposing evil is good, but only truth put into the soul keeps the enemy out.

- Relapse. The clean-up was partial and temporary, because it never reached the people's conscience. Chronicles still records the good, because grace covers a multitude of sins.

2 Chronicles 14:6 · Darby

And he built fortified cities in Judah, for the land had rest, and he had no war in those years; because Jehovah had given him rest.

Asa became king of Judah after years of war between the two halves of a divided nation. The first thing recorded of his reign is quiet, and this verse traces that quiet to God — which raises the question: what is peace for?

Rest as a Gift, Not an Achievement

The verse does not say the land had rest because Asa was a strong king. It traces the calm to God. One writer links the blessing to the reforms Asa had just carried out.

He did what was right in the sight of the Lord. He took away the strange altars, the high places and the images, and cut down the groves. He was not satisfied with this work, but he also commanded Judah to seek the Lord. The land was quiet. The Lord blessed him and the land for the faithful work he had done.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Where the ESV says the LORD "gave him peace," older translations read "had given him rest" — the wording these writers use. One writer traces the gift back further still, behind Asa himself:

We come to the account of Asa's happy reign, introduced by the pure grace of God, as 1 Kings 15:4 says: "For David's sake the LORD his God gave him a lamp in Jerusalem" in the person of Asa.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Quiet Follows the Clearing Out of Idols

Asa's reign shows that peace and purity travel together. When people abandon God, this writer argues, something always fills the empty space:

Man cannot live without religion: if he does not have the religion of the true God, he will invent a false religion to satisfy his conscience and answer to his instincts... When man's own will becomes his god, Satan masters him and triumphs. What trouble takes hold of the fool who has said in his heart, "There is no God!" What agitation, what despair, what deadly sorrow! And, on the other hand, what rest there is in separation from evil and in the worship of the holy God, the true God!

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Pulling Down Is Only Half the Work

Asa had already smashed the images and cut down the groves. Now he builds. The two belong together:

He was no mere destroyer of idols. If he had the zeal to break down the images, he also had the wisdom to build fortified cities. To expose evil is very well, but to furnish the soul with truth is what protects it from the invasion of the enemy.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

What Peacetime Is For

Asa spent the quiet years building. One writer draws out what that means for us:

When God gives us rest, it is so that we may concentrate all our activities on arming ourselves against the attacks of the enemy. The enemy will not be slow to return. Our means of defence and our fortresses are the Word and nothing but the Word. Let us use the time when we are not battered by storms to ground ourselves in the Word and draw from it our strength to withstand.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

One writer turns the lesson into a warning, drawn from a season of rest that was wasted:

How well it would have been for the churches of the sixteenth century if they had been as wise after the Reformation. During the rest that followed they could have built and fortified themselves in their position of defence of "the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints." But sadly, they slept. When the armies of worldliness, ritualism and rationalism appeared at their borders, they were unprepared and powerless to drive them back. They were not, like Judah, ready and able to resist the enemy when he came.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

When the Enemy Arrived

The quiet years were not an end in themselves. The years of building had taught Asa where his real strength lay:

During the ten quiet years the king had learned to rely on God, and to prepare for the coming of the enemy. Asa's five hundred and eighty thousand men seemed a powerful force made up of "mighty men of valor." But the advancing army of Zerah the Ethiopian seemed much stronger, for he had a million men and three hundred chariots. King Asa went to meet this great army, but he was not relying on his forces; he cried out to the LORD his God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Sought — Asa cleared out the idols and told his people to seek the LORD. The writers tie the quiet of his reign to that faithfulness, and behind it to God's grace to David's line.

- Given — The rest came from God, not from Asa's strength. The LORD gave him peace.

- Built — Asa did not only tear evil down; he built. Exposing evil is good, but it is truth in the soul that keeps the enemy out.

- Guarded — God gives rest so His people can ground themselves in the Word, the only real fortress.

- Tested — A wasted rest leaves a people powerless when the enemy comes. A rest used well taught Asa to lean on God when a million men marched against him.

2 Chronicles 14:7 · Darby

And he said to Judah, Let us build these cities, and surround them with walls and towers, gates and bars, while the land is yet before us; for we have sought Jehovah our God; we have sought him, and he has given us rest on every side. And they built and prospered.

Asa's words to Judah tie three things together. There is a cause: they had sought the LORD their God. There is a gift: God gave them peace on every side, which older translations call rest. And there is a task to do while that gift lasts. It raises a practical question: what is a quiet season for?

Rest Traced Back to Its Source

The building work is not shown as the win of a capable king. Asa and the people name the reason for their security before they name their plans. One writer notes how plainly they credited God:

Notice the great prosperity which followed the work he had done. "The kingdom was quiet before him." He built and fortified cities. They acknowledged that it was all of God.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

That seeking had already shown itself in action. Asa's reign pulled down high places and incense altars, and called the nation to seek God:

His faithfulness showed in constructive work. He commanded Judah to seek the Lord and to keep the law. But the destructive work mattered just as much. He removed the high places and incense altars that Solomon's reign had introduced and that Rehoboam and Abijah had kept.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Quiet Years Spent on Walls

Asa did not treat peace as permission to relax. He read it as an opportunity, and one commentator sets his choice against the alternative:

How did Asa make use of this rest? He did not act like David, who thought about resting while his own men were in the field. Instead, he used the quiet that God granted him to defend himself against the enemy outside.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer turns this into a rule for God's people, and names what our own walls and towers are:

What instruction Asa's attitude gives us! When God gives us rest, it is so that we can put all our energy into arming ourselves against the enemy's attacks. He will not be slow to return. Our means of defence and our fortresses are the Word and nothing but the Word. Let us use the time when no storms are beating on us to ground ourselves in the Word and draw from it our strength to stand.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Tearing Down Is Not Enough

Asa's reforms had two halves. Breaking idols clears the ground; walls and towers put something in its place:

He did more than smash idols. If he had the zeal to break down the images, he also had the wisdom to build fortified cities. Exposing evil is good, but it is truth filling the soul that keeps the enemy out. They made the best use of the time, as Ephesians 5:16 tells us to do: "making the best use of the time, because the days are evil." So God was with them.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Defence, though, was not the whole of Asa's preparation, and the pattern carries over:

The work was not only building cities to defend God's people. It was also preparing God's army, a host the Lord could use against His enemies. We are not only builders in God's service. We are also part of the Lord's army, contending "for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3). That means we must stand against the enemies of God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

While the Land Is Still Ours

Asa's phrase carries a limit inside it — the land is theirs now. One writer points to the Reformation, the movement that reshaped the churches of Europe, as a season of rest that went to waste:

The churches of the Reformation had a quiet spell afterwards. It would have been well for them if they had been as wise and used it to build and fortify their position, defending "the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints." But they slept. So when worldliness, empty ritual and human reasoning arrived at their borders, they had no power to drive them back. Unlike Judah, they were not ready or able to resist the enemy when he came.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Asa himself later failed to hold the ground he had gained. When Baasha, a rival king, moved against him, he forgot how God had already given him victory over an earlier invader, Zerah:

Asa forgot his experience with Zerah and how God had won that victory (see his beautiful prayer, 2 Chronicles 14:11). He forgot that the Lord who struck down Zerah could also strike down Baasha. So he feared the rival king.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Sought — Asa and Judah did not take credit for their quiet years. They traced their peace straight back to God.

- Given — the rest came as a gift with a purpose. Spend it arming yourself, because the enemy will return.

- Built — pulling down what is false is only half the work. Truth has to fill the space, and the Word is the only real fortress.

- Armed — walls were not Asa's whole preparation. Beside the builder stands the soldier, contending for the faith.

- Kept? — the land was theirs only for a while. The churches after the Reformation slept through their rest, and the enemy overran them. Asa himself later forgot who had won his victory.

2 Chronicles 14:8 · Darby

And Asa had an army that bore targets and spears out of Judah three hundred thousand; and out of Benjamin, that bore shields and drew the bow, two hundred and eighty thousand all these, mighty men of valour.

Ten quiet years gave Asa time, and this verse shows how he used them: over half a million trained men from Judah and Benjamin, each tribe with its own weapons. So why did he need an army at all, if his strength lay outside himself?

Peace Spent Building

Asa's reign began with a clearing out of idolatry, and the quiet that followed was not spent idle. One writer notes that tearing down and building up belong together:

He was no mere destroyer of idols. If he had the zeal to break down the images, he also had the wisdom to build fortified cities. To expose evil is very good, but furnishing the soul with truth is what protects it from the invasion of the enemy. They redeemed the time, as we are told to do in Ephesians 5:16, "Making the best use of the time, because the days are evil." So God was with them.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Walls Are Not Enough

Verse 8 moves from stone to men. Fortresses keep the enemy out, but an army must go out to meet him, and that requires weapons in both hands:

When God gives us rest, it is so that we may put all our activity into arming ourselves ahead of time against the attacks of the enemy. He will not be slow to return. Our means of defence and our fortresses are the Word and nothing but the Word… However, the fortified cities are not enough, even though the enemy may not enter them. Asa has an army trained for war… To avoid defeat in battle we must carry weapons in the right hand and in the left. Above all we must know how to use the two-edged sword, which is the Word of God. Only in this way can we, after having overcome everything, stand firm when conflict comes.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Weapons Named

Older translations call Judah's large shield a "target." A reference work gives the word's plain sense, with the other places it appears:

A shield. 1 Kings 10:16; 2 Chronicles 9:15; 2 Chronicles 14:8.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Judah carried shield and spear; Benjamin carried shield and bow. Each tribe held cover in one hand and a weapon in the other. One writer finds the same order in the Christian's armour:

We have not got the sword yet; the defensive armour comes before the offensive. In that state (having a good conscience, and the spirit of grace and peace) I now come to the shield from Satan. I am to look up to God with entire confidence; this is the shield of faith. Then comes the helmet of salvation. I can hold my head up; and… I take the sword. The sword of the Spirit is God's word.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Numbers That Still Fell Short

The count in this verse reads impressive until the next verse arrives. Asa's careful preparation still left him outnumbered:

Asa also gathered an army of 300,000 from Judah and 280,000 from Benjamin, all capable warriors (v. 8). However, after ten years of his reigning the king of Ethiopia came to attack him with an army of one million men and 300 chariots (v. 9). So he had 420,000 more men than Asa had. But Asa was not discouraged.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Armed and Still Dependent

Having the army did not make Asa lean on it. One writer sees his faith rising to its height here:

Asa's faith rises to blessed heights on this occasion. He himself commands a fine army of over half a million "mighty men of valour." Even so, he takes the place of complete dependence on God. He makes the conflict a matter between God and the enemy. Such faith can never be disappointed.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Where did that confidence come from? One writer points to what Asa learned in God's presence, then to what he saw daily at the temple, and finally to the cross:

Asa is a man of faith. In God's presence he has learned that he can have no confidence in the flesh. But he has also learned that there is strength outside himself, which he may always turn to. His daily contact with the temple of God at Jerusalem taught him this. At the entrance of the sanctuary, before his eyes, stood the pillar of Boaz. Its name means: "In Him is strength!"… This whole passage is the lesson of our strength. The most powerful enemy has no strength against God, and only faith is needed to prove it. Satan himself had to admit this when his hatred attacked Christ. At the cross, where he thought he was at last rid of Him, he met God's power in the weakness of God.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Rest — God gave the ten quiet years for a purpose. He gives rest so that we arm ourselves before the enemy returns, as he surely will.

- Build — Asa did not stop at pulling idols down. Exposing evil is good, but it is truth in the soul that keeps the enemy out.

- Arm — Walls alone are not enough. Judah carried shield and spear, Benjamin shield and bow. Cover comes first, then the sword, which is the Word of God.

- Count — All that strength still left him 420,000 men short. The shortfall did not discourage him.

- Rely — With half a million men under him, Asa still took the place of total dependence. He made the battle God's own quarrel. The pillar at the temple door said it: in Him is strength. The strongest enemy has no strength against God, and Satan learned that at the cross.

2 Chronicles 14:9 · Darby

And Zerah the Ethiopian came out against him with a host of a thousand thousand, and three hundred chariots, and he came to Mareshah.

Asa has had ten quiet years of building and reform. Then an invading army almost twice the size of his own marches as far as Mareshah. Two questions follow: who was Zerah, and why did such an attack fall on a king who had just done right?

Who Zerah Was

The invader's identity is not settled. Scripture names his nation and his numbers, but gives him no royal title:

The next person mentioned is ZERAH the Ethiopian, who brought an army of 1,000,000 and 300 chariots against Asa the king of Judah. Asa called to the Lord for help in true devotion, and said that his rest was on Him. God answered his faith. The Egyptian armies were defeated, and Judah took "very much spoil." Notice that Scripture does not say that Zerah was a Pharaoh. He is thought to have been the general of Osorkon II, the fourth king of the twenty-second dynasty.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

An Unprovoked Invasion

An earlier Egyptian invasion, under Shishak, had come as discipline on Judah for sin. This one is different in kind, and one writer draws out what that difference meant for the outcome:

It was one thing for Shishak to invade the land of Judah because they had sinned against the Lord (2 Chron. 12:2), and quite a different matter when Zerah came against them unprovoked, at his own expense, as it were. God, who loves and defends His people, gave him the punishment he deserved. So he was defeated, and his immense army of more than a million men was wiped out.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The Test of Asa's Faith

Judah's quiet years ended in a test:

But faith had to be tested. A powerful army under the leadership of Zerah, an Ethiopian, came against Judah. The battle was to take place in the open field, in the valley of Zephathah. Before the forces ever clashed Asa cried to the Lord.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Arithmetic of the Threat

Commentators differ on Zerah's rank, but not on the numbers:

Asa also gathered an army of 300,000 from Judah and 280,000 from Benjamin, all capable warriors. But after he had reigned ten years, the king of Ethiopia came to attack him with an army of one million men and 300 chariots. So he had 420,000 more men than Asa had. But Asa was not discouraged.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where His Confidence Came From

Asa's father Abijah had leaned on the rightness of his religion. Asa's confidence came from somewhere else:

What, then, is the source of his confidence? His being right? His religion, giving him the assurance, as it gave his father Abijah, that God must be with him? That is not where Asa's secret lies. Asa is a man of faith. In God's presence he has learned that he can have no confidence in the flesh. He has also learned that there is strength outside himself, and he can always turn to it. He knew this from his daily contact with the temple of God at Jerusalem. At the entrance of the sanctuary, right before his eyes, stood the column of Boaz, which means: "In Him is strength!"

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

God's Quarrel, Not Asa's

Asa had a large army, and still did not lean on it:

Asa's faith rises to blessed heights on this occasion. He himself commands a fine army of over half a million "mighty men of valour." Even so, he takes the place of complete dependence on God. He makes the conflict a matter between God and the enemy. God never disappoints such faith.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Victory and Its Spoil

Judah's strength did not win this battle, and Judah's gain did not stop at survival:

The Ethiopians flee and cannot recover. This was because Israel was not Asa's army but God's army: they were crushed before the Lord and before His army. Asa's victory meant more than the defeat of the enemy. It also meant the real conquest of cities, spoil, flocks, and riches. So for us, every victory over the Enemy that rests on self-judgment brings new and precious gains. They come out of the treasure of Christ's riches, which no one can measure.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Lesson Asa Later Forgot

Asa's faith did not hold to the end:

It is difficult to account for this sudden defect in Asa's faith. Not long before, with God's help, he had destroyed the immense army of Zerah the Ethiopian. Now he faces an enemy not half as dangerous. His faith fails, and he looks for rescue to human strength.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Rest — ten peaceful years came first. Then the attack came, and faith had to be tested in the open field.

- Reckoning — Zerah's army outnumbered Asa's by 420,000 men. Asa was not discouraged.

- Reliance — his confidence was not in being right, nor in his religion. It rested on strength outside himself, learned in God's presence.

- Rout — he made the fight a matter between God and the enemy. The Ethiopians fell before the Lord, and Judah gained cities, spoil and riches.

- Remember — Asa later forgot this. The king who trusted God against a million leaned on human help against a far smaller enemy.

2 Chronicles 14:10 · Darby

And Asa went out against him, and they set the battle in array in the valley of Zephathah near Mareshah.

Asa had used a long season of rest to fortify his cities and train an army. Now a huge invading force stood at Mareshah, and the question was what all that preparation was worth.

Rest Given for Preparation

The quiet years were not wasted. One writer turns them into a lesson about what rest is for.

What instruction Asa's attitude gives us! God gives us rest for a reason. We are to put all our effort into arming ourselves against the enemy's attacks. The enemy will not be slow to return. Our means of defence and our fortresses are the Word and nothing but the Word. Let us use the calm times, when no storms beat on us, to ground ourselves in the Word. From it we draw our strength to stand. However, the fortified cities — which the enemy is shut out of — are not enough; Asa also had an army trained for war.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Ground of the Battle

Asa met the invader on Judah's own ground, not on foreign soil.

Fortified city in the lowlands of Judah. Joshua 15:44; 2 Chr. 11:8; 2 Chr. 14:9-10; 2 Chr. 20:37; Micah 1:15.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

This invasion was different from an earlier one. Shishak had come against Judah while the people were in sin.

It was one thing for Shishak to invade the land of Judah because the people had been unfaithful to the Lord (2 Chron. 12:2). It was quite another matter when Zerah came against them unprovoked, at his own expense, as it were. He received his just punishment from God, who loves and defends His people.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Going Out, Not Waiting

Asa's move forward was not bravado. One writer contrasts him with his father Abijah, who leaned on the rightness of his cause.

Abijah relied on the merits of his religion to win the battle. Asa does not. He first sits down and works out whether he, with ten thousand men, can withstand the one coming against him with twenty thousand. The result of his reckoning leaves him in no doubt; he goes out against the enemy. What, then, is the source of his confidence? Being in the right? His religion, giving him the assurance, as it gave his father Abijah, that God must be with him? That is not where Asa's secret lies. Asa is a man of faith. In God's presence he has learned that he can have no confidence in the flesh. He has also learned that there is strength outside himself, which he may always turn to. He came to know this through his daily connection with the temple of God at Jerusalem. At the entrance of the sanctuary, before his eyes, stood the pillar called Boaz, which means: "In Him is strength!"

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Armed and Still Dependent

Asa was not a weak king without options. What he did with his strength is the striking part.

Asa's faith rises to blessed heights on this occasion. Though he himself commanded a fine army of over half a million "mighty men of valour," he takes the place of complete dependence on God. He makes the conflict a matter between God and the enemy. Such faith can never be disappointed.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Whose Army Lined Up That Day

Why did God want His people drawn up in that valley at all?

The Lord could have struck the Ethiopians down without His people lifting a finger against them. But He graciously allowed them a part in the conflict. So when the enemy fled before the Lord, they fled before His host too. What is more, the Lord allowed His host to plunder the enemy, to be more than conquerors.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Later Asa forgot this field. He hired Syria to help him instead, and God sent a prophet to remind him.

He reminded Asa that the army of the Ethiopians and Lubims had been huge, far greater than Israel's, with many chariots and horsemen. Yet because Asa had relied on the Lord then, God gave him a decisive victory.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Rest — God gave the quiet years so Asa could build walls and train soldiers. Rest is time for arming, because the attack will come.

- Reckoning — Asa weighed the odds, found them against him, and still went out. His confidence rested on strength outside himself, not on being in the right.

- Reliance — He drew up a huge army, then leaned wholly on God. He made the fight God's quarrel, not his own.

- Reach — God routed the invader through the ranks drawn up in the valley. He let His people share the fight and carry off the plunder.

- Remembering — This valley was meant to be Asa's lifelong reason to trust God. He forgot it later, and it cost him.

2 Chronicles 14:11 · Darby

And Asa cried unto Jehovah his God, and said, Jehovah, it maketh no difference to thee to help, whether there be much or no power help us, O Jehovah our God, for we rely on thee, and in thy name have we come against this multitude. Jehovah, thou art our God; let not man prevail against thee.

A far larger army was marching on Judah, but Asa did not weigh his strength against theirs. He called out to God and made the battle God's own — which is what faith does when the odds look hopeless.

A prayer that puts everything on God

The prayer is short. Its power lies in what Asa hands over to God.

Before the forces ever clashed Asa cried to the Lord. His prayer is most beautiful and simple. It still feels fresh, and it has helped all God's trusting people in every age... What confidence and trust! He put the whole matter upon the LORD. Their enemies were His enemies. In His name, resting on Him, they went forth. May we know and practice the same confidence. Such a prayer could not remain unanswered.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Where the confidence came from

Asa's father Abijah had rested on being religiously right. One writer asks where Asa's confidence came from instead, and finds the answer in what Asa saw every day at the temple.

What, then, is the source of his confidence? His being right? His religion, giving him the assurance, as it gave his father Abijah, that God must be with him? That is not where Asa's secret lies. Asa is a man of faith. In God's presence he has learned that he can have no confidence in the flesh, but that there is strength outside himself that he can always turn to... In front of him, at the entrance of the sanctuary, stood the pillar of Boaz, which means: "In Him is strength!"

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

That reliance was not improvised in the crisis.

During the ten quiet years the king had learned to rely on God, and to prepare for the coming of the foe.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Nothing with God, whether with many or with none

The striking thing is that Asa was not empty-handed. He had 580,000 trained soldiers — and he prayed as though he had none.

Asa's faith rises to blessed heights on this occasion. He himself commanded a fine army of over half a million "mighty men of valor." Yet he takes the place of complete dependence on God, and makes the conflict a matter between God and the enemy. Such faith can never be disappointed.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The same principle runs elsewhere in Scripture. Jonathan climbed toward an armed garrison saying, in the wording one writer quotes, "There is no restraint to the Lord to save by many or by few."

The enemy may be as the sand on the sea shore for multitude: that is nothing — and faith knows it. He can give strength to one sword to subdue a host.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"Let not man prevail against You"

Asa's last line shifts the whole dispute. The invasion is no longer aimed at Judah but at God Himself.

This prayer showed the king's dependence and reliance on God. It showed that he saw Zerah's attack as a challenge to the God of Israel. In saying "let not man prevail against You," Asa placed the whole issue on the Lord... The Lord could have struck down the Ethiopians without His people lifting a finger. But in His grace He let them have a part in the conflict... And the Lord let His army plunder the enemy, so they were more than conquerors.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The gain that follows the victory

The account does not stop with the enemy running away. Judah came home loaded.

The Ethiopians flee; "they could not revive." The reason is that Israel was not Asa's army but God's army: "They were crushed before Jehovah and before His army" (v. 13). Asa's victory was not only the defeat of the enemy. It also won cities, spoil, flocks, and riches... So for us, every victory over the Enemy, based on self-judgment, brings new and precious gains. They are drawn out of the treasure of Christ's measureless riches.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The same king, the opposite choice

Years later the same king leaned on a foreign army instead of on God. God sent a prophet to remind him of this day.

He reminded Asa that the army of the Ethiopians and Lubims had been huge, far greater than Israel's, with many chariots and horsemen. Yet Asa had relied on the Lord then, and God gave him a decisive victory. "For the eyes of the Lord run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to show Himself strong on behalf of those whose heart is loyal to Him" (v. 9)... How badly does our lack of faith affect our normal life!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Rely — Asa's secret was not that he was in the right. He had learned to place no confidence in himself, and to draw on strength outside himself.

- Prepare — he built that reliance in ten quiet years, long before the crisis arrived.

- Transfer — with half a million soldiers in hand, he still made the fight a matter between God and the enemy.

- Share — God could have destroyed Zerah alone, but in grace He gave His people a part in the battle and the plunder.

- Remember — years later Asa leaned on a foreign king instead. A prophet reminded him: the Lord looks over the whole earth to show Himself strong for hearts that are wholly His.

2 Chronicles 14:12 · Darby

And Jehovah smote the Ethiopians before Asa and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled.

Asa of Judah faced an invading army of a million men. He did not count his own troops. He called on God. This verse is the answer, and it raises a question: why does the enemy fall before Asa and before Judah, and not before the LORD alone?

The Invader and the Provocation

One writer sets Zerah's attack beside the earlier invasion under Shishak. Shishak came because Judah had sinned. Zerah came on his own.

It was one thing for Shishak to invade the land of Judah because the people had been unfaithful to the LORD (2 Chron. 12:2). It was quite another matter when Zerah came against them unprovoked, at his own expense. God loves and defends His people, so He gave Zerah his just punishment. He defeated him and wiped out his immense army of more than a million men.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

A Prayer That Could Not Fail

The victory in this verse answers the prayer just before it. Asa handed the whole dispute to God.

What confidence and trust! He put the whole matter upon the LORD. Their enemies were His enemies. In His name, resting on Him, they went forth. May we know and practise the same confidence. Such a prayer could not remain unanswered. The LORD struck the Ethiopians and gave His people a great victory.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Where Asa's Confidence Came From

So where did Asa's courage come from? It was not from anything in himself.

That is not where Asa's secret lies. Asa is a man of faith. In God's presence he has learned that he can put no confidence in the flesh. But there is strength outside himself, and he may always turn to it. His daily connection with the temple of God at Jerusalem taught him this. At the entrance of the sanctuary, right before his eyes, stood the column of Boaz, which means: "In Him is strength!"

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Whose Army Was It?

The next verse says the Ethiopians were broken "before the LORD and his army" — and the army in question is Judah. That phrase reverses the ownership of the troops Asa had mustered in verse 8.

The Ethiopians flee; they could not recover. This was because Israel was not Asa's army but God's army: "They were broken before the LORD and His army" (v. 13). Asa's victory was not only the defeat of the enemy. It also won cities, spoil, flocks, and riches (vv. 14-15). So for us, every victory over the Enemy is based on judging ourselves. And each victory brings new and precious gains, drawn out of the treasure of the unsearchable riches of Christ.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Why Judah Is Named at All

God needed no help. Yet the verse names Asa and Judah beside the LORD.

The LORD could have struck the Ethiopians without His people lifting a finger. But in His grace He gave them a part in the conflict. If the enemy fled before the LORD, they also fled before His host. What is more, the LORD allowed His host to plunder the enemy, to be more than conquerors.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Victory Asa Later Forgot

Years later Asa relied on the king of Syria instead of on the LORD. God sent the prophet Hanani, who pointed back to this battle.

He reminded Asa that the army of the Ethiopians and Lubim had been huge, far greater than Israel's, with many chariots and horsemen. Yet Asa had relied on the LORD then, and God gave him a decisive victory. "For the eyes of the LORD run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to give strong support to those whose heart is blameless toward him" (2 Chron. 16:9). So Hanani sought to persuade Asa that God longs to do the very best for those who put their whole confidence in Him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Asa handed the whole quarrel to God and made his enemies God's enemies. Such a prayer could not go unanswered.

- Ground. Asa's confidence rested on strength outside himself, not on being in the right. He learned it in God's presence at the sanctuary.

- Ownership. Judah fought as God's army, not Asa's. The enemy fell before the LORD and before His host.

- Share. God could have acted alone. Instead He gave His people a part in the fighting and the plunder, making them more than conquerors.

- Memory. Asa later trusted Syria, and this victory became the evidence against him. God looks for hearts wholly His, and shows Himself strong for them.

2 Chronicles 14:13 · Darby

And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them to Gerar; and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that none of them was left alive; for they were crushed before Jehovah and before his army. And they carried away very much spoil.

Zerah the Ethiopian marched against Judah with a million men. Asa was heavily outnumbered, so he prayed and handed the whole quarrel to God. This verse records the answer. Judah chased the enemy as far as Gerar. Not one Ethiopian was left alive, and the people came home richer than they went out.

Whose Army Won

The verse gives the credit to the LORD, not to Asa. Then it adds three words: and His army. One writer explains why those words matter.

The Ethiopians flee; they could not recover. This was because Israel was not Asa's army but God's army: "They were broken before the LORD and His army" (v. 13). Asa's victory did not only defeat the enemy. It also won cities, spoil, flocks, and riches. So for us, every victory over the Enemy that rests on self-judgment brings new and precious gains. They are drawn from the treasure of the unfathomable riches of Christ.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Prayer Behind the Victory

Asa had over half a million fighting men of his own. One writer points out what he refused to lean on.

Asa's faith rises to blessed heights on this occasion. He himself controlled a fine army of over half a million "mighty men of valor." Yet he takes the place of entire dependence on God. He makes the conflict a matter between God and the enemy. Such faith can never be disappointed.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

A Share in the Victory

The verse has two movements. God breaks the enemy, and then Asa and his people chase them down. One writer sees kindness in that order.

In saying "let not man prevail against You," Asa cast the issue entirely on Jehovah, and He answered the faith of the king. The Lord could have struck the Ethiopians without His people lifting a finger against them. But He graciously allowed them to have a part in the conflict. If the enemy fled before the Lord, they also fled before His host. Moreover, the Lord allowed His host to spoil the enemy, to be more than conquerors.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why Zerah Fell

Why did Zerah come at all? One writer gives a likely human reason, and then a deeper one.

Some identify Zerah with one of Shishak's successors. If that is right, the invasion probably came from Asa's refusal to keep paying the tribute that Shishak had imposed on his grandfather Rehoboam. But it was one thing for Shishak to invade Judah "because they had been unfaithful to the LORD" (2 Chron. 12:2). It was quite another matter when Zerah came against them unprovoked, "at his own expense," as it were. God loves and defends His people, so Zerah met his just punishment. He lost the battle, and his immense army of more than a million was utterly destroyed.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Writers differ over Zerah's exact title, but not over the size of his force or its end.

King of Ethiopia, or a general in the Egyptian army, who came against Asa with a million troops and three hundred chariots. His army was struck down by Jehovah, and Asa took much spoil.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Victory Asa Later Forgot

Later in his reign the same king faced a much smaller enemy. One writer finds his response hard to explain.

It is difficult to account for this sudden defect in Asa's faith. With God's help he had recently destroyed the whole immense army of Zerah the Ethiopian. Now he faces an enemy not half so strong. His faith fails, and he depends for rescue on a human arm.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Cast — Asa had over half a million men. He still made the conflict a matter between God and the enemy, and such faith is never disappointed.

- Struck — the verse credits the collapse to the LORD, not to Judah's strength. Zerah came unprovoked against a people God loves and defends, and he met his just punishment.

- Shared — God could have finished it alone. Instead He gave His people a part, so the enemy fled before Him and before His host.

- Spoiled — Israel fought as God's army, not Asa's. The victory brought not just safety but cities, flocks and riches — more than conquerors.

- Squandered — the same king who watched a million men fall later leaned on human strength against a far weaker enemy. Yesterday's answered prayer is no substitute for today's dependence.

2 Chronicles 14:14 · Darby

And they smote all the cities round about Gerar, for the terror of Jehovah came upon them; and they spoiled all the cities, for there was very much spoil in them.

Asa's victory over the Ethiopians did not stop on the battlefield. Judah chased them past Gerar, and the fear of the LORD went ahead of God's people as they took town after town and carried off the plunder.

Where the confidence came from

Asa faced an army of more than a million men. One writer traces the difference between him and his father Abijah:

Abijah relied on the merits of his religion to win his battle. Asa did not. He first sits down and works out whether he, with ten thousand men, can face the one coming against him with twenty thousand… Asa is a man of faith. In God's presence he has learned that he can have no confidence in himself, but that there is strength outside himself that he may always turn to.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

God's army, not Asa's

The same writer names whose army was really on the field. He then draws out what the victory produced:

The Ethiopians flee; "they could not revive." Israel was not Asa's army but God's army. That is why "they were crushed before Jehovah and before His army" (v. 13). Asa's victory was not only the defeat of the enemy. It was also the positive conquest of cities, spoil, flocks, and riches (vv. 14-15). So for us, every victory over the Enemy that rests on self-judgment brings new and precious gains, drawn out of the treasure of the measureless riches of Christ.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the invader was destroyed outright

Shishak had invaded Judah before, and for a different reason. One commentator draws the contrast with Zerah, and explains why his army was destroyed:

It was one thing for Shishak to invade the land of Judah "because they had transgressed against the Lord" (2 Chron. 12:2). It was quite another matter when Zerah came against them unprovoked, at his own expense, as it were. He met his just punishment from God, who loves and defends His people. God defeated him and completely destroyed his huge army of more than a million men.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

A share in God's victory

God struck the Ethiopians, so Judah's pursuit could look unnecessary. One writer explains why God let His people share in the fight:

The Lord could have struck the Ethiopians without His people lifting a finger against them. But in His grace He gave them a part in the conflict. The enemy fled before the Lord, and they fled before His army too. What is more, the Lord let His army plunder the enemy, to be more than conquerors.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Land that already belonged to Judah

Those towns were not a random target. One commentator explains whose land it really was:

At the same time they defeated all the cities around Gerar. This was Philistine territory. It truly belonged to Judah, but Judah had never taken it. From these cities they took a great amount of plunder too, including much livestock (vv. 14-15).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Gerar was an old landmark in Israel's story:

Ancient city on the south of Gaza in the possession of the Philistines. It was visited by both Abraham and Isaac.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Where the campaign ended

The campaign ends with the army going home. One writer notes where they went:

After the victory, Asa and his people "returned to Jerusalem." That was the city of God, close to Jehovah's temple. There, in fellowship with Him, they go on to renew their strength.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Dependence. Asa did not trust his army or his religion. His strength was "strength outside himself," and he turned to it.

- Deliverance. The Ethiopians could not recover because the force facing them was God's army, not Asa's.

- Justice. Zerah attacked unprovoked, and met "his just punishment from God, who loves and defends His people."

- Share. God could have won without them, but He let His people chase and plunder — "to be more than conquerors."

- Possession. The cities around Gerar were Judah's by right, but Judah had never taken them. Every victory over the Enemy opens up gains from the riches of Christ.

2 Chronicles 14:15 · Darby

They smote also the tents of cattle, and carried away sheep and camels in abundance, and returned to Jerusalem.

Asa's battle with Zerah's army does not end when the enemy runs. Judah sweeps through the camps, drives off the livestock, sheep and camels, and takes the road back to Jerusalem. This closing verse asks what a God-given victory is for, and what God's people do with what they win.

Why the Enemy's Goods Passed to Judah

Judah had not started this war. One writer compares this attack with the earlier one by Shishak. That difference explains why Zerah lost everything:

It was one thing for Shishak to invade Judah "because they had transgressed against the Lord" (2 Chron. 12:2). It was quite another matter when Zerah attacked them unprovoked, at his own expense, so to speak. God, who loves and defends His people, gave him the punishment he deserved. He defeated Zerah and completely destroyed his huge army of more than a million men.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

A Victory That Gained, Not Only Repelled

The chapter could have ended with the enemy scattered. Instead it ends with wealth in Judah's hands. One writer sees in that the pattern of every real spiritual victory:

Asa's victory did more than defeat the enemy. It also won cities, spoil, flocks, and riches (vv. 14-15). So for us, every victory over the Enemy that rests on self-judgment brings new and precious gains. They come out of the treasure of the boundless riches of Christ.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

A Share in God's Own Victory

The fighting was God's from the start; Judah could have stood still. Their part in the chase and the plunder was a gift:

The Lord could have struck the Ethiopians without His people lifting a finger against them. But in His grace He let them share in the fight. If the enemy fled before the Lord, they fled before His host too. What is more, the Lord allowed His host to plunder the enemy, to be more than conquerors.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Ground That Was Already Theirs

The raid did not stop at Zerah's camp. One writer points out whose land it reached next:

Judah defeated all the cities around Gerar. This was Philistine land, but it truly belonged to Judah. Judah had never taken it. From these cities they took a great amount of plunder also, including much livestock (vv. 14-15).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Road Back

The verse does not leave the army camped among the flocks it has taken. It sends them home, and the destination matters:

After the victory, Asa and his people "returned to Jerusalem." There they are in the city of God, close to the LORD's temple, in fellowship with Him. There they renew their strength.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What the Spoil Was For

What a people do with the spoil decides what the victory does to them. One writer draws out both the rule and the danger:

The results of the victory are here consecrated to the Lord, and so it should always be. If our successes lead us to depend on ourselves, to be pleased with ourselves, or to build up our own comfort, then victory becomes a snare. It turns us away from God instead of bringing us closer to Him.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Asa fell into that danger himself. Years later a far smaller threat came from Baasha of Israel. Asa emptied the treasuries to buy Syrian help. He acted, as one writer puts it, "forgetful of his experience with Zerah and the manner of getting the victory" (Arno C. Gaebelein).

Summary

- Cause. Zerah attacked unprovoked. God loves and defends His people, so He destroyed that army. The spoil in this verse is His verdict.

- Gift. God could have won without them. He let them join the chase and strip the camps. They were not spectators but more than conquerors.

- Reach. The gain reached past the battlefield to the cities around Gerar. That land was Judah's by right, but Judah had never taken it.

- Return. They carried the spoil back to Jerusalem, close to the temple. There fellowship with God renews the strength that won the battle.

- Result. Spoil given to God keeps a victory safe. Spoil spent on self turns the same victory into a snare. Asa fell into that trap later, when he forgot how Zerah was beaten.

2 Chronicles 15:1 · Darby

And the Spirit of God came upon Azariah the son of Oded.

The Spirit of God comes on a man named Azariah at a striking moment. King Asa is riding home in triumph from battle, and the word that meets him is not praise but a warning that also cheers him.

The timing of the message

The message comes when Asa is at his strongest. One writer sees God guarding a king who had begun well:

But the Lord knew the danger that threatened Asa. He had begun well. He was faithful to the Lord, and he and the people had seen a wonderful proof that the Lord hears and answers prayer. Would he continue and end as well as he had begun?… The message was needed, and it came at the right time. The danger for God's people is always greatest after they win a victory and enjoy outward success and prosperity.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer points to an earlier king whose run of victories ended badly:

When Asa came back to Jerusalem in triumph, the Spirit of God came on Azariah ("whom the Lord helps") the son of Oded. He went out to meet the king, not as a flatterer at court, but with a warning that was both solemn and cheering… People have rightly said that we are never in greater danger than right after some great success, even when that success truly comes from God, in answer to real faith. David is a sad example. In the chapters before the one that records his sin with Bathsheba (2 Sam. 11), he wins one brilliant victory after another over his enemies… Then, as if resting in those victories, he lets his watchfulness slip, and "the mighty" falls.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The Spirit coming upon a man

These words describe something different from what believers have today. One writer sets the two side by side:

Since Christ finished His great sacrificial work and went up on high, the Holy Spirit is God's gift of love to all believers alike. But the Old Testament is different. There we sometimes read of the Spirit of God coming upon men for some special service. This is God's sovereign act, and it has nothing to do with whether the man is converted. So the Spirit of the Lord came upon Othniel (Judges 3:10), and upon Azariah the prophet in the days of Asa (2 Chron. 15:1). These two were true believers. But we also read that the Spirit of God came upon the messengers of Saul, and even upon the king himself (1 Sam. 19:20-24). None of these were believers, for murder was in their hearts at the time.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Azariah among the prophets of Judah

Verse 8 calls the same message "the prophecy of Oded," so the son speaks for his father. And the kind of prophet he is fits a pattern:

This prophecy is Azariah's, or rather his father Oded's, since Azariah is his messenger (v. 8). It has the character of all spoken prophecy. It speaks to the king first, then to the two faithful tribes, Judah and Benjamin. Azariah sets out the terms of the covenant of law: "The LORD is with you while you are with Him. If you seek Him, He will be found by you, but if you forsake Him, He will forsake you" (v. 2). Both sides had to keep this covenant. God always keeps it on His side, for He is faithful.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Not a threat to salvation

One writer answers a reader who used these conditions against the security of the believer:

We must say, dear friend, that it shows a sad lack of spiritual understanding to bring such passages of Scripture to bear in any way on whether Christ's members endure to the end. These passages, and countless others in the Old Testament, along with similar ones in the New Testament, open up a subject of deep importance: God's moral government. To be only a subject of God's government is one thing. To be a subject of His unchangeable grace is another. We should never confuse the two.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the word produced

Many people left the northern kingdom and came over to Asa. One writer explains what drew them:

Judah had the temple, which was God's dwelling place. They had the God-given priesthood and the sacrifices. In a word, they stood on true ground and had the truth. But that is not what drew so many to them from Israel. What drew them was the Lord's presence and divine power at work alongside the truth. So today it is not enough to say that we have the truth. Truth as truth will never win souls.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Timing. The Spirit comes on Azariah at the peak of Asa's success — the very point where God's people stand in the greatest danger.

- Messenger. His name means "whom the Lord helps." He comes not as a flatterer at court, but with a warning that is solemn and cheering at once.

- Power. The Spirit coming upon a man for special service is God's sovereign act. It is not the same as the Spirit who now lives in every believer alike.

- Message. It sets out covenant terms that God always keeps on His side. It belongs to His moral government, not to the question of salvation.

- Result. Many came over to Asa — drawn not by the truth he held, but by the Lord's presence at work with it.

2 Chronicles 15:2 · Darby

And he went out to meet Asa, and said to him, Hear ye me, Asa, and all Judah and Benjamin Jehovah is with you while ye are with him; and if ye seek him he will be found of you, but if ye forsake him he will forsake you.

Asa had just come home from a great victory. God's first word to him is not a celebration but a warning. Azariah meets the king with three short clauses: a promise, an invitation, and a threat. Asa's whole later life turns on them.

A Word Timed for the Moment of Success

The message lands where a believer is least on guard. One writer sets it beside David's fall:

When Asa came back to Jerusalem in triumph, the Spirit of God came on Azariah ("whom Jehovah helps"), the son of Oded. He went to meet the king — not as a court flatterer, but with a serious yet cheering warning... It was "a word in season". It has been truly said that we are never in greater danger than right after some great success, even when that success truly comes from God, in answer to genuine faith. David is a sad example. In the chapters before the one that records his sin with Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11), he wins one brilliant victory after another over his enemies... Then, as if resting in those victories, he lets his watchfulness slip, and "the mighty" falls.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The Terms Belong to a Covenant

These words restate the covenant Israel lived under. One side of it never fails:

Azariah presents the conditions of the covenant of law (v. 2). Both sides had to keep this covenant. The Lord always keeps His side, for He is faithful. But if Israel were unfaithful, they had to fall under the judgment of God, who must forsake them.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What the Verse Is Not About

Because the verse says God may forsake, many use it to argue that a believer can lose salvation. Commentators reject that use. They draw a line between two ways God deals with people:

Your reference to 2 Chronicles 15:2 can be connected with passages like Ezekiel 18. These, and countless other scriptures in the Old Testament, as well as similar passages in the New Testament, unfold the deeply important subject of God's moral government. To be a subject of God's government is one thing. To be a subject of His unchangeable grace is another. We should never confuse them.

after_note: DELETE

C. H. Mackintosh

What is at stake instead is testimony, fruit and victory:

This has nothing to do with the question of salvation, or with the eternal life the believer already has in Christ. To bear a real testimony, to bear fruit to God, and to have the victory at all times, we need a close walk with the Lord. Without it, God's people are helpless and are bound to dishonour their Lord.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Blessing Given Freely, Enjoyed on Terms

The same distinction is put another way — a gift can be fully yours and still slip out of your hands:

It is important to remember that, while all our blessings are purely and simply on the ground of grace, and therefore unconditional, yet if we are to be in the enjoyment of these blessings, there must be a suitable condition of soul. Hence the need of continual exercise of heart before God, in case we are robbed of what is our proper portion.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Presence Others Can See

This is not a private matter. Other believers can tell when God is with a person:

It must be seen that the Lord is with us; for He is the magnet of His people's hearts. How then may we make sure of the Lord's displayed presence? Azariah proclaims the condition: "Hear me, Asa, and all Judah and Benjamin: The LORD is with you while you are with Him." (v. 2.) It is always so. To be with God is to share His judgment of ourselves and of everything around us, to stay truly separate from evil, and to submit to His word. If we walk with Him in this way, He will never fail to show that He is with us.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Way Back

Azariah points back to Israel's darkest time, with no true God, no teaching priest and no law. Even then the way home stood open:

No wonder Israel were in trouble. They had forsaken the true God. They had no priest to teach them the things of God. They did not know His word. Whenever they turned to God, in their troubles, God heard them, and answered their cries. How rich is God's mercy; how wonderful His grace.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Asa himself became the proof of the verse in both directions:

While he was with the Lord, the Lord was with him. But he forsook the Lord and turned to human help, making a sinful alliance with the king of Syria. After that, the Lord's presence and power were no longer clearly with him.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- With — the promise is not simply "the LORD is with you". It runs "while you are with Him". His displayed presence follows your walk.

- Warned — the word came at the peak of victory. Success relaxes watchfulness, as David's fall shows.

- Weighed — the verse deals with how God governs His people, not with eternal life in Christ. A close walk is what keeps testimony, fruit and victory.

- Won back — in Israel's worst days, with no true God, priest or law, He still heard them whenever they turned. The middle clause stays open.

- Watch the end — Asa began with the Lord and finished leaning on Syria. A bright start is no substitute for staying with Him.

2 Chronicles 15:3 · Darby

Now for a long while Israel [was] without the true God, and without a teaching priest, and without law;

Azariah brought King Asa a word about Israel's past. It names three losses that came together — and raises a hard question: how does a nation given the true God end up with no one to teach it?

The period Azariah recalls

Commentators read this as a look back to the time of the judges, before Israel had kings.

This refers especially to the time of the Judges, when everyone did what was right in his own eyes. In that book we are told that many times, when in trouble, they turned to the Lord and He delivered them. But the general condition was so low that God troubled them because of their self-will.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The three things Israel lacked are not three separate failures. Take away one and the others go with it.

God, the priesthood, and the law had disappeared, so to speak; every man had been a law to himself. It was the reign of wickedness.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What "a teaching priest" meant

The priest's work ran two ways. He carried the people's case before the Lord, and he carried the Lord's mind back to them.

The priest had to carry the judgement of the people before the Lord. He also had to explain the Lord's rules to the people. He was to be the always-ready channel between the Lord and the assembly. He was not only to know the mind of God for himself; he had to be able to interpret that mind to the people. All of this called for constant watching, constant waiting, and constant time over the inspired page.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

During the years Azariah recalls, that channel went silent. One writer traces how long the silence lasted.

The history of the Judges never mentions the high priest, or any other priest, or even a Levite, giving counsel or acting in any public way. That silence runs from the time of Phinehas the son of Eleazar down to Eli. The knowledge of God was lost. His people broke and forgot the relationship He had kept with them by the ark of the covenant.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why Azariah raised the past with Asa

Azariah is not giving a history lesson for its own sake. Asa's own generation had drifted the same way, and truth once known had faded from view.

Israel and Judah had lost much of the knowledge of truth. The darkening influence of idolatry had long hidden from them truth revealed earlier. God calls again, and reminds Asa, Judah, and Benjamin of His covenant and their responsibility.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The call came with terms that bound both sides.

Azariah sets out the conditions of the covenant of law: "The LORD is with you while you are with Him. If you seek Him, He will be found by you, but if you forsake Him, He will forsake you." Both sides had to keep this covenant. The Lord always keeps His side, for He is faithful. But if Israel were unfaithful, they could only fall under the judgment of God, who must forsake them.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Trouble, and the mercy that met it

The three losses explain the misery that followed. But the account does not stop there.

No wonder Israel was in trouble. They had forsaken the true God, they had no priest to teach them the things of God, and His word was unknown to them. Whenever they turned to God, in their troubles, God heard them, and answered their cries. How rich is God's mercy; how wonderful His grace.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Teaching as a continuing provision

The need this verse names did not end with Israel. One writer sets its phrase beside what the New Testament asks of teachers.

The Old Testament speaks about "a teaching priest" (2 Chr. 15:3) and of "the Levites that taught" (2 Chr. 30:22). The New Testament speaks of "faithful men, who will be able to teach others also" (2 Tim. 2:2). Again, one of the marks of a good overseer is that he should be "able to teach." The teaching takes in the whole revelation of God and puts the soul into the full light and blessing of Christianity.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Without God — the loss begins at the top. Forsake the true God, and the priest and the law go with Him. Commentators read the verse as one collapse, not three.

- Without a teacher — the priest had to interpret God's mind to the people, and that took constant time over God's Word. Through the whole book of Judges, no priest appears in public service at all.

- Without law — with no one teaching it, God's word became unknown, and every man became a law to himself. Commentators call that the reign of wickedness.

- Trouble — misery is the natural result, and God used it. Idolatry had hidden truth once revealed, so God called again through Azariah.

- Found — the verse that records the famine of teaching also records the mercy. They turned, they sought Him, and He was found. The same provision continues today in faithful people able to teach others.

2 Chronicles 15:4 · Darby

but in their trouble they turned to Jehovah the God of Israel, and sought him, and he was found of them.

Asa has just come home from a great victory when the prophet Azariah meets him with a message about the nation's past: long years without God, without teaching and without law. This verse is the bright half of that message — trouble drove Israel back, and God let them find Him.

The dark years Azariah recalls

The "long while" Azariah describes is not vague. One writer notes that the tense points to a period already closed:

Azariah then reminds them of how, in days gone by ("has been," verse 3, should be "was" — in the days of the Judges, evidently) when, in apostasy and distress, the people turned to the LORD, God of Israel, and sought Him, He was found by them.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

What made that era so dark was not only bad behaviour but the collapse of everything that held the nation together:

Azariah recalls the former days when all the people had been unfaithful. He points especially to the time of the Judges, when Israel's disobedience brought complete disorder. God, the priesthood, and the law had disappeared, so to speak. Every man was a law to himself. It was the reign of lawlessness.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Trouble as the thing that turned them

The verse does not say they turned because they grew wise. It says they turned in their distress. Commentators treat that as one of God's normal ways of recovering His own:

Adversity generally drives to God a saint who has wandered. It is one of the means grace employs. It was so with David. It is sometimes used to bring the wicked to repentance, as in the case of Manasseh.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why they were in trouble at all

Their distress was not random hardship. It traced back to what verse 3 describes — and the answer they received traces back to God's character:

It is little wonder that Israel were in trouble when they had forsaken the true God, when they had no priest to teach them the things of God, and when His word was unknown to them. Whenever they turned to God, in their troubles, God heard them, and answered their cries. How rich is God's mercy; how wonderful His grace.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Sought — and found

"He was found by them" is the proof of the rule Azariah had just stated: the LORD is with you while you are with Him; seek Him and He will be found. One writer points out that only one side of that arrangement was ever in doubt:

Azariah presents the conditions of the covenant of law: "The LORD is with you, while you are with Him; and if you seek Him He will be found by you, but if you forsake Him He will forsake you." Both sides had to keep this covenant. The LORD always keeps His side, for He is faithful. But if Israel proved unfaithful, they would have to fall under the judgment of God, who must forsake them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What this promise is not saying

The verse ties finding God to seeking Him. That makes it easy to read as a statement about whether a person is saved. One writer draws the line clearly:

This has nothing to do with the question of salvation and eternal life, which the believer has in Christ. Bearing a real testimony, fruit to God, and victory at all times calls for a close walk with the Lord. Apart from this, God's people are helpless and must dishonour their Lord. Verses 3-6 picture the results of turning away from the Lord, like those seen in Israel in the time of the judges.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

The timing of the message

Azariah brought this history lesson to a king fresh from success, not to a king in ruins. That timing is the point:

It was "a word in season." We are never in greater danger than just after a great success — even when that success truly comes from God, in answer to genuine faith.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Without. Israel had lost God, teaching and law. Every man was a law to himself, and trouble was the harvest of that loss.

- Trouble. Trouble did not just interrupt their story. Grace used it to turn a wandering people back, as with David and with Manasseh.

- Turned. The verse records no grand reform programme. They turned and sought — that is all God asked before He answered.

- Found. God's side never failed. He is faithful, so the only question was whether His people would stay with Him — and when they turned back, peace and rest followed.

- Warning. The promise is about walk and testimony, not about whether a believer has eternal life. Azariah brought it in the hour of victory, when the danger of drifting is greatest.

2 Chronicles 15:5 · Darby

And in those times there [was] no peace to him that went out nor to him that came in, but great disturbances were amongst all the inhabitants of the countries.

Azariah meets Asa on the road home from a great victory. Instead of congratulating him, he describes an earlier age — a time when travel was unsafe and every district was in turmoil. The verse raises a question for every generation: what happens to ordinary daily life when a people lets go of God?

A look back at the time of the Judges

Commentators read the verse as a look back at the time of the Judges, long before Asa's day. One writer names what had gone missing, and what filled the gap:

Azariah then recalls the former days when all the people had been unfaithful. He points above all to the time of the Judges, when Israel's disobedience produced the most complete disorder... God, the priesthood, and the law had disappeared, so to speak; every man had been a law to himself. Wickedness ruled.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer pins down when this happened, and corrects the older wording:

Azariah then reminds them of what happened in the past. ("Has been" in verse 3 should be "was" — in the days of the Judges: compare Judges 5.) The people had turned away from God and were in distress. Then they turned to Jehovah, God of Israel, and sought Him, and they found Him.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

So the verse looks back: Azariah shows Asa what his nation had already lived through.

God's hand, not bad luck

The breakdown was not an accident of politics. One writer traces it to God Himself:

God's government deals with nations as well as with people. All around Israel in the days of their trouble, God was bringing disturbance among the nations: "nation was broken against nation, and city against city," and peace was nowhere to be found. If men will not have God, they must suffer at the hand of God for their self-will and idolatry.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

No peace for those who leave God

The words about going out and coming in cover all of life — leaving home and coming back. One writer sets the misery beside what the people found when they cried out, and what returned when the king did:

How many times the people in their anguish had cried out to the Lord and returned to Him! And each time they had found God to be a Deliverer. There is "no peace" in abandoning God — no rest, no peace for the wicked, says Isaiah — but trouble upon trouble. Yet from the moment the king returned, as Asa did, there was peace and rest.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Asa had already known that peace. The prophet is showing him the alternative.

Spoken at the moment of greatest danger

The timing matters. Asa had just come home from a victory, and that is when such a word was needed:

It was a needed message at the right moment. The danger for God's people is always greatest after they win a victory and enjoy outward success and prosperity... Verses 3-6 picture the results of turning away from the Lord, like those seen in Israel during the time of the Judges.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same writer adds that this warning is not about whether a believer is saved. It is about whether God's people can bear a real testimony and win. That takes a close walk with the Lord.

Action, not fear

Azariah does not leave Asa staring at the ruins of an earlier age. The history is followed by a call to be firm, with a promise attached:

Do we not also need to listen to this call, even though we live under grace? God's government is hidden today, but it is no less real. Under it there is a present reward for what we do, not only a future one. This reward is peace, rest, and strength.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Asa heard it and acted. He cleared out the idols and repaired the altar, so that the people could return to the true worship of God.

Summary

- Cause. Israel was left without the true God, without a priest to teach them, without law. Every man became a law to himself.

- Collapse. With God gone, ordinary safety went too. Going out and coming in were unsettled, and turmoil reached every district.

- Hand. This was God's government, not misfortune. If men will not have God, they suffer at His hand for their self-will.

- Contrast. Abandoning God brings no peace, only trouble upon trouble. The moment the king turned back, peace and rest returned.

- Call. Be firm, above all right after a success. God still rewards what we do now, with peace, rest and strength.

2 Chronicles 15:6 · Darby

And nation was broken against nation, and city against city; for God disturbed them with all manner of distress.

King Asa has just come home from a great victory, and a prophet meets him with a history lesson instead of congratulations. It pictures an age of collapse, when nations and cities ground each other to pieces — and the question is why a king at the peak of his success needed to hear it.

The Timing of the Warning

Azariah's message comes when Asa looks least in need of it. One writer names success itself as the danger:

But the Lord knew the danger that threatened Asa. He had begun well. He was faithful to the Lord, and he and the people had seen a wonderful proof that the Lord hears and answers prayer. Would he continue and end as well as he had begun? The Spirit of God came at this important time on Azariah. When Asa came home victorious, the prophet met him and gave him his message. It was a needed message, and it came at the right time. The danger for God's people is always greatest after they have won a victory and are enjoying outward success and prosperity.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Disorder and the Loss of Peace

The broken nations and cities are not a general picture of world history. Rossier places the scene in Israel's own past, in the time of the judges. The nation had drifted from God, from teaching and from law, and it had no peace:

Azariah then recalls the earlier days when the whole people had been unfaithful. He points especially to the time of the Judges, when Israel's disobedience brought about the most complete disorder… God, the priesthood, and the law had disappeared, so to speak. Every man had been a law to himself. It was the reign of wickedness… There is "no peace" in forsaking God — no rest, no peace for the wicked, says Isaiah — but trouble on top of trouble. On the other hand, from the moment the king turned back to Him, as Asa did, there was peace and rest.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

God's Hand Behind the Chaos

The verse does not leave the violence unexplained. It traces the crushing to God Himself, who rules nations and not only people:

God's government deals with nations as well as with individuals. All around Israel in the days of their trouble, God was stirring up unrest among the nations: "Nation was crushed by nation and city by city." There was no peace to be found. If men will not have God, they must suffer at God's hand for their self-will and idolatry.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

But what about the nation God uses to do the crushing? One writer warns that being the rod in God's hand gives no nation a reason for pride.

In God's government of the nations He may use one nation as His rod to punish another. We see this again and again in the Old Testament. But it will go badly for the nation He uses if it grows proud of that role. God rules with justice, so just as surely that nation will be humbled in its turn.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Mercy Inside the Distress

The distress was never the whole story. The same writer who traces the trouble to God also tells what happened whenever the people turned back to Him:

No wonder Israel was in trouble. They had forsaken the true God. They had no priest to teach them the things of God. His word was unknown to them. Whenever they turned to God in their troubles, God heard them and answered their cries. How rich is God's mercy; how wonderful His grace.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Point of the History Lesson

Azariah does not stop at the wreckage. Rossier reads the encouragement that follows as a word for readers today, with a reward that is not only future:

After the call comes encouragement: "But you, take courage! Do not let your hands be weak, for your work shall be rewarded" (v. 7). Do we not also need to heed this call, even though we live under grace? God's government is hidden now, yet it is no less real, and it gives a present reward for what we do, not only a future one. That reward is peace, rest, and strength. Asa had experienced this, but the rest of his history will show us how much he needed that call — and we need it as much as he did.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The disorder began with drift: no true God, no teaching priest, no law. Every man became a law to himself.

- Consequence. Nations and cities tearing at each other were not random politics. God's government reaches nations as well as people, and men who will not have God suffer at His hand.

- Caution. Even the nation God uses as His rod is not exempt. Pride in that role brings its own humbling.

- Mercy. Whenever they turned to God in their trouble, He heard them and answered their cries. In forsaking Him there is no peace; in returning to Him there is peace and rest.

- Call. Azariah preached this history to a king at his strongest, because danger is greatest after victory. The answer is courage and hands that do not go slack, and the reward — peace, rest, and strength — is present as well as future.

2 Chronicles 15:7 · Darby

But as for you, be firm and let not your hands be weak; for there is a reward for your deeds.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

2 Chronicles 15:8 · Darby

And when Asa heard these words and the prophecy of Oded the prophet, he took courage, and put away the abominations out of all the land of Judah and Benjamin, and out of the cities that he had taken from mount Ephraim, and renewed the altar of Jehovah, that was before the porch of Jehovah.

Asa had just come from a crushing victory over an Ethiopian army when a prophet met him with a message from God. Here we see what that word did inside the king, and then what it did in the land.

Hearing Before Doing

The verse opens with what Asa heard, not with what he did:

And Asa, hearing these words, believed what the prophet had said and then acted on them. This is the true path to blessing — learning, believing and obeying. He removed the abominable idols. He renewed the altar before the porch of the LORD, which had fallen into disuse.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Translations differ over the name of the prophet Asa heard.

The Alexandrian manuscript and the Latin Vulgate read "Azariah son of Oded" where the text reads "Oded the prophet."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Why Courage Was Needed

Why did Asa need courage? One writer points to opposition, quoting the prophet's charge here in an older translation:

"Be strong therefore," he says, "and do not let your hands be weak, for your work shall be rewarded." The New Translation reads, "But as for you, be firm." Asa had probably met opposition in his work of reform. He was in danger of failing to carry it through to completion. So he was urged to be firm, because there would be a sure reward for his work of restoring the uncorrupted worship of Jehovah in his kingdom.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The courage here is of a different kind from the courage that won the battle in the previous chapter:

As soon as Asa had heard the words of this prophecy, "he took courage." Here we find a new mark of strength. It is not victory over the Ethiopians, as before, but practical purification... So it must be for us too. We must firmly banish from our lives everything that is abominable in the sight of God, every defilement, so that we may enjoy unmixed fellowship with Him... The Christian life does not allow us to let things go.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Widened Sphere

Asa did not stop at the borders of his own tribes:

Asa does not limit himself to purifying the cities of Judah, as he had earlier. He also put away the abominations "from the cities that he had taken in the hill country of Ephraim." After the king's victory God had enlarged his sphere of activity. Asa was now responsible to see the same principles of holiness adopted there as in the territory of Judah.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Altar Renewed

The altar Asa restored was not a new one:

This was the altar on which Solomon offered burnt offerings when he brought his Egyptian bride into the house that he had built for her (2 Chron. 8:12). It had evidently been removed, or allowed to fall into disuse or decay, before being "rebuilt" by Asa.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Commentators differ on what "renewed" means here:

I have no doubt that this means renewing the sacrifices regularly offered on the altar as the law directed, just as in many other passages. This altar, built by Solomon, was still whole and did not need rebuilding... In short, worship of Jehovah as the Word directs had been neglected under the previous reigns. Now it was re-established according to God's mind. Where separation from the defilement of the world is true and energetic, the worship of God's children soon returns to its honoured place.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Beyond Judah's Borders

Asa's cleansing had an effect beyond his own borders:

Once worship was re-established, Israel's unity was realised in the small measure that suited a time of division and ruin. God's favour towards His faithful people was plain to see, and the sight of it worked on the consciences of those who until then had belonged to the ten tribes.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how deep the reform went. One writer warns that a law cannot reach where idolatry really lives:

The idols that were in Judah and Benjamin he puts away. How far idolatry had spread, how much it had grown, to need a law to put it down! In his zeal he decrees that "whoever would not seek the LORD, the God of Israel, should be put to death." Did you ever know idolatry, or any sin, put away by commandment? It may hide its head... but it still exists, and repressive laws in fact strengthen it. Its seat is in the heart, and the idol is only the outward symbol.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Word first. Asa heard, believed, then acted. Learning, believing and obeying is the true path to blessing.

- Courage next. Courage here is not battlefield bravery. It is strength for practical purification, refusing to let things go.

- Reach widens. Victory had enlarged Asa's territory, and he carried the same standard of holiness into the new cities.

- Altar restored. Asa put a neglected altar back in use. Where separation from defilement is real, worship soon regains its place.

- Others drawn. God's visible favour worked on consciences outside Judah. But one writer warns that idolatry sits in the heart, where no decree can reach it.

2 Chronicles 15:9 · Darby

And he assembled all Judah and Benjamin, and the strangers with them out of Ephraim and Manasseh, and out of Simeon; for they fell away to him out of Israel in abundance, when they saw that Jehovah his God was with him.

Asa had just heard the prophet Azariah. He cleared out the idols, renewed the altar in Jerusalem, and people from the northern tribes came south to join him. The verse raises a plain question: what draws others in, and how is it kept?

Gathering follows cleansing

The order matters. The cleansing came first. Only then did the crowds come.

Once worship was re-established, Israel's unity took shape again — in the feeble measure that suits a time of division and ruin. God showed His favour to His faithful people, and the sight of it worked on the consciences of those who until then had belonged to the ten tribes. From their very beginning those tribes had been bound up with Jeroboam's idolatry.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What drew them

Judah had everything that was right. But something more than that was at work.

This is what we have called the attraction of power. As pointed out before, Judah had the temple, God's dwelling place, along with the divine priesthood and the sacrifices. In a word, they were on the true ground, and they had the truth. But this is not what drew so many to them from Israel. What drew them was that the Lord displayed His presence and divine power along with the truth. So now it is not enough to say that we have the truth. We shall find that truth as truth will never win souls. It has been said that you cannot meet Satan with mere truth. Unless the truth is held in communion with a living Christ, you will be powerless against his schemes. Christ Himself is the truth. If He is left out, the truth becomes only a formal creed. It may contain nothing but the truth, yet it has neither life nor power.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The condition of His presence

So how is that presence secured? Azariah had already given the terms, earlier in the chapter.

It is a mistake, then, to expect others to be drawn to us because we have the truth. It must be seen that the Lord is with us, for He is the magnet of His people's hearts. How, then, may we make sure of the Lord's displayed presence? Azariah announces the condition: "Hear me," he says, "Asa, and all Judah and Benjamin: The Lord is with you while you are with Him." So it always is. To be with God is to share His judgment of ourselves and of everything around us, to be in true separation from evil, and to be in subjection to His word. If we are walking with Him like that, He will never fail to show that He is with us.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Drawn, not conquered

Asa won part of the north without a fight.

Instead of fighting Israel, king Asa drew in a remnant who valued the Lord being with the king. On the renewed altar they offered sacrifices to the Lord. This was a partial, if not a full, restoration of the worship God had sought from His people. Even if it was weak compared with the early days, how very pleasing this must have been to the Lord. It is never too late to return to the Lord, even if it is in evident weakness.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The split between the tribes was by now long settled, which makes the movement all the more striking:

But if the saints are easily scattered, they quickly rally when the Lord's hand is seen. Even in Asa's time, when division was complete, they fell to him in great numbers out of Ephraim, when they saw that the Lord was with him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the gathered crowd did

The next verses show what the gathering was for.

In this great gathering in the fifteenth year of Asa's reign, they offered to the Lord 700 bulls and 7,000 sheep taken as plunder. How good it was to draw the people's attention to the value of the sacrifice. Every case of recovery in Israel came with sacrifice. It reminds us how important the sacrifice of Christ is, for it is the source of all blessing for His people.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Asa later lost

The same principle worked in reverse at the end of Asa's life.

This was one of the brightest revivals in the history of the kings of Judah, from the days of Solomon until that time. But the sequel shows that the end was not so bright. Asa's heart turned away from the Lord, and when he turned to human strength a dark cloud overshadowed his end. While he was with the Lord, the Lord was with him. But then he forsook the Lord and turned to human help. He made an unholy alliance with the king of Syria. After that, the Lord's presence and power could no longer be seen with him.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Cleanse — the idols went out and the altar was repaired before anyone came in. Gathering follows cleansing, not the other way round.

- Presence — Judah's correct position did not draw the north. What drew them was the sight of God with His people. Truth on its own wins no one.

- Condition — His presence rests on one term. He is with us while we are with Him, in separation from evil and subjection to His word.

- Attraction — Asa drew people in instead of fighting for them. Even in evident weakness, it is never too late to return to the Lord.

- Sacrifice — the gathered crowd came to an altar, which points to the sacrifice of Christ, the source of all blessing. When Asa later left the Lord, the power that gathered them was gone.

2 Chronicles 15:10 · Darby

And they assembled themselves at Jerusalem in the third month of the fifteenth year of the reign of Asa.

This verse gives a date because something unusual happened that year. Crowds streamed into Jerusalem — not only from Judah and Benjamin, but from tribes that had broken away long before. What drew them? Why to that city? And what came of the gathering?

Who Assembled

The crowd in Jerusalem came from more than one kingdom. One writer explains why they came.

Another result of Asa's faithfulness was the regathering of Israel: he gathered all Judah and Benjamin, together with the people from Ephraim, Manasseh and Simeon who had settled among them. They came over to him from Israel in great numbers when they saw that the Lord his God was with him. Worship had been re-established, and Israel's unity appeared again — in the weak form that fits a time of division and ruin.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

But what was it that drew them? One writer answers with a warning that still applies.

This is what we have termed the attraction of power. In a word, they were on the true ground and had the truth. But that is not what drew so many to them from Israel. What drew them was that the Lord displayed His presence and divine power along with the truth. So now it is not enough to say that we have the truth; for we shall find that the truth as truth will never win souls.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why Jerusalem

The place of the gathering was not a matter of convenience.

No doubt, if the heart were cold and careless toward God, it would matter little about the place of worship; all places would be alike. But take this as a fixed principle. Every loyal, loving heart in the whole land, from Dan to Beersheba, would gladly hurry to the place where Jehovah had put His Name, and where He had chosen to meet His people.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What They Brought

The gathering did not stop at attendance. The animals offered that day came from the spoil of an earlier victory, and one writer turns that into a lesson about success.

On that day they sacrificed to the Lord seven hundred oxen and seven thousand sheep out of the spoil they had brought. The results of the victory are given over to the Lord here, and so it should always be. But suppose our successes lead us to depend on ourselves, to be pleased with ourselves, or to build up our own comfort. Then victory becomes a trap. It turns us away from God instead of bringing us closer to Him.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The offering also taught the crowd something.

How good it was to turn the people's attention to the value of the sacrifice. Every recovery in Israel came with sacrifice. That reminds us how important the sacrifice of Christ is, since it is the source of all blessing for His people.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Oath Sworn There

At this assembly the people bound themselves by oath. One writer is blunt about the mood, and yet finds God's answer more generous than the mood deserved.

They were also far too showy about it. "They swore an oath to the Lord with a loud voice and with shouting and with trumpets and with horns." Such demonstrations were no new thing in Israel. Israel had made such noise before at Sinai and elsewhere, and always with the same results — more saying than doing, much promise and little performance, high hopes and little to show for them. Yet there was clear sincerity, and even reality, though mixed with much that was only surface. God can tell what comes from Himself, even when it is mixed with what is merely human, and He rewarded them.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Another writer looks at the same oath and asks what the people received that day.

They had broken the covenant. They admit it and humble themselves. They return to it, and they feel the blessing at once. Jehovah "was found by them," and He has never hidden Himself from those who seek Him, even in the darkest moments of human history. To find the Lord! What a treasure! Why should they not rejoice! What rest when He is found!

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen — People came out of Ephraim, Manasseh and Simeon because they saw the Lord was with Asa. Holding the truth did not gather them; God's power displayed with the truth did.

- Sought — They travelled to the one place where God had put His Name. A cold heart treats every place as equal; a loving heart wants the appointed meeting place.

- Sacrificed — Plunder from a victory became an offering. Success handed back to God blesses; success kept becomes a snare.

- Sworn — The oath was loud and, in one writer's judgment, more promise than performance. God still read the real sincerity inside it and rewarded it.

- Satisfied — He was found by them, and rest followed. God has never hidden Himself from anyone who seeks Him, in any age.

2 Chronicles 15:11 · Darby

And they sacrificed to Jehovah in that day, of the spoil that they had brought, seven hundred oxen and seven thousand sheep.

In Asa's fifteenth year as king, Judah and Benjamin met at Jerusalem, joined by people from the northern tribes. They offered animals taken from the enemy they had just beaten, which raises the question of what a victory is for.

The Fruit of Victory Given Back to God

The animals offered here were not bred at home. They were taken from the defeated enemy. The people put them on God's altar instead of into their own herds. One writer draws out both the principle and the opposite danger:

The results of the victory are here consecrated to the Lord, and so it should always be. If our successes make us self-reliant, self-satisfied, and eager for our own comfort, victory becomes a trap. It turns us away from God instead of bringing us closer to Him.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Sacrifice at the Centre of Every Recovery

The numbers are large, and one writer sees the reason: an offering that size turned the whole crowd's eyes to the sacrifice.

How good it was to turn the people's attention to the value of the sacrifice! Every recovery in Israel came with sacrifice, and that reminds us how important the sacrifice of Christ is: it is the source of all blessing for His people.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Altar Behind the Offering

There was an altar to use only because Asa had already cleared out the idols and put the altar of the Lord back in service. One writer takes that renewal to mean the sacrifices had stopped, not that the stonework was broken:

I have no doubt that here, as in many other passages, it means restarting the sacrifices the law required on the altar. Solomon built this altar. It was still whole and needed no rebuilding... In short, the worship of the Lord that follows the Word had been neglected under the earlier kings. Now it was set up again as God intended. Wherever God's children truly and firmly separate themselves from the filth of the world, their worship soon takes back its honoured place.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Who Came, and What Drew Them

Some of the worshippers had travelled from tribes outside Asa's kingdom. One writer explains what actually draws people, and names the condition the prophet Azariah gave:

It is a mistake to expect others to be drawn to us because we have the truth. People must see that the Lord is with us, for He is the magnet of His people's hearts. Azariah states the condition: "Hear me, Asa, and all Judah and Benjamin: The LORD is with you while you are with Him." It is always so. To be with God means agreeing with His judgment of ourselves and of everything around us, keeping clear of evil, and obeying His word. If we walk with Him like that, He will always show that He is with us. And the more plainly His presence is with us, the more power goes out to attract the hearts of other believers.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Joy That Followed — and a Warning Underneath It

After the sacrifice the people bound themselves by oath to seek God with all their heart. The day ended in joy:

Every renewal of the covenant accompanies a true work of conscience in the people. They had broken the covenant. They admit it and humble themselves. They return to it and feel the blessing at once... The LORD "was found by them." He has never hidden Himself from those who seek Him, not even in the darkest moments of human history. To find the Lord! What a treasure! Why should they not rejoice!

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Yet a sincere day is not the same as a lasting one. One writer is frank about what the oath was worth:

They had sworn with all their heart and sought the Lord with all their soul. There is no doubt they meant it, but they did not suspect the treachery of their own hearts. Still, God respected the good intentions they had, and gave them rest all around for the time being.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Spoil → altar. What the enemy lost, God received. Victory is safe only when we hand its gains back to the One who gave it.

- Altar → worship. Asa restarted the sacrifices the earlier kings had dropped. Clear out evil, and worship soon takes back its place.

- Worship → magnetism. People came from outside Asa's borders. Holding the truth does not draw hearts; the Lord's clear presence does.

- Sacrifice → Christ. Every recovery in Israel came with sacrifice. Each one pointed to Christ's sacrifice, the source of all blessing for God's people.

- Seeking → rest. They sought Him and found Him. God hides from no seeker — though their own hearts were weaker than they knew.

2 Chronicles 15:12 · Darby

And they entered into a covenant to seek Jehovah the God of their fathers, with all their heart, and with all their soul,

King Asa had just heard a message from God through a prophet, and he acted on it. The people answered by binding themselves with an oath — and commentators weigh both the value of that oath and its limits.

Where the Covenant Came From

The covenant was not a burst of feeling. It followed a sequence. The king heard a message from God, believed it, cleared out the idols and put the altar back into use. Sacrifice came before promise.

Asa, hearing these words, believed what the prophet had said and then acted on them. That is the true path to blessing — learning, believing, obeying. The abominable idols were removed, and he restored the altar in front of the porch of the LORD, which had fallen out of use. A great scene of sacrifice followed. In connection with it they entered into a covenant to seek the LORD.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Words Are Older Than Asa

The words "to seek the LORD, the God of their fathers" were not new that day. They repeat what the nation already had in writing, in the covenant God made with Israel through Moses.

A known covenant must therefore have existed between God and the people. That covenant is set out in Exodus 24 and Deuteronomy 29, and what it contains is the same as what we read here... They entered into covenant to have the LORD for their God and to renounce all other gods. The historian describes Asa's zeal. In places he uses the very words of the law of Moses for what that law requires: "to seek the LORD, the God of their fathers, and to do the law and the commandment."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Renewal, Not a New Thing

The wording is Moses' wording. So this was the renewal of an old agreement, not the making of a new one. Renewals like this did not hold.

On this occasion they entered into a covenant to seek the LORD with all their heart and with all their soul. They also said that anyone who would not agree to this should be put to death (vv. 12-13). Like various other covenants, this was simply a renewal of the covenant of law that Moses first gave. And as in those cases, the people soon broke it... Only in the New Testament do we find the law set aside because it cannot work, and the pure grace of God brought in as the only principle that can really produce fruit for God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Zeal Beyond Their Strength

Commentators differ over how healthy the mood of that day was. One takes the promise itself as the problem — good intentions built on a strength the people did not have.

It was very commendable that they should seek the Lord with such zeal. But they had not realised their own weakness, or the weakness of their fathers, who could not keep the law at all. There is no power in man to keep the law or to enter into such a covenant with God. We can only confess that we cannot do it. We must throw ourselves on the sovereign mercy and grace of a God who is rich in mercy.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another writer questions the death penalty the people added. He sees their loud display as an old pattern in Israel. Even so, he says God found something real in it.

This severity hardly suited a people who had been guilty of that same neglect only a short time before... They were also very demonstrative. Loud displays like this were nothing new in Israel. They had been heard before at Sinai and elsewhere. The results were always the same: more saying than doing, much promise and little performance, great hope and little to show for it. But there was clear sincerity, and even reality, though mixed with much that was only on the surface. God can recognise what is His own even when it is mixed with what is only of the flesh, and He rewarded them.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

He Was Found by Them

The oath was not the end of the story. One writer traces the same pattern in every return to God.

Every renewal of the covenant goes together with a real work of conscience in the people. They had broken the covenant. They admit it and humble themselves. They return to it and feel the blessing at once... The Lord was found by them. Never, even in the darkest times of human history, has He hidden Himself from those who seek Him. To find the Lord! What a treasure!

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Sequence — The covenant grew out of a message heard, believed and obeyed. Idols went out and sacrifice came back first. The pledge came last.

- Source — The pledge borrows the very words of the covenant given through Moses. It renewed something the nation already had.

- Strain — They swore with all their heart, but had not measured their own weakness. No one can keep the law; only the grace of God produces fruit.

- Sincerity — Something real was there, mixed with noise and excess. God can recognise what is His own even when the flesh is mixed in.

- Sought and found — He was found by them, and He has never hidden Himself from anyone who seeks Him.

2 Chronicles 15:13 · Darby

and that whoever would not seek Jehovah the God of Israel should be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman.

Asa's reform reached its high point in a public oath. This verse gives the penalty attached to it: death for anyone in Judah who would not seek the Lord. Commentators see real sincerity here, mixed with real excess. They use the moment to ask what a law can and cannot do to the human heart.

The covenant they were renewing

The oath was not new with Asa. One writer traces its wording straight back to the books of Moses. So the people already held a covenant they knew.

So a known covenant must have existed between God and the people. Exodus 24 and Deuteronomy 29 describe that covenant, and its substance is the same as the one recorded here… In describing Asa's zeal, the historian sometimes uses the very words of the books of Moses for what those books require: "to seek the LORD, the God of their fathers, and to keep the law and the commandment."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

That places the death clause in a familiar pattern, with a familiar ending — and points to what only came later.

On this occasion they entered into a covenant to seek the Lord God of their fathers with all their heart and with all their soul. They added that anyone who would not agree to this should be put to death (vv. 12-13). Like the other covenants they made, this was simply a renewal of the covenant of law first given by Moses. And as in those cases, so here: before long they broke it… Only in the New Testament do we find the law set aside because it is ineffective, and the pure grace of God brought in as the only principle that can truly bring forth fruit for God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Zeal that outran self-knowledge

The people passing this sentence had been guilty of the same neglect not long before. One commentator notes the mismatch, and hears in their oath an echo of earlier scenes in Israel.

The tide of reformation ran high — too high, we may fear. They determined "that whoever would not seek the LORD, the God of Israel, should be put to death, whether young or old, man or woman." Such severity hardly suited a people who had been guilty of that very neglect only a short time before… Such displays were nothing new in Israel. The people had made them at Sinai and elsewhere, always with the same results — more saying than doing, much promise and little performance, great expectation and little result.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The root a law cannot reach

The need for such a decree shows how far idolatry had spread. Another writer presses the harder question: can a penalty remove it?

How clear the spread of idolatry, how much it had grown, to need a law to put it down! In his zeal he decrees that "whoever would not seek the LORD, the God of Israel, should be put to death." Did you ever know idolatry, or any sin, put away by a command? It may hide its head… but it still exists, and harsh laws only strengthen it. Its seat is in the heart. The idol is only the outward symbol, the visible sign of the heart's hostility to God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What no one can promise

The oath asked for whole-hearted seeking and backed it with death. Commentators do not dismiss the intention. They say the people did not know themselves.

It was very commendable that they should seek the Lord with such zeal. But they had not seen their own weakness, nor the weakness of their fathers, who could not keep the law at all. Man has no power to keep the law, or to enter into such a covenant with God. We can only confess that we are completely unable to do it, and cast ourselves on the sovereign mercy and grace of a God who is rich in mercy.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The answer God gave

God answered the desire underneath the threat, not the threat itself. One writer says that answer still stands.

Their religious enthusiasm ran so high that they determined to put to death every person who did not seek the LORD. And when they sought Him with their whole desire, they found Him, and He gave them rest. These are precious and encouraging words. He is the LORD, who does not change. It is still true today and always will be true. Those who seek Him with their whole desire will find Him.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Covenant — The oath renewed the old covenant of Moses, in the very words of his books. Like every such renewal, it soon broke down.

- Clause — People who had lately neglected God themselves now decreed death for that neglect. The severity hardly suited them.

- Commandment — No law can remove idolatry. It hides its head under harsh laws, because its seat is in the heart, not in the image.

- Confession — Do not swear such an oath. Admit you cannot keep it, and cast yourself on God's mercy.

- Consequence — God answered the desire, not the threat. They sought Him with the whole heart, they found Him, and He gave them rest. He has not changed.

2 Chronicles 15:14 · Darby

And they swore to Jehovah with a loud voice, and with shouting, and with trumpets, and with cornets.

This is the high point of Asa's reign: a battle won, a prophet heard, the idols gone, and now a whole nation swearing to seek the Lord. The verse leaves one question open: did the volume match the heart?

What draws others

An oath like this is sworn where others can see it. One commentator asks what actually draws people to God's people.

It is a mistake to expect others to be drawn to us because we have the truth. Others must see that the Lord is with us; for He is the magnet of His people's hearts. How may we make sure of the Lord's displayed presence? Azariah states the condition: "Hear me," he says, "Asa, and all Judah and Benjamin: The Lord is with you, while you are with Him."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The words they swore

The oath was not invented for the occasion. Its terms come from the covenant God gave through Moses, down to the penalty in the verse before.

So a known covenant must have existed between God and the people. Exodus 24 and Deuteronomy 29 describe that covenant, and its substance is the same as the covenant recorded here... They entered into covenant to have the Lord for their God, and to renounce all other gods, verses 12-21. In places, the historian describes Asa's zeal in the very words of the Pentateuch. The Pentateuch asks for exactly this: "to seek the Lord God of their fathers, and to do the law and the commandment."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Trumpets and horns

The verse names two instruments. Older versions call the second a "cornet," but one reference work traces the Hebrew word back to the ordinary word for a trumpet.

In Daniel 3:5-15 the word is qeren and means "horn or cornet." In the four other places the word is shophar, which is often translated "trumpet." 1 Chronicles 15:28; 2 Chronicles 15:14; Psalm 98:6; Hosea 5:8.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Noise Israel had made before

One commentator weighs the display carefully. He is uneasy about the noise, but he does not dismiss it.

The tide of reformation ran high — too high, it is to be feared. They decided that anyone who would not seek the Lord God of Israel should be put to death, whether young or old, man or woman. This severity hardly suited a people who had themselves been guilty of just such neglect a short time before. They were excessively demonstrative also. "And they swore to the Lord with a loud voice, and with shouting, and with trumpets, and with horns." Such demonstrations were nothing new in Israel. They had been heard before at Sinai and elsewhere. The results were always the same — more saying than doing, much promise and little performance, much expected and little seen. But there was clear sincerity, and even reality, though mixed with much that was only on the surface. God can recognise what is of Himself, even when it is mixed with what is only of the flesh, and He rewarded them.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

What an oath cannot reach

The reform had a law behind it. One commentator asks what a command can actually achieve.

How clear the spread of idolatry was, how greatly it had grown, to need a law to put it down! Did you ever know idolatry, or any sin, put away by commandment? It may hide its head: idolaters may seem to throw their idols to the moles and the bats, but it exists and is rather strengthened by repressive laws. Its seat is in the heart, and the idol is only the outward symbol, the visible sign of the heart's hostility towards God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer follows what became of the covenant behind the oath.

Like various other covenants, this was only a renewal of the covenant of law first given by Moses. As in those cases, so here, the covenant was soon broken... They had sworn with all their heart and sought the Lord with all their soul. There is no doubt they meant it, but they did not suspect the treachery of their own hearts. Still, God respected the good intentions they had, and gave them rest all around for the time being.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God met the seeking

The noise was mixed, but the answer came. One writer finds words here that still hold today.

When they sought Him with their whole desire He was found by them and gave them rest. These are precious and encouraging words. He is the LORD, who does not change. It is still true today and ever will be true. He will be found by those who seek Him with their whole desire.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Drawn — Holding the truth does not draw people. They come when they see that the Lord is with you.

- Sworn — The oath borrows its wording from the law given through Moses: seek the Lord, and do the commandment.

- Loud — The shouting and trumpets echo Sinai, where such promises brought more saying than doing.

- Shallow — A law can drive sin into hiding. But sin's seat is the heart, so a law against idols never reaches the idol.

- Found — God saw what was real inside the display and gave them rest. He still answers those who seek Him with their whole desire.

2 Chronicles 15:15 · Darby

And all Judah rejoiced at the oath; for they took the oath with all their heart, and sought him with their whole desire; and he was found of them. And Jehovah gave them rest round about.

Asa's reign had just seen a great victory, a warning from a prophet, and a sweeping clear-out of idols. Now the whole nation swore an oath to seek the God of their fathers. The verse tells us what came of it: joy, a God they found, and quiet on every border. It also raises a question. Why did God answer this oath, when so many others came to nothing?

The Whole Desire Behind the Oath

One writer ties the result to the zeal God saw in them, and to the action that proved it:

The Lord took account of their zeal, "for they had sworn with all their heart and had sought Him with their whole desire," so that "He was found by them, and the LORD gave them rest all around." To show they were in earnest about rejecting idolatry, Asa removed his mother Maachah from being queen, because she had made an idol; he cut her idol down, crushed it, and burned it in the Kidron Valley.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another writer holds this out as a promise that has not expired:

And when they sought Him with their whole desire, He was found by them and gave them rest. These are precious and encouraging words. He is the LORD, who does not change. It is still true today and ever will be true. He will be found by those who seek Him with their whole desire.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

He Was Found by Them

"He was found by them" is the heart of the verse. One writer draws out both the joy in those words and the way rest and strength feed each other:

The LORD "was found by them." Never, even in the darkest moments of man's history, has He hidden Himself from those who seek Him. To find the Lord! What a treasure! Why should they not rejoice! What rest when He is found! "The LORD gave them rest all around." In the previous chapter we saw the strength that follows rest. In this chapter we see the rest that follows strength. So in a faithful life, strength and rest keep renewing each other.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Rest All Around

This rest showed up in how Judah's neighbours behaved. One writer sets Asa beside a king whose story went the other way:

"When a man's ways please the LORD, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him" (Prov. 16:7). Asa proved this, and so did his son Jehoshaphat. Both kings had quiet and rest all around, because they did the will of God (2 Chron. 14:7; 2 Chron. 15:15; 2 Chron. 20:30). But of Solomon we read, sadly, "The LORD stirred up an adversary against Solomon, Hadad the Edomite."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Real, Yet Mixed

Commentators differ on how to read the scene. Some take the zeal at face value. One writer judges that the movement ran hotter than the people could keep up:

The tide of reform ran high — too high, I am afraid… Such harshness hardly suited a people who had been guilty of that very neglect only a short time before… much promise, and little performance; great expectation, and little of it realised. But there was clear sincerity, and even reality, though mixed with much that was only on the surface. And God, who can tell what comes from Himself even when it is mixed with what is merely human, rewarded them.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

What an Oath Cannot Do

God gave the rest "for the time being." One writer explains why sincere people still break the promises they mean:

There is no doubt they meant it, but they did not suspect the treachery of their own hearts. Still, God respected the good intentions they had, and gave them rest all around for the time being (v. 15). Only in the New Testament do we find the law set aside because it does not work. There God brings in His pure grace as the only principle that can bear fruit for Him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Later kings and leaders renewed the same covenant, and it broke every time:

The same thing happened under Hezekiah, Joash, Ezra, and Nehemiah. But we must add that the covenant was broken again each time. A man who still does not know himself has to learn what he is by being put under responsibility. Even so, joy is the result of every restoration, even one that is partial and temporary.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Sought — the oath counted because it came from the whole heart. God took account of their zeal.

- Found — God never hid Himself from those who seek Him, even in history's darkest hours. He does not change, so this is still true today.

- Rested — finding Him brought rest on every side. When a man's ways please the LORD, even his enemies are at peace with him.

- Mixed — the reform ran high, and much of it was shallow. God can still tell what comes from Himself, and He rewarded them.

- Broken — the rest lasted only "for the time being." People who do not yet know their own hearts break the covenants they swear. Grace, not law, is the principle that bears fruit for God.

2 Chronicles 15:16 · Darby

And also Maachah, the mother of Asa the king, he removed from being queen, because she had made an idol for the Asherah; and Asa cut down her idol, and stamped it, and burned it in the valley Kidron.

Asa's reform against idols began in public; in this verse it reaches his own family. He strips his grandmother of her rank and burns her image, which forces a hard question: does loyalty to God still hold when the guilty person is family?

The Queen Mother and Her Idol

The word "mother" here needs care. Commentators explain her title:

Maachah, his grandmother, most likely had some oversight as "queen-mother." (1 Kings 15:13 calls her the mother of Asa, and 2 Chronicles 15:16 does the same. In these passages "mother" means grandmother.)

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Older translations call what she made "a grove." The word is Asherah, and it names an object, not a place:

On the whole it seems most probable that they were wooden symbols of a goddess. They took the form of images or pillars, or plain tree trunks set in the earth… Immorality was almost constantly associated with idolatry. The Greek Old Testament translates the name Asherah here in 2 Chronicles 15:16 as Astarte, the Syrian goddess.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Reform That Reaches the Palace

Cleaning up the nation was only half the job:

Asa does not content himself with repelling evil publicly; he purifies his own house. Both must be done together. Otherwise our Christian life will be only an empty show… Maacah was in fact Asa's grandmother, and she had probably been made regent, with the title of queen, when Abijah died. See how firmly Asa sets natural ties aside! He makes no allowance for them when the honour of his God is at stake. Nothing stops him. He takes away all hope that Maacah could hold any influence at all over God's people. In front of everyone he treats her as an enemy of Jehovah. May we imitate him! We are far too ready to go easy on Satan when the sin is in our own families.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Where Faithfulness Is Really Tested

Others met the same test in their own homes:

A man's own family circle is the real test of his faithfulness… Gideon too began his work for God by tearing down the altar of Baal that his father had set up. And in the early church a man could not serve as an elder or a deacon unless he managed his own home well.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

No Exemption for Rank or Age

Maacah had two obvious defences: her closeness to the king and her age. Asa accepted neither:

Also, Asa showed no favouritism to his own close relative — his grandmother — who had made an idolatrous image of Asherah. He removed her from the place of Queen Mother. Not even her age would make any difference in this case. Such evil cannot be excused, no matter who is guilty of it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Asa also crushed the image and burned it in the Kidron valley. That ground already had a reputation:

In Old Testament times people treated it as a defiled place. Asa burned his mother's idol there (1 Kings 15:13). Josiah also burned the symbols of idolatry there.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What It Cost, and What Followed

The decision cost Asa something. One writer notes it plainly:

He even removed his mother from being queen. No doubt this was a very painful trial for the son, but she was an idolatress.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Yet this high point later becomes the measure of Asa's decline:

What a change in Asa from first to last! At the start he did not spare even his own mother. Later he put Hanani in prison and oppressed some of the people. He is so forgetful of God, of His mercy, of His promise and of His claims on them, that he seeks help from Syria.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Identify — "Mother" here means grandmother. Maacah held the rank of queen mother, and her "grove" was an Asherah — a wooden symbol of a goddess.

- Purify — Asa cleansed the nation and his own house together. Cleaning up in public only, commentators warn, leaves the Christian life "an empty show."

- Spare no one — Asa let neither family closeness nor old age excuse the evil.

- Publicise — Asa cut the image down, crushed it and burned it in the defiled Kidron valley, where all could see, ending her influence over God's people.

- Persevere — The king who once did not spare his own mother later put Hanani in prison. Early zeal is no guarantee of a faithful finish.

2 Chronicles 15:17 · Darby

But the high places were not removed from Israel; only, Asa's heart was perfect all his days.

Asa cleared the idols out of Judah and restored the Lord's altar and sacrifices. Yet one thing was left standing, and the same verse still calls his heart whole for a lifetime.

What the high places were

These were not only pagan shrines. Some were used for the worship of the true God — and they still offended Him.

Israel was to destroy all the high places of the pagan nations. That would show how much they hated their wicked ways. But human nature is no better in those who are near to God than in those who are far from Him. The time soon came, sadly, when Israel chose high places for themselves. Some of these were for idol worship, and some for the worship of the Lord. But every high place offended Him, whatever the motives of those who set it up. They were the expression of self-will, of hearts that would not obey His commandments.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why they were left standing

Commentators differ on which high places these were and why Asa let them be. One reading points to the limits of his authority.

Though Asa removed the high places from Judah (ch. 14:5), he did not remove these from the rest of Israel (v. 17). Of course, over the ten tribes he did not have the authority he had over Judah. Some from those tribes had chosen to recognise him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A grain of sand

Another reading takes the omission as a real compromise — small in scale, but not small in effect.

This seemed to be of little importance, for he had removed all the abominations from these same cities. But when it is a matter of separation from evil, nothing is unimportant. Without doubt Scripture describes Asa's heart as "perfect all his days." His heart understood what suited the Lord's holiness. But in practice he fell short of it. Tolerating the high places was a grain of sand compared with all his activity. But a grain of sand can stop even the best built machine. A flaw in an iron beam will break the most solid bridge.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What a perfect heart means

Older translations read "perfect" here where the ESV says "wholly true." The word does not claim Asa never failed.

Remarkable is God's word about Asa; though he did not remove the idolatrous high places, yet his heart was perfect with the Lord all his days. (1 Kings 15:14; 2 Chron. 15:17.) Perfection is always in relation to the truth revealed. Noah was perfect. Job was "blameless and upright." God said to Abraham, "walk before me, and be blameless." But Israel and Judah had lost much of the knowledge of truth.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Law cannot change a heart

Asa's reform ran on royal decree — and a decree only reaches as far as behaviour.

Did you ever know idolatry, or any sin, put away by commandment? It may hide its head. Idol-worshippers may seem to throw their idols to the moles and the bats. But it still exists, and repressive laws only strengthen it. Its seat is in the heart, and the idol is only the outward symbol, the visible index of the heart's enmity against God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

God's pleasure in recording it

The failure and the commendation stand in the same verse.

So much had been done. Idolatry was removed, the Lord's altar renewed, the sacrifices to God restored. Yet it could still be said, "But the high places were not removed from Israel" (verse 17). While the high places stood, the people were in danger of going back to idol worship. Despite this, the Spirit of God noted, "only Asa's heart was perfect all his days." It gave the Lord pleasure to record the state of His servant's heart.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

"All his days" and the sad closing years

Asa's later years held real failures. One writer ties them to the verdict of this verse.

Asa never went back to idolatry, and that is probably why the Spirit of God has recorded that "Asa's heart was perfect all his days." There was still failure. He looked to the enemy of Israel for help instead of to the Lord. He would not humble himself under God's rebuke. He imprisoned Hanani the prophet, and he mistreated some of the people. Then, when his feet were diseased under God's discipline, he turned to the physicians and not to the Lord.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Self-will. High places offended God even when people used His own name there. They expressed self-will — hearts that would not obey Him.

- Limits. Asa's reach did not cover all Israel. The high places still stand in the record as work left undone.

- Grain. When it comes to separation from evil, nothing is too small. A grain of sand stops the best-built machine.

- Measure. "Perfect" is measured against the truth revealed. Asa's heart was true to the light he had; it does not mean he never failed.

- Pleasure. God notes the failure and still delights to record a whole heart. A royal decree never uproots idolatry, because its seat is in the heart.

2 Chronicles 15:18 · Darby

And he brought into the house of God the things which his father had dedicated, and the things which he himself had dedicated, silver, and gold, and vessels.

Asa's long reform ends with something carried in, not torn down. He places treasure in God's house — gifts set apart by his father Abijah, and gifts he set apart himself. In the very next chapter the same silver and gold leave the temple again.

Reform That Ends in Giving

Asa had spent his reign judging the evils in Judah. But his work did not stop at tearing down. The three things he carried in each carry a meaning.

On the negative side, Asa judged the glaring evils in Judah. But he did not stop there. He also did good work on the positive side. He brought into the house of the Lord the things his father had dedicated and the things he himself had dedicated: silver, gold and vessels. The silver symbolizes redemption. So it speaks of Asa's appreciation of the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. Gold speaks of the glory of God. So it shows his appreciation of what brings glory to God. The vessels were containers that illustrate the faith of holding the truth in love. May we who are believers today care deeply about honoring our God and Father. We must not ignore the negative side, but the positive is much more fruitful.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Dedication Was Not New

Giving valuable things to God was not something Asa invented. Other nations did it too, and in Israel the giver lifted the gift up before God.

Giving precious things to God's service was not a new practice. The treasuries of Egypt's temples were full of such objects. Israel dedicated its gifts to the Lord, and He accepted what they gave as wave offerings. The giver lifted up the gift and waved it heavenwards, as before God, "as an acknowledgement that He to whom it was offered is Lord and Giver of all."

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Two Sets of Gifts, One King

Why were his father's gifts still waiting to be brought in?

It seems Abijah had not carried through his promise in dedicating these things. Asa fulfilled this for him, and added his own contribution.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Record God Keeps

Verse 17 admits a failure: the high places stayed. Even so, God praised Asa's heart, and He noticed what Asa gave.

Despite this, the Spirit of God noted, "only Asa's heart was perfect all his days." It gave the Lord pleasure to record the state of His servant's heart. He was pleased to tell of Asa bringing into the house of God the things which his father dedicated, and the things which he himself dedicated. God never forgets anything that is done for Him, and He showed His appreciation of king Asa by giving him peace, for "there was no war until the thirty-fifth year of his reign."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Same Treasure, Sent Out Again

Later, Baasha threatened Judah. Asa opened the treasury he had once filled. He sent its contents to a foreign king to buy military help.

Baasha's move against the kingdom of Judah brings out the lack of faith in Asa's heart: he had no confidence in God. His tireless zeal against idolatry had no reality in his soul… He goes to the king of Syria for help; there is not even the appearance of going to God. Asa has brought silver and gold into the house of God; now he gives these treasures to Ben-hadad, and adds to them treasures from his own house.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Asa gave away more than metal — and believers can make the same trade.

God will not give His glory to another, but Asa in effect gave God's glory (the gold) to Ben-hadad! … Too often, in our day, believers use things that belong to God (as Asa used the gold and silver from the house of the Lord) to serve their own selfish ends.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Bring in. Asa's reform is not measured only by the evils he judged. What he carried into God's house completed it, and that positive side is the more fruitful one.

- Gift. Silver speaks of redemption, gold of God's glory, the vessels of holding the truth in love. To dedicate them is to acknowledge that God is Lord and Giver of all.

- Reach. The gift reaches back a generation: what Abijah promised and left undone, his son delivered, adding his own.

- Result. God recorded Asa's perfect heart and his gift. He answered with peace to the thirty-fifth year. Nothing done for Him is forgotten.

- Guard. Asa later sent that same treasure out to Ben-hadad, handing God's glory to another. What you dedicate today, faith must still guard tomorrow.

2 Chronicles 15:19 · Darby

And there was no war until the thirty-fifth year of the reign of Asa.

The chapter closes with a date. The fighting stopped, and stayed stopped, until the thirty-fifth year of Asa's reign. That quiet raises two questions: why God gave it, and why the verse marks the year it ended.

Peace as God's Acknowledgment

The verse follows a record of Asa's heart and his gifts brought into God's house. One writer reads the quiet as God's response:

It gave the Lord pleasure to record the state of His servant's heart. He was pleased too to tell of Asa bringing into the house of God the things his father dedicated, and the things he himself dedicated. God never forgets anything done for Him. He showed His appreciation of king Asa by giving him peace, for "there was no more war until the thirty-fifth year of the reign of Asa."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Rest and Strength Feeding Each Other

Earlier in the chapter the people had sought God with their whole heart, and the rest followed. Henri Rossier traces a rhythm running through these two chapters:

Jehovah "was found by them," and never, even in the darkest moments of man's history, has He hidden Himself from those who seek Him. To find the Lord! What a treasure! What rest when He is found! "Jehovah gave them rest all around." In the preceding chapter we saw the strength that follows rest. In our present chapter we see the rest that follows strength. So it is that in a faithful life, strength and rest keep renewing each other.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Small Thing Left Standing

The same chapter notes that the high places were not removed. Rossier weighs that one omission against everything else Asa did:

Letting the high places stand was a grain of sand compared with his overall activity. But a grain of sand can stop even the best-built machine. A flaw in an iron beam will break the most solid bridge. And Judah's full security rested on Asa's careful faithfulness to his God. From this point on, after ten years of rest and prosperity, we notice decline in this man of God.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

When the Quiet Ended

The years of peace named here run out, and the next chapter opens with an invasion. One writer treats that invasion as the moment Asa's real condition surfaced:

Baasha's move against the kingdom of Judah brings out the lack of faith in Asa's heart: he had no confidence in God. His unceasing activity in zeal against idolatry had no reality in his soul. The sun rose in the form of Baasha's invasion, and this outward piety withers away. There was no depth of earth. He goes to the king of Syria for help; there is not even the appearance of going to God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how far the failure reached. Darby limits it to trust:

But although Asa's faithfulness continued, his trust in God failed afterwards. Baasha was jealous that Israelites were going over to Judah, so he builds a city to stop it. And Asa, instead of looking to the Lord, allies himself with Syria. The alliance produced the effect he wanted, but it stirred up Gentiles against Israel.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Date Itself

The number in this verse, and the thirty-sixth year in the next chapter, do not fit the recorded death of Baasha. He was Israel's king, and he later attacks Judah. Commentators differ on the solution. One takes the figures as a scribe's slip:

The dates in 2 Chron. 15:19 and 16:1 do not fit the date of Baasha's death (1 Kings 16:8). So of course they do not fit Baasha's war against Asa either. Commentators have tried to remove the difficulty in two ways. Some suppose that the numeral 35 refers not to the year Asa came to the throne, but to the separation of the kingdoms of Judah and Israel. Others correct the numeral in Chronicles. The latter is clearly the only satisfactory solution. There is plainly a copyist's mistake here.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another refuses that route and takes the first option instead:

This verse, compared with 1 Kings 15:33 and 16:8, presents a chronological difficulty. According to those references, Baasha must have been dead ten years before the thirty-sixth year of Asa's reign. And we cannot always explain these seeming differences by a supposed copying error. The only apparent way out is to date "the thirty-sixth year" from the start of Judah as a kingdom separate from Israel. That would place the event in the sixteenth year of Asa's actual reign, just after the events of the previous chapter.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Sought. The people sought God with their whole heart, and He never hides Himself from those who seek Him.

- Found. Rest came when they found Him — and in a faithful life strength and rest keep renewing each other.

- Rewarded. Nothing done for God is forgotten; He showed His appreciation of Asa by giving him the long stretch without war.

- Undermined. One tolerated thing, small beside all Asa's zeal, was the grain of sand — and decline set in after the years of rest.

- Tested. When the peace ran out and Baasha came, Asa bought Syria's help instead of looking to the Lord. Commentators differ on the date: a copyist's slip, or a count from the year the kingdom split.

2 Chronicles 16:1 · Darby

In the thirty-sixth year of the reign of Asa, Baasha king of Israel came up against Judah, and built Ramah, in order to let none go out or come in to Asa king of Judah.

Asa of Judah had reigned well for years, until Baasha of Israel fortified a border town to fence his own people in. This verse opens the turn in Asa's story, and it raises two questions: why does the date look odd, and why does the king's faith give way here?

The Thirty-Sixth Year

Commentators have long debated this date and differ on how to settle it. One approach counts the years from a different starting point:

Critics have made much of the supposed wrong date, the thirty-sixth year of Asa's reign. Compare 1 Kings 15:33 with the first verse of this chapter to see the apparent discrepancy. Suppose Baasha invaded Judah soon after the events recorded in the previous chapter. Then this was the thirty-sixth year after the ten tribes revolted. This presents a possible solution. Others think it is the error of a scribe.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Ramah: A Fortress Near Jerusalem

The town Baasha chose to fortify stood close to Judah's capital:

Baasha king of Israel threatened Asa and began to build Ramah, a fortified city only a few miles from Jerusalem.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Shutting People In

People were leaving Israel for Judah, and Baasha meant to stop it:

Baasha, king of Israel, had become alarmed at the thought of some from Israel defecting to Judah. Therefore he came and built Ramah as a buffer between the two companies. What a picture! Those who have left the Lord's center will do all they can to keep their followers from returning to the Lord's place for them. This was not a direct attack upon Judah, but Asa considered it an offense.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer names the wider pattern behind the wall:

Baasha could not attack Asa without putting himself in danger. So he wanted to stop his subjects from leaving him and joining God's testimony. This principle appears again and again: those who, like Baasha, still keep up a profession of true religion, though mixed with deadly errors, cannot bear a testimony near them that attracts souls.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Test That Exposed the Heart

The invasion did not create Asa's problem; it uncovered it. Years of energetic reform had not gone as deep as they looked:

Baasha's move against the kingdom of Judah brings out the lack of faith in Asa's heart. He had no confidence in God. His unceasing activity in zeal against idolatry had no reality in his soul. Then Baasha's invasion rose like the sun, and this outward show of godliness withers away, because there was no depth of soil. He goes to the king of Syria for help; there is not even the appearance of going to God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Lesser Trial Than the One He Survived

Asa had faced a far bigger army before, and that comparison makes this collapse striking:

It is difficult to account for this sudden defect in Asa's faith. Not long before, with God's help, he had destroyed the immense army of Zerah the Ethiopian. Now, facing an enemy not half so strong, his faith fails. He looks to human strength to rescue him.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Why the Fear Took Hold

One writer traces the fear back to an evil Asa had tolerated:

Sadly, by tolerating a certain evil, Asa gave an opening for this hostility. Baasha could have thought: Asa claims to be closer to God than we are, yet he does the same things we do when they suit his ambitions! Asa fears Baasha. He has given way on one point, so he can no longer treat the world as a system he must never compromise with and never ask help from. He knows he has no strength of his own, just as when the Ethiopians attacked. But he no longer has the same assurance that all his strength is in God.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Wall. Baasha built Ramah as a buffer to stop his people crossing to Judah; those who leave the Lord's center work to keep their followers from returning.

- Test. Baasha's threat was smaller than the Ethiopian army Asa had already survived, yet this time his faith failed.

- Root. His zeal against idols was busy, but it had no reality in his soul. The sun rose, and the plant withered for lack of depth.

- Crack. One tolerated evil left him unable to treat the world as something he must never ask help from.

- Reliance. So he went to the king of Syria, and there was not even the appearance of going to God.

2 Chronicles 16:2 · Darby

And Asa brought out silver and gold out of the treasures of the house of Jehovah and of the king's house, and sent to Ben-hadad king of Syria, who dwelt at Damascus, saying,

Asa had already seen God shatter a far larger army. Yet when a smaller threat came from Israel, he took silver and gold — some of it from God's own house — and sent it to a foreign king to buy protection. How does a man of real faith end up hiring the world instead of asking the Lord?

A small test that exposed a hidden decline

From the outside, Asa still looked strong. God saw something else.

God knew His servant Asa. There was clearly backsliding that no one could see from the outside. So God allowed Baasha to come against him, to prove what was in his heart. Asa was such a good man, and his heart was perfect all his days. Yet there was just that departure from first love that the Lord could discern.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Paying with what belonged to God

Part of the payment came out of the temple treasury. One writer sees where the trouble began.

One hardly knows anything sadder than this account of Asa. No doubt he was the Lord's, but he was out of communion, and he relied on his own resources. And he begins by robbing God. Then he asked a worldly man to do something plainly dishonourable... If we get out of communion, there is no telling what we may do. It is sad to think that the flesh has more room to work in a believer than in the unconverted.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Asa himself had once filled that treasury.

Asa has brought silver and gold into the house of God; now he gives these treasures to Ben-hadad, and adds to them treasures from his own house. All this is the glory of the kingdom departing from the house of David.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Weaker enemy, weaker faith

Asa's own record makes this move hard to explain.

It is difficult to account for this sudden defect in Asa's faith. He had only recently, with God's help, completely destroyed the immense army of Zerah the Ethiopian. Now, faced with an enemy not half so dangerous, his faith fails. He depends for deliverance on human strength... It was the beginning of Asa's downfall. Though he got the deliverance he wanted, it cost him the rebuke of God and wars to the end of his reign.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Leaning on his father's alliance

Asa bought his way out of the threat. In doing so he followed his father's example.

To block this plan, Asa relies on Ben-hadad, the king of Syria. He sends him presents, courts his alliance, and uses him to drive Baasha away... A league with the world may bring us advantages at first, but afterwards we taste its bitter fruits... His father had allied himself with the enemies of God's people; Asa acknowledges and seeks after this alliance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The success that hid the loss

Ben-hadad took the money and attacked Israel. By every visible measure, Asa had solved his problem.

Ben-hadad, king of Syria, moved only by his love of silver and gold, agreed to break a treaty he had with Israel and take sides with Judah... Asa would no doubt feel himself justified, as many do who think the end justifies the means. He gained his object through friendship with the world! If instead of this he had sought the grace and guidance of the Lord... certainly God would have acted in the best way possible.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The payment cost him a victory over Syria he could have won.

Alliance with the world prevents our overcoming the world. If he had not done this, the Syrians would have fallen into Asa's hands. For "the eyes of the LORD run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to give strong support to those whose heart is blameless toward him." Solemn and precious word!

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Tested. A smaller threat than he had already beaten exposed a decline no one around him could see.

- Spent. He paid for rescue with the temple's silver and gold. What he once brought into God's house went out to a foreign king.

- Traded. He leaned on his father's old alliance. Trust in the Lord gave way to trust in Syria.

- Gained. The plan worked. Baasha pulled back, and success made the wrong method look right.

- Lost. The bought victory cost him a greater one — and brought God's rebuke and wars to the end of his reign.

2 Chronicles 16:3 · Darby

There is a league between me and thee, and between my father and thy father behold, I send thee silver and gold; go, break thy league with Baasha king of Israel, that he may depart from me.

Asa had shown real faith earlier in his reign, and once faced an overwhelming army trusting God alone. Why then, in his thirty-sixth year, does a smaller threat from Baasha of Israel send him to buy a treaty with silver and gold from God's house?

A faith already tested

Asa had faced a far greater army and trusted God then. One writer states the puzzle:

It is hard to explain this sudden failure in Asa's faith. Only a short time before, with God's help, he had wiped out the huge army of Zerah the Ethiopian. Now, facing an enemy not half so dangerous, his faith fails, and he leans on human strength to save him.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The small concession behind the large one

The collapse did not come out of nowhere. Asa had already given way on a smaller point:

Asa fears Baasha. Since he has given way on one point, he can no longer treat the world as a system he must never compromise with and never ask help from. He knows well that he lacks strength, just as he did when the Ethiopian attacked. But he no longer has the same assurance that all his strength is in God.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Robbing God to hire a king

Notice where the payment comes from, and what Asa asks for. He takes the money out of God's house, and he asks Ben-hadad to break his word to another king:

It is hard to find anything sadder than this account of Asa. No doubt he belonged to the Lord, but he was out of communion with God, and relied on his own resources. And he begins by robbing God. Then he asked a worldly man to do a plainly dishonourable thing... If we get out of communion there is no saying what we may do.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

That gold belonged to God's house, and it ended up in a foreign king's hands:

God will not give His glory to another (Isa. 42:8), but Asa in effect gave God's glory (the gold) to Ben-Hadad! So Asa made the fatal mistake of enlisting the world's help to fight against his own brothers, the children of Israel... But too often, in our day, believers use shocking means of fighting against other believers who have offended them. They also use things that belong to God (as Asa used the gold and silver from the house of the Lord) to get what they selfishly want.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"As there was between my father and your father"

Asa's appeal rests on a treaty his own father had already made. One writer weighs what kind of man that father was:

How sad to hear a godly king say such things! Abijam, Asa's father, had walked "in all the sins of his father" — and now Asa identifies himself with him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The success that cost a victory

The plan worked. But success is not the same as God's approval:

Asa would no doubt feel himself justified, as many do who consider that the end justifies the means... He gained his object through friendship with the world! Suppose instead he had asked the Lord for grace and guidance, to be freed from the threat of the ten tribes of Israel. God would certainly have intervened in the best possible way.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The treaty also lost him a victory God was ready to give:

Instead of looking to the Lord, Asa allies himself with Syria. The alliance produced the effect he wanted, but it stirred up the nations against Israel. And that was not all: alliance with the world stops us from overcoming the world. Had he not done this, the Syrians would have fallen into the hands of Asa.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the bargain cost

The relief was real. So was the bill:

This was the beginning of Asa's downfall. The deliverance he wanted did come — Ben-hadad listened to King Asa, and Baasha stopped building Ramah. But it cost Asa the rebuke of God, and wars to the end of his reign.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Concession — Asa "has given way on one point." After that he can no longer treat the world as something he must never bargain with. Big failures grow out of small ones.

- Fear — A lighter test than the Ethiopian invasion breaks him. He no longer has the assurance that all his strength is in God.

- Robbery — He pays for the treaty out of God's treasury. He "begins by robbing God," and hands God's glory to Ben-hadad.

- Success — The plan works, and that is why it deceives. Those who gain their object this way feel justified, as many do who think the end justifies the means.

- Loss — "Alliance with the world stops us from overcoming the world." Asa paid Syria instead of trusting God. So the enemy God would have handed him escaped, and wars followed to the end of his reign.

2 Chronicles 16:4 · Darby

And Ben-hadad hearkened to king Asa, and sent the captains of his forces against the cities of Israel; and they smote Ijon and Dan and Abelmaim, and all the store-magazines of the cities of Naphtali.

Asa, king of Judah, took silver and gold from the temple and paid the king of Syria to break his treaty with Israel. The money worked — Syrian troops hit Israel's northern towns — but the chapter asks whether a plan that works is a plan God approved.

The towns that fell

The towns named here lay in the north, in the land of the tribe of Naphtali:

Naphtali's land was mountainous and fertile. It lay in the north, with the upper Jordan on the east and Asher on the west. Ijon, which was farther north than Dan, was in their land. Joshua 19:32-39. When Baasha, king of Israel, attacked Judah, Asa sent gold and silver to Ben-hadad, king of Syria, for help. He responded at once.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why Ben-hadad listened

The verse opens by saying Ben-hadad listened to Asa. One writer points to what bought that answer, and to how Asa likely felt about the result:

Only his love for silver and gold moved Ben Hadad, king of Syria. He agreed to break a treaty he had with Israel and take sides with Judah (vv. 3-4). He attacked some of the cities of Israel including the storage cities of Naphtali. This had the effect Asa wanted. No doubt Asa felt justified, as many do who think that the end justifies the means (vv. 5-6).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Success that cost everything

The plan worked. One writer weighs what it cost:

At first Asa's unfaithfulness seems to bear excellent fruit. Baasha stops building Ramah. Asa and his people carry its stones away to build fortresses against Israel. The king seems to have escaped a great disaster by taking this path. But he loses all the blessing of a walk of faith, and he will prove this in a sad way. Oh, how much happier he was when he felt he had no strength at all, and still stood against the countless army of Zerah!

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The victory he forfeited

The Syrian army that marched for Asa was an army he could have beaten himself. One writer draws the wider principle:

Asa, instead of looking to the Lord, makes an alliance with Syria. It produced the effect he wanted, but it stirred up Gentiles against Israel. And this was not all; alliance with the world prevents our overcoming the world. If he had not done this, the Syrians would have fallen into Asa's hands. For "the eyes of the LORD run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to give strong support to those whose heart is blameless toward Him."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The loss follows a rule that holds for us too:

How remarkable is the government of God. Whatever wrong step we take to reach a goal, it not only fails to reach it, but it brings its own chastening with it. The very thing we least desire comes upon us. God would have stopped not only Israel, but Syria too. Instead, the army of the king of Syria escaped out of his hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Foreign swords against his own people

The towns struck here belonged to Asa's own people. He paid a Gentile king — an outsider to Israel — to attack them, and one writer calls that almost unthinkable:

Asa is so forgetful of God, of His mercy, of His promise and of His claims on them, that he seeks help from the Syrian. So we see this amazing, even monstrous thing: Judah seeking Gentile help against Israel, and buying it with the Lord's treasures. This tells their evil condition before God. If they were ready to worship the Gentiles' God, why not ask the Gentiles for help?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same writer brings it into the present day:

So Asa made the fatal mistake of getting the world's help to fight against his own brothers, the people of Israel. Instead of making a treaty with Syria, how much better it would have been for Asa to seek the restoration of Israel! But too often today, believers use shocking ways to fight other believers who have offended them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The pull we still feel

What moved Asa still moves us. One writer names the danger:

The pull to meet a worldly trial in a worldly way is immense. We easily think that spiritual means cannot meet the world's attacks on us. So we are in danger of turning to earthly means to escape. ... Be sure, if we do not feel the danger, it is because we are ourselves under the world's influence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Bought: Ben-hadad "listened" because he was paid; his motive was love of silver and gold, not loyalty to Judah.

- Worked: the Syrian raids on Ijon, Dan, Abel-maim and Naphtali's store cities did what Asa wanted. Success is not proof of God's approval.

- Lost: the army that fought for him was the army God would have given into his hand. An alliance with the world keeps us from overcoming the world.

- Turned: a wrong step brings its own chastening. The thing we least want comes instead.

- Warned: the pull to meet a worldly trial in a worldly way is strong. If we do not feel the danger, we are already under the world's influence.

2 Chronicles 16:5 · Darby

And it came to pass when Baasha heard of it, that he left off building Ramah, and let his work cease.

Asa paid the king of Syria to break with Israel, and the plan worked: Baasha stopped fortifying Ramah, and the crisis passed. So the verse raises a hard question — does a plan that works mean God approved it?

The Scheme Succeeded

At first the results looked excellent. Commentators point out what Asa lost at the same moment.

At first Asa's unfaithfulness seems to bear excellent fruit. Ben-hadad accepts silver and gold taken out of the house of the Lord as tribute. He breaks his alliance with Baasha. He uses the chance to attack the cities of Ephraim and to make himself master of the store cities of Naphtali. Baasha stops building Ramah. Asa and his people carry its stones away to build fortresses against Israel. By taking this path the king appears to escape a great disaster. But he loses all the blessing of a walk of faith, and he will sadly prove it.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Results Used As Self-Justification

When the outcome is good, we stop questioning the method. Commentators warn about that danger here.

This had the effect Asa wanted. No doubt Asa felt himself justified, as many do who think the end justifies the means. Asa was able to attack Ramah and reduce it to nothing. He gained his object through friendship with the world! Suppose he had instead asked for the grace and guidance of the Lord, to be freed from the threatened attack of the ten tribes. God would then have stepped in, in the best way possible. We too may find great blessing through depending on the Lord. Then we are in great danger of depending on our own ability to get what we want.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Larger Victory Forfeited

Asa got Israel off his back, but Syria's army escaped him. His bargain bought less than faith would have given.

How remarkable is the government of God. Whatever wrong step we take to reach an aim, it not only fails to reach it, but it brings its own chastening with it. The very thing we least desire comes upon us. God would not only have hindered Israel, but Syria. Instead of this, the army of the king of Syria escaped out of his hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Delay Is Not Approval

Nothing bad happened on the day Baasha withdrew. God's rebuke and years of war came later.

A sad decline in his later days — that the king of Judah finds his refuge in the king of Israel instead of in the Lord. Nevertheless, all goes, apparently, well for the moment, for God does not judge all at once. "When Baasha heard of it, he stopped building."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Smaller Test That Broke Him

Asa had already faced Zerah's much bigger army and won by trusting God. Baasha was the smaller threat, which makes this collapse strange.

It is difficult to account for this sudden defect in Asa's faith. Not long before, with God's help, he had destroyed the huge army of Zerah the Ethiopian. Now he faces an enemy not half as strong, and his faith fails. He depends for rescue on human strength. It was the beginning of Asa's downfall. He did get the rescue he wanted, for "Ben-hadad listened to King Asa," and Baasha "stopped building Ramah, and let his work cease." But it cost him the rebuke of God and wars to the end of his reign.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The Alternative He Skipped

Ramah was Baasha's blockade between the two kingdoms. Asa's answer was to hire Syria against his own family instead of praying.

When war threatened Asa from Baasha and Israel, the faith of Asa sadly faltered. Baasha built Ramah to stop any traffic between Judah and Israel. Why did Asa not simply bring this matter to the Lord in prayer? Asa made the fatal mistake of enlisting the world's help to fight against his own brothers, the children of Israel. Instead of making a treaty with Syria, how much better it would have been for Asa to seek the restoration of Israel! But too often today, believers use shocking means to fight other believers who have offended them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Smaller test. Asa fell to a weaker enemy than the one he had already beaten by faith. Past victories do not carry you through the next crisis.

- Hired help. He relied on the king of Syria rather than on God, paying for it with treasure taken out of the Lord's house.

- Quick result. Baasha stopped building, just as Asa planned. Commentators warn that success like this tempts us to call the method right.

- Lost victory. Because he relied on Syria, Syria's army escaped him; God would have stopped both enemies for him.

- Later cost. God's rebuke and wars to the end of his reign followed, because God does not judge all at once.

2 Chronicles 16:6 · Darby

And king Asa took all Judah; and they carried away the stones and the timber from Ramah, with which Baasha had been building, and he built with them Geba and Mizpah.

Asa's payment to Ben-hadad worked. Baasha pulled back from the fort he was building at Ramah. Asa then stripped the abandoned site and used its timber and stone for his own walls. The verse records a win, and commentators ask the harder question: what did that win cost Asa?

Ramah Dismantled

One writer traces the whole sequence in a few lines:

Later Baasha king of Israel threatened Asa. Baasha began to build Ramah, a fortified city only a few miles from Jerusalem. To stop this, Asa paid a large sum of money to Ben-hadad king of Syria to invade Israel. This worked for the time being. The building of Ramah stopped, and Asa carried away its stones and built Geba and Mizpah.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Gain Without Blessing

Every outward sign pointed to a wise decision. One commentator sets that gain beside an earlier day when Asa felt he had no strength:

At first Asa's unfaithfulness seems to bear excellent fruit. Baasha leaves off building Ramah; Asa and his people carry its stones away to build fortresses against Israel. By taking this path the king seems to have escaped a great disaster. But all the blessing of a walk of faith is lost to him, and he will make sad proof of this. Oh, how much happier he was when he felt himself to be without strength and yet withstood the vast army of Zerah!

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Because it worked, Asa would have had no sense of having done wrong:

This had the effect that Asa had desired, and Asa would no doubt feel himself justified, as many do who consider that the end justifies the means. Asa was able to attack Ramah and reduce it to nothing. He gained his object through friendship with the world! ... We too, after we have found great blessing through depending on the Lord, may find ourselves in great danger of then depending on our own ability to gain our ends.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Walls Against Brothers

Notice who the new forts at Geba and Mizpah were pointed at. The same writer draws the line from Asa's hired army to the way believers treat one another:

He failed badly by enlisting the help of the Lord's enemies against his own brothers the Israelites. Nor was that all, for he took the silver and gold that was left in the treasuries of the house of the Lord to pay for this help from Syria... Instead of making a treaty with Syria, how much better it would have been for Asa to seek the restoration of Israel! But too often, in our day, believers use shocking means of fighting against other believers who have offended them. They also use things that belong to God (as Asa used the gold and silver from the house of the Lord) to serve their own selfish ends.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Victory He Forfeited

The words "has escaped you" point to a win Asa could have had and let go:

It was the beginning of Asa's downfall. He got the deliverance he wanted, but it cost him the rebuke of God and wars to the end of his reign... Instead of calling on Ben-hadad for help, he might have subdued him, as "has escaped you" implies. David had reigned over Damascus. Only in the days of Solomon's decline did Syria begin to exist as a separate and independent kingdom... it was in God's heart to use Asa to destroy this heathen power. In days to come that power caused His people so much sorrow and distress.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

A Rule of God's Government

Two forts gained; one nation left standing that God meant to remove. Another writer sees a rule at work here:

How remarkable is the government of God. We may take a wrong step to reach some end. It will not reach that end, and it brings its own chastening with it. The very thing we least desire comes upon us. God would have hindered not only Israel, but Syria.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Mizpah Long Afterwards

One of the two cities Asa built from Ramah's stones appears again long after his death:

Nebuchadnezzar puts Gedaliah in charge of the people left in the land, to tend the vines and work the fields... Gedaliah lived at Mizpah, a strong city that Asa, king of Judah, had built with the stones of Ramah.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Stones gained. Baasha stopped building, and Asa carried the material away to fortify Geba and Mizpah. A real, visible win.

- Blessing lost. The plan seemed to bear excellent fruit, yet all the blessing of a walk of faith was gone. Asa was happier when he had no strength and faced Zerah's vast army.

- Aim mistaken. Asa raised the new walls against his own brothers. He paid for them with silver and gold from the house of the Lord. Believers still fight believers with what belongs to God.

- Victory forfeited. The Syrian army escaped him. God meant to use Asa to destroy that power, which later caused His people much sorrow.

- Government felt. A wrong step never reaches the end it aims at. It brings its own chastening, and what we least desire is what comes.

2 Chronicles 16:7 · Darby

And at that time Hanani the seer came to Asa king of Judah, and said unto him, Because thou hast relied on the king of Syria, and hast not relied on Jehovah thy God, therefore has the army of the king of Syria escaped out of thy hand.

Asa had already seen God shatter a huge Ethiopian army. Yet when a smaller threat came from Baasha, king of Israel, he paid for Syria's help with silver and gold from the temple — and at the very moment the plan worked, God sent Hanani the seer to call it failure.

Success That God Refused to Bless

The alliance achieved everything Asa wanted. Baasha stopped fortifying Ramah, and Judah had peace.

Though Asa had gained his ends in hiring Syria to help him, God did not congratulate Asa! Rather, He sent Hanani the prophet to him to strongly reprove him for having relied on the king of Syria instead of on the Lord.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The gain was real. What it cost him was every blessing that belongs to a walk of faith.

By taking this path the king seems to have escaped a great disaster. But he has lost all the blessing of a walk of faith, and he will prove it, to his sorrow. Oh, how much happier he was when he felt he had no strength of his own, and still stood against the countless army of Zerah!

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

A Collapse of Faith That Is Hard to Explain

The obvious question is why his faith gave way at all.

It is hard to explain this sudden failure of Asa's faith. Not long before, with God's help, he had wiped out the immense army of Zerah the Ethiopian. Now, facing an enemy not half as dangerous, his faith fails, and he leans on human strength to save him. It was the beginning of Asa's downfall. He got the deliverance he wanted, but it cost him the rebuke of God and wars to the end of his reign.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Commentators read the inner cause differently. One writer sees a zeal for reform that never reached the heart: Asa was "outwardly zealous against idols, inwardly no faith in God" (The Bible Treasury). Others treat him as a true believer who lost his footing.

The Enemy That Got Away

Hanani's charge names a loss, not just a fault. Where the ESV says the Syrian army "has escaped you," older translations read "escaped out of your hand" — and that hand is the point these writers press.

Instead of calling on Ben-hadad for help, Asa could have conquered him, as the words "escaped out of your hand" imply... God had it in His heart to use Asa to destroy this pagan power, which in later days caused His people so much sorrow and distress. But he missed his opportunity.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The enemy Asa paid to rescue him was the enemy God meant him to remove.

The Way God Governs His People

God's discipline here is not random. It grows straight out of the wrong step itself.

How remarkable is the government of God. Whatever wrong step we take to reach an end, it not only fails to reach it, but brings its own chastening with it. The very thing we least want comes on us. God would have stopped not only Israel but Syria too. Instead, the army of the king of Syria escaped out of his hand.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Heart Divided

Hanani's words expose something Asa's reforms had hidden.

The king's heart was no longer perfect. It had been perfect about idols, but not about the world. You cannot hope for blessing while you keep one of the great principles of Christian holiness and abandon the other. Joy, peace, and strength are gone.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Same Pressure Today

The pull Asa felt is not ancient history.

The pull to meet a worldly trial in a worldly way is immense. People easily think that you cannot meet the world's attacks on you by spiritual means, so the danger is that we turn to earthly means to escape... Be sure of this: if we do not feel the danger, it is because we are under the world's influence ourselves.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer traces the slide to lost closeness with God: "If we get out of communion there is no saying what we may do" (The Bible Treasury).

Summary

- Relied once — Asa had beaten a far bigger army by leaning on God. His failure was not inexperience. It was a sudden collapse of faith before a smaller threat.

- Relied elsewhere — the sin Hanani names is a change of reliance. Not idols, not neglected reform, but leaning on the king of Syria instead of on God.

- Reliance costs — the plan worked and still cost him everything. Syria slipped out of the hand that was meant to subdue it. The peace he bought turned into war for the rest of his reign.

- Reliance exposed — a heart can be perfect about idols and imperfect about the world. Keep one principle of holiness, drop the other, and joy, peace and strength are gone.

- Reliance today — the pull to meet a worldly trial in a worldly way is strong. Not feeling the danger is the proof that the world already has us.

2 Chronicles 16:8 · Darby

Were not the Ethiopians and the Libyans a huge army, with very many chariots and horsemen? but when thou didst rely on Jehovah, he delivered them into thy hand.

Hanani's rebuke does not argue with Asa; it makes him do arithmetic. A far larger army of Ethiopians and Libyans had already fallen to him, so why did a smaller threat from Baasha send him buying help from Syria?

Why God Points Back to the Bigger Army

Asa had faced something far worse and survived it, which makes his later panic hard to explain.

It is difficult to account for this sudden defect in Asa's faith. Only a short time before, with God's help, he had destroyed the huge army of Zerah the Ethiopian. Now, facing an enemy not half as dangerous, his faith fails, and he looks to human strength to save him. Had not his father Abijah trusted the Lord and defeated an earlier army of Israel twice the size of his own? It was the beginning of Asa's downfall.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

What "Relied on the LORD" Had Looked Like

The verse says the victory came because Asa relied on God. That reliance had a shape: Asa prayed it out loud before the battle started.

But faith had to be tested. A powerful army led by Zerah, an Ethiopian, came against Judah… Before the two sides ever clashed, Asa cried to the Lord. His prayer is beautiful and simple… "Help us, O LORD our God, for we rely on You, and in Your name we have come against this multitude. O LORD, You are our God; let not man prevail against You." What confidence and trust! He put the whole matter in the LORD's hands. Their enemies were His enemies.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

This is the reliance that verse 8 points back to.

The Victory Asa Traded Away

The rebuke begins with a loss: the Syrian army escaped his hand.

"So the army of the king of Syria has escaped out of your hand." Asa could have subdued Benhadad instead of calling on him for help; that is what "escaped out of your hand" implies… It was in God's heart to use Asa to destroy this pagan power, which in later days caused His people so much sorrow and distress. But he missed his opportunity.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Activity Without Trust Underneath

Asa's record until this point was full of religious reform. The crisis exposed what that reform had not reached.

Baasha's attack on the kingdom of Judah brings out the lack of faith in Asa's heart. He had no confidence in God. His tireless zeal against idolatry had no reality in his soul. Then the sun rose, in the form of Baasha's invasion, and this outward religion withers away, because there was no depth of soil. He goes to the king of Syria for help; there is not even the appearance of going to God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how deep the failure went. One writer reads it as zeal that was never real inside. Another says Asa was a good man who had drifted from his first love.

Asa was such a good man, and his heart was perfect all his days. Yet there was that departure from first love which Jehovah could see.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Separated From Idols, Not From the World

The failure was not a return to idolatry. It was an alliance — and that cost him the two things his early reign had enjoyed.

He had lost his strength; now he loses his rest. These were the two great blessings at the start of his reign… The king's heart was no longer perfect. It had been perfect toward idols, but not toward the world. You cannot hope for blessing if you keep one of the great principles of Christian holiness and abandon the other.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Principle Beyond Asa

Both halves of Asa's story teach the same lesson about where to look for help.

In time of trouble, the heart is often ready to turn anywhere for help other than to God. But faith always looks to God, and to God only… When Asa, king of Judah, relied on Jehovah, God delivered him from a great army of Ethiopians. But when he relied on the king of Syria instead of the Lord his God, the prophet rebuked him for it, and constant wars followed.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

Summary

- Reliance decides. The same king faced a huge army and won, then faced a smaller one and failed. The difference was not the size of the threat, but who he leaned on.

- Reliance remembers. God's rebuke is a memory test. Hanani makes Asa look back at the Ethiopians and Libyans he had already seen defeated.

- Reliance wins more than safety. Asa bought Syria's help, so Syria escaped the hand that could have subdued it. Borrowed help cost him a victory God meant to give.

- Reliance runs deeper than reform. Zeal against idols can look strong while trust in God stays shallow. Pressure shows which is which.

- Reliance must stay whole. Asa's heart was right about idols but not about the world. That half-separation cost him his strength and his rest.

2 Chronicles 16:9 · Darby

For the eyes of Jehovah run to and fro through the whole earth, to shew himself strong in the behalf of those whose heart is perfect toward him. Herein thou hast done foolishly; for from henceforth thou shalt have wars.

Asa had already seen God shatter an army far bigger than his own. Yet when a smaller threat came, he paid the king of Syria to fight for him. The prophet Hanani's answer to that bargain is this verse. It tells us how God watches the earth, and what heart He watches for.

The moment the words were spoken

The rebuke lands on a king who had every reason to know better. His earlier victory over Zerah the Ethiopian made the collapse of his trust harder to explain.

It is hard to explain this sudden failure in Asa's faith. Not long before, with God's help, he had destroyed the huge army of Zerah the Ethiopian. Now, facing an enemy not half as dangerous, his faith fails, and he leans for rescue on human strength.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The scheme worked. Asa got what he wanted, which makes the prophet's visit surprising.

Asa got what he wanted by hiring Syria to help him, but God did not congratulate him! … So Hanani tried to persuade Asa that God very much wanted to do the very best for those who put their full confidence in Him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Eyes that run to and fro

The picture of God's eyes moving over the earth is not only about His seeing. Writers tie it to His active government, and they trace the same eyes into Zechariah.

In 2 Chronicles 16 the eyes of the LORD are pictured running to and fro throughout the whole earth, to show Himself strong for those whose heart is perfect towards Him. This is the faithfulness of God, taking notice of all things in His ways of government. In Zechariah, the eyes rest on the stone that is laid in Zion. That is where the seat of that government stands — the government that sees everything, everywhere.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

That searching gaze covers every corner of the map, without exception.

His "eyes" run to and fro through the whole earth, beholding the evil and the good. Nothing can possibly escape His notice, whether it happens in the far east or the far west, at either pole or at the equator. The One who has again and again shown "Himself strong on behalf of those whose heart is perfect toward Him" is the One who controls the future of the nations and of the whole earth.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A heart that is perfect

The phrase can frighten anyone who looks honestly at themselves. One writer removes the misunderstanding directly, and does it while commenting on Asa's own case.

Those whose hearts are perfect are not those perfect in flesh, but those who know there is nothing good in them. "Stop regarding man," and begin with yourself.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Showing Himself strong

What God asks of such a heart is simpler than most people expect.

Simply rely on the Lord in everything, just to do His will quietly, and He will show Himself strong on your behalf.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same eye that misses nothing is not a hostile eye toward those who trust Him. One writer says the believer can even watch where it looks.

But the believer has nothing to fear from the keen, piercing glance of that eye of sevenfold brightness. To him it is soft, tender and affectionate, "like doves beside streams of water." It is his happy privilege to watch where it looks. "I will counsel you with my eye upon you."

Modernised from Andrew MillerOriginal wording

What the shortcut cost

Hanani ends by telling Asa he has acted foolishly and will have wars from now on. Part of what he lost was an opportunity: Syria itself could have fallen into his hand.

How remarkable is the government of God. Whatever wrong step we do to accomplish an end, not only does it not accomplish it, but it brings its own chastening with it. The very thing we least desire comes upon us. God would not only have hindered Israel, but Syria. Instead of this, the host of the king of Syria escaped out of his hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Asa's response sealed it — he jailed the prophet, oppressed some of the people, and later, when disease struck his feet, turned to physicians rather than to the Lord.

Summary

- Searching. God's eyes cover the whole earth. Nothing escapes His notice, because this seeing is His government at work.

- Seeking. They are not just scanning. They are looking for someone to be strong for. God is eager to do His very best for those who fully trust Him.

- Sincere. The heart He looks for is not a flawless heart. It is the heart that knows there is nothing good in itself, and so leans on Him alone.

- Simple. Rely on the Lord in everything and do His will. To the believer, that searching eye is tender, and it guides.

- Sobering. Asa won his battle and lost the blessing. The shortcut carried its own chastening, and wars followed him to the end.

2 Chronicles 16:10 · Darby

And Asa was wroth with the seer, and put him in the prison; for he was enraged with him because of this. And Asa oppressed some of the people at the same time.

Hanani the seer had just charged King Asa with folly: unbelief had sent him to the king of Syria for help instead of to God. Verse 10 shows what he did with that word — and it is the hinge on which a bright reign turns dark.

Rage at a Word He Knew Was True

Asa was not raging against a lie. One writer weighs what that anger revealed about the king, and where it left him:

When Hanani charged him with folly, he put the seer in prison for his faithfulness. "And Asa inflicted cruelties upon some of the people at the same time" — the seer's sympathisers, probably. His small-minded anger, at what he knew only too well to be the truth, shows a low condition of soul from which he apparently never recovered. His end was as humiliating as his beginning had been brilliant.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

God's Mouthpiece

Hanani brought a message, not an opinion. One writer finds Asa's blindness strange in a man who believed God:

Instead of seriously taking the message to heart as from God, Asa became angry with Hanani and put him in prison (v. 10). Being a believer, why did he not recognise that Hanani was not speaking his own thoughts, but had been God's mouthpiece? So Asa in his later years spoiled a testimony that had been bright and commendable.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Locking Up the Prophet, Locking Up the Conscience

The prison door closed on more than a man. One writer traces what had changed inside Asa:

The prophet brought Asa the word of God. Instead of humbling himself under it, Asa becomes angry and puts Hanani in prison. Sadly, along with him he was imprisoning his own conscience. The king's heart was no longer perfect. It had been perfect about idols, but not about the world… And there is more. In seeking the help and friendship of the world, Asa became an enemy of the word of God in the person of the man who carried it.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

From One Evil to the Next

The verse records two acts, not one: the seer jailed, and people oppressed. The chain does not stop with Asa's victims:

Whatever wrong step we take to reach an end, it does not reach it. Worse, it brings its own chastening with it… Asa stood convicted of his folly as well as of his sin. He was angry with the seer and put him in a prison house. One evil leads on to another, so Asa oppressed some of the people at the same time. But God oppressed him, or at least chastised him: he was diseased in his feet. The same unbelief that sent him to Ben-hadad now sent him to men when he should have looked to the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who the Oppressed People Were

Asa's cruelty fell on a particular group. One writer sees them as part of something God has always kept for Himself:

When the prophet Hanani reproves him, he puts him in prison, and at the same time oppresses some of the people. See how plainly the king and the people are drifting from God: those who stay faithful to Him are the ones he imprisons and oppresses. These were some of that remnant which God always, even in the darkest times, kept for Himself.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Mirror for Our Own Anger

One writer turns this from history into a warning. Asa's anger has an ordinary cause, and it is one we share:

Here we find Asa very angry with Hanani, because Hanani had rebuked him for his DISOBEDIENCE. So Asa puts Hanani in prison, an act of gross INJUSTICE… Such cases show us how often anger rises in our hearts when someone rebukes us, or faithfully reproves us, for a sin we have committed. Let us be on our guard against this. It is enough to have committed the sin. It is far worse to add a second sin, and perhaps a third, when a servant of God reproves us for it — as Asa did.

Modernised from A. T. SchofieldOriginal wording

How Far He Had Fallen

Measure this verse against the Asa of earlier chapters, and the distance is startling:

What a change in Asa from first to last — from the time when he did not spare even his own mother (2 Chron. 15:16) to the time when he put Hanani in prison and oppressed some of the people. So forgetful of God, of His mercy, of His promise and His claims on them…

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Reproof. God sent Hanani as His mouthpiece; the message was true, and Asa knew it.

- Rage. Anger is often the reaction of a heart caught out, and adding a second sin to the first is worse than the first.

- Prison. Jailing the prophet silenced Asa's own conscience and made him an enemy of God's word in the person of its bearer.

- Ripple. One evil leads to another: first the seer in prison, then the faithful oppressed with him.

- Result. Chastening followed: disease in his feet, and a brilliant beginning ended in humiliation.

2 Chronicles 16:11 · Darby

And behold the acts of Asa, first and last, behold, they are written in the book of the kings of Judah and Israel.

The verse ends Asa's reign with a pointer to a record, not with a verdict on the king. Why press that his acts run "first and last"? And what does it mean that a whole life, not just the best years, goes on file?

The whole course, not the starting line

One writer treats the verse's phrase "first and last" as the key to Asa's story:

It is easy to see why the chronicler should write of his acts "first and last" (2 Chron. 16:11). "You were running well. Who hindered you?" You could ask that of many besides the Galatians and Asa. A good beginning matters, but it is not everything. We are called to run with endurance the race that is set before us.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The distance between the first and the last

One writer looks under Asa's zeal, then sets his earliest act beside his last:

Baasha's attack on the kingdom of Judah brings out the lack of faith in Asa's heart: he had no confidence in God. His tireless zeal against idolatry had no reality in his soul... What a change in Asa from first to last, from the time when he did not spare even his own mother (2 Chron. 15:16) to the time when he put Hanani in prison and oppressed some of the people. He had grown so forgetful of God — of His mercy, of His promise, of His claims on the people — that he asks the king of Syria for help. So we get this astonishing, even monstrous thing: Judah seeking Gentile help against Israel, and buying it with the Lord's treasures.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer turns Asa's wrong step into a rule about how God governs:

How remarkable is the government of God. Whatever wrong step we take to reach a goal not only fails to reach it, but brings its own chastening with it. The very thing we least desire comes upon us... I do not say that Asa was not a man of God, but I do say that there was great and grievous failure.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The book the verse points to

Chronicles names other books besides this one, and it never names its own writer:

These books mention other books and histories again and again — works the author of Chronicles refers to. They include a book of the kings of Judah and Israel (2 Chron. 16:11; 25:26; 28:26; 32:32). In all, just twelve sources appear. The author whom the Spirit of God used must remain unknown to man, but God knows him.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What a record like this preserves

Chronicles uses the same phrase of Josiah, another king. One writer asks what that will mean when God reviews a life:

At the judgment seat of Christ everything will come out in the light of God. "The rest of the acts of Josiah and his goodness... and his deeds first and last, behold they are written." So God records our goodness as well as our badness. No unfortunate last deeds will wipe out our first deeds, done when love was fresh and warm. God will remember everything and judge its worth. "The LORD is a God of knowledge, and by Him actions are weighed" (1 Sam. 2:3). Not "counted," as if quantity were everything with God, but "weighed"; quality is the chief thing with Him.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

How God Himself summed Asa up

Chronicles is open about Asa's failures. Yet when God later speaks of him, one writer notices what God leaves out:

Asa's history reveals his weaknesses; God, in His comments on his character, gives no hint of them (2 Chron. 20:32; 21:12). He loves to commend whatever is lovely in His servants' lives, and only when necessary exposes their failures and follies. May we in this, as in everything else, be "imitators of God"! (Eph. 5:1.)

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Written. Asa's reign ends with a footnote to a record. Chronicles names twelve such sources. The writer God used stays unknown to us and known to Him.

- First. The opening of Asa's story was bright — reform so thorough that he did not spare even his own mother. A good beginning is real, but it is not the whole account.

- Last. He ended by buying Syrian help with the Lord's treasures and jailing the prophet. The zeal had no faith under it, and each wrong step brought its own chastening.

- Both. Because the file reads "first and last," the early warmth is not erased by the late failure. Actions are weighed for quality, not counted for quantity.

- Commended. When God later speaks of Asa, He mentions none of the weaknesses. That is the pattern to imitate when we speak of one another.

2 Chronicles 16:12 · Darby

And Asa in the thirty-ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease was extremely great; yet in his disease he did not seek Jehovah, but the physicians.

Asa's reign closed with a body in pain and a heart that would not turn. The real trouble it records is not the illness but where the king turned for help.

A chastening hand, not an abandoning one

The illness was not random misfortune. Writers see God still working with a servant He had no wish to lose.

But does God finally give up His servant? We think not. I have no doubt this was God's dealing with His servant in chastening, "For whom the Lord loves He chastens." He was reluctant to give Asa up, despite his failure. He meant the chastening for blessing, if only Asa had bowed under God's hand and humbled himself in His sight.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

God's patience measured in years

The dates in the chapter show a pattern of waiting, before the illness and after it.

After Asa's bad treatment of the prophet, the Lord gave him three years to consider and change his ways. Only then did He allow Asa to become diseased in his feet (v. 12). It is sad that he did not turn back to the Lord in that time. But also, when his feet were so diseased, why did he not then at least seek the Lord's mercy? Instead, he sought physicians. The Lord gave him two more years after the attack of his ailment before He took him away in death.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the feet

Writers read the place of the disease as a picture. Feet are what a person walks on.

One failure produces another; he "oppressed some of the people the same time." God visits him, and he is greatly diseased in his feet. His physical condition illustrates the condition of his soul. He once walked well. Did he grasp the truth being taught? "Yet even in his disease he did not seek the LORD, but sought help from physicians."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The application is turned toward those who have walked a long road already:

And yet, in his old age, even Asa "was diseased in his feet." I suppose the lesson here is for us who are getting old. With diseased feet, one cannot walk right. "He will keep the feet of His saints" (1 Sam. 2:9). May He keep our feet healthy and clean even to old age.

Modernised from George C. WillisOriginal wording

Who were these physicians?

Commentators differ on what the word covers. One writer takes it as ordinary medical help, chosen ahead of God:

It is not that God objects to physicians, for Luke was a "beloved physician" (Col. 4:14), but to seek the help of physicians (perhaps many of them), in preference to consulting the Lord, is a sad lack of faith. If a believer needs to consult a physician, he should pray that the Lord will give that physician wisdom to treat his case.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer sees something darker behind the word:

Scripture proves many times over that God sent diseases as a punishment for the sins of His people. For a cure they should have looked to Him who was disciplining them. Of Asa it is said, "he did not seek the LORD, but sought help from physicians," which probably means those associated with magic.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The same unbelief, a second time

Asa had already turned to Ben-hadad, the king of Syria, for help instead of God. The sickbed drew out the same unbelief.

But God oppressed him, or at least chastised him, for he was diseased in his feet. The same unbelief that sent him to Ben-hadad now sent him to men, when he should have looked to the LORD. We must remember the great point in Israel: they had God to care for them. Men now look to God to bless the means at hand. Israel was different. Their looking to God in every trouble was a special testimony.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Hardened by what should have softened

God aimed this discipline at Asa's heart. Instead of softening him, it left him harder.

Sad to say, this discipline did not produce fruit! He had lost communion with God. He had rejected His word. He was angry with the prophet and with those faithful to him. So he falls into moral hardening: "Yet even in his disease he did not seek the LORD, but sought help from physicians." God sent this to bring his heart closer to Himself, and Asa uses it as an excuse to move further away. When it is a matter of his own health, he trusts weak, fallible instruments. The grace of God no longer speaks to his heart.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Finishing badly

Asa began well and ended broken. That is the warning for anyone still standing.

He began well. His beginning was very bright indeed; and had he gone on in simplicity and in the energy of faith, what a different story he would have left on record. Instead, he came into port like a ship that had met a great storm — disabled and broken, without mast or sail. He could have come in with flags flying and all sail set. How it reminds us of that word which says, "Let not him that girds on his armour boast himself as he that takes it off."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Seeking, not sickness — The charge is not that Asa was ill, or that he called doctors. It is that "he did not seek the LORD."

- Sent to be sought — The disease was chastening from a God reluctant to give His servant up, meant to bring him back.

- Waiting to be sought — Three years passed before the illness, two more before his death. God gave him room to turn, and he never used it.

- Feet that stopped seeking — Diseased feet picture a walk gone wrong, and Asa never read the sign in his own body.

- Hardened, not softened — What God sent to draw him near became his excuse to go further off. A bright beginning came into port a wreck.

2 Chronicles 16:13 · Darby

And Asa slept with his fathers, and died in the one-and-fortieth year of his reign.

Asa died in the forty-first year of his reign. That reign began with faithfulness, peace and prosperity, and ended with a king who sought physicians and not God.

A Good Start, a Dark Close

One writer traces the whole arc, and notes what God still chose to say about Asa's heart:

How very sad to see such an end after such a good start, and after such a long reign of peace and prosperity! But such is man. The same story is told of other kings of Judah, and of many a good man since. Solomon had an excellent start, but a sad ending through allowing his wives to take away his heart from God. Asa never went back to idolatry. That is probably why the Spirit of God has recorded that Asa's heart "was wholly true all his days" (older translations read "perfect"). … As the sun set on the good king's life it cast a dark shadow, softened by his early faithfulness to Jehovah.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Time Given, Time Wasted

Asa's end did not come without warning. God left long gaps in which Asa could have turned back:

The Lord gave Asa three years, following his bad treatment of the prophet, to consider and change his ways, before He allowed Asa to become diseased in his feet. It is sad that he did not turn back to the Lord in that time. But also, when his feet were so diseased, why did he not then at least seek the Lord's mercy? … The Lord gave him two more years after his illness struck before He took him away in death. Even those two extra years did not turn him back to the Lord. So he died in the forty-first year of his reign.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Diseased Feet, Diseased Walk

Another writer follows the chain that led to the illness:

He relied on the king of Syria, and not on God. Asa is angry, and puts the prophet in prison. One failure produces another. Then God visits him, and his feet become severely diseased. His physical condition pictures the condition of his soul. He had once walked well.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

This discipline came because Asa was dear to God — and it hardened him instead of softening him:

It is because Asa is dear to Him that Asa himself becomes the object of His discipline. … Sadly, this discipline did not produce fruit! He has lost communion with God. He has rejected His word. He is angry with the prophet and with those who are faithful to him. So he falls into moral hardening. The very thing God sent to bring his heart closer to Him he now uses as an excuse to move even further away. When it comes to his own health, he puts his trust in weak, fallible instruments.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Physicians and Faith

The writers do not condemn medicine itself. They condemn leaving God out:

God does not object to physicians, for Luke was a "beloved physician" (Col. 4:14). But to seek help from physicians rather than consult the Lord is a sad lack of faith. If a believer does need to see a physician, he should pray that the Lord will give that physician wisdom to treat his case.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Splendid Funeral, No Fragrance for God

Verse 14 describes lavish honours at Asa's burial. Rossier weighs them against God's estimate:

At his death people lavished plenty of incense on him, but there was no sweet fragrance for God. Spices serve to cover or to delay the decay of a body, and the world's incense cannot take the place of God's favour. Is this not often so with Christians who have sought the favour of men? … The more unfaithfulness was mixed into a man's life, the more praise he gets — praise no one would ever speak around the coffin of a faithful man.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Warning for Later Years

Asa failed late in life, and the same pattern runs through the kings of Judah:

Reading the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah, we were struck by this. These kings did what was right in the sight of the Lord, yet they went astray and turned their backs on their God. It did not happen in youth, but in middle life and old age.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Start — Asa's reign opened in faithfulness and peace. His death shows that a strong beginning does not secure a strong ending.

- Shift — He leaned on the king of Syria instead of God, then jailed the prophet who told him so. One failure produced another.

- Summons — His diseased feet pictured a walk gone wrong. God sent the illness because Asa was dear to Him, and gave him three years, then two more, to repent.

- Silence — He sought physicians and never sought the Lord at all. Commentators note that seeking help is not the sin; leaving God out of it is.

- Spices — A magnificent funeral covered decay but gave God no fragrance. Human praise grows loudest where faithfulness was weakest. So finish well, not just begin well.

2 Chronicles 16:14 · Darby

And they buried him in his own sepulchre, which he had excavated for himself in the city of David, and laid him in a bed filled with spices, a mixture of divers kinds prepared by the perfumer's art; and they made a very great burning for him.

Asa's reign ends with a splendid funeral. He is laid in a tomb he had cut for himself, on a bed of spices, and a great fire burns in his honour. It raises a hard question. What is a grand burial worth, when the king spent his last years turning away from God?

A Sunset with a Shadow

The chapter closes a reign that began well and ended badly. One writer reads the burial honours as the one gleam left in a dark evening.

How very sad to see such an end after such a good start, and after such a long reign of peace and prosperity, but such is man... He failed by looking to the enemy of Israel for help instead of to the Lord. He failed by not humbling himself under God's rebuke. He failed by imprisoning Hanani the seer, and by oppressing some of the people. Then when diseased in his feet, under God's government, he "did not seek the LORD, but sought help from physicians" (verse 12). As the sun set on the good king's life it cast a dark shadow. Three things relieved that shadow: his early faithfulness to the LORD, the various spices from the bed on which his body lay, and the "very great burning for him" (verse 14).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Bed of Spices

Older translations call these workers apothecaries. The word means a maker of perfume — the same skill used for the sanctuary's holy oil and incense.

In Scripture this term does not mean someone who mixes drugs for medicine. It means someone who mixes ointments and the like — what we would now call a "perfumer." The margin of Exodus 30:25 translates it that way, where the holy anointing oil is an ointment blended by the apothecary's art. The same was said of the holy incense. Asa was buried in a tomb filled with sweet odours and spices prepared by the apothecaries' art.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the Burning Meant

Such a burning belonged to kings. Writing on a later king who was promised the same funeral, one commentator explains the custom and why God grants it.

That is to say, he would have a funeral suited to his dignity as a king, and after the usual manner of the Jews — a bed of spices prepared to burn the king's body, and laments over him. The reason for this is that God, even in His judgment, carefully remembers whatever good there may have been.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same holds in Asa's own record.

Asa's history reveals his weaknesses: God, in His comments on his character, gives no hint of them (2 Chron. 20:32; 21:12). He loves to commend whatever is lovely in His servants' lives, and only when necessary exposes their failures and follies.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Perfume Cannot Replace God's Favour

Commentators differ on how to read the funeral. One writer finds no fragrance in it for God at all.

In his death, although much incense was lavished on him, there was nothing of sweet-smelling savour for God. Spices serve to cover or to delay the decay of a body, and the world's incense cannot take the place of God's favour. Is this not often so with Christians who have sought the favour of men? Men praise them after their death in proportion to the confidence they have placed in men and refused to God. Such incense is only testimony given to a believer's weaknesses.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What the Crowd Was Celebrating

A nation can mourn a ruler without asking how he stood with God.

There was much in his reign that the people had cause to appreciate, and they laid him in a bed filled with spices and ointments, and made a very great burning for him. The people would not be as concerned about Asa's relationship with God as about his outward success in reigning.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Son of David in a Garden Tomb

One writer applies this verse to the burial of Jesus by Joseph and Nicodemus.

These two Israelites, as true children of Abraham, claim the body of the Lord and consecrate it with the faith of the patriarch. As true subjects of the King of Israel, they also honour it with the honours of a son of David (2 Chr. 16:14). They spend large and costly perfumes on it. They lay it in the garden, in a new, untainted tomb, where the smell of death had never passed.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Decline. Asa looked to the enemy of Israel for help, jailed the prophet who rebuked him, and oppressed the people. In his illness he sought physicians, not the Lord. A good start ended hard.

- Honour. The tomb, the perfumer's spices and the great burning were the full honours of a king. God, even when judging, remembers whatever good there was.

- Silence. God's later mentions of Asa give no hint of his failures. He commends what is lovely and exposes faults only when He must.

- Fragrance. Spices only delay decay. The world's incense cannot take the place of God's favour.

- Fulfilment. Joseph and Nicodemus gave Jesus the same royal honours — costly perfumes, and a new tomb in the garden that death had never touched.