And the name of the man was Nabal, and the name of his wife Abigail; and the woman was of good understanding, and of a beautiful countenance; but the man was churlish and evil in his doings; and he was a Calebite.
One verse introduces two people, and the whole chapter grows out of the gap between them. A rich landowner behaves badly. His wife is discerning and beautiful. The verse also drops one loaded detail: he came from the house of Caleb. How did such a family line produce such a man?
The names in this chapter carry meaning. One commentator sets her name against his conduct:
Verse 3 tells us the contrast between Nabal and his wife. Her name Abigail means "father of joy." Her beautiful face also reflected a beautiful character. Nabal, however, was a harsh man whose actions were evil. He lived for himself and his pleasures. Yet he had descended from Caleb, a man of unusual godliness and devotion.
His name is not a mild insult. It belongs to a specific kind of folly in Scripture:
He is, as already said, Nabal — the word used where it is written, "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God.'" In Scripture this is what "folly" is mostly tied to, or identified with. And for Scripture, "the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom."
Caleb was known for unusual godliness. His descendant was not. One writer traces where the family resemblance really lay:
Nabal, verse 3 tells us, "was a Calebite." As a family trait these two men shared energy of nature. But this energy in the service of the flesh produces a Nabal, while in the service of faith it produces a Caleb. A person may give his members to sin as instruments of unrighteousness, or to God as instruments of righteousness (Rom. 6:13).
"Harsh and badly behaved" is God's verdict on a man his neighbours admired. One writer holds the two views side by side, using an older translation that reads "churlish" and "evil in his doings":
This Nabal had received such benefits from David and his men. He comes before us as a man of substance and high social position. In the eyes of the world he was a "very great" man — one who could entertain in royal style. In God's sight, however, he was a churlish man and "evil in his doings"; one who would put up with no interference from others. He claims to know nothing of David, for he asks, "Who is David? Who is the son of Jesse?" … to Nabal, David was only a runaway servant.
The verse calls her discerning. One writer says where that understanding came from, and what it saw:
She had evidently considered the people and events of her day, and the Lord had given her understanding… She hears from one of the young men about her husband's folly, and at once acts in faith… Nature could only see in David a runaway servant. Faith does not look at mere outward circumstances. It sees, in the hunted and needy David, the coming king.
The verse binds a woman of faith to a man of folly. One writer weighs what that cost her day by day, and what God was doing in it:
But being taught of God in this way must have made her place in Nabal's house very painful. Her connection with Nabal was a yoke. She was harassed every day. She met hindrances from the man she was bound to, and had no communion with him… She might have felt this to be a strange dealing of the Lord towards her. But her heart was being prepared for a service she did not yet know.
Another writer turns this into counsel:
The case of this remarkable woman is full of encouragement and instruction. It speaks to all who feel cramped and hindered by ties they cannot escape. To all such the history of Abigail says: Be patient. Wait on God. Do not think you have no opportunity for testimony. The Lord may be greatly glorified by quiet submission, and He will surely give relief and victory in the end. True, some may have to blame themselves for forming such ties in the first place. But even then, if the folly and evil are really felt, confessed, and judged before God, and the soul is brought into full submission, the end will be blessing and peace.
- Name — Nabal means "fool" — the man who says in his heart there is no God. Abigail means "father of joy," and her face matched her character.
- Line — Nabal descended from Caleb, a man of unusual godliness. The same natural energy served the flesh in one man and faith in the other. Godliness is not inherited.
- Ledger — The world called him a great man; God called him harsh and badly behaved. Both verdicts stand over the same life.
- Understanding — Abigail's discernment was faith. Where nature saw a runaway servant in David, faith saw the coming king — and acted at once.
- Waiting — A believer bound to a hard household still has opportunity for testimony. Patience under the yoke was Abigail's training for a service she did not yet know was coming.
And David heard in the wilderness that Nabal was shearing his sheep.
David is living as a hunted man in the wilderness. News reaches him there that a rich sheep owner nearby is shearing his flocks. One man has nothing, the other has plenty, and the next move belongs to the rich man.
One writer weighs the two men's positions, and traces each to what the man himself was.
David was in the wilderness; this was his place. Nabal was surrounded by all the comforts of life. David owed all his sorrows and hardships to what he was. Nabal owed all his possessions and enjoyments to what he was.
Nabal was not an outsider. He belonged to the same nation as the man he ignored.
This Nabal was an Israelite. He stands in sharp contrast with David. Though anointed king of Israel, David had nowhere to lay his head. He was a wanderer from mountain to mountain, and from cave to cave. Nabal was a selfish man, with no sympathy for David. If he had blessings, he had them for himself.
One writer counted every shearing scene in the Bible and found the same flaw in each.
Only four times in Scripture do we read of sheep shearing. Three of them are Genesis 38:13 (Judah), 1 Samuel 25:4 (Nabal), and 2 Samuel 13:23 (Absalom). In each case, something unpleasantly selfish is involved. Peter was not told by the Lord to "shear My sheep," but "shepherd My sheep" and "feed My sheep" (John 21:16-17).
(The ESV has "Tend my sheep" and "Feed my sheep.")
David sent ten young men with a respectful message and a request for food.
When David heard of Nabal's sheep shearing project, he felt it was the right moment to act. He sent ten young men to him to ask for some provisions of food (v.5). Of course Nabal was under no legal obligation to David. But no doubt he ought to have felt himself under moral obligation. David instructed the young men to show Nabal the fullest respect... The message was simple and respectful. Any right-minded man would have been considerate of them.
Another writer places the scene, and names what David's request rested on.
At this point David, in the wilderness of Paran, heard that Nabal, a rich sheep owner of Maon, was shearing his sheep in Carmel. So he sent and asked for a gift, as an acknowledgment of the kindness he had shown, and the protection his men had given, to Nabal's flocks and servants in the past... Most would think such services would normally call for some payment. But far beyond that, David, through his messengers, gave the sheep owner a chance to serve the Lord's anointed during his time of trial. That message sent to Nabal tested him in a double way. Would he repay kindness, and would he care for the king after God's own heart?
Commentators differ over David's action here. One sees the sending as a real cost to David's dignity.
This no doubt was a great trial to David. It takes, I need not say, much grace to ask a favour, especially from such a man as Nabal... it was no small humiliation for the anointed of the LORD.
Another reads the same step as a lapse — a man in need looking sideways instead of upward.
Human energy is good in itself. But if it is not used in dependence upon God, Satan can and will use it against God's revealed will. To those who wait upon the Lord, divine power comes in... This, then, was the lesson David was set down to learn in this chapter of his history, and God had His own way of teaching it. In a time of need David turns to man for help, instead of to God!
Nabal's refusal was not a small rudeness. It was a settled choice to know nothing of what God was doing.
His serious fault was pretended ignorance of the divine purposes, and of who David was... His heart was not interested in what God had already done for Israel, nor in the blessing yet in store for His people. Selfishness had closed his heart against the stranger. He was "willingly ignorant."
One writer turns this into a warning for anyone whose religion is profession only.
It is easy to claim the religion of Christ, while Christ Himself is unknown, and the cross of Christ is hated... All this is fully illustrated in Nabal. He was a mean-spirited man who had shut himself up among his luxuries and wealth. He cared nothing for God's anointed, and felt nothing for him in the season of his painful exile.
- Heard — the news reached David in the wilderness. His hardship and Nabal's comfort each flowed from what the man was.
- Sent — David had no legal claim, only a moral one, and the message he sent was simple and respectful.
- Tested — the request tried Nabal twice over: would he repay kindness, and would he care for God's chosen king?
- Refused — Nabal was "willingly ignorant." Selfishness had closed his heart against the stranger.
- Warned — the same test stands today: it is easy to claim the religion of Christ while Christ Himself is unknown.
Then David sent out ten young men; and David said to the young men, Go up to Carmel, and go to Nabal, and greet him in my name.
David is still a fugitive in the wilderness, and Nabal is a wealthy sheep owner enjoying the busy, festive season of shearing. David sends ten young men with a greeting. What happens next depends on what Nabal makes of a message carried in David's name.
David sends from the wilderness; the messengers go up to Carmel. One writer ties each man's place to what he was.
David was in the wilderness; this was his place. Nabal was surrounded by all the comforts of life. David owed all his sorrows and hardships to what he was. Nabal owed all his possessions and pleasures to what he was.
David tells the men to greet Nabal in his name. Notice who sends that greeting, and who receives it.
David's grace does not stop there. Like the Lord when He was here on earth, David is depending on man for some refreshment. Yet everything belongs to him by right. And in exchange he sends peace through his messengers to the sinner, to Nabal.
David and Nabal already had a history. But kindness given is not a contract signed.
When David heard of Nabal's sheep-shearing, he felt it was a good moment to send ten young men to ask him for food (v.5). Of course Nabal was under no legal obligation to David, though there is no doubt he ought to have felt himself under moral obligation. Nabal is reminded that while David's men were near his shepherds, they had protected them rather than stealing from them, as many armies would do. The message was simple and respectful, and any right-minded man would have been considerate of them.
Asking a favour was no light thing for the man God had already anointed king.
This no doubt was a great trial to David. It takes much grace to ask a favour, and above all from a man like Nabal. Even though Nabal might be little known — and David knew well what some men in Israel were like — it was no small humiliation for the anointed of the Lord.
Yet David asked without envying what Nabal had:
David did not grudge Nabal his prosperity. No doubt he felt he would not have exchanged his place for Nabal's. And it was no hard message that he sent: "I am not asking you to leave your riches and follow me. I say, Peace be to you, and peace be to your house, and peace be to all that you have. Only will you show kindness to me? Will you give me what I need?"… A heart in a gracious state will not grudge those around it, nor say, "See what I am, and what you are not." It will seek instead to build the link that joins it to another.
Because the messengers come "in my name," Nabal's answer will reveal what he thinks of the name. The request is small; the question underneath it is not.
That message sent to Nabal tested him in a double way. Would he repay kindness, and would he care for the king after God's own heart?
Nabal held all he had as his own. But the commentator points out how small David's request really was:
Nabal claimed full and absolute right and control over everything God had given him in His fruitful garden ("Carmel")… God gave him an opportunity of owning His anointed, the future king, and of ministering to him — and it would not have gone unrewarded. But he had no faith. He fell short here, and failed to seize the moment, and so lost everything, even his own life… Man is only a steward, and must give account of everything to God. David asks for only a small part of what will all be at his disposal by and by… Everything depended on his estimate of the one who asked the favour.
Nabal is more than one rude man in an old story. One writer sees a religion many people still hold.
It is easy to profess the religion of Christ while Christ Himself is unknown and His cross is hated… All of this is pictured in full by the rude, ungracious Nabal. He had shut himself up among his luxuries and wealth. He cared nothing for God's anointed, and felt nothing for him in his time of painful exile and wandering in the wilderness.
- Sent — David is in the wilderness because of who he is; Nabal is comfortable because of who he is. The ten messengers cross that gap.
- Peace — David owns everything by right. Still he offers peace to Nabal, his house and all he has before he asks for anything.
- Claim — David's men had guarded Nabal's shepherds. No law required a gift. Every moral instinct did.
- Test — the errand asked two questions at once: will he repay kindness, and will he own God's chosen king?
- Estimate — everything hung on what Nabal made of the name the messengers carried. He got it wrong, lost his opportunity, and lost his life.
And thus shall ye say Long life [to thee]! and peace be to thee, and peace be to thy house, and peace be to all that thou hast!
David's men come to a rich man named Nabal with a greeting, not a demand — a blessing spoken over the man, his household, and everything he owns. Who sends peace like that from the wilderness, and what does it cost a man to refuse it?
David is the anointed king living in exile, and he sends not a bill but a blessing. One writer sees the pattern of Christ here: the owner of all things asks men for food, and gives peace in exchange.
If, like the Lord when He was here on earth, he depends on man for some refreshment, he sends peace back in exchange. Everything belongs to him by rights, yet he brings this peace to the sinner, to Nabal, through his messengers: "Peace be to you, and peace be to your house, and peace be to all that you have!" Did Nabal want this peace, after such obvious protection of his men and his flocks?
The greeting travels from scarcity to plenty. Each man's position came from who he was.
David was in the wilderness; this was his place. Nabal was surrounded by all the comforts of life. The first owed all his sorrows and hardships to what he was. The second owed all his possessions and enjoyments to what he was.
David asks for food, but he has no legal claim on Nabal. His men had guarded Nabal's shepherds, and the message only asks him to weigh that.
Of course Nabal had no legal obligation to David. Yet without doubt he ought to have felt a moral one. David told the young men to show Nabal the fullest respect. They were to greet him with peace toward himself, his house and all that he had… The message was simple and respectful, and any right-minded man would have been considerate of them.
To send this message at all was hard. The man God had chosen as king had to stand at a rich man's gate with his hat in his hand.
This was no doubt a great trial to David. It takes much grace to ask a favour, above all from a man like Nabal. David may have been little known, and he knew well what some men in Israel were like. Even so, it was no small humiliation for the anointed of the Lord.
Notice what the message does not say. David never resents Nabal's wealth and never compares the two lives.
David was in need — here was another who was not in need… David did not grudge him his prosperity. He surely felt he would not have swapped his place for Nabal's. It was no hard message that he sent… David's heart was large enough to have rejoiced in anything that would have joined Nabal's place to his own. And so it always is. When a believer's heart is in a gracious state, there will be no grudging of those around, and no wish to say, "See what I am, and what you are not."
Nabal's reply asks who David is. One writer finds the cause of his rudeness in that question.
Here was the secret of this worldly man's coldness of heart: he did not know him. Had he known him, it would have been a very different matter. But he knew neither who he was nor where he came from. He did not know that he was insulting the Lord's anointed. In his selfish folly he was throwing away the privilege of meeting the need of the future king of Israel.
Nabal refused the peace. His wife Abigail went out to David herself.
David sends her back to her house with the peace which Nabal had not wanted, and with the assurance of his favour (vv. 6, 35). There she will patiently wait for the message of the beloved one calling her to himself.
- Peace sent. The rejected king's first word to a rich stranger is a threefold blessing — on him, on his house, on all he owns. Grace moves from the wilderness toward the wealthy.
- Peace earned nothing. Nabal owed David no legal debt, only a moral one. The message was respectful, and any right-minded man would have honoured it.
- Peace costs the sender. It took much grace for the anointed of the Lord to ask a favour of such a man — no small humiliation.
- Peace without envy. David does not begrudge Nabal his wealth; a heart in a gracious state never says, "See what I am, and what you are not."
- Peace refused, peace received. Nabal's coldness came from not knowing who David was. The peace he threw away, Abigail carried home instead.
And now I have heard that thou hast shearers; now thy shepherds who were with us, we hurt them not, neither was there aught missed by them, all the while they were in Carmel.
David is an exile in the wilderness with a band of followers. At shearing time he sends ten young men to Nabal, a rich sheep owner at Carmel. His claim is simple: Nabal's shepherds had been with him, and they had lost nothing. Two questions follow. What was David like in the years men rejected him? And what do you owe a man who guarded you and never asked for anything?
David had no legal hold over Nabal. His claim rested on a fact anyone could check.
Of course, Nabal was under no legal obligation to David, though he should have felt himself under a moral one. David's messengers are to remind him of one thing. While David and his men were near Nabal's shepherds, they protected them instead of robbing them, as many armies would do. No one was hurt, and no sheep went missing. They suggest that Nabal ask his own shepherds to confirm it. So they ask Nabal to give them whatever food he has to hand.
The protection was real, not passive. Out in the fields, flocks faced danger from more than one direction.
While hiding in the area where Nabal kept his flocks, David and his men had not intruded on his rights. Instead, they had acted as a wall. They protected his flocks from attacks by wild beasts, and from men even more savage.
David invites Nabal to check the story with his own workers. Their account goes further than David's own.
Had David overstated what he and his band had done? What could the shepherds say? "Yet the men were very good to us, and we suffered no harm, and we did not miss anything when we were in the fields, so long as we went with them. They were a wall to us both by night and by day, all the while we were with them keeping the sheep" (verses 15-16). Most would think that such service normally deserved repayment. But there was more to it than that. Through his messengers, David gave the flock owner a chance to serve the Lord's anointed in his time of trial. That message sent to Nabal tested him in a double way. Would he repay kindness, and would he care for the king after God's own heart?
David was already God's anointed king when he did this. He had no house and no throne.
David is the anointed of the Lord — the coming king, and the man of God's heart. Yet here he is a hunted man in the place of reproach. He hides in the caves of the earth, a needy wanderer in desert places, surrounded by a band of faithful followers who had gathered to him (1 Sam. 22:1-2). And as he wandered, he and his followers went about doing good.
Waiting on God did not make David idle. The wilderness itself gave him the work.
David and his companions still live in the wilderness of Judah. They wait on God for the hour and the signal of their deliverance. But there David has the chance to prove himself the protector of the weak, in the face of a thousand dangers through the night watches. "They missed nothing" as long as they were with him.
Nabal had enjoyed every bit of this. What he would not do was value the man who gave it.
This was just how Nabal acted. He took every advantage he could from David. But the moment David asked him for sympathy and help, his worldly spirit showed itself... Nabal could well understand the value of David's protection, though he cared nothing for David's person. While David's men were a wall around his possessions, he would put up with them. But once they became a burden, he rejected them and insulted them.
One writer reads the scene as a picture of how the world treats Christ. He also marks the limit of that picture.
Applying this in a spiritual way — how the world has copied Nabal in his rude refusal of David's request! It too has its sheep-shearing, its time of gathering in rich results to which it has contributed little or nothing. It has not realized that every earthly mercy it enjoys was bought by the death of Christ, and that He has been their unseen protector and provider... We are not speaking here, of course, about the gospel. The gospel makes no claim on the sinner. It confronts him with his guilt and lost condition. It does not ask him for a present. It asks him to admit his sin and to accept the gift of God.
- Wall — David's men stood between Nabal's flocks and both wild animals and violent men, night and day.
- Nothing missing — an armed band that could have robbed them took nothing. The shepherds confirmed every word David said.
- Doing good — hunted and homeless, David spent his wilderness years protecting the weak as he waited on God.
- Double test — David's message asked Nabal two things. Would he repay kindness? Would he care for God's anointed king?
- The Nabal spirit — value the protection, despise the protector. The world still does it, enjoying mercies bought by the death of Christ and giving Him nothing back.
Ask thy young men, and they will tell thee. Therefore let the young men find favour in thine eyes; for we come in a good day give, I pray thee, what thy hand may find to thy servants, and to thy son David.
David and his men are living in the wilderness. Nabal, a rich sheep owner, is holding a feast at shearing time. David sends ten messengers to ask him politely for whatever food he can spare. The verse is a request, but it is also a test. What will a rich man do when God's anointed king, in exile and need, asks for a share of his plenty?
David gives his young men careful words. They make no threat and claim no legal right. They point to a service done, tell Nabal to check the facts with his own shepherds, and leave the amount to him.
Nabal was under no legal obligation to David, though he certainly ought to have felt himself under moral obligation. David told the young men to show Nabal the fullest respect, greeting him with peace toward himself, his house and all that he had... So they ask Nabal to give them whatever food he has on hand. The message was simple and respectful, and any right-minded man would have been considerate of them.
The messengers speak peace over Nabal, his house, and all he owns before they ask for anything. One writer sees a reversal here. The man who by right owns everything comes needing help, and gives a blessing in return for bread.
Like the Lord when He was here on earth, David is depending on man for some refreshment. Yet everything belongs to him by right, and through his messengers he brings peace to the sinner, to Nabal, in exchange for this. "Peace be to you, and peace be to your house, and peace be to all that you have." Does Nabal want this peace, after such clear protection of his men and his flocks? For such grace and courtesy, did David not have the right to ask for some proof of thankfulness?
David asks only for a share of what is at hand. Even that was no small thing for a man already anointed as king to ask.
This no doubt was a great trial to David. It takes much grace, I need not say, to ask a favour, especially from a man like Nabal. And little known as such a man might be — David well knew what some men in Israel were like — it was no small humiliation for the Lord's anointed.
There is no envy in the appeal. David wants Nabal joined to him, not stripped of anything.
David was in need — here was another not in need... the message he sent was not a hard one. "I do not ask you," he says, "to leave your riches and follow me... only will you show kindness to me; will you give me what I need?" The heart of David was large enough to have rejoiced in anything that would have identified Nabal's place with his.
"We come on a feast day" points to a day of plenty in Nabal's house. The request put two things to Nabal at once.
Most would think that services like these normally called for some repayment. But David did more than that. Through his messengers he gave this sheep owner a chance to serve the Lord's anointed in his time of trial. That message tested Nabal in two ways. Would he repay kindness, and would he care for the king after God's own heart?
David asks for whatever is at hand. One writer points out that none of it was ever Nabal's own, and that the man whose name the messengers carry will one day own it all.
God gave him a chance to acknowledge His anointed, the future king, and to serve him — a chance that would not have gone unrewarded. But he had no faith. He was proved wanting here. He let the moment slip, and so lost everything, even his own life... Man is only a steward, and must give account of everything to God. David asks for just a small part of what will one day all be at his disposal... Everything depended on what Nabal thought of the one who asked the favour.
One writer sees today's world in Nabal's shearing feast. It gathers in a rich harvest without knowing who protected it.
It too has its sheep-shearing, its time of gathering in rich results to which it has contributed little or nothing. It has not realized that every earthly mercy it enjoys was bought by the death of Christ, and that He has been their unseen protector and provider. He makes His claim — not a harsh nor an unjust one — that of their abundance they give freely to Him.
- Protection — David's men guarded Nabal's shepherds and took nothing. The claim was moral, not legal, and Nabal's own servants could confirm it.
- Peace — David blesses Nabal's whole household before asking, and leaves the amount to him.
- Humbling — it took grace for the anointed king to ask a favour of such a man. Sending the message cost David something.
- Opportunity — a day of plenty made the test double. Repay the kindness, and own God's chosen king while he is still rejected.
- Estimate — all hung on what Nabal thought of David. Misjudge the one who asks, and you throw away the blessing of giving to him.
And David's young men came, and spoke to Nabal according to all those words in the name of David, and ceased.
David's ten young men reach Carmel at sheep-shearing time and repeat his message word for word. Then they stop — and everything now rests on how one rich man answers the king God has chosen.
David is the anointed of the Lord. Yet here he must ask a stranger for food, and the asking costs him something:
This was no doubt a great trial to David. It takes much grace, I need not say, to ask a favour, above all from a man like Nabal. David may have been little known, and he knew well what some men in Israel were like. Still, it was no small humiliation for the anointed of the Lord.
The message opens with a blessing, not a demand. One writer sees a king who gives more than he asks:
Like the Lord when He was here on earth, he depends on man for some refreshment. Yet everything belongs to him by right. And in exchange he sends peace to the sinner, to Nabal, through his messengers. "Peace be to you, and peace be to your house, and peace be to all that you have!" (v. 6). Did Nabal want this peace, after such obvious protection of his men and his flocks?
David's claim could be checked. Nabal's own shepherds were there, and this is what they said:
Had David exaggerated the service that he and his band had rendered? What could the shepherds say? "The men were very good to us, and we suffered no harm... They were a wall to us both by night and by day, all the while we were with them keeping the sheep" (vv. 15-16). Most would think such service called for some return. But David gave more than that. Through his messengers he offered the sheep owner a chance to serve the Lord's anointed in his time of trial. That message sent to Nabal tested him in two ways. Would he repay kindness, and would he care for the king after God's own heart?
The young men add nothing of their own. They say all that David said, in David's name, and then leave the matter with Nabal:
The young men were instructed to show the fullest respect to Nabal, greeting him with peace toward himself, his house and all that he had... In view of this they ask that Nabal should give them whatever provisions he may have readily available (v. 8). The message was simple and respectful, and any right-minded man would have been considerate of them.
Messengers sent in another man's name are never refused alone:
Nabal rejects the messengers without a second thought. He never sees that this means rejecting David himself. "The one who rejects you rejects Me, and the one who rejects Me rejects Him who sent Me" (Luke 10:16). Their master had sent them to bless, and Nabal insults them (v. 14).
Nabal asks, "Who is David?" One writer traces the refusal back to one fact:
Here was the secret of this worldly man's estrangement of heart: he did not know him. Had he known him, it would have been a very different matter. But he neither knew who he was nor where he came from. He did not know that he was insulting the Lord's anointed. In his selfish folly he was throwing away the privilege of meeting the need of the future king of Israel.
One writer applies the scene to a world that lives on mercies it never traces to their source:
Applying this briefly in a spiritual way, how the world has imitated Nabal in his rude refusal of David's request! It too has its sheep-shearing, its time of gathering in rich results to which it has contributed little or nothing. It has not realised that every earthly mercy it enjoys was bought by the death of Christ. He has been their unseen protector and provider... We are not speaking here, of course, of the truth of the gospel. There God makes no claim on the sinner. The gospel confronts him with his guilt and lost condition. It does not ask him for a present. It asks him to acknowledge his sin and accept the gift of God.
- Sent — the words are David's, spoken in David's name. The messengers carry both the honour and the cost of a king who must ask, not seize.
- Peace — what reaches Nabal first is not a bill but a blessing on him, his house and all he has.
- Proof — the claim could be checked. Nabal's own shepherds said David's men were a wall around the flocks day and night.
- Pause — the messengers say everything and add nothing. Then they stop, and a simple, respectful message waits on one man's will.
- Answer — "Who is David?" exposes a heart that never knew him. Nabal turned away the messengers — and with them the king who sent them.
And Nabal answered David's servants and said, Who is David? and who is the son of Jesse? there are many servants now-a-days that break away every man from his master.
David asked a rich sheep owner for food, after his men had guarded that owner's flocks. The reply was a sneer, and it shows what Nabal thought of God's anointed king and of the goods he called his own.
Nabal's opening words sound like an honest question. Commentators read them as a refusal to know what he already knew.
He claims to know nothing about David, since he asks, "Who is David? Who is the son of Jesse?" No doubt he knew of David's great victory over the giant, and how the women had sung his praises. But he probably saw David as a man whose head his great deeds and the songs of women had turned. In his eyes David was after the throne, and so was a rebellious servant who had broken away from his master, King Saul. If he had heard any rumour that Samuel anointed David king, he plainly treated it as a matter of no interest at all.
Nabal was not simply out of the loop. He had shut a door.
His serious fault was pretended ignorance of God's purposes and of who David was. The pretence was plain, because his own admissions gave him away and convicted him of contempt for God. His heart had no interest in what God had already done for Israel, nor in the blessing still in store for His people. Selfishness had closed his heart against the stranger. He was "willingly ignorant." Like those Paul writes about, he "refused to have God in his knowledge." In his case it was not innocence or ignorance, but hostility.
The second half of the verse turns evasion into slander. David was on the run because Saul hunted him, and Nabal lived close enough to know it.
To him, David was nothing but a runaway slave who had absconded from Saul, his master. Nabal probably knew something about the rights and wrongs of the case. He could well have known why David was away from Saul's court. He himself had likely watched the relentless hunt for David. For him, then, to speak as he did showed more than a misunderstanding. It was a deliberate refusal to recognise the rightful claims of a man who was suffering for no wrong of his own.
The next verse spells out what this one implies: everything Nabal owns, he owns absolutely. Writers see the refusal and the possessive pronouns as one attitude.
Nabal had claimed full and absolute right and control over everything God had given him in His fruitful garden ("Carmel"). God gave him a chance to acknowledge His anointed, the future king, and to serve him. That chance would not have gone unrewarded. But he had no faith. He was found wanting here, missed the moment, and so lost everything, even his own life. God alone has absolute right over all things. He says, "The silver is mine, and the gold is mine," and, "The earth is the LORD's and the fullness thereof." Man is only a steward, and must give account of it all to God.
Nabal's wife had no better sources of information than her husband. She reached the opposite conclusion.
Who David was, and what he was, was plain to her; there was nothing mysterious about it. She knew that he fought the LORD's battles, and that no evil had been found in him all his days. What folly, then, to be against him and to bring his righteous anger on yourself... A runaway servant he was in Nabal's eyes; a man fighting the LORD's battles he was in Abigail's eyes. In this she was right. To refuse him help, then, was to take sides against God.
The same dismissal turns up later, aimed at someone greater.
Later the chief men used the same words when faced with the Lord's work: "As for this man, we do not know where he comes from" (John 9:29). This is how man treated the rejected Jesus. He despises His sovereign grace. He does not grasp His power in judgment, and does not stop to think that this judgment is at the door.
What Nabal did with David, people still do with Christ.
It takes the clear sight of faith for anyone to see the true glory of Christ and hold to Him while He is rejected... It is hard to find anything more selfish than a heart that takes everything Jesus has to give and gives Him nothing back. "As long as I am saved, the rest doesn't matter." That is the secret thought of many a heart. Put more honestly, it would run: "If I am sure of salvation, the glory of Christ matters little."
- The question — "Who is David?" decides the whole chapter. All depended on what Nabal made of the man who asked the favour.
- The ignorance — he chose not to know. His own words exposed the pretence, and behind it lay hostility, not honest doubt.
- The slander — Nabal called David a runaway servant. He knew better, and refused on purpose to own the claims of a man suffering for no wrong of his own.
- The ownership — Nabal held his goods as his own. But man is only a steward, and must give account to God.
- The answer — Abigail knew no more than he did, yet she called David the man who fights the LORD's battles. The same question now asks who Christ is to us.
And shall I take my bread, and my water, and my flesh which I have killed for my shearers, and give [it] to men whom I know not whence they are?
Nabal met David's polite appeal with a question of his own: who is this man to me? Everything that follows in the chapter turns on his answer.
The refusal was not about food. It came from what Nabal thought of the man who asked.
Here was the secret of this worldly man's coldness of heart; he did not know him. Had he known him, it would have been a very different matter. But he neither knew who he was nor where he was from. He did not know that he was insulting the Lord's anointed. In his selfish folly he was throwing away the privilege of meeting the need of the future king of Israel.
Commentators differ on whether that ignorance was real. One writer reads it as deliberate:
Nabal probably knew something of the merits of the case. He could hardly have been unaware of why David was away from Saul's court. For him, therefore, to speak as he did showed more than a misunderstanding. It was a deliberate refusal to recognise the righteous claims of one who was suffering for no wrong of his own.
Four times over he says "my." But ownership is the one thing he gets wrong. (Where the ESV has "my meat," older translations read "my flesh.")
Nabal claimed full and absolute right and control over all that God had given him in His fruitful garden ("Carmel"). He spoke of it as "my bread," "my water," "my flesh," and so on. He had no faith. He missed the opportunity God gave him, and so lost everything, even his own life... God alone has absolute right over all things. He says, "The silver is mine, and the gold is mine" — yes, "the earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof." Man is only a steward, and must give account of it all to God.
His name and his words point the same way.
Nabal means "fool." He stands for the natural man, and especially for those who reject the Lord and His message of peace. His words "my bread" — "my water" — "my flesh" — "my shearers" and the whole story remind us of that other fool our Lord spoke of. He also spoke of "my barns" — "my fruits" — "my goods" (Luke 12:16-21).
Set David's identity aside for a moment. Israel's law had already settled how to treat a poor brother.
Deuteronomy chapter fifteen says, "If among you, one of your brothers should become poor... you shall not harden your heart or shut your hand against your poor brother, but you shall open your hand to him and lend him sufficient for his need, whatever it may be." Precious grace! How like God. How unlike Nabal! Grace would keep the heart wide open to every case of need. Selfishness would close it against everyone who asks. Nabal should have obeyed the word regardless of whether he knew David. But his selfishness ran too deep to allow obedience to the Lord's word, or love to the Lord's anointed.
David's messengers did more than ask for food. They gave Nabal a test, and a chance that never came back.
That message sent to Nabal tested him in two ways. Would he repay kindness, and would he care for the king after God's own heart? His words are an index to his mind... God's interests on earth at that time meant nothing to Nabal. He lost his chance of taking God's side in his day, and lost it forever.
His own wife had the same facts and reached the opposite verdict.
We may suppose that Abigail's chances of forming a right judgment on this question were no better than Nabal's. But what a difference between them! In Nabal's eyes David was a runaway servant. In Abigail's eyes he was a man fighting the Lord's battles. In this she was right. To refuse him help, then, was to take sides against God.
Nabal's reply is not the only failure in this chapter.
It was so utterly uncalled for, so brutal, that perhaps most of us can only say we would have done what he did. But the question is not whether his resentment was natural. Was it an expression of the faith, patience and self-denial that had so beautified his life up to this time? There can be only one answer. David clearly failed here in his readiness to take his case into his own hands, rather than wait only upon God.
- Person. Everything hung on who Nabal thought David was. He did not know him, and so threw away the privilege of supplying the future king.
- Possession. His fourfold "my" claimed absolute right over what God had given. Man is only a steward, and must give account of it all.
- Precedent. Deuteronomy told him to open his hand to a poor brother. His selfishness broke that plain word, whoever David was.
- Proof. Abigail knew no more than her husband, yet she judged rightly. His ignorance was a choice, not a handicap.
- Peril. The story exposes David too. He took his case into his own hands instead of waiting on God.
And David's young men turned their way, and went back, and came and reported to him according to all those words.
David sent ten messengers to Nabal with a peaceful greeting and a small request. They came back with nothing but an insult to repeat. This short verse is the hinge of the chapter. What the young men carry home turns a quiet errand into a near-massacre.
Asking Nabal for a favour cost David something. One writer notes both the humbling and the temper of the man who refused:
This was no doubt a great trial to David. It takes, I need not say, much grace to ask a favour, especially from such a man as Nabal. He might be little known — and David knew well what some men were in Israel. Even so, it was no small humiliation for the anointed of the Lord. But Nabal valued nothing of God, and hated every thought of grace, as the natural man does.
Nabal's refusal was more than rudeness. One writer shows what he threw away, and what the whole scene turned on:
Nabal had claimed full and absolute right and control over everything God had given him in His fruitful garden ("Carmel"). He spoke of it as "my bread," "my water," "my flesh," and so on. God gave him a chance to acknowledge His anointed, the future king, and to serve Him. That chance would not have gone unrewarded. But he had no faith. He was proved wanting here, failed to seize the moment, and so lost everything, even his own life... Everything depended on his estimate of the one who asked the favour.
His question was not a real question:
Though Nabal asked who David was, he was not concerned to find out, for he was intensely self-centred.
The men went back and told David everything. What David does next shows why the report matters:
The young men return to David to report the way Nabal responded to their request (v.12). David does not think of consulting the Lord. He decides at once to retaliate against Nabal's insulting treatment, and he takes four hundred armed men with him. Nabal had not decided to kill David, as Saul had. Yet David is ready to kill Nabal, though he would not kill Saul when he had the chance. When people treat us in a proud, contemptuous way, we give way far too easily to our own feelings of outrage. We are ready to take revenge. Yet when we take these matters into our own hands, we almost always end up doing worse to the offender than he did to us.
The insult stung. But David's answer is not what we would expect from the man who had spared Saul:
No doubt it was deeply trying to meet such base ingratitude from a man he had guarded like a wall of defence. It stung, too, to be reproached on the very ground of the circumstances faithfulness had called him into. He was accused of breaking away from his master at the very time he was being hunted like a partridge through the mountains. All this was hard to bear. In the first outburst of feeling, David speaks words that would not stand the examination of the sanctuary. "Each of you strap on his sword." That was not quite the language we would have expected from one who had so far walked in such a meek and gentle spirit.
The report set a collision in motion. One writer names what was about to meet what — and who stopped it:
The flesh in David would meet the flesh in Nabal! Had such a conflict been allowed, who can tell how it would have ended? But God dealt graciously with David. He softened his heart and turned him from his purpose. He used an instrument prepared in secret and now brought forward at just the right moment.
David had guarded Nabal's men, and Nabal still would not acknowledge him. One writer draws the lesson out for anyone who claims Christ today:
The moral of all this is deeply instructive. It takes the clear vision of faith to discern the true glory of Christ and cling to Him in the time of His rejection. It is one thing to be a Christian, as people say, and another to confess Christ before men. Indeed, it is hard to find anything more selfish than a heart that takes all Jesus has to give and yields Him nothing in return.
- Request. David asked Nabal for a favour, and the asking itself was a humbling for God's anointed.
- Refusal. Nabal was not concerned to find out who David was. Everything was "my bread, my water, my flesh."
- Report. The messengers brought back Nabal's exact words. Everything hung on his estimate of the man who had asked.
- Revenge. David did not consult the Lord; he strapped on a sword, and the flesh in him rose to meet the flesh in Nabal.
- Rescue. God stopped the collision by an instrument prepared in secret. That spared David from the sword he had strapped on, and Nabal lost everything, even his own life.
And David said to his men, Gird ye on every man his sword. And they girded on every man his sword; and David also girded on his sword; and there went up after David about four hundred men; and two hundred abode by the baggage.
David's messengers come back empty-handed and insulted. His answer is instant: swords on, four hundred men behind him, two hundred left with the baggage. Commentators treat this one verse as a turning point. David had just spared a king who wanted him dead. Now he moves to destroy a man who only refused him food.
The command itself is the problem. David had taken years of hunting without striking back. Here, in one sentence, a different man speaks.
No doubt it was deeply trying to meet such base ingratitude from a man he had guarded like a wall. It stung, too, to be blamed for the very situation his faithfulness had put him in. He was accused of deserting his master at the very time Saul was hunting him through the mountains like a partridge. All this was hard to bear. In that first rush of feeling, David spoke words that could not stand examination in God's presence. "Every man strap on his sword!" was not quite the language we would expect from a man who had walked so meekly and gently until then.
The chapter before makes this jarring. Saul had hunted David, and David let him walk away alive.
Saul was clearly his enemy, and a very powerful one. At Saul's hand David had lost most of the things men count dear... Nabal, the man he now deals with, is proud and stingy and insolent. But he is not an enemy in the same sense; and even if he were, he is a contemptible one by comparison. David has no reason to fear him and never supposes he has. With such a man, how easy to show the generosity that cost him so much with Saul! Yet this is exactly where David fails... he flares into a rage that would sweep every male of Nabal's house into the slaughter with him!
Commentators turn the scene on the reader.
When people treat us in a proud, contemptuous way, we give way far too easily to our own outrage and are ready to take revenge. Yet once we take these matters into our own hands, we nearly always fall into the wrong of doing worse to the offender than he did to us.
The reason given is not that Nabal's rudeness was small. It is that David had stopped seeing God behind the man in front of him.
David's sword could never have cured Nabal's selfishness, and faith would never have taken such a course. David did not act like this toward Saul; he left him wholly to God... Why did he not act this way toward Nabal? Because he was not in communion. He was off his guard, and the enemy took advantage of him. Nature will always lead us to defend ourselves and resent every injury... but the man of faith rises above all such things at once. He sees God in everything. The jealousy of Saul, the folly of Nabal — he takes it all as coming from the hand of God.
The mistake was in the timing, and in whose hand the judgment belonged.
Before he received this teaching from godly Abigail, David had strapped on his sword and ordered his companions to do the same. He was running ahead of the time for vengeance. The hour of judgment had not yet struck. It would come through One greater than David. Of Him it is said: "Gird Your sword on Your thigh, O mighty one, in Your splendor and majesty" (Ps. 45:3); but as long as David was a stranger in his inheritance it was still the time of grace.
David's rejection often pictures Christ's. At this verse the picture fails, and the failure is instructive.
David may, in a rash moment, strap on his sword to take vengeance on his enemies. Peter, in the same spirit, will draw his sword to defend his Master. But Christ Himself, facing His enemies, says, "Put your sword back into its place." In every such picture there are these contrasts. They only show that no picture can fully set out the perfection of Jesus.
The sword never reached Nabal. Commentators credit that to God, not to David's second thoughts.
It is only a lapse, though, not the bent of his heart. In mercy God steps in to stop His servant from carrying out a vengeance that would have stayed the regret of his life. The instrument God chose is striking too — Abigail, the wife of Nabal.
- The insult — Nabal repaid protection with contempt. The provocation was real, and commentators admit we give way to outrage just as easily.
- The sword — his order was speech that could not stand in God's presence, from a man who had walked meekly until then.
- The contrast — he spared the king who hunted him, then moved to wipe out a household over food. He failed the easy test.
- The cause — lost communion, not the size of the offence. Faith traces every injury back to God's hand, and David had stopped.
- The rescue — the hour of judgment was not his to bring forward. God stopped him through Abigail and spared him a lifelong regret.
And one of [Nabal's] young men told Abigail, Nabal's wife, saying, Behold, David sent messengers out of the wilderness to bless our master; and he has insulted them.
One servant sees what his master has done and takes the news straight to Abigail. His report turns the whole story. It raises two questions: how can a man enjoy David's protection and still despise David himself? And who warns a household when nobody can speak to its head?
The servant tells Abigail what David's men had been in the fields: good to them, taking nothing, standing guard day and night. Nabal knew the value of what he had received. He would not pay for it.
This was just Nabal's way of acting. He got all the advantage he could from David. But the moment David asked for sympathy and help, his worldly spirit showed itself... Nabal could see the value of David's protection, but he cared nothing for David himself. As long as David's men were a wall around his possessions, he would tolerate them; but when they became a burden, he rejected and insulted them.
Nabal's answer was not just ungracious. Commentators weigh it against Scripture itself.
As you would expect, Nabal's conduct went directly against Scripture, and his spirit went against the spirit of its divine Author. Precious grace! How like God. How unlike Nabal! Grace would keep the heart wide open to everyone in need. Selfishness would close it against every person who asks. Nabal ought to have obeyed the word, whatever he knew about David. But his selfishness ran too deep to allow obedience to the Lord's word, or love for the Lord's anointed.
Nabal had asked, "Who is David?" The servant's report shows the question was hollow. His household knew David's men well. Commentators read Nabal's claimed ignorance as blindness he chose.
His serious fault was that he pretended not to know God's purposes, or who David was. The pretence was clear, because his own admissions gave him away and convicted him of impiety. His heart had no interest in what God had already done for Israel, nor in the blessing still in store for His people. He was "willingly ignorant," and like those Paul writes of in Romans 1:28, he "refused to have God in his knowledge." In his case it was not simplicity or ignorance, but enmity. Knowledge, however unwelcome, fixes responsibility on the soul and exposes it to judgment.
The words quoted there from Romans 1:28 come from an older translation; the ESV reads, "they did not see fit to acknowledge God."
The verse reads like ordinary household news. Commentators see God's hand behind it, because nobody could speak to the master himself.
But the hand of God intervened in grace. He moved one of Nabal's young servants to tell Abigail how Nabal had treated David's servants... The servant knew people would expect David to avenge Nabal's insulting words. He saw that both Nabal and his whole household were in immediate danger. Some of the servants had tried to reason with Nabal. They found him such a son of Belial — a worthless man — that they could not speak to him.
The danger was real. Commentators fault David as well:
David does not think of consulting the Lord. He decides at once to hit back at Nabal's insulting treatment, taking four hundred armed men with him... When people treat us in a proud, contemptuous way, we give way far too easily to our own outrage. We are ready to take revenge. Yet when we take these matters into our own hands, we are almost always exposed to an unrighteous reaction. We end up doing WORSE to the offender than he did to us.
The same news reached two people in that house and produced opposite results. Abigail did not wait for her husband's consent. Commentators see faith in that, not disloyalty.
She hears about her husband's folly from one of the young men. She acts at once in faith, and so without consulting her husband. Nature could only see a runaway servant in David. Faith does not look at outward circumstances. In the hunted and needy David, faith sees the coming king.
Her move was open to misreading from every side, and commentators admit it:
The pathway of faith sometimes looks suspicious, and what Abigail did might have seemed to an outside observer quite open to blame, whether you think of David or of her husband. But Abigail saw the will and glory of God, and where faith sees what He is doing, all questions are settled. Whatever it might look like, whatever it might cost, her mind was made up: and God vindicated her, and judged Nabal.
- Taken. Nabal let David's men guard his possessions, then refused David himself. He kept the benefit and rejected the man.
- Pretended. "Who is David?" was not a real question. Commentators call it willing ignorance, and the knowledge he refused still fixed his responsibility.
- Reported. One servant carried the truth to the one person who could act. God's grace came through the lowest voice in the house.
- Threatened. Vengeance was already on the road. Commentators fault David too, for arming himself instead of consulting the Lord.
- Answered. Abigail heard the same report and acted in faith. She saw the coming king in the hunted man, where Nabal saw only a runaway.
And the men were very good to us, and we were not hurt, neither missed we anything, as long as we companied with them, when we were in the fields.
David's messengers told Nabal that his shepherds had come to no harm while David's men camped nearby. Nabal answered with insults. This verse is the reply of the shepherds themselves, the men who were there. It raises the question the whole chapter turns on: what do you owe someone whose kindness you have enjoyed?
David's claim could be tested. The shepherds who were there gave their answer.
Had David exaggerated the service that he and his band had rendered? What could the shepherds say? "The men were very good to us, and we suffered no harm, and we did not miss anything... They were a wall to us both by night and by day, all the while we were with them keeping the sheep." Most would think that service like this normally calls for repayment. But David did more than that. Through his messengers he gave the rich sheep owner a chance to serve the Lord's anointed in his time of trial. That message tested Nabal in two ways. Would he repay kindness, and would he care for the king after God's own heart?
What the shepherds remembered about David's men was not what they took, but what they gave.
In the course of his wanderings, he, and his followers, went about doing good; for the shepherds of one Nabal have to own that David and his men "were very good to us." They protected the shepherds and their flocks night and day; so that, as long as David and his men were in their neighbourhood, they lost nothing.
Another writer names what those flocks were guarded against.
While hiding in the area where Nabal kept his flocks, David and his men had not trespassed on his rights. Instead, they had acted as a wall to protect his flocks from attacks by savage beasts, and by men more savage still. So David makes a frank appeal for recognition by Nabal. Would he not give him a small portion of that which he had in such abundance?
No law required Nabal to give David anything. The claim on him was of another kind.
Of course Nabal was under no legal obligation to David, though there is no doubt he ought to have felt himself under a moral one. The message reminds Nabal that while David and his men were in the same area as his shepherds, they had protected them rather than stolen from them, as many armies would do. None were hurt, and no sheep were missing. They suggest that Nabal ask his shepherds about it, to confirm it.
Nabal had gained something real from these men. His answer shows what he valued.
This was just Nabal's way of acting. He took all the advantage he could from David. But the moment David put in his claim for sympathy and help, his worldly spirit showed itself. Nabal could understand the value of David's protection well enough, though he cared nothing for David himself. As long as David's men were a wall around his possessions, he would tolerate them. But once they became a burden, he rejected them and shouted abuse at them.
Commentators read this as more than an old quarrel over food. One applies it to the heart that wants the benefits of Christ and nothing more.
It is one thing to be a Christian, as people say, and another thing to confess Christ before men. It is hard to find anything more selfish than the state of heart that takes all Jesus has to give, and gives Him nothing in return. "Provided I am saved, all the rest is unimportant." This is the secret thought of many a heart.
Another turns it on a world that enjoys mercies it never traces to their source.
How has the world imitated Nabal in his churlish refusal of David's request! It too has its sheep-shearing, its time of gathering in rich results to which it has contributed little or nothing. It has not realized that every earthly mercy it enjoys was bought by the death of Christ, and that He has been their unseen protector and provider. He makes His claim — not a harsh or unjust one — that out of their abundance they give freely to Him.
- Verified. The shepherds confirm David's account. No harm, no losses, nothing missing — his claim rested on plain fact, not on a boast.
- Unpaid. David's men guarded the flocks from wild animals and violent men, night and day, and no one had paid them for it.
- Owed. No law made Nabal give anything. His debt was a moral one, and that is the kind a selfish heart ignores most easily.
- Kept, but only the useful part. Nabal valued David's protection but cared nothing for David himself. He put up with the wall while it cost him nothing.
- Repeated. The same sum is still worked out today. People take all Christ gives and return nothing, and a world enjoys mercies it never credits to its unseen protector.
They were a wall to us both by night and day, all the while we were with them feeding the sheep.
One of Nabal's servants goes past his master and tells Abigail, his master's wife, what really happened out in the fields. His plain words about the wall decide two things: whether David was right to ask Nabal for anything, and what Abigail will do next.
David had claimed that Nabal's shepherds lost nothing while his men were nearby. The shepherds' own answer settles that, and turns his request into a test.
Had David exaggerated the service that he and his band had given? What could the shepherds say? … Most people would think that services like these called for some repayment. But David's message did far more. Through his messengers he gave the flock owner a chance to serve the Lord's anointed in his time of trial. That message sent to Nabal tested him in two ways. Would he repay kindness, and would he care for the king after God's own heart? … God's interests on earth at that time meant nothing to Nabal. So he lost his chance to take God's side in his day, and lost it for ever.
A wall keeps danger out. Here the danger was wild animals, and men who were worse.
David and his men were hiding near the place where Nabal kept his flocks. They had not trespassed on his rights. Instead, they had acted as a wall to protect his flocks from savage beasts, and from men more savage still. So David makes a frank appeal to Nabal for recognition. Would he not give him a small portion out of what he had in such abundance?
The servant does not argue with Nabal — others had tried and failed. He speaks to the one person in the house who will act. God's hand was behind it.
But the hand of God stepped in with grace. He moved one of Nabal's young servants to tell Abigail how Nabal had treated David's men. They had never oppressed the shepherds or taken anything from them. Instead they had acted as a wall of defence for them by night and day (v. 16). He knew people would expect David to avenge Nabal's insulting words. He saw that both Nabal and his whole household were in immediate danger. Some of the servants had clearly tried to reason with Nabal. They found him such a son of Belial — such a worthless man — that they could not speak to him.
What the servant hands Abigail is information; what she does with it is faith.
The pathway of faith sometimes looks suspicious. To an outsider, what Abigail did might have seemed quite blameworthy — whether you think of David or of her husband. But Abigail saw the will and glory of God. Where faith sees what He is doing, all questions are settled.
Nabal had enjoyed every benefit the wall gave him. His anger flares only when the men who provided it ask for something back.
This was exactly Nabal's way of acting. He took all the advantage he could from David. But the moment David made his claim for sympathy and help, his worldly spirit showed itself… Nabal could well understand the value of David's protection, though he cared nothing for David's person. As long as David's men were a wall around his possessions, he would tolerate them. But as soon as they became a burden, he rejected them and abused them.
Nabal is not the last to enjoy a harvest he did not protect.
Apply this in a spiritual way. How the world has copied Nabal in his rude refusal of David's request! It too has its sheep-shearing, its time of gathering in rich results to which it has contributed little or nothing. It has not realised that the death of Christ purchased every earthly mercy it enjoys. It has not seen that He has been their unseen protector and provider.
The problem goes deeper than bad manners. It is a failure to see who Christ is.
It takes the clear sight of faith to see the true glory of Christ, and to hold to Him in the time when He is rejected… You can hardly find a state of heart more selfish than this: taking everything Jesus has to give, and giving Him nothing in return.
- Wall — David's men guarded Nabal's shepherds night and day, from wild animals and from worse men. They took nothing.
- Witness — the shepherds confirm that David told the truth. Nabal cannot plead ignorance.
- Test — the request tested Nabal twice: would he repay kindness, and would he honour God's chosen king?
- Verdict — Nabal valued the wall and despised the man who built it. He welcomed David's men until they cost him something.
- Warning — the world still lives behind a wall it did not build. Faith sees the Protector, not just the protection.
And now know and consider what thou wilt do, for evil is determined against our master, and against all his household; and he is such a son of Belial, that one cannot speak to him.
A servant runs to Abigail with a warning her husband will never hear. David is coming, the whole household is in danger, and the one man who could stop it is the one man nobody can talk to.
The warning comes from one of Nabal's young servants. One commentator traces his speaking up to God's own working.
But the hand of God intervened in grace. He influenced one of Nabal's young servants to tell Abigail how Nabal had treated David's servants. He knew everyone would expect David to do something to avenge Nabal's insulting words. He saw that both Nabal and all his household were in immediate danger. Some of the servants had clearly tried to reason with Nabal, but found he was such a son of Belial (a worthless man) that they could not speak to him.
The ESV reads "such a worthless man"; older translations render it "a son of Belial." The phrase is not a name but a description of character.
The Hebrew word means 'worthless, lawless.' It is not a proper name. It stands as a picture of evil, so we read of a 'son of Belial' and a 'daughter of Belial' (Deut. 13:13; Judges 19:22; 1 Sam. 1:16; 1 Sam. 25:17, 25). In the New Testament it is set in contrast with Christ, as if it meant Satan (2 Cor. 6:15).
The man's own name pointed the same way. Abigail later admits it openly to David:
Nabal was a man of Belial (that is, a worthless fellow). As his name was, so was he; Nabal (that is, a fool) was he, and folly was with him.
Nabal had brushed aside the question of who David was. That one blind spot cost him everything.
God gave him a chance to own His anointed, the future king, and to serve him — a chance that would not have gone unrewarded. But he had no faith. He was tested here and found wanting. He failed to take the opportunity, and so lost everything, even his own life... Everything depended on what he thought of the one who asked the favour. Blind to this, Nabal laid himself open to God's righteous judgment. But the Spirit of God shows the truth to Abigail and moves her to act at once, turning away the threatened judgment from the whole household — except its guilty head, on whom destruction fell very soon after.
One writer sees in Nabal a picture reaching beyond his own day:
Nabal means "fool." He is a picture of the natural man, and especially of those who reject the Lord and His message of peace. His words — "my bread," "my water," "my flesh," "my shearers" — and the whole story remind us of that other fool our Lord spoke about. He also spoke of "my barns" - "my fruits" - "my goods" (Luke 12:16-21).
The household was not the only one in danger. One writer shows David slipping into danger of another kind.
This was terrible! And David was rashly taking himself out of the place of dependence — the only happy, the only holy place. Nor was it on behalf of the congregation of the Lord. No, it was to avenge himself on one who had treated him badly. Sad mistake! It was a happy thing for him that there was an Abigail in Nabal's house. God was about to use her to keep David from answering a fool according to his folly. This was just what the enemy wanted. Satan used Nabal's selfishness to trap David, and Abigail was the Lord's instrument to deliver him.
The servant hands Abigail a decision, not a discussion. The clock is the point.
Now Abigail's opportunity had come. Would she use it? Or would she hide behind her husband, let the precious moments pass, and so be caught in the destruction that Nabal in his folly was inviting? She had only a short time to decide. Putting it off for a day would have been fatal.
Stepping past her husband could look like disloyalty. One writer answers that charge:
The path of faith sometimes looks suspicious. To an outsider, what Abigail did might have seemed worth blaming, whether you think of David or of her husband. But Abigail saw the will and glory of God, and where faith sees what He is doing, every question is settled. Whatever it might look like, whatever it might cost, her mind was made up. God vindicated her, and judged Nabal.
- Refused. God gave Nabal the chance to own His anointed king, and Nabal threw it away. Everything turned on what he thought of the one who asked.
- Unreachable. "Worthless" is not a name but a character — lawless, and so closed that his own servants could not get a word through to him.
- Endangered. One man's folly put a whole household under sentence, and Satan used that same folly to pull David out of dependence on God.
- Decided. The warning demanded action within hours. If Abigail had hidden behind her husband, she would have shared his ruin.
- Delivered. Abigail acted on what faith saw God doing. It looked questionable from outside, but God vindicated her, judged Nabal, and kept David from avenging himself.
And Abigail made haste, and took two hundred loaves, and two skin-bottles of wine, and five sheep ready dressed, and five measures of parched [corn], and a hundred raisin-cakes, and two hundred fig-cakes, and laid them on asses.
A warning has just reached Abigail: David is coming in anger. She does not argue and she does not wait. She loads donkeys with the food her husband refused, and tells him nothing.
She heard the warning and treated it as true. One writer applies her haste to every reader who has heard that judgment is coming.
She learns that "evil is determined" against Nabal and against his whole household. At once she prepares everything her husband had refused David, and much more besides, without holding back. Then she goes quickly to meet him. Oh, that souls who have heard that evil is decided against them might do the same. There is no time to lose: haste is essential; the avenger is already on His way. When someone receives the announcement of judgment as testimony from God, he hurries to escape it. This is faith. The only way out is to go and meet the One who is coming to judge. Abigail had one fear only: that she might not reach David before his sword was drawn. She knew that then it would be too late. But she had no fear about how the meeting would end, because she knew the character of the man she was going to speak to.
Nabal's folly had put the whole house in danger. The decision now fell to his wife.
Now came Abigail's opportunity. Would she use it? Or would she hide behind her husband and let the precious moments pass? Then she too would be caught up in the destruction that Nabal in his folly was inviting. She had only a short time to decide, and putting it off for a day would have been fatal.
She acted without telling her husband, and that could look like disloyalty.
The pathway of faith sometimes looks suspicious. What Abigail did might have seemed open to criticism from the outside, whether one thinks of David or of her husband. But Abigail saw the will and glory of God, and where faith sees what He is doing, no question remains. Whatever it might seem, whatever it might cost, she had made up her mind. God vindicated her, and judged Nabal.
The supply was large, and she organised it herself.
Abigail was a woman of action. She had large provisions made up, of bread, wine, ready dressed sheep, corn, raisins and figs (v.18). She did not tell Nabal anything about it, but took enough servants to care for the donkeys that carried the food. She did not have to go far to meet David, who with his men was on the way to attack Nabal (v.20).
The verse counts two hundred cakes of figs. A dictionary of Bible terms explains what such cakes were.
People made figs into cakes by pressing them together. 1 Sam. 25:18; 1 Sam. 30:12.
She gave generously, and thought little of what she gave.
When she heard of him, she responded to his claims without a moment's hesitation. She sent him a generous offering, yet humbly admitted it was unworthy of him. She bowed before him to the ground. She looked for mercy and took her husband's guilt on herself, for she judged Nabal's conduct to be completely wrong.
Her errand kept Nabal's household alive. One writer looks at what it did for David.
The value of Abigail's service was not that she saved Nabal from David's sword. It was that she kept David from drawing the sword at all.
- Warned. She learned that ruin was fixed against the whole household. She believed the report and acted the same hour.
- Hurried. Delay was the one fatal choice. Her haste was faith, because the avenger was already on the way.
- Loaded. She prepared everything Nabal had refused, and much more: bread, wine, dressed sheep, grain, fig cakes and raisins.
- Lowly. The gift was generous, yet she called it unworthy of him. She bowed to the ground and took her husband's guilt as her own.
- Rescued. Nabal's house lived. But the greater rescue was David's: she kept him from drawing the sword to avenge himself.
And she said to her young men, Go on before me; behold, I come after you. But she did not tell her husband Nabal.
Abigail has just loaded donkeys with food for a man her husband insulted, and she tells him nothing about it. Was this a wife going behind her husband's back, or a believer acting before it was too late?
The verse does not say why she kept silent. One writer explains what talking to Nabal would have achieved.
It was well that Nabal had a wise wife. One of Nabal's servants told Abigail, Nabal's wife, what had happened, and that David was on the warpath. Abigail acted at once to put things right. To refer the matter to Nabal would have been a waste of time. Without asking her husband, she prepared a large supply of good food for David and his men. She went to meet him before David could take revenge on her husband.
The warning itself did not arrive by accident. Everyone under that roof stood to lose their lives, and the alarm came through an unnamed servant.
But the hand of God intervened in grace. He influenced one of Nabal's young servants to tell Abigail how Nabal had treated David's servants. David's men had not oppressed Nabal's people or taken anything from them. They had been a wall of defence for them by night and day. He knew people would expect David to avenge Nabal's insulting words. He saw that both Nabal and his whole household were in immediate danger.
Why did she see David so differently from her husband? One writer traces it to faith rather than nature.
She hears about her husband's folly from one of the young men. She acts at once in faith, and so without consulting her husband. Nature could only see a runaway servant in David. Faith does not look at mere outward circumstances. It sees the coming king in the hunted and needy David. So she takes her place as a subject of the king, and acts with the deference that is fitting in the presence of a king.
Her move can look wrong: a wife acting alone, for a man her husband had just turned away. One writer meets that objection head on.
The pathway of faith sometimes looks suspicious. To someone looking on from outside, what Abigail did might have seemed quite open to blame, whether one thinks of David or of her husband. But Abigail saw the will and glory of God. Where faith sees what He is doing, all questions are settled. Whatever it might seem, whatever it might cost, she had made up her mind. God vindicated her, and judged Nabal.
She sends the gift on ahead and follows behind it. That is the plan of someone with almost no time left.
Abigail was a woman of action. She did not tell Nabal anything about it, but took enough servants to care for the donkeys that carried the food. She did not have to go far to meet David, who with his men was on the way to attack Nabal. He had given himself no time to calm down before acting.
The same opportunity had come to Nabal first.
He lost his opportunity of taking God's side in his day, and lost it for ever. Has Nabal had no successors? Has he no representatives on earth today?
She could have stayed silent and left the responsibility with her husband.
Now, however, came Abigail's opportunity; would she use it? Or would she hide behind her lord and let the precious moments pass? That would leave her caught up in the destruction which Nabal was inviting by his folly. She had only a short time to decide; putting it off for a day would have been fatal.
Her silence saved her household. It also rescued David from himself.
Sad mistake! It was a happy thing for him that there was an Abigail in the house of Nabal. God was about to use her to keep him from answering a fool according to his folly. This was just what the enemy wanted. Satan used Nabal's selfishness to trap David, and Abigail was the Lord's instrument to deliver him.
- Danger — A young servant carried the warning. The whole household, not just Nabal, stood under the threat.
- Discernment — Nature saw only a runaway servant in David. Faith showed Abigail the coming king, and she acted on what she saw.
- Decision — Nabal lost his opportunity for good; Abigail took hers. Asking her husband first would have achieved nothing, and one day's delay would have been fatal.
- Deliverance — God vindicated what looked questionable from outside. Her household was safe, and He judged Nabal.
- Double rescue — The same act saved her home and stopped David from avenging himself. She became God's instrument to deliver the very man she went out to appease.
And as she was riding on the ass, and coming down by the covert of the hill, behold, David and his men came down opposite to her; and she met them.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Now David had said, Surely, in vain have I kept all that this [man] had in the wilderness, so that nothing was missed of all that was his; and he has requited me evil for good.
Nabal has insulted David, whose men had guarded his property for nothing. This verse lets us hear what David said as he rode out armed to take revenge. The complaint is true — and that is what makes the question hard: what do you do with a wrong that really happened?
David's facts are not in dispute. What is wrong is where he has put himself while he says them.
This was terrible! And David was rashly taking himself out of the place of dependence — the only happy, the only holy place. Nor was it on behalf of the congregation of the Lord. No, it was to avenge himself on one who had treated him badly. Sad mistake!
The writers do not pretend the insult was small. They also show where a wronged man is meant to take it.
It was deeply trying to meet such base ingratitude from a man to whom he had been a wall of defence. It stung, too, to be reproached on the very ground of the circumstances that faithfulness had put him in. He was accused of running away from his master. And this at the very time when he was being hunted like a partridge through the mountains. All this was hard to bear. In the first outburst of feeling, David speaks words that would not stand up to examination in the sanctuary. "Every man strap on his sword!" That was not the language we would expect from a man who had walked until now in such a meek and gentle spirit. Scripture gives the poor brother his resource: to cry to the Lord, not to draw his sword for revenge.
David had spared Saul, a man who wanted him dead. Nabal only insulted him, and Nabal is the one David sets out to destroy.
He had given himself no time to calm down before acting. Verse 21 tells us what he had said. He said it was useless for him to have shown kindness to Nabal's men and possessions in the wilderness. Nabal had only returned him evil for good. He was forgetting that he himself had returned good for evil to Saul. And now he had another opportunity to do the same to Nabal.
The failure is sharpest because the test was easier this time. It also raises a question about what still lives underneath a changed man.
David has no cause whatever to fear him, nor does he for a moment suppose he has. With such a man, how easy to show the generosity that, in Saul's case, cost so much to show! Yet it is precisely here that David fails entirely... Can this be the same man we have just been admiring for his noble control and self-forgetfulness? It is the same, and not the same. It is David, no longer under the control of the presence of God... Is there, then, a Saul living even beneath a David? Is it ready to show itself as soon as the guard on it is removed, unchanged from what it was before faith came? Yes, it is even so. Our best remedy is to be conscious of it, so that we realize how completely we depend on God at all times.
David's contempt shows in the words "this fellow." The problem is not Nabal at all.
When the soul is out of communion, it gets distracted by secondary causes and lesser agents. That is what happened to David when he looked at Nabal. If he had paused to look at the matter calmly before God, we would never have had these words: "In vain have I guarded all that this fellow has in the wilderness." He would have passed on and left "this fellow" to himself.
David never carried out the plan he had just announced.
This is only a lapse, however, and not the bent of his heart. God mercifully steps in. He keeps His servant from carrying out a vengeance that would have remained the regret of his life. The instrument God chose is striking — Abigail, the wife of Nabal.
David never needed to lift the sword he had strapped on. Within days the matter was closed.
Only ten days later God took away Nabal's life (v.38). What control then did he have over all those things he had called his own (v.11)? We are certainly reminded here of God's words, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord" (Romans 12:19).
- Grievance. David's complaint was true. He guarded Nabal's property and got insult back. A real wrong is where the danger begins, not where it ends.
- Drift. Rehearsing the wrong took him out of the place of dependence. What followed was not for God's people but to avenge himself.
- Blind spot. He returned good for evil to Saul, who wanted him dead. He forgot that lesson before Nabal, who only insulted him.
- Interruption. God sent Abigail to stop a vengeance that would have been a lifelong regret. The rescue came from inside Nabal's own house.
- Repayment. Ten days later God took Nabal's life. David never needed the sword at all.
So and more also do God to the enemies of David, if I leave of all that is his by the morning light any male.
David is on the road with four hundred armed men, and verse 22 is the oath he swears while marching. He uses God's name to swear that no male in Nabal's house will live to see morning — yet he had spared Saul, who wanted him dead.
Nabal's insult was real, and David answered at once. He swore by God's own name. One writer places the fault not in the sting David felt, but in the speed:
He had given himself no time to calm down before acting. In verse 21 he says that his kindness to Nabal's men and property in the wilderness was wasted, for Nabal had only returned him evil for good. He was forgetting that he himself had returned good for evil to Saul. Then he used God's name to call down vengeance on the enemies of David. He declared that he would not leave one male alive in all of Nabal's household. We would expect him to make only Nabal suffer for his insulting words. But his temper would not let him make any distinction.
Nabal was rude; the oath condemns every male in his house. The same writer sets David's two enemies side by side:
David never thought of asking the Lord. He decided at once to strike back at Nabal's insulting treatment, and he took four hundred armed men with him. Nabal had not set out to kill David, as Saul had. Yet David is ready to kill Nabal, though he would not kill Saul when he had the chance. When people treat us with contempt, we give way far too easily to our own outrage, and we are ready to take revenge. Yet when we take these matters into our own hands, we are nearly always in danger of an unrighteous reaction. We do WORSE to the offender than he did to us.
Most readers feel for David here. But sympathy is not the test:
Nabal's answer to David's messengers was surely meant to stir up any hidden resentment David may have had. It was so uncalled for, so brutal, that most of us can only say we would probably have done the same. But the question is not whether his resentment was natural. Was it an expression of the faith, patience and self-denial that had made his life so beautiful until now? There can be only one answer. David failed badly here. He was ready to take his case into his own hands instead of waiting on God alone.
David had sworn the oath and armed his men. What stopped him came from outside himself:
This is only a lapse, as we have said, and not the true bent of his heart. In mercy God steps in to stop His servant from carrying out a vengeance that would have stayed the regret of his life. The one God chose is striking too — Abigail, the wife of Nabal. God has often used the lips of a woman to call His people back to the path of faith and obedience.
Keeping this oath would have cost David more than it won him. One writer names what was at stake:
She took the blessed place of intercession. David, in his anger, was just about to strike the blow. He would have avenged himself with his own hand, instead of leaving the case in God's hand. This would have taken away one of the most blessed features in David's character — his leaving of all things to God.
David never carried out the oath. One writer counts up what that failure saved and what it gained:
By this wise and well-timed action Abigail saved the lives of herself and her household. She also won an honoured standing in Israel. She became the chosen companion of the Lord's anointed, in hard times as well as good ones. David not only avoided the guilt of shedding innocent blood. His heart was comforted and strengthened beyond words by this proof of God's guard, care, and working on his behalf. The danger was past and his needs were met. David's heart was now so full of the goodness of the Lord that he could only worship where he had meant to fight.
- Insult. Nabal returned evil for good. The provocation was real — most of us would have done the same.
- Oath. David gave himself no time to cool. He used God's name for his own revenge, and swore away a whole household for one man's words.
- Excess. He spared Saul, who wanted him dead. He condemned Nabal, who only insulted him. Revenge nearly always does worse to the offender than the offender did.
- Rescue. God stepped in through Abigail. He spared His servant a vengeance that would have been the regret of his life.
- Worship. David kept the finest feature of his character — leaving everything in God's hands — and he worshipped where he had come to fight.
And when Abigail saw David, she hasted and lighted off the ass, and fell before David on her face, and bowed herself to the ground,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and fell at his feet, and said, Upon me, my lord, [upon] me let the iniquity be; but let thy handmaid, I pray thee, speak in thine ears, and hear the words of thy handmaid.
David and his men are on their way, ready to fall on Nabal and his whole household. Abigail rides out to meet him, falls at his feet, and asks him to lay her husband's guilt on her — though she had no part in the insult.
Her opening words are not a defence. She knew nothing about the insult, yet she refuses to use that as an excuse.
Here again Abigail makes haste. She hurries to acknowledge David's lordship, his rights over her, and her own unworthiness. She begs him, and so admits that she depends on his good pleasure. More than that, by taking this attitude she, the woman of faith, admits that she is guilty. She takes on herself all the consequences of her ties to Nabal. She does not come to plead her innocence, although she knew nothing of what had happened (v. 25). In David's presence she wants only to find herself guilty. She hurries to confess it, because she knows David's grace.
Anyone can bow. Her words went further than the bow, and they included the truth about her own husband.
What a beautiful contrast Abigail makes to both Nabal and David here! She fell on her face before David and bowed to the ground (v. 23). But the humility of her words goes further than the humility of her bow (v. 24). She tells David that she will take the blame for Nabal's evil, and she humbly asks David to hear what she has to say. Though Nabal was her husband, she would not hide the truth about his harsh character.
Twice in this verse she calls herself David's servant. Older translations read "handmaid." Other women in Scripture used the same word.
These words often refer in Scripture to a female slave, as applied to Hagar the Egyptian, Gen. 25:12; but they were also used by women themselves as a term of humility, as when Hannah spoke to the Lord and to Eli, 1 Sam. 1:11, 16, 18; as Abigail did to David, 1 Sam. 25:24-41; and as Mary and Elizabeth did, as handmaids of the Lord. Luke 1:38, 48.
She went out to meet the danger instead of waiting for it. One thing worried her, and one thing did not.
When she learns that "evil is determined" against Nabal and against all his household, she hurries to act. She prepares everything her husband had refused David, and much more besides, holding nothing back. Then she goes quickly to meet him. Oh, that souls who have heard that evil is decided against them might do the same! There is no time to lose. Haste is essential; the avenger is already on His way… Abigail had only one fear: that she might not meet David before he drew his sword. She knew that then it would be too late. But she had no fear about the outcome of their meeting, because she knew the character of the one she would speak to.
Nabal's household deserved what was coming. That is what makes her plea remarkable.
Fitting punishment hung in the balance. All were ready to rush on Nabal and his household… What a fine witness to the power of the Spirit of grace, where the carrying out of judgment was so well deserved! She had an instinctive spiritual conviction about it. The matter was best left in the hands of Him who would deal solemnly with her guilty husband.
The obvious reading is that Abigail saved her household. One writer points to a second rescue that mattered more.
Abigail's service was precious not because she saved Nabal from David's sword, but because she kept David from drawing the sword at all.
David had no throne yet and no safety. Her closing words show what she saw in him.
Abigail serves David. More than that, she saw the God-given dignity resting on him in the middle of the sorrows of his outcast place. She meets him in a way that fits it. To her, Saul is only "a man" (v. 29). She cares so much for David's reputation that she pleads with him on that ground for her unworthy husband, identifying herself with his iniquity. And she asks one thing only: that David would remember her "when he comes into his kingdom."
- Guilt owned. She knew nothing of the insult, yet she refused to plead that. She asked David to lay her husband's guilt on her instead.
- Grace trusted. She hurried to confess because she already knew David's grace. Her one fear was arriving too late.
- Words below the bow. Her posture was humble; her words went lower. She called herself his servant and told the truth about her husband.
- Judgment deserved. Her plea shines because the punishment hanging over Nabal's house was deserved.
- The king spared. The greater rescue was not Nabal's life but David's own hand, kept from drawing the sword.
Let not my lord, I pray thee, regard this man of Belial, Nabal; for as his name is, so is he Nabal is his name, and folly is with him; and I thy handmaid did not see the young men of my lord, whom thou didst send.
David is coming down the hill armed, set on wiping out Abigail's household. She rides out to meet him and asks him to ignore her husband, because the man's name says everything: Nabal means "fool," and folly is what he is.
The name carried a fixed meaning. One writer ties it to the way Scripture uses "folly" everywhere else:
We are now introduced to a man of Israel. He lives in Maon, and his possessions are in Carmel. But he is Nabal, "a fool," and he is struck down for his folly… He is, as already said, Nabal. That is the word used where it is written, "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God.'" Indeed, this is what Scripture mostly connects or identifies folly with, just as Scripture also says, "the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom."
God uses the same word in Luke 12. He says it to a rich man who felt safe in what he owned:
His home is at Maon, "a dwelling-place." That perhaps suggests a sense of security in earthly things. He is much like the man in Luke 12, who said, "Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry." Indeed, God's answer to him, "Fool!" is a translation of Nabal, which means "folly." His end, too, like Nabal's, stands in solemn contrast to the luxury around him.
Abigail's other word for him is "worthless fellow" — "man of Belial" in older translations. It was never anyone's name:
The Hebrew word means "worthless, lawless." It is not a proper name. Scripture uses it as a picture of evil itself, so we have "son of Belial," "daughter of Belial," and so on: Deuteronomy 13:13; Judges 19:22; 1 Samuel 1:16; 1 Samuel 25:17, 25. In the New Testament it stands in contrast to Christ, as though it meant Satan (2 Corinthians 6:15).
Nabal treated everything he owned as his own. God gave him one chance to serve the king He had chosen, and he threw it away:
Nabal had claimed full and absolute right and control over everything God had given him in His fruitful garden ("Carmel"). He spoke of it as "my bread," "my water," "my flesh." God gave him a chance to own and serve His anointed, the future king, and it would not have gone unrewarded. But he had no faith. He fell short here, failed to seize the moment, and so lost everything, even his own life… God alone has absolute right over all things. Man is only a steward, and must give account of it all to God… All hangs on the person of David.
Abigail does not defend her husband, and she does not soften him either:
Though Nabal was her husband, she would not hide the truth about his harsh character. She plainly admits he is a man of Belial — a worthless man. She tells David that his name, Nabal, meaning "fool," described his character. She had not seen the men David sent, so she did not know until afterwards what had happened.
She could have pleaded her own innocence, since she never saw David's messengers. She does not:
By taking this attitude she, the woman of faith, recognises that she is guilty. She takes on herself all the consequences of being tied to Nabal. She does not come to plead her innocence, even though she knew nothing of what had happened (v. 25). In David's presence she wants only to find herself guilty. She hurries to confess it, because she knows David's grace.
Abigail leaves the matter of judgment with God:
What a fine witness to the power of the Spirit of grace, where the carrying out of judgment was so richly deserved! She had the instinctive spiritual conviction that it was best left in God's hands. He would deal solemnly with her guilty husband.
- Name. "Nabal" means fool, the Bible's word for the man who says in his heart there is no God — and his name matched his life.
- Folly. He claimed everything as his own — "my bread," "my water" — and left no room for God's anointed.
- Opportunity. God gave him a chance to serve the coming king. He had no faith in who David was, so he lost everything, even his life.
- Honesty. Abigail tells David the truth about her husband. She still refuses to plead her own innocence.
- Grace. She stands in the guilty man's place and asks for mercy, because she knows David's grace. She leaves judgment to God.
And now, my lord, [as] Jehovah liveth, and [as] thy soul liveth, seeing Jehovah has restrained thee from coming with bloodshed, and from avenging thyself with thine own hand, now let thine enemies, and they that seek evil to my lord, be as Nabal.
Abigail meets David as he rides out with armed men to destroy Nabal's household. Her first words treat the killing as already stopped, and she gives God the credit, not herself.
Her plea has three parts: an oath, a claim about who stopped David, and a wish about his enemies.
In verse 26 she pleads with David on the basis that the Lord lives and that David's soul lives. Was it not clear that the Lord had sent her to hold David back? He was about to kill in order to avenge himself with his own hand. She does not excuse Nabal. She wishes that David's enemies, and all who seek his harm, would be as Nabal. What did she mean? Not that they should prosper in wealth as Nabal had done. She wanted them left in God's hands, for Him to deal with in His own way. David had left Saul in God's hands; now Nabal would be left there too. In fact, God dealt with him more quickly than David would have imagined. It seems this wise woman was speaking prophetically.
David had a real grievance against Nabal. The question is what spirit moved him.
Look again at David: he was in danger, not only of failing to overcome, but of being overcome and falling into deep sin. How did he act as the servant of God, meekly bearing Nabal's taunts and cutting insults? Did he take it up in the name of God? No; it was in the spirit of his own wounded pride.
Behind the wounded pride stood a plain command David was about to break.
She was humble. She didn't take the credit for what she was doing. She credited it to the Lord. It was He who had restrained David and kept him from shedding Nabal's blood in revenge. David had been in grave danger. He was about to break a command of the Lord: "You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Lev. 19:18).
David was not wrong that Nabal deserved judgment. He was wrong about the timing, and about whose hand would deliver it.
Before receiving this teaching from the mouth of godly Abigail, David had strapped on his sword and had ordered his companions to do the same. He was getting ahead of the moment for vengeance; the hour of judgment had not yet struck; it would come through One greater than David. Of Him it is said: "Gird your sword on your thigh, O mighty one, in your splendor and majesty" (Ps. 45:3); but as long as David was a stranger in his inheritance it was still the time of grace.
Commentators differ on whether Abigail spoke as a prophet. One writer stops short of that, and still sees God's hand in her words.
It is good not to avenge ourselves. There is no indecision in her words. We need not claim a prophetic spirit for her, yet we can see — and she is not the only case — that God not only listens and hears, but also suggests when He sees fit, and confirms it perhaps far beyond anything she herself expected.
God used the least likely person in the story.
This weak woman, knowing what was appropriate to grace, becomes God's instrument to keep the greatest of His servants, the very anointed of the Lord himself, from evil. Only one Man never needed a reminder of the feelings that suited the position He had taken here on earth. He is Grace in person, the grace of God which has appeared to all men, and He never errs.
The same faith is open to us when someone wrongs us today.
Think of the most trying things that happen to us. If we can by faith link ourselves with God, if we can see Him with us as our friend — the One who has said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord" — we shall never feel inclined to avenge ourselves. We shall think of nothing except intercession for those who have grieved and wronged us. God's present dealings are in grace and mercy. "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good."
- Restrained — Abigail gives God the credit. The Lord held David back from bloodguilt and from avenging himself with his own hand.
- Provoked — David drew his sword for wounded pride, not for God's honour. It would have broken the command to love his neighbour as himself.
- Early — Nabal did deserve judgment, but David was ahead of the clock. He acted in the hour of grace with a sword that belongs to a greater King.
- Sent — a weak woman became God's instrument to keep the anointed king from evil. God's help often arrives in the weakest hand.
- Left — her wish for David's enemies means handing them to God. He dealt with Nabal more quickly than David would have imagined.
And now this blessing which thy bondmaid has brought to my lord, let it be given to the young men that follow my lord.
Abigail meets David on the road with the food her husband had refused him. She asks nothing for herself. She asks only that her gift go to the men who follow him, and she speaks to David as a king, though he is a hunted man with no crown.
Two people looked at the same fugitive and saw opposite things. Her faith shaped the gift she brought.
Nature could see nothing in David but a runaway servant. Faith does not look at outward circumstances. Faith sees the coming king in this hunted and needy man. So she takes her place as a subject of the king. She acts with the deference that is fitting in the presence of a king. She prepares her present, and when she meets David she falls at his feet, bows to the ground, and owns David as her lord. She takes sides with David against both her husband and king Saul. She admits that Nabal, though her husband and a great man in the world, is acting in a godless and foolish way, and that Saul, though the reigning king, is only a man opposing God's anointed.
She calls herself David's servant. Older translations use the word "handmaid." Women in Scripture chose that word for themselves.
These words often refer in Scripture to a female slave. They are used of Hagar the Egyptian, Genesis 25:12. But women also used them of themselves as a term of humility. Hannah spoke this way to the LORD and to Eli, 1 Samuel 1:11, 16, 18. Abigail spoke this way to David, 1 Samuel 25:24-41. Mary and Elizabeth called themselves handmaids of the Lord, Luke 1:38, 48.
The bowing does not stop with her body.
She fell on her face before David and bowed to the ground (v.23). But the humility of her words goes further than her lowly posture (v.24).
She does not hand the food to David for himself. She directs it to the men in his company, and the only thing she asks for herself is pardon.
She begs David to receive the supplies she has brought for the young men who followed him (v.17). She asks him to forgive her own trespass, because she was sure the Lord would make David a sure house.
Later, when David sends for her as his wife, the same instinct shows again: she reaches for the lowest place among those who serve him.
Abigail ministers to David. More than that, she saw the God-given dignity that rested on him in the sorrows of his outcast place, and she meets him as that dignity deserves. She bows to the earth before his messengers, and she speaks the most perfect words a humble heart can speak — "Let your handmaid be a servant to wash the feet of the servants of my lord." (Compare John 13:5, 14.)
David was on his way to avenge himself. Abigail met him before he arrived.
In Abigail we see someone who was used to correct David himself. The value of Abigail's service was not that she saved Nabal from David's sword. It was that she kept David from drawing the sword at all.
David takes the food, and later he takes the woman who brought it. He leaves Nabal to God.
David accepted her person and her present, and left Nabal in God's hands. The next morning Abigail told Nabal the danger he had escaped, and his heart died within him. About ten days later God struck him and he died. So God avenged the insult against His servant during his rejection, and saved David from avenging himself.
- Sight — Nabal saw a runaway servant. Abigail saw the coming king, and her present was what that sight required.
- Self — she calls herself David's servant. Hannah, Mary and Elizabeth used that same word of themselves. Her words humble her further than her bowed body does.
- Reach — the gift goes past David to the young men who follow him. Later the same heart asks to wash the feet of his servants.
- Rescue — the value of what she carried was not that it saved Nabal from the sword. It was that it kept David from drawing it.
- Reward — David accepted her person along with her present, and left Nabal to God. Ten days later God struck Nabal, and God spared David the guilt of avenging himself.
I pray thee, forgive the transgression of thy handmaid for Jehovah will certainly make my lord a lasting house; because my lord fights the battles of Jehovah, and evil has not been found in thee all thy days.
Abigail meets David while he is riding out in anger. Her plea for her household rests on nothing about herself. It rests on who David is and on what God has promised him. Two things stand side by side in her words: she confesses guilt that was not hers, and she is certain of a throne no one can yet see.
Abigail's opening is not a defence. She asks pardon as if the wrong were her own.
Abigail hurries to acknowledge David's lordship, his rights over her, and her own unworthiness. She begs him, and so admits that she depends on his good will. More than that, by taking this place she, the woman of faith, admits that she is guilty. She takes on herself all the results of her tie to Nabal. She does not come to plead her innocence, although she had had no knowledge of what had happened. In David's presence she has no other wish but to find herself guilty, and she hastens to confess it, for she knows David's grace.
Nabal and Abigail looked at the same man and reached opposite verdicts.
Who David was, and what he was, was all plain to her; there was nothing mysterious about it. She knew that he fought the Lord's battles, and that no evil had been found in him all his days. What folly, then, to be against him... A runaway servant he was in Nabal's eyes; one fighting the Lord's battles he was in Abigail's eyes. In this she was right. To refuse him help, then, was to take sides against God.
The same words also set David apart from Saul.
Abigail, in verse 28, shows the clear faith that recognised David as the king of God's choice even while he was in exile. She knew that David cared about fighting the battles of the Lord. Saul was the opposite. He thought only of fighting his own enemies — real or imagined.
She said this at the worst possible moment — David was on his way to kill. Naming his true work was itself a rebuke.
She shows him the evil of taking revenge for himself. She shows the weakness and folly of the man he means to take revenge on. She reminds him of his proper work: "fighting the battles of the LORD." This must have brought home to his heart how humbling it was that Abigail met him as he rushed out to fight his own battle.
Her praise was true of David as a picture of Christ, yet it outran the man himself.
"My lord is fighting the battles of the LORD, and evil shall not be found in you so long as you live." How could the sight of perfection in a man fail to draw her heart? Yet David, a picture of Christ, is in himself only an imperfect man. Christ would never have been in danger of seeking justice for Himself. Only the grace of God kept David back, when he had already decided to leave none of his enemies alive.
"A sure house" means a lasting family line. Abigail speaks of it as already settled.
Abigail speaks of Saul as a man. The LORD, she says, will make a sure house for David. This is the insight of faith. On this point it is the truth of God's purpose, and in its fulness. Without knowing it, she was forming for herself the place of the church, in the future she was preparing for herself.
Pointing him forward was also how she cooled his anger.
The leading point in this address is the special reference to the future. All these references to David's future blessing and glory were well suited to draw his heart away from his present grievance. The sure house, the bundle of life, and the kingdom were far better than Nabal's flocks and herds. In view of these glories, David could well afford to leave Nabal his portion, and to leave him to it.
Her verdict on David also settled how she saw everyone else around her.
She had seen David's true character and position. Nabal, her husband, is a worthless man — Saul, the king, is only a man. But David was fighting the battles of the Lord, and he would yet reign over Israel. When David was the chief figure before her eyes, the whole political history of her day was plain to Abigail. How plain, too, things can become now, when the Lord Jesus Christ is before the soul.
- Faith confesses. Abigail does not argue her innocence. She takes the guilt of her house on herself and trusts David's grace.
- Faith identifies. She names David by his true work: fighting the battles of the LORD. Saul fought his own battles. Nabal saw only a runaway servant.
- Faith is honest about the man. Her words describe perfection. Only grace kept David from the revenge he had already decided on. The full picture belongs to Christ.
- Faith is certain of the future. "A sure house" is God's own purpose, grasped by faith. Without knowing it, Abigail was preparing her own place in it.
- Faith reorders the present. The kingdom ahead outweighed Nabal's flocks. With God's King in the foreground, she saw everything else at its real size.
And if a man is risen up to pursue thee and to seek thy life, the soul of my lord shall be bound in the bundle of the living with Jehovah thy God; and the souls of thine enemies, them shall he sling out from the hollow of the sling.
David is riding out to take revenge when Abigail meets him on the road. She does not plead for her household. She tells him what God thinks of him: the LORD keeps his life safe, and his pursuers will be flung away. In one sentence she reduces King Saul to "a man" and lifts a fugitive into the keeping of God.
Abigail is not guessing at the future. She knows God's mind about David, and that changes how she sees everyone else — even the king.
Everything Abigail says is the fruit of her communion with God's thoughts. It is not prophecy, but she knows what will happen to David because she knows what God thinks of him. Saul, the king of Israel, is in Abigail's estimation only "a man … risen up to pursue [David] and to seek [his] life." In his opposition to David, the son of Jesse, he does not even deserve to have his name mentioned.
The ESV calls it "the bundle of the living"; the writers quote older translations that say "the bundle of life." Abigail is promising more than survival. She says God has taken David up, and for ever.
She was right. Speaking in the power of the Spirit she says, "the soul of my lord shall be bound in the bundle of life with the LORD your God." She sees him taken up by God intimately and for ever: this alone explains and justifies her conduct.
The same verse has a second image. A sling holds a stone only to throw it away. Abigail's own husband Nabal proved the point within days.
Returning to her husband, Abigail finds him disgracing himself at a drunken feast. When he is sober, he hears what has happened. At once "his heart died within him, and he became as a stone." About ten days later the Lord struck him. To use Abigail's own figure, he is flung aside in judgment just as a stone is slung from the middle of a sling (29, 36-38).
David was riding out to avenge himself. Abigail answers by pointing him to three things God had promised him.
Notice that the leading point in this address is the special reference to the future. "The LORD will certainly make my lord a sure house." "The soul of my lord shall be bound in the bundle of life with the LORD your God." "When the LORD shall have done to my lord," and so on; "and shall have appointed you ruler over Israel." All these references to David's future blessing and glory were well suited to draw his heart away from his present grievance. The sure house, the bundle of life, and the kingdom were far better than Nabal's flocks and herds; and in view of these glories, David could well afford to leave him to his portion, and his portion to him.
What makes the bundle safe is not the people inside it. And what lies outside it is not safe at all.
"The bundle of life" — the phrase used by the woman who confessed David's glory on the day of his humiliation — is a firm bundle, well packed and sure. It holds because the Lord Himself is in it, as He was long ago in the burning bush. In man's thoughts that bundle looks weak and despised, like a bramble bush. Yet outside its limits everything is tottering.
The picture reaches past David. Believers now share the one life that is in Christ.
The love of God gathers us into the presence of God Himself. It gives the life of His Son to those dead in trespasses and sins. They have a life locked up in the Son, and nothing can touch it. Life hidden with Christ in God! If Christ Himself, up there, is my life, it links me up with Him in whom is the whole bundle of life. Why can the head never say, "I have no need of you," to the weakest member passing through the trials and sorrows of this wilderness? Because we are bound up in one bundle of life.
- Sight — Abigail speaks from God's thoughts, not from fear. That is why the reigning king is only "a man" to her, while David belongs to the LORD.
- Safety — The bundle means more than escaping a pursuer. God has taken David up, closely and for ever.
- Sling — The same verse promises the opposite end for David's enemies. Nabal, struck within ten days, was the first stone flung out.
- Settled — Next to a sure house, the bundle of life and the kingdom, Nabal's flocks were not worth a sword. The promised future drained the anger out of the quarrel.
- Sureness — The bundle holds because the Lord Himself is inside it. Everyone joined to Christ shares the life locked up in the Son.
And it shall come to pass, when Jehovah shall do to my lord according to all the good that he has spoken concerning thee, and shall appoint thee ruler over Israel,
David is riding out to avenge himself on Nabal, and Abigail meets him on the road. She points him past the insult of the moment to the day God will make him prince over Israel, and asks what that day will say about this one.
Abigail is not guessing. She speaks about David's future because she has already weighed what God thinks about him.
Everything Abigail says is the fruit of her communion with God's thoughts. It is not prophecy, but she knows what will happen to David because she knows what God thinks of him... Saul, the king of Israel, is in Abigail's estimation only "a man... risen up to pursue David and to seek his life." In his opposition to the son of Jesse he does not even deserve to have his name mentioned.
The "good" God had spoken was not a vague hope. It was God's settled purpose, written out later in 2 Samuel 7.
The Lord, she says, will make a sure house for David. This is the understanding that faith gives. It is the truth of God's counsels (2 Samuel 7:11), in its fullness as far as this point goes.
Nabal had the same facts his wife had. The difference was faith: she was sure David's rule would come by God's own appointment.
She knew that he fought the Lord's battles, and that no evil had been found in him all his days. What folly, then, to be against him... And she was no less clear about his future. She was sure... that he would rule by divine appointment over Israel... In Nabal's eyes he was a runaway servant; in Abigail's eyes he was a man fighting the Lord's battles.
Her argument is simple. David is about to fight over something far smaller than what God has promised him. (Where these writers quote "the bundle of life," ESV reads "the bundle of the living.")
Notice that the leading point in this address is the special reference to the future. "The Lord will certainly make my lord a sure house." "The soul of my lord shall be bound in the bundle of life with the Lord your God." "When the Lord has done to my lord... and has appointed you prince over Israel." All these references to David's future blessing and glory were well suited to draw his heart away from his present grievance. The sure house, the bundle of life, and the kingdom were far better than Nabal's flocks and herds. In view of these glories, David could well afford to leave Nabal to his portion, and his portion to him.
Abigail does not name the throne as flattery. She turns it into a test: judge today's act by the day you will sit there.
With wise foresight she speaks of the day he ascends the throne. On that day he would be most thankful to have no record of shedding blood without cause, and no record of taking the law into his own hands to avenge himself (v. 31). If such a blot was on his past record, it would remain a great grief to his own heart.
Her concern went beyond David's reputation to his soul.
How sweet to see, in a dark and cloudy day, a woman of Israel whose faith lets her see clearly, and feel such concern — not only for the unstained honour of the future king of Israel, but also that his soul should be kept, simply and to the end of the trial, from what was contrary to the grace of the Lord.
What steadied Abigail can steady us. If God has said He will repay, we have nothing left to repay.
The place of faith is always to look beyond present circumstances, on to the time of the end. Then we begin to see and judge things according to God. That is how it was with Abigail. When we realise our association with God, and the appointed end of glory, we shall act as she did. In the most trying things that happen to us, if by faith we can see God with us as our friend, the One who has said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord," we shall never feel inclined to avenge ourselves.
Because she is sure of the throne, her only request is to be remembered when He reaches it — a request commentators repeatedly connect to another.
In view of that glory, and in confidence in the king, she can say, "When the Lord has dealt well with my lord, then remember your servant." Those words cannot help recalling that far greater scene, when a dying thief saw in a crucified Man the Lord of glory and the King of kings... So the high-born Abigail and the low-born thief, with the same faith, look beyond the present. They act and speak in the light of the future, and the future proves their faith right.
- Promise. The "good" God spoke about David was His settled purpose, written out later in 2 Samuel 7 — not Abigail's guess.
- Perception. She knew the future because she knew God's mind about David; Nabal had the same facts and saw only a runaway servant.
- Proportion. A sure house, the bundle of life and a kingdom outweighed a quarrel over one man's flocks.
- Protection. She wanted the coming throne to carry no record of blood shed without cause — a blot that would have grieved David's own heart.
- Petition. Certain of his reign, she asks only to be remembered in it — the same faith the dying thief showed toward a crucified King.
that this shall be no stumbling-block to thee, nor offence of heart for my lord, either that thou hast shed blood without cause, or that my lord has avenged himself. And when Jehovah shall deal well with my lord, then remember thy handmaid.
Abigail meets David on the road with his sword already drawn. Her closing argument is not about her household at all. It is about what David will feel later, when the LORD makes him prince over Israel. She asks him to weigh his anger now against his coming glory, and then asks one thing for herself: remember me.
She asks David to imagine himself already reigning, then to look back at the deed he is about to do. One writer draws out what that test would have done to him:
If David had looked ahead like this to the time of his glory, he would never have thought of raising his hand to give the blow, or of shedding blood without cause. Yet we know he came close to staining his hands with the blood of the very young men who spoke so well of him to Abigail. Had he thought, "How, in the hour of my glory, will this action appear to me?" he would have been checked.
Abigail does not argue David out of his anger. She fills his view with something larger than the insult. One writer traces that thread through her whole speech, quoting her words from an older translation:
Notice that the leading point in this address is the special reference to the future. "The Lord will certainly make my lord a sure house." "The soul of my lord shall be bound in the bundle of life with the Lord your God." "When the Lord shall have done to my lord … and shall have appointed you ruler over Israel." All these references to David's future blessing and glory were well suited to draw his heart away from his present grievance. The sure house, the bundle of life, and the kingdom were far better than Nabal's flocks and herds; and in view of these glories, David could well afford to leave Nabal to his portion, and his portion to him.
The danger was not mainly to Nabal's household. It was to something in David himself that had marked him out all along:
She took the blessed place of intercession. David, in his anger, was about to strike the blow. He would avenge himself with his own hand instead of leaving the case in the hand of God. That would have taken away one of the most blessed features in the character of David — leaving all things to God.
Her care ran in two directions at once:
How sweet to see, in the dark and cloudy day, a woman of Israel whose faith lets her see clearly and care so deeply. Her care was not only for the unstained honour of the future king of Israel. She also wanted his soul kept, in simplicity and right to the end of the trial, from what was contrary to the grace of the Lord.
Judgment was coming. David's mistake was the timing and the hand:
Before godly Abigail taught him this, David had strapped on his sword and had ordered his companions to do the same. He was getting ahead of the moment for vengeance. The hour of judgment had not yet struck. It would come through One greater than David. Of Him it is said: "Gird your sword on your thigh, O mighty one, in your splendor and majesty" (Ps. 45:3); but as long as David was a stranger in his inheritance it was still the time of grace.
Her last words look past the present to the day of David's power. The answer went further than the asking:
A very striking parallel may be drawn between Abigail and the criminal crucified beside Jesus. Abigail's prayer is, "When the LORD has dealt well with my lord" — that is, when David should sit on the throne of Israel — "then remember your servant." The criminal prayed, "Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom."… David answered Abigail's request at once, and accepted her person. As soon as Nabal died, he married her. So he made her his companion in rejection while he waited for the kingdom… In both cases the answer went far beyond the prayer. And such is grace — divine grace. It loves to go beyond our desires, and to bless according to the heart of the Giver rather than according to the need we put into words.
- Test it by the throne. Abigail asks David to weigh today's act by how it will look in the day of his glory. A deed that brings no regret then is safe now.
- Self-avenging costs the avenger. Striking Nabal would have stripped David of the very thing that marked him: leaving his cause with God.
- Grace has an hour. Judgment was coming, but not yet and not by David's hand. While he was still a stranger in his inheritance, it was the time of grace.
- Love guards character. Abigail cared for the future king's unstained honour. She cared just as much that his soul be kept from what was contrary to the grace of the Lord.
- Remembered beyond asking. She asked only to be remembered in the kingdom. David accepted her at once and made her his companion in rejection. Grace blesses from the Giver's heart, not by the size of the asking.
And David said to Abigail, Blessed be Jehovah, the God of Israel, who sent thee this day to meet me.
David is on his way to destroy Nabal's household when Abigail meets him on the road with food and a plea. His first words after hearing her are not to her but to God — and that order tells you what he saw.
David does not treat the meeting as luck or as a clever woman's timing. He traces it back to the One who arranged it.
David had no choice but to recognize that it was the Lord who had sent Abigail. He blessed God first for His great grace in this matter. Then he blesses Abigail's wise advice, and then Abigail herself. She had prevented David from carrying out his purpose of shedding blood and avenging himself with his own hand. He tells her the terrible truth: if she had not hurried to meet him, he and his men would have killed every male in Nabal's household. He stresses again that it was the Lord God of Israel who had kept him back from harming Abigail by the destruction he had planned for her household. Otherwise he would not have controlled his own temper until it was too late.
The rebuke came from a woman of the very household he was riding out to destroy. What gave her words weight was her faith.
It was a remarkable thing for David to find a faith greater than his own. And yet who can doubt that, in this at least, no faith in Israel that day matched Abigail's?
That a hidden, obscure believer could correct the anointed king is part of the point.
Abigail, in her quiet, hidden life, stood far more in communion with the truth than David did. She was able to check the wrong feeling of even the man of faith. David was lost, as it were, in the mist of his own thoughts. Abigail brought the clear light of the truth to bear on his actions. And David owned it, and thanked God for her counsel.
Abigail did not argue about whether Nabal deserved it. She talked about David's throne, his sure house, his future — and that is what drained the anger out of him.
Notice that the leading point in this address is the special reference to the future. All these references to David's future blessing and glory were well suited to draw his heart away from his present grievance. The sure house, the bundle of life, and the kingdom were far better than Nabal's flocks and herds. In view of these glories, David could well afford to leave Nabal to his portion, and his portion to him.
The same test works in reverse. A believer heading into revenge is not thinking about how it will look later.
If David had looked ahead like this to the time of his glory, he would never have thought of raising his hand to give the blow, or of shedding blood without cause. Yet we know how close he came to staining his hands with the blood of the very young men who spoke so kindly of him to Abigail. Had he thought, "How will this action appear to me in the hour of my glory?" it would have stopped him.
Most people resent the one who blocks them. David blesses her. That puts him in the opposite place from Saul, the king hunting him.
Happy David! He has found a wife after his own heart, a wife whom he blesses and whose wisdom he blesses (v. 33), a true helper in the difficulties of his career. He blesses her for stopping him from doing evil which would have dishonoured his God. Saul had blessed the Ziphites, who had offered themselves to carry out his evil plans against David. In the name of the Lord he had hailed as deliverers the men who would have helped him make war against His anointed!
Commentators also read the chapter as a picture. Abigail comes out to meet the rejected David before judgment falls on Nabal, and that has a larger meaning.
Nabal (Israel) is set aside, the one who rejected David; and Abigail becomes the wife of the despised one, while he is in the wilderness. This is not the church in the strict sense, but she stands on the principle of the church. Abigail goes to meet David before the death of Nabal: so it is with the church before the nation is judged. The faith of this woman is very remarkable.
- Sent. David sees a chance meeting on the road as God's own doing. His first blessing goes to the Sender, not to the messenger.
- Stopped. David blesses God and Abigail for what they stopped: no blood shed, no revenge taken by his own hand.
- Spoken. The correction came from an unknown woman whose faith outran his own. David took it instead of resenting it.
- Steered. Abigail moved his eyes off Nabal's sheep and onto his coming kingdom. What looks small in the light of glory loses its grip now.
- Shown. David blesses the person who blocked his revenge. Saul blessed the men who offered to help him do evil.
And blessed be thy discernment, and blessed be thou, who hast kept me this day from coming with bloodshed, and from avenging myself with mine own hand.
David is on his way to Nabal's house to avenge himself when Abigail meets him on the road. His words in this verse bless her judgment and bless her person for one reason: she stopped him from shedding blood and from settling his own score.
One writer points out what Abigail's faith saw, and what it was jealous to protect:
How sweet to see, in the dark and cloudy day, a woman of Israel whom faith enables to see clearly. She felt such jealousy — not only for the unstained honour of the future king of Israel, but also for his soul. She wanted it kept free, right to the end of the trial, from what was contrary to the grace of the Lord.
David meant to settle it by his own hand, and not on behalf of God's people. One writer shows the danger in that:
This was terrible! And David was rashly taking himself out of the place of dependence — the only happy, the only holy place. Nor was it on behalf of the congregation of the Lord. No, it was to avenge himself on one who had treated him badly. Sad mistake! It was a happy thing for him that there was an Abigail in the house of Nabal. God was about to use her to keep him from answering a fool according to his folly. This was just what the enemy desired. Satan used Nabal's selfishness to trap David, and Abigail was the Lord's instrument to deliver him.
In this verse David blesses her discretion, then Abigail herself. He starts further back:
David had no alternative but to recognize that it was the Lord who had sent Abigail. He blessed God first for His great grace in this matter. Then he blesses Abigail's wise advice, and then Abigail herself. She had stopped him from carrying out his purpose of shedding blood and avenging himself with his own hand. Then he tells her the terrible truth. If she had not hurried to meet him, he and his men would have killed every male in Nabal's household.
David calls her judgment blessed. One writer shows where its power lay:
Notice that the leading point in this address is the special reference to the future. "The Lord will certainly make my lord a sure house." "The soul of my lord will be bound in the bundle of the living with the Lord your God." "The Lord... will have appointed you ruler over Israel." All these references to David's future blessing and glory were well suited to draw his heart away from his present grievance. The sure house, the bundle of life, and the kingdom were far better than Nabal's flocks and herds. In view of these glories, David could well afford to leave Nabal to his portion, and his portion to him.
The man of faith was the one corrected, and the correction came from a quiet home:
Abigail, in her place of quiet retirement, stood much more in the place of communion with the truth than David. She was able to check the wrong feeling of even the man of faith. David was wandering, as it were, in the fog of his own thoughts. Abigail brought the clear light of the truth to bear on his actions. And David owned her counsel, and thanked God for it.
Another writer describes what her reproof did for David:
The words of the righteous Abigail reproved David. They proved an excellent oil for his head. They anointed him with a spirit of wisdom and of the fear of the Lord, and turned him away from the counsel of his heart.
What kept David's hand down is meant to keep ours down too:
The place of faith is always to look beyond present circumstances, on to the time of the end; then we begin to see and judge things according to God. So it was with Abigail... In the most trying things that happen to us, faith can associate us with God. We can see Him with us as our friend, the One who has said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord." If we do, we shall never feel inclined to avenge ourselves, or think of anything except intercession for those who have grieved and wronged us. The present dealings of God are in grace and mercy... "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good."
- Danger. Taking revenge pulled David out of the place of dependence. Satan used Nabal's selfishness to set the trap.
- Deliverance. Abigail was the Lord's instrument. Without her hurried ride, David would have killed every male in Nabal's house by morning.
- Discretion. Her words pointed David to the sure house and the kingdom ahead, so the present grievance lost its grip.
- Discernment. The check came from a woman in quiet retirement. She saw the truth more clearly than the man of faith she corrected — and David thanked God for it.
- Duty. Vengeance belongs to God. Our part now is to pray for those who wrong us, and to overcome evil with good.
But indeed, as Jehovah the God of Israel liveth, who has restrained me from hurting thee, except thou hadst hasted and come to meet me, there had not been left to Nabal by the morning light any male.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
So David received of her hand what she had brought him, and said to her, Go up in peace to thy house; see, I have hearkened to thy voice, and have accepted thy person.
David has already decided to leave none of his enemies alive, and Abigail has come to him with a gift and a plea. Verse 35 records what he does with both her gift and with her — and why he no longer needs to settle the score himself.
David takes the supplies. He does not go on to take Nabal. One summary of the chapter puts both halves of that decision side by side:
Abigail hurried to calm David's anger. David accepted her person and her present, and left Nabal in God's hands. The next morning, when Abigail told him the danger he had escaped, his heart died within him. About ten days later God struck him and he died. So God avenged the insult done to His servant while he was rejected, and saved him from taking revenge himself.
David, the future king, takes correction from Abigail. One writer names what was rare in it. Her faith went further than his own:
How good to see, in a dark and cloudy day, a woman of Israel whose faith made her see clearly and care so deeply. She cared not only that the future king of Israel keep his honour unstained. She cared that his soul be kept in simplicity, right to the end of the trial, from what was against the grace of the Lord… It was a rare thing for David to find a faith greater than his own. Yet who can doubt that, in this at least, no faith like Abigail's was seen in Israel that day?
Nabal escaped David's sword. But one writer points to a greater rescue:
The value of Abigail's service was not that she saved Nabal from David's sword. It was that she kept David from drawing the sword at all.
David had already made up his mind. The change in this verse did not come from him:
Only the grace of God keeps David, when he had already decided to leave none of his enemies alive. God uses Abigail to make him take back that decision, and to keep him from losing the character of grace that fits the Lord's anointed.
Nabal had not wanted peace. David now gives that same word to Abigail, and it sends her home to wait:
And so David blesses her. He will indeed remember her, just as she asked. Her "Remember your servant" finds an ear as ready as the "Remember me" of the converted thief much later. David sends her back to her house with the peace Nabal had not wanted, and with the assurance of his favour (vv. 6, 35). There she will patiently wait for the message of the beloved one calling her to himself.
Some older translations end the verse, "I have accepted your person." David welcomes the woman, not just her supplies. And what she asked for was small:
To her, Saul is only "a man" (v. 29). She cares so much for David's good name that she pleads with him on this ground for her unworthy husband, taking his guilt as her own. She only asks to be remembered by David "when He comes into his kingdom." A crucified thief could ask the same, and it was fitting… David received Abigail's offering, listened to her voice, and accepted her person (v. 35). Ten days later Nabal died under the Lord's judgment, and David sent and spoke with Abigail to take her as his wife.
One writer reads the whole scene as a picture of Christ and His people. David is in rejection, and Abigail is what he gains in that day:
Abigail is a picture of the Church. And since David here pictures the Lord, she makes up to him, in the day of his rejection, for all he had lost in the kingdom. She is with him where even Jonathan cannot follow. She becomes his wife and shares his suffering, and later she shares his throne and glory.
- Received. David takes the present from her hand and stops there. He leaves Nabal in God's hands. Within ten days God settles the account David wanted to settle himself.
- Heard. "I have obeyed your voice" means a king took correction from a woman whose faith ran ahead of his own.
- Rescued. Her real success was not saving Nabal from the sword. It was keeping David from ever drawing it, so he kept the grace that fits the Lord's anointed.
- Peace. Nabal did not want peace, so David gives that word to Abigail. She goes home in favour, to wait for the call that comes later.
- Accepted. David welcomed not just her gift but her person. She asked only to be remembered, and that small ask, like the thief's "remember me," was enough.
And Abigail came to Nabal; and behold, he held a feast in his house, like the feast of a king; and Nabal's heart was merry within him, for he was drunken to excess; so she told him nothing, less or more, until the morning light.
Abigail has just turned David's sword away from her household. She comes home to find her husband feasting — drunk, cheerful, and with no idea how close he came to death that day.
This was no ordinary meal. One writer reads the whole of human nature in it.
Such is man! Nabal puts himself in David's place and thinks only of treating himself well. He becomes drunk and is in no condition to know anything of what awaits him. His doom is fixed.
David's men had asked Nabal for help and got nothing. The feast that same evening shows what kind of refusal it was.
This "harsh and evil" man (v. 3) refused to give anything. Yet we read in verse 36, "he was holding a feast in his house, like the feast of a king." It mattered little to him that outside, the servants of David were in dire need of help. He was keeping for himself what he had, and enjoying himself with it all. But God was displeased and struck him... We should also be careful about what we keep for ourselves and what we spend on ourselves. Otherwise people may see us living like a king while the Lord's servants go without.
Nabal felt safe that evening. One writer says that feeling is the most ordinary thing in the world.
This is the way of the world. When an awful judgment was just about to fall on him suddenly, he was utterly insensible to his danger. Men have no conscience about the past and no fear of the future. So they throw themselves into self-indulgence, standing on the very edge of God's devastating judgment!
Abigail had just come from stopping the bloodshed. Now she had to walk in and watch this.
What a picture of a man of the world, enjoying himself and crying out that all is peace and safety while destruction hangs over him. What must Abigail have felt as she watched that? Could she have stayed quietly at home and joined in that feast?
Nabal was alive that night only because someone had stood between him and David's anger.
David spared Nabal, but God was about to deal with him in His own way. He cared for none of the things happening around him. He did not understand them. Someone had interceded for him, and he was careless about it; he had received mercy, and he passed it by.
The next morning, sober, he heard the whole story. Another writer weighs what he did with it.
He had lost the opportunity of repaying David's kindness. Was there any regret for the past, any repentance for what he had done? There is not a trace of it... He never showed kindness to David when he had the power to do it. And he never repented of his foolishness when the chance to repent came.
Abigail said nothing while the wine was in him. She waited until he was sober enough to hear her.
Abigail returned from her meeting with David and found Nabal "very drunk," so she told him nothing at all until the morning light. In the morning the wine had gone out of him. His wife told him what had happened, and "his heart died within him, and he became as a stone." What a sad picture of a man of the world! He sank into drunkenness during the night. When morning came, terror struck him, and the arrow of death pierced him.
- Blind. Nabal feasted like a king on the night his household came closest to destruction. He never felt the danger at all.
- Selfish. He refused David's men any help, then spent everything on himself. What we keep back and what we spend on ourselves both get noticed.
- Spared. He was alive that evening only because Abigail interceded. He received mercy without knowing it, and passed it by once he was told.
- Hardened. The morning gave him a second chance, this time to repent. Commentators find no trace of regret in him, only terror.
- Timed. Abigail stayed silent while he was drunk, and told him everything in the morning.
And it came to pass in the morning, when the wine was gone out of Nabal, that his wife told him these things; and his heart died within him, and he became [as] a stone.
Abigail met David on the road and saved her household, but she told her drunk husband nothing that night. In the morning Nabal hears how near he came to death, and the news kills something in him ten days before he dies.
The verse hinges on a change of state: the night's drinking is over, and reality arrives with daylight. One writer sets the two halves of that night side by side:
Abigail returned from her interview with David and found Nabal "very drunk." So she told him nothing at all, less or more, until the morning light... What a sad picture of a man of the world! Sunk in drunkenness during the night, and when the morning dawned, struck with terror, pierced by the arrow of death.
The same writer reads the wine as a picture of something wider than one man's drinking:
How solemnly like the crowds the enemy has lured in every age! He makes them drunk on the passing joys of a world that lies under the curse of God. That world waits for the fire of His judgment. "Those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk, are drunk at night." But the morning is near. Then the wine — a fitting symbol of this world's joy — will have all evaporated.
The danger had already passed when Abigail spoke. The report alone was enough to undo him:
The foolish man had no idea this was coming, and when he heard it his heart died within him and he became as a stone (v. 37). Clearly he was so terrified that he became like a man paralysed. But fear of judgment does not save a man's soul, and it does not soften his heart to respond to God: his heart became as hard as a stone.
Fear is not the same as repentance. Here the verse turns from fright to something more serious:
The next morning, when he was sober, Abigail told him of the danger she had stepped in to prevent. He was filled with fear. His heart died within him, and he became as a stone. He had lost the opportunity of repaying David's kindness. Was there any regret for the past, any repentance for what he had done? There is not a trace of it. His wife's account now gave him a chance to judge his past ways, and he neglected that too. How intensely foolish he appears. He showed no kindness to David when he had the power to do it. He did not repent of his folly when the chance came.
The stone is not only Nabal's reaction. One writer sees in it how God deals with a man who has already hardened himself:
Man hardens himself against God by his own choice. In time God answers by hardening that heart Himself, as Judge and Ruler. Then the grace of God can no longer reach him: he becomes dead while he lives.
The same writer asks who this hardening falls on:
About God, Romans 9:18 tells us: "He hardens whomever He wills." This is the result of a man hardening his own heart. Whom does God will to harden? Those who will not repent.
Another writer sees the outcome settled before the blow fell:
His doom is fixed... He is already dead before being struck dead ten days later.
What Abigail reported was good news — rescue, not threat. That is what makes his reaction so dark:
Intercession had been made for him; he was careless about it. He had received mercy, and he passed it by... But when the feast was over, his wife simply told him what had happened — a story of mercy and of grace. Yet though she told it in plain truth, it was like words of death to Nabal. It withered his heart, and "he became as a stone." The hand of God was against him.
The same writer names the feeling this pictures:
One day this will be felt in full. People will look back at mercies they received. But they will see themselves cut off from every blessing, and from the God who gave them. This is remorse. Nothing is so painful as remorse. It is the sense that times of mercy have gone for ever, and that the person who received them is separated from God for ever.
- Wine wears off. The feasting at night and the terror at dawn are the same man, hours apart. This world's joy evaporates and leaves the sober facts standing.
- Mercy arrives. What Abigail brought him was rescue he had done nothing to earn — a story of mercy and grace laid at his feet.
- Mercy passed by. He was careless about the intercession made for him. Then he let the second chance go by — the chance to judge his past. Not a trace of repentance.
- Fear hardens. Terror is not conversion. Fear of judgment neither saves the soul nor softens the heart; his heart instead became hard as stone.
- Judgment lands. Ten days later the Lord struck him. But the writers see a man already finished at verse 37 — "dead while he lives."
And it came to pass in about ten days that Jehovah smote Nabal, and he died.
Ten days pass between Abigail's report and the blow. In that gap the case changes hands: David sheathes his sword, and the Lord acts instead. Two questions follow — why God settled the account rather than David, and why terror did not save a terrified man.
Abigail met David with a gift, and he left the matter with God. One summary of Nabal's life shows the two results that followed:
David accepted her person and her present, and left Nabal in God's hands. The next morning, when Abigail told him the danger he had escaped, his heart died within him. About ten days later God struck him and he died. In this way God avenged the insult given to His servant while he was rejected. He also saved him from avenging himself.
Another writer asks what Nabal's wealth was worth to him after that, and points to God's own word on vengeance:
Only ten days later God took away Nabal's life (v.38). What control did he then have over all those things he had called his own (v.11)? We are certainly reminded here of God's words, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord" (Romans 12:19).
One writer reads Nabal's collapse at the news as the real end, with the stroke ten days later only confirming it:
His doom is fixed. When he does learn of it, "his heart died within him, and he became as stone." He was already dead before the stroke ten days later struck him dead.
Another writer weighs what Nabal did with those ten days:
He did not show kindness to David when he had the power to do it. He did not repent of his foolish acts when the chance to repent came. Can we wonder that God at length took up the matter with him? The Lord struck him, and he died. His time of testing had ended, and his future was fixed beyond changing.
Fear is not faith. One writer explains why Nabal's terror left him worse off than before:
When he heard it, his heart died within him and he became as a stone (v.37). Clearly he was so terrified that he became like a man paralysed. But fear of judgment does not save a man's soul. It does not soften his heart to respond to God. Instead his heart became as hard as a stone. We are told about God in Romans 9:18: "He hardens whomever He wills." This is the result of a man hardening his own heart. Whom does God will to harden? Those who will not repent.
Nabal feasted, sobered up, and died. One writer sums up that sequence:
What a sad picture of a man of the world! He sank in drunkenness during the night. Then morning dawned, and terror struck him — the arrow of death pierced him.
The same writer looks from Nabal's fear to a far greater meeting:
Nabal did not even meet David face to face; yet the very thought of his avenging sword filled his soul with deadly fear. How much more terrible will it be to meet the gaze of a despised and rejected Jesus! Then the Abigails and the Nabals will find their places, those who had known and loved the true David, and those who had not.
Nabal escaped David's sword and met something far heavier:
The rest of the chapter sets out the judgment that fell on Nabal at once. There is no judgment so solemn as when a man falls into the hand of the living God.
One writer turns the whole story into a single question for every reader:
People's fate hangs on this choice. Do they despise Christ today while He is rejected? Or do they value Him as God values Him and appeal to His grace, which alone can "accept their person"?
- Insult. Nabal's sin was contempt for God's servant at a time when that servant was rejected.
- Restraint. David left the case with God. God then avenged the insult and kept His servant from taking revenge.
- Delay. The ten days were Nabal's last chance. Abigail told him the truth, but he never repented, and his time of testing ran out.
- Stone. Nabal was terrified, not changed. Fear of judgment does not save a soul; here it only left his heart harder.
- Choice. One question still divides people: do they despise Christ while He is rejected, or value Him as God values Him?
And when David heard that Nabal was dead, he said, Blessed be Jehovah, who has pleaded the cause of my reproach from the hand of Nabal, and has kept back his servant from evil; but Jehovah has returned Nabal's evil upon his own head. And David sent and communed with Abigail, to take her as his wife.
David's men had drawn their swords against Nabal's household. Only Abigail stopped them. Ten days later the man who insulted David is dead, and David never touched him. His response is not a victory cry but a blessing of God's name — and then a message sent to the widow.
David had set out to fight. The news of Nabal's death found him with nothing left to fight for.
The danger was past and his needs were met. David's heart was now so full of a sense of the goodness of the Lord that he could only worship where he had thought to fight.
Notice which of the two things David blesses God for first. It is not Nabal's death but his own escape.
When David hears the news (v.39) he is afresh reminded of the great mercy of the Lord that had kept him back from the evil of avenging himself. He blessed God for taking this matter into His own capable hand. God rewarded the evil-doer himself and did not punish the men of his household, as David was ready to do.
Another writer points to how quickly God acted:
A few days are enough to show that there is never any need for someone to avenge himself. God strikes Nabal, and his lamp of life goes out in hopeless gloom.
David says God "returned the evil of Nabal on his own head." The hand that returned it was God's own.
The rest of the chapter sets out the judgment that fell on Nabal at once. No judgment is as solemn as when a man falls into the hand of the living God.
Nabal had two chances, and he let both go.
He neither showed kindness to David when he had it in his power, nor did he repent of his follies when the chance to repent came. Can we wonder that God at last took up the matter with him? The Lord struck him, and he died. His time of testing was over, and nothing could change his future now. Nabal might have been remembered as a man who served the Lord's anointed in the days when he was hunted. Instead he stands out on the page of history as a harsh man, a worthless man, and a fool.
The second half of the verse answers Abigail's one request: that David would remember her when things went well for him. She asked to be remembered, and received a marriage.
This request is remarkably like the one the dying thief made to the Lord Jesus. It teaches us much, especially when we remember that, as far as sight went, neither of them had anything to build a hope on. In both cases too, the answer went far beyond the request. In about ten days the Lord struck Nabal so that he died, and David took Abigail to be his wife, to suffer with him and to reign.
Abigail leaves before David's fortunes have changed.
There is no delay. She hurries to meet the one who loves her, the king of grace. She does not wait for better times, when David's throne would be secure. She leaves everything without a thought for what she was leaving behind.
Writers read this marriage as a picture of something later, and they differ on how far to press it. One sees the church in it:
Death sets Abigail free from the chain of such a marriage. David then brings her into his own household and links her with himself. It may picture the Church — sinners who recognised our Lord in the time of His rejection. Set free from the bondage of sin, they are brought into bridal relationship with the Lord in glory.
Another writer stops short of naming her the church, but keeps the principle:
Nabal (Israel) is set aside, the man who rejected David; and Abigail becomes the wife of the despised one while he is in the wilderness. She is not the church itself, but she stands on the principle of the church.
- Restraint. David's first praise is for what God stopped him doing. His escape from his own vengeance mattered more to him than his enemy's death.
- Vindication. He left his case with God, and God took it up. Only the guilty man fell, not the household David would have destroyed.
- Forfeit. Nabal had two chances: to serve the Lord's anointed, then to repent. He let both go, and his time of testing ran out.
- Freedom. The judgment that ended Nabal set Abigail free. Her plea to be remembered became a place at David's side.
- Reign. She left everything behind to follow a rejected king. She suffered with him first, and shared his throne after.