And Jehovah was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned away from Jehovah the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice,
The king who built the temple has ended up worshipping the gods of his foreign wives. Two questions follow: how does a man who saw God twice end here, and what does God's anger mean for someone He has blessed?
The chapter repeats one phrase: his wives turned away his heart. One writer shows what that describes, and how long it took.
"His wives turned away his heart" — the word is repeated in verse 4. It is a terrible thing when what belongs to the world lodges in the heart and takes control of it. It turns the affections away from their only object toward vile, shameful, guilty objects... It took time for this sowing to the flesh to bear its fruit. Who would have believed that the Solomon of the temple would become an idolater? He once knelt and spread out his hands toward God in the sight of the people.
The idolatry was not the first move away from God. It grew out of earlier choices that at the time looked harmless, even successful.
At first this neglect of the word appeared to have no bad effect. He grew rich, as though it were only the fulfilment of God's promise. But it soon led to a departure more serious in its nature and its consequences... It ended in open disobedience of the clearest and most essential requirements of God's word. The path of sin is slippery, and it is always walked with quickening steps. The reason is that the first sin tends to weaken in the soul the authority and power of the one thing that can keep us from committing still greater sins. That one thing is the word of God, along with the sense of His presence, which gives the word all its practical power over us.
The verse gives the reason God's anger burned: this man had heard from God twice, and on this very subject. Comfort was part of the trap.
The Lord's anger burned against this famous king. He turned against God, even though the Lord had appeared to him twice and had given him a clear command not to follow other gods. It seems unthinkable that a believer would sink to such a level as Solomon did, but wealth and ease can be a terrible snare even to one who is born of God.
Another writer turns the failure on the reader: watch the very thing God has singled out in you.
The greater the privilege and the higher the honour, the deeper the shame... It is written for our wisdom, for our learning, for our warning, that we should beware of slipping in the very thing which God singles out in us. ... Solomon rested in the fruits God had given him. He enjoyed what came from God, but turned aside from the living source.
Long before Solomon, the law had named two things a king must not pile up. His famous wisdom did not stop him from doing both.
We find Solomon importing war horses from Egypt and multiplying wives. He had seven hundred wives who were princesses and three hundred concubines, and his wives turned away his heart. This went against the prohibition in Deuteronomy 17:16: "Only he must not acquire many horses for himself or cause the people to return to Egypt in order to acquire many horses... And he shall not acquire many wives for himself, lest his heart turn away." Wisdom did not keep Solomon, and it will not keep any one of us. But clinging to the Lord will.
God deals with His people under a holy government. Grace does not lift anyone out from under it.
Grace known by us in Christ does not deliver us from this holy government of God. Instead, it gives us a higher place of favour than faith had ever known before. So we have greater responsibility, and we come more directly under the action of such divine principles... David used the sword to carry out his own sinful will, and the sword never left his house. Solomon mixed with foreigners, and his heart was led astray. Enemies then rose up from the very places he had drawn on to please himself.
Solomon's fall is not the end of the kingdom's story. Another King will hold the throne.
As far as man is concerned, this is the end of the kingdom. But what a prospect for the future! ... The kingdom of the Divine Solomon will reappear like the sun shining in its strength. It will never again depend on the fallible obedience of man. It will rest on the unfailing responsibility of the King whom God will anoint on Zion, the mountain of His holiness.
- Heart first. The chapter repeats it: his wives turned his heart. The idols came later, once the affections had moved.
- Step by step. The ruin grew from an earlier neglect of God's word that seemed to cost him nothing. Each step made the next easier.
- Twice. God measures the fall by the light given: two appearances, a plain command on this very point, and honour that deepens the shame.
- Wisdom fails. The wisest man alive fell where he was strongest. Only dependence on the Lord keeps anyone.
- Government stands. Grace does not lift a believer out of God's government. But the kingdom's future rests on a King who cannot fail.
and had commanded him concerning this thing, not to go after other gods; but he kept not what Jehovah had commanded.
God was angry with Solomon, and this verse gives the reason. God Himself had warned him about this very thing. Solomon had heard God's voice twice, and still did not keep what God commanded. How did a man who knew so much come to obey so little?
One writer traces the three times God spoke to Solomon, and how the tone changed each time.
Once more, and for the last time, Solomon heard the voice of his God. When He appeared to him in Gibeon, He said, "Ask what I shall give you." He was pleased with the young king's reply (1 Kings 3). In Jerusalem He spoke to him with encouragement and warning (1 Kings 9). Now He could only pass sentence on a servant who had been so unfaithful. The kingdom of Israel was now to be broken up. As a witness for God it had become worthless.
The phrase "concerning this thing" points to a specific instruction, not a general one. Solomon had both the written law and God's own voice on the subject.
God had given warnings and clear instructions in the Law. He had also appeared to Solomon Himself twice, and had commanded him not to go after other gods. Wife after wife seems to have persuaded him to build a high place for her idol... Before long these high places defiled "the mountain east of Jerusalem," the Mount of Olives. They stayed there 350 years, until the reign of Josiah.
The collapse was not sudden. It began with small departures from God's word that seemed to do no harm at the time.
At first this neglect of the word seemed to do no harm. He grew rich, as though God were only keeping His promise. But it soon led to a more serious departure, both in itself and in what came of it... and at last to open disobedience of the clearest and most basic commands. The slippery path of sin is always walked with quicker and quicker steps. The first sin weakens in the soul the authority and power of the one thing that can keep us from still greater sins — the word of God.
Wisdom did not keep Solomon safe, because his failure lay somewhere other than the mind.
One good clue lies in a proverb of his, where he tells us, "Whoever trusts in his own mind is a fool" (Prov. 28:26). God had given His people clear instructions that their kings were not to take many wives. Solomon... took 700 wives, princesses, and 300 concubines besides these! Perhaps he told himself that some of these marriages served the interests of the state. But God tells us plainly that "Solomon clung to these in love." Solomon's problem was a matter of the heart! He disobeyed, and his heart was turned away.
Older translations read "trusts in his own heart" in that proverb — the word this writer picks up.
God's anger did not mean He had given Solomon up. One writer even finds comfort in it.
There is a little comfort for us here — almost the only comfort in all we are told of king Solomon — and it is this: God disciplined him. He did not merely let the fruit of his evil, the results of his folly, show up in his family. He disciplined Solomon himself, in his own lifetime. This is His way with His own people. In some cases it is almost the only hope you have that a person is a child of God: God does not let the evil pass, but deals with it now, in this world. Those God passes over in spite of evil are clearly waiting to be condemned with the world. But those who are guilty and are dealt with now are the objects of God's fatherly care.
Reproof did not do for Solomon what it had done for his father.
When David sinned against the Lord, he repented deeply as soon as the Lord reproved him. God reproved Solomon too, but nothing suggests that he ever repented.
Solomon's failure was a lost love, and that danger reaches past kings and past the young.
When Solomon turned from God, he left his first love. He gave the idols of the nations the place in his heart that belonged to God. There is always the danger, even in old age, that something will push out of our hearts the love we owe to God. That is why it is written, "Little children, keep yourselves from idols" (1 John 5:21).
- Light given. God appeared to Solomon twice and named this exact sin. His anger matched the light Solomon had.
- Word neglected. The slide began with small steps that seemed harmless while his riches grew. Each one loosened the word's hold on him.
- Heart turned. The problem was never a lack of wisdom but a lack of guarded love — he clung in love to what God had forbidden.
- Anger that chastens. God did not let the evil pass. He dealt with Solomon in his own lifetime — a mark of fatherly care, not rejection.
- No repentance. David repented under reproof; Solomon, so far as the record shows, did not — so keep your heart, even in old age.
And Jehovah said to Solomon, Forasmuch as this is done by thee, and thou hast not kept my covenant and my statutes which I commanded thee, I will certainly rend the kingdom from thee, and will give it to thy servant
Solomon's reign ends with a verdict, not a gift. God will tear the kingdom away and give it to one of Solomon's own servants. What is he charged with? Why does a whole nation pay? And is there any mercy left in it?
God's complaint is not vague. It names a covenant and laws Solomon knew and ignored. One writer shows how far the collapse had already gone.
Turn to 1 Kings 10 and 11 and you find King Solomon breaking down at every point. He collects many horses. He sends the people back to Egypt. He takes many wives for himself, and piles up silver and gold in great amounts. And though much is told us of Solomon's riches, wisdom and splendour, we are never told that he read the law of the Lord.
Before the kingdom was torn, something else was. His wives moved his heart first, and one writer explains why a heart never stays empty.
His heart was turned away from the Lord first, so when he grew old he gave in to the pull of idols. Our hearts are not empty spaces. If we push the Lord out of our hearts, they will soon take hold of some false substitute. These wives had many substitutes, and they could persuade Solomon that they were attractive.
God had spoken to Solomon twice before, at Gibeon and at Jerusalem. This third time the tone has changed.
Once more, and for the last time, Solomon heard the voice of his God. When He appeared to him at Gibeon, He said, "Ask what I shall give you," and He was pleased with the young king's reply (1 Kings 3). In Jerusalem He spoke to him in words of encouragement and warning (1 Kings 9). Now He could only pass sentence on His shamefully unfaithful servant... The kingdom of Israel should now be broken up. As a witness for God it had become worthless.
Solomon's father sinned too. The difference is what he did next.
When the Lord rebuked David for his sin, David repented deeply. God rebuked Solomon too, but nothing shows that he repented.
Later events give the servant a name, and show the split that followed.
The Lord was angry with him, and no wonder: He would tear the kingdom from him and give it to his servant (1 Kings 11:11). This came to pass, not in Solomon's reign, for God had respect to his father, David. It came in the reign of his very foolish son Rehoboam. The kingdom was split: ten tribes went with Jeroboam, Solomon's servant, and Judah and Benjamin stayed with Rehoboam. It was a big price to pay for his folly and sin.
Solomon heard the sentence and tried to stop it. That put him in company he would not have chosen.
He has become like Saul. Saul tried to kill David because God had given him the kingdom. In the same way Solomon tried to kill his servant Jeroboam, because God had given him ten tribes. In both cases it was rebellion against the decree of God.
The word "surely" sounds final. Yet the next verses soften both the timing and the extent. Neither mercy is owed to Solomon.
Yet the Lord would not do this while Solomon was alive, because He respected Solomon's father David. Solomon's son would suffer the shame of a broken kingdom (v.12). Even so, God would leave one tribe to that son — again for David's sake, not for Solomon's sake... This mercy was also for Jerusalem's sake. God's choice of that city stood, despite the failure and disobedience of all Israel.
This verse gives one cause for the split. It is not the whole account.
Ten of the tribes of Israel were torn from Rehoboam. In 1 Kings 11:11 we are told it was for the sin of Solomon. But verse 33 of the same chapter says it was for the idolatry of the people. And in chapter 12 we find the triggering cause was the harsh way Rehoboam met the people... The fact is that the sin of any one of the three named was enough by itself to bring all the harm that was done. So the responsibility is left at the door of each. Let me say again, though, that this judgment is only about God's government in this life. It does not always reach into eternity.
The story ends here only if the throne depends on men like Solomon.
As far as man is concerned, this is the end of the kingdom. But what a prospect for the future! ...the kingdom of the Divine Solomon will reappear like the sun shining in its strength. It will never again depend on the fallible obedience of man. It will rest on the King whom God will anoint on Zion, the mountain of His holiness, and He never fails in what He has taken up.
- Heart first. Nothing was torn from Solomon until something was turned in him; a heart emptied of God fills with substitutes.
- Charge next. God names the failure plainly: a covenant and laws Solomon was given and never kept.
- Sentence follows. The God who once said "Ask what I shall give you" now only pronounces judgment, and Solomon, unlike David, never repents.
- Mercy remains. The tearing is delayed past his lifetime and one tribe is spared — for David's sake and Jerusalem's, not his own.
- Hope outlasts it. One writer sees the broken kingdom pointing on to a King whose reign never rests on man's obedience.
notwithstanding in thy days I will not do it, for David thy father's sake; I will rend it out of the hand of thy son;
Solomon's long slide into idolatry ends with God speaking to him again — no longer with promises, but with a sentence: God will tear the kingdom away. Verse 12 holds a strange mercy inside that sentence: the loss is real, but God delays it, and the reason has nothing to do with Solomon himself.
God had told Solomon what turning to other gods would cost. Solomon ignored the warning, and God's own word bound Him to act.
God spoke to Solomon again, but now in judgment. He had warned Solomon what would come of turning away from following Him and keeping His commandments. If he served and worshipped idols instead, the result would be ruin. He must now act in faithfulness to His word. In Galatians 6:7 we read, "Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap." Solomon's wisdom, wealth and power could not turn aside God's just judgment. The kingdom would be torn from him and given to his servant.
The words "I will not do it in your days" sound like leniency toward Solomon. The reason attached to them says otherwise.
God acted in judgment as He must always do when the believer knowingly breaks Scripture. God delayed carrying out that judgment, not for Solomon's sake, but for his father David's.
Solomon keeps his throne whole; his son inherits the fracture. God grants even the one tribe left over on the same borrowed credit.
Yet the Lord would not do this while Solomon was living, because the Lord respected Solomon's father David. But Solomon's son would suffer the humiliation of a broken kingdom (v.12). God would still leave one tribe to that son — again for the sake of David, not for Solomon's sake. Judah was that tribe, though Benjamin, very small and weak, was included with Judah.
This pattern is not confined to kings, and it has a boundary worth knowing.
In the government of God, children have to suffer for the sins of their parents, and nations for the sins of their rulers. People may complain about this and call it injustice. But the fact remains. If a man wastes his inheritance and abuses his body, his children will suffer for it in poverty and weakness. But this does not extend beyond the present life, and the sorrows here on earth are short-lived. No one will undergo the judgment of hell for the sins of others, but only for those he has committed himself.
God sets two limits on the loss — one on its timing, one on its size. Both trace back to the same source.
God always acts in faithfulness to His word and in keeping with His character. So here God holds back from carrying out His judgment during Solomon's lifetime. He does this in line with His word to David, whom He calls "My servant," and for the sake of Jerusalem, the city He had chosen. God also softens its severity. He would not take away the entire kingdom. He would give Solomon's son one tribe, and so keep a lamp for David always in Jerusalem.
Solomon could have rested in that promise. Instead he went after the servant God had named.
Now Solomon faced another promise of God. This time God had promised Jeroboam that part of the kingdom would be his. God had assured him, "Yet for the sake of David your father I will not do it in your days." Solomon would not rest in that. Like Herod in a later day, he took the law into his own hands and tried to kill Jeroboam. But of course nothing could frustrate God's promises. Jeroboam fled into Egypt and stayed there until Solomon died.
When the split came, it looked like one king's blunder. Verse 12 had already named the deeper cause.
The obvious and immediate cause of the division was the foolishness of the king. He rejected the advice of the elders. But the underlying cause was Solomon's idolatry... The kingdom was never reunited, and will not be until the Lord comes.
- Sown — Solomon was warned. He sowed idolatry and reaped a torn kingdom. Wisdom, wealth and power could not turn it aside.
- Delayed — the mercy in "I will not do it in your days" was real, but God credited it to David, not to Solomon.
- Softened — the same reason that delayed the judgment also shrank it. God left one tribe and kept a lamp for David in Jerusalem.
- Inherited — the son bore the broken kingdom his father earned. Such consequences run through families and nations. But they belong to this life, not to eternity.
- Wasted — God gave Solomon a lifetime of grace. He spent it hunting Jeroboam instead of resting in God's word. The split he tried to stop came anyway, and it has never healed.
only, I will not rend away all the kingdom I will give one tribe to thy son, for David my servant's sake, and for Jerusalem's sake which I have chosen.
God's word to Solomon here is both a sentence and a reprieve. He will tear the kingdom away, but not all of it. His reason has nothing to do with Solomon. It points to David, long dead, and to a city God had chosen.
The judgment stands. What limits it is God's faithfulness to His own word.
God always acts in faithfulness to His word and in keeping with His character. So here God holds back His judgment during Solomon's lifetime. He does this in line with His word to David, whom He calls "My servant," and for the sake of Jerusalem, which He had chosen. God also softens its severity. He would not take away the entire kingdom, but would give Solomon's son one tribe, and so keep a lamp for David always in Jerusalem.
God gives David's name as the reason, twice over. Nothing in Solomon, and nothing in the nation, earned what He leaves behind.
Yet the Lord would not do this while Solomon was living because the Lord respected Solomon's father David. But Solomon's son would suffer the humiliation of a broken kingdom. God would still leave one tribe to that son, also for the sake of David, not for Solomon's sake. Judah was that tribe, though it also included Benjamin, which was very small and weak. God granted this for Jerusalem's sake too, since His choice of that city stood despite the failure and disobedience of all Israel.
One tribe sounds like almost nothing left. Yet what is left carries a promise the ten tribes never had.
What mercy! "a light always." The kingdom was greatly reduced in size and in glory. But there was a very marked difference from the ten tribes, the much larger part that passed to the other man. They would change rulers from time to time. Their governing family kept changing, and one man after another rose up... Not so with Judah. God calls it only one tribe, to state their utter loss of glory in the strongest possible way. Yet the light shall be there always. This was how the Lord God of Israel dealt with them: merciful, and at the same time completely righteous.
God says the same thing again later in this chapter, when He speaks to Jeroboam. One writer draws from that repetition what God prizes most.
In verse 34 God comes back once more to the grace He had shown to David. He adds in verse 36: "Yet to his son I will give one tribe, that David My servant may always have a lamp before Me in Jerusalem, the city where I have chosen to put My name." Grace is more in God's eyes than all glory. Or rather, grace is the most precious part of glory, for it stands, so to speak, at the head of all divine perfections.
This is not a one-off mercy. The phrase becomes a refrain running through the later history of the kings.
Would the royal house of David be true to its trust as witness for God among the nations? Sadly, we know the answer. Yet the patience of God was wonderful. In His anger He told Solomon that He would tear his kingdom away. Then He added, "but I will give one tribe to your son, for the sake of David My servant and for the sake of Jerusalem that I have chosen" (1 Kings 11:13). To Jeroboam He said that David His servant was to have a lamp always before Him in Jerusalem, "the city where I have chosen to put My name" (1 Kings 11:36). Later God recorded the unfaithfulness of Abijam, Solomon's grandson. Even then He said, "Nevertheless, for David's sake the LORD his God gave him a lamp in Jerusalem, setting up his son after him, and establishing Jerusalem" (1 Kings 15:4).
God's word to Jeroboam sets a limit on the affliction that follows. It also points to a kingdom built on different ground from Solomon's.
But God makes one reservation: "And I will afflict the offspring of David because of this, but not forever" (v. 39). In due time that grace, on which David's kingdom rested, would assert its rights again. Jeroboam's kingdom and Solomon's own stood not on grace but on responsibility. The promises of God are without repentance; He delights in grace. So the future kingdom of the true King of Glory will rest on a new covenant, a covenant of grace where God alone is under obligation.
- Cause. God keeps His word, so the sentence falls: He tears the kingdom from Solomon, and Solomon's son bears the loss.
- Limit. God does not take the whole kingdom. The judgment is real, but He holds it back and softens it.
- Reason. God spares that one tribe for David's sake and Jerusalem's sake, not for Solomon's. The mercy rests on someone other than the man He is judging.
- Refrain. "For David's sake" comes back again and again in the later chapters, keeping a lamp in Jerusalem for generation after generation.
- End. God afflicts David's line, but "not forever." The kingdom He intends at last rests on grace, where He alone is under obligation.
And Jehovah stirred up an adversary to Solomon, Hadad the Edomite; he was of the king's seed in Edom.
Solomon once had rest on every side, but he let the honour of the LORD's name slip. Now God raises up an enemy, and a hard question comes with him: Hadad acts out of his own hatred, yet the Lord raised him up.
The word translated "adversary" here is also a name.
Satan is a name for THE DEVIL, the great enemy of God and man. The name is much the same in Hebrew, Greek, and English, and it means "adversary." Several passages use the word of other adversaries too: see Numbers 22:22; 1 Kings 11:14, 23, 25.
Earlier Solomon had rest, with no adversary and no misfortune. What changed was what he cared about.
As long as he cared for the LORD's interests, his fame and glory stayed unspotted. He could say, "The LORD my God has given me rest on every side. There is neither adversary nor misfortune" (1 Kings 5:4). But he forgot the honour of the LORD's Name, and the brightness of his glory was dulled. Then the LORD stirred up adversaries for him.
Solomon himself had written the principle he now proved in reverse, and other kings proved it the right way round.
"When a man's ways please the LORD, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him" (Proverbs 16:7). So Asa proved, and Jehoshaphat his son. Both these kings had quiet and rest all around, because they did the will of God… It is a solemn thing when God must enter into a dispute with any of us. But "if we judged ourselves truly, we would not be judged" (1 Corinthians 11:31).
The verse says God did this. One writer calls that the one comfort in Solomon's sad last chapter.
But this is a little comfort to us. Indeed, I may say it is almost the only comfort we have in the story of king Solomon — that God chastised him. He did not only let the fruit of his evil, the results of his folly, show up in his family. He chastised Solomon himself, in his own lifetime. This is His way with His own people. In some cases it is almost the only hope you have that a person is a child of God: God does not let the evil pass, but deals with it now in this world. Those whom God passes over despite their evil are people who are clearly waiting to be condemned with the world. But those who are guilty and are dealt with now are the objects of God's fatherly care.
Hadad had been alive all along. Scripture says nothing of him until this moment.
God is wise, and that young prince was kept to be a sting to king Solomon… God does not say a word about that until Solomon's failure. Then Hadad comes forward in a clear and decided way to be a scourge for the guilty king.
Solomon's marriage ties with Edom did not soften the old grudge, and neither did Egypt's comforts.
God stirs up enemies against Solomon from the very nations his desires had drawn him to. Edom was full of deadly hatred against Israel, because David, through Joab, had cut off all the males of that land. Hadad had escaped with a few servants. But had his hatred lessened because Solomon had taken Edomite women as wives? … One emotion in the heart of Hadad speaks more loudly than all the honours and delights of Egypt's court: hatred, hatred against Solomon. He gives up all his advantages to satisfy this hatred… Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed. The conduct of believers, whether more or less at fault, only serves as an excuse for this hatred.
The same writer draws the line for today: distance keeps the enemy still, and friendship wakes it up.
The world is like Hadad. The cross of Christ gives us our place towards it: by that cross the world is crucified to us, and we to the world (Galatians 6:14). As long as we keep that place and count the world a defeated enemy (John 16:33), it does not make a move. But make an alliance with it, and it cannot forget its defeat. It may keep up an appearance of indifference, but it will hate us no less.
Hadad had no interest in the God of Israel. That did not stop God from using him.
When enemies rise up against us our first appeal should be to God as to why He has permitted it. The enemies themselves may have no thought of God, but they can still be His instruments to discipline His people… Hadad and Rezon appear to have troubled him for many years. Solomon could have crushed them, but in his greatness and majesty he seems to have despised them. Solomon forgot his own words in Proverbs 16:7. When a later enemy rose up, instead of exercising his conscience before God about him, he tried to kill him, as Saul had done with David.
- Cause. Solomon had rest on every side while he cared for God's name. He forgot it, and adversaries came.
- Hand. The Lord raised Hadad up. God did not just let Solomon reap what he sowed. He chastised the king himself, in his lifetime.
- Mercy. Discipline now is the comfort in the story. God leaves some in their evil for judgment; those He deals with are under His fatherly care.
- Timing. Hadad lived in Egypt's court for years, unmentioned. God kept him in reserve and brought him out only after Solomon failed.
- Response. Solomon tried to kill his enemy instead of asking God why He allowed him. The first appeal goes up, not out.
Now it came to pass when David was in Edom, when Joab the captain of the host had gone up to bury the slain, after he had smitten every male in Edom
This verse looks back years before Solomon's reign, to Joab's war in Edom, where he struck down every male. One child escaped, and decades later God raised him up as an enemy to the unfaithful Solomon.
One writer sees God's hand in the escape itself. The boy who got away from Joab was kept alive for a purpose.
Now he comes forward. God is wise, and He kept that young prince to be a sting to king Solomon. But this is some comfort to us. I may say it is almost the only comfort the story of king Solomon gives us — that God disciplined him. He did not merely let the fruit of his evil, the results of his folly, show in his family. He disciplined Solomon himself, in his own lifetime.
The same writer goes further. Discipline now is one mark of a real child of God:
This is His way with His own people. In some cases it is almost the only hope you have that a person is a child of God: God does not let the evil pass. He deals with it now, in this world.
The events of this verse belong to David's day. The trouble they produced came out only when Solomon was old. Writers see a settled pattern in that gap:
The Lord does not begin to discipline His people at once, or quickly. At least, that is not His usual way. Our sin may find us out years and years after we commit it. The Lord may bring our ways back to mind long after we have left them and turned to better ones.
Solomon had married Edomite women, among others. The adversary God raised up came out of Edom. One writer sees the discipline shaped to fit the fault:
Solomon kept company with foreigners, his heart was led astray, and enemies rise up in the very places that supplied his pleasures (1 Kings 11). A man's self-made plans and wilful choices always come back to him with a harvest of results. If he would only hear the Voice speaking in them, that harvest would bring him down before God, confessing his own helplessness and sin. There he would receive the lifting up that God always gives to those who humble themselves under His mighty hand.
The cost was the one thing his reign had been famous for:
Peace, the fruit that marked this reign, is destroyed. Solomon passes through a time full of troubles, revolts, and plots against his throne. Nations such as Egypt once counted an alliance with him an honour. Now they feed, honour, and support his worst enemies.
One writer traces Hadad's hatred past its obvious cause:
Edom was filled with deadly hatred against Israel, because David, by the hand of Joab, had cut off all the males of that land. Hadad had escaped with a few servants. But had his hatred grown any less because Solomon had taken Edomite women as wives? One feeling in the heart of Hadad speaks more loudly than all the honours and delights of Egypt's court: hatred, hatred against Solomon. He gives up all his advantages to satisfy it. No doubt the conduct of David's men had given him the motive, but Joab and David were dead, and the hatred went on. Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed. The behaviour of believers, whether more or less blameworthy, only serves as an excuse for this hatred.
One writer reads the two countries as pictures. The boy who fled Edom found a welcome in Egypt:
Hadad was an Edomite who had fled to Egypt when Joab under David had reduced the Edomites to almost nothing (vs.14-16). Hadad gained such favour with Pharaoh king of Egypt that Pharaoh gave him his own wife's sister as a wife (v.19). Edom pictures the flesh, while Egypt stands for the world. The world will always be friendly with the flesh, and Hadad was well off in Egypt.
One writer turns this into a warning about our own dealings with the world:
The world is like Hadad and Rezon. The cross of Christ gives us our place towards it: by that cross the world is crucified to us, and we to the world (Galatians 6:14). As long as we keep that place, and count the world a defeated enemy (John 16:33), it does not make a move. But let us make an alliance with it, and it cannot forget its defeat. It may keep up an appearance of indifference, but it will not hate us any less.
- Kept. God's wisdom preserved the child who escaped Joab's sword, to make him a sting to Solomon at the right moment.
- Delayed. Discipline rarely comes at once. Sin can find a person out years later, long after they have turned to better ways.
- Matched. The enemy came from the very nation Solomon had married into. Our own plans come back to us with a harvest of results.
- Unchanged. Egypt's honours and Solomon's Edomite marriages did nothing to soften Hadad. The world's hatred uses our conduct as an excuse, not a cause.
- Comforting. God dealt with Solomon in his own lifetime instead of letting the evil pass. That is the mark of a Father's care.
(for Joab abode there six months with all Israel, until he had cut off every male in Edom),
This verse is a note in brackets. It looks back years earlier, to the campaign in which David's commander Joab wiped out the men of Edom. The detail seems out of place in Solomon's story — until you notice that one boy escaped, and that God was keeping him.
The verse explains where Edom's hatred of Israel's king came from. One writer notes that the men behind it were already dead, and the hatred lived on.
Edom was filled with deadly hatred against Israel because David, by the hand of Joab, had cut off all the males of that land (2 Samuel 8:13-14; 1 Chronicles 18:12; Psalm 60, heading). Hadad had escaped with a few servants... No doubt the conduct of David's companions had given the motive for it, but Joab and David were dead: the hatred continued. Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed. The conduct of believers, whether more or less blameworthy, only gives that hatred a pretext.
Joab's work was not complete. One writer sees God's wisdom in the child who slipped away.
Now he comes forward. God is wise, and that young prince was kept to be a sting to king Solomon. But this is a little comfort to us, and indeed, I may say, almost the only comfort we have in the history given us of king Solomon — that God chastised him. He chastised him, not merely allowing the fruit of his evil, the results of his folly, to appear in his family, but chastised him himself in his own lifetime. Those whom God passes over in spite of their evil are clearly waiting to be condemned with the world. But those who are guilty and whom He deals with now are objects of His fatherly care.
Hadad had his own reasons. God had His. One writer says our first question, when enemies rise, belongs to God.
When enemies rise up against us our first appeal should be to God as to why He has permitted it. The enemies themselves may have no thought of God, but they may still be His instruments for the discipline of His people. The cruel Assyrian was the rod of the Lord's anger toward Israel — "but he does not so intend" (Isaiah 10:5-7). The Hebrew Christians were suffering, and they were close to giving up. Their suffering seemed to come from the persecution of godless men. But it was also the Father's gracious chastening.
Solomon's enemy came out of a nation he had used for his own pleasure. One writer treats that as a pattern, not an accident.
Solomon kept company with foreigners, his heart was led astray, and enemies rose up in the very places he had drawn on to please himself. Man's self-chosen plans and wilful choices always come back on him with a harvest of results. If he would only hear the Voice speaking in those results, they would bring him down before God, owning his helplessness and sinfulness. There he receives the lifting up that God always gives to those who humble themselves under His mighty hand.
Hadad found shelter in Egypt. One writer reads the two countries as pictures.
Hadad was an Edomite who had fled to Egypt when Joab under David had reduced the Edomites to almost nothing. Hadad gained favour with Pharaoh king of Egypt, who even gave him his own wife's sister as a wife. Edom pictures the flesh, while Egypt symbolises the world. The world will always be friendly with the flesh, and Hadad was well off in Egypt.
One writer sets a proverb beside two kings of Judah who found it true, then turns it on the reader.
"When a man's ways please the Lord, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him" (Proverbs 16:7). So Asa proved, and Jehoshaphat his son. Both these kings had quietness and rest round about, because they did the will of God... It is a solemn thing when God has to enter into controversy with any of us, but "if we judged ourselves truly, we would not be judged" (1 Corinthians 11:31).
- Kept — one child survived six months of slaughter. One writer sees God preserving him as a future sting for a king who was not yet reigning.
- Kept waiting — Hadad's hatred outlived Joab and David. The world always hates the Lord's anointed, and our conduct only gives that hatred a pretext.
- Kept for discipline — an enemy with no thought of God can still be His instrument. The Assyrian was a rod in His hand, and so was the suffering of the Hebrew Christians.
- Kept close — Edom pictures the flesh and Egypt the world. The two are always friendly, and Hadad was well off in Egypt.
- Kept from judgment — self-chosen plans come back as a harvest. But when God deals with us now, it is the mark of His fatherly care. If we judge ourselves, we are not judged.
that Hadad fled, he and certain Edomites of his father's servants with him, to go into Egypt, Hadad being yet a little child.
A boy from Edom's royal family escapes a slaughter and grows up safe in Egypt. Scripture tells us this only now, when Solomon's heart has turned away — and that timing says something about how God deals with His own.
Hadad's escape looks like an accident of war. One writer sees God's hand in it, and finds a strange comfort there.
God is wise, and He kept that young prince to be a sting to king Solomon. But this gives us a little comfort. In fact, I may say it is almost the only comfort we have in the record of king Solomon: God chastised him. He did not merely let the fruit of his evil, the results of his folly, show in his family. He chastised Solomon himself during his own lifetime. This is His way with His own people. In some cases it is almost the only hope you have that a person is a child of God: God does not let the evil pass. He deals with it now, in this world. Those God passes over despite their evil are clearly waiting to be condemned with the world. But when God deals with the guilty now, they are the objects of His fatherly care.
Hadad escaped years before this chapter. Why does his story appear only now?
God made him a source of trouble to Solomon. When Hadad heard in Egypt that David had died, he came forward. But God does not say a word about that until Solomon's failure. Then Hadad appears in a clear and definite way to be a scourge for the guilty king.
Solomon had looked outside Israel for his pleasures. The trouble now comes from the same place.
Solomon kept company with foreigners. His heart went astray. Enemies now rise from the very places he had used to please himself (1 Kings 11). A man's own plans and stubborn choices always come back to him with a harvest of results. If only he would hear the Voice speaking in them, that harvest would bring him down before God, owning his own helplessness and sin. There he would receive the lifting up that God always gives to those who humble themselves under His mighty hand.
The boy grew up in Pharaoh's house and married into the royal family. One thing still pulled harder.
Hadad had fled to Egypt. Pharaoh's court welcomed him, he became Pharaoh's brother-in-law, and his son grew up among the heirs to the throne. Where do the sympathies and favours of the world go? Not to David, but to David's enemy. One feeling in Hadad's heart speaks louder than all the honours and pleasures of Egypt's court: hatred, hatred against Solomon. He gives up all his advantages to satisfy this hatred… Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed. The behaviour of believers, better or worse, only gives that hatred an excuse.
The two nations in this verse also carry a picture.
Edom pictures the flesh while Egypt symbolizes the world. The world will always be friendly with the flesh, and Hadad was well off in Egypt.
Peace was the mark of Solomon's reign. The discipline strikes that very thing.
Peace was the fruit that marked this reign, and it is destroyed. Solomon goes through a time full of troubles, revolts, and plots against his throne. Nations such as Egypt once counted an alliance with him an honour. Now they feed his worst enemies, raise them to honour, and support them.
What should a believer do when opposition comes? Solomon shows the wrong answer.
When enemies rise up against us, our first appeal should be to God, asking why He has permitted it. The enemies themselves may have no thought of God. Even so, they may be His instruments to discipline His people… Hadad and Rezon seem to have caused trouble for many years. Solomon could have crushed them, but in his greatness and majesty he seems to have despised them.
- Kept — a wise God preserved the little child who slipped away to Egypt, holding him in reserve as a sting for a king who had not yet sinned.
- Timed — Scripture holds Hadad's story back until Solomon's heart turns. God brings the trouble forward at the hour of failure, not before.
- Matched — the enemy rises from the very place Solomon had used to please himself. Our own choices come back to us as a harvest.
- Sheltered — Egypt honoured David's enemy, not David's son. The world hates the Lord's anointed, and a believer's faults only give that hatred its excuse.
- Fatherly — discipline now is not condemnation but proof that you are God's child. Ask Him why He has allowed it, instead of brushing the trouble aside as Solomon did.
And they arose out of Midian, and came to Paran, and took men with them out of Paran, and they came to Egypt, to Pharaoh king of Egypt; who gave him a house, and appointed him victuals, and gave him land.
Hadad escaped Joab's sword as a boy and ended up in Pharaoh's court with a house, food and land. Why does Scripture trace one small fugitive's route so carefully, and why does the world treat him so well?
Hadad's flight happened decades before the events of this chapter. He was a little boy when Joab destroyed the men of Edom, and this escape route is how he survived. One writer sees God's hand in it:
Now he comes forward. God is wise, and that young prince was kept to be a sting to king Solomon.
Hadad had lived in Egypt for years. Scripture says nothing about him during all the splendour of the temple, the wealth and the peace. He appears only after the king's heart turns away:
Hadad then is one means of putting the wise king to great uneasiness… God does not say a word about that until Solomon's failure. Then Hadad comes forward in a very decided and distinct way to be a scourge for the guilty king.
Solomon himself had married Pharaoh's daughter. Yet the same court now houses, feeds and settles the man who hates Solomon's house:
Hadad had fled to Egypt, had been welcomed at Pharaoh's court, had become his brother-in-law, and his son had been brought up among the heirs to the throne. Where do the sympathies and favors of the world go? Not to David, but to David's enemy. One emotion in the heart of Hadad speaks louder than all the honours and delights of Egypt's court: hatred, hatred against Solomon. He gives up all his advantages to satisfy this hatred.
Rossier then looks for the root of that hatred:
No doubt the conduct of David's men had given the reason for it. But Joab and David were dead, and the hatred went on. Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed, and the conduct of believers, whether more or less blameworthy, only serves as an excuse for this hatred.
These enemies never took Solomon's throne. One commentator says what they were for, and why Hadad fitted so well in Egypt:
The Lord did not allow Solomon to have everything go his way. To speak to Solomon's conscience the Lord raised up adversaries against him. They could not dethrone Solomon, but were thorns in his side to cause unrest among the people… Edom pictures the flesh while Egypt symbolizes the world. The world will always be friendly with the flesh, and Hadad was well off in Egypt.
Solomon had taken foreign wives from Egypt, Edom and elsewhere. The enemies God now stirs up come from those same places:
David used the sword to carry out his own sinful will, and the sword never left his house. Solomon kept company with strangers, and they led his heart astray. Enemies now rise up from the very places he had drawn his pleasures from (1 Kings 11). The plans a man makes for himself and the choices of his own will always come back on him with a harvest of results. If he would only hear the Voice speaking in them, that harvest would bring him down before God, owning his own helplessness and sin.
Since Hadad is God's instrument, the first response is not to deal with Hadad:
When enemies rise up against us our first appeal should be to God as to why He has permitted it. The enemies themselves may have no thought of God. Even so, they can be His instruments to discipline His people… Hadad and Rezon seem to have caused trouble for many years. Solomon could have crushed them, but in his greatness and majesty he seems to have despised them.
Kelly finds a comfort in it:
This is one comfort to us — almost the only comfort in the whole history of king Solomon — that God chastised him. He did not merely let the results of his folly appear in his family; He chastised Solomon himself, in his own lifetime. This is His way with His own people. Those whom God passes over in spite of their evil show that they are waiting to be condemned with the world. But those who are guilty and are dealt with now are the objects of God's fatherly care.
- Preserved — Hadad's escape through Midian and Paran was no accident. God kept the young prince alive to be a sting to Solomon.
- Sheltered — Egypt housed, fed and landed him. The world's favour went to David's enemy, not to David. That hatred outlasted every kindness shown him.
- Matched — Edom pictures the flesh, Egypt the world. The two are natural friends, so Hadad was at home in Pharaoh's court.
- Returned — Solomon's enemies rose from the very nations he had courted for his own pleasure. Self-chosen plans come back with a harvest.
- Merciful — the adversary is God's rod, and it could not take Solomon's throne. When opposition comes, ask God why He allowed it. To be dealt with now is the mark of a Father's care, not condemnation.
And Hadad found great favour in the sight of Pharaoh, and he gave him as wife the sister of his own wife, the sister of Tahpenes the queen.
Hadad was an Edomite prince who fled to Egypt as a child, and Pharaoh treated him like family. Two questions press: why does Egypt welcome an enemy of David's house, and why do we hear of it only now?
He was royalty in exile, kept alive far from home:
An Edomite of the royal family. As a child he was taken to Egypt. Pharaoh later gave him his sister-in-law as his wife. When David died, he returned to his own country. God stirred him up, and he became an enemy who did harm to Solomon.
Egypt does for the king's enemy what it never does for the king's house. And under all that comfort, something stayed alive:
Hadad had fled to Egypt. Pharaoh's court had welcomed him, he had become Pharaoh's brother-in-law, and his son had grown up among the heirs to the throne. Where do the sympathies and favours of the world go? Not to David, but to David's enemy. One feeling in Hadad's heart speaks louder than all the honours and delights of Egypt's court: hatred, hatred against Solomon. He gives up all his advantages to satisfy this hatred. Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed, and the conduct of believers, whether more or less blameworthy, only serves as an excuse for this hatred.
The verse names an Edomite and the house of Pharaoh. One writer reads both as pictures, and says why God let such a man rise:
To speak to Solomon's conscience the Lord raised up adversaries against him. They could not dethrone Solomon, but were thorns in his side to cause unrest among the people... Hadad gained favour with Pharaoh king of Egypt, so much so that Pharaoh gave him his own wife's sister in marriage. Edom pictures the flesh while Egypt symbolises the world. The world will always be friendly with the flesh, and Hadad was well off in Egypt.
Now Egypt arranges a marriage for the king's adversary. The nations that once counted Solomon's friendship an honour have changed sides:
The king's unfaithfulness would also bring the Lord's discipline down on himself during the last years of his reign. Peace, the fruit that marked this reign, is destroyed. Solomon goes through a period full of troubles, rebellions, and plots against his throne. Nations such as Egypt, who in earlier times had counted an alliance with him an honour, now feed his worst enemies, raise them to honour, and support them.
Nothing here is accident. God kept that boy alive for a purpose, and the story of him waits until Solomon's fall:
God is wise, and He kept that young prince to be a sting to king Solomon. There is a little comfort for us in that. In fact I may say it is almost the only comfort in the whole story of king Solomon — that God chastised him. He did not simply let the fruit of his evil, the results of his folly, show up in his family. He chastised Solomon himself, in his own lifetime. This is His way with His own people... Those whom God passes over despite their evil are plainly waiting to be condemned with the world. But those who are guilty and whom He deals with now are the objects of His fatherly care.
The same pattern shows up in anyone who courts the world's goodwill:
The world is like Hadad and Rezon. As long as we keep the place toward it that the cross of Christ gives us the right to take — the cross by which the world is crucified to us and we to the world (Galatians 6:14) — as long as we treat the world as a defeated enemy (John 16:33), it does not make a move. But make an alliance with it, and it cannot forget its defeat. It may keep up an appearance of indifference, but it hates us just as much.
- Cause. Solomon's heart turned away, so God raised up adversaries to speak to his conscience.
- Shelter. Hadad came from Edom's royal family. Egypt took him in as a child, because the world gives its sympathies to David's enemy, not to David.
- Favour. Marriage into Pharaoh's family gave him wealth and standing. One thing in his heart outweighed it all: hatred of Solomon.
- Timing. Scripture tells the story only at the point of Solomon's fall. God kept that young prince to be a sting, and chastised the king in his own lifetime.
- Result. Chastening is the mark of God's fatherly care, not condemnation. And the world stays quiet only while we treat it as a defeated enemy; ally with it, and it never forgets its defeat.
And the sister of Tahpenes bore him Genubath his son; and Tahpenes brought him up in Pharaoh's house; and Genubath was in Pharaoh's household, among the sons of Pharaoh.
Solomon's long peace is ending, and Hadad the Edomite — a refugee prince from a nation David had crushed — is now Pharaoh's brother-in-law, with his son growing up among Pharaoh's own children. Why does God allow an enemy of Israel this place in the palace, and what does it say about the alliances Solomon built?
Tahpenes was Egypt's queen, and Pharaoh gave her sister to Hadad.
Genubath: son of Hadad an Edomite by an Egyptian princess, sister of Tahpenes the queen.
Hadad had lived safely in Egypt for years. One commentator sees God's timing in bringing him forward now — and finds comfort in it.
Now he comes forward. God is wise, and that young prince was kept to be a sting to king Solomon. But this is a small comfort to us. Indeed, I may say it is almost the only comfort we have in the story we are given of king Solomon — that God disciplined him. He did not merely let the fruit of his evil, the results of his folly, show up in his family. He disciplined Solomon himself, in his own lifetime. This is His way with His own people... The people God passes over despite their evil show that they are waiting to be condemned with the world. But those who are guilty and are dealt with now are the objects of God's fatherly care.
Genubath grew up with Pharaoh's sons. One writer asks where that puts the world's favour.
Hadad had fled to Egypt, had been welcomed at Pharaoh's court, had become his brother-in-law, and his son had been brought up among the heirs to the throne. Where do the sympathies and favours of the world go? Not to David, but to David's enemy. One feeling in Hadad's heart speaks louder than all the honours and pleasures of Egypt's court: hatred, hatred against Solomon. He gives up all his advantages to satisfy this hatred. Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed. The conduct of believers, whether more or less blameworthy, only serves as an excuse for this hatred.
God did not let Solomon have everything his own way. One writer explains what the adversaries were for, and what the two nations picture.
The Lord did not let Solomon have everything go his way. To speak to Solomon's conscience the Lord raised up adversaries against him. They could not remove Solomon from the throne, but they were thorns in his side, causing unrest among the people. Hadad gained favour with Pharaoh king of Egypt, even to the point that Pharaoh gave him his own wife's sister as a wife. Edom pictures the flesh while Egypt symbolises the world. The world will always be friendly with the flesh, and Hadad was well off in Egypt.
Solomon had courted Egypt. Egypt now returns the courtesy — to his enemy.
The king's unfaithfulness would also bring the Lord's discipline down on him during the last years of his reign. Peace, the fruit that marked this reign, is gone. Solomon goes through a period full of troubles, revolts, and plots against his throne. Nations such as Egypt once counted it an honour to be allied with him. Now they feed his worst enemies, raise them to honour, and support them.
One writer turns the same pattern into a principle of God's government that still reaches us.
Grace known by us in Christ does not deliver from this holy government of God... Solomon kept company with foreigners, his heart went astray, and enemies rise up from the very places where he drew the means of pleasing himself. A man's own plans and willful choices always come back to him with a harvest of results. If he would only hear the Voice speaking in them, they would bring him low before God, owning his helplessness and sinfulness. Then he would receive the lifting up that God always gives to those who humble themselves under His mighty hand.
Solomon had married an Edomite wife. One writer asks what that tie was worth once Hadad went home.
When Hadad heard that David was no longer living, he wanted to return to his own country. After he returned, the record here says nothing more about him. But since he was an adversary of Solomon, the implication is that he took up Edom's cause and resisted Solomon's reign. Though Solomon had married an Edomite wife, this did not lessen Hadad's enmity.
- Cause. Solomon's heart went after foreigners. The trouble came back from the very place he had used to please himself.
- Gift. The discipline itself is a mercy. When God deals with a man in his own lifetime, that is fatherly care, not abandonment.
- Timing. Hadad sat safe in Egypt for years. God brought him forward when Solomon needed a sting.
- Alliance. Egypt honoured Solomon while he prospered, then honoured his enemy. The world's favour goes to David's enemy, not to David.
- Result. Marriage ties bought nothing. Solomon had an Edomite wife, and Hadad still hated him.
And Hadad heard in Egypt that David slept with his fathers, and that Joab the captain of the host was dead; and Hadad said to Pharaoh, Let me depart, that I may go to mine own country.
Solomon's heart has turned from the Lord, and his peaceful reign now starts to collect enemies. Hadad, an Edomite prince who fled to Egypt from David's army, hears that David and Joab are dead and asks Pharaoh to let him go home.
Hadad had been alive and within reach for years. But Scripture says nothing about him until Solomon's heart goes astray. Commentators read that silence as deliberate.
God does not say a word about that until Solomon's failure. Then Hadad comes forward in a clear and decided way, to be a scourge for the guilty king.
The result was not one battle. It was a slow unravelling of everything Solomon's reign was famous for.
Peace, the fruit that marked this reign, is destroyed. Solomon goes through a time full of troubles, revolts, and plots against his throne. Nations such as Egypt once counted an alliance with him an honour. Now they feed, honour, and support his worst enemies.
Solomon's wives were foreign women, and the trouble now comes from that very direction.
Solomon kept company with foreigners, his heart was led astray, and enemies rise up from the very places he had used to please himself (1 Kings 11). A man's own plans and wilful choices always come back to him with a harvest of results. If he would only hear the Voice speaking in them, that harvest would bring him low before God, confessing his own helplessness and sinfulness.
Hadad waits for two deaths — David's and Joab's — before he stirs. Yet the men he had reason to hate were gone, and his hatred did not die with them.
Where do the sympathies and favours of the world go? Not to David, but to David's enemy. One feeling in Hadad's heart speaks louder than all the honours and pleasures of Egypt's court: hatred, hatred against Solomon. He gives up all his advantages to satisfy it. No doubt the behaviour of David's men had given him his reason for it. But Joab and David were dead, and the hatred went on. Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed, and the conduct of believers, whether more or less blameworthy, only serves as an excuse for this hatred.
Solomon had also married an Edomite woman — a tie of family that did nothing to soften the man.
Nothing more is said about him after his return, but as an adversary of Solomon he seems to have taken up the cause of Edom against Solomon's reign. Though Solomon had married an Edomite wife, this did not lessen Hadad's hatred.
Hadad was comfortable in Egypt and had every reason to stay. One writer reads the two countries in this story as pictures.
Hadad was an Edomite who had fled to Egypt when Joab, under David, had reduced the Edomites to almost nothing... Edom pictures the flesh while Egypt symbolizes the world. The world will always be friendly with the flesh, and Hadad was well off in Egypt.
That picture carries a warning for us.
The cross of Christ gives us our place toward the world: by it the world is crucified to us, and we to the world (Galatians 6:14). As long as we keep that place, and treat the world as a defeated enemy (John 16:33), it does not make a move. But let us make an alliance with it, and it cannot forget its defeat. It may keep up an appearance of indifference, but it will not hate us any less.
Hadad returning home looks like nothing but loss for Solomon. Yet God set both a purpose and a limit on the adversaries He raised.
To speak to Solomon's conscience the Lord raised up adversaries against him. They could not remove him from the throne, but they were thorns in his side, causing unrest among the people.
One commentator finds here the single hopeful note in the whole account of Solomon's decline.
God is wise, and that young prince was kept to be a sting to king Solomon. But this is a little comfort to us, and indeed, I may say, almost the only comfort that we have in the history that is given us of king Solomon — that God chastised him... Those that God passes over in spite of evil are persons who are evidently waiting to be condemned with the world, but those who, being guilty, are dealt with now are objects of God's fatherly care.
- Timing. Hadad was alive for decades, but he moves only after Solomon's heart turns. God held the adversary back until the hour of failure.
- Source. The blow lands from the very place Solomon had used to please himself. Choices come back as a harvest.
- Hatred. David and Joab were dead, yet the hatred lived on. It was never about them; the world hates the Lord's anointed.
- Alliance. An Edomite wife in Solomon's house did not soften Hadad. Friendship with the world never disarms it; it only makes you forget that it hates you.
- Mercy. The thorn came to reach Solomon's conscience, not to take his throne. God's discipline of a guilty man is the mark of a son, not of someone passed over.
And Pharaoh said to him, What then dost thou lack with me, that behold, thou desirest to go to thine own country? And he said, Nothing; but in any case let me depart.
Hadad the Edomite has everything a refugee could want: a royal wife, a son raised in Pharaoh's palace, a place at Egypt's court. So why does a man who lacks nothing insist on going home, and why does God let him go at this moment?
Pharaoh's question is reasonable. He has treated Hadad well, and cannot see what is pulling him back to Edom. One writer names the motive that outweighed everything Egypt offered:
Hadad had fled to Egypt. Pharaoh's court welcomed him, he became Pharaoh's brother-in-law, and his son grew up among the heirs to the throne. Where do the sympathies and favours of the world go? Not to David, but to David's enemy. One feeling in Hadad's heart speaks louder than all the honours and pleasures of Egypt's court: hatred, hatred against Solomon. He gives up all his advantages to satisfy this hatred. No doubt the conduct of David's men had given him a reason for it. But Joab and David were dead, and the hatred went on. Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed, and the conduct of believers, whether more or less blameworthy, only serves as an excuse for this hatred.
Hadad names nothing he lacks; he asks only to be let go, and gives no reason at all. A grudge is not fed by comfort, and comfort will not buy it off.
Hadad's welcome in Egypt was no accident. One commentator reads the pairing of the two nations as a picture:
Hadad was an Edomite who had fled to Egypt when Joab under David had reduced the Edomites to almost nothing. Hadad gained such favour with Pharaoh king of Egypt that Pharaoh gave him his own wife's sister as a wife. Edom pictures the flesh while Egypt symbolises the world. The world will always be friendly with the flesh, and Hadad was well off in Egypt.
Hadad had been in Egypt since he was a small child. Scripture says nothing about him for years. Then he appears, at the moment God chose to deal with Solomon. One writer reads that timing as God's own work, and finds comfort in it:
God is wise, and that young prince was kept to be a sting to king Solomon. This gives us a little comfort — in fact, I may say, almost the only comfort in the story we are given of king Solomon: God chastised him. He did not just let the fruit of his evil, the results of his folly, show up in his family. He chastised Solomon himself, in his own lifetime. This is His way with His own people... Those whom God passes over despite their evil are people who are clearly waiting to be condemned with the world. But those who are guilty and are dealt with now are the objects of God's fatherly care.
Pharaoh asks Hadad what he lacks. The better question was the one Solomon never asked: what does God intend by letting this man go home?
Hadad went home and became a lasting thorn. Solomon, at the height of his power, never took him seriously. Another writer names the response that was missing:
When enemies rise up against us our first appeal should be to God as to why He has permitted it. The enemies themselves may have no thought of God, but they may still be His instruments for disciplining His people... Hadad and Rezon seem to have caused trouble for many years. Solomon could have crushed them. But in his greatness and majesty he seems to have looked down on them.
Rossier turns Hadad's story into a warning about how believers relate to the world:
The world is like Hadad and Rezon. As long as we keep the place towards it that the cross of Christ allows us to take — the cross by which the world is crucified to us, and we to the world — as long as we treat the world as a defeated enemy, it does not make a move. But if we make an alliance with it, it cannot forget its defeat. It may keep up an appearance of indifference, but it will not hate us any less.
Pharaoh saw a well-treated guest. God saw an adversary, ready and waiting.
- Stirred. Hadad did not rise by chance. God kept him safe from childhood to be a sting to Solomon at the right moment.
- Sheltered. Egypt fed and honoured David's enemy. The world's favour goes to the side against God's king. The world and the flesh are natural allies.
- Unsatisfied. A royal wife and a place at court could not outweigh one grudge. Hatred gives up its advantages rather than give up itself.
- Sent. Enemies with no thought of God can still be His instruments of discipline. The first move is to ask God why He has permitted it — not to despise the trouble.
- Chastened. That God dealt with Solomon in his own lifetime is the comfort in the story. Those chastened now are treated as His own; those passed over are not.
God stirred him up yet an adversary, Rezon the son of Eliada, who had fled from Hadadezer king of Zobah, his lord.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And he collected men to him, and became captain of a band, when David slew them [of Zobah]; and they went to Damascus, and dwelt there, and reigned in Damascus.
Rezon was a runaway officer from a kingdom David had crushed, and he used that defeat to build a career: a band of fighters, a captured city, a throne of his own. His revolt began in David's day, but Scripture tells it here, right after Solomon turned to other gods — and that placement is the key to the verse.
The raiders in this verse rose out of a war Israel had already won. And God was the one who raised their leader up.
Another adversary that God raised up against Solomon was Rezon the son of Eliadah. He was the servant of Hadadezer king of Zobah whom David had decisively defeated (2 Sam. 8:3-8). Rezon "loathed Israel" (v. 25), and gathered followers, so that he became a captain of a band of raiders (v. 24). So these two enemies, Hadad and Rezon, believed they were right to hate Israel, because David had made their nations suffer.
Rezon had been gathering men since David's campaigns. Scripture says nothing about him until Solomon's idolatry is on the page.
I do not mean that the trouble caused by Hadad or Rezon began only when Solomon became an idolater. But I do point this out: the Holy Spirit holds back the account of the trouble they caused the king until then. The Spirit Himself presents it as a direct chastening of his idolatry.
One writer finds a single comfort in the whole record of Solomon.
This is almost the only comfort we have in the history given to us of king Solomon — that God chastised him. He chastised him. He did not just let the fruit of his evil, the results of his folly, show up in his family. He chastened Solomon himself, in his own lifetime. This is His way with His own people. In some cases it is almost the only hope you have that a person is a child of God: God does not let the evil pass, but deals with it now, in this world. Those He passes over despite their evil are plainly waiting to be condemned with the world. But those who are guilty and are dealt with now are the objects of God's fatherly care.
The damage went well beyond one raiding band.
Peace, the fruit that marked this reign, is destroyed. Solomon goes through a time full of troubles, riots, and plots against his throne. Nations such as Egypt once thought it an honour to be allied with him. Now they feed, promote, and support his worst enemies. All kinds of ties are weakened. The king's yoke weighs heavily on the people, to prevent rebellion at home. The result is only poorly suppressed discontent, which breaks out from time to time.
Solomon had taken wives from the very nations now attacking him. One writer draws the lesson for anyone tempted to make friends with what Christ has already defeated.
Underneath it all, the world always hates the Lord's anointed, and the conduct of believers, whether more or less blameworthy, only serves as a pretext for this hatred. The world is like Hadad and Rezon. The cross of Christ gives us a place to take toward the world — the cross by which the world is crucified to us and we to the world (Gal. 6:14). As long as we keep that place, and treat the world as a defeated enemy (John 16:33), it does not make a move. But let us make an alliance with it. Then it cannot forget its defeat. It may keep up a look of indifference, but it will hate us no less.
The band of raiders in this verse became a state — and that state shaped Israel's history for centuries.
David had reigned over Damascus. Only in the days of Solomon's decline did Syria begin to exist as a separate and independent kingdom (see 1 Kings 11:23-25). Its first king "was an adversary of Israel all the days of Solomon… And he loathed Israel and reigned over Syria." This continued to be the attitude of Syria toward Israel.
Enemies do not always have to rise. One writer names the condition that keeps them quiet.
"When a man's ways please the LORD, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him" (Prov. 16:7)… It is a solemn thing when God has to enter into a dispute with any of us, but "if we judged ourselves truly, we would not be judged" (1 Cor. 11:31).
- Cause. Rezon's revolt began in David's day, but Scripture tells it only after Solomon's idolatry. The Spirit presents it as direct chastening for that sin.
- Mercy. Discipline in this life marks a person as under God's fatherly care, not as passed over and left for judgment.
- Cost. The peace that marked Solomon's reign gave way to plots, a heavier yoke, and discontent among his own people.
- Reach. A band of raiders became the kingdom of Syria at Damascus, an enemy of Israel long after Solomon was gone.
- Remedy. The world, like Rezon, is a beaten enemy until we ally with it. Judging ourselves spares us the discipline Solomon had to endure.
And he was an adversary to Israel all the days of Solomon, besides the mischief that Hadad [did]; and he abhorred Israel, and reigned over Syria.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Jeroboam the son of Nebat, an Ephrathite of Zeredah, Solomon's servant (whose mother's name was Zeruah, a widow woman), even he lifted up his hand against the king.
Solomon turned to other gods, and a chain of adversaries followed. This verse names the third and most damaging of them — not a foreign enemy, but Solomon's own servant. How did a trusted man come to raise his hand against his master, and who stood behind him?
The two earlier opponents, Hadad and Rezon, came from outside Israel. One writer notes that Scripture waits until Solomon's idolatry to tell their story. He then points out how different this man is:
I do not mean that Hadad and Rezon only became a trouble when Solomon turned to idols. But notice this: the Holy Spirit saves the account of the trouble they caused the king until then. The Spirit Himself presents them as a direct chastening for his idolatry. And these were not the only ones. They were external. Solomon might say, "Well, we cannot expect anything better. They have private grudges, or national grudges, against our family." But "Jeroboam the son of Nebat, an Ephraimite," was no foreigner. He was not avenging some supposed wrong done to his family or his race.
Another writer names what made this man so dangerous, and who was behind the revolt:
Solomon's third enemy was the most dangerous. He was Solomon's own servant, a capable man whom the king had trusted with a responsible position (v.28). Jeroboam rebelled against the king because of a message God sent to him by the prophet Ahijah. So it is plainly God who raised up such an adversary.
The verse names his town, his father, and his widowed mother. Solomon was not the only one watching this young man:
Jeroboam, the first king of the ten-tribe kingdom of Israel, was the son of a widow and a promising young man. From the human standpoint he had everything going for him. Solomon was busy fortifying Jerusalem. He noticed how hard Jeroboam worked and put him in charge of the work crews from Ephraim and Manasseh. But we see that the king was not alone in taking note of this young man. God also took note of his industry and ambition. God's eye is upon the ways of man and, more than that, He knows the thoughts and desires of every man's heart.
The verse does not say what this raised hand did. One writer suggests a failed grab for power, and sets it against David:
"He lifted up his hand against the king," it says. It may have been some failed attempt on his part to raise a rebellion, to hurry along the fulfilment of the prophecy about him. Compare 2 Samuel 20:21. How unlike David, the man after God's own heart! Samuel the prophet had anointed and chosen him to replace Saul. Yet David would not harm a hair of the condemned king's head, or lift a finger to take the kingdom for himself! David was a man of faith; and faith — that precious "gift of God"! — always waits on God, waits for His time and His way to fulfil His promises.
God had promised Jeroboam the kingdom. But Ahijah said it would pass from the hand of Solomon's son, not Solomon's own. Jeroboam would not wait:
Ahijah had made it clear that Solomon should be "prince all the days of his life." Only out of his son's hand would God take the kingdom and give it to Jeroboam. But he could not wait. Like a wilful, impatient child, he took the case out of God's hand and handled it himself.
Another writer asks whether we do the same thing:
The kingdom was his. He had only to believe the promise of God for that. Yet, like Jacob, he felt he had to work out his own schemes to get the promise fulfilled. Are we not ourselves sometimes guilty of the same mistake? So often we are not content with God's clear promise. We try to get what we want by our own efforts, sometimes at the cost of obeying God's Word.
The rising of this servant fits a wider principle of how God governs:
David used the sword to accomplish his own sinful will, and the sword never departed from his house. Solomon consorted with strangers, his heart was led astray, and enemies arise in the very quarters from which he drew the means of pleasing himself (1 Kings 11). Man's self-devised plans and wilful choice always come back on him with a harvest of results.
What began with one raised hand became a permanent tear in the nation. The split came in the days of Solomon's son Rehoboam:
They have been a divided people since the days of Rehoboam. Solomon's serious turning away from the Lord tore the nation apart after his death. God allowed Jeroboam to lead ten tribes away from their loyalty to the house of David (1 Kings 11 — 12). They have never been united since that day.
- Cause. Scripture presents these adversaries as God's direct chastening for Solomon's idolatry.
- Closeness. Hadad and Rezon were foreigners. This third adversary was Solomon's own servant, and that is what made him the most dangerous.
- Sovereignty. Solomon promoted him for his hard work. God saw his heart, and raised him up by a message through Ahijah.
- Impatience. He knew the kingdom would pass from Solomon's son, yet he would not wait. David, though Samuel had anointed him over Saul, never lifted a finger to seize the throne.
- Consequence. One raised hand split Israel in two, and the nation never came back together.
And this was the cause that he lifted up his hand against the king Solomon was building Millo, and closing the breach of the city of David his father;
This verse stops the story to answer one question. Why did a trusted servant of Solomon raise his hand against his own king? The answer starts with a building project in Jerusalem.
God had already stirred up two enemies against Solomon: Hadad and Rezon. Both were foreigners with old grudges. Jeroboam was neither.
The mischief caused by Hadad and Rezon did not only begin when Solomon became an idolater. But notice this: the Holy Spirit holds back the account of the trouble they caused the king until then. The Spirit Himself presents it as a direct chastening for his idolatry. And these were not the only ones. They were external. Solomon might say, "Well, we cannot expect anything better. They have private grudges, or national grudges, against our family." But "Jeroboam, the son of Nebat, an Ephrathite," was no foreigner, and it was not a question of avenging supposed wrongs done to his family or his race.
The verse ties the revolt to Solomon's building work at Millo.
Next comes the building of the Millo. This must have been a citadel, a tower in Jerusalem's defences. Solomon fortified his kingdom against possible attacks by enemies. Yet he had already welcomed the enemy into his kingdom by marrying an Egyptian woman!
The trouble did not arrive at random.
Solomon kept company with strangers, and they led his heart astray. Enemies arose in the very quarters from which he drew the means of pleasing himself. Man's self-devised plans and wilful choice always come back on him with a harvest of results.
Solomon put Jeroboam in charge of forced labour from his own tribe.
The post gave him a place of importance in the eyes of his fellow countrymen, and it prepared the way for what was soon to follow. They plainly resented this forced labour. "Your father," they said later to Rehoboam, "made our yoke heavy." There is no certain evidence that this was really so. Their labour served the glory and security of the kingdom, and everyone was meant to share in its prosperity. It is possible, though, that Solomon set them to work on projects that served nothing but self-indulgence. When men leave the right way, as Solomon did, they soon become oppressive. That would give some ground for their discontent. And Jeroboam, it is quite certain, would take no trouble to calm it.
A prophecy had already been spoken about Jeroboam. He would not wait for God to fulfil it.
"He lifted up his hand against the king," it says. It may have been a failed bid on his part to stir up rebellion, to hurry along the prophecy concerning him. How unlike David, the man after God's own heart! The prophet Samuel had anointed and chosen him to replace Saul. Even so, David would not harm a hair of the condemned king's head, or lift a finger to bring the kingdom to himself! David was a man of faith; and faith — that precious "gift of God"! — always waits on God, waits for His time and His way to fulfil His promises.
The job that made Jeroboam useful also made him dangerous. One writer turns the story into a warning for God's people.
Solomon had set him over Ephraim for the work of fortifying Millo, which was the defence of Jerusalem against enemies from the north. It was a most dangerous move, but what could Solomon foresee? God alone knew. Through his duties Jeroboam knew all the secrets of the stronghold, and he won the sympathies of his own tribe as well. In the same way, when difficulties arise among God's people, the greatest danger comes from those who by their own activity have taken up the principles of their fellow believers. Such men have managed to put themselves in the place of Christ in winning the sympathies of the many.
after-note: restores the source's Millo detail (depth) and splits the 47-word sentence Such are the weapons they use to make a breach among the people of God. Their motives appear unselfish. Like Jeroboam, they would free the people from a yoke that is hard to bear. In reality they are Satan's instruments to destroy the testimony of God. And yet they are servants of Christ, as Jeroboam was of Solomon!
- Breach within. Hadad and Rezon attacked from outside; Jeroboam rose from inside the household, with no foreign grudge to explain him.
- Walls misplaced. Solomon built a citadel against attack from outside, but he had already welcomed the enemy in.
- Yoke resented. Jeroboam ran the labour levy. It gave him standing with his own tribe, and a grievance he had no wish to calm.
- Hand lifted. He grabbed at a kingdom God had yet to give him; David, already anointed, would not lift a finger to take one.
- Harvest reaped. Trouble came from the very quarters Solomon used to please himself. Self-chosen plans come back with their own harvest.
and the man Jeroboam was strong and valiant; and Solomon saw the young man that he was industrious, and he made him ruler over all the charge of the house of Joseph.
Solomon's kingdom is starting to break apart, and the man who will tear it is not a foreign invader but his own employee. Why did Solomon's eye for talent hand him his rival, and why was ability alone not enough to make Jeroboam a good king?
Jeroboam enters the record with no royal background. One writer sets his rise beside other sudden promotions in Scripture:
Jeroboam is an example of something quite common in the East. A man is raised from a relatively low position in private or public life to the highest, or one of the highest, positions in the land. We have examples of this in Scripture, such as Joseph and Moses, and secular history mentions plenty more.
Earlier in the chapter God stirred up Hadad and Rezon against Solomon. Both were outsiders with old national quarrels. Jeroboam was different:
The Holy Spirit holds back the account of the trouble Hadad and Rezon caused the king until this point. The Spirit Himself presents it as a direct chastening of Solomon's idolatry. And these were not the only ones. They were external. Solomon might say, "Well, we cannot expect anything better. They have private grudges, or national grudges, against our family." But Jeroboam, the son of Nebat, an Ephrathite, was no foreigner. This was not a matter of avenging supposed wrongs done to his family or his race.
This promotion is what made the threat serious. Jeroboam knew the kingdom from the inside.
The third enemy of Solomon was the most dangerous, for he was a servant of Solomon, a capable man whom Solomon had entrusted with a responsible position (v. 28). Jeroboam rebelled against the king because of a message God sent to him through the prophet Ahijah. So it is plainly God who raised up this adversary. Jeroboam was from Ephraim, and Solomon set him over all the labour force of the house of Joseph (Ephraim and Manasseh). He would be fully familiar with the running of the affairs of Solomon's kingdom.
Solomon judged Jeroboam by what he could see — the man's work.
When Solomon was busy fortifying Jerusalem he noticed Jeroboam's industrious ways and promoted him to be in charge of the work crews from Ephraim and Manasseh. But we see that the king was not alone in taking note of this young man. God also took note of his industry and ambition. God's eye is on the ways of man and, more than that, He knows the thoughts and desires of every man's heart.
Industry is a real virtue. The same writer marks its limit:
Jeroboam's industriousness was commendable, but God looks for more than merely commendable human character traits. He looks at the heart and wants hearts wholly committed to Him. So He told Jeroboam, "If you will listen to all that I command you, and will walk in my ways, and do what is right in my eyes… as David my servant did, I will be with you and will build you a sure house… and I will give Israel to you" (v. 38).
The job put Jeroboam over work gangs drawn from his own tribes. One writer weighs whether their later complaint was fair:
This naturally gave him a place of importance in the eyes of his fellow countrymen, and prepared the way for what was soon to follow. They clearly resented this forced labour. "Your father made our yoke heavy," they later said to Rehoboam… There is no certain evidence that this was true. Their labour served the glory and security of the kingdom, and everyone was meant to share in its prosperity… It is possible, however, that they were set to work on what served only self-gratification; for when men leave the right way, as Solomon did, they soon become oppressive.
God had already promised him the kingdom. He still would not wait for it:
He had secretly longed for power over his brothers. The phrase "all that your soul desires" shows it clearly. He probably chased the fulfilment of Ahijah's prophecy with the feverish haste of pride… Ahijah had said plainly that Solomon should be ruler all the days of his life, and that only out of his son's hand would the kingdom pass to Jeroboam. But like a wilful, impatient child, he could not wait, and had to take the matter out of God's hand and act for himself.
- Noticed. Solomon saw an industrious young man and promoted him. God saw the same man and read his heart.
- Promoted. Charge of the labour force of Ephraim and Manasseh gave him standing at home and inside knowledge of the kingdom.
- Positioned. Hadad and Rezon attacked from outside. Jeroboam was Solomon's own servant, so the chastening came home.
- Promised. God promised him Israel outright, but a lasting house depended on walking in God's ways, as David did.
- Impatient. He had a clear promise and still schemed to hurry it up. Like a wilful, impatient child, he would not wait for God's time.
And it came to pass at that time that Jeroboam went out of Jerusalem, and the prophet Ahijah the Shilonite found him in the way; and he had clad himself with a new garment; and they two were alone in the field.
An officer Solomon had promoted walks out of Jerusalem alone. On the open road a prophet meets him, and what happens to the coat on his back settles the future of the nation.
The king was meant to hold Israel's link with God. Watch what God does when the king fails.
Now a prophet appears. The ruin of the priesthood raised up Samuel; in the same way, the fall of the kingship now raises up a prophet. As these books go on, he becomes the striking link between the people and God, now that the kingship has failed in its responsibility.
A prophet on the scene is not only bad news.
His appearance proved that the grace and mercy of God could not be destroyed even when everything was ruined.
Jeroboam was no foreign enemy. Solomon had promoted him himself.
Solomon's third enemy was the most dangerous. He was Solomon's own servant, a capable man whom Solomon had trusted with a position of responsibility (v.28). Jeroboam rebelled against the king because of a message God sent him through the prophet Ahijah. So it is plainly God who raised up this enemy.
The coat is not a random object. It is new, and so is what it stands for.
Ahijah met Jeroboam outside Jerusalem, with no one else there to see it (v.29). Ahijah was wearing a new garment. He took it and tore it into twelve pieces, telling Jeroboam to take ten of them. The garment was Solomon's kingdom, newly set up.
The tearing is not a forecast of something God will do later.
He tears the new garment he is wearing (the kingdom itself was still quite new), and gives ten parts to Jeroboam. At that very moment the kingdom is torn out of Solomon's hands, though people only see it later. One tribe is left to the house of David, because grace freely chose David and Jerusalem.
God gives His reason in the message: "they have forsaken me." One writer asks who that "they" really was.
"They" was Solomon, the king! No doubt, all the people later followed that same path, but at this moment one man had sinned — the king. God had set him in a position of responsibility for all the people, and his unfaithfulness brought judgment on Israel.
The charge is spelled out in full. It was also a warning to the man who heard it.
God's reason for breaking up the kingdom is stated very clearly. Israel had forsaken the Lord and had sunk to worshiping all kinds of false gods and goddesses, ignoring God's statutes and judgments (v.33). God plainly hated that guilt, and Solomon led the way into it. It should have made a deep impression on Jeroboam's conscience, so that he took care never to copy such practices. But soon after he was raised up as king of the ten tribes, he fell into the same evil ways.
One tribe looks like a scrap next to ten. Watch what happens to each kingdom afterwards.
What mercy — a light always! Judah was greatly reduced, cut down in size and glory, yet one thing marked it off sharply from the ten tribes. Their kingdom began with a rebellious servant, and it would not end with him. Rebellious servant after rebellious servant would rise up against the king of Israel, so the ruling family was changed over and over and over again. It was not so with Judah. God calls it only one tribe, and still the light will always be there.
God had put the matter in His own hand, and told Jeroboam the outcome. Jeroboam would not leave it there.
But like a stubborn, impatient child, he could not wait. He had to take the case out of God's hand and handle it himself.
What God asked of him was simple trust.
The kingdom was his. He had only to believe the promise of God for that. Yet, like Jacob, he felt he had to work out his own schemes to get the promise fulfilled. Are we not ourselves sometimes guilty of the same mistake?
- Failure — kingship broke down, so God raised up a prophet as the link between Himself and His people.
- Sign — the new garment stood for the new kingdom. Tearing it settled the split that day, though no one saw it yet.
- Cause — the reason was idolatry. One man held responsibility for all, and his sin brought judgment on the nation.
- Mercy — God kept one tribe for David's sake. Its light would always burn, while the ten tribes changed ruling families again and again.
- Warning — the kingdom was already his by God's promise. He would not wait. He schemed for what he only had to trust God for.
Then Ahijah seized the new garment that was on him, and rent it in twelve pieces;
Ahijah stops Jeroboam on the road outside Jerusalem. No one else is watching. He takes the new coat off his own back and tears it into twelve strips. The act says more than a speech could: Solomon's kingdom is about to come apart, and God Himself is doing the tearing.
The scene marks a shift in how God deals with His people. The king has failed, and God does not leave His people without a voice.
Now a prophet appears. Just as Samuel came at the time when the priesthood was ruined, so the fall of the kingship now raises up a prophet. He becomes the link between the people and God when kingship in responsibility has failed. We shall see this so strikingly through these books. Ahijah the prophet meets Jeroboam outside Jerusalem. He tears the new garment he is wearing (and indeed the kingdom was still quite new), and gives ten parts to Jeroboam. At that very moment the kingdom is torn out of Solomon's hands, though this fact is only realized later.
The detail that the coat was new is not decoration.
Ahijah was wearing a new garment. He took it, tore it into twelve pieces, and told Jeroboam to take ten pieces. The garment was the kingdom of Solomon, newly established.
The tearing is not politics. Ahijah gives a reason for it.
But God's reason for breaking up the kingdom is stated very plainly. Israel had forsaken the Lord. They had sunk to the level of worshipping various idolatrous gods and goddesses, and they ignored God's statutes and judgments (v.33). God plainly hated such guilt on Israel's part, and Solomon was the leader in it. This ought to have impressed Jeroboam's conscience deeply, so that he would make sure he did not follow such practices himself. But it was not long after he was raised up as king of the ten tribes that he fell into the same evil ways (ch. 12:29-33).
Ahijah tears twelve pieces, but hands over only ten. What stays behind matters as much as what is given.
The the message of the Lord through Ahijah also declared His faithfulness to David. The Lord still speaks of "David my servant"; he is to have a lamp always before Him in Jerusalem, the city He has chosen to put His name there. The house of David in the middle of all the evil is not forgotten. There will be affliction, "but not forever" (verse 39). And Jeroboam also has the opportunity of having a house "as I built for David," on the condition of obedience. But ambitious Jeroboam did not keep the statutes and commandments of the Lord.
Why does the kingdom not change hands at once?
Because of His promises to David, He would not entirely take the kingdom from David's family, and He would not do this during Solomon's lifetime. While God is always faithful to His word, He is never in a hurry to carry out His righteous judgments.
Ahijah's message also carried a timetable.
Ahijah had clearly said that Solomon should be "ruler all the days of his life." Only out of his son's hand would the kingdom be taken and given to Jeroboam. But like a wilful, impatient child, he could not wait, and had to take the case out of God's hand and act for himself.
God said two different things to Jeroboam that day.
God's promise to Jeroboam was plain. The kingdom was his unconditionally. "You shall reign over all that your soul desires, and you shall be king over Israel." The continuing of the kingdom, on the other hand, depended on his obedience. "If you will listen… walk in My ways, and do what is right in My eyes… I will be with you and build you a sure house." The kingdom was his. He only had to believe God's promise for that. Yet, like Jacob, he felt he needed to work out his own schemes to get the promise fulfilled. Are we not sometimes guilty of the same mistake? So often we are not content with God's clear promise. We try by our own efforts to get what we want, sometimes at the cost of obeying God's Word.
- Torn — the new garment pictures Solomon's new kingdom. God Himself tears it; this is no palace revolt.
- Why — the stated cause is idolatry: Israel forsook the Lord and served other gods, with the king leading.
- Kept — ten pieces go to Jeroboam, but one tribe stays with David's line. David keeps a lamp in Jerusalem. The affliction is real, yet "not forever."
- Timed — God is faithful to His word but never hurried; the sentence falls in the son's reign, not Solomon's.
- Forfeited — the kingdom was a gift, but keeping it depended on obedience. Jeroboam schemed for what God had already promised, and lost the house he was offered.
and said to Jeroboam, Take thee ten pieces; for thus saith Jehovah the God of Israel Behold, I will rend the kingdom out of the hand of Solomon, and will give ten tribes to thee;
Solomon received the kingdom whole. Now God is about to tear it in pieces, and the news comes through a prophet who meets Jeroboam outside Jerusalem. Why did God tear away ten tribes, why did He leave anything at all, and what did Jeroboam do with the promise he was handed?
Ahijah's appearance is itself part of the message. Prophets appear in Israel's story where the appointed order has broken down.
When the king failed in his responsibility, it was really the people's relationship with God that suffered. But then something happened that lasted through the whole life of the kingdom, and even after it: the prophet came on the scene. His appearance proved that the grace and mercy of God could not be destroyed even when everything was ruined.
The garment Ahijah tore was new. That detail carries the meaning of the sign.
Ahijah the prophet meets Jeroboam outside Jerusalem. He tears the new garment he is wearing (the kingdom was indeed still quite new), and gives ten parts to Jeroboam. At that very moment the kingdom is torn out of the hands of Solomon, although people only realize this later.
God does not leave the cause in doubt.
But God's reason for breaking up the kingdom is most clearly stated. Israel had forsaken the Lord and had sunk down to the level of worshiping various idolatrous gods and goddesses, ignoring God's statutes and judgments (v.33). Solomon was the leader in that guilt. God's plain hatred of it ought to have struck Jeroboam's conscience, so that he would keep clear of such practices. Yet soon after he became king of the ten tribes, he fell into the same evil ways.
Rossier stops on the word "they" in that charge.
"They" was Solomon, the king! No doubt all the people later followed that same path, but at this moment one man had sinned — the king. God had set him in a position of responsibility for all the people, and his unfaithfulness brought judgment on Israel.
Ten pieces go to Jeroboam. The reason the rest stays is not Solomon's worth.
"However," God said, "I will not take the whole kingdom out of his hand" (v.34). He would allow Solomon's son to keep the tribe of Judah (which included Benjamin) for David's sake, not for Solomon's sake. God also made it plain to Jeroboam that He had chosen Jerusalem to put His name there (v.36).
What is left to David's line is small, but the light in it never goes out.
What mercy! "a light always." Judah was greatly reduced — reduced in the extent and glory of the kingdom. But there was this marked difference from the ten tribes, the much larger part that passed to the other man. They would shift their loads from time to time. Their ruling family changed again and again, and one man after another rose up. Not so with Judah. Judah was reduced to what God calls only one tribe — the strongest possible way of stating their complete loss of glory. Still, there the light shall be always.
The difference between Jeroboam's kingdom and David's was not size but foundation.
David's kingdom stood on grace, and in due time that grace would assert its rights again. Jeroboam's kingdom, and Solomon's own, stood not on grace but on responsibility. God never takes back His promises; He delights in grace. So the future kingdom of the true King of Glory will rest on a new covenant — a covenant of grace, where God alone is under obligation.
Jeroboam had a plain promise. He still went to work to secure it himself.
God's promise to Jeroboam was plain. The kingdom was his, with no conditions attached. Keeping it in his family, on the other hand, depended on his obedience. The kingdom was his. He had only to believe the promise of God for that. Yet, like Jacob, he felt he had to work out his own schemes to get the promise fulfilled. Are we not ourselves sometimes guilty of the same mistake? So often we are not content with God's clear promise, but try by our own efforts to get what we want, sometimes at the cost of obedience to God's Word.
- Cause. The torn garment is judgment, not politics. Israel turned to other gods, and Solomon led the way.
- Restraint. God did not take the whole kingdom — one tribe was kept back, and kept for David's sake, not Solomon's.
- Light. The small portion carried a promise of light that would never go out, steady while the ten tribes changed one ruling family for another.
- Foundation. Jeroboam's kingdom rested on his obedience. David's rested on grace. That is why the coming kingdom rests on a covenant where God alone is under obligation.
- Waiting. The kingdom was already Jeroboam's by promise; he schemed for it anyway — the warning is against helping God keep His word.
but one tribe shall he have for my servant David's sake, and for Jerusalem's sake, the city which I have chosen out of all the tribes of Israel
Ahijah tore a new cloak into twelve pieces and handed ten of them to Jeroboam. In God's sentence, the kingdom Solomon built was already broken. God held back one tribe only. The two reasons He gives for keeping it have nothing to do with Solomon.
The verse says who keeps the one tribe, and then gives the two reasons why. One writer follows both reasons back to David and to Jerusalem, and also names who was counted inside that "one tribe":
The Lord told Solomon that because he had done this, and had not kept His covenant and His statutes, He would surely tear the kingdom away from him and give it to his servant. Yet the Lord would not do this while Solomon was alive, because the Lord respected Solomon's father David. Solomon's son would suffer the shame of a broken kingdom instead. Even so, God would leave one tribe to that son — again for David's sake, not for Solomon's sake. Judah was that tribe, though Benjamin, very small and weak, was counted with it. God granted this also for Jerusalem's sake, because His choice of that city stood despite the failure and disobedience of all Israel.
The split that followed is often blamed on Rehoboam. One writer traces it further back:
In the hour of Solomon's idolatry, God decreed the ruin of his kingdom. For David's sake God put off the judgment during Solomon's own day. But in the days of Rehoboam, his proud and foolish son, Jeroboam the son of Nebat rebelled and snatched ten of the twelve tribes out of his hand. Rehoboam was about to go to war to win back what he had lost. Shemaiah, the man of God, stopped him with a word from God: this division was from God. Division was the judgment for idolatry.
Judah and Benjamin both stayed with David's house, so the count in this verse puzzles readers. A reference work on the tribes explains how Benjamin drops out of the count:
When the kingdom divided, Benjamin stayed with Judah, but Israel seized a large part of Benjamin's land. At times Benjamin seems to drop out of sight. Ahijah said that God had kept one tribe for the house of David — as if Benjamin counted as cut off in judgement, 1 Kings 11:36. People spoke of the two tribes together as "Judah," while they called the ten tribes "Israel."
The verse gives two reasons, not one. One writer sees them bound together long before Ahijah spoke:
David and Jerusalem were linked by ancient decree in one covenant of peace and joy.
Ten tribes sound like the better share. Yet Jeroboam's throne changed hands again and again, while the one tribe kept something the ten never had:
What mercy! "a light always." The kingdom was greatly reduced — reduced in size and in glory. But mark the difference from the ten tribes, the much larger part that went to the other king. They would shift their load from time to time. The family that governed them changed again and again, and one man after another rose up. It began with a rebellious servant, and it would not end with him. Many a rebellious servant would rise up against the king of Israel, and so the ruling family would change over and over again. Not so with Judah. They were reduced to what God calls only one tribe — His way of saying in the strongest possible terms how completely their glory had shrunk. Still, there the light shall be always.
Keeping one tribe back kept a family line going. That line had somewhere to arrive:
For this future Son to be "the offspring of David," David's line had to be kept alive until He appeared. That is why God had promised David "to give to him always a lamp, and to his sons" (2 Chron. 21:7). Now, how was this lamp going to shine in the royal house until the promised Son appeared? How was it to pass through man's poisoned air and moral darkness without being put out? If it went out, David's true Heir could never appear. Satan understood this. If he could put out the lamp, all God's purposes for the "Just Ruler over men" would come to nothing. But the Son of David appeared in the world, despite all the enemy's efforts to put out this light.
- Cause — Solomon's idolatry tore the kingdom. Rehoboam's folly was only the occasion, and God held the blow back past Solomon's lifetime for David's sake.
- Concession — God keeps the one tribe for David's sake and Jerusalem's, never for Solomon's. The mercy is borrowed, not earned.
- Count — "one tribe" means Judah with Benjamin inside it. Benjamin was small, and Ahijah spoke of it as though cut off.
- Contrast — the ten tribes got size and endless changes of dynasty; the one tribe got a light that never went out.
- Continuance — that light was David's line, kept burning through the dark until the Son of David came.
because they have forsaken me, and have worshipped Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, Chemosh the god of the Moabites, and Milcom the god of the children of Ammon, and have not walked in my ways, to do that which is right in my sight, and my statutes and mine ordinances, as David his father.
God has just promised Jeroboam ten of Israel's tribes. Here He gives the reason for the loss: three foreign gods have taken the place that belonged to Him alone, and David is named as the standard Solomon failed to meet.
The verse opens with a plural: "they have forsaken me." Yet God is judging one king here. One reading takes the plural as pointing straight at Solomon:
"They have forsaken Me," says the Lord... "They" was Solomon, the king! No doubt, all the people later followed that same path, but at this moment one man had sinned — the king. God had set him in a position of responsibility for all the people, so his unfaithfulness brought judgment on Israel. What a severe punishment Solomon had incurred.
Commentators differ here. Others read the plural as widening the blame beyond the king, and point out that Scripture gives more than one reason for the same disaster:
Ten of the tribes of Israel were torn from Rehoboam. In 1 Kings 11:11 we are told it was for the sin of Solomon, but verse 33 of the same chapter says it was for the idolatry of the people. In chapter 12 we find the immediate cause was the harsh spirit in which Rehoboam met the people, when they asked him for a gentler rule than his father's. The fact is that the sin of any one of the three parties named was quite enough to bring all the trouble, and so the responsibility is left at the door of each.
God names the three gods instead of speaking of idolatry in general. One writer identifies each one, and says that building shrines for his wives left Solomon himself guilty:
It has been stated that Solomon himself was not actually guilty of idolatry. If he built the places of idolatrous worship for his many wives only, he was guilty of the sin of idolatry. Luxuries, wealth, self-indulgence, the lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh and the pride of life led into idolatry. It is the same in the closing days of the present age. Ashtoreth, a Phoenician goddess, was worshipped with impure rites. Milcom (Molech) was the idol-god of the Ammonites. Chemosh was the sun-god and war-god of the Moabites.
Behind the name Milcom lay a rite in which parents gave up their own children:
Then we move from wives to children, and to that most inhuman rite: parents were so blinded by Satan that they gave their own children as sacrifices to Molech or Moloch, and probably Malcham or Milcom.
The astonishing thing is the identity of the man. The one who built the house for God's name set up shrines for Chemosh and Milcom. The path there was traced backwards to a single earlier step:
We may wonder how such a man as Solomon could ever be led to "build high places for Ashtoreth the abomination of the Sidonians, and for Chemosh the abomination of Moab, and for Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites." But the reason is easy to see. He had first disobeyed the Word of his Lord by going to those nations for wives. From there he fell easily enough into the deeper error of adopting their worship.
The collapse was slow, not sudden — and that is what makes it dangerous:
His reign opened amid the glory of a little millennium... But as we go on examining his conduct, it is easy to see that his early glory fades, the king's heart turns to the world, the world becomes his master... And how had this decline begun? Note, dear brother, it did not happen all at once, but gradually; without his noticing, the things of the world gained access to his heart, and he went from bad to worse until he became an idolater.
The verse ends by comparing Solomon with his father. David failed too, yet God's verdict on him was striking:
David failed, yet this could be written about him: "David did what was right in the eyes of the LORD and did not turn aside from anything that He commanded him all the days of his life, except in the matter of Uriah the Hittite" (1 Kings 15:5). This is a remarkable divine commendation.
God still holds one tribe back, and the reason is David, not Solomon:
In verse 34 God comes back once more to the grace He had shown to David. He adds: "And to his son I will give one tribe, that David My servant may have a lamp always before Me in Jerusalem, the city that I have chosen for Myself to put My name there" (v. 36). Grace is more in God's eyes than all glory, or rather, grace is the most precious part of glory, for it is, so to speak, at the head of all divine perfections.
Jeroboam, who received these words and the ten tribes, learned nothing from them:
Israel was guilty of this, and Solomon was the leader in it. God's plain hatred of such guilt should have impressed itself deeply on Jeroboam's conscience, so that he would take care not to follow such disgusting practices. But soon after he was made king of the ten tribes, he fell into the same evil ways.
- Cause — The kingdom was not lost to politics. One step away from God's Word made the next step easy.
- Named — God lists Ashtoreth, Chemosh and Milcom. Their worship was impure, and it cost children their lives.
- Reach — What the king did in private became the nation's religion. Leaders carry others with them.
- Measure — David failed too, yet God commended him for keeping His commands. He is the standard this verse holds up.
- Remnant — Judgment stops short of total loss. God leaves one tribe for David's sake, so the lamp keeps burning — grace, not merit.
But I will not take the whole kingdom out of his hand; for I will make him prince all the days of his life for David my servant's sake, whom I chose, who kept my commandments and my statutes;
Ahijah the prophet has just torn a new garment and handed ten pieces of it to Jeroboam, Solomon's own servant. Yet the judgment announced here stops short of total loss. The reason God gives points away from Solomon, back to a father long dead.
The charge just before this verse uses the plural, as though the whole nation had turned to foreign gods. One writer notes who God really has in view.
"They have forsaken me," says the Lord, "and worshiped Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians... and they have not walked in my ways... as David his father did" (v. 33). "They" was Solomon, the king! No doubt all the people later followed that same path, but at this moment one man had sinned — the king. God had set him in a position of responsibility for all the people. His unfaithfulness brought judgment upon Israel.
Solomon keeps the throne until he dies. But the delay does not mean God let the sin pass.
God acted in judgment as He must ever do when the believer knowingly breaks Scripture. The kingdom was to be torn from him and given to his servant. The carrying out of this judgment was delayed, not for Solomon's sake but for that of his father David.
The same clause tested the man who received the prophecy. Ahijah had named the moment for Jeroboam's turn, and Jeroboam would not wait.
Ahijah had clearly said that Solomon should be "ruler all the days of his life." Only out of his son's hand would the kingdom be taken and transferred to Jeroboam. But Jeroboam was like a wilful, impatient child. He could not wait. He had to take the case out of God's hand and handle it himself.
Twice in this passage God names David as the reason He holds back. Reading the same phrase a few verses later, one writer draws out what it reveals about God Himself.
In verse 34 God, ever coming back to the grace He had shown to David, adds: "Yet to his son I will give one tribe, that David my servant may always have a lamp before me in Jerusalem, the city where I have chosen to put my name" (v. 36). Grace is more in God's eyes than all glory. Or rather, grace is the most precious part of glory, because it stands, so to speak, at the head of all divine perfections.
God calls David a man who kept His commandments, though David's life held real failure. One writer points to how Scripture itself sums him up.
Although there was failure with David, it could be written about him: "David did what was right in the eyes of the LORD." He "did not turn aside from anything that he commanded him all the days of his life, except in the matter of Uriah the Hittite" (1 Kings 15:5). This is a remarkable divine commendation.
The remaining share looks pitiful — God calls it one tribe. But one writer contrasts what happened to the ten tribes with what happened to the small one.
What mercy! "a light always." Greatly reduced — reduced in the size and glory of the kingdom. But there was a very marked difference from the ten tribes, the much larger part that passed to the other man. They would shift their loads from time to time. After continual changes in the ruling family, they had one king after another rising up. Not so with Judah. Judah was reduced to what God calls only one tribe. That word puts their loss of glory in the strongest possible way. Still, there the light shall be always.
If the lamp never goes out, someone must hold the promise that keeps it burning.
David's throne is guaranteed by God, not to Solomon or to any other unfaithful creature, but to Christ. Jeremiah 33:15-17 makes this clear. "In those days and at that time I will cause a righteous Branch to spring up for David, and he shall execute justice and righteousness in the land... For thus says the LORD: David shall never lack a man to sit on the throne of the house of Israel."
- Cause. The charge names the nation, but one man is meant. The king carried the responsibility, so his unfaithfulness brought judgment on Israel.
- Delay. Solomon keeps the throne for life — a postponement granted for David's sake, not for his own.
- Ground. God keeps coming back to the grace He showed David; grace stands at the head of all His perfections.
- Verdict. God's summary of David: right in everything except the matter of Uriah. That is a remarkable commendation.
- Result. One tribe looks like almost nothing, yet the light stays there always. And God guarantees the throne itself not to any failing man but to Christ.
but I will take the kingdom out of his son's hand, and will give it unto thee, -- the ten tribes.
Ahijah the prophet has just torn his new coat and handed ten parts of it to Jeroboam, one of Solomon's servants. Here God names the timing — not Solomon's reign, but his son's — and the man who will receive the ten tribes.
The torn coat was not theatre. It marked a shift in how God kept contact with His people once the throne had broken down.
Now a prophet appears. Just as the ruin of the priesthood raised up Samuel, so the fall of the kingship now raises up a prophet. The king has failed in his responsibility, so the prophet becomes the link between the people and God. Ahijah tears up the new coat he is wearing — the kingdom itself was still quite new — and gives ten parts to Jeroboam. At that very moment the kingdom is torn out of Solomon's hands, though people only see it later.
Solomon keeps his throne to the end of his days. The loss lands on the next king. Commentators trace that gap to God's word to David rather than to any easing of the sentence.
Because of His promises to David, God would not take the whole kingdom from David's family. He would not do it during Solomon's lifetime either. God is always faithful to His word. But He is never in a hurry to carry out His righteous judgments.
Rehoboam's own folly triggered the split, yet the shape of that folly was set long before he opened his mouth.
Solomon was the wisest of men. Yet he did not obey the clear instructions of Scripture. He leaned on his own understanding, wrecked his life, and broke up his kingdom. It will never be one kingdom again until Christ comes to reign. So the consequences of his sin come out in the history of his son, to whom he gave a heathen mother. What else could we expect but catastrophe!
The chapter blames Solomon, then blames the people's idolatry, then chapter 12 shows Rehoboam's harshness lighting the fuse. One writer treats all three accounts as true at once.
If we had only 1 Kings 11:11, we would conclude that it all happened because of Solomon's sin. If we had only verse 33 of the same chapter, we would say it was for the sin of the people. If we had only chapter 12, we would be sure to blame the nation's ruin on the harsh rule of Rehoboam. The fact is that the sin of any one of the three was enough on its own to bring all the harm that followed. So the responsibility lies at the door of each. Let me say again, though, that this judgment is only a matter of God's government, and does not always reach into eternity.
What Jeroboam receives here is a gift with no strings. What he does with it is another matter entirely — and the two must not be confused.
God's promise to Jeroboam was plain. The kingdom was his, with no conditions attached... Keeping the kingdom, on the other hand, depended on his obedience... He had only to believe the promise of God. Yet, like Jacob, he felt he needed to work out his own schemes to get what God had promised. Are we not ourselves sometimes guilty of the same mistake? So often we are not content with God's clear promise, but try by our own efforts to get what we want, sometimes at the cost of obedience to God's Word.
The ten tribes came with no promise of a steady throne. Judah's far smaller share came with something better.
If it began with a rebellious servant, it would not end with him. Many a rebellious servant would rise up against the king of Israel. So the ruling family would change over and over again. Not so with Judah. God calls Judah no more than one tribe, which is the strongest possible way of saying how far their glory had shrunk. Yet there the light will always shine.
Ahijah's message ends by promising affliction to David's line — and then setting a boundary on it.
We must notice the difference between God's ways in government with His people and His ways in grace. Because of their sins and their refusal to repent, the Jews have been under His chastening hand, and they still are. That is His righteous government. But the grace and love of His heart towards them never change. Mark the terms of the covenant: "And I will afflict the offspring of David because of this, but not forever" (1 Kings 11:39). This principle matters enormously — for Israel, for the church, and for each individual Christian.
- Torn — Ahijah's cut coat announced a kingdom already torn in God's sight. The split only showed itself after Solomon died.
- Delayed — the judgment skipped Solomon's own reign, for David's sake. God keeps His word, but He is never in a hurry to carry it out.
- Shared — Solomon's disobedience, the people's sin, and Rehoboam's harsh rule each carried enough guilt on its own. This judgment belonged to God's government on earth, and did not always reach into eternity.
- Conditional — the ten tribes were a free gift to Jeroboam. Keeping them depended on obedience, and he schemed instead of trusting God.
- Limited — God would afflict David's line, but not for ever. His government chastens, while His grace towards His people never changes.
And unto his son will I give one tribe, that David my servant may have a lamp always before me in Jerusalem, the city that I have chosen for myself to put my name there.
Solomon turned to other gods, and it cost him the kingdom. Yet God kept one tribe back, so that David's lamp would not go out in Jerusalem.
God's charge sounds like it is aimed at the whole nation. One writer points to the one man behind it:
"They have forsaken Me," says the Lord, "and have worshipped Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians, Chemosh the god of the Moabites, and Milcom the god of the children of Ammon, and have not walked in My ways…" (v. 33). "They" was Solomon, the king! No doubt all the people later followed that same path, but at this moment one man had sinned — the king. Set before God in a position of responsibility for all the people, his unfaithfulness brought judgment upon Israel.
God spared little, and not for Solomon's sake:
God would leave one tribe to that son, also for the sake of David, not for Solomon's sake. Judah was that tribe, though Benjamin, very small and weak, was included with Judah. Also, this concession was for Jerusalem's sake, for God's choice of that city remained in spite of the failure and disobedience of all Israel.
God keeps coming back to David as the reason for what He spares. One writer weighs grace against glory:
In verse 34 God, ever coming back to the grace He had shown to David, adds: "And to his son I will give one tribe, that David My servant may have a lamp always before Me…" (v. 36). Grace is more in God's eyes than all glory, or rather, grace is the most precious part of glory, for it is, so to speak, at the head of all divine perfections.
The word "always" carries the promise. One writer sets Judah's line beside the northern kingdom:
What mercy! "a light always." The kingdom was greatly reduced — smaller in size and in glory. But here is the sharp difference from the ten tribes, the much larger part that went to the other king. They would change rulers from time to time. The family that governed kept changing, and one man after another rose up. … Not so with Judah. Judah was reduced to what God calls only one tribe — His way of saying as strongly as possible how far their glory had shrunk. Even so, there the light will be always.
(Older translations render the word as "light" rather than "lamp"; the sense is the same.)
The lamp appears in other passages too, joined to anointing and to light:
In the Old Testament we find anointing and the lamp together: "There will I make the horn of David to bud: I have ordained a lamp for My Anointed" (Ps. 132:17). David himself was spoken of as "the light of Israel" (2 Sam. 21:17); and, in a far higher sense, our Lord Jesus declares Himself "the Light of the world" (John 8:12).
The lamp had to keep burning until the promised Son came, and an enemy had every reason to put it out:
For this future Son to be "the offspring of David," David's line had to continue until He appeared. That is why God had promised David "to give to him always a lamp, and to his sons" (2 Chron. 21:7). Now, how was this lamp going to shine in the royal house until the appearing of the promised Son? How was it to pass through man's poisoned air and moral darkness without going out? If it went out, David's true Heir could never appear. Satan understood this. If he could succeed in extinguishing the lamp, all of God's counsels concerning the "Just Ruler over men" would come to nothing.
The city was God's own choice. One writer traces that choice forward:
From 1 Kings 11:36 we know that the place referred to in Deuteronomy was Jerusalem. Psalm 78:68 shows us that God chose Mount Zion, which He loved, to place His Sanctuary there. Further on we see (verse 7) that God made this place known in connection with His servant David. David is a picture of the Son of David, who in Matthew 18:20 speaks about the place connected with His Name, where He wants to be among His own.
So where does the lamp shine today? One writer answers:
If it is asked, where does this lamp shine now? Not on earth, for Jerusalem, the place of its earthly display, is "trampled underfoot by the Gentiles." But the eye of faith can see it shining with undimmed brightness "in the true tabernacle." There it will keep shining "until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in." And then… the blessed lamp will come out from the place where it now shines, and cast its cheering rays on the dark path of the oppressed and sorrowing remnant.
- The sin — the failure was Solomon's own. He held the throne, so his unfaithfulness brought judgment on the whole nation.
- The sparing — God kept back one tribe, Judah, with small, weak Benjamin joined to it. He did it for David's sake and for the city He had chosen, not for Solomon's.
- The grace — God keeps coming back to the grace He showed David. Grace stands at the head of all His perfections.
- The lamp — a light that would burn always. The northern throne changed hands again and again. Judah's lamp had to keep burning until David's true Heir appeared.
- The shining — no one sees the flame in Jerusalem today. Faith sees it burning elsewhere, ready to come out again and light the dark path of a suffering people.
And I will take thee, that thou mayest reign over all that thy soul desireth, and thou shalt be king over Israel.
Solomon still sits on the throne when the prophet Ahijah tells Jeroboam that God will make him king over ten tribes. Two questions follow: how much of that promise was certain, and why did Jeroboam wreck what God handed him?
The verse opens with God's own action: "I will take you." Solomon had already promoted this hard-working young man. But the promotion that mattered came from higher up.
When Solomon was busy fortifying Jerusalem, he noticed how hard Jeroboam worked. He put him in charge of the work crews from Ephraim and Manasseh. But we see that the king was not alone in taking note of this young man. God also took note of his industry and ambition. God's eye is on the ways of man, and more than that, He knows the thoughts and desires of every man's heart.
The promise gave Jeroboam wide room to rule. It did not give him room to ignore God.
God favoured Jeroboam by putting the ten tribes of Israel into his trust. A good and wise king had plenty of freedom to act. But God also demanded obedience to His statutes and commandments.
The two verses say different things. The kingdom itself was not up for negotiation; keeping it was.
God's promise to Jeroboam was plain. The kingdom was his unconditionally. "You shall reign over all that your soul desires, and you shall be king over Israel." Whether the kingdom lasted, on the other hand, depended on his obedience. "If you will listen … walk in My ways, and do what is right in My sight … I will be with you, and build you a sure house." The kingdom was his. He had only to believe the promise of God for that. Yet, like Jacob, he felt he needed to work out his own schemes to get the promise fulfilled. Are we not sometimes guilty of the same mistake? Often we are not content with God's clear promise. We try by our own efforts to get what we want, sometimes at the cost of obeying God's Word.
One writer finds a clue to Jeroboam's heart in that phrase. He wanted power over his brothers before he was ever told he would have it.
But Jeroboam knew nothing of faith. He had secretly wanted power over his brothers. The expression "over all that your soul desires" shows it clearly. He probably tried to hurry Ahijah's prophecy along with the feverish haste of pride, and that is why he had to run to Egypt for shelter… Ahijah had plainly said that Solomon should be "prince all the days of his life." God would take the kingdom only out of his son's hand and give it to Jeroboam. But, like a stubborn, impatient child, he could not wait. He had to take the case out of God's hand and act for himself.
A promised crown tests a man before he ever wears it. David faced the same test and passed it.
How unlike David, the man after God's own heart! The prophet Samuel had anointed and chosen him to replace Saul. Even so, David would not harm a hair of the condemned king's head, or lift a finger to bring the kingdom to himself. David was a man of faith; and faith — that precious "gift of God"! — always waits on God — waits for His time and way to fulfil His promises.
God's word was enough to build a reign on. Jeroboam wanted something he could arrange for himself.
He had only to let God act in his favour, to obey Him, and he was assured of reigning over all that his soul desired (1 Kings 11:37).
But the promises of God were not enough for this man. He reasoned on a purely human level.
- Taken. The reign starts with God's move, not Jeroboam's record. God saw his hard work and the desires of his heart.
- Given. God promised the kingdom outright. Jeroboam had only to believe Him for it.
- Kept. The sure house of the next verse was the part that hung on obedience: wide freedom to reign, and a plain demand to walk in God's ways.
- Grasped. Instead of waiting as David waited, he tried to force the promise through, and had to flee to Egypt for it.
- Forfeited. He would not rest on God's plain word. Human reasoning cost him the sure house, and left him known as the man who made Israel to sin.
And it shall be, if thou wilt hearken unto all that I command thee, and wilt walk in my ways, and do that which is right in my sight, in keeping my statutes and my commandments, as David my servant did, that I will be with thee, and build thee a lasting house, as I built for David, and will give Israel unto thee.
Solomon's unfaithfulness cost his family ten of Israel's tribes. God handed them to Jeroboam and promised him a dynasty as lasting as David's — and that promise hangs on one word: "if."
God puts two different things before Jeroboam. The throne is a gift. Whether it lasts depends on Jeroboam.
God's promise to Jeroboam was plain. The kingdom was his unconditionally. "You shall reign over all that your soul desires, and you shall be king over Israel." But whether the kingdom lasted depended on his obedience. "If you will listen… walk in My ways, and do what is right in My eyes… I will be with you, and build you a sure house." The kingdom was his. He had only to believe the promise of God for that. Yet, like Jacob, he felt he needed to work out his own schemes to get what was promised. Are we not sometimes guilty of the same mistake? So often we are not content with God's clear promise, but try by our own efforts to get what we want, sometimes at the cost of obeying God's Word.
God does not set an unreachable bar. He points Jeroboam to a life already lived.
God assured Jeroboam of blessing if he sought the Lord's interests as David did. This was not beyond Jeroboam, for God was only asking for what David had already shown.
A king still had wide freedom. One writer puts both sides plainly: "There was plenty of liberty of action for a good and wise king. But there was also God's demand for obedience to His statutes and commandments" (An Outline of Sound Words).
The promise gives Jeroboam a house as sure as David's, but it stands on a different footing. The next verse also sets a limit on how far David's line will suffer.
A new responsibility now rests on Jeroboam. God was giving him a privileged position. His house was to be as sure as David's, if he would listen to the commandments of the Lord. But God makes one reservation: "And I will afflict the offspring of David because of this, but not forever" (v. 39). In due time the grace that founded David's kingdom would claim its rights again. God established Jeroboam's kingdom — and Solomon's too — not on grace but on responsibility. God never takes back His promises; He delights in grace.
Jeroboam had God's word for his security. Instead of resting on it, he weighed the odds and set up a religion of his own.
Events unfold without him having to interfere. But he does not trust, and says in his heart: "Now the kingdom will return to the house of David." He has no confidence in God, so he weighs up the probabilities and stops there. Faith never stops at probabilities. I would even say that it feeds on impossibilities and is the better for it. His unbelief in God's promise and his indifference to the worship of the Lord produced a national religion of his own, separate from the worship God had established at Jerusalem.
God let his reign run its full course. The dynasty was another matter.
Despite his wickedness, the Lord allowed Jeroboam to reign twenty-two years. The Lord had used him to discipline the guilty house of David. But his own evil course made it impossible for him to establish a new dynasty. He knew Solomon's sins, and God had encouraged him to do well. The "sure house" mentioned in 1 Kings 11:38 could not be, for Jeroboam had led the people far away from their God.
Two kings held the throne on these terms. Both failed. That leaves a question the verse itself does not answer.
The Lord gave Jeroboam rule over the ten tribes because Solomon had been unfaithful. He told him that if he would listen to His commandments, walk in His ways, and do what was right in His sight, He would be with him and build him "a sure house" (1 Kings 11:38). But who can God trust except the Lord Jesus? Solomon was unfaithful; so was Jeroboam.
- Given — God handed Jeroboam the ten tribes outright. Only the lasting of his house hung on the "if" of obedience.
- Gauge — the standard was "as David my servant did" — a life already lived, so not beyond Jeroboam's reach.
- Ground — his kingdom stood on responsibility; David's stood on grace. God would afflict David's line, "but not forever."
- Grasping — Jeroboam did not trust the promise. He weighed the odds, set up a religion of his own, and lost the sure house.
- Guarantee — both kings failed. The sure house rests at last on the one Man God can trust.
And I will for this afflict the seed of David, but not for ever.
Ahijah's message to Jeroboam ends with the old house, not the new king. David's line will be struck, but the blow comes with a time limit. That last clause raises the whole question. How can God tear a kingdom apart in judgment and promise in the same breath that the wound will not last?
Commentators draw a line between how God governs His people and what His heart feels toward them.
Under God's righteous government, the Jews have been and still are under His chastening hand, because of their sins and their refusal to repent. But the grace and love of His heart toward them never change. Note the terms of the covenant: "And I will afflict the offspring of David because of this, but not forever." This principle matters immensely — for Israel, for the church, and for the individual Christian. The apostle uses the same principle when he handles Israel's rejection and restoration: "They were broken off because of their unbelief… But as regards election, they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers. For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable."
Each throne rested on a different foundation. That is why the affliction has an end.
A new responsibility now falls on Jeroboam. God was giving him a privileged position. His house was to be as sure as David's, if he would listen to the commandments of the Lord. But God makes one reservation: "And I will afflict the offspring of David because of this, but not forever." In due time the grace that founded David's kingdom would assert its rights again. Jeroboam's kingdom rested on responsibility, not on grace, and so did Solomon's own kingdom. God never takes back His promises; He delights in grace. So the future kingdom of the true King of Glory will rest on a new covenant — a covenant of grace where God alone is under obligation — and on a new creation. Solomon's kingdom rested on neither.
The words do not mean God takes grace away for a season. He is showing something else while grace stays hidden.
"But not forever": in the ways of God there are periods where judgment, so to speak, eclipses grace. It is not that grace no longer exists. Grace stays exactly the same, but it stops shining out, so that God can show other perfections of His glory, such as righteousness and judgment. The same happens to the sun, more than a hundred times the diameter of the earth, when the earth's shadow eclipses it. When the eclipse is over, the huge star appears again in all its brightness. The shadow that covered it has taken away none of its splendour — except to the eyes of men.
Nothing here softens the blow that landed. The promise of a limit came inside a sentence of real loss that ran for centuries.
The whole message to Jeroboam ends with the remarkable words, "I will afflict the offspring of David because of this, BUT NOT FOREVER." David's offspring had now come under the rod of the covenant. Afterwards we see little but its blows. We also see the multiplied and multiplying sins that brought these blows on the guilty nation and its more guilty kings, despite all the patience with which God bore with them.
Judah's line held while the northern kingdom's ruling families kept changing.
What mercy — "a light always"! The kingdom was much reduced in size and glory. But there was a marked difference compared with the ten tribes. They would shift their loads from time to time, and after continual changes in the ruling family, one king would rise up after another… Not so with Judah. Judah was reduced to what God calls only one tribe, which states their loss of glory in the strongest possible way. Still the light would be there always.
The promise of a limit was not given so the godly could fight the judgment. It told them what to accept and what to wait for.
They were the Lord's witnesses. They ought to accept the division as the result of their sin. They ought to commit themselves to God. He would know how to put things right once His judgment had run its course and borne its fruit. That is why Ahijah had said to Jeroboam: "And I will afflict the offspring of David because of this, but not forever."
- Cause — the affliction is real discipline for real sin. The rod of the covenant fell on David's line and kept falling for generations.
- Limit — "not forever" is the reservation God puts on His own judgment. Judgment eclipses grace; it never ends grace. And the eclipse passes.
- Ground — Jeroboam's throne rested on his obedience. David's rested on grace. So one house failed for good, and the other still has a future.
- Pledge — the light left to Judah was the visible proof of the limit while the judgment ran.
- Response — those who trust God accept the chastening as the fruit of sin. They leave the outcome to Him, since His gifts and calling are irrevocable.
And Solomon sought to kill Jeroboam; and Jeroboam arose and fled into Egypt, to Shishak king of Egypt; and he was in Egypt until the death of Solomon.
The prophet Ahijah has just told Solomon that God will give part of his kingdom to Jeroboam. Solomon's answer is not repentance but a death warrant. The verse leaves us with a king hunting God's chosen man, a fugitive sheltering in Egypt, and a promise that outlives them both.
God had raised up adversaries to correct Solomon. This verse shows what that correction produced in him.
Solomon seeks to kill Jeroboam (v. 40). See what feelings this discipline produced in his heart! The obstacle God had raised up should have bowed him into God's presence, submitting to the correction. Instead it only irritates him and drives him to try to free himself of it. How sad is the heart that has lost its fellowship with God and does not judge itself. What has Solomon, the king of righteousness, come to? His heart is no longer upright before God. How far he is from his beginnings!
The root of it was that Solomon would not accept what God had said. One writer traces the downward line simply:
Solomon knew that God had told Jeroboam he would be king over Israel, but instead of being chastened and repentant because he himself was to blame, Solomon wanted to kill Jeroboam. Thus, he was not willing to submit to God's Word in this matter. His disobedience to God led him farther and farther astray.
Jeroboam was more than a political threat. He was one of a line of enemies God allowed, and Solomon should have asked God why.
When enemies rise up against us our first appeal should be to God as to why He has permitted it. The enemies themselves may have no thought of God. Even so, they may be His instruments to discipline His people… Jeroboam rose up later, and became a much more serious enemy. He was an ambitious young man, and even aspired to the throne (1 Kings 11:37). Solomon forgot his own words in Proverbs 16:7. Instead of searching his conscience before God about this opponent, he tried to kill him, just as Saul had done with David.
Solomon held absolute power, and it was useless against a word God had already spoken.
But now Solomon faced another promise of God, made this time to Jeroboam: part of the kingdom would be his. God had assured him, "Yet I will not do it in your days, for the sake of David your father." Instead of resting in that, Solomon took the law into his own hands and tried to kill Jeroboam, as Herod would do in a later day. But of course God's promises could not be broken. Jeroboam fled into Egypt and stayed there until Solomon died.
Why did Solomon strike at Jeroboam just then? Scripture does not say, and one writer suggests Jeroboam had tried to hurry the prophecy along — which exposes him as much as Solomon.
We are not told whether news of Ahijah's prophecy reached Solomon, or whether the excited Jeroboam gave the secret away by some rash or rebellious act. But Scripture says of him, "He lifted up his hand against the king." Perhaps he made some failed attempt to raise a rebellion and hurry along the prophecy about him… How unlike David, the man after God's own heart! Samuel the prophet had anointed and chosen him to replace Saul, yet he would not harm a hair of the condemned king's head, or lift a finger to bring the kingdom to himself. David was a man of faith. And faith — that precious "gift of God"! — always waits on God. It waits for His time and His way to fulfil His promises.
The same impatience shows up in ordinary life:
The kingdom was his. He had only to believe the promise of God for that. Yet, like Jacob, he felt he had to work out his own schemes to get the promise fulfilled. Are we not sometimes guilty of the same mistake? So often we are not content with God's clear promise. We try to get what we want by our own efforts, sometimes at the cost of obeying God's Word.
The verse names the king who took Jeroboam in. Solomon had married a Pharaoh's daughter to strengthen his throne, and Shishak had overthrown that very royal house.
Solomon had allied himself with Pharaoh by marrying his daughter. Perhaps he did this only to please himself, or perhaps he expected an alliance with such a powerful country to strengthen his kingdom. Either way it all comes to nothing, as every such scheme does where God's word is disobeyed or ignored. Shishak overthrew Pharaoh, Solomon's father-in-law, and so ended that royal line. Shishak became the "new king" who "did not know" Solomon or his successor.
- Word — God had said part of the kingdom would pass to Jeroboam. The whole verse is Solomon's refusal to bow to that word.
- Rod — Jeroboam was God's instrument of discipline. Solomon's first question should have been "Why has God allowed this?" — not "How do I remove him?"
- Sword — Solomon reached for the sword instead, as Saul did with David, and hardened where he should have humbled.
- Flight — Jeroboam grasped at the promise, and it drove him into exile. David was promised a throne, and he waited for God's time.
- Futility — The murder plot failed, and Solomon's Egyptian alliance collapsed. Nothing he gained by his own scheming lasted.
And the rest of the acts of Solomon, and all that he did, and his wisdom, are they not written in the book of the acts of Solomon?
Chapter 11 has just told us about Solomon's foreign wives, his idolatry, and the enemies God raised against him. Now the reign ends with a footnote pointing to a book no one has read — so why does God give us a summary line instead of the whole story?
The verse points readers to a document that once existed but is not part of the Bible:
The Acts of Solomon, 1 Kings 11:41: probably the public records of the kingdom.
Kings points to outside records like this again and again. The writer worked with real sources, and that did not make his own account any less God-given:
In various places the text points to books that contain more about the life of the king in question — books the writer may have based his accounts on. It points, for example, to the book of the Acts of Solomon (1 Kings 11:41), and several times to the books of the chronicles of the kings of Israel and of the kings of Judah... The author of the books of Kings was able to use these "references" under the guidance of the Holy Spirit while writing his God-inspired work.
The verse admits there was more to say. What God leaves out, He leaves out by choice:
When the historical parts of the Old Testament were written, more information about the kingdom was still available in the books named. Anyone who needed it could have found it there. But it was not required for the inspired volume of God.
This same formula repeats through the book. One writer weighs those lost national records against the Bible the believer holds:
These chronicles were drawn up during the reigns of all the rulers of those times, whether Jewish or Gentile. They have nothing to do with the Word of God. What the Lord did not choose to record or explain is written there instead. These chronicles have been lost... The believer has no need for any of them; he has God's Word. There in God's account he finds all that is necessary for him, as well as the divine evaluation of people, events, and things. Non-inspired writings may record certain deeds, even with great exactness. But those deeds never carry anything more than human evaluation.
Compare how Scripture closes David's life with how it closes Solomon's:
David's later words fill two long chapters (1 Chronicles 28 and 29). The simple faith and delight in the things of God he shows there lifts our souls as we read... But no last words of Solomon are recorded. We have the brief statement that "Solomon slept with his fathers and was buried in the city of David his father, and Rehoboam his son reigned in his place" (1 Kings 11:43). More about him could be read in the writings of Nathan, Ahijah and Iddo (2 Chronicles 9:29); but no more space is given to this most faulty servant in the inspired Word.
The verse lists his wisdom among the things written down. That is what makes the ending so sobering:
At his death he was buried in Jerusalem, and Rehoboam took the throne (v. 43). But what a solemn lesson for us: the wisest man who ever lived made shipwreck of his personal life! May God preserve us from the pride of knowledge!
The warning lands on the finish, not the start:
It is the end of the race that tells with us all. Happy is the man who, by the grace of God, keeps running well. Happy is the man who can say like Paul at the last, "I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith" (2 Timothy 4:7).
- Source. "The book of the acts of Solomon" was most likely the kingdom's public records. The writer of Kings could draw on it under the Holy Spirit's guidance.
- Selection. More information existed, but God's book did not need it. What He leaves out, He leaves out on purpose.
- Survival. The national chronicles are lost. God's Word remains — and only it gives His evaluation of people and events.
- Silence. David left long final words of faith. Solomon left none — only a burial notice and a footnote.
- Sobering. The wisest man who ever lived made shipwreck of his life. The end of the race tells, not the bright start.
And the time that Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel was forty years.
This verse closes the record of Solomon's reign with three plain facts: how long he reigned, where, and over whom. What did those forty years produce? And what did they fail to produce? That is the question commentators press.
These years cover the height of Solomon's glory. Writers read that glory as a picture of someone greater:
Solomon was now at the height of his glory, a vivid picture of someone greater than Solomon. He really does prefigure the Lord Jesus as King. Only when we see this can we understand why God attaches such importance to the history of men like David in one light and Solomon in another. David as the warrior-king who actively puts down the enemies, Solomon as the man of peace who will reign over the conquered nations and kingdoms.
Solomon reigned as long as his father did. One writer turns that comparison on what each king handed down:
Solomon reigned the same length of time as his father David — 40 years. But despite his great wisdom and the splendour of his kingdom, he did not leave his son a legacy nearly as valuable as David had left him. David had left Solomon a true regard for the living God. Solomon did not follow his father's path of obedience. What kind of example was this to Rehoboam? Why did Solomon not wisely consider that his days were numbered, just as David's had been? In Ecclesiastes 12 he wrote about how short life is. He concluded, "Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil." Why did he not accept for himself the advice he gave to others?
Writers also read these forty years as a test. God gave the wealth, and the wealth exposed what was really there:
Solomon's reign was just forty years. It was a time, they say, in which Judah was bound to have a special prominence. It was also a time in which the remarkable prosperity God gave them tested them as to their real condition. The departure of the people into idolatry, with Solomon himself drawn into it through his wives, was the sad answer to a test like this.
The record gives the length of the reign and nothing of how Solomon ended. Two writers weigh what is missing. The first looks for repentance and finds none:
And Solomon? Not a word of repentance! No tears like those his father wept. No confession as came from David's lips. Only one thing is stated. Only one act is mentioned of apostate Solomon. He sought to kill Jeroboam. After a reign of 40 years, Solomon passed away, not quite 60 years old.
The second sets Solomon's silence against his father's parting words:
David's latter-day words fill two long chapters. The simple faith and delight in the things of God found there lifts our souls as we read. But no last words of Solomon are recorded. ... It is the end of the race that tells with us all.
One writer finds a comfort in Solomon's story. God dealt with him while he was still alive:
This is almost the only comfort we have in the history given us of king Solomon — that God chastised him. He did not merely let the fruit of his evil appear in his family. He chastised Solomon himself, in his own lifetime. This is His way with His own people. In some cases it is almost your only hope that a person is a child of God: God does not let the evil pass. He deals with it now in this world.
Solomon's forty years ended badly. Writers look past him to a reign that will outlast and outshine his:
His reign of righteousness will surpass Solomon's reign, so miserably cut short, in its splendour and its length. For they will fear Him "as long as the sun and moon endure, throughout all generations." But it will also begin as Solomon's reign never began: "He shall come down like rain on the mown grass." It will bring heavenly blessing where judgment has done its work and left nothing to harvest.
- Height. Forty years over all Israel put Solomon at the height of his glory. He pictures a greater King — the man of peace.
- Test. That same prosperity was a test of what was really in the heart, and idolatry was the answer it drew out.
- Silence. The record gives his years but no repentance and no last words — the end of the race is what tells.
- Mercy. God chastised Solomon in his own lifetime. Writers read that as a reason to hope he belonged to God.
- Unbroken. Solomon's reign was cut short. The reign it pictured will surpass it in splendour and in length, and it will begin with blessing.
And Solomon slept with his fathers, and was buried in the city of David his father; and Rehoboam his son reigned in his stead.
Solomon's reign began with a gift of wisdom no one else has ever received. It ends here in one sentence: death, burial, and a son on the throne. The verse records no repentance and no recovery, so commentators ask what forty years of such privilege produced, and what Solomon passed on.
The verse says two things, not one: Solomon "slept with his fathers," and he "was buried." Commenting on another king, one writer explains the difference:
The words "So Jehoiakim slept with his fathers" simply state that he died. In Scripture that is a different expression from "buried with his fathers," as a comparison of 2 Kings 15:38 and 16:20 easily shows.
Solomon's reign lasted as long as his father's. The comparison turns painful when you ask what each man passed down.
Solomon reigned the same length of time as did his father David — 40 years. Yet despite his great wisdom and the splendor of his kingdom, he did not leave his son a legacy nearly as valuable as the one David left him. David had left Solomon a true regard for the living God. Solomon did not follow his father's path of obedience to God. What kind of an example was this to Rehoboam? Why did Solomon not wisely consider that his days were numbered, just as David's had been? In Ecclesiastes 12 he wrote about how short life is. He ended by saying, "Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil." Why did he not take for himself the advice he gave to others?
Solomon is remembered worldwide for wisdom. That is precisely what makes his ending so pointed, and it puts every reader on notice.
Wherever people know the Bible, Solomon is famous for his exceptional wisdom. How sad that a man so deeply wise turned into a great fool. He wrote the Book of Ecclesiastes. In it he feared that his son might be a fool — as indeed he was — but he did not seem worried about himself. Well does the Apostle say, "Let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall."
The same lesson is drawn from the death notice itself:
But how solemn a lesson for us is the fact that the wisest man who ever lived made shipwreck of his personal life! May God preserve us from the pride of knowledge!
God's discipline reached Solomon near the end of his reign. One commentator watches how he answered it:
Solomon seeks to kill Jeroboam. Such are the feelings produced in his heart by this discipline! The obstacle God had raised up did not bring him bowed into God's presence, humbly submitting to the chastening. It only irritates him and drives him to try to free himself of it. How sad the heart that has lost its communion with God and that does not judge itself. What has Solomon, the king of righteousness, come to? His heart is no longer upright before God. How far he is from his beginnings!
The succession sounds orderly. It was not. Solomon's death released a division that has never been healed.
Then the nation will be one once more. They have been a divided people since the days of Rehoboam. Solomon's serious turning away from the Lord tore the nation apart after his death. God allowed Jeroboam to lead ten tribes away from their loyalty to the house of David. They have never been united since that day.
If everything rested on Solomon, his death would be the end of the story. Commentators point out that it never did rest on him — his life was the test case for a bigger question.
Solomon's greatness and his later fall answer an all-important question. God gave him the highest favour and dignity possible as a direct gift. Can a man hold himself in that position by his own strength? Let Solomon's fall answer. But was God's promise resting on Solomon's faithfulness? No. God's kingdom does not depend on Solomon's faithfulness. It rests on One greater than Solomon, Who will certainly establish it at the right and appointed time.
- Gift — God gave Solomon the highest position and honour possible as a direct gift. His life tests one question: can a man hold such a place by his own strength?
- Drift — The wisest man alive ended a fool. Knowledge did not protect him. The warning stands for anyone who thinks he is standing firm.
- Discipline — God raised up adversaries in the closing years. Solomon did not bow. He struck back at Jeroboam — the mark of a heart that had lost communion with God and would not judge itself.
- Legacy — David handed Solomon a true regard for God. Solomon handed Rehoboam an example of disobedience. He preached "fear God and keep his commandments" and did not take his own advice.
- Grace — His death split the nation, and it has stayed split. Yet God's promise never depended on his faithfulness. It rests on One greater than Solomon, Who will establish the kingdom at the appointed time.