shepherd the flock of God which [is] among you, exercising oversight, not by necessity, but willingly; not for base gain, but readily;
Peter writes to elders as one of them. He gives them a single task: care for God's people the way a shepherd cares for sheep. Three questions follow. What does shepherding involve? Whose flock is it? And what motive drives the work?
Older translations use the word "feed" here. Commentators say the command covers much more than that.
The elders are exhorted to shepherd the flock of God. Shepherding is more than feeding; it implies guidance, and every form of care that is needed by the sheep. The Lord clearly wants His people to be visited and cared for. When He was on earth, He felt deep compassion as He saw the sad state of His earthly people, "like sheep without a shepherd" (Matthew 9:36). Sadly, there is still so little of this shepherd care, and that shows how low and weak the condition of God's people is.
The same Greek word appears in John 21:16, where the Lord speaks to Peter. That link carries a warning about how people talk about a congregation.
The Greek word used here is the same one we find in John 21:16, and it really means "shepherd" — shepherd the flock of God. It is not to be done for shameful gain, for profit, for money. Believers here are called "the flock of God." Preachers and pastors often call the people they preach to "my flock" or "my people." That language is not scriptural, and we should avoid it. God's children do not belong to anybody but the Lord.
The man writing this had denied the Lord three times. Christ restored him with these very words.
Peter's heart may well have leapt as he wrote the early verses of 1 Peter 2, which recalled the moment when the Saviour gave him his new name. Did it not also swell with deepest gratitude and humble praise as he now wrote to elders, remembering the grace that restored him in front of his brothers — the man who had denied Him three times? Feed My lambs; tend (or, shepherd) My sheep; feed My sheep (John 21:15, 17, 18)... To him then and there He entrusted what was dearest to Himself, His lambs and His sheep, to tend and feed His flock. In the same love Peter in his measure appeals to elders as a fellow-elder.
Two words settle everything else in the verse: the flock is God's. One commentator makes that conviction the first test of fitness for the work.
They have to bear in mind first that the flock is God's. If a man does not carry the sense in his soul that it is God's flock, I do not think he is fit to be an elder, or to hold any other office of spiritual trust. He stands far from the right ground for being a blessing to what, after all, is God's flock.
God still lets men feed what belongs to Him, and that permission answers any claim of ownership.
Moreover it was the flock of God which they were to feed. What a solemn as well as sweet thought! How impossible it is for anyone to think of it as his own flock, once he has grasped that it is the flock of God, and that God allows us to feed it!
Oversight means guarding the flock against real dangers, and it will not always be welcome.
He calls the elders to pastoral ministry: "shepherd the flock of God that is among you" (v.2). He knows that this work can be hard (he himself was a "fellow elder"). Shepherding the flock involves protecting it from various dangers (cf. Acts 20:28-30). This needs constant watchfulness. Exercising "oversight," as Peter also calls this ministry, is not always welcome, because sometimes people have to be corrected and urged on.
after_note: DELETE
Peter names two wrong motives: pressure and profit. Both were foreseen.
It is most important that the "elder" uses his spiritual authority in the right way and spirit. That is why three things are set out in verses 2 and 3. He is to take up his service willingly, readily, and as himself a model to the flock. The Holy Spirit who inspired these words foresaw how strong the pull would be to take up such work — either from compulsion, or from love of gain, or from a desire for power and influence.
The other side of the verse is gladness in the work itself.
"Not for shameful gain, but eagerly" — this is a spontaneous, blessed desire to serve Christ and care for His people. And what is more blessed than being allowed, in any measure, to care for Christ's people?
- Whose — The flock is God's, never the elder's. Forget that, and a man is not fit for spiritual trust.
- What — Shepherding is wider than feeding: guidance, visiting, protection, and every care the sheep need.
- How — Oversight means constant watching for real danger. It includes correction, which is never welcome.
- Why — Not from pressure and not for money, but willingly and gladly. The work is a privilege, not a burden.
- Who — Peter himself was restored with the words "shepherd My sheep." He hands on what is dearest to Christ.
not as lording it over your possessions, but being models for the flock.
Peter's warning to the elders is blunt: the shepherd is not the owner. Behind the phrase "those in your charge" lies a Greek word that later split the church into two classes.
The older King James wording, "neither as being lords over God's heritage," adds a word that is not in the text. The italics in that version give it away.
The elders are told to shepherd the flock of God which was among them... They must remember first that the flock is God's. If a man does not carry that sense in his soul, I do not think he is fit to be an elder, or to hold any other office of spiritual trust... Notice that "God's" is printed in italics. We can say without hesitation that the phrase does not mean God's heritage at all. It means something completely different. The true sense is this — "Nor as lording it over your possessions." The elders are not to treat the flock as if it belonged to them.
One Greek word in this verse explains how the church came to be divided into two ranks.
The Greek word for heritage in this text just quoted is klēros, from which the English word, clergy, is derived. The Bible clergy consisted of ALL Christians, and the laity (Greek, laos, the people) were the heathen outside the Christian circle. The clergy have stolen a word that belongs to all God's people. They claim it as the name of a class, which Scripture never authorized. And they have handed the rest of God's people a title, laity, which once described the heathen world outside.
The safeguard against domineering is not a rule but a fact: the flock belongs to God.
The elders were to feed the flock of God with a ready mind, not because they were forced to. They were not to do it for gain, nor as men governing an inheritance of their own, but as examples to the flock... Moreover it was the flock of God which they were to feed. What a solemn as well as sweet thought! How impossible it is for anyone to think of it as his own flock, once he has grasped that it is God's flock, and that God allows us to feed it!
Kelly shows what this fact changes in ordinary church life, and what the opposite claim costs.
It is God's flock, not yours; and you are not to lord over it as if it were your own belongings. If it were your heritage, you would have certain rights... When this is fully weighed, it makes a wonderful change in the mind, tone, and temper. It changes both those who tend the flock and those they care for. For then they look to God, and no petty feeling about trespassing on another's rights remains... The truth is that the assumption of "my flock," or "yours", is the root of endless mischief.
If even a believer's own property really belongs to the Master, so does a congregation. And a trust calls for an account.
To the man of faith, the property that flesh counts our own is not really ours. It is the Master's goods, entrusted to his care. How much more, then, must elders beware of lording it over the charge allotted to them as if it were theirs? No, they are to become models of the flock. They must always remember that it is God's flock, and that they must give account to the Lord for how they guided His sheep, and for their own daily walk.
The positive half of the verse replaces one method of moving people with another.
They are warned not to lord it over God's heritage. They are not to drive the flock but to lead it as "examples to the flock."
Bellett sets service against patronage.
They prove what they teach, and they labour in the spirit of service, not of patronage. They are not lords of the heritage, but examples of the flock. They claim no dominion over the faith; they are helpers of the joy.
Writers note that the danger Peter names is what later history produced.
The Holy Spirit who inspired these words foresaw how strong the pull would be to take up such work. It might be from compulsion, or for love of gain, or from a desire for power and influence. Church history proves how much these words were needed. It tells us how the simple "elders" or "bishops" of the apostles' day were slowly turned into "princes of the church," who lorded it over God's people as though they were their own possessions.
- Ownership — The flock is God's, not the shepherd's. Every other instruction in the verse follows from that one fact.
- Wording — Older translators added the word "God's." The sense is "not lording it over your own possessions."
- Clergy — Kleros, the word here, gave us "clergy," yet Scripture uses it of all God's people, never of a separate class.
- Method — The elder does not drive the flock. He leads it, proving what he teaches by how he lives.
- Account — Nothing here is owned, only entrusted. Elders will answer to the Lord for how they guided His sheep.