1 Kings 18:20–39

1 Kings 18:20 · Darby

So Ahab sent to all the children of Israel, and gathered the prophets together unto mount Carmel.

Elijah has just told Ahab that the real trouble in Israel is the throne, not the prophet. Now one man's demand turns into a national assembly, and the king himself does the gathering.

A king commanded by a friendless man

The plan came from Elijah, not from the palace. That is what makes the king's obedience so surprising.

Amazing, when we consider the relative position of the two men. Ahab was a powerful ruler. He had all the military resources of the kingdom at his disposal, and a determined and ruthless wife behind him. Yet now a weak and friendless man was in effect ordering him to call a meeting of the nation! We have already remarked on the moral dignity that communion with God gives. We see it again here in Elijah the Tishbite. The condition of things throughout the country was desperate. It could not go on forever. So the king agreed to Elijah's proposal for a meeting. He could not imagine how it would end, but he hoped there would soon be rain!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A purpose Ahab never intended

Ahab did as he was told. But the plan he carried out was not his own.

Ahab gave in and summoned Baal's prophets at Elijah's command. This shows how completely God's constraint had overpowered him. Against his will, God made him the instrument for carrying out His purpose. So the Lord made the wrath of man praise Him. The prophets of Baal were therefore gathered on Mount Carmel.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Another writer adds what Ahab could never have guessed about the numbers on his side:

God wants it so; whether Ahab wants it or not, this must be done. But no doubt the thought would never cross the mind of this godless king. His religion, with its eight hundred and fifty prophets, would be absolutely nothing before one single prophet of the Lord!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

No one excused

The summons went to "all the people of Israel" and to the prophets alike.

Everyone who has shared in this great sin must be present. The leaders and the led are to gather at Carmel. No privilege anyone enjoys, and no position, however high, will count as a reason to stay away. Those who feast at the royal table, and those who serve Baal, must be present with all the people.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Who actually came

Elijah had asked for two groups of false prophets. The record names only one group, and the reason is not certain.

It is not quite certain that the prophets of Ashtaroth were present. Jezebel may have been able to protect her own favourites, though feeling among the people was too strong for her to stop the gathering altogether. Elijah wanted both groups of false leaders to attend, but the record names only Baal's four hundred and fifty.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

One issue, openly tested

This meeting was not for debate. It put one plain question in front of the whole nation.

It was a challenge — a fair and open challenge from the prophet. The question was between God and Baal. Elijah on one side and these prophets on the other would settle it. So Ahab sends to all, and all gather together.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer looks at the same scene and turns it on the reader:

Elijah's aim here is very clear. He stands for God, and wants the people's hearts for God. He wants the Lord to be known, and His name to be believed. Is the Lord God, or is Baal God? That was the serious question, and the great point to settle. Look at that man standing there all alone, while eight hundred and fifty haters of the truth surround Ahab. It is a grand thing to stand for God, whoever and wherever you may be.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A later crowd, a worse decision

One writer sets this gathering beside a later one, where a nation again had to choose.

We can only think of one gathering in the Holy Land more momentous in its results than that on Mount Carmel. All four Gospel writers record a crowd gathered outside Pilate's palace in Jerusalem. The highest religious leaders of the nation led them. A great decision had to be made. The people had to choose between Barabbas the robber and the blessed Son of God, Israel's Messiah. "Not this man, but Barabbas," was their united cry.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Summoned. The gathering began as one man's demand. A hostile king carried it out. That is the moral weight of walking close to God.

- Overruled. Ahab acted against his own interest. God made him the unwilling instrument of His purpose.

- Assembled. No rank excused anyone. Leaders, false prophets and ordinary people all had to stand in the same place.

- Outnumbered. Eight hundred and fifty against one meant nothing. Numbers would not settle this question.

- Deciding. Carmel put one issue before a nation: the Lord or Baal. The same choice came again outside Pilate's palace, and there the crowd chose Barabbas.

1 Kings 18:21 · Darby

Then Elijah drew near to all the people, and said, How long do ye halt between two opinions? if Jehovah be God, follow him; and if Baal, follow him. And the people answered him not a word.

Elijah stands before a whole nation and forces a choice the crowd has dodged for years: the LORD or Baal, not both. The problem was never belief. It was that belief never became a decision.

The crowd he was speaking to

Three groups stood on Carmel that day. Elijah aimed his words at only one. (The writers below use "Jehovah," the older English form of "the LORD.")

Elijah made this powerful appeal in front of a mixed audience: a degraded king, a corrupt company of prophets, and a fashionable crowd of undecided triflers. Passing by the king and the prophets, Elijah speaks directly to the people. The king led the nation's turning away from God, and he had already been charged with his sins. The prophets of Baal were the open opponents of God, and were about to be exposed and judged. But the vast mass of the people were undecided, halting between two opinions. By profession they were the people of Jehovah, by practice they were the worshippers of Baal.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What "halting" means

The word rendered "halt" (ESV: "go limping") is the same one translated "pass over" elsewhere. There it does not mean walking past.

The words "the Lord will pass over you" do not mean that He would pass by the door where the blood was. They mean that He would halt before it, and cover everyone inside from all judgment and harm. The use of the word here translated "pass over" in other Old Testament passages will prove this. In 1 Kings 18:21 it is given as "halt," the sense, as the context shows, being to stand still or hover.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Israel was hovering. They never dropped the God of Israel. They just added another god and never settled the matter.

Israel lived under the yoke of an idolatrous religion. She followed Baal without ever openly renouncing Jehovah. She was halting between two opinions. This is one of the marks of the world's religion. The number of those walking in open unbelief grows daily. But there are others who renounce neither faith nor godlessness. They find good reasons both for excusing the evil and for objecting to the good. They are the indifferent ones, who refuse to choose between the two sides and who do not answer a word when Elijah speaks to them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Two opinions, and no conviction

Elijah's own wording exposes the problem. The people held views about God; they did not hold God.

There is another class — the vast mass of Christians in name only, who "halt between two opinions." Sadly, they have no personal faith in Christ, nothing but "opinions." With them, God and His word, Christ and His cross, time and eternity, heaven and hell, are merely matters of opinion. Such opinions produce no settled convictions. About these solemn realities they hold TWO opinions. They would not oppose Christ, but they will not confess Christ. They have no wish to fall out with God, but they would gladly stay on good terms with the world. They would like to escape the judgment of sin, but they are set on enjoying the pleasures of sin. They would like to die as saints, but they prefer to live as sinners.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What the prophet was asking for

Elijah's demand was simple, and no one could argue against it.

The prophets of Baal could not contradict it or resist it. The prophet only asked for decision of character. Nothing could be gained on either side by wavering ways. "I wish you were either cold or hot." The Lord's own words to Elijah in the next chapter tell us that seven thousand in Israel had not bowed the knee to Baal. They were probably only waiting for some strong hand to raise the standard of truth, so that they could gather round it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The silence that followed

The crowd gave no answer. Their silence was a confession.

In Elijah's day men were silenced by this appeal. They "answered him not a word." Every mouth was stopped. They stood before the prophet a silent, conscience-stricken, self-condemned people.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Yet the same crowd found its voice moments later — for the test, not for the choice.

To Elijah's appeal, "How long will you halt between two opinions?" they answered not a word; but the proposal to settle the great question by a trial by fire was so reasonable that "all the people answered and said, It is well spoken."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The same question today

The question was never meant to stay in Israel's history.

Things are brought to a point. And now, my friends, if Christ is not worth having, say so. If He is worth having and following, then throw in your lot with Him. How long will you halt? "Well," you say, "I am not in a hurry." God knows that, and the devil knows it too. And he will not let you be in a hurry if he can help it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The wavering ended when God acted.

The fire from heaven at once confounded the prophets of Baal and confirmed the prophet's faith. It delivered the people from their sad condition of halting between two opinions.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Hovering — the word rendered "halt" means to stand still or hover. Israel followed Baal without ever renouncing the LORD.

- Divided — by profession they belonged to God. By practice they belonged to Baal.

- Opinions — two opinions means no conviction. They would not oppose Christ, and they would not confess Him.

- Decision — Elijah asked for one thing only: decision of character. Seven thousand were waiting for someone bold enough to raise the standard.

- Fire — the appeal met silence. Then fire from heaven ended the wavering. Only God settles what argument cannot.

1 Kings 18:22 · Darby

And Elijah said to the people, I, only I, remain a prophet of Jehovah; and Baal's prophets are four hundred and fifty men.

On Mount Carmel, Elijah says the count out loud: one prophet of the LORD against four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal. What do those odds prove, and how did one man end up as God's only public voice in a whole nation?

A Nation Where Truth Had One Voice

The lopsided count is no accident. Commentators point to a pattern in Scripture: what God raises up, the enemy copies in bulk.

Satanic power counterfeits everything that is of God and therefore good. In old times the Holy Spirit moved holy men to give us words from God. The great adversary also moved, and he brought false prophets in among the people. We have many examples of this in Scripture… Even after the destruction of the prophets of Baal, about four hundred prophets lured Ahab to his death. Against them stood one prophet, Micaiah the son of Imlah, who told him the truth.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Alone in Public, Not Alone in Israel

Elijah is speaking to the people, not to Baal's prophets. Seven thousand in Israel had not bowed to Baal, yet only one man spoke up. One writer points to Obadiah, another man in this account who feared the LORD.

Having convicted the people of their sin, the prophet makes his second appeal… How evil the time when there is only one true prophet to stand against four hundred and fifty false ones. Seven thousand had indeed not bowed the knee to Baal. Still, only one man was left to witness for the Lord. It is good to refuse to acknowledge Baal. But there is a vast difference between not bowing down in worship to Baal and standing up to witness for the Lord. Obadiah may fear the Lord deeply, but his ungodly connections have closed his mouth. We hear no word of him on Carmel. The fear of God may lead seven thousand to mourn before God in secret. But the fear of man holds them back from witnessing for God in public.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Odds Are Not the Argument

Elijah names the numbers, then refuses to let them decide anything. He calls for a different judge.

Who is the God of Israel? That is the great question. Elijah boldly proposes to settle it by the test of fire. The appeal is to God. The decision shall not rest with the solitary prophet of the Lord or the four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal. It shall be no question of man's reasonings or of the opinion of one man against four hundred and fifty. God shall decide.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Composure Learned in Hidden Places

Where did such calm come from? One writer traces it back to the hidden years before Carmel.

What calmness the sense of competence gives! He can wait while the pretenders make full trial of all their powers. When they have worn themselves out and proved their powerlessness, he comes forward to repair the altar of the Lord, in the order God had appointed… He had learned God so well at Cherith and Sarepta that he is ready for these public demonstrations. He can enter on them with calmness and dignity.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Peril Inside the Position

Standing alone carries its own danger. The enemy can turn a stand for God into flattery for the man.

Nothing but the mighty power of God could have kept Elijah in his extraordinary position on Mount Carmel. He was a man with the same nature as ours. He was the only one of his day with enough moral courage and spiritual power to make a public stand for God against the power of idolatry. So the enemy could easily suggest to his poor heart, "What a great man you are to stand out as the solitary champion of Israel's ancient faith!" But God held up His dear servant so far. He carried him through this very trying scene, because he was His witness and His servant.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

When "I Only" Hardens Into Complaint

The same words come back in a darker mood. One writer names what Elijah had overlooked.

Elijah had seen the terrible evils that covered the land. But somehow he had overlooked the good that was there. Had he known that the LORD still had thousands of true hearts in Ahab's kingdom, he would hardly have said, "I, even I only, am left!" Being taken up with yourself ruins you spiritually, whatever form it takes. It is especially wrong when it leads any servant of God to imagine that he is the last true man on earth. The testimony of God has never yet depended on the slender thread of a human life, and it never will.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Dark day. One true prophet against four hundred and fifty shows how far a nation had fallen. The enemy answers every work of God with a crowd of counterfeits.

- Alone in public. Seven thousand had not bowed to Baal, yet only one man stood up to witness. Secret loyalty and open testimony are not the same.

- God decides. Elijah stakes nothing on the count or on human reasoning. A test of fire will settle who is God.

- Hidden training. Elijah learned his calm dignity at Cherith and Sarepta, out of public view.

- No indispensable man. Standing alone can tempt a servant to think everything depends on him. God's testimony never hung on one life, and never will.

1 Kings 18:23 · Darby

Let them therefore give us two bullocks and let them choose one bullock for themselves, and cut it in pieces, and put it on the wood, and put no fire; and I will sacrifice the other bullock, and put it on the wood, and put no fire.

Elijah stands alone on Mount Carmel against four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal. Instead of arguing, he proposes a test: two bulls, each cut in pieces and laid on wood, with no fire put to either one. His terms decide everything that follows — who chooses first, what no one may touch, and who must act.

The question put to God, not to men

Elijah had already asked the crowd to stop wavering and got silence. So he moved the matter beyond debate.

Elijah boldly proposes settling this great question by the test of fire. "The God who answers by fire, He is God." The appeal is to God. The decision will not rest with the solitary prophet of the Lord or the four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal. It will be no question of man's reasonings or of the opinion of one man against four hundred and fifty. God shall decide.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Numbers were all on one side. Elijah's terms made that count for nothing.

Two sacrifices that looked the same

The two altars will look almost the same. Both sides bring a bull. Both cut it up. Both lay it on wood. Nothing visible sets them apart.

Two religions meet face to face: Elijah's and Baal's, for the third, Israel's, is party to both. In public, these two religions look like they have the same sacrifice. How can anyone tell them apart? Fire from heaven must consume one of the bulls, but not the other. That is how a person can recognise the true God. That is also how the people will learn what they are, so that they may be turned to repentance.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"Put no fire to it"

The one clause that mattered most was the ban on lighting the wood. Elijah pressed that point because of the men he was dealing with.

It was important to stress that last clause when dealing with men who had no principles. Priestly "miracles" have a bad name for fraud. In the calm of faith, Elijah could afford to let Satan's agents move first. He knew quite well that the god they served had no power.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Note what Elijah gives away: the first turn and the choice of animal. He can afford it, because he is not the one who has to send the fire.

A test nobody could call unfair

The crowd had refused to answer Elijah's earlier challenge. This proposal they accepted at once.

The people knew well that Baal was supposed to be the god of fire, so they said, "It is well spoken." When Elijah appealed to them, "How long will you go limping between two different opinions?", they did not answer a word. But the proposal to settle the great question by a trial by fire was so reasonable that "all the people answered, 'It is well spoken.'"

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The challenge was out in the open, and it named the two sides on trial.

It was a challenge given — a fair and open challenge by the prophet. The question lay between God and Baal, and Elijah on the one hand and these prophets on the other would settle it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why it had to be a sacrifice

Why did the test need a victim on the wood at all? The answer lies in who God is and what Israel had become.

Here is a holy God who must deal with all evil by the consuming fire of judgment. Here is a guilty nation sunk deep in the very evil that the holy God must judge. Surely the fire of the Lord must fall, and equally surely, the nation must be consumed. How can they escape? If the guilty nation is to be spared, the altar must be built and a sacrifice provided. That sacrifice will stand for the guilty nation before God, and the judgment they have deserved can fall on it. The judgment falls upon the victim, the nation goes free.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The same writer sees the cross foreshadowed here, with one difference he is careful to mark.

On Carmel the fire of judgment consumed the burnt sacrifice. At Calvary, may we not say, the sacrifice consumed the fire of judgment. There the storm of judgment that hung over our heads burst on His head and spent itself. The judgment He bore, He exhausted. Resurrection is the everlasting proof of this.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Decision. Elijah takes the question out of human hands. It is not one man's opinion against four hundred and fifty; God Himself will settle it.

- Sameness. Both altars look identical — same animal, same wood, same ritual. Only the fire from heaven can tell true worship from false.

- Restraint. "Put no fire to it" rules out every human trick. Elijah can even let his opponents go first, because the fire is not his to supply.

- Fairness. People believed Baal ruled the fire. So the crowd that had stayed silent could not fault Elijah's terms.

- Substitution. The fire falls on the bull, not the people. Judgment lands on the victim and the nation walks free. At the cross Christ bore that judgment and exhausted it.

1 Kings 18:24 · Darby

And call ye on the name of your gods, and I will call on the name of Jehovah; and the god that answers by fire, let him be God. And all the people answered and said, The word is good.

Two altars stood on Mount Carmel. Each held a bullock laid on wood, with no fire under it. Elijah's terms were simple enough for a child to check. Yet they settled the deepest question anyone can ask: who is God, and how does He show it?

The decision taken out of human hands

Elijah stood alone against 450 prophets. He would not settle the question by argument or by counting heads, so he asked for a verdict from above.

Alone though he is, Elijah does not hesitate to challenge the crowd of false prophets. He has rebuked the king; he has convicted the nation for its half-hearted wavering. Now he will expose the folly of these false prophets and the emptiness of their gods. Who is the God of Israel? is the momentous question. Elijah boldly proposes that this great question go to the trial by fire. The appeal is to God. The decision shall not rest with the one lonely prophet of the Lord, or with the four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal. God shall decide.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The terms were too plain to refuse, and the people said so.

The people of Israel were there too, and they had to be made to understand the conflict and the question to be decided. Whatever their secret thoughts, they stayed silent when the prophet called them to declare for the LORD or for Baal. Then Elijah proposed a test. No one could refuse a test so easy to check, and so the people answered, "It is well spoken."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Two altars that looked identical

Nothing on the outside told the true from the false. Both sides had an animal, wood, and prayers.

Two religions meet face to face: Elijah's and Baal's, for the third, Israel's, is party to both. Publicly these two religions appear to have the same sacrifice. How are they to be distinguished? One of the bullocks must be consumed by fire from heaven, but not the other. In this way people will be able to recognise the true God. In this way too they will learn to know themselves, so that they may be turned to repentance.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Fire on the sacrifice, not on the people

Fire from heaven can fall on people in judgment. Elijah asked for something else.

He proposes to the people a sign that the Lord alone could produce, and it had a deep significance. This is not fire from heaven falling on men in judgment, as would happen later at the prophet's call. It is fire falling on the burnt offering.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The prophets of Baal did offer blood that day — their own, cut from their bodies — and it achieved nothing.

The blood of the false prophets flows. But neither their blood nor the blood of any man can atone for Israel's sin or open heaven to this poor people!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The picture drawn on the altar

Elijah soaked his sacrifice with water before he prayed. One writer sees the death of Christ pictured there.

There was no natural link between fire from heaven and a water-soaked victim. There was no natural link between the judgment of God and the holy Saviour — nothing in Him to invite wrath. But He took the sinner's place. The fire came down and He bore the judgment, just as the fire came down on Elijah's sacrifice. It consumed the sacrifice, the wood, the stones, the water and the very dust — levelling all to the ground.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Fire as God's mark of acceptance

One writer brings the sign down from the mountain to the individual soul.

The highest evidence of our God and of His truth is the acceptance He certifies to each soul who knows Him in atonement. That is, to each soul He has received. God answers by fire. In this answer, pictured by fire, the accepted soul senses that God receives him, and does so in all the strength and terribleness of holiness.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A sign that will one day be copied

Fire from heaven can also be copied. One writer looks ahead to a deceiver who will do it.

Among other marvels, he will be permitted to use the very miracle that Elijah used on Mount Carmel to call Israel back to Jehovah. Compare Revelation 13:13 with 1 Kings 18:24. His works are called "powers," because they are clearly superhuman. They are called "signs," because they have meaning and teaching. They are called "wonders," because they are meant to attract attention and admiration.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Fire decides. Elijah gave the verdict to God, not to debate and not to numbers. Both altars looked the same. Only the fire could tell the true God from the false, and show the people themselves so they might repent.

- Fire falls on the victim. It came down on the burnt offering, not on men in judgment. The blood Baal's prophets cut from themselves could atone for nothing.

- Fire pictures the cross. Fire consumed a soaked sacrifice that had nothing to draw it. So judgment fell on the holy Saviour, who had nothing in Him to invite wrath.

- Fire certifies. God still answers by fire when He receives a soul that knows Him in atonement, and He receives it in all the strength and terribleness of holiness.

- Fire will be imitated. A coming deceiver will be allowed to work the very miracle Elijah used on Carmel.

1 Kings 18:25 · Darby

And Elijah said to the prophets of Baal, Choose one bullock for yourselves, and sacrifice it first; for ye are the many; and call on the name of your god, but put no fire.

Mount Carmel has become a courtroom, and Elijah gives the opening move to the other side. Why would one man, facing four hundred and fifty opponents, hand them first choice of the animal and first turn at the altar? And why does he insist they light no fire of their own?

The First Turn Given Away

Elijah's terms sound generous, and they are. He lets the men who serve Baal pick their bull and go first. One writer finds the reason for his calm in the verse's last words: "but put no fire to it."

It was important to stress that last clause when dealing with unprincipled villains. Priestly "miracles" have a bad reputation for fraud. In the calmness of faith, Elijah could afford to let Satan's agents move first. He knew well that the god they served had no power.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

At the start, every outward advantage sat on Baal's side.

At the start the cause of Baal appeared at its best. Baal had his choice of the sacrifice and the sympathy of the court. He also had a large priesthood, zealous for his interests — that is, for their own.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why the Test Was Fire

Both sides would build an altar. Both would lay out a bull. Seen from a distance, the two religions looked alike, so something had to separate them.

Two religions meet face to face: Elijah's and Baal's — for the third, Israel's, takes part in both. Publicly these two religions appear to offer the same sacrifice. How are they to be told apart? One of the bulls must be consumed by fire from heaven, and not the other. By this means people will be able to recognise the true God. By this means the people too will learn to know themselves, and so be turned to repentance.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Verdict Taken Out of Human Hands

Elijah stood alone against four hundred and fifty. He asks for a test that no head count can settle.

Elijah boldly proposes to put this great question to the trial by fire. "The God who answers by fire, He is God." The appeal is to God. The decision will not rest with the lone prophet of the Lord, nor with the four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal. It will be no question of human reasoning, or of the opinion of one man against four hundred and fifty. God shall decide.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What Follows the Invitation

The prophets of Baal took the offer and called on their god.

Let us go back to Carmel and see how Elijah deals with the prophets. He gives them the first chance, and they prepare their sacrifice. What comes next? They cry, "O Baal, answer us!" But there was no voice, and no one answered. And they limped around the altar that they had made. He knew the whole thing was false, just as today everything that is not Christ is false. What you and I want is the truth. And Christ is the Truth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Their effort was enormous.

All day long they tore their throats, if not the heavens, with their cries. But the sheer scale of their effort only showed how useless it all was. There was no reply. The mountain of zeal did not bring forth even a mouse.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

No Fire of Our Own

The ban on human fire was not only a guard against cheating. One writer carries it further, to the sinner and his own efforts.

They used up the day in useless cries and in cutting themselves, and there was no response. Ashamed and silent, they had to wait for the voice of God. Then the prophet took those special precautions to make clear that it was indeed God, and He alone, who was dealing with His people. Water is poured again and again over the sacrifice and over the altar, until it fills the ditch around it. Now no possibility of fire is left, and all of nature's heat is quenched. Then, in a few simple words, the prophet asks the Lord to show Himself. He cannot show Himself where the smouldering embers of nature's efforts are still glowing. It is good for the sinner to realise this.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Fire decides. Two altars looked the same. Only fire from heaven could tell the true God from the false, and teach the people what they themselves were.

- Fire, not numbers. The opinion of one man against four hundred and fifty proves nothing. Elijah handed the verdict to God.

- Fire, not fraud. Elijah aimed "put no fire to it" at unprincipled men, since priestly "miracles" have a bad reputation for fraud. Faith could let them go first.

- Fire, not frenzy. A whole day of shouting produced nothing. Effort on that scale only exposed how powerless the object of it was.

- Fire, not our embers. God shows Himself once nature's own heat has died out. The sinner needs to learn this.

1 Kings 18:26 · Darby

And they took the bullock which had been given them, and sacrificed it, and called on the name of Baal from morning until noon, saying, O Baal, answer us! But there was no voice, and none answered. And they leaped about the altar that had been made.

On Mount Carmel the prophets of Baal get the first turn, and they use it for a whole morning. Their failure raises the questions the whole scene turns on: what makes a god real, and what makes prayer more than noise?

The first turn deliberately given away

Elijah lets his opponents go first, and one writer notes he had a reason for insisting they light no fire themselves.

The people knew well that Baal was the reputed god of fire, and said, "It is well spoken." Elijah then turned to the prophets of Baal and said, "Choose for yourselves one bull and prepare it first, for you are many, and call upon the name of your god, but put no fire to it" (1 Kings 18:25). It was important to stress that last clause when dealing with unprincipled villains. Priestly "miracles" have a bad name for fraud. In the calmness of faith, Elijah could afford to let Satan's agents move first. He knew very well that the god they served had no power.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Everything staked on a god who cannot speak

The prophets shouted for a whole morning and got nothing back. A psalm says why.

What a day it was! From morning until noon the prophets cried, "O Baal, answer us!" — knowing that for them everything was at stake. Their god's silence threw them into a frenzy, and they leaped about the altar they had made. "The idols of the nations are silver and gold, the work of human hands. They have mouths, but do not speak; they have eyes, but do not see; they have ears, but do not hear, nor is there any breath in their mouths. Those who make them become like them, so do all who trust in them" (Ps. 135:15-18).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why the leaping began

One writer names the reasoning behind the leaping, and finds the same habit in all false worship.

Having taken their bull and dressed it, they called on Baal from morning to noon to step in and prove his claims. "But there was no voice, and no one answered." They thought, as in all false worship, that more energy was needed from them. So they leaped on the altar they had made.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Volume is not power

Baal's side had every advantage that day: numbers, the court's backing, first pick of the sacrifice.

At the start, Baal's cause seemed to have everything in its favour. He had his choice of the sacrifice, the sympathy of the court, and a large priesthood, eager for his interests — that is, their own. All day they tore their throats, if not the heavens, with their cries, "O Baal, answer us." They waved their arms like madmen. They leaped in a frenzy on the altar and cut themselves with knives until the blood gushed out on them. But the sheer excess of what they did only showed how useless their efforts were. There was no reply. A mountain of zeal produced not even the smallest result.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

An empty image with something real behind it

The idol was lifeless, yet something real stood behind the worship of it — and the blood it cost settled nothing.

Baal does not answer (vv. 25-29). See the irony in how the prophet treats this lifeless object! Through it Satan was working his terrible influence on the hearts of men. The blood of the false prophets flows (v. 28), but neither their blood nor the blood of any man can atone for Israel's sin or open heaven to this poor people!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same mistake in prayer today

The Lord warned His disciples about empty repetition in prayer. One writer points back to this scene as the example.

If the Lord had to charge the Jews with hypocrisy, He had to judge the nations for their empty repetitions and many words in prayer (see 1 Kings 18:26-29). Beyond that, He also warns His disciples against thoughtless prayers. He knew in advance what would develop in Christianity. Pagan religions are not the only home of empty repetition of pre-written prayers. Christian churches practise it too.

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

Everything that is not Christ is false

One writer defends the way Elijah dealt with the prophets, and turns it into a test for today.

I think Elijah was right in the way he treated them. He knew the whole thing was false, just as today everything that is not Christ is false. What you and I want is the truth. And Christ is the Truth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Cry — From morning until noon they called on Baal. Everything was at stake for them.

- Silence — No voice, no answer: the idol has a mouth that does not speak, and those who make idols become like them.

- Frenzy — When a false god stays silent, his worshippers supply more energy. They leaped on the altar and cut themselves, and a mountain of zeal produced not even the smallest result.

- Repetition — The Lord judged the nations for empty repetitions and many words. Repeated pre-written prayers carry the same fault in churches today.

- Contrast — Elijah gave his opponents the first turn in complete calm. He knew their god had no power, and that everything which is not Christ is false.

1 Kings 18:27 · Darby

And it came to pass at noon that Elijah mocked them and said, Cry aloud; for he is a god; for he is meditating, or gone aside, or he is on a journey; perhaps he sleeps, and will awake.

It is noon on Mount Carmel. The prophets of Baal have shouted at their altar all morning and nothing has happened. Elijah finally speaks — not to pray, but to mock. Why would a prophet of God use ridicule? And what do his excuses for Baal say about the god they were calling?

Silence, Then Scorn

Elijah said nothing all morning. He let the prophets of Baal call on their god for hours before he opened his mouth.

They prepare their altar, dress their bull, and call on their god. From morning until noon they cry to Baal. It was useless — there was no voice, and no one answered. Until midday Elijah is a silent witness of their futile efforts. Then at last, for the first and only time, he speaks to these false prophets. And it is only to mock them.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What the Taunt Reveals

Elijah offers four excuses for Baal. He is deep in thought. He has stepped aside to relieve himself. He is travelling, or asleep. Each excuse gives Baal a limit. Two of the writers quoted below use an older translation, which has "he is talking, or he is pursuing" where the ESV reads "he is musing, or he is relieving himself."

Elijah gave the prophets of Baal plenty of time to call on their mystical god... When there was no answer, they jumped around the altar they had made. They acted as though their movements could influence their idol! After a few hours of useless energy, Elijah mocked them. He told them to cry louder. Perhaps Baal was preoccupied, or busy, or on a journey, or asleep and needed waking. They had no idea of a God who knows everything and is present everywhere.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Irony Aimed at a Lifeless Thing

The idol itself was a lifeless thing. One writer names who was working through it, and what all the blood spilled that day could never do.

See the irony in the way the prophet treats this lifeless object! Through it Satan was exercising his terrible influence over the hearts of men. The blood of the false prophets flows. But neither their blood nor any man's can atone for Israel's sin or open heaven to this poor people!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Effect on the Prophets

Elijah's words did not calm the scene. They drove the prophets to try harder, and to cut themselves for an answer that never came.

They thought more energy was needed from them, as in all false worship... Elijah mocked them, for he knew that gods made by human hands were only emptiness. By his taunts and irony he provoked them to desperation, so that they cut themselves with knives and lances "until the blood gushed out upon them." It was all useless. They kept up their "prophesying" until the time of the evening sacrifice, but "there was no voice. No one answered; no one paid attention."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why Elijah Could Mock

One writer draws a lesson from the contrast. Elijah knew what it was to pray and be heard. The priests of Baal did not.

Now let me ask whether you know what prayer is. What use is prayer if you have no sense that God has heard you? Look at the priests of Baal. Elijah said to them, "Cry aloud" — cry louder still, until he does hear. "Either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened." He said it mockingly. He himself knew what it was to be heard, to be joined in his own soul to a God who always hears. So it is with us now.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Mockery and Truth

Was Elijah right to mock? One writer answers yes, and points past Baal to what is false today.

And now the prophet turns a little sarcastic as he says, "Cry aloud! for he is a god; either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened." I think Elijah was right in the way he treated them. He knew the whole thing was false, just as today everything that is not Christ is false. What you and I want is the truth. And Christ is the Truth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Silence — Elijah watched from morning to noon without a word. His only words to them were mockery.

- Smallness — Every excuse in the taunt gives Baal a limit: distracted, away, asleep. The prophets had no idea of a God who knows everything and is present everywhere.

- Emptiness — Elijah knew that gods made by human hands are only emptiness. And no amount of spilled human blood can atone for sin.

- Frenzy — The taunt drove them to knives and lances. More noise and more blood produced the same result: no voice, no answer, no one who paid attention.

- Certainty — Elijah could mock a sleeping god because he knew a God who always hears. That contrast runs through the whole scene.

1 Kings 18:28 · Darby

And they cried aloud, and cut themselves after their manner with swords and spears, till the blood gushed out upon them.

For hours the prophets of Baal had called on their god, and no answer came. This verse shows what they did next: they shouted louder and cut open their own bodies, as if their own blood could force him to act.

The weapons in their hands

The word behind "lances" is a soldier's weapon. One reference work explains what these men turned on themselves:

romach. A spear used by warriors, with a metal point. 1 Kings 18:28. The word is often translated 'spear.' The priests of Baal, in their desperation, wounded themselves with this weapon.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Driven to it by Elijah's mockery

The cutting did not start the contest. It came after hours of silence, and after Elijah had mocked them:

With the crowds looking on, when noon came Elijah mocked the unhappy prophets. He suggested that they were not crying loudly enough. Perhaps their god was busy with something else and could not attend to them. Perhaps he was away from home. Or perhaps he was asleep! Stung by these taunts, the false prophets gashed themselves with swords and spears until their bodies streamed with blood! This unholy farce, carried on by men made in the image of God, was allowed to continue three hours longer.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Before the knives came the leaping. One writer names what these men had never understood about God:

When there was no answer, they jumped around the altar they had made, as though to influence their idol with their physical movements! They had no conception of an all-knowing, ever-present God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A principle running through every false religion

Silence did not stop them. It only made them work harder, and that pattern runs through all false worship.

They thought that more energy was demanded on their part, as in all false worship. So they leaped upon the altar that was made. Elijah mocked them, for he knew that gods made with men's hands were only vanity. His taunts and irony drove them to desperation, so that they cut themselves with knives and lances "until the blood gushed out upon them." It was all in vain.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Blood that could never atone

Their blood flowed, and it settled nothing. One writer says why that blood could do nothing for Israel:

Baal does not answer (vv. 25-29). See the irony the prophet uses against this lifeless object! Through it Satan was working his terrible influence on the hearts of men. The blood of the false prophets flows (v. 28). But neither their blood nor any man's blood can atone for Israel's sin or open heaven to this poor people!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

How far religious flesh will go

Scripture later warns believers against people it calls "the concision." One writer links that warning back to what the priests of Baal did:

"Beware of evil workers, beware of the concision" — a play upon the word "circumcision." We know how the idolatrous priests cut themselves with knives and lances (1 Kings 18:28). This may refer to that practice. It is astonishing how far the flesh may go in its religious energy, entirely opposed to the mind of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Self-harm as religion, then and now

The verse says they cut themselves "after their custom." This was a settled practice, not a one-off, and one writer traces the same idea into later systems of penance:

Long ago, the priests of the heathen nations required their people to do works of penance and self-punishment. They even cut their flesh with knives, like the priests of Baal in 1 Kings 18:28. So Rome teaches that God is not satisfied without bodily tortures and endless penances. But this denies the value of the FINISHED WORK of the Lord Jesus Christ. It denies the PRECIOUS BLOOD that alone cleanses from ALL sin.

Modernised from For the YoungOriginal wording

The same writer contrasts this with true self-denial:

These poor, deluded Baal worshippers did not notice Elijah's sarcasm. So they took his advice: they cried out more loudly to Baal, and they also cut themselves with knives and lances. In this way idolaters injure the body literally. They think this is the self-denial that will influence their false god. How different is the true self-denial of a believer! True self-denial makes no show, but involves a sober self-judgment in spiritual reality.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Silence — Baal never answered. His prophets had no idea of a God who is all-knowing and always present.

- Frenzy — silence pushed them to shouting, then to blood. In all false worship the demand falls back on the worshipper's own effort.

- Blood — their blood flowed, yet no man's blood can cover Israel's sin or open heaven.

- Flesh — Scripture's warning against "the concision" may point back to this cutting. It shows how far religious flesh will go against the mind of God.

- Contrast — penance and self-harm deny the finished work of Christ. Real self-denial makes no show at all.

1 Kings 18:29 · Darby

And it came to pass when midday was past, that they prophesied until the [time] of the offering up of the oblation; but there was neither voice, nor any that answered, nor any attention.

On Mount Carmel Israel had to choose between the LORD and Baal, and the test was simple: the God who answers by fire is God. Verse 29 is the end of Baal's turn — a whole day of crying out and cutting, and not one sound from heaven.

A Whole Day, and Nothing Came Back

Baal's prophets had the whole day to themselves, from morning until the evening sacrifice. One writer traces the hours and their growing desperation:

From morning until noon they cried to Baal. It was in vain. There was no voice and no one answered. Until midday Elijah watches their useless efforts in silence. Then at last he speaks to these false prophets, for the first and only time — and only to mock them. Stung by the scorn of Elijah they redouble their efforts. For three hours more, from noon until the evening sacrifice, they cry aloud and cut themselves with knives until their blood gushes out. Still it is all in vain: "there was no voice. No one answered; no one paid attention."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the Silence

Nothing answered, because there was nothing there to answer:

The prophets of Baal call upon their false god. No fire leaps from a cloudless sky. They become frenzied in their call upon Baal. But Baal did not respond. He was only something the devil had imagined.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Yet a real power stood behind that empty name, working on real hearts:

Baal does not answer (vv. 25-29). See with what irony the prophet treats this lifeless object! Satan was using it to exercise his terrible influence on the hearts of men. The blood of the false prophets flows (v. 28). But neither their blood nor any man's blood can atone for Israel's sin or open heaven to this poor people!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Blood Spilled for Nothing

The knives had a purpose. These worshippers believed their own pain would move their god, and one writer holds that up against real self-denial:

They took Elijah's advice and cried out more loudly to Baal, also cutting themselves with knives and lances. So idolaters really do injure their own bodies, thinking this is the self-denial that will influence their false god. How different is the true self-denial of a believer! True self-denial makes no show, but involves a sober self-judgment in spiritual reality. The prophets of Baal continued this useless noise all afternoon until the time of the evening sacrifice (v. 29).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The verse says they "raved on" while no one answered. Men made in the image of God spent a whole afternoon doing it:

Driven on by these taunts, the false prophets cut themselves with swords and spears until blood ran down their bodies! This unholy farce on the part of men made in the image of God was allowed to continue three hours longer.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Hour of the Evening Sacrifice

The silence did not break at a random moment. It lasted right up to the one hour in the day that already belonged to God:

At "the time of the offering of the evening sacrifice" Elijah judged that his opportunity had come. It was 3 p.m. In Jerusalem the evening lamb was being laid on the altar of the LORD, together with its grain offering and drink offering. All of it spoke to God of Christ, whose death at Calvary took place at that hour (Ex. 29:41; Matt. 27:46). It was the hour of divine blessing: compare Ezra 9:5; Dan. 9:21. The hour had struck for Elijah's sacrifice to be offered, and for the blessing which followed.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Warning for Any Heart

The scene is not only about an ancient idol. It is about anything a heart leans on instead of God:

How solemn, and how true for all time, are those words of Jeremiah: "Cursed is the man whose heart turns away from the LORD"! It does not matter who or what we put our confidence in — a religious system, a religious ritual, or anything else. It is a departure of the heart from God. A curse follows it. When the final struggle comes, people will call on their Baal in vain: "there will be no voice, no one to answer, no one to pay attention."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- No voice — from morning to the evening hour the false prophets got nothing: no sound, no answer, no attention.

- No power — the silence had a reason. Baal did not exist; the influence behind him was Satan's, and it could not send fire.

- No atonement — their own blood streamed out for hours, but no man's blood can cover sin or open heaven.

- No cover left — Elijah stayed silent and let the farce run its full course. Their failure was complete and public before his own hour came.

- One answer — their religion ran out at the hour of the evening sacrifice. That hour pointed to Christ's death, and it was the hour of blessing.

1 Kings 18:30 · Darby

Then Elijah said to all the people, Draw near to me. And all the people drew near to him. And he repaired the altar of Jehovah which was broken down.

Baal's prophets had called on their god all day and got no answer. Now the one man left on the Lord's side turns from the false altar to a ruined one, and calls a whole nation to watch him rebuild it.

Waiting for Error to Run Out

Elijah does not rush. He lets the false system run itself out before he shows anything better.

It is always good to wait patiently and let evil and error find their own level. Time will surely bring the truth to light. Error may dress itself ever so carefully in the respectable robes of age. But time will strip those robes off and show it in all its ugliness. Elijah felt this. So he could stand quietly by and let all the sand in Baal's hourglass run out before he began to show the pattern of a better way. It takes a very real grasp of divine principles to take this patient course. Had our prophet been shallow-minded or badly taught, he would have been in much greater haste. He would have rushed to display his system and stir up a storm of opposition against his opponents.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

"Come Near to Me"

The call is an invitation, not an order. It comes after Elijah has already reached the crowd in two other ways.

With the false prophets completely defeated, Elijah makes his third appeal to the people. He has spoken to their conscience, he has appealed to their reason, now he will speak to their hearts. He gathers them around him with the gracious invitation, "Come near to me." In response, all the people come near to him. In silence they watch the prophet repair the altar of the Lord. Having thrown down the altar of Baal, he sets up the altar of the Lord. It is not enough to expose what is false; the truth must be upheld.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Elijah works in the open. He wants witnesses at close range.

First of all he called the people to him. He wanted them to examine his actions for themselves, and to make it impossible for them to doubt that the Lord had really acted.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Altar as a Measure of the People

Elijah begins with repair work, not a speech.

Now it was Elijah's turn. He stood alone as the public witness — alone in front of timid people-pleasers, waverers between two opinions, and open, wicked rebels against God. His first act was to repair the altar of the Lord that was broken down. The state of the altar was proof of the state of the people.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Teaching the Way Back to God

There is warmth in the call, and what Elijah rebuilds teaches the people how to come back to God.

"Come near to me," said Elijah to the people, who had been led astray so long like foolish sheep. There is a sound of tenderness in the prophet's words, like Joseph's invitation to his guilty and trembling brothers in Genesis 45:4. Elijah would soon lead the poor misguided people back to their patient and faithful God. In front of them he repaired the long-dishonoured altar of the Lord. He would teach them the true way of approach to God. If blessing was ever to be enjoyed in Israel again, it must be on the ground of the sacrifice God accepts.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Only Half the Work

Pulling down what is false is not the end of the job.

The first thing he does is to "repair the altar of the Lord that was broken down." This was Israel's centre, and every true reformer turned his attention to it. Those who try a one-sided reformation may be content with merely throwing down what is false. They stop short of laying a sound base on which to build something new. But such a reformation will never last; it carries too much of the old leaven with it to be a testimony. The altar of Baal must not only be thrown down — the altar of the Lord must be set up.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One Man, One Altar, in a Day of Ruin

Elijah rebuilds on the ground of what God set up at the beginning, not on the wreckage he can see.

Elijah says, "Come near to me" (v. 30). At that time he was God's representative on earth, which Christ was in perfection. If they stayed far off, Israel would not be able to witness what God was about to do... Outwardly the altar was broken down; that is to say, Israel as a whole no longer existed. But it was enough that one man should bear witness with his altar of twelve stones that what God established in the beginning would remain forever.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Broken. The ruined altar was a mirror. Its condition showed where the people stood with God.

- Patient. Elijah let Baal's system run itself out first. Haste would only have raised a storm instead of showing a better way.

- Near. He reached their conscience, then their reason, then their heart. He brought the crowd close enough that no one could doubt what God did.

- Repaired. He does not just pull down what is false. Tearing down alone leaves too much old leaven behind. The Lord's altar must go back up.

- Enough. In a day of ruin, one man rebuilding on God's original ground was testimony enough. Blessing could only come through the sacrifice God accepts.

1 Kings 18:31 · Darby

And Elijah took twelve stones, according to the number of the tribes of the sons of Jacob, to whom the word of Jehovah came saying, Israel shall be thy name;

Baal's prophets shouted at a silent sky all day, and no fire fell. Then Elijah called the crowd near and picked up twelve stones — in a nation that had split in two long before.

The Altar Rebuilt Before the Fire Falls

The altar of the Lord lay in pieces. One writer reads Elijah's first move as a lesson in how a people comes back to God.

In their presence he repaired the long-dishonoured altar of the Lord. He would teach them the true way of approach to God. If blessing was ever again to be enjoyed in Israel, it must be in virtue of the divinely accepted sacrifice.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Another writer asks what a lasting reform requires.

People who attempt a one-sided reform may be content with tearing down what is false. They never go on to lay a solid foundation and build something new on it. But that kind of reform will never last... The altar of Baal must be thrown down, but the altar of the Lord must also be set up.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Twelve Stones for a Nation Split in Two

The arithmetic is the point. Ten tribes had broken away from the other two, and Carmel stood in the north. Elijah still counted twelve.

Elijah was standing on ten tribe ground. But his twelve stones tell us that he entered into God's thoughts about His people. The people were still one in His mind. Only two tribes still recognised the temple in Jerusalem. Yet the High Priest went on carrying the names of all the children of Israel on his breastplate before the Lord, and twelve loaves were still placed on the table in the holy place. Two centuries after the great gathering on Mount Carmel, Hezekiah, king of Judah, commanded at the Passover he held in Jerusalem that atonement should be made for all Israel. Yet only two tribes accepted his rule, and the deportation of the northern tribes had already begun!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The stones also said something to the ten tribes that had pulled away.

What a reproof to the separated 10 tribes! God was concerned for all Israel, and Elijah showed this impartial consideration for all twelve tribes.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Name God Gave

The verse traces the tribes back to the man God renamed. Why did his name have to change?

Jacob ("the supplanter") must have his name changed if he is to receive proper blessing from God. Only when the flesh is touched and shriveled does Jacob receive the name Israel ("a prince with God"). By nature he was Jacob, but by the grace of God he becomes Israel.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

How long was that name meant to hold?

Now the question is this. How long was Israel to be the name, and how long was Israel's unity to last? Always, without a break, forever. This is where Elijah took his stand.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What Unbelief Would Have Said

Twelve stones could easily have looked out of date. One writer puts that objection into words.

If he had looked at what he could see — if Israel's moral condition had ruled him... he would never have dared to build an altar of twelve stones. Unbelieving human nature might argue like this: "This is not the time for an altar of twelve stones. That day is gone... How much better, how much more fitting, to lower the standard to match your true condition."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Elijah did the opposite. The same writer weighs what his count showed:

Elijah recognized the twelve tribes of Israel at a time when they were divided, weakened, and brought low. That showed true communion with the mind of God about His people.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Same Stones Today

One writer carries Elijah's count straight across to Christians today.

Why twelve stones? It was the expression of the unity of Israel. Instead of being a divided, broken-up people, Elijah knew that before God they were one. In the same way, the servant of God today who knows the truth knows that there is one Body, one Spirit, and one Head in heaven. And of course he will try to maintain this glorious truth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

And the stones look forward as well as back:

Despite the nation's divided state, faith recognizes the unity of the twelve tribes. Every tribe must be represented in the altar of the Lord. Faith sees that the day is coming when idolatry will be judged and the nation will be one, with God in the midst.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Repair first. Elijah rebuilt the broken altar before any fire fell. Tearing down Baal's altar was not enough on its own.

- Count twelve. Elijah stood in the breakaway north and still built for all twelve tribes. God's own sanctuary agreed: twelve names on the breastplate, twelve loaves on the table.

- The name is the ground. Grace renamed Jacob the supplanter Israel. The stones rest on that word of God, not on the nation's record.

- Refuse the lowered standard. Faith does not shrink God's truth to fit the visible ruin, however reasonable that sounds.

- One now, one then. Elijah held to one Israel in a split land; believers hold to one body today. Faith already sees the day when the nation will be one, with God among them.

1 Kings 18:32 · Darby

and with the stones he built an altar in the name of Jehovah, and made a trench round about the altar, of the capacity of two measures of seed;

All day on Mount Carmel, Baal's prophets have called on their god, and no answer has come. Now Elijah turns from tearing down what is false to building what is true.

Repairing, Not Only Demolishing

Elijah's first move is to mend a ruin, and that order of work matters.

Some people carry out a one-sided reform. They are content just to throw down what is false. They never go on to set up a sound basis for building something new. But such reform will never stand. It keeps too much of the old evil in it to be a testimony. The altar of Baal must not only be thrown down, but the altar of the Lord must be set up.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Twelve Stones for a Divided Nation

The number of stones is the striking thing. The kingdom was split, and Elijah stood among the ten northern tribes. Yet he counted twelve.

This act is proof of the prophet's spiritual perception. The twelve tribes were no longer walking in unity. Their unity has still not returned to this day, and it will not return until the kingdom of the Lord Jesus. Elijah was standing on ten-tribe ground. But his twelve stones tell us that he entered into God's thoughts about His people. The people were still one in His mind. Only two tribes still recognised the temple in Jerusalem. Yet the high priest still carried the names of all Israel's sons on his breastplate before the Lord. Twelve loaves still lay on the table in the holy place.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The man who built it felt utterly alone, yet he refused to build for his own side only.

There must always be the testimony of the full people of God. In the whole Old Testament there is no clearer sign of what the Spirit of God marks out as fitting to Himself. No man ever felt more isolated than Elijah. Yet that man's heart was with the whole people of God. Faith can never do less. It can never be content with a part; it must have all God's people for God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Built in the Name of the Lord

Elijah builds "in the name of the LORD" — not in his own name, and not in the name of a party. Commentators carry that over to God's people now.

Some would sacrifice to the Lord on the altar of Baal. In other words, they would keep an evil system and be content to give it a right name. But no; the only centre of unity God can recognise is the name of Jesus — simply and only that. The people of God must not be looked at as members of a system, but as members of Christ.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Trench Around the Altar

Elijah dug a trench big enough to hold two seahs of seed, then had water poured over the whole altar. He was removing every excuse in advance.

There had to be the fullest proof here. The trial of the poor widow who was not an Israelite lost none of its force. Still less would this trial be softened, where God's own honour was at stake and Baal's false claims had to be exposed. So what Elijah poured on was nothing that would feed a fire. Water puts a fire out, if the fire comes from man.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Commentators also read the soaked sacrifice in that trench as a picture of the death of Christ.

Fire from heaven and a water-soaked sacrifice had nothing in common. The judgment of God and the holy Saviour had nothing in common either, and there was nothing in Him to invite wrath. But He took the sinner's place. The fire came down and He bore the judgment, just as the fire fell on Elijah's sacrifice. It consumed the offering, the wood, the stones, the water and the very dust, levelling it all to the ground.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The Witness of One Man

The altar did not reunite the nation. Writers apply this to anyone who feels outnumbered.

Outwardly the altar lay in ruins; that is to say, Israel as a whole no longer existed. But it was enough that one man bore witness with his altar of twelve stones. What God had established in the beginning would remain forever. Those who proclaim this truth will always be few in number. Perhaps they will remain alone like Elijah. But this testimony has been entrusted to us, just as it was to Elijah, in a time when everyone is falling away. So what does their number matter?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Repair first. Exposing error is only half the work; the altar of Baal must come down and the altar of the Lord must go up.

- Count twelve. The nation was split, but Elijah built to God's reckoning of His people, not to the visible division.

- Name it rightly. Elijah built in the name of the Lord — the one centre God recognises, never a system wearing a good label.

- Flood the trench. The water removed every human explanation, so when the fire fell, only God could get the credit.

- Stand alone if needed. One man with twelve stones was enough witness; those who hold this ground have often been few.

1 Kings 18:33 · Darby

and he put the wood in order, and cut the bullock in pieces, and laid it on the wood. And he said, Fill four pitchers with water, and pour it on the burnt-offering, and on the wood.

Baal's prophets have called on their god all day, and no fire has come. Now Elijah lays out his own sacrifice — and then calls for water.

Order Before Fire

Everything in this verse is deliberate. Elijah sets the wood and the victim in place, and only then calls for water. One writer compares this test with Elijah's earlier testing of a poor widow, and shows why Elijah made nothing easier here:

There had to be the fullest proof here. If the trial of the poor Gentile widow was not weakened at all, then it could be weakened even less where God's own honour was at stake, and where Baal's claims were to be disproved. Therefore it was not anything that would feed the fire, but rather put it out if it were fire from man.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Water Where Fire Was Wanted

A man planning to light a fire himself would never soak the wood first. Elijah wants the watching people to see that no hidden spark is waiting there:

Then, to show there was no trick in what he did, he says, "Fill four jars with water and pour it on the burnt offering and on the wood" (1 Kings 18:33). He is determined to let them see that there is no fire there. The truth of God is very simple. There is no underhand work about it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Nature's Embers Put Out

Elijah removes every human possibility before he prays. One writer draws a lesson for the sinner from it:

Water is poured again and again over the sacrifice and over the altar, until it fills the ditch around the altar. Every possibility of fire is now gone, and all nature's heat quenched. Only then, in a few simple words, does the prophet ask the Lord to show Himself. Ah, yes, He can do so now. He cannot show Himself where there are still smouldering embers of nature's efforts; and it is well for the sinner to realise this.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Victim For a Guilty Nation

The animal on the altar is not a prop for a miracle. It is a burnt offering, and it stands in the place of the people watching. Without it, the fire that fell would have had nowhere else to go:

How wonderful is this scene. A holy God who must deal with all evil by the consuming fire of judgment, and a guilty nation steeped in the evil which the holy God must judge. Surely the fire of the Lord must fall, and equally surely, the nation must be consumed. How can they escape? … If God is to spare the guilty nation, then the altar must be built and a sacrifice provided. That sacrifice will stand for the guilty nation before God, and the judgment they have earned can fall on it.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Elijah's own confidence rested there too. He drew near at the hour of the evening sacrifice:

It was the time of the evening sacrifice. This fact showed where Elijah rested for the sign he asked for. It was not in his own service or prayers, but in the value of the burnt offering, which stands for the sacrifice of Christ.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Cross Foreshadowed

One writer reads the soaked sacrifice as a picture of Christ:

He built his sacrificial altar, laid the wood in order, and placed the bull in its pieces on it. He dug the trench and poured out twelve jars of water, more precious than wine after the years of drought. In all this he pictured the death of Christ in a most striking way. Fire from heaven and a water-soaked victim had nothing in common. The judgment of God and the holy Saviour had nothing in common either. There was nothing in Him to invite wrath. But He took the sinner's place, the fire came down, and He bore the judgment.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Order — Elijah arranges the wood, cuts the bull and lays it on: he prepares with care, then leaves the outcome to God.

- Water — poured on the very spot that needed fire, so no one could suspect a hidden spark or a trick.

- Quenched — with nature's every ember put out, God is free to act; He does not share the stage with human effort.

- Victim — the burnt offering stands in for a guilty nation. The fire falls on the sacrifice, and the people go free.

- Christ — the soaked sacrifice had nothing to attract the flame. The Saviour had nothing in Him to invite wrath, yet He bore the judgment in the sinner's place.

1 Kings 18:34 · Darby

And he said, Do it the second time. And they did it the second time. And he said, Do it the third time. And they did it the third time.

On Carmel the prophets of Baal had cried all day and got nothing, and now it was Elijah's turn at the repaired altar. Instead of making his sacrifice easier to burn, he had the people soak it — four jars at a time, three times over. Why would a man who wants fire pour water on it?

Water, not fuel

Elijah put nothing on that altar that could help a flame. God had not softened an earlier test either.

There must be the fullest proof here. God did not weaken the trial when He tested the poor Gentile widow. He would weaken it even less where His own honour was at stake, and where He had to disprove Baal's claims. So what they poured on was not anything that would feed the fire. It was something that would put the fire out, if the fire came from man.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The crowd did the pouring

Elijah did not pour the water himself. He handed the jars to the watching crowd.

First of all he called the people to him. He wanted them to examine his acts for themselves. He wanted to make it impossible for them to doubt that the Lord had stepped in. Next he repaired and built the altar of the Lord. With twelve stones he set all the tribes of Israel before God. Then he made a trench round the altar and prepared the sacrifice. He told the people to drench it three times with water. They poured so much that the water ran round the altar, and he filled the trench with water too. Who that saw what was done could doubt for a moment that only divine power could make that sacrifice burn?

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Another writer reads the repetition the same way — as a guard set against any charge of a hidden trick.

Besides this he guarded carefully against anyone suspecting trickery in what he was doing. He told them to fill four waterpots with water and pour it on the sacrifice. They did this, and he told them to repeat this a second and third time, so that the water ran all around the altar and filled the trench.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Faith enlarges the obstacle

Repeating the order twice more was not caution. It was faith.

Elijah's faith had given God room to act. He had made a trench and filled it with water. In other words, he had made the difficulty as great as possible, so that the divine triumph might be complete. And so it was.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Every human spark put out

There is a lesson here for anyone who hopes to add something of his own to God's work.

Water is poured again and again over the sacrifice and over the altar, until it fills the ditch around the altar. Every possibility of fire is gone. All nature's heat is out. Then, in a few simple words, the prophet asks the Lord to show Himself. Ah yes, He can do so now. He cannot show Himself where the embers of nature's efforts are still smouldering. The sinner does well to grasp this. The fire that divine love kindles comes from God. Man does not find it in his own heart. To look for it there would only deny man's need of God. And the believer must not forget the same truth.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A picture of the cross

After years without rain, water was the costliest thing on that mountain. One writer looks at the soaked victim and sees the cross.

He built his sacrificial altar and laid the wood in order. He placed the bull in pieces on it. He built the trench and poured out twelve barrels of water — water more precious than wine after the years of drought. In all this he pictured the death of Christ in a most striking way. There was no natural fit between fire from heaven and a water-soaked victim. There was no natural fit between the judgment of God and the holy Saviour; there was nothing in Him to invite wrath. But He took the sinner's place. The fire came down, and He bore the judgment. It fell on Elijah's sacrifice in the same way, consuming the sacrifice, the wood, the stones, the water and the very dust, levelling everything to the ground.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Water — What Elijah called for would smother a fire, not feed one. Nothing that could burn on its own went onto that altar.

- Witnesses — The people carried the jars themselves. The crowd that had to choose between God and Baal tested the altar with their own hands.

- Three times — The repeated soaking left no room for doubt. Faith made the obstacle as large as possible, so the victory would be unmistakable.

- Embers — God shows Himself where nature's heat is out, not where a spark of human effort still smoulders.

- Fire — The judgment fell on that drenched, unlikely victim — a picture of the holy Saviour taking the sinner's place.

1 Kings 18:35 · Darby

And the water ran round about the altar; and he filled the trench also with water.

Elijah had rebuilt the altar, laid the wood and the cut-up bull on it, and called for water three times until the trench was full. Why would a man praying for fire work so hard to make fire impossible?

Water Where Fire Should Be

Elijah chose the one thing that could only work against a fire. One writer explains why the test was made so hard:

There had to be the fullest proof here. In testing the poor Gentile widow, the trial was not weakened at all. Still less would it be weakened where God's own honour was at stake and Baal's claims had to be disproved. So what he poured on was nothing that would feed a fire; it would rather put one out, if the fire came from man... His witness was as full as it could be.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The prophets of Baal had taken no such risk. As one writer observes, "The prophets of Baal did not dare to use water in this way, but Elijah used it freely" (W. W. Fereday).

Faith Gives God Room

Elijah was not being reckless. One writer explains what the trench really showed:

Elijah's faith had given God room to act. He had made a trench and filled it with water. In other words, he made the difficulty as great as possible, so that the divine triumph might be complete. And that is exactly what happened.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The water itself was costly. After years of drought it was worth more than wine, and Elijah poured twelve barrels of it over the sacrifice (A. J. Pollock).

Nothing Hidden from the Crowd

The people did the pouring themselves. Elijah first called them close, so they could watch every step:

First of all he called the people to him. He wanted them to examine his acts for themselves, so that they could not doubt that the Lord had really stepped in. Next he repaired and built the altar of the Lord, and with twelve stones he represented all the tribes of Israel before God. Then he made a trench around the altar, prepared the sacrifice, and told the people to drench it three times with water. They did it so thoroughly that "the water ran around the altar and filled the trench also with water." Could anyone who watched this doubt for a moment that only divine power could set that sacrifice on fire?

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Another writer puts Elijah's aim plainly: "He is determined to let them see that there is no fire there. The truth of God is very simple. There is no underhand work about it" (W. T. P. Wolston).

No Embers of Human Effort Left

Now nothing on that altar could catch fire on its own. One writer draws out what this means for anyone coming to God:

Water is poured again and again over the sacrifice and over the altar, until it fills the ditch around the altar. Every possibility of fire is now gone, and all nature's heat is quenched. Only then, in a few simple words, does the prophet ask the Lord to show Himself. Ah, yes, He can do so now. He cannot show Himself where the embers of nature's efforts are still smouldering. It is well for the sinner to realise this.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Drenched Victim

One writer sees in this drenched sacrifice a striking picture of the death of Christ:

There was nothing in a water-soaked victim to draw fire from heaven. There was nothing in the holy Saviour to draw the judgment of God, nothing in Him to invite wrath. But He took the sinner's place, and the fire came down, and He bore the judgment. It fell just as the fire fell on Elijah's sacrifice, consuming it, the wood, the stones, the water, the very dust — levelling all to the ground.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The altar carried the twelve tribes in its twelve stones, so the fire fell on what stood for the people themselves: "The sacrifice was consumed; the people are consumed with the sacrifice. But judgment without mercy falls on what represents them before God, and this sets them free to rejoice in His deliverance" (H. L. Rossier).

Summary

- Water first. Elijah poured on the one thing that kills fire, so that nothing on the altar could feed a flame of human making.

- Water as proof. The people filled the barrels and watched the trench overflow; no one could later claim a trick.

- Water as room. Faith made the difficulty as great as possible, so that the victory would belong to God alone.

- Water as surrender. God shows Himself once the embers of human effort have gone out.

- Water and the cross. A soaked victim had nothing in it to attract fire, yet the fire fell on it — and those it represented went free.

1 Kings 18:36 · Darby

And it came to pass at [the time of] the offering up of the oblation, that Elijah the prophet drew near, and said, Jehovah, God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, let it be known this day that thou art God in Israel, and that I am thy servant, and that I have done all these things by thy word.

All day the prophets of Baal had shouted, danced and cut themselves, and nothing happened. Then Elijah steps forward at a set hour and prays a few short sentences. Why did God answer him and not them?

The Hour He Chose

Elijah did not pray at random. The "oblation" is the daily gift offered to God at the temple. Elijah waited for the hour when priests in Jerusalem were laying it on God's altar.

At "the time of the offering of the evening sacrifice" Elijah judged that his opportunity had come. It was 3 p.m. In Jerusalem, priests were laying the evening lamb on the altar of the Lord, along with its grain offering and drink offering. All of it spoke to God of Christ, whose death at Calvary took place at that hour (Ex. 29:41; Matt. 27:46). It was the hour of divine blessing: compare Ezra 9:5; Dan. 9:21. The hour had struck for Elijah's sacrifice, and for the blessing that followed.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

That choice of hour shows what Elijah leaned on.

Notice the time when the prophet drew near. It was the time of the offering of the evening sacrifice. That fact declared where Elijah rested for the sign he asked for. He rested not in his own services or prayers, but in the value of the burnt offering, which signifies the sacrifice of Christ.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Drawing Near

Earlier in the scene Elijah had called the people to come near to him. Now the movement is his own, and it is toward God.

"At the time of the offering of the oblation, Elijah the prophet came near" — not merely the people to him, but the prophet to the Lord. He drew near to that which was to be the witness of His power, of His testimony, of His own name and glory... How blessed! It was a secret between God and His prophet. But now Elijah told it out, before any answer came. So all the profit of the answer would belong to the people, and the word of the Lord would be lifted higher and glorified in their eyes.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Name He Calls On

Elijah calls God the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel. He had already built that confession into the altar, using twelve stones for a nation that was split in two.

The twelve stones represented the twelve tribes, the people in their entirety before God. At a time of ruin, the prophet bears testimony to the unity of the people, just as witnesses today bear testimony to the oneness of the body of Christ. Outwardly the altar was broken down; that is to say, Israel as a whole no longer existed. But it was enough that one man, with his altar of twelve stones, should bear witness to this: what God established in the beginning would remain forever... Those who proclaim this truth will always be few in number. They may remain alone, like Elijah. But what does their number matter, if God has entrusted this testimony to us, as He did to Elijah?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"That I Am Your Servant"

Elijah stands before a whole nation, and asks nothing for himself.

In his prayer, Elijah makes nothing of himself but everything of God. He seeks no place for himself. He has no desire to lift himself up before the people. He wants to be known only as a servant carrying out the commands of the Lord. His one desire is that God may be glorified. To this end he would have all the people know that the Lord is God. He would have them know that the Lord is doing "all these things". He would have them know that the Lord is speaking to their heart, to turn the people back to Himself.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"At Your Word"

The last clause carries the weight. Elijah is not proposing a plan to God; he is reporting obedience.

Yet we must not think that the power was in his prayer. His prayer was subject to the Word of God, and the power lies there. Elijah himself says, "I have done all these things at Your word" (1 Kings 18:36). Prayer that depends on God leads us to understand His Word, and to want His will done.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same test explains what happens one chapter later. There a threat, not a word from God, set Elijah moving.

Up to this point he had moved at the word of the Lord. On Mount Carmel he could say, "I have done all these things at Your word." On this journey, no directing word from the Lord moved him. A threatening word from a woman did.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. Elijah's strength was never his own eloquence. He claimed only that he had done everything at God's word. Prayer that rests on that word carries power.

- Sacrifice. He timed his prayer to the evening offering. He rested not on his own praying, but on the value of the burnt offering, which speaks of Christ.

- Nearness. The prophet came near to God and spoke out his secret before any answer came. So the whole benefit of the answer fell to the watching people.

- Servant. He asked for no honour, only to be known as a servant obeying orders, with one desire — that God be glorified.

- Unity. Twelve stones for a divided nation. One man's altar can still testify to what God set up at the beginning, however few stand with him.

1 Kings 18:37 · Darby

Answer me, Jehovah, answer me, that this people may know that thou Jehovah art God, and [that] *thou* hast turned their heart back again.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

1 Kings 18:38 · Darby

And the fire of Jehovah fell, and consumed the burnt-offering, and the wood, and the stones, and the dust, and licked up the water that was in the trench.

All day Baal's prophets cried out and got no answer. Then one short prayer from Elijah brought fire out of a clear sky onto a soaked altar — and where that fire fell matters as much as the fact that it fell.

The answer under impossible conditions

Elijah stacked the odds against himself on purpose. He soaked the altar again and again, so no one could claim a trick. One writer sets the noise of Baal's prophets beside the confidence of the one man facing them.

All day they tore their throats, if not the heavens, with their cry, "O Baal, answer us." They waved their arms like madmen. They leaped about on the altar and cut themselves with knives till the blood gushed out on them. But the sheer excess of their efforts showed how useless they were. There was no reply. Elijah was different. Though he stood alone, he was fully confident in Jehovah. He even took elaborate precautions to rule out every suspicion of human help. The altar and the sacrifice were repeatedly drenched with water. Then, in answer to his prayer, the sacred fire fell from the cloudless sky and consumed everything. Humanly speaking, God acted under the least favourable conditions for the glory of His name.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The hour that explains the answer

Elijah chose his moment with care. It shows where his confidence rested.

The time when the prophet drew near should be noted. It was the hour of the evening sacrifice. That fact declared where Elijah rested for the sign he asked for. He rested not in his own services or prayers, but in the value of the burnt offering, which pictures the sacrifice of Christ... The Lord heard and answered the prayer of His servant.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Fire that fell on a victim, not on a nation

One writer names the problem that no prayer on its own could solve.

A holy God must deal with all evil by the consuming fire of judgment. This nation is steeped in that very evil. How can they escape? Here is an issue that no fervent prayer of a righteous man can meet. If the guilty nation is to be spared, an altar must be built and a sacrifice provided. That sacrifice will stand for the guilty nation under the eye of God, and the judgment they have deserved can fall on it. And so it happened, for we read, "The fire of the LORD fell and consumed the burnt offering." The judgment falls on the victim, the nation goes free.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A picture of the cross

One writer follows the direction of the fire forward to the cross.

The fire stands for the righteous judgement of God. It might well have fallen on the disobedient nation. Or, passing the nation by, it might have fallen on Ahab and his hundreds of idolatrous prophets, all servants of the Devil. But it did nothing of the kind. The fire fell on the innocent bull that Elijah had placed on the altar! What a picture of the great sacrifice of Calvary! There the righteous judgement of God fell — not on the wicked masses of men, and not even on the corrupt leaders who were mainly to blame for setting up that cross. The judgement of God in all its terrible severity fell on the Holy One who hung there. It forced from Him the cry, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The second time fire fell

Fire from heaven falls twice in Elijah's story. The difference between the two times carries the lesson.

The fire fell on the victim as an atonement for the sins of the guilty people. Not one Israelite was touched by that fire... Years have passed since then. The grace of God provided a sacrifice and sheltered the guilty people from the fire of judgment, and that grace has been forgotten. The sacrifice has been despised, and now, once again, the fire falls on the hilltop. But this time there is no victim between a holy God and a sinful people. Instead of falling on the victim, the fire falls on the guilty people in overwhelming destruction.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The sign that will be counterfeited

One writer sees a counterfeit of this sign still ahead.

In his day, God empowered Elijah to call down fire from heaven. That fire bore witness to the true God and exposed the worship of an idol. What Elijah did by the power of God, Antichrist will imitate by the power of the devil. His aim will be to turn people from the true God to worship an idol, or image of the beast.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Fire falls. The fire stands for God's righteous judgement, and that day it had to fall somewhere.

- Fire spares. It landed on the innocent bull on the altar, so the guilty nation went free untouched.

- Fire pictures. The same judgement later fell on Christ at the cross, drawing from Him the cry, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

- Fire warns. When fire fell a second time in Elijah's story, no victim stood between a holy God and sinful people.

- Fire convinces. Elijah rested on the value of the evening sacrifice, not on his own prayers. God answered under the least favourable conditions, and that answer closed the question.

1 Kings 18:39 · Darby

And all the people saw [it], and they fell on their faces and said, Jehovah, he is God! Jehovah, he is God!

Carmel was a public test with the whole nation watching: two altars, two names, one question. Fire came down, the people dropped to the ground and cried out twice — but what did the fire strike, and how deep did that confession go?

Where the fire landed

The fire came down as judgment, but it did not strike the people who deserved it.

Do not miss a word of this remarkable verse. The fire stands for the righteous judgment of God. It could well have fallen on the disobedient nation. Or it could have passed the nation by and fallen on Ahab and his hundreds of idol-worshipping prophets, all servants of the Devil. But it did nothing of the kind. The fire fell on the innocent bull that Elijah had placed on the altar! What a picture of the great sacrifice of Calvary! There the righteous judgment of God did not fall on the wicked masses of people. It did not even fall on the corrupt leaders who were mainly to blame for setting up that cross. The judgment of God in all its terrible severity fell on the Holy One who hung there.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Fire on the sacrifice, fire on the people

Fire fell from heaven twice in Elijah's life. The gap between the two is the gap between a sacrifice accepted and a sacrifice despised.

At Carmel "the fire of the Lord fell and consumed the sacrifice." The fire fell on the sacrifice as an atonement for the sins of the guilty people, and the people go free — not one Israelite was touched by that fire. As a result God brought the people back to Himself... Years have passed since the fire fell on the sacrifice at Carmel. The grace of God that provided a sacrifice and sheltered the guilty people from the fire of judgment has been forgotten. The sacrifice has been despised, and now once again the fire falls on the hill top... this time no sacrifice stands between a holy God and a sinful people.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The two names in the cry

The shout uses two names for God. Older translations print Jehovah where the ESV has "the LORD," and Elohim where it has "God." Joining the two names says that Israel's God is the one supreme God, the Creator.

It was important, in a book addressed to Israel, to show that Jehovah, their God, was the one true supreme Elohim, the Creator, unlike the demon gods of the surrounding nations... "It was shown to you, so that you might know that Jehovah, He is Elohim; there is no one else besides Him." So the people, when Elijah brought down fire from heaven, cry out, "Jehovah, He is Elohim; Jehovah, He is Elohim."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A prayer with no self-interest in it

Notice what Elijah asked God for — and what he left out.

This is intelligent prayer. The prophet is engaged solely about God and His people. He does not say, "Hear me, that this people may know that I am a true prophet." No; his only aim was to bring the people back to the God of their fathers, and to have the claims of God established in their consciences, in opposition to the claims of Baal. And God listened and heard.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Rain after the confession, not before

The rain came in a fixed order. That order warns anyone who wants blessing while the conscience stays untouched.

The showers of blessing come after God's judgment has fallen on the burnt offering. They come only after Israel, faced with this event, has acknowledged the Lord and turned their hearts back to Him. Today people seek plenty of rain while the conscience is left untouched. That desire can end in only one result. The rain was not given to Israel until after the work of God had been done for them and in them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The worth of the shout

Commentators differ on the depth of this confession. One writer holds that even a confession worth little opened the door for God to bless:

The public confession of Jehovah's name — little as it might have been worth to those who joined in it, "Jehovah, He is the God; Jehovah, He is the God" — made it possible for God to bless them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer says the day fell short of what Elijah had expected.

He had thought that these mighty displays of the power of God would turn the whole nation to God in deep repentance. For the moment they did indeed fall on their faces and own, "The Lord, He is the God." But no real revival had taken place. Elijah has to learn that wind, earthquake and fire may indeed be God's servants to wake people up. But unless a person hears the "still small voice," no one is truly won for God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Fire falls — Elijah prayed for God's claims, not his own name, and God answered with fire.

- Fire spared them — it struck the sacrifice on the altar, not the guilty nation and not its false prophets.

- Fire won them — the people fall down and name the one true God twice: He is God, and there is no other.

- Fire before rain — blessing came after the confession. Ask for showers with an untouched conscience and only one result follows.

- Fire is not enough — the crowd bowed, but no real revival came. Awe wakes a nation; only the still small voice wins the heart.