1 Peter 2:13–16

1 Peter 2:13 · Darby

Be in subjection [therefore] to every human institution for the Lord's sake; whether to [the] king as supreme,

Peter writes to Christians scattered among the nations, and he tells them to submit to the rulers over them. He attaches one reason: the Lord. The verse raises three questions. What must I submit to? How far does it go? And what if the ruler is a bad man?

What the command covers

Does "human institution" mean religious rules? One writer says no, and shows that Peter defines his own terms in the next verse.

In 1 Peter 2:13 we have nothing to do with the rules of religion on earth. Colossians 2 declares that they were nailed to the cross and taken out of the way. The apostle urges the believing Jews to behave well among the Gentiles, and to be in subjection to every human creation or institution for the Lord's sake. This he explains as civil government: "whether it be to the emperor as supreme, or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good." Christian Jews must not be unruly like their unbelieving brothers.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The motive: for the Lord's sake

Peter attaches one reason: "for the Lord's sake." Is that phrase about the ruler, or about the believer?

A republic had its claim no less than royalty. The only relation revealed for the believer is subjection. There is not one word here, or anywhere else in the New Testament, about the believer exercising authority in the present evil age. The grace of Christ is the pattern for every Christian. "For the Lord's sake" does not mean His relation to the human creation, though He is indeed Lord of all. It means His appeal to the saints themselves, that they obey Him in submission to the powers of the world.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The ruler's character

What if the ruler is a bad man who never acknowledges God?

As honour is not at all based upon their personal character, we have nothing at all to do with their origin, how they got their power, or how they use their power. All that we have to do, as believers, is to own God and the magistrate. Perhaps the magistrate, or the king, does not own God himself. That is a serious thing for him, but it does not change our relation.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A stranger's place

Believers hold the place of strangers in this world. That standing rules out one thing and requires another.

It would be wholly inconsistent for those who take the place of strangers in this world to attempt to form these institutions or appoint the authorities. We are, however, to be subject to them, and this with the highest motive, for the Lord's sake. We are to be subject to subordinate as well as to supreme authorities, and, again, for the reason that we view them all in relation to the Lord. Whether they exercise their authority in the fear of God or fail to do so, we are to view them as sent by God for the maintenance of the government of the world.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Where subjection stops

Subjection has a limit. One writer sets it from Peter's own words to the Sanhedrin, the Jewish ruling council.

Are we, then, advocating a blind subjection to earthly rule? By no means. When human commands conflict with the word of God, this same apostle has taught us how to act. He, with the other apostles, told the Sanhedrin: "We must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29).

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Refusing to obey is not the same as fighting back.

It is our duty to obey and submit ourselves to them in all things. The one condition is that they do not call on us to disobey God, or do violence to conscience. If they do this, we must — what? Resist? No, but suffer.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Freedom used rightly

Peter's readers had every natural reason to resent the foreign rulers set over them, and the verse cuts across that instinct.

These scattered Christian Jews might well resent the Gentile authorities over them, whether kings or governors. They might resent the many ordinances and laws and regulations that had been set up too. Still, they were to submit. Government, they had to recognise, was a divine institution. The Christian is of course free, for he stands in the liberty of Christ. Still, he must not use his freedom as "a cover-up for evil" — in any way to vent his anger on others. He must regard it as liberty to serve God, and the service of God demands the subjection to rulers laid down here.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Scope. The command is about civil government — kings and governors — not religious rules. Peter defines his own terms in the next verse.

- Motive. "For the Lord's sake" is an appeal to the believer, not a statement about the ruler. Obedience to Him is the reason we submit.

- Reach. The ruler's origin, character and use of power are not the believer's business. We own the highest and the lowest authorities alike.

- Limit. Subjection is not blind. Where a human command conflicts with God's word, we obey God rather than men — and then suffer instead of resisting.

- Result. Freedom in Christ is real. But it is freedom to serve God, and that service shows itself in submission, not in venting anger.

1 Peter 2:14 · Darby

or to rulers as sent by him, for vengeance on evildoers, and praise to them that do well.

Peter writes to believers scattered across the empire. He tells them how to live under rulers they did not choose. The verse names two things at once: who governors answer to, and what they exist to do.

Sent Through the King

The wording marks out a chain of authority. Governors are not sent straight from heaven. The king sends them. The ESV reads "sent by him"; older translations render the same phrase "sent through him," and that is the wording discussed below.

The Spirit makes a distinction, even while He commands subjection to all: the king is supreme, and the governors are sent through him to punish evildoers and to praise those who do well. "Sent through him" points to the king's authority as the higher one. If God had been meant here, the phrase would, I believe, have been "by," and not the in-between word "through." Anyone can see how odd the mistake would be. It would make the divine commission belong not to the king, but only to the governors he appoints.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Government Is For

The two aims named here did not start with Peter. One writer traces them back to what God said to Noah after the flood.

The aim of government stated in the last part of verse 14 is quite clear. It is to punish evildoers and to encourage those who do well. God laid this broad duty on Noah after the flood. We hear of neither king nor magistrate in the world before the flood... "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in His own image" (Gen. 9:6) first laid the basic foundation of human government as it stands. Life belonged to God, and He gave this principle to Noah.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Subject to the Lesser as Well as the Greater

Peter covers the local official as well as the emperor. The believer's reason for obeying is not the ruler's personal godliness.

The exhortations that follow view the believer in relation to the institutions and authorities of this world. It would be wholly inconsistent for those who take the place of strangers in this world to try to form these institutions or appoint the authorities. We are, however, to be subject to them, and this with the highest motive, for the Lord's sake. We are to be subject to lower authorities as well as to supreme ones, and again for the reason that we view them all in relation to the Lord. Whether they use their authority in the fear of God or fail to do so, we are certainly to see them as sent by God to maintain the government of the world.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why a Christian Can Afford to Submit

Nero ruled Rome, and he was capable of anything. A believer can still obey such a ruler, because the worst he can do cannot reach what matters most.

The place of the Christian is complete obedience to the governing authorities, even if Nero were king. Nero could not touch my portion, which is heavenly. So whatever the question is, unless it interfered with my obedience to God, I would not mind. He could only bring me into "the lion's mouth," and this might turn into a testimony. He could not touch my resurrection life... I take my example from Christ, who appealed to no one but God. Yet even in the darkest hour of wickedness, when God's priests were pressing the Roman authorities to crucify His Son, the Lord says, "You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Real Praise, Wrong Ambition

Doing good draws praise from rulers. One writer says that praise is worth having, then names the ambition it must never become.

There is also a praise that should never be taken lightly. Doing practical good, and submitting readily for the Lord's sake to human institutions, calls out this praise from the rulers of this world. It can be won with honour even from the very worst of human governments. On the other hand, someone who shares in the heavenly calling, whose name is registered above and whose rights as a citizen are there and not here, can never consistently seek the reputation of a social or political reformer.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Where Submission Stops

Obedience is wide, but it is not unlimited. The order of Peter's own words settles which claim comes first.

Other Scriptures clearly show that the only limitation to our subjection to men is the fear of God. When men insist upon direct disobedience to God, we must set God first (Acts 4:19). So here the order is, "Fear God. Honour the king."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent — the governor comes through the king, not straight from God. The chain is human, yet God stands behind the whole structure.

- Sword — government exists to punish wrong and praise right. God gave that charge to Noah after the flood and never withdrew it.

- Scope — obedience covers the local official as well as the emperor. It does not wait for a ruler to be godly.

- Safe — even a Nero can only reach the body. He cannot touch a believer's heavenly portion, so submission costs nothing eternal.

- Stop — the single limit is the fear of God: when men demand disobedience to Him, "Fear God" outranks "honour the king."

1 Peter 2:15 · Darby

Because so is the will of God, that by well-doing ye put to silence the ignorance of senseless men;

Peter has just told scattered believers to submit to kings and governors for the Lord's sake. Now he gives the reason: this is what God wants, and it has a target — the ignorance of people who speak against Christians.

The will of God here is about your daily path

Scripture uses "the will of God" in more than one sense, and this verse is not about God's hidden purposes but about how a believer walks day by day.

In many passages the will of God has reference to the eternal counsels of God, as we read, "who works all things according to the counsel of His will" (Ephesians 1:11). In other passages the reference is to God's will for His people in their daily path (1 Thessalonians 4:3; 1 Peter 2:15, etc.).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The setting: submission to authority

The "doing good" Peter means is not abstract. It is the quiet submission described in the verses just before. It comes from people whose real interests lie elsewhere.

Those who belong to Christ have nothing directly to do with governing the world. Scripture says plainly that they are not of the world, just as He was not... Now is the time to suffer with Him, and to look to be glorified with Him later. So meanwhile we should be all the more eager to submit to every human institution (the literal word is "creation"), not only to a king as the highest authority, but also to the governors he sends out from time to time to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good. Our real interests are above; but this is our duty for the Lord's sake.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That submission has one boundary.

The word of God plainly tells His people to obey the governing authorities (Romans 13:1; Titus 3:1; 1 Peter 2:13-17). It is not for us to question how that authority came to power, or what kind of person holds it. Our part is to obey. But when the will of man clashes with the word of God, and tries to force that will on our consciences, we must obey God rather than man (Acts 4:19).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"Put to silence" and "foolish men"

The word behind "put to silence" is stronger than it sounds in English. And "foolish" is about not knowing God.

A weighty reason follows. "For this is the will of God (and are we not sanctified for obedience — the obedience of Jesus?), that by doing good you should put to silence (literally, muzzle) the ignorance of foolish people."... The true and fitting answer to the world's spiteful hatred is a godly life. For all men, not just some, are foolish if they do not know God. That is why they take a malicious pleasure in blaming His children for their own evils.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The specific charge being answered

The ignorance is not vague. Believers faced a specific charge, and their obedience answered it.

By submitting to authority and doing good, the Christian puts to silence the ignorance of foolish men. They accuse the believer of rebelling against authority (Luke 23:14-15; Acts 24:12-13). We are free from the world. But we must not use that freedom to speak evil of this world's rulers. We are to give ourselves wholly to the service of God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The weapon is a life, not an argument

Because the accusation is about conduct, the reply is conduct. Writers facing public attack applied the verse exactly this way.

My own desire would be that you should not answer back, but that by a holy and blameless life you put to silence the ignorance of foolish men... Your best answer is "perfect silence."

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Another writer gave the same counsel, and added that even being called Beelzebub — a name for the devil — makes you like your Master.

Dear friends, stand firm; and I beg you, abound in the work of the Lord, and by doing good put to silence the ignorance of foolish people... Remember the word, "When reviled, we bless; when persecuted, we endure; when slandered, we entreat. We have become, and are still, like the scum of the world, the refuse of all things." If you are called Beelzebub, you know well why you should bear it, returning blessing for cursing. It is a privilege we rarely have, to be like our Master.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Free — and therefore a servant

This submission is not slavery, and the freedom behind it is not an excuse for self-will.

For he is free. He does not depend on the government, though he respects it. He depends on God. And such liberty must not be twisted into mere self-will, because it is really liberty to please God as His willing servants.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Will — The "will of God" here is not His hidden counsel. It is His will for your daily path.

- Well-doing — That will means submitting to human authority for the Lord's sake. One limit: when man's will clashes with God's word, obey God.

- Muzzle — The literal word is muzzle. "Foolish" covers everyone who does not know God, and such people blame believers for their own evils.

- Weapon — The charge is about conduct, so the answer is conduct. Not a reply, not a defence — a holy life is the best silence.

- Freedom — None of this is slavery. The Christian is free and depends on God alone. That freedom is liberty to serve Him, never a cover for self-will.

1 Peter 2:16 · Darby

as free, and not as having liberty as a cloak of malice, but as God's bondmen.

Peter has just told believers to submit to kings and governors. Now he guards that command from the other side: those who submit are free people, and their freedom is given for serving God, not for hiding wrongdoing.

Free, and yet subject

The order to submit does not cancel the Christian's freedom. One commentator holds both together.

The Christian is of course free, for he stands in the liberty of Christ. Still, he must not use his freedom as "a cloak of malice" — in any way to vent his anger on others. He must treat it as liberty to serve God, and serving God demands the subjection to rulers set out here.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

This freedom is not a better position inside the world. It is freedom from belonging to the world at all.

Here the Christian receives the place of being completely free. He does not belong to the world; he belongs to heaven. He does not use his liberty as a cloak of maliciousness. He lives as the servant of God, seeking only to be a servant. Now a servant's business is simply to follow the will of his master, and God's will is that I should submit.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The cloak, and who was accusing

"A cover-up for evil" pictures freedom worn like a coat over something hidden. Older translations call it "a cloak of maliciousness." Outsiders were making that charge against Christians, and the answer to it was conduct, not argument.

The true and fitting answer to the spiteful hatred of the world is a godly course of living… This steady well-doing does not give up the liberty with which Christ set us free. We live by the Spirit, so we are to walk by it too, instead of wearing liberty as a cloak of malice — which is what our enemies claimed we did.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The accusation was political. The reply was a life that gave it nothing to hold on to.

By subjection to authority, and by well-doing, the Christian would put to silence the ignorance of senseless men. Such men charge the believer with rebellion against authority. We are free from the world. But we are not to use our freedom to speak evil of this world's authorities. Instead we are to devote ourselves wholly to the service of God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Bondmen of God

The word behind "servants" is stronger than hired help. It reaches into every relationship named around it in this chapter.

"Servants of God" (verse 16). This is the last of the descriptions the apostle uses in this chapter, and it takes in all the rest. The word translated "servants" is really "bondmen," and speaks of those wholly devoted to the will of God. Notice the instructions that surround this description: "Be subject… to the emperor… to governors"; "Honor everyone"; "Love the brotherhood"; "Fear God"; "Honor the emperor"; "Servants, be subject to your masters." Wherever we are, whatever our sphere, our conduct should match our position as "servants of God."

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Being God's bondman changes who the Christian leans on while he obeys the government.

He is free: he is not dependent on the government, though he respects it; he depends on God. And this liberty must not be twisted into mere self-will. It is liberty to please God as His willing servants.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Liberty is not licence

If freedom means doing as I please, the freest man who ever lived would have been the least obedient. Jesus shows the opposite.

The liberty of the saint is not licence to do his own will. If anything could have taken away the liberty of the Lord Jesus, it would have been hindering Him from always being obedient to the will of God. All that moves in the sphere of man's will is sin… The essence of sanctification is having no will of our own… True slavery is being enslaved by our own will. True liberty means having our own will completely set aside.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where the submission stops

The Christian submits as God's servant. So the submission stops where a human order contradicts God's word.

Obedience to the powers that be is the plain direction of the word of God for His people. We are not to raise questions about how the authority came to power, or about the character of the person who holds it. Our part is to obey. But sometimes the will of man clashes with the word of God and tries to force that will on our consciences. Then we must obey God rather than man.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Free — the believer belongs to heaven, not to the world, and depends on God, not on any government.

- Free for — that freedom exists so he can serve God, and God's will for him now is submission to human authority.

- Not a cloak — never wear freedom as a coat over spite or self-will. Outsiders were already accusing Christians of just that.

- Bondman — "servant" here means someone wholly devoted to God's will. That title covers every sphere: rulers, masters, fellow believers, everyone.

- The one limit — do not ask how a ruler came to power; refuse only when man's will overrides God's word.