1 Samuel 17:34–35

1 Samuel 17:34 · Darby

And David said to Saul, Thy servant fed his father's sheep, and there came a lion, and also a bear, and took a lamb out of the flock.

Saul looked at David and saw a boy. David answered with a story from the hills that no army had watched. His job was keeping his father's sheep, and going after whatever came to take one.

Hidden Training for a Public Hour

David's answer points backwards. What he did alone in the pasture is why he could stand in the valley.

David could point to secret training in view of public opportunity.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

God works this way with those He uses. The obscurity of the previous chapter was not wasted time; it was school.

In the previous chapter we find David in complete obscurity. His brothers thought nothing of him, and neither did his father. He was away from the family, keeping sheep, and no one thought him worth calling to the sacrifice. Yet he was the chosen of the Lord. And he had not been alone in the wilderness. He had been under God's teaching. He had been preparing for public service, in the secret school of Him who does not look on the outward appearance and who does not see as a man sees... God will always have to do in secret with that soul which He intends to serve Him in public.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Motive Behind the Fight

Why did he do it? The value at stake was one lamb, and no crowd was watching.

Notice that David did not do this to show off his own strength. In fact there were likely no witnesses. It was his concern for the lamb that moved him, and God gave him strength on this account. Suppose someone has a shepherd's heart of love for the people of God, together with concern for the honour of God among His people. Then he may fully count on God to enable him to defeat the power of ungodly enemies.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That small errand is what fits him for the large one.

There was with him the shepherd's heart which had made him risk his life, not before the eyes of many, nor for a great result, but for a single lamb only. How could he now shrink when the issue was so vast, and the people of God were looking in vain for a deliverer?

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Duty, Not Heroics

David does not describe the lion and the bear as adventures he chose. They came into the middle of his work.

But what traits do we find in David? He is deeply conscious that God's strength is his, and he forgets himself in every difficulty that comes in the way of duty... Guarding sheep is his business, so he goes at once against the lion and the bear and kills them. He does these works of energy purely as duty, and so the difficulties are as nothing.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Who Gets the Credit

The story could read as a boast about strength. Notice how David ends it: he names the One who did the delivering.

David did not do this by human strength or skill. He does not claim the fame of the deed for himself either. He is careful to add: "The Lord who delivered me from the paw of the lion and from the paw of the bear will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine." This shows deep acquaintance with God and His power, and thorough confidence in Him. He gained both far away from the eyes of man, in the secret of the Lord's shelter.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Memory is what turns that past rescue into present courage — and forgetting is the ordinary failure.

This shows us the littleness of their faith. We are very much like that. We forget. If we were constantly full of faith we should remember, as David also remembered his victory over the lion and the bear, when he was called to meet Goliath.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Shepherd Who Gives His Life

Commentators read the scene as a picture of Christ. One takes the rescue from the beast's mouth as a type of Christ binding the strong man.

That is where he had struck down the lion and the bear, a type of Christ when He bound the strong man. Before he fought the Philistine, he had rescued his father's sheep from an enemy that tried to snatch them away and devour them. Christ did the same during His lifetime. Not one of the sheep His Father had given Him was lost... But He had much more to do than that, for He had to abolish the power of the enemy himself.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another keeps the comparison, but says the picture falls far short.

David, the shepherd lad, kept his father's sheep in the wilderness of Bethlehem. He was faithful to his trust, and for the sake of a lamb he put his life in danger... Surely the Spirit of God gives this as a type of Him who is the good Shepherd. It proves David's extraordinary courage and devotion. Yet how faintly it pictures what the good Shepherd went through to save the sheep that was lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret first. God deals with a soul in private before He uses it in public; David's obscurity was His training ground, not a delay.

- Secret motive. With likely no witnesses, David fought for a lamb — concern for the flock, not display of strength, moved him.

- Secret duty. Guarding sheep was his job. He moved from duty, not ambition, so the lion and the bear counted as nothing.

- Secret credit. David hands the victory to the Lord who delivered him from lion and bear. The same Lord, he says, will deliver him from this Philistine.

- Secret pattern. The lad who risked his life for one lamb is a faint picture of the good Shepherd. Christ saved the sheep, and He broke the enemy's power as well.

1 Samuel 17:35 · Darby

And I went after him, and smote him, and delivered it out of his mouth; and when he arose against me, I seized him by his beard, and smote him, and slew him.

David's answer to Saul is not a boast; it is a report from the sheepfold. It raises two questions: why risk your life for one lamb, and what does a hidden fight prove about a public battle?

Why David Went After the Lamb

One writer retells the fight and points out what moved David into danger.

David chased the animal, attacked it, and took the lamb out of its mouth. Then he faced it head on, caught it by the beard, and killed it. It is important to notice that David did not do this to show off his own strength. In fact there were likely no witnesses. It was his concern for the lamb that moved him, and God gave him strength for that reason. Suppose someone has a shepherd's heart of love for the people of God, along with concern for the honour of God among His people. Then he can fully count on God to enable him to defeat the power of ungodly enemies.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

To David this was not heroism. It was his job, and that is why the danger counted for nothing.

But what traits do we find in David? He had a deep sense that God's strength was with him. He forgot himself in all the difficulties that come in the way of duty. He keeps his father's sheep: a lion and a bear come to take a lamb from the flock. It is his business to guard sheep, so he goes at once against the lion and the bear, and kills them. He does these bold deeds simply because duty calls. So the difficulties are as nothing.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Story Never Told Until Now

David was not repeating a favourite story. No one seems to have heard it before, and he had a reason for telling it now.

As another has remarked, David had not boasted of his triumph over the lion and the bear. No one seemed to have heard of it before. He probably would not have spoken of it at all. He told it only to show what solid ground of confidence he had for the great work he was about to begin. He wanted to make clear that he was not going out in his own strength.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Those hidden years in the fields were preparation.

David had learned in secret what God could be to him. Then came a call to public service, and to testimony to God's faithfulness and power. He was ready to take his place in confidence in God.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The Argument of Faith

David treats the giant as one more beast. One writer names the logic behind that.

This was the argument of faith. The hand that had delivered him from one difficulty would deliver him from another. There is no "if" in any of it. David did not wait for a sign; he simply said, "Your servant will go."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Shepherd Behind the Shepherd

Commentators see a picture of Christ in this rescue. One writer links the wilderness fight to the Lord's own work against the enemy.

That is where he had struck down the lion and the bear. This pictures Christ when He bound the strong man. Before he fought the Philistine, he had rescued his father's sheep from an enemy that tried to snatch them away and devour them. Christ did the same during His lifetime; not one of the sheep His Father had given Him was lost... He stood alone in the gap and said, "Let these men go." But He had much more to do than that. He had to abolish the power of the enemy himself.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer warns that the picture falls far short of the reality.

Surely the Spirit of God gives this as a picture of Him who is the good Shepherd. It is great proof of David's courage and devotion. Yet how faintly it shows what the good Shepherd went through to save the sheep that was lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Duty, not display — No crowd watched David fight. Concern for the lamb moved him, and God supplied the strength.

- Self forgotten — Guarding the flock was his business. So he never weighed the lion and the bear against his own life.

- Secret first — No one had heard the story until now. God trained him in private for the public work ahead.

- Deliverance repeats — The hand that rescued him from the beast will rescue him from the giant. So there is no "if" in his offer to go.

- A faint portrait — David snatched a lamb from the jaws of death. That pictures the Good Shepherd — faintly, next to what it cost Him.