1 Samuel 5:2–7

1 Samuel 5:2 · Darby

And the Philistines took the ark of God and brought it into the house of Dagon, and set it by Dagon.

The Philistines had beaten Israel in battle and carried off the ark of God. Now they set it down in the temple of their own god at Ashdod. Their trophy raises the real question here: does God's honour depend on the faithfulness of His people?

Israel's Failure Behind the Capture

The ark reached a pagan temple because of the way Israel had treated it.

Here we see the sad and humiliating result of Israel's unfaithfulness. They had kept the ark of God with a careless hand and a faithless heart, or it could never have ended up lodged in the temple of Dagon! How deeply Israel had failed! They had let go of everything. They had given up what was most sacred, and let the uncircumcised profane and blaspheme it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

More than an object was lost here. God had withdrawn His presence because His people had tied its symbol to their own sinful state.

The people of God had completely failed to uphold the honour of God. Worse, they had tried to tie the symbol of His presence to their own sinful condition. So God acted in judgment and withdrew His presence from among them. In these circumstances, while the godly may well be humbled because of the unfaithfulness of God's people, they need not fear for the honour of God. Quite apart from His people, God is able to vindicate His holiness and maintain His majesty.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Trophy Set Beside an Idol

Not long before, these same Philistines had felt very differently about the ark.

The Philistines had trembled when they heard that the ark had come into the camp of Israel. Now the ark has come into their hands, and they boldly place it in the house of their idol. It is as if they were celebrating its capture as a victory for their god Dagon over the God of Israel. Their former trembling was as needless as their present daring is misplaced.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

They may even have felt they were doing Israel's God a favour.

They think the most fit place for it is in the house of Dagon, the fish-god (half fish, half man). No doubt they even considered they were patronising Israel's god by giving it this place!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Dagon Against the God of Israel

The moment the ark entered that temple, the two sides in the dispute changed.

Now that the ark of God stands in the house of Dagon, the question is no longer between the Philistines and Israel. It is an issue between Dagon and the God of Israel. There can be but one end to this contest. Dagon is flung to the earth before the ark. To prove this is no accident, his worshippers set Dagon up in his place again — which only shows the majesty of God and the emptiness of an idol more clearly.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Glory Defended Where No One Was Watching

No Israelite was there to see what happened next in the temple at Ashdod.

If Israel would not act in defence of God's truth, He must act Himself — and so He did. The lords of the Philistines had defeated Israel. But the gods of the Philistines must fall down before that ark. Long ago it had driven back the waters of the Jordan. Here was divine triumph. In the dark, empty house of Dagon there was no eye to see and no ear to hear. There the God of Israel was defending those great truths His own people had so failed to uphold.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

No Rival Beside Him

Setting the ark beside Dagon put the true God among the idols, as though He were one of them.

To us, with the light of the New Testament, "an idol has no real existence." But to these worshippers of Dagon, every idol stood for a real god, good or evil. The God of heaven and earth will allow no rival, and there is no one besides Him. He has decreed that every knee shall bow to Him, and every tongue confess that He is Lord. We see this truth here among the Philistines. They set the ark beside their Dagon, as a sign, they thought, of his triumph over "these mighty gods of the Hebrews."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

What was settled in Ashdod still holds wherever people try to combine the two.

The whole affair proved beyond all question that the Lord and the uncircumcised could never go on together. So it was, so it is, and so it must always be. "What accord has Christ with Belial? … What agreement has the temple of God with idols?" None whatever.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Failure — Israel handled the ark carelessly and tied God's presence to their own sin. So it ended up in a pagan temple.

- Presumption — The Philistines once trembled at the ark. Now they set it beside Dagon and credited their idol with the win.

- Contest — Inside that temple the fight was no longer Philistia against Israel. It was Dagon against God.

- Vindication — Unseen and alone, God defended the honour His own people had given up.

- Exclusivity — God allows no rival. He and idols can never share a house.

1 Samuel 5:3 · Darby

And when they of Ashdod arose early the next day, behold, Dagon had fallen on his face to the ground before the ark of Jehovah. And they took Dagon, and set him in his place again.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

1 Samuel 5:4 · Darby

And when they arose early the next morning, behold, Dagon had fallen on his face to the ground before the ark of Jehovah; and the head of Dagon and both the palms of his hands were cut off upon the threshold; only the fish-stump was left to him.

The Philistines had captured the ark of God and set it beside their idol Dagon in his temple at Ashdod. On the first morning the idol lay face down. On the second it lay broken. Who did this, and why did God wait a second night to finish it?

What Was Left of Dagon

Dagon was a composite figure, and the verse notes exactly which parts were destroyed and which were left. One writer draws the point from the shape of the idol itself:

Once men carried it into Dagon's house (this being an idol, part man and part fish), and when the ark went in, the man fell down, and the fish only was left in place. This had its meaning.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The pieces that fell were the human ones, and where they fell mattered too:

The next morning it lies face down again. But this time it cannot be set up so easily. The human parts — the head and hands — of the part-man, part-fish god are cut off and lying on the threshold. Only the fish part is left to him. So the confusion man has made is undone. The human joined to the animal is shown to be worthy only of contempt, fit to be trampled underfoot, and the creature lies face down in the presence of the Creator.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Head and Hands

The two parts removed were the parts a worshipper would look to for help. The damage was therefore a message, aimed precisely:

It was a message to the Philistines that if they thought Dagon had intelligence, he had not even a head: if they thought he could do anything, he had no hands to do it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

No Accident

The first fall could be explained away, and the Philistines did explain it away by standing the idol up again. The second night removed that option:

Night came, and morning succeeded that night, when the Ashdodites found that Dagon's previous fall was no accident. There lay the idol, not merely prostrate and helpless, but now broken to pieces, the head and the palms of its hands cut off on the threshold, and only the stump, or fishy part of the idol left. The Ashdodites evidently had been aware of nothing unusual during the night. No earthquake upset the idol's equilibrium. God, the true God, had thrown it down.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

No Defender but God

Israel had failed, and no one from Israel was there to act for God. That is what makes the scene so striking:

If Israel would not act to defend God's truth, He must act Himself — and so He did... In the darkness and stillness of the house of Dagon, where there was no eye to see and no ear to hear, the God of Israel was acting to defend those great truths His people had so failed to hold up. Dagon fell, and in his fall he proclaimed the honour of the God of Israel... The scene was so completely emptied of the creature that the Creator could show Himself in His own true character. Man's failure made room for God's faithfulness. The Philistines had proved stronger than Israel; but Jehovah was stronger than Dagon.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

This shifts where our anxiety belongs:

We need never be afraid that God will fail to vindicate either His holiness or His power. Our only fear should be lest we be not in that state in which we can be vessels of testimony for Him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Broken God Still Worshipped

The most sobering detail is what the Philistines did next. They kept the religion and merely built a new custom around the wreckage:

Indeed, set this humiliated glory beside Dagon, as the men of Ashdod did, and the world's idol will be overturned and broken. But this changes nothing about the worship that the world offers to its idol. It prefers its mutilated false gods, objects of disdain and derision, to the glory of God that makes it uncomfortable.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Shadow of a Greater Victory

Several writers read the two mornings as a picture of something larger — a first fall, then a shattering:

Instead of learning the lesson of Dagon on his face on the earth before the ark, they put Dagon back in his place again, only to find him, not only fallen down again, but broken, his head and hands cut off, his fish stump being left. Are we not taught another lesson from this, even that the death of Christ not only brought down the power of the god of this world, but also broke his power, or, as the Scripture says, "that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil" (Heb. 2:14).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Fallen — The first night put the idol on its face. The Philistines could still call that an accident.

- Broken — The second night removed the head and the hands: no intelligence to know, no power to act, only the fish stump left standing.

- Alone — No one from Israel defended the ark. In an empty temple at night God acted for His own honour. Man's failure made room for His faithfulness.

- Hardened — The men of Ashdod picked up the pieces and made a rule about the threshold. They preferred a broken god to the glory that unsettled them.

- Foreshadowed — The broken idol pictures the death of Christ, which destroyed the one who had the power of death.

1 Samuel 5:5 · Darby

Therefore neither the priests of Dagon nor any that come into Dagon's house tread on the threshold of Dagon in Ashdod to this day.

The Philistines had carried Israel's ark into the temple of their god Dagon. Twice they found the idol on the floor. The second time, its head and hands lay broken off at the doorway. This verse records the result. They did not repent. Instead they kept a habit of stepping over that threshold long after.

The real contest in Dagon's house

The ark now stood inside the idol's temple. That changed who the real opponents were.

Once the ark of God stood in the house of Dagon, the question was no longer between the Philistines and Israel. It became an issue between Dagon and the God of Israel. This contest could end only one way. Dagon is thrown to the ground before the ark. To prove this was no accident, Dagon is put back in his place. The result only shows the majesty of God and the emptiness of an idol more clearly.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the threshold

The custom in this verse points to the exact spot where the pieces fell. The broken parts carried their own message.

The second morning, though, they could not repair the damage. Dagon had fallen again, and this time his head and the palms of his hands were cut off. This was a message to the Philistines. If they thought Dagon had a mind, he did not even have a head. If they thought he could act, he had no hands to act with. The damage had happened on the threshold of his house. So the priests of Dagon took up the superstitious custom of never stepping on that threshold as they came in the door.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A standing mark of victory

Israel had failed, and the ark was in enemy hands. Even so, God guarded His own name.

God is always enough for His own honour… So it became a standing mark of the victory of the God of Israel over Dagon.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Honour paid where judgment fell

The sight should have ended Dagon's worship. Instead the Philistines turned the place of his humiliation into one more thing to revere.

If there had been the least desire for truth, what a powerful witness this would have been to the Philistines! It would have shown them the emptiness of Dagon and the reality of the living God. Sadly, their hardened hearts see little in it. They even give Dagon more honour by refusing to step on the threshold where his head and hands had lain… All witness is hopeless to those who do not want to know the truth. But God is vindicated.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Their reaction was not merely stubborn; it was the natural working of what they had given themselves to.

Head and hands gone, what will he do now? It is strange that his worshippers should respect him at all after this. But as Bishop Hall once said, "It is just of God that those who lack grace should lack sense too. Superstition turns men into the wood and stone they worship."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The world keeps its broken god

The idol lost, but the worship carried on.

Set this humbled glory of God beside Dagon, as the men of Ashdod did, and the world's idol will fall and break. But that changes nothing in the worship the world gives its idol. The world prefers its broken false gods, objects of contempt and mockery, to the glory of God that makes it uncomfortable… Their superstitious habit itself stands as a lasting witness to how low their idol had fallen.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A shadow of a greater fall

The custom in Ashdod outlasted the day it began. So do the effects of a far greater victory.

Satan thought he had won a mighty victory over God and His Christ when he used the leaders of Israel to crucify and kill their Messiah. But in the wisdom of God, it was his own undoing… Men did not see this mighty triumph. But the unseen world saw it openly, just as the priests of Dagon saw their god humbled and broken… Like the triumph of the Philistines, Satan's triumph was short-lived. The effects of Christ's triumph last, and they bring rich and lasting blessing to His own.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Contest — The ark beside the idol made it a straight issue between Dagon and the God of Israel. It could end only one way.

- Broken — The head and the hands went first: no intelligence, no ability. God exposed the false god at the very door of his own house.

- Memorial — The doorway they would not step on became a lasting mark of God's victory. His honour never rested on Israel's success.

- Superstition — They honoured the place of judgment instead of leaving the god who fell there. Evidence changes no one who has no desire for truth.

- Triumph — Dagon's temple points ahead to Christ's victory over Satan. The enemy's win was brief. Christ's win lasts.

1 Samuel 5:6 · Darby

And the hand of Jehovah was heavy upon them of Ashdod, and he laid them waste, and smote them with hemorrhoids, -- Ashdod and its borders.

The Philistines beat Israel in battle and carried off the ark of God, the golden chest that marked His presence among them. They set it up before their god Dagon, who twice fell broken before it; now the blow moves from the idol to the people who worshipped him.

From the Idol to the Idolaters

The judgment does not stop at the fallen statue.

This is not the only way God upholds His majesty. He has poured contempt on the idol; now He will deal in judgment with the idolaters. "The hand of the LORD was heavy against the people of Ashdod." Many are destroyed and others are struck with disease. In their distress the Philistines of Ashdod seek advice from their lords, who tell them to send the ark to Gath.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Nature of the Blow

Commentators compare this stroke with what God had already done in Egypt. There He struck both the people and everything they lived on.

In Egypt, God poured out His plagues not only on the people but on their sources of livelihood. He does the same here. He laid His hand heavily on them and struck them with tumours. The plague was probably like the boils of Egypt, and like what we now call the bubonic plague — repulsive and deadly in its effects. He had said, "Against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments" (Ex. 12:12). The blow was so complete that no one could ever point to a person or a god of Egypt who escaped. He would do the same in the land of the Philistines. The scale was smaller, but the work was just as thorough, and it closed off every opening for unbelief to raise its head again.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Not a Coincidence

The plague had a boundary. It covered Ashdod and its whole territory, but it followed the ark and went no further.

This was not a general epidemic visiting the land. The tumours only attacked those places where the Ark was held captive. God was teaching the Ashdodites that His presence and power were solemn realities. Made aware of it in this distressing way, they wanted to be rid of the presence of the Ark. As long as it remained, disease and death would keep destroying them. In agony they said, "The Ark of the God of Israel shall not remain with us, for His hand is severe on us and on Dagon our god." What a confession from the conquerors of the Israelites!

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

God Guards What His People Lost

Israel's sin had cost them the battle and the ark. Their loss did not leave God defenceless.

What could be a clearer testimony to the living power and the truth of the God of Israel than this very fact? Granted, Israel deserved to be in the dust. Granted, they could not strike a blow. Granted, they were struck hardest when they most dishonoured the ark of Jehovah. But God watched over His own ark, which Israel's sin had so recklessly betrayed and lost. The destruction that went out was so marked that all the lords of the Philistines could not help feeling their utter weakness before the God of Israel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Mercy Inside the Severity

A lighter judgment would have left the Philistines room to explain everything away.

And do we not see mercy in all this? Suppose Dagon had only been knocked over. Then the people's unbelief and their half-pity for their god would have found some ready excuse. They would have patched up their pride and their wounded god at the same time, and carried on with the old idolatry. But the judgment touches their property too. Even the little mice, small and contemptible as they are, can ravage their fields and rob them of their food. So they are forced to acknowledge a hand whose weight they are beginning to feel, and they cannot escape its chastening. Then the blow comes still closer. They feel the stroke of God on their own bodies, with the dead all around them. Surely they must bow and own the rod.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Warning It Carries Forward

One writer draws a line from Ashdod's fate to the world that handled Christ.

It was a solemn matter for the people of Ashdod to lay their hands on the ark of God. How much more solemn for the world to lay their hands on the Lord Jesus and put Him to death!

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Hand on the idol. God shamed Dagon first, then dealt with the people who bowed to him — one hand, working outward.

- Hand on the body. The stroke was tumours, like the plagues of Egypt. It touched bodies and livelihood, so no one could claim escape.

- Hand they could trace. This was no ordinary epidemic. It fell only where the ark was held, and the Philistines named the cause themselves.

- Hand that means mercy. The blows came closer and closer, until every excuse ran out and the sufferers had to bow.

- Hand no defeat weakens. Israel lost the ark through sin and could not lift a finger. God defended His own glory without them.

1 Samuel 5:7 · Darby

And when the men of Ashdod saw that it was so, they said, The ark of the God of Israel shall not abide with us; for his hand is severe upon us, and upon Dagon our god.

The men of Ashdod had carried Israel's ark home as a trophy. Now their idol lies in pieces and disease is spreading, so they name the hand behind it — and then ask that hand to move on.

From the Idol to the Idolaters

The disease in Ashdod is not a separate event from the fall of Dagon, the Philistine god, in the verses just before. One writer reads two stages of one answer.

Nor is this the only means by which God maintains His majesty. He has poured contempt on the idol; He will now deal in judgment with the idolaters. "The hand of the Lord was heavy on the people of Ashdod." Many are destroyed and others are struck with disease.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Glory Maintained After Failure

Israel had lost the ark through their own sin. What follows shows that God's honour did not fall with theirs.

God will be God, however His people may fail. Israel failed completely to guard the ark of His testimony. They let it pass into the hands of the Philistines. All was lost in man's hand. Then the glory of God shone out in power and splendour. Dagon fell, and the hand of the Lord made the whole land of the Philistines tremble. The events proved beyond all question that the Lord and the uncircumcised could never go on together. So it was, so it is, and so it must always be. "What accord has Christ with Belial? … What agreement has the temple of God with idols?" None whatever.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

If God can defend Himself among His enemies, one fear is left for His people.

We need never be afraid that God will fail to vindicate either His holiness or His power. Our only fear should be that we are not in the state in which we can be vessels of testimony for Him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Hand They Could Trace

The Ashdodites did not have to guess at the cause. One writer shows how the disease marked out its own target.

The Lord's hand was heavy on the men of the place. He destroyed them, and struck them with tumours, in Ashdod and in its territory (v. 6). This was not a general epidemic in the land. The tumours only attacked those where the Ark was held captive. God was teaching the Ashdodites that His presence and power were solemn realities. Aware of it — made aware in this distressing way — they wanted to be rid of the presence of the Ark. As long as it remained, disease and death would keep destroying them. In deep distress they said, "The ark of the God of Israel must not remain with us, for His hand is hard against us and against Dagon our god." What a confession from the conquerors of the Israelites!

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Relocation Instead of Repentance

Their confession was accurate. Their response was not.

These afflictions horrify the men of Ashdod, where the ark had first been brought. Like people in similar situations, they try to get rid of the cause. They do not do it by repentance, but by putting God, as it were, far away from them. If the load grows too heavy for one shoulder, it will be shifted to the other and then to the arms. The load does not yet become so unbearable that it lays them low before the God of Israel. Still less does it bring them to a sense of their true condition. They will get rid of the trouble by getting rid of the ark. So they send it on to Gath, from Gath to Ekron, and through all the cities of the Philistines.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An Old Pattern in Human Hearts

The same instinct appears far beyond Ashdod. One writer traces it from Eden to Sinai to Gadara, where Jesus had just freed a man from demons.

Guilty man is always afraid of God. Adam, fallen, was afraid; Israel, at Sinai, were afraid; and the men of Gadara were afraid. It does not matter how God comes. He may come as a visitor in the Garden of Eden, in majesty at Sinai, or in grace as at Gadara. The presence of God is unbearable to guilty man. Men prefer the demons, the possessed man, and the pigs to the Son of God. They prefer them even though He is present in power and grace to deliver man. So we read, "They began to beg Him to depart from their region". Their prayer was answered — He departed.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Idol first. God poured contempt on Dagon, then dealt with the idolaters. The falling statue and the heavy hand are one answer in two stages.

- Hand traced. This was no general epidemic. The disease followed the ark, so Ashdod could not mistake whose hand it was.

- Confession made. The conquerors of Israel said the hand was hard on them and on their own god. It was a true statement from the wrong mouths.

- God removed. They pushed God further off instead of repenting. The load moved from Ashdod to Gath to Ekron.

- Pattern repeated. Guilty people have always found God's nearness unbearable — in Eden, at Sinai, at Gadara. When they ask Him to leave, He goes.