And Saul eyed David from that day and forward.
Israel's women had just sung David's victory over the giant, ranking him above their king. From that day on Saul watched him with a jealous eye, and much of the rest of 1 Samuel grows out of that one look.
David had done Saul a great service. One writer asks why the memory of it faded so fast.
The sense of the great service David had done faded quickly from Saul's spirit. And why? Because his object, his idol, was himself, and David's name that day got in the way of it… This roused the jealous sensitivity of the king: "They have ascribed to David ten thousands, and to me they have ascribed thousands, and what more can he have but the kingdom? And Saul eyed David from that day on." Yes, and it was an evil eye, and Satan did not fail to take advantage of what the occasion offered.
Saul's son Jonathan looked at the same man and saw something completely different.
Jonathan was occupied with David. Saul eyed him from that day on. To him he was an object of jealousy, to Jonathan of admiration. What caused this difference? The songs of the women put Saul in the second place. This the king could not endure. So jealousy took hold of the unhappy king. It urged him along a course his better judgment at times condemned, and he never really turned from it. From this time until Saul's death, David suffered his bitter hatred.
The look did not stay a look for long.
From this day onward Saul eyed David (v. 9). The next day shows the depth of his heart. The evil spirit comes upon him. When he was among the prophets he had been able to give the impression that he depended on the Spirit of God. Once he is handed over to Satan, the fruits of his wicked heart show at once. This man who "prophesied within the house" throws his spear to "pin David to the wall" (vv. 10-11).
One detail marks how deep the change went.
The old remedy that had soothed the king, music, now lost its effect. When the evil spirit first came on him, it gave way to the sweet sounds of David's harp. It was no longer so. Evil in the presence of the good it hates tends to move fast and deep.
Saul is not a special case. One writer warns what this feeling does in anyone who allows it.
There is no telling how far this feeling may carry even a child of God, once he willingly allows it. It grows so fast. What starts as envy of another's success, prosperity, and position may soon turn into hatred, and then into plotting against him.
The rest of Israel welcomed David; Saul did not. One writer sees in the king something bigger than one man's jealousy.
But Saul stood out in base and brutal contrast to the rest of Israel. A bitter and undying hatred sprang up in his heart towards the man who had delivered the people. He eyed David with a jealous eye, and sought to destroy him (verses 9, 10). Saul represents the unconverted man, the man in the flesh… The flesh is that evil principle inside the human heart that shuts out God and Christ. It will always make SELF the supreme object of life, in opposition to Christ. The flesh will have religion, and meetings, and will sometimes tolerate Christians, but it will not have Christ.
The same writer follows envy through the Bible to its worst outcome.
We now come to the most terrible thing envy ever accomplished, in Mark 15:10. The chief priests, God's professed servants, handed Jesus, the Son of God, over to Pilate. They did it out of that wretched, miserable feeling of envy, which had eaten away everything even human in their hearts. Here envy led them to CRUCIFY CHRIST.
If self was the root, what is the cure?
It takes a very simple heart and a single eye to rejoice in what someone else has done as truly as in our own work. If the glory of God and the good of His people had filled Saul's heart, he would not have spent a thought on the numbers, his or David's. Sadly, he sought his own glory. This was the secret of his envy and jealousy. Oh, what sacred rest, what true dignity, what perfect quietness of spirit comes from self-renunciation! It is the self-renunciation that grows from having the heart wholly occupied with Christ.
- The song: The women's comparison put Saul in second place, and that was what he could not endure.
- The self: His idol was himself, so another man's honour felt like an injury. Seeking his own glory was the secret of his envy.
- The eye: The look was an evil eye, and Satan used the opening. Within a day the watching became a thrown spear, and it did not stop until Saul died.
- The reach: Left to grow, the same feeling moves from envy to hatred to plotting. Its worst outcome came when the chief priests handed Jesus over out of envy.
- The cure: A single eye can rejoice in another's success. Rest and quietness come to a heart wholly occupied with Christ, not with its own place.
And it came to pass the next day that an evil spirit from God came upon Saul, and he prophesied in the midst of the house, but David played with his hand, as on other days; and the spear was in Saul's hand.
The day after the women's victory song, Saul's jealousy breaks out. This verse raises two hard questions. How can a man speak as a prophet while an evil spirit drives him? And why does the music that once calmed him stop working?
The verse traces the harmful spirit back to God. The account earlier sets Saul's loss beside David's gain.
When David was anointed, the Spirit of the Lord came on David from that day forward. But the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the Lord troubled him. The servants knew who sent the evil spirit, and looked for a skilful harp player to drive the demon out. God overruled what they did, and brought His anointed to the king.
The ESV says Saul "raved." Other translations say he "prophesied." Commentators argue for the second, and say inspiration can come from a source other than God.
The demon possesses him again, because he gave way to his temper. He nourished his hatred against David. When the evil spirit came on him, he prophesied. This has been hard for some to understand. Several translators have rendered it "raved"; but that cannot be done. The word "prophesy" is the same word used in chapter 5:5. Prophesying means to speak by inspiration. It does not always mean predicting future events. Besides divine inspiration, there is also a satanic inspiration. Certain groups that claim particular gifts have been restored also claim inspiration, and many have traced that to the influence of demons. Saul spoke words that came from the evil spirit living in him.
Later, Saul prophesies again — that time by the Spirit of God. Set the two scenes side by side and a warning appears: being a mouthpiece proves nothing about the state of the heart.
Even Saul is here forced to prophesy by the Spirit of God, and this is not the first time in his life. In 1 Samuel 18:10 he had done so by the evil spirit which had come on him. God is able to speak through the mouth of a Saul who at other times is the mouthpiece of Satan. He can do the same through the mouth of a Balaam or of a Caiaphas. This only proves that God uses someone as an instrument if it suits Him. But we must distinguish between the life-giving work of the Holy Spirit and His various operations in power. Power may give great knowledge of the Word, and maybe also the energy to use that knowledge for others. But it never leads us to judge ourselves. It never leads us to take Christ as the One who answers our need. It gives neither repentance nor faith.
David plays "as he did day by day" — the same hand and the same harp that once brought relief. This time it does no good. The reason lies in Saul, not in the music.
But notice: the old remedy that soothed the king, music, had now lost its effect. When the evil spirit first came upon him, it yielded to the sweet sounds of David's harp and hand. It was no longer so. The progress of evil in the presence of the good it hates is apt to be rapid and deep.
Another writer draws the same lesson about hearing God's Word.
To quiet this, David again played the harp for Saul. But this time it had no calming effect. It is the same with the ministry of the Word of God. It stops producing good effects when people have heard it for a long time and treated it with indifference.
Saul knew who had killed the giant. He also knew who had given David the kingdom.
David's skill does not remove jealousy and bitter hatred from Saul's heart. The young man had killed the giant who terrified the king and his army. In their victory song the women credited David with ten thousands and Saul with only thousands. This stirred up hidden depths of evil in the king's heart, and he sought to kill David. He knew that God had given the kingdom to David, and he hated him all the more. It was rebellion against God as well as hatred of David. It was the enmity of man's king against God's anointed.
David keeps playing while the spear stays in Saul's hand. Commentators read that pattern as one every follower of Christ should expect.
Follow Christ fully. What will be the result? Javelins. If Christ is made much of, Satan must oppose. So we read that three times Saul threw a javelin at David.
- Source — Saul speaks by inspiration, but not from God. The word used is the ordinary word for "prophesy." That is why commentators speak of a satanic inspiration as well as a divine one.
- Proof — Speaking by a spirit proves nothing about a person. Power can hand out knowledge and energy. It never produces repentance or faith.
- Hardening — The harp once refreshed Saul. Now it leaves him untouched, because evil moves fast and deep near the good it hates.
- Warning — God's Word works the same way. Hear it long enough, treat it with indifference, and it stops doing good.
- Target — Saul's spear was meant for David, but his quarrel was with God, who gave David the kingdom. Anyone who makes much of God's Anointed should expect javelins too.
And Saul cast the spear, and thought, I will smite David and the wall. But David turned away from him twice.
Twice a spear flew across the king's hall, and twice the young man holding the harp stepped aside. Saul says out loud what he wants. The question is what turned a king's gratitude into hatred, and who kept the harp player alive.
Saul's anger did not begin with David himself. One writer shows what the crowd's opinion of David exposed in the king.
This is not yet anger against David. It is anger at people's opinion, which was lifting David up and putting the king down. And it happened at the very moment when Jonathan's faith was giving up everything for the one he loved. The reason is simple: the flesh can never bear being nothing in Christ's presence.
One writer names what Saul lacked.
It takes a very simple heart and a single eye to rejoice as honestly in the fruit of someone else's work as in the fruit of our own hands. If the glory of God and the good of His people had filled Saul's heart, he would not have given one thought to the numbers credited to him or to David. Sadly, he sought his own glory. This was the secret of his envy and jealousy.
David was doing the very thing that had once calmed Saul. It had stopped working, and one writer explains why.
But notice, the old remedy that soothed the king, music, had lost its effect now. When the evil spirit first came upon him, it yielded to the sweet sounds of David's harp and hand. It was no longer so. The growth of evil in the presence of the good it hates tends to be rapid and deep.
Verse 10 says Saul raved, or prophesied, inside his house. Then the spear left his hand. One writer sees here the moment when Saul's real state came to the surface.
From this day on Saul eyed David. The next day shows the depth of his heart: the evil spirit comes upon him. When he was among the prophets, he had been able to give the impression that he depended on the Spirit of God. Now he is handed over to Satan, and the fruits of his wicked heart show at once. This man who "prophesied in the midst of the house" throws his spear to pin David to the wall.
Saul had refused to fight Goliath himself. Now he throws a weapon at a harp player who is serving him.
He was afraid to fight against Goliath, yet he threw his javelin at David, meaning to kill him. And he did it while David was serving him in obedience, playing his harp. This cowardly act by itself proved that Saul was unfit for his place of royal dignity. At this time David was able to dodge the javelin, and also on a later occasion. We might wonder why David came back to play for Saul after that first try on his life. But it proves how real David's faithfulness was.
Jealousy alone does not explain a hatred this persistent. One writer looks behind the king to a greater enemy.
Saul only saw David. Satan saw in him the type of Christ who is the Son of David. If Satan could only destroy David, where would be the Son and all the promises bound up in Him? … Only Satan's hostility to Christ fully explains Saul's persistent and unnatural desire to kill his own daughter's husband. It began with jealousy. But David's conduct was submissive and never changed, and that would have been quite enough to remove such a feeling — a feeling with no grounds, and for that reason rooted all the deeper — if jealousy had been all.
David escaped twice. One writer sets the glory of the battle against Goliath beside the danger of Saul's house, and credits David's survival to the Lord's mercy.
David came from the brilliant glory of the valley of Elah into very different scenes in Saul's household. There, envious looks and heartless attempts on his life were the only return for the soothing notes of his harp and the brave deeds of his sling and his sword. Saul owed his continuance on the throne, under God, to David, yet the javelin was Saul's return. But the Lord in His mercy kept His dear servant amid all the difficulties of his extremely hard position.
- Song — the women's praise cost Saul nothing but first place. That was enough. Jealousy starts where self-glory loses ground, not where someone does wrong.
- Spear — what the song stirred, the hand finished. Saul raved like a prophet and threw like a murderer in the same room. A religious appearance hides nothing from God.
- Service — David kept playing, and came back to play again. Faithfulness shows itself when a servant returns to a man who has already tried to kill him.
- Shadow — Saul aimed the spear at David, but the hatred behind it was older than Saul. David's submissive conduct should have ended the grudge. That is why one writer looks past Saul to Satan's hostility to Christ.
- Shield — the spear missed. David had kept Saul on the throne that Saul was defending, and the Lord kept David through every throw.
And Saul was afraid of David, because Jehovah was with him, and had departed from Saul.
David had saved Saul's kingdom, and now the king was afraid of him. The verse gives the reason in two halves: what David had been given, and what Saul had lost.
Saul owed his life and his throne to the man he now dreaded. One writer traces how quickly a victory celebrated by everyone became, for the king alone, a threat.
What was the effect on Saul? Did he share the joy of victory, and the delight of his subjects in the victor? No. The flesh only saw a rival. Anger, envy, jealousy and hatred took hold of Saul's heart towards the one to whom he owed his life and his kingdom. At first in secret, then out in the open, he used all the power he had to trap and destroy David.
At this stage the anger was not yet aimed at David himself:
This is not yet anger at David. It is anger at what people thought, an opinion that was lifting David up and putting the king down. And it came at the very moment when Jonathan's faith was giving up everything for the one he loved. This is because the flesh can never bear being nothing in Christ's presence.
Saul's loss had a cause, and Saul himself knew what it was.
That was a solemn discovery for Saul to make — that the Lord had departed from him. And why had He departed? Because Saul had disobeyed the Lord. He had gone his own way. He lost the kingdom, and God left him as well. He was afraid of David because the Lord was with him. Saul was aware of this, yet the fear of the Lord did not keep him from the dreadful act of trying to kill David.
David had courage, skill and charm. None of that is what the verse points to.
And the LORD is with him. This was David's greatest asset. All his natural ability and charm would have counted for little without the LORD's presence. We see this in Saul. He had so much that was attractive, but when he lost the Spirit of the Lord, all his personal greatness counted for nothing. Of the blessed Lord Jesus we read in Acts 10 that He went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, "for God was with him." And when the hour drew near for Him to go to the cross, He said to His disciples, "You will be scattered, each to his own home, and will leave me alone. Yet I am not alone, for the Father is with me" (John 16:32).
Saul still had another option in front of him.
Was this reminder that the man after God's heart was the greater man not a chance for Saul to turn back even now and bow to the government of God? What an act of faith it would have been! And what a lesson to the whole nation, if the king had chosen to give up his throne to the one whom God had so clearly used! But there is no thought of that in his heart.
Instead of bowing, Saul sent David away with an honor. It cost him the one man who could quiet him.
This honor does what Saul wanted: it takes David out of his sight. But it hands the poor king over to every suggestion of pride and hatred, because he no longer has his servant near him, the model of humility and grace. Poor Saul! By his own choice he robs himself of the only person able to calm him and shield him from the attacks of Satan.
And the arrangement achieved the opposite of what Saul intended.
He gives him work far from himself, but where the people see him more than ever. God always carries out His purposes, despite every precaution men take in the flesh.
Commentators also read this hatred as more than one man's jealousy.
Saul only saw David. Satan saw in him a picture of Christ, who is the Son of David. If Satan could only destroy David, where would the Son be, and all the promises bound up in Him? ... It began with jealousy. But David's submission never changed, and that would have been enough to remove a feeling so groundless — groundless, and for that reason rooted all the deeper — if jealousy had been all there was.
- Cause — The Lord left Saul because Saul disobeyed and went his own way. What emptied his reign was the loss of God's presence, not a lost battle.
- Gift — God's presence was David's real advantage. Without it, natural gifts like Saul's count for nothing.
- Evidence — Saul could see that God was with David. Knowing it never moved him: he had the chance to bow, and he refused.
- Reaction — Unable to surrender, he put David at a distance, and so lost the only person who could calm him.
- Result — Sending David away backfired. It put David in front of the whole nation. God carries out His purpose through the very steps men take against it.
And Saul removed him from him, and made him his captain over a thousand; and he went out and came in before the people.
Saul has twice thrown his spear at David and missed. Now he tries a quieter way to be rid of him: a promotion that moves David out of his sight.
The command over a thousand men looks like advancement. Commentators read it as fear finding a polite exit.
In verse 12, Saul was afraid of David. He could not bear David's presence, so he "removed him from him" while giving him an apparent honour: he made him "captain over a thousand." This honour removes David from his sight — and this is what Saul wanted. But it hands the poor king over to every suggestion of pride and hatred, once he no longer has his servant near him, the model of humility and grace. Poor Saul! He deliberately deprives himself of the only person able to soothe him and serve him as a defence against the attacks of Satan.
Saul sends David away, but he does not dismiss him. Fear stops him halfway, and David keeps his command in the field.
At last, Saul can bear the presence of the sweet singer no longer, and puts him at a distance. Fearing, however, to set him completely aside, he makes him a captain over a thousand. So David can continue his service of warfare and wins the hearts of multitudes of the people.
The lower post became David's introduction to the nation. Saul's fear produced the very thing he dreaded.
Then fear comes upon Saul. He realises that Jehovah is with David, and not with himself, so he gives David a lower place away from him. But this brings David still more before the people, and into favour and acceptance with them. And Saul fears the more.
Saul moved David out of the palace, but not out of the nation's view.
David's escape from Saul's javelins added to the evidence that the Lord was with David and not with Saul. This increased Saul's fear of him, so that he removed him to some distance, making him captain over a thousand men. But though absent from Saul's presence, David could not be hidden from the eyes of the people. He "went out and came in before the people," which implies a clear, honest testimony: he had nothing to hide. Earlier we read that he behaved himself wisely (v. 5); now the text adds "in all his ways." This wise behaviour only increased Saul's fear of him, instead of winning his thankful respect, as it did with the people. They loved David for it — a perfectly normal and right reaction, in contrast to the abnormal folly of jealousy.
David's place changed, but the Lord stayed with him. God even used Saul's hostility to train him.
Saul took step after step to humble David, to show his own ill-feeling, or worse. But God saw to it that each step became only a means in His hands to fit David all the more for the kingdom. "David behaved himself wisely in all his ways; and Jehovah was with him." Jehovah was with him in the house of Saul and kept him safe. Jehovah was with him outside the king's house as well. There he proved himself before the people as his servant — all the better because he was Jehovah's servant.
Jealousy started it. But one writer looks past Saul to the power behind him.
Saul was Satan's tool in his hatred of Christ. Saul only saw David. Satan saw in him a picture of Christ, who is the Son of David… It began with jealousy. But David's submissive conduct never failed, and it would have been quite enough to remove a feeling so groundless — which for that very reason had a deeper root — if that had been all… And all through these scenes the real contest is between two opposing forces — if we may speak this way — the power of God on one side, and the power of Satan on the other.
- Fear acts. Saul could not bear David near him, so he wrapped his fear in a title and sent him away.
- Fear costs. By sending David away, Saul lost the one servant whose music could calm him.
- Fear backfires. The lesser post put David in front of the whole nation, and Saul's alarm only grew.
- Openness answers it. David went out and came in before the people — an open life with nothing to hide.
- God overrules it. God used every move Saul made against David to prepare him for the throne, in the palace and out of it alike.
And David prospered in all his ways; and Jehovah was with him.
David now serves in the king's court, and Saul has come to fear him. This verse says two things about David: how he acted, and that the LORD was with him.
One writer weighs David's strength in battle against the way he behaved at Saul's court. He finds the second more astonishing.
He had shown himself to be a man whom Jehovah had armed with remarkable strength. But I think the gracious and prudent wisdom of David — with Saul, for instance — is even more astonishing. The strength Jehovah gave his arm was, by comparison, a passing thing. In any case, it was only called for now and then... But his going in and out before the king, and the wise, sensitive, refined and admirable part David played at Saul's court, is a most instructive lesson for our souls.
The same writer compares this court with the errands David used to run for his father.
Before this he had gone where his father sent him, and there Jehovah blessed him and gave him honour. Now he was in a new position. He did not choose this place. God gave it to him, in a setting he had never sought.
Verse 5 had already said David acted wisely. Older translations read, "David behaved himself wisely in all his ways," where the ESV says he "had success in all his undertakings." One writer notes the added words, and the open life behind them.
Though David was away from Saul's presence, he could not be hidden from the eyes of the people. He "went out and came in before the people," which implies a clear, honest testimony: he had nothing to hide. Verse 5 told us that he behaved wisely; now the words "in all his ways" are added. This wise behaviour only increased Saul's fear of him. It did not win his thankful respect, as it did with the people.
One writer traces what God's presence did with Saul's attacks on David.
God took care that every step Saul took to humble David, or to show his ill will, or worse, became only a means in God's hands to fit David all the more for the kingdom. Jehovah was with him inside Saul's house and kept him safe. Jehovah was with him outside the king's house too, and there he proved himself before the people as their servant — the better servant because he was Jehovah's servant.
The same protection is traced through the specific dangers of the chapter, where God raised up help David had no reason to expect.
While at the court, and in the camp, God watched over David in a marked way, and raised up friends where they might not have been expected. Twice God preserved him from being struck by the king's javelin.
Where did this prudence come from? One writer traces it to God, not to natural cleverness.
Saul fears him; for the God who has forsaken him is with David. He employs him at a distance from himself, but there he is more than ever in view of the people. God always carries out His purposes, despite all the merely human precautions of man. David is prudent. He has the wisdom of God, who is with him in all his ways. He is energetic and unassuming, and always successful. All Israel and Judah love him, and before them he goes out and comes in with all the strength and superiority of faith.
Another writer turns this into a test for anyone who claims wisdom.
Is anyone wise and understanding? Let him show it in his behaviour, which involves more than his words. It takes in his whole manner of life, for "his works" are added here. Compare David, who "behaved himself wisely in all his ways" (1 Sam. 18:14). This is not said of Solomon, though he had such wisdom.
David's wise walk points beyond itself. Psalm 101 puts a similar claim on the lips of a king, and commentators read the difference carefully.
Who else could say, "I will behave myself wisely in a perfect way" (v. 2)? We are told "David behaved himself wisely in all his ways" (1 Sam. 18:14), but this was limited, and not perfect. Yet he is a picture of the perfect King... The Lord Jesus waits long for God to establish Him as King, just as David waited to take the throne of Israel, though he had been anointed long before.
- Sent, not chosen. David acted wisely in a court he never asked for. God gave him the place; he did not choose it.
- All his ways. The praise widens from single acts to a whole way of life — an open life with nothing to hide.
- With him. God was with David inside Saul's house and outside it. Every attempt to break him only trained him for the throne.
- Wisdom, not cleverness. This is the wisdom of God in a man of faith. It shows in works, not in talk, and it is not human scheming.
- Picture and reality. David's wisdom was real but limited. The perfect King it pictures still waits, as David waited, for God to seat Him on His throne.
And Saul saw that he prospered well, and he stood in awe of him.
Saul has already thrown his spear at David twice and missed. Now he watches David succeed everywhere he goes, and the king draws back in dread — so what lay behind this "great success," and why did it frighten Saul instead of pleasing him?
(The quotes below use an older translation: "behaved himself wisely." The ESV says "had great success.")
David's wisdom was a life lived in the open, where everyone could watch it. One writer notes how the phrase grows from its earlier use a few verses back:
Though absent from Saul's presence, David could not be hidden from the eyes of the people. He "went out and came in before the people," which implies a clear, honest testimony: he had nothing to hide. Earlier we were told that he behaved himself wisely (v.5). Now the text adds "in all his ways." This wise behaviour only increased Saul's fear of him. It did not earn his thankful respect, as it did with the people.
The same writer treats David's conduct as the pattern for what wisdom looks like anywhere:
Is one wise and intelligent? Let him show it in the way he lives. That is more than his words. It is his whole manner of life, for the text adds "his works" here. Compare David, who "behaved himself wisely in all his ways." 1 Sam. 18:14... true wisdom produces meekness. Meekness judges self, seeks no self-exaltation, and recognises God's rights as supreme over us.
Saul's fear had a reason. The God who had left him was now with David.
Poor Saul! Troubled by the evil spirit, David plays on the harp to soothe him, and Saul seeks to kill him. David escapes. Saul fears him; for the God by whom he is himself forsaken is with David. He employs him at a distance from himself, but where he is more than ever in the view of the people. God always carries out His purposes in spite of all the carnal precautions of man.
Saul's moves against David served a purpose Saul never intended:
Saul took step after step to humble David, to show his own ill-feeling, or worse. God took care that each step became only a means in His hands to fit David more for the kingdom... The LORD was with him in the house of Saul and kept him safe. The LORD was with him outside the king's house too. There he proved himself before the people as his servant — all the better because he was the LORD's servant.
Saul owed his throne to David, and paid him with a javelin:
David came from the brilliant glory of the valley of Elah into very different scenes in Saul's household. There he gave the soothing notes of his harp and the brave exploits of his sling and his sword. The only return he got was envious looks and heartless attempts on his life. Saul owed his continuance on the throne, under God, to David, yet the javelin was Saul's return. But the Lord in His mercy kept His dear servant in all the tangles of his extremely difficult position.
Plain jealousy should have faded, because David never struck back. One writer traces the lasting hatred to a deeper enemy:
Saul only saw David. Satan saw in him a picture of Christ, who is the Son of David. If Satan could only destroy David, where would be the Son and all the promises bound up in Him?... It began with jealousy, but David's submissive conduct, so unfailing, would have been quite enough to remove such unfounded feeling, had that been all... And all through these scenes the real contest is between two opposing forces: the power of God on one side, and the power of Satan on the other.
Psalm 101 speaks of a wisdom more perfect than David's. One writer marks both the likeness and the limit:
Who else could say, "I will behave myself wisely in a perfect way" (v. 2)? We are told "David behaved himself wisely in all his ways" (1 Sam. 18:14), but this was limited, and not perfect. Yet he is a picture of the perfect King... just as David had to wait to take the throne of Israel, though anointed long before (1 Sam. 16:13).
- Presence. Saul's fear starts where God's presence had moved: the God who had left him was with David.
- Wisdom. David's wisdom was an open life with nothing to hide. It showed in his works, and it stayed humble.
- Distance. Saul sent David away to cut him down. It only set him further in front of the people. God's purpose runs on through man's precautions.
- Enmity. David's gentleness should have ended plain jealousy. The hatred held on because Satan stood behind Saul.
- Throne. Every move to humble David only fitted him for the kingdom. His wisdom was limited; it points on to the King whose way is perfect.
But all Israel and Judah loved David, for he went out and came in before them.
David killed Goliath, and the same conduct that won him the heart of the nation made King Saul afraid of him. This verse sits inside that split reaction and raises two questions: what does it mean to "go out and come in" before people, and is love from everyone always a good sign?
One writer takes the phrase as a picture of open conduct.
Saul's fear of David grew, so he moved him some distance away and made him captain over a thousand men. But being away from Saul's presence did not hide David from the eyes of the people. He "went out and came in before the people," which implies a clear, honest testimony: he had nothing to hide. Earlier we were told that he behaved wisely (v. 5); now the text adds "in all his ways." This wise behaviour only increased Saul's fear of him. It did not win his thankful respect, as it did with the people. They loved David for it — a normal and right reaction, unlike the abnormal folly of jealousy.
Saul kept moving David away from himself to humble him. Every move did the opposite. The writer below uses "Jehovah" where the ESV has "the LORD."
But God took care that every step Saul took to humble David, or to show his own ill-feeling, or worse, should only be a means in God's hands to fit David more for the kingdom. "David behaved himself wisely in all his ways; and Jehovah was with him." Jehovah was with him in the house of Saul and kept him safe. Jehovah was with him outside the king's house too. There he proved himself before the people as his servant — and he did it better because he was Jehovah's servant.
Chapter 18 is full of people who love David. One writer warns that "human love has many different traits and… only one of these traits has value in the sight of God." Then he sorts them out.
The daughters of Israel, the people, and Saul's servants love David for his deliverances. Even Saul, at a given moment (1 Sam. 16:21), "loved [David] greatly," because of the relief he brings him in his sufferings. Michal loves David according to nature — which does not stop her from despising him later on (2 Sam. 6:16). Jonathan, last of all, loves him with the only love that is true, good, and lasting. He loves him as his own soul. He cherishes David for what he is in himself.
The verse names Israel and Judah separately. One writer follows both through the rest of David's story.
David's victory over Goliath won the hearts of the tribes of Israel and Judah. But a long time passed before he was undisputed king over them… Judah was faithful to David, and the other tribes of Israel were for the house of Saul… Israel's love for David kept changing. They left David and followed his rebellious son, Absalom… If love for David should have unified the tribes, love for Christ and His interests should unify the believers in Him. Love for David should have refused the subtle schemes of Absalom. Love for Christ should enable believers in Him to refuse the claims of Satan and the world.
Solomon later asked for wisdom so that he could "go out and come in before this people." One writer finds a warning in that.
No doubt he remembered what Scripture said of David: "All Israel and Judah loved David because he went out and came in before them" (1 Sam. 18:16). This was a good testimony before others. Solomon was concerned about this, as we too ought to be. Yet he did not seem to realise where David's good testimony came from. It grew out of a much deeper work of heart than concern about his testimony. Nor should our first thought be how we affect others. Should we not first consider how we should please the Lord?
David was already anointed king, yet the man on the throne hated him.
So David, while anointed king of Israel, was called to endure the hatred and scorn of the ruling power. Yet all who could trace his moral worth loved him… His way to the throne lay through many sorrows and difficulties. He, like his blessed Master — the One he pictured — was called to suffering first, and glory afterwards.
- Wisdom first. The nation's love grew out of David behaving wisely "in all his ways," and the Lord was with him.
- Then visibility. "Going out and coming in" means an open life. David had nothing to hide.
- Then love. The crowds loved him for what he did for them. Jonathan loved him for what he was in himself — the one love that lasts.
- Then testing. The nation's love proved changeable, and they followed Absalom. Love for Christ is meant to hold where theirs broke.
- Then glory. The people loved him; the throne hated him. David's road ran through suffering first, then the kingdom.
And Saul said to David, Behold my eldest daughter Merab, her will I give thee to wife; only be thou valiant for me, and fight Jehovah's battles. But Saul thought, My hand shall not be upon him, but the hand of the Philistines shall be upon him.
Saul's jealousy has turned quiet and calculated: he offers David his eldest daughter, Merab, and asks only that he keep fighting Israel's battles. The verse then lets us hear what he was really thinking.
Saul had already pledged his daughter to whoever defeated Goliath. Bringing that promise back now, with conditions attached, was not generosity but method.
Saul had once promised his daughter to the man who beat Goliath. He now renews that promise. He offers her to David on one condition: that he will fight the Lord's battles bravely, above all against the Philistines. The craft of Satan that marks the king here shows the true nature of his character. He will expose David to all the dangers of constant warfare. He will also stir up the Philistines against him by special insult, so that they will do all they can to kill him. So while seeking to avoid the responsibility for his death, Saul is really plotting it.
Saul's words are faultless. The second half of the verse shows what lay underneath them.
The king is already a murderer in his heart. Soon he becomes one in fact (v. 11). He looks for an underhanded way to rid himself of the man he hates. He promises his daughter Merab to David, but this is only a sham. "Fight the LORD's battles," Saul tells him, full of outward respect. Deep in his heart, though, hatred is boiling, along with the desire to see "the hand of the Philistines … against him."
Saul's plan had a second purpose beyond killing David: it protected Saul's reputation. He wanted the death without the blame. David, meanwhile, was getting an education.
Saul now tries to trap David. He offers him his eldest daughter, on condition that he should fight the Lord's battles. He is not yet so hardened in wickedness that he would openly lay hands on him. Instead he said, "Let the hand of the Philistines be against him." David never gets Merab. He would have seen the marriage as a most unexpected honour, but it was not to be. "Continual dropping wears away the stone," and this was always the schooling David needed. How he must have winced at each shift and deceit! He was so little prepared for this when he entered the royal circle. … But through it David was learning the deceitfulness of this present evil world.
The prize on offer was rank in the king's family. David never reached for it, and he had not fought Goliath for it either.
The honours and riches promised to the man who killed Goliath were not what moved him. After the victory we do not find him claiming them. They were flattering and splendid — the very things a man would grab if he sought his own glory. Instead we hear him saying, "Who am I, and what is my life, or my father's family in Israel, that I should be son-in-law to the king?"
Saul's scheme depended on the Philistines finishing David. It had the opposite effect.
But God took care of the outcome. Every step Saul took to humble David, or to show his own ill-feeling, or even worse, became only a means in God's hands to fit David the more for the kingdom. … Saul said to David, "Here is my elder daughter Merab. I will give her to you for a wife. Only be valiant for me and fight the LORD's battles." This was a mere pretence. … It only gave David the opportunity for fresh victories. … But there was no truth nor conscience toward God in Saul, any more than care for David or regard for the pledged promise of a king.
Commentators read Saul's campaign against David as a pattern repeated later. The better David proved himself, the more Saul feared him — and fear of a man God has chosen has a long history.
But because David was the Lord's chosen, Saul is his enemy, and David is the victim his enemy craved. The more wisely David conducts himself, and the more he shows that God is with him, the more Saul fears him. With a heart beyond reason, Saul hates him and would gladly kill him. In all this he goes the way of Satan, who, knowing the Son of God in his day, trembled before Him and yet sought to destroy Him.
- Pretence. Saul renewed his promise of Merab only to break it. The offer was "a mere pretence," dressed in the language of fighting the Lord's battles.
- Plot. Saul wanted David dead and his own hands clean. So he set out to stir up the Philistines and let them do the killing.
- Poise. David answered, "Who am I?" He never claimed the honours owed him, and never mentioned the king's broken word.
- Providence. God used every move Saul made against David to fit him the more for the kingdom. The trap only gave David fresh victories.
- Pattern. Saul hated the one God had chosen. In this he went the way of Satan, who trembled before the Son of God and still sought to destroy Him.
And David said to Saul, Who am I? and what is my life, [or] my father's family in Israel, that I should be son-in-law to the king?
Saul has just offered David his elder daughter Merab, dressing the offer up as a call to fight the Lord's battles. David does not grab at the honour; he asks who he is that he should marry into the king's family.
Saul's proposal was not a reward but a plot, and David had reason to suspect it. Saul had already promised a royal marriage to Goliath's killer, and never paid it.
Of course Saul knew that the people thought highly of David, so he used the trick of offering his older daughter Merab to David if David would prove himself brave in fighting the Lord's battles (v.17). David had good cause to be suspicious of this, for Saul had already promised his daughter to the man who would kill Goliath (ch. 17:25). Saul hoped that David would take such risks in his fighting that the Philistines would kill him. But David showed a humble spirit. He protested that he did not think himself worthy to be the king's son-in-law.
David meant the question; he was not putting on modesty. And Saul's answer to it was to give Merab to another man.
"And David said to Saul, 'Who am I?'" — for his humility was real, with nothing put on — and still God worked on his behalf in fresh ways. "Who am I, and who are my relatives, my father's clan in Israel, that I should be son-in-law to the king?" But there was no truth or conscience toward God in Saul, and no care for David or regard for the promised word of a king. "But at the time when Merab, Saul's daughter, should have been given to David, she was given to Adriel the Meholathite for a wife."
David had a reason for fighting Goliath, and the prize was not it. Watch what he does after the win.
The Lord had been dishonoured, and His people threatened, and this was "the cause" that moved David to say to Saul, "Your servant will go and fight with this Philistine." The honours and riches promised to the man who killed Goliath were not what moved him. After the victory we do not find him claiming them, splendid and flattering as they were — the very things for a man who wanted glory for himself. Instead we hear him saying, "Who am I, and who are my relatives, my father's clan in Israel, that I should be son-in-law to the king?" and we see him going back to being the king's harpist.
His own brother had accused him of pride and a bad heart. One writer hears David's answer to that charge in a psalm.
Perhaps it was after he had endured the taunts of Eliab, his eldest brother, who charged him with pride and a bad heart, that he poured out his soul in the words of Psalm 131. Turning away from his brother, his soul turned towards his God with these words: "O LORD, my heart is not lifted up; my eyes are not raised too high; I do not occupy myself with things too great and too marvelous for me. But I have calmed and quieted my soul, like a weaned child with its mother; like a weaned child is my soul within me."
Years later David sits as king, and he asks the same question again.
The first thing worth noting is the king's humility. He has no thought of pride. Communion with the Lord, instead of exalting man, lowers him in his own estimation. "Who am I, O Lord GOD, and what is my house, that you have brought me thus far?" David is well aware of his origin and glories in it because this origin exalts the God who took him from the sheepfold!
David holds back, meets every condition, and receives a bride at the end of it. One writer sees a faint picture of something larger here.
With fitting modesty, David shrinks from the honour of being linked with the king, but he meets all the conditions, and in the end receives Saul's second daughter as his bride. This is a very faint foreshadowing, may we not say, of the Church, which is given to our Lord as the result of His glorious victory. "Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her."
- Trap — Saul's offer of Merab was bait. He wanted the Philistines to kill David for him.
- Question — David's "Who am I?" was real humility. He claimed nothing, though Saul had already held back the reward for killing Goliath.
- Silence — He claims none of the promised honours and riches. He goes back to serving as the king's harpist.
- Root — That calm came from a soul already quieted before God, weaned of great matters, as Psalm 131 puts it.
- Consistency — The same "Who am I?" comes later from the throne. Closeness to the Lord lowers a man in his own eyes instead of lifting him.
And it came to pass at the time when Merab Saul's daughter should have been given to David, that she was given to Adriel the Meholathite as wife.
Saul had promised his daughter Merab to the man who fought his battles, but he gave her to someone else instead. The short verse shows what Saul had become, and raises a question: what was God doing for David through this public shame?
Saul dressed the offer up as a reward for courage. His real aim was the opposite.
Soon the king, who is already a murderer in his heart, becomes one in fact (v. 11). He looks for a sly way to get rid of the man he hates. He promises his daughter Merab to David, but this is only a sham. "Fight the LORD's battles," Saul tells him, full of outward respect. Deep in his heart hatred is boiling, along with the desire to see "the hand of the Philistines … upon him" (vv. 17-19).
Saul broke a promise he had given as king. One writer names what was missing in him.
But there was no truth or conscience toward God in Saul, any more than care for David or regard for the pledged promise of a king.
God took every move Saul made to shame David and turned it toward the throne David would later hold.
But God took care that every step that Saul took to humble David, or to show his ill-feeling, or even worse, should be only a means in God's hands to fit David the more for the kingdom. The LORD was with him in the house of Saul and kept him safe. The LORD was with him outside the king's house too, and there he proved himself before the people as his servant, the better because he was the LORD's servant.
Commentators also notice that the loss may have cost David less than we assume.
The time came when David had proved himself equal to the task Saul had assigned to him. He was therefore entitled to marry Merab. But Saul again proved himself untrustworthy by giving Merab to another man (v. 19). This may have been just as well for David, since there seems no sign that he had any love for Merab anyway.
David was new to the royal court and unready for its dishonesty. One writer looks past this single broken promise to the pattern.
David never gets Merab, though he clearly would have regarded it as a most unexpected honour; but it was not to be. "It is the continual dropping which wears the stone," and this was always the character of the schooling David needed. How he must have winced under each change of mind and each deceit! He was so little prepared for this when he entered the royal circle. The noble and strong can hardly bear the meanness of envy. But it was teaching David the deceitfulness of this present evil world.
Saul came back later for fresh services, and David had every ground to raise the old wrong. He never did.
Not a word about the earlier wrong done to him. Not a syllable about Merab given to Adriel. Nothing about the king breaking his royal word, so solemnly pledged in the hour of danger in the valley of Elah, and renewed later by Saul himself for fresh services.
Adriel appears only here and in one later, grim passage. The marriage produced sons who paid for a crime of Saul's.
Son of Barzillai, the Meholathite, to whom Merab, Saul's daughter, was given as wife after having been promised to David. She bore Adriel five sons, and these were given up to death to avenge the Gibeonites because Saul had killed some of them. In 2 Samuel 21:8 these five sons are named as the sons of Michal, Saul's daughter. They were surely the sons of Merab and not of Michal. It seems most likely that the name Michal here is the mistake of an early copyist.
- Bait — The promise of Merab was a sham from a king already a murderer in his heart, hoping the Philistines would kill David for him.
- Broken — Saul had no truth or conscience toward God, so breaking his royal word cost him nothing.
- Overruled — Every step Saul took to humble David became a means in God's hands to fit David the more for the kingdom.
- Schooled — Steady dripping wears away stone. Saul's repeated deceit taught David how deceitful this world is.
- Silent — Asked for fresh service later, David said not a syllable about Merab. The wronged man kept no ledger of the wrong.
And Michal Saul's daughter loved David; and they told Saul, and the thing was right in his sight.
Saul had already promised his older daughter Merab to David, then gave her to another man. Now he hears that his younger daughter Michal has fallen for David, and the news pleases him — though not for the reason a father might expect.
This is not Saul's first offer of a daughter. The earlier one was a trap dressed as an honour — and God turned it to David's gain.
Every step Saul took to humble David became only a means in God's hands. God used it to fit David all the more for the kingdom. Saul said to David, "Here is my elder daughter Merab. I will give her to you as a wife; only be valiant for me and fight the LORD's battles." This was a mere pretence. "For Saul said, 'Let not my hand be upon him, but let the hand of the Philistines be upon him.'" It only gave David the chance for fresh victories… But there was no truth or conscience toward God in Saul. He had no care for David, and no regard for the promise a king had made.
Michal's love was real. Saul saw an opening in it.
Michal, Saul's second daughter, loves David. Saul tells himself: "I will give her to him, that she may be a snare to him, and that the hand of the Philistines may be upon him" (v. 21). In his thinking this marriage is a new way of getting rid of his future son-in-law. He hides his intent. He orders his servants to speak to David in secret: "Behold, the king delights in you, and all his servants love you" (v. 22). He pretends to feel affection toward him, to push the son of Jesse to his destruction all the more surely.
Saul's plan backfired. The marriage he meant as a trap ended up shielding David.
Michal loved David. She proved her love by saving his life: her plan let David escape the men Saul sent to kill him. In New Testament language she cared for her husband's interests (1 Cor. 7:34).
Several people in this chapter love David: the nation, Saul's servants, Saul himself for a while, Michal, and Jonathan. Not all of these loves are worth the same.
The daughters of Israel, the people, and Saul's servants love David because he rescued them. Even Saul, at one moment (1 Sam. 16:21), "loved David greatly," because of the relief he brings him in his sufferings. Michal loves David according to nature — which does not stop her from despising him later on (2 Sam. 6:16). Last of all, Jonathan loves him with the only love that is true, good, and lasting. He loves him as his own soul. He cherishes him for who David is in himself.
Years later David danced before the ark. The same woman despised him, and Scripture stops calling her his wife.
David humbled himself to be one of that holy gathering. He joined that service, so acceptable and pleasing to God. But one person was watching, and her heart was not in tune with it… The ark of God does not have the first place in her soul. So Scripture calls her here not the wife of David, but Saul's daughter. In her father's time the ark was never thought of, and she, brought up in that neglect, gives no thought to the ark now. For though she loved David (1 Samuel 18:20), she had no heart for God; she was still Saul's daughter. The closest earthly ties with the saints of God cannot bring the unrenewed heart into communion with Him.
Natural love is not worthless. But it has a limit.
God honours the place of natural feelings and responsibilities. But they should never come before the spiritual… Michal was ready to help David on the natural level, but not on the spiritual level.
Commentators also see a larger picture here. David shrinks from the honour, meets every condition, and wins a bride.
With fitting modesty, David shrinks from the honour of being linked to the king. Yet he meets every condition, and in the end Saul gives him his second daughter as his bride. This is a very faint foreshadowing, may we not say, of the Church, given to our Lord as the result of His glorious victory. "Christ loved the Church and gave Himself for it."
- Love offered. Michal's love for David was real, not pretended, and she later risked herself to save his life.
- Love exploited. The news pleased Saul, but not for his daughter's sake. He meant her as a snare, hoping the Philistines would do what his own hand would not.
- Love overruled. Every scheme Saul aimed at David only gave him fresh victories. The trap became the marriage that protected him.
- Love measured. Michal's love was natural. Jonathan loved David for who he was. Chapter 18 sets the two side by side, and only one lasts.
- Love outlasted. When the ark came home she was still called Saul's daughter — closeness to God's people is not the same as a heart for God.
And Saul said, I will give him her, that she may be a snare to him, and that the hand of the Philistines may be upon him. And Saul said to David, Thou shalt this day be my son-in-law a second time.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Saul commanded his servants, Speak with David secretly, saying, Behold, the king has delight in thee, and all his servants love thee now therefore be the king's son-in-law.
Saul wants David dead, but not by his own hand. So he drops open violence and sends his servants with a warm, private word about the king's delight in him. Why would a king who wants a man dead have him flattered? And why did David, who had every reason for suspicion, answer as he did?
The secret briefing of the servants is not a change of heart but a change of method. The compliment is the wrapping on a trap.
He hides his real purpose. He orders his servants to speak to David secretly. They are to say: "Behold, the king has delight in you, and all his servants love you." He pretends to feel affection for him, to push the son of Jesse to his destruction all the more surely.
The private tone is part of the act. David had one plain reason to doubt the message, yet he let it pass.
Deceitfully he commanded his servants to speak to David as though in private confidence. Saul thought very highly of him, they were to say, and would be glad to have him as a son-in-law. David should have suspected this, since Saul had promised him Merab and then not given her. But David did not question it. He thought himself unworthy to be the king's son-in-law, since he was a poor man with no reputation.
Saul's warm words are not free.
To trap David and destroy him, the king demanded a fresh price for his other daughter's hand.
David could have named every broken promise. He named none of them.
Not a word about the wrong that had been done to him before — not a syllable about Merab given to Adriel. Nothing about the king failing to keep his royal word in the hour of danger, so solemnly pledged in the valley of Elah, or personally renewed later still for fresh service.
That restraint is not weakness. It is what faith looks like when it deals with an authority that has failed.
The fact was that David, looking to God, was far more jealous for the king's honour than the king himself. So it always is, and should be, wherever there is faith. God may still uphold something altogether unworthy of Himself or of His people. As long as He does, faith bears with it and openly pays all worthy respect. This is not folly; nor is it cringing, though it is far from this generation. It is faith.
Jealousy alone does not explain the scheming.
Saul only saw David. Satan saw in him a picture of Christ, who is the Son of David… Satan's opposition to Christ is the one thing that fully explains Saul's stubborn and unnatural desire to kill his daughter's husband. It began with jealousy. David's conduct was always submissive, and that alone was enough to have removed such a feeling, had jealousy been all. The feeling had no ground — and for that very reason its root ran deeper. Satan's cunning saw in the young man who killed Goliath the power of God, and the forefather of the One who would crush his head and conquer Death and Hell. That is why Saul's jealousy ripened into Satan's hatred.
The same trap works today, whenever praise comes from someone who wants something from you.
This is the same principle as bribery. Let the believer take care to avoid such trapping nets. Accepting flattery is accepting falsehood. Flattery is deceit: it is not even honestly meant, and it is not sober, real fact. Satan is extremely skilled in such methods.
- Bait. The secret message was pretence. Saul faked affection to drive David toward destruction.
- Price. Behind the warm words came a fresh demand, the real cost of the king's "delight."
- Silence. David never raised Merab or the promise broken in the valley of Elah. He answered only out of his own low view of himself.
- Faith. David guarded the king's honour better than the king did. That is not foolishness or grovelling. It is what faith does while God still upholds a failing thing.
- Guard. Flattery is deceit dressed as kindness, and Satan is skilled at using it. When praise comes with an errand attached, treat it as a net, not a gift.
And Saul's servants spoke those words in the ears of David. And David said, Is it a light thing in your eyes to be the king's son-in-law, seeing that I am a poor man, and lightly esteemed?
Saul has just offered his younger daughter Michal to David. He sends his servants to tell him how pleased the king would be to have him in the family. His reply is not a bargain but a confession of what he thinks he is worth — and it comes from a man the king had already promised a royal bride once before.
The message carried to David sounded like warmth from the throne. Its real purpose was to get him killed. One commentator explains why Saul was pleased that his daughter loved David:
Saul was pleased about this, not because he thought of his daughter's happiness, but because this might lead to David's death. He wanted his own daughter to be a snare to David. He deceitfully ordered his servants to speak to David as though in private confidence. They were to say that Saul really thought very highly of David and would be glad to have him as a son-in-law. David should have suspected this, since Saul had promised him Merab and then not given her to him. But he never questioned it. He considered himself unworthy to be the king's son-in-law, a poor man of no reputation.
Another writer describes the message the servants carried:
In his thoughts this marriage is a new way of getting rid of his future son-in-law. He hides his real aim and orders his servants to speak to David secretly. They are to say that the king delights in him and that all his servants love him. He pretends to feel affection toward David, to push the son of Jesse to his destruction all the more surely.
The striking thing about David's answer is what it leaves out. One commentator lists the injuries David could have raised and did not:
Not a word about the previous wrong that had been done him — not a syllable about Merab given to Adriel — or of the king's having failed in his royal word during the hour of peril, so solemnly pledged in the valley of Elah, or personally renewed later still for fresh services.
David's low view of himself came with a high view of the throne — higher than the man sitting on it held. The same writer calls this faith, not weakness:
The fact was that David looked to God. He was far more jealous of the king's honour than the king himself was. It is always so, and should be, wherever there is faith. God sometimes upholds what is completely unworthy of Himself or His people. As long as He does, faith bears with it and openly pays all the respect that is due. This is not folly; nor is it cringing, even though it is far from this generation. It is faith.
David's humility did not soften Saul. It fed him. One writer sees the same blindness at work far beyond Saul:
David's great humility in the face of the king's proposals only moves Saul further along in his wicked plan. Man's hatred and pride never could understand the humility and the love of Christ.
The pattern runs through David's whole story. Even before this, the one God chose was the one nobody thought to call:
The Lord's anointed proved to be one who was regarded as of no account, for the young David was not even invited to meet the prophet. How suggestive of Him who was "despised and rejected by men"! Notice his occupation: he keeps the sheep. Again suggestive of our blessed Lord.
Another writer treats being nothing as something to want, not something to escape:
Oh, to be nothing! This is true liberty — true happiness — true moral elevation. What intense power of attraction there is in one who makes nothing of himself! On the other hand, how repulsive is a pushing, elbowing, self-exalting spirit! How completely unworthy of one bearing the name of Him who made Himself of no reputation!
- Trap. The warm message from the palace was bait. Saul meant his own daughter to be a snare and the Philistines to kill David.
- Poverty. David answered out of a real sense of being poor and of no reputation. He never suspected the trap, and never raised the broken promise about Merab.
- Silence. David named none of his grievances: the wrong done him, Merab given away, the king's word broken after the valley of Elah.
- Honour. David guarded Saul's honour more carefully than Saul did. Faith bears with what is unworthy and pays it real respect. That is not cringing.
- Christ. Hatred and pride could not read David's lowliness. They could not read the humility of Christ either — the One despised and rejected. To be nothing is true liberty, and the mark of those who bear His name.
And the servants of Saul told him, saying, On this manner did David speak.
Saul has sent his servants to David with a secret offer: marriage into the royal family. Now they bring David's reply back to the king, and the whole chapter turns on this one line.
The servants were not neutral messengers. Saul told them what to say, and the warmth in their words was fake.
Michal, Saul's second daughter, loves David. Saul tells himself: "Let me give her to him, that she may be a snare for him and that the hand of the Philistines may be against him" (v. 21). In his thoughts this union is a new means of getting rid of his future son-in-law. He hides his real intent and orders his servants to speak to David secretly, saying: "Behold, the king has delight in you, and all his servants love you" (v. 22). He pretends to feel affection toward him in order to push the son of Jesse to his destruction all the more surely.
David's answer mattered less for what it said than for what it left out. Saul had already promised him his older daughter Merab and then married her to another man.
And Saul's servants spoke those words in the ears of David. And David said, "Does it seem to you a little thing to become the king's son-in-law, since I am a poor man and have no reputation?" Not a word about the wrong already done to him. Not a syllable about Merab, whom the king gave to Adriel. Nothing about the king breaking his royal promise in the hour of danger — the promise made so solemnly in the valley of Elah, and renewed in person later on for fresh service.
That restraint did nothing to soften the man who heard it reported.
David's great humility in the face of the king's proposals only moves Saul further along in his wicked plan. Man's hatred and pride never could understand the humility and the love of Christ.
David's reply was not weakness or flattery. It came from a man whose eye was on God.
The fact was that David, looking to God, cared far more for the king's honour than the king himself did. So it always is, and should be, wherever there is faith. As long as God sustains something completely unworthy of Himself or His people, faith puts up with it and openly pays all the respect due. This is not folly, my friends; nor is it cringing, even though it is rare in this generation. It is faith. And so Saul's servants told him how David had spoken.
Commentators differ on how to read David here. One writer thinks he should have seen the trap.
David should have suspected this, since Saul had promised him Merab and then not given her to him. But this raised no question in his mind. He considered himself unworthy to be the king's son-in-law, a poor man of no reputation (v.23).
The report was exactly the opening Saul wanted. He named a dowry meant to kill.
Saul, against all honesty and honour, gives Merab to Adriel. But he is still bent on David's destruction, so he offers him Michal as a snare. The price he sets is "a hundred foreskins of the Philistines." David agreed at once. He did not keep to the limit of the contract. Such is the greatness of his nature — he will be no man's debtor — that he goes beyond the condition and "killed two hundred of the Philistines." But the more we are above the spirit of the world, the more it will hate us. So Saul now "was David's enemy continually."
Ordinary envy dies down when the rival proves harmless. Saul's did not. One writer traces this to a source beyond Saul.
Saul only saw David. Satan saw in him the picture of Christ, who is the Son of David. If Satan could only destroy David, where would the Son be, and all the promises bound up in Him?… Satan's hostility to Christ is the only thing that fully explains Saul's stubborn and unnatural desire to kill his daughter's husband. It began with jealousy. But David's submission never changed, and that alone would have been quite enough to remove such a groundless feeling — groundless, and for that reason rooted all the deeper — had jealousy been all.
- Report. Saul scripted the servants' warm words. They covered his plan to let the Philistines kill David.
- Reply. David's answer named no grievance. Not Merab, not the broken promise from the valley of Elah — only his own low view of himself.
- Reason. That silence was not timidity. Faith looking to God guarded the king's honour better than the king did.
- Result. Saul turned the report into a death warrant. The price was a hundred Philistines; David paid two hundred and won the king's daughter.
- Root. Humility never disarms pride. Saul's hatred outlived every reason for it. The real contest was Satan against Christ.
And Saul said, Thus shall ye say to David The king does not desire any dowry, but a hundred foreskins of the Philistines, to be avenged of the king's enemies. But Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines.
Saul wants David dead, but not by his own hand. So he names a bride-price for Michal that sounds like patriotism — revenge on the king's enemies — but is meant to get David killed.
The condition Saul attaches to Michal's hand looks like a call to national service. Commentators read it as a trap. The demand itself would also enrage the Philistines against David.
The Satanic cunning the king shows here reveals his true character. He will expose David to all the dangers of constant warfare . By a special insult he will stir up the hatred of the Philistines against him, so that they will make every effort to put him to death. So while trying to avoid the blame for his death, Saul is plotting it.
Saul does not speak to David himself. He sends servants with warm words.
Michal, Saul's second daughter, loves David. Saul tells himself: "Let me give her to him, that she may be a snare for him and that the hand of the Philistines may be against him" (v. 21). He hides his purpose and orders his servants to speak to David secretly, saying: "Behold, the king has delight in you, and all his servants love you" (v. 22). He pretends to feel affection for him, to push the son of Jesse more surely toward his destruction.
Why would a king hunt the man who had just rescued his nation? Commentators point to envy.
Envy here seems to grip Saul so terribly that it gains complete mastery over him. It leads him to try three times to murder David. Some people do not know how quickly and fatally the poison of envy works. To them it seems almost unbelievable that Saul could have sought to kill the very man who had just delivered Israel, and for such a small reason. Yet I am sure of this: anyone who knows anything of his own heart can trace the seeds of great crimes in the feelings that envy stirs.
David says yes to terms he must have suspected. The task itself made that possible.
David stays in his lowliness, and Merab is given to another. Michal gives Saul a more plausible opportunity. David was only required to destroy the power of the enemies of God's people, so he accepts Saul's proposal and succeeds.
Saul had already cheated David once: Merab, promised to him, went to another man.
The fact was that David looked to God. He cared far more for the king's honour than the king himself did. It is always so, and should be, wherever there is faith. As long as God upholds even what is quite unworthy of Himself or His people, faith bears with it and openly pays all proper respect. This is not folly, and it is not cringing. It is faith. So Saul's servants told him how David had spoken. Saul said, "Thus shall you say to David, 'The king desires no bride-price.'" What he wanted was the death of a hundred Philistines. Yet David's simple mind still clung to the king's honour. Saul had broken his word to David again and again, and still David did not sneer at it.
David does not just meet the terms. He goes past them. Success in the test does not soften Saul.
Still bent on David's destruction, Saul offers him Michal as a snare. The condition is that he bring as bride-price "a hundred foreskins of the Philistines." David agreed at once. He did not stop at the limit of the contract. True to the greatness of his nature — for he will be no man's debtor — he went beyond it and "killed two hundred of the Philistines." But the more we are above the spirit of the world, the more it will hate us. So Saul now "was David's enemy continually."
David wins his bride by defeating enemies. Commentators see a small hint of something far larger.
With fitting modesty, David shrinks from the honour of being joined to the king. Still, he fulfils all the conditions, and in the end Saul gives him his second daughter as a bride. Is this not a very faint picture of the Church, which is given to our Lord as the result of His glorious victory? "Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her."
- Envy plots. A trivial offence hardened into three attempts at murder; small jealousies carry the seeds of great crimes.
- Flattery baits. Saul sends servants with kind words about the king's delight in David. The warmth is fake, and it aims at his death.
- Faith accepts. The offer is not honest. David can still take it, because the work strikes the enemies of God's people.
- Obedience overshoots. He kills two hundred, not one hundred. He will be no man's debtor, and he never throws Saul's broken promise back at him.
- The snare fails. David comes home alive, with a bride — a distant picture of the Church won by Christ's victory. Saul only hates him more.
And his servants told David these words; and the thing was right in David's sight to be the king's son-in-law. And the days were not expired,
Saul has offered his daughter Michal to David, and the price he names is a hundred Philistine foreskins. The verse sets two minds side by side: a king planning a death, and a young man glad to be honoured.
The friendly message that reached David was staged. Saul chose both the messengers and the bait.
Michal, Saul's second daughter, loves David. Saul tells himself: "I will give him her, that she may be a snare to him, and that the hand of the Philistines may be upon him" (v. 21). In his thoughts this union is a new means of getting rid of his future son-in-law. He hides his real motive and orders his servants to speak to David secretly, saying: "Behold, the king has delight in you, and all his servants love you" (v. 22). He pretends to feel affection for him, to push the son of Jesse to his destruction all the more surely.
One writer sees the same tactic used later against Jesus by the Pharisees, the religious leaders of His day.
Does this not remind us of the spite of the Pharisees? They looked for every way to trap the Lord in His words. They wanted to turn others away from Him and, if possible, to expose Him to judgment from the Romans.
The king had broken his word to David before. None of that bitterness shows here.
The fact was that David, looking to God, cared far more for the king's honour than the king himself did. So it always is, and so it should be, wherever there is faith. As long as God upholds even what is completely unworthy of Himself or of His people, faith bears with it and openly pays all proper respect. This is not folly, nor is it cringing, though this generation is far from it. It is faith… "And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king's son-in-law." His simple mind still clung to the king's honour. The word so often broken in his own case drew no sneer from him. He feared God and the king. If the king really thought so of David, he valued it.
David's modesty had the opposite effect on Saul.
David's great humility in the face of the king's proposals only moves Saul further along in his wicked plan. Man's hatred and pride never could understand the humility and the love of Christ.
The verse ends by noting that the allotted days had not yet run out — and the next verse tells us why. David moved fast, and he did not stop at the number asked.
King Saul used this to his advantage. He told his servants to say that he needed no dowry except a hundred foreskins of the Philistines. That did not guarantee the men would be killed, but this was clearly what Saul had in mind. He expected David to die while trying to kill so many. But David doubled the number to two hundred… Saul could hardly go back on his promise then, and he gave David Michal as his wife (v. 27).
Saul's plotting served a purpose he never intended.
But God took care of this. Every step Saul took to humble David, to show his own ill-feeling, or worse, became only a means in God's hands to fit David all the more for the kingdom… "For Saul said, Let not my hand be upon him, but let the hand of the Philistines be upon him." It only gave David opportunity for fresh victories.
David met the king's terms and won his bride. One writer sees a larger picture in it.
With becoming modesty, David shrinks back from the honour of being linked to the king. Yet he meets every condition, and in the end Saul gives him his second daughter as his bride. This is a very faint picture, may we not say, of the Church, which is given to our Lord as the result of His glorious victory. "Christ loved the church and gave Himself up for her."
- The bait: Saul sent his flattering message in secret and hid his plan to get David killed.
- The blindness: Saul could scheme against David but never understand him. Pride cannot read humility.
- The gladness: David still valued the king's honour. Broken promises drew no bitter word from him.
- The overruling: every step Saul took to bring David down became, in God's hands, further training for the throne.
- The bride: Saul set his terms as a death sentence. David turned them into a victory and won his wife — a faint picture of the Church given to Christ through His triumph.
when David arose and went, he and his men, and smote of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they delivered them in full to the king, that he might be the king's son-in-law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter as wife.
Saul offered David his daughter Michal for one price: a hundred Philistine foreskins. He hoped the errand would kill David; instead David came back with double, and the plot turned into a marriage.
The dowry was never about the price. It was about the journey to collect it.
King Saul used this to his advantage. He told his servants to say to David that he wanted no dowry except a hundred foreskins of the Philistines. This did not guarantee that the men would die, but that was clearly what Saul had in mind. He expected the Philistines to kill David as he tried to kill so many of them. But David doubled the number to two hundred, killing the men and bringing their foreskins to Saul. Saul could hardly go back on his promise then, so he gave David Michal as his wife.
David does not haggle the price down, and he does not stop at the number Saul named.
Saul, against all honesty and honour, gives Merab to Adriel. But he is still set on destroying David, so he offers him Michal as a trap. The condition is that David bring a hundred foreskins of the Philistines as the dowry. David agreed at once. He did not stay inside the limit of the contract. Because of the greatness of his nature — he will be no man's debtor — he goes beyond the condition and "killed two hundred of the Philistines." But the more we rise above the spirit of the world, the more it will hate us.
David had every reason to be bitter. Saul had given the older daughter to another man. David says nothing about it.
The fact was that David, looking to God, cared more for the king's honour than the king himself did. It is always so, and should be so, wherever there is faith. As long as God keeps in place even what is completely unworthy of Himself or His people, faith puts up with it and freely pays all the respect due. This is not folly; nor is it cringing... His simple mind still held to the king's honour. The word so often broken in his own case provoked no sneer. He feared God and the king. If the king really thought of him that way, David valued it. That was the feeling of his generous heart.
The price Saul named is grim to modern ears. But it points to the one thing the Philistines lacked.
Notice how they are described — uncircumcised, people without the mark of covenant relationship with God, the covenant God made with Abraham... In spiritual terms, circumcision answers to that sentence of death on ourselves: we should not trust in ourselves, but in the living God... Uncircumcision answers in the same way to confidence in the flesh. And after all, what are the Philistines, for all their greatness, dug in on the shining heights of power and position? In the eyes of faith, what are they but people who have confidence in the flesh? They trust in human power, human wisdom, human forms, everything of man, and they leave God out.
Some writers read David here as a picture of Christ. He wins his bride by battle.
With fitting modesty, David shrinks from the honour of being linked to the king. But he meets all the conditions, and in the end Saul gives him his second daughter as his bride. This is a very faint picture, we might say, of the Church, given to our Lord as the result of His glorious victory. "Christ loved the church and gave Himself up for her."
The plot and the outcome sit in one sentence. The errand meant to kill David is the errand that wins him the bride.
In the end the adversary's schemes fail. David wins the victory and receives the king's daughter as his wife, because the price asked of him for her is the destruction of the Lord's enemies.
- The price — Saul set the dowry at a hundred Philistines. He expected David to die collecting them.
- The payment — David brought two hundred. He would be no man's debtor, so he went past the terms instead of just meeting them.
- The posture — David paid the price and never threw Saul's broken promises back at him. Faith honours the throne even when the man on it has broken his word.
- The picture — The Philistines carry one label: uncircumcised, men who trust the flesh. The price David paid was their defeat.
- The prize — The trap became a wedding. Commentators see here a faint sketch of the Church given to Christ as the fruit of His victory.
And Saul saw and knew that Jehovah was with David; and Michal Saul's daughter loved him.
Saul gave his daughter Michal to David, hoping the Philistines would kill him. The plan failed. Instead the king was left with two facts he could not deny: God was with David, and his own daughter loved him. Neither one softened him.
The marriage was never a gift. Saul's own words explain what he meant Michal to be:
Michal, Saul's second daughter, loves David. Saul tells himself: "Let me give her to him, that she may be a snare for him and that the hand of the Philistines may be against him" (v. 21). In his thoughts this union is a new means of getting rid of his future son-in-law. ... He pretends to feel affection toward him, to push the son of Jesse to his destruction all the more surely.
David met the offer with humility. That is exactly what hatred cannot handle:
David's great humility in the face of the king's proposals only moves Saul further along in his wicked plan. Man's hatred and pride never could understand the humility and the love of Christ.
The verse does not say Saul suspected. It says he saw and knew. One writer traces how that certainty grew step by step, and what it cost the king:
Saul sees more and more that the LORD is with David, and grows still more afraid of him. What a sad development of a sad state of soul! Yet Saul did have fine points of natural character, and at times they showed in better feelings. But God was not in them (1 Sam. 19)... Saul, being forsaken by God, cannot bear that He should be with David.
One commentator asks why the same facts hardened him, and points past Saul for the answer:
The king was closed to good and unrelenting toward David. How did this come about? Satan held him fast. The enemy took the very things that even nature would have respected and valued, and turned them only into food for his constant hatred and malice. Such is the power, such the way, of Satan.
Saul meant his daughter to be bait. She did not play the part he wrote for her:
The references in 1 Samuel 18:20, 28 are enough evidence that Michal, the daughter of Saul, really loved David. Her father, in his hatred of David, thought to use her as a snare that would cause David's downfall. His efforts failed. Michal loved David, and she proved it by saving his life. Her plan let David escape the men Saul sent to kill him.
The same writer follows her story further and finds a limit to that love:
How sad that her natural love blinded her eyes when David danced with all his might before the ark of the LORD (2 Samuel 6:12-16). Natural feelings and duties have a place that God honours, but they should never come before the spiritual. Michal was ready to help David on the natural level, but not on the spiritual level.
The chapter ends with the two men moving in opposite directions:
Though David was now Saul's son-in-law, this did not make Saul feel any more kindly toward him. Saul knew the LORD was with David, and he knew Michal loved him. That knowledge only increased his fear of David and his hostility toward him. Verse 30 notes that the Philistine commanders went out, clearly meaning to attack Israel. In each case David behaved himself more wisely than all Saul's servants, so that his name became highly esteemed.
Jealousy alone cannot explain a hatred this persistent. One writer looks further back for the cause:
Saul only saw David. Satan saw in him a picture of Christ, the Son of David... Only Satan's hostility to Christ fully explains Saul's constant, unnatural desire to kill his daughter's husband. It began with jealousy. David's conduct was always submissive, and if jealousy had been all, that alone would have been enough to clear away a feeling so groundless — and being groundless, it had all the deeper root... All through these scenes the real contest, if we may speak this way, is between two opposing powers: the power of God on one side, and the power of Satan on the other.
- Snare — Saul handed Michal over as a trap, to put David within reach of Philistine swords. The trap caught nothing.
- Sight — Saul did not lack evidence. He saw and knew God was with David. Because God had left him, that was the one thing he could not bear.
- Reversal — Blessing and affection would win most hearts. The enemy turned both into fuel for Saul's hatred.
- Love — Michal's love was genuine, and it saved David's life. But it helped him on the natural level only, never on the spiritual one.
- Result — Saul's fear hardened into settled hatred. David kept acting wisely, and his name only grew. Fighting God's choice never shrinks it.
And Saul was yet the more afraid of David; and Saul was David's enemy continually.
Saul had tried to have the Philistines kill David, and the plan failed: David came home a winner and married the king's daughter. The proof that God was with David only made Saul more afraid, and turned him into an enemy for life.
Saul could see what God was doing, and he could see his daughter's love for David. Why did it make him worse instead of better?
No good could reach the king, and nothing could soften him toward David. How did this happen? Satan held him fast. The enemy took the very things that even nature would have respected and valued, and used them only to feed Saul's hatred and malice without end. Such is the power, such the way, of Satan.
Saul was not a man without good qualities. But something else was missing.
Saul sees more and more that the LORD is with David, and grows still more afraid of him. What a sad development of a sad state of soul! Yet Saul did not lack fine natural qualities, which showed themselves at times in better feelings. But God was not in them (1 Sam. 19)… Saul, being forsaken by God, cannot bear that He should be with David.
Saul's plans kept producing the opposite of what he wanted.
Then fear comes upon Saul. He realizes that the LORD is with David, and not with himself. So he gives David a lower post, away from his own presence. But this only brings David more before the people, and wins him their favour and acceptance. And Saul fears the more.
David had served Saul with the harp, with the sling, and with a dowry paid twice over. None of it softened the king.
Such bitter and undeserved hatred may surprise us. But it only shows us the malice of the worldly man who professes to serve God — malice that no amount of goodness or service will disarm.
The same writer turns from Saul to the reader:
But the more we are above the spirit of the world, the more it will hate us. And Saul now becomes "David's enemy continually." This faithful servant must have learned by now that all his goodness and service in the court had counted for nothing.
Jealousy alone cannot explain a hatred this long against a son-in-law who stayed submissive. One writer traces it to a deeper source.
Saul was his tool in his hatred of Christ. Saul only saw David. Satan saw in him the picture of Christ, who is the Son of David. If Satan could destroy David, where would the Son be, and all the promises bound up in Him?… It began with jealousy. But David's submissive conduct never wavered, and had jealousy been all, that would have been quite enough to remove a feeling so groundless — groundless, and for that very reason rooted deeper. Satan's wisdom saw the power of God in the young man who had killed Goliath. It saw the ancestor of the One who would crush Satan's head and conquer death and hell. That is why Saul's jealousy ripened into Satan's hatred. And all through these scenes the real contest is between the opposing forces — the power of God on one side, and, on the other, the power of Satan.
- Saw. Saul had the evidence in front of him: God with David, his own daughter loving David. It hardened him instead of humbling him. Light refused becomes fuel.
- Feared. Saul's fear grew because God had forsaken him. A man who has lost God's presence cannot bear to see it resting on someone else.
- Failed. Each move to sideline or destroy David only raised him higher before the people. So Saul feared the more.
- Hated. No amount of goodness or service disarmed Saul. David's loyalty earned him a permanent enemy. The more a life rises above the spirit of the world, the more that world hates it.
- Behind it all. A hatred this long points past Saul. Satan saw in David the ancestor of Christ, and the real contest running through these chapters is the power of God against the power of Satan.
And the princes of the Philistines went forth; and it came to pass, whenever they went forth, that David succeeded better than all the servants of Saul; and his name was much esteemed.
Saul has just given his daughter Michal to David, and he can see that God is with the man he fears. Now the Philistine commanders take the field again, and every new campaign lifts David higher in Israel's eyes. The chapter ends with two results: Saul's schemes fail, and the name he wants erased is the name everyone honours.
The point here is repetition. This was not one famous victory but a run of campaigns, and each one ended the same way:
Verse 30 notes that the commanders of the Philistines went out, clearly aiming to attack Israel. But each time, David acted more wisely than all Saul's servants, so his name became highly esteemed.
The ESV says David "had more success." Older translations read "behaved himself more wisely," which is the wording the writers use below. David had no training for palace life. One writer treats that gap as an advantage:
By grace David was able to walk in this wisdom. He had none of the habits of a court. That only gave the Spirit of God a better opportunity! The reason is simple. What is the source of a believer's lowliness, his obedience, his generous kindness, his unflinching courage? It is not at all a question of what the man once was in the flesh, but of what God makes Christ Himself to him by faith.
Saul had tried two methods against David: the marriage bargain, then open violence. This verse records how both ended. One writer links that failure to Saul's next move, spoken openly to his own son:
So we see how the design, the hidden snare, the carefully laid plans to overthrow David, all come to nothing. First there was corruption, then violence — equally useless. Saul was now bold enough to tell Jonathan and all his servants to kill David. The liar and murderer was at his usual work.
Saul had also sent David away from the palace, hoping distance would make people forget him. It did the opposite:
He employs him at a distance from himself, but where he is more than ever in the view of the people. God always carries out His purposes despite all the fleshly precautions of man. David is prudent. He has the wisdom of God, who is with him in all his ways.
Chapter 18 builds a record of growing acceptance. This verse is its last line. Against that record stands one man, the king:
After the overthrow of the giant, David got a measure of recognition in Israel. 1 Samuel 18 says that all the people approved of him (verse 5); the women sang his praises (verse 7); all Israel loved him (verse 16); and his name was highly esteemed (verse 30). But Saul stood out in base and brutal contrast to the rest of Israel. A bitter and undying hatred for the people's deliverer sprang up in his heart.
Several writers see the pattern of this verse repeated in Jesus. Rossier links David's rise to the start of the Lord's public ministry:
So David succeeds better than all Saul's servants, and his name was highly esteemed (v. 30); a lovely picture of the Lord at the beginning of His career (Luke 4:15)!
One writer finds the same pattern in the early church, with Stephen in David's place:
But in all who clung to earthly things, this display of power and glory only stirs up greater fear and hatred. It smoulders for a while, then bursts out in argument against Stephen. Yet he behaves more wisely than all the servants of Saul (1 Sam. 18:30; Acts 6:8-10), so that the name of Christ is highly esteemed.
- Pressure — The Philistine commanders come out again. David rises in war, not in peace.
- Wisdom — David's skill came from grace, not court training. His inexperience gave the Spirit of God a freer hand.
- Failure — First a marriage bargain, then open violence. Both of Saul's methods collapse, and God carries out His purpose anyway.
- Renown — Saul sent David away from the palace to be forgotten. Distance only put him more fully before the people.
- Shadow — The same pattern meets Christ and those who serve Him. One side hardens in hatred; the other honours His name.
And Saul spoke to Jonathan his son, and to all his servants, that they should slay David.
Saul had worked against David in hidden ways before. Now he says it out loud. He orders his own son and all his servants to kill him. One sentence holds two hearts: a king who wants David dead, and a son who delights in him.
The scheming now becomes an open plot. Jonathan answers it by arguing David's case:
In the previous chapter Saul had used roundabout ways to rid himself of the Lord's anointed; here he sets up a real conspiracy against him: "Saul spoke to Jonathan his son, and to all his servants, that they should kill David." Jonathan preaches grace to his father by setting before him what David was, what David had done for him at the risk of his own life, and by reminding him that he himself, Saul, had at first rejoiced when he saw these things.
The word "but" in the middle of the verse is the turn. One writer traces both sides of it back to their sources:
First there was corruption, then violence — equally useless. Saul was now bold enough to tell Jonathan and all the rest "that they should kill David." The liar and murderer was at his usual work. "But Jonathan, Saul's son, delighted much in David." In such a sad picture of king Saul, is it not refreshing to see this? The Holy Spirit worked everything that was of God at that time, and afterwards sketched the history for us. He has also shown us that God does not leave Himself without witness of His grace. He who pulls back the veil from Saul's most secret wickedness lets us see the devotion of Jonathan. He tells the story of what God works in love, and what Satan works in murderous hatred and pride. Jonathan then only clings to David the more because of his father's hostility.
The order came from a father and a king. What holds Jonathan back is not feeling, but what he knows about David:
The love will soon be tested and will prove true. "And Saul spoke to Jonathan his son, and to all his servants, that they should kill David." Will the son obey his father's command? He knew David "in the Lord," that is, on the ground of a "most holy faith," and "strong in the Lord and in the power of his might." Nothing could make him lift a hand against one who was his closest friend and the Lord's anointed. He would serve him, whatever it cost; but murder him! The very thought was disgusting to him.
Father and son share a house and a name. One man divides them, and one writer sees in that split the choice every person faces:
The contrast between Saul's attitude to David and Jonathan's was very great. The poor jealous king was now often troubled by an evil spirit. He hated David and wanted to destroy him. He even told Jonathan, as well as his servants, to kill David. Jonathan, for his part, "delighted much in David." This was the rock on which father and son split, and the break could not be undone. In the same way today every person's eternal destiny is settled by the attitude of his soul toward the Son of God.
Jonathan's delight was real. But one writer points to the one thing it lacked:
Jonathan should have gone out to David. If he had, he would have suffered loss and shame from Saul, but he would have had David's company, and later high honour in David's kingdom. He did well in delighting much in David. He was right to speak about David to his father Saul. But he lacked one thing. He drew back from the path of separation with David. He was not with David in the mountains and woods of his rejection. Perhaps he thought he could "do more good," as people say, by staying in Saul's house.
- Open hatred. Saul moves from hidden schemes to a spoken order to kill. Jonathan answers by reminding his father of David's service and of his own earlier joy.
- Preserved delight. Satan works murderous hatred in this verse. God works in love in the same verse, and leaves Himself a witness — Jonathan's delight in David.
- Tested delight. A father's command could not move Jonathan. He knew David as the Lord's anointed. He would serve him at any cost, but never harm him.
- Dividing delight. David is the rock on which father and son split. Every person's destiny turns the same way — on his attitude toward the Son of God.
- Incomplete delight. Jonathan delighted in David and spoke well of him, yet stayed in Saul's house. Delight that will not follow the rejected one misses his company and his kingdom.
But Jonathan Saul's son delighted much in David. And Jonathan told David, saying, Saul my father seeks to kill thee; and now, I pray thee, take heed to thyself in the morning, and abide in a secret place and hide thyself;
Saul has just ordered his son and his servants to kill David. The next line turns to Jonathan. Two hearts face the same man: one wants him dead, the other sends a warning and tells him where to hide.
One writer sets Saul's hatred beside Jonathan's delight, and finds there the question that decides every person's destiny.
The contrast between Saul's attitude to David and Jonathan's was very great. The poor jealous king, now often troubled by an evil spirit, hated him and would destroy him… Jonathan, for his part, "delighted much in David." This was the rock on which father and son split, and the break was final. In the same way today, the attitude of a person's soul towards the Son of God settles his eternal destiny. "What do you think of Christ?" is the great question that will either make or break everyone who hears it.
One writer sees the two men as pictures of two kinds of people in Israel, and sees love serving David against his own father.
To my mind, Jonathan, Saul's son, shows us those in whom the Spirit of Christ will work in Israel. Saul pictures that part of Israel which goes deeper and deeper into dark evil, because it does not value Christ. In the end the devil has full power over it… Here was a loving heart that wanted to give David this needed service. He gave it even though his own father was the one involved — a father who, sad to say, now showed open murderous malice.
Another writer reads the same moment as a test that Jonathan's love passed:
That love will soon meet the test, and it will prove true… Will the son obey his father's command? He knew David "in the Lord" — that is, on the ground of a "most holy faith"… Nothing could persuade him to lift his hand against his close friend, the Lord's anointed. He would serve him, whatever it cost; but murder him! The very thought was hateful to him.
Jonathan tells David to take care and hide. One writer sees God's kindness in giving him such a friend, and God's purpose in the hiding itself.
God's ways with His people are touching and gracious! He may see that His servant must learn, through a bitter process, the evil of keeping company with the world, and that he must separate from it. At the same time He provides him with a devoted heart he could fully trust. David had one green spot, one sheltered place. Like a guardian angel it kept him safe from the scheming of malice and all unkindness. The One whom David pictured knew little of such a resource on earth, though no one valued it more than He… When we sink so low that we must "stay in a secret place" and hide, we do not only prove that God is our resource; we settle it for ourselves. When better days return, the soul can compare the rest it had when it seemed to have nothing with the rest it has when natural resources are plentiful. If we are faithful, we value the natural less and less beside the divine. However hard we try, we can never find in the lower resource the rest we have in the higher.
Jonathan does not only warn; he promises to stand next to his father and speak about David. One writer hears a model for Christian witness in that plea, while noting how far the greater Son went beyond David.
Jonathan was willing to speak up for David… In these words we can almost hear the Christian speaking up for his Saviour and Lord. The hated one's words and works had been very good, and his hand had worked a great salvation for Israel. Who dares to accuse the words or the works of the Son of God? Who can deny that He has worked "such a great salvation" for His people? David "put his life in his hand"; our blessed Lord went immeasurably further, for He laid down His life for the sheep.
One writer admires Jonathan's love, then points to where it stopped.
Saul hates him, but Jonathan delights much in him. How precious! And he tries to save his life… And here is just where Jonathan, with all his love and delight in David, fails. He does not follow David, but stays in the house of Saul, where "David's place was empty." He refused to share David's rejection, and he suffered loss for it: he died on the mountains of Gilboa, among the enemies of the man he loved.
- Delight divides. Saul hated David and Jonathan delighted in him. The same man split father from son, and the Son of God still splits people today.
- Delight speaks. Jonathan told David the truth. He would not obey his father, because he knew David as the Lord's anointed.
- Delight shelters. The warning sent David into a secret place. There he proved for himself that God was his resource.
- Delight defends. Jonathan spoke up for David. In him we hear a believer speaking up for his Saviour — the One who laid down His life.
- Delight must follow. Jonathan delighted, warned and defended — yet he stayed in Saul's house. Love that will not share the rejection stops short.
and I will go out and stand beside my father in the field where thou art, and will speak of thee with my father and see what it is, and tell thee.
Saul has now said openly what he had only schemed at before: David must die. Jonathan answers with a plan in three parts: David is to hide, Jonathan will plead his case face to face, and Jonathan will report back what he learns.
The chapter opens with a father and a son taking opposite sides about the same person. One writer sees that split as the pattern for every age since.
The contrast between the attitude of Saul and Jonathan towards David was very great. The poor jealous king was now often troubled by an evil spirit. He hated David and wanted to destroy him. He even told Jonathan and his servants to kill David. Jonathan, for his part, "delighted much in David." This was the rock on which father and son split, and the division could not be undone. In the same way today, the attitude of a person's soul towards the Son of God settles his eternal destiny. "What do you think of Christ?" is the great question. It will either make or break every person to whom it is put.
Jonathan's plan protects David's life before it argues David's case.
Jonathan truly loved David and warned him of Saul's intentions. Still, Jonathan thought he could reason with Saul and persuade him that David was not an enemy, but a true friend. He told David to stay hidden from Saul, while he himself pleaded for him with his father. Then Jonathan "spoke well of David to Saul his father" (v. 4). How fitting it is if we today will speak well of the Lord Jesus before others who oppose Him!
Jonathan does not send a message. He puts himself at the side of the man who is hunting David.
Jonathan, Saul's son, seems to me to picture those in whom the Spirit of Christ will work in Israel. Saul pictures the part of Israel that goes deeper and deeper into dark evil, because it does not value Christ. In the end it falls right under the power of the devil... Here was a loving heart, eager to do this needed service for David. Yet the man in question was his own father, who sadly showed murderous hatred.
Jonathan sets out David's worth and Saul's own past joy in it.
Jonathan preaches grace to his father. He sets before him what David was, and what David had done for him at the risk of his own life. He also reminds Saul that he himself had rejoiced at first when he saw these things: "You saw it, and rejoiced." David's activity was far above anything Jonathan could do for him, and Jonathan knew it, even though he loved David as his own soul.
The same writer weighs what Saul's promise was worth.
Saul listens to Jonathan and swears, "As the LORD lives, he shall not be put to death." God sets grace before the heart of the natural man, and this halts the growth of his wickedness for a moment. But this is not conversion. Saul's plan to murder David changes, yet he does not repent.
Jonathan promises to report back whatever he sees. Speaking up for a hated man draws fire.
Follow Christ fully. What will be the result? "Javelins." If we make much of Christ, Satan must oppose... Yes, David risked his life, but Jesus laid down His for us. We have every reason to "speak well" of Him. But if we do, what then? Look out for javelins. Satan cannot touch Christ, but he will touch you if he can.
One writer sees Jonathan's effort as real love aimed at the wrong target.
He could speak for David, and speak nobly and well; but he could not — or rather, did not — follow him. Yet Jonathan was not idle in David's cause, though his efforts were misdirected. He laboured to persuade Saul and his followers to receive him again, and for a moment seemed to succeed... But his father's heart had not changed, and David had to flee for his life again. It is the story of Christendom briefly retold: kind efforts by true Christians to reconcile worldly people to an acknowledgement of Christ, while their hearts are far from Him.
- Delight. Jonathan's course begins with his delight in David. That delight divided him from his father — the same question every person faces about the Son of God.
- Warn. Love acts before it argues. Jonathan hides David first, then goes to plead for him.
- Stand. Jonathan stands beside the very man who wants David dead. Love serves where serving costs most.
- Speak. His argument is pure grace: what David is, what David did at the risk of his life, and how Saul himself once rejoiced in it.
- Limit. The plea wins a pause, not a changed heart. Commentators differ on it: is Jonathan's pleading a model for speaking well of Christ, or love aimed at the wrong target?
And Jonathan spoke good of David to Saul his father, and said to him, Let not the king sin against his servant, against David, because he has not sinned against thee; for also what he did was very advantageous to thee;
Saul has just ordered his son and his servants to kill David. Jonathan answers with words alone: can words change a hard heart, and what will they cost him?
Jonathan warns his father that killing David would be the king's own sin. Then he argues the case in two halves, one negative and one positive.
Jonathan loved David and warned him of Saul's intentions. He advised David to remain hidden from Saul, while Jonathan interceded for him with his father… He speaks of the negative fact that David had in no way harmed Saul. Then he speaks of the positive fact that David's works had been very good. This included venturing his life against Goliath, which had caused Saul and all Israel to rejoice.
The plea also reaches back to what Saul himself once felt:
Jonathan preaches grace to his father by presenting to him what David was, what David had done for him at the risk of his own life, and by reminding him that he himself, Saul, had at first rejoiced after he had witnessed these things: "You saw it, and rejoiced." How far superior David's activity was to all that Jonathan could do for him! Jonathan knew this, even though he loved David as his own soul.
David is in hiding. He cannot defend himself, so Jonathan defends him. Writers hear in this a picture of speaking up for Christ where He is unwelcome.
Jonathan was willing to speak up for David. His protest as given in 1 Samuel 19:4-5 is deeply touching… In these words we can almost hear the Christian speaking up for his Saviour and Lord. The hated one's words and works had been very good, and his hand had worked a great salvation for Israel. Who dares to accuse the words or works of the Son of God? Who can deny that He has worked for His people "so great salvation"? (Heb. 2:3). David "put his life in his hand"; our blessed Lord went immeasurably further, for He laid down His life for the sheep.
The same reading turns the verse into a direct question for the reader:
And as Jonathan spoke good of David, oh can we not speak good of Jesus? Has He not worked a great salvation? Apart from Jesus, is there anything truly great or good? Has any other one glorified God about sin, as He has on the cross?
The plea works. Saul swears David will live. Yet writers weigh what that promise was worth.
By presenting grace to the heart of the natural man, God allows his wickedness to be stopped for a moment. But this is not conversion. Saul's murderous intention changes, yet he does not repent. He takes back his decision and makes a new resolution when faced with the appeals of a man of faith. But the resolution is barely made before he shows himself in no way free from his impulses. His behaviour proves that he is a miserable slave of Satan.
Jonathan's strongest point — "you saw it, and rejoiced" — exposes Saul instead of curing him:
But it was a mere passing emotion; not a trace of divine feeling had any place in his soul. Rocky ground hearers are very emotional. They seem full of divine joy while the wonders of divine grace are set out. But it passes quickly, like the dew before the sun (Matt. 13:20-21).
Defending a hated man draws the hatred onto the defender.
Three times he had tried to kill David. But when David is out of sight, Saul tries to kill Jonathan, who stood up for him. That is just like the Christian; when Christ is out of sight, he has to stand up for his Lord, and is persecuted.
Much in Jonathan is worth copying. Yet writers note the line he never crossed.
We may well marvel at his simple-hearted admiration of David, his great love for David, his delighting much in David, his speaking well of David, and his effort to ensure the safety of David. In much of this we might well copy him. But how very sad is the failure: with so much that is praiseworthy, he was held back from that complete devotion that would share all the dangers and hardships in the outside place.
- Love speaks. Jonathan loved David, so he warned him and then argued his case to the man who wanted him dead.
- Speak facts. David had done Saul no harm. He had risked his life and won a great salvation for Israel.
- Speak good of Christ. Writers read the scene as a picture of confessing Jesus where He is opposed. His words and works were good. He went further than David: He laid down His life.
- Speech may not convert. Saul swore David would live. Writers agree this was not repentance. His old joy over Goliath was passing emotion.
- Speaking costs. Saul later threw a javelin at Jonathan for defending David. And Jonathan, for all his love, never joined David in the place of rejection.
for he put his life in hand, and smote the Philistine, and Jehovah wrought a great salvation for all Israel thou didst see [it], and didst rejoice; why then wilt thou sin against innocent blood, in slaying David without cause?
Saul had ordered his son and his servants to kill David, and Jonathan answers with an argument: a record of what David had already done for the king. Two questions follow: what made David innocent, and why did so strong a case fail to hold Saul?
Jonathan builds his defence in two halves, and one writer sets out how the reasoning runs and where it lands for us:
Jonathan however, positively loved David and warned him of Saul's intentions. Still, Jonathan thought he could reason with Saul and persuade him that David was not an enemy, but a true friend... Then Jonathan "spoke good of David to Saul his father." How appropriate it is if we today will speak good of the Lord Jesus before others who oppose Him! He speaks of the negative fact that David had in no way harmed Saul, then of the positive fact that David's works had been very good, including venturing his life against Goliath, which had caused Saul and all Israel to rejoice.
Jonathan's words say that David risked his life. One writer sets Christ beside that risk:
When speaking of David to Saul his father, Jonathan says, "he took his life in his hand and he struck down the Philistine." Jesus did more than that. He laid down His life to save me, and He has done it. Christ, the Son of God, has not only risked His life for you and me, but He has laid it down, everlasting praise to His blessed name!
The Lord worked this salvation through David, and it reached the whole nation. One writer sets the works of the Son of God beside it:
The hated one's words and works had been very good, and a great salvation had been worked for Israel by his hand. Who dares find fault with the words or the works of the Son of God? And who can deny that He has worked "such a great salvation" for His people? (Heb. 2:3).
Jonathan reminds Saul that he once rejoiced over the very victory he now resents. One writer treats that gladness as a warning about feelings that never take root:
Jonathan reminded his father that at the moment of David's victory over Goliath — "you saw it, and rejoiced." But it was only a passing emotion. Not a trace of divine feeling found any place in his soul. Hearers who are like rocky ground are very emotional. They seem full of divine joy while the wonders of divine grace are set out. But it soon passes, like dew before the sun (Matt. 13:20-21).
To kill David would be to shed blood that has no charge against it. Saul listens to Jonathan and swears that David will not be put to death. One writer weighs that change of mind:
So it is not that Saul's heart never softened — it did soften from time to time. But he was no longer in any way master of his own movements. He was only a slave of Satan, little as he realized it himself.
Jonathan won his case, and the result was that David went back into Saul's house. Commentators differ here. Grant commends Jonathan for speaking good of David. Another writer sees a loving heart smoothing over a difference God had made:
But what Jonathan's heart was set on did not run with God's purpose about David. If it had, it would have drawn him out of Saul's house. Left to its own aims, it would bring David back to the house of Saul — and that is what it did... A loving, kindly spirit tends to smooth the way. It draws together people whom God intends to walk in completely different paths.
- Risk. David took his life in his hand and struck down the Philistine; Christ went further and laid His life down.
- Salvation. The Lord worked a great salvation for all Israel through David. No one can find fault with those works, or with the works of the Son of God.
- Speaking good. Jonathan's method is the model. Say what the hated man has not done wrong, then what he has done well. Speak that way of Christ before those who oppose Him.
- Rejoicing that faded. Saul once cheered the victory he now resents. Emotion without root passes like dew in the sun.
- Not enough. The plea won an oath, but it sent David back into Saul's house. Good feeling can smooth over a difference God Himself has made.
And Saul hearkened to the voice of Jonathan, and Saul swore, [As] Jehovah liveth, he shall not be put to death!
Jonathan has just argued David's case before his father. This verse records the effect: Saul listens, and swears in the Lord's name that David will live. The question the commentators press is what such an oath is worth when it comes from a heart that has not changed.
The verse turns on Saul heeding "the voice of Jonathan." One writer sums up what that voice set before him:
In the previous chapter Saul had used roundabout ways to rid himself of the Lord's anointed. Here he sets up a real conspiracy against him: "Saul spoke to Jonathan his son and to all his servants that they should kill David." Jonathan preaches grace to his father. He sets before him what David was, and what David had done for him at the risk of his own life. He also reminds him that Saul himself had rejoiced at first when he saw these things: "You saw it, and rejoiced."
Another writer adds that Jonathan named both sides of the case — the harm David had not done, and the good he had done:
Then Jonathan "spoke well of David to Saul his father" (v.4). How fitting it is if we today will speak good of the Lord Jesus before others who oppose Him! He speaks of the negative fact: David had in no way harmed Saul. Then he speaks of the positive fact: David's works had been very good. David had risked his life against Goliath, and that had caused Saul and all Israel to rejoice.
Saul drops his plan for murder. The change is real, but this writer refuses to call it repentance:
Saul listens to Jonathan and swears: "As the Lord lives, he shall not be put to death!" (v. 6). By presenting grace to the heart of the natural man, God allows a brief halt in the growth of his wickedness. But this is not conversion. Saul's murderous intention is changed, yet he does not repent. He takes back his decision. Faced with the urging of a man of faith, he makes a new resolution. But the resolution is hardly made before he shows he is in no way free from his impulses. His behaviour proves that he is a miserable slave of Satan.
Saul swears in the Lord's name. One writer weighs that oath in a single word:
Then Jonathan persuades his father to stop. Saul uttered a meaningless oath: "As the Lord lives, he shall not be put to death." And Jonathan brought David to Saul.
Yet the softening was real. Another writer holds both sides together:
It is not that Saul's heart never softened. Indeed it did soften from time to time. But he was no longer in any way master of his own movements. He was only a slave of Satan, little as he realised it himself.
The chapter itself supplies the test. Within a few verses the javelin is in Saul's hand again:
Now we shall have to trace what follows. Every effort to escape the slavery of the devil only proves that the devil is the stronger of the two. Flesh in the highest place only brings a man under the power of the enemy more surely and more quickly. So, despite his oath and Jonathan's acting on it, "Jonathan called David, and Jonathan reported to him all these things. And Jonathan brought David to Saul, and he was in his presence as before."
David goes back to his old place at court. One writer notes how he would have lived there:
Jonathan's reasoning is of course plain and right, and on this occasion it has a good effect on Saul. Jonathan therefore brings David back again to his former position in Saul's company. We may be sure that David would be constantly on his guard at this time. Experience would teach him to be cautious.
- Plea. Saul listened because Jonathan set David's innocence and David's service in front of him. Jonathan also reminded him that he had once rejoiced over the very man he now wanted dead.
- Pause. Grace pressed on an unchanged heart can halt wickedness for a moment. One writer is clear: that halt is not conversion.
- Promise. Saul swore by the Lord's own name, yet one writer calls the oath meaningless. The softening was real feeling. But Saul was no longer master of his own movements.
- Proof. Saul's oath did not set him free. Every effort to escape this slavery only proves the enemy is the stronger of the two.
- Practice. Like Jonathan, speak well of the Lord Jesus before those who oppose Him. Like David, go back to your place and stay on your guard.
Then Jonathan called David, and Jonathan declared to him all those things. And Jonathan brought David to Saul, and he was in his presence as previously.
Jonathan has pleaded for his friend, and Saul has backed down. This verse records the result. Jonathan brings David back, and David serves in the king's court just as he did before. But how much was that peace worth? Had Saul changed, or only paused?
Saul wanted Jonathan's help against David. One writer traces what Jonathan did instead, and where it left David.
Saul's hatred grows, and now he tries to enlist Jonathan, along with his other servants, against David. But Jonathan had already given his allegiance to David, and nothing could make him lift his hand against him. For the time, this checks Saul's persecution. Jonathan gets his chance to speak well of David. He recalls David's glorious victory. He reminds the king how the king himself rejoiced at that time. He appeals to his sense of honour, if nothing else. Saul listens for the time and promises to spare David, who now returns to his old work in the king's house.
What Jonathan said, and how he said it, carries over to us.
Then Jonathan "spoke good of David to Saul his father" (v.4). How appropriate it is if we today will speak good of the Lord Jesus before others who oppose Him! He speaks of the negative fact that David had in no way harmed Saul, then of the positive fact that David's works had been very good.
Saul took back his decision. Commentators are careful about what that proves.
When God presents grace to the heart of the natural man, He lets that man's wickedness be halted for a moment as it grows. But this is not conversion. Saul's murderous intention changes, yet he still does not repent. He takes back his decision. He makes a new resolve when a man of faith urges him. But no sooner is the resolve made than he shows he is in no way free from his impulses. His behaviour proves that he is a miserable slave of Satan.
The softer feeling was genuine as far as it went. What Saul lacked was the power to hold to it.
So it is not that we find no softening of heart in Saul. We do find it from time to time. But he was no longer master of his own movements in any way. He was only a slave of Satan, little as he realised it himself.
The peace of verse 7 did not last. One writer marks how short it was.
For a brief moment (19:7) David had respite. Not for long; the evil spirit again dominates the miserable king. David seeks shelter from the king's fury in his own home, but as quickly leaves it; for even there the hate of Saul would reach him.
Commentators differ here. Some read Jonathan's mediation as God's kindness to a hunted man:
God's ways with His people are touching and gracious! … Jonathan warns David, speaks to his father for him, and Saul relents, and "he was in his presence as before."
Others see love pulling David back onto a path God had not set for him.
Within their own range and purpose, Jonathan's desires would bring David back to the house of Saul, and in fact they did. "He was in his presence as before." The kindness of a loving spirit tends to smooth the way. It draws people together whom God has set on entirely different paths. … Few dangers are like this. Jonathan had faith, but it was a faith that in practice brought David back into its own circumstances, where the evil spirit from the Lord was.
Both writers agree on what came next: the calm broke, and Saul's hatred found David again.
Saul swung between rage and relenting. David did not swing at all.
As for David, he does not change. "He was in his presence as before" (v. 7). The grace that has led him until now still marks his person and his behaviour.
- Plea — Jonathan spoke well of David on two grounds: David had done Saul no harm, and his works had been very good. We have the same two grounds when we speak well of Christ to people set against Him.
- Promise — Saul's promise changed his words, not his heart. Grace can halt wickedness for a moment in the natural man without producing repentance.
- Prison — Saul's heart really did soften at times. Yet he was "no longer master of his own movements." Good resolutions do not free a slave.
- Pause — Verse 7 is a brief rest, not a settled peace. Saul's hatred soon reached David even at home.
- Permanence — David does not change. Saul's behaviour swings with his moods. The grace that shaped David holds steady.
And there was war again; and David went forth and fought with the Philistines, and smote them with a great slaughter; and they fled before him.
Saul has just sworn not to kill David, and David is back at court as if nothing had happened. Then war breaks out again. David crushes the Philistines, and that success reopens the murder plot in the verses that follow.
War returns right after the truce. One writer reads Saul's calm as the surface over a man God had left.
Jonathan's appeal has power over his father, and for a time all is well. But God has forsaken Saul, and Saul cannot bear that He should be with David. War breaks out. David is God's own instrument in what He does for His people, and he defeats the Philistines and drives them away.
The enemy here is the Philistines. The same writer explains what was being tested in that fight.
Notice that it is the Philistines who are there, and through them the power of faith is put in question. The battle of God and of faith is fought with them. There David always succeeded, and there Saul failed.
A fresh victory did not make David safer. One writer draws a rule from this for anyone who serves God.
A fresh victory of David's wakes up again the evil spirit that had taken control of Saul. As long as the believer does not trouble Satan by winning victories over his followers, his hostility stays asleep, as it were; but his deadly hatred soon wakes up. We see this hatred against David at the very moment when the evil spirit seems to be calmed by the relief David kindly brings the king. So a moment comes when the only thing the believer can do is to flee, to escape like a bird out of the trapper's net.
The evil spirit is not the whole story. Another writer traces the trouble back to Saul himself, and to the limits God set.
Another war takes place (v.8). David leads the armies of Israel and wins a great victory. Many Philistines are killed, and the rest retreat in confusion. This did not make Saul value and honour David. Instead it deepened his jealousy. His real enemy was only his own pride, which opened the door for the evil spirit to turn him in hatred against David. Yet it is again made clear that the evil spirit could not do this without God's permission. God in His sovereign government allowed it because Saul was stubborn. Saul had refused God's Spirit, so he had to learn by experience that he had chosen a spirit of evil. That experience should have woken his conscience and driven him to the Lord, but he would not yield to God.
Saul's oath did not last. One writer marks the difference between a mood that softens and a heart that repents.
When God sets grace before the heart of the natural man, He allows his wickedness to be held back for a moment in its growth. But this is not conversion. Saul's murderous intention is changed, and still he does not repent. He takes back his decision and makes a new resolve when a man of faith urges him. Yet no sooner is that resolve made than he shows he is in no way free from his own impulses.
Another writer asks who was really steering Saul.
So it is not that we find no softening of heart in Saul. We do find it from time to time. But he was no longer in any way master of his own movements. He was only a slave of Satan, little as he realized it himself.
Saul's quarrel was not only personal. Another writer traces the same hatred forward to Jesus.
He knew that God had given the kingdom to David, and he hated him all the more. It was rebellion against God, as well as hatred of David. It was the enmity of man's king against God's anointed — the same feeling that said, when Jesus, the true Heir, came, "This is the heir. Come, let us kill him and have his inheritance."
- Truce. Jonathan's plea quieted Saul, and David came back to court. But a paused threat is not a healed heart. Saul changed his mind without repenting.
- Victory. War started again, and David struck the Philistines hard. These battles test faith. David always succeeded there. Saul always failed.
- Backlash. That fresh victory woke the hatred again. While no victories trouble the enemy, his hostility sleeps. Then comes a point where the only thing left is to flee.
- Root. Saul's deeper jealousy grew out of his own pride. Pride opened the door to the evil spirit, and that spirit acted only by God's permission. Saul had to learn by experience what he had chosen.
- Pattern. The clash is bigger than two men. Man's king hating God's anointed is the same spirit that later said of the true Heir, "Come, let us kill him."
And an evil spirit from Jehovah was upon Saul. And he sat in his house with his spear in his hand; and David played with his hand.
Saul had sworn that David would not die, yet here the evil spirit returns and the spear is back in the king's hand. Two questions press: how can an evil spirit come "from the LORD," and why does the music that once soothed Saul end with a spear in the wall?
The phrase troubles readers, because it sounds as if God is the author of the evil. One writer answers by asking what God actually commissions:
Evil as well as good has its commission from God — not its existence, but its liberty to act, and the limits of its action. So we see with Job in early times, and in Ahab's case later; and what a comfort it is to know this. This is how the wrath of man is made to praise Him, while the rest of it He restrains. Nothing can escape the divine government by being evil, or by admitting that it is. How could it? Only in this way can we be at peace, sure that no waves can rise higher than the footstool of His throne.
The spirit did not force its way in. Another writer traces the trouble back to what Saul refused, and to what a man is left with when he refuses it:
God did not only allow Saul to take his own headstrong way. Since Saul had refused the Spirit of God, God left him open to the opposite of this, an evil spirit. God allowed the evil spirit to trouble Saul, to wake him up to the folly of his own self-will. Disobedience to God does not leave us in a merely negative state, but in a state of positive evil.
In this chapter the trigger is David's victory over the Philistines. The same writer names the real enemy Saul faced:
Instead of making Saul appreciate and honour David, this brought on deeper jealousy. His real enemy was only his own pride. That pride opened the door for the evil spirit to turn him in hatred against David.
Days earlier Saul had sworn that David would not die. One writer weighs the javelin against that oath:
Again Saul threw his javelin at David, intending to kill him. What was the value of his sworn oath that David would not be killed (v.6)? This breaking of his oath shows Saul's painful incapacity for ruling over men.
The broken oath points to something deeper than a weak character:
Now we have to trace how every effort to escape the devil's slavery only proves that he is the stronger of the two. Flesh in the highest place only brings a man under the enemy's power more surely and more quickly.
The strangest detail is David himself, harp in hand, serving a man who had already thrown a javelin at him:
His watchful eye is on David, and he is clearly looking for a chance to be rid of him. Yet he would still make use of David's playing, and David takes up the harp again when the evil spirit torments the king.
Why did the music help at all? One writer explains what the harp worked on:
David's harp does not act directly on Satan, but on Saul. Its strange power to soften and subdue the savage temper of the rejected king, though only for a time, drives back and shuts off the power that assails him. For the time being he is set free.
The javelin is not a one-off. Saul throws it three times in these chapters, and it lands wherever someone honours David. One writer turns that into a warning:
Follow Christ fully. What will be the result? Javelins. If we make much of Christ, Satan must oppose. So we read that three times Saul threw a javelin at David (1 Sam. 18:10-11; 1 Sam. 19:9-10). Satan cannot touch Christ, but he will touch you if he can. When David was off the scene altogether, Jonathan spoke up again for his worth, and so Saul threw a javelin at him to kill him (1 Sam. 20:33).
David slips aside and the spear hits the wall. One writer sets the escape beside a moment in Christ's life:
Again he seeks to kill David, and again David escapes. It is just as our Lord passed through the middle of His enemies who wanted to lay hands on Him. He went on His way, for His hour had not yet come.
- Permitted — the evil spirit acts only by God's commission. God sets its liberty and its limits, so no wave rises higher than the footstool of His throne.
- Opened — Saul refused God's Spirit, so the opposite spirit came in. Disobedience leaves a man not neutral but in positive evil, and his own pride held the door.
- Enslaved — the javelin breaks the oath Saul swore days before. Every effort to escape the devil's slavery only proves that the devil is the stronger of the two.
- Served — David plays on for the man hunting him. The harp calms Saul for a time, but Saul still wants his chance to kill.
- Preserved — the spear hits the wall and David slips away. Our Lord too passed through His enemies, because His hour had not yet come. Make much of David, and expect javelins.
And Saul sought to smite David and the wall with the spear; but he slipped away out of Saul's presence, and he smote the spear into the wall. And David fled, and escaped that night.
Saul had just sworn to Jonathan that David would not be put to death, and now the spear is in his hand again while David plays the harp for him. Why does grace harden this king instead of changing him, and why must God's anointed flee by night?
This attack on David is not a first impulse but a broken promise. One writer ties the thrown spear back to the oath Saul had sworn.
Again Saul threw his javelin at David, intending to kill him. What was the value of his sworn oath that David would not be killed (v. 6)? This breaking of his oath shows Saul's painful incapacity for ruling over men. David was on guard, however, and again dodged the javelin and escaped from Saul's house (v. 10).
Jonathan's appeal had worked, but not for long. Another writer explains why such a change never lasts:
By presenting grace to the heart of the natural man, God allows his wickedness to be held back for a moment. But this is not conversion. Saul's murderous intention changes, yet he still does not repent. He takes back his decision and makes a new resolve when a man of faith urges him. Yet no sooner is that resolve made than he shows he is in no way free from his impulses.
This is the third spear Saul has thrown at David, and every one has missed. One writer counts the failed attempts and shows who stood behind each escape:
Twice God kept him from being struck by the king's javelin (1 Sam. 18:11)… Then Saul ordered Jonathan and his servants to kill him. Here again the unhappy king's purpose failed, because Jonathan befriended him. A third personal attempt on David's life (1 Sam. 19:10) came to nothing, just like the other two. What folly to fight against God! But what power the enemy can have over a man! … Neither man nor devil can prevail against God.
David was doing his job when the spear flew — playing music to soothe the king. One writer turns that detail into a warning for anyone who stands with Christ.
Follow Christ fully. What will be the result? "javelins." If Christ is made much of, Satan must oppose. So we read (1 Sam. 18:10-11; 1 Sam. 19:9-10) that three times Saul cast a javelin at David. But Jonathan "delighted much in David" (1 Sam. 19:2), and began to "speak good" of him to Saul (1 Sam. 19:4-5). Yes, David risked his life, but Jesus laid down His for us. Well may we "speak good" of Him. But if we do, what then? Look out for javelins.
Another writer sees Saul himself as a picture of the world the believer serves in:
Saul, I think, is a picture of the world taking a religious title, just as Christendom is kept going by the world. The more faithful we are to it, the more we stir up its hostility. But how useful this hostility is to the man of God! If he stays faithful, it drives him in the end away from all connection with it. However much he may serve, he can never win.
David does not fight back or stay. He goes. One writer sees that flight not as weakness but as the only move left:
A fresh triumph of David's re-awakens the evil spirit that had taken control of Saul. As long as the believer does not trouble Satan by winning victories over his followers, his hostility stays asleep, as it were. But his deadly hatred soon wakes up. We see this hatred against David at the very moment when the relief David kindly brings the king seems to calm the evil spirit. A moment comes, then, when the only thing the believer can do is to flee, to escape like a bird out of the fowler's net.
The whole chain — anger, violence, deceit, murder — is read as a shadow of something later and greater:
Instead of love to David, he showed him anger (1 Sam. 18:8), violence (1 Sam. 18:11), deceit (1 Sam. 18:21), and murder (1 Sam. 19:1, 10; 1 Sam. 20:33). Jesus, God's anointed Man, went through the same in far greater measure. In prophecy it could be said of the Lord Jesus, "So they reward me evil for good, and hatred for my love", and again, "More in number than the hairs of my head are those who hate me without cause; mighty are those who would destroy me" (Ps. 109:5; Ps. 69:4). The important lesson we learn from this tragic episode in Saul's life is that the flesh has no appreciation of Christ.
- Oath. Saul swore David would not die. The oath broke at David's next victory. Reform without repentance always collapses.
- Spear. Three throws, three misses. God kept His anointed safe every time. Fighting God's purpose is plain folly.
- Service. The spear came while David served the king. Making much of Christ is what invites the opposition.
- Flight. When hatred settles in, the believer's one move is to escape "like a bird out of the fowler's net." That hostility itself drives him out of a world he could never win over.
- Shadow. Evil repaid for good, hatred for love. David's night flight points to Christ, God's anointed Man, hated without cause.
And Saul sent messengers to David's house, to watch him, and to slay him in the morning; and Michal David's wife told him, saying, If thou save not thy life to-night, to-morrow thou wilt be put to death.
Saul's hatred has hardened into a plan: watchers around David's house, and death set for dawn. Why did God let it come to this, and what was David doing inside while the killers waited?
One writer sees a pattern in this night. The enemy stays quiet until the believer starts winning.
A fresh victory of David's re-awakens the evil spirit that had taken control of Saul. As long as the believer does not trouble Satan by victories won over his followers, his hostility stays asleep. But his deadly hatred soon wakes up. We see this hatred against David at the very moment when the gracious relief he brings the king seems to subdue the evil spirit. A moment comes, then, when the only thing the believer can do is to flee, to escape like a bird out of the fowler's net. Now David's death is fixed and final. Michal's natural affection for David moves her to help him in her own way. God uses here the human feelings that stirred her.
Jonathan had helped David before. He is not the only instrument God has.
God is never limited in His resources. So He had instruments other than Jonathan for the help of His persecuted servant. Michal used a trick to help David escape when Saul would have murdered him in his bed. Samuel sheltered him at Naioth when his own home was no longer safe.
Psalm 59 carries the note "when Saul sent men to watch his house in order to kill him." David answered the deadline with music. (The writer quotes the psalm itself in an older English translation.)
Saul's messengers were prowling round the house, like dogs greedy for their prey. David was far from afraid. He expected their defeat and disappointment with scorn. He rejoiced in the power of the Lord and His mercy. And he prepared a song for the morning that Saul had appointed for his death — "But I will sing of your power, yes, I will sing aloud of your mercy in the morning, to you, O my strength, will I sing: for God is my defence, and the God of my mercy."
The same psalm shows what David did not pray for.
The account in this chapter has its counterpart in Psalm 59, written when Saul sent men to watch David's house to kill him. Saul's messengers were men of blood, gathered against him. They went round the city during the night. Meanwhile David was lifting his heart in prayer to the Lord. He looked to Him for deliverance, sure that He would be gracious toward him. They sought his life not for any wrong he had done, but because he belonged to the Lord. For the moment he does not ask the Lord to kill his enemies, or to kill Saul, so that David's people may not forget these things. The godless king must stay alive until the patience of the Lord's anointed has had its perfect work.
Michal's warning saved David's life. Commentators weigh her motive differently.
Michal clearly loves David. But that love does not seem joined with genuine faith here. Still, we would not brand her as being entirely like her father. Her act involved deception, which we do not excuse. It has some likeness to what Rahab did, when she sent the spies away in peace. But Michal does not seem as loyal in heart as Jonathan. Still, her scheme shows at least her willingness to help her husband, and he escapes safely.
One writer sees the same escape repeated much later in the Bible.
Saul sends to his daughter's house, David's wife, to take David, but Michal lets him down through the window, reminding us of Paul's escape from the plotting of the Jews in Damascus. What a unity underlies all truth, whether it is the hostility of the natural heart or the path of faith through the world!
- The plot. Saul's hatred wakes when David wins. He sets a deadline for morning and turns David's own house into a trap.
- The warning. God was not limited to Jonathan. He used Michal's affection — real love, though not clear faith — to get His servant out alive.
- The night. While the watchers circled the house, David prayed and sang. They hunted him not for his sin but because he belonged to the Lord.
- The restraint. He did not ask for Saul's death. The godless king stayed alive until the patience of the Lord's anointed had done its full work.
- The outcome. Driven from home, David escapes through a window and finds shelter with Samuel at Naioth.
And Michal let David down through a window; and he went, and fled and escaped.
Saul has posted men outside David's house with orders to kill him at daybreak. The escape that follows raises three questions: was flight a failure of faith, who stood behind the rescue, and how did David spend that night?
One writer marks this night as the turn in David's whole life:
David was driven from the court and looked for shelter in his house. At once Saul sent messengers "to watch him, that he might kill him in the morning." His wife, Saul's daughter, told him of the danger and he escaped. From that night he never again had a settled home while Saul lived. This is history. Psalm 59 gives us much more. According to its title it was written when Saul's plot was discovered, and with knowledge of the men Saul sent.
Was running away a failure of faith? One writer points to what woke Saul's rage again, and to the one move David had left:
A fresh triumph of David's re-awakens the evil spirit that had taken control of Saul... A moment comes, then, when the only thing the believer can do is to flee, to escape like a bird out of the fowler's net. Now David's death is decreed, and nothing will reverse it. Michal, moved by her natural affection for David, comes to his help in her own way. God used here the human feelings that stirred her.
Jonathan had been God's instrument for David before. Two others step in now:
God is never limited in His resources. So He had instruments other than Jonathan for the help of His persecuted servant. Michal used a trick to help David escape when Saul would have murdered him in his bed. Samuel sheltered him in Naioth when his own home was no longer safe.
Writers do not treat Michal as a simple heroine.
Michal clearly has love for David, but it does not seem to be joined with genuine faith here. Still, we would not brand her as being entirely like her father. Her act, with its deception, which we do not excuse, has some points of likeness to Rahab, who sent out the spies in peace. But she does not seem as loyal in heart as Jonathan. Her plan shows at least her willingness to help her husband, and he escapes safely.
Another writer looks at her motive:
Why did Michal not tell Saul frankly that she did not want her husband killed? Clearly her love for David took second place to her fear of Saul. She lied to her father, telling him that David had threatened to kill her if she did not let him go.
Psalm 59 shows what David was doing while the messengers circled outside.
While Saul's messengers were prowling round the house, like dogs greedy for their prey, he was far from afraid. He expected their defeat and disappointment with scorn. Rejoicing in the power of the Lord and His mercy, he prepared a song for the morning that Saul had appointed for his death: "I will sing of your strength; I will sing aloud of your steadfast love in the morning."
One writer sees the same escape repeated much later, in Paul's flight from Damascus:
Saul shows that it was not a passing passion, but the renewal of a relentless hatred with a definite purpose. He sends to his daughter's house, David's wife, to seize David, but Michal lets him down through the window, reminding us of Paul's escape from the plots of the Jews in Damascus (Acts 9:23-25). What a unity underlies all truth, whether it is the hostility of the natural heart or the path of faith through the world!
David was already the anointed king. His road to the throne ran out of a window.
So David, though anointed king of Israel, had to endure the hatred and scorn of the ruling power. All who could see his moral worth loved him... David knew he was anointed king, but Saul held the throne. He was quite content to wait on God and to accept His timing meekly... His way to the throne lay through many sorrows and difficulties. He, like his blessed Master, was called to suffering first, and glory afterwards.
- Hatred — Saul's move is not a passing temper but a settled purpose. David's victories wake that hatred instead of soothing it.
- Flight — There are moments when the believer's only move is to escape like a bird out of the fowler's net, and this was one.
- Helper — God is never short of instruments. Beyond Jonathan, He had Michal's window and Samuel's shelter ready.
- Weakness — Michal's rescue was real but mixed. She had love without faith, and fear of her father strong enough to make her lie.
- Song — While Saul's men circled the house, David prepared praise for the very morning set for his death. Suffering first, glory afterwards.
And Michal took the image, and laid it in the bed, and put the net of goats' [hair] at its head, and covered it with the coverlet.
Saul has posted messengers around David's house to kill him at daybreak. Michal, David's wife, buys him time with a dummy in the bed — and the object she uses is a household idol.
The Hebrew word behind "image" is teraphim. The same object turns up in other homes in Scripture:
This is a Hebrew word in the plural. It refers to household idols, like the ones Rachel stole from her father. There, as in other places, the word appears as "images," with "teraphim" in the margin (Genesis 31:19, 34, 35). Michal the wife of David had one in her house, and laid it in the bed when David escaped (1 Samuel 19:13, 16). Micah also had them in his house, and regarded them as "gods" (Judges 17:5; 18:14-20). People used them in some way for divination — for seeking hidden knowledge. They stand among the images and idols that Josiah cleared out of the land.
The verse reports, in passing, that such an object stood in the house of the man of God. One writer asks how it got there and what it cost:
This passage also shows us that there was an image (a teraphim) in David's house. Certainly, David did not worship it, but its presence allows us to conclude that he put up with it… The image (teraphim) ranks below the idol. It is a household god of lower rank. People give it a certain importance, and even consult it at times. Such superstitions quickly lead to true idols… Often the believer lacks the energy to drive these causes of stumbling out of his family. Each one of us must watch this carefully, even though, like Jacob and David, we may think they have no influence over our own life. Michal, Saul's daughter, had clearly brought the image into David's household, and so she became a snare to the man of God.
Michal wanted David alive. But what she reached for shows where her trust lay:
Michal, to gain time for David, had put a "teraphim" in David's bed (v. 13). This was an image in human form. It was truly idolatrous, yet Israelites too often used it alongside the worship of God. Poor Michal! She did not know the power of God, nor did she have real faith in His faithfulness. She thought it necessary to at least partly trust in idols! But we all may too easily become skilled at practising deception.
Michal's trick buys time, and she follows it with a second lie when she is caught. Scripture tells the story plainly, but it does not approve it:
And Michal practised a deception. Like Rachel, she had teraphim — the idol-images in wide use among the Chaldeans and other nations. Jehovah had forbidden them, and yet people used them in secret (Judges 17:5; 18:14). Michal's image must have been fairly large. She arranged it in the bed and then told the messengers, "He is sick." When they uncover the trick, she lies again and says that David threatened her life. The Scriptures record these wrongs, and that is only proof of how honest they are. The Holy Scriptures never approve such things. In all these attempts on David we also see a foreshadowing of the attempts made on the life of our Lord.
The same chapter shows two people helping David, and they do not help him in the same spirit. Michal covers herself by telling Saul that David forced her hand:
Michal avoids her father's wrath by acting before him as though she were one of David's enemies, forced by his threats to let him escape: "He said to me, 'Let me go. Why should I kill you?'" (v. 17). How different her heart is from Jonathan's! He openly defended the one he loved dearly, at his own risk and peril.
Commentators differ on how hard to be on her. One calls the deception inexcusable, yet allows that her plan at least shows she wanted to save her husband (Samuel Ridout).
Saul had meant this marriage as a trap. The escape it produced also produced a psalm:
Saul gave his daughter Michal to be David's wife, thinking in this way to trap him. But she became David's deliverer. This called forth Psalm 59. David had faith that God would laugh at his enemies: God was his defence and the God of his mercy.
- Image. The object was a teraphim — a household idol. Rachel stole such images, Micah kept them as gods, and Josiah later cleared them from the land.
- Tolerated. It stood in David's home. He did not worship it, but he put up with it — and lesser superstitions lead on to real idols.
- Trusted. Michal loved David but did not know the power of God, so she leaned partly on an idol to save him.
- Told, not blessed. Scripture reports her trick and her second lie without approving either. Recording a sin is proof of honesty, not approval.
- Delivered. Saul's trap became David's rescue, and the night produced Psalm 59, where the credit goes to God as his defence. The attacks on David also foreshadow the attacks later made on the life of Christ.
And Saul sent messengers to take David, and she said, He is sick.
Saul's men stand at David's own door, and the word that meets them is that the man they want is ill in bed. Who really lay there? And how did God keep His anointed alive while armed men watched the house?
Saul's hunt had moved from the throne room into David's bedroom. Notice what the king now calls his own son-in-law.
Michal did not get what she wanted by telling Saul's messengers that David was sick. Saul was so set on killing him quickly that he ordered his servants to carry David to him in his bed. Of course they then found out the trick, and Saul was angry with his daughter for helping her own husband! Instead of calling David her husband, Saul calls him "my enemy," which was not true, for David had no hatred toward Saul.
The shape under the covers was a teraphim — a household figure. One writer explains both what such an object was and how it came to be in the home of the Lord's anointed at all.
This passage also shows us that there was an image — a teraphim — in David's house. David did not worship it, but its presence shows that he put up with it. Strictly speaking the teraphim was not an idol, and Scripture keeps the two apart… It ranks below an idol. It is a kind of household god. People treated it as important and even asked it for guidance at times. Superstitions like this soon lead to real idols… Often a believer lacks the energy to clear such traps out of his family… Michal, Saul's daughter, had clearly brought the image into David's home, and so she became a snare to the man of God.
Michal's words at the door were a lie, and another lie followed. One writer asks what it means that the Bible reports them at all.
God had forbidden such images, yet people used them in secret (Judges 17:5; 18:14). Michal's image must have been fairly large; she laid it in the bed and then told the messengers, "He is sick." When they uncovered the trick, she lied again and said that David had threatened her life. Scripture records these wrongs, and that is one proof of how honest it is — yet it never approves them. In every attempt on David's life we see a foreshadowing of the attempts later made on the life of our Lord.
Michal wanted her husband alive. Commentators differ over how serious the object in the bed was; this writer calls it plainly idolatrous, and asks what Michal was trusting in.
Michal, to buy time for David, had put a "teraphim" in his bed (v.13). This was an image in human form, idolatrous in itself, yet Israelites too often used it alongside the worship of God. Poor Michal! She did not know the power of God, and she had no real faith in His faithfulness. She thought she had to put at least some trust in idols! But any of us can quickly become expert at deceiving people.
Her brother Jonathan faced the same father and chose a different way.
Michal escapes her father's anger by acting as though she were one of David's enemies, forced by his threats to let him go: "He said to me, 'Let me go. Why should I kill you?'" (v. 17). How different her heart is from Jonathan's, who openly defended the one he dearly loved, at his own risk and danger.
David's rescue did not rest on the quality of the people who helped him.
God is never limited in His resources. So He had others besides Jonathan to help His persecuted servant. Michal's trick let David escape when Saul would have murdered him in his bed, and Samuel sheltered him at Naioth when his own home was no longer safe.
While Michal spoke at the door, David was doing something else.
The account in this chapter has its counterpart in Psalm 59, written "when Saul sent men to watch his house in order to kill him." While Saul's messengers, violent men gathered against him, went around the city through the night, David was lifting his heart to the Lord in prayer. He looked to Him for rescue (vv. 1-2), sure that He would be gracious to him (v. 10). They wanted his life not for any wrong or sin of his, but because he belonged to the Lord.
- Danger — Saul's hatred followed David from court to camp to his own bedroom. The king now called his loyal son-in-law "my enemy," though David bore him no hatred.
- Prayer — while armed men circled the house, David asked God to rescue him. They hunted him for no wrong of his, but because he belonged to the Lord.
- Rescue — God is never short of resources. When Jonathan could no longer help, Michal's trick and then Samuel's shelter at Naioth kept His servant alive.
- Flaw — Michal loved David, but she did not know the power of God. The figure she laid in the bed was a household image, tolerated in the home of the Lord's anointed.
- Verdict — Scripture records both lies without ever approving them. Every attempt on David's life points forward to the attempts made on the life of our Lord.
And Saul sent the messengers to see David, saying, Bring him up to me in the bed, that I may put him to death.
Saul's messengers come back with word that David is too sick to move, and the king answers: carry him here, bed and all. The excuse meant to buy time only proved how fixed Saul's purpose was, and it raises a question: who was guarding David that night?
Michal's story about David's illness should have stalled the arrest. Saul's reply shows the man giving the orders.
Michal did not gain what she wanted by telling Saul's messengers that David was sick. Saul was so determined to kill him quickly that he ordered his servants to bring David to him in his bed. Then, of course, they discovered the trick, and Saul was upset with his daughter because she had helped her own husband. Instead of calling David her husband, Saul calls him "my enemy," which was not true, for David had no hostility toward Saul.
David was already gone, and Saul kept hunting.
David runs away. Saul shows that this was not a passing burst of feeling, but the return of that relentless hatred which had a settled purpose.
Saul already knew whom God had chosen. That knowledge fed his hatred instead of cooling it, and it made the quarrel bigger than one man.
He knew that the kingdom had been given to David by God, and he hated him all the more. It was rebellion against God, as well as hatred of David. It was the enmity of man's king against God's anointed — the same feeling that said, when Jesus, the true Heir, came, "This is the heir. Come, let us kill him and have his inheritance."
Psalm 59 names this night in its opening note: "when Saul sent men to watch his house in order to kill him." It lets us hear David's own voice.
Saul's messengers, men of blood gathered against him, went round the city during the night. All that time David was lifting up his heart in prayer to the Lord. He was looking to Him for deliverance, sure that He would be gracious toward him. They were after his life not for any transgression or sin of his, but because he belonged to the Lord.
Saul had fixed a morning for the killing. David got ready for that same morning in his own way.
While Saul's messengers were prowling round the house, like dogs hungry for their prey, he was far from afraid. He looked on them with scorn and expected them to fail and be disappointed. Rejoicing in the power of the Lord and His mercy, he prepared a song for the morning that Saul had appointed for his death.
David's prayer that night stopped short of asking for Saul's death.
For the moment he is not asking the Lord to kill his enemies, or to kill Saul. The wicked king must stay alive until the patience of the Lord's anointed has done its perfect work. Later God will destroy the enemy to establish his reign.
The rescue came through Michal, and commentators differ on how to weigh what she did. Some stress that God was behind it:
Michal, moved by her natural affection for David, comes to his help in her own way, God using here the human feelings that stirred her.
Others stress that using her is not the same as approving what she did.
Michal used a trick. Like Rachel she owned teraphim, the idol-images so widely used among the Chaldeans and other nations. God had forbidden these, yet people still used them in secret (Judges 17:5; 18:14). Michal's image must have been fairly large; she laid it in the bed and then told the messengers, "He is sick." When the messengers discover the trick she lies again, saying that David had threatened her life. That Scripture records these wrongs is evidence of its honesty; but the Holy Scriptures never approve such things. In all these attacks on David we also see a foreshadowing of the attacks later made on the life of our Lord.
Saul's men came for the bed and found no David in it. That became the pattern of David's whole exile.
No one had been allowed to touch him; and though there was only a step between him and death, God occupied that step, and no one was allowed to harm him.
- Hatred hardens. Sickness was no obstacle to Saul; he simply ordered the bed carried to him. What looked like temper was a settled purpose that no excuse could deflect.
- Hatred aims higher than it knows. Saul knew God had given the kingdom to David, and hated him for it — the same enmity that later said of the true Heir, "Come, let us kill him."
- Hatred meets prayer. While the watchers circled the house, David asked God for deliverance. They wanted his life not for any sin of his, but because he belonged to the Lord.
- Hatred meets song. He prepared a song for the very morning Saul had fixed for his death, rejoicing in God's power before any rescue had arrived.
- Hatred meets God. Between David and death there was only one step, and God occupied that step. The messengers found only an image in the bed, because God let no one touch His anointed.
And the messengers came in, and behold, the image was in the bed, and the net of goats' [hair] at its head.
Saul's men come back with a new order: carry David to the king, bed and all. They pull back the cover and find a dummy. Two questions follow. Why was an idol-image in David's house? And what do we make of the wife who saved him by lying?
Saul pushed harder, and the trick collapsed.
Michal did not get what she wanted by telling Saul's messengers that David was sick. Saul was so determined to kill him quickly that he ordered his servants to bring David to Saul in his bed. Then of course they discovered the deception, and Saul was upset with his daughter because she had been helpful to her own husband! Instead of calling David HER HUSBAND, Saul calls him "my enemy," which was not true, for David felt no hatred toward Saul.
The word behind "image" is teraphim. It was a household figure, and one of them sat in David's own home.
This passage also shows us that there was an image (a teraphim) in David's house. David did not worship it, but its presence shows he put up with it… A teraphim ranks a little below an idol. It is a kind of household god, treated as having some importance, and people even consult it at times. Such superstitions soon lead to real idols… Often a believer lacks the energy to clear these stumbling blocks out of his family. Each of us must watch this closely, even if, like Jacob and David, we credit them with no influence over our own life. It seems Michal, Saul's daughter, brought the image into David's household, and so she became a snare to the man of God.
Commentators differ on how serious the object was. One treats it as milder than a true idol. Another calls it plainly idolatrous and points to Michal's trust in it.
Michal, to gain time for David, had put a "teraphim" in David's bed (v.13). This was an image in human form. It was truly idolatrous, yet Israelites too often used such things alongside the worship of God. Poor Michal! She did not know the power of God, nor did she have real faith in His faithfulness. She thought she had to put at least part of her trust in idols! And any of us can become skilled at deception all too easily.
Caught out, Michal had to answer her father. She chose a story that cleared her and made David the threat.
Michal escapes her father's anger by acting as though she were one of David's enemies, forced by his threats to let him go: "He said to me, 'Let me go. Why should I kill you?'" (v. 17). How different her heart is from Jonathan's. He took up the defence of the one he dearly loved, in the open and at his own risk.
The Bible reports the whole episode without praising the method. One writer draws out what that honesty proves, and what the attacks on David point toward.
Michal used a trick. Like Rachel she had teraphim, the idol-images so widely used among the Chaldeans and other nations. The LORD had forbidden these, yet people still used them in secret (Judges 17:5; 18:14). Michal's image must have been fairly large; she laid it in the bed and told the messengers, "He is sick."… The Scriptures record these wrongs, and that is one proof of their genuineness; but the Holy Scriptures never approve such things. In all these attacks on David we also see a picture of the later attacks on the life of our Lord.
Men watched the house all that night. Psalm 59 carries a note tying it to that very night, and it shows what David was doing while they watched.
The account in this chapter has its counterpart in Psalm 59, given "when Saul sent men to watch his house in order to kill him." Saul's messengers were violent men, banded together against David, and they went round the city through the night. While they did, David was lifting up his heart in prayer to the Lord. He looked to Him for rescue (vv. 1-2), sure that He would be gracious to him (v. 10). They were after his life for no transgression or sin of his, but because he belonged to the Lord.
When this escape route closed, another opened.
God is never limited in His resources. So He had helpers other than Jonathan for His persecuted servant. Michal used a trick to let David escape when Saul would have murdered him in his bed, and Samuel sheltered him at Naioth when David's own home was no longer safe.
- The image — the thing in the bed was a teraphim, a household idol; David did not worship it, but he tolerated it, and it came into his home through his wife.
- The tolerance — what a believer puts up with at home becomes a trap for the family. One writer urges us to clear such things out, even when we credit them with no power.
- The trick — Michal's trick got David out alive, yet she did not know the power of God, and she lied about him the moment her father turned on her.
- The contrast — Jonathan defended David in the open, at his own risk. Michal defended herself by making David out to be a threat.
- The Deliverer — Scripture records the trick without approving it. The real rescue came from God, who is never short of means, and David was praying to Him while the messengers watched the house. These attacks on David also foreshadow the attacks on the life of our Lord.
Then Saul said to Michal, Why hast thou deceived me so, and sent away mine enemy, that he is escaped? And Michal said to Saul, He said to me, Let me go; why should I slay thee?
Michal is Saul's daughter and David's wife. She has just been caught helping David escape. Now she stands before her father with an answer ready, and what she says about David never happened.
Saul had married Michal to David hoping the marriage would trap him. One writer shows how that plan backfired, and names the psalm it produced:
He gave his daughter Michal to be David's wife, and thought to trap him this way; but his wife became his deliverer. This is what brought out Psalm 59. He had faith that God would laugh at his enemies: God was his defence and the God of his mercy.
The escape needed a cover story. When the first one failed, Michal made up a second. One writer follows the lies, then draws two lessons from them:
Michal practised a deception. Like Rachel she had teraphim — the idol-images used so widely among the Chaldeans and other nations... She arranged it in the bed and then told the messengers, "He is sick." When they found out, she lied again and said that David had threatened her life. The Scriptures record these misdeeds, and that is evidence that they are genuine. Yet the Holy Scriptures never approve such things. In all these attempts on David we also see a foreshadowing of the attempts later made on the life of our Lord.
Her answer puts David in the wrong and makes her the victim. Set beside Jonathan, the difference stands out:
Michal avoids her father's anger by posing as one of David's enemies. She claims his threats forced her to let him go: "He said to me, 'Let me go. Why should I kill you?'" How different her heart is from Jonathan's! He defended the one he loved dearly, out in the open and at his own risk.
Her love for David was real, and so was the help she gave. The method is another matter:
Michal clearly loves David. But that love does not seem to come with genuine faith here. Still, we would not brand her as being just like her father. Her deception, which we do not excuse, is in some ways like the act of Rahab, who sent the spies away in peace. Yet she does not seem to be as loyal in heart as Jonathan. Still, her scheme shows at least her willingness to help her husband, and he escapes safely.
Her motive was simple human affection. God used even that:
Michal is moved by her natural affection for David. She comes to his help in her own way. God uses here the human feelings that stirred her.
Saul's own words give him away. He will not name the relationship:
Michal did not achieve what she wanted by telling Saul's messengers that David was sick. Saul was so determined to kill him quickly that he ordered his servants to bring David to him in his bed. Then, of course, they discovered the deception. Saul was upset with his daughter because she had helped her own husband. Instead of calling David HER HUSBAND, Saul calls him "my enemy." That was not true, for David felt no hatred toward Saul.
Years later David demanded Michal back. One writer reads her words here as a warning David should have weighed:
Michal had shown no faithfulness to David in 1 Samuel 19:17. She told her father that David had threatened to kill her if she did not let him escape from Saul. Why should he want her returned when she had proven undependable? Was it only his own rights he was thinking about?
- Rescue. Saul gave Michal to David as a trap, but she became his rescuer instead. Out of that came Psalm 59, where David is sure that God laughs at his enemies.
- Deception. She first said David was sick. When that failed, she invented a threat on her life. Scripture records such misdeeds without approving them, and the attacks on David foreshadow the later attempts on the life of Christ.
- Motive. Natural affection, not faith, moved her — and God still used those human feelings to save His servant.
- Contrast. She protected herself by posing as David's enemy. Jonathan defended David in the open, at his own risk. Commentators compare her to Rahab, yet they refuse to excuse the lie.
- Aftermath. Saul calls his son-in-law "my enemy," which is untrue. Michal calls her husband a threat, which is untrue too. David would meet that disloyalty again.