Then came two women, harlots, to the king, and stood before him.
Two women of the lowest standing in Israel come before the king with a quarrel over a child. What follows is a sample of Solomon's wisdom at work. Commentators see in it both how God judges and a picture of a far greater love.
Solomon had asked God for the wisdom to carry out the duties of his throne. The next scene puts that gift to work in public.
J. N. DarbySolomon knows he needs the help of Jehovah to fulfil the duties before him. Through the grace of God, he shows a state of heart about this which pleases Jehovah… The judgment he gives shows the wisdom he had asked for, and the people acknowledge that it comes from God.
Two claims, no proof, no witnesses, no distinguishing marks on the child. Their trade did not close the court to them.
H. L. RossierThough it concerns prostitutes, nothing changes this judgment. Men always let the character of those who speak to them shape their judgments. It is not so with God. What matters to Him is the heart, not the outward character. Solomon's judgment rests on the affections the heart shows. Claims and denials were worth the same here, so judgment could not rest on them… The question was not which of the two women was more worthy — both were prostitutes. It was not whether the actions complained of were likely or had happened — there had been no witness. It was not whether the true mother could recognise her child by some outward sign — there were none.
The order to divide the child sounded monstrous. No one in the room could have guessed where it was going.
William KellyNo ruler better than Solomon shows that the heart of kings is unsearchable… Did one soul see into his heart when he called for a sword? He said, "Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one and half to the other." The false mother was as willing as the true one was not, but who could have anticipated it except the king? What sounded cruel turned out wise and kind.
The false claimant agreed to the sentence, and her agreement exposed her.
Leslie M. GrantIt was not love for the child that moved her, but jealousy toward the other woman. Solomon knew that if she was dishonest enough to steal the child, his test would reveal her motives.
The real mother would rather lose her son than see him killed.
H. L. RossierWhen the true mother saw the sword lifted over her child, "her heart yearned for her son." The object loved matters more to us than our love for it. This is how one tells what is real, and who the true mother is… Only divine wisdom can tell, by the state of the heart, whether a profession of faith is real. How often there is profession without reality! Where are the affections for Christ? Where is the devotion that sacrifices even its lawful advantages and rights for Him?
One writer draws out the principle behind the king's ruling and follows it to the cross.
J. T. MawsonThe king's judgment was this: self-sacrificing love has the unbreakable right to hold and enjoy the object it loves. And all the power of his throne stood behind his judgment to make it good. Solomon's judgment declared the law of God's universe, and there is none greater than it.
J. T. MawsonThe sentence of death had been passed on us and the enemy of God claimed us as his; not that he cared for us at all. "He shall be neither mine nor yours; divide him," said the woman who was not the mother — let it perish. Satan would have been overjoyed if we had been buried for ever in the depth of hell. Then God and Christ would have lost us for ever. But the Good Shepherd gave His life for the sheep.
One writer looks past the verdict to what such a case says about Solomon's reign, and about the greater King to come.
W. W. FeredayThe king's action made a deep impression on the people generally. "And all Israel heard of the judgment that the king had rendered, and they stood in awe of the king, because they perceived that the wisdom of God was in him to do justice." But the incident reminds us that Solomon's glorious reign did not reach perfection. No one could ever bring such a sordid case before Solomon's greater Son, God's "Holy One."
- Asked — Solomon asked God for wisdom to judge. This case is the public proof that God gave it.
- Impartial — the women's trade did not shut the court to them. God weighs the heart, not the speaker's reputation.
- Tested — there were no witnesses and no proof. The sword was not cruelty. It made hidden motives speak.
- Revealed — jealousy said, "divide him." Love would rather give the child up than see him die. Love shows itself by what it will surrender.
- Fulfilled — self-sacrificing love holds the unbreakable right to the one it loves. The cross proved that law.
And the first woman said, Ah, my lord! I and this woman abode in one house; and I was delivered of a child with her in the house.
Two women with no standing in society walk into the king's court, and one of them speaks first. Her case opens a dispute that no witness could settle.
The woman's speech in this verse begins a story that runs to verse 21. One writer traces the whole complaint she brings:
Leslie M. GrantTwo women who were prostitutes came to Solomon to have him judge a controversy between them. The complainant stated her case first. She claimed that after she had given birth to a child, the other woman had smothered her own child by lying on him at night. Then, while the first mother was sleeping, the other woman had swapped the babies. When she awoke in the morning, she said, she found the child dead, but in examining him, found this was not her child.
She calls him "my lord" — a woman of the streets speaking to the throne. The king hears her case anyway.
H. L. RossierAfter the understanding to worship before the ark, which was the first sign of his wisdom, we find in Solomon "the wisdom of God… to do judgment" (v. 28). Though it concerns harlots, nothing changes this judgment. People always let the character of the speaker sway their judgments; it is not so with God. What is important for Him is the heart, not the outward character.
Her account is detailed, but it is only her account. Strip the case down and there is nothing left for an ordinary judge to work with.
H. L. RossierClaims and denials carried equal weight in this case, and no judgment could rest on them. What could establish judgment was the showing of the heart. The question was not which of the two women was the more worthy — both were harlots. It was not whether the actions complained of were likely or had taken place — there had been no witness. It was not whether the true mother could recognise her child by certain outward signs — there were none.
No one in the room could have predicted what Solomon did next.
William KellyNo sovereign better than Solomon shows that the heart of kings is unsearchable. See his decision of the dispute between the mothers, whose was the dead child, and whose the living one. Was there one soul who saw into his heart? He asked for a sword and said, "Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one and half to the other." The false mother was as willing as the true was not, but who could have expected it except the king? What sounded cruel turned out wise and kind.
The test did not produce evidence. It produced love — and the ruling followed the love.
The Judgment Which The King Had JudgedOne of them loved the child with a mother's true love. The other had no love for him at all. She wanted him only because she could not bear to see true love in possession of what it loved. "Bring a sword and divide the living child," said the king. For that moment the child was under the sentence of death, with the sword hanging over it, ready to strike. How could anyone save him from the carrying out of the sentence? True love found the way of salvation for it. But it was the way of sacrifice, and that was the only way… The king's judgment was this: self-sacrificing love has a right that cannot be taken away — the right to have and enjoy the object it loves.
The same writer carries that verdict straight to the cross:
The Judgment Which The King Had JudgedThe sentence of death had been passed on us and the enemy of God claimed us as his; not that he cared for us at all. "Let it be neither mine nor yours, but divide it," said the woman who was not the child's mother — let it perish… But the Good Shepherd gave His life for the sheep.
The test was original and it worked. Yet the same writer notes what Solomon's reign still lacked.
W. W. FeredayThe suggestion to divide the baby with the sword was new and bold. It was probably without precedent in the world's history. But it brought out the feelings of the true mother with such a rush that it became clear whose the child was… But the incident reminds us that perfection was not reached in Solomon's glorious reign. It is unthinkable that anyone would bring such a sordid case to Solomon's greater Son, God's "Holy One," for judgment.
- Heard. The king heard two women society had written off. Who they were changed nothing in his judgment.
- Stuck. Word stood against word, with no witness and no mark on the child. Ordinary evidence could settle nothing.
- Sword. The king's unexpected order was the one test that could expose a heart; what sounded cruel turned out wise and kind.
- Sacrifice. The true mother gave up the child rather than see him die. Self-sacrificing love has the right to what it loves.
- Calvary. The cross shows the same law. Love took the way of sacrifice, and that is how it saved and kept the one it loved.
And it came to pass the third day after I was delivered, that this woman was delivered also; and we were together; no stranger was with us in the house, only we two were in the house.
Two women come before the king with one living baby between them, and one of them is lying. Their babies were born three days apart, and verse 18 adds the fact that makes the case impossible: no one else was in the house.
The two women who bring this quarrel are prostitutes, yet the king hears them out. One writer notes what could not decide the case:
H. L. RossierThough it concerns prostitutes, nothing changes this judgment. People always let the character of the speaker sway their judgment; it is not so with God. What matters to Him is the heart, not the outward character. The question was not which of the two women was more worthy — both were prostitutes. Nor was it whether the acts they complained of were likely, or had even happened — there had been no witness to it. Nor was it whether the true mother could recognize her child by some outward sign — there were none.
Verse 18 shuts every ordinary door. No third person was in the house, so neither woman could call anyone to back her story.
Leslie M. GrantThey had brought the babies with them, but there were no witnesses. We would think someone else must have seen which child was born first. However, Solomon did not need other witnesses. He called for a sword, and commanded that the living child should be cut in half, with each mother having a half. Of course this would not be a satisfactory arrangement, but Solomon knew who he was dealing with. The real mother protested strongly, saying she would rather the other woman take her child than have the child killed.
Since nothing outside the two women could settle it, the king had to read the women themselves. One writer compares his wisdom with David's:
William KellyHe perfectly understood the heart of man; David entered into the heart of God. There was the difference. Solomon understood the heart of man well — no man better; no man so well. God has used him as the vessel of the deepest human wisdom that even the word of God contains. I call it human, because it is about human affairs.
The order he gave sounded cruel, and no one in the room could see where it was going.
William KellyDid one soul see into his heart when he asked for a sword? He said, Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one and half to the other. The false mother was as willing as the true was not, but who could have anticipated it but the king? What sounded cruel turned out wise and kind.
What the sword exposed was not a fact but an affection. One writer states the principle the king applied:
J. T. MawsonThe king's judgment was this: self-sacrificing love has a right that cannot be taken away — the right to have and enjoy what it loves. And all the power of his throne lay behind his judgment to give effect to it. Solomon's judgment declared the law of God's universe, and there is no greater law than that.
One writer applies the same test to the claim to belong to Christ:
H. L. Rossier"Divide it," says the one who is not the mother, giving way to her resentment. A person quickly sacrifices Christ when it is a matter of satisfying his own passions. Only divine wisdom can tell whether a profession of faith is real, and it judges by the state of the heart. How often there is profession without reality!
Commentators also read the scene forward. Some see in Solomon's decision a sample of a greater King's rule:
J. G. BellettHe will rule or judge wisely, as expressed by Solomon's decree between the two prostitutes. And the sceptre of righteousness in His hand will secure peace.
Others point the other way. The case itself shows that Solomon's reign, for all its splendour, was not the perfect one:
W. W. FeredayIt is unthinkable that such a squalid case could ever be brought to Solomon's greater Son for judgment.
- No witness. The two women were alone in the house, so no outside evidence existed and the case was one word against another.
- No favourites. Both women were prostitutes, so worth settled nothing. God weighs the heart, not reputation.
- No proof needed. The king did not look for more witnesses; he created a test that made the hidden heart speak.
- Love answers. The woman who would rather lose her son than see him killed proved she was the mother. Self-sacrificing love holds the right to what it loves.
- A greater Judge. Commentators see a picture of the King who is still to come. They also see a reign that fell short, since such a case reached the throne at all.
And this woman's child died in the night; because she had lain upon it.
Two women share one house, each has a newborn son, and now one baby is dead and one is alive. The woman speaking blames the other for rolling onto her own child in her sleep — and no one else was there to see it.
This line is one piece of a longer complaint. A commentator retells the story the first woman brought to the king:
Leslie M. GrantTwo women who were prostitutes came to Solomon to have him settle a dispute between them. The woman bringing the charge spoke first. She claimed that after she gave birth to a child, the other woman smothered her own child by lying on him at night, and then swapped the babies while the first mother slept. When she woke in the morning, she said, she found the child dead — but on looking at him closely, she saw he was not her child.
Only the two women were there that night, so the king had nothing to weigh but their opposite claims:
H. L. RossierA claim and a denial carried equal weight here, so the king could not base his judgment on their words. What could settle it was what the heart showed. The question was not which of the two women was more respectable — both were prostitutes. It was not whether the acts complained of were likely or had happened — no one had seen them. It was not whether the true mother could recognize her child by some outward mark — there were none.
The same writer draws out what the king refused to count against them:
H. L. RossierEven though the case concerns prostitutes, nothing about this judgment changes. People always let the reputation of the speaker sway their judgment. It is not so with God. What matters to Him is the heart, not the outward character.
No one could prove what happened that night, so the king set a test instead. He proposed cutting the living child in two:
Leslie M. GrantThe real mother of the child protested. She said she would rather the other woman took her child than have the child killed. The other woman was happy to have the child divided, knowing that then neither of them would have him. Love for the child was not what moved her; jealousy toward the other woman did. Solomon knew that a woman dishonest enough to steal a child would show her motives under the test he gave her.
One writer looks at how the order struck those who heard it:
William KellyDid a single person see into his heart when he asked for a sword and said, Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one and half to the other? The false mother was as willing to do it as the true mother was unwilling, but no one except the king could have foreseen that. What sounded cruel turned out wise and kind.
One writer sets the two women side by side as the sword is raised:
J T MawsonOne of them loved him with a mother's true love. The other had no love for him at all. She wanted him only because she could not bear to see true love holding what it loved. "Bring a sword and divide the living child," said the king, and for that moment the child was under a sentence of death. The sword hung over him, ready to strike. How could he be saved from it? True love found the way to save him, but it was the way of sacrifice. That was the only way… She was ready to give herself up for the life and good of her child.
He puts the king's verdict into a single rule:
J T MawsonThe king's judgment was this — self-sacrificing love has a right that cannot be taken away — the right to have and enjoy what it loves. And all the power of his throne stood behind his judgment to carry it out.
One writer weighs both what the test achieved and what the case shows about Solomon's reign:
W. W. FeredayThe idea of splitting the baby with a sword was new and bold, and probably nothing like it had ever been tried before. But it brought out the true mother's feelings in such a rush that it became clear whose the child was… Still, the incident reminds us that Solomon's glorious reign fell short of perfection. We cannot imagine a case this squalid being brought for decision to Solomon's greater Son, God's "Holy One."
- Night. A baby dies while his mother sleeps on him, and everything that follows happens where no one can see it.
- No witnesses. Word against word, no marks, no proof — so the evidence could never settle who owned the living child.
- Heart. Facts failed, so the heart spoke. The king judged by what love showed, not by the women's reputation.
- Sword. The raised sword forced both hearts open. One woman gave up her son to keep him alive. The other was content to see him cut in two.
- Verdict. Love that gives itself up keeps what it loves. The king's full power stands behind that ruling.
And she arose at midnight, and took my son from beside me, while thy handmaid slept, and laid it in her bosom, and laid her dead son in my bosom.
A woman stands before Solomon and tells what happened in the dark: a baby swapped at midnight, one child dead, one alive, and no witness awake. How does a king reach the truth when all he has is two women's conflicting words?
Verse 20 sits inside the first woman's opening statement. Grant retells the charge in full.
Leslie M. GrantThe woman who brought the complaint spoke first. She said that after she had given birth to a child, the other woman smothered her own child by lying on him at night. The other woman then changed the babies while the first mother was sleeping. When she awoke in the morning, she said, she found the child dead. But in examining him, she found this was not her child.
The swap happened while she slept, so the king has nothing to weigh. No witness, no mark on the child, and two claims of equal weight.
H. L. RossierMen always let the character of the person speaking sway their judgment; it is not so with God. What matters to Him is the heart, not the outward character. Solomon's judgment is based on the affections shown by the heart. Statements and denials were of equal value in this case, and judgment could not be based on them. The question was not which of the two women was the more worthy — both were prostitutes. It was not whether the things complained of were likely or had happened, for there had been no witness to it. Nor was it whether the true mother could recognise her child by some outward sign — there were none.
No one could rebuild that night, so Solomon made the present moment speak. His order gave nothing away.
William KellyNo ruler better than Solomon shows that the heart of kings is unsearchable. See his decision in the dispute between the mothers, over whose was the dead child and whose the living one. Was there one soul who saw into his heart when he asked for a sword? Divide the living child in two, he said, and give half to the one and half to the other. The false mother was as willing as the true one was not, but who could have expected it except the king? What sounded cruel turned out wise and kind.
She had said the child was lifted from her side. Solomon's test reached for a bond no swap could transfer.
Leslie M. GrantSolomon used something God has planted in a mother: an instinct of deepest attachment to her own child. You are not likely to find it where there is no direct vital relationship. So there remained not the slightest doubt that the first woman was the mother of the child, and the king ordered them to give the child to her.
The sentence over the child forced love to show itself.
J T MawsonOne of them loved it with a mother's true love. The other had no love for it at all. She wanted it because she could not bear to see true love in possession of what it loved. "Bring a sword and divide the living child," said the king. For that moment the child was under the sentence of death. The sword ready to strike hung over it. How could it be saved from having the sentence carried out? True love found the way of salvation for it, but it was the way of sacrifice; that was the only way.
Mawson sums up the king's verdict:
J T MawsonSelf-sacrificing love has an unbreakable right to have and enjoy the one it loves. And all the power of his throne lay behind his judgment to give effect to it.
Rossier turns the test on the reader's own heart.
H. L. Rossier"Divide it," says the one who is not the mother, giving way to her resentment. A person quickly sacrifices Christ when it is a matter of satisfying his own passions. Only divine wisdom is able to discern the reality of profession by the state of the heart. How often there is profession without reality! Where are the affections for Christ? Where is the devotion that sacrifices even its rightful advantages and rights for Him?
The verdict won Solomon the awe of the nation. Even so, the case marks a limit.
W. W. FeredayThe king's action made a deep impression on the people in general. "And all Israel heard of the judgment that the king had rendered, and they stood in awe of the king, because they perceived that the wisdom of God was in him to do justice." But the incident reminds us that Solomon's glorious reign did not reach perfection. It is unthinkable that anyone could bring such a sordid case for decision to Solomon's greater Son, God's "Holy One."
- Dark — the swap happened at midnight while the mother slept. No witness, no mark on the child.
- Deadlock — claim and denial weighed the same, and neither woman's character helped. Evidence could not settle it.
- Discernment — Solomon reached past the dark to the heart. No one guessed his purpose until he asked for the sword.
- Devotion — the true mother gave up her claim to keep the child alive. That sacrifice is still the mark of real love.
- Dominion — all the power of a throne stood behind the verdict that love keeps what it loves. It points to a greater King than Solomon.
And when I rose in the morning to give my child suck, behold, it was dead; and I considered it in the morning, and behold, it was not my son, whom I bore.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the other woman said, No, for the living is my son, and the dead is thy son. And this one said, No, but the dead is thy son, and the living is my son. Thus they spoke before the king.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Then said the king, The one says, This that is living is my son, and thy son is the dead; and the other says, No, for thy son is the dead, and my son is the living.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the king said, Bring me a sword. And they brought a sword before the king.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the king said, Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one, and half to the other.
Two women claimed the same baby, and the king's answer was not a verdict at all — it was a call for a sword. The cruellest order in the chapter is the moment the truth comes out.
There was no evidence to work with. One writer traces how the king moved past that dead end:
Leslie M. GrantThey had brought the babies with them, but there were no witnesses. We would think that someone else must have seen which child was born first. However, Solomon did not need other witnesses. He called for a sword, and commanded that the living child should be cut in half, with each mother having a half. Of course this would not be a satisfactory arrangement, but Solomon knew who he was dealing with.
Nobody in the room could have guessed what the order was for. William Kelly weighs how the order sounded against how it ended:
William KellyWas there one soul who saw into his heart when he asked for a sword and said, "Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one and half to the other"? The false mother was as willing as the true one was not, but who could have expected it except the king? What sounded cruel turned out to be wise and kind.
The king did not weigh who the women were. He weighed what they loved:
H. L. RossierPeople always let the character of the speaker sway their judgment. It is not so with God. What matters to Him is the heart, not the outward character. Solomon's judgment rests on the affections the heart shows. Statements and denials were of equal value in this case, and judgment could not rest on them. What could settle the judgment was the heart showing itself... For where true ties of love exist, we try to protect at any cost what is dear to us, even at the risk of losing it for ourselves. That is the character of love. Love is not selfish: it sacrifices itself for the object it loves.
For a moment the baby's life hangs on the raised blade, and the only way out is sacrifice:
J T Mawson"Bring a sword and divide the living child," said the king, and for that moment the child was under the sentence of death. The sword hung over it, ready to strike. How could it escape that sentence? True love found the way of salvation for it, but it was the way of sacrifice; that was the only way... She was ready to sacrifice herself for the life and the good of her child.
The same writer sees our own case in that raised sword:
J T MawsonThe sentence of death had been passed on us and the enemy of God claimed us as his; not that he cared for us at all. "Let it be neither mine nor yours, but divide it," said the woman whose child it was not — let it die. Satan would have rejoiced greatly if we had been buried for ever in the depths of hell, for then God and Christ would have lost us for ever. But the Good Shepherd gave His life for the sheep.
Half a child is no child. Mawson turns that on the reader:
J T MawsonA divided child is a dead child, a divided heart is a dead heart; and so far it is offensive to the Lord. Is it not this that He means when He says, "Would that you were either cold or hot"? True love can bear no rival; it must have its object; nothing can make up for it. We may give our time, money, talents — it will all be utterly despised. Love cries out for response, for the wholehearted and undivided response of the heart of the one loved.
This judgment showed real wisdom. One writer also marks its limit:
W. W. FeredayThe suggestion to divide the baby with the sword was new and bold, and likely nothing like it had happened before in the world's history. But it drew out the feelings of the true mother so clearly that there was no doubt whose the child was... Yet the incident reminds us that Solomon's glorious reign did not reach perfection.
- Sword. With no witnesses on either side, the king used a test instead of testimony. He needed nothing more.
- Heart. The test skipped reputation and character. It went straight to the affections, because that is where God looks.
- Sacrifice. Love proved itself by being willing to lose the child rather than see it die; love is not selfish.
- Calvary. The child under the raised sword pictures our own sentence, and the way of rescue was the way of sacrifice.
- Undivided. A divided child is a dead child, and a divided heart is a dead heart; love asks for the whole response, not a share.
Then spoke the woman whose was the living child to the king, for her bowels yearned over her son, and she said, Ah, my lord! give her the living child, and in no wise put it to death. But the other said, Let it be neither mine nor thine; divide it.
Two women who worked as prostitutes came to Solomon with no witnesses and no evidence. One living baby lay between them. The king called for a sword, and this verse catches the moment the real mother's love settled the case.
Nothing in the usual toolkit of a judge was available here. One writer walks through each avenue and closes it off:
H. L. RossierSolomon's judgment is based on the affections shown by the heart. Statements and denials were of equal value in this case, and judgment could not be based on them. What could settle the judgment was what the heart revealed. The question was not which of the two women was the more worthy — both were prostitutes. It was not whether the things they claimed were likely or had happened — there had been no witness. It was not whether the true mother could recognise her child by some outward sign — there were none.
The same writer draws a contrast. People let the character of the speaker sway their judgment, but God does not: "What is important for Him is the heart, not the outward character."
The word behind "her heart yearned" points to the body's deepest place of feeling. Commentators note it as a recurring Bible image:
VariousWe use the heart as the symbol of love, but people of the East more often used the inward parts as the symbol of the deepest feeling of love, pity and compassion. (See Genesis 43:30; 1 Kings 3:26; Jeremiah 31:20; Philippians 1:8; Colossians 3:12; 1 John 3:17.)
Older translations read, "her bowels yearned over her son."
Her plea hands the child to her rival, and that is how she saves his life:
J. T. MawsonFor the moment that child was under the sentence of death; the sword ready to strike hung over it. How could it be saved from the carrying out of the sentence? True love found the way of salvation for it. But it was the way of sacrifice. That was the only way… She was prepared to sacrifice herself for the life and the good of her child.
Rossier states what love is by nature, then turns it toward Christ:
H. L. RossierWhere true ties of love exist, we seek to protect what is dear to us at any cost, even at the risk of losing it for ourselves. Love is not selfish: it sacrifices itself for the one it loves. The love of Christ has done that for us, and we can do that for Him in return: "For your sake we are being killed all the day long" (Romans 8:36).
The second woman agrees to the sword. Her agreement is not indifference but something worse:
Leslie M. GrantThe other woman was willing to have the child divided, knowing that neither of them would have the child. It was not love for the child that moved her, but jealousy toward the other woman.
Rossier turns this into a mirror for anyone who claims to belong to Christ:
H. L. Rossier"Divide it," says the one who is not the mother, giving way to her resentment. A person quickly sacrifices Christ when it is a matter of satisfying his own passions. Only divine wisdom can tell whether a profession is real by looking at the state of the heart. How often there is profession without reality! Where are the affections for Christ? Where is the devotion that sacrifices even its lawful advantages and rights for Him?
Nobody in the room could have predicted the king's method, and that is part of what made it wisdom:
William KellyWas there one soul who saw into his heart when he called for a sword and ordered the living child divided in two, half to each woman? The false mother was as willing as the true was not, but who could have expected that, except the king? What sounded cruel turned out wise and kind.
The child went to the woman who would rather lose him than bury him. One writer names the principle the king enforced, then follows it to the cross:
J. T. MawsonThe king's judgment was this — SELF-SACRIFICING LOVE HAS THE UNTOUCHABLE RIGHT TO POSSESS AND ENJOY THE ONE IT LOVES. And all the power of his throne stood behind his judgment to carry it out. This was the law of God's universe, declared in Solomon's judgment, and there is none greater.
J. T. MawsonThe sentence of death had been passed on us, and the enemy of God claimed us as his — not that he cared for us at all. Satan would have rejoiced if we had been buried for ever in the depth of hell, for then God and Christ would have lost us for ever. But the Good Shepherd gave His life for the sheep.
- Test. Solomon had no witnesses and no birthmarks to weigh. So he let the heart give the evidence.
- Yearning. The word points to the deepest place of feeling in a person. Scripture uses the same image elsewhere for compassion.
- Surrender. Real love let go. She would rather hand her son to her rival than see him killed.
- Exposure. The rival said "divide him" out of jealousy, not love. The same self-interest still sacrifices Christ to satisfy a passion.
- Verdict. Love that sacrifices itself has the right to keep what it loves. A throne stands behind that ruling. So the Good Shepherd's death secures His sheep.
And the king answered and said, Give this one the living child, and in no wise put it to death she is its mother.
Two women shared a house, one baby was alive, one was dead, and no witness could say which was which. Here the king gives the child back to the mother who fought for his life, in a ruling commentators trace all the way to the cross.
No testimony could settle the case, because there was none. Solomon found another way to the truth.
Leslie M. GrantSolomon did not need other witnesses. He called for a sword, and commanded that the living child should be cut in half, with each mother having a half. It was not love for the child that moved the false mother, but jealousy toward the other woman. Solomon knew that if she was dishonest enough to steal the child, the test he gave her would reveal her motives.
No one else could guess what the king was thinking.
William KellyNo king shows better than Solomon that the heart of kings cannot be read. Not one soul saw into his heart when he asked for a sword. The false mother was as willing to divide the child as the true mother was unwilling, and who could have expected that except the king? What sounded cruel turned out wise and kind.
Both women were prostitutes. Neither had a reputation a human judge would trust.
H. L. RossierEven though the case concerns prostitutes, nothing changes this judgment. People always let the character of those who speak to them sway their judgments. It is not so with God. What matters to Him is the heart, not the outward character. The question was not which of the two women was more worthy, for both were prostitutes. It was not whether the things they complained of were likely or had really happened, for there had been no witness. It was not whether the true mother could recognise her child by outward signs, for there were none. It was a matter of judging the state of her heart, and only the affections she showed could reveal it.
The true mother would rather lose her son than see him killed. That willingness to let go tells the real from the fake, and God gives back what love is ready to lose.
H. L. RossierWhen the true mother saw the sword lifted over her child, her heart yearned for her son. The object loved means more to us than our love for it. This is how you tell what is real, and who the true mother is. Among people who claim the name of Christian, the one who has never found an object for his heart soon gives himself away. "Divide it," says the woman who is not the mother, giving way to her resentment. People are quick to sacrifice Christ when it suits their own desires. How often there is a claim without the reality! Where is the devotion that sacrifices even its lawful rights for Him?… This is a question of ties created by God, of something given by Him which the soul values. God will never take it away from us. On the contrary, in the trial we shall receive it back afresh from His own hand.
The king does more than name a mother. He settles a claim, and one writer states it as a law.
J T MawsonThe king's judgment was this — self-sacrificing love has the inalienable right to the possession and enjoyment of the object it loves. And all the power of his throne stood behind his judgment to carry it out. Solomon's judgment declared the law of God's universe, and there is none greater than it.
Commentators take the same rule to the cross.
J T MawsonOur minds at once go back to Calvary, and we think of the self-sacrificing love that expressed itself there. The sentence of death lay on us, and the enemy of God claimed us as his. He did not care for us at all. Satan would have rejoiced if we had been buried for ever in the depth of hell, for then God and Christ would have lost us for ever. But the Good Shepherd gave His life for the sheep.
The whole nation saw the wisdom of God in the verdict. Yet one writer points to what the case itself says about Solomon's reign.
W. W. FeredayThe king's action made a deep impression on the people. "And all Israel heard of the judgment that the king had rendered, and they stood in awe of the king, because they perceived that the wisdom of God was in him to do justice." But the incident reminds us that perfection was not reached in Solomon's glorious reign. Such a squalid case could never come before Solomon's greater Son, God's "Holy One."
- Sword. With no witnesses and two unreliable claims, Solomon's order to divide the child was a test, not a sentence. What sounded cruel turned out wise and kind.
- Heart. The verdict rests on the heart, not on reputation or evidence. Both women were prostitutes, and only their affections could decide the case.
- Sacrifice. The real mother would rather lose her son than see him die. Love shows itself by what it gives up, and God gives it back.
- Right. The judgment declares a law: self-sacrificing love has the rightful claim to the one it loves. The throne's power enforces it.
- Cross. Commentators see the same rule at Calvary, where love paid the price to keep its own. Fereday adds that Solomon's reign, for all its wisdom, still fell short of the reign of his greater Son.