1 Kings 2:8–46

1 Kings 2:8 · Darby

And behold, there is with thee Shimei the son of Gera, the Benjaminite of Bahurim, who cursed me with a grievous curse in the day that I went to Mahanaim; but he came down to meet me at the Jordan, and I swore to him by Jehovah saying, I will not put thee to death with the sword.

David is dying. In his last words to Solomon he names a man he had once forgiven — Shimei, who cursed him while he was running for his life. The verse raises a hard question: if David swore not to kill Shimei, why does he hand the case to his son at all?

The man and the moment

Shimei's story runs from an insult to an execution.

Son of Gera, a Benjaminite, of the house of Saul. He cursed David and called him "a worthless man." He threw stones and dust at him while David was hurrying away from Jerusalem during Absalom's rebellion. But he submitted when David returned, and David did not punish him then. When David was dying, he reminded Solomon of Shimei's wickedness, because Shimei had cursed the king the Lord had anointed. Solomon later promised Shimei his life on one condition: that he never leave Jerusalem. Shimei broke the agreement, and he was put to death.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The timing shows the man. He cursed David on the day David looked finished.

When it seemed to Shimei that David was losing to Absalom, then he felt safe in cursing him. But when David regained his authority in Israel, Shimei changed his attitude and came to David to apologise. He apologised out of fear for his own safety. But David accepted it and swore to him by the Lord that he would not kill him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

An oath kept, a case left open

Refusing revenge is not the same as leaving wrong unanswered.

David would not take revenge for his own sake. But later, when he was near death, he charged Solomon to see that Shimei suffered for his wickedness. This was simple righteousness. After David's death, no one could say that David was only seeking revenge. Similarly, God may allow evil men to live today, but future eternal judgment awaits them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Spared, but not declared innocent

Shimei was still in the kingdom and looked reconciled. Yet David's words draw a line between sparing a man and clearing him.

He was then apparently restored, but if David in grace had spared him, he did not hold him innocent. Everything now depended on how he behaved under the king of righteousness. His conduct would show whether his repentance was real.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Two views of David's charge

Commentators differ on how to judge the charge itself. Some defend it as overdue justice.

Critics have attacked David's character because of this charge. However, the charge to Solomon to carry out vengeance on these two men is not a stain on King David. The punishment was well deserved. Joab had killed Abner and Amasa. Shimei had, with great vileness, cursed God's king. Both were wicked men. David's own guilt had no doubt made him neglect the solemn duty that justice demanded.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Others feel the shame of it more sharply — a king passing on to his son what he could not do himself.

David's own sins in the matter of Uriah and Bathsheba had weakened his hands. It has been well said that a crippled hand cannot swing a heavy sword. Besides, had he not used Joab as his tool for the murder of Uriah? As he lay dying, he charged Solomon to deal with Joab and the others he had spared. Still, the whole story is humiliating.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What Solomon's kingdom pictures

One reign gives way to another, and grace gives way to judgment.

Throughout David's reign David tolerated these men and showed them grace. But he charges Solomon to put them to death. They must receive no mercy once David's reign of grace is over. This is solemn, sinner. David's throne, like God's at present, is a "throne of grace."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

When the sentence came, it fell on a man who had broken his own word, not on a man taken by surprise.

Though Shimei did not keep his promise, Solomon would keep his. Solomon also reminded him of the wickedness of his attitude toward David, and that this wickedness would come back on his own head. David had not killed Shimei, so that no one could call it personal revenge. But justice had to be done, even though David was no longer alive. Shimei's case is a warning to us not to speak evil of those in authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Curse. Shimei cursed David at his lowest point. The insult struck the king the Lord had anointed, so it was no private quarrel.

- Grace. David swore not to put him to death, and kept the oath; he would not take vengeance for himself while he sat on the throne.

- Delay. Being spared is not being cleared. Shimei kept his life, but his repentance stayed untested.

- Test. Life under the new king exposed him. He had one condition to keep, he broke it, and repentance born of fear proved empty.

- Judgment. God likewise lets evil men live now under a throne of grace. But the reign of grace ends, and then judgment falls.

1 Kings 2:9 · Darby

And now hold him not guiltless; for thou art a wise man, and thou shalt know what thou oughtest to do to him; but bring his hoar head down to Sheol with blood.

David's last words to Solomon are about Shimei, a man he had spared during his own lifetime. Is this a dying king settling old scores, or something else?

Not private revenge

David refused revenge while he lived. The charge he now gives his son is a different thing.

For his own sake, David would not take revenge. Yet later, near death, he charged Solomon to see that Shimei suffered for his wickedness (1 Kings 2:8-9). This was simple righteousness. After David's death, no one could say David was only seeking revenge. In the same way, God may allow evil men to live today, but eternal judgment awaits them in the future.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the case had waited so long

The delay itself has a cause, and it is not to David's credit. Commentators trace it back to his own history.

David's own sins over Uriah and Bathsheba had weakened his hands. There is truth in the saying, "a crippled hand cannot swing a heavy sword." Besides, had he not used Joab as his tool to murder Uriah? When he lay dying, he told Solomon to deal with Joab and the others he had spared. Still, the whole story is humiliating.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Spared, but never declared innocent

The words "do not hold him guiltless" draw a line. Mercy is not the same as a verdict of innocence.

He seemed to be restored. David had spared him in grace, but he did not hold him innocent. Everything now depended on how he behaved under the king of righteousness. His conduct would show whether his repentance was real.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Grace and righteousness together

David knew what his son's reign would need, even where his own reign had failed.

David, who represents grace, understood what was appropriate to a reign of righteousness. If there were no righteousness, grace itself would be nothing but guilty weakness. As a man, David showed very little ability to give each of these qualities its rightful place... God alone has found, in Christ, the way to bring these two things together: His perfect hatred for sin and His perfect love for the sinner.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Righteousness handled by wisdom

David names the man and the guilt. He leaves the method to Solomon.

Solomon is best known for his wisdom. His father joined righteousness to this divine quality. David charged his son about certain offenders he had spared until then, and said, "You are a wise man. You will know what you ought to do to him … Act therefore according to your wisdom" (1 Kings 2:6-9). Righteousness was to be carried out with divine wisdom, so there would be no mistakes.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Years later the case came back, and it turned on a promise.

Someone reported Shimei's trip to Solomon. Solomon called him in and reminded him of his promise to stay in Jerusalem, and of Solomon's own promise to have him killed if he broke it (vv. 41-42). Shimei did not keep his promise, but Solomon would keep his. Solomon also reminded him how wicked his attitude toward David had been, and that this wickedness would come back on his own head. David had not killed Shimei, so that nothing would look like personal revenge. But justice had to be done, even though David was no longer alive. Shimei's case warns us not to speak evil of those in authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A picture of the coming kingdom

The charge also looks ahead to a greater reign.

This is the first mark of the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth. Nothing escapes the watchfulness of this judgment. We see it in the case of Shimei.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer turns this on the reader:

David tolerated these men all through his reign. He showed them grace. But he charges Solomon to put them to death. Once David's reign of grace is over, they must receive no mercy. This is solemn, sinner. David's throne, like God's at present, is a "throne of grace" (Heb. 4:16). David let his enemies live. Judgment fell on those enemies when Solomon's glorious reign began, and that reign pictures the coming thousand-year reign of Christ. If you refuse God's grace and stay unreconciled, you must face judgment. In grace God lets you live now, as David let his enemies live.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Guilt held. David's grace spared Shimei, but it never called him innocent. Sin left unjudged is still sin.

- Grace tested. His life now hung on how he behaved under the king of righteousness. His conduct would show whether his repentance was real.

- Grace needs righteousness. Without righteousness, grace is only "guilty weakness." David could not hold the two together. In Christ, God does.

- Righteousness needs wisdom. David names the guilt and leaves the method to Solomon. Wise justice makes no mistakes, and no one can call it revenge.

- Grace has an end. David's reign tolerated these men. The throne we come to now is a throne of grace, but the reign that follows lets nothing escape.

1 Kings 2:10 · Darby

And David slept with his fathers, and was buried in the city of David.

David's story closes with one quiet sentence. The king dies, and they bury him in the fortress he once captured. Behind that short line sit large questions. What does "slept with his fathers" claim? Why does the burial place matter? And why did his tomb still matter centuries later?

A reign measured, a life ended

The record is sober. One commentator adds up the years and draws a lesson from them:

2 Samuel 5:4 tells us that David was 30 years old when he began to reign, and reigned 40 years over Israel. So he died at 70 years of age and was buried in Jerusalem. For seven years he reigned in Hebron and for 33 years in Jerusalem. By the time David died, Solomon was already reigning and his kingdom was firmly established. Solomon also reigned for forty years. How short indeed is the span of earthly glory! The last days of Paul in prison were much brighter with rejoicing than the last days of either David or Solomon.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What "slept with his fathers" says — and does not say

The phrase sounds gentle, but it states one thing only: the man died. Scripture uses different words for being buried with one's fathers:

"So Jehoiakim slept with his fathers" only expresses his death. In Scripture that is a different expression from "buried with his fathers." Compare 2 Kings 15:38 with 2 Kings 16:20 and you will see it at once.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Scripture uses the same expression of good and bad kings alike. One commentator warns against reading a quiet death as a verdict on the man:

"Asa slept with his fathers" — the same words that are said of Jeroboam, of Rehoboam, and of so many others. It may be a special favour. … But this favour is far from showing that the Lord took pleasure in them. It does not show either that they had found beyond the tomb the happiness their hearts had sought in vain in the world.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The city he took becomes the place he rests

David rests in the stronghold he took from the Jebusites, the people who held it before him. The names of that place carry meaning:

Zion is the place which illustrates God's sovereignty in grace, as we see from another psalm (Psalm 78:68). It shows that grace at work when man has done all he could to produce utter ruin. … Zion itself means "fixed." Scripture first mentions it (2 Samuel 5:7) when David takes it out of the hand of the Gentile "treader down" — the Jebusite. It becomes then "the city of David," which, we rejoice to remember, means "Beloved."

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Two accounts of the same ending

Another book of Scripture closes David's history on a different note, and that choice fits its purpose:

The last verses of our chapter (1 Chronicles 29:26-30) repeat 1 Kings 2:10-12 in view of at last closing David's history. The Holy Spirit mentions his old age, "full of days, riches, and honour." That fits the purpose of this book. It also stands in contrast with his end, as 2 Samuel 23:1-6 and 1 Kings 1 record it for us.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The grave that never emptied

David's tomb was still a well-known landmark long after his death. That fact settled a question about the words David wrote:

Was David writing of himself? Impossible. He had died and was buried, and his tomb was with them, still holding his dust. Clearly his tomb was then well known. And all were perfectly agreed that he, the first of his dynasty, had not risen from the dead. Yet he wrote of One who would die, and would be raised soon afterwards. For God would not leave that One's soul in Hades (the place of spirits without their bodies), and He would not allow His body to see corruption.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

One writer points to how Paul used David's death when he preached:

He contrasted Christ with the Psalmist. He said, "David indeed, having in his own generation ministered to the will of God, fell asleep and was added to his fathers and saw corruption." But He whom God raised again "saw no corruption" (Acts 13:36-37). This fact is of fundamental importance for us today.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The epitaph worth wanting

The same sentence in Acts sums up David's whole life:

In Acts 13:36 we have a full, unqualified commendation of David's life. No "but" comes in to spoil the picture. … We notice David "served his own generation by the will of God." He could not truly serve his own generation unless he served the will of God.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Slept — the phrase states one fact: the man died. Scripture uses it of faithful and faithless kings alike. It settles nothing about a person's standing before God.

- Buried — he rests in the stronghold he took from the Jebusites. It became the city of David, a name that means "Beloved" — grace stepping in after ruin.

- Remained — his tomb still held his dust centuries later. That fact proved his words pointed past himself to Another.

- Contrast — David's body saw corruption. God raised Christ, and He saw none. Everything for us today rests on that difference.

- Serve — David's epitaph is not his throne or his forty years. It is that he served his own generation by God's will. That part is open to us too.

1 Kings 2:11 · Darby

And the days that David reigned over Israel were forty years he reigned seven years in Hebron, and he reigned thirty-three years in Jerusalem.

One sentence closes the reign of Israel's most famous king. Forty years, split between two capitals. Commentators read it two ways at once: as the record of a man's life, and as a picture of Christ's coming kingdom.

A Life Closed Off

The same figures appear again at the end of 1 Chronicles, but that book closes David's life on a different note.

The last verses of that chapter (1 Chron. 29:26-30) repeat 1 Kings 2:10-12 in order to close David's history at last. The Holy Spirit mentions his old age — "full of days, riches, and honor" — to match the purpose of Chronicles. This stands in contrast with his end, which 2 Samuel 23:1-6 and 1 Kings 1 record for us.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Seven Years In Hebron

The first stretch of the reign covered only part of the nation. Commentators count it as seven years and a half, and they find meaning in the place as much as in the length.

In this first subdivision, then, we find David in possession only of part of a divided kingdom. We trace the growth of his power, despite enemies and hindrances, until the death of Ishbosheth opens his way to the throne of all Israel. During all this time (seven years and a half) his throne is in Hebron. That place holds many cherished memories, linked forever with the faith of his pilgrim forefathers, from Abraham to Jacob. "Communion," with all that it implies, must be the power of a kingdom.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Thirty-Three In Jerusalem

The move to Jerusalem did not end the fighting. Some commentators see the pattern of Christ's kingdom here. They note that David's fighting never stopped, and that peace came only with the son who followed.

David reigned at Hebron for seven years before he reigned at Jerusalem. This period was one of conflict between the house of David and the house of Saul. But even after this, when all the tribes owned him as king, David fought one long series of conflicts with Israel's enemies all around. True, he was successful in these conflicts. His conquests reached far and near, for God was with him and gave him victory over his enemies. But a time of conflict, however successful, is not a time of quiet and rest. Solomon, as his name shows, was the peaceful prince.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Why Forty

The two figures add up to forty, a number that carries weight through Scripture. One writer warns against turning the pattern into a timetable.

David reigned seven years in Hebron, and thirty-three in Jerusalem, together forty years. That number always expresses the sufficiency and completeness of whatever it is used about. And Messiah will rule among His enemies till all of them are put down. But how to divide the era of judgment… is not revealed. God will give understanding to diligent faith. But if you try to line up the events of David's reign with the future course of judgment, you will certainly fall into mistakes.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

How Short The Glory

Put the reign beside David's age, and the whole life looks brief.

2 Samuel 5:4 tells us that David was 30 years old when he began to reign, and reigned 40 years over Israel. So he died at 70 years of age and was buried in Jerusalem… Solomon also reigned for forty years (1 Kings 11:42). How short indeed is the span of earthly glory! Paul's last days in prison were far brighter with joy than the last days of either David or Solomon! (2 Tim. 4:6-8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The length of a life matters less than what it served. Acts looks back on David and commends him with nothing held back.

In Acts 13:36 we have a full, unqualified commendation of David's life. No "but" spoils the picture. Another translation gives a delightful rendering of the verse: "David, indeed, having in his own generation ministered to the will of God, fell asleep."

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The Better Portion

The reign ends and a more splendid one begins. Yet the man who suffered is not the poorer of the two.

There was this difference between David and his son. Together they picture our Lord Jesus Christ in His sufferings and in His glory. Still, we would be very wrong to suppose that David had not a better portion before God than his son had. Faith is better than its own results. If we could have heaven without the pathway of faith on earth, we would never be as blessed as we hope to be.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Forty — the whole reign adds up to the number of sufficiency and completeness. Messiah will rule among His enemies until all are put down.

- Seven — at Hebron David held only part of a divided kingdom, in a place tied to the faith of his fathers. Communion must be the power of a kingdom.

- Thirty-three — all Israel owned him as king, yet his reign stayed one long series of conflicts. Peace waited for Solomon.

- Seventy — David died at seventy, and the span of earthly glory is short. Yet Acts 13:36 commends his life with no "but" in it.

- Better — the throne passed to the son who reigned in glory. Yet faith is better than its own results, and David's portion before God was the better one.

1 Kings 2:12 · Darby

And Solomon sat on the throne of David his father; and his kingdom was established greatly.

David's long reign ends here. His son takes his place, and the throne still carries his father's name. Commentators see more here than a note on history. They read this verse as a summary of the whole reign, and as a picture of a greater King to come.

One reign, without a break

This is not the start of something new and separate. Solomon had already sat on his father's throne before David died. One writer sees the two reigns as a single whole.

The Second Book of Samuel shows David setting up the kingdom of Israel. The opening of First Kings shows us that same kingdom firmly established by Solomon. Note that Solomon's rule forms one continuous whole with David's. The death of the old king did not interrupt it for a moment, because Solomon had sat on his father's throne while David was still alive. As a picture, this is one single, unbroken reign. Its two periods look very different from each other, yet the reign joins them both in a complete and unbreakable unity.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A sentence that describes the whole reign

The verse comes right after David's burial, yet it does not describe day one of the new king. It states what marked the reign from start to finish, and sets it against what came before.

David dies (vv. 10-12). Here the Word does not note the opening of Solomon's reign. It notes what marks that reign in general and as a whole: "his kingdom was firmly established." This is the character of the kingdom of righteousness, in contrast with the kingdom of grace, which was full of trouble and rebellion.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Established by righteous judgment

A king makes his throne secure by dealing with wrongdoing. Solomon wrote that principle down himself. The same chapter that opens with his enthronement then applies it to Joab and others.

We can learn Solomon's own thinking from his Book of Proverbs: "Take away the wicked from the presence of the king, and his throne will be established in righteousness" (Proverbs 25:5). After Solomon carried out judgment on Joab and others, the Holy Spirit says, "the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon" (1 Kings 2:46).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The chapter ends by saying it again. One writer notes the gap of time between the two statements, and sees the same pattern in what is still to come.

So, when the evil had been fully judged, "the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon." Three years passed before Scripture says the kingdom was fully established… In the same way, when Christ takes His kingdom, there will be a short period in which Gog and Magog come down from the far north to attack Israel — a land brought back from war and living in peace. But they will be judged without mercy, so that Christ's kingdom may be established in unchallenged supremacy (Ezekiel 38).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Still called David's throne

Solomon sat on it, but the seat kept his father's name. That detail runs right through Scripture, even though Solomon later built a throne of his own.

It is worth noting that the throne is always called David's throne, not Solomon's or any other king's (1 Kings 2:12; Jeremiah 13:13; Jeremiah 29:16). Solomon made a throne (1 Kings 10:18; 2 Chronicles 9:17-18)… All of this carries symbolic teaching. It will be fulfilled in the One who will sit on the throne of David in power and glory for a thousand years.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The greater Son of David

The promise God made to David reached further than Solomon. Commentators take his enthronement and everything that follows it as an advance sketch.

Solomon and his glorious reign foreshadow the reign of that greater Son of David, our Lord, in whom the covenant promise made to David will be fully accomplished. The section that begins with Solomon's enthronement is full of rich meaning, both as a picture and as prophecy. Solomon's righteous judgments, his wisdom, his reign in peace, and above all the building of the temple, all foreshadow Him who will soon receive the throne and build the temple of the LORD (Zechariah 6:13).

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same phrase, "the throne of David," appears again when Gabriel speaks to Mary. There it does not point back to Solomon's day.

Luke tells us how Gabriel announced the coming of Christ as a Saviour, and then goes on to say: "the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David" (Luke 1:32). In this verse the "throne of David" refers to Christ's thousand-year reign… David's reign foreshadowed the reign of Christ.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Continuous — David's death interrupted nothing. Solomon had already sat on his father's throne, so the two reigns form one whole.

- Characteristic — the verse does not report day one. It sums up the whole reign: a kingdom of righteousness, unlike the reign of grace, which was full of trouble and rebellion.

- Cleared — a throne is established when the wicked are taken away from the king. That is why chapter 2 ends with the same words.

- Christ's — the throne always carries David's name, never Solomon's. It waits for the One who will sit on it in power and glory.

- Coming — Gabriel used the same phrase to Mary. So Solomon's established kingdom is a sketch of a reign still ahead.

1 Kings 2:13 · Darby

And Adonijah the son of Haggith came to Bathsheba the mother of Solomon. And she said, Comest thou peaceably? And he said, Peaceably.

Solomon is secure on the throne, and the first man to test it is the brother whose own bid for the crown had just failed. Adonijah does not go to the king; he goes to the king's mother, who asks at once if he comes in peace.

A pardoned rebel returns

Adonijah had tried to seize the crown, and the king pardoned him. One commentator shows what he did with that pardon.

Adonijah is the first to bring judgment on himself. The king had treated him kindly and had pardoned his offence and rebellion. But now he asks for something that can only suggest a second and subtle try for the kingdom. He sought the one who had been the young companion of the aged king. And he sought it through Bathsheba.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why he avoided the king

Adonijah picks his route with care. He wants someone with influence to carry his case for him. One writer finds the same instinct in a religious habit alive today.

Adonijah was like many religious people today, who choose to pray to Mary the mother of the Lord Jesus, to seek her influence with the Lord. He was too cautious to approach Solomon himself.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Bathsheba's guarded question

Her question is not politeness. She knew what Adonijah's success would have cost her and her son.

Adonijah speaks to Bathsheba, so that she may bring his request to the king, her son. "Do you come peacefully?" asks this godly woman, who has her doubts about the son of Haggith. She knew that if he had succeeded in his plans, she and her "son Solomon should be counted offenders."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Yet her caution did not go far enough.

Adonijah was not a changed man, even though he had submitted to Solomon. After David's death he came to Bathsheba. She was on her guard, wondering if he came in peace, but she was not on her guard enough.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"Peacefully" — outward only

Adonijah answers with one word. Then he starts to talk about the crown that he says should have been his.

This man, though outwardly broken, is still far from broken in his heart. "You know," he says, "that the kingdom was mine, and that all Israel fully expected me to reign." … His words alone reveal an embittered heart. The bitterness was long held down, and now it shows itself, because he had not judged himself in the least.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

His appeal was moving, and Bathsheba missed what lay behind it.

Adonijah, the wicked rebel on probation, visits Bathsheba. … Bathsheba was completely won by Adonijah's moving plea and did not discover the wicked plot hidden beneath his request.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A throne that brings things to light

Adonijah makes his move while the throne is still new. A kingdom of righteousness does not leave what opposes it alone.

The throne is barely set up before hostile elements, foreign to the kingdom, show themselves. But this is the character of the kingdom of righteousness: it reproves everything that is not in harmony with itself. In Solomon's presence the flesh can no longer push itself forward or follow its own bent as it pleases.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Pardoned. Adonijah had rebelled, and the king pardoned him. This visit turns that pardon into the opening move of a second try for the throne.

- Indirect. He goes to the king's mother, not to the king. It is the same instinct that sends people to a go-between instead of to the Lord Himself.

- Guarded. Bathsheba doubted him, and with reason. His success would have left her and Solomon counted as offenders.

- Unjudged. His "Peacefully" was outward only. The words that follow reveal a bitterness long held down, because he had never judged himself.

- Exposed. A kingdom of righteousness reproves whatever does not match it. In the true king's presence the flesh can no longer push itself forward.

1 Kings 2:14 · Darby

And he said, I have something to say to thee. And she said, Speak.

Solomon's throne is new, and his older brother Adonijah has already tried once to seize the crown. Solomon spared his life, and now Adonijah comes to the king's mother with something to ask.

The Man Who Was Living on Borrowed Time

Adonijah had grabbed at the kingdom once and lost. When he begged for his life, Solomon set terms instead of a simple pardon. Those terms stand behind this conversation.

Adonijah begs the king for mercy and tries to get from him a solemn promise to spare his life. Solomon agrees to forget and to be gracious one more time. But he places Adonijah under responsibility before the glory of his reign: "If he shows himself to be a worthy man, not one hair of his will fall to the ground. But if wickedness is found in him, he will die."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

So every word he speaks from here on is on trial.

Peace on the Lips

Bathsheba had reason to be wary. She asked him outright whether he came in peace.

"Do you come in peace?" asks this godly woman, who has her doubts about Adonijah. She knew that if his plans had succeeded, she and her son Solomon would be treated as offenders. This man looks broken on the outside. In his heart he is still far from broken. "You know," he says, "that the kingdom was mine, and that all Israel looked to me to reign." How could such claims fail to stir the anger of the true king?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why He Chose Her and Not the King

Adonijah did not take his request to the king. He took it to the king's mother.

Adonijah was not a changed man, despite having submitted to Solomon. After David's death he came to Bathsheba. She was on her guard, wondering if he came in peace, but she was not on guard enough… He was too cautious to approach Solomon himself. But he told Bathsheba that all Israel had set their expectations on him. This was only pride. How did he know that all Israel favoured him?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Her caution was real, but it was not enough. She gave him leave to speak, and his plan moved forward.

A Plot Under a Kindly Sounding Request

What he wanted was Abishag, the young woman who had cared for David in his last days. Said plainly it sounds harmless. It was not.

He openly admits that the LORD had given the kingdom to his brother. Then he asked Bathsheba to ask her son Solomon to give him Abishag the Shunammite as his wife. Adonijah's moving appeal won Bathsheba over completely. She did not see the wicked plot hidden beneath it… By eastern custom, many people treated a dead king's wife or concubine as a claim to the rights of the king. Abishag was not David's wife in the full sense, yet she must have been counted as belonging to the departed king. If Solomon had granted the request, he would have hopelessly degraded himself in the eyes of the people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Small Petition With a Kingdom Behind It

Bathsheba passed the matter on as a minor favour. Solomon heard what she did not.

It did not look like much on the surface, but Solomon was wise. Solomon detected the unjudged ambition and rebellion in Adonijah's heart. So even though his own mother was the one asking, he judges. She presented what she called a small petition. People often do that when something great lies behind it, though the great thing is not always known. Bathsheba on this occasion was only the instrument of a man who was not seeking something small. He was seeking the greatest place in the kingdom.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The King Who Cannot Be Deceived

Commentators read Solomon as a picture of Christ reigning in glory. Before that king, a will still set against Him cannot hide behind a polite request.

Solomon at first shows mercy to Adonijah. But that man's will was still restless, and he desired the dead king's wife. That will awakens the righteous judgment appointed for those who had failed in integrity and had risen up against God's anointed. It is the first mark of the king reigning in glory. He carries out righteous judgment in the earth. There is no escaping the watchfulness of this judgment.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Spared. Solomon gave Adonijah his life back on one condition: no wickedness must be found in him. His opening words here begin the test he fails.

- Smooth. He says he comes in peace, then claims at once that the kingdom was his. He had submitted on the outside, but not in his heart.

- Sideways. He will not face the king. He works through the king's mother, whose guard was real but not enough, and a moving appeal won her over.

- Small. The request is dressed as a little favour. But asking for Abishag was reaching for the crown. A modest plea can have something great hidden behind it.

- Seen. Solomon read the heart behind the words. He is a picture of Christ reigning. Nothing escapes the watchfulness of that judgment.

1 Kings 2:15 · Darby

And he said, Thou knowest that the kingdom was mine, and all Israel had set their faces on me that I should reign; but the kingdom is turned about and is become my brother's, for it was his from Jehovah.

Adonijah tried to take his brother's throne and failed. Now he comes to Solomon's mother with a favour to ask, and he opens with a claim about the past.

A claim bigger than the facts

Adonijah does not take his case to the king himself. One writer calls his claim pride, and asks how he could know the nation was with him.

He was too cautious to approach Solomon himself. But he told Bathsheba that she knew the kingdom was his and that all Israel had set their expectations on him. This was only pride, for how did he know that all Israel favoured him? Natural thought might have expected the eldest son to succeed his father, but Adonijah knew that the Lord had chosen Solomon as king. Yet he had thought he might defeat the Lord's choice by gathering people after him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the throne was never his by birth

Adonijah's claim rested on being born before Solomon. Scripture shows that birth order does not always settle who inherits.

Among people, being born first usually gives the firstborn rights, but not always. By the natural order of birth Esau had the birthright, yet it passed to Jacob, the younger brother. David had many sons born before Solomon, yet the royal right to follow David on the throne went to Solomon. This is a striking case. Because of it Solomon appears in the family line of the Messiah, traced through Abraham and David (Matthew 1:6), though he was not David's eldest son. It was God's sovereign grace that gave this high honour of "firstborn" to the son of David and Bathsheba. It shows that birth order did not always decide firstborn rights.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Words of submission, an unchanged heart

The verse ends with words that sound like faith. One writer weighs them and hears bitterness, not submission.

This man looks broken on the outside. In his heart he is far from broken. "You know," he says, "that the kingdom was mine, and that all Israel fully expected me to reign." How could claims like these fail to anger the true king? ... His words alone reveal a bitter heart. That bitterness was held down for a long time, and now it shows itself, because he had not judged himself at all. True, he also adds, "However, the kingdom has turned about and become my brother's, for it was his from the LORD." But is this a real recognition of God's will? Is it real submission to the throne of righteousness? Adonijah accepts the change because he cannot do otherwise. To his mind Solomon is an intruder.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Spared, watched, and still on probation

Solomon had already spared Adonijah once and sent him home. That mercy came with a limit.

Solomon knows Adonijah and does not change his judgment when he sees him bowed before him. He knows what that proud heart holds, a heart that only pretends submission and repentance. "Go to your house," he says to him. Brief, severe words. Adonijah should have taken warning from them. From then on his part was to stay quiet, as a man found guilty and kept under watch. He enjoys this patience only as long as no evil appears in him. It will be the same in the future reign of the Messiah. He will spare many rebels who come to Him pretending repentance, but once evil is found in them He will cut them off from the land. When righteousness reigns, there will be no room for the wicked.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"I will be king" — the root sin

Earlier, Adonijah had said it plainly: he meant to be king. One writer traces those words back to the first rebellion of all.

Adonijah knew God's purpose full well. Even so, he "exalted himself, saying, 'I will be king,'" and in his vanity "prepared for himself chariots and horsemen, and fifty men to run before him." As surely as Solomon prefigures Christ, Adonijah prefigures the Antichrist. Note the fatal words, "I will." In Isaiah 14:13-14 we hear Lucifer saying five times, "I will." Here we have the very essence of sin. 1 John 3:4, correctly translated, teaches us that "sin is lawlessness." Lawlessness is self-will.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The same writer points ahead to the day when God deals with pride.

God will know how to bring down all proud claims in the day of His wrath. "The haughtiness of man shall be humbled, and the lofty pride of men shall be brought low, and the LORD alone will be exalted in that day" (Isaiah 2:17). May the Lord keep us all from the Adonijah spirit of pride and self-exaltation!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Claim. Adonijah opens with a boast, not a request. He rests it on birth order and on a following he could not prove.

- Choice. God's sovereign grace gave the throne to a younger son, just as Jacob received what belonged to Esau by birth.

- Confession. He says the change came from the LORD. One writer hears a bitter heart giving in, not a heart bowing.

- Concession. Solomon's mercy had spared him once, and it held only while no fresh evil showed. He treated the pardon as a pause, not a warning.

- Cause. Behind the polite words stands the old "I will be king." That self-will is the very essence of sin, and we should pray to be kept from it.

1 Kings 2:16 · Darby

And now I ask one petition of thee; refuse me not. And she said to him, Speak.

Adonijah had already tried to seize the throne, and failed. Now he comes to Solomon's mother with one request, and asks her to promise before she hears it that she will not refuse. The words sound modest. Two questions follow: what was he asking for, and why through her?

The Man Behind the Request

Adonijah speaks before he asks. Bathsheba doubted him from the start and asked whether he came in peace. He replies that the kingdom was his, and that all Israel had looked to him. One writer finds the man's real heart in that opening line:

This man looks broken on the outside, but his heart is far from broken. "You know," he says, "that the kingdom was mine, and that all Israel set their faces on me, that I should reign." How could such claims fail to stir the indignation of the true king? He — Adonijah — to have all the rights of succession to the crown and to the people of David! His words alone show an embittered heart, a bitterness long held down. It comes out now because he had not judged himself in the least.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

He does add that the kingdom became his brother's, and that it was his from the Lord. But was that real submission? The same writer says no. Adonijah "accepts this because he cannot do otherwise."

Why He Went to Bathsheba

He does not take his request to the king. He takes it to the king's mother, and he secures her promise before revealing what he wants.

He asked Bathsheba to intercede for him, to ask Solomon to allow Adonijah to take Abishag as his wife. He thought Bathsheba's intercession would carry weight with Solomon (vv. 16-17). Bathsheba did not see the dangers in such a suggestion. A sympathetic nature led her more than careful wisdom, and she agreed to plead for him (v. 18).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Grant adds that Bathsheba handled it badly. She should have simply told Solomon what Adonijah had said. Instead she repeated Adonijah's own tactic: she asked her son for one small favour and urged him not to refuse her. Solomon was too quick as well. He promised before he had heard what she wanted.

What He Was Really Asking For

The request comes out in the next verse. He wants Abishag, the young woman who had cared for David in his last days. That ask was far bigger than it sounds.

Adonijah's request was a scheme to take the kingdom. Abiathar and Joab most likely put it together. To many, a deceased king's wife or concubine was, by Eastern custom, as good as a claim to the rights of the king (2 Samuel 12:8; 16:21-22). Now Abishag was not David's wife in the full sense of the word. Even so, she must have counted as belonging to the dead king.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Solomon's reply confirms it. He tells his mother to ask for the kingdom for Adonijah too. Granting the favour, the same writer says, would have "hopelessly degraded" Solomon in the eyes of the people.

Small Words, Large Intent

Adonijah asks for one small thing. The small size is part of the plan.

It did not look like much on the surface, but Solomon was wise. Solomon detected the unjudged ambition and rebellion in Adonijah's heart... Bathsheba, on this occasion, was only the instrument of another man. He was not seeking something small. He wanted the greatest place in the kingdom.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Kelly adds that a small petition "is often done when there is something great behind, though not always known." Bathsheba carried the request. She did not know what she carried. Solomon still judged the matter, even though it was his own mother who brought it.

What Refusal Protected

To grant this "one request" would not have been a kindness. It would have been a legal concession.

Abishag! — that young woman who had served David and cared for him tenderly. She had lived close to the king of grace. And she was to be given to this rebellious man, whom only the patience of Solomon had spared until this moment!... To give Abishag to him would be to admit that he had some right to his father's succession, some contact with the kingdom which he might be able to press at some favourable moment. It would be to accept his claims, and the revolt led by Joab and Abiathar, as legitimate.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Rossier closes with a question: should the woman who served David as a pure virgin be handed over to this godless man? Solomon's answer came fast. He had Adonijah put to death that same day.

Summary

- Heart — His opening claim that the kingdom was his exposes "an embittered heart, a bitterness long held down." He never judged it, so he was never safe.

- Route — He would not face the king. He worked through the king's mother, using her influence because he had none of his own.

- Request — One modest favour was really a claim on the dead king's household. By custom, that meant a claim on the crown.

- Reach — Behind the small words stood "the greatest place in the kingdom." Bathsheba became the tool of an ambition she never saw.

- Result — Granting it would have made the rebellion legal. Solomon refused, and Adonijah died that same day. The throne stood.

1 Kings 2:17 · Darby

And he said, Speak, I pray thee, to Solomon the king -- for he will not refuse thee -- that he give me Abishag the Shunammite as wife.

Adonijah had already tried to seize David's throne. Now he comes to Solomon's mother with what sounds like a small personal favour. Two questions follow. Can a man bow to a king he still resents in his heart? And what does Abishag, the young woman who cared for David in his last days, have to do with the crown?

A Request for a Throne, Not a Wife

Asking for a woman from the dead king's household was never a private matter. It carried a political claim that is easy to miss today.

Later he asked to be given Abishag as his wife, the woman who had shared David's bed. According to Herodotus, eastern countries saw such a request as a claim to the crown. That fits Solomon's words, "Ask for him the kingdom also." It also explains the advice Ahithophel gave Absalom, to go in openly to his father's wives.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Another writer sees a plot behind the words, and names the men likely behind it.

Adonijah's request was a scheme to get the kingdom. Most likely Abiathar and Joab cooked it up... Abishag was not David's wife in the full sense of the word, yet people must have counted her as belonging to the dead king.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Man Who Would Not Go Himself

Adonijah never approaches Solomon. He works through someone he thinks the king cannot refuse.

Adonijah was like many religious people today. They choose to pray to Mary, the mother of the Lord Jesus, to seek her influence with the Lord. He was too cautious to approach Solomon himself. But he told Bathsheba that she knew the kingdom was his and that all Israel had set their expectations on him. This was only pride, for how did he know that all Israel favored him?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One writer asks whether Adonijah's submission to Solomon was ever real.

His words alone reveal a bitter heart. That bitterness was held down for a long time, and now it shows itself, because he had not judged himself at all. True, he also adds, "The kingdom has turned about and become my brother's, for it was his from the LORD." But is this a real recognition of the will of God, a real submission to the throne of righteousness? Adonijah accepts it because he cannot do otherwise. He certainly does not belong to the "willing people" in the day of the power of the son of David. To his mind Solomon is an intruder.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Size of a Small Request

Adonijah calls it one small thing. Bathsheba passes it on the same way.

She presented what she called a small petition. People often do that when something great lies behind, though it is not always known. On this occasion Bathsheba was only the instrument of a man who was not seeking something small. He was seeking the greatest place in the kingdom — and so Abishag is what he asks for.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer faults two others in the scene, not just the schemer.

Bathsheba did not see the danger in such a suggestion. A kind heart, rather than careful wisdom, led her to agree to speak to Solomon for him. She should have simply told Solomon what Adonijah had said. Instead she told him she had only a small request to make, and urged him not to refuse her. But Solomon too was too quick. He promised his mother he would not refuse, before he had heard what she wanted.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Belonged to David

There is a second objection, beyond politics. It has to do with who Abishag was, and who was asking for her.

Abishag! That young girl had served David and cared for him with tenderness. She had lived close to the king of grace. And now she is to be handed over to this rebel, whom only Solomon's patience had spared until this moment!... Should the woman who served David as a pure virgin be handed to this godless man?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Pattern of a Later Claim

One writer reads the story forward, to a far larger attempt on what belongs to the King.

Will the King of Glory ever agree to hand over to another the bride He has chosen for Himself as King of Grace? The Antichrist, the man of sin, may hope to rob Christ of His bride by seizing a Christendom that has turned away from God... But he tries to put himself in Christ's place, to take His bride, and to seize the kingdom. Those efforts will end for the harlot and for himself in the lake of fire and brimstone.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Ask small. He offers it as a small favour, but behind it stands a bid for "the greatest place in the kingdom."

- Ask sideways. Adonijah will not face Solomon. He sends a third party, hoping her influence will win what he dare not ask for himself.

- Ask unchanged. He said the kingdom came to his brother from the Lord. His words to Bathsheba show a man who had never judged himself.

- Granted small, lost large. If Solomon had granted it, he would have handed the rebel a claim to the throne.

- Asked, and answered. Bathsheba's kindness missed the danger. Solomon promised too fast. But his reply, "Ask for him the kingdom also," showed he had seen the real request.

1 Kings 2:18 · Darby

And Bathsheba said, Well, I will speak for thee to the king.

Adonijah has just asked the king's mother to get Abishag for him as his wife. Bathsheba agrees at once. Her short answer raises the questions of the chapter. What was he really asking for? Why did he ask her and not Solomon? And why did so quick a promise end in a death sentence?

What the request was really reaching for

The favour sounded personal and modest, but commentators read it as a move on the crown itself. In that world a dead king's women carried the claim of the throne with them:

Adonijah's request was a scheme to get the kingdom. It was most likely put together by Abiathar and Joab. By the customs of the East, many people counted a dead king's wife or concubine as a claim to the rights of the king (2 Sam. 12:8; 16:21-22). Abishag was not David's wife in the full sense of the word. Still, she must have been counted as belonging to the dead king. If Solomon had granted the request, he would have hopelessly degraded himself in the eyes of the people (2 Sam. 2:7).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer weighs who Abishag was, and what handing her over would have settled for good:

Abishag! — that young woman who had served David and cared for him tenderly — was she to be given to this rebellious man whom only Solomon's patience had spared until now? To give Abishag to him would be to grant him some right to his father's succession. It would give him some contact with the kingdom, which he could claim at a convenient moment. It would be to accept his pretensions, and the revolt led by Joab and Abiathar, as legitimate.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why he went through Bathsheba

Adonijah never brought this to Solomon himself. One commentator sees in that avoidance a habit that has outlived him:

Adonijah was like many religious people today. They choose to pray to Mary the mother of the Lord Jesus, to seek her influence with the Lord. He was too cautious to approach Solomon himself. But he told Bathsheba that she knew the kingdom was his and that all Israel had set their expectations on him. This was only pride, for how did he know that all Israel favoured him?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A small petition with something large behind it

Bathsheba carried the matter in as a little thing. Solomon saw straight through it:

It did not look like much on the surface, but Solomon was wise. Solomon detected the unjudged ambition and rebellion in Adonijah's heart... She presented what she called a small petition. That is often done when there is something great behind it, though the great thing is not always known. On this occasion Bathsheba was only the instrument of one who was not seeking something small. He was seeking the greatest place in the kingdom — and so Abishag is the request.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Bathsheba's "yes"

Her motive was kind. Commentators are not harsh with her, but they do not excuse the lapse either:

Bathsheba did not see the danger in such a suggestion. She agreed to speak to the king for him out of a sympathetic nature rather than careful wisdom (v.18). She ought to have simply reported to Solomon what Adonijah had said. Instead she told him she had only a small petition to make, and urged him not to deny her request (vs.19-20). But Solomon was also too quick. Before he heard her request, he assured his mother that he would not refuse it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The heart the request exposed

Adonijah had been spared once already, on terms. What he says to Bathsheba shows where he still stood:

This man, though outwardly broken, is nevertheless far from broken in his heart... His words alone show an embittered heart, a bitterness long held down and now coming out, because he had not judged himself at all. He does add, "The kingdom has turned about and has become my brother's, for it was his from the LORD." But is that a true recognition of the will of God? Is it a true submission to the throne of righteousness? Adonijah accepts it because he cannot do otherwise.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Solomon had spared him on one condition:

Solomon was not vengeful toward his brother, but he was guarded in the way he answered. If Adonijah proved himself dependable, he would not die. But if wickedness later appeared in him, Solomon would not spare him (v.52).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Small ask, large aim. It looked like a marriage request. Commentators read it as a bid for the throne, most likely drafted by Joab and Abiathar.

- Small ask, avoided king. Adonijah would not face Solomon. He worked through someone he thought easier to reach — the same instinct, one writer says, behind praying to Mary rather than to the Lord.

- Small ask, quick yes. Bathsheba's sympathy ran ahead of her caution. She should have reported Adonijah's words, not backed them.

- Small ask, prior promise. Solomon promised before he heard what he was agreeing to. Both sides of this exchange carry a warning.

- Small ask, whole heart revealed. The request uncovered an unjudged heart. Adonijah had bowed to the throne only because he could not do otherwise. That was the one thing the king had said he would not let pass.

1 Kings 2:19 · Darby

And Bathsheba went to king Solomon, to speak to him for Adonijah. And the king rose up to meet her, and bowed himself to her, and sat down on his throne; and he caused a throne to be set for the king's mother, and she sat on his right hand.

Adonijah has asked the queen mother to carry a request to her son. Solomon receives her with great honour — but the errand she has agreed to run is dangerous.

The seat beside the throne

Solomon does three things before he hears a word of her errand. One commentator sees more in them than family affection.

Beautiful is the reverence which Solomon showed to his mother. He rose from his throne. He bowed to her (the Septuagint, an early Greek translation, reads "he kissed her"). He made her sit at his right hand. How he honoured and loved her! It may foreshadow His love for the believing remnant of Israel, His beloved people, who will share in His coming Kingdom.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why Adonijah chose a go-between

The man behind this visit never comes himself. One commentator sees in that avoidance a pattern still common today.

Adonijah was like many religious people today. They choose to pray to Mary, the mother of the Lord Jesus, to gain her influence with the Lord. He was too cautious to approach Solomon himself. But he told Bathsheba that she knew the kingdom was his and that all Israel had set their expectations on him. This was only pride, for how did he know that all Israel favoured him? Adonijah knew that the Lord had chosen Solomon as king. Yet he thought he might defeat the Lord's choice by gathering people behind him. His words to Bathsheba show that he had not submitted to Solomon in his heart, and so he could not be trusted.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A small request with something large behind it

Bathsheba calls her errand a small petition. She is not the one who shaped it.

She presented what she called a small petition. That is often done when there is something great behind it, though it is not always known. On this occasion Bathsheba was only the instrument of one who was not seeking something small, but the greatest place in the kingdom. So the request is for Abishag.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the request would have granted

Abishag had cared for David in his last days. Handing her to Adonijah would not have been a wedding gift; it would have been a legal foothold.

To give him Abishag would be to grant him some right to his father's succession. It would give him some contact with the kingdom, which he could claim at a convenient moment. It would treat his claims, and the revolt led by Joab and Abiathar, as lawful. Should the woman who served David as a chaste virgin be given to this godless man?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer explains the custom that gave the request its force.

Adonijah's request was a scheme to obtain the kingdom. To many people, taking a dead king's wife or concubine was, by Eastern custom, the same as claiming the king's own rights. Had Solomon granted the request, he would have hopelessly degraded himself in the eyes of the people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Two mistakes in one conversation

The honour of this moment does not make either party careful.

Bathsheba did not see the dangers in such a suggestion. A sympathetic nature, not cautious wisdom, led her to agree to plead for him. She should have reported to Solomon exactly what Adonijah had said. Instead she told him she had only a small petition to make, and urged him not to refuse it. But Solomon too was quick to promise his mother he would not refuse — before he had heard what she wanted.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The King who will not surrender His bride

One writer sees the same struggle on a far larger stage. A rival reaches for the bride and the throne of the rightful king.

It will be the same with the Church. Will the King of Glory ever agree to hand over to another the bride He chose for Himself as King of Grace? The Antichrist, the man of sin, may hope to rob Christ of His bride by seizing a Christendom that has abandoned the faith — Babylon the Great at the end. But his efforts to put himself in Christ's place, to take His bride, and to seize the kingdom will end in the lake of fire and brimstone, for the harlot and for himself alike.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Honour — Solomon rises, bows, and seats his mother at his right hand. One writer sees here a hint of the love the coming King will show His people.

- Access — Adonijah would not come to the king himself. He worked through someone close to him — as people pray through Mary instead of coming straight to the Lord.

- Disguise — A "small petition" can carry the largest ambition. Abishag was not the real object; the throne was.

- Haste — Bathsheba agreed without discerning, and Solomon promised without listening. Sympathy and generosity both need wisdom before they commit.

- Refusal — The King will never yield His bride to another. The rival who reaches for the bride and the kingdom loses both.

1 Kings 2:20 · Darby

Then she said, I desire one small petition of thee; refuse me not. And the king said to her, Ask, my mother, for I will not refuse thee.

Solomon has just risen from his throne, bowed to his mother, and seated her at his right hand. Then Bathsheba asks for one small favour — but she is speaking for Adonijah, a rebel the king has so far spared, and what he really wants is the throne.

Honour Given to the King's Mother

Before Bathsheba names her request, the story pauses on how Solomon receives her:

Beautiful is the reverence which Solomon showed to his mother. He rose from his throne, he bowed himself to her (the Septuagint version reads "he kissed her"), and he made her sit at his right hand. How he honoured and loved her! It may foreshadow the love of Him for the believing remnant of Israel, His beloved people, who will have a share in His coming Kingdom.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"One Small Request"

Bathsheba calls her petition small. Solomon does not take the word at face value:

It did not look like much, but Solomon was wise. Solomon detected the unjudged ambition and rebellion of Adonijah's heart… She presented what she called a small petition. That is often done when there is something great behind it, though not always known, for Bathsheba on this occasion was only the instrument of one who did not seek something small, but the greatest place in the kingdom.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Abishag Meant the Throne

Adonijah had asked for Abishag, and what he asked for reached far past marriage:

Abishag! — that young woman who had served David and had tenderly cared for him, who had lived in the intimacy of the king of grace, to be given to this rebellious man whom only the patience of Solomon had spared until this moment! How little he knew both David and Solomon! To give Abishag to him would be to admit that he had some right to his father's succession, some contact with the kingdom which he might be able to assert at some favourable moment.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer explains the custom behind the request:

Adonijah's request was a scheme to obtain the kingdom. Most likely Abiathar the priest and Joab had planned it. In the customs of that day, taking a dead king's wife or concubine amounted to claiming the rights of the king. Abishag was not David's wife in the full sense of the word, yet she must have been considered as belonging to the departed king. Had Solomon granted the request, he would have hopelessly degraded himself in the eyes of the people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Kindness Without Discernment

Bathsheba is not the schemer here. She is the one being used — and one writer still finds fault with her:

Bathsheba did not discern the dangers of such a suggestion, and was led more by a sympathetic nature than by careful wisdom when she agreed to intercede for him. She ought to have simply reported to Solomon what Adonijah had said, rather than telling him she had only a small petition to make and urging him not to deny her request. But Solomon was also too quick to assure his mother — before hearing her request — that he would not refuse it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Promise Made Too Soon

The promise costs Solomon. He gave his word before he heard the request, and now he must break it:

When she made her request, he flatly refused it, because he recognised that Adonijah still wanted the kingdom. Bathsheba had thought it was a small matter, but Solomon discerned the spirit behind the request, which was a deeply serious matter. He found he could not keep his word to his mother. Instead he decided that Adonijah must die, so that he would be no threat to Solomon's authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Bride the King Will Not Surrender

One writer sees in this refusal a picture that reaches far beyond the palace:

It will be the same with regard to the Church. Will the King of Glory ever consent to yield to another the bride He has chosen for Himself as King of Grace? The Antichrist, the man of sin, may hope to rob Christ of His bride by seizing apostate Christendom, which becomes Babylon the Great at the end. But his efforts to substitute himself for Christ, to take possession of His bride, and to seize the kingdom will end for both the harlot and for himself in the lake of fire and brimstone.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Honour first. The king rises, bows, and seats his mother at his right hand. One writer sees a picture of Christ's love for His people, who will share His coming kingdom.

- "Small" is the trap. A petition called small often has something great behind it. Bathsheba asked for a woman; by the custom of that day, that was a claim on the crown.

- Sympathy is not discernment. A kind heart moved her, not careful wisdom. She should have reported Adonijah's words instead of pressing them as her own.

- Promise after you hear. Solomon gave his word before he heard the request. He could not keep it, and the haste was his, not hers.

- The King keeps His own. Solomon would not give Abishag away, because that meant giving away the kingdom. Christ will never yield the bride He has chosen to another.

1 Kings 2:21 · Darby

And she said, Let Abishag the Shunammite be given to Adonijah thy brother as wife.

Adonijah had already tried to seize the throne. Now he goes to Solomon's mother instead of to Solomon, and Bathsheba carries his wish to the king. The words sound like a family courtesy about a marriage. So why does Solomon hear a bid for the crown, and why does a man die that same day?

A small petition with something large behind it

Bathsheba called her request a little thing. One writer treats that word as the key to the scene.

It did not look much in appearance, but Solomon was wise. Solomon detected the unjudged ambition and rebellion of Adonijah's heart... She presented what she called a small petition. People often do that when something great lies behind, though it is not always known. Bathsheba, on this occasion, was only the instrument of a man who did not seek something small. He sought the greatest place in the kingdom. And so the request is for Abishag.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why asking for Abishag was asking for the throne

Abishag had cared for David in his last days.

By the custom of that part of the world, a dead king's wife or concubine counted for many as much as claiming the rights of the king (2 Sam. 12:8; 16:21-22). Now Abishag was not David's wife in the full sense of the word. Yet people must have regarded her as belonging to the departed king. Had Solomon granted the request, he would have hopelessly degraded himself in the eyes of the people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The historian Herodotus records the same custom. It "agrees with Solomon saying, 'Ask for him the kingdom also,' and explains also the advice given by Ahithophel to Absalom, to go in publicly to his father's wives" (Morrish Bible Dictionary).

Why Adonijah went through the king's mother

Adonijah had submitted to Solomon, yet he would not take the request to him. One writer sees in that a habit still alive today.

Adonijah was not a changed man, even though he had submitted to Solomon... Adonijah was like many religious people today. They choose to pray to Mary the mother of the Lord Jesus, to seek her influence with the Lord. He was too cautious to approach Solomon himself.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where Bathsheba went wrong

Her kindness was real. But she made Adonijah's cause her own instead of simply laying his words before the king.

Bathsheba did not see the dangers in such a suggestion. A sympathetic nature, more than careful wisdom, led her to agree to speak for him. She ought to have simply reported to Solomon what Adonijah had said. Instead she told him she had only a small request to make, and urged him not to refuse it. But Solomon also was too quick to assure his mother, before hearing her request, that he would not refuse it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The woman who belonged to the king of grace

The wrong was not only political. It also touched the king Abishag had served.

Abishag! — that young woman who had served David and cared for him with tenderness, who had lived close to the king of grace. And she was to be given to this rebellious man, whom only Solomon's patience had spared until now! How little he knew both David and Solomon! To give Abishag to him would be to admit that he had some right to his father's succession. It would give him some contact with the kingdom, which he might press at some convenient moment.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A picture of a bride no rival can seize

Some writers read the episode as a shadow of a greater claim that will also fail.

It will be the same with regard to the Church. Will the King of Glory ever consent to hand over to another the bride He has chosen for Himself as King of Grace? The Antichrist, the man of sin, may hope to rob Christ of His bride by seizing apostate Christendom... but his efforts to put himself in Christ's place, to take possession of His bride, and to seize the kingdom will have one end. Both the harlot and he himself will end in the lake of fire and brimstone.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Righteous judgment as the mark of the reigning king

Solomon had already spared Adonijah once. The renewed request brings the death sentence.

Solomon at first shows mercy to Adonijah. But Adonijah's will was still restless, and he wanted the dead king's wife. That awakens the righteous judgment meant for those who had failed in integrity and had risen up against God's anointed. It is the first character attached to the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Small. Bathsheba called it a little thing. That is what makes it dangerous — something great can hide behind a small-sounding request.

- Throne. By the custom of the time, asking for the late king's woman was claiming the late king's rights. Solomon told her to ask for the kingdom too.

- Go-between. Adonijah would not face the king, so he used the king's mother. People still seek influence with the Lord through someone else instead of coming to Him.

- Unjudged. Mercy had spared him once. What killed him was a will that never submitted, still reaching for what belonged to another.

- Judgment. Commentators read Solomon here as a picture of the King reigning in glory. He carries out righteous judgment in the earth, and no rival will ever take His bride.

1 Kings 2:22 · Darby

And king Solomon answered and said to his mother, And why dost thou ask Abishag the Shunammite for Adonijah? ask for him the kingdom also; for he is mine elder brother; even for him, and for Abiathar the priest, and for Joab the son of Zeruiah.

Bathsheba brings Solomon a favour that sounds harmless: let Adonijah marry Abishag, the young woman who cared for David in his last days. The king's reply treats it as a bid for the throne, and names the two men behind it. How could a marriage request carry that weight? Why did it cost Adonijah his life?

A small petition with something large behind it

The request came wrapped in modesty, and Solomon saw through the wrapping.

It did not look like much on the surface, but Solomon was wise. Solomon detected the unjudged ambition and rebellion of Adonijah's heart. So he judges, even though it was his own mother Bathsheba who was involved. She presented what she called a small petition. That is often done when there is something great behind it, though not always known. Bathsheba on this occasion was only the instrument of one who did not seek something small, but the greatest place in the kingdom. And so Abishag is the request.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The older brother and the crown

Solomon calls Adonijah his older brother and names his two backers. The reply points back to an earlier grab at the throne — and to what asking for Abishag meant.

He was apparently the oldest of David's sons at the end of David's life, and may have thought that he would succeed to the throne. But without consulting his father he said, "I will be king," and both Joab and Abiathar helped him. David at once proclaimed Solomon as king. He afterwards asked to have as wife Abishag, with whom David had shared his bed. According to Herodotus (3.68), eastern countries counted this as a claim to the crown. That agrees with Solomon saying, "Ask for him the kingdom also." It also explains the advice Ahithophel gave to Absalom: to sleep with his father's wives in public.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the gift would have handed over

One writer spells out what Solomon would have been giving away with her.

To give Abishag to him would be to grant him some right to his father's succession. It would give him some contact with the kingdom, which he might be able to claim at a convenient moment. It would be to accept his claims and the revolt led by Joab and Abiathar (v. 22) as lawful. Should the woman who had served David as a chaste virgin be given to this godless man?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A heart that agreed with God's choice but never bowed to it

Adonijah had admitted that the kingdom was his brother's by the Lord's decision. His first words to Bathsheba show what that admission was worth.

"You know," he says, "that the kingdom was mine, and that all Israel expected me to reign" (v. 15). How could such claims fail to stir the indignation of the true king?… His words alone show an embittered heart. That bitterness was held down for a long time. It comes out now because he had not judged himself in the least. To be sure, he also adds: "The kingdom has turned about and become my brother's, for it was his from the LORD." But is this a real recognition of the will of God, a real submission to the throne of righteousness? Adonijah accepts it because he cannot do otherwise.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Where the appeal went wrong

Solomon had just promised his mother he would not refuse her, and now he refuses. One writer finds a mistake on both sides.

She ought to have just reported to Solomon what Adonijah had said. Instead she told him she had only a small petition to make, and urged him not to deny her request (vv. 19-20). But Solomon also was too quick to assure his mother, before hearing her request, that he would not refuse it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The king who judges, and the King He pictures

Solomon had already spared Adonijah once. This second move ended that patience.

Solomon at first shows mercy to Adonijah. But Adonijah's will is still restless, and he wants the dead king's wife. This wakes up the righteous judgment meant for those who had failed in integrity and had risen up against God's anointed. It is the first mark attached to the king reigning in glory. He carries out righteous judgment in the earth. There is no escaping the watchfulness of this judgment.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

One writer carries the picture forward from Abishag to Christ and His bride.

It will be the same for the Church. Will the King of Glory ever hand over to another the bride He has chosen for Himself as King of Grace?… Here judgment did not wait: that very same day Adonijah is put to death.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Small ask. Adonijah dressed his request as a minor favour. Solomon saw a reach for "the greatest place in the kingdom."

- Real claim. Asking for the late king's companion was understood as a claim to the crown — hence Solomon's "ask for him the kingdom also."

- Named backers. Abiathar and Joab stood behind the request. Granting it would have made their revolt lawful.

- Unjudged heart. Adonijah's words admitted God's choice. His bitterness showed he had never bowed to it.

- Swift judgment. Mercy had already spared him once. His restless will brought righteous judgment that same day — the mark of the King who reigns in glory.

1 Kings 2:23 · Darby

And king Solomon swore by Jehovah saying, God do so to me, and more also, -- Adonijah has spoken this word against his own life!

Solomon's mother has just asked a small favour for his older brother, Adonijah: a wife. The king answers with an oath sworn in the LORD's name and staked on his own life.

The Request Decoded

Adonijah asked for Abishag, the young woman who had cared for David in his last days. Solomon's reply — ask for him the kingdom too — reflects what such a marriage meant at the time.

When Bathsheba states Adonijah's request, Solomon's sharp insight and wisdom show at once. "And why do you ask Abishag the Shunammite for Adonijah? Ask for him the kingdom also; for he is my elder brother, even for him, and for Abiathar the priest, and for Joab the son of Zeruiah." Adonijah's request was a scheme to get the kingdom. Abiathar and Joab most likely worked it out. To many people, taking a dead king's wife or concubine was, by Eastern custom, the same as claiming the rights of the king.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Small Petition

Adonijah did not come himself. He sent the king's mother, and she called it a small request.

It did not look much on the surface, but Solomon was wise. Solomon detected the unjudged ambition and rebellion of Adonijah's heart, and so he judges, even though it was Bathsheba his mother who was asking. She presented what she called a small petition. That is often done when there is something great behind it, though not always known, for Bathsheba on this occasion was only the instrument of one who was not seeking something small, but the greatest place in the kingdom.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Abishag

Solomon's patience had kept Adonijah alive. Granting this request would have handed him far more than a wife.

Abishag! — that young woman who had served David and cared for him tenderly, who had lived close to the king of grace! And she was to be given to this rebellious man, whom only Solomon's patience had spared until now! How little he knew both David and Solomon! To give Abishag to him would be to admit that he had some right to his father's succession. It would grant him a link with the kingdom that he could press at some convenient moment. It would treat his claims, and the revolt led by Joab and Abiathar, as legitimate.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Writers who read Solomon as a picture of Christ see the same refusal repeated on a larger scale.

It will be the same for the Church. Will the King of Glory ever consent to give up to another the bride He has chosen for Himself as King of Grace? … Here judgment did not have to wait: that very same day Adonijah is put to death.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Mercy With Terms

Solomon's oath is not a sudden change of mood. Adonijah had already been spared once, and the pardon carried a stated condition.

Adonijah begs for the king's mercy and tries to get from him a solemn promise to spare his life. Solomon agrees to forget and to be gracious one more time. But he places Adonijah under responsibility before the glory of his reign: "If he will show himself a worthy man, not one of his hairs shall fall to the earth, but if wickedness is found in him, he shall die."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

That is why the oath falls on Adonijah's own life. The pardon had named wickedness as the line he must not cross, and his own words crossed it.

The Charge of Jealousy

Critics have offered another motive for the death sentence that follows.

Certain critics have suggested that Solomon had a more selfish, sensual reason for putting his elder brother to death. One of them says that if Abishag is the fair Shulamite of the Song of Songs, there can be little doubt that Solomon himself loved her. But there is absolutely no evidence that Abishag is the same as the Shulamite, and Jewish tradition does not support such a theory. It is a mere guess.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Throne and Its King

Commentators see more here than palace politics. Solomon's judgment pictures a greater King.

So we see that Solomon was not the man of blood that David was, and he was not the conquering king of Israel. Even so, he was a type of the Lord Jesus when He goes out as a man of war, which He surely will. He is a type of Him when He executes vengeance on His enemies, when He will bring them before Him and have them slain before Him, as He says in the parable. He is the type of the carrying out of righteous vengeance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Pardon. Adonijah had been spared once. The pardon came with terms: behave well and live, be found in wickedness and die.

- Probation. The terms left him alive but on trial. Only Solomon's patience had spared him so far.

- Petition. The ask looked small and came through the king's mother. A small request can hide a large claim.

- Proof. By the custom of the day, asking for the woman who had served David was a move on the throne. The wickedness named in the pardon had surfaced.

- Penalty. Solomon's oath names what the request had already done. Commentators see a picture of a coming reign where righteousness, not delay, answers rebellion.

1 Kings 2:24 · Darby

And now [as] Jehovah liveth, who has established me, and set me on the throne of David my father, and who has made me a house, as he promised, Adonijah shall be put to death this day.

Solomon had already spared Adonijah's life once. Now his elder brother comes back through the king's mother with what sounds like a small request. Verse 24 is Solomon's answer under oath — and the ground he gives for it is not his own power but what the LORD had done for him.

The Request Behind the Request

Asking for Abishag was not a romantic favour. Adonijah was reaching for the crown again. The custom of that world made his meaning plain.

When Bathsheba states Adonijah's request, Solomon's keen discernment and wisdom are at once clear. Adonijah's request was a scheme to get the kingdom. Most likely it was devised by Abiathar the priest and Joab. To many people, a dead king's wife or concubine was, by Eastern custom, as good as a claim to the rights of the king. Now Abishag was not David's wife in the full sense of the word. Yet people must have regarded her as belonging to the dead king. If Solomon had granted the request, he would have hopelessly degraded himself in the eyes of the people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

An Oath Grounded in What God Did

The strength of Solomon's sentence lies in its opening clause. He does not point to his own power. He names the One who set him on the throne.

"As the LORD lives, who has established me" — notice how simple and how real the sense in the king's mind was that this was the LORD's doing. As long as he held that fast, Solomon was strong as well as wise.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Heart That Never Submitted

Adonijah had spoken as though he accepted God's choice. One writer asks whether that submission was real.

His words alone show an embittered heart, a bitterness long held down and now coming out, because he had not judged himself in the least. To be sure, he also adds, "The kingdom has turned about and become my brother's, for it was his from the LORD." But is this a true recognition of the will of God, a true submission to the throne of righteousness? Adonijah accepts it because he cannot do otherwise. He does not belong to the "willing people" in the day of the power of the son of David. To his mind Solomon is an intruder — and if that is so, what must the LORD who had established Solomon be to him?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Mercy First, Then Righteous Judgment

Mercy came first. Adonijah would not stay under it, and that is what called out the sentence.

Solomon at first shows mercy to Adonijah. But Adonijah's will is still restless, and he wants the dead king's wife. This awakens the righteous judgment meant for those who had failed in integrity and had risen up against God's anointed. It is the first character attached to the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"Today" — Judgment Without Delay

Solomon did not set a date or open an inquiry. He settled the matter the same day Adonijah asked. Commentators see this speed as a picture of something still to come.

It will be the same for the Church. Will the King of Glory ever agree to give up to another the bride He has chosen for Himself as King of Grace? The Antichrist, the man of sin, may hope to rob Christ of His bride by seizing a Christendom that has abandoned the faith, which becomes Babylon the Great at the end. But he tries to put himself in the place of Christ, to take possession of His bride, and to seize the kingdom. His efforts will end for both the harlot and for himself in the lake of fire and brimstone. Here judgment did not have to wait. Adonijah dies that very same day.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Established. Solomon's case rests on what the LORD did. He placed him on David's throne and built him a house, as He promised. While Solomon held that, he was strong and wise.

- Exposed. The throne of righteousness shows what a heart truly is. Adonijah's polite words could not hide the bitterness he had never judged.

- Claimed. Asking for Abishag was a quiet grab at the crown. By the custom of that world, the dead king's woman carried the dead king's rights.

- Executed. Adonijah refused the mercy shown him. The sentence that followed is the first mark of the king reigning in glory: righteous judgment carried out in the earth.

- Foreshadowed. One day another will reach for Christ's kingdom and Christ's bride. The judgment will be just as swift.

1 Kings 2:25 · Darby

And king Solomon sent by the hand of Benaiah the son of Jehoiada; who fell on him, that he died.

Adonijah asked for Abishag, the young woman who had cared for David in his last days. Solomon heard that request as a bid for the crown — so why did asking for a wife cost a man his life?

Why the request was a bid for the crown

One commentator explains the custom that gave the request its force:

When Bathsheba passes on Adonijah's request, Solomon's sharp insight and wisdom show at once. "And why do you ask Abishag the Shunammite for Adonijah? Ask for him the kingdom also, for he is my older brother." Adonijah's request was a scheme to get the kingdom. Abiathar and Joab most likely put it together. By Eastern custom, many people treated a dead king's wife or concubine as the king's own, so asking for her was the same as claiming the rights of the king... Had Solomon granted the request, he would have disgraced himself beyond recovery in the eyes of the people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The size of a petition is no guide to what stands behind it:

It did not look like much, but Solomon was wise. Solomon detected the unjudged ambition and rebellion of Adonijah's heart... She presented what she called a small petition. That is often done when there is something great behind it, though not always known. On this occasion Bathsheba was only the tool of a man who was not after something small. He wanted the greatest place in the kingdom.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A heart that had never bowed

Solomon had spared Adonijah once already. His own words to Bathsheba show what that mercy had not changed:

This man looks broken on the outside, but in his heart he is far from broken. "You know," he says, "that the kingdom was mine, and that all Israel set their faces on me, that I should reign." How could such claims fail to anger the true king?... His words alone show an embittered heart, a bitterness long suppressed and now showing itself, because he had not judged himself in the least.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Solomon had set the terms of that earlier mercy himself, and they came with a condition:

Solomon agrees to forget and to be gracious one more time. But he puts Adonijah under responsibility before the glory of his reign: "If he will show himself a worthy man, not a hair of his shall fall to the earth, but if wickedness is found in him, he shall die."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The king who judges

One writer reads this scene as the first mark of Solomon's reign:

Solomon at first shows mercy to Adonijah. But Adonijah's will is still restless, and he wants the dead king's wife. That awakens the righteous judgment meant for those who had failed in integrity and who had risen up against God's anointed. It is the first character attached to the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth. There is no escaping the watchfulness of this judgment.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What that judgment secured, however, had a limit:

Adonijah's disloyal scheming threatened the throne that David wanted made secure, so Benaiah fell upon him and he died... "And the kingdom was established" — yes, established for a time, but not forever! Just judgment prevailed temporarily.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Self-will and where it ends

Adonijah's rebellion began with two words: "I will." One writer traces where that self-will leads:

As surely as Solomon prefigures Christ, Adonijah prefigures the Antichrist. Note the fatal words, "I will." In Isaiah 14:13-14 we hear Lucifer saying five times, "I will." Here we have the very essence of sin. 1 John 3:4, correctly translated, teaches us that "sin is lawlessness." Lawlessness is self-will... Self-will has been the ruin of the human race, and its full evil has not yet come out.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The hand that carried out the word

The verse names the man who carried out the sentence. He had a long record of following his king:

Benaiah is of special interest to us. In David's time he already held a leading place in service. He had followed his master's footsteps in everything, step by step. Was he not worthy to be made chief captain over the whole army later on? Yet this man has no ambition other than to stay faithful to his king and to copy him. He is not like Joab, who takes the stronghold of Zion to gain the top place. No, he is humble, for his whole purpose is to reproduce David in his conduct.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Ambition. The request for Abishag was a claim on the crown. Solomon's insight saw the kingdom hidden inside a "small petition."

- Unjudged. Solomon pardoned Adonijah, but pardon never broke him — his own words still called the kingdom his.

- Conditional. The earlier mercy came with terms: prove himself worthy and not a hair falls; show wickedness and he dies.

- Righteousness. Righteous judgment is the first mark of the king reigning in glory. Nothing escapes his watchfulness.

- Temporary. The kingdom stood firm — but only for a time, which is why the picture points past Solomon to a greater King.

1 Kings 2:26 · Darby

And the king said to Abiathar the priest, Go to Anathoth, to thine own fields; for thou art worthy of death; but I will not at this time put thee to death, because thou didst bear the ark of Adonai Jehovah before David my father, and because thou hast been afflicted in all wherein my father was afflicted.

Solomon has just taken the throne, and his first acts settle old scores. The man he sends away is the priest who carried the ark and shared David's hardships — so what had Abiathar done, and why does he keep his life?

A reign of righteousness begins

Solomon's judgments open his reign, and they fall on people who had God's patience and did not use it:

So the reign of righteousness begins with judgment. It falls on all those who were placed under the grace and patience of God, but did not use it to bring their hearts and their actions into line with this rule. Abiathar was all the more guilty because he had carried the ark of the Lord before David, and had also shared his afflictions from the beginning (1 Sam. 22:20). He had had a part in the testimony of the Lord's anointed, and had suffered for it. Solomon recognises this. But there was one case where Abiathar's faithfulness was tested, and where the glory of the son of David was at stake. In that case he failed completely and abandoned his master.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The one test he failed

Abiathar had backed Adonijah's grab for the throne. That single choice exposed him:

Abiathar the priest had earlier seemed true to David (2 Sam. 15:24-29). But Adonijah's defection tested him and proved him lacking, so he could no longer be trusted as a faithful priest. Solomon did not put him to death, though he told him he deserved it (v. 26). Instead he banished him from Jerusalem and sent him to Anathoth, his home.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Mercy for past faithfulness

Carrying the ark is what stood between Abiathar and execution. It also makes his part in the plot harder to explain:

Abiathar had carried the ark of God, and this saved him on the day Solomon convicted him. It was very sad that a priest of God should be caught up in a plot to set aside the will of God. God had clearly told David that Solomon was to succeed him as king. If Abiathar had been living close to the king, he would have known the mind of God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The move he made to secure his position destroyed it:

No doubt Abiathar thought that following Adonijah would secure him the priesthood. He was flattered that Adonijah had consulted him. But instead of being confirmed in the priesthood, Solomon thrust him out. Only his earlier faithfulness saved him from death.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A sentence passed generations earlier

Abiathar's removal also closed a case God had opened long before against the house of Eli:

Abiathar followed David in his wanderings, and he stayed in office all through David's reign. But for his part in Adonijah's conspiracy, Solomon banished him to the priests' town of Anathoth, where he most likely died in disgrace. "So Solomon expelled Abiathar from being priest to the LORD, thus fulfilling the word of the LORD that he had spoken concerning the house of Eli in Shiloh" (1 Kings 2:27). He was the fourth high priest from Eli, and the last of the line of Ithamar to hold this office of dignity and honour. God had announced His judgment on the family nearly a century before. It did not come quickly, but it still came exactly as God had said.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The priest now stands under the king

Abiathar's removal also marks a change in where the priest stands:

After the king is brought in, the position of the priesthood changes. It stops being the usual link between the people and God. When God sets Eli aside, He says, "I will raise up for Myself a faithful priest… and he shall go in and out" — not before Me, but "before My anointed forever" (1 Sam. 2:35). Here I have a royal person, another link between God and the people, set above priesthood. So Solomon was quite right in thrusting out Abiathar.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Faithful once is not enough

Abiathar had stayed loyal when Absalom rebelled. That earlier test did not cover the later one:

Abiathar should have known that if it was wrong to follow Absalom, it was also wrong to follow his brother Adonijah. It is not enough for us to be faithful in one crisis: we ought to be faithful in every crisis — yes, at all times and in all things.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Word spoken. God's sentence on Eli's house waited nearly a century. Then it fell just as He said. Delay is not cancellation.

- Test applied. Abiathar looked loyal for a lifetime; Adonijah's plot was the one trial that measured him, and he failed it.

- Grace refused. His guilt was greater, not smaller. He had carried the ark, shared David's sufferings, and had every means of knowing God's mind.

- Mercy given. Past faithfulness did not save his office. It did save his life: he went to his own fields instead of to the sword.

- Order settled. With the king in place, the priest now serves before the anointed one. Righteous rule begins by removing those who will not bend to it.

1 Kings 2:27 · Darby

And Solomon thrust out Abiathar from being priest to Jehovah, to fulfil the word of Jehovah, which he had spoken concerning the house of Eli in Shiloh.

Solomon's first acts as king settle old accounts, and removing Abiathar looks like politics after a failed coup. Yet the verse ties it to something God had said generations earlier about the family of Eli, the priest at Shiloh.

A sentence carried out a century later

God announced His judgment on Eli's house in Samuel's day. It fell in stages, and this verse is the last.

The house of Eli continued its priestly duties through the reigns of Saul and David, until Solomon became king. At Saul's command, Doeg the Edomite killed eighty-five of the Lord's priests. That terrible slaughter was part of the judgment God pronounced on Eli's family (1 Sam. 22). Only one, Abiathar, escaped and fled to David... He was the fourth high priest from Eli, and the last of the line of Ithamar to fill this office of dignity and honour. God had pronounced His judgment on the family almost a century before. It was not carried out quickly, but it was carried out just as God had said.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The sentence waited for a reason to fall

The word came first; the occasion came later. One writer sets Esau beside Abiathar.

Here we find the principle expressed in the words "I loved Jacob, but Esau I hated" (Mal. 1:2-3), spoken thirteen centuries after He had said, "the older shall serve the younger" (Gen. 25:23). It was the Lord's free choice. But He pronounces the sentence only after Esau had shown himself to be the irreconcilable enemy of God and of His people. It is the same with Abiathar. He is cut off from the priesthood one hundred and thirty-five years after the judgment is announced. But first he supplied a reason for that judgment by his alliance with the rebel.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Abiathar did not fall only for an ancestor's fault. He had backed Adonijah's bid for the throne.

Abiathar the priest had seemed true to David before (2 Sam. 15:24-29). But Adonijah's defection tested him and proved him lacking. He could no longer be trusted as a faithful priest. Solomon did not put him to death, though he told him he was worthy of death (v. 26). Instead he banished him from Jerusalem and sent him to Anathoth, his home.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A long loyalty lost at the last test

Abiathar had fled to David when Saul massacred the priests, and stayed with him through every hardship. That record makes the ending heavier, not lighter.

Abiathar was all the more guilty because he had carried the ark of the Lord before David. He had also shared in David's afflictions from the beginning (1 Sam. 22:20). So he had had a part in the testimony of the Lord's anointed and had suffered. Solomon recognises this. But there was one case that tested Abiathar's faithfulness, and it concerned the glory of the son of David. There he fails completely and abandons his master. The word of the Lord, long suspended, is fulfilled: Abiathar is rejected.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Out of the office, not stripped of all honour

Commentators notice that Abiathar still appears beside Zadok in a later list (1 Kings 4:4), and read Solomon's act as narrower than total disgrace.

There is no doubt that Solomon had removed Abiathar from office... It seems that, in view of Abiathar's faithfulness in times past, Solomon did not want to deprive him of the dignity of priesthood, although he had removed him from the office of priesthood.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The priest now stands behind the king

The removal marks a shift in how God deals with His people. The promise to Eli's replacement pointed that way already.

After the king comes in, the position of the priesthood changes. It stops being the usual link between the people and God. When Eli is set aside (1 Sam. 2:35) God says, "I will raise up for myself a faithful priest... and he shall go in and out" — not before Me, but "before my anointed forever." There I have a royal person, another link between God and the people, set up above priesthood. So Solomon was quite right in thrusting out Abiathar.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A preview of a coming reign

Solomon is not only closing the past. One writer sees the future in these opening judgments.

Here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness. In the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Judgment will follow disobedience quickly, as it did with Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The personal edge is obvious. Men of standing were set aside at the very moment the kingdom was established in glory.

...surely they awaken in our consciences the grave importance of seeing that we are true to our Lord Jesus during this time of His personal absence and rejection, so that when He comes we may have His precious commendation — "Well done, good and faithful servant!"

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — God spoke this sentence on Eli's house about a century earlier. Delay was not cancellation. This verse closes it.

- Occasion — the word waited for Abiathar's own act. He sided with Adonijah against the king God had chosen.

- Test — a lifetime beside David ended in failure at the one test that touched the glory of the son of David.

- Shift — with the king on the throne, the priest is no longer the usual link between God and the people.

- Preview — Solomon's opening days show how righteousness will govern when Christ reigns.

1 Kings 2:28 · Darby

And the report came to Joab (for Joab had turned after Adonijah, though he had not turned after Absalom); and Joab fled to the tent of Jehovah, and caught hold of the horns of the altar.

Solomon has executed Adonijah and banished Abiathar, so Joab runs to the tent of the LORD and grips the horns of the altar. Why did this hardened soldier turn religious, and why did the altar do nothing for him when it had spared Adonijah a chapter earlier?

Why Joab Ran

The verse pauses to note that Joab had supported Adonijah but not Absalom. One writer traces the difference back to Joab's own interests.

Joab had not supported Absalom. David was then a strong, active king, and Joab knew that deserting him would not serve his own best interests. But now David was dying, and Joab's natural thoughts drew him to follow Adonijah, David's oldest living son.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer sets Joab's case inside a wider pattern. His earlier loyalty only makes the charge worse.

So the reign of righteousness starts with judgment. It falls on those who had God's grace and patience but never used it to bring their hearts and actions into line with that rule... Scripture says plainly that Joab had not turned after Absalom (v. 28), whatever his feelings in that matter may have been. But turning away from the reign of righteousness at its very start was far more serious. It showed no fear at all before the one destined to sit as glorious king on his throne.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What The Horns Meant

The altar was not a random hiding place. Its horns carried a meaning. That meaning explains why a guilty man would grab them, and why they could still fail him.

The horn is a symbol of strength. So when the blood was sprinkled on the horns, the whole strength of the altar now works for the sinner instead of against him. And that strength is displayed in full. The horns of the altar became a place of refuge, a sanctuary no one could violate. They sheltered everyone who had a right to their protection on the ground of the sprinkled blood. Joab sought this protection when he fled from Solomon (1 Kings 2:28). But he had no claim on it, for he was a murderer, and so he was killed.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Law Already Ruled On Him

Solomon was not improvising. The law already covered this exact case, and it named the altar.

Joab flees to the tabernacle and takes hold of the horns of the altar. That cannot save him. The Word of God is against him: "But if a man willfully attacks another to kill him by cunning, you shall take him from my altar, that he may die" (Ex. 21:14). Solomon remembers this. Once Solomon has settled the judgment, it is too late for the altar to shelter him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Fear, Not Faith

Adonijah had made the same move and lived. Joab made it and died. One writer puts the difference in the man, not in the altar.

We also read of Adonijah, who for fear of judgment went and caught hold of the horns of the altar (1 Kings 1:50) and was spared at the time. Later Joab attempted the same thing, but having proved himself treacherous, he was killed. For it was not faith that moved him, but fear.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

One writer turns the scene toward the reader.

This is like the sinner who, in desperation, would gladly claim the benefits of the death of Christ to escape the judgment. Yet his heart is still far from Him. But wherever there is trust in the value of the sacrifice offered to God on the altar, no power on earth or in hell can touch that soul. It rests under the shelter and protection of that sacrifice.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why The Throne Needed This

This was not just tidying up old scores. The blood Joab had spilled stood in the way of Solomon's reign.

Solomon's kingdom could not be established until the innocent blood of Abner and Amasa was avenged on Joab. Joab had shed that blood without David's knowledge (vv. 32-33)... His execution pictures how the coming thousand-year kingdom of the Lord Jesus will be established: in righteousness, which brings peace.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Was Missing At That Altar

One writer points to the timing. Joab grabbed an altar at a moment when what he needed most did not yet exist.

Joab fled to the tabernacle of the Lord and caught hold of the horns of the altar. But there was no perfect sacrifice then, and no risen and glorified Saviour on the throne of God. So "Benaiah the son of Jehoiada went up, and fell upon him, and killed him."... And the kingdom was established — yes, established for a time, but not forever! Just judgment prevailed temporarily.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Grip — Joab grabbed the horns of the altar, Israel's place of refuge, and it did not save him.

- Claim — The horns sheltered only those covered by the sprinkled blood. Joab was a murderer, so he had no claim on them.

- Command — The law had already said a man who kills by cunning is to be taken from the altar and put to death.

- Motive — Fear drove him to the altar, not faith. Only trust in the sacrifice shelters a soul, and then no power on earth or in hell can touch it.

- Contrast — He reached for an altar when there was as yet "no perfect sacrifice... and no risen and glorified Saviour upon the throne of God."

1 Kings 2:29 · Darby

And it was told king Solomon that Joab had fled to the tent of Jehovah; and behold, he is by the altar. And Solomon sent Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, saying, Go, fall on him.

The report reaching Solomon is short and strange: Joab is at God's altar, holding on to it. The king's reply is shorter still, and it raises the hardest question here: why does the place of mercy give this man no mercy?

The report and the order

One writer traces the scene from Joab's fear to the moment Benaiah acts:

When news came to Joab of Adonijah's execution and of Abiathar's banishment, Joab knew he could not escape punishment, since he had sided with Adonijah. He went to the tabernacle and took hold of the horns of the altar as Adonijah had done at first. This was the desperate act of a man clinging to religious ritual, but having no knowledge of God. Solomon sent Benaiah to execute Joab. Benaiah was reluctant to do this while Joab was clinging to the horns of the altar. But at Solomon's word, since Joab would not leave the altar, Benaiah carried out this unpleasant task.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Joab brought with him

He came empty. That is the difference between his grip on the altar and true refuge:

He thought he had reached a safe place of refuge. But he did not come with sacrifice and blood. So the altar was against him, and he died.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The same act, two different outcomes

Adonijah had grabbed those same horns and lived. So the altar was not powerless. God's law had already ruled Joab's case out:

Adonijah found refuge at the horns of the altar. His act seems to say, "instead of a substitute, I present myself." In his case that unconditional surrender was accepted, and he was pardoned. Joab did the same, and it was not accepted. He had deliberately killed two men by cunning, and God had appointed that such a man should be allowed no mercy: "you shall take him from my altar that he may die." So he was put to death.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

What the horns were for

In the sacrifices, blood went on those horns. That blood changed the altar's strength from being against a guilty person to being for him:

The horn is a symbol of strength. The strength of the altar had been against the sinner. When the blood was sprinkled on the horns, that whole strength, displayed in all its completeness, now works for him. So the horns of the altar became a place of refuge, a sanctuary no one could violate. They sheltered everyone who had a right to their protection on the ground of the sprinkled blood. Joab sought this protection when he fled from Solomon; but since he had no claim on it, for he was a murderer, he was slain. This is like the sinner in desperation. He would gladly claim the benefits of the death of Christ to escape the judgment, while his heart is still far from Him. But where there is trust in the value of the sacrifice offered to God on the altar, the soul rests under its shelter and protection. No power on earth or in hell can touch it.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Joab seen for what he was

Joab had kept his place for years by being careful. That caution now fails him:

In this situation Joab, long held back by caution during David's lifetime, shows himself as he is. But in the end man's caution fails before the judgment of God. God arranges events in such a way that, sooner or later, the most careful men are shown in their true light.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the sentence had to fall

Solomon's order is not revenge. It clears a throne:

Joab flees to the tabernacle and takes hold of the horns of the altar. That cannot save him. The Word of God is against him... When Joab's judgment is settled it is too late for the altar to shelter him. The sentence must fall on him, so that "for David and for his descendants and for his house and for his throne there shall be peace from the LORD forevermore." Without it, blood would have remained on the house of David. Judgment was necessary for his glory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Kelly looks past Solomon to the King he pictures:

Solomon was not the man of blood that David was, and he was not the conquering king of Israel. Yet he was a picture of the Lord Jesus when He goes out as a man of war, which He surely will, and when He carries out vengeance on His adversaries... indeed, the reality is much greater than the picture.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood first. Blood from the sacrifice on the horns was what made the altar a shelter. Joab came with other men's blood on his hands and none of the sacrifice.

- Fear is not faith. He clung to the altar as religious ritual, without knowing God — a grip of terror, not trust.

- Two men, one altar. Adonijah surrendered there and was pardoned. Joab was not, because God had already ruled that a man who kills by cunning must be taken from the altar and put to death.

- Nothing stays hidden. Caution kept Joab in place for years under David. God arranged events to show him as he was.

- Peace costs judgment. The sentence was not spite. Unavenged blood would have clung to David's house. Only judgment left that throne in lasting peace — a small picture of a far greater King still to act.

1 Kings 2:30 · Darby

And Benaiah came to the tent of Jehovah and said to him, Thus saith the king Come forth. And he said, No; for I will die here. And Benaiah brought the king word again, saying, Thus said Joab, and thus he answered me.

Joab has run from Solomon's judgment to the tent of the LORD and taken hold of the altar. The king's officer arrives with a one-word order, and Joab will not move. His refusal raises the question: can the place of sacrifice shield a man from crimes he never dealt with?

A hold that could not save

Joab would rather die at the altar than leave it. One writer points to the command Solomon had in view:

Joab flees to the tent and takes hold of the horns of the altar. That cannot save him. The Word of God is against him: "But if a man willfully attacks another to kill him by cunning, you shall take him from my altar, that he may die" (Ex. 21:14). Solomon remembers this. Once Joab's judgment is settled, it is too late for the altar to shelter him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Religion without a sacrifice

Joab comes to the altar empty-handed. He grips the horns, but brings nothing that the altar is for. So the place he clutches stands against him:

Joab feared what would happen after his treachery to King Solomon. He fled to the tent of the LORD and "caught hold of the horns of the altar" (1 Kings 2:28). He thought he had reached a safe refuge. But he did not come with sacrifice and blood. The altar was against him, and he died.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Another writer traces both Joab's grip on the altar and the officer's pause before striking there:

This was the desperate act of a man clinging to religious ritual, but having no knowledge of God. Solomon sent Benaiah to execute Joab. Benaiah was hesitant to do this while Joab was clinging to the horns of the altar. But at Solomon's word, since Joab would not leave the altar, Benaiah carried out this unpleasant task.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why Adonijah lived and Joab died

Adonijah had held the same horns and walked away alive. One writer reads the act as a surrender, and shows why it did not save Joab:

Adonijah found refuge at the horns of the altar (1 Kings 1:50). The act seems to mean, "instead of a substitute, I present myself." His unconditional surrender was accepted, and he was pardoned. Joab did the same (1 Kings 2:28), but his surrender was not accepted. He had deliberately killed two men by cunning. God had ruled in Ex. 21:14 that such a man should be shown no mercy: "you shall take him from my altar, that he may die." So he was put to death.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

Long delayed, not forgotten

The murders behind Solomon's order were years old. One summary of Joab's life notes where the account came due:

Joab refused to leave the altar when he was summoned, so he was put to death there. The punishment for his murders was long delayed, but it fell on him now in righteous judgement.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Blood answered so the throne could stand

The execution was not private revenge. Joab's guilt stood in the way of the new reign:

Solomon's kingdom could not be established unless the innocent blood of Abner and Amasa was avenged on Joab — blood Joab had shed without David's knowledge (vv. 32-33)... Joab's execution is a picture of the millennial kingdom of the Lord Jesus: it will be established in righteousness, and righteousness brings peace.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The refuge that does hold

The altar itself was not powerless. Its horns were a real sanctuary — for the right people, on the right ground:

The horns of the altar became a place of refuge. It was a sanctuary no one could break, for all who were rightly under its protection on the ground of the sprinkled blood. Joab sought this protection when he fled from Solomon (1 Kings 2:28). He had no claim on it, for he was a murderer, so he was killed. This is like the sinner who, when pressed hard, would gladly claim the benefits of the death of Christ to escape the judgment. Yet his heart is still far from Him. But where there is trust in the value of the sacrifice offered to God on the altar, no power on earth or in hell can touch that soul. It rests under the altar's shelter and protection.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Refuge. The horns of the altar were a real sanctuary for anyone sheltering there on the ground of sprinkled blood.

- Claim. Joab had none. He came with fear instead of faith, and with no sacrifice. So the altar he gripped stood against him.

- Contrast. Adonijah held the same horns and was pardoned. Joab held them and died, because God's written word gave no mercy to a man who kills by cunning.

- Delay. Abner's and Amasa's blood was years old and unavenged. Long postponement is not cancellation; the account came due at the altar.

- Result. Solomon had to answer that blood before David's throne could rest in peace — a picture of a kingdom built on righteousness, and righteousness brings peace.

1 Kings 2:31 · Darby

And the king said to him, Do as he has said, and fall upon him, and bury him; and take away the innocent blood, which Joab shed, from me and from the house of my father.

Solomon tells Benaiah to strike Joab down at the altar he is clinging to, and to bury him. That death also settles an older account: blood Joab had shed without cause. Two questions follow. Why does the altar not protect Joab? And why must a king remove blood-guilt before his reign can stand?

Blood shed without cause

The words "without cause" reach back years, to a murder David refused to own. One writer shows how David took no part in Joab's killing of Abner and called down God's judgment on him.

How David recovers the precious features of his character in these difficult circumstances! Refusing any share in this evil, he proves himself "innocent in the matter" (2 Cor. 7:11). He calls God's judgment down on Joab: "May it [the blood of Abner the son of Ner] fall upon the head of Joab and upon all his father's house" (v. 29). And again: "The LORD repay the evildoer according to his wickedness!" (v. 39). Later this judgment of God, spoken by David, comes to pass (1 Kings 2:31-34).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What David asked of God, Solomon now carries out. The blood was Joab's, but the stain lay on the royal house.

The altar was no shelter

Joab had run to the tabernacle and grabbed the horns of the altar. The horns stood for the altar's strength, and a guilty man could lay hold of them — but not every guilty man. One writer sets Joab beside Adonijah, who took hold of the same altar and lived.

Adonijah sought safety there and found it (1 Kings 1:50). Joab, at the same refuge, met the just repayment of his sins (1 Kings 2:28-34). The reason is this: "if a man willfully attacks another to kill him by cunning, you shall take him from my altar, that he may die" (Ex. 21:14).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Solomon's command in verse 31 is not a king overriding the sanctuary. It is a king obeying a written law that had already named this exact case.

Holding the altar without knowing God

Joab's grasp on the horns looked like faith. One writer names it for what it was.

This was the desperate act of a man clinging to religious ritual, but having no knowledge of God. Solomon sent Benaiah to execute Joab. Benaiah was hesitant to do it while Joab clung to the horns of the altar. But at Solomon's word, since Joab would not leave the altar, Benaiah carried out this unpleasant task.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Judgment clears the house

Verse 31 gives a reason for the execution: to take the guilt away from Solomon and from his father's house. The removal was not optional if the promise of verse 33 was to stand.

Joab flees to the tabernacle and takes hold of the horns of the altar. That cannot save him... When Joab's judgment is settled, it is too late for the altar to shelter him. Vengeance must be carried out so that "for David and for his descendants and for his house and for his throne there shall be peace from the LORD forevermore" (v. 33). Without that vengeance, blood would have stayed on the house of David. Judgment was necessary for his glory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A throne established in righteousness

Solomon later wrote as a proverb what he did here with a sword.

Solomon's own thinking can be learned from his Book of Proverbs. "A king who sits on the throne of judgment winnows all evil with his eyes" (Prov. 20:8). "Take away the wicked from the presence of the king, and his throne will be established in righteousness" (Prov. 25:5). When Solomon had carried out judgment on Joab and others, the Holy Spirit says, "So the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon" (1 Kings 2:46).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

This kind of judgment points past Solomon to another king.

Righteous judgment carried out on the earth is the first character attached to the king reigning in glory. There is no escaping the vigilance of this judgment.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The altar and the sinner

One writer applies the same altar to the sinner.

The horns of the altar became a place of refuge. They were a sanctuary no one could violate, for all who had a right to that protection on the ground of the sprinkled blood. Joab sought this protection when he fled from Solomon (1 Kings 2:28). But he had no claim on it, for he was a murderer, and so he was killed. This is like the sinner who is desperate and would gladly claim the benefits of the death of Christ to escape the judgment. Yet his heart is still far from Him. But where there is trust in the value of the sacrifice offered to God on the altar, no power on earth or in hell can touch the soul sheltered there.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood. Joab killed Abner "without cause." The guilt rested on David's house, not only on Joab's, until Solomon dealt with it.

- Altar. The horns were a real refuge. But Scripture had already ruled out the deliberate killer: take him from the altar to die.

- Grasp. Joab clung to the ritual without knowing God. Touching the altar is not the same as trusting the sacrifice.

- Peace. The judgment was the means, not the end. First the blood-guilt went, then God promised lasting peace to David's throne.

- Throne. With the wicked taken away, "the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon." Writers see in that righteous judgment a picture of the king who will reign in glory.

1 Kings 2:32 · Darby

And Jehovah shall requite the blood which he shed upon his own head, because he fell upon two men more righteous and better than he, and slew them with the sword, without my father David's knowledge Abner the son of Ner, captain of the host of Israel, and Amasa the son of Jether, captain of the host of Judah.

Solomon has just sent Benaiah to kill Joab at the altar for murdering two commanders, Abner and Amasa. Why did that blood go unavenged for so long, and why did the altar not shelter Joab?

The two men named

These two men did not die in battle. Each murder had its own motive.

Joab was David's nephew (1 Chronicles 2:18) and commander of his forces. He showed great courage in war, but he was vengeful, and all through he seems never to have shared the king's mind. He treacherously assassinated Abner to avenge his brother Asahel, whom Abner had killed in self-defence (2 Sam. 2:23). He also killed Amasa, whom David had promoted to be commander-in-chief, out of jealousy at having a rival (2 Sam. 20:10). These, as Solomon says, were better men and more righteous than he. These killings, and his killing of Absalom with his own hand against the king's express command, brought David great sorrow.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

Without David's knowledge

Solomon is careful to say the killings happened behind his father's back. David's own reaction at the time bears that out.

How the precious features of David's character return in these hard circumstances! Refusing any part in this evil, he proves that he was "innocent in the matter" (2 Cor. 7:11). He calls down God's judgment on Joab, asking that Abner's blood fall on him: "May it fall upon the head of Joab and upon all his father's house" (2 Sam. 3:29). And again: "The LORD repay the evildoer according to his wickedness!" (2 Sam. 3:39). Later this judgment of God, spoken by David, is carried out (1 Kings 2:31-34).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the account stayed open

David knew what Joab had done. So why did Joab live on, unpunished, for years?

In the matter of righteousness David failed badly. He allowed Joab to murder both Abner and Amasa and go unpunished. David's own sons Amnon and Absalom were guilty of terrible sins, and they also went unpunished. About Joab, David said, "these men the sons of Zeruiah are more severe than I." He even said, "I was gentle today, though anointed king" (2 Sam. 3:39). Pitiful words from a man who had so often known God's sustaining power and grace. But Joab was a capable military commander, and so useful to the state. This is by no means the only time the sins of public men have been excused. But it is not righteousness.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

(Fereday quoted an older translation reading "too hard for me" and "I am this day weak, though anointed king.")

What Joab was really serving

Joab spent a lifetime looking like David's man. Was he serving the king, or himself?

Perhaps this bloody man thought he was serving his king the whole time he was serving his own interests. Impossible! What a man does for his own interest, he does against God. In a time of peace Joab's belt and sandals — his service and his walk — had been stained with the blood of war. This was defilement. War must overtake him in turn. He must learn there could be no peace for him. Peace is kept for those who make peace (James 3:18). Solomon's reign was a reign of peace and righteousness, and it could not tolerate such men.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The altar was no shelter

Joab's last move was to grab the horns of the altar. The law had already ruled out that escape.

Joab flees to the tabernacle and takes hold of the horns of the altar. That cannot save him. The Word of God is against him: "But if a man willfully attacks another to kill him by cunning, you shall take him from my altar, that he may die" (Ex. 21:14). Solomon remembers this. Once Solomon has determined the judgment, it is too late for the altar to shelter him. Vengeance had to fall on Joab, so that "for David and for his descendants and for his house and for his throne there shall be peace from the LORD forevermore" (v. 33). Without it, blood would have stayed on the house of David. Judgment was necessary for his glory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Righteousness first, then peace

Joab's death closes more than an old account. It sets the pattern for how a kingdom of peace begins.

To establish Solomon's kingdom, the innocent blood of Abner and Amasa had to be avenged on Joab. Joab had shed that blood without David's knowledge (vs. 32-33). Joab had stood by David until he went over to Adonijah. That defection showed his true motive. It was not love for David but his own advantage. His motives in killing Abner and Amasa were selfish too. Joab's execution pictures how the millennial kingdom of the Lord Jesus will be established: in righteousness, which brings peace.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood shed. Joab killed Abner out of revenge and Amasa out of jealousy. The verse calls both men better and more righteous than he was.

- Blood hidden. It was done without David's knowledge; David refused any part in it and asked God to lay it on Joab's head.

- Blood unpunished. David let it stand for years. Joab was useful, and David was weak. Commentators name it for what it is: not righteousness.

- Blood returned. The altar could not shelter a deliberate murderer; the law said to take such a man from the altar and put him to death.

- Blood cleared. Solomon settles the debt, the throne is clean, and God promises peace to David's house forever. Righteousness comes first, then peace.

1 Kings 2:33 · Darby

And their blood shall be requited upon the head of Joab, and upon the head of his seed for ever; but upon David, and upon his seed, and upon his house, and upon his throne, shall there be peace for ever from Jehovah.

Solomon's last word about Joab points two ways at once: blood lands forever on one house, peace rests forever on another. Why should the death of one old soldier settle anything, and why must a kingdom of peace begin with it?

Blood Comes Back to Its Owner

Joab killed Abner and Amasa years before this, and for years nothing happened to him. One writer looks at what Joab thought of himself, and at what God did not forget.

He thought that he had served his lord, the king, faithfully; in fact, he had always sought his own advancement. God did not forget his crimes. The blood he shed came back on his head and on his descendants.

Modernised from Alfred GuignardOriginal wording

Why David's House Needed This Death

The second half of the verse explains the first. The blood had to come off David's house before that house could have peace, and the verse traces that peace to the LORD.

Vengeance must be carried out on him so that "for David and for his descendants and for his house and for his throne there shall be peace from the LORD forevermore" (v. 33). Without that vengeance, blood would have stayed on the house of David. Judgment was needed for his glory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Altar Was No Cover

Joab died holding the horns of the altar. One writer explains who the altar was built to shelter, and why Joab had no claim on it.

The horns of the altar became a place of refuge. They were a sanctuary no one could touch, for all who had a right to their protection on the ground of the sprinkled blood. Joab sought this protection when he fled from Solomon (1 Kings 2:28); but since he had no claim on it, for he was a murderer, he was killed. This is like the sinner in desperation. He would gladly claim the benefits of the death of Christ to escape judgment, while his heart is still far from Him. But wherever there is trust in the value of the sacrifice offered to God on the altar, that soul is safe. No power on earth or in hell can touch it as it rests under that shelter and protection.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Peace for David, None for Joab

The verse gives peace to David's house and none to Joab. One writer traces that back to what Joab did in peacetime.

In time of peace Joab's "belt and sandals," his service and his walk, had been stained with the blood of war. This was a defilement. War must overtake him in turn. He must learn that there could be no peace for him, because peace is kept for those who make peace (James 3:18). Neither Solomon's reign of peace nor his reign of righteousness could tolerate such elements.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Note: the ESV of 1 Kings 2:5 speaks of "the belt around his waist" and "the sandals on his feet." Older translations read "girdle and shoes."

Righteousness First, Then the Kingdom Stands

Judgment came first, and the kingdom stood after it. One writer also reads the scene forward, to a greater reign.

For Solomon's kingdom to be established, the innocent blood of Abner and Amasa had to be avenged on Joab. Joab had shed that blood without David's knowledge (vs. 32-33)… Joab's execution pictures how the millennial kingdom of the Lord Jesus will be established in righteousness, which brings peace.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer links the same lesson to Solomon's own proverbs about a king's throne.

We can learn Solomon's views from his book of Proverbs: "A king who sits on the throne of judgment winnows all evil with his eyes" (Prov. 20:8). "Take away the wicked from the presence of the king, and his throne will be established in righteousness" (Prov. 25:5). Solomon carried out judgment on Joab and others. Then the Holy Spirit says, "So the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon" (1 Kings 2:46).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood — Joab shed the blood of Abner and Amasa in peacetime. That blood came back on his own head and on his descendants.

- Delay — years without punishment were not a pardon. God did not forget, and the sentence landed under the new king.

- Altar — the altar sheltered those who came on the ground of the sacrifice. It gave a murderer nothing. It is still unbreakable shelter for anyone who truly trusts that sacrifice.

- Peace — Joab could have no peace, because peace is kept for those who make peace. It rests instead on David, his descendants, his house and his throne, and it comes "from the LORD."

- Throne — righteousness clears the ground first, and then the kingdom stands. Commentators see the same pattern completed in the reign of Christ, where righteousness brings lasting peace.

1 Kings 2:34 · Darby

And Benaiah the son of Jehoiada went up and fell upon him, and put him to death; and he was buried in his own house in the wilderness.

Joab had led David's armies for a lifetime, yet he died at the altar he had grabbed for safety, and was buried in his own house out in the wilderness. The verse raises two hard questions. Why did holding the altar not save him? And why did Solomon's peaceful reign begin with a sword?

Judgment Delayed, Not Cancelled

Joab had murdered men years before this. Nothing happened at the time — and that silence was not acquittal.

When Joab heard that Adonijah's cause had failed, he saw his danger, fled to the tabernacle, and caught hold of the horns of the altar. He refused to leave when they summoned him, so they put him to death at the altar. So punishment for the murders he had committed, though long delayed, now fell on him in righteous judgment.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

His career looked like loyal service. God and David valued it differently:

For many long years he led David's armies. He was honoured among the people of God and victorious over their enemies. But all this activity was without value, either in the eyes of God or of David. He was not given a place among David's mighty men, an honour that was given to his armour-bearer. In the end he received his due under the government of God, and perished miserably by the sword in the very house of God where he thought he had found a refuge. He thought he had served his lord the king faithfully; in fact, he had always sought his own advancement.

Modernised from Alfred GuignardOriginal wording

Why The Altar Gave No Shelter

The altar did not fail him. God's law had already ruled out shelter for a man like him.

Joab flees to the tabernacle and takes hold of the horns of the altar. That cannot save him. The Word of God is against him: "But if a man willfully attacks another to kill him by cunning, you shall take him from my altar, that he may die." Solomon remembers this. Once Joab's judgment is settled, it is too late for the altar to shelter him. Vengeance had to be carried out on him. Only then could it be true that "for David and for his descendants and for his house and for his throne there shall be peace from the LORD forevermore." Without that vengeance, blood would have stayed on the house of David. Judgment was necessary for his glory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The altar really was a refuge — but only for those with a right to it:

The horn is a symbol of strength. When the blood was sprinkled on the horns, the whole strength of the altar, once against the sinner, is now used on his behalf. So the horns of the altar became a place of refuge, a sanctuary no one could violate, for all who were rightfully under their protection on the ground of the sprinkled blood. Joab sought this protection when he fled from Solomon; but since he had no claim on it, for he was a murderer, he was slain. This is like the sinner who is desperate to escape the judgment. He would gladly claim the benefits of the death of Christ, while his heart is still far from Him. But wherever there is trust in the value of the sacrifice offered to God on the altar, no power on earth or in hell can touch that soul. It shelters under the altar's protection.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Man Of Ability Without Faith

Joab's ruin began with a calculation.

Adonijah confers with Joab, the man who had constantly used David for his own purpose. Joab reckoned that David would be of very little use to him any longer. The opportunity seemed good; he took it. Policy is always ruinous work in the end, at any rate among God's people. There was no faith in Joab. He was a wise man after the flesh; he was an extremely political individual.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Righteousness First, Then The Throne Stands

Solomon had written the rule his reign then carried out:

Solomon's own views can be learned from his book of Proverbs: "Take away the wicked from the presence of the king, and his throne will be established in righteousness." When Solomon had carried out judgment on Joab and others, the Holy Spirit says, "So the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

One writer sees the same order in the coming kingdom of Christ:

Joab's execution pictures the way the millennial kingdom of the Lord Jesus will be established in righteousness, which brings peace.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Reign Of Grace Has A Closing Date

David tolerated these men for years. Solomon did not. That change of administration is the warning in the chapter.

All through David's reign these men were tolerated. Grace was shown to them. But Solomon is charged to kill them. No mercy is to be shown to them once David's reign of grace is over. David's throne, like God's at present, is a "throne of grace." Judgment was carried out on these enemies at the opening of Solomon's glorious reign. If you refuse God's grace and stay unreconciled, you must have judgment. In grace God lets you live, as David let his enemies live.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Delay. Joab's murders went unpunished for years; the verse shows that delay was patience, not pardon.

- Refuge. He reached the altar but had no claim on it — the sacrifice shelters faith, never mere fear.

- Motive. A lifetime of visible service collapsed the moment his own advantage pointed away from the king.

- Order. The kingdom could not stand in peace until the blood was dealt with; righteousness comes first, peace follows.

- Deadline. David's throne let enemies live; Solomon's did not. Grace has a reign, and reigns end.

1 Kings 2:35 · Darby

And the king put Benaiah the son of Jehoiada in his stead over the host; and Zadok the priest the king put in the stead of Abiathar.

Solomon's clear-out of the old rulers ends not with a death but with two appointments: Benaiah takes the army, and Zadok takes the priesthood. Behind that short note lies a sentence God had spoken generations earlier, and a pattern of how a king rewards the men who stood with him.

A Sentence Long Delayed

Abiathar's removal was not Solomon's improvisation. Commentators trace it back to a word God spoke to Eli, an earlier priest. They also note how long God waited before acting on it.

The leader of the conspiracy, the false king, has met his fate. Now Solomon's righteousness catches up with the priest (vv. 26–27). David had supported him for a long while, but the Lord had already spoken his sentence in the ears of Eli. … One hundred thirty-five years after the judgment was announced, he is cut off from the priesthood. He had first given a reason for his judgment by his alliance with the rebel.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Where Abiathar Broke Down

His record was long. That made his one failure heavier, not lighter.

Abiathar was all the more guilty in that he had borne the ark of the Lord before David, and that he had also shared in his afflictions from the beginning (1 Sam. 22:20). So he had shared in the testimony of the Lord's anointed, and he had suffered. Solomon recognizes this. But in the one case where Abiathar's faithfulness was tested, where the glory of the son of David was at stake, he makes shipwreck and abandons his master.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Priest Before The Anointed

The change is more than a change of men. Once a king reigns, the priest's place is set in relation to him. That is why Solomon could remove a priest at all.

After the king is brought in, there is a change in the position of the priesthood; it ceases to be the habitual link of connection between the people and God. When God sets Eli aside (1 Sam. 2:35), He says, "I will raise up for Myself a faithful priest … and he shall go in and out" — not before Me, but "before My anointed forever." There I get a royal person, another link between God and the people, set up above priesthood. So that Solomon was quite right in thrusting out Abiathar; 1 Kings 2:27.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Judgment Without Cruelty

Solomon took away Abiathar's office but not his life. Writers note that he did not take away his honour either.

Abiathar himself (1 Kings 4:4), driven from the priesthood, is counted among the princes alongside Zadok. He had carried the ark and shared all David's afflictions. He lost his office, but his lord did not wish to take from him the dignity he was giving to all those who had suffered with the rejected king.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Benaiah: The Long Loyalty Repaid

Benaiah's promotion over the army is the other half of the verse. It crowns a lifetime of standing in one place.

Joab did not share David's mind about Solomon sitting on the throne. Benaiah did share the king's God-given desires, along with others of David's mighty men. … Rebellion broke out against King Solomon. Remarkably, Adonijah, its head; Joab, its energy; and Shimei, who cursed David, all fell at last by the sword of Benaiah. He was "with David" in his rejection and his fighting; "with David" as captain of his bodyguard; "with David" in his kingdom in positions of honour. Now David's son Solomon raised him to be captain of the army of Israel, and he shared in that glorious reign when the wars were past.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Zadok's House And Its Future

Zadok's appointment reaches a long way in both directions: back to an old promise, and forward to a coming day.

Zadok takes his place as the high priest, and we know this will be the line when the Lord Jesus comes to reign. … the family of Zadok will be actually in the administration of the priesthood in that future day of blessedness on the earth. This we know from the book of Ezekiel … "But the Levitical priests, the sons of Zadok, who kept the charge of My sanctuary when the people of Israel went astray from Me, shall come near to Me to minister to Me" (Ezekiel 44:15). The reason is plain: they were faithful. But there is another reason too, which does not appear in the prophecy. They were the direct descendants of Phinehas. God had sworn in the wilderness … that there would be an everlasting covenant with the priesthood and the family of Phinehas.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Picture Of The Coming Reign

Commentators read the judgments and appointments in this chapter as a preview of Christ's coming reign.

Solomon spares Abiathar's life but thrusts him out of the priesthood, so fulfilling the word of the Lord concerning the house of Eli (1 Sam. 2:31–36). Zadok alone becomes priest (verse 35). … And here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness; in the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- One test. Abiathar's long service could not cover one failure. He sided against the king God had chosen.

- One sentence. God's word about Eli's house waited generations. It fell once Abiathar had given his own reason for it.

- One order. With a king on the throne, the priest's place is before the anointed. So Solomon could remove one priest and install another.

- One reward. Benaiah stood with David in rejection and in the kingdom. Solomon gave him command of the whole army.

- One preview. Both appointments sketch the reign to come. Today grace reigns through righteousness; then righteousness itself will reign, with Zadok's line near to God.

1 Kings 2:36 · Darby

And the king sent and called for Shimei, and said to him, Build thee a house in Jerusalem, and abide there, and go not forth thence anywhere.

Solomon has already judged Adonijah, Joab and Abiathar, and now he calls in the last man on his father's list. He gives Shimei a boundary instead of a death sentence — so why is a pardoned man still on trial, and why test him at all?

A case left over from David's reign

Shimei had cursed David and later said he was sorry. David spared his life. But what did that pardon actually settle?

He looked like a restored man. But though David in grace had spared him, he did not hold him innocent. Everything now depended on how he behaved under the king of righteousness. His conduct would show whether his repentance was real. As with Joab, Shimei's case goes to the wisdom of Solomon.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Kept within sight of the king

Why fence him in at all? Shimei had once said sorry, but sorry had not changed him.

Shimei was a different kind of character again. He had cursed David viciously, yet he had apologised for it, and David had then spared his life (2 Sam. 19:18-23). But he was not changed in heart. Solomon told him in effect that he could not trust him out of sight. He ordered him to live in Jerusalem, and warned him that if he ever went elsewhere he would be put to death.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The man who agreed to the terms

Shimei accepts the terms gladly. One writer hears an older voice in that answer.

Solomon places him on the footing of responsibility and he accepts it. He shows in this his complete ignorance of his own sinful state, and so of his inability to obey. Had not Israel said the very same words when God proposed the law? "All that the LORD has spoken we will do" (Exodus 19:8). And so Shimei answers that the word is good, and that he will do as his lord the king has said. He knows, poor man, that to disobey means death, and that his blood will be on his own head. Yet he can do nothing but disobey. He cannot give up two runaway slaves. To get them back for a day, he throws away his own life!… The man who is put under responsibility, accepts it, and fails cannot be tolerated under the reign of righteousness.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What he traded his life for is the sting of the story. Three years later he crossed the line, chasing two runaway slaves.

Surely he had not forgotten Solomon's warning and his own promise! Perhaps he thought three years was enough to change Solomon's mind. But he wanted slaves to rule over, while he himself would not be content to be ruled!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Mercy that did not cancel righteousness

Was David right to spare him in the first place? One writer has doubts.

Nor does his mercy to Shimei seem to have upheld the righteousness that should mark the throne. He evidently came to believe this himself, as we see from his instruction to Solomon about him. Relaxing the full penalty might well suit the day of David's return to the throne. Shimei had, after all, claimed to repent. But there seems to have been no reality in it such as would have matched that fuller grace.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

A picture of the coming kingdom

Why does Scripture record these court cases at all? One writer looks past Solomon's court to a kingdom still to come.

At first Solomon shows mercy to Adonijah. But Adonijah's will is still restless, and that awakens the righteous judgment meant for those who had failed in integrity and had risen up against God's anointed. This is the first mark of the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth. There is no escaping the watchfulness of this judgment. This is seen in the case of Shimei.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer sets that coming kingdom beside our own day:

And here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the age to come. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness. In the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Judgment will fall swiftly on disobedience, as it fell on Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Spared — David let Shimei live, but never called him innocent. The case stayed open.

- Tested — Solomon puts him on the footing of responsibility. Stay in Jerusalem and live; cross the line and die.

- Agreed — Shimei calls the word good and promises to keep it, just as Israel did when God proposed the law. He does not know that he cannot obey.

- Failed — two runaway slaves outweighed his own life; he wanted men to rule over but would not be ruled himself.

- Judged — the king's watchfulness reaches him. Today grace reigns through righteousness. In the kingdom to come, righteousness reigns, and judgment falls on disobedience at once.

1 Kings 2:37 · Darby

And it shall be that on the day thou goest forth, and passest over the torrent of Kidron, ... know for certain that thou shalt surely die thy blood shall be upon thine own head.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

1 Kings 2:38 · Darby

And Shimei said to the king, The saying is good as my lord the king has said, so will thy servant do. And Shimei dwelt in Jerusalem many days.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

1 Kings 2:39 · Darby

And it came to pass at the end of three years, that two servants of Shimei's ran away to Achish son of Maachah, king of Gath. And they told Shimei saying, Behold, thy servants are in Gath.

Solomon had spared Shimei's life on one condition: stay in Jerusalem. Three years later, two of his slaves run off to a Philistine city, and Shimei goes after them. That short errand settles his case. So what did those three years test?

The Errand

The trip was long. The reason for it was small:

Three years later, two of Shimei's slaves escaped from his service. They went to Gath, about 25 miles from Jerusalem. When Shimei was told his servants were there, he took a trip by donkey to look for them. Surely he had not forgotten Solomon's warning and his own promise! Perhaps he thought that three years was enough to change Solomon's thoughts. But he wanted slaves to rule over, though he would not be content to be ruled himself.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Gath

The servants ran to Gath, a Philistine city. David had gone there himself once, in a low moment:

One of the five royal cities of the Philistines, and the city Goliath belonged to... David went to Achish king of Gath when his faith failed him about God's protection. Later, when he was king and in power, he took Gath and her towns out of the hand of the Philistines.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Life Held on Terms

Shimei had cursed David. When David came back, Shimei confessed his sin, and David spared his life. But sparing a man is not the same as clearing him:

He was then apparently restored, but if David in grace had spared him, he did not hold him innocent. Everything was made to depend on his conduct under the king of righteousness. His conduct would show whether his repentance was real.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Willing in Word, Unable in Deed

Shimei took the terms on himself. One writer reads his failure as a picture of the whole world under God's law:

Solomon places him on the footing of responsibility and he accepts this. In doing so he reveals his total ignorance of his state of sin, and so of his inability to obey... He knows, wretched man, that to disobey means death for him, and that his blood will be on his own head. Yet he is unable to do anything but disobey. He is unable to give up two runaway slaves. To get them back for a day, he sacrifices his own life! What a picture of the world! It knows the law of God, yet it will not and cannot submit to that law once a passing interest comes between God's will and itself.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Nothing Hidden from the King

Shimei slipped out in private, and word still reached the king. One writer sees Solomon's rule here as the pattern of a greater reign:

It is the first mark of the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth. There is no escaping the watchfulness of this judgment. This is seen in the case of Shimei.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Two men gave their word that day. Only one kept it:

Though Shimei did not keep his promise, Solomon would keep his. Solomon also reminded him of the wickedness of his attitude toward David. That wickedness would come back on his own head... Shimei's case is a warning to us not to speak evil of those in authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two Reigns, Two Principles

David's reign left Shimei alive. Solomon's did not. One writer sees in that change of kings a picture of an age still to come:

Shimei was commanded to remain in Jerusalem; disobedience would mean certain death. When he disobeyed, the sentence of death was carried out on him. Here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness. In the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Disobedience will be swiftly met by judgment, as it was with Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Spared. Shimei had cursed the king and lived. Grace spared him, but it did not pronounce him innocent.

- Bound. Solomon put him on the footing of responsibility. Shimei accepted the terms and the penalty himself.

- Tested. Three quiet years proved nothing. His conduct under the king of righteousness would show whether his repentance was real.

- Exposed. Two runaway slaves undid him. He wanted slaves to rule over, yet he would not be ruled himself. That is the world's attitude toward God when a passing interest cuts across His will.

- Settled. Shimei broke his word. Solomon kept his. Where righteousness reigns, no one escapes its watchful judgment.

1 Kings 2:40 · Darby

Then Shimei arose, and saddled his ass, and went to Gath, to Achish, to seek his servants; and Shimei went, and brought his servants from Gath.

Solomon had given Shimei one simple condition: stay inside Jerusalem and live. Three years later two of his slaves ran away to a Philistine city. This verse is the moment Shimei saddles his donkey and goes after them — the choice that costs him everything.

The errand

Three years of obedience ended over a matter of property.

However, three years later two of Shimei's slaves escaped from his service and went to Gath, about 25 miles from Jerusalem. When Shimei heard his servants were there, he took a trip by donkey to look for them (v.40). He had surely not forgotten Solomon's warning and his own promise! Perhaps he thought three years was enough to change Solomon's mind. He wanted slaves to rule over, but he would not be content to be ruled himself!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The price of two slaves

Shimei accepted Solomon's terms in his own words. One writer says that acceptance is what exposed him.

Solomon places him on the footing of responsibility and he accepts this. So he shows his complete ignorance of his state of sin, and therefore of his inability to obey. Had not Israel spoken the very same words when God proposed the law to them? "All that the LORD has spoken we will do" (Ex. 19:8). And Shimei says the same: "What you say is good; as my lord the king has said, so will your servant do" (v. 38). He knows, poor man, that to disobey means death for him, and that his blood will be on his own head. Still he can do nothing but disobey. He is unable to give up two runaway slaves. In order to get them back for a day, he sacrifices his own life! What a picture of the world! It knows the law of God, yet it will not and cannot submit to it once a passing interest comes between itself and the will of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Where he went

Gath was no neutral ground, and David had a history there.

Gath was one of the five royal cities of the Philistines, and Goliath came from there… David went to Achish king of Gath when his faith in God's protection failed him.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

David had gone to Achish when his faith failed. Shimei went to the same city when his word failed.

Nowhere to hide

Shimei crossed a line that Solomon was watching. One writer sees here the first mark of a king who reigns in glory.

At first Solomon shows mercy to Adonijah. But Adonijah's will is still restless, and he asks for the dead king's wife. This wakes the righteous judgment kept for those who had failed in integrity and had risen up against God's anointed. It is the first character attached to the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth. There is no escaping the vigilance of this judgment. This is seen in the case of Shimei.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Solomon then judged Shimei by Shimei's own promise.

Someone reported Shimei's trip to Solomon. The king called for Shimei and reminded him of his promise to stay in Jerusalem, and of Solomon's promise to have him killed if he did not (vs.41-42). Though Shimei did not keep his promise, Solomon would keep his. Solomon also reminded him that his wickedness toward David would come back on his own head. David had not killed Shimei, so as to avoid any appearance of personal revenge, but justice had to be done even though David was no longer alive. Shimei's case is a warning to us not to speak evil of those in authority (Jude 8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Mercy given, then tested

Years earlier David had spared Shimei's life and left the question of his sincerity open.

David does not stop to ask whether Shimei's feelings are sincere. He is not judging them now. Shimei will have to give account for them later, when his conduct will show whether they were real (1 Kings 2:36-46). "You shall not die," David tells this guilty man.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A picture of the age to come

One writer sees in Shimei's end a glimpse of the coming age, and a contrast with our own.

Shimei was commanded to remain in Jerusalem; disobedience would mean certain death. When he disobeyed, the death sentence fell on him. And here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness; in the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Judgment will fall quickly on disobedience, as it did with Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Boundary. Shimei could live on one condition: stay in Jerusalem. He accepted the terms in his own words.

- Bait. Two runaway slaves pulled him past the line. He wanted slaves to rule over, but would not be ruled himself.

- Blindness. Accepting a rule he could not keep exposed him. He knew disobedience meant death, and he still could not obey.

- Breach. He left the king's city for Gath, a Philistine royal city. Mercy had delayed the reckoning; his conduct showed what his apology was worth.

- Balance. Solomon kept his word when Shimei broke his. In the coming kingdom, righteousness reigns and judgment follows disobedience quickly.

1 Kings 2:41 · Darby

And it was told Solomon that Shimei had gone from Jerusalem to Gath, and had come again.

Three years earlier Solomon had let Shimei live on one condition: stay inside Jerusalem or die. Now the news of his journey reaches the throne. Why would a man spared by grace risk everything for two runaway slaves?

The Terms He Was Given

Shimei had once cursed David publicly, then apologised when David returned to power. One writer traces how that pardon left an open question rather than closing the case.

Shimei had cursed David, and then when David came back he showed signs of repentance and confessed his sin. He seemed to be restored, but although David in grace had spared him, David did not treat him as innocent. Everything now depended on his conduct under the king of righteousness. His conduct would show whether his repentance was real.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the Journey Revealed

The errand looks small: a man going after two runaway slaves. Set beside the promise he had made, it shows what mattered more to him.

Three years later two of Shimei's slaves escaped from his service. They went to Gath, about twenty-five miles from Jerusalem. When Shimei heard his servants were there, he took a trip by donkey to look for them. Surely he had not forgotten Solomon's warning and his own promise! Perhaps he thought that three years was enough to change Solomon's thoughts. He wanted slaves to rule over, though he would not be content to be ruled himself.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Nothing Escapes the King

Shimei went and came back, apparently unnoticed. Yet the report arrives anyway, and one commentator treats this as the defining feature of the reign being described.

It is the first mark of the king reigning in glory. He carries out righteous judgment in the earth. There is no escaping the watchfulness of this judgment. This is seen in the case of Shimei.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Condemned by His Own Agreement

Shimei's own promise becomes the thing that condemns him. One writer reads the episode as a picture of everyone who agrees that God's law is good and then cannot keep it.

Solomon places him on the footing of responsibility and he accepts this. In doing so he shows his complete ignorance of his sinful state, and therefore of his inability to obey. Had not Israel spoken the very same words when the law was proposed? "All that the Lord has spoken we will do." And so Shimei: "The saying is good: as my lord the king has said, so will your servant do." He knows, wretched man, that to disobey means death for him. He knows that his blood will be on his own head. And yet he cannot do anything but disobey. He is unable to give up two runaway slaves. To get them back for a day, he sacrifices his own life! What a picture of the world! It knows the law of God, yet it will not and cannot submit to it, once a passing interest comes between itself and the will of God. His own word judges him: "The word that I have heard is good." A man placed under responsibility, who accepts it and then fails, cannot be tolerated under the reign of righteousness.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

One Man Kept His Word

Two promises had been made in that earlier interview. Only one of them was honoured, and the contrast carries a warning past the story itself.

Word of Shimei's trip reached Solomon. The king called for Shimei and reminded him of his promise to remain in Jerusalem, and of Solomon's promise to have him killed if he did not. Though Shimei did not keep his promise, Solomon would keep his. Solomon also reminded him how wicked his attitude toward David had been, and told him that this wickedness would come back on his own head. David had not killed Shimei, so as to avoid any appearance of personal revenge. But justice had to be done, even though David was no longer alive. Shimei's case is a warning to us not to speak evil of those in authority.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Glimpse of the Coming Reign

Solomon's throne also gives a picture of a kingdom still to come. One writer uses Shimei's end to contrast how God governs now with how He will govern then.

And here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness; in the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Judgment will meet disobedience swiftly, as it did with Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Spared. David's grace gave Shimei his life, but it did not declare him innocent. Everything now rested on how he behaved under the king of righteousness.

- Bound. He called the king's terms good and promised to keep them, putting himself on the ground of responsibility.

- Exposed. He wanted slaves to rule over, yet would not be ruled himself, and he traded his life for two runaways.

- Reported. Nothing escaped the king. News of the quiet trip still reached the throne, because there is no escaping the watchfulness of this judgment.

- Judged. His own words condemned him — a picture of a world that agrees God's law is good and still cannot submit to it.

1 Kings 2:42 · Darby

And the king sent and called for Shimei, and said to him, Did I not make thee swear by Jehovah, and protest to thee, saying, Know for certain, that on the day thou goest forth, and walkest abroad anywhere, thou shalt surely die? and thou saidst to me, The word that I have heard is good.

Three years earlier, Solomon had set the terms on which Shimei would live. Why does the king now build his case on Shimei's own reply, and not on the trip to Gath?

The Terms Shimei Had Accepted

Solomon does not begin with the crime. He begins with the promises — his own and Shimei's.

News of Shimei's trip reached Solomon. The king called for Shimei and reminded him of his promise to remain in Jerusalem, and of Solomon's promise to have him killed if he did not (vv. 41-42). Though Shimei did not keep his promise, yet Solomon would keep his. Solomon also reminded him of his wicked attitude toward David. That wickedness would come back on his own head. David had not killed Shimei, so that nothing would look like personal revenge. But justice still had to be done, even though David was no longer alive. Shimei's case is a warning to us not to speak evil of those in authority (Jude 8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Condemned by His Own Verdict

Shimei had called the arrangement good, and that word now accuses him. One writer reads the episode as the story of a man who agreed to stand on his own obedience — with no idea what he was agreeing to.

Solomon places him on the footing of responsibility and he accepts this. By this he shows his complete ignorance of his state of sin, and so of his inability to obey. Had not Israel spoken the very same words when God proposed the law? "All that the LORD has spoken we will do" (Ex. 19:8). And so Shimei: "What you say is good; as my lord the king has said, so will your servant do" (v. 38). He knows — wretched man — that disobeying means death for him. He knows his blood will be on his own head. Still he can do nothing but disobey… What a picture of the world! It knows God's law, yet once a passing interest comes between God's will and itself, it will not and cannot submit. His own word judges him: "What you say is good" (v. 42). The reign of righteousness cannot tolerate a man who is put under responsibility, accepts it, and then fails.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the Errand Exposed

What pulled Shimei past the city limit was small: two runaway servants.

However, three years later two of Shimei's slaves escaped from his service and went to Gath, about 25 miles from Jerusalem. When Shimei was told his servants were there, he took a trip by donkey to look for them (v. 40). Surely he had not forgotten Solomon's warning and his own promise! Perhaps he thought three years was enough to change Solomon's mind. But he wanted slaves to rule over, though he would not be content to be ruled himself!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Pardon Without Acquittal

David had spared Shimei years before. But mercy is not the same as a verdict of innocence.

So he seemed to be restored. But though David in grace had spared him, he did not hold him innocent. David made everything depend on his conduct under the king of righteousness. His conduct would show if his repentance was real.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

One commentator sees David swearing an oath he had no power to make good:

Here too the king shows that he was in no way equal to the task that only the true David will take up and carry out in full. Moved by his own feelings, he swears to Shimei that he shall not die — an oath that could not hold once Solomon came to the throne, as we learn from another book of Scripture.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Kingdom Where Nothing Slips Through

Commentators read Solomon's dealings with Shimei as a picture of Christ's coming reign.

Righteous judgment is the first mark of the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth. No one escapes the watchfulness of this judgment. Shimei's case shows it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer sets that coming age beside the present one:

And here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness; in the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Judgment will swiftly meet disobedience, as it did with Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — Shimei had called Solomon's terms good. The king convicts him with his own words.

- Weakness — Standing on your own obedience shows what you are, not what you can do. Shimei promised what Israel promised when God proposed the law, and failed as Israel failed.

- Wanting — Two runaway servants pulled him out of the city. He wanted to rule others, but would not be ruled himself.

- Waiting — David's pardon spared his life, but never called him innocent. His conduct under the next king would show whether his repentance was real.

- Watchfulness — Commentators read the ending as a picture of Christ's coming reign, where no disobedience escapes notice. Today grace reigns through righteousness; then righteousness itself will reign.

1 Kings 2:43 · Darby

Why then hast thou not kept the oath of Jehovah, and the commandment that I charged thee with?

Shimei had agreed to stay inside Jerusalem. Three years later he left, and Solomon calls him in to answer for the broken oath. The king is not asking for information. He already knows. His question presses a harder point: Shimei had accepted these terms himself, and then broke them.

A man spared but not cleared

Solomon is not dealing with a fresh offender. Shimei had been pardoned once before, and one writer explains what that pardon did not settle.

Shimei, from the tribe of Benjamin, had cursed David, and then when David returned he showed signs of repentance by confessing his sin. He seemed to be restored. David in grace had spared him, but he did not hold him innocent. Everything now depended on his conduct under the king of righteousness. His conduct would show whether his repentance was real.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Judged by his own words

Solomon's question names two things: an oath sworn to the LORD and a command from the king. Shimei had accepted both, and had called the terms good. One writer shows how that acceptance became his judgment.

Solomon puts him in a place of responsibility and he accepts it. This reveals his complete ignorance of his state of sin, and therefore of his inability to obey. Had not Israel spoken the very same words when the law was proposed? "All that the LORD has spoken we will do" (Ex. 19:8). And so Shimei: "The word is good; as my lord the king has said, so will your servant do." He knows, wretched man, that to disobey means death for him and that his blood will be on his own head — and yet he is unable to do anything but disobey. He is unable to give up two runaway slaves. To get them back for a day, he sacrifices his own life! What a picture of the world! It knows the law of God, and it will not and cannot submit to it once a passing interest comes between God's will and itself. His own word judges him: "The word that I have heard is good." The reign of righteousness cannot tolerate a man who takes on responsibility and then fails.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What he crossed the line for

What drew Shimei out of the city was small. One writer points out the irony of the errand.

When Shimei heard that his servants were there, he took a trip by donkey to look for them. Surely he had not forgotten Solomon's warning and his own promise! Perhaps he thought three years was enough to change Solomon's mind. He wanted slaves to rule over, but he would not be content to be ruled himself!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two promises, one kept

The terms carried two promises: Shimei's and the king's. Only one of them held.

Someone reported Shimei's trip to Solomon. Solomon called for Shimei. He reminded him of his promise to remain in Jerusalem, and of his own promise to have him killed if he broke it. Though Shimei did not keep his promise, Solomon would keep his. Solomon also named the wickedness of his attitude toward David. That wickedness would come back on his own head. David had not killed Shimei, so as to avoid any appearance of personal revenge. But justice still had to be done, even though David was no longer alive. Shimei's case is a warning to us not to speak evil of dignities (Jude 8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A picture of a coming reign

Commentators read this scene as more than court business.

He executes righteous judgment on the earth. Nothing escapes the watchfulness of this judgment. Shimei's case shows it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer marks the difference between that reign and this present age.

Solomon commanded Shimei to remain in Jerusalem. Disobedience would mean certain death. When he disobeyed, the death sentence fell on him. And here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness. In the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Judgment will meet disobedience swiftly, as it met Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Word that spared. David let Shimei live after the cursing. But sparing a man is not the same as clearing him. Solomon's reign would settle the matter.

- Word he accepted. Shimei called the terms good and promised to keep them. Israel had spoken the same way when the law came, and it ended the same way.

- Word he broke. Two runaway servants were enough to pull him past the boundary. He would rule slaves, but he would not be ruled himself.

- Word that judged him. Solomon's question needed no new evidence. Shimei's own oath, sworn before the LORD, convicted him, and the wickedness came back on his own head.

- Word of the coming King. Commentators see here a preview of a reign where nothing escapes notice. They also mark the difference from now: grace reigns in this age, righteousness in the age to come.

1 Kings 2:44 · Darby

And the king said to Shimei, Thou knowest all the wickedness of which thy heart is conscious, which thou didst to David my father; and Jehovah returns thy wickedness upon thine own head;

Shimei had once cursed David. Years later, Solomon brings that old wrong back up. He does not argue the case. He points Shimei to what his own heart knows, and leaves the outcome to the Lord, who turns a man's evil back on him.

A Man Spared, Not Cleared

Shimei's place under the new king looked secure. One writer shows that he was really on probation.

This same Shimei had not joined Adonijah's following. He stayed with David's mighty men and had followed Solomon. So he seemed to be restored. But if David in grace had spared him, he did not hold him innocent. Everything now depended on how he behaved under the king of righteousness. His conduct would show whether his repentance was real.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

An Offence Against the Lord

Solomon names David as the man Shimei harmed. One writer doubts Shimei's apology and points past David to the one the evil was really against.

David knew that Shimei's apology was not sincere. So he told Solomon to act wisely and see that Shimei was put to death for this evil, which had really been against the Lord (vs.8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Justice Without Revenge

Why did David never settle this himself? One writer explains that David's own hand would have looked like personal revenge. Waiting did not cancel the debt.

Solomon also reminded him how wicked his attitude toward David had been. He told him that this wickedness would come back on his own head. David had not killed Shimei, so that nothing would look like personal revenge. But justice still had to be done, even though David was no longer alive. Shimei's case is a warning to us not to speak evil of those in authority (Jude 8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Condemned by His Own Agreement

Shimei had accepted Solomon's terms and called the order good. That agreement is what condemned him in the end. One writer reads it as the story of a man who does not know what he cannot do.

Solomon puts him on the ground of responsibility, and he accepts it. In doing so he shows how completely blind he is to his state of sin, and so to his inability to obey… He knows, poor man, that to disobey means death for him, and that his blood will be on his own head. Still he can do nothing but disobey. He cannot give up two runaway slaves. To get them back for a day, he throws away his own life! What a picture of the world! It knows the law of God, yet it will not and cannot submit to it, once a passing interest comes between itself and the will of God. His own word judges him: "The word that I have heard is good" (v. 42).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Evil Returns to the Sender

Harm returning on a man's own head is not just Shimei's story. One writer traces the same rule through God's dealings with nations.

God knows how to turn man's evil back upon himself. He did this with Haman in the Book of Esther (Esther 7:6-10), and it will be so with nations who attack Israel in the tribulation period (Daniel 11:40-45). This is perfectly righteous government. Nations will be caught in their own net. Through painful experience they will learn that God makes Himself known in the judgments He carries out.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

A Picture of the Coming Reign

Writers look past Shimei to a greater King. Nothing slips past that throne. And the age we live in is not yet the age of that reign.

It is the first character attached to the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth. There is no escaping the vigilance of this judgment. This is seen in the case of Shimei.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

And here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness; in the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Judgment will meet disobedience quickly, as it did with Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace waits. David spared Shimei. Sparing him was not the same as calling him innocent. The new king would settle the case.

- Responsibility tests. Shimei took Solomon's terms and called them good. He had no idea that he could not obey.

- Conscience convicts. Solomon calls no witnesses. He points to what Shimei's own heart knew, and to the word Shimei had called good.

- Evil returns. Bringing harm back on the doer's own head is how God governs — the net catches the one who set it.

- The throne stands. David would not act for himself. Righteousness still acted after his death. Nothing escapes the King who reigns in righteousness.

1 Kings 2:45 · Darby

and king Solomon shall be blessed, and the throne of David shall be established before Jehovah for ever.

Shimei has broken the terms he accepted. Solomon's last word to him sets two things side by side: one man's guilt returning on his own head, and a throne made secure before the LORD. Why should the removal of one old offender matter to a whole kingdom? And why say "forever" of a throne whose king would later fail?

Justice Delayed, Not Cancelled

David had let Shimei live. Commentators point out that this restraint was deliberate, and that it did not close the case.

David had not killed Shimei so as to avoid any appearance of personal retaliation, but justice had to be done even though David was no longer alive. Shimei's case warns us not to speak evil against those in authority (Jude 8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Throne Rests on Cleared Ground

The verse joins the blessing on the king to the settling of the throne. Solomon later wrote down the principle he was acting on here.

We can learn Solomon's own thinking from his book of Proverbs: "A king who sits on the throne of judgment winnows all evil with his eyes" (Proverbs 20:8). "Take away the wicked from the presence of the king, and his throne will be established in righteousness" (Proverbs 25:5). When Solomon had carried out judgment on Joab and others, the Holy Spirit says, "the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon" (1 Kings 2:46).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Condemned by His Own Agreement

Solomon gave Shimei clear terms. Shimei called those terms good, and that answer is what condemns him.

Solomon places him on the footing of responsibility and he accepts this. He thus reveals his pure ignorance of his state of sin and, therefore, of his inability to obey. Had not Israel spoken the very same words when the law was proposed? "All that the LORD has spoken we will do" (Exodus 19:8). And so Shimei: "What you say is good; as my lord the king has said, so will your servant do." He knows, wretched man, that to disobey means death for him. He knows his blood will be on his own head. And still he can do nothing but disobey… He is judged by his own word. The man who is put under responsibility, accepts it, and fails cannot be tolerated under the reign of righteousness.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Picture of the King Who Is Coming

Commentators read Solomon's first acts as a preview of a greater reign.

Solomon at first shows mercy to Adonijah. But Adonijah's will is still restless, and he wants the dead king's wife. This awakens the righteous judgment meant for those who had failed in integrity and had risen up against God's anointed. It is the first character attached to the king reigning in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth. There is no escaping the vigilance of this judgment. This is seen in the case of Shimei.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer sets that coming rule against the way God deals with people now.

And here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness; in the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Disobedience will be swiftly met by judgment as it was with Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Word "Forever" Outruns Solomon

Yet the word "forever" reaches past Solomon himself.

Adonijah, by his disloyal scheming, was a threat to the establishing of the throne as David wanted it, so Benaiah struck him down and he died. Joab fled to the tabernacle of the LORD and caught hold of the horns of the altar. But there was no perfect sacrifice then, and no risen and glorified Saviour on the throne of God. "So Benaiah the son of Jehoiada went up and struck him down and put him to death." Solomon also gave orders about Shimei, so Benaiah "went out and struck him down, and he died. So the kingdom was established" — yes, established for a time, but not forever! Just judgment prevailed for a while.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Grace Now, Judgment After

There is a warning in the timing. Shimei survived one reign and not the next.

All through David's reign these men were tolerated. Grace was shown them. But Solomon is charged to put them to death. No mercy must be shown them after David's reign of grace is over. This is solemn, sinner. David's throne, like God's at present, is a "throne of grace" (Hebrews 4:16).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Guilt keeps. David spared Shimei to avoid any look of personal revenge. The wrong still stood. Justice was handed forward.

- Terms accepted. Shimei agreed to Solomon's terms and called them good. His own word judged him.

- Throne cleared. Remove the wicked, and the throne stands. Solomon wrote it himself: "take away the wicked… and his throne will be established in righteousness."

- Throne previewed. Commentators see here the first mark of the King reigning in glory. He judges the earth in righteousness, and nothing escapes.

- Throne of grace, now. Solomon's kingdom was established for a time, not forever. Today God's throne is a throne of grace. That season has an end.

1 Kings 2:46 · Darby

And the king commanded Benaiah the son of Jehoiada; who went out and fell upon him, and he died. And the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon.

The closing line of 1 Kings 2 comes after a run of executions carried out by Benaiah — Adonijah, Joab, and now Shimei. Why does a reign of peace open with death sentences? And what does that say about the King this kingdom pictures?

Judgment Settles the Throne

The order matters. The kingdom is called secure only after Solomon carries out the sentences. One writer ties that order to Solomon's own sayings about kings:

We can learn Solomon's own mind from his Book of Proverbs: "A king who sits on the throne of judgment winnows all evil with his eyes" (Proverbs 20:8). "Take away the wicked from the presence of the king, and his throne will be established in righteousness" (Proverbs 25:5). After Solomon had carried out judgment on Joab and others, the Holy Spirit says, "So the kingdom was established in the hand of Solomon" (1 Kings 2:46).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Shimei Condemned by His Own Word

Shimei had wronged David in the past. Still, Solomon gave him terms, and Shimei agreed to them — then broke them. One commentator sees a man who thought he could keep his own promise:

Solomon puts him under responsibility, and he accepts it. In this he shows his complete ignorance of his own sinful state, and so of his inability to obey... He knows, wretched man, that to disobey means death for him and that his blood will be upon his own head — and still he can do nothing but disobey. He cannot bring himself to give up two runaway slaves. To get them back for a day, he throws away his own life! What a picture of the world, which knows the law of God and will not and cannot obey it once a passing interest comes between God's will and itself. His own word judges him: "What you say is good" (v. 42). A reign of righteousness cannot tolerate a man who is given responsibility, accepts it, and then fails.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

David had spared Shimei years before, but not because he was innocent:

Solomon also reminded him how wickedly he had treated David. That wickedness would come back on his own head. David had not killed Shimei, so that no one could call it personal revenge. But justice still had to be done, even though David was no longer alive. Shimei's case is a warning to us not to speak evil of those in authority (Jude 8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A King Whose Eye Nothing Escapes

One writer reads Solomon's dealings here as a picture of Christ reigning in glory:

At first Solomon shows mercy to Adonijah. But Adonijah's will is still restless: he wants the dead king's wife. That wakes the righteous judgment meant for those who had failed in integrity and had risen up against God's anointed. This is the first mark of the king who reigns in glory. He executes righteous judgment in the earth. Nothing escapes the watchfulness of this judgment. Shimei's case shows it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Grace Now, Righteousness Then

Commentators set the present age beside the age to come. Shimei's swift end belongs to the second:

And here we have another glimpse of the government of the kingdom in the coming age. In the present age grace reigns through righteousness. In the kingdom age, when the Lord rules over all, righteousness reigns. Judgment will meet disobedience at once, as it did with Shimei.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

One commentator reads Joab's death the same way:

Solomon's kingdom could not be established until Joab paid for the innocent blood of Abner and Amasa — blood he had shed without David's knowledge. Joab's execution pictures how the thousand-year kingdom of the Lord Jesus will be set up in righteousness, and that righteousness brings peace.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the Picture Falls Short

Solomon's throne was secure, but only for a time:

Solomon also gave the order about Shimei, so Benaiah "went out and struck him down, and he died. So the kingdom was established" — yes, established for a time, but not forever! Just judgment prevailed only for a while.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Today the throne works another way:

Grace justifies the believer today, and sets him in a kingdom which can never be moved. Great David's greater Son is crowned on high, and lives no more to die. A greater than Solomon is there to administer grace to the chief of sinners, and to the most needy of the saints... Having first made purification for sins, the Son of God went up to the throne. Having laid down His life for us, He lives above. Grace has the upper hand, and today it prevails in righteousness.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — The throne becomes secure only after evil is cleared away. Righteousness is what establishes a kingdom, as Solomon's own Proverbs say.

- Consent — Shimei agreed to the terms, then broke them. A reign of righteousness cannot tolerate a man who accepts responsibility and then fails.

- Reach — Nothing slips past this King. Mercy came first, but no offender escaped His watchful judgment.

- Contrast — Today grace reigns through righteousness. In the coming kingdom righteousness reigns, and judgment meets disobedience at once, as it did with Shimei.

- Completion — Solomon's kingdom stood for a time only. A greater than Solomon is on the throne today. He gives out grace, and His kingdom can never be moved.