And Rehoboam went to Shechem; for all Israel had come to Shechem to make him king.
Solomon has died. His son Rehoboam goes to Shechem to be made king, and the meeting ends with the kingdom split in two. The opening sentence already shows that something is wrong: the king goes to the people, instead of the people coming to the king.
Why Shechem, and not Jerusalem? One writer answers by comparing this with how David came to the throne:
"Rehoboam went to Shechem, for all Israel had come to Shechem to make him king." The very first word shows the state of the king and the state of the people. Why to Shechem? What brought them there? What business had they there? Why not come to Jerusalem? When David was coming to the throne the tribes of Israel came to Hebron, because Hebron was where the king lived. Hebron was the king's chief city. He had reigned there before he reigned in Jerusalem. The people came to the king, as was fitting. Rehoboam heard that the foundations were being loosened and about to be destroyed, and the king goes to Shechem. It was there that the people chose to go, and there the king has to follow. He was a fool; he did not understand how to reign; he did not own his place from God.
Shechem already carried a long history for Israel:
The first city of Canaan visited by Abram, Genesis 12:6, where it is called Sichem. When Jacob returned to Palestine, Hamor the Hivite was its king. The bones of Joseph were buried there. When the land was divided it fell to the lot of Ephraim, and became a Levitical city and a city of refuge. It was there that Joshua delivered his last address to the people. Under the Judges the city was taken by Abimelech... The tribes assembled there to crown Rehoboam, and, when the kingdom divided, it became the headquarters of Jeroboam.
The same writer reads that first step as a picture of the man:
God had not made Shechem the centre or the right place for king or people. The people chose to go there, and Rehoboam followed them. That was how his reign began. It was an ominous beginning, but it was a beginning that suited the character of Rehoboam. Where Rehoboam ought to have been firm, he was loose. Where he ought to have been yielding, he was stubborn. These two things unfit any man to govern. The great secret of governing well is to know when to be firm and when to yield, and to do it in the fear of God: to be as firm as a rock about what is a divine principle, and as yielding as possible about what is merely an indifferent thing.
Jeroboam had been living in Egypt. He came back when Solomon died:
No one knows how long Jeroboam stayed in Egypt. But we read that he returned when Solomon died, and was there at Rehoboam's coronation, where the rebellion was completed... The time was ripe. Solomon's incompetent son and successor did not take to heart his father's sound proverb, "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger." He showed his lack of wisdom and fitness to govern a freedom-loving people. As a result he brought on the separation of the already alienated northern tribes. He weakened and almost ruined a kingdom that had recently stretched from the Nile to the Euphrates.
The speed of the collapse points back to a word spoken in the previous generation:
This explains how it was that ten tribes with one mind so suddenly shook off their loyalty to the house of David. A runaway servant no sooner blows his trumpet than they follow him. It was the judgment of the Lord, pronounced in Solomon's day, carried out in the days of his son. "But I will take the kingdom out of his son's [Rehoboam's] hand and will give it to you [Jeroboam], ten tribes" (1 Kings 11:35).
The writers weigh the blame differently. One looks past the leaders to the people themselves:
Here again the root of division is worldliness that turns aside to other gods, and disobedience to the Word of God. But now it is found in the people. By itself, the folly and failure of the leaders — however great — would not cause division. It causes division because the people of God as a whole are in such a low condition.
- Place — The king went to the ground the people chose. He did not call them to his own city, as the tribes once came to David at Hebron.
- Past — Shechem already had a mixed record: Abram, Jacob, Joshua's last address, Abimelech's violence. It would become Jeroboam's capital.
- Person — Rehoboam's first step showed the flaw that ruined him. He was loose where he should have stood firm, and stubborn where he should have bent.
- Plot — Jeroboam came back from Egypt when Solomon died. The moment was ripe, and a harsh answer instead of a soft one split the kingdom.
- Purpose — The break was the Lord's judgment, announced in Solomon's day and carried out in his son's. A drifting people made it possible.
And it came to pass when Jeroboam the son of Nebat heard it (now he was yet in Egypt, whither he had fled from the presence of king Solomon, and Jeroboam dwelt in Egypt;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and they sent and called him), that Jeroboam and all the congregation of Israel came and spoke to Rehoboam, saying,
Solomon is dead, and his son Rehoboam has gone north to Shechem to be crowned. The tribes call Jeroboam home from Egypt to speak for them, and what they ask will decide whether Israel stays one kingdom.
The king did not summon the nation; he followed it. One commentator sees in that the man Rehoboam would prove to be.
Why Shechem? Why not Jerusalem? When David came to the throne, the tribes of Israel came to Hebron, because Hebron was the king's city — the people came to the king, as was fitting. "Rehoboam went to Shechem, for all Israel had come to Shechem to make him king." That is the reason for it. It was not that God had made Shechem the centre or the right place for king or people. The people chose to go there, Rehoboam followed them, and that was how his reign began. It was an ominous beginning, but it suited Rehoboam's character exactly. Where Rehoboam should have been firm he was loose, and where he should have yielded he was obstinate. These two things make any man unfit to govern.
Jeroboam was living in Egypt when Solomon died. The assembly's first act was to call him back.
How long Jeroboam stayed in Egypt is not known. But at Solomon's death he returned, and he was present at Rehoboam's coronation, when the rebellion was complete... The time was ripe. Solomon's incompetent son and successor did not heed his father's sound proverb: "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger." He showed instead that he lacked the wisdom and fitness to govern a freedom-loving people. As a result he brought on the separation of the northern tribes, who were already alienated. That weakened and almost ruined a kingdom which had stretched from the Nile to the Euphrates only a short time before.
The complaint the assembly brings has a long history. When Israel first asked for a king, Samuel told them what a king would cost.
In answer to the people's demand for a king, Samuel gave them the Lord's message, which sets out in vivid terms what man in power is. There is a monotony in the words "he will take," repeated six times. Their sons would have to serve in the army. Their daughters would become his cooks. The king would demand the produce of their fields and flocks for his own support, and so on. It could hardly be otherwise. How else could the kingdom keep its dignity and majesty? In the highest days of Israel's prosperity this became unbearable... The greater the glory of the kingdom, the greater the burden on the people must be.
Commentators differ. Some take the complaint at face value:
They said Solomon had made their yoke heavy. What a sad comment on Solomon's character! He was a king of great wealth. But wealthy rulers almost always use strong methods to increase their wealth, instead of using it to ease the hardships of the people. Solomon records his mother's charge to him: "Open your mouth, judge righteously, defend the rights of the poor and needy." He did not only ignore her counsel. He went so far as to oppress the poor and needy.
Others are less sure the charge was true:
There is no certain evidence that this was really so. Their labour served the glory and security of the kingdom, and its prosperity was meant to benefit everyone... It is possible, however, that Solomon set them to work on things that served only self-gratification. When men leave the right way, as he did, they soon become oppressive. That would give some ground for their discontent — and it is quite certain that Jeroboam would take no trouble to calm it.
The complaint points forward, by contrast, to a King whose rule never turns bitter.
Jeroboam is there, called by the people to be their spokesman before the king. These men complain to the king about the yoke his father had put on them: "Your father made our yoke heavy." That wording shows this had not always been the case. Christ's yoke will never be heavy on His people. To His own He will always remain what they have known Him to be in the day of suffering and of grace. He says, "My yoke is easy, and my burden is light." Beyond all doubt the nations must submit to Him, and He will strike them with a rod of iron. But all the prophets testify to the grace with which He will feed His people.
- Place: The crowning happened where the people chose, not where God had chosen — an ominous start to a reign.
- Person: The assembly that came to crown Rehoboam had already sent to Egypt for the man who would replace him.
- Price: Samuel had warned that a king "will take." The greater the kingdom's glory, the heavier the load on the people.
- Petition: Commentators differ. Was the yoke truly heavy, or was the charge unproven and useful to Jeroboam? And how far was Solomon to blame?
- Promise: Israel said Solomon made their yoke heavy. The King still to come says His own yoke is easy and His burden light.
Thy father made our yoke grievous; and now lighten thou the grievous servitude of thy father and his heavy yoke that he put upon us, and we will serve thee.
Solomon's reign ended in gold and fame, but at Shechem the nation met his son Rehoboam with a bill, not cheers. Was the complaint about a heavy yoke fair, and why did it end in a split that never healed?
Fame has a price tag, and the people paid it. One writer traces their complaint back to the warning Samuel gave when Israel first asked for a king. (Older translations read "grievous" where ESV reads "heavy.")
In answer to the people's demand for a king, Samuel gave them the Lord's message, which sets out in vivid terms what man in power is. There is a monotony in the six times repeated words "he will take." He would take their sons for the army, make their daughters his cooks, and demand the produce of their fields and flocks for his own support... In the highest days of Israel's prosperity this became unbearable. So we hear them saying to the son of Solomon, "your father made our yoke grievous." The greater the glory of the Kingdom, the heavier the burden on the people had to be.
Commentators differ on whether the people had a real case. One writer weighs the charge and leaves it open:
They clearly resented this enforced labour. "Your father," they said later to Rehoboam, "made our yoke grievous." They spoke of it, too, as a "heavy" yoke. There is no certain evidence that this was really so. Their labour went to the glory and security of the kingdom, and everyone was supposed to share in that prosperity. It is possible, though, that their work served nothing but self-indulgence. For when men leave the right way, as Solomon did, they soon become oppressive.
Another writer is blunt: Solomon broke the very counsel he recorded.
They had a serious request. They said Solomon had made their yoke heavy. How sad a comment on the character of Solomon! He was a king of great wealth. But wealthy rulers will nearly always use strong means to increase their wealth, instead of using it to relieve the hardships of the people. Solomon records that his mother told him to "open your mouth, judge righteously, and plead the cause of the poor and needy" (Prov. 31:9). But he not only ignored his mother's counsel: he went so far as to oppress the poor and needy.
Their words end with a promise of loyalty: lighten the load, and we will serve you. One writer still hears revolt in them, and in the place they chose to meet.
He went to Shechem, for all Israel had come to Shechem to make him king. Shechem no longer had any link with divine grace, or truth, or purpose, or anything else. Israel simply went there, and he followed... "Your father made our yoke grievous" — you see the rebellious spirit from the very beginning. It is now in their language, as it was in their act before.
The people offered to serve the king if he lightened the load. The older advisers told him to take the servant's place himself. He turned to flatterers instead.
Rehoboam consults the old men who had stood before Solomon and drunk wisdom at its source. Their counsel is that of Jesus to His disciples: "Let the greater among you be as the younger, and the leader as he that serves" (Luke 22:26)... Rehoboam leaves the counsel of wisdom for that of the young men who had grown up with him. They could only be the mirror and reflection of their master's thoughts. Had he himself stood before his father hearing the wise proverbs that fell from his lips, he could have passed on something of this wisdom to others... Those who flatter his pride are the ones who win his approval.
The word "grievous" marks a change: the yoke had not always felt that way. Under Christ that change never comes.
These men complain to the king about the yoke his father had put on them: "Your father made our yoke grievous." The words show that this had not always been the case. Christ's yoke will never be grievous upon His people. To His own He will always remain the same as they have known Him in the day of suffering and of grace: "My yoke is easy, and my burden is light."
- Yoke inherited. Solomon's subjects paid for his fame. The greater the kingdom's glory, the heavier the load on ordinary people.
- Yoke disputed. Commentators differ on the complaint's fairness. Some find no proof that the work was cruel. Others say Solomon ignored the counsel about the poor and needy that he wrote down himself.
- Yoke offered back. The people promised service in exchange for relief. But one writer hears revolt already in their words and in the place they chose.
- Yoke refused. Wise counsel told the king to take the servant's place. Rehoboam chose the young men who flattered his pride.
- Yoke exchanged. Christ's yoke is easy and His burden light. He stays the same toward His own, in days of suffering and in glory.
And he said to them, Depart yet for three days, then come again to me. And the people departed.
Rehoboam has just come to the throne at Shechem. The ten tribes ask him to lighten the load his father laid on them, and Jeroboam speaks for them. His reply is to send them home for three days — and what he does with those three days decides the fate of a kingdom.
One writer sees nothing wrong in the people's request, or in the king's choice to take time over it.
Jeroboam and others with him asked Rehoboam to lighten the heavy service of Solomon. If he did, they would gladly serve him (v.4). This was certainly a reasonable request. At the time Rehoboam wisely asked them to come back in three days for an answer (v.5). It was right for him to talk this suggestion over with his council.
He gave those three days to men who were already rebellious. Their own words showed it.
He went to Shechem, for all Israel had come to Shechem to make him king… At Shechem there was no longer any link with divine grace, or truth, or purpose, or anything else. Israel simply went there, and he followed… "Your father made our yoke heavy" — you see the rebellious spirit from the very beginning. It is now in their language, as it was in their act before.
The three days gave him time to ask Solomon's old advisers what to say.
Rehoboam consults the old men who had stood before Solomon and drunk at the very source of wisdom. Their counsel is the counsel of Jesus to His disciples: "let the greatest among you become as the youngest, and the leader as one who serves" (Luke 22:26). The old men say, "If you will be a servant to this people today and serve them, and speak good words to them when you answer them, then they will be your servants forever" (v. 7).
Even so, one writer measures that advice and finds it short of the highest ground.
It was not the noblest ground, it is true. It was not the ground that would have left him in both liberty and responsibility… That ought to have been his ground, if he wanted to serve the LORD by watching over the best interests of the LORD's people… It was prudence, it was good policy. I could not say there was faith in it, but there was good policy in it, as far as that went.
A man who asks for advice still chooses which advice to take, and the choice exposes him.
Rehoboam gives up the counsel of wisdom to follow the young men who had grown up with him and stood before him (v. 8). They could only mirror and reflect their master's own thoughts… But no — the men who flatter his pride are the ones who win his approval. The counsel of the young men in the final analysis is only that of his own heart.
He asked men during those three days. One writer names the One he never asked.
It is said of King Rehoboam, "His mother's name was Naamah the Ammonite. And he did evil, for he did not set his heart to seek the LORD" (2 Chr. 12:13-14). He refused the advice of the wise old men and took the counsel of the foolish young men. He answered like a blind fool with a mad heart, and he lost ten tribes out of twelve.
Scripture calls the rough answer that followed "a turn of affairs brought about by the LORD, that He might fulfill His word" (v. 15). So does a prediction excuse the men who carried it out?
Did that excuse Jeroboam? This is a very important principle that you will find constantly in the word of God. A prophecy is in no way a sanction of what is predicted. Prophecy takes in the most abominable acts that have ever been done by the proud, corrupt, or murderous will of man.
The old men's three-fold advice is read as a pattern for how the strong should treat the weak.
Rehoboam is counselled by the old men, who are rich in experience, that all will be well if he will "be good to this people and please them and speak good words to them" (2 Chron. 10:7). Does not this carry our thoughts to Romans 15:1-4? In the first verse of this passage we have the "kindness" that bears "the infirmities of the weak" rather than putting grievous yokes upon them; in verses 2 and 3 we have the pleasing one another for "good to edification," rather than pleasing ourselves; and in verse 4 we have the "good words" of Scripture for our comfort and hope.
- Pause — The three-day delay was itself wise. A fair request deserved time, and a young king did right to turn to his council.
- Counsel — The pause brought the right advice: serve this people, and they will serve you. It is the rule Jesus gave — the leader is the one who serves.
- Choice — Advice only helps a man who will be corrected. Rehoboam picked friends who mirrored him, so the counsel he took was his own heart's.
- Omission — He asked men for three days, but he never set his heart to seek the LORD. The pause that could have saved him ruined him.
- Outcome — The split was foretold, yet the prophecy excused no one. God keeps His word even through the proud will of man, and man still answers for what he does.
And king Rehoboam consulted with the old men, who had stood before Solomon his father while he yet lived, saying, How do ye advise to return answer to this people?
Solomon is dead, and his son Rehoboam faces his first test as king. The people ask for lighter burdens, he takes three days to answer, and he turns first to the men who had served his father.
One writer sees nothing wrong in the king's actions so far:
Jeroboam and others with him asked Rehoboam to lighten the heavy service Solomon had laid on them. If he did, they would gladly serve him (v.4). This was a reasonable request. At the time Rehoboam wisely asked them to come back in three days for an answer (v.5). It was right that he should discuss this suggestion with his council.
The verse marks these men by where they had stood — in Solomon's presence. That is where their wisdom came from.
Rehoboam consults the old men who had stood before Solomon to drink at the source of wisdom. Their counsel is that of Jesus to His disciples: "Let the greatest among you become as the youngest, and the leader as one who serves" (Luke 22:26)... Rehoboam turns away from this wise counsel and follows the young men who had grown up with him and who stood before him (v. 8). They could only mirror and reflect their master's thoughts. If he had stood before his father himself, hearing the wise proverbs from his lips, he could have passed some of that wisdom on to others... The counsel of the young men, in the end, is only that of his own heart.
One writer notes what listening could have saved, and why the people's plea was fair.
His father had forced the people into labour, and this caused deep dissatisfaction. Rehoboam might have calmed it, if he had wisely and humbly listened to the aged men who had been his father's honoured counsellors. Long experience had taught them the mood of the people. And in asking for lighter burdens, the people were only doing what any people not reduced to slavery might have asked.
Commentators differ over the elders' advice. One writer calls it wise; another finds it short of the best ground a king could take.
It was not the noblest ground, it is true. It was not the ground that would have left him in both liberty and responsibility... it ought to have been the ground if he would be a servant of Jehovah — if he would serve Jehovah in watching over the best interests of Jehovah's people. But they said, as far as their measure went: "If you will be a servant to this people today and serve them, and speak good words to them when you answer them, then they will be your servants forever." It was prudence, it was good policy. I could not say there was faith in it, but there was good policy in it, as far as that went.
Good advice cannot help a man who does not know when to hold his ground and when to give way.
Where Rehoboam ought to have been firm he was loose, and where he ought to have been yielding he was obstinate; and these two things unfit any man to govern. The great secret of governing well is always knowing when to be firm and when to yield. A ruler must do this in the fear of God. He must be perfectly certain what is a divine principle, and there be as firm as a rock. He must also know what is only an indifferent thing, and there be as yielding as possible.
One writer traces the elders' three words into the New Testament.
The old men are rich in experience. They tell Rehoboam that all will be well if he will "be kind to this people, and please them, and speak good words to them" (2 Chron. 10:7; ESV: "be good to this people"). Does not this carry our thoughts to Romans 15:1-4? In the first verse we have the "kindness" that bears "the infirmities of the weak" instead of putting heavy yokes on them. In verses 2 and 3 we have pleasing one another for "good to edification," instead of pleasing ourselves. In verse 4 we have the "good words" of Scripture for our comfort and hope.
- Asked. Rehoboam did the right thing first: he paused three days and put the question to his father's council.
- Standing. The elders were worth hearing because of where they had stood — before Solomon. Rehoboam never took that place, so he had no wisdom to pass on.
- Serving. A king who serves his people keeps them forever. Christ gave His disciples the same principle.
- Measured. One writer calls their advice sound policy, but not faith. The noblest ground would have been to serve the Lord by watching over His people.
- Wasted. Good counsel cannot save a man who is loose where he should be firm and stubborn where he should yield.
And they spoke to him saying, If this day thou wilt be a servant to this people, and wilt serve them and answer them and speak good words to them, they will be thy servants for ever.
Solomon's son has just taken the throne. The people's first move is to ask for relief from the heavy load his father laid on them. Solomon's old advisers answer with a rule that turns kingship upside down: hold the people by serving them.
One writer sets their answer beside the words of Jesus:
Rehoboam consults the old men who had stood before Solomon to drink at the source of wisdom. Their counsel is the counsel of Jesus to His disciples: "Let the greatest among you become as the youngest, and the leader as one who serves" (Luke 22:26).
Another writer names the old temptation of rulers, and what real rule looks like:
From the earliest times it has been the curse of kings that they used their position for themselves, for their own ease or selfish ambition, rather than for serving the people. The principle, "whoever would be first among you must be slave of all," seems to have a twofold meaning. First, perhaps, it shows that any thought of self-importance only makes it necessary for a person to be brought low. But on the other hand, in a scene where the beloved sheep of Christ are attacked on every side, the best proof of a spirit of rule is to serve them. So He, the true King, could say in the fullest way, "I am among you as the one who serves."
One writer matches each part of that advice to Romans 15:
Rehoboam is counselled by the old men, who are rich in experience, that all will be well if he will "be good to this people and please them and speak good words to them" (2 Chron. 10:7). Does this not carry our thoughts to Romans 15:1-4? In the first verse we have the kindness that bears with "the failings of the weak" instead of putting heavy yokes on them. In verses 2 and 3 we have pleasing one another for their good, to build them up, instead of pleasing ourselves. In verse 4 we have the "good words" of Scripture for our comfort and hope.
Commentators differ on how high to rate this advice. One writer finds real prudence in it, but not faith:
It was not the noblest ground, it is true. It was not the ground that would have left him in both liberty and responsibility... it ought to have been the ground, if he would be a servant of Jehovah — if he would serve Jehovah by watching over the best interests of Jehovah's people. But they said, according to their measure, "If you will be a servant to this people this day... they will be your servants forever." It was prudence, it was good policy. I could not say there was faith in it, but there was good policy in it, as far as that went.
Rehoboam had a real chance to hold the nation together:
He might have calmed the anger caused by the forced labour his father demanded. He had only to listen humbly to the aged men who had been his father's honoured counsellors. They knew the temper of the people well from long experience. And in asking for their burdens to be lightened, the people were only doing what any people not reduced to slavery might have asked. Had the new king granted their reasonable request... they would, as the old ministers said, have been his loyal subjects forever. But he abandoned their wise counsel.
Rehoboam refused the elders' way. One writer turns the same warning on anyone who has to deal with the faults of others:
The whip and the scourge may be righteous, but there is no winning the heart of man with these... How many brothers have been driven away for good! They might have been won back to God and to us. But we hammered at the conscience only, with the heart ungained — with the heart, I may say, almost unsought. We have not overcome evil, because we have not overcome it with good. We have readily taken the judge's chair, and have got back judgment; but the Master's lowly work we have done little of.
- Serve first. The elders' terms are a chain: be a servant, serve them, answer them, speak good words — and only then does loyalty follow.
- Serve, and you rule. Stooping to serve is the best proof of a spirit of rule, and the King Himself was among His people as the one who serves.
- Good words are specific. They mean bearing with the weak, building others up instead of pleasing yourself, and comfort drawn from Scripture.
- Good advice is not always faith. Commentators differ: one sets it beside the words of Jesus, another finds prudence in it but not faith.
- Force loses hearts. Rehoboam took the harsher counsel and lost the loyal subjects he could have had; severity may be righteous and still win no hearts.
But he forsook the advice of the old men which they had given him, and consulted with the young men, who had grown up with him, that stood before him.
The people have asked Rehoboam to lighten the load his father laid on them, and he has three days to decide. Two sets of advisers stand ready: the men who had served Solomon, and the men who grew up alongside Rehoboam. His choice between them splits a kingdom.
The older men did not tell him to give up his throne. They told him how to keep a people. One writer links their advice to Romans 15:
The old men are rich in experience. They advise Rehoboam that all will be well if he will "be good to this people and please them and speak good words to them" (2 Chron. 10:7). Does not this carry our thoughts to Romans 15:1-4? In verse 1 we have the kindness that bears with "the failings of the weak," instead of putting heavy yokes on them. In verses 2 and 3 we have pleasing our neighbour "for his good, to build him up," instead of pleasing ourselves. In verse 4 we have the "good words" of Scripture for our comfort and hope.
Yet even this advice fell short of the best ground:
It was prudence, it was good policy. I could not say there was faith in it, but there was good policy in it, as far as that went.
The men he turned to had grown up with him and stood before him. They owed him their place, and it showed in their advice:
Rehoboam abandons the counsel of wisdom to follow that of the young men who had grown up with him and stood before him (v. 8). They could not be anything other than the mirror and reflection of their master's thoughts. If he had stood before his father and heard the wise proverbs that fell from his lips, he could have passed some of that wisdom on to others. He would have known what suits a king. He would have known that "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger" (Prov. 15:1); that "Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall" (Prov. 16:18)… But no, those who flatter his pride are the ones who win his approval. The counsel of the young men in the final analysis is but that of his own heart.
He did not seek a second opinion. He sought an echo.
What the young men proposed did not look like folly at the time. It looked like backbone:
Such is the spiritual advice of the old men. The counsel of nature, given by the "young men," is very different. They advise Rehoboam to take a course that appears highly commendable to nature: it takes a strong line, and it maintains authority and the majesty of the kingdom. Alas, Rehoboam follows the advice of nature. He becomes overbearing and unreasonable. He threatens the protesters with violent, extreme discipline (1 Kings 12:12-15).
The old men's road was service; the young men's road was mastery. That road was not only for kings:
The old men's counsel is the counsel of Jesus to His disciples: "Let the greatest among you become as the youngest, and the leader as one who serves" (Luke 22:26).
Rehoboam's choice was his own. But one writer warns against reading the split as nothing more than a political blunder:
It was true that Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause of the division. But the word of God in judgment had gone out long before the violent words of the king. The mighty hand of God in discipline was behind the feeble hand of the king. The holy government of God was tearing the kingdom apart, and behind the discipline of God lay the low condition of the people.
God said it would happen before it happened. That excuses nobody:
A prophecy in no way approves what it predicts. Prophecy takes in the most terrible acts that the proud, corrupt, or murderous will of man has ever done.
Rehoboam grew up within reach of his father's wisdom and ignored it. One writer turns that on the reader:
Is this not a word to young Christian men to pay attention to what Solomon said, even if they do not find wisdom in their own fathers? Young people tend to belittle their parents' wisdom and to think that they themselves know.
- Asked — He consulted the men of experience first, then refused what he heard. Seeking advice you never meant to take is not humility.
- Echoed — The friends he turned to were simply the reflection of his own thoughts. Their counsel was his own heart handed back to him with approval.
- Flattered — Advice that backs a strong hand feels like leadership. What nature calls maintaining authority can be pride walking toward its fall.
- Refused — The road he rejected was service: be good to the people, please them, speak good words to them.
- Split — His folly tore the kingdom in two, yet God's government stood behind it. A predicted outcome never excuses the one who brings it about.
And he said to them, What advice give ye that we may return answer to this people who have spoken to me saying, Lighten the yoke which thy father put upon us?
Rehoboam has just heard from the men who served his father: answer the people kindly. Now he puts the same question to a second group — the friends he grew up with.
One commentator sees here the failure that shows up in every human picture of good rule. He notes what Rehoboam inherited from his father, and what he did not:
In the next chapter (2 Chronicles 10) we find what, sadly, appears in all human types — failure. Rehoboam the king, Solomon's son, does not inherit his father's wisdom, but whatever was foolish and wrong in Solomon. Rehoboam did not take counsel with the men of experience who might have helped his youth. He took it with the young men, who only pushed his rashness further.
His friends had grown up with him and stood before him. Their answer could hold no surprise:
Rehoboam abandons the counsel of wisdom to follow that of the young men who had grown up with him and stood before him (v. 8). So they could only be the mirror and reflection of their master's thoughts. Had he himself stood before his father, he would have heard the wise proverbs that fell from his lips. Then he could have passed some of that wisdom on to others. He would have known what suits a king. He would have known that "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger" (Prov. 15:1); that "Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall" (Prov. 16:18), and many other precepts. But no — those who flatter his pride are the ones who win his approval. The counsel of the young men is, in the end, only that of his own heart. Pride goes hand in hand with despising your neighbour. This lowly people counts for nothing in the eyes of a king who exalts himself.
The complaint he handed to his friends was not an outrageous demand. The people wanted relief from forced labour:
He might have calmed the unrest caused by his father's forced levy of labour (see 1 Kings 11:28) if he had listened humbly to the aged men who had been his father's honoured counsellors. They knew the temper of the people well, from long experience. In asking for their burdens to be lightened, the people were only asking what any people not reduced to slavery might ask. But he abandoned their wise counsel. A handful of inexperienced court favourites had his ear. Like himself, they thought more about the rights of the king than about his responsibility to govern righteously. So he replied with a speech about as rash and insolent as any ever spoken from a throne to a civilised nation.
The answer his friends gave had a real appeal. It looked like a proper defence of the throne's dignity:
That is the spiritual advice of the old men. The counsel of nature, given by the "young men," is very different. They advise Rehoboam to take a course that looks highly commendable to nature: taking a strong line, and keeping up authority and the majesty of the kingdom. Sadly, Rehoboam follows the advice of nature. He becomes overbearing and unreasonable. He threatens the protesters with violent, extreme punishment (1 Kings 12:12-15).
Commentators rate the older men's advice differently. One weighs it against a higher standard than shrewdness:
It was not the noblest ground, it is true. It was not the ground that would have left him in both liberty and responsibility. That would be the true ground. It ought to have been his ground, if he meant to be a servant of Jehovah — if he meant to serve Jehovah by watching over the best interests of Jehovah's people. But they said, according to their measure, "If you will be a servant to this people today and serve them, and speak good words to them when you answer them, then they will be your servants forever." It was prudence, it was good policy. I could not say there was faith in it, but there was good policy in it, as far as that went.
The bad choice of advisers was a symptom. Scripture's verdict on this king points further back:
It is said of King Rehoboam, "His mother's name was Naamah the Ammonite. And he did evil, for he did not set his heart to seek the LORD" (2 Chron. 12:13-14). He refused the advice of the old men of wisdom and took the counsel of the foolish young men. He answered like a blind fool with a mad heart, and lost ten tribes out of twelve.
- Unprepared heart. His failure started before he asked the question. He never set his heart to seek the Lord, so his father's wisdom was not his.
- Chosen mirrors. He asked the men who grew up with him, and the advice that flattered his pride won out. Their reply was only his own heart handed back.
- Servant ground. The older men pointed to a servant's path: serve this people, speak good words, and they stay yours. The higher ground still would have been to serve them as Jehovah's servant.
- Nature's strength. The harsh course looked like firmness and dignity. That is what made it persuasive — and ruinous.
- A kingdom lost. A fair request, answered roughly, cost him ten tribes out of twelve.
And the young men that had grown up with him spoke to him saying, Thus shalt thou say to this people that have spoken to thee saying, Thy father made our yoke heavy, and lighten thou it for us, -- thus shalt thou say to them My little [finger] is thicker than my father's loins;
Israel asked Rehoboam to lighten their load, and he took the question to the friends he grew up with. Their reply is not a policy but a boast, and commentators show how one sentence about a little finger split a kingdom in two.
Rehoboam did not ask the young men to learn something. He asked them to hear what he already wanted. One writer shows why their words won:
Those who flatter his pride are the ones who win his approval. In the end, the counsel of the young men is simply the counsel of his own heart. Pride goes hand in hand with looking down on your neighbour. This lowly people counts for nothing in the eyes of a king who exalts himself. Even his father, the great Solomon, seems small to him compared with his own greatness.
The same writer names the wisdom Rehoboam threw away. His father's proverbs had warned him: "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger" (Proverbs 15:1). They warned him again: "Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall" (Proverbs 16:18).
The older advisers had told him to serve the people and speak good words to them. Then they would be his servants forever. Commentators praise that advice, but only so far. It was shrewd, not spiritual:
It was not the noblest ground, it is true. It was not the ground that would have left him in both liberty and responsibility. That would have been the true ground. It ought to have been his ground, if he meant to serve Jehovah by watching over the best interests of Jehovah's people. But they spoke according to their measure… It was prudence, it was good policy. I could not say there was faith in it, but there was good policy in it, as far as that went.
The picture is crude. His little finger outweighs his father's thighs. The lightest touch of his rule will press harder than the full weight of Solomon's.
These young men had some authority in government. They wanted to use that authority as cruel overlords of the people. They advised Rehoboam to tell the people he would be more demanding than his father. He would admit that his father had disciplined them with whips. But he would discipline them with scourges, since his little finger would be thicker than his father's waist.
The people asked for relief. The answer his friends wrote promises the opposite. It even trades the whip for the scourge.
The flaw in the advisers was not their age alone but their idea of what a throne is for. One writer contrasts the seasoned men who knew the nation with the young circle who did not:
He might have calmed the discontent caused by his father's forced labour levy. He needed only to listen, wisely and humbly, to the older men who had been his father's honoured counsellors. They knew the temper of the people well from long experience… But he abandoned their wise counsel. He fell under the influence of a handful of inexperienced novices and young court favourites. Like him, they thought more about the king's rights than about his responsibility to govern righteously. So he replied with about as rash and insolent a speech as was ever spoken from a throne to a civilised nation.
The same writer names the principle behind the disaster. Authority is God-given. Crushing people with it is not.
God commands submission to the governing authorities. But tyranny over the souls and bodies of men is nowhere approved in His word. Rulers who try it must learn the results at their own cost. There are many proofs of this in Scripture, as in history. Government is of God, and therefore of divine appointment; but God frowns on every abuse of power.
Days later, reality tested the boast:
Rehoboam found it hard to believe that the ten tribes had really refused his yoke. So he confidently sent Hadoram, his tax collector, to collect the payment he had imposed. This unwise act brought matters to a crisis, and the angry people stoned him. He had boasted so proudly that his "little finger" should be "thicker than his father's thighs." Now the king shamefully "hurried to mount his chariot to flee to Jerusalem."
- Chosen — Rehoboam did not want counsel. He wanted agreement. The young men gave him back his own heart.
- Refused — The older men offered a way of serving that would have kept the people for good. Commentators call it sound policy, not faith. He threw even that away.
- Boasted — A little finger thicker than his father's thighs, whips traded for scourges. He promised to press harder than Solomon on people begging for relief.
- Abused — Government is God's appointment. Oppression is not. Rulers who claim rights without responsibility must learn the cost.
- Collapsed — Days later the man with the thicker finger ran for his chariot. One sentence had cost him ten tribes.
and whereas my father laid a heavy yoke upon you, *I* will add to your yoke my father chastised you with whips, but *I* will chastise you with scorpions.
Rehoboam answered a plea to lighten the taxes his father Solomon had imposed with a promise of a heavier load. His words split the nation in two — but was the split his doing, or God's hand?
The "scorpions" are not insects. Commentators take the word to mean a whip:
In Revelation 9 we read of locusts with stings in their tails. They torment people the way scorpions do. They stand as symbols of cruel and pitiless agents of some kind. In 1 Kings 12:11, 14 and 2 Chronicles 10:11, 14, the word is thought to point to a scourge with hard knots or metal points.
The line came from his young advisers. One writer describes what they wanted:
These young men, who had some authority in government, wanted to use that authority as cruel overlords of the people. They advised Rehoboam to tell the people that he would be more demanding than his father. He would admit that his father had punished the people with whips, but he himself would punish them with scourges. His little finger would be thicker than his father's waist.
Rehoboam did not get new advice. He heard his own thoughts read back to him:
Rehoboam turns away from wise counsel and follows the young men who grew up with him and served him. They could be nothing other than the mirror and reflection of their master's thoughts... But no, the ones who flatter his pride are the ones who win his approval. The counsel of the young men is, in the end, only the counsel of his own heart. Pride goes hand in hand with despising your neighbour. In the eyes of a king who exalts himself, this lowly people counts for nothing.
The older advisers had urged a different way to rule. One writer links their words to Christian life today:
The old men, rich in experience, advise Rehoboam that all will be well if he will "be kind to this people, and please them, and speak good words to them" (2 Chronicles 10:7). Does this not carry our thoughts to Romans 15:1-4? In the first verse of that passage we have the "kindness" that bears "the infirmities of the weak" instead of putting heavy yokes on them. In verses 2 and 3 we have pleasing one another for "good to edification," not pleasing ourselves. And in verse 4 we have the "good words" of Scripture for our comfort and hope.
Proverbs warns that the mouth can preserve a life or ruin it. One writer applies that to Rehoboam:
The virtue of guarding your mouth (v. 3) is a great preserver of life. Sadly, Rehoboam did not guard his mouth when the Israelites asked him to lighten the load of taxes Solomon had imposed. He answered them, "My father disciplined you with whips, but I will discipline you with scorpions" (1 Kings 12:13-14). This was "opening his lips wide," and it ended in the destruction of the kingdom.
Rehoboam had a genuine right to rule. What he did not have was permission to crush:
God commands us to be subject to the powers that be. But tyranny over the souls and bodies of people is nowhere approved in His word, and rulers who try it must learn the results to their cost. There are many proofs of this in Scripture, as in history. Government is of God, and therefore of divine appointment; but God's frown is on all abuse of power.
There was more at work here than one king's folly:
It was true that Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause of the division. But the word of God in judgment had gone out long before the violent words of the king. The mighty hand of God in discipline was behind the feeble hand of the king. The holy government of God was tearing the kingdom apart. And behind that discipline lay the low condition of the people.
Nor does the fulfilled prophecy leave anyone innocent:
This is a very important principle that you will find constantly in the word of God. A prophecy is in no way a sanction of what is predicted. Prophecy takes in the most evil acts that the proud, corrupt, or murderous will of man has ever produced.
- The yoke asked about — the people wanted the load lightened. Rehoboam promised to add to it, backed by a whip with knots or metal points.
- The yoke advised — the older counsellors urged kindness and good words. That is the way of bearing with the weak instead of loading them.
- The yoke chosen — he took the counsel of men who mirrored his own heart, and pride made him despise the people he ruled.
- The yoke that broke him — a mouth "opened wide" destroyed the kingdom. God's frown rests on all abuse of power.
- The yoke God laid — God had announced the division in judgment long before. Even so, prophecy never excuses the pride that carries it out.
And Jeroboam and all the people came to Rehoboam the third day, as the king had appointed saying, Come again to me on the third day.
Rehoboam's three days are over, and the whole nation returns to Shechem to face a king who has already made up his mind. What looks like an orderly royal audience is the hinge on which the kingdom of Israel splits in two.
The people's petition was not a revolt. Commentators note that they asked for something fair, and that the king was right to delay his answer.
Jeroboam and others with him asked Rehoboam to lighten the heavy service of Solomon. If he did, they would gladly serve Rehoboam. This was certainly a reasonable thing to ask. At the time, Rehoboam wisely asked them to come back in three days for an answer. It was right that he should discuss this suggestion with his council.
Between the request and the return, two groups spoke into the king's ear. One had served Solomon; the other had grown up alongside Rehoboam. The second group, one writer observes, gave him back what he already thought.
The old men give the same counsel Jesus gave His disciples: "Let the greatest among you become as the youngest, and the leader as one who serves" (Luke 22:26)... Rehoboam abandons the counsel of wisdom. He follows the young men who had grown up with him and who stood before him. They could only mirror and reflect their master's thoughts... The counsel of the young men is in the end only that of his own heart. Pride goes hand in hand with despising one's neighbour.
The verse names Jeroboam first among those who come back. He was not a neutral spokesman. He already knew the prophecy that God would tear the kingdom away. One writer draws a careful line: knowing a prophecy does not excuse helping it happen.
He was in the plot; he was the one who knew well what the prophecy was, and now there was a chance to take advantage of it... Did that excuse Jeroboam? This is a very important principle that you will find constantly in the word of God. A prophecy is in no way a sanction of what is predicted. Prophecy takes in the most disgusting acts that the proud, corrupt, or murderous will of man has ever done.
Rehoboam met the people with violent words. Commentators do not treat kingship itself as the problem. The problem is what a ruler does with the power he is given.
God commands submission to the governing authorities. But His word nowhere approves tyranny over the souls and bodies of men. Rulers who try it must learn the results at their own cost. There are many proofs of this in Scripture, as in history. Government is of God, and therefore of divine appointment; but God's frown is on all abuse of power.
It would be easy to blame the whole disaster on one young man's bad temper. Commentators warn that this obvious reading stops at the immediate cause.
It was true that Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause of the division. But the word of God in judgment had gone out long before the violent words of the king. The mighty hand of God in discipline was behind the feeble hand of the king. The holy government of God was tearing the kingdom apart. Behind the discipline of God was the low condition of the people.
God announced this tearing to Solomon while he still reigned. What breaks out on the third day started long before.
The obvious and immediate cause of the division was the foolishness of the king in rejecting the counsel of the elders. But the underlying cause was Solomon's idolatry. We read, "And the LORD was angry with Solomon, because his heart had turned away from the LORD, the God of Israel"... "I will surely tear the kingdom from you"... The kingdom was never reunited, and will not be until the Lord comes.
- Root. The split did not begin at Shechem. Solomon's heart had already turned away, and God's word of judgment had already gone out.
- Pause. The three days were a mercy. Rehoboam was right to delay and take counsel; the failure came in which counsel he kept.
- Mirror. The young men did not give him new advice — they handed back his own pride, which is why he found it so easy to accept.
- Answer. Authority is God-given, but never for crushing people. God frowns on every abuse of power.
- Hand. Behind the feeble hand of a foolish king was the mighty hand of God in discipline. That split still stands, and only the Lord's coming will end it.
And the king answered the people roughly, and forsook the advice of the old men which they had given him;
Rehoboam has three days to decide how he will rule. His two sets of advisers give him opposite answers. This verse records his choice: a harsh reply that threw away the older men's counsel and cost him most of his kingdom.
The choice was not simply old versus young. One commentator points out that the young men had grown up with Rehoboam and stood before him. Their advice was only his own mind handed back to him.
Rehoboam turns away from the counsel of wisdom to follow the young men who had grown up with him and stood before him (v. 8). So they could be nothing but the mirror and reflection of their master's thoughts. If he had stood before his father himself and heard the wise proverbs he spoke, he could have passed some of that wisdom on to others. He would have known what suits a king. He would have known that "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger" (Proverbs 15:1); that "Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall" (Proverbs 16:18)... But no, those who flatter his pride are the ones who win his approval. In the end, the counsel of the young men is only the counsel of his own heart.
The older men had told him to serve the people and speak good words to them. Another writer draws out how much spiritual weight sat in that plain advice.
Rehoboam is counselled by the old men, who are rich in experience, that all will be well if he will "be kind to this people, and please them, and speak good words to them" (2 Chron. 10:7). Does not this carry our thoughts to Romans 15:1-4? In the first verse of this passage we have the "kindness" that bears "the infirmities of the weak" rather than putting grievous yokes upon them; in verses 2 and 3 we have the pleasing one another for "good to edification," rather than pleasing ourselves; and in verse 4 we have the "good words" of Scripture for our comfort and hope.
Commentators weigh that advice differently. One judges it sound as far as it went, but no higher than shrewdness.
It was not the noblest ground, it is true. It was not the ground that would have left him in both liberty and responsibility... But they spoke according to the measure they had: "If you will be a servant to this people today and serve them, and speak good words to them when you answer them, then they will be your servants forever." It was prudence, it was good policy. I could not say there was faith in it, but there was good policy in it, as far as that went.
Commenting on Proverbs, one writer ties Rehoboam's reply to the warning about guarding your lips.
Closely connected with this is the virtue of guarding your mouth (v. 3), which does much to preserve life. Sadly, Rehoboam did not guard his mouth when the Israelites asked him to lighten the load of taxes Solomon had imposed. He answered them, "My father disciplined you with whips, but I will discipline you with scorpions" (1 Kings 12:13-14). This was "opening his lips wide," and ended in the destruction of the kingdom.
To nature, the hard line looked like strength. Here is where it led.
They advise Rehoboam to take a course that looks very commendable to nature. It takes a strong line. It keeps up authority and the majesty of the kingdom. Sadly, Rehoboam follows the advice of nature. He takes an overbearing and unreasonable attitude, and he threatens the protesters with violent and extreme discipline (1 Kings 12:12-15). The people answer the King's violence with violence of their own. They stone the King's officer, and the division is complete (1 Kings 12:16-19).
Rehoboam's folly is not the whole story of the division.
It was true that Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause of the division. But the word of God in judgment had gone out long before the violent words of the King. The mighty hand of God in discipline was behind the feeble hand of the King. The holy government of God was tearing the kingdom apart, and behind the discipline of God was the low condition of the people.
That does not excuse anyone. Another writer draws out the principle.
"And the king answered the people harshly, and forsaking the counsel that the old men had given him..." Did that excuse Jeroboam? This is a very important principle that you will find constantly in the word of God. A prophecy is in no way a sanction of what is predicted. Prophecy takes in the most abominable acts that the proud, corrupt, or murderous will of man has ever done.
- Counsel offered — Serve the people and speak good words, and they will serve you forever. Experienced men gave Rehoboam the right advice.
- Counsel forsaken — He chose advisers who mirrored his own thoughts. Those who flattered his pride won his approval.
- Words spoken — He did not guard his mouth, and "opening his lips wide" ended in the destruction of the kingdom.
- Kingdom torn — The hard line looked like strength. The people answered the king's violence with their own, and the division was complete.
- God governing — Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause, but God's hand was behind the king's hand. A prophecy that foretells an act never excuses it.
and he spoke to them according to the advice of the young men, saying, My father made your yoke heavy, but *I* will add to your yoke my father chastised you with whips, but *I* will chastise you with scorpions.
Israel asked their new king for a lighter load, and Rehoboam answered with a threat that cost him ten of the twelve tribes. Where did such words come from, and was the ruin they caused only man's doing?
The people asked for a lighter load, and Rehoboam promised a heavier one. Even the word he chose named a sharper pain:
In 1 Kings 12:11, 14 and 2 Chronicles 10:11, 14, the reference is thought to be to a scourge with hard knots or metal points.
Solomon had been demanding too. But there is a difference between a heavy hand and a boast about it:
Though Solomon had been demanding, he was wiser than to speak in this cruel way to the people. But Rehoboam did not have the wisdom of his father. He and the young men ought to have realised they could not get away with such arrogant treatment of the people.
Rehoboam asked two sets of advisers and picked the answer he already wanted. The young men had grown up in his court, so their advice was no outside voice:
They could not be anything other than the mirror and reflection of their master's thoughts. Those who flatter his pride are the ones who win his approval. The counsel of the young men is, in the end, simply the counsel of his own heart. Pride goes hand in hand with looking down on your neighbour. To a king who exalts himself, this lowly people counts for nothing.
Read that way, the harsh reply is not policy but a self-portrait. To human nature, it even looked like the right call:
They advise Rehoboam to take a course that looks admirable to human nature: take a strong line, and keep his authority and the majesty of the kingdom. Sadly, Rehoboam follows the advice of nature. He becomes overbearing and unreasonable. He threatens the protesters with violent, extreme discipline.
The older advisers had offered the opposite path — that a king holds people by serving them. Commentators tie their advice to the way of Christ:
Their counsel is that of Jesus to His disciples: "let the greatest among you become as the youngest, and the leader as one who serves" (Luke 22:26). The old men say: "If you will be a servant to this people today and serve them, and speak good words to them when you answer them, then they will be your servants forever."
The proverb that would have saved him was his own father's:
Solomon's incompetent son and successor paid no attention to his father's sound proverb: "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger." So he showed that he lacked the wisdom and the fitness to govern a freedom-loving people. As a result, he brought on the separation of the already alienated northern tribes.
The kingdom did not fall to an invading army. It fell to a sentence:
Rehoboam, sadly, did not guard his mouth. The Israelites asked him to lighten the load of taxes Solomon had imposed… This was "opening his lips wide," and it ended in the destruction of the kingdom.
The harm came home: "Because he was rich, he thought he could get away with such cruelty, but the scourge came back to his own head" (L M Grant).
Rehoboam's folly is not the whole story. Commentators hold two truths together:
It was true that Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause of the division. But the word of God in judgment had gone out long before the violent words of the king. The mighty hand of God in discipline was behind the feeble hand of the king.
That does not turn the prophecy into permission. As one writer puts it, "a prophecy is in no way a sanction of what is predicted" (William Kelly).
The complaint that opened the scene was about a heavy yoke. Commentators set against it a King whose rule never crushes:
Christ's yoke will never be a burden to His people: "For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light." All the prophets bear witness to the grace with which He will feed His people: "He will tend his flock like a shepherd; he will gather the lambs in his arms."
- Pride speaks. The harsh reply came from Rehoboam's own heart; his young advisers only mirrored back what he already wanted to hear.
- Pride refuses. The older advisers offered him a servant-king's way: serve the people, speak good words. He chose a show of strength instead.
- Pride wounds. "Scorpions" meant a scourge with knots or metal points. He promised his people more pain than his father gave.
- Pride divides. One unguarded sentence, not an enemy army, tore ten tribes away and came back as a scourge on his own reign.
- Pride is not the last word. God spoke His judgment long before the king spoke — yet prophecy never excused the folly that fulfilled it.
So the king hearkened not to the people; for it was brought about by Jehovah, that he might give effect to his word, which Jehovah spoke through Ahijah the Shilonite to Jeroboam the son of Nebat.
Rehoboam's harsh answer at Shechem looks like plain pride in a young king. But the record says the LORD was behind it, keeping the word Ahijah spoke to Jeroboam — so who is to blame for the split?
Verse 15 explains the refusal from God's side rather than Rehoboam's:
So the king refused even to consider the needs of the people. But we know that God in His great wisdom was directing matters in this way to carry out the truth of His word to Jeroboam (v.15). It was certainly not pleasing to God that Rehoboam answered the people so cruelly. But God was working sovereignly for His own glory.
No one forced Rehoboam's hand. He asked two sets of advisers, and the ones he chose handed his own thoughts back to him:
Rehoboam abandons the counsel of wisdom and follows that of the young men who had grown up with him and who stood before him (v. 8). They could not be anything other than the mirror and reflection of their master's thoughts... If he had listened to the wise proverbs of his father, he would have known that "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger" (Prov. 15:1); that "Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall" (Prov. 16:18)... But no, those who flatter his pride are the ones who win his approval. The counsel of the young men in the end is simply the counsel of his own heart.
Jeroboam knew what Ahijah had promised him, and the moment to act on it had come:
Jeroboam was in the plot. He was the one who knew well what the prophecy was, and now there was a chance to take advantage of it... Did that excuse Jeroboam? This is a very important principle that you will find constantly in the word of God. A prophecy is in no way a sanction of what is predicted. Prophecy takes in the most disgusting acts that have ever been done by the proud, corrupt, or murderous will of man.
The kingdom broke in a single afternoon, but the decision was years old:
The obvious and immediate cause of the division was the foolishness of the king in rejecting the counsel of the elders. But the underlying cause was Solomon's idolatry. We read, "And the LORD was angry with Solomon, because his heart had turned away from the LORD, the God of Israel... I will surely tear the kingdom from you and will give it to your servant... I will tear it out of the hand of your son" (1 Kings 11:9-12). The kingdom was never reunited, and will not be until the Lord comes.
Scripture gives more than one explanation for the split, and no party can hide behind another:
Ten of the tribes of Israel were torn from Rehoboam. In 1 Kings 11:11 we are told it was for the sin of Solomon. But verse 33 of the same chapter says it was for the idolatry of the people. And in chapter 12 we find the immediate cause was the tyrannical spirit in which the overbearing Rehoboam met the people... The fact is that the sin of any one of the three parties named was quite enough to bring about all the damage. So the responsibility lies at the door of each. Let me say again, however, that this judgment is only governmental — God's dealing with people in this life — and does not always reach into eternity.
Rehoboam's first instinct was to win the tribes back by force. A prophet told him whose hand had done it, and for once he listened:
Rehoboam flees; nothing but Judah and Benjamin remain to him. To recover what he had so foolishly lost, he gathers together an army of 180,000 men against Israel. But Shemaiah the prophet urges them on God's behalf: "You shall not go up or fight against your relatives the people of Israel. Every man return to his home, for this thing is from me" (v. 24). The king and the two tribes fear the LORD and return according to His word. If only they had continued in this path, which is the beginning of wisdom!
- Root — Solomon's idolatry settled the split long before Shechem. The rough answer was only the occasion.
- Refusal — Rehoboam chose the advice that echoed his own pride. The loss was not something done to him.
- Hand — God was directing events to keep His word to Jeroboam. The cruelty of the answer still displeased Him.
- Responsibility — Scripture names Solomon, the people, and Rehoboam. No one can shelter behind another, and a prophecy never excuses the act.
- Response — the answer to a loss God has sent is not an army but submission. "This thing is from me" stopped the war, and that path is the beginning of wisdom.
And all Israel saw that the king hearkened not to them; and the people answered the king saying, What portion have we in David? And [we have] no inheritance in the son of Jesse To your tents, O Israel! Now see to thine own house, David! And Israel went to their tents.
Solomon is dead. His son Rehoboam has answered the people's plea for a lighter load with a threat. Now ten tribes walk away from the throne of David for good, and the break has never healed.
The cry in this verse was not invented that day. One writer traces it back to an earlier rebel, and sets against it what believers can say instead.
Judah and Israel were held together in practical oneness under David, the anointed of God... but even in his days the divisive spirit showed itself in a worthless man. "He blew a trumpet and said, 'We have no portion in David, and we have no inheritance in the son of Jesse; every man to his tents, O Israel!'" (2 Sam. 20:1). The seed was sown that day; and though the evil work was stopped there and then, it bore its bad fruit long afterwards... In contrast to this, the true joint-heirs surely say, All our portion is in Christ Jesus, and so is our inheritance for ever — let us stay in Him!
Rehoboam had two sets of advisers, and he chose the ones who echoed what he already wanted to hear.
Rehoboam turns away from the counsel of wisdom to follow that of the young men who had grown up with him... Had he stood before his father and heard the wise proverbs that fell from his lips, he could have passed on some of that wisdom to others. He would have known that "A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger" (Prov. 15:1); that "Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall" (Prov. 16:18)... The counsel of the young men is, in the end, only the counsel of his own heart. Pride goes hand in hand with despising one's neighbour.
It is easy to read this as pure politics: a foolish king, an angry crowd, a torn kingdom. One writer says that reading stops too soon.
People of that day looked at the bare facts and might have concluded that the division was wholly due to the folly of Rehoboam... Such arguments might seem reasonable to the natural mind. But they would have been false. It was true that Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause of the division. Yet the word of God in judgment had gone out long before the violent words of the king. The mighty hand of God in discipline was behind the feeble hand of the king. The holy government of God was tearing the kingdom apart. Behind the discipline of God was the low condition of the people.
The verse just before says the king would not listen because this turn of affairs came from the LORD. It fulfilled His word spoken through the prophet Ahijah. Some have used that to excuse the rebels.
Did that excuse Jeroboam? This is a very important principle that you will find constantly in the word of God. A prophecy is in no way a sanction of what is predicted. Prophecy takes in the most disgusting acts ever done by the proud, corrupt or murderous will of man.
Behind the cry lay Solomon's oppression, and out of the cry came a whole new kingdom.
Solomon turned away from God and oppressed His people. So at his death the people find their occasion to make demands on the new king coming to his father's throne. His rude and foolish answer brings on the crisis, and then we hear the unthankful and heartless cry... Ephraim then takes the lead of the ten tribes who revolted from the house of David, headed by Jeroboam, a man of the tribe of Ephraim. A new kingdom is formed, and every one of its nineteen kings turns away from the LORD.
Israel made the break in a single day. One writer follows what became of it, and where the same thing has happened since.
They announced a division among brothers at once. The division took no time to make, yet it has continued through the centuries until now. It will not be healed until the Lord Jesus comes in power and glory at the end of the Great Tribulation. In God's purposes Israel is one nation that cannot be divided. In practice the nation has been totally inconsistent with God's plan for her. Sadly, the same has been true in the history of the Church of God on earth also.
- Seed — a rebel in David's own reign shouted the same words. Division starts as an idea long before it becomes an event.
- Spark — Rehoboam took the advice that flattered him. A harsh answer, where a soft one was needed, cost him ten tribes.
- Government — Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause. But God had spoken His judgment long before, and behind it lay the low state of the people.
- Responsibility — being foretold never makes an act right. Prophecy describes man's worst deeds without approving them.
- Portion — Israel claimed no share in David and walked away from his house. Believers say the opposite: our whole portion and inheritance is in Christ.
But as for the children of Israel that dwelt in the cities of Judah, Rehoboam reigned over them.
The ten tribes have just walked away from Solomon's son. This verse records what remains to him: the Israelites living in Judah's towns. Two questions follow. Why did anyone stay with Rehoboam? And what was this shrunken kingdom worth in God's eyes?
The shout that split the kingdom was not new. One writer traces it to an older revolt, and counts what was left.
Israel rebels: "What portion do we have in David?" (v. 16). This was the rallying cry to rebellion, the common cry of those who were discontented in the days of David (2 Sam. 20:1). Rehoboam flees; nothing but Judah and Benjamin remain to him.
Those who stayed did not stay because Rehoboam had earned it. One writer separates the two sides of the split, then names what the smaller kingdom still holds.
The rebellion of the ten tribes was morally their own act and deed. Through Rehoboam's folly, it would have spread to all the tribes. Judah stayed with Solomon's son only because God's providence ruled it so. As His gracious word had said, He kept one tribe for the house of David, to carry out His purpose — the bringing in of His king. Judah keeps the hill of Zion. Though stripped of glory, they still have the temple and the city. God still acknowledges them, and the royal link between the Lord and the kingdom of Judah holds. Jeroboam's kingdom had no such outward link.
God calls what was left to David's son only "one tribe." Another writer weighs that small share against the bigger northern kingdom, and finds the smaller one steadier.
Judah was greatly reduced — reduced in the size and glory of the kingdom. But there was a marked difference from the ten tribes, the much larger part that went to the other side. They kept shifting their burdens from time to time. The ruling family changed again and again, and one man after another rose up... Not so with Judah. God calls it only one tribe, to put in the strongest possible way how completely their glory was gone. Still, there the light shall always be.
The chapter says this turn of events came from the Lord. The same writer measures Jeroboam's part by a rule he finds all through Scripture.
Did that excuse Jeroboam? This is a very important principle that you will find constantly in the word of God. A prophecy is in no way a sanction of what is predicted. Prophecy takes in the most terrible acts that have ever been done by the proud, corrupt, or murderous will of man.
The verse names a mixed group: Israelites, yet living in Judah's cities. One writer says who moved south, and how long their good start lasted.
The priests and Levites stayed faithful to the Lord, to His house and worship at Jerusalem, and to the house of David — the royal house God had chosen. They left the land of Israel to live in Judah and Jerusalem. Others too, who had set their hearts to seek the God of Israel, left the side of those who had broken away and flocked to Rehoboam. For three years all went well, and they walked "in the way of David and Solomon." But their goodness was like the early dew and the morning cloud, and passed quickly away — as everything merely human does.
Rehoboam kept a kingdom, but Israel was one nation no longer. One writer measures how long the split lasted, and finds the same failure among Christians today.
They at once announced a division among brothers. The division took no time at all, yet it has lasted through the centuries until now. It will not be healed until the Lord Jesus comes in power and glory at the end of the Great Tribulation... The same has sadly been true in the history of the Church of God on earth. There is only "one body" (Eph. 4:4), yet in practice there are many bodies of professing Christians. That is a shameful contradiction to our perfect unity "in Christ."
Losing ten tribes could have ended Rehoboam's usefulness. One writer shows what he did instead.
From now on Rehoboam stays inside the smaller sphere the division has left him, for we read that "he lived in Jerusalem." Does that mean he settles down to quiet ease and does nothing? ... Far from it. At once we read that he becomes a builder. He "built cities for defense in Judah." As we might say today, he "strengthened the things that remained."
- Cause. Harsh words from Rehoboam met an old rebel cry, and ten tribes walked out — their own act, whatever God had foretold.
- Kept. God's overruling providence held one tribe for David's house, so that His king would come.
- Small. God called what was left only one tribe. Yet it kept the temple, the city and a light that never went out, while the north kept changing rulers.
- Drawn. Priests, Levites and others who sought God left the north for Judah's cities — a move of the heart, not politics.
- Built. Rehoboam never got back what he lost, but inside his smaller borders he strengthened what remained.
And king Rehoboam sent Adoram, who was over the levy; but all Israel stoned him with stones, that he died. And king Rehoboam hastened to mount his chariot, to flee to Jerusalem.
Rehoboam had just lost ten tribes by one harsh speech. He still sent his tax officer to collect from them, and the killing that followed split the kingdom for good — but whose hand was behind it?
The king's officer held a long-standing post. One reference work traces the same office and name back through two earlier reigns:
Chief over the tribute in the days of Solomon (1 Kings 4:6; 1 Kings 5:14). In David's time ADORAM was over the tribute (2 Sam. 20:24), and in the days of Rehoboam also a person of this name was over the tribute (1 Kings 12:18). Gesenius and others take that name as a shortened form of Adoniram, and as referring to the same person. The Adoram of 1 Kings 12:18 seems to be called HADORAM in 2 Chr. 10:18. All Israel stoned him to death at the revolt of the ten tribes. If Adoniram held office from David to Rehoboam it would cover a long period; still it may be the same man throughout, or father and son.
Sending him misread the moment badly. One writer traces the mistake to self-flattery, and sets the king's boast beside his flight:
Rehoboam found it hard to believe that the ten tribes had really refused his yoke. He flattered himself, no doubt, that they would not dare rebel against his authority... So he confidently sent Hadoram to collect the imposed assessment. This unwise act brings matters to a crisis. The furious people stone the old collector-general, who had served in this office under his father Solomon and his grandfather David. The king had boasted that his "little finger" would be "thicker than his father's waist." Now, to his shame, he "hurried to mount his chariot to flee to Jerusalem."
The officer died for what he stood for. The people had complained of a heavy yoke, and one writer sets that complaint beside the yoke of Christ:
These men complain to the king about the yoke his father had put on them: "Your father made our yoke heavy." That wording shows it had not always been so. Christ's yoke will never be heavy on His people. To His own He will always stay the same as they have known Him in the day of suffering and of grace: "My yoke is easy, and my burden is light."
The king took the advice that looked strong. One writer follows it through to the stones:
The young men advise Rehoboam to take a course that seems admirable to the natural mind. It looks like taking a strong line and upholding the authority and majesty of the kingdom. Sad to say, Rehoboam follows the advice of nature. He takes a proud and unreasonable stand, and threatens the protesters with violent, extreme discipline. The people meet the king's violence with violence of their own. They stone the king's officer, and the division is complete.
The stoning did not create the revolt; it exposed it. And the damage outlasted everyone involved:
But this only became the open occasion for the rebellion to show itself... And that rebellion was never healed. Sad to say, we shall find worse abominations than this. But in this way the bitter fruits of evil were beginning to show themselves; and he who had sown the wind must reap the whirlwind.
It would be easy to blame the whole disaster on one proud young ruler. Commentators warn that this reading stops too soon:
It was true that Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause of the division. But the word of God in judgment had gone out long before the violent words of the king. The mighty hand of God in discipline was behind the feeble hand of the king. The holy government of God was tearing the kingdom apart, and behind the discipline of God was the low condition of the people.
One writer follows the split forward, past Israel to the Church:
This division happened with no delay. But it has continued through the centuries until now, and it will not be healed until the Lord Jesus comes in power and glory... In the counsels of God, Israel is one nation that cannot be divided. But in practice the nation has been completely inconsistent with God's plan for her. Sad to say, the same has been true in the history of the Church of God on earth too.
- Root — the split goes back past Rehoboam. God's word of judgment had already gone out, and the low condition of the people invited the discipline.
- Yoke — the tax officer stood for a burden that had grown heavy. Christ's yoke never grows heavy on His people.
- Folly — the king answered a complaint with threats, force met force, and the man he sent paid with his life.
- Flight — the king who boasted of his "little finger" ended up running for his chariot.
- Reach — the tear was never healed. Commentators see in it Israel's long division, and the divided state of God's people since; only Christ's coming will mend it.
And Israel rebelled against the house of David, unto this day.
Rehoboam's harsh answer to the people ends in a split that was still open in the writer's own day. Two questions follow: who caused it, and why does Scripture treat this rebellion as something God Himself brought about?
It would be easy to pin the whole disaster on one bad decision by a young king. Commentators warn that stopping there misses what God was doing.
People of that day, looking at the bare facts of the case, might have concluded that the division was wholly due to the folly of Rehoboam. But however reasonable such a conclusion might appear to the natural mind, it would have been false. It was true that Rehoboam's folly was the immediate cause of the division. But the word of God in judgment had gone out long before the violent words of the king, and the mighty hand of God in discipline was behind the feeble hand of the king.
God's judgment fell on the king's own sin. But it reached past the throne to the people as well.
Here we find the root of division to be worldliness that turns aside to other gods, and disobedience to the Word of God, but now connected with the people. The folly and failure of the leaders, however great, would not necessarily cause division were it not for the low condition of the people of God generally. "This is done of you" condemns the individual; "they have forsaken Me" reveals the low condition of the people that lies behind the failure of the leaders.
God had foretold this split through a prophet, and Jeroboam knew it. That knowledge did not make his act innocent. Scripture still calls it rebellion.
A prophecy is in no way a sanction of what is predicted. Prophecy takes in the most terrible acts that have ever been done by the proud, corrupt, or murderous will of man.
The same writer sees the split as a harvest from seed sown earlier:
And that rebellion was never healed. Here the bitter fruit of wrongdoing was beginning to show itself, and the one who had sown the wind had to reap the whirlwind.
The split lasted for centuries. Commentators see in it a lasting gap between what God says His people are and what they became in practice.
This division happened at once, but it has continued through the centuries until now. It will not be healed until the Lord Jesus comes in power and glory at the end of the Great Tribulation. In God's counsels Israel is one nation, indivisible. In practice the nation has been totally inconsistent with God's plan for her. Such has sadly been true in the history of the Church of God on earth also. Though there is only "one body" (Eph. 4:4), in practical testimony there are many bodies of professing Christians. That is a shameful contradiction of our perfect unity "in Christ."
Rehoboam wanted to win the tribes back by force. God forbade it, and writers draw a lesson from that.
Do we not find the same thing among God's people today? Because of our unfaithfulness there has been division among God's people. Instead of standing together in conflict against the common foe, God's people are so often engaged in opposing each other. Instead of fighting with brothers, we should pay attention to God's word to Rehoboam when the division occurred: "Thus says the Lord, You shall not go up or fight against your relatives the people of Israel… for this thing is from me" (1 Kings 12:24). God has allowed the divisions among brothers because of our sin and folly. It is for us to bow our heads and hearts before Him in shame, and to go on quietly before Him seeking His will in the middle of the sad and solemn consequences of our failure.
No king ever put the nation back together. Writers point to the one hand that will.
How beautiful it is that in God's day, when the Lord takes up the staff of Israel and of Judah, it will be reunited in His hand. It will be one, as it has never been since the division. All efforts in the past have been useless. King Rehoboam might fight to bring back the tribes that revolted, but it was completely impossible… But when the mighty Son of God takes hold of His people, that broken staff will be reunited.
- Root — God's word of judgment went out long before the split. Worldliness and disobedience to God's Word were its real source.
- Reach — The king did not fail alone. A people who had forsaken the Lord stood behind his folly.
- Responsibility — A prophecy excuses no one. It foretells evil acts without approving them, and the harvest matched the sowing.
- Result — "To this day" marks a break no human effort ever repaired. Commentators see the same contradiction today: one body in Scripture, many bodies in practice.
- Repair — God forbids fighting fellow believers. Only the Lord's own hand will make the broken staff one again, at His coming.
And it came to pass when all Israel heard that Jeroboam had come back, that they sent and called him to the assembly, and made him king over all Israel none followed the house of David, but the tribe of Judah only.
The break happens fast: Israel hears that Jeroboam is back, calls an assembly, and crowns him. Two questions hang over the verse: was this rebellion man's doing or God's, and what did the house of David keep?
Israel got the leader their own condition called for. One writer traces that choice back to the decline under Solomon. He also links it to an earlier king Israel demanded and then had to live with.
All Israel had sunk into a far worse condition during the days of Solomon. That was to be expected once Solomon himself sank to the level of worshipping idols. God knew that Israel wanted a king with ability. They were not concerned to have a man of integrity who would put the Lord first in his thoughts, as David did. So God gave Israel the kind of king they wanted, and they made Jeroboam king over all Israel (v.20). Israel had to learn by experience how foolish it was to want a king such as Saul (1 Sam. 8:11-20). In the same way, having a king such as Jeroboam, they would learn by sad experience that they ought to trust the Lord instead of demanding their own rights.
A prophecy had already announced what Jeroboam would gain. Knowing that in advance did not make his grasping for it innocent.
Did that excuse Jeroboam? This is a very important principle, and you will find it again and again in the word of God. A prophecy never approves what it predicts. Prophecy covers the most terrible acts that the proud, corrupt, or murderous will of man has ever done.
Benjamin also stayed with Rehoboam, yet the record says Judah only. The reason is one of size and naming.
On the separation of the ten tribes, Judah and Benjamin formed a kingdom under the name of Judah. Benjamin being only a small tribe, the kingdom of Judah is sometimes spoken of as one tribe. No doubt the territory of Simeon was attached to Judah as well, since that tribe was more or less lost in the land.
That one tribe was no accident of politics, and it kept everything that mattered.
Judah stayed loyal to Solomon's son only because of the overruling providence of God. In keeping with His gracious word, God reserved one tribe to the house of David, and He did it to accomplish His purpose — the bringing in of His king. Judah keeps the hill of Zion. Stripped of glory, they still have the temple and the city. God still owns them, and the royal link between the Lord and the kingdom of Judah still stands. With Jeroboam's kingdom there was no outward link. There was no properly ordained priest, and the king was given in judgment... All the symbols of worship appointed by God were with Judah; the ten tribes had not one of them.
The king's own folly set off the split, but it was not the deeper source. God also claimed the outcome as His own.
When the ten tribes revolted and Israel was divided, Rehoboam tried to unite them by force. But the Lord sent him a message saying, "this thing is from me." The apparent and immediate cause of the division was the foolishness of the king in rejecting the counsel of the elders. The underlying cause was Solomon's idolatry.
The crowning of Jeroboam took a day. Its effects have run on for centuries, and one writer reads the same pattern into the state of Christians today.
Jeroboam and his followers announced at once a division among brothers. The division took no time at all, but it has continued through the centuries until now. It will not be healed until the Lord Jesus comes in power and glory at the end of the Great Tribulation. In the counsels of God, Israel is one nation that cannot be divided. In practice the nation has been completely inconsistent with God's plan for her. Sadly the same has been true in the history of the Church of God on earth. There is only "one body" (Eph. 4:4), yet in practical testimony there are many bodies of professing Christians. That is a shameful contradiction of our perfect unity "in Christ."
- Cause. The split looked like one king's foolish answer to the people. The deeper cause was Solomon's idolatry, and the Lord's own message named the outcome as His doing.
- Choice. Israel wanted a capable king, not a man who put the Lord first. God gave them what they asked for — the same sad lesson Saul had already taught them.
- Excuse. Jeroboam had a prophecy on his side, yet a prophecy never approves what it predicts. Knowing what was coming did not clear him.
- Remnant. "Judah only" means two tribes under one name. It was small, yet it held Zion, the temple, the city and every God-given symbol of worship. The larger kingdom had none of them.
- Result. The kingdom broke in a day and has never come back together. It will stay that way until Christ comes — a warning to a divided people who are, in truth, one body.
And Rehoboam came to Jerusalem; and he assembled all the house of Judah, with the tribe of Benjamin, a hundred and eighty thousand chosen men apt for war, to fight against the house of Israel, that he might bring the kingdom again to Rehoboam the son of Solomon.
Rehoboam would not accept the loss of the ten northern tribes, so he raised 180,000 fighting men to take the kingdom back by force. The verse raises a question that still matters: when God's people split, may one side force them back together?
Two things happened at Jerusalem: a king made a plan, and God answered it.
When Rehoboam returned to Jerusalem, he thought he could force Israel into submission. He gathered 180,000 chosen warriors to attack Israel. But the Lord stepped in. He sent the prophet Shemaiah to forbid Rehoboam to carry out this attack. Shemaiah told him and the people of Judah and Benjamin not to go and fight their brothers.
Stopping that army took a man willing to stand in front of it.
Shemaiah must have been a very brave man. He stood in front of a gathered army of 180,000 men, an angry king and an angry people, and delivered a message that must have been very unwelcome. And you cannot help admiring how graciously the king and the people submitted.
There was something right about what Rehoboam wanted.
Rehoboam sets to work at once to bring the people of God together again. Using the methods that suited his day, he gathers an army for this purpose. There is no question that it was in accord with God's thoughts that the people should be one. They had been one at the beginning of God's ways with them. In the day to come they will be one again, as the prophet said... So it might look as if Rehoboam was right to work at ending the division and uniting the people of God.
What ruled the plan out was the reason God gave for the split.
Shemaiah, the man of God, tells Rehoboam why they must stop. It is because God says, "This thing is from Me." God had rebuked Solomon for his worldliness and for disobeying the Word of God, and said to him, "I will surely tear the kingdom from you." Now that the blow has fallen, God can say to Rehoboam, "This thing is from Me." To seek to undo the evil of Solomon may be right; to ignore the governmental acts of God is certainly wrong. Rehoboam and those with him have to learn what we all have to learn in the divisions our own folly has caused. No one can brush aside the government of God.
God still called the ten tribes their brothers. That one word shaped what Judah could and could not do.
God did not forbid His people to seek a righteous way of reconciliation. He did not forbid them to find out why the break had happened, or to confess their failure together. What He did forbid was fighting with their brothers... Where there has been failure on all sides, it is best to drop the sword and for everyone to go to their knees.
Rehoboam's harsh answer broke the kingdom in two. It did not create the divided heart that was already there.
The break came through the folly of Rehoboam. Yet God was behind it, to expose the disunity that already existed in Israel. God often exposes the same kind of evil in the Church of God — evil that people try to cover up, but that in the end causes public divisions. This is to our shame, but God is perfectly righteous to show any condition for what it really is.
Note who stayed. The promise to David spoke of one tribe, yet the verse counts Benjamin with Judah:
When the kingdom divided, Benjamin stayed with Judah, though Israel seized a large part of their land. At times they seem to drop out of sight. Ahijah said that God had kept one tribe for the house of David, as if Benjamin counted as cut off in judgement. People regularly spoke of the two tribes as "Judah," and of the ten tribes as "Israel."
Obedience left Rehoboam a smaller kingdom. What did he do inside it?
From now on Rehoboam stays inside the narrow sphere the division has made, for we read that "he lived in Jerusalem." Does that mean he settles down to a life of quiet ease and does nothing?... Far from it. At once we read that he becomes a builder... As we might say today, he "strengthened what remained." And he provided food for the people of God.
- Cause. Rehoboam's folly split the kingdom. God used the split to expose a disunity that was already there.
- Restraint. One man with a message from God stopped 180,000 armed men. The king listened, and the war never happened.
- Brothers. The ten tribes stayed brothers, not targets. God banned the sword, not the honest search for peace.
- Method. Wanting one people matched God's own mind. Forcing it by strength ignored God's hand in the break, and so was wrong.
- Result. Obeying left Rehoboam a smaller field. Inside it he built, fortified, and fed the people of God.
But the word of God came to Shemaiah the man of God, saying,
Rehoboam has just lost ten tribes, and his answer is an army of 180,000 men. Before a single sword is drawn, God speaks. He does not speak to the king on his throne, but to a man named Shemaiah. The whole future of the nation hangs on whether Rehoboam obeys that word.
A prophet appears at this exact moment for a reason. When the leaders of God's people failed, God opened a new way to reach them.
Once the priesthood was ruined, it no longer served as the public link between the people and God. The king, the Lord's anointed, took the priest's place in that role. From then on, all the blessing of Israel — and its judgment too — depended on the conduct of the king. Strictly speaking, when the king failed in his responsibility, it affected the people's relationship with God. But then something new happened. It lasted through the whole time of the kingdom and even afterwards: the prophet came on the scene. His coming proved that nothing could destroy the grace and mercy of God, even when everything was in ruins.
Scripture calls Shemaiah a "man of God." The phrase turns up at a particular kind of moment.
The expression "man of God" occurs about 76 times in the Old Testament, and only two times in the New. Except where Moses is spoken of, it refers to those who witnessed to God's people in a day of departure.
Shemaiah had to carry this message into a camp already armed for war.
Shemaiah (heard of Jehovah), a man of God, brought the message from the Lord not to fight against Israel. They obeyed, and the war was avoided. As failure had come in, prophecy at once reappears. Shemaiah must have been a very courageous man. He stood in front of a gathered army of 180,000 men, an angry king and an angry people, and delivered a message that no one wanted to hear. And one cannot but admire the gracious submission of king and people.
The ten tribes were guilty. That did not give Rehoboam the right to punish them.
Rehoboam wants to fight. It was in vain. God had given away ten parts of the kingdom. He would not allow a man who was himself guilty to fight even against the guilty. God had not given them a king of the house of David in order that they might fight against Israel. "You shall not go up or fight against your brothers, the people of Israel. Every man return to his home, for this thing is from me." So they listened to the word of the Lord and went home again, according to the word of the Lord.
God claims the division as His own act. That draws a line between repairing damage and resisting God.
He has to learn, and all Israel with him, that despite the division the ten tribes are still their "brothers." They are not to go up or fight against them. Moreover Shemaiah, the man of God, tells Rehoboam why they must stop. It is because God says, "This thing is done of Me." God had rebuked Solomon for his worldliness and disobedience to the Word of God, and told him, "I will surely tear the kingdom from you." Now that the blow has fallen, God can say to Rehoboam, "This thing is done of Me." Trying to undo the evil of Solomon may be right. Ignoring the governmental acts of God is certainly wrong.
Being stopped looks like loss. Here it was a rescue, and a later king shows the cost of ignoring the same word.
It was mercy on God's part to send this message. Otherwise there might have been a terrible slaughter, with nothing settled at all. Later than this, Amaziah, a king of Judah, launched a battle against Joash king of Israel, and suffered a heavy defeat. At least Rehoboam had sense enough to listen to Shemaiah and to obey the Word of the Lord.
- Word after ruin. The king's failure broke the nation, but God did not fall silent. The prophet's arrival proved that His grace and mercy outlast total ruin.
- Word to a man. Apart from Moses, "man of God" marks those who spoke for God when His people had turned away. The word reaches the crisis through such a man, not through the throne.
- Word against the sword. God would not let one guilty side punish another. He sent the 180,000 home and forbade brother to fight brother.
- Word owning the loss. "This thing is from me" makes the division God's own act. Undoing Solomon's evil may be right. Overriding God's dealings never is.
- Word obeyed. Shemaiah faced an angry king and army, and they submitted. That obedience prevented a slaughter. A later king ignored the same word and lost his battle.
Speak unto Rehoboam, the son of Solomon, king of Judah, and unto all the house of Judah and Benjamin, and to the remainder of the people, saying,
Rehoboam has gathered an army to win back the ten tribes by force. Before the first blow falls, God sends a word — and He sends it to the king, the two tribes, and all the people with them.
The king has just lost most of his kingdom. Into that collapse God sends a man with a message. Writers see a pattern: as the kingship falls, prophets come to the front.
Notice how the role of the prophet grows in importance as the kingship falls into ruin. Through all this part of the history, prophets hold our attention. Ahijah was the first to appear, when Solomon fell under God's judgment... Now here is Shemaiah, who turns Rehoboam from his plans of war. The role of the prophet was a great grace. It allowed relations between God and His people to continue despite the ruin. Above all, the prophet was the mouthpiece for the Word of God.
Rehoboam still had an army of 180,000 and a reason to use it. The word that stops him names him king of Judah only.
It must have been clear to him now that the rebellion was very real and serious. It was not a passing wave of discontent that would soon die away by itself and be forgotten. But a man does not easily accept such an immense loss, or such terrible results coming so suddenly. Force may still work. There is the army, one hundred and eighty thousand strong... Might must make right, if right cannot be shown any other way. But "the God of peace" loves His people even when they are misguided and in error. So He warns the king of Judah by the word of the man of God, Shemaiah. Note the deliberate limit of his title (2 Chron. 11:3).
God's reason is not that the war would fail. It is that the split came from Him. One writer sets this word beside God's earlier sentence on Solomon.
He has to learn, and all Israel with him, that despite the division the ten tribes are still their "brothers." They are not to "go up nor fight against" them. Moreover Shemaiah, the man of God, tells Rehoboam why they must stop. It is because God says, "This thing is from Me." God had rebuked Solomon for his worldliness and for disobeying the Word of God. He said to him, "Since this is done by you... I will tear the kingdom from you." Now that the blow has fallen, God can say to Rehoboam, "This thing is from Me." To try to undo the evil of Solomon may be right. To ignore God's own acts of government is certainly wrong.
There is another reason the war was hopeless. Rehoboam was not the innocent party.
Rehoboam wants to fight. It was in vain. God had given away ten parts out of the kingdom, and God would not sanction that the man who is himself guilty should fight even against the guilty. God had not given them a king of the house of David so that they might fight against Israel.
The ban is narrow. It stops the sword, not the search for peace.
Look carefully at that Old Testament story. God did not forbid His people to seek a righteous way of reconciliation, or to find out why the split had happened, or to confess their failure together. But He did forbid them to fight with their brothers... Where the failure has been general, it is better to drop the sword and for everyone to go to their knees.
Rehoboam listened, and that obedience saved lives. A later king of Judah would not be so wise.
It was mercy on God's part to send this message, for otherwise there might have been a terrible slaughter with no problem resolved at all. Later, Amaziah, a king of Judah, attacked Joash king of Israel, and suffered a heavy defeat (2 Kings 14:8-12). At least Rehoboam had sense enough to listen to Shemaiah and to obey the Word of the Lord.
Accepting the loss did not mean giving up on the people of God.
Does this mean he settles down to a life of quiet ease and inaction? Does he no longer concern himself with the interests of the people of God? Far from it, for at once we read he becomes a builder... As we might say in our day, he "strengthened the things that remained." He also provided "stores of food, oil, and wine." He provided food for the people of God.
- Sent. With the kingdom in ruins, God sends a prophet. Commentators call this a great grace: God keeps speaking to His people after the collapse.
- Named. The message calls Rehoboam king of Judah only. It then reaches past him to Judah, Benjamin, and all the rest of the people.
- Stopped. God tells them the division came from Him. He would not sanction the war, and a guilty man has no right to punish the guilty.
- Still brothers. God forbids the sword, but not the search for reconciliation or the confessing of failure together.
- Building. Obedience spared a slaughter. Rehoboam then strengthened and fed what remained.
Thus saith Jehovah Go not up, nor fight with your brethren, the children of Israel; return every man to his house, for this thing is from me. And they hearkened to the word of Jehovah, and returned to depart, according to the word of Jehovah.
Rehoboam had lost ten of the twelve tribes in a day, and he gathered an army to take them back by force. God stopped him with one message through a prophet named Shemaiah: the split had come from God Himself.
The phrase "this thing is from me" points back to an earlier word spoken over Solomon.
He has to learn, and all Israel with him, that despite the division the ten tribes are still their "brethren." They are not to "go up nor fight against" them. Shemaiah, the man of God, tells Rehoboam why they must stop. It is because God says, "This thing is from Me." God had rebuked Solomon for his worldliness and disobedience to the Word of God, and said to him, "Since this is done by you… I will tear the kingdom from you." Now that the blow has fallen, God can say to Rehoboam, "This thing is from Me." To seek to undo the evil of Solomon may be right. To ignore the acts of God's government is certainly wrong.
The aim looked patriotic. That did not make it right.
Under the government of God this division of the kingdom was the punishment of the sins of Solomon, brought on by the folly of Rehoboam; it must therefore stand. To fight, then, to bring back the unity of the nation, good as the purpose might seem, was to fight against God. Rehoboam ought to have been thankful that God's love to David had left him even two tribes.
One man with a message turned a king back from war.
Now here is Shemaiah who turns Rehoboam from his plans of war. The role of the prophet was a great grace. It let relations between God and His people continue despite the ruin. Above all the prophet was the mouthpiece for the Word of God… Whoever followed this Word could be sure of good guidance and blessing. It is the same for us… Our prophet is the Word of God. God no longer gives us new revelations, as He did in times past, because He has already revealed everything to us. But when His Word speaks to us, let us respect it and not turn aside.
The ban was not only government. It was kindness.
It was mercy on God's part to send this message. Otherwise there might have been a terrible slaughter with no problem solved at all. Later, Amaziah, a king of Judah, launched a battle against Joash king of Israel, but suffered a crushing defeat. At least Rehoboam had sense enough to listen to Shemaiah and to obey the Word of the Lord.
God banned the sword. He did not ban the search for peace. That difference matters wherever believers are divided today.
Look carefully at that Old Testament story. God did not forbid His people to seek a righteous way of reconciliation, or to find out why the split had happened, or to confess their failure together. But He did forbid them to fight with their brethren… Where there has been general failure, it is best to drop the sword and for all to go to their knees. The division in Israel was God's condemnation on their evil state.
Rehoboam and the two tribes did the one thing open to them.
Very wisely Rehoboam and the two tribes stopped their efforts. As we read, they "obeyed the words of the Lord." They accept the humiliation and sorrow of the division and bow under the chastening hand of the Lord.
Submission here is not despair, because God had already set a boundary on the discipline.
They, the Lord's witnesses, ought to accept the division as the result of their sin. They ought to entrust themselves to God, who would know how to put things right once His judgment had run its course and borne its fruit. That is why Ahijah had said to Jeroboam: "And for this I will afflict the descendants of David, but not for ever."
- From Me — the torn kingdom was God's own act, His answer to Solomon's sin, not just the fallout of Rehoboam's folly.
- Against God — a war to force reunion, however good the aim looked, would have been a war against God Himself.
- Mercy — the ban saved Judah from a slaughter that would have solved nothing; Amaziah later ignored the lesson and lost his war.
- Brethren — God banned the sword, not reconciliation; when failure is general, drop the weapon and go to your knees.
- Not for ever — Rehoboam's part was to bow under God's hand; God's part was to limit the discipline and one day remedy it.
And Jeroboam built Shechem in mount Ephraim, and dwelt therein; and went out from thence, and built Penuel.
God has just given Jeroboam ten of Israel's twelve tribes. His first act as king is building work at two places heavy with history. Why did a man who already held a kingdom by God's own word feel the need to fortify it? And what did that instinct cost him?
Shechem was not a random site. One writer notes both its strategic value and the charm of the valley Jeroboam settled into:
He made historic Shechem his capital and fortified it. He also made Penuel (the face of God — a name that should have reminded him of God's past dealings with the scheming Jacob) a key strategic point. One writer says of Shechem: "The setting is lovely. The valley runs west, with rich black soil, watered by springs that send out many streams flowing west. Orchards of fruit, olive groves, vegetable gardens and greenery on every side delight the eye." It was the very spot for a man set on pleasing himself and aiming at a life of luxury.
Penuel came with a history of its own — and with ruins to rebuild:
This is the place where the mysterious man wrestled with Jacob. Jacob gave it this name, meaning "face of God," because, as he said, he had seen God face to face and his life was spared. The place comes up again five hundred years later: its men refused to give Gideon supplies. On his way back he broke down the tower and killed the men of the city. Jeroboam rebuilt it.
Jeroboam raised the walls but missed everything the name stood for:
Jeroboam made Shechem his capital. He also built the ancient Penuel (the face of God, Gen. 32:30; Judges 8:8), but he did not meet the Lord there like Jacob. Then he took the step that led straight into idolatry.
The irony is that God had offered to do the building Jeroboam now took into his own hands:
Jeroboam had received a conditional pledge from the Lord… He had only to obey Him and let God act for him. Then he could be sure of reigning over all that his soul desired.
Another writer splits the promise in two, and names the mistake:
The kingdom was his with no conditions attached… Keeping the kingdom, on the other hand, depended on his obedience. "If you will listen to all that I command you… walk in My ways, and do what is right in My eyes… I will be with you and will build you a sure house." The kingdom was his. He had only to believe God's promise for that. Yet, like Jacob, he felt he had to work out his own schemes to get the promise fulfilled. Are we not sometimes guilty of the same mistake ourselves?
The next verses show the thinking behind the building. Jeroboam weighed the odds instead of trusting the promise:
He has no confidence in God, so he weighs up the probabilities and stops there. Faith never stops at probabilities. I would even say that it feeds on impossibilities and is the better for it… His unbelief in God's promise and his indifference to the worship of the LORD led him to set up a national religion of his own, separate from the worship God had established at Jerusalem.
Jeroboam offered the new religion to the people as something near and easy:
He based it on bringing religion to their doors. He would give his people a religion that was not too costly or too difficult. In fact, he was only trying to make religion serve his policy.
His own plans to secure the kingdom destroyed it:
Sadly, when Jeroboam came to the throne he did not depend on God and His word. He set out to establish his kingdom by his own devices. Having no faith in God, he fell back on natural reason and human schemes to keep the professing people of God together. Acting this way, he sealed the doom of his kingdom. He set up two golden calves and said to the people, "Behold your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt."
- Promise. The kingdom was already Jeroboam's, with no conditions. God promised to build him a sure house as well, if he obeyed.
- Building. Jeroboam built instead of letting God build. He fortified Shechem as his capital, a lovely valley that suited a man set on pleasing himself.
- Forgetting. He rebuilt Penuel, "face of God," the place where Jacob had seen God face to face — yet he did not meet the Lord there as Jacob had.
- Calculating. The same mind that built walls weighed probabilities instead of trusting a promise. Faith never stops at probabilities. It feeds on impossibilities.
- Ruin. Human schemes to hold the people together produced the golden calves. Religion served his policy, and the king doomed his own kingdom.
And Jeroboam said in his heart, Now shall the kingdom return to the house of David.
Jeroboam now rules ten tribes. The first thing Scripture records of his reign is not a decision but a thought — a fear he never said out loud. Everything that follows grows out of that one private calculation: the calves at Bethel and Dan, the priesthood he invented, the feasts he made up.
No one else heard this fear. One writer notes that God reports what was in the new king's heart — and what had always been there:
But the newly-crowned king quickly showed that he did not hold his kingdom in faith as a trust from God. "And Jeroboam said in his heart, 'Now the kingdom will turn back to the house of David.'" Note that the all-seeing Eye tells us what was going on in his heart — and it had never been anything but "an evil, unbelieving heart"… This man has no trust in God and no confidence in the people around him. He was like an earlier king, Saul, who turned away from God and began to suspect everybody around him.
Before we condemn him, one writer recalls another man who once said something similar in his own heart:
It is easy for us to judge him. But let us remember that even David, the anointed of God, was once in such a low spiritual condition that he lost sight of God's promises. He said in his heart: "Now I shall perish one day by the hand of Saul." He went down to join the Philistines, his people's enemies, and only just escaped the shameful position of fighting with them against Saul's army.
Nothing had gone wrong yet. Jeroboam was only counting up what might go wrong — and one writer draws the line between that and faith:
Events unfold without his having to interfere, but he is mistrusting and says in his heart: "Now the kingdom will turn back to the house of David." He has no confidence in God, so he weighs the probabilities and stops there. Faith never stops at probabilities — I would even go so far as to say that it feeds upon impossibilities and is the better for it… Out of his unbelief in God's promise, and out of his indifference to the worship of the Lord, Jeroboam sets up a national religion, separate from the worship God had established at Jerusalem. From the moment that this worship was not a worship of the Lord, what could it be? Idol worship.
Jeroboam faced a real problem. Where he took it for an answer decided everything:
There is no doubt that if Jeroboam had truly sought the mind of God about his problem, he would have been reassured. Whatever happened, the kingdom was his… Instead of asking God, we read that Jeroboam "took counsel" — clearly from men. The result was the setting up of two golden calves. One stood at Dan, in the far north. The other stood at Bethel, as a challenge to the God of Jacob… It is remarkable that he repeated the sin of Aaron and the people of Israel at the foot of Sinai… Some have argued that Jeroboam was truly worshipping the Lord, only with the help of visible images. People still use that argument today to excuse open idolatry. The Bible does not support this. It says plainly: "This thing became a sin."
Jeroboam presented the calves to his people as a favour. One writer names what he was after:
He presented it as bringing religion to their doors, as helping his people to a religion that would not be too costly or too difficult. In fact, he was only seeking to make religion serve his policy.
God had already offered Jeroboam the very security he was scheming for. Others paid a high price to stay clear of what he built:
The Lord promised Jeroboam "a sure house" if he would walk in His ways… Still, Jeroboam had no faith in God and His word. He feared for the safety of his throne if the people kept going up to Jerusalem to worship, so he installed golden calves in Bethel and Dan… He appointed priests from every class of people, ignoring the special privilege of the Levites. He set up feasts of his own invention… All this was more than unfaithfulness; it was open apostasy. Thankfully, large numbers hated these evils, for the Word of God had some authority over their hearts. They turned their backs on Jeroboam's evil inventions, in some cases giving up their homes and lands.
- Heart first. The ruin starts where no one can see it. A king reasons in his heart and holds his kingdom as a prize to guard, not as a trust from God.
- Heart afraid. Unbelief weighs the odds and stops there. Faith goes further, and even feeds on impossibilities.
- Heart advised. He had a genuine problem. He could have asked God. He took counsel of men instead, and the answer they gave him was an idol.
- Heart accommodated. Jeroboam offered worship that was nearer and cheaper. He was bending religion to serve his policy.
- Heart's harvest. He lost the "sure house" God had offered him. Many who refused his invention gave up homes and lands to keep the Word of God over their hearts.
If this people go up to do sacrifice in the house of Jehovah at Jerusalem, the heart of this people will turn again to their lord, to Rehoboam king of Judah, and they will kill me, and return to Rehoboam king of Judah.
God has just given Jeroboam the kingdom of Israel, and his first act as king is to count the odds against himself. He traces a chain of danger — worship at Jerusalem, loyalty to Rehoboam, his own death — and one question follows: why does a man who already holds a promise from God feel he must protect himself?
Before any of this reasoning, God had already set His terms with Jeroboam. He was not left to guess at his future.
Jeroboam had received a conditional pledge from the Lord: "And if you will listen to all that I command you, and will walk in my ways, and do what is right in my eyes by keeping my statutes and my commandments, as David my servant did, I will be with you and will build you a sure house, as I built for David, and I will give Israel to you" (1 Kings 11:38). He had only to let God act in his favour, to obey Him, and he could be sure of reigning over all that his soul desired.
The verse is a piece of political arithmetic, Each step follows from the one before. The problem is where the first step came from.
Events unfold without his having to interfere, but he is mistrustful, and says in his heart: "Now the kingdom will turn back to the house of David." He has no confidence in God, so he weighs up the probabilities and stops there. Faith never stops at probabilities — I would even go so far as to say that it feeds upon impossibilities and is the better for it. Once he has accepted that the kingdom will probably return to the house of David, Jeroboam carries his reasoning further. He thinks he must stop the people from going up to Jerusalem to offer their sacrifices there, in case they have contact with the royal house of Judah. The king decides that this is a matter of life and death: "the heart of this people will turn again to their lord, to Rehoboam king of Judah, and they will kill me." His decision is made: Israel must have a new religion. Out of his unbelief in God's promise, and out of his indifference to the worship of the Lord, comes a national religion. Jeroboam sets it up himself, and it is different from the worship God had established at Jerusalem.
Jeroboam feared the pilgrimage because of what the people would remember once they arrived there.
He was afraid that if he allowed his subjects to go up to Jerusalem they would think again of their old king — think again of the grand purposes of God connected with Jerusalem. What does he do then? He devises a religion out of his own head.
Jeroboam presented his new religion as a kindness — worship brought closer to home, at less cost. Something else lay underneath.
He put it on the ground of bringing religion to their doors, of helping his people to a religion that would not be too costly or too difficult; in fact, he was only seeking to make religion serve his policy. He did this knowing well that it is impossible for a kingdom — and more particularly Israel, God's people — to be strong on the earth where God is not owned. The owning of God has to be blended with the government, so that the kingdom does not have two rival authorities. In fact, of the two, religion has the stronger hold on the conscience, not civil obedience.
Jeroboam never took his problem to God. A different outcome was open to him.
There is no doubt that if Jeroboam had truly sought the mind of God about his problem, God would have reassured him. Whatever happened, the kingdom was his. And if he had set his people an example by going regularly to Jerusalem to worship, the two kingdoms could perhaps have lived together in peace and godliness for many years.
The question behind the verse outlives Jeroboam: who chooses the place of worship?
God had said, you shall worship in the place that I will choose. Dan and Bethel were Jeroboam's choice. Today many seek to serve God and "worship" Him in the manner and the place that suits them. But the New Testament teaches us that the place must be of God's choosing — the place where Christ is in the midst, and where the Holy Spirit is free to lead in true worship.
- Promise. Jeroboam already held God's pledge of a sure house; he needed only to obey and let God act for him.
- Probability. Instead he weighed the odds and stopped there — faith does not stop at probabilities, it feeds on impossibilities.
- Substitute. Fearing Jerusalem's pull on the people's hearts, he devised a religion out of his own head and made it serve his policy.
- Convenience. He sold the new worship as nearer and cheaper; that is still how a substitute for God's place wins a crowd.
- Counsel. He never took his problem to God — had he asked, God would have reassured him, and the two kingdoms might have lived in peace.