1 Thessalonians 2:15–16

1 Thessalonians 2:15 · Darby

who have both slain the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and have driven us out by persecution, and do not please God, and [are] against all men,

Paul comforts a young church that its own neighbours are hounding, and he points it to believers in Judea who suffered the same way. That comparison leads him into one of his sharpest charges — a list that reaches back through Israel's history and out to the whole human race.

A charge that gathers up a whole history

The killing of Jesus was not a single crime standing on its own. One writer traces the line from the prophets to the cross, and shows that the cross did not end the pattern:

But the Jewish people made light of their privileges and threw them away. They killed the prophets who pressed their unfaithfulness and their falling away from God on their consciences. Their guilt reached its peak at a time when outward religion still looked orderly. Then the shameful rejection and death of their own Messiah exposed their real unbelief and hatred of God. But evil is never satisfied. Even the cross only sharpened their bitterness against those who witnessed to God's grace. They "drove us out."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The charge that the Old Testament never made

God's older quarrel with the nation was about idolatry. This verse brings a new charge:

In the past God's great case against the Jews was their constant idolatry. The Old Testament prophets are full of it. The New Testament adds a still greater charge: they "killed the Lord Jesus." On top of that, they drove the Apostle out by persecution and, as far as they could, blocked the gospel from going out to the Gentiles. They refused to go through the door of salvation themselves, and as far as they could they stopped others from going through it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Not a new sin, and not only theirs

The verse links the death of Jesus with the death of the prophets. One writer draws out what that says about human nature, and not only about one nation:

The death of Jesus was the peak of Israel's sin, but it was not a new kind of sin for them. In earlier times the mere report of His coming was enough to make that nation hate and murder all the prophets sent to them. What hatred this shows! They did not only murder Him when He appeared. Their bitterness ran so deep that they killed anyone who prophesied of His coming, even before they saw Him. Stephen charged this bloodthirsty spirit home on the council as the nation's crowning sin against the Lord. And him they murdered — the first martyr in the church. It may help us to remember that in Israel God was testing human nature itself. So in their conduct we see what the Gentiles would have done, if they had had the same chance.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Why the message enraged them

Paul says they drove him out. One writer explains why the message itself made them so angry:

The preaching of grace drives those who hold the law into fury. Grace makes little of any earthly privilege, and insists that the Jew is as ruined as the Gentile. So the Jew's hatred of the gospel never dies... But grace goes further. It proclaims blessings in Christ beyond compare, it wipes out every distinction, and it brings the believer, Jew or Gentile alike, into a new place of heavenly relationship and everlasting favour. That they cannot bear.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Displeasing God, opposing everyone

Their own zeal did not settle the matter, and neither did the number of people who agreed with them. Where the ESV says they "oppose all mankind," older translations read "contrary to all men":

Certainly this was not pleasing to God, no matter how zealous for God they claimed to be. It was "contrary to all men," or "against all men," for it was against the proper interests of all mankind. Many might agree with them, but it was still to the actual harm of them all.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same hostility shows up again and again:

It was religion that led the attack on Christ while He was here on earth. Later it was religion that persecuted His followers. Religion not only refused the gospel; it tried to stop it from flowing out to others.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The phrase is not the last word

The charge describes the present, not the end of the story. Writing about the promised new heavens and new earth, one commentator sets that future against this very phrase:

Jerusalem will be a rejoicing, instead of a heartache, as it is now. Her people will be a joy, instead of "contrary to all men" (1 Thess. 2:15) as they are now. Sorrow will depart and prosperity be established.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Pattern — Killing Jesus was the peak, not the start. The same hatred had already killed the prophets who announced Him.

- Mirror — In Israel human nature itself was on trial. Their conduct shows what anyone else would have done with the same chance.

- Cause — Grace enrages those who trust in privilege. It puts Jew and Gentile on the same ground.

- Measure — Zeal did not please God, and wide agreement did not make it good for anyone. Opposing the gospel works against everyone's real interests.

- Reversal — The charge describes a present condition, not a permanent one. The same city is promised as a joy instead of a heartache.

1 Thessalonians 2:16 · Darby

forbidding us to speak to the nations that they may be saved, that they may fill up their sins always but wrath has come upon them to the uttermost.

Paul has just listed a chain of opposition: killing the Lord Jesus and the prophets, driving out the preachers. Now he names the act that tops the list. They blocked the message from reaching people outside Israel. Two phrases carry the weight: filling up the measure of their sins, and wrath coming "at last" — older translations read "to the uttermost."

The Sin That Fills the Cup

The offence is not only what they did against God. It is also what they refused to others. Commentators say that resenting God's kindness to outsiders draws down the final reckoning.

One of the sins that will draw out the last judgments on the Jews is not merely their deep ingratitude toward God. It is also their hatred of the grace He is showing to the poor Gentiles in their wretchedness and sin. Paul puts this strongly. They fill up the measure of their sins "by hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles that they might be saved," and "wrath has come upon them at last!" They cannot bear that others should hear the gospel of grace. Their pride in the law led them to despise it for themselves.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The position is strange, and one writer presses it with questions.

Their intense sectarian hatred also shows in their forbidding the apostles to speak to Gentiles. We may ask, what did this have to do with them? They had themselves rejected Jesus as an impostor. If the Gentiles they despised received Him, why did they not gloat that Gentiles were falling for what they considered gross deception? Were they afraid, though they hated Christ, that this might not be deception after all? Were they really fighting their own badly troubled conscience?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why Grace Was Intolerable

The hostility had a cause. A message that levels everyone removes the standing that religious privilege had given.

The preaching of grace drives those who have the law into fury. Grace makes little of any earthly privileges at all. It insists on the ruin of the Jew as much as of the Gentile. So the Jew's hatred of the gospel never dies. It was bad enough to hear a message as far above the law, and as much deeper, as Christ is greater than Moses. But this message went further. It proclaimed matchless blessings in Christ that wipe out every distinction. It brings the believer, Jew or Gentile alike, into a new place of heavenly relationship and everlasting favour. That is intolerable.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Wrath to the Uttermost

Paul writes this while Jerusalem still stands. Commentators read the past tense as a verdict settled rather than a sentence carried out.

Wrath from God does rest in a special way on blinded and unrepentant Israel. Luke 21:23 speaks of it in connection with the siege of Jerusalem under Titus. In 1 Thessalonians 2:16 Paul speaks of wrath having come upon them to the uttermost. He wrote that twenty years or more before Jerusalem fell. He plainly meant that the wrath was not yet carried out, but that God had settled it beyond recall. That wrath, we believe, will reach its climax in the great tribulation.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"To the uttermost" also marks a change of degree from everything that went before.

"Wrath is come upon them to the uttermost" — upon the Jews. God had visited unbelieving Israel several times with partial punishments. But now they had rejected Christ and the gospel. So God subjects them to the full extent of His judgment. That judgment still continues, and will only be carried out in the future trouble of Jacob.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Mercy Underneath the Verdict

The verse is severe, but it is not the end of the story. Losing every claim opens the door to pure mercy.

The Jews were the objects of the promises, and the Gentiles the objects of pure mercy. Jesus came to fulfil the promises made to the fathers, and the Jews rejected Him. They also refused and rejected the mercy God revealed to the Gentiles. In this way they filled up the measure of their sins, so that the wrath of God "is come upon them to the uttermost." So they too, shut up in unbelief, become objects of pure mercy, like the Gentiles — even though by natural descent they had been heirs of the promises. This is what brings out the riches of the wisdom of God in a way that surprises our hearts.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Same Spirit Today

The attitude described here is not tied to one nation. One writer links it to the older brother in the story of the lost son.

He may represent the Jew, of whom Paul wrote that they "displease God and oppose all mankind by hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles that they might be saved." But he also represents those self-righteous people who will not have the grace of God, and they are many.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Grace levels everyone. It insists on the ruin of Jew and Gentile alike. That is what made the gospel unbearable to people who prized their privileges.

- Cup. Refusing grace for yourself was serious. Refusing it to others filled the measure. The last item in Paul's charge is blocking the message from reaching the nations.

- Conscience. They had already called Jesus an impostor, so why fight the message? One writer asks whether they were really fighting their own troubled conscience.

- Sentence. Paul wrote of wrath "at last" twenty years before Jerusalem fell. It was not yet carried out, but settled beyond recall — and no longer partial discipline. Its climax is still future.

- Surprise. Shut up in unbelief, Israel has no claim left but mercy — the same mercy the Gentiles received. That is where the riches of God's wisdom show.