1 Peter 1:18–21

1 Peter 1:18 · Darby

knowing that ye have been redeemed, not by corruptible [things, as] silver or gold, from your vain conversation handed down from [your] fathers,

Peter has just told these believers to live in reverent fear as strangers here. Now he gives the reason: they already know what their freedom cost, and what it freed them from — an inherited way of religion, handed down and empty.

Knowledge, not guesswork

Peter's call to reverent fear can sound like worry about whether you are truly saved. The reason he gives here rules that out.

The fear that the saints were urged to live in during their stay here is as far as possible from doubt about their souls and distrust of God's grace. Those two go together. They may even be two sides of the same unbelief — the unbelief that leaves Christ out as the gospel reveals Him. The words that follow shut such dread out completely. They rest the fear Peter teaches on a comforting and settled fact: they have been redeemed. And they were redeemed by what is most precious to God of all things, and most effective for sinners.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Silver and gold: the old price

The mention of money is not random. These readers came from people whose redemption really did cost silver and gold.

They knew, and so do we, that we are redeemed with the precious blood of Christ. Their fathers had been redeemed with silver and gold — a redemption in picture form, carried out under Jewish law. Sometimes they gave actual money, as in Exodus 30:11-16 and Numbers 3:44-51. Sometimes redemption came by sacrifice, as in Exodus 13:13-15. Even then silver and gold played a part, since they were needed to buy the animal for the sacrifice. Silver and gold are the least corruptible of metals, yet they are corruptible. The price of our redemption was incorruptible and precious.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the old way is called "futile"

The life left behind was not obvious vice. It was religion.

Notice this. Redemption has many wonderful results, and one named here is that the saints were redeemed from their empty course, or way of life, handed down from their fathers. It is hard to imagine words that fit more exactly. They do not describe Gentile idol worshippers. They describe the Jews since the Maccabees (Jewish leaders from the centuries before Christ), holding tight to tradition passed from father to son.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The problem was the source of their obedience.

The Jewish way of life had sunk into a matter of mere tradition received from their fathers. This was obvious in Isaiah's day (Isaiah 29:13), and the Lord Jesus pressed the charge home on them, quoting Isaiah's words, in Mark 7:6-13. Even the right things they did, they did not because God had commanded them, but because tradition ordered them. So their way of life had become corrupt and deeply offensive to God. Our Gentile way of life was pure darkness and lawlessness, and equally corrupt.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The fathers and the Father

One contrast carries the whole verse: the Father, and the fathers.

There is a contrast here. On one side is the Father these converted Jews called on. On the other is the whole empty round of traditional ways passed down by their fathers. We are redeemed from religion that makes a fine outward show, as well as from what is immoral and corrupt… They were now calling on a Father who shows no favouritism. So their way of life, while they walk through this world as strangers, should be marked by fear. Not because they did not know their redemption, but because they did.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What it costs the believer now

Older translations call the old life "vain conversation." The word covered far more than talk, and being freed from it makes a demand.

There you have vain conversation, which is connected with fleshly religion. We must not take it as merely the talk of the lips. I think Peter uses it in a much wider way than that. What is the first thing he says? You have been brought right out of that system of religion which suits man as he naturally is. You have been redeemed to God with the precious blood of Christ. So the first thing the soul grasps here is this: you are out of the old state. You are delivered from that vain conversation… What we have to do is shake ourselves clear of everything religious that does not suit God.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

For the first readers, that break cost them the worship they grew up in. It gave them something better.

That which gave them peace would destroy every old association. They had learned how precious the blood is by finding forgiveness of sins through it. Now they had to learn that it is just as precious because by it they were redeemed from the futile ways inherited from their fathers. They would have access as worshippers to heaven itself — and as a holy priesthood too, there to worship the Father in spirit and truth.

Modernised from James L HarrisOriginal wording

Summary

- Known — the verse rests on certainty, not hope. The fear Peter urges grows out of a redemption you already have, never out of doubt about it.

- Not bought — silver and gold once ransomed Israel. Even the least corruptible metals decay, so the price of our redemption had to be incorruptible.

- Not only from sin — what is left behind is a way of life: inherited, religious, empty. Isaiah condemned it, and so did the Lord Himself.

- Fathers to Father — tradition handed down was the old trust. The redeemed now call on the Father instead, and that exchange is the heart of the verse.

- Break clean — knowing the cost, shake yourself free of any religion that does not suit God, however long it has run in the family.

1 Peter 1:19 · Darby

but by precious blood, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot, [the blood] of Christ,

Peter tells his readers what their rescue cost. Not money, but blood — the blood of a sacrifice. Two questions follow. Why does he call this blood precious? And why must the Lamb be flawless?

Not Silver or Gold

Peter's contrast is not random. Both metals already carried a settled meaning in Israel's worship:

There were two symbols of redemption in the Old Testament. At every census of Israel, God required each man to give a ransom for his soul. This ransom money was a half silver shekel, and it was "to make atonement for their souls" (Ex. 30:11-16)... Silver and gold, the two most precious metals, both stood as a figure of redemption. Peter alludes to this... He contrasts the blood of Christ with silver and gold. In God's eyes that blood has infinite value, because it comes from the whole truth of the person of Christ. And the point he wants us to notice is this: God's claims on His children match the preciousness of the blood that redeemed them.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why It Is Called Precious

So what gives this blood its value?

The precious blood of Christ is the foundation of redemption, and the means of it too. Only one thing measures its value: the infinite worth of His Person, as God perfectly judges it.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Peter sets this blood against things that decay. Another writer shows what that means for us:

That precious blood is the price of our redemption. Silver and gold decay and change in value; this blood does not. It stays in all its own preciousness. So the redemption it secures is eternal, and our relationship with the blessed God is sure for ever. But at what a cost! ... He laid down that precious, spotless life in death.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

The Lamb Behind the Words

The words "like that of a lamb" point back to sacrifices these readers knew by heart. One writer names more than one:

The reference is plain in the words "like that of a lamb without blemish or spot." It may well point to the Passover lamb we have spoken of. They also had the morning burnt offering. And perhaps above all, there was the evening lamb, offered between the evenings, day after day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Without Blemish or Spot

The two terms are not just repetition. Each has its own root in the Old Testament and its own meaning:

Look at the Old Testament pictures Peter clearly has in mind. The first time "without blemish" comes up with a sacrifice is in Exodus 12. It involves that our Lord was perfect in sinless, subject, obedient Manhood... It is not until we reach Numbers 19 that we find the second word Peter uses here, "without spot"... We looked these words up some time ago. Without blemish means without a defect: nothing is missing. Without spot seems to have more to do with what is external, like a splash of paint on someone.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

That flawless life raises a question: did His obedience itself pay for sin? One writer answers, and also names the kind of rescue this verse describes:

1 Peter 1:19 speaks more in the sense of redemption — of a ransom that takes us out of the hands of the enemy. Christ's obedience during His life worked toward the perfection of the sacrifice. That obedience did not pay for sin, but it was fully acceptable to God. What mattered was the acceptability of His Person, which His work required. But that obedience did not pay for sin.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

How the Ransomed Live

Peter ties this price to how his readers now live. Notice what Christ bought them out of, and that their fear rests on certainty, not doubt:

We are redeemed from religion that is only a good outward show, as well as from what is immoral and depraved... They were now calling on a Father who judges each one without partiality. So their conduct should be marked by fear while they walk through this world as strangers. Not because they did not know their redemption, but because they did — and that redemption did not come by perishable things like silver and gold, which suited their old walk. That old walk was empty in other ways, and emptiest of all in its traditional religion. From all of it they knew themselves redeemed by the precious blood of Christ.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Price, not metal. Silver and gold were Israel's own pictures of ransom. Peter names them only to rule them out.

- Price set by the Person. One thing measures the blood's value: the infinite worth of the One whose blood it is, as God judges it.

- Price that cannot fall. Unlike metals, it never deteriorates or shifts in value — so the redemption it buys is eternal.

- Price paid by a flawless Lamb. "Without blemish" means nothing missing; "without spot" means nothing staining from outside. His obedient life made the sacrifice acceptable. But that obedience was not what paid for sin.

- Price that reshapes the bought. Ransomed out of the enemy's hands and out of an empty inherited religion, the redeemed walk as strangers in reverent fear. That fear comes from knowing redemption, not from doubting it.

1 Peter 1:20 · Darby

foreknown indeed before [the] foundation of [the] world, but who has been manifested at the end of times for your sakes,

God's plan to redeem was not a rescue improvised after things went wrong. Peter reaches back behind creation itself. The Lamb whose blood bought his readers was already in God's mind before the world existed. Then He came into view at a set moment in time — and He came for them.

Redemption Was Not an Afterthought

The verse steadies believers who might think the gospel is something recent:

The apostle now takes up a comforting truth that steadies the believer. The gospel may have been new to them. But it was all settled in God's mind and counsel before man fell — yes, before creation. Redemption was no afterthought to repair the damage. Of course the Lord God implied it in the sentence He passed on the serpent in paradise, and every sacrifice afterwards pictured it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer draws out what this says about God when evil entered His creation:

If the "Lamb without blemish and without spot" was "foreordained before the foundation of the world," then redemption must certainly have been in God's mind that far back. The Blessed One did not have to pause and invent a plan to repair the terrible evil the enemy had brought into His fair creation. No, He had only to bring out the truth about the spotless Lamb from the unexplored treasury of His precious counsels.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

An Answer to the Charge of Novelty

Next to a law centuries old, the gospel could look like the newcomer. This verse turns that around:

It was no new thought. Though only newly brought out, it was in fact the oldest of all purposes. Did they boast about their law? The apostle can answer that Christianity was in God's mind before the foundation of the world. It is the present blessed revelation of grace in Christ. Therefore there could be no comparison on that score, not even for a Jew.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Before" the Foundation, Not "From" It

The verse says "before" the foundation of the world, not "from" it. One writer holds that the difference matters:

"From" the world's founding does not carry the same meaning as "before" it. Let us respect and learn from the very words of God… A Christian finds it easy to understand that Christ was foreknown before time began. But how wonderful the grace that God chose us for such an association, and for such a purpose! He was known before creation, since He had a glory of His own above it. We by grace are the objects of God's counsel, and His work matched it. So we may enjoy everything where He is, and with Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer links that earlier date to who is being blessed:

The introduction of the Lamb of God was no afterthought with God. He was pre-ordained before the foundation of the world. Why before the foundation of the world? Because the blessing of the heavenly saints — the church — was thought of before the foundation of the world.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why He Appeared When He Did

Being foreknown was not enough; the Lamb also had to appear. The moment was chosen, not random:

"Foreknown" could not be enough. Christ was "manifested" in due time, and the due time was "at the close of the times." God's patience had been long. He dealt with man in many ways, governing him, to see if in some way there might be fruit from man that He could accept. The fall happened in one man, but it belonged to the whole race. And the sample of that race under God's special care proved the tree worthless.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Manifested as Both Redeemer and Revealer

He came to do more than redeem. He also showed us who God is:

The Lamb of God was ordained in eternity, but manifested in time… and that not only as the Redeemer but as the Revealer. God was perfectly revealed in Him, so that it is by Him that we believe in God. We do not come to believe in God through the wonders of creation, or through the law given by Moses, or through visions of angels. We believe through Christ — once dead, now risen and in glory.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Two Short Words: "For You"

The eternal plan ends up addressing the reader directly:

This Lamb — the Lamb of God — has been entirely of God's providing. He was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifested in these last times for you. God had thought of His people from all eternity, and had told out all His heart for them in the gift of His beloved Son.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Before — the Lamb was foreknown before creation, so redemption was never a repair job God improvised after the fall.

- Older — the plan came before the world, so the gospel is not the newcomer. It is the oldest purpose God has, older than the law men boasted in.

- Higher — "before" the foundation is not the same as "from" it. That earlier word marks out heavenly blessing, and grace puts believers inside it.

- Then — God made Him manifest at the end of the times, once His long testing had proved that man produced no fruit He could accept.

- Yours — the whole line of eternal counsel ends in two small words: "for you." There God tells out His whole heart in the gift of His Son.

1 Peter 1:21 · Darby

who by him do believe on God, who has raised him from among [the] dead and given him glory, that your faith and hope should be in God.

Peter has been writing about Christ, the Lamb who bore our sins. Now he tells his readers where that leaves them. They are not only forgiven; they are brought to trust God Himself. The verse turns on three things. Our believing comes through Christ. God raised Him and gave Him glory. And the result is faith and hope resting in God.

Through Him, not through anything else

The phrase "through him" rules out every other route to God. It points to one.

God had appointed the Lamb in His own purpose before the world was made. But He was revealed in the last days for believers. And here believers are presented as they truly are: they believe in God through Jesus — through this Lamb. They do not believe because of creation. Creation does testify to His glory, but it gives the conscience no rest, and it says nothing of a place in heaven. They do not believe because of providence. Providence directs all things, yet it still leaves God's government in deep darkness. Nor do they believe because of the way God revealed Himself on Mount Sinai, under the name Jehovah, with the terror that goes with a broken law. We believe through Jesus, the Lamb of God. And notice: it does not say we believe in Him, but "through Him" in God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where faith looks

Notice where faith looks. It does not look at the believer's own state. It looks at something God did outside of him.

Faith does not rest on my being risen. It rests on Christ having been raised. That difference matters a great deal. Many a sincere soul keeps turning inward, trying to find out whether it is risen. But that is not the faith that God Himself works. … My confidence is this: God raised Christ from the dead, when Christ was there for me.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The God they came to trust

Peter's readers were in a hard situation. The verse answers a practical question for them: what is this God like?

Through Him, through Christ the lamb, they now believed in God. And that is the point made here: what God did they believe in? How did they know that they could trust Him, especially in their difficult situation? The answer lies in the verse quoted above: They believed in a God who raised Christ from the dead and gave Him glory. He had not left Christ in the grave. By raising Him from the dead, He had put on record that Christ had all His good pleasure. On top of that, He rewarded Him richly and "gave him glory".

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Resurrection, glory, and the question of our sins

How can we know God is for us? One writer answers with two facts and one question: where are our sins now?

The resurrection of Christ from among the dead, and the glory given to Him on high, are God's mighty and clear evidence. They prove that He is for the believer completely and for ever. If anything could have made this doubtful, it was our sins. But they were laid on another — yes, God laid on Christ the iniquity of us all. Christ bore our sins in His body on the tree. Where are they now? After making purification for sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high. Not one sin did God leave on the believer; not one did Christ carry into heaven.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer draws out what this removes from the believer's mind: Christ's resurrection "is to give him faith and hope toward God, delivered from all fear of judgment."

Faith and hope — and their resting place

Faith and hope are not two words for the same thing. One looks at now. The other looks ahead.

For He shows us the very heart of God, and through Him faith and hope in God become fully real. Faith is present confidence of heart in His faithfulness. Hope is the precious expectation of future glory in His presence.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Peter puts our faith and hope in God Himself, not in anything else. One writer says that is why such faith cannot fail. He also thinks it is rarer than we assume.

What a blessed rest in Himself has God presented for our faith and hope! And surely nothing less than having them in God Himself will do. Everything outside of God changes and is uncertain. But He does not change. Faith and hope that rest in Him cannot fail or come to an end. I do think, in our own day, there is very little of faith and hope in God.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Summary

- Through Him — not creation, not providence, not Sinai. Christ is the one road by which a conscience comes to rest in God.

- In God — Christ is the means; God Himself is the object. Faith goes through Christ and rests in God.

- Raised — faith looks at what God did to Christ, not at what the believer feels has happened in himself.

- Given glory — the Son's reward is God's open proof that the sin question is closed. God left no sin on the believer, and Christ carried none into heaven.

- So that — here is the aim. Confidence now in God's faithfulness. Expectation of glory with Him later. Both rest on the One who never changes.