And he built the house of the forest of Lebanon; its length was a hundred cubits, and its breadth fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubits, upon four rows of cedar-pillars, with cedar-beams upon the pillars;
After the temple, the account turns to Solomon's own palace. The first building is a hall named after a mountain forest, and its cedar and pillars raise one question: what was it for?
The name raises a question about where this building actually stood.
The context shows that these passages do not refer to the forest at Lebanon. Rather, Solomon had a house in Jerusalem built from the trees of Lebanon, and he called it "the house of the forest of Lebanon."
The name may also describe what the building looked like from the inside, and what it stood for.
The name reminds us of how it was built, and perhaps of how it looked as well. Solomon built it of cedar wood. Inside and outside it had cedar columns. Set in long rows, they may have made the house look like a grand forest. On the other hand, we can see in this name a beautiful image of this glorious reign. Lebanon faced Tyre and even belonged to it. So there was a link between this house and the nations that had submitted to the great king.
It helps to know what kind of tree this was.
This is the beautiful tall tree that Solomon used widely in building the temple and his palaces. Its name "cedar" comes from the firmness of its roots. Its wood lasts a long time and has a sweet smell. People used it for beams, pillars and masts, and for carved images.
One thing this house lacked sets it apart from the temple.
Solomon did not overlay this building with gold, for gold speaks of the nature of God, and the house of the forest of Lebanon speaks of the government of God. So cedar wood stands out here (vs.2-3), because cedar is a lasting wood. This tells us that the government of the Lord Jesus will be stable and lasting through the whole 1000 years. This house had many pillars, though only 2 stand at the entrance of the temple.
The measurements given here outstrip the house Solomon had just built for God.
Next to the Temple, Solomon's most important building was the house of the forest of Lebanon. Solomon set it up in Jerusalem, but he built it with materials brought down from Lebanon. This house was much larger than the Temple. The Temple was 60 cubits long and 20 cubits wide. The house of the forest of Lebanon was 100 cubits long and 50 cubits wide. Both were 30 cubits high. In this great building Solomon kept his 300 shields of beaten gold, and every vessel in it was of pure gold, none of silver, for silver counted for nothing in the days of Solomon (1 Kings 10:17-21).
The four rows of pillars framed a line of sight that ended at a person.
Your eye passed through the forest of cedar pillars in the central part to the second porch. At its far end rose a throne of gold and ivory, beautifully made. On that throne you could gaze at the glorious king, peaceable Solomon, the Lord's beloved Jedidiah, whose wisdom no one ever surpassed — the righteous king doing righteousness.
The building's function followed from that throne.
This porch of the throne was the "porch of judgment." That was the seat of government for the nations, the place where righteousness was upheld. The house of the forest of Lebanon linked the government of Israel itself with that of the nations.
The building points ahead to a reign still to come.
Here we have a picture, given in advance, of the glorious rule of the kingdom, when our Lord judges in righteousness. The house of the forest of Lebanon is a picture of His glory among the nations… Everything in the temple and in the palace buildings was glorious, and it revealed the immense riches of the great king. What a day it will be when Christ displays His riches and glory, and the saints of God share it all!
One more difference from the temple points the same way:
This building had windows (vs.4-5), though the temple did not. Government looks out to consider the welfare of the people. In the temple everything speaks of God's glory, with no outward view at all.
- Name. The house stood in Jerusalem, not in Lebanon. The forest came to the city as cedar carried down from the mountain.
- Material. Cedar has firm roots, lasting wood and a sweet smell. This house has cedar, not gold: gold speaks of God's nature, and this building speaks of His government.
- Scale. At 100 by 50 cubits it was larger than the temple's 60 by 20, though the two matched in height.
- Throne. The rows of cedar pillars opened a view straight to the porch of judgment, where the righteous king sat and judged.
- Reach. Facing Tyre and the nations, this house tied Israel's government to theirs. It pictures the day when Christ shows His glory among the nations, and His own share it with Him.
and it was covered with cedar above upon the side-chambers, which were on forty-five pillars, fifteen in a row.
This verse describes the roof of Solomon's own palace hall: a cedar ceiling resting on forty-five pillars, set in three rows of fifteen. Commentators ask what all those pillars stand for, and why a king's house says so much about the reign of Christ.
This building was not the temple. What went on inside it shows what it pictures.
Scripture describes "the house of the forest of Lebanon" in detail. It was much larger than the temple, though not as elaborate and costly. This house was the place of judgment and administration of Solomon's kingdom. So it speaks of the administration of the earthly kingdom of the Lord Jesus in the millennium — the 1000 years of His reign of righteousness and peace.
The verse names cedar and no other material. Writers weigh that against the gold of the temple.
This building was not overlaid with gold, for gold speaks of the nature of God, and the house of the forest of Lebanon speaks of the government of God. So cedar wood stands out here (verses 2-3), because cedar is a lasting wood. That tells us the government of the Lord Jesus will be stable and lasting through the whole 1000 years. Many pillars stood in this house, while only two stand at the entrance of the temple.
The chambers, the rows of fifteen and the cedar laid over them all belong to one design.
It was built of cedar wood. Inside and out it showed cedar columns, and those long rows may have made the house look like a grand forest… The house of the forest of Lebanon was one hundred cubits long (forty cubits longer than the temple), fifty cubits wide, and thirty cubits high. It rested on four rows of columns. On both sides stood three rows of columns, set in groups of fifteen, with sets of rooms stacked one above another… Above these rooms a cedar ceiling formed a roof. It also covered the centre of the building, and four rows of columns held that ceiling up.
So why does this house need so many supports? One writer answers from what God's own house does not need.
The house of God supports itself. In its perfect stability it needs no other support. The glory of God is enough in itself; yet God the Father brings His children into it and gives them a home there. It will not be like that in the reign of Christ over the nations. The saints will be called to share in His reign and to judge the world with Christ (1 Cor. 6:2; Ps. 2:9; Rev. 2:26-27). The Lord will have companions in His government, always living near the king, just as Solomon's companions once lived in the house of the forest of Lebanon.
The house is named after Lebanon, a land outside Israel. One writer follows that name to the nations.
Lebanon faced Tyre and even belonged to it. So there was a link between this house and the nations that had submitted to the great king. It was there that Solomon sat as sovereign and judge of the nations as well as of his own people.
Another writer gives each of Solomon's buildings its own picture, and places this one among the nations:
To my mind it is the house of Solomon that pictures the church, in connection with Christ. The temple pictures the Father's house on high, where God brings us to live. "We are His house." And the house of the forest of Lebanon pictures His glory among the nations. The porch of judgment marks out this glorious reign. The glory was not all on the outside. The inner court was just as beautiful.
Not every writer reads the chapter only as a picture of glory. One compares how long Solomon spent on each house.
In 1 Kings 7 we have the house. "He built the House of the Forest of Lebanon." Here is the difference between what belonged to Solomon and what was for the Lord. And we find one striking fact too: long as he worked on the Lord's house, he spent nearly twice as long on his own. So it is quite clear what Solomon was heading toward. It might be slow, but the fruit was yet to appear — bitter fruit of self.
- Purpose. This was the hall where Solomon judged and ruled. It pictures rule, not worship.
- Material. Cedar rather than gold marks it out: gold speaks of God's nature, cedar of a government that endures.
- Pillars. Forty-five columns hold up this roof. God's own house needs none. The pillars point to companions who will share Christ's reign.
- Reach. The name ties the house to Lebanon and Tyre, nations under the king. Christ's glory reaches beyond Israel.
- Caution. Solomon spent nearly twice as long on his own house as on the Lord's. Commentators differ: some see only coming glory here, one sees the first bitter fruit of self.
And there were cross-beams in three rows, and window was against window in three ranks.
Here the record counts the windows of Solomon's second great house, the house of the forest of Lebanon. The detail looks small, yet the temple had no windows at all, and commentators find meaning in that gap.
Ancient windows were not panes of glass:
There are several Hebrew words translated this way. reason: contradicts Grant's "not in the temple"; also splits 31-word grade-17 sentence
These windows sit in a building of rows. One writer gives its size and explains how the openings faced:
The house of the forest of Lebanon was one hundred cubits long (forty cubits longer than the temple), fifty cubits wide, and thirty cubits high. It rested upon four rows of columns. The windows were opposite one another. We have reason to think that some faced outward, and the others inward toward the building itself, facing the porch.
Solomon's hall of government let in light from outside. The house of worship did not. One writer ties the difference to the purpose of each building:
There were windows in this building (vv. 4-5), though not in the temple. Government looks out to consider the welfare of the people. In the temple everything speaks of God's glory, with no outward vision at all. Inside this house of the forest of Lebanon stood a hall called the Hall of Judgment, where Solomon set his throne (v. 7).
The tabernacle, the tent of worship used before the temple, was the same:
There was no window in the tabernacle. No light of nature entered the Holy Place. The light of the golden lampstand, and that alone, was the light of the Holy Place. It reminds us of the Scripture, "And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and its lamp is the Lamb" (Revelation 21:23).
Why name a building in Jerusalem after a forest in the north? One writer finds more in the name than the source of the timber:
It was built of cedar wood. Inside and outside it showed cedar columns. Set in long rows, they may have made the house look like an imposing forest. On the other hand, we can see in this name a beautiful picture of this glorious reign. Lebanon faced Tyre and even belonged to it. So there was a link between this house and the nations in submission to the great king. It was there that Solomon sat as sovereign and judge of the nations as well as of his own people.
Commentators take that reign as a picture of a greater one still to come:
This house was the place of judgment and administration of Solomon's kingdom. It therefore speaks of how the Lord Jesus will govern His kingdom on earth in the millennium. That is the 1000 years of His reign of righteousness and peace.
Windows facing in and out suit a reign whose glory showed both ways. One writer reads Solomon's buildings as pictures of Christ, His people, and His rule:
To my mind, it is rather the house of Solomon that prefigures the church in connection with Christ. The temple prefigures the Father's house on high, where we are brought to dwell. "We are His house." The house of the forest of Lebanon prefigures His glory among the nations. The porch of judgment marks the character of this glorious reign. The glory was not all on the outside. The inner court was just as beautiful. The glory was not hidden either. The outer court, as well as the inner, showed the royal glory of the One who built the whole.
- Openings. Windows then were latticed gaps for light and air. Those inside could watch the world outside unseen.
- Outward. Three rows faced each other. Some looked out, some looked in: light entering a house built for ruling.
- Contrast. The temple and the tabernacle had no such outward view. Inside, the lampstand alone gave light, because everything there spoke of God's glory.
- Reason. Government must look out and weigh the welfare of the people. So the hall of judgment is the building with windows.
- Reach. The house took its name from a forest that faced the nations. It pictures the coming reign of Christ over the nations — a glory not kept hidden.
And all the doors and posts were square, with an architrave; and window was against window in three ranks.
This verse ends the description of the house of the forest of Lebanon. It was the largest of the buildings Solomon put up for himself after he finished the temple. The details are plain building work: squared doorframes, and windows facing each other in three rows. So why does Scripture record them at all?
Verse 5 is part of the description of one building among several. One writer lists them and says what they picture:
The buildings consisted of the following: The house of the forest of Lebanon (verses 2-5). The porch of pillars (verse 6). The porch of judgment, where the king judged (verse 7). The house where the king lived (verse 8). The house where Pharaoh's daughter lived, built like his own (verse 8). The wall which surrounded the great court. While the temple was God's dwelling place, the palace buildings were the dwelling place of the king and his wife, Pharaoh's daughter. From there the king carried out judgment. Here we have a picture in advance of the glorious rule of the kingdom, when our Lord judges in righteousness. The house of the forest of Lebanon is the type of His glory among the nations.
Where does the name come from? One writer finds two answers in it:
It was built of cedar wood. Inside and outside, it had cedar columns. Set in long rows, they may have given the house the look of a grand forest. On the other hand, we can see in this name a beautiful image of this glorious reign. Lebanon faced Tyre and even belonged to it. So there was a relationship between this house and the nations in submission to the great king. It was there that Solomon sat as sovereign and judge of the nations as well as of his own people.
Why does this house have windows at all?
There were windows in this building (vs.4-5), though not in the temple. This is because government looks out to consider the welfare of the people. In the temple everything speaks of God's glory, with no outward view at all.
How were the facing windows arranged? One writer offers a careful answer:
The windows were opposite one another. We have reason to think that some faced outward and the others inward toward the building itself, facing the porch.
Why no gold on this house?
This building was not overlaid with gold. Gold speaks of the nature of God, while the house of the forest of Lebanon speaks of the government of God. So cedar wood stood out in this house (vs.2-3), for cedar is a lasting wood. This tells us that the government of the Lord Jesus will be stable and lasting throughout the entire 1000 years. Many pillars were in this house, though only 2 are seen at the entrance of the temple.
This house looked out and in at once. One writer takes in the whole palace:
The glory was not all on the outside. The inner court was equally beautiful. The glory was not hidden either. The outer court, as well as the inner, exhibited His royal glory who built the whole.
The same writer who noted the forest-like rows draws a contrast with the temple, where pillars are almost absent:
The house of God supports itself, and has no need of other support in its perfect stability... It will not be so with the reign of Christ over the nations. The saints will be called to share in His reign and to judge the world with Christ (1 Cor. 6:2; Ps. 2:9; Rev. 2:26-27). The Lord will have companions in His government. They will always dwell near the king, just as Solomon's companions once lived in the house of the forest of Lebanon.
- House. Verses 2–5 describe one building: the house of the forest of Lebanon, named for its cedar and its forest of columns. There Solomon sat as judge of the nations.
- Windows. The temple had no outward view. This house did, because government looks out to consider the welfare of the people.
- Wood. No gold here, but cedar — a lasting wood. The government of the Lord Jesus will last just as long: the whole thousand years.
- Openness. Inner court and outer court alike showed the royal glory of the One who built it all. Nothing was hidden.
- Companions. Pillars fill this house but not the temple. God's house needs no support. The reign to come will have saints sharing it, dwelling near the king.
And he made the porch of pillars; its length was fifty cubits, and its breadth thirty cubits; and there was a porch in front of them; and there were pillars, and steps in front of them.
The hall of pillars stood between the great cedar house and the throne room, with its own porch and canopy in front. Commentators read this palace complex as a picture of how the Lord Jesus will one day govern the earth, and the pillars are the key detail.
Solomon's palace was a group of buildings, each named and measured in turn:
The buildings consisted of the following: The house of the forest of Lebanon (verses 2-5). The porch of pillars (verse 6). The porch of judgment, where the king judged (verse 7). The house where the king dwelt (verse 8). The house where Pharaoh's daughter dwelt "like unto his house" (verse 8). The wall which surrounded the great court. The account mentions seven things in connection with the palace buildings. The temple was God's dwelling place; the palace buildings were the dwelling place of the king and his wife, Pharaoh's daughter. From there the king carried out judgment. Here we have a picture of the glorious rule of the kingdom, when our Lord judges in righteousness.
The hall took its name from what filled it. Older translations call it the porch of pillars:
The centre itself had two porches. The first was the porch of pillars. It is well named, for it had six rows of pillars along its sides and four rows of pillars rising in the middle. Next came the porch of the throne, or the porch of judgment. It continued from the first and filled the back of the building. At the back of this porch a marvellous throne arose.
The verse mentions a further porch in front of this one, with its own pillars and canopy. The rows of columns led the eye somewhere:
In front of the porch of pillars there was an entry porch, and we are not told its size. It too was decorated with a row of columns. It had a beam across the top, or a flight of steps by which one reached the house. Your eye passed through the forest of cedar pillars in the central part to the second porch. At its far end rose a throne of gold and ivory, wonderfully made. On this throne you could gaze at the glorious king, peaceable Solomon, Jedidiah, the beloved of the Lord, whose wisdom was never surpassed — the righteous king carrying out righteousness.
The temple next door was overlaid with gold; this house was not:
This building was not overlaid with gold, for gold speaks of the nature of God, and the house of the forest of Lebanon speaks of the government of God. So cedar wood stood out here. Cedar is a lasting wood. This tells us that the government of the Lord Jesus will be stable and lasting throughout the entire 1000 years. Many pillars stood in this house, though only 2 stand at the entrance of the temple.
One writer reads the difference as what God's own house needs compared with what Christ's reign will include:
Pillars were everywhere in this house, in contrast to the temple, which had none, except the two pillars Jachin and Boaz at its entrance... The house of God supports itself, and has no need of other support in its perfect stability. The glory of God is enough for itself; only God the Father associates His children with it and gives them a dwelling place there. It will not be so with the reign of Christ over the nations. The saints will be called to share in His reign and to judge the world with Christ (1 Cor. 6:2; Ps. 2:9; Rev. 2:26-27). The Lord will have companions in His government. They will always live near the king, just as Solomon's companions once lived in the house of the forest of Lebanon. In the same way, the Lord had priests living with Him in His temple.
The buildings picture Christ's glory among the nations and the church joined to Him:
To my mind, it is the house of Solomon that pictures the church in connection with Christ. The temple pictures the Father's house on high, where we are brought to dwell. "We are his house"; as the house of the forest of Lebanon prefigures His glory among the Gentiles. The porch of judgment characterises this glorious reign.
- Pillars, placed. The hall of pillars sits between the great cedar house and the throne room. It is one of seven parts of Solomon's palace, separate from the temple.
- Pillars, pointing. The pillars were not decoration for their own sake. The eye travelled through them to a throne of gold and ivory, where a righteous king sat carrying out righteousness.
- Pillars, not gold. Gold speaks of the nature of God. Cedar marks this house as speaking of His government, and cedar lasts, picturing a reign that stays stable for a thousand years.
- Pillars, shared. God's own house needs no supports; a kingdom does. The many pillars here stand for saints called to reign and judge with Christ, companions living near the king.
- Pillars, worldwide. The house of the forest of Lebanon points to Christ's glory among the nations. The porch of judgment gives that reign its character.
And he made the porch for the throne where he judged, the porch of judgment; and it was covered with cedar from floor to floor.
Solomon's palace complex included one room built for a single purpose: a hall where the king sat to hear cases and give verdicts. Older translations call it "the porch of judgment." Why did Israel's king give justice a room of its own? And whose reign does that room point to?
This hall was not a separate building. It stood inside a much larger one, and its design differed from the temple's in a telling way:
This building had windows (vv. 4-5), but the temple did not. Government looks out to consider the welfare of the people; in the temple everything speaks of God's glory, with no view outward at all. Inside this house of the forest of Lebanon, Solomon built a hall called the Hall of Judgment, and there he set his throne (v. 7). Cedar paneled it completely.
Gold covered the temple walls. Cedar lined this hall from floor to rafters, and that difference carries meaning:
No gold covered this building. Gold speaks of the nature of God, and the house of the forest of Lebanon speaks of the government of God. So cedar wood stood out here (vv. 2-3). Cedar is a lasting wood, and this tells us that the government of the Lord Jesus will be stable and lasting through the whole 1000 years.
The building was named after Lebanon, the mountain region north of Israel. Its name says something about how it looked, and something about who came under its rule:
The house was made of cedar wood. Inside and outside, cedar columns stood in long rows, which may have given the house the look of an imposing forest. The name also gives us a beautiful picture of this glorious reign. Lebanon faced Tyre and even belonged to it. Thus there was a relationship between this house and the nations in submission to the great king. It was there that Solomon sat as sovereign and judge of the nations as well as of his own people.
The room's name states its business:
This porch of the throne was the "porch of judgment." There stood the seat of government over the nations, the place that upheld righteousness.
One writer pictures what a visitor saw from the entrance:
Your eye passed through the forest of cedar pillars in the central part of the house to the second porch at the far end. There a throne of gold and ivory rose up, made with wonderful skill. On that throne you could gaze at the glorious king — peaceable Solomon, the Lord's beloved Jedidiah, whose wisdom no one ever surpassed — the righteous king carrying out righteousness.
Commentators read this room as a preview of a reign still to come:
From there the king carried out judgment. Here we see in advance the glorious rule of the kingdom, when our Lord judges in righteousness. The house of the forest of Lebanon stands for His glory among the nations.
Another writer sets the palace and the temple side by side:
To my mind, it is the house of Solomon that pictures the church joined to Christ. The temple pictures the Father's house on high, where He brings us to live. "We are his house." And the house of the forest of Lebanon pictures His glory among the nations. The porch of judgment gives this glorious reign its character.
One writer builds a contrast on the pillars:
Pillars stood everywhere in this house, unlike the temple, which had none except the two at its entrance, Jachin and Boaz. The house of God supports itself. It needs no other support, for it stands perfectly stable. The glory of God is enough in itself; only, God the Father joins His children to it and gives them a home there. It will not be so with the reign of Christ over the nations. The saints will be called to share in His reign and to judge the world with Christ (1 Cor. 6:2; Ps. 2:9; Rev. 2:26-27). The Lord will have companions in His government, and they will always live near the king, just as Solomon's companions lived in the house of the forest of Lebanon.
- Windows — the temple had none, but this hall had them. Government looks out at the welfare of the people; the temple looks only at God's glory.
- Cedar — no gold here. Gold speaks of God's nature; this house speaks of His government. The lasting wood says the rule of Christ will be stable.
- Reach — Lebanon faced Tyre, so the hall linked Israel's rule to the nations. Solomon judged both from one seat.
- Sight — down the long rows of pillars a visitor saw the throne. On it sat the peaceable king, carrying out righteousness.
- Companions — the temple needed no pillars; this hall was full of them. Saints will share Christ's reign, judge the world, and live near the King.
And his house where he dwelt had another court within the porch, which was of the like work. And he made, like to this porch, a house for Pharaoh's daughter, whom Solomon had taken.
This verse ends the account of Solomon's palace with two more buildings. One is the king's own home, with an inner court like the hall of judgment. The other is a house for Pharaoh's daughter, built on the same plan. Commentators see pictures of Christ's reign in both, though they judge the king's Egyptian marriage very differently.
The first house named here is where Solomon lived, not where he ruled.
The first is called Solomon's "own house," "his house where he dwelt," his own residence. Scripture says little about it. The "house of the forest of Lebanon" had a "porch for the throne." In its place the king's house had "another court" inside the entrance porch, built in the same way. Solomon did not judge in this house. He lived there. Scripture presents it in a mysterious way; it is a house of intimacy.
One writer reads each building as a picture of something different.
To my mind it is the house of Solomon that pictures the church, as such, joined to Christ. The temple pictures the Father's house on high, where we are brought to live. "We are His house." The house of the forest of Lebanon pictures His glory among the nations. The porch of judgment marks this glorious reign.
One writer traces government from this court through to the church today.
Verse 8 mentions in passing that the house Solomon built for himself to live in had a court inside the hall, like the one in the house of the forest of Lebanon. The house of the forest of Lebanon stresses government, and that points to the thousand-year kingdom of the Lord Jesus. Government is also needed in the house of God, the Church, today. So 1 Peter 4:17 tells us, "It is time for judgment to begin at the household of God."
Writers do not agree on whether Solomon's marriage to Pharaoh's daughter was a fault. One calls it wrong, yet sees God turning it to good — and sees a warning in the order Solomon built:
One cannot say that righteousness was kept here. Yet how wonderful that God should make a thing that was wrong in itself a picture of what is perfectly good in Him. As we know, the Lord has shown His grace in no way so much as in His dealings with the nations outside Israel. Scripture says, "He took Pharaoh's daughter and brought her into the city of David until he had finished building his own house and the house of the LORD." I do not think that order is without its teaching. He was thinking of his own house first. No wonder he was not so particular about Pharaoh's daughter. We are never right when the Lord's house is not before our own.
Another answers that the charge misses the point of the picture:
Many have thought that Solomon's marriage to the daughter of the king of Egypt broke the law and was an act of unfaithfulness. Forgetting what the Word pictures can lead to such mistakes. Would we say that Joseph was unfaithful when he married Asenath, the daughter of Potipherah, a priest in Egypt? Or that Moses was unfaithful when he married Zipporah, the daughter of the priest of Midian?
Scripture spends the fewest words of all on her house, and the bond it pictures is glorious but not the closest.
The third house belongs to the foreign wife, the daughter of Pharaoh. Scripture says little more about it than about the house where the king lived. We know only that it was built on the plan of the porch of the house of Lebanon. We have already said that Solomon's union with Pharaoh's daughter did not picture the Lord's bond with the Church. It pictured the bond of the Messiah with the nations that once oppressed God's people. This union is glorious beyond doubt, but it does not give the same closeness.
Outward splendour is what ties all these buildings together.
Everything showed the glory, the riches, and the power of the great king. In this outward glory, Pharaoh's daughter had a house like the king's. This outward glory — of the walls, of the courts of the LORD, of the king's house, and of all the rest — shows how these things are joined together in Christ on the day His glory is displayed.
- Dwelling. Solomon's own house was not where he judged but where he lived — a house of intimacy, described in very few words.
- Judgment. Its inner court matched the hall of judgment, and government still belongs to the house of God now: judgment begins there first.
- Failure. Commentators differ on the Egyptian marriage. One calls it wrong and notes that Solomon built his own house before the Lord's; another says the charge forgets the picture being drawn.
- Grace. Either way, the foreign wife's house stands for the nations once hostile to God's people, now brought near to the King.
- Display. Every house shared the King's own glory — a picture of the day when Christ's glory is displayed and all these things are joined in Him.
All these [buildings] were of costly stones, hewn stones, according to the measures, sawed with saws, within and without, even from the foundation to the coping, and on the outside as far as the great court.
The record of Solomon's building work pauses here to describe the stone itself: costly, measured, sawn smooth on both faces, and used everywhere from the foundation up to the coping, the top course of the wall. Why record the quality of stone that no visitor would ever see?
For one writer, the cost matters most where the building begins:
It was of prime importance to lay a costly foundation, one whose solidity would be proof against every test, as the base of the temple of God. This is what God has done for His spiritual house as well. The foundation is Christ, the Chief Cornerstone; the foundations are the truths about Christ and His work as He has presented them through His apostles and prophets. These are the great stones, the costly stones. It is impossible to remove one without compromising or shaking the whole building.
One writer measures these stones and works out what they weigh, and what they point to:
These great foundation stones, sawn and hewn, were indeed "costly stones, huge stones, stones of eight and ten cubits." A cubit, at the lowest, is one foot six inches. So these great stones were at least twelve feet every way, and some fifteen feet every way. If you work it out, you will find they weighed about 250 tons each... Solomon built three houses, which answer, I have no doubt, to the threefold glory of Christ. The same sized stones formed the foundation of each. So Christ is the foundation-stone alike of the Church of God in heavenly places, the future kingdom of Israel, and of millennial blessing to the whole world. The cross we shall find to be the foundation of all.
"Cut according to measure" describes work so exact that the finished joints still astonish those who examine them:
Such stones are still in place, beautifully shaped and squared. They fit so closely that you cannot slip the blade of a pen-knife between them, though there is no mortar — the work of the stone-squarers... In the quarry under Jerusalem, small chips lying about show that workers cut and shaped many stones there, ready for their appointed place.
One writer takes the cost and the cutting together:
All of these houses were built of costly stones. That shows the great cost to the Lord Jesus to bring Gentiles to Himself as well as Israel, through His great sacrifice at Calvary... Being hewn speaks of the work of the Spirit of God. He separates people from the caverns of sin that held them, and cuts them down to a suitable size to fit into God's building. We need this purging work of the Spirit of God today; Israel and believing Gentiles in the Millennium will need it too.
Someone had to lift each stone out of the ground before anyone could saw it:
Is it not perfectly plain that those great stones, 250 tons in weight, never got out of the pit by any effort or work of their own? As we say, they would never have seen daylight if they had not been drawn out. You might just as well have put up a ladder of ten steps and told these stones to climb it out of the darkness. It is the same as setting the ten commandments before a dead sinner and telling him to climb them and so get out of the pit of sin.
The same stone ran through the temple, its courts, and these houses alike:
Verses 9-12 connect the glory of these houses to that of the temple and of its inner and outer courts. The same precious stones were used for all these buildings. Their foundations were the same. Nothing was used that did not match the character of the Lord and of Solomon.
The cutting is not the last stage. The polishing is still going on:
Then these stones must be "polished after the likeness of a palace." This is the work of the teacher, who unfolds the mysteries of God and leads souls upward, onward, Godward, into closer conformity to Christ. The present world is God's workyard... The Lord Jesus is not only making use of the gifts of the Spirit, but also of the trials and temptations that come upon Christians; for all things are under His skilful hand, therefore "for those who love God all things work together for good."
The cost then becomes personal:
If those were great stones and costly, surely believers are great stones and costly. "He who did not spare His own Son but gave Him up for us all." I am no mason, but a stone fifteen feet cube would cost a great deal. And, fellow-believer, fellow-stone in the living temple, think what you have cost.
- Costly below. The best stone went where nobody could see it — the foundation. Commentators read that foundation as Christ Himself, and as the truths about His work.
- Costly out of the pit. A 250-ton block never climbed out of the quarry. Someone drew it out. No one climbs out of sin by effort either.
- Costly under the saw. "Cut according to measure" is the Spirit's work: separating, sizing, fitting a person into God's building.
- Costly everywhere. Foundation to coping, inside to outer court — the same quality everywhere, even where no eye would reach.
- Costly to you. The price of every living stone was the giving up of God's own Son — so think what you have cost.
And the foundations were of costly stones, great stones, stones of ten cubits and stones of eight cubits.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And above were costly stones, hewn stones, according to the measures, and cedar.
This line describes the upper courses of Solomon's buildings, above the huge foundation stones. Commentators read the stone and cedar here as a picture of something far larger than a royal palace.
One writer notes that the same costly materials run through every part, and that this outward glory points beyond Solomon:
It was the same thing also towards the great outer court. So even the great court, as well as the inner court of the house of the LORD, was built with costly stones and with cedar. The house itself had its own particular glory. Everything showed the glory, the riches, and the power of the great king. This outward glory — of the walls, of the courts of the LORD, of the king's house, and of all the rest — shows how these things are connected in Christ in the day of His manifested glory.
Another writer ties the three houses Solomon built to three sides of Christ's glory:
Solomon built three houses. I have no doubt they answer to the threefold glory of Christ. Stones of the same size formed the foundation of each (1 Kings 7:11). In the same way, Christ is equally the foundation-stone of the Church of God in heavenly places, of the future kingdom of Israel, and of millennial blessing to the whole world. The cross we shall find to be the foundation of all.
The word "costly" is not decoration. The same writer works out how big these blocks really were:
These great foundation stones, sawn and hewn, really were costly stones, great stones, some of ten cubits and some of eight. A cubit, at the lowest, is one foot six inches — it is the measure from a man's elbow to the end of his fingers. So these great stones were at least twelve feet across, and fifteen feet across. If you work it out, you will find they weighed about 250 tons each.
He turns that price tag on the reader:
If those were great stones and costly, surely believers are great stones and costly. "He who did not spare His own Son but gave Him up for us all." And, fellow-believer, fellow-stone in the living temple, think what you have cost.
Masons did not use the stones as found. They sawed and squared each one to a set size first. One commentator reads that shaping as a work done in people:
All of these houses were built of costly stones (v.9). This shows the great cost to the Lord Jesus of bringing Gentiles to Himself as well as Israel, by means of His great sacrifice at Calvary. Hewn stones formed the foundation, and the same stones enclosed the court. Being hewn speaks of the work of the Spirit of God. He separates people from the caverns of sin that held them in bondage. He cuts them down to a suitable size to fit into God's building. We today need this purging work of the Spirit of God; Israel and believing Gentiles in the Millennium will need it too.
Shaping is one thing; placing is another. A stone that size goes where the builder puts it:
The apostle Peter runs parallel with this when he writes: "you yourselves like living stones are being built up as a spiritual house" (1 Peter 2:5). One stone cannot make a building, and stones do not choose their own place. Each stone finds its place according to the mind of the Divine Architect.
The verse pairs costly stone with cedar. One writer describes that wood, and what covering stone with it pictures:
The cedar wood has a fine grain and a fragrant smell. It resists decay so well that cedar beams, little changed, still turn up in ruins of Asian temples 2000 to 3000 years old. This sets out in some measure the abiding character of the Lord Jesus Christ. "You remain." Passing time has no effect on Him... Because of these qualities, Solomon made sure cedar covered everything in his building, good as the building already was. In Peter's letter, the living stones (hewn by a workman who never made a mistake) are built up into a spiritual house. They are, however, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ only as far as they are wrapped up or hidden in the beauty of Christ.
The stones in this verse do nothing. Everything happens to them. Stanley presses that point:
You notice that everything was done to these stones. They did not do one bit of it. They were hewn, they were drawn out, they were built into the temple, they were covered with cedar. The pure gold was put on them. It is the same with the poor sinner. Salvation from beginning to end is all of God.
- Costly — the stones were huge and expensive. Read of believers, they say what each one cost God: His own Son.
- Cut — hewing pictures the Spirit's work. He separates people from sin's caverns and trims them to fit God's building.
- Carried — no stone climbed out of the quarry or chose its spot. The Divine Architect places each one.
- Covered — cedar over stone speaks of Christ's unchanging character. Living stones are acceptable to God only as hidden in Him.
- Complete — the stones did nothing at all. Hewn, drawn out, built in, covered, gilded: salvation from start to finish is all of God.
And the great court round about had three rows of hewn stones, and a row of cedar-beams; and so it was for the inner court of the house of Jehovah, and the porch of the house.
Verse 12 closes the building account with the walls that ringed the whole complex. Two questions follow. Why record a courtyard wall at all? And why was it built as richly as the house it surrounded?
Commentators press the sameness first. The same materials went into the sanctuary and into the boundary walls.
It was the same thing also towards the great outer court. So even the great court, as well as the inner court of the house of Jehovah, was built with costly stones and with cedar. The house itself had its own particular glory. Everything showed the glory, the riches, and the power of the great king. This outward glory of the walls, of the courts of Jehovah, of the king's house, and of all the others shows the connection between these things in Christ in the day of His manifested glory.
The verse describes a wall around the courts. One account gives its layout and thickness.
The Separate Place, on which the Temple stood, was one hundred cubits square. The Court of the Altar and the Separate Place together formed what was called the Inner Court. A wall five cubits thick surrounded it, built of three rows of cut stones, with cedar beams on the top.
"Hewn" means shaped with tools. One writer applies that shaping to people.
All of these houses were built of costly stones (v.9). This shows the great cost to the Lord Jesus to bring Gentiles to Himself as well as Israel, through His great sacrifice at Calvary. The foundation was of hewn stones and the court was enclosed with these also. Being hewn speaks of the work of the Spirit of God. He separates people from the caverns of sin that held them in bondage. He cuts them down to a suitable size to fit into God's building. We today need this purging work of the Spirit of God. Israel and believing Gentiles in the Millennium will need it too.
Cedar is the second material named. One writer lists what makes it fit for this building.
The cedar is marked by great durability, great height, refreshing shade and fine beauty, and these qualities picture Christ. The cedar wood has a fine grain and a fragrant smell. It resists decay so well that cedar beams, little changed, have been found in the ruins of Asian temples between 2000 and 3000 years old. This shows in a measure the abiding character of the Lord Jesus Christ… Because of these qualities, Solomon took care to have everything in his building, good though it might be, covered with cedar. Of the house itself we read, "All was cedar; no stone was seen." In Peter's letter, the living stones (cut by a workman who never made a mistake) are built up into a spiritual house. They are, however, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ only in so far as they are wrapped up or hidden in the beauty of Christ.
Verses 9–12 stand between Solomon's own houses and the courts of the temple. One writer notes what they share.
Verses 9-12 connect the glory of these houses to that of the temple and of its inner and outer courts. The same precious stones were used for all these buildings. Their foundations were the same. Nothing went into them that did not match the character of the Lord and of Solomon.
Another writer works out the weight of those foundation stones and reads the shared base as pointing to one Person: "as the same sized stones formed the foundation of each, so is Christ the foundation-stone alike of the Church of God in heavenly places, the future kingdom of Israel, and of millennial blessing to the whole world. The cross we shall find to be the foundation of all."
Commentators differ on how far the details can be pressed. One admits openly that this arrangement resists interpretation: "It may be difficult to picture just what is meant by this, and the spiritual meaning of it may be just as difficult to work out."
- Same stone. The great court, the inner court and the porch used the same costly stone and cedar as the house. The boundary matched the sanctuary.
- Same glory. The materials did not change at the wall. So the outer court showed the king's glory, riches and power as clearly as the house did.
- Same hewing. Stone is cut before it is laid. That trimming pictures the Spirit's work: He separates people from sin and cuts them to fit God's building.
- Same covering. Cedar resists decay, and inside the house it hid every stone. Living stones are accepted only as hidden in the beauty of Christ.
- Same foundation. The temple and the king's own houses rested on the same stones and the same foundations, and their cost points to what it cost Christ at Calvary.
And king Solomon sent and fetched Hiram out of Tyre.
Solomon's temple is going up, and the bronze work needs a craftsman. The king looks outside Israel, brings back a man from Tyre, and the record pauses to name him — so why does this one worker matter?
A reference work describes him, and notes that the two records of his mother's tribe do not match:
He was a skilled worker from Tyre, filled with wisdom and understanding. He was sent to make things for the temple. His father was a man of Tyre. In 2 Chronicles 2:14 he is called "the son of a woman of the daughters of Dan." But 1 Kings 7:14 reads "a widow's son of the tribe of Naphtali," which may mean that her husband was a man of Naphtali. He is called Huram in 2 Chronicles 2:13.
God chose two Israelites to build the tabernacle in the wilderness, and no outsider shared the work. Solomon's temple is different:
In the wilderness the Lord had chosen Bezalel of Judah and Oholiab of Dan for the work of the tabernacle (Exodus 35:30-35). Then the work of the tabernacle had fallen to the children of Israel alone. The people, entirely separated from the nations, could have no work in common with them. The scene changes under Solomon: the reconciled nations now serve God together with His own people. The Lord's Anointed has dominion over them both. Hiram belonged to both by birth. His parentage came from the joining of Israel with the Gentiles — a remarkable fact that fits the scene before us exactly.
The temple record names only one builder, and that detail points forward:
Looking on to the temple, only one man is named as working — Hiram. His mother was Jewish and his father was a Gentile. He is surely a picture of the world to come: "And those who are far off shall come and build in the temple of the LORD" (Zechariah 6:15). Looking on further to the temple described for us in Ezekiel, not one person is mentioned as building there. Looking on further to the New Testament, where the spiritual house is brought into being, three Builders are named: the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
God had the right man ready, and Chronicles lists far more than bronze work:
The Lord had prepared a suitable overseer for the work Solomon required. King Solomon sent and brought this man, Huram, from Tyre. His name was the same as the king of Tyre. In 2 Chronicles 2:13-14 much more is said about him. There he is "skilled to work in gold and silver, bronze and iron, stone and wood, purple and blue, fine linen and crimson, and to make any engraving and to accomplish any plan that may be given him."
Gold filled the temple itself. Bronze — older translations call it brass — belonged to the outer court, and Hiram's work stopped there:
By divine righteousness we are able to stand before Him. We have it in Christ in heaven. Brass is the symbol of the righteousness of God, showing on earth what He is for sinful man. The furniture of the temple was made of gold. The furniture of the court was brass, and it had been cast in the earth. Hiram worked in brass only.
God prepared Hiram for work that no one else could match, and commentators see a picture in that:
We sometimes hear of a man who is "a jack of all trades, master of none," but here was a man who was a master of all trades. Certainly there would be nobody else who could approach his capabilities. God had specially prepared him for the purpose of building the temple. We surely see in him a picture of the Holy Spirit of God. The Spirit is perfectly skilled in every detail of the work of building God's house.
Hiram's finished work carried one meaning:
The work of Hiram ends here. It was, in type, the Holy Spirit's power unfolding in this world what Christ is and what God Himself is in His government.
- Sent for. Solomon looked outside Israel. He brought Hiram from Tyre to do the bronze work of the temple court.
- Mixed birth. His father was a man of Tyre, his mother an Israelite. Kings names Naphtali, Chronicles names Dan; her husband may have been the man of Naphtali.
- Widened work. Israelites alone built the tabernacle. The nations share in building the temple, because the Lord's Anointed rules over both.
- Only one name. The tabernacle has two named builders, the temple only one — and he belongs to both peoples. Those far off will come and build.
- The pattern. God prepared one man who was master of every craft — a picture of the Spirit, skilled in every detail of building God's house.
He was a widow's son of the tribe of Naphtali, and his father was a man of Tyre, a worker in brass; and he was full of wisdom and understanding and knowledge, to do all kinds of works in brass. And he came to king Solomon, and made all his work.
Solomon sends to Tyre for the man who will cast the bronze work of the temple. The record then pauses to tell us who he was: his mother's tribe, his father's city, and the wisdom God gave him. That short biography raises three questions. Why does a foreigner's son handle the holy vessels? Why only one metal? And who does he picture?
Here his mother's tribe is Naphtali. In 2 Chronicles it is Dan. Writers treat this as a puzzle with an answer, not a contradiction:
Then Solomon sent and brought Hiram out of Tyre. This was not the king, but a master workman. His father was from Tyre. His mother was by birth of the tribe of Dan; she was a widow, and she had married a man of Naphtali. This reconciles an alleged discrepancy. In Chronicles he is called Huram. His correct name was probably Huram-abi ("abi" meaning "my father").
Israelites alone built the tabernacle. The temple is different, and Hiram's parentage marks the change:
In the wilderness the Lord had chosen Bezaleel of Judah and Aholiab of Dan for the work of the tabernacle. At that time the work of the tabernacle fell to the children of Israel alone. The people were completely separate from the nations and could have no work in common with them. The scene changes under Solomon: the nations, now reconciled, serve God together with His own people. The Lord's Anointed has dominion over them both. Hiram belonged to both by birth. The alliance of Israel with the Gentiles formed his parentage — a remarkable fact, and one that fits the scene before us.
This was more than a hiring decision. Fereday sees God's wider purpose for His house in it:
The two kings brought Israelite and Gentile together, and the skilled workman united both in one person. This reminds us again that when the Lord caused the temple to be built, He had Gentiles in mind for blessing as well as His people Israel. "Let not the foreigner who has joined himself to the Lord say, 'The Lord will surely separate me from His people.' … these I will bring to My holy mountain, and make them joyful in My house of prayer … for My house shall be called a house of prayer for all peoples" (Isaiah 56:3-7).
The verse does not say Hiram learned his trade; it says he was filled. Commentators read the whole range of his ability as a portrait:
We sometimes hear of a man who is "a jack of all trades, master of none," but here was a man who was a master of all trades. No one else could come near his ability. God had prepared him for this very purpose: building the temple. In him we see a picture of the Holy Spirit of God, who is fully skilled in every detail of the work of building God's house.
Two metals dominate the temple, and the verse assigns Hiram only one of them:
Gold is always the symbol of divine righteousness that brings us into God's presence. Because of divine righteousness we can stand before Him. We have it in Christ in heaven. Bronze is the symbol of the righteousness of God displaying upon earth what He is for sinful man. The furniture of the temple was made of gold. The furniture of the court was bronze, cast in the earth. Hiram worked in bronze only.
Hiram's work filled the court, outside the holy place, where everyone could see it. Rossier ties the picture together:
In a word, it is the righteousness of God, but shown to the outside world in His government. The furniture of the court shows us what is needed so that nothing hinders this display. The Spirit of God, whom Hiram represents, is occupied with this. So we find God opening His house so that we may dwell there with Him. Christ supplies us with the divine righteousness (the gold) we need for this. The Son, as King of Righteousness, shows the glory of His kingdom. And the Spirit acts so that this righteousness can be shown without hindrance before the eyes of all men on earth.
The craftsman shared the name of his king. One writer sees both sides of such an honour:
How suggestive it is of privileges given, and at the same time of responsibilities taken on.
- Filled — his skill came from God, not from training. God prepared him for this work before Solomon ever sent for him.
- Fitted — mother from Israel, father from Tyre. He belonged to both peoples, like the temple itself: Israel and the nations at work together.
- Focused — of the temple's two metals he handled only bronze. Bronze is righteousness shown on earth, in the open court, where people are.
- For all — the foreigner at the furnace is an early hint of the house called a house of prayer for all peoples.
- Followed by responsibility — he carried his king's name and his king's honour. Privilege given is privilege answered for.
And he formed the two pillars of brass; the height of one pillar was eighteen cubits, and a line of twelve cubits encompassed the second pillar.
The temple is built. At its entrance stand two huge pillars of bronze. The verse gives only metal and measurements. Yet commentators read these pillars as a public statement, set where everyone coming to the house would see them.
One writer traces where the bronze came from and what it stands for.
David took the brass (more likely "copper" or "bronze") for the pillars from Syria in war, as we are told in 1 Chron. 18:8. Brass stands for the righteousness of God in judgement. That is why it was used for the altar of burnt offering. Scripture gives four pictures of righteousness. Gold — divine righteousness in itself. Brass (or copper) — divine righteousness applied to man in judgement. Linen — "the righteous deeds of the saints" (Rev. 19:8). Filthy rags — the righteousness of the flesh (Isa. 64:6).
Bronze carries more than one meaning. One writer marks off the use here from the way the metal speaks elsewhere.
When the book of Kings mentions brass, it is not a picture of the divine righteousness by which we come to God. It shows to the eyes of the world the righteousness that marks the kingdom and the government of Solomon, or of Christ. In a word, it is the righteousness of God, but shown outwardly in government.
Eighteen cubits high, twelve around. In feet, the size is easier to picture.
Two great pillars of copper at the entrance added to the splendour of the temple. Each was 18 cubits (27 feet) high and 12 cubits (18 feet) around. If these were solid copper their weight must have been tremendous. They would still be very strong if they were hollow with walls only 4 inches thick.
Another writer looks at where the pillars stood, and at the design in their proportions.
The word that 1 Kings uses for where they stood means "by," not "in": he set up the pillars by the porch of the temple. They were hollow, and the brass was four fingers thick (Jer. 52:21). Brass is a symbol of strength; hollow speaks of emptiness. People who know about such things say that the thickness and size given here give the greatest strength with the least metal. That is just like God in His perfect wisdom.
The pillars stood where no visitor could miss them, and they carried two names.
The bronze pillars stood in front of the porch of the temple and caught the eye at once. They were the outward display of the principles of the kingdom. We have already said that the temple has no other pillar. They were named Jachin (He shall establish) and Boaz (in Him is strength). These were the two great truths pictured for everyone who shared in the blessed reign of Solomon.
The same writer weighs the tense of the first name.
Under Solomon himself the pillar Jachin — He shall establish, not, He has established — spoke of an establishing still to come, of which Solomon's reign was only a faint picture. As for the pillar Boaz — In Him is strength — this is something past, present, future, and eternal. Strength is in Him. The moment the link with God broke, neither the king nor the kingdom would have any strength.
Another writer takes the two names and follows them past Solomon's day.
Jachin means "He shall establish." It is a promise that God will one day establish His house, for it was not to be established then. Israel's unfaithfulness later brought that house down, but God's promise for the future stands. Boaz means "in Him is strength." If the weakness of Israel led to ruin and failure, the Lord Jesus is still the strong One who will do the will of God perfectly.
One writer links these two columns with a promise made to the overcomer, and finds a contrast as well as a likeness.
"The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God." In Solomon's temple two vast bronze pillars stood in the porch. This promise surely points back to them, yet it also stands in contrast. Those pillars were taken away when the temple was destroyed. The promise to the overcomer here is that he will never go out again. It is a fixed and eternal position.
- Bronze stands. Bronze speaks of God's righteousness applied to man in judgement, put on show before the eyes of the world.
- Strength stands. Vast, hollow, four fingers thick — the greatest strength from the least metal. One writer calls that God's perfect wisdom.
- Two names stand. Jachin, "He shall establish," and Boaz, "in Him is strength" — the only pillars named in the house, set in front of it for all to read.
- A future stands. Jachin is future tense, not past; Solomon's reign was the weak picture of an establishing still to come.
- The overcomer stands. Solomon's pillars went when the temple fell. The one made a pillar in God's temple will never go out again.
And he made two capitals of molten brass, to set upon the tops of the pillars; the height of the one capital was five cubits, and the height of the other capital was five cubits;
This verse stops to describe two crowns of cast bronze, each seven and a half feet high, set on top of Solomon's two great temple pillars. Why does Scripture pause over the head of a pillar, and what did these crowns say to everyone who came to God's house?
The Hebrew behind "capitals" is not an architectural throwaway. One writer explains the term and, at the same time, reconciles the different heights Scripture gives for these tops:
1 Kings 7:16 gives the capitals — or crowns, as the Hebrew word Cotharoth means — as five cubits high. Verse 19 gives the lily work as four cubits. And 2 Kings 25:17 says, "the height of the capital was three cubits." The truth, I take it, is that each of these capitals had four parts: a square ledge on top, half a cubit thick, carrying the pomegranates; a similar ledge at the bottom; a bowl one cubit deep; and a rounded belly of three cubits. The last two together, covered with lily work, would make the four cubits. The two ledges would complete the height of five cubits.
Inside the house the furniture was gold. Outside, in the courtyard where people stood, the metal changed:
Divine righteousness is what makes us able to stand before Him. We have it in Christ in heaven. Bronze is the symbol of the righteousness of God, showing on earth what He is for sinful man. The temple's furniture was gold; the court's furniture was bronze, cast in the earth. Hiram worked in bronze only.
Almost everything in Solomon's temple copied the older tent of worship on a grander scale. These crowned pillars did not:
The vessels of Jehovah's house were on a much larger scale than those of the tabernacle, but they were the same, though greater in number. The only new things were the pillars, Jachin and Boaz. The names mean "He will establish" and "in Him is strength" — names that make the meaning of these pillars plain. I have no doubt that the passage in Revelation 3:12 alludes to these pillars.
The crowns sat at the top of two columns whose names carried a message anyone entering could read. One of them looks forward; the other never needed to:
Solomon's throne, his government, his people's relations with God, his worship — everything, in picture form, rested on what God had done. He had established his reign. But under Solomon himself the pillar Jachin said He shall establish, not He has established. It pointed to a future establishing, and Solomon's reign was only a faint picture of it. As for the pillar Boaz — In Him is strength — this is something past, present, future, and eternal. Strength is in Him. Solomon, like every godly king in Israel, had to know this. The moment the link with God was broken, neither the king nor the kingdom would have any strength.
The decoration on these crowns carries meaning:
A lattice network of chains ornamented the capitals on top of the pillars. Besides this, two rows of copper pomegranates served as ornaments, and the capitals were in the shape of lilies. The pomegranates (full of seeds) speak of the abundant fruitfulness of the work of God, while the lilies speak of the beauty of God's work.
Fruit at the very top of a pillar pictures what the Lord looks for:
Bronze pomegranates ornamented the tops of the pillars. How can the divine character be declared before all without bearing fruit abounding in righteousness? The Lord desires to be crowned with fruit. If strength is in Him, it is there to produce fruit.
The pillars themselves did not last, but their message did:
He will establish; in Him is strength — a precious assurance both for Israel and for ourselves. He is willing, He is able. David's royal house forfeited everything by unfaithfulness; but Christ will restore it all in the day of His power. Meanwhile, Solomon's famous pillars have been broken up as scrap and carried to Babylon. The Holy Spirit dwells sorrowfully on their beauty while recording their destruction.
- Crown. The word for "capital" means crown. The different heights given in Kings and 2 Kings fit together once you count the crown's four parts.
- Crowned in bronze. Bronze belongs to the courtyard, not the inner house. It pictures God's righteousness shown on earth to sinful man.
- Crowned with new truth. The tabernacle had nothing like these pillars. They were the one new feature, their names tell why, and one writer hears them behind Revelation 3:12.
- Crowned with fruit and beauty. Pomegranates and lily work at the top speak of fruitfulness and beauty in God's work. The Lord wants to be crowned with fruit.
- Crowned forever. The pillars ended as scrap in Babylon. But "He will establish" and "in Him is strength" wait on Christ, not on Solomon.
[and] nets of checker-work, wreaths of chain-work, for the capitals which were upon the top of the pillars; seven for the one capital and seven for the other capital.
This verse sits inside a long, careful description of the two great bronze pillars at the front of Solomon's temple. Here the account pauses on the ornament that covered their tops. Why does Scripture spend so much detail on decoration, and what do a lattice and a chain have to say about God?
The ornament belongs to two pillars that stood at the entrance, where no one could miss them. Each pillar carried a name.
The bronze pillars, placed in front of the porch of the temple, drew attention at once. They represented the outward display of the principles of the kingdom. We have already said that no other pillar is mentioned in the temple. They were named Jachin (He shall establish) and Boaz (in Him is strength). These were the two great truths shown in symbol to everyone who shared in Solomon's blessed reign. Everything came from Him; in Him, and in Him personally, there is strength. He sustains Himself and needs no outside help at all. His strength establishes others; it does not need to be established.
Another writer gives their size, and what they testified about Christ:
These great pillars, each about 18 cubits high, were a public testimony. Stability is found in Christ, and only in Christ.
Other passages give the capital different measurements. One writer solves the puzzle by treating it as a structure with several parts, not one solid block.
1 Kings 7:16 makes the capitals — or crowns, as the Hebrew word Cotharoth means — five cubits high. Verse 19 makes the lily work four cubits. And 2 Kings 25:17 says, "the height of the capital was three cubits." I think each of these capitals had four parts. (1) A square ledge on the top, half a cubit thick, with the pomegranates on it. (2) A similar ledge at the bottom. (3) A bowl one cubit deep (1 Kings 7:41). (4) A rounded swelling of three cubits (1 Kings 7:20). The last two together, covered with lily work, would make the four cubits. The two ledges would complete the height of five cubits. A network or checker work also covered the capitals, expressing self-control (1 Kings 7:17-18).
One writer reads the two patterns in this verse as a picture of what Christ does with His own. First He catches them. Then He holds them.
The ornaments of the pillars suggest what Christ works for and in His own. "Nets of checker work": He has caught us out of the sea of humanity for Himself (Matt. 13:47; Luke 5:10). "Wreaths of chain work": He binds and secures all whom He acquires (Hosea 11:4).
The writer uses an older translation here: "nets of checker work." The ESV reads "lattices of checker work."
The chain work was not invented for the temple. It appears in only one other place in Scripture, and that place says something about the bond that unites God's people.
Chains also decorate the pillars here. Scripture mentions them nowhere else except on the shoulder pieces and the breastplate of the high priest. They hold the different parts firmly together. They seem to picture the strength of the bond that unites the people of God.
Commentators differ over how to count and separate these ornaments. One writer says the English translation mixes up two different things. He reads the chains as a picture of subjection rewarded:
The seven chains of wreathed work on each pillar tell of entire subjection. They also tell of what it results in: fullness of honour. The English translation constantly confuses the network or checker work with the chain work or wreaths — seven chains hung on each pillar. The confusion is not in the Hebrew Scriptures, which are perfectly clear and distinct. It is in the translation. Only from the Hebrew originals is it possible to harmonise these various differences.
Set this careful description beside what happened to the pillars later. They did not last.
Meanwhile, Solomon's notable pillars have been broken up as scrap, and carried to Babylon (Jer. 27:19-22; Jer. 52:17-23). The Holy Spirit dwells sorrowfully upon their beauty while recording their destruction.
- Pillar — Two bronze columns stood at the temple entrance, showing the principles of the kingdom. Their names meant "He shall establish" and "in Him is strength."
- Crown — The word behind "capital" means a crown. This crown had ledges, a bowl and a swelling — which explains the different measurements elsewhere.
- Net — One writer reads the checker work as a net: Christ has caught His own out of the sea of humanity for Himself.
- Chain — The chain work binds and secures what the net catches. Chains appear elsewhere only on the high priest's shoulder pieces and breastplate.
- Memory — The pillars later ended up as scrap in Babylon. Scripture still records their beauty in full detail.
And he made pomegranates, namely two rows round about upon the one network, to cover the capitals that were upon the top of the pillars; and so he did for the other capital.
Two rows of pomegranates ran around the netting on top of each great pillar at the temple entrance. Commentators read this cast fruit as far more than decoration.
One writer moves from the size of these ornaments to their meaning:
Two great copper pillars stood at the entrance and added to the magnificence of the temple. Even the capitals on top of the pillars were 5 cubits (7.5 feet) high, and a lattice network of chains decorated them. Besides this, two rows of copper pomegranates served as ornaments, and the capitals had the shape of lilies. The pomegranates, full of seeds, speak of the abundant fruitfulness of the work of God, while the lilies speak of the beauty of God's work.
Chapiter is an older English word for the capital, the crowning piece on top of a pillar. Scripture gives three different heights for it, and one writer fits them together:
1 Kings 7:16 gives the chapiters — or crowns, as the Hebrew word Cotharoth means — as five cubits high. Verse 19 gives the lily work as four cubits. And 2 Kings 25:17 says, "The height of the capital was three cubits." I take it that each of these chapiters had four parts. On the top was a square ledge, half a cubit thick, and on this ledge were the pomegranates. A similar ledge sat at the bottom. Then came a bowl one cubit deep, and a bulge of three cubits.
after-note-none: The last two together, covered with lily work, would make four cubits. The two ledges would complete the height of five cubits. The chapiters were also covered with a network or chequer work, which speaks of temperance and self-control.
Why pomegranates, and so many of them? The same fruit hung on the robe of Israel's high priest, next to golden bells:
One detail stands out: the pillars had hundreds of pomegranates on their capitals. In the Word the pomegranate seems to be the image of fruit borne for God. Bells and pomegranates alternated along the hem of the high priest's garment. The bells represent the testimony, the pomegranates the fruit. The pomegranates on the robe were of blue, purple, and scarlet. This was heavenly fruit, fruit matching the dignity of the Lord and His royal dignity as Messiah. Our fruit should bear the character of Christ and be worthy of Him. It should also match our testimony, just as the pomegranates were the same in number as the golden bells. One often finds Christians with more bells than pomegranates, more words than fruit!
The names of the two pillars meant "He will establish" and "in Him is strength." One writer links that strength to the fruit above it:
Bronze pomegranates decorated the tops of the pillars. How can the divine character be declared before everyone without bearing fruit that abounds in righteousness? The Lord desires to be crowned with fruit. If strength is in Him, it is there to produce fruit. He is the True Vine here below, and as such He has no other function. All His care for His own, all His disciples, has for its purpose that they might bear fruit.
Commentators differ on the netting: one reads it as self-control, another as Christ holding those He has caught. Here each part of the decoration points to Him:
The decorations of the pillars suggest what Christ works for and in His own. "Nets of checker work": He has caught us out of the sea of humanity for Himself. "Wreaths of chain work": He binds and secures all whom He acquires. "Pomegranates" are often used in Scripture as emblems of fruitfulness. All who are Christ's are meant to be fruitful. "Upon the top of the pillars was lily work": the lily character, purity and lowliness, is precious in His sight.
Jeremiah lists these same pomegranates again, when the pillars go to Babylon as scrap. One writer reads both the loss and the hope in that record:
He will establish; in Him is strength — a precious assurance both for Israel and for ourselves. He is willing, He is able. David's royal house has forfeited everything by unfaithfulness, but Christ will restore it all in the day of His power. Meanwhile, Solomon's famous pillars have been broken up as scrap and carried to Babylon (Jeremiah 27:19-22; 52:17-23). The Holy Spirit dwells with sorrow on their beauty while recording their destruction.
- Crown — the Hebrew word for the capital means a crown. The pomegranates rested on ledges at its top and bottom, above the netting.
- Strength — the names of the pillars spoke of establishing and of strength. The fruit sat on the very top of that strength.
- Fruit — the pomegranate is packed with seeds. It stands for fruit borne for God, and strength in Christ is there to produce it.
- Balance — on the high priest's robe every bell had a pomegranate to match. Fruit should keep pace with words, not lag behind them.
- Beauty — the Holy Spirit lingers on this ornament even while recording that the pillars went to Babylon as scrap. What man forfeits, Christ will restore in the day of His power.
And the capitals that were upon the top of the pillars were of lily-work [as] in the porch, four cubits.
Two huge bronze pillars stood at the entrance of Solomon's temple. Why does this verse stop to record that their tops were shaped like lilies, and how high they were?
Scripture gives more than one height for these capitals. One writer works out how the parts fit together:
In 1 Kings 7:16, the capitals — or crowns, as the Hebrew word Cotharoth means — are said to be five cubits high. In verse 19 the lily work is said to be four cubits. And in 2 Kings 25:17, "the height of the capital was three cubits." The truth, I think, is that each of these capitals had four parts: a square ledge on the top, half a cubit thick, on which were the pomegranates; a similar ledge at the bottom; a bowl of one cubit deep; and a rounded belly of three cubits. The last two together, covered with lily work, would make the four cubits. The two ledges would complete the height of five cubits.
So why a lily? One writer explains what it pictures:
The lily is the ideal of purity, beauty, and attractive grace. It may be found (though not always) in the lowliest circumstances, and even surrounded by the signs of the curse, though that is foreign to its own nature. Such an emblem may well suit the Lord Himself in His character as Man; and His people too, as by grace they share it with Him.
The crown on the pillar may also say something about the kingdom it stood in:
The pillars were crowned with lily work, a picture, we believe, of the glory of this reign at its beginning (Matt. 6:28-29).
Yet the Lord turned that comparison around:
Our blessed Lord once spoke with appreciation of "the lilies of the field." "Consider them," He said. "I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these" (Matt. 6:28-29). From His holy heaven He had seen Solomon in his magnificent coronation robes, made by skilful hands. But to His mind the modest lily, the work of God, was a more attractive picture. The Song of Songs compares God's saints to lilies.
The Song of Songs uses the same flower for the people God loves, and the contrast there is sharp:
Link it with the Song of Songs, and hear what the Bridegroom says of the earthly bride: "As a lily among brambles, so is my love among the young women." That is the gorgeous lily growing in the thorn thickets of Palestine. We have the teaching about the thorn: how it came in, and what its end will be. We were all thorns once. We can take these words for ourselves, and say that His grace has transformed us into the lily. Clothed in Christ, the believing soul has that fragrance and beauty before Him. God is the One who does this; it is not the result of their scheming and toil.
One writer connects these pillars with a promise Christ made to a church that had little strength:
The tops of the pillars were of lily-work: the lily character, purity and lowliness, is precious in His sight. Solomon's massive bronze pillars were in the Lord's thoughts in His promise to the one who conquers in Philadelphia. He said, I will make him a pillar in the house of My God and he shall go out no more. What an encouragement to all who with little strength seek to keep His word and not deny His name.
The pillars under the lily work stood in plain view, and their names carried a message:
The bronze pillars stood in front of the porch of the temple, and they caught the eye at once. They put the principles of the kingdom on public display. They were named Jachin (He shall establish) and Boaz (in Him is strength). These were the two great truths presented in symbol to everyone who took part in the blessed reign of Solomon. All came from Him; in Him, and in Him personally, there is strength. He maintains Himself and needs no outside help at all. His strength establishes others; it never needs establishing itself.
- Crown. The Hebrew word for these capitals means crowns. The four cubits of lily work covered part of a five-cubit crown.
- Character. The lily pictures purity, beauty and grace that can grow in the lowliest place. It fits Christ as Man, and His people by grace.
- Contrast. Solomon crowned his pillars with lilies. Yet the Lord said Solomon in all his glory was never dressed like one flower.
- Change. In the Song of Songs the lily grows among thorns; we were all thorns once, and grace, not effort, made the difference.
- Continuation. The lily character is precious to Christ now. The one who conquers gets a place as a pillar in the house of God, standing on the strength that is in Him.
And the capitals upon the two pillars, above also, close to the enlargement which was behind the network, had two hundred pomegranates in rows round about, [also] on the other capital.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And he set up the pillars for the porch of the temple; and he set up the right pillar, and called its name Jachin; and he set up the left pillar, and called its name Boaz.
Two hollow brass columns stood at the front of Solomon's temple. Solomon gave each one a name. Why name a pillar at all, and what did those two names say to everyone who walked past?
Each name is a short sentence about God, not about Israel. Writers call them the right and left pillars; the verse names the same two by south and north.
Solomon named the pillars Jachin (on the right of the entry) and Boaz (on the left). Jachin means "He shall establish." This is a promise that God will one day establish His house. He was not going to establish it then. Israel's unfaithfulness later cost them that house. But God's promise about the future still stands. Boaz means "in Him is strength." Israel's weakness led to ruin and failure. But the Lord Jesus is still the strong One, and He will do the will of God perfectly.
Did the pillars stand in the porch or in front of it? One writer weighs the wording, and reads the metal too.
About the position of the pillars: the word that 1 Kings renders "in" means "by" — "He set up the pillars by the porch of the Temple." This matches 2 Chronicles 3:17, "He erected the pillars in front of the temple." The pillars were hollow, and the brass was four fingers thick. Brass is the emblem of strength. Hollow expresses emptiness. Those skilled in these questions say that the thickness and size given here secure the greatest strength with the smallest quantity of metal. That is just like God in His perfect wisdom.
Jachin is future tense. That one detail changes what the pillar claims.
Solomon's throne, his government, his people's relations with God, his worship — everything rested on what God had done. He had established Solomon's reign. All of it was a picture. But in Solomon's own day the pillar Jachin said, He shall establish — not, He has established. It spoke of an establishing still to come, and Solomon's reign was only its feeble picture. As for the pillar Boaz — In Him is strength — this is something past, present, future, and eternal. Strength is in Him. Solomon, like every godly king in Israel, had to know this. The moment the link with God was broken, neither the king nor the kingdom would have any strength.
The number is not decoration. One writer ties the pair to the Bible's rule about witnesses.
And further, let us note that there were two pillars, the sign of divine stability. This kingdom, when it is in the hands of the Lord Jesus, will not be a mere picture but a reality. It will never dissolve through the weakness of man. It will not pass to anyone else. So, as the witness of it, there were two pillars — Jachin and Boaz. These show it as a figure, but only as a witness. "Every charge must be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses."
Solomon's reign was only a picture. The real kingdom is still to come.
The pillars did not last. Babylon's army broke them up. Yet their message survived the wreck.
In Solomon's case the brass pillars could not be kept. The king and those who followed him were unfaithful. The Chaldeans broke the pillars up. Solomon's kingdom could not be established, because he did not seek his strength in God. But even if the material pillars have disappeared, the moral pillars remain. Strength is in the Lord. A day is coming when He will show everyone that He has established in righteousness a kingdom that can never be moved.
One writer finds both truths said about Christians in the New Testament.
They are silent but eloquent witnesses to two great truths: God establishes, and strength is in Christ. The truths declared in this way are expressed by the Holy Spirit in 2 Corinthians 1:21 — "And it is God who establishes us with you in Christ, and has anointed us."
Another writer hears these pillars behind Christ's promise to the believer who overcomes.
"The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God" (Revelation 3:12). Solomon set up two huge brass pillars in the porch of the temple, remarkable for strength and solidity. The names of these pillars were Jachin, establish, and Boaz, strength. The allusion in our text is to these pillars. The believer in Philadelphia is weak and tested. He may even be thrown out of the respected and popular church on earth. Yet he will be established and made strong in the eternal blessedness of Heaven.
- Establish — Jachin means "He will establish." The tense is future. Solomon's kingdom pictured something God had not yet done.
- Strength — Boaz means "in Him is strength." That one is timeless — past, present, future, and eternal.
- Witness — two pillars stood in front of the house, not inside it. Two, because a matter is confirmed by two witnesses.
- Broken — unfaithfulness cost Israel the pillars, and Babylon's army broke them up. The metal went; the message did not.
- Yours — God establishes believers in Christ now, and Christ promises the overcomer a pillar's place in the temple of His God.
And upon the top of the pillars was lily-work; and the work of the pillars was finished.
This chapter describes the two huge bronze pillars at the entrance of Solomon's temple, and it ends with what sat on top of them: lily-work. Why should a flower crown the heaviest metalwork in the house of God?
Two designs sat on top of these pillars. One writer gives the meaning of each:
The pomegranates (full of seeds) speak of the abundant fruitfulness of the work of God, while the lilies speak of the beauty of God's work.
Another writer links the lily-work to the glory of Solomon's reign, and turns the fruit beside it into a lesson for us:
The pillars were crowned with lily-work, a picture, we believe, of the glory of this reign at its beginning (Matt. 6:28-29). Our fruit should bear the character of Christ and be worthy of Him. It should also match our testimony. One often finds Christians with more bells than pomegranates, more words than fruit!
One writer sets out what the lily pictures, and who it fits:
The lily is the perfect picture of purity, beauty and attractive grace. It may be found in the lowliest circumstances, though not always. It may even be surrounded by the signs of the curse, though the curse is foreign to its own nature. Such an emblem may well suit the Lord Himself in His character as Man; and His people too, as by grace they share it with Him.
Jesus once compared the king who built this temple with a flower:
Our blessed Lord once spoke with appreciation of "the lilies of the field." "Consider them," He said. "I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these" (Matt. 6:28-29). From His holy heaven He had seen Solomon in his magnificent coronation robes, made by skilful hands. But to His mind the modest lily, the work of God, was the more attractive picture. God's saints are likened to lilies in the Song of Songs (Song 2:2-16). May the gracious Spirit of God work the lily character in us all. No "outward adornment" will compare with it (1 Peter 3:3).
Solomon's temple copied the tabernacle — the tent of worship that came before it — in most of its furniture, only on a larger scale. The pillars were the exception:
The vessels of the Lord's house were on a much larger scale than those of the tabernacle. But they were the same, only greater in number. The only new things were the pillars, Jachin and Boaz. That is to say, "He will establish," and "in Him is strength." These names make the meaning of the pillars obvious. I have no doubt that the passage in Revelation 3:12 refers to these pillars.
The two names are not saying the same thing twice. One looks forward; the other never changes:
Under Solomon himself the pillar Jachin — He will establish, not He has established — spoke of an establishing still to come. Solomon's reign was only a weak picture of it. As for the pillar Boaz — In Him is strength — this is something past, present, future, and eternal. Strength is in Him. The moment the link with God broke, neither the king nor the kingdom would have any strength.
The verse says the work of the pillars was finished. Yet what Solomon finished did not last:
In Solomon's case, the king and his successors were unfaithful, so the bronze pillars could not be kept. The Chaldeans broke them up (Jer. 52:17-23). His kingdom could not be established because he did not seek his strength in God. But even if the material pillars have disappeared, the moral pillars remain. The day will come when the Lord, in whom is strength, will show everyone that He has established a kingdom in righteousness. That kingdom shall never be moved.
The two ideas — a pillar and a lily-crowned top — come together in a promise the Lord makes to believers:
"On the tops of the pillars was lily-work": the lily character, purity and lowliness, is precious in His sight. Solomon's massive bronze pillars were in the Lord's thoughts when He promised the overcomer in Philadelphia: "I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God. Never shall he go out of it." What an encouragement to all who with little strength seek to keep His word and not deny His name.
- Crowned. The top of the temple's heaviest metalwork was not a weapon or a crest but a flower. Beauty sat on top of strength.
- Lowly. The lily stands for purity, beauty and grace that can grow in the lowliest setting. It fits Christ as Man, and His people with Him.
- Compared. Jesus set Solomon's robes beside a field lily and called the lily lovelier. God's own work outshines the king's.
- Named. Jachin ("He will establish") and Boaz ("in Him is strength") were the one new feature of this temple. The first pointed ahead; the second was always true.
- Finished. The work was finished, yet the Chaldeans broke these pillars up. What they stood for still waits: a kingdom that cannot be moved, and an overcomer made a pillar who goes out no more.
And he made the sea, molten, ten cubits from brim to brim, round all about; and its height was five cubits; and a line of thirty cubits encompassed it round about.
The temple courtyard held one huge basin of cast metal, called a "sea," deep enough to hold thousands of gallons. Why did priests who already served at an altar of blood need this much water, and what does the washing picture?
The measurements describe a standing pool, not a portable bowl.
The Sea was a large pool made of cast copper, ten cubits (15 feet) in diameter. It took the place of the basin in the tabernacle, Israel's earlier tent of worship (Ex. 30:17-21). It stood 5 cubits high, and it rested on 12 oxen, also of copper it seems, three facing each direction, with their backs turned inwards. So, if the oxen were 4 or 5 feet in height, the top of the sea would be 11 or 12 feet high. It stood outside the temple, between the large copper altar and the temple door. It held 3000 baths (about 8000 gallons) of water, and the priests washed in it (2 Chron. 4:5-6). There must have been steps up to the Sea, but Scripture says nothing about them.
The metal is not incidental. The same material used for the altar where sin was judged is used for the basin where dirt is removed.
Solomon's cast sea was brass. Brass is the fitting symbol of divine righteousness. That righteousness demands judgment on sin, as at the brass altar, or judgment on uncleanness, as at the brass sea. Revelation 1 describes the Lord Jesus: "His feet were like burnished bronze, refined in a furnace." That is how He walks among the lampstands. He cannot tolerate evil. He must judge it and trample it under His feet. This is why brass served for both the altar, where sin was atoned for, and the sea, where defilement was washed away.
The sea held water, not blood. That decides where a defiled priest went — and where a failing believer turns.
Under the law, a priest whose hands and feet had become defiled did not need to go back to the brass altar. He needed to go forward to the brass sea. He did not need the blood applied again to make him a priest. He needed only to wash with water, so that he could carry on his service. So now, if a believer fails, if he sins, if he picks up defilement, he does not need washing in the blood again as at the first. He needs the cleansing action of the Word, by which the Holy Spirit brings home to the soul the remembrance of what Christ has done. This removes the defilement, restores communion, and fits the spiritual priest again for his service. Did a sea holding 3000 baths of water make little of a priest's defilement? Did it not prove instead how much God made of it?
The metal itself had a history. It came from a different source than the metal of the earlier basin.
The basin in the tabernacle came from the women's mirrors (Ex. 38:8); the sea came from the spoils of David's conquests. The mirrors suggest that those who gave them gave something up; the spoils speak of victory, which fits the glories of the kingdom that Solomon's reign displays. Scripture does not give the size and capacity of that basin. For the sea it records these details.
Priests did not wash all over at this basin. They washed two things, and each stands for something.
The brass sea served for the daily cleansing of the priests. There they washed their hands and their feet. This made them fit to carry out their service and to live where the Lord lived. In the same way, the disciples could have no part with Christ in the Father's house unless He washed their feet (John 13:8). The Word of God does this washing, on the ground of Christ's intercession as our Advocate. Under the law this washing applied to hands and feet, that is to say, to works and walk. Under grace it applies only to the walk. We have been purified from dead works to serve the Living God, and that happened once for all.
The scale of the basin is itself a message, and its last appearance in Scripture shows what happens when cleansing is no longer needed.
The huge amount of water in the cast sea points to the unlimited provision grace has made. Revelation 4:6 says that "before the throne there was as it were a sea of glass, like crystal." That sea of glass points back to the cast sea in Solomon's temple. But it is not a sea of water. It is glass like crystal, because the redeemed in glory no longer need cleansing. They have entered a perfect and settled state of holiness.
- Judged — brass stands for righteousness that condemns sin and defilement alike. One metal serves both altar and sea.
- Provided — the metal came from the spoils of David's victories, and spoils speak of a victory already won.
- Drawn — priests took water for hands and feet: works and walk, the daily need of those who serve.
- Applied — failure sends the believer forward to the water, not back to the blood. The Word cleanses.
- Finished — before the throne the sea is glass, not water. Nothing there needs washing again.
And under the brim of it round about there were colocynths, encompassing it, ten in a cubit enclosing the sea round about; two rows of colocynths, cast when it was cast.
A band of carved fruit ran under the lip of the great bronze basin in the temple court. The gourds were set in two rows, and they came out of the mould with the basin itself. So what did they picture, and why does Scripture tell us they were not added later?
The ornament described here finishes off the largest vessel in the temple court. One account of the temple sets the decorated edge alongside the basin's enormous capacity:
The Bronze Sea was for the use of the priests; they could not reach up to dip their hands into it. The brim was worked like the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies, and knops or gourds in two rows, ten knops to a cubit. This Bronze Sea, with its vast collection of water, presents to us the idea of unlimited supply.
The older English word for these ornaments is "knops." A Bible dictionary traces the Hebrew word behind it:
peqaim, "wild cucumbers," egg-shaped. 1 Kings 6:18; 1 Kings 7:24. The definite form of these ornaments is not known, except as may be guessed from the relief carving on the Arch of Titus at Rome.
The same ornament was carved on the cedar walls inside the house, next to half-open flowers. One writer reads the two together:
The cedar walls do not carry the same decoration. They were decorated only with half-open flowers and gourds (or buds or knobs, which may be what the word means in verse 18). There you saw a picture of constant flowering, of a renewal full of freshness and beauty that matched the rest of God, of an endless season of joy. And all of it was covered and protected by divine glory, there in the temple of God, which for us is the Father's house!
Commentators differ on what the rows under the brim were. One reads them as small oxen, and finds meaning in how many and how small they are:
You may say: well, I mostly look to Him in great trials, to help me in great temptations; but what hinders my soul and troubles it most are the little worrying trials of life. "The little foxes that spoil the vines." Have you not noticed those little oxen too? Not only the great oxen, looking every way, but the patient, watchful care of our tender High Priest, in His preserving, restoring service, over all the little trials of our wilderness path — yes, even though they be ten in every cubit.
The gourds were not bolted on. They came out of the mould with the basin, in one piece. The same writer draws out what that pictures:
And they were cast when the molten sea was cast. It is the inseparable part of His blessed work, as He says so sweetly, "I am among you as the one who serves." But do not use this precious word as a cover for indifference about evil, as if He lovingly allowed the least evil or defilement. Nothing can be more false or dangerous. He does not allow it, but lovingly takes the towel and girds Himself to serve.
The basin itself held water for the priests, and that washing had a limited reach:
The bronze sea served for the daily purification of the priests. There they washed their hands and their feet. So they were fit to carry out their service and to dwell where the Lord dwelt. In the same way, the disciples could have no part with Christ in the Father's house unless He washed their feet. The Word of God does this washing, on the basis of Christ's intercession as Advocate. Under the law this washing applied to hands and feet, that is, to works and walk. Under grace it applies only to walk.
A basin of standing water belongs to a place where dirt is picked up. The last book of the Bible shows the same vessel changed:
"Before the throne there was as it were a sea of glass, like crystal." This clearly points back to the molten sea in the earthly sanctuary. But it is not a sea of water, as there, but of glass — a silent yet eloquent witness to the fixed and unalterable purity of the eternal home of the glorified. On earth we often need the water of the Word, because of the defilements picked up along the way that come in between our souls and God. In the happy scene we are going to, defilement will never be possible.
- Fruit — the "gourds," or knops, were small round fruit shapes. The same carving ran along the cedar walls, picturing constant flowering and freshness.
- Fulness — they ringed a basin whose huge capacity speaks of supply without limit.
- Smallness — set ten to a cubit, they answer to the small, wearing troubles of daily life, not only the large ones. (Commentators differ, since some read these shapes as little oxen.)
- Oneness — cast in the same pour as the basin, the ornament could never come off. The washing cannot be separated from the One who serves.
- Finish — day by day the water washed hands and feet. In glory the sea becomes crystal, because nothing there will need cleansing.
It stood upon twelve oxen, three looking toward the north, and three looking toward the west, and three looking toward the south, and three looking toward the east; and the sea was above upon them, and all their hinder parts were inward.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And its thickness was a hand-breadth, and its brim was like the work of the brim of a cup, with lily-blossoms; it held two thousand baths.
This verse finishes the description of the great bronze basin at Solomon's temple. The priests washed at it, and commentators find meaning in every detail: the thickness, the rim, and the water it held.
Kings gives two thousand baths; Chronicles gives three thousand. One reference work treats these as two measurements of the same basin:
1 Kings 7:26 states that it "contained 2000 baths." This probably refers to the amount of water usually put into it. The reason is that 2 Chronicles 4:5 says "it received and held 3000 baths," which may mean its full capacity. The dimensions above do not seem to agree with this capacity. But the exact shape of the basin is not given; it may have bulged out a good deal in the middle.
Note: the ESV reads "It held two thousand baths" in 1 Kings 7:26; the wording quoted here is from an older translation.
The metal matters. One writer links the basin to the bronze altar in the same court. Both show one truth applied to two problems:
Solomon's molten sea was made of brass. Brass is the fitting symbol of divine righteousness demanding judgment upon sin (as in the brazen altar), or demanding judgment upon uncleanness (as in the brazen sea). Revelation 1 speaks of the Lord Jesus as having "His feet like fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace." That is how He is seen walking among the lampstands. He cannot tolerate evil, but must, in the exercise of judgment, trample it beneath His feet.
Note: the ESV reads "burnished bronze" in Revelation 1:15; older translations have "fine brass."
What the sea held matters as much as how much of it there was. The same writer notes that a defiled priest moved forward to the sea, not back to the altar:
But the brazen sea contained water, not blood. Those who came to it had already proved the power of the blood. They only needed the washing of water. … A priest under the law whose hands and feet had become defiled did not need to go back to the brazen altar. He needed to go forward to the brazen sea. … So now, if a believer fails, if he commits sin, if he contracts defilement, he does not need a second washing in the blood as at the first. He simply needs the cleansing action of the Word.
Two thousand baths is a huge amount of water for washing hands and feet. One writer takes the size itself as the message, and follows it into Revelation:
The immense quantity of water contained in the molten sea suggests the unlimited provision grace has made. In Revelation 4:6, we read that before the throne was a sea of glass like crystal. This sea of glass is an allusion to the molten sea in Solomon's temple. But it is not a sea of water, but of glass like crystal, because the redeemed in glory no longer need cleansing. They have entered upon a perfect and fixed state of holiness.
Mackintosh turns that volume around and asks what such a supply says about defilement itself:
Does this make little of defilement? The very opposite! Did the provision of a molten sea, with its 3000 baths of water, make little of priestly defilement? Did it not rather prove what a serious matter it was in the judgment of God, and how impossible it was to carry on with a single stain on the hands and feet?
The rim curved like the lip of a cup and carried lily blossoms — beauty on a working vessel. One writer follows that flower elsewhere in Scripture:
The rim of the molten sea had flowers of lilies worked into it. This carries our minds into the Song of Songs. … In that book the King again and again compares His people to lilies (Song 2:2-16 etc.). It is a beautiful picture, telling of purity and lowliness, two features always delightful to the eye of the Lord.
The basin served the priests. One writer applies that service to believers now, and separates what we are from how we live:
Both laver and molten sea were for the use of the priests. From these vessels they drew water to cleanse their hands and feet when serving in the sanctuary of God. … The New Birth has made us fit in nature for His presence. But the laver and the molten sea teach us that we must also be fit in practice if we would enjoy His presence. … Grace has made "a holy priesthood" of the whole household of faith, but holiness demands purity of thought and life in us all.
- Bronze — the metal speaks of God's righteousness judging uncleanness. The altar nearby spoke of judgment on sin.
- Water — the sea held water, not blood; a defiled priest went forward to wash, not back to the altar to start again.
- Two thousand baths — Kings may give the usual contents, Chronicles the full capacity. Either way the volume pictures grace's unlimited supply — and how seriously God treats one stain.
- Lilies — the rim's flowers picture purity and lowliness, the character the King delights in.
- Glass — in Revelation the sea before the throne is crystal, not water. Cleansing is over; holiness is fixed.
And he made ten bases of brass four cubits was the length of one base, and the breadth four cubits, and the height three cubits.
Hiram has been casting the bronze for the temple court, and now the record stops to measure ten matching stands. Why does Scripture spend so many verses on furniture that only held water, and what were these ten stands for?
The name itself points to the job. One writer links the Hebrew word behind "stand" to the word for "foot." The passage itself shows what these objects held up:
The "bases" (a word from the same root as "foot") for Solomon's temple are described in detail, and their purpose was clearly to hold up the basins (1 Kings 7:27-39). The bronze "sea" is also described in full, but nothing is said of smaller vessels to pour the water into for use (1 Kings 7:23-26).
The stands are bronze, not gold. One writer draws a line between the metal inside the house and the metal in the court:
By divine righteousness we are able to stand before Him. We have it in Christ in heaven. Bronze is the symbol of the righteousness of God, displaying on earth what He is toward sinful man. The temple furniture was made of gold; the court furniture was bronze, cast in the earth. Hiram worked in bronze only.
One writer finds it striking that the bases get more space than the basins. He also supplies what 1 Kings leaves out — the use of both:
There were ten bronze bases with wheels, and ten basins rested on them. Remarkably, more is said about the bases than about the basins. A man would hardly write this way, but the Holy Spirit's ways are always divinely wise, whether we understand them or not. 1 Kings 7:27-39 describes the bases and basins at some length, but 2 Chronicles 4:6 tells us their use: "What they offered for the burnt offering they washed in them, but the sea was for the priests to wash in." Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. Since that was so, they had to be absolutely clean.
The priest washed parts of the animal before it went up on the altar. One writer says what that washing pictures:
In Leviticus 1:9 we see that the priest washed the inner parts and the legs of the animal with water. This picture must match a future reality — the offering of Christ to God in perfect purity. He who offered Himself as a pleasing aroma was holiness itself and needed no washing. Yet the picture had to be washed, to show the perfection of Christ's offering.
Another writer puts the stakes plainly:
His spotlessness was necessary for His sacrifice. Prove one flaw in the Christ of God, and the blood of His cross loses its value. Then nothing can save us from the damnation of Hell.
The verses just after this one describe figures cut into the sides of each stand. One writer reads them as a portrait of God Himself:
"Lions, oxen, and cherubim" were carved on the bases themselves: strength, patience, and divine intelligence. The burnt offering is presented pure according to these attributes. Clearly they served to establish an offering by which the people, identified with the victim, might be made acceptable to God. On the "bases" one might read what sort of God it was who had given His people a way to dwell with Himself.
Solomon's temple has ten of almost everything. One writer reads the number ten as a forecast:
The ten lavers with their bases were for the washing of the sacrifices. We see that instead of one laver there were ten; and there were also ten candlesticks and ten tables. Everything was increased and on a large scale. The whole house and its contents represented untold wealth. It all foreshadows that coming glorious Kingdom of Christ.
- Stand. The word is related to "foot." These ten bronze frames were made to hold the basins.
- Bronze. Gold filled the house; bronze filled the court. Bronze shows God's righteousness on earth toward sinful man.
- Washing. The basins washed the burnt offering; the great sea washed the priests. Two cleansings, two purposes.
- Purity. The spotless sacrifice was washed anyway, to show the perfection of Christ's offering. One flaw in Him and the cross loses its value.
- Kingdom. One basin became ten, with ten candlesticks and ten tables — increase on every side, pointing to the reign of Christ.
And the work of the bases was this they had panels, and the panels were between the fillets.
Here the account of the temple courtyard slows down to describe how the ten bronze stands were built, before it even measures the basins they carried. Why does Scripture spend such care on a washing-stand's frame, and what were the figures on its panels meant to teach?
The stand here is not a small footing. It is a large structure on wheels, with borders and sides holding its panels. One writer gives the measurements, and notes that two different Hebrew words in this chapter both come into English as "base":
The bases were square, four cubits wide and three cubits high, with ledges, borders, or sides, some extra parts, and supports for the basin. They stood on wheels one and a half cubits high, and had carvings of lions, oxen, and cherubim. Two different Hebrew words are both translated "base" in 1 Kings 7. One is the base under the basin — keen, the word translated "foot" for the basin in the Tabernacle. The other is the larger base, meconah, four cubits by three.
One writer points out this imbalance. He also says what these vessels were for, which this chapter never states but 2 Chronicles does:
Ten bronze bases with wheels were made, and ten basins rested on them. Strikingly, Scripture says more about the bases than about the basins. A man would hardly write this way; but the Holy Spirit's ways are always wise with God's own wisdom, whether we understand them or not… 2 Chronicles 4:6 tells us what they were for: in them they washed what was offered for the burnt offering, while the sea was for the priests to wash in. Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. Since that is so, they had to be completely clean.
If the sacrifice pictured Christ, why wash it at all? One writer answers that the picture needed washing, not the One pictured:
The bronze sea served to cleanse the priests. The ten basins, five on the right of the court and five on the left, served to wash what the people offered for the burnt offering (2 Chr. 4:6)… He who offered Himself as a sweet-smelling offering was holiness itself and needed no washing. But the picture had to be washed, to show the perfection of the offering of Christ.
The panels were not left blank. Three figures were carved into them, one of them the cherubim — figures of angels. One writer compares them with the four living creatures of Revelation 4 and notes which one is missing here:
On the panels of the carts were lions, oxen and cherubim (v.29). In Revelation 4:7 we read of four living creatures, one like a lion, another like a calf (or ox), one having the face of a man and the last like a flying eagle. In our chapter the cherubim takes the place of the man, and the flying eagle is left out. This is likely because the eagle speaks of God's swift judgment, and there will be none of that in the millennial kingdom. The lion speaks of strength, the ox, of service and the cherubim of intelligent government.
Those same figures, on the same panels, are read by another writer as a statement about the God who provided the sacrifice:
The burnt offering is presented pure according to these attributes… One might read on the "bases" what was the manner of the God who had supplied His people with a means for dwelling with Himself.
This frame stood on wheels. One writer notes where these stands were placed, and what the metal they were made of shows:
The priests washed their hands and feet in the Sea, but there were also ten carts, each one carrying a basin for washing the animals of sacrifice. These could be moved around, but five carts stood on the right side of the temple and five on the left side. The carts were made of copper too. So the outside furnishings all stressed the holiness of God, while the inside stressed the glory of God (the gold).
So why record all this detail? One writer answers:
Notice that 2 Chronicles 4:6 only mentions the basins, while here they are described in much more detail. The reason is that this is about the outward showing of what God is, both in His government and in His kingdom. That showing of God will be seen in Christ, who will reign in full view of the world.
- Frame — The stand was a large square structure, four cubits by three, with borders, side panels, supports and wheels. Two Hebrew words in this chapter are both translated "base."
- Focus — Scripture says more about the stands than about the basins they carried. No man would have written it that way.
- Purity — The sacrifices washed at these stands had to be completely clean, because each one spoke to God of Christ. The picture needed washing; the One pictured did not.
- Figures — Lion, ox and cherubim were cut into these panels: strength, service and intelligent government. The eagle of swift judgment is left out.
- Display — All of this stood outside, in the open court. It showed the holiness of God in copper, and pointed on to Christ reigning in full view of the world.
And on the panels that were between the fillets were lions, oxen and cherubim; and over the fillets there was a base above; and beneath the lions and oxen were garlands of festoon-work.
Solomon's temple had ten wheeled bronze stands that carried washbasins in the courtyard. Why does Scripture stop to record the figures carved on their side panels, and why these three?
One account describes their shape, the carvings on their borders, and what the washing pictured:
There were ten bases and lavers of bronze, five placed on the south or right side of the Temple, and five on the north or left side. The bases were square, four cubits wide and three cubits high, with ledges, borders, or sides, and supports for the laver. They stood on wheels, one and a half cubits high, and had carvings of lions, oxen, and cherubim… The inward parts and legs of the burnt offerings were washed. So they pictured Him whose inward thoughts, feelings, purposes, and desires were always pure and holy, whose walk and ways were blameless and undefiled, and who offered Himself without spot to God.
One writer notes how much space the stands get:
Ten bases of bronze with wheels were made, and ten lavers rested on them. Remarkably, more is said about the bases than about the lavers. This would hardly be man's way of writing. But the Holy Spirit's ways are always divinely wise, whether we understand them or not… Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. That being so, they had to be absolutely clean.
Each figure carries a meaning, and together they point to the coming reign of Christ:
On the panels of the carts were lions, oxen and cherubim. In Revelation 4:7 we read of four living creatures. One is like a lion, another like a calf (or ox), one has the face of a man, and the last is like a flying eagle. In our chapter the cherubim takes the place of man, and the flying eagle is left out. This is likely because the eagle speaks of the swift execution of God's judgment. There will be no such thing in the millennial kingdom. The lion speaks of strength, the ox of service, and the cherubim of intelligent government. All of these are important in the future kingdom of Christ.
Commentators differ on the ox: some read it as service, others as firmness and patience.
Another writer sets out what each creature stands for, and singles out the cherub:
The "living creatures" of Revelation are cherubim. They represent these attributes: the lion, strength; the ox (or calf), firmness and patience; the man, intelligence; the eagle, the rapidity of the judgments and government of God… In these chapters the cherub has a unique place. It is neither an ox nor a lion. It is an intelligent being… This intelligence ornaments the house of God. Those who draw near may see it in all the details of the divine building.
The washing and the government belong together. These basins washed the parts of the burnt offering, and the panels carried the attributes of the God who arranged it:
"Lions, oxen, and cherubim" were sculpted on the bases themselves. They stand for strength, patience, and divine intelligence. The burnt offering is presented pure according to these attributes. Clearly these attributes were used to establish an offering by which the people could be made acceptable to God, since the people were identified with the victim. On the bases one could read what this God was like — the God who had given His people a way to dwell with Himself.
The sacrifice itself had no flaw to remove. The washing was there to display that fact:
He who offered Himself as a pleasing aroma was holiness itself and had no need to be washed. But the picture had to be washed, to show the perfection of the offering of Christ.
At the top of the base, the pattern changes:
The crown of the base bore nothing more than cherubim and lions with palm trees, as on the walls of Ezekiel's temple. Strength and intelligence crown the foundation of God's ways in government. If Solomon stayed faithful, there would be no more need of patience: it would have reached its goal. Strength and divine intelligence could now look towards the palm trees, symbols of triumph and of peaceful protection, as in the millennial temple to come. Peace on earth! The reign of peace was established in righteousness.
- Stand. The ten bronze stands carried the water that washed the sacrifices, and Scripture says more about the stands than about the basins they held.
- Strength. The lion on the panel speaks of strength, and strength with intelligence crowns God's ways in government.
- Patience. The ox speaks of service, or of firmness and patience, and patience reaches its goal when peace fills the earth.
- Wisdom. The cherub stands for intelligent government, so anyone drawing near could read on the panels what this God is like. The eagle of swift judgment is missing: this house speaks of peace.
- Purity. All of it held up one thing: an offering with no flaw to wash away, where the washing displayed the perfection of Christ.
And every base had four wheels of brass, and axles of brass; and on its four corners were shoulder-pieces under the laver were shoulder-pieces molten, behind every garland.
Here the temple's list of furnishings slows into detail: ten movable bronze stands, each with wheels, axles and corner supports for a basin. Why does Scripture spend so much space on a washing stand?
One summary gathers the details: how many stands there were, where they stood, and how they were built.
There were ten bronze stands and basins (1 Kings 7:27, 38). Five stood on the south — the right side or shoulder — of the Temple, and five on the north, the left side (1 Kings 7:39). The stands were square: four cubits wide and three cubits high. They had ledges, borders or sides, some further parts, and supports (older versions say "undersetters") for the basin. They stood on wheels one and a half cubits high, and they were engraved with lions, oxen and cherubim. Two Hebrew words are both translated "base" in 1 Kings 7. One is keen, the base under the basin — the same word translated "foot" for the basin in the Tabernacle. The other is meconah, the larger base of four cubits by three.
Older translations call the corner supports of this verse "undersetters."
Corner pieces or blocks as parts of the foundation of the molten sea. 1 Kings 7:30, 34.
The basins on these stands had one job: washing what went on the altar as a burnt offering.
Ten bronze stands, with wheels, were made for ten basins to rest on. Remarkably, more is said about the stands than about the basins... 2 Chronicles 4:6 tells us their use: "Such things as they offered for the burnt offering they washed in them; but the sea was for the priests to wash in." Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. This being so, they must be absolutely clean.
Why does that spotlessness matter so much?
His spotlessness was necessary for His sacrifice. Prove one flaw in the Christ of God, and the blood of His cross loses its value, and nothing can save us from the damnation of Hell.
The wheels meant the basins could be moved to where the work was.
These basins were pushed about on their wheels all the time. They stood at the edge of the altar platform, so that the victims could always be presented pure.
One writer also finds meaning in the number four.
The four wheels on each cart (v. 30) speak of what is earthly and passing. Four is the number of earth's directions: north, east, west and south.
Every part named in this verse — wheels, axles, supports — is bronze. The same metal appears on the altar and on the basin, with one meaning.
Bronze is the judgment of righteousness as it applies to man. So the altar of burnt offering was bronze, and the basin was bronze. One judged sin in a sacrifice, the other by the word. It marked the unchangeable nature of that judgment — God, who could not bear sin, must deal with it.
These same stands carried carved lions, oxen and cherubim on their panels. One writer links the figures to the future kingdom of Christ.
The lion speaks of strength, the ox of service, and the cherubim of intelligent government. All of these are important in the future kingdom of Christ.
Another writer names the same figures a little differently, and ties them to the offering itself.
after-note: DELETE
"Lions, oxen, and cherubim" were carved on the stands themselves: strength, patience, and divine intelligence. The burnt offering is presented pure according to these attributes. Clearly these attributes have been used to establish an offering by which the people, identified with the victim, might be made acceptable to God. On the stands one could read what kind of God had given His people a way to live with Himself.
Ten stands, ten basins — one writer finds a warning in the repeated number.
Ten is the number of responsibility, as the ten commandments of the Law show. So the many tens in Solomon's Temple remind us that everything was set up on the ground of responsibility. That wonderful system of glory and blessing would last only as long as king and people stayed faithful.
- Bronze — every part named here is bronze, the metal of God's unchanging judgment of sin.
- Basin — that judgment fell on a sacrifice. The sacrifice had to be washed clean, because it spoke to God of the spotless Christ.
- Wheels — the basins rolled to the altar again and again, so every victim came to it pure.
- Carvings — lions, oxen and cherubim marked the stands with strength, service and wise government. The equipment itself showed what God is like.
- Ten — the repeated number marks this whole system of glory as resting on the faithfulness of king and people.
after-note:
And the mouth of it within the crown and above was a cubit; and its mouth was rounded, [as] the work of the base, a cubit and a half; and also upon its mouth was sculpture; but their panels were square, not round.
This verse sits inside a long, careful description of the ten wheeled bronze stands made for Solomon's temple, each one holding a basin of water. It measures the round opening, the crown above it and the carvings around it — so why does Scripture give such space to the furniture that only held the water?
The verse keeps two shapes apart: the opening is round, but the panels are square. A survey of the temple lists the parts, and notes two Hebrew words behind the word "base" here:
One writer weighs the proportions of the account, and points to Chronicles for the use of these vessels:
There were ten bronze bases with wheels, and ten basins rested on them. Strikingly, more is said about the bases than about the basins. This would hardly be man's way of writing; but the Holy Spirit's ways are always wise with God's own wisdom, whether we understand them or not. The bases and basins are described at some length in 1 Kings 7:27-39, but Scripture tells us their use in 2 Chronicles 4:6: "In these they were to rinse off what was used for the burnt offering, and the sea was for the priests to wash in." Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. Because of that, they had to be completely clean.
This water washed what was laid on the altar, not the priests. One writer explains why that washing mattered:
The burnt offering stands for the sacrifice of Christ. He offered Himself to God, glorifying Him in all that He is, and He did this in regard to sin. God is able to receive us according to the perfection of this sacrifice. The sacrifice had to be presented to God with no defilement at all. So it had to be shown as perfect, and its purity had to reach further than conduct alone: it included the "inward parts" of the offering. The water of the basins pictured this truth.
The verse notes carvings at the opening. Three figures appear on these stands, and one writer reads each one as a trait of God Himself:
"Lions, oxen and cherubim" were carved on the bases themselves: strength, patience and divine intelligence. The burnt offering is presented pure in keeping with these attributes… On the bases you could read what kind of God this was — the God who had given His people a way to dwell with Himself.
The crown at the top did not carry all three figures. The same writer weighs what is missing:
The crown of the base carried nothing more than cherubim (men) and lions with palm trees, just as on the walls of Ezekiel's temple. Strength and intelligence crown the foundation of God's ways in government. If Solomon would be faithful, there would be no more need of patience: it would have accomplished its goal. Strength and divine intelligence could now look towards the palm trees, symbols of triumph and of peaceful protection. It will be the same in the millennial temple to come. Peace upon earth!
All of this stood in plain sight. One writer draws out both the glory of that and the question it left open:
The burnt offering had glorified God. The holy offering had shown all that He was, and had declared it openly. Under Solomon's glorious reign the people had these things before their eyes everywhere. But this reign was entrusted to man's responsibility. Could it last?
- Shape — The verse sets a round opening, "a cubit and a half deep," inside square panels. Two Hebrew words lie behind "base" here: keen, the "foot" used of the tabernacle basin, and meconah, the larger square stand of four cubits by three.
- Purity — The water in the basin washed the burnt offering, inward parts included. The purity it pictured went further than conduct alone.
- Emphasis — Scripture says more about the stand than about the basin. Commentators call this the Spirit's wisdom, not a writer's oversight, and point to 2 Chronicles 4:6 for the use.
- Carvings — Lions, oxen and cherubim stand for strength, patience and divine intelligence. They show the character of the God who gave His people a way to dwell with Him.
- Crown — At the top the ox drops away and palm trees appear. Strength and intelligence crown the foundation, with peace in view — offered to Solomon, and resting on his faithfulness.
And the four wheels were under the panels; and the supports of the wheels were in the base; and the height of a wheel was a cubit and half a cubit.
The chapter has already described the pillars and the sea. Now it slows down to measure ten wheeled stands, down to their axles and the height of one wheel. Why does Scripture give so much space to the base and wheels of one piece of temple furniture?
These wheeled frames were not the vessels themselves. They were the supports — and one writer finds the space Scripture gives them surprising:
Ten bases of brass with wheels were made, and ten basins rested on them. Strikingly, Scripture says more about the bases than about the basins. A man would hardly write this way. But the Holy Spirit's ways are always wise with divine wisdom, whether we understand them or not. Scripture describes the bases and basins at some length in 1 Kings 7:27-39. Their use, though, comes in 2 Chronicles 4:6: "In these they were to rinse off what was used for the burnt offering, and the sea was for the priests to wash in."
The verse gives the height of one wheel: a cubit and a half. That wheel belonged to a much larger object:
The bases were square: four cubits wide and three cubits high. They had ledges, borders or sides, certain additions, and supports for the basin... They stood on wheels, one and a half cubits high, and had carvings of lions, oxen, and cherubim... The basins were circular, four cubits in diameter; each one held forty baths (about 1,360 litres). Altogether they appear to have stood about eight cubits in height.
These stands were built to roll, and that movement served the altar:
These basins rolled about constantly on their wheels. They stood at the threshold of the altar platform, so that the victims might always be presented as pure.
One writer reads meaning in the numbers themselves — both the ten stands and the four wheels:
The number 10 speaks of human responsibility (as the 10 commandments). Today God's sovereign work in the redemption that is in Christ Jesus sets man's ability or responsibility aside. The four wheels on each cart speak of what is earthly and passing. Four is the number of earth's directions: north, east, west and south.
The wheels sat under panels, and those panels were not blank. One writer sets their three figures beside the four living creatures of Revelation and notes what is missing:
On the panels of the carts were lions, oxen and cherubim. In Revelation 4:7 we read of four living creatures. One is like a lion, another like a calf (or ox). One has the face of a man, and the last is like a flying eagle. In our chapter the cherubim takes the place of man and the flying eagle is omitted. This is likely because the eagle speaks of God's judgment carried out swiftly, and there will be nothing like that in the thousand-year kingdom. The lion speaks of strength, the ox of service, and the cherubim of intelligent government. All of these matter in the future kingdom of Christ.
The water these stands carried was not for the priests but for the sacrifice. Washing a sacrifice was a picture, and it raises a question:
The bronze sea served to cleanse the priests. The ten basins stood five on the right of the court and five on the left. They served to wash what was used for the burnt offering. In Leviticus 1:9 we see that the priest washed the inner parts and the legs of the victim with water. This type must correspond to future reality — to the offering of Christ to God in perfect purity. He who offered Himself as a pleasing aroma was holiness itself, and He had no need to be washed. But the type had to be washed, to show the perfection of the offering of Christ.
Frame, wheels and axles all shared one metal with the altar and the sea. That choice carried meaning:
The altar of Burnt Offering was made of brass. Bronze or copper is perhaps the correct word for the metal used. Here is a quotation from a departed friend, W. Kelly: "Gold is the righteousness of God for drawing near where God is. Brass is the righteousness of God for dealing with man's evil where man is." So the vessels inside the house were of gold. Those outside — altar, sea, bases and basins — were of brass.
- Support — the wheels, axles and frame exist to hold a basin of water. Scripture describes the supports at more length than the basins they carry.
- Movement — the stands rolled to the altar platform, so water for cleansing stayed near the sacrifice.
- Purity — that water washed what was offered for the burnt offering. So the victim pictured One who needed no cleansing Himself.
- Reach — four wheels match the four directions of the earth. The carved lion, ox and cherub speak of strength, service and intelligent government.
- Metal — brass marks these as vessels for the outside. It pictures God's righteousness meeting man where man is. Gold belongs inside the house.
And the work of the wheels was like the work of a chariot wheel their supports, and their rims, and their spokes and their naves were all molten.
Solomon's temple courtyard held ten bronze stands, and each one rolled on four wheels. This verse stops to name the parts of those wheels, so why does Scripture slow down over a wheel, and what were the stands carrying?
One survey of the temple furniture gathers the measurements and the setting:
There were ten bases and basins of brass. Five stood on the south or right side of the Temple, and five on the north or left side. The bases were square, four cubits wide and three cubits high. They had ledges, borders or sides, some added parts, and supports for the basin. They stood on wheels one and a half cubits high, and had carvings of lions, oxen, and cherubim.
One writer traces the name of these stands to what they were built to do:
In the detailed description of the "bases" for Solomon's temple, the word comes from the same root as "foot." Their purpose was clearly to support the basins (1 Kings 7:27-39).
The way this record is arranged raises a question of its own:
There were ten bases of brass with wheels, and ten basins rested on them. It is remarkable that the record says more about the bases than about the basins. A man would hardly write this way; but the Holy Spirit's ways always show divine wisdom, whether we understand them or not. 1 Kings 7:27-39 describes the bases and basins at some length; but 2 Chronicles 4:6 tells us what they were for: the basins washed what was offered for the burnt offering, while the sea was for the priests to wash in. Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. So each one had to be completely clean.
This wheel was not carved or hammered. Axle, rim, spoke and hub were poured as molten metal — brass, in older wording — and the metal tells us which part of the house we are in.
Brass is the symbol of the righteousness of God, showing on earth what He is for sinful man. The furniture of the temple was gold; the furniture of the court was brass, cast in the earth. Hiram worked in brass only.
A chariot wheel is built to roll. These basins were made to move:
These basins, always being pushed about on their wheels, stood at the edge of the altar platform, so that the sacrifices could always be presented pure.
Commentators also read meaning in the counting — ten stands, four wheels apiece:
The number 10 speaks of human responsibility (as in the 10 commandments). Today God sets man's ability or responsibility aside by His sovereign work in the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. The four wheels on each cart speak of what is earthly and passing. Four is the number of earth's directions: north, east, west and south.
Every spoke and hub existed to bring water to the altar. One writer explains what the washing was for:
The sacrifice had to be presented to God without any defilement. So it had to be shown to be perfect, and this purity went further than conduct alone: it included the "inwards" of the offering. The water of the basins showed this truth.
The washing covered the inner organs and the legs of the animal. One writer sees a picture of Christ in that pairing:
The inwards and legs of the burnt offerings were washed. So they became a picture of Him whose inward thoughts, feelings, purposes, and desires were always pure and holy; whose walk and ways were blameless and undefiled.
- Court — Ten wheeled bronze stands stood in the outer courtyard, five on each side of the house. Each one carried a large basin of water.
- Cast — Axle, rim, spoke and hub were all poured in bronze. Bronze is the metal of the court, where God shows on earth what He is for sinful man. Gold belonged inside.
- Carried — Wheels mean movement. The basins moved to the altar platform, so the offerings could always be presented pure.
- Cleansed — The water washed the inner parts and the legs of the burnt offering. Its purity had to reach further than outward conduct.
- Christ — Every sacrifice at that altar spoke to God of Christ. So it had to be spotless: inward thoughts holy, outward walk undefiled.
And there were four shoulder-pieces to the four corners of one base; of the base itself were its shoulder-pieces.
This stand is one of ten bronze carts in the courtyard of Solomon's temple, each with four corner supports cast as one piece with the frame. Why does Scripture linger over a frame that only held something else?
Older translations call these corner props "undersetters," or "shoulder-pieces." They took the weight of the basin above. One survey of the temple furniture sets out the whole assembly and its purpose:
There were ten bases and lavers of brass, five placed on the south or right side of the Temple, and five on the north or left. The bases were square: four cubits wide and three cubits high. They had ledges, borders or sides, certain additions, and undersetters or supports for the laver. They stood on wheels, one and a half cubits high, and had carvings of lions, oxen, and cherubim... "In them they washed what they offered for the burnt offering" (2 Chronicles 4:6, in an older translation).
Scripture says more about the frame than about the basin resting on it. One writer treats that as deliberate:
Ten bases of brass, with wheels, held ten lavers. Strikingly, Scripture says more about the bases than about the lavers. A man would hardly write it that way. But the Holy Spirit's ways are always divinely wise, whether we understand them or not... Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. This being so, they must be absolutely clean.
The great bronze basin, called the Sea, and these ten smaller ones did not do the same job:
The "molten sea" washed the priests. They all had access to this one way of cleansing from the defilement of their walk. Christ, made sin, is the source of cleansing for His own; His Word is the means. Ten lavers were needed to wash the victims; these were, we do not doubt, symbolic of the absolute purity of Christ.
The parts washed carried their own meaning:
The inner parts and legs of the burnt offerings were washed. So they became a picture of Him whose inward thoughts, feelings, purposes, and desires were always pure and holy, and whose walk and ways were blameless and undefiled...
The metal matters. Inside the building, everything was gold. Outside in the open court, everything was bronze, the metal older translations call brass:
In virtue of divine righteousness we are able to stand before Him. We have it in Christ in heaven. Brass is the symbol of the righteousness of God displaying upon earth what He is for sinful man. The temple furniture was gold. The court furniture was brass, cast in the earth.
The bases were not left bare. One writer reads the figures cut into them as a picture of what kind of God this is:
Lions, oxen, and cherubim were sculpted on the bases themselves: strength, patience, and divine intelligence. The burnt offering is presented as pure according to these attributes... On the bases you could read what kind of God this was — the God who had given His people a way to dwell with Himself.
Another writer notes what is missing. Revelation 4:7 lists four living creatures, one of them a flying eagle. Here the eagle drops out:
This is likely because the eagle speaks of the swift execution of God's judgment, and there will be no such thing in the millennial kingdom. The lion speaks of strength, the ox of service, and the cherubim of intelligent government. All of these are important in the future kingdom of Christ.
The four supports sat over wheels, so the whole unit could be pushed where it was needed:
These lavers were pushed about on their wheels again and again. They stood at the edge of the altar platform, so that the victims could always be presented as pure.
- Frame. Four corner pieces held up a basin of water. The frame exists for the sake of what rests on it.
- Water. That water washed each sacrifice. Every offering spoke to God of Christ, so it had to be clean.
- Metal. The bronze of the open court pictures God's righteousness meeting sinful man on earth. The gold inside the house pictures what we have in Christ in heaven.
- Figures. Lion, ox and cherubim show strength, patient service and intelligent rule. They tell you what kind of God gave His people a way to draw near.
- Wheels. The stands rolled on wheels beside the altar, so a pure offering was always within reach.
And in the top of the base there was a circular elevation of half a cubit round about; and on the top of the base its stays and its panels were of the same.
This verse closes the description of the ten bronze stands made for Solomon's temple. Why does Scripture record the shape of a metal stand in such detail, and what did these stands carry?
The band, the stays and the panels all belong to one piece of temple furniture. Two different Hebrew words in this chapter are both translated "base," and one of them goes back to the laver in the tabernacle — Israel's portable tent of worship in the wilderness:
There were ten bases and lavers of bronze… The bases were square, four cubits wide, three cubits high, with ledges, borders, or sides, and certain additions, and supports for the laver. They stood on wheels, one and a half cubits high, and had carvings of lions, oxen, and cherubim. There are two Hebrew words both rendered "base" in 1 Kings 7. One is keen, the word rendered "foot" for the laver in the Tabernacle; this is the base directly under the laver. The other is meconah, the larger base of four cubits by three.
These stands had one job. One writer contrasts them with the great bronze sea:
In the detailed description of the "bases" (a word from the same root as "foot") for the temple of Solomon, their purpose was clearly to support the lavers. The bronze sea also gets a full description, yet the account names no smaller vessels for pouring out water for actual use.
The lavers on these stands washed the victims brought for the burnt offering. One writer explains why the washing had to reach the inward parts:
The victim had to come before God without any defilement. So it had to be shown perfect, and this purity went further than conduct alone: it included the "inwards" of the offering. The water of the lavers showed this truth… Ten lavers were needed to wash the victims. These were, we do not doubt, symbolic of the absolute purity of Christ.
The round band at the top of the stand is its crown. Its carvings differ from the ones lower down:
The crown of the base bore nothing more than cherubim (men) and lions with palm trees, as on the walls of Ezekiel's temple. Strength and intelligence crown the foundation of God's ways in government. If Solomon would be faithful, there would be no more need of patience: it would have accomplished its goal. Strength and divine intelligence could now look towards the palm trees, symbols of triumph and of peaceful protection, as in the millennial temple to come. Peace upon earth! The reign of peace stood on righteousness. The lavers for the burnt offering proclaimed this, and so did the walls of the temple.
The panels of these stands carry three figures. Revelation names four living creatures, and one of them is missing here:
On the panels of the carts were lions, oxen and cherubim. In Revelation 4:7 we read of four living creatures, one like a lion, another like a calf (or ox), one having the face of a man and the last like a flying eagle. In our chapter the cherubim takes the place of man and the flying eagle is omitted. This is likely because the eagle speaks of the swift execution of God's judgment. There will be no such thing in the millennial kingdom. The lion speaks of strength, the ox of service and the cherubim of intelligent government. All of these are important in the future kingdom of Christ.
One writer finds meaning in how much space Kings gives these lavers:
Note that 2 Chronicles 4:6 only mentions the lavers, while here Scripture describes them in greater detail. The reason is that this concerns the outward display of what God is, both in His government and in His kingdom. Christ will display God in this way when He reigns in full view of the world.
- Base — Two Hebrew words here are both translated "base." The stand's name shares a root with "foot," and its one job was to hold up a laver.
- Water — The lavers washed the burnt offering, inward parts and all. They picture the absolute purity of Christ's sacrifice.
- Crown — The band at the top carried cherubim, lions and palm trees. Strength and intelligence crown God's ways, and peace is the result.
- Panels — Lion, ox and cherub speak of strength, service and intelligent government. The eagle of swift judgment has no place in this kingdom.
- Display — Kings dwells on these details because they show what God is in His government. Christ will display it when He reigns before the whole world.
And he engraved on the plates of its stays and on its panels cherubim, lions and palm-trees, according to the space upon each; and garlands were round about.
Ten wheeled stands carried the washing basins in Solomon's temple, and this verse names what was cut into them: cherubim, lions and palm trees. Why record the decoration on washing equipment, and what do these figures say about the kingdom of Christ?
The figures sit on the top piece of each stand, the part that crowns it. One writer links that crown to the walls of Ezekiel's temple:
The crown of the base carried nothing more than cherubim (men) and lions with palm trees, as on the walls of Ezekiel's temple (Ezekiel 41:18-19). Strength and intelligence crown the foundation of God's ways in government... Strength and divine intelligence could now look towards the palm trees, as in the millennial temple to come. The palm trees are symbols of triumph and of peaceful protection. Peace upon earth!
The stands carried the basins used for washing the burnt offerings. Scripture gives more space to the stands than to the basins:
Ten bronze bases, with wheels, were made, and ten basins rested on them. Remarkably, more is said about the bases than about the basins. This would hardly be man's way of writing; but the Holy Spirit's ways are always wise, whether we understand them or not... their use is told us in 2 Chronicles 4:6: "In these they were to rinse off what was used for the burnt offering, and the sea was for the priests to wash in." Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. Since that was so, they had to be absolutely clean.
One commentator sets these three figures beside the four living creatures of Revelation:
On the panels of the carts were lions, oxen and cherubim (v.29). In Revelation 4:7 we read of four living creatures. One is like a lion, another like a calf (or ox), one has the face of a man, and the last is like a flying eagle. In our chapter the cherubim takes the place of man and there is no flying eagle. This is likely because the eagle speaks of God's swift judgment. There will be no such thing in the millennial kingdom. The lion speaks of strength, the ox of service, and the cherubim of intelligent government. All of these matter in the future kingdom of Christ.
Ezekiel saw cherubim too, in his temple vision and in his opening vision. One writer points out how their faces differ:
The cherubim here bear the human figure, as on the walls of the temple. In Ezekiel 41:19 they have two faces, a lion's and a man's. These are the power and intelligence that mark the reign of Christ once it is firmly established. In Ezekiel 1 the four creatures each had four faces, because there the point was to picture the throne of God in judgment.
The palm appears again and again in Solomon's temple. One writer gathers what it stands for:
It is the symbol of beauty (Song of Solomon 7:7), of righteousness, prosperity and fruitfulness (Psalm 92:12-14), of salvation and victory (Revelation 7:9), and of royal glory (John 12:13). Its wide use in the first temple ties it to the kingdom and glory that Solomon's reign pictures (1 Kings 6:29, 32, 35; 1 Kings 7:36; 2 Chronicles 3:5). These are the characteristic features of the Millennial age. Palm branches were also used at the Feast of Tabernacles (Leviticus 23:40; Nehemiah 8:15). That feast pictures the time of peace and joy that will come when our Lord has established His kingdom on earth.
Both the basins and the stands carried a message:
The basins did not belong to the tabernacle in the wilderness, though no doubt it had vessels for washing the burnt offering (Exodus 27:19; Exodus 38:30). They showed in the kingdom the perfection of the burnt offering, the basis of the people's acceptance before God. This purity, this holiness of the sacrifice, satisfied all the demands of God's government. The bases and their crowns also proclaimed, through their ornaments, every attribute of this government.
- Foundation. The carvings are on the stands that carry the washing basins. Even the supports bore the marks of God's government.
- Cleanness. The basins washed the burnt offerings. The sacrifice that pictured Christ had to be completely clean.
- Government. Lion, ox and cherub speak of strength, service and intelligent rule. The eagle of swift judgment is missing.
- Victory. The palm stands for triumph, fruitfulness and the peace of the coming kingdom.
- Acceptance. Every carving on these stands showed Israel where they stood before God. The offering was perfect, and it met all His government required.
After this [manner] he made the ten bases all of them had one casting, one measure, one form.
This line closes a long, detailed account of the ten stands that held the temple's washing basins, and its point is simple: all ten matched — same cast, same size, same shape. So why does Scripture spend so much space on them, and what does that sameness say about God?
Scripture says more about the stands than about the basins they held. One writer asks why, and points to what the basins were for.
Ten brass stands with wheels were made, and ten basins rested on them. Strikingly, Scripture says more about the stands than about the basins. This would hardly be a man's way of writing; but the Holy Spirit's ways are always wise, whether we understand them or not. The stands and basins are described at length in 1 Kings 7:27-39, but 2 Chronicles 4:6 tells us their use: in them they washed what was offered for the burnt offering, while the sea was for the priests to wash in. Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. Since that is so, they had to be completely clean.
The metal matters too. The stands stood in the court, and the court's furniture was brass, not gold.
Because of divine righteousness we can stand before Him. We have it in Christ in heaven. Brass is the symbol of the righteousness of God, showing on earth what He is for sinful man. The temple's furniture was gold; the court's furniture was brass, cast in the earth. Hiram worked in brass only.
The tabernacle — the tent Israel worshipped in before the temple — had no such basins. These belong to the kingdom, and even their ornaments carry a message.
The basins did not belong to the tabernacle in the wilderness, though that tent no doubt had vessels for washing the burnt offering. In the kingdom they showed the perfection of the burnt offering. That perfection is the basis of the people's acceptance before God. This purity, this holiness of the sacrifice, satisfied every demand of God's government. We also see that the stands and their tops proclaimed by their ornaments all the marks of this government.
Every stand carried the same carved figures. Set them beside the four living creatures in Revelation and one is missing.
On the panels of the carts were lions, oxen and cherubim (v.29). In Revelation 4:7 we read of four living creatures. One is like a lion, another like a calf (or ox), one has the face of a man, and the last is like a flying eagle. In our chapter the cherubim takes the place of the man, and the flying eagle is left out. This is likely because the eagle speaks of God's swift judgment, and there will be no such thing in the millennial kingdom. The lion speaks of strength, the ox of service, and the cherubim of intelligent government. All of these matter in the future kingdom of Christ.
The number ten was practical. It matched the sheer volume of sacrifice the temple would see.
Ten carts with basins were needed because so many animals had to be washed before they were offered. At the dedication of the temple they offered 22,000 bulls and 120,000 sheep! (ch. 8:63). How good it is to know that the offering of the Lord Jesus has canceled all those Old Testament offerings (Heb. 10:1-14). But all those offerings point to one thing: an infinitely great sacrifice had to be offered if the sins of mankind were to be atoned for.
The pattern was fixed, so nothing was left to human taste. Later, a king of Judah undid it.
Ahaz then removed the stands that carried the basins. He took the sea down from its raised place and set it on a stone pavement. He also changed the king's walkway to suit the whims of the king of Assyria. So he lowered God's appointed standards to fit the thoughts and desires of men — the standard of worship, of approach to the House of God, and of purity in that approach! God had made His commands known to Moses in exact detail, and Moses had carried them out to the letter. The divine standard was clear!
- One measure. Every stand matched, because the pattern came from God, not the craftsman. The way to Him is fixed, not up for negotiation.
- One material. The stands were brass, cast in the earth: God's righteousness shown on earth for sinful man. Gold was for inside the house.
- One purpose. They held the water that washed what went on the altar. Every sacrifice spoke of Christ, so it had to be spotless.
- One government. Lions, oxen and cherubim speak of strength, service and intelligent rule. The eagle of swift judgment is left out of a reign of peace.
- One sacrifice. Ten stands served tens of thousands of animals. All that washing points to the one offering that answers for sin for good.
And he made ten lavers of brass one laver contained forty baths; every laver was four cubits; upon every one of the ten bases one laver.
Ten round bronze basins now rest on the ten wheeled stands, one basin to each stand. Why ten, when the tabernacle had only one — and what was all that water for?
This verse does not say what the basins were for. Another record of the same work answers that, and one writer shows what the washing pointed to.
The bronze Sea served to cleanse the priests; the ten basins, five on the right of the court and five on the left, served to "wash... such things as they offered for the burnt offering" (2 Chron. 4:6). In Leviticus 1:9 we see that the priest washed the inner parts and the legs of the victim with water. This type must correspond to future reality — to the offering of Christ to God in perfect purity. He who offered Himself as a sweet-smelling aroma was holiness itself and had no need to be washed. But the type had to be washed, to show the perfection of the offering of Christ.
The washing touched two parts of the animal: the inside, and the legs. Each one pictures something in Christ.
The basins were round, four cubits across; each one held forty baths [about 1,360 litres] (1 Kings 7:38). Altogether they appear to have stood about eight cubits high... "Such things as they offered for the burnt [ascending] offering they washed in them" (2 Chron. 4:6). The inner parts and legs of the burnt offerings were washed; so they became a picture of Him whose inward thoughts, feelings, purposes and desires were always pure and holy; whose walk and ways were blameless and undefiled, and who "offered Himself without spot to God."
The metal matters. Gold belonged inside the house; bronze belonged outside it.
The altar of Burnt Offering was made of bronze... Another writer put it this way: "Gold is the righteousness of God for drawing near where God is; bronze is the righteousness of God for dealing with man's evil where man is" (W. Kelly). So the vessels inside the house were gold. Those outside — altar, molten sea, bases and basins — were bronze.
The tabernacle had one basin. Solomon's temple has ten. Commentators read that increase in two ways. One sees abundance, pointing forward:
The ten basins with their bases were for the washing of the sacrifices. We see that instead of one basin there were ten; and there were also ten lampstands and ten tables. Everything was an increase and on a large scale. The whole house and its contents represented untold wealth. It all foreshadows that coming glorious Kingdom of Christ. Then there will be the increase and the blessing pictured by the ten basins, the ten lampstands and the ten tables.
Another reads the number itself as a measure of what rested on Solomon and his people:
Numbers in Scripture have meaning. Ten is the number of responsibility, shown in the ten commandments of the Law. So the many tens in Solomon's Temple are a reminder that everything here stood on the ground of responsibility. That wonderful system of glory and blessing would continue only if king and people stayed faithful.
The verse pairs each basin with its own wheeled stand. Older translations call these stands "bases". What was carved on them, and the fact that they moved, both matter.
"Lions, oxen, and cherubim" were carved on the bases themselves: strength, patience, and divine intelligence. The burnt offering is presented pure according to these attributes... On the "bases" you could read what kind of God this was — the God who had given His people a way to live with Himself.
The wheels kept the water close to the altar:
These basins were pushed about constantly on their wheels. They stood at the edge of the altar platform, so the victims could always be presented as pure.
- Purpose — The ten bronze basins washed the animals for the burnt offering. The large Sea washed the priests.
- Purity — The water touched the inner parts and the legs: a picture of One whose thoughts were holy and whose walk was blameless. He needed no cleansing, yet the type had to be shown spotless.
- Position — Bronze belongs outside: the righteousness of God dealing with man's evil where man is.
- Plenty — One basin in the wilderness becomes ten in the temple. The increase points to the wealth of Christ's coming kingdom. Ten also speaks of responsibility resting on king and people.
- Proximity — Each basin had its own wheeled stand and stayed near the altar. A pure offering was always within reach.
And he put the bases, five on the right side of the house, and five on the left side of the house; and he set the sea on the right side of the house eastward, over against the south.
This verse closes the record of the temple's bronze work by telling us where Solomon set each water vessel. Some translations call the stands "bases", and commentators ask why the water came in two forms, why there was so much of it, and why it stood where it did.
One writer walks through the layout and the shape of these vessels, then reads the washing as a picture of the One who offered Himself to God.
There were ten bases and lavers of brass (1 Kings 7:27, 38). Five stood on the south or right side or shoulder of the Temple, and five on the north or left side (1 Kings 7:39)… The bases were square: four cubits wide and three cubits high, with ledges, borders, or sides, and certain additions, and supports for the laver. They stood on wheels, one and a half cubits high, and had carvings of lions, oxen, and cherubim. The lavers were circular, four cubits in diameter… The inward parts and legs of the burnt offerings were washed. So they became a picture of Him whose inward thoughts, feelings, purposes, and desires were always pure and holy. His walk and ways were blameless and undefiled, and He "offered Himself without blemish to God."
One writer traces the cleanness of the sacrifices back to the One they pictured.
1 Kings 7:27-39 describes the bases and lavers at some length, but 2 Chronicles 4:6 tells us what they were for: in the lavers they washed what was offered for the burnt offering, and the sea was for the priests to wash in. Every sacrifice brought to the altar spoke to God of Christ. So they had to be completely clean… In this way God would teach us in pictures lessons about His Holy One: "He committed no sin" (1 Peter 2:22). "He knew no sin" (2 Cor. 5:21). "In Him there is no sin" (1 John 3:5).
The one great sea served a different need from the ten lavers, and its size says something about the supply.
The molten sea was for the priests and the Levites to perform their washings. It pictures that cleansing which His people need and which is so graciously provided by the Lord Himself. The huge quantity of water held in the molten sea suggests the unlimited provision grace has made. In Revelation 4:6, we read that before the throne was a sea of glass, like crystal. This sea of glass points back to the molten sea in Solomon's temple. But it is not a sea of water; it is of glass, like crystal, because the redeemed in glory no longer need cleansing.
Another writer sets the two washings side by side and names what each stands for.
The "molten sea" washed the priests. They all had access to this single way of being cleansed from the defilement of their walk. Christ, made sin, is the source of cleansing for His own; His Word is the means. Ten lavers were needed to wash the victims; these were, we do not doubt, symbolic of the absolute purity of Christ.
The metal of these vessels follows a pattern that runs through the whole building.
There were also ten carts which each carried a laver for washing the animals of sacrifice. These could be moved around… The carts were made of copper too. So the holiness of God marked all the outside furnishings, while the inside showed the glory of God (the gold).
The stands could roll, and that mobility had a purpose at the altar.
These lavers were constantly pushed about on their wheels. They stood at the entrance to the platform of the altar, so that the victims could always be presented as pure.
The washing also had a public meaning under Solomon's kingdom.
In the kingdom they showed the perfection of the burnt offering, which was the basis of the people's acceptance before God. This purity, this holiness of the sacrifice, satisfied all the demands of God's government.
One writer sees meaning in the sheer number of these vessels.
The ten lavers with their bases were for the washing of the sacrifices. Instead of one laver there were ten; and there were also ten lampstands and ten tables. Everything was an increase and on a large scale. It all foreshadows that coming glorious Kingdom of Christ.
- Placed — Five stands stood on the south side of the house, five on the north, and the sea at the corner. Wheels kept the lavers moving, so water was always within reach of the altar.
- Purity — The ten lavers washed what was offered for the burnt offering. Every sacrifice spoke to God of Christ, so it had to be clean.
- Provision — The one sea washed the priests. Its vast size speaks of unlimited provision. Revelation's sea of glass shows the redeemed in glory needing cleansing no longer.
- Pattern — Brass outside, gold inside: holiness marked the court, glory marked the house.
- Promise — Ten lavers instead of one, with ten lampstands and ten tables. This increase points on to the coming Kingdom of Christ, where the holiness of the sacrifice satisfies every demand of God's government.
And Hiram made the lavers, and the shovels, and the bowls. So Hiram ended doing all the work that he made for king Solomon [for] the house of Jehovah
The last verse of Hiram's bronze work names three plain items: pots, shovels and basins. Why does Scripture list buckets and scoops beside the great pillars and the sea, and why does a Gentile craftsman finish the work?
Older translations read "lavers" here instead of "pots." The ten lavers appear in the verses just before.
Everything Hiram cast was bronze, never gold. The two metals belong to two different places.
Divine righteousness is what lets us stand before Him. We have it in Christ in heaven. Bronze is the symbol of the righteousness of God, showing on earth what He is for sinful man. The furniture of the temple was gold. The furniture of the court was bronze, and it was cast in the ground. Hiram worked in bronze only.
The ten lavers were not for the priests. The great bronze sea washed them. The lavers washed something else.
The bronze sea was for washing the priests. The ten lavers, five on the right of the court and five on the left, were for washing "what was used for the burnt offering" (2 Chr. 4:6). In Leviticus 1:9 we see the priest washing the inner parts and the legs of the animal with water. This picture had to match the reality it pointed to: the offering of Christ to God in perfect purity. He who offered Himself as a sweet-smelling offering was holiness itself and needed no washing. But the picture had to be washed, to show the perfection of the offering of Christ.
Another writer links those two parts to the One they picture.
The inward parts and the legs of the burnt offerings were washed. So they became a picture of Him whose inward thoughts, feelings, purposes and desires were always pure and holy; whose walk and ways were blameless and undefiled; and who "offered Himself without blemish to God."
The pots carried away ashes. That sounds like cleanup, but the ashes themselves were a testimony.
Ashes are the witness that the fire has done its work. They are the witness of a completed and accepted sacrifice. So the margin of Psalm 20:3 reads, "The Lord turn to ashes your burnt sacrifice." The text translates that word as "accept," and the margin explains it. This witness of an accepted sacrifice is not a sign of sorrow; the other word is used for that. Nor is it a sign of worthlessness and emptiness. There is nothing worthless about the sacrifice of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The Hebrew word behind "basins" names their use.
mizraq, 'large basin or bowl,' used for holding the blood that had to be sprinkled (Ex. 27:3; 1 Kings 7:40, 45, 50; 2 Chr. 4:8).
Hiram was not simply hired for this work. He was equipped for it.
Hiram "was full of wisdom, understanding, and skill for making any work in bronze" (v. 14). He stands for the Spirit of God (Isa. 11:2) in this work.
Still, his work had a limit.
So in the next chapter (4) we find all the fittings — the altar and the bronze sea, and the pots and shovels and basins — for everything has its place. And further, Solomon made all the golden vessels. Huram, a Gentile, might be trusted with the outside vessels; but "Solomon made all the vessels that were in the house of God" (v. 19). These were under his own direct oversight, as was fitting for him.
The verse ends with a finished job. One writer ties the ground where Hiram cast his vessels to the ground we stand on now.
The Spirit has recorded the place, and the kind of ground, where Hiram did his work: "In the plain of the Jordan the king cast them, in the clay ground between Succoth and Zarethan" (1 Kings 7:46). We are all living in "the clay ground" while we wait for the coming of the Lord Jesus. But His hand is forming and shaping us. At the end of his work Hiram handed Solomon a multitude of shining sacred vessels, fit for the sanctuary of God. Just as surely, the Holy Spirit at the end of His present gracious work will present in heavenly glory a multitude of souls made fully fit for the companionship of the First-born Son.
- Bronze — gold belonged inside the temple, bronze to the court outside. Bronze shows on earth what God is for sinful man, and Hiram worked in nothing else.
- Washing — the lavers washed the offering, not the priest. The washing showed the spotless purity of the sacrifice; it fixed no fault in it.
- Ashes — the pots carried the proof that the fire had done its work. Ashes here mean an accepted sacrifice, not waste or mourning.
- Blood — the basins were bowls for catching the blood for sprinkling. Even the smallest vessel served the sacrifice.
- Finished — Hiram ended his work by handing the king a multitude of shining vessels. In the same way, the Spirit's work in the clay ground ends with a multitude presented in glory.
two pillars, and the globes of the capitals that were on the top of the pillars, two; and the two networks, to cover the two globes of the capitals which were on the top of the pillars;
What stands at the front of a building tells you what the building rests on. Verse 41 opens the closing list of Hiram's bronze work: two pillars, two bowl-shaped capitals, and two lattices to cover the bowls.
Chapter 7 already described these pieces. This list repeats them as the record of what one workman finished. One commentator notes who gets the credit, and how much metal the list holds.
Though 2 Chronicles calls Hiram an expert in every kind of work, it credits Solomon, not Hiram, with all the building of the temple. Here in 1 Kings 7:40-45 Scripture calls the work Hiram's, at least all the bronze (or copper) work… The weight of the copper was not even determined because it was so great. Indeed, who can measure the holiness of God?
Almost everything in Solomon's temple copied the tabernacle, the tent of worship Israel carried through the wilderness. The copies were simply larger and more numerous. The pillars listed first in this verse were the exception.
The vessels of Jehovah's house were made on a much larger scale than those of the tabernacle; but they were the same, although greater in number. The only new things were the pillars, Jachin and Boaz; that is to say, "He will establish," and, "in Him is strength" (names which make the meaning of these pillars evident). I have no doubt that Revelation 3:12 points back to these pillars.
Everything in this list is bronze, and that is deliberate. Inside the house the furniture was gold. Out in the courtyard, where these pillars stood, the metal changes. So does its meaning.
Because of divine righteousness we are able to stand before Him. We have it in Christ in heaven. Bronze is the symbol of the righteousness of God, displaying upon earth what He is for sinful man. The furniture of the temple was gold; the furniture of the court was bronze, cast in the earth. Hiram worked in bronze only.
This verse names a bowl and the lattice that covers it. The accounts give these capitals different heights, which has long puzzled readers. One writer builds the capital out of four parts, and the numbers then agree.
In 1 Kings 7:16, the capitals — or crowns, as the Hebrew word Cotharoth means — are five cubits high. In verse 19 the lily work is four cubits. And in 2 Kings 25:17, "the height of the capital was three cubits." I think each capital had four parts: (1) a square ledge on top, half a cubit thick, carrying the pomegranates; (2) a similar ledge at the bottom; (3) a bowl one cubit deep (1 Kings 7:41); and (4) a bulge of three cubits (1 Kings 7:20). The last two, covered with lily work, make the four cubits; the two ledges complete the five.
The decoration is not filler. One writer reads each part — the netting named in this verse, the chains, the fruit, the flowers — as a picture of what Christ works for and in His own.
"Nets of checker work": He has caught us out of the sea of humanity for Himself (Matthew 13:47; Luke 5:10). "Wreaths of chain work": He binds and secures all whom He acquires (Hosea 11:4). Scripture often uses "pomegranates" as emblems of fruitfulness. All who are Christ's are meant to be fruitful. "on the tops of the pillars was lily-work": the lily character, purity and lowliness, is precious in His sight.
Invaders later carried these pillars off and smashed them. That was not the end of what they meant.
In Solomon's case, the bronze pillars could not be kept, because the king and his successors were unfaithful. The Chaldeans broke them up (Jeremiah 52:17-23). His kingdom could not be established because he did not seek his strength in God. But even if the material pillars have disappeared, the moral pillars remain. The day will come when the Lord, in whom is strength, will show everyone that He has established in righteousness a kingdom which can never be moved.
The pillars outlast their bronze in one more way. One writer ties them to the promise of Revelation 3:12, given to faithful believers in Philadelphia.
Solomon's massive bronze pillars were in the Lord's thoughts in His promise to the overcomer in Philadelphia: "I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God. Never shall he go out of it." What an encouragement to all who with little strength seek to keep His word and not deny His name.
- Counted — the pillars, bowls and lattice head a list of bronze so vast that no one weighed it. One writer sees in that the holiness of God, whose house it was.
- New — almost everything else copied the tabernacle on a larger scale; the pillars alone were new, named "He will establish" and "in Him is strength."
- Bronze — the metal of the courtyard, not the inner house: God's righteousness shown on earth to sinful man.
- Crowned — netting, chains, fruit and lily work covered the bowl-shaped capitals: Christ catches, binds, makes fruitful, and prizes lowliness in His own.
- Standing — invaders broke up the bronze, yet the two truths the pillars carried outlast it: strength is in Him, and He will establish.
and the four hundred pomegranates for the two networks, two rows of pomegranates for one network, to cover the two globes of the capitals which were upon the pillars;
This verse sits inside a long list of Hiram's bronze work, counting four hundred pomegranates in two rows on each of the two latticeworks over the pillar tops. Why would God record the exact number of decorative fruits, and what were they there to say?
The verse belongs to a closing summary of everything Hiram made in copper:
Here in 1 Kings 7:40-45 the work is said to be Hiram's, at least all the bronze (or copper) work. The summary of all the copper work in verses 40-47 impresses us with the great value of all this. No one even worked out the weight of the copper, because it was so great (v.47). Indeed, who can put a figure on the holiness of God?
The metal itself carries a message:
The brass (more likely "copper" or "bronze") of the pillars came from Syria, where David took it in war, as 1 Chron. 18:8 tells us. Brass stands for the righteousness of God in judgement. That is why it appears in the Altar of Burnt-offering.
The verse gives two rows on each latticework. One writer counts the rows out in full:
The number is given in different ways. The pomegranates were in two rows, twelve in a row: twenty-four on the upper ledge of each pillar, and twenty-four on the lower ledge, facing the four winds (Jer. 52:23) — that is, facing east, west, north, and south. That makes forty-eight on each pillar, ninety-six for the two together. With one pomegranate at each corner of the ledges, there were one hundred all round each ledge, and two hundred on each pillar. The number on the two pillars was four hundred. The pomegranates and lily work speak of the fruits and graces of the Spirit.
The pomegranate already stood for fruitfulness elsewhere:
The pomegranate alternated with bells at the bottom of the high priest's robe, as a picture of fruitfulness, and the columns of Solomon's temple carried the same ornament.
The verse hangs the fruit on two latticeworks. With the chain work and the lily tops, the ornaments trace what Christ does with those who are His:
The ornamentations of the pillars suggest what Christ works for and in His own. "Nets of checker work": He has caught us out of the sea of humanity for Himself (Matt. 13:47; Luke 5:10). "Wreaths of chain work": He binds and secures all whom He acquires (Hosea 11:4). Scripture often uses "pomegranates" as pictures of fruitfulness. All who are Christ's are meant to be fruitful. "Upon the top of the pillars was lily work": the lily character, purity and lowliness, is precious in His sight.
The fruit sat at the very top of the pillars, where everyone could see it:
Brazen pomegranates ornamented the tops of the pillars. How can anyone show the divine character to everyone without bearing fruit that abounds in righteousness? The Lord desires to be crowned with fruit. If strength is in Him, it is there to produce fruit. He is the True Vine here on earth, and in that character He has no other work. All His care for His own, for all His disciples, has one purpose: that they might bear fruit. He must show Himself before all eyes as the One who produces it.
The high priest's robe explains why the number matters:
One characteristic detail: they had hundreds of pomegranates on their capitals. In the Word the pomegranate seems to be the image of fruit borne for God. Bells and pomegranates alternated around the hem of the high priest's garment (Ex. 28:31-35). The bells represent the testimony, and the pomegranates the fruit. Those pomegranates were "of blue and purple and scarlet" — heavenly fruit, fruit that matches the dignity of the Lord and His royal dignity as Messiah. Our fruit should bear the character of Christ and be worthy of Him. It should also match our testimony, just as the pomegranates were equal in number to the golden bells. One often finds Christians with more bells than pomegranates, more words than fruit!
- Unweighed — the copper work was so vast that no one weighed it, a picture of a holiness no one can put a figure on.
- Counted — yet the fruit is counted: two rows, one hundred to a ledge, four hundred in all, facing every direction.
- Caught — the latticework speaks of people caught out of the sea of humanity for Christ. The chain work speaks of His holding them fast.
- Crowned — the fruit sat at the very top. The Lord means to be crowned with fruit, and His strength in us is there to produce it.
- Matched — bells and pomegranates were equal in number; the warning is against a life with more words than fruit.