1 Kings 20:1–34

1 Kings 20:1 · Darby

And Ben-Hadad king of Syria assembled all his host; and there were thirty-two kings with him, and horses and chariots; and he went up and besieged Samaria, and fought against it.

Chapter 20 opens with the enemy at the gates. Ben-hadad of Syria has gathered every ally he has and ringed Israel's capital with an army, and the verse leaves one question hanging: where is Ahab's God in this?

The Old Quarrel Behind the Siege

The attack did not come out of nowhere. The king at the walls was pressing a claim he had inherited from his father.

Ben-Hadad, king of Syria, once gave strong help to Asa, king of Judah, against Baasha, king of Israel. From then on he stayed Baasha's enemy. He took cities from him, and he even won by conquest certain rights over Samaria, the capital of the kingdom (v. 34). His son, also named Ben-Hadad, goes up against Ahab and besieges Samaria. Claiming his father's rights, he sends the king an insulting demand (v. 3).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Force Meant to Frighten

Ben-hadad opens with words instead of weapons. He expects the sight of his army to do the work for him.

God's care for His people Israel still shows clearly in this chapter, despite Ahab's ungodly character. Ben Hadad, king of Syria, gathered a huge army, with 32 kings allied to him, and came to besiege the city of Samaria. He was so sure of his greater strength that he did not start the battle at once. Instead he sent messengers to tell Ahab, "Your silver and your gold are mine; your loveliest wives and children are mine" (v.3). So he was calling on Ahab to submit to his authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The King Who Never Looks Up

Ahab had heard the whole nation shout that the Lord is God. Now, with an army outside his walls, he acts as though none of it happened.

What does Ahab do? He had watched the scenes of 1 Kings 18 unfold before his eyes. He had heard his whole people cry in his ears, "The LORD, He is God!" Yet he spares not one thought for the God who had just restored His own worship by His power — the worship Ahab had replaced with the worship of Baal (1 Kings 16:31-32)! Ahab does not ask the Lord what to do, and he does not put his cause in His hands.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

He works out his chances without God, and surrenders.

He shows that God is a stranger to him. He acts as if God did not even exist, and he accepts the shame the pagan king puts on him: "My lord, O king, as you say, I am yours, and all that I have" (v. 4). After all, what could he do against Ben-Hadad, who led all his forces and had thirty-two kings with him? That is how people who do not know God work things out.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What Syria Stands For

One writer looks past the politics. He reads Syria, or Aram, as a picture of man lifting himself up on what God gave him.

As a picture, we have already traced in part what Aram, or Syria, stands for. It stands for man. God has lifted man up in Christ, in His own gracious and wonderful way. But man lifts himself up, and by doing so he drags himself down to his own ruin. That second thing is what the historical Aram shows us. The world keeps showing this in different ways. "Man's day" is a day when man makes himself great with what he has robbed from God, and lifts himself up by the very things God's mercy gave him.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

God's Care Under Judgment

Judgment was already hanging over Israel. Yet God had not finished with them.

In the next chapter (1 Kings 20) we are looking mostly at Israel's national standing among their enemies. But here is the striking fact. Even when judgment was drawing near on the people, when evil was judged and the Lord was acknowledged, He still claims His people as His own. That is something people often wonder at.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Claim. Ben-hadad presses rights his father won over Samaria — the siege is an old feud collecting an old debt.

- Confidence. Thirty-two allied kings let him talk before he fights. He expects Israel to give in at the sight of his strength.

- Calculation. Ahab weighs the odds and never once turns to God, though he had heard his whole nation confess that the Lord is God.

- Character. Syria pictures man exalting himself on what God's mercy gave him — and ruining himself by it.

- Care. Judgment was drawing near, and still God claimed His people as His own.

1 Kings 20:2 · Darby

And he sent messengers to Ahab king of Israel into the city, and said to him, Thus says Ben-Hadad

Ben-hadad, king of Syria, has surrounded Samaria with a huge allied army. Before a single blow is struck, he sends a message into the city claiming everything Ahab owns.

Why Messengers and Not an Assault

The siege does not begin with fighting. It begins with a message, and the reason is how sure Ben-hadad is of his own strength.

God's care for His people Israel is still clearly shown in this chapter, despite the wicked character of Ahab. Ben-Hadad, king of Syria, gathered a huge army, with 32 kings allied to him, and came to Samaria to besiege the city. He was so sure of his greater strength that he did not start the battle at once. Instead he sent messengers to Ahab to tell him, "Your silver and your gold are mine; your loveliest wives and children are mine" (v.3). So he was calling on Ahab to submit to his authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

An Old Grudge, A New King

The claim is not invented on the spot. It reaches back into a family history of conflict between Syria and Israel.

Ben-Hadad, king of Syria, had once given firm help to Asa, king of Judah, against Baasha, king of Israel. Ever since then he had stayed the enemy of Baasha. He had taken cities from him. He had even won by conquest certain rights over Samaria, the capital of the kingdom (v. 34). His son, also named Ben-Hadad, goes up against Ahab and besieges Samaria. Claiming his father's rights, he sends the king an insolent demand.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Demands That Keep Growing

Ben-hadad is not negotiating. When Ahab gives in, the demands grow.

Ahab was immensely wicked. Even so, God promised him victory over the army of Ben-Hadad, king of Syria, which had invaded the land. Looking for an excuse for war, Ben-Hadad first demanded Ahab's silver, gold, wives, and children. When Ahab would have handed these over, the enemy king demanded more. He demanded the right to send his servants to search the houses of Ahab and his servants, and to take away everything they treasured most.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

What Ahab's Answer Reveals About Him

Ahab's reply to the messengers is the answer of a slave, not a king. One writer sets him beside three young men who faced a stronger king with fewer options.

Ahab's weakness is shown further by his cringing answer to the king of Syria who was besieging him… Then the messengers came back with even more insolent demands. The king would likely have accepted the humiliating terms proposed, if his bolder and more patriotic subjects had not advised otherwise, saying, "Do not listen to him, and do not agree." A wicked man is never anything but a weak man. Only "the righteous" is, as the proverb says, "bold as a lion." When Ahab does refuse the king of Syria his demand, unworthy of a soldier, he says half apologising, "This thing I may not do." He does not use the bold, strong "will not" of the three Hebrew young men, who were in a more helpless position and faced a more powerful king (Dan. 3:18).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Knapp is quoting an older English translation; his point rests on its softer "may not."

Claiming What He Has No Right To Claim

"Your silver and your gold are mine" is the language of an owner. One writer weighs Satan's boast that the glory of the world was his to give away.

That was false, and yet true. It was false as to legal right, but true as to fact, for Satan had gained this by man's sin. As to right, he had none at all. Satan had no right to give glory to anyone. But through his craft he led man to turn away from God. He attacked the first Adam and defeated him. He profits from this victory over man… and here he sets himself up as the usurper. "I have all this," he says, "and I give it to whomever I will."

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

The Adviser Ahab Never Called

Ahab had seen God restore His own worship in Israel and heard his whole nation confess the Lord. None of it comes to mind when the messengers arrive.

What does Ahab do? The scenes of 1 Kings 18 had unfolded before his own eyes. He had heard his whole people cry in his ears, "The LORD, He is God!" Yet he does not spare one thought for the God who had just restored His worship by His power — the worship Ahab had replaced with the worship of Baal (1 Kings 16:31-32)! Ahab does not consult the Lord or commit his cause to Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- The claim. Ben-hadad sends words before weapons. He is sure of his greater strength, and his message calls Ahab to submit to his authority.

- The pretext. The demand for silver, gold, wives and children is an excuse for war. When Ahab agrees, the enemy asks for more.

- The collapse. Ahab's cringing reply shows that a wicked man is never anything but a weak man. Only the righteous is bold as a lion.

- The bluff. "Mine" is the word of a usurper. Satan made the same kind of claim: false as to right, true only as to fact.

- The silence. Ahab never consults the Lord or commits his cause to Him. God's care for His people is still displayed in this chapter, despite Ahab.

1 Kings 20:3 · Darby

Thy silver and thy gold is mine; thy wives also and thy children, the goodliest, are mine.

Samaria is under siege. Before a single blow falls, the Syrian king sends a message. He claims Ahab's treasure and his family as already his own. The real question is not whether Ahab can beat such odds. It is whether a king who had heard his whole nation confess the Lord will turn to Him at all.

A Claim Built on Old Conquests

The demand was not random bullying. Ben-hadad was collecting on what he believed his family already owned.

Ben-Hadad, king of Syria, had once given firm help to Asa, king of Judah, against Baasha, king of Israel. Ever since then he had stayed Baasha's enemy. He had taken cities from him, and had even won by conquest certain rights over Samaria, the capital of the kingdom (v. 34). His son, also named Ben-Hadad, goes up against Ahab and besieges Samaria. He lays claim to his father's rights. He sends an insulting demand to the king: "Your silver and your gold are mine; your best wives and children also are mine" (v. 3).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Message Is a Call to Surrender

Ben-hadad opened with words, not weapons.

He was so sure of his greater strength that he did not begin the battle at once. Instead he sent messengers to Ahab to tell him, "Your silver and your gold are mine..." (v.3). So he was calling on Ahab to submit to his authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Demand Designed to Grow

Giving in to the first demand did not settle anything. What looked like a price turned out to be an opening move.

Ben-Hadad was looking for an excuse for war. First he demanded Ahab's silver, gold, wives, and children. When Ahab was ready to hand them over, the enemy king demanded more. He claimed the right to send his servants to search the houses of Ahab and his officials, and to carry off everything they treasured most.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

The God Ahab Never Consulted

Something is missing from Ahab's response. He had heard his whole nation confess the Lord, and it left no mark on him.

What does Ahab do? The scenes of 1 Kings 18 had unfolded before his own eyes. He had heard his whole people cry in his ears, "The LORD, He is God!" Yet he has not even a thought for the God who had just restored His worship by His power — the worship Ahab had replaced with the worship of Baal (1 Kings 16:31-32)! Ahab does not consult the Lord nor commit his cause to Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

That silence shapes his reply in verse 4: "As you say, my lord, O king, I am yours, and all that I have."

He showed that God was a stranger to him. Acting as though God did not even exist, he accepts the humiliation the pagan king forced on him... After all, what could he do against Ben-Hadad, who led all his forces and had thirty-two kings with him? This is how people who do not know God work things out.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Wickedness Makes a Man Weak

Ahab's surrender was not just a political move. One writer ties his weakness to his character, and sets him beside three young Hebrew men who refused a more powerful king. Ahab's own refusal is quoted below from an older translation; the ESV of verse 9 reads, "but this thing I cannot do."

Ahab's weakness shows again in his grovelling answer to the king of Syria, who was besieging the city... A wicked man is never really anything but a weak man. Only "the righteous" is, as the proverb says, "bold as a lion." Ahab does refuse the king of Syria this demand, which no soldier should have accepted. But he says it half as an apology: "This thing I may not do." He does not use the bold, firm "will not" of the three Hebrew young men. They were in a more helpless position, and they faced a more powerful king (Dan. 3:18).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Grace That Outlasts the King's Indifference

This threat opens a chapter that ends in rescue. The reason lies with God, not with the king.

How great is God's patient endurance! Despite Ahab's huge wickedness, God promised him victory over the army of Ben-Hadad, king of Syria, which had invaded the land.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

Summary

- Claim. Ben-hadad pressed what he counted as his father's rights over Samaria. Before any battle, he demanded Ahab's silver, gold, wives and children.

- Compromise. The demand was an excuse for war, not a deal. Ahab was ready to hand it all over, and the Syrian king at once asked for more.

- Silence. Ahab had heard Israel confess the Lord. Even so, he did not consult Him or commit his cause to Him. He reasoned like a man to whom God was a stranger.

- Weakness. A wicked man is never really anything but a weak man. Ahab managed only a half-apology, while the righteous are bold as a lion.

- Grace. God's patience outlasted the king's wickedness. He still promised Ahab victory over the invading army.

1 Kings 20:4 · Darby

And the king of Israel answered and said, My lord, O king, according to thy saying, I am thine, and all that I have.

Ben-hadad has surrounded Samaria with thirty-two allied kings. Before a single blow is struck, he claims Ahab's silver, gold, wives and children. Ahab agrees to all of it in one short sentence. Commentators read in that sentence the whole character of the man: a king of Israel handing himself over to an enemy who worshipped idols, without once turning to God.

The Demand Behind the Words

Ben-hadad opened the siege with a message instead of an attack.

He was so confident of his superior strength that he did not begin the battle at once. Instead he sent messengers to Ahab to tell him, "Your silver and your gold are mine; your loveliest wives and children are mine" (v.3). So he was calling upon Ahab to submit to his authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ahab's calculation was purely military, and on those terms it was sound.

Ahab knew his forces were no match for the formidable enemy, so he answered, in evident subservience, "My lord, O King, just as you say, I and all that I have are yours" (v.4). He would give in to the haughty demands of Ben Hadad.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A King Who Left God Out

One writer sees in Ahab's answer a man for whom God simply was not there.

He acted as though God did not even exist, which showed that God was a stranger to him. So he accepts the humiliation the pagan king forces on him: "As you say, my lord, O king, I am yours, and all that I have" (v. 4). What, indeed, could he do against Ben-hadad, who led all his forces and had thirty-two kings with him? This is how people who do not know God reason things out.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The habit of leaving God out was long-standing, not a momentary lapse.

This is the man who had watched the events of 1 Kings 18 with his own eyes. He had heard his whole people cry out in his ears, "Jehovah, He is God!" Yet he has not even a thought for the God who had just restored His own worship by His power — the worship Ahab had replaced with the worship of Baal (1 Kings 16:31-32)! Ahab does not consult the Lord or commit his cause to Him. Had he ever humbled himself before Him at all?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Wickedness Makes a Man Weak

One writer reads the tone of Ahab's answer as a sign of his character.

Ahab's weakness is further made manifest by his servile answer to the besieging king of Syria… A wicked man is never really anything but a weak man. It is only "the righteous" who is, as the proverb says, "bold as a lion." When Ahab does at last refuse the demand, he says it half apologetically: this thing he "may not" do. He does not use the bold, strong "will not" of the three young Hebrew men who faced a more powerful king in a more helpless position (Dan. 3:18).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Surrender Invites More

Giving way did not buy peace. The demands only grew.

But what does his humiliation before Israel's enemy achieve? Ben-hadad uses the chance to add outrage to his harshness: "You shall deliver me your silver, and your gold, and your wives, and your children; but tomorrow about this time I will send my servants to you, and they shall search your house…" Again Ahab does not return to God. To him it matters more to call the elders of the land together and consult them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Later in the chapter Ahab does speak boldly. One writer sets that against his tone here.

At first he was slavishly submissive to Ben-hadad. Later, with unusual spirit, he says, "Let not him who puts on his armour boast himself as he who takes it off."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Grace Toward a Hard Heart

Ahab never turns to God. God, though, is not finished with him.

What was the Lord's ground for speaking like this? The condition of Ahab's heart? We have just seen how hard it was… If Ahab had not learned this already under the weight of God's judgments, this miraculous deliverance might touch his heart and bring him back. What touching patience God shows, even toward the most profane, the most indifferent, the most hardened! The God whom man rejects does not tire. He comes back to him as the God of grace and of deliverance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The help that comes next is not really about Ahab at all.

God's care for His people Israel is still remarkably displayed in this chapter, in spite of the unholy character of Ahab.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Claim: Ben-hadad demanded silver, gold, wives and children. It was a call to submit to his authority, and Ahab agreed.

- Calculation: Ahab counted thirty-two kings against his own strength. That is how people reason when they do not know God.

- Collapse: His servile answer exposed his character. A wicked man is never really anything but a weak man.

- Consequence: Surrender bought nothing. The enemy raised his demands, and still Ahab did not turn to God.

- Compassion: God did not tire of this hard heart. He came back to it as the God of grace and deliverance.

1 Kings 20:5 · Darby

And the messengers came again, and said, Thus speaks Ben-Hadad saying I sent to thee indeed, saying, Thou shalt deliver me thy silver, and thy gold, and thy wives, and thy children;

Ben-hadad, king of Syria, had surrounded Samaria with thirty-two allied kings. He demanded Ahab's silver, gold, wives and children, and Ahab agreed to all of it. Now the messengers come back with a second demand. Why did giving in buy Ahab nothing?

The first demand and the instant surrender

The siege opened with a message rather than an attack:

He was so sure of his greater strength that he did not begin the battle at once. Instead he sent messengers to Ahab to tell him, "Your silver and your gold are mine; your loveliest wives and children are mine" (v.3). So he was calling on Ahab to submit to his authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ahab gave way at once.

Surrender feeds the appetite it hoped to satisfy

The second message is not a softer one. Having got everything by asking, Ben-hadad now asks for more than he named:

This latter uses the occasion to add outrage to his harshness: "You shall deliver me your silver, and your gold, and your wives, and your children; but tomorrow about this time I will send my servants to you, and they shall search your house, and the houses of your servants; and whatever is pleasant in your sight, they shall put in their hand and take away" (vv. 5-6).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The difference between the two messages matters. The first took what the king owned; the second sent foreign hands through every room in the city to pick out whatever they liked.

Ben-hadad was looking for an excuse for war. He first demanded Ahab's silver, gold, wives and children. When Ahab was ready to hand them over, the enemy king demanded more. He demanded the right to send his servants to search the houses of Ahab and his servants, and to take away everything they treasured most. The elders of Israel advised Ahab not to give in to this outrageous demand. So the weak-willed king sent word to Ben-hadad that he could not do it.

after-note: DELETE

Eugene P. Vedder Jr.

God is never brought into the matter

The striking thing is not Ben-hadad's greed but Ahab's silence toward heaven. He had watched fire fall on Carmel and heard his whole nation confess the Lord, and still:

God was a stranger to him. He acted as though God did not even exist, and he accepted the humiliation the pagan king forced on him: "My lord, O king, as you say, I am yours, and all that I have" (v. 4). What, after all, could he do against Ben-hadad, who led all his forces and had thirty-two kings with him? That is how people who do not know God reason.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Even when he finds the nerve to refuse, he turns to his elders, not to God.

Wickedness shows itself as weakness

Ahab's grovelling reply exposes what he was. One writer draws the moral bluntly, noting that the refusal, when it finally came, was half-hearted:

Ahab's weakness is shown further by his servile answer to the besieging king of Syria... When the messengers came back with more insolent demands, the king would probably have accepted the humiliating terms. He refused only because his braver, more patriotic subjects advised otherwise, saying, "Do not listen or consent." A wicked man is never really anything but a weak man. It is only "the righteous" who is, as the proverb says, "bold as a lion." When Ahab does refuse the king of Syria this demand, which no soldier should accept, he says half apologetically, "This thing I cannot do." He does not use the bold, strong "will not" of the three Hebrew young men, who were in a far more helpless position and faced a more powerful king (Dan. 3:18).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The lesson of the inch

Ahab's mistake is an old one. Give the first thing asked, and the next demand is bigger:

Many have agreed to go one mile with Satan who never meant to go two. So Satan leads poor people down into the depths of sin by winding stairs, which keep them from seeing the bottom they are heading for... Give no place to Satan! Not an inch in his first moves. Outside the door he is a beggar, and a modest one. Let him in, and he will rule the house.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

That is the threat in verses 5 and 6. The beggar at the door now proposes to search the house.

Grace that keeps coming back

God did not leave Samaria to fall. He promised this king a rescue Ahab never asked for:

If the weight of God's judgments had not taught him this before, perhaps this miraculous deliverance would touch his heart and restore him. What touching patience God shows, even toward the most profane, the most indifferent, the most hardened. The God whom man rejects does not grow tired. He comes back to him as the God of grace and of deliverance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Demand. Ben-hadad's first message was a call to submit. Ahab submitted, so the messengers came back for more.

- Escalation. The second demand was bigger than the first: not just the treasure, but a search of every house for whatever the enemy liked.

- Silence. Ahab never consults God. He counts thirty-two kings against his own strength and leaves God out.

- Weakness. His servile answer proves the rule: a wicked man is never anything but a weak man. Only the righteous are bold as a lion.

- Grace. God still promises this king deliverance. The God whom man rejects comes back to him as the God of deliverance.

1 Kings 20:6 · Darby

but to-morrow about this time I will send my servants to thee, and they shall search thy house, and the houses of thy servants; and it shall be, that whatsoever is pleasant in thy sight, they shall put in their hand and take away.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

1 Kings 20:7 · Darby

And the king of Israel called all the elders of the land and said, Mark, I pray you, and see how this [man] seeks mischief; for he sent to me for my wives, and for my children, and for my silver, and for my gold; and I denied him not.

Ben-hadad of Syria has surrounded Samaria with a huge army. He claimed Ahab's silver, gold, wives and children, and Ahab handed them over without a fight. A second, larger demand has now arrived, and Ahab calls Israel's elders together — and only now does he speak of trouble.

Escalating Demands

Ben-Hadad's first demand was never meant to settle anything. One writer names what he was after, and what happened when Ahab gave way:

Looking for an excuse for war, Ben-Hadad first demanded Ahab's silver, gold, wives, and children. When Ahab was ready to hand these over, the enemy king demanded more. He demanded the right to send his servants to search the houses of Ahab and his servants and take away all their most treasured possessions.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

The Price Of The First Yes

Ahab tells the elders he refused Ben-Hadad nothing. That first yes is why a second demand came. One writer warns where a small first yes leads:

Many have agreed to go a mile with Satan who never intended to go two. This is how Satan leads poor creatures down into the depths of sin. He takes them by winding stairs, so they never see the bottom they are heading for... Give Satan no place! Not an inch, not even in his first suggestions. A beggar who is modest while he stands outside the door will command the house once he is let in.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Consulting Men, Not God

Ahab gathers the elders. One writer points out who he left out, and then asks a wider question about this king:

Ahab does not consult the Lord nor commit his cause to Him. For that matter, had he ever humbled himself before Him?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer gives the reasoning behind Ahab's surrender, and shows what it got him:

What could he do against Ben-Hadad, who came with all his forces and thirty-two kings? That is how those who do not know God reason things out. But what does he gain by humbling himself before Israel's enemy? Ben-Hadad uses the occasion to add outrage to his harshness... Here again, Ahab does not return to God. He thinks it more important to call the elders of the land together and consult them. They are in favour of resistance; he accepts the first conditions and rejects the second.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Wickedness And Weakness

When Ahab finally does refuse, listen to how he says it. One writer sets his words beside braver words spoken under worse odds:

The messengers came back with even more insolent demands. The king would probably have given in to these humiliating terms. But his braver, more patriotic subjects advised otherwise, telling him not to listen and not to consent. A wicked man is never really anything but a weak man. It is only "the righteous" who is, as the proverb says, "bold as a lion." When Ahab does refuse the king of Syria's demand, which no soldier should have made, he says, half apologetically, "This thing I may not do." He does not use the bold, forceful "will not" of the three Hebrew young men, who were in far more helpless circumstances and facing a more powerful king (Dan. 3:18).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Grace Toward A Hardened King

God does not walk away from a king like this:

What touching patience on the part of God, even toward the most godless, the most indifferent, the most hardened. The God whom man rejects, instead of growing tired, appears to him again as the God of grace and of deliverance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Surrender invites — Ahab admits he refused nothing. His first yes is what brought the bigger demand. The beggar outside the door ends up commanding the house.

- Surrender blinds — Ahab calls the second demand trouble-seeking. The first one was too. He only saw it when the price went up.

- Surrender consults men — Ahab calls a council of elders. He does not consult the Lord. Those who do not know God reason from the size of the enemy army.

- Surrender exposes weakness — the man bold enough to be wicked was too weak to say a plain no. Only the righteous are bold as a lion.

- Grace outlasts surrender — God does not grow tired of the man who rejects Him. He comes back to the most hardened king as the God of grace and deliverance.

1 Kings 20:8 · Darby

And all the elders and all the people said to him, Hearken not, nor consent.

Ben-hadad, king of Syria, had surrounded Samaria with a huge army. Ahab agreed at once to hand over his silver, gold, wives and children. So the Syrian king raised his price: his men would search every house and take whatever they liked. Now Ahab calls in the elders and the people. The striking thing is not what they tell him, but whom he asked.

The Demand That Went Too Far

Ahab's surrender did not buy peace. It brought a harsher demand — and that is the demand the nation refused:

How great is God's patient endurance! Ahab's wickedness was immense, yet God promised him victory over the army of Ben-Hadad, king of Syria, which had invaded the land. Ben-Hadad wanted an excuse for war. First he demanded Ahab's silver, gold, wives, and children. When Ahab would have surrendered these to him, the enemy king demanded more... The elders of Israel advised Ahab not to give in to this outrageous demand, and the weak-willed king sent word to Ben-Hadad that he could not do so.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

Counsel Taken From Men, Not From God

Ahab gathers a council. One name is missing from it:

What does Ahab do? He had watched the scenes of 1 Kings 18 unfold before his own eyes. He had heard his whole people cry in his ears, "The Lord, He is God!" Yet he has not even a thought for the God who had just restored His worship by His power... Ahab does not consult the Lord nor commit his cause to Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The verse shows where he took his problem instead:

There again, Ahab does not return to God. To him it is more important to call together and consult with the elders of the land. They are for resistance; he accepts the first conditions and rejects the second.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Weak King, A Bolder People

The advice in this verse has more backbone than the man who asked for it:

The king would probably have given in to the humiliating terms, if his braver and more patriotic subjects had not advised otherwise... A wicked man is never anything but a weak man. Only "the righteous" is, as the proverb says, "bold as a lion." And when Ahab does refuse this demand, which no soldier should accept, he says it half apologetically: "This thing I may not do" (older translation). He does not use the bold, strong "will not" of the three Hebrew men in Daniel 3:18, who were in far more helpless circumstances and faced a more powerful king.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

From Cringing To Bravado

Stiffened by the elders, Ahab swings from grovelling to swagger. Neither mood has God in it:

What a proof Ahab gives of the blinding power of sin! At first he grovels before Ben-hadad. Later, with unusual spirit, he says, "Let not him who straps on his armour boast himself as he who takes it off." Then God asserted His supremacy, in the plains as well as in the hills. For His own name's sake He gave Ahab victory over the Syrians, and so gave Israel another chance to return to His worship. And this wretched, blinded Ahab takes Ben-hadad to his heart, embraces him, and claims kinship with Israel's foe — God's enemy! ... But though judgment is near, mercy still lingers over the guilty nation.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Where Counsel Belongs

This scene does not make asking advice wrong. It shows what happens when advice replaces dependence:

Each of us must depend upon God alone; even the most godly of men cannot replace Him... We can listen to counsel. We can ask counsel of those who are further on than we are in understanding, in wisdom, and in true godliness. This is what humble hearts do — hearts that have no confidence in themselves. But we must depend upon God alone for our decisions and for our walk.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Surrender invites more. Ahab handed over his silver, gold, wives and children. The answer was a bigger demand: every house searched. Giving ground bought nothing but a bigger demand.

- Wrong council. Ahab called in the elders; he never turned to God. He had heard the whole nation cry, "The Lord, He is God!" — yet in the crisis that memory shaped nothing.

- Right answer, unchanged heart. The elders stood firmer than the king. But resisting Syria is not the same as returning to God. Ahab took the good advice and still never turned back.

- Weakness is moral. A wicked man is never anything but a weak man; boldness belongs to the righteous. Ahab's swing from grovelling to swagger is the same emptiness in two moods.

- Counsel, then dependence. Humble hearts do ask advice from those further on. But no godly adviser can stand in God's place; the decision must rest on Him.

1 Kings 20:9 · Darby

And he said to the messengers of Ben-Hadad, Tell my lord the king, All that thou didst send for to thy servant at the first I will do; but this thing I cannot do. And the messengers departed, and brought him word again.

Ben-hadad's army has surrounded Samaria. Ahab has already agreed to hand over his silver, gold, wives and children. Then the Syrian king raised his price: his servants would also search every house and take whatever they liked. Here Ahab says no at last. Two things stand out: where that no came from, and how weak his words were.

Advisers Drew the Line, Not God

Ahab never asks God what to do. He weighs the demand with his advisers instead, and their verdict is the answer this verse records.

Showing that God was a stranger to him, acting as though He did not even exist, he accepts the humiliation the heathen king forced on him: "As you say, my lord, O king, I am yours, and all that I have" (v. 4)… Once again Ahab does not return to God; to him it matters more to call together and consult the elders of the land. They are for resistance; he accepts the first conditions and rejects the second.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The refusal was not really his own.

When the messengers came back with more insulting demands, the king would probably have accepted the humiliating terms, if his bolder and more patriotic subjects had not advised otherwise, saying, "Do not listen or consent."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

"I Cannot" Instead of "I Will Not"

Notice how Ahab speaks. He calls Ben-hadad "my lord the king" and himself "your servant," and his refusal sits inside that flattery. An older translation reads "this thing I may not do." One writer sets those words beside a firmer refusal made against worse odds.

Ahab's weakness shows again in his grovelling answer to the Syrian king who was besieging him… A wicked man is never really anything but a weak man. It is only "the righteous" who is, as the proverb says, "bold as a lion." Ahab does refuse the king of Syria this demand, which no soldier should accept. But he says it half as an apology: "This thing I may not do." He does not use the bold, forceful "will not" of the three Hebrew men. They were far more helpless, and they faced a more powerful king (Dan. 3:18).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The First Surrender Only Raised the Price

Ahab's total surrender in verse 4 bought him nothing. Ben-hadad did not want treasure; he wanted an excuse for war, so each concession only raised the price. Behind this squalid haggling, God was acting toward Ahab in a way he had not earned.

How great is God's longsuffering patience! Despite Ahab's immense wickedness God promised him victory over the army of Ben-Hadad, king of Syria, which had invaded the land. Looking for an occasion for war, Ben-Hadad first demanded Ahab's silver, gold, wives, and children. When Ahab would have handed these over to him, the enemy king demanded more.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

Why the First Inch Matters

Order matters here. Ahab accepted the first demand, and that is why the second one came. One writer traces the same pattern in the way sin gains ground.

Many have agreed to go a mile with Satan who never intended to go two. So Satan leads poor creatures down into the depths of sin by winding stairs, so that they cannot see the bottom they are heading for… Give no place to Satan — not an inch, even in his first moves. He who is a beggar, and a modest one, outside your door, will command the house if you let him in.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Where Ahab's Half-Heartedness Ended

Ahab could not say a firm "will not" here. He could not say it later either, when God handed him both the victory and the enemy king. God had given him proof of Himself three times over.

Ahab had this threefold testimony, but sadly he gained nothing from it. Ben-hadad's cunning trapped him, after God had placed Ben-hadad in his hand. He not only let him live, but said, "He is my brother." It was the beginning of his final downfall.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Line without God. Ahab drew a line at last, but his advisers drew it for him. He never turned to God at all.

- Line spoken weakly. "I cannot" is not "I will not." A wicked man is at bottom a weak man; only the righteous is bold as a lion.

- Line drawn too late. Ahab's yes to the first demand invited the second. Surrender never satisfies an enemy who wants a war.

- Line held by an inch. Give the enemy no place at all, not even an inch at the start; the modest beggar at the door ends up commanding the house.

- Line finally erased. The man who said this thing I cannot do later spared the enemy God had put in his hand, and called him brother. That was the start of his downfall.

1 Kings 20:10 · Darby

And Ben-Hadad sent to him and said, The gods do so to me, and more also, if the dust of Samaria shall suffice for handfuls for all the people that follow me!

Samaria is under siege, and Ahab has just refused Ben-hadad one demand too many. Ben-hadad answers with an oath by his gods: his army is so huge that the ruins of the city will not give each man a handful of dust — and neither king has yet mentioned the God of Israel.

The Boast Itself

Ahab answered this taunt with a taunt of his own. Where Ben-hadad was when that answer arrived matters too.

Ben Hadad's reply was coarse and arrogant. It seems the arrogance of Ben Hadad gave Ahab the courage to reply, "Let not him who straps on his armor boast himself as he who takes it off." Of course these were fighting words, just as those of Ben Hadad were. Ben Hadad received the message while he and his companions were drinking in the command post — the place that called for sober, sound wisdom.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ahab's Weakness

Ahab's own answers had already shown what kind of man he was. Even when he finally said no, he said it weakly.

A wicked man is never really anything but a weak man. Only "the righteous" is, as the proverb says, "bold as a lion." When Ahab does refuse the demand of the king of Syria — a demand no soldier should have accepted — he says it almost as an apology: "This thing I cannot do."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

God Left Out of the Reckoning

Two kings trade threats. Neither of them mentions God. Ahab's bold answer in verse 11 is no better than his surrender in verse 4.

God was a stranger to him, and he acted as though He did not even exist. So he accepts the humiliation the pagan king forces on him: "My lord, O king, according to your word, I am yours, and all that I have" (v. 4). What could he do against Ben-Hadad, who led all his forces and had thirty-two kings with him? So those who do not know God reason things out... Ahab replies with spirit: "Let not him who straps on his armor boast himself as he who takes it off" (v. 11), but he still does not take God into account.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Ben-hadad's bluster is only one example of something wider.

No human being will boast in the presence of God. Human pride may boast outside that presence. It may put forward its claims, glory in its resources, and be proud of what it takes on, as long as God is not thought of. But bring Him in, and all the bragging, the boasting, the empty glory, the grand claims, the self-satisfaction and the self-conceit will wither away in a moment.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Answer God Chose

Ben-hadad measured his army by handfuls of dust. God did not answer him with matching force.

But God's time had come to humble insolent Ben-hadad: "And behold, a prophet came near to Ahab king of Israel and said, 'Thus says the LORD, Have you seen all this great multitude? Behold, I will give it into your hand this day, and you shall know that I am the LORD.'"... God would humble Ben-hadad, but not by any show of strength — not by the seven thousand soldiers Ahab had left. He would do it by the servants of the princes of the provinces, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Mercy Behind the Victory

God promised rescue to a king who deserved nothing. He had more in view than lifting the siege.

What was the Lord's reason for speaking this way? The condition of Ahab's heart? We have just seen its callousness. But Israel in the presence of Elijah's miracle had acknowledged the true God. Would He not show His grace at the least sign of His people's returning to Himself? As for Ahab, God tells him: "You shall know that I am the LORD." If God's judgments had not taught him this already, perhaps this miraculous deliverance would touch his heart and restore him. What touching patience on the part of God, even toward the most profane, the most indifferent, the most hardened.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast — Ben-hadad's answer was coarse and arrogant. He heard Ahab's reply while drinking, in the place that called for sober judgment.

- Weakness — Ahab refused only faintly. A wicked man is never anything but a weak man, while only the righteous is bold as a lion.

- Blindness — Both kings reasoned like people who do not know God. Ahab's bolder words still left Him out of the account.

- Humbling — Boasting lasts only while God is not thought of. When He stepped in, two hundred and thirty-two servants of the princes broke a huge army.

- Purpose — God gave the victory so that Ahab would know He is the LORD — patience toward the most hardened of men.

1 Kings 20:11 · Darby

And the king of Israel answered and said, Tell [him], Let not him that girdeth on boast himself as he that putteth off!

Ben-Hadad of Syria had surrounded Samaria and sent Ahab his demands. Ahab had already offered him everything he owned. Then the demands grew worse, and the king of Israel answered with one proverb about armour. The words are wiser than the man who spoke them, and the chapter that follows tests whether he believed them.

The saying itself

Picture a soldier putting on his armour before a battle, and taking it off after it. Only the second man has anything to boast about. One writer applies the line to Ruth, who kept working in the field until the day ended:

She made a good beginning, as many do. But, unlike most, she made just as good an ending. It is fairly easy to start, but very hard to keep going. "Let not him who straps on his armor boast himself as he who takes it off." That was a very good proverb, though spoken by a very bad king (1 Kings 20:11).

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The man who spoke it

Ahab's boldness arrives late. He had already surrendered in principle, and only stiffened when his own people refused to go further. A study of the kings reads his collapse and his sudden courage as two sides of the same character:

When the messengers came back with even ruder demands, the king would probably have accepted the humiliating terms. His bolder, more patriotic subjects advised against it, saying, "Do not listen or consent." A wicked man is never really anything but a weak man. Only "the righteous are bold as a lion," as the proverb says. When Ahab does refuse the Syrian king's demand — a demand no soldier should accept — he says, almost as an apology, "this thing I cannot do."

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Courage without God

The reply is bold. But Ahab says nothing about God. One commentator follows his thinking and names what is missing:

So those who do not know God reason things out... There again, Ahab does not return to God; to him it is more important to call together and consult with the elders of the land. They are for resistance; he would accept the first terms and reject the second. At this answer Ben-Hadad's anger no longer knows any limits. Ahab replies with spirit: "Let not him who straps on his armor boast himself as he who takes it off" (v. 11), but he still does not take God into account.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Ahab against his own proverb

The armour did come off, and Ahab won. Then he broke his own rule. Instead of thanking God for the victory, he made a friend of God's enemy.

At first he gave in to Ben-Hadad like a slave. Later, with unusual spirit, he says, "Let not him who straps on his armor boast himself as he who takes it off." Then God showed His supremacy, in the plains as well as in the hills. For His own name's sake He gave Ahab victory over the Syrians, and so gave Israel another chance to return to His worship. Yet the wretched, blinded Ahab welcomes Ben-Hadad, embraces him, and claims kinship with Israel's foe — God's enemy! There is not even the appearance of thanks to God for His wonderful mercy and deliverance.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The boast belongs at the end

The proverb still speaks to anyone in the middle of a fight. One writer applies it to the Christian's daily battle, and points first to Christ's own victory:

The Lord Jesus has gone through this scene before us. He has "plundered" the house of the enemy in triumph, and delivered his captives out of his hand... Whatever others may do, you must crush every movement of your own will that rises against your calling as a Christian. You do this by the power of the Spirit, as the Word teaches... The battle is not over yet, so to anyone who would boast, say, "Let not him who straps on his armor boast himself as he who takes it off."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A worked example

The pattern is not rare. One writer ends the story of a king who began far better than he finished:

He began well. His beginning was very bright. Had he gone on in simplicity and in the energy of faith, what a different story would stand on record. Instead he came into port like a ship that had met a great hurricane — disabled and broken, without mast or sail. He could have come in with flags flying and all sail set.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Armour on — the boast belongs to the man taking his armour off, not the man putting it on. Starting is easy; continuing is hard.

- Wrong mouth — a very good proverb from a very bad king. Ahab found courage only when his own people refused to surrender.

- No God in it — he answered Ben-Hadad with spirit, but he never took God into account.

- Armour off — victory came, and Ahab embraced God's enemy with no thanks to God. He broke his own rule.

- Still fighting — the battle is not over yet, so hand anyone tempted to boast Ahab's own words.

1 Kings 20:12 · Darby

And it came to pass when he heard this word, as he was drinking, he and the kings in the tents, that he said to his servants, Set yourselves. And they set themselves against the city.

Ben-hadad is camped outside Samaria with thirty-two allied kings, and Ahab's defiant answer has just reached him. He gives his battle order from a drinking tent — so what kind of king is this, and why would God act at all for a king as bad as Ahab?

The Word "Booths"

One reference work defines the word behind "booths":

A booth or tent, used poetically for a dwelling.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the order to attack came from a shelter in the field. One writer notes what such a moment called for:

Ben Hadad's reply was coarse and arrogant. He sent word to Ahab, "The gods do so to me, and more also, if enough dust is left in Samaria for a handful for each of the people who follow me." The haughtiness of Ben Hadad clearly emboldened Ahab to reply to him, "Let not the one who puts on his armor boast like the one who takes it off." These were fighting words, just like Ben Hadad's. And Ben Hadad received the message while he and his men were drinking in the command post — the place where sober, sound wisdom was called for. He gave orders to get ready to attack the city.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Confidence That Weakens an Army

Ben-hadad's drinking was not a private failing; it shaped the fighting force under him. Against Israel's tiny muster, his mood was one of settled superiority:

This seemed a pathetically weak force against the formidable army of Syria, but Ben Hadad, totally self-confident, was becoming drunk together with the other 32 kings. Would a leader like that inspire his men in disciplined warfare? Certainly not! But when the young men of Israel went out of the city, Ben Hadad gave orders to take them alive, whether they had come out for peace or for war. He had no doubt of Syria's total superiority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Gentile Habit, and Its Cost

One writer sets Ben-hadad's drinking beside an Israelite king who died the same way:

"Drinking himself drunk" was Elah's occupation at the time of his assassination. Wild, self-indulgent living does not appear to have been the special sin of the kings of Israel and Judah in general, and it has never been characteristic of the Jewish people. It was the special sin of many of their Gentile neighbours. Look at Ben-hadad with his thirty-two allied kings, "drinking himself drunk in the booths".

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Elah was killed while he was drunk. Ben-hadad now gives his battle order in the same state.

The Answer to the Boast

One writer points out who God chose to answer that boast:

But God's time for the humiliation of insolent Ben-hadad had come. God would humiliate Ben-hadad, not by any show of strength, such as the seven thousand soldiers left to Ahab, but by the servants of the district governors, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Ahab's Silence Toward God

Ben-hadad's drinking is the obvious folly. The king inside the city has a quieter one:

There again, Ahab does not return to God; to him it is more important to call together and consult with the elders of the land. They favour resistance; he accepts the first conditions and rejects the second. At this answer Ben-Hadad's anger knows no more limits. Ahab answers with spirit: "Let not him who straps on his armor boast like him who takes it off," but he still leaves God out of account.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why God Still Moved

If neither king was seeking Him, the deliverance that follows must be explained another way:

As for Ahab, God tells him: "You shall know that I am the Lord." If he had not learned this before under the weight of the judgments of God, this miraculous deliverance might touch his heart so that he would be restored. What touching patience on the part of God, even toward the most profane, the most indifferent, the most hardened. The God whom man rejects, instead of tiring, reappears to him as the God of grace and of deliverance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast — Ben-hadad swore Samaria would not yield a handful of dust for each of his soldiers. Ahab warned him not to boast before the armour came off.

- Booth — the order to attack came out of a drinking session in a field tent. That moment called for sober, sound wisdom.

- Drink — drunkenness marked the neighbouring kings, not Israel's own. Assassins killed Elah while he was drinking himself drunk.

- Handful — God humbled the boaster with 232 servants of the district governors, not with Ahab's seven thousand soldiers.

- Knowledge — God's aim was that Ahab would know Him as Lord. He kept coming back to a hard, indifferent king as the God of grace and deliverance.

1 Kings 20:13 · Darby

And behold, a prophet drew near to Ahab king of Israel, and said, Thus saith Jehovah Hast thou seen all this great multitude? behold, I will deliver it into thy hand this day; and thou shalt know that I am Jehovah.

Samaria is under siege. Thirty-two allied kings are camped outside, and King Ahab has already offered the enemy his silver, his gold, his wives and his children. Into that scene walks an unnamed prophet with a promise of victory. The reason he gives has nothing to do with Ahab deserving it.

A Word to a King Who Never Asked for One

Nothing in the chapter suggests Ahab prayed. He had heard a whole nation shout that the Lord is God. Yet when the crisis came, he looked everywhere but up.

What does Ahab do? He had watched the scenes of 1 Kings 18 unfold before his eyes. He had heard his whole people cry in his ears, "The LORD, He is God!" Yet he has not even a thought for the God who had just restored His worship by His power — the worship Ahab had replaced with the worship of Baal. Ahab does not consult the Lord nor commit his cause to Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

He consulted the elders of the land instead, and traded insults with Ben-hadad. God never entered his thinking. The prophet came anyway.

Why God Spoke at All

If Ahab's heart gave no ground for this promise, something else did.

What was the Lord's ground in speaking this way? The condition of Ahab's heart? We have just seen how hard it was. But Israel, in the presence of Elijah's miracle, had acknowledged the true God. Would He not show His grace at the least sign of His people returning to Himself?... What touching patience on God's part, even toward the most godless, the most indifferent, the most hardened. The God whom man rejects, instead of tiring, appears to him again as the God of grace and of deliverance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Stated Purpose of the Victory

Ahab's army was small, and his regard for the God of Israel was smaller.

Despite this, God intervened. He sent a prophet to Ahab to tell him that He would deliver this great multitude of the Syrians into their hand that day. Notice, however, that God told him this with an object in view — that Ahab would know that God is indeed the Lord.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ahab had already seen God act once, at close range.

The Lord now promised Ahab victory over the Syrian enemy. Ahab had seen God send down fire on Mount Carmel, and had seen his 850 idolatrous prophets destroyed. It was not that Israel deserved it. No, God told Ahab, "you shall know that I am the LORD." The Lord would prove Himself in this way too. Would Israel, would Ahab, repent and turn back to Him? "God's kindness is meant to lead you to repentance," Romans 2:4 tells us.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

Victory by the Smallest Possible Means

Ahab asks "By whom?" and the answer removes any chance of crediting the army. Israel had seven thousand men available; God names 232 junior officers instead.

God's time to humiliate Ben-hadad had come. He would not do it by any show of strength, such as the seven thousand soldiers left to Ahab. He would do it by the servants of the princes of the provinces, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two. They "went out at noon, while Ben-hadad was drinking himself drunk in the booths, he and the thirty-two kings who helped him."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

A few hundred servants went out in broad daylight. The king besieging them was too drunk to answer.

What Ahab Did With the Lesson

God gave the same message again when Syria came back a second time.

The Lord again stepped in for Israel. He sent a man of God to Ahab to say that because the Syrians had claimed God is not a God of the valleys, God would hand the multitude of the Syrians over to the small army of Israel. Again the Lord declares that He has an object in doing this — that Ahab might know that God is the Lord. How often did God bear witness to His grace and power for Ahab's benefit! Yet all this had little lasting effect on Ahab's attitude toward God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Unasked. Ahab never consulted God during the siege. The prophet came to him. The promise started on God's side.

- Undeserved. The promise did not rest on Ahab's heart. It rested on God's readiness to answer the least sign of His people turning back to Him.

- Unmistakable. God used 232 servants, not the seven thousand soldiers. Only He could take the credit.

- Unhidden. The rescue came with a goal attached — Ahab would know who the Lord is.

- Unheeded. God gave the same lesson again when Syria returned. It had little lasting effect on Ahab.

1 Kings 20:14 · Darby

And Ahab said, By whom? And he said, Thus saith Jehovah By the servants of the princes of the provinces. Then he said, Who shall begin the battle? And he said, Thou.

A Syrian army has surrounded the city of Samaria. A prophet has just told Ahab, an idol-worshipping king, that God will hand him that huge army the same day. Ahab asks two short questions: which troops, and who starts the fight? The answers are the opposite of what military sense would suggest.

The instrument God names

God does not point Ahab to his standing army. He names the young men who served the district governors, and one writer counts them.

God would humiliate Ben-hadad, not by any show of strength, such as the seven thousand soldiers left to Ahab, but by the servants of the governors of the districts, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The odds and the order to attack first

The reply cuts against every instinct of a besieged city.

God would use the "servants of the governors of the districts" to deliver the enemy army into Ahab's hands, and they are only a handful against this multitude. Instead of waiting for the enemy to attack, Ahab is the one who must begin the battle, and his army numbers only seven thousand men! Ahab follows the prophet's word, and that day the Syrians suffer a great defeat.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the enemy was no match

On paper Syria could not lose. The behaviour of its king is the detail that changes the picture.

This force looked hopeless against the powerful army of Syria. But Ben Hadad, full of self-confidence, was getting drunk with the other 32 kings (v.16). Would a leader like that inspire his men in disciplined warfare? Of course not! But when the young men of Israel went out of the city, Ben Hadad gave orders to take them alive. It made no difference whether they had come out for peace or for war. He had no doubt of Syria's total superiority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"You" — the king told to lead

The last word of the verse puts Ahab himself at the head of the action. What he did with that order is another matter.

You may not have noticed this about the first victory. Thirty-three kings stood against him, yet Ahab does not come at the front of the battle but at the rear. Who shall begin the battle? It is set in motion by the young men, the servants of the governors of the districts. These two hundred and thirty-two go out for the battle. Then the seven thousand go out to the battle. When Ahab sees the enemy running away, he joins them; he comes in when the victory is won.

Modernised from Dr. Daniel W. PatersonOriginal wording

Why God spoke to this king at all

The promise of victory was not a reward for improvement. One writer sets it against what Ahab had already seen.

Before this, on Mount Carmel God had sent down fire to burn up Elijah's sacrifice, and the people had cried out, "The LORD, He is God! The LORD, He is God!" Ahab had seen that scene, and he had watched his 850 idolatrous prophets destroyed. The Lord now promised to give him victory over the Syrian enemy. It was not that Israel deserved it. No, God told Ahab, "You shall know that I am the LORD." The Lord would prove Himself in this manner too. Would Israel, would Ahab, repent and turn back to Him? "God's kindness is meant to lead you to repentance," Romans 2:4 tells us.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

Commentators read Ahab's state differently at this moment. One sees a man who "seems inclined to let God work; in any case, he has no other resource." Another calls his conduct through the chapter despicable. Both agree the outcome came from God, not from the king.

Summary

- Question. Ahab asks "By whom?" and gets an answer no general would give. God will not use his seven thousand soldiers, but two hundred and thirty-two servants of the district governors.

- Odds. The chosen force was "only a handful against this multitude." It had to attack first, not wait behind the walls. The whole plan rested on the prophet's word.

- Contrast. God's small band marched out while the enemy king sat drinking with thirty-two allied kings. He was so sure of his strength that he ordered the men taken alive either way.

- Command. The final word of the verse, "You," put Ahab at the head of the battle. In practice he came in at the rear, once the enemy was already running.

- Purpose. Israel had not earned this. God gave the victory so that Ahab, who had already seen Carmel, would know that He is the LORD — kindness meant to lead him to repentance.

1 Kings 20:15 · Darby

And he numbered the servants of the princes of the provinces, and they were two hundred and thirty-two; and after them he numbered all the people, all the children of Israel, seven thousand.

Ben-hadad and thirty-two allied kings had Samaria under siege, and a prophet had just told Ahab that God would hand that huge army to him that very day — through the servants of the district governors. This verse counts the men: 232 attendants, with a national army of only seven thousand behind them.

The Smallness Is Deliberate

God had the larger force available, and He passed over it on purpose:

God would humiliate Ben-hadad, not by a show of strength like the seven thousand soldiers left to Ahab, but by the servants of the princes of the provinces, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Older translations call these servants "young men." The verse counts them apart from the army — they were attendants of the provincial officials.

Why God Moved At All

Ahab had no claim on this help. The reason for the promise lay outside him:

What was the Lord's reason for speaking this way? The condition of Ahab's heart? We have just seen how hard it is. But Israel had acknowledged the true God when they saw Elijah's miracle. Would He not show His grace at the least sign of His people's returning to Himself? As for Ahab, God tells him, "You shall know that I am the LORD." If the weight of God's judgments had not taught him this already, perhaps this miraculous deliverance would touch his heart and bring him back. What touching patience God shows, even toward the most godless, the most indifferent, the most hardened! The God whom man rejects does not grow tired; He comes back to him as the God of grace and deliverance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Counting, Then Obeying

The prophet tells Ahab to open the attack instead of waiting behind his walls. So Ahab counts his men, and the numbers argue against him:

At this critical moment Ahab seems inclined to let God work; in any case, he has no other resource. The prophet gives him a clear answer. The "servants of the princes of the provinces," through whom God would hand the enemy army over to Ahab, are only a handful against this multitude. Ahab must not wait for the enemy's attack; he himself must begin the battle, and his army numbers only seven thousand men! Ahab follows the prophet's word, and that day the Syrians suffer a great defeat.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The King Who Arrived Late

Ahab was to begin the battle himself. Here is where he stood when it started:

In the first victory — the victory that declared God the God of the hills — Ahab had thirty-three kings against him. He does not come at the front of the battle but at the rear. Who was to order the battle? The young men set it in motion, the servants of the prince of the provinces. These two hundred and thirty-two go out for the battle, then the seven thousand go out to the battle. When Ahab sees the enemy running, he joins them; he comes in after the victory is won. Despicable, I say.

Modernised from Daniel W. PatersonOriginal wording

What the Victory Was For

Commentators differ over Ahab here: one credits him with following the prophet's word, another sees a king who let others fight and arrived once it was safe. They agree on the purpose behind the victory:

God gave Ahab's army victory so that he might have one more proof, besides the one already given on Mount Carmel, that He was Jehovah, the unchanging One. He stoops down in such grace! In this way He would also encourage and feed any little faith that might have sprung up in the hearts of a nation that had nearly abandoned Him, after what they saw on Mount Carmel. Trust in Him He calls "precious faith" (2 Peter 1:1) — that is how highly He values it.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Threat. A huge army with thirty-two kings behind it surrounded a king with a hard heart. God spoke first anyway.

- Word. The plan came through a prophet, not through counting. Ahab acted on that word while the numbers still said he would lose.

- Few. God passed over the seven thousand and chose the 232 attendants. No one could credit Ben-hadad's fall to Israel's strength.

- King. The man who was to lead the battle waited at the rear. He joined in only when the enemy was already running.

- Purpose. "You shall know that I am the LORD" was the aim. Carmel had one proof; this was another, to warm the small faith left in a nation that had nearly abandoned God.

1 Kings 20:16 · Darby

And they went out at noon; and Ben-Hadad drank himself drunk in the tents, he and the kings, the thirty-two kings that helped him.

Samaria is under siege by Ben-hadad, king of Syria. The city's answer is a march of a few hundred young men in broad daylight, while the Syrian king and his thirty-two allies sit deep in a drinking party.

God's Chosen Instrument

The force that goes out is not the army; it is a small band named in advance by a prophet. One writer contrasts this small band with the troops Ahab could have used.

God's time to humble the insolent Ben-hadad had come. God would not humble him by any show of strength, such as the seven thousand soldiers left to Ahab. He would do it by the servants of the princes of the provinces, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

God put the honour of the day on the men no one would have picked.

God, through the word of a prophet, sends out even the weak part of the army. The honour had to go to what was known — not the warriors, but the armour-bearers — and the Syrians are destroyed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Order To Attack

Israel does not wait behind its walls to be hit. The order was to start the fight. The numbers made no military sense.

The "servants of the princes of the provinces" who would hand the enemy army over to Ahab are only a handful against this huge army. Ahab is not to wait for the enemy to attack; he is the one who must begin the battle — and his army numbers only seven thousand men! Ahab obeys the prophet's word, and that day the Syrians suffer a great defeat.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Drunken Commander

The verse holds two pictures side by side. A small column marches out; the enemy's war council is too drunk to notice. One commentator asks what such a leader would do to his own troops.

This seemed a pitifully weak force against the powerful army of Syria. But Ben Hadad was completely sure of himself, and he was getting drunk along with the other 32 kings (v.16). Would a leader like that inspire his men to fight with discipline? No! But when the young men of Israel went out of the city, Ben Hadad gave orders to take them alive, whether they had come out for peace or for war. He had no doubt of Syria's total superiority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Words Of The Verse

The word translated "booths" does not mean a palace. It is a plain word for the place where he was sitting.

A booth or tent; used in poetry for a dwelling. 2 Sam. 22:12; 1 Kings 20:12, 16; Ps. 18:11; Ps. 27:5; Ps. 31:20.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer notes where this kind of drinking usually turns up in the record of the kings.

"Drinking himself drunk" was what Elah was doing at the time he was assassinated. Drunken, loose living does not seem to have been the special sin of the kings of Israel and Judah as a whole, and it has never been typical of the Jewish people. It was the sin of many of their non-Jewish neighbours — look at Ben-hadad with his thirty-two allied kings, "drinking himself drunk in the booths" (1 Kings 20:16).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Why God Gave The Victory

Ahab's heart was not the reason for the deliverance. The promise attached to it was that he would learn who the LORD is.

Why did the Lord speak like this? Was it the condition of Ahab's heart? We have just seen how hard it was. But Israel had acknowledged the true God when they saw Elijah's miracle. Would God not show His grace at the least sign that His people were turning back to Him? To Ahab He says, "you shall know that I am the LORD." If Ahab had not learned this before under the weight of God's judgments, this miraculous deliverance might perhaps touch his heart so that he would be restored. What touching patience God shows, even toward the most ungodly, the most indifferent, the most hardened! The God whom man rejects does not grow tired; He comes back to him as the God of grace and of deliverance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast. Ben-hadad came against Samaria with thirty-two allied kings. He had no doubt that Syria was far stronger. So he ordered the Israelites taken alive, whether they came out for peace or for war.

- Booths. He spent the hour of the attack drinking himself drunk in tents. The same words describe Elah of Israel at the moment of his assassination.

- Handful. God named His instrument in advance. Not the seven thousand, but two hundred and thirty-two servants of the provincial officers — the armour-bearers, not the warriors.

- Noon. They went out in broad daylight. They began the battle instead of waiting to be attacked, and Syria suffered a great defeat.

- Lesson. The day was not about Ahab's worth but about God's patience. God said, "you shall know that I am the LORD." He comes back even to the hardened as the God of grace and deliverance.

1 Kings 20:17 · Darby

And the servants of the princes of the provinces went out first; and Ben-Hadad sent out, and they told him saying, There are men come out of Samaria.

Ben-hadad, king of Syria, has Samaria under siege with a huge army and thirty-two allied kings, and God has promised to hand that whole army over to Ahab. In verse 17 the promise starts to move: the smallest force possible walks out of the gate, and the enemy's scouts see them coming.

The Chosen Instrument

God chose the men Himself, and He passed over the larger force Ahab still had.

God would humiliate Ben-hadad. He would not do it by any show of strength, such as the seven thousand soldiers left to Ahab. He would do it by the servants of the princes of the provinces, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Older translations call these men the servants of the princes of the provinces. This verse calls them the servants of the governors of the districts.

Attack, Not Defence

Notice the direction: they go out. Samaria was the city under siege, so waiting behind the walls would be the obvious move.

The "servants of the princes of the provinces" are only a handful against this multitude, and God would use them to deliver the enemy army into Ahab's hands. Ahab is not to wait for the enemy to attack. He must begin the battle himself, and his army numbers only seven thousand men! Ahab follows the prophet's word, and that day the Syrians suffer a great defeat.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What Ben-hadad Saw

The scouts' report is flat and factual: men are coming out of Samaria. Ben-hadad's answer shows what he thought of the threat.

This seemed a pathetically weak force against the powerful army of Syria. But Ben-hadad was completely sure of himself, and he was getting drunk with the other thirty-two kings. When the young men of Israel went out of the city, Ben-hadad gave orders to take them alive, whether they had come out for peace or for war. He had no doubt of Syria's total superiority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That confidence was misplaced. The Syrians lost badly the same day.

Where the King Was

God had told Ahab to order the battle himself. Where Ahab actually stood is worth noticing.

You may not have noticed something about the first victory, when God was declared to be the God of the hills. Thirty-three kings stood against Ahab. Yet Ahab does not come at the front of the battle; he comes in the rear. Who shall order the battle? The young men set it in motion — the servants of the princes of the provinces. These two hundred and thirty-two go out for the battle. Then the seven thousand go out to the battle. When Ahab sees that the enemy is routed, he joins them. He comes in when the victory is won.

Modernised from Dr. Daniel W. PatersonOriginal wording

Why God Helped Such a Man

Ahab's heart was hard, and God promised him victory anyway. Why?

What was the Lord's ground in speaking this way? The condition of Ahab's heart? We have just seen its hardness. But Israel, faced with Elijah's miracle, had acknowledged the true God. Would He not show His grace at the least sign of His people's return to Himself? As for Ahab, God tells him: "you shall know that I am the LORD." If the judgments of God had not taught him this before, perhaps this miraculous deliverance would touch his heart and restore him. What touching patience on God's part, even toward the most godless, the most indifferent, the most hardened.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Few — God picked 232 servants over the 7,000 soldiers on hand, because the point was never Israel's strength. God humiliated Ben-hadad with the weakest force available.

- First — The besieged side attacks. Obedience to the prophet's word sent the smallest force out of the gate ahead of everyone else.

- Fooled — Ben-hadad heard the report and ordered the men taken alive, peace or war. Total confidence in his own superiority left him defenceless against God.

- Followed — Ahab gave the order, then held back. He joined the fight only after the enemy broke. A man can obey God's word and still keep himself safe.

- Forbearance — God gave the victory so that a hardened king would know who the LORD is. God kept reappearing to the man who had rejected Him, as the God of grace and deliverance.

1 Kings 20:18 · Darby

And he said, Whether they be come out for peace, take them alive; or whether they be come out for war, take them alive.

Ben-hadad is drinking with thirty-two allied kings while his army surrounds Samaria, and word comes that a small group has walked out of the city. He gives one order for both possibilities — peace or war, take them alive.

An order given over wine

The man giving this order was in no condition to give it. Wine, not military judgment, fed his certainty.

This seemed a pathetically weak force against the formidable army of Syria. But Ben-Hadad was totally self-confident, and he was getting drunk with the other thirty-two kings. Would a leader like that inspire his men in disciplined warfare? Certainly not! But when the young men of Israel went out of the city, Ben-Hadad gave orders to take them alive, whether they had come out for peace or for war. He had no doubt of Syria's total superiority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God's appointed hour

Ahab had already warned him not to boast before the fight was over. Ben-hadad drank anyway, and the hour he picked for drinking was the hour God had picked to bring him down.

Then, more nobly, poor Ahab answers: "Let not him who straps on his armor boast himself as he who takes it off." Provoked by this reply, Ben-hadad, under the influence of drink, gave the mad order for an instant attack on the city. But God's time to humble insolent Ben-hadad had come… God would not humble him by any show of strength, such as the seven thousand soldiers left to Ahab. He would use the servants of the princes of the provinces, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two. "And they went out at noon, while Ben-hadad was drinking himself drunk in the booths, he and the thirty-two kings who helped him."

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

A handful sent to strike first

Ben-hadad expected to collect whatever came out of the city. Instead he got an attack. A prophet had ordered it, and the men sent to make it were far too few for the job.

The "servants of the princes of the provinces," the men through whom God would hand the enemy army over to Ahab, are only a handful against this huge army. Ahab is not to wait for the enemy's attack. He is the one who must begin the battle, and his army numbers only seven thousand men! Ahab follows the prophet's word, and that day the Syrians suffer a great defeat.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The order turned back

Nobody carried the order out. What Ben-hadad planned for Israel's young men fell on the soldiers he sent to take them.

But God's intervention decided everything. Those who wanted to capture the young men of Israel died themselves instead. This spread confusion into Syria's ranks and they fled from Israel. Ben-Hadad escaped on horseback, but the army of Syria became prey for Israel. Israel attacked their horses and chariots and slaughtered a great number of the enemy.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God gave the victory at all

Ahab was no better than the man besieging him. The promise of victory was not a reward for his heart. It was an appeal to it.

What was the Lord's ground in speaking this way? The condition of Ahab's heart? We have just seen its hardness. But Israel, in the presence of Elijah's miracle, had acknowledged the true God. Would He not show His grace at the least sign of His people returning to Himself? As for Ahab, God tells him: "You shall know that I am the LORD." If God's judgments had not taught him this before, this miraculous deliverance might touch his heart and restore him. What touching patience on God's part, even toward the most profane, the most indifferent, the most hardened.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Commentators differ over Ahab's own part in the fight. One writer points out where Ahab stood while the young men went out:

You may not have noticed, but in the first victory, with thirty-three kings against him, Ahab does not come at the front of the battle but at the rear. Who shall order the battle? The young men start it, the servants of the prince of the provinces. These two hundred and thirty-two go out to the battle, then the seven thousand, and when Ahab sees that the enemy is routed he joins them. He comes in when the victory is won.

Modernised from Dr. Daniel W. PatersonOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast — Ben-hadad's order covered peace and war alike, because he never imagined defeat. His certainty came from wine, not from facts.

- Hour — his moment of loudest confidence was the exact moment God had set for his humbling.

- Handful — God chose the smallest instrument, 232 servants of the provincial princes. No one could credit that win to strength.

- Reversal — the men sent to take Israel alive were the ones who died. The order fell back on the men who obeyed it.

- Purpose — the victory was not Ahab's reward but God's appeal to a hardened king, so that he would know who the LORD is.

1 Kings 20:19 · Darby

And these servants of the princes of the provinces came out of the city, and the army that followed them.

The siege of Samaria has just turned. A prophet has promised Ahab the whole Syrian army that day, and the force God names is a handful of young men — not the trained soldiers.

The size of the force

One writer sets the tiny detachment beside the troops Ahab had:

God would humiliate Ben-hadad, not by any show of strength, such as the seven thousand soldiers left to Ahab. He would do it by the servants of the princes of the provinces, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Honour on the weakest part

The group was small. It also came from the least likely part of the ranks:

Ben-hadad besieges Samaria. God, by the direction of a prophet, sends out even the feeble part of the army, because honour must be put on it — not the warriors, but the armour-bearers. And the Syrians are demolished.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Going out, not waiting

The men go out of the city. A besieged king would sit tight behind his walls. This order reversed that and left Ahab nothing to fall back on:

At this critical moment Ahab seems inclined to let God work; in any case, he has no other resource. The prophet answers his questions plainly. God would deliver the enemy army into Ahab's hands by the "servants of the princes of the provinces" — only a handful against this multitude. Instead of waiting for the enemy's assault, Ahab is the one to begin the battle. And his army numbers only seven thousand men!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

An enemy too sure of himself

On the other side, the Syrian king saw nothing to fear:

This seemed a pathetically weak force against the formidable army of Syria. But Ben-Hadad was completely sure of himself, and he was getting drunk with the other thirty-two kings. Would a leader like that inspire his men in disciplined warfare? Certainly not! But the young men of Israel went out of the city. Ben-Hadad gave orders to take them alive, whether they had come out for peace or for war. He had no doubt of Syria's total superiority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That contempt collapsed. The men sent to capture them were killed instead, and the Syrians fled. Leslie M. Grant

Where the king was

The verse puts the young men first and the army after them. Ahab was told to command the battle, but he appears only later. One writer reads that order as a clue:

The words "the king of Israel went out" come after the account of the going out and victory of the young men and the small army. This seems to imply that he stayed cautiously behind until the rout of the besiegers had begun — even though, by the prophet's word, he was to order the battle. Then, when the danger was past, he comes out from his place of safety inside the city walls. There he helps to slaughter an already defeated enemy.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Why God gave the victory at all

Ahab had done nothing to earn this. The reason lay elsewhere:

What was the Lord's ground for speaking like this? The condition of Ahab's heart? We have just seen how hard it was. But Israel, faced with Elijah's miracle, had acknowledged the true God. Would He not show His grace at the least sign that His people were returning to Him? As for Ahab, God tells him, "You shall know that I am the LORD." Perhaps he had not learned this before under the weight of God's judgments. Then this miraculous deliverance might touch his heart and restore him. What touching patience on God's part, even toward the most godless, the most indifferent, the most hardened! The God whom man rejects does not grow tired. He comes back to him as the God of grace and deliverance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Few, on purpose. Two hundred and thirty-two servants of the district governors led the way, not Ahab's seven thousand soldiers. God humiliated Ben-hadad without any show of strength.

- Honoured, not overlooked. God sent out the feeble part of the army — the armour-bearers, not the warriors — and put honour on it.

- Forward, not fortified. Ahab had to start the battle instead of waiting behind his walls. He had no other resource than the prophet's word.

- Despised, then victorious. A drunken Ben-Hadad ordered these men taken alive. His own soldiers died instead, and Syria fled.

- Undeserved, and still given. The king hung back until the rout began. God still gave the victory, so that even a hardened man might know that He is the LORD.

1 Kings 20:20 · Darby

And they slew every one his man; and the Syrians fled, and Israel pursued them; and Ben-Hadad the king of Syria escaped on a horse with the horsemen.

Samaria is under siege, its king has already offered to surrender, and the Syrian army outside is so large that its commander expects no fight. Then a small force walks out of the gate at noon, each man cuts down his opponent, and the Syrians run — their king riding for his life.

The Force That Won the Day

A prophet named the men who would break the siege. On paper, the numbers made the result impossible.

The "servants of the princes of the provinces" who would deliver the enemy army into Ahab's hands are only a handful against such a huge army. Ahab is not to wait for the enemy's attack; he is to start the battle himself, and his army numbers only seven thousand men! Ahab follows the prophet's word, and that day the Syrians suffer a great defeat.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Commentators point out which force God passed over:

God would humble Ben-hadad — not by any show of strength, not by the seven thousand soldiers Ahab still had, but by the servants of the princes of the provinces, who numbered two hundred and thirty-two.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Take Them Alive

Ben-hadad's own order shows what he expected from the encounter. He gave it without putting down his drink.

This looked like a hopelessly weak force against Syria's powerful army. But Ben Hadad was completely sure of himself, and he was getting drunk with the other 32 kings (v.16). Would a leader like that inspire his men to fight with discipline? Not at all! But when the young men of Israel went out of the city, Ben Hadad gave orders to take them alive, whether they had come out for peace or for war. He had no doubt that Syria was far stronger.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The phrase "each struck down his man" turns that order upside down.

But God's intervention decided everything. Those who wanted to capture the young men of Israel found that they were the ones who died instead (vs.19-20). This spread confusion into Syria's ranks and they fled from Israel.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The King on Horseback

Ben-hadad had come with horses and chariots and thirty-two allied kings. He leaves with a horse and an escort. His horse saves him, but it saves nothing else. Israel went straight after the horses and chariots he came with.

Ben Hadad escaped on horseback, but the Syrian army became easy prey for Israel. Israel attacked their horses and chariots and killed a great number of the enemy (v.21).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That escape is not a loose end. Because Ben-hadad lived, he came back — and the next war settled a claim about which god had given the victory.

This time the point is to prove to the Syrians that Israel had not won the victory by their "gods of the mountains." Ben-Hadad changes the organization of his army and the place of battle, but it does no good. The Israelites, as few in number as two little flocks of goats, strike down one hundred thousand of the enemy's men in one day. So the Syrians had to learn who the Lord was, and Israel could know Him too.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Where Ahab Was Standing

The prophet had told Ahab to lead the attack. The order of events in the chapter suggests he did not.

The words "The king of Israel went out" come after the account of how the young men and the small army went out and won. That order of events seems to imply something. Though the prophet's word said he should order (or command) the battle, he held back where it was safe until the besiegers had begun to flee. Then, when the danger is past, he comes out from his safe place inside the city walls and helps to kill an enemy that is already beaten.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Why God Gave the Victory

The victory was not a reward. Ahab had shown no sign of turning, and the promise came with a purpose: "you shall know that I am the LORD."

If he had not learned this before under the weight of God's judgments, perhaps this miraculous deliverance would touch his heart and restore him. What touching patience God shows, even toward the most profane, the most indifferent, the most hardened! The God whom man rejects does not grow tired; He comes back to him as the God of grace and of deliverance!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Confidence — Ben-hadad's last order before the rout was to take the Israelites alive. He expected prisoners, not a fight.

- Handful — God chose the 232 servants of the provincial officials over the 7,000 soldiers, so no one could credit the win to Israel's strength.

- Reversal — the men sent to capture were the men who died, and panic did the rest of the work.

- Horse — the king got away on a horse, while Israel destroyed the horses and chariots he had brought.

- Purpose — the whole deliverance aimed at a hard heart: God came to Ahab as his deliverer, so that he would know who the LORD is.

1 Kings 20:21 · Darby

And the king of Israel went out, and smote the horses and chariots, and slew the Syrians with a great slaughter.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

1 Kings 20:22 · Darby

And the prophet drew near to the king of Israel, and said to him, Go, strengthen thyself, and understand, and see what thou shalt do; for at the return of the year the king of Syria will come up against thee.

Israel has just routed Ben-hadad's huge army, and the natural instinct after such a win is to relax. Instead a prophet arrives with no congratulations — only an order to get stronger, and a date: the Syrian king returns when the year turns.

A warning that is itself mercy

Notice who gets this message. Ahab had shown no interest in God, yet God keeps speaking to him. One writer sees kindness in the warning:

What patient, marvellous grace God shows! His goodness would lead men to repentance. So He sends His prophet, even to Ahab, to warn him of what the Syrians will do.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Rescued, and still not grateful

A victory given by God should produce thanks. One writer names Ahab's response, and what the next battle would prove:

No spirit of thankfulness is produced in the king's heart. God warns him by the prophet that at the return of the year Ben-Hadad will attack him again. This time it is a matter of proving to the Syrians that Israel had not gotten the victory by their "gods of the mountains."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Told not to slacken

"Strengthen yourself" is an order not to let go after a win. The deadline, "in the spring," reads in older translations as "at the return of the year" — the point in the year when Syria would march again. One writer joins both halves of the prophet's word and weighs what Ahab did with it:

However, the Lord sent the prophet to Ahab again. He told him not to relax, but to strengthen himself, because Syria would return in the spring of the year to attack Israel. God stepped in for Ahab like this. That should have driven Ahab to turn from his evil ways and trust only the Lord. But the Word of God did not penetrate his hard heart.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same writer calls God's patience here wonderful: "this foolish king might have had a different end if only he had turned to the Lord."

Why success is the dangerous hour

The warning lands at the moment of victory. One writer describes that danger in comments on Israel's battles elsewhere:

But such are our hearts that, in the very victory God gives us, we are apt to begin to trust in self and to loosen our belts. The path to victory is usually safer than the high ground of success we have already won. Nothing needs a watchful and prayerful spirit more than a time of marked blessing. Indeed, defeats often arise from a lack of care in the hour of success.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The order to "consider well what you have to do" fits this: the man who has just won is the man most likely to trust himself.

A beaten enemy, not a finished one

The prophet names the same king coming back again. One writer draws out the principle in comments on Israel's incomplete conquests:

An enemy half conquered is an enemy unconquered. You must completely overthrow the power of evil that would keep you out of one corner of your inheritance. If you do not, you will find that enemy come up again. You may hold him down for a time and make him secondary. But if the enemy is not really a conquered enemy, he will conquer us one day.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the warning was worth

The year turned and the attack came, just as the prophet said. The second battle taught both sides one lesson:

Ben-Hadad reorganises his army and changes the place of battle, but it is all in vain. The Israelites, in number like two little flocks of goats, strike down a hundred thousand of the enemy's men in one day. The wall of Aphek falls on those who were left. So the Syrians had to learn who the Lord was, and so Israel could know Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — God tells Ahab in advance what is coming and when; the message is a warning, not a reward for the victory just won.

- Grace — God speaks at all to a man like Ahab. One writer calls it patient, marvellous grace, His goodness leading men to repentance.

- Strengthen — the order is not to relax. Success is the hour when hearts start to trust themselves and drop their guard.

- Returns — a defeated enemy is not a destroyed enemy. Half-conquered, he comes back, so no season of sitting still is safe.

- Response — the word came true and God delivered Israel. Yet it never reached Ahab's hard heart; one writer says he might have ended differently had he turned.

1 Kings 20:23 · Darby

And the servants of the king of Syria said to him, Their gods are gods of the mountains; therefore they were stronger than we; but if we fight against them on the plateau, shall we not be stronger than they?

Israel has just beaten Syria in the hill country. Now the Syrian king's advisers hand him an explanation and a plan: Israel's God works on high ground, so move the war down to the plain and the result will change. The verse raises two questions — where does such reasoning come from, and what does God do with it?

Unbelief's explanation

Commentators trace the advice back to the Syrians' whole idea of what a god is. They had no category for a God who rules everywhere, so they read the defeat as a matter of terrain.

The Syrians had no idea of a God who rules everywhere. They assumed that each nation had its own 'gods' of various kinds, and that all of them shared the weakness and failure seen in humans. Ben Hadad's servants got the idea that Israel's God was a God of the hills, because Israel had won in the hill country (v.23). So they thought they would win if they fought Israel in the plain. Such is the stupidity of unbelief!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the hills

The theory had its own logic. The Syrians looked at Israel's hill country and at the battle they had just lost, and planned a rematch.

They knew very well that Samaria was a hill, and Jerusalem was a hill. So they thought that the Lord God of Israel was only a god of the hills. So the next time they would go down into the valleys and see whether the God of Israel was able to meet them there. But the God of Israel was the God of the valleys as much as of the hills. There they are beaten far worse the second time than the first. They gave the challenge, God answers, and they were overwhelmed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A god tied to one place

This was not a Syrian peculiarity. One writer places it inside the idolatry of every land and age, where each nation kept its own god — the same thought he finds in Balak.

To his dark idolatrous mind, what was the Lord of Israel more than the guardian god of one particular people, or of one limited area where He might indeed be supreme, while in another place another god would win? That was clearly the thought of Balak. The idolatry of every land and age never went beyond this; each nation had its own god… Long afterwards the Syrians said the God of Israel was the god of the hills, and not of the valleys.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The rematch on the plain

Ben-Hadad followed the advice in full. The result tested the theory, and both sides learned from it.

This time it is a matter of proving to the Syrians that Israel had not won the victory by their "gods of the mountains." Ben-Hadad changes the organization of his army and the place of battle, but it is useless. The Israelites, in number like two little flocks of goats, strike down one hundred thousand of the enemy's men in one day. The wall of Aphek falls on those who were left. So the Syrians had to learn who the Lord was, and so Israel could know Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Hills and plains in daily life

What the Syrians said is easy to reject as an idea. It is harder to reject as a habit. One writer asks how our daily conduct matches what we say we believe.

In theory we dismiss as plainly absurd the idea of a God who is Almighty on the hills but powerless on the plain. But it is worth asking how our practice matches what we say we believe… we know the steep slopes of the rugged hills of confusion, trial and temptation, where we found the present help and strength we needed… Yes, we have often known the truth that "God is the God of the hills". But on the plains of home life, at work, and in the valleys of life with other people, how often has our fretful, selfish, crooked conduct given the enemy an occasion to say: "Their God is the God of the hills, but not of the plains and valleys, so let us fight them on the plains."

Modernised from W G TurnerOriginal wording

No valley out of reach

The Syrians shut God out of the valleys. One writer shows how far His love actually reaches.

There is no valley experience that is beyond the reach of the love of God. The Psalmist could say, "Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for You are with me." So in the darkest valley of all, where we meet the strongest enemy, we have not only the endless blessings of our God, but His actual presence with us.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The advisers judged God by the map. They assumed every nation has a local god with human limits. That is the reasoning of unbelief.

- Plan. Their remedy was a change of ground: fight in the plain and the outcome will change.

- Answer. New troops, new battlefield, worse defeat — the God of the hills proved to be the God of the valleys too.

- Purpose. The defeat was a lesson to both sides: the Syrians had to learn who the Lord was, and Israel could know Him.

- Application. The enemy still says it of us when we are strong on the hills of trial and weak on the plains of home, business and friendship. Yet no valley, not even death's, is outside His presence.

1 Kings 20:24 · Darby

And do this take the kings away, every man out of his place, and put governors in their stead;

Israel has just crushed Ben-hadad's army at Samaria. His advisers now explain the defeat their own way. This verse holds their plan: fight on level ground next time, and replace the allied kings with appointed officers.

Why the kings had to go

The first battle showed what Syria's leadership was worth. Ben-hadad and the kings with him spent it drinking.

Ben Hadad, totally self-confident, was becoming drunk together with the other 32 kings (v.16). Would a leader like that inspire his men in disciplined warfare? Certainly not!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

So swapping thirty-two drinking allies for appointed officers looked like an obvious fix.

The theory driving the plan

The change of commanders was only half the plan. Syria refused to see God's hand in the defeat. Instead they decided for themselves where Israel's God could and could not act.

The Syrians are destroyed, and they do not learn that God was against them. No, it was "the god of the hills." They knew very well that Samaria was a hill, and that Jerusalem was a hill. So they thought that the Lord God of Israel was only a god of the hills. The next time, they would go into the valleys and see whether the God of Israel could meet them there.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Careful plans, false foundation

Nothing in this advice is careless. New officers, a new battlefield, a detailed plan. But the thinking underneath it was wrong.

The Syrians had no idea of a sovereign God. They assumed that each nation had its own 'gods' of various kinds, and that all of them shared the weakness and failure seen in humans. Ben Hadad's servants came up with the idea that Israel's God was a God of the hills, because Israel had won in the hill country (v.23). So they thought they would win if they fought Israel on the plain. Such is the stupidity of unbelief! They planned the next battle in detail, and they persuaded Ben Hadad to accept those plans (vs.24-25).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Restructuring changes nothing that matters

Both changes recommended here — different leaders, different ground — were tested, and both failed together.

Ben-Hadad changes the organization of his army and the place of battle, but it is useless. The Israelites, few in number like two little flocks of goats, kill a hundred thousand of the enemy's men in one day. The wall of Aphek falls on those who were left. So the Syrians had to learn who the Lord was, and so Israel could know Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer draws out the principle behind that result:

Means were nothing to Israel's God, the Lord, who is called "the God of battles." He can save by many or by few. When a mere handful does not destroy all of a vast army, He can shake a wall down on the rest, and so complete the destruction it deserved.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Where this touches us

One writer finds a lasting principle in this old campaign. The idea that God rules some parts of life but not others did not die with Ben-hadad.

If we look past what is only local and temporary in this old story of the Benhadad campaign, we can see a lasting principle in it that applies to us today. For are we not often tempted to accept the completely artificial division of life into two compartments, one labelled sacred and one labelled secular? We then come very near to the folly of agreeing with the enemy's suggestion: that God is indeed the God of the sacred, with all its vision and closeness to Him, but not the God of the secular, with its daily round of home duties, work and time with other people.

Modernised from W G TurnerOriginal wording

The same writer then turns from what we believe to how we behave:

Yes, we have often known the truth that "God is the God of the hills." But what about the plains of home life, our work, and the valleys of life with other people? How often has our irritable, selfish, crooked behaviour given the enemy an excuse to say: "Their God is the God of the hills, but not of the plains and valleys. So let us fight them on the plains."

Modernised from W G TurnerOriginal wording

Summary

- Diagnosis. The plan spotted a real fault: the kings had been drinking instead of leading, so they had to go.

- Blind spot. Syria blamed the ground and the leaders, not God. They thought He ruled the hills only.

- Method. They planned every detail. But careful planning built on unbelief is still stupidity.

- Result. New officers and new ground changed nothing — God saves by many or by few, and can bring a wall down on whoever is left.

- Application. The same lie lives on when we treat God as Lord of sacred hours, but not of home, work and company.

1 Kings 20:25 · Darby

and number thee an army, like the army that thou hast lost, horse for horse, and chariot for chariot; and we will fight against them on the plateau shall we not be stronger than they? And he hearkened to their voice, and did so.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

1 Kings 20:26 · Darby

And it came to pass, at the return of the year, that Ben-Hadad numbered the Syrians, and went up to Aphek, to fight against Israel.

A year earlier a prophet had warned Ahab that Syria would return, and this verse is that warning coming true. Ben-hadad counts his troops and picks new ground at Aphek, down on the plain — but can a new battlefield change anything?

The Warning Fulfilled

A prophet had already named the season and the enemy. One commentator reads that warning as kindness to a man who deserved none:

God's grace is patient and marvellous! His goodness would lead men to repentance. So He sends His prophet, even to Ahab, to warn him of what the Syrians will do.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Why Aphek

Aphek was no random pick. Its position explains why Ben-hadad marched there:

This Aphek lay about six miles east of the Sea of Galilee, on the direct road between the land of Israel and Damascus. It was a common battlefield of the Syrian kings.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

His advisers chose the low ground for a reason. That reason was their picture of Israel's God:

The Syrians had no idea of a sovereign God. They assumed that each nation had 'gods' of various kinds, all of them as weak and as likely to fail as people are. Ben Hadad's servants came up with the notion that Israel's God was a God of the hills because Israel had triumphed in the hill country (v.23). So they thought they would win if they were to fight Israel in the plain. Such is the stupidity of unbelief!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Folly of Shifting Ground

Behind the muster lies an assumption: that where you stand can decide what God will do. One writer finds the same thinking in an earlier king and prophet who changed position to try to change God's mind:

What low and contemptible thoughts both king and prophet had of their Creator! They imagined that such tricks and changes of position could completely change His mind about His people. The king of Syria and his advisers were just as stupid when they were at war with Israel in the days of Ahab. They suggested that the LORD was God of the hills, but not of the valleys; so if the Syrians fought on the lower ground, victory would be theirs (1 Kings 20).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Reorganised Army Defeated

Ben-hadad changed two things: his army and his ground. Neither change helped, and the defeat taught both sides something:

This time the point was to prove to the Syrians that Israel had not won the victory by their "gods of the mountains." Ben-Hadad changes the organization of his army and the place of battle, but all in vain. The Israelites, in number like two little flocks of goats, kill one hundred thousand of the enemy's men in one day. The wall of Aphek falls on the survivors. So the Syrians had to learn who the LORD was, and so Israel could know Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Counting was the one thing Ben-hadad could control, and counting was the one thing that did not matter:

Means were nothing to Israel's God, the LORD, who is called "the God of battles." He can save by many or by few.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Hills and Valleys in Our Own Lives

One writer reads the Syrian strategy as a picture of our own lives. No one says out loud that God rules only part of life, but our behaviour can say it for us:

In theory we dismiss as absurd the idea of a God who is Almighty on the hills but powerless on the plain. But it is worth asking how our practice matches what we profess. When we are hard at work for the Lord, the hill of difficulty has made us cry out, "Who is sufficient for these things?" And the God of the hills has taught us that "our sufficiency is of God." Yes, we have often proved that God is the God of the hills. But what about the plains of home life, the business zone, and the valleys of social life? How often has our fretful, selfish, crooked conduct given the enemy an occasion to say: "Their God is the God of the hills, but not of the plains and valleys, so let us fight them on the plains"?

Modernised from W G TurnerOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — a prophet named the season and the enemy a full year ahead. God's goodness would lead men to repentance, so He sent the warning even to Ahab.

- Ground — Aphek sat on the plain, on the main road from Damascus. Syrian kings had fought there before. Ben-hadad picked it for the flat land.

- Reasoning — Israel had won in the hills, so the Syrians decided Israel's God was a God of the hills. Commentators call that the stupidity of unbelief.

- Result — the new army and the new ground changed nothing. Israel looked like two little flocks of goats and killed a hundred thousand. A falling wall finished the rest.

- Reach — we make the same mistake when we trust God on the hills of difficulty, then deny Him by how we live at home, at work and among friends.

1 Kings 20:27 · Darby

And the children of Israel were numbered and victualled, and they went against them; and the children of Israel encamped before them like two little flocks of goats; but the Syrians filled the land.

Ben-hadad has come back for a second war with Israel, this time on the plain at Aphek. Israel musters every man, and its army still looks tiny beside the Syrian host. What is a counted, fully assembled, badly outnumbered people supposed to do?

Ground of the Enemy's Choosing

Israel fights on this ground because Syria chose it. The Syrians had lost in the hills, so they drew a conclusion about Israel's God and moved the war to flat land.

The Syrians had no concept of a sovereign God. They assumed that each nation had its own 'gods' of various kinds, and that all these gods shared the weakness and failure seen in humans. Israel had won in the hill country, so Ben Hadad's servants got the idea that Israel's God was a God of the hills (v.23). Therefore they thought they would win if they were to fight Israel in the plain. Such is the stupidity of unbelief!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Numbered, and Still a Handful

This was not a case of poor turnout. One writer traces Israel's smallness through the whole story of God's people.

Littleness was characteristic of what we may call Israel's day. That nation began its existence as "the fewest of all peoples" (Deut. 7:7). Later the fighting forces of the ten tribes stood at full strength. They had counted every man, and none was missing. Even then they were only like "two little flocks of goats" beside the Syrians (1 Kings 20:27). When the southern kingdom of Judah filled up with evil, only a very small remnant remained (Isaiah 1:9).

Modernised from Other AuthorsOriginal wording

Victory Without Means

The two armies faced each other for a week before anyone fought. Then the size of the gap proved not to matter.

For a whole week the two hostile armies lay camped opposite each other. Israel's poor little army was "like two little flocks of goats," but God was on its side. On the seventh day they joined battle, and those "two little flocks of goats" destroyed a host of a hundred thousand men. The rest of the defeated army numbered twenty-seven thousand. They had invaded Israel's land without provocation, and they escaped the slaughter. They fled into the city of Aphek, and there a wall fell on them. Means were nothing to Israel's God, Jehovah, who is called "the God of battles." He can save by many or by few. Whatever a mere handful of a few thousand men fails to destroy of a vast army, He can crush by shaking a wall down on the rest.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Rearranging the Odds Changes Nothing

Syria's new strategy — new formation, new battlefield — was answered point for point. The outcome was aimed at two audiences at once.

Ben-Hadad changes the organization of his army and the place of battle, but it is all in vain. The Israelites, in number like two little flocks of goats, strike down a hundred thousand of the enemy's men in one day. The wall of Aphek falls on those who were left. So the Syrians had to learn who the Lord was, and so Israel could know Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Syria had turned God's power into a question of geography. His answer came in events, not words.

The taunt of the Syrians was "the LORD is God of the hills, but He is not the God of the valleys." God's answer to this was the complete deliverance of His people.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

The Valley as Our Own Ground

Christians also walk through low ground, and the comfort is not in the valley itself.

God brings the saints home. The Lord Jesus leads many sons home to glory. On the way we pass through an endless variety of circumstances, and they are not always mountain-top experiences. There are valleys, sometimes very deep valleys… I want to stress right away that it is not the valleys so much I want to engage you with, but the God of the valleys. He is the God who is victorious in 1 Kings 20. He began a good work in us, and He will carry it on until the day of Jesus Christ (Phil. 1:6).

Modernised from Dr. Daniel W. PatersonOriginal wording

Summary

- The valley chosen. Syria picked the plain because it thought Israel's God ruled only the hills. Unbelief tries to work out where God cannot reach.

- The valley counted. Israel mustered every man and still looked like two little flocks of goats. Smallness has marked God's people from the start.

- The valley fought. Means were nothing to Israel's God. He saves by many or by few. The small army struck down a hundred thousand, and a falling wall finished the rest.

- The valley answered. God's reply to the taunt was not a speech but a deliverance, so that both Syria and Israel would know who the Lord is.

- The valley today. Believers pass through low places as well as high ones. The point of the story is not the valley but the God who is victorious there.

1 Kings 20:28 · Darby

And the man of God drew near, and spoke to the king of Israel and said, Thus saith Jehovah Because the Syrians have said, Jehovah is a god of the mountains, but he is not a god of the valleys, I will give all this great multitude into thy hand, and ye shall know that I am Jehovah.

The Taunt That Provoked the Answer

The Syrians lost the first battle in the hill country. From the terrain they drew a conclusion about Israel's God. Their reasoning came out of a world where every god had a home ground.

The Syrians had no concept of a sovereign God. They assumed that each nation had its own 'gods' of various kinds, and that all of them shared the weakness and failure seen in humans. Ben Hadad's servants came up with the notion that Israel's God was a God of the hills because Israel had triumphed in the hill country (v.23). So they thought they would win if they were to fight Israel in the plain. Such is the stupidity of unbelief!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Lower Ground Changed Nothing

Choosing the battlefield was their way of testing whether Israel's God had limits.

They knew very well that Samaria was a hill, and Jerusalem was a hill, and they thought that the Jehovah God of Israel was only a god of the hills. So the next time they would go into the valleys, to see whether the God of Israel was able to meet them there. But the God of Israel was the God of the valleys as much as of the hills. There they are beaten far worse on the second occasion than on the first. They gave the challenge, God answers, and they are overwhelmed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Audiences, One Lesson

The verse ends with a purpose: "you shall know that I am the LORD." Writers note that the outcome taught both sides of the battle line at once.

This time it is a matter of proving to the Syrians that Israel had not won the victory by their "gods of the mountains." Ben-Hadad changes the organization of his army and the place of battle, but it is no use. The Israelites, in number like two little flocks of goats, strike down one hundred thousand of the enemy's men in one day. The wall of Aphek falls on those who were left. So the Syrians had to learn who the Lord was, and so Israel could know Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Great Multitude, Small Flock

The verse promises "all this great multitude" into the hand of an army that looked like nothing at all.

For a whole week the two armies lay camped facing each other. Israel's poor little army was "like two little flocks of goats," but with God on its side. When they join battle on the seventh day, the "two little flocks of goats" destroy a host of a hundred thousand men… Means were nothing with Israel's God, Jehovah, who is called "the God of battles." He can save by many or by few. What a mere handful (a few thousand) does not destroy of a vast army, He can shake down a wall upon the rest.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The King Who Received It

The message came to Ahab, one of Israel's worst kings. God's stated aim was that this man should know Him.

The Lord again stepped in on behalf of Israel. He sent a man of God to Ahab with this message: because the Syrians had said that God is not a God of the valleys, God would deliver the multitude of the Syrians into the hand of the small Israelite army (v.28). Again the Lord clearly declares that He has an object in doing this, that Ahab might know that God is the Lord. How often did God bear witness to His grace and power for Ahab's benefit! Yet all this had little lasting effect on Ahab's attitude toward God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The God of the Valleys

The Syrians meant the title as an insult. Believers have since taken it as a comfort, because low ground is not where God's care thins out.

As God brings home the saints, as the Lord Jesus leads home many sons to glory, we have to pass through an endless variety of circumstances. They are not always mountain-top experiences. There are valleys, sometimes very deep valleys… It is not the valleys so much I want to engage you with, but the God of the valleys. He is the God who is victorious in 1 Kings 20, the God who having begun a good work in us will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ (Phil. 1:6). He is the God who wants you and me to get the most out of those valley experiences that in His wisdom and His love He puts us through.

Modernised from Dr. Daniel W. PatersonOriginal wording

Summary

- The insult. The Syrians blamed the terrain for their first defeat. They pictured Israel's God as a local god of the hills — the stupidity of unbelief.

- The answer. God took up their challenge on the ground they chose, and the second defeat in the valley was worse than the first on the heights.

- The odds. A force like two little flocks of goats faced a host of a hundred thousand men. Means were nothing to Israel's God. He can save by many or by few.

- The purpose. "You shall know that I am the LORD" reached both camps — the Syrians had to learn who He was, and Israel could know Him.

- The reach. Ahab saw grace and power again and again, with little lasting effect. Yet the title the enemy sneered at stands: He is the God of the valleys as much as of the hills.

1 Kings 20:29 · Darby

And they encamped one over against the other seven days; and it came to pass that on the seventh day the battle was joined; and the children of Israel smote of the Syrians a hundred thousand footmen in one day.

Two armies camp facing each other for a full week. Then the fighting starts, and a tiny Israelite force cuts down a hundred thousand Syrian foot soldiers in one day. The numbers are the point. God arranged this battle to answer an insult about where His power reaches.

The Taunt That Set Up the Battle

The Syrians had already lost once, near Samaria. They did not conclude that Israel's God had beaten them. They decided He was a local god of high ground, and chose flat land for the rematch.

Benhadad besieges Samaria. God, through the direction of a prophet, sends out even the feeble part of the army — not the warriors, but the armour-bearers — because honour must go to what is known. The Syrians are demolished, and they do not learn that God was against them. No, it was "the god of the hills." They knew very well that Samaria was a hill, and Jerusalem was a hill. They thought that Jehovah, the God of Israel, was only a god of the hills. So the next time they would go into the valleys and see whether the God of Israel was able to meet them there. But the God of Israel was the God of the valleys as much as of the hills. There they are beaten far worse the second time than the first. They gave a challenge, God answers, and they were overwhelmed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Seven Days of Waiting

The week of waiting took surprise out of the battle. Each side had time to size up the other.

For seven days the armies remained opposite each other, each as it were taking measure of the other. So there was no element of surprise in the battle, except for this: when they attacked, the Israelites were able to kill 100,000 Syrian foot soldiers in one day.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Handful Against a Host

Israel's army looked like nothing — two little flocks of goats against a host of a hundred thousand. The size gap is what makes the result unmistakable.

Israel's poor little army was "like two little flocks of kids," but with God on its side. When they join battle on the seventh day, the "two little flocks of kids" destroy a host of a hundred thousand men. Twenty-seven thousand of the beaten army escaped the sword of the people whose land they had invaded without provocation. They fled into the city of Aphek, where a wall fell on them. Means were nothing with Israel's God, Jehovah, who is called "the God of battles". He can save by many or by few. When a mere handful does not destroy the whole of a vast army, He can shake down a wall on the rest.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Why God Gave the Victory

God gave His reason for this victory before the battle. He wanted Ahab to know who He is.

The Lord again intervened on behalf of Israel. He sent a man of God to Ahab with this word: because the Syrians had said God is not a God of the valleys, God would deliver the multitude of the Syrians into the hand of the small Israelite army (v.28). Again the Lord clearly declares that He has an object in doing this, that Ahab might know that God is the Lord.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Ahab Did With It

Right after this victory, Ahab welcomed the beaten Benhadad as family.

God had asserted His supremacy in the plains as well as in the hills. For His own name's sake He gave Ahab victory over the Syrians, and so gave Israel another opportunity to return to His worship. Then the wretched blinded Ahab takes Benhadad to his heart, embraces him, and claims kinship with Israel's foe — God's enemy! Not even the appearance of thanksgiving to God for His wonderful mercy and deliverance. Instead, he makes an alliance with one whose purpose was to destroy Israel. But though judgment is near, mercy still lingers over the guilty nation.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Same Mistake Today

The Syrians fenced God into one type of ground. One writer sees the same instinct in how we split up our own lives.

Look beneath the local and temporary details of this old story of the Benhadad campaign. The narrative holds an eternal principle that applies to us now. Are we not often tempted to agree to the artificial division of life into compartments labelled sacred and secular? We come very near to endorsing the folly the enemy suggested: God is the God of the sacred, with all its vision and communion, but not the God of the secular, with its daily round of home duties, business obligations, and social life.

Modernised from W. G. TurnerOriginal wording

Summary

- The claim. The Syrians said Israel's God ruled hills but not valleys, and chose the plain to prove it.

- The setup. Seven days in the open removed surprise. A force like two little flocks of goats faced a host of a hundred thousand.

- The answer. A hundred thousand fell in one day. A falling wall finished twenty-seven thousand more. Means were nothing to the God of battles.

- The purpose. God gave His reason beforehand: Ahab must know that God is the Lord, in the valleys as much as on the hills.

- The warning. Ahab took the mercy and then embraced God's enemy. The same instinct lives on whenever we treat God as Lord of the sacred hours but not the working day.

1 Kings 20:30 · Darby

And the rest fled to Aphek, into the city; and the wall fell on twenty-seven thousand men of them that were left. And Ben-Hadad fled, and came into the city, [from] chamber to chamber.

Syria's second war with Israel ended inside a city, not on the battlefield. A wall finished what the fighting had started, and the king with the huge army ended the day hiding in a back room. Two questions follow. Why did judgment chase the Syrians past the battle, and what did Ben-hadad's hiding place gain him?

The theory Syria came to test

Syria picked the ground for the second campaign. They had decided that Israel's God belonged to the hills.

They knew very well that Samaria was a hill, and Jerusalem was a hill. So they thought that the Lord God of Israel was only a god of the hills. So the next time they would go into the valleys and see whether the God of Israel was able to meet them there. But the God of Israel was the God of the valleys as much as of the hills. There they were beaten worse the second time than the first. They gave a challenge, God answered, and they were overwhelmed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A city that offered no cover

The survivors ran to Aphek for the reason anyone runs to a walled town.

The rest fled to Aphek, but found no security there, for God caused a wall to fall on 27,000 men. So there was a tremendous slaughter of Syria, and the king, Ben Hadad, found a hiding place in an inner chamber.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the wall matters

Israel's army that day was tiny — two little flocks of goats against a countryside full of Syrians. The falling wall shows that the size of the winning side was never the point.

When they join battle on the seventh day, the "two little flocks of goats" destroy an army of a hundred thousand men. Twenty-seven thousand survivors of the defeated army escaped being killed by the people whose land they had invaded without provocation. They fled into the city of Aphek, where a wall fell upon them. Means were nothing to Israel's God, who is called "the God of battles". He can save by many or by few. What a mere handful does not destroy of a vast army, He can shake down a wall upon the rest, and so complete its deserved destruction.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The king in the inner chamber

The verse leaves the Syrian king alone behind a door. One writer sees here a line from the Psalms proved true.

History confirms what the word of God declares in verse 16, "The king is not saved by his great army." "The Syrians filled the countryside," while Israel encamped "like two little flocks of goats" (1 Ki. 20:27). Yet the Lord told Israel He would deliver the great army into their hand (v. 28). Israel killed 100,000 foot soldiers, so Ben Hadad, king of Syria, was far from being saved by his own great army. He went into an inner chamber to hide (v. 30). This is only one of many occasions that prove the truth of this verse.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The instinct to hide

What Ben-hadad did with a wall and a door, people do with anything they can find.

How awful the contrast with David, Israel's own sweet singer! Despite his sins, he could say by grace, "You are a hiding place for me" (Ps. 32:7). He was hiding in God, not from Him, with One before him who could and would cover all his sins and charge him with nothing. Our effort to cover our sins, or to escape from His presence, is useless indeed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The victory Ahab wasted

This victory put Ben-hadad in Ahab's power.

Within a short space of time, this was the third occasion on which God would convince the king of Israel, and his people, that He was what His prophets proclaimed Him to be — the Lord, the God of Israel. Among men He insists that every charge must be established "by the evidence of two or three witnesses". He will not use an easier rule Himself in His dealings with people. Ahab had this threefold testimony given to him, but sadly he entirely failed to profit by it. He is trapped by Ben-hadad's cunning, after God had placed him in his power. He not only let him live, but said, "He is my brother." It was the beginning of his final downfall.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast — Syria fought at Aphek on a theory: a God of the hills could be beaten in the valleys. The second defeat was worse than the first.

- Battlefield — Israel was two little flocks of goats; Syria filled the countryside. Means were nothing to the God of battles, who can save by many or by few.

- Wall — what the small army did not destroy, God shook down on the rest. The run to a walled city gave them no security.

- Chamber — the king with the great army ended behind a closed door. The king is not saved by his great army, and no effort to escape God's presence succeeds.

- Wasted — the victory put Ben-hadad in Ahab's hand as a third testimony. Ahab called him brother instead, and that was the start of his downfall.

1 Kings 20:31 · Darby

And his servants said to him, Behold now, we have heard that the kings of the house of Israel are merciful kings let us, I pray thee, put sackcloth on our loins, and ropes upon our heads, and go out to the king of Israel; perhaps he will save thy life.

Israel has just crushed Ben-hadad's huge army twice. The Syrian king is hiding in an inner room at Aphek. His officials come up with a plan built on one thing they have heard about Israel — that its kings spare the beaten.

A reputation for mercy

The Syrians were not guessing. Israel's kings had a name abroad. Years later another Syrian force met real mercy — from Israel's God, through His prophet. One commentator links the two moments:

The Syrians had heard before that "the kings of the house of Israel" were "merciful kings" (1 Kings 20:31). Now Israel's God showed them His own mercy, through His prophet's action. And it did have some effect, and was not forgotten at once, for we read, "So the bands of Syria came no more into the land of Israel." Such is the power of grace — even over hardened, pagan soldiers.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Sackcloth and ropes

Sackcloth and ropes look like repentance. But the servants are not sorry for anything. They are calculating, and their master would never have done the same:

Ben Hadad's servants then advised their master to go out and ask Ahab for mercy, for they had heard that Israel's kings were merciful. Ben Hadad would never have spared Ahab if their positions were reversed. But of course he would take any chance to stay alive. They put on the outward signs of repentance and came to Ahab, telling him "Your servant Ben Hadad says, 'Please let me live'" (v.32).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"He is my brother"

The gamble works. Ahab does not just spare the man — he calls him family. One writer hears in that word both an insult to God and a warning to Christians:

Ahab replies: "He is my brother," when God had given him into his hands for destruction. The idolater who had likened the LORD to "the gods of the mountains" is brother to the king of Israel! What an outrage to the glory and the holiness of God there is in this word, "He is my brother"! ... The world loves and owns this kind of clemency and affability. How often those who ought to be God's witnesses before the world call the world, "My brother, my brethren"! How sad is this word, which deceives the world and denies Christian character. No, Christians belong to a different family from the world. They are children of God; the world has the prince of this world for its father.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

When softness is not kindness

Was Ahab's mercy a virtue? One commentator says no. Kindness to God's people and firmness toward their oppressor belong together:

Ahab had no business being on brotherly terms with a king whose constant aim was to oppress God's people. He was putting himself on a level with a Gentile king. He forgot where Israel stood before God, and where Israel's king stood. In a case like this, strict conduct is the proper companion of a real sense of God's perfect grace toward His people ... but when a man who holds the place of God's servant despises God, the weakness this produces takes on the look of kindness toward men.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Trapped by the man he spared

Three times over, God had proved who He was. Ahab learned nothing from it. The plea in this verse became the trap:

God gave Ahab this threefold testimony, but sadly he gained nothing from it. Ben-hadad's cunning trapped him, after God had placed the man in his power. Ahab not only let him live, but said, "He is my brother." It was the beginning of his final downfall.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The man he released would be the death of him. A prophet came to tell him so. An earlier king had made the same mistake:

Ahab had failed to carry out God's purpose against this wicked king. King Saul had failed the same way with the Amalekites in 1 Samuel 15. Just as with Saul, there would be a price to pay: Ahab would one day die at the hand of the Syrians. The LORD would later declare through the prophet Jeremiah: "Cursed be he that does the work of the LORD negligently, and cursed be he that keeps back his sword from blood."

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

Summary

- Reputation. Israel's enemies knew its kings as merciful kings. That name pointed past the kings to the mercy of Israel's God, shown later through His prophet to Syrians who then stopped raiding.

- Guile. Sackcloth and ropes were the outward signs of repentance without the reality. Ben-hadad would never have spared Ahab. He only wanted to stay alive.

- Brother. God had marked Ben-hadad for destruction, and Ahab called him family. That word was an outrage to God's holiness. It warns anyone who claims kinship with the world.

- Firmness. Softness toward God's enemy is not grace. It is weakness wearing the look of kindness, and it grows where God is despised.

- Price. The man Ahab let go became the cause of his death. The release that looked generous began his downfall.

1 Kings 20:32 · Darby

And they girded sackcloth on their loins, and ropes on their heads, and came to the king of Israel, and said, Thy servant Ben-Hadad says, I pray thee, let me live. And he said, Is he yet alive? he is my brother.

Ben-hadad had attacked Israel twice and lost both times. Now his officers come to Ahab dressed as condemned men, betting on Israel's reputation for mercy. Ahab's answer to the defeated enemy — "my brother" — is the turning point of the chapter. Commentators treat it as the moment his true condition came to light.

Strategy, not repentance

The sackcloth and the ropes looked like the marks of a broken man. Commentators read the scene as a cold calculation by men who knew what Israel's kings were like.

Ben Hadad's servants then advised their master to go out to seek the leniency of Ahab, for they had heard that Israel's kings were merciful. Ben Hadad would certainly not have spared Ahab if their positions had been reversed. But of course he would take any chance he could to stay alive. They put on the outward signs of repentance and came to Ahab, telling him "Your servant Ben Hadad says, 'Please let me live'" (v.32).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the word "brother" gave away

Ahab's surprise that Ben-hadad was still alive turns at once into a claim of kinship. Commentators weigh that claim against what God had already decided about the man.

Ahab replies: "He is my brother," when God had given him into his hands for destruction. The idolater who had likened Jehovah to "the gods of the mountains" is brother to the king of Israel! What an outrage to the glory and the holiness of God there is in this word, "He is my brother"!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the kinship was out of place

Commentators give two reasons why the word was wrong. The first is the place Ahab held before God.

Ahab has no knowledge at all of the mind of God, and he lets the man whom God had condemned escape. There are cases where such a light attitude only proves that the honour of God and His thoughts have no influence over the heart. It was not for Ahab to be on brotherly terms with a king whose constant aim was the oppression of God's people. It was putting himself on a level with a Gentile king, forgetting the position both of Israel and of Israel's king, with respect to God. In a case like this, firm severity is what goes together with a real sense of God's perfect grace towards His people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The second reason is what the two men had in common.

There is one character in this chapter who is utterly despicable — that man is Ahab… Ben-hadad was typical of the kings of Syria in his religion: he was an idol worshipper. Ahab said to this idol worshipper, "he is my brother" (v.32), for he too was an idol worshipper.

Modernised from Dr. Daniel W. PatersonOriginal wording

When mercy is wrong

Ahab's kindness raises a wider question: is mercy always right?

Mercy is not always of God. Sometimes God's honour is at stake. At such times mercy is a curse. It is only human mercy, mercy that follows self-will, and it deceives all the more because it looks so fair. There are times when sparing the enemy of the Lord means failing completely to meet the Lord's will and the Lord's glory… So let us watch for this, dear friends. Whenever the time comes to stand firm, it may look like unkindness. It may look like turning away people who would gladly take the mercy offered. Even so, we must be firm against whatever overthrows the glory of the Lord. God only can show us when mercy is right, and when it is fatal.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The price Ahab paid

What looked generous cost Ahab his life and his people. Commentators compare him with an earlier king who spared an enemy God had condemned.

He made the same fatal mistake that king Saul made when he spared Agag. Calling the enemy of Israel "my brother" and taking him up into his chariot may have sounded well and looked generous to men like himself, who would applaud his conduct as noble. But in God's eyes it was unpardonable disobedience, and he and the nation would be made to suffer for it. Men might praise him. But what is human praise worth to a man whose conduct God condemns? Then came the verdict: "Thus says the Lord, Because you have let go out of your hand a man whom I appointed to utter destruction, therefore your life shall go for his life, and your people for his people."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The same word on Christian lips

Commentators put the same word on Christian lips today.

Ahab, pleased with himself now that he was in control, could afford to be generous. Sadly, his attitude compares with that of many Christians who consider it gracious to act as though even unbelievers were brothers. So they identify themselves with the enemies of the Lord, under the fair-sounding excuse of tolerance. But this is treachery against the Lord.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Costume. Sackcloth and ropes looked like repentance. They were a bid for survival, not a change of heart.

- Claim. Ahab answered that costume with a claim of kinship. God had already handed that man over to him for destruction.

- Cause. Commentators give two reasons for the word. Ahab forgot the place Israel's king held before God. And both men worshipped idols.

- Caution. Mercy is not always from God. When His honour is at stake, sparing His enemy is failure dressed up as kindness.

- Cost. Onlookers applauded the generosity. God's sentence was that Ahab's life would go for Ben-hadad's life. The same warning falls on any believer who calls the Lord's enemies "brother."

1 Kings 20:33 · Darby

And the men took it as a good omen, and hastened to catch what came from him, and they said, Thy brother Ben-Hadad. ... And he said, Go, bring him. And Ben-Hadad came forth to him; and he caused him to come up into the chariot.

God has just given Ahab victory over Syria, and the beaten enemy king's men are begging for his life. Everything turns on one word Ahab lets slip — "brother" — and on how fast they seize it.

"He is my brother"

Ahab gives Ben-hadad a title, and he gives it to a man God had already marked out for destruction.

His servants offer to beg mercy from the victor. They have heard that the kings of the house of Israel are gentle and merciful kings. Humiliated and beaten, they come begging for their king: "Please let me live." Ahab replies, "He is my brother." Yet God had given Ben-hadad into his hands for destruction. The idolater who had compared the Lord to "the gods of the mountains" is brother to the king of Israel! What an outrage to the glory and the holiness of God there is in this word, "He is my brother"! Ahab has Ben-hadad come up into his chariot, makes a covenant with him, and sends him away. The world loves and approves this kind of leniency.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The word they were watching for

The men are not just listening to Ahab. They are watching him for a sign, and the word used for their watching is also the word for divining.

It is a word used for diligent observation (1 Kings 20:33). And divining, apart from the heathenism so often linked with it, is simply discerning the future in the present.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Three witnesses, ignored

God had already given Ahab all the proof he needed of who He is.

This was the third time in a short space that God would convince the king of Israel, and his people, that He was what His prophets said He was — the Lord, the God of Israel. Among men He insists that every word be established "in the mouth of two or three witnesses," and He will not use an easier rule Himself in His dealings with men. Ahab had this threefold testimony given to him, but sadly he completely failed to profit by it. Ben-hadad's cunning trapped him, after God had placed Ben-hadad in his power. He not only let him live; he said, "He is my brother." It was the beginning of his final downfall.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Kindness where God had spoken

Ahab's failure is not cruelty. It is a softness that shows God's mind carries no weight with him at all.

Ahab has no knowledge at all of the mind of God, and he lets the man whom God had condemned escape. Sometimes lightheartedness proves only one thing: the honour of God and His thoughts have no influence over the heart. Ahab was putting himself on a level with a Gentile king. He forgot where God had placed Israel and Israel's king. In such a case, firmness of conduct is the fitting companion of a sense of God's perfect grace towards His people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A treaty instead of thanksgiving

Ahab lifts Ben-hadad into his own chariot. That is how he answers the deliverance God has just worked for him.

God had asserted His supremacy in the plains as well as in the hills. For His own name's sake He gave Ahab victory over the Syrians, and so gave Israel another opportunity to return to His worship. Yet there was not even the appearance of thanksgiving to God for His wonderful mercy and deliverance. Instead, he makes an alliance with a man whose aim was to destroy Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same word today

Grant finds the same attitude among Christians today.

Ahab was self-satisfied now that he was in control, so he could afford to be generous. Since Ben-hadad was still alive, he told them, "He is my brother." Sadly, this attitude matches that of many Christians. They think it gracious to act as though even unbelievers were brothers. So they identify themselves with the enemies of the Lord, under the plausible excuse of tolerance. But this is treachery against the Lord.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Life for life

Later a prophet comes to Ahab with a bandage over his eyes. Ahab passes sentence on himself without realising it.

Ahab must pronounce his own judgment, just as David had to when the prophet Nathan came to him. He was blind; the bandage he saw over the prophet's eyes was the bandage over his own eyes, and he did not even know it! Suddenly the word of God sounds in his ears like a violent wind of judgment: "Because you have let go out of your hand the man whom I had devoted to destruction, your life shall be for his life, and your people for his people."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Watched — Ben-hadad's men study Ahab for a sign. They pounce on the one word they need.

- Trapped — their cunning catches Ahab, after God had placed the enemy in his power. His final downfall starts here.

- Brother — to call an idolater "brother" is no generosity. It offends God's holiness, and shows God's thoughts have no hold on Ahab's heart.

- Allied — he gives God no thanks for the victory. He takes the man who meant to destroy Israel into his own chariot and makes a covenant with him.

- Charged — Ahab let go the man God had devoted to destruction. The sentence: his own life for that life, his people for that man's people.

1 Kings 20:34 · Darby

And [Ben-Hadad] said to him, The cities that my father took from thy father I will restore; and thou shalt make streets for thyself in Damascus, as my father made in Samaria. And I [said Ahab] will send thee away with this covenant. So he made a covenant with him, and sent him away.

Ahab has just beaten Syria a second time, and God gave him the win. The defeated Ben-hadad offers cities and trading rights, and Ahab makes a covenant and lets him go — generosity, or betrayal?

"He is my brother"

Ahab calls the beaten enemy his brother. One writer weighs what that word does to God's honour:

Ahab replies: "He is my brother," when God had given him into his hands for destruction. The idolater who had compared the Lord to "the gods of the mountains" is brother to the king of Israel! What an outrage against the glory and the holiness of God there is in this word, "He is my brother"! Ahab has Ben-Hadad come up into his chariot, makes a covenant with him, and sends him away.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The deal that looked like good business

The terms were concrete: cities returned, and trading posts in the enemy's capital. Here is how the deal looked to the king who signed it:

Ahab invited Ben Hadad into his chariot. Ben Hadad told him he would restore the cities his father had taken from Ahab's father. He also said Ahab could set up market places for Israel in Damascus. On this basis they made a treaty. No doubt Ahab felt he had done good work in making Ben Hadad more friendly toward him in an outward way. But Ahab was ignorant of God's thoughts.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Kindness that covers contempt

Letting Ben-hadad go can look big-hearted. One commentator sees a heart where God's honour weighs nothing:

Benhadad is overcome and Israel is delivered from his power. But Ahab has no knowledge at all of the mind of God, and he lets the man whom God had condemned escape. There are cases in which levity only proves that the honour of God and His thoughts have no influence over the heart. It was not for Ahab to be on brotherly terms with a king whose constant aim was the oppression of God's people... But contempt for God makes a man weak when he holds the place of God's servant. That weakness then takes on the character of kindness towards men.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

No word of thanks to God

One writer marks what is missing between the victory and the treaty:

God had asserted His supremacy, in the plains as well as in the hills. For His own name's sake He gave Ahab victory over the Syrians, and so gave Israel another opportunity to return to His worship. Then the wretched, blinded Ahab takes Benhadad to his heart, embraces him, and claims kinship with Israel's foe — God's enemy! Not even the appearance of thanksgiving to God for His wonderful mercy and deliverance. On the contrary, he makes an alliance with one whose purpose was to destroy Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Who a believer may call "brother"

One writer turns Ahab's word into a warning for Christians:

Sadly, this attitude compares with that of many Christians. They consider it gracious to act as though even unbelievers were brothers. In this way they identify themselves with the enemies of the Lord, under the fair-sounding plea of tolerance. But this is treachery against the Lord.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The price of letting him go

God's answer to the treaty comes a few verses later. One writer sets it beside another king who spared a condemned enemy:

"Because you have let go out of your hand a man whom I had devoted to destruction, therefore your life shall be for his life, and your people for his people." ... He made the same fatal mistake that king Saul made when he spared Agag. Calling the enemy of Israel "my brother" and taking him up into his chariot may have sounded well. It looked generous to men like himself, who would praise his conduct as noble. But in God's eyes it was unpardonable disobedience, and he and the nation would be made to suffer for it.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The same writer traces where this led:

From that time God appears to give Ahab up: first to covetousness and murder, and then to war with the nation whose blaspheming king he had called "my brother" and allowed to escape. That nation killed him.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Victory — God handed Ben-hadad over for destruction. The win asserted His supremacy in the plains as well as the hills, and gave Israel another opportunity to return to His worship.

- Word — Ahab answered that gift with two words: "my brother." Commentators call it an outrage against God's holiness. The man was an idolater who had compared the Lord to the gods of the mountains.

- Bargain — cities returned and markets in Damascus looked like good work. Ahab felt he had made an enemy friendly, but he "was ignorant of God's thoughts."

- Weakness — contempt for God can take on the look of kindness toward men. Ahab's lightness proves that God's honour carried no weight in his heart.

- Verdict — "your life shall be for his life." It was the same mistake Saul made with Agag. From here Ahab moves on to covetousness, murder, and death at the hands of the nation he embraced.