For when one says, *I* am of Paul, and another, *I* of Apollos, are ye not men?
The Corinthians were not divided over doctrine but over preachers, and Paul treats their slogans as a symptom of something wrong in them. Why does favouring one teacher over another prove an unspiritual state, and what were these believers losing by it?
Paul does not ask about their knowledge or their gifts. He looks at how they talk about their teachers. One writer explains what "walking as men" means here:
They were not spiritual but carnal (3:1). How could Paul tell? It was very simple: 'Are you not carnal, and walk as men?' (3:3). Don't we all have to walk as men? Not in the sense the words are used here. Walking as men means living without reference to God and His wisdom and teaching, with the flesh unjudged. This was the deeper reason for the party spirit and contention among them.
Translations differ at the end of this verse. Some read "are you not carnal?" Others read "are you not men?" The ESV has "are you not being merely human?" One writer sharpens the point: the reproof is not that they behaved like bad men, but that they behaved like men at all.
The apostle rebukes them for walking not merely as bad men, but "according to man." They lined up under their new favourites, forgetting Christ and abusing their own mercies received through His servants. "Are you not men?" he says, protesting in anger against such a state of things. They were saints and ought to walk as such.
The problem was not that they listened to Paul or Apollos. It was that they accepted a teaching because of who said it:
These Corinthian saints fed this spirit of rivalry. They attached themselves to certain gifted teachers. They followed them closely and accepted all they said — not always because it was the truth according to the word of God, but because a favourite teacher had said it. Each one then defended his favourite teacher, and that led to strife, and strife to divisions. Two evils followed: one was sectarianism, which set aside the truth of the church, the other clericalism, which set aside Christ as the Head of the church.
The habit was not new to them. They carried the party ways of the schools of men into the church, and only changed the names:
Rivalry and strife were works of the flesh, not fruits of the Spirit. Their existence among them showed how little they walked in self-judgment. It was the party work they were used to in the schools of men. Certainly party zeal for Paul or Apollos was no better than for Plato or Aristotle.
One writer traces how the rivalry spreads from one person to the next:
The evidence of their fleshliness was in their rivalry, strife, and factions. The spirit of rivalry is so contrary to Him who, though He is Himself the Highest, has come among us "gentle and lowly in heart." And of course, when one person makes a fleshly effort to reach a high place, it wakes the fleshly resentment of another. Strife follows, and it breaks the people of God into factions.
Those who took sides also robbed themselves:
They stood in the way of their own spiritual growth by encouraging the forming of parties. They also robbed themselves of the value and profit of gifts the Lord had given for building up. If we take up only one line of teaching and follow only one teacher, we lose the benefit we might get from the other gifts given to men.
The remedy is not fewer teachers, but room for all of them:
There are different kinds of workmen, and different lines of truth. It is our happy privilege, and indeed our holy duty, to recognise and rejoice in them all. To be puffed up for one against another is to be "carnal and walk as men." To run down any of Christ's servants is to run down the truth he carries, and to forsake our own mercies.
- Symptom — The slogans are Paul's evidence, not his subject. How believers talk about their teachers shows whether the flesh is judged.
- Diagnosis — "Walking as men" means acting without reference to God and His wisdom, with the flesh left unjudged. The shame is that saints were living on that level at all.
- Root — Rivalry is the opposite of the One who came gentle and lowly. One person's push for a high place stirs another's resentment, and factions follow.
- Damage — Following only one favourite teacher stunts growth and robs you of gifts the Lord gave for building up. Two evils grow from it: sectarianism and clericalism.
- Cure — Recognise and rejoice in every workman and every line of truth. Running one down means losing the truth he carries and forsaking your own mercies.
Who then is Apollos, and who Paul? Ministering servants, through whom ye have believed, and as the Lord has given to each.
The Corinthians had lined up behind their favourite preachers. Paul does not defend his own standing. He asks what he and Apollos really are. His answer — servants, and only what the Lord gave them — changes how we think about gifted people in the church.
Paul did not name the men the Corinthians were following. He used his own name and Apollos's instead.
The apostle was grieved to the heart over the state of things in Corinth. The Spirit led him to rebuke the saints there. Their self-will and their foolish personal preferences were destroying their unity. To be able to speak more plainly, and even vehemently, he transferred these things in a figure to himself and to Apollos. He could not well ask, "Who is this leader or that?" — people would charge him with envy. But he could ask, "Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom you believed?" and stir up no opposition.
The problem goes deeper than admiring the wrong man. Boasting in any man grows from the same root as self-importance.
Boasting in men, however blessed they may be, belongs to the flesh, just as much as self-assertion does. Both are shoots off the same tree. Some men are set up as heads of schools. How could they accept such a false position, for themselves or for their followers, if their eye is single to Christ? And if it is not, can they be trusted?
Paul answers with a word of service, not of rank. It takes back the position the Corinthians had given these men.
First, the Apostle asks, "Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos?" The Corinthian assembly had been lifting these gifted men into the false position of party leaders. Yet they were, after all, only "ministering servants" by whom the Corinthians had believed.
This does not sideline the servant. It puts the honour where it belongs and puts the message to the test.
When someone sends a messenger with a message, it is most unfitting to give the messenger a place of high honour. Respect him for his message, and weigh his message with care. Do not give him the honour that belongs only to his master. Check his message closely: is it simply and only the word of the master, faithfully given?
Paul says the Corinthians believed through these men. Their faith came by these servants, but it rests somewhere else. That one word separates two kinds of ministry.
This true-hearted faithful servant of Christ sought only to bring the souls of his hearers into direct personal contact with God Himself. He did not seek to link them to Paul. "Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom you believed." The aim of all false ministry is to attach souls to itself. So the minister is exalted, God is shut out, and the soul has no divine foundation to rest on. True ministry, as seen in Paul and Moses, has one blessed aim: to attach the soul to God. Then the minister gets his true place — simply an instrument; God is exalted; and the soul is settled on a sure foundation that can never be moved.
Paul does not flatten the servants into sameness. He traces the difference back to the Giver. That leaves no ground for comparison.
Was there no difference, then, between Paul and Apollos? As the Lord gave to each. What room is there for boasting about men? Why not boast in the Lord who gave to each? They had thought little about this. Grace unites. Flesh divides and scatters — flesh taken up with this man or that, sometimes, as here, unable to find anything except in its favourites... The fact is that the Lord gives in different ways, nothing that is not good for building up, nothing in vain. It is not His way to form a class of labourers all alike, but to work differently through each one.
A gift from the Lord is not the same as the natural ability of the person who carries it.
Notice the difference between the spiritual gift and the natural capacity of the person... The gifts differed in measure (compare 1 Cor. 3:5), and they were related to natural capacity. For instance, where the Lord makes a man an evangelist, he will be able to address an audience and not have to write out his sermon. But no cultivating of natural ability could turn it into a gift from Christ.
- Servants, not centres. Corinth made its teachers into party leaders. They were only servants through whom people believed.
- Given, not achieved. Each man had only what the Lord assigned to him. No amount of training turns natural ability into a gift from Christ.
- Through, not in. Faith came by their preaching, but it rests on God. Ministry that ties souls to itself leaves them with no foundation.
- Difference without rivalry. The Lord works through each servant in a different way. Ranking favourites throws away the variety He gave.
- Honour the message. Respect the messenger for his message. Test whether it is his Master's word. Keep for the Master the honour that is His alone.
*I* have planted; Apollos watered; but God has given the increase.
Corinth had split into rival groups, each named after a favourite preacher. Paul answers with a picture from farming: one man plants, another waters, and neither can make anything live. So what is a servant worth, and who produces the result?
(Older translations say "gave the increase" where the ESV says "gave the growth." The quotes below use the older wording.)
Paul is not giving a gentle lesson on teamwork. He is pulling down the habit of gathering a following around a man.
Boasting in men, however blessed those men may be, comes from the flesh, just as much as pushing yourself forward does. The two are branches of the same tree. How could men who are set up as heads of schools accept such a false position, for themselves or for their followers, if their eye is truly fixed on Christ alone? And if it is not, can they be trusted? … Grace unites. Flesh divides and scatters.
The verse uses two verbs, not one. Planting and watering are different jobs.
Third, not all of these servants had the same service. In a field, one man plants and another tends the plants, but God alone can make the plants grow. So in the Lord's service, God may use Paul to win converts and Apollos to care for the converts, but God alone can give life and spiritual growth.
The word "but" in the verse is a hard stop. You can measure effort and skill. No one can manufacture the result.
God does His own work. He chooses and equips His workers as He wills. If Paul plants or Apollos waters, the work of both is in the power of the One who has given to each, and the increase comes from His sovereign will. So boasting has no place in the work of ministry, just as it has no place in the faith that justifies a sinner. Neither the planter nor the waterer is anything, for both might labour and the result be a blight instead of a blessing.
If God gives the growth, then serving Him is an honour that carries no credit.
We must always keep in mind that God is the doer of the works done on the earth. If He is pleased to use us, let us never forget that we are only instruments, as helpless and powerless as a poker. No doubt we have enjoyment in the work; but we are not dealing now with the question of enjoyment, but of ability. If any real work is done, God is the doer of it. To Him be all the glory.
This is why Paul answers a question about himself by disappearing from it.
Paul hides himself. He had received great revelations from the Lord, and he had a wide range of knowledge. Yet the moment he sees the spirit of setting Paul up creeping in, he says, "Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom you believed, even as the Lord gave to every man? I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase." … If he had put himself forward, Christ would not have been seen.
The Corinthians set Paul and Apollos against each other. The verse has them working the same field, one after the other.
Paul's founding of the church at Corinth certainly involved hard work and struggle. Apollos would not have watered it with the refreshing ministry of the Word without serious spiritual effort. But they were both servants of one Master. They were united in their labours, not rivals, as the factions at Corinth would make them. And the Corinthians were not told to reward them according to their own estimate of their value. God would do this, according to their labour, after their labour was finished.
A farmer who leaves the growth to God must also accept God's timing.
Let us cast the seed into the ground and leave the increase to God, who alone can give it. Like the farmer, let us wait patiently for the early rain and the latter rain. It is no use poking the seed with a revival stick. The word of God will never take root that way.
- Plant — Paul's labour was real. The verse never belittles the work, only the claim attached to it.
- Water — Apollos did a different job on the same field. That makes the two men colleagues in turn, not rivals to rank.
- But — one small word breaks the chain. Both men could labour and still get a blight, because growth is not in the worker's hands.
- God — He chooses His servants, equips them, and gives the increase. So boasting has no place in ministry, and none in the faith that justifies.
- Increase — the harvest is His to give and the reward His to judge. That frees the worker to wait, and to stay out of sight so that Christ is seen.
So that neither the planter is anything, nor the waterer; but God the giver of the increase.
Paul has just called himself and Apollos farmhands in a field, and now he gives the result: the workers are nothing, and God is everything. Behind it lies a crisis at Corinth, where believers were forming fan clubs around their favourite preachers. (The quotations below say "increase" where the ESV says "growth.")
Paul is not being modest for its own sake. He is treating a sickness in the church. Believers had grouped themselves around their favourite teachers.
Paul found it unbearable — a heartbreaking sorrow, we might say — that a servant's name should come between the Lord and His people. It did not matter how distinguished that servant was.
What drew them to these men was talent, and that was the mistake.
They were captivated by the brilliant mind of this one, or the flowing eloquence of that one, or the pushing energy of a third. They should have seen them simply as "ministers" or "servants." These men did have different qualities and different gifts, but even these came "as the Lord gave to every man" (1 Cor. 3:5). So instead of glorifying the Lord who had gifted and enabled them, they glorified the servants, who were only instruments or vessels...
The word "nothing" is not an insult to the labourer. It measures him against the one thing he cannot do.
If God gives the increase, then the servants count for very little by comparison. Yet the Corinthians had been lifting them out of their place. Without God they were nothing and their service useless.
Faith leaves a sinner nothing to boast about, and the same holds for the preacher and his work.
God does His own work. He chooses and equips His agents at His will. If Paul plants or Apollos waters, both work by the power of Him who has given to each. The increase comes from His sovereign will. So boasting has no place in the true work of the ministry, just as it has no place in the faith that justifies a sinner. Neither the planter nor the waterer is anything. Both might labour, and the result be a blight instead of a blessing. Only God, who commands the increase, is anything.
Ask who deserves the praise when a job is done with a tool.
Who thinks of praising the poker? Who would say, "My, what a marvellous poker!" It is not the lifeless poker but the living hand that does the work. True, the hand uses the poker; but the poker is useless without the hand.
If God alone gives growth, no technique or pressure can force results.
What can the sower do to make the corn grow while he sleeps? The seed grows, but "he does not know how." I wish that all workers in the gospel paid more attention to passages like 1 Cor. 3 and Mark 4. Let us cast the seed into the ground and leave the increase to God, who alone can give it. Like the farmer, let us wait patiently for the early rain and the latter rain. It is no use poking the seed with a revival stick. The word of God will never take root that way.
Being "nothing" does not cancel the worker's labour. It only moves the judgment of it out of human hands.
Though the servants are one, "each shall receive his own reward according to his own labour." The reward will not match the position man may have given the servant. It will not match man's thoughts about his service either. It will match God's estimate of his labours.
Because the increase belongs to God, so do the workers. No party can claim them.
Whoever the servants may be, they belong to God in direct responsibility. In this sense they are not the church's, and still less a party's... They are God's fellow-labourers. He gave them, they do His work, they answer to Him in everything, and in the end they give Him an account.
- Cause. Divisions at Corinth grew from admiring gifted men rather than the Lord who gifted them.
- Cure. Paul reduces himself and Apollos to nothing. No servant's name may stand between the Lord and His people.
- Reason. Planting and watering are real work. But life is not in the worker's hands: he may labour and still get a blight instead of a blessing.
- Practice. Sow the seed and leave the growth to God — pressure and technique cannot make the word take root.
- Result. The worker is nothing in himself. Yet he is God's fellow-labourer, answerable to Him and rewarded by God's estimate, not man's.
But the planter and the waterer are one; but each shall receive his own reward according to his own labour.
At Corinth, some made Paul the head of a party and set up Apollos as his rival. Paul answers by placing the two men side by side as workers on one field. Then he says who fixes their pay, and how.
Corinth turned gifted men into favourites. This verse takes that rivalry apart.
Though their work differs, the servants "are one". By making them leaders of parties, the Corinthian assembly was setting them against one another. But neither can do without the other. However varied the gifts, as servants they are one.
Older translations sharpen the phrase: not just "one", but "one thing".
"He who plants and he who waters are one thing." Here he puts ministry, or ministers, together as "one thing." The result is that God alone matters.
The Corinthians were busy ranking their teachers. Paul takes that job out of their hands.
They were united in their work, not rivals, as the factions in Corinth would make them. And no one told the Corinthians to reward them by their own estimate of their value. God would do that, according to their labour, once their labour was finished.
That raises a second question: what does God measure?
Though they are one as servants, "each shall receive his own reward according to his own labour". The reward will not match the position people gave the servant. It will not match what people thought of his service. It will match God's estimate of his work.
Being "one" does not blur the workers into a crowd. Older translations read "his own reward according to his own labour", and that little word own guards the person.
Neither one counts for anything in himself. Both are one in the source of their shared ministry. Yet each keeps his own individuality, both in his responsibility and in his reward. Notice how clearly the apostle states the settled, unbreakable link between service and reward. From Jesus down, this principle holds… The work and its reward will match each other. Each worker will receive according to his own toil.
If rewards differ, are some believers more accepted than others? Commentators answer by separating two things that people mix up.
As for acceptance, we are in Christ, all accepted alike — all to be conformed to the image of the Son — all having Christ for our righteousness. Paul cannot have a more perfect righteousness or a higher glory. But besides this, saints have the privilege of service. They are the vessels of God's love to others… By grace we do receive the reward of labour, and every man his own reward according to his own labour… In short, righteousness is in Christ, the same for all; God rewards service.
Where does that difference show? Writers point to the coming kingdom.
In the kingdom, as we are taught in the parable (Luke 19), one is to have authority over ten cities, another over five. But the Father's house stands far above such differences, and all His children share it with Christ alike. It answers, not to their services, but to His redemption, His infinite love and His glory.
Reward can ruin service if it becomes the reason for serving. Yet it still has a place.
Pay never drives the service of love. God does not put reward before the soul as the motive for doing anything. But when we meet difficulties on the path of service, He sets the crown before us to encourage us to keep going.
- One. Paul sets planter and waterer together as one thing. Rivalry between servants has nothing left to feed on, and God alone matters.
- Own. Being one does not erase the person. Each keeps his own responsibility and his own reward, matched to his own toil.
- God's estimate. What people thought of a servant fixes nothing. God weighs the labour itself, and His estimate sets the reward.
- Grace, then service. Every believer has the same righteousness in Christ. Service is what God rewards — one servant over ten cities, another over five.
- A crown, not a wage. Reward is never the reason to serve. God holds out the crown to keep the servant going when the path gets hard.
For we are God's fellow-workmen; ye are God's husbandry, God's building.
Paul is writing to a church splitting into fan clubs around its teachers — some for Paul, some for Apollos. Verse 9 answers the whole quarrel with three claims of ownership. The workers belong to God. So do the field and the house they work on.
The stress in the first clause does not fall on the workers but on whose they are. One writer weighs what that one word means for the workers and for Corinthian pride:
How cheering this is to the despised but faithful, self-denying and gracious workers! How humbling to Corinthian vanity! It never took into account the one principle the Spirit gives here for the divine and lasting reward. "For we are God's fellow workers. You are God's field, God's building." Whoever the servants may be, they are directly responsible to God — not, in this sense, to the church, and still less to a party. They are God's fellow workers. He gave them, they do His work, and they answer to Him in everything. In the end they must give Him an account. The emphasis rests on "God's."
Commentators differ on how to read the phrase. Some take it to mean workmen who belong to God and serve under Him. They warn against the older rendering, "labourers together with God":
We are not fellow-workers with God, but under Him. We are His fellow-workers, but in entire subjection to Him, in no way on a level with Him. The wording in the Authorised and Revised Versions of 1 Cor. 3:9 and 2 Cor. 6:1 is ambiguous and dangerous. Many have read it as putting God and His servants on the same level. Read that way, it is evil and presumptuous.
Others read it as a real partnership, and find nothing improper in it:
God's only reward is the doing of His will. The Spirit of adoption leads the feet of God's true children in the steps of Jesus, and so makes them co-workers with Him in His work. It is a wonderful thing to say, but it fits the character of our calling perfectly; for through redemption God calls us into the fellowship of His own Son.
Both pictures in the verse had two men attached to them, and each man had his own task:
Each, however, had his own distinctive work. In the field, Paul planted and Apollos followed to water the young plants. In the building, Paul was the wise architect who laid the foundation, and Apollos built on it. Their work was different, but their aim was one... So God keeps both unity and variety among His servants, and no one is to be set against another.
The two images are not repetition. One writer draws out what each picture is for, and what follows for anyone tempted to wear a party label:
They are "God's field" and "God's building". The first picture is a field, where there is fruit, or increase, for God. The second is a temple, where the Spirit of God lives and where there is light for people... The truth Paul used to meet and condemn divisions in those early days still condemns the divisions of Christendom today. If we realise that we belong to God, that we are "God's field" and "God's building", we will refuse to be called by any party name.
If the church is God's building, the next verses ask the obvious question: who builds, and with what?
Building pictures the raising up of a spiritual house for God, and Christ is its Builder... Others build too, but only as His instruments. Paul calls himself "a wise master builder", or better, "architect", because he laid the foundation of the church well, and that foundation is Christ. The workers are warned about the material they use in building a house for God. Unsuitable materials will not stand the test of fire. Then the builders suffer loss: they see their work burned up and lose their reward.
Everything in the verse is God's. So the servant's account is with Him, and both flattery and blame lose their hold:
If it is a question of tillage — it is God's field; or if it is a building, it is God's building — God's temple... This principle makes you independent of everybody. It clears you of every influence but one: "I have to do with God. I must answer to God." It makes no difference whether people praise me or criticise me.
- God's workers. The servants are not rivals or party leaders. They belong to God, He gave them, and they answer to Him.
- God's field. The saints are His field, and what He looks for from it is fruit — increase for Himself.
- God's building. The same people are His house, where His Spirit lives and light shines out for others to see.
- God's materials. Everyone who builds on the one foundation answers for what he uses. Fire will test it, and poor work loses its reward.
- God's verdict. Because all three are His, His workers wear no name but His, and no praise or blame from people needs to weigh with them.
According to the grace of God which has been given to me, as a wise architect, I have laid the foundation, but another builds upon it. But let each see how he builds upon it.
Paul pictures the church as a building. He laid its foundation, others are working on top of it, and two questions follow: what is that foundation, and what makes one worker's building stand while another's fails?
Paul could have pressed his apostolic office here. Instead he traces his work back to a gift, and one commentator sees a lost instinct in that choice.
Even the apostle loved to tie his work and his office to the grace of God rather than to bare authority. That instinct has so faded from Christendom that ministry has become a merely human thing and has even taken on a worldly character. The loss to the church is beyond words, and the dishonour to the Lord is most serious... Here we have the responsibility of the one who ministers. The apostle's place stands, but so does responsible service, and that is a serious thing.
The title he does take — older translations say "wise master builder" — is closer to our word architect:
Others are builders too, but only as instruments. Paul calls himself a "wise master builder," or better, an "architect," because he laid the foundation of the assembly well. That foundation is Christ.
Paul did not lay stone. He preached a Person, and everything built later must match Him.
Jesus Christ must be the foundation. If He is not, then what is built is not the assembly of God... The foundation is the teaching that believers have received into their hearts. When Paul first came to Corinth he preached "Jesus Christ and Him crucified." That was the foundation, and every other part of the building should take its character from it.
No later worker can lay that foundation again:
In the same way today, whoever the workmen may be, no one can lay any foundation but Jesus Christ. The Lord said, "on this rock I will build my church." For his part, the apostle Paul did this same work as a wise master builder. He laid that same foundation, so no one has the right to lay another.
There is a building Christ Himself is raising. There is also one He hands to men, and this verse deals with the second.
Paul, as a wise master builder, laid the foundation. When others build, he warns them not to build with wrong materials — wood, hay, straw — which will be destroyed. The building work was put into man's hands as a responsibility, and so it came under judgment. "On this rock I will build my church" gives me Christ's building, and that is still going on; it is not finished yet... All that is Christ's work, what men call the invisible church, and so it is. But on the other hand, "let each one take care how he builds upon it" — that is, on the foundation Paul laid. There you have man's work as a responsible instrument.
Another writer weighs the two kinds of work against each other.
The work of Christ in building His Church must be perfect... But, as this passage in 1 Corinthians teaches, He also entrusts the work of building to His servants, and He holds them responsible for the character of their work.
Paul's warning here is about the way a man builds. One writer traces that back to the foundation.
Each builder must keep the character of the foundation in mind. It should control how he builds and also what materials he uses. In verse 10 the Apostle stresses how we build; in verse 12 it is what we build. The builders' motives must fit Christ, and so must the methods and principles that guide them.
The Corinthians had strong opinions about their teachers. Those opinions had the values the wrong way round.
Builders may raise very different material on that foundation. Some of it is precious, like the great, costly stones of the temple. Some of it is worthless and vile. And here man's judgment fails. No doubt many a believer at Corinth had prized the hay and straw of human wisdom and looked down on the gold and silver of apostolic truth. So there is need of another day, and of the Lord's own discernment.
- Grace — Paul traces his whole office to a gift, not to status. Service is a responsibility, not a rank.
- Foundation — Laying it meant preaching Christ crucified. That work is done, so no one may lay another.
- Handed over — What Christ builds cannot fail. What He entrusts to servants can, and this verse deals with that work.
- Manner — Verse 10 asks how you build, verse 12 asks what. The foundation should govern your motives and your materials.
- Tested — Corinth rated human wisdom above apostolic truth. So the work waits for another day, and for the Lord's own judgment of it.
For other foundation can no man lay besides that which [is] laid, which is Jesus Christ.
Paul is writing about God's building at Corinth. The verse names its one foundation, limits what every later worker can do, and raises a hard question about anyone who builds on something else.
Paul can be called a founder of the church at Corinth. In what sense is that true?
It is only in a secondary and relative sense that the apostle can call himself a founder... God's building rests on one eternal truth: the person of Christ. He is now "declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead." That truth is essential and life-giving. Receiving it by faith sets the believer in his place as a stone of God's building.
Christ is the foundation. Writers also speak of it as the message about Him, received into the heart. So what did Paul lay at Corinth?
Jesus Christ must be the foundation, otherwise what is built is not the church of God. There are many other kinds of institutions in this world... but only what rests on the foundation of Jesus Christ is God's church. The foundation is the doctrine received into the hearts of those who have believed, and when Paul first came to Corinth he preached "Jesus Christ and him crucified." That was the foundation, and every other part of the building should take its character from it.
The words rule out every rival, Peter included. One writer tests that claim and answers it for his own soul.
As to Peter being the foundation, except as a mighty instrument in God's hands, I do not believe it for a moment, because Paul says, "no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ."... I could not trust my soul to any foundation but Christ. None has died for me but He. None is the truth but He... Besides, if Peter was the foundation, how can the pope be so now? The foundation of the church cannot be laid now.
The same rule reaches into personal religion. Put anything beside Christ, and God counts it dishonour, not help.
Are you thoroughly satisfied with God's foundation? Or are you trying to add something of your own? Your own works, your prayers, your church rituals, your vows and resolutions, your religious duties? If so, if you are trying to add the smallest bit to God's Christ, you may be sure you will be put to shame. God will not allow such dishonour to be offered to His tested, chosen, precious cornerstone... He is enough for God, and He may well be enough for us.
Whatever happens to the work built above it, the base itself is not at risk, because God laid it.
That foundation must be divine, the work of God's Holy Spirit. Thank God for that. We begin with an unchangeable, eternal foundation. The work in the soul of the believer must be on the basis of the work accomplished at Calvary for God's glory and our eternal salvation. That foundation can never, thank God, be destroyed.
A safe foundation is no licence for careless work on top of it. One writer separates two buildings that share it.
The house that Christ builds in grace is permanent and eternal. What man builds in responsibility is another thing altogether. The one is unfailing, the other utterly failing, and so it will be judged... Paul laid the true foundation; no other could be laid. Other builders might build "gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw." Fire would test everything. Whether the work lasted depended on the materials. The teaching of the servants brought in souls according to its own character.
- Laid — God has already laid the foundation. Paul is a founder only in a secondary sense, and no one lays it again today.
- Christ — Paul preached Christ crucified, the Son of God declared by resurrection. Every later stone must match Him.
- Only — nothing may stand beside Christ. Not an apostle, not the pope, not your own works and religious duties.
- Safe — the foundation is divine, the work of God's Spirit, and it can never be destroyed. Everything in the believer rests on what Christ accomplished at Calvary.
- Tested — what men build on it is another matter. Teaching is the material and fire is the test. Souls take the character of the doctrine they receive.
Now if any one build upon [this] foundation, gold, silver, precious stones, wood, grass, straw,
Paul has just said that Christ alone is the foundation and that no one can lay another. The question that now follows is not what a servant stands on, but what he adds — and whether it will survive the fire.
Where Christ builds, the work cannot fail. Where men build, it can.
But in 1 Corinthians 3 we have human builders, and a temple or building which is then in existence. As a wise master-builder, Paul had laid the foundation; the work was well done; but here man's responsibility comes in. Every man must take care how he builds on it. A builder may put wood, hay, or straw into the building. Then the work comes to nothing, though the builder himself is saved — saved only as through fire. A third case is also mentioned: the man who corrupts the temple of God, and God will destroy him… Now in all this we have a temple whose state depends on builders or corrupters. Man's responsibility comes into it, and the state of things depends on his faithfulness. So the building may be built badly, or corrupted. This cannot be where Christ builds.
So what is this building actually made of?
The foundation, as he says, is Christ — the truth about Him which the first inspired teacher communicated. All later building is by teaching. That teaching shapes and forms everyone who accepts it. So building and building people up are the same thing — in the original, the same word. The care was to be about the material used: "gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw" (v. 12). So these materials refer first of all to doctrines.
What makes gold, silver and precious stones the right material?
Gold, silver, and precious stones will survive the fire. In fact the fire will make them shine more brightly. The gold speaks of the glory of God. What has been done for His glory will receive a reward. Silver speaks of the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. What has been done out of appreciation for His sacrifice will receive a reward. Precious stones speak of the fruit of the Spirit reflected in the believer, and this too will receive a reward.
Bad material is not just a bad idea. It shows up as people.
It is putting wood, hay, or straw on the foundation instead of gold, silver, or precious stones. That is, it is bringing souls into the assembly of God who have no divine life. This can happen in two ways. The first is the preaching of false doctrines. Such doctrines overturn the truths of Christianity. They set aside, for example, the need for the new birth, or the need for cleansing by the precious blood of Christ. Teaching like that brings natural men into the Church — men who do not have the Spirit of God. The second way is openly bringing into the assembly people who are not saved through faith in the Lord Jesus.
Paul names three good materials and three worthless ones rather than simply "good" and "bad."
A man may teach sound doctrine, or he may teach what is worthless. And the images used — "gold, silver, precious stones" — suggest that the doctrines taught differ in value. In the same way, "wood, hay, straw" suggests that some errors are worse than others.
But who decides what is precious and what is worthless? Not us.
Men may build very different material on that foundation. Some of it is precious, like the great and costly stones of the temple. Some of it is worthless and vile. And here man's judgment is at fault. No doubt many a Corinthian believer had prized the hay and straw of man's wisdom, and looked down on the gold and silver of apostolic truth. So we need another day, and the Lord's discernment.
Size is a poor guide too.
Gold, silver, and precious stones do not make nearly as great a show as wood, hay, or straw. What a great pile of hay we may gather, boasting of how much we have done! But what anguish of heart when the fire tests it and it all burns up.
- Foundation. Christ is the foundation, and no one can replace Him. This verse asks the next question: what does each worker build on Him?
- Material. You build by teaching, so the six materials stand first of all for doctrine. Within each set there are degrees: some truths are more precious, and some errors are worse.
- Souls. Teaching shapes people. So worthless material shows up as souls brought into God's assembly who have no divine life.
- Judgment. Our own verdict fails. The Corinthians prized man's wisdom and slighted apostolic truth. That is why the Lord's day of discernment must come.
- Warning. The cheap materials make the bigger show and the larger pile, and the fire is what settles the difference.
the work of each shall be made manifest; for the day shall declare [it], because it is revealed in fire; and the fire shall try the work of each what it is.
Paul writes here about builders working on a foundation already laid. A day is coming that will show what each builder produced, and the test will be fire.
The word "day" here does not mean the future in general. Commentators tie it to the moment Christ is revealed, and they call its character judicial.
The "day" (v. 13) always has to do with judgment. It is the day that tries the work; it is simply and entirely judgment. The day will be revealed in fire, and that fire will test people's work. No doubt this will happen when Christ is revealed... The work might be tested any day. But when that day comes, God will bring to light the purposes of their hearts, for they are stewards of the mystery of Christ.
Fire destroys whatever only looked solid. That includes teaching that holds people together for a while.
The day of trial will test the work of each one... Anything built with wood, hay or stubble will not stand the fire of judgment. Souls may be held together for a time with false doctrine, as we see on every hand in Christendom, but such work will not stand the fire.
Paul later says that being judged by others is a very small thing to him. One writer links that to this verse.
In 1 Corinthians 3:13 he had told us that "each one's work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it." Here we have THE DAY when God's opinion will be heard. This is MAN'S DAY, when people insist on making their opinion heard. That day is completely against the Apostle and everyone who thinks like him. The opinion of "man's day" was a very small thing with Paul.
The verse asks what sort of work each one has done. That phrase decides what the fire measures.
At the judgment seat of Christ, the fire of infinite holiness will test everything. It will destroy all that was not the fruit of the Spirit. Notice, that "the fire will test what sort of work each one has done." It does not say "how much it is." The question is quality, not quantity. That day will destroy a vast amount of so-called Christian work, but all that has truly been for Christ will stand the test.
Every builder's work goes into the fire. The good work goes in too, and so does the apostle's own. This rules out reading the passage as a punishment or cleansing of the soul after death.
Rome has famously built one of its main proofs of purgatory on this passage. But that idea is itself a sample of the rubbish the apostle warns against... a day of sifting judgment is meant and not some intermediate state now after death. Fire is a picture of His judicial action, which burns up all dross. It is not punishment for the spirit or soul separated from the body, and it is not a process of purifying it... Besides, the fire tests the work of each one. It tests the apostle's work as surely as the work of his critics. Gold, silver, and precious stones go into the fire just as much as the material that burns.
The fire falls on what a believer built, not on the believer.
No doubt we will review our whole path here in the light of that judgment seat. All that has been of the flesh will be loss then... Fire signifies the trial of the judgment of God. "Our God is a consuming fire." "Everyone will be salted with fire." But this applies to the Christian's ways and work, not to the Christian himself.
If the day discloses it, today's verdicts cannot.
Whatever is "of faith" will both stand and be unerringly appreciated in the coming day. All that is not of faith, though acceptable in the eyes of men, will surely disappear before the face of Him who is as a consuming fire to the flesh. But until that day comes, no one can settle the quality of much that is done, day after day, in the name of the Lord Jesus and in the claimed interest of truth... Christian opinion is not fire; nor is popularity an unerring proof of worth.
- The Day judges. "The day" is not a date on a calendar. It is judgment itself, arriving when Christ is revealed, and it discloses the work, not the man.
- The Day silences man's day. Now is man's day, when everyone airs an opinion. Paul treated it as the smallest of matters, because a better verdict was coming.
- The Day tests sort, not size. The question is what kind of work it is, never how much of it there was.
- The Day burns work, not workers. Fire here pictures God's judicial action burning up dross. It is not punishment for the soul after death, and not a cleansing of it either.
- The Day, therefore, waits. Popularity proves nothing. Criticism settles nothing. Most Christian work waits for fire, not opinion, to declare what it is.
If the work of any one which he has built upon [the foundation] shall abide, he shall receive a reward.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
If the work of any one shall be consumed, he shall suffer loss, but *he* shall be saved, but so as through [the] fire.
Paul has just set Christ as the one foundation, and warned that fire will test what each servant builds on it. Verse 15 takes the worst case. The building burns down, yet the builder walks out alive. Two questions follow: what is lost, and what is the fire?
The material that burns is not a record of a believer's failures. One writer keeps the passage tied to its subject — teaching and labour:
In 1 Corinthians 3, the wood, hay and stubble are not sins. He is speaking of preaching and teaching. A man may be a real Christian on the foundation, and yet all his labour may be bad labour, because he taught nonsense and empty ideas — even if it was not heresy. When trial tests it, it all goes. He is not lost, but his work is, and he is badly shaken. Paul is speaking of his own work, or the work of Apollos or others — not of their sins.
This verse is the middle of three cases. Verses 14, 15 and 17 give three outcomes:
First, if a man's work survives, he will receive a reward (v. 14). The man is saved, and his work stands... Second, if a man's work is burned up, he will suffer loss, but he himself will be saved, only as through fire (v. 15). The man is saved, but his work is all lost. There is no reward. Suppose I have been busy building something up, and in the day of the Lord I find it was all a mistake. What loss I will suffer!... Third, if anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy him (v. 17). The man is lost, and his work is lost.
Some have long used this verse to argue for a place of cleansing after death. One writer answers that, and explains what the fire pictures:
It is well known that Rome has built on this passage one of its chief proofs of purgatory... But clearly the faithful in general and their ways are not in question here. Ministers and their teaching are. And the day meant is a day of sifting judgment, not some in-between state after death. Fire is the picture of God's judicial action, which burns up all the dross. It is not punishment for the spirit or soul on its own, and it is not a process of purifying it. "Saved, but only as through fire" marks how hard the escape is... Besides, God tests each man's work this way — the apostle's work as surely as the work of the men who ran him down. The fire tests gold, silver and precious stones no less than the material that burns... The real danger is bringing rubbish in where the true foundation is owned — not fundamental error or teaching against Christ, but airy notions and loose rules about practice, which the day of trial would expose and destroy.
One writer compares the builder to Lot, who escaped from Sodom as the city burned:
They will be saved, but only as through fire. Think of Lot, who escaped out of Sodom. His righteous soul was tormented there, and everything he had built up in Sodom burned. But a believer's salvation does not depend on his service and work.
Commentators differ over what "saved" means here. Some take it as final salvation. One writer draws a different line:
The believer is saved because the foundation under him cannot be destroyed. But how sad that so much of what filled his time should be destroyed in judgment, and that fire should be his salvation. The question here is not eternal salvation through the atoning work of the cross. It is salvation under God's government — rescue from the tangles that would keep the soul out of its inheritance.
Being saved and being rewarded are not the same thing:
The work of some stands, and they receive a reward straight from the hand of the Lord who was once pierced for their sins at Calvary. Others will see their work burned up. They "suffer loss," which means they lose the promised crown. They are saved, but only as through fire. They just get into heaven, and that is all. There is no rich welcome for them. It was the rock under their feet that saved them.
People misuse this verse in two ways. Some blunt its edge. Others turn it into a threat against a believer's confidence:
We should seek to make a holy use of these verses by keeping pressure on our nature in all its vanities, lusts and tempers. That is how the Lord meant us to use them. He never meant us to use them in a legal way, to shake our confidence in Christ and His full salvation... The deepest sense of grace, and the clearest grasp of our perfect justification as sinners, will never weaken our sense of how solemn the judgment seat of Christ is.
- Foundation — The man stands because Christ is under him, not because his building held. The rock under his feet saved him.
- Fire — It is God's judicial action in a coming day of sifting. It tests every servant's work alike. It is not a punishment or a cleansing of the soul after death.
- Work — What burns is bad building, not sins. It is worthless teaching and empty labour.
- Loss — He keeps salvation and loses the reward; he gets in, and that is all.
- Response — The right use is watchfulness now, never a weakened confidence in Christ.
Do ye not know that ye are [the] temple of God, and [that] the Spirit of God dwells in you?
The Corinthians were lining up behind favourite teachers. Paul answers with a question about something they already knew but had stopped weighing: God has a dwelling on earth, and they are it.
Paul does not introduce a new doctrine here. He recalls a fact the Corinthians knew but had let go flat, and one writer turns the same question back on the reader.
The apostle now appeals to the Corinthians, briefly but with energy, about the character of this building he has been speaking of. He is not announcing a new truth to them. It was something very well known, which they still did not value as they should. What a marvel of divine grace that they should be indwelt by the Spirit of God! We know it as a doctrine just as well as they did. Has the wonder of it grown less with us? Do we need to be urged about our responsibility in view of this relationship to the Supreme?
A temple is not made by its materials but by the One who lives in it. On that basis God has a house on earth now, made up of believers together and not of each one on his own.
So God has His temple on earth now as surely as He had of old in Israel… It was always the presence of God that made God's temple. Its true glory was not the costly stones, nor the splendour of gold or silver. It was the cloud in which the LORD was pleased to come down… So now it is not just that there are Christians. God has His house, or temple. It is the assembly. Not the people taken one by one, but those built together for that purpose by the Spirit… The Spirit does dwell in each believer, but that is another truth… How solemn that a divine Person, the Holy Spirit, dwells where Christians are — and this because of redemption!
If the Spirit lives in this house, what is His part in it?
The Holy Spirit is not in an assembly as God's house or dwelling. He is in the assembly… The assembly is as much the house, or temple, of God as it is the body… And if the Holy Spirit dwells in that dwelling place, is He to do nothing there, or to direct everything?
The same truth settles the rivalry over teachers. In a house that belongs to God, no name can head a party.
Where He dwells, God is necessarily everything. His dwelling is holy. All His name and nature are displayed there. Man may not put his folly on show there. There is no room for rival schools and religious pride. Who is Paul? Who is Apollos? Glory itself belongs to that temple.
The holiness of this temple is not a report on how the Corinthians were living. It comes from the One who lives there, and that is what makes right living possible.
The apostle is not speaking of practical holiness here. He means the holiness that comes from the Spirit dwelling in them. And that indwelling is the power of practical holiness. He presses the responsibility of those who act in arrogant defiance of Him. In grace He has taken this place of relationship with the redeemed people of God.
Paul writes in the present. It was already true of them as they were. That is why the words both search us and lift us.
And notice, these words describe not what the church will be by and by, but what it is now. How loudly such facts call for holiness of heart and life! They call for "truth in the inward being," and for conformity to His will in everything! Could anything be more solemn, and yet could anything be more blessed? To have a place there, to be at home with God in His holy temple, to live where "God's Spirit dwells" — that is our highest dignity and richest blessing on earth.
- Known — Paul appeals to a fact they already had; the danger is not ignorance but a wonder that has worn thin.
- Occupied — Presence makes a temple, not materials. The Spirit dwells where Christians are, and He dwells there because of redemption.
- Collective — The Spirit lives in each believer. This verse speaks of believers built together. Both truths stand, and in that house He is there to direct.
- Undivided — Where God is everything, rival parties and boasting in men have no place. Who is Paul? Who is Apollos?
- Holy — The holiness comes from the Guest, and that same indwelling is the power for holy living now, not later.
If any one corrupt the temple of God, *him* shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, and such are *ye*.
These words are a warning to a whole church. Paul has just called the Christians at Corinth God's temple, the place where His Spirit lives. Two questions follow. What does it mean to "destroy" this temple, and who is the person God threatens?
The address is plural. One writer shows which of the two Greek words for "temple" Paul chose.
Two thoughts go with the House of God: approach and display. We see the first in the Tabernacle and the second in the Temple of Solomon. As far as we know, the term "House of God" is never used of any local company of saints, but the temple is, as we have it here. It views the saints in Corinth as the shrine from which God showed Himself. The New Testament uses two words for "temple", hieron and naos. The first takes in all the temple buildings; the second only the sanctuary or inner shrine. It is naos here.
This is not only about Corinth:
Paul addressed this to the saints at Corinth as a body. What was true of the saints at Corinth is true of the local assembly in any city. The Holy Spirit is not only in each one who composes the assembly, but He dwells in the assembly as a company. It is this that makes it such a serious matter for anyone to defile the temple of God.
Older translations read "defile" in the first half of the verse and "destroy" in the second. One writer explains why the punishment fits the crime so exactly.
"Defile" and "destroy" in this verse are the same word and warn that God would repay with justice anyone who defiled this temple. Such a person would not have the knowledge of God. His presence in that company was spoiling the pure display of God's nature and character, either by bad doctrine or by bad practice. Take a person in that company who could only corrupt, by his teaching and his practice. God would corrupt him in the end. Such a one would be like a weed among the wheat.
One writer starts with a prior question: what makes this temple holy in the first place?
God's holiness attaches also to His temple... But what exactly does the apostle mean, and who takes on this guilt? To answer that, we must first ask another question: what makes the temple holy? Paul says, "you are God's temple." But how did they become that? The answer is, "through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth." God's temple is founded on His truth. So it is false teaching, above all, that defiles it. Moral debasement and corruption always follow false teaching, and they defile it too. Holiness can only live with truth.
Earlier in the chapter Paul writes about builders. This verse speaks of someone else. Commentators differ about where he stands. Some read him as an enemy from outside. Others read him as someone inside the company who does not know God.
Verse 17 however does not speak of a builder, but a destroyer, and therefore not a believer at all. Some people outside are willing to do Satan's work of destruction. Sometimes "fierce wolves" come in among the saints, meaning to destroy... This refers to an enemy. Even so, let the believer be careful not to look like a destroyer in the slightest way.
Is the sentence too harsh? One writer asks whether a holy God could act any other way.
There is the enemy at work, using men who bear the Lord's name, to corrupt or destroy. For God speaks of evil doctrine according to its own nature, if it works unhindered... Awful end! Could the holy God feel or act otherwise? It is useless to plead love; for in truth the blow of love, caring for the objects it loves, is beyond everything to be feared. He will surely destroy those whom Satan uses in this way, under whatever disguise, to pollute the very streams of life and blessing for souls.
The verse does not end with the destroyer. It ends with the readers: you are that holy temple.
God's dwelling-place holds this holy and exalted position. So it is clear that nothing unholy, in principle or in practice, must be tolerated. Everyone connected with it should feel the weight and seriousness of that word: "the place on which you are standing is holy ground."... Most weighty words these, for every member of God's assembly — for every stone in His holy temple!
- Temple — Paul's word means the inner sanctuary. He uses it of a group, not of one person. The local assembly is the shrine from which God shows Himself.
- Truth — that sanctuary rests on God's truth. So false teaching defiles it first, and moral corruption follows.
- Destroyer — this verse is not about a poor builder. It is about a destroyer, and one writer says he is no believer at all.
- Retribution — one word does double duty. The man who corrupts the temple is corrupted by God. Justice, measure for measure.
- Ground — the closing words turn to you. You are that holy temple, so nothing unholy can be allowed in it.
Let no one deceive himself if any one thinks himself to be wise among you in this world, let him become foolish, that he may be wise.
Paul has just warned that God's temple is holy. Now he turns from the builders to the mindset that ruins the building. The danger here is not open unbelief. It is quiet self-flattery: a man inside the church who counts himself wise by the standards of his own age, and never suspects that he is fooling himself.
One writer explains who had slipped into the church at Corinth, and how hard this failure is to catch in yourself:
The verse seems to hint that unconverted men had already found a place among the believers there, through an outward acceptance of the Gospel. On the strength of their supposed intelligence, they were taking the place of teachers in the Church. Nothing is easier than deceiving yourself; nothing is harder than really judging yourself. What Paul rejects here is any recognition of natural gift or influence as carrying weight in the Church of God. True grace in believers will freely admit the many social differences among those whom God has called. But to use natural ability, or the accident of birth or social position in the world, as a way to get ahead or to gain personal influence in the Church means forgetting completely what God's house is. It means forgetting the presence and the holiness of Him who lives there by His Spirit.
Self-deception has a source, and one writer names it:
It is possible, then, to deceive yourself that what is being taught is true, when in fact it is worthless. The great source of deception is trying to stand well with the world by fitting Christianity to the wisdom of this world. The servant who will stand for the truth must be willing to become a fool in the eyes of the world. Then, indeed, he will have the wisdom that is true in God's sight.
Being wise is not the same as knowing a lot:
We have to remember that knowledge and wisdom are different things. Knowledge covers far more ground in our day than in the first century, yet the Apostle could write, "We all have knowledge. Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up" (1 Cor. 8:1). There is nothing wrong with real knowledge. But the men who gain it are fallen sinners, and it puffs them up to their own ruin. Wisdom is the ability to apply and use knowledge well. That ability fallen man has not.
Paul had already taken this road, and one writer asks what became of the men who thought him a fool:
How much better and safer it is to become a fool, so that you may be wise! That was the path the apostle took, in obedience to the vision from heaven. Did he not seem foolish in the eyes of all with whom he broke? Was he not wise, whatever a Festus might say? What and where is Festus now? And Agrippa and Bernice? And the high priest and the accusing chiefs of the Jews? They thought themselves wise. So did others in the Corinthian church who brought in the wisdom of the schools to dodge the cross and stand well with the men of their time.
Those were the powerful men of Paul's day, and they are gone.
Let worldly wisdom into the church, and it changes everything it touches:
Bring man's wisdom into the preaching of the gospel, and it empties the cross of Christ of its power. Bring it into the teaching of God's truth, and it causes strife and sects, and puts "philosophy and empty deceit" in the place of that mystery in which "are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge." Bring it into the ordering of the Church, and it pushes out the directions of Scripture for rules and forms that men have invented.
Becoming a fool ends in gain, not loss. The wisdom on offer is a Person, and all things come with Him:
Worldliness and worldly wisdom were dangers to the believers at Corinth. So the Apostle shows them that it was the worldly wise, the rulers of this age, who crucified the Lord of glory. And He is the hidden wisdom of God, the One whom God has made wisdom to us who are in Christ Jesus… "So let no one boast in men." Why? Because we have the Lord Himself, whom men crucified, to boast in; and we belong to Him. And since we are His, the Apostle adds, "All things are yours. You are Christ's, and Christ is God's."
- Deceived — nothing is easier than fooling yourself, and nothing is harder than judging yourself. That is where the verse starts.
- Motive — wanting to stand well with the world feeds the lie. So we trim the faith until it sounds respectable.
- Diagnosis — knowledge is not wisdom. Wisdom is the ability to use knowledge well, and fallen man has lost it.
- Cost — becoming a fool means walking Paul's road. The confident men of the age will write you off, and they come to nothing.
- Gain — the one who lets go of his reputation for wisdom receives Christ as his wisdom, and with Him, all things.
For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God; for it is written, He who takes the wise in their craftiness.
Paul has just told the Corinthians that they are God's temple, and that God will destroy anyone who destroys it. Now he says why the clever thinking they admired has no place there: God calls it folly, and He catches clever people in their own cleverness.
The word translated "world" means more than the people in it. One writer explains what it covers, and what human wisdom has made of it.
Paul had to say that the wisdom of this world is folly with God. Now the word he uses for "world", kosmos, means the world as an ordered system. All human wisdom has been at work ordering that system. Well, what a mess the world is in! There will be no way out of it until Divine power, working in Divine wisdom, steps in.
The verdict is not that the world's thinkers were stupid. It is that their best effort ended nowhere near God.
The world had plenty of time to develop its wisdom. The result was that all the wisdom of the philosophers proved to be folly, because it left man in complete ignorance of God. The end of all man's wisdom is that "the world by wisdom knew not God". It was not that the world failed to know God through ignorance or stupidity; it was by its wisdom that it did not know God. All the wisdom of the ages — the combined efforts of the keenest minds in the world — leaves man in utter ignorance of God, and in utter ignorance of himself.
The line Paul quotes comes from the book of Job. His use of it settles something about that book.
People have written whole volumes to prove — as if that were possible — that Job never existed, and that the book is only a page of Arabian romance. But Ezekiel among the prophets (Ezek. 14:14, 20), and James among the apostles (James 5:11), guarantee the life, trials, and death of Job. And Paul confirms the divine character of the book by quoting from it, introducing the quotation with the usual formula "it is written" (1 Cor. 3:19, with Job 5:13).
God does not need to argue the wise down. He lets their own scheming close on them.
The wisdom of this world commands the respect of the natural man. At times it may look very attractive even to the Christian, as it did to the believers at Corinth. Still, it is folly with God. The very wisdom of the world becomes its undoing, for it is written, "He catches the wise in their craftiness". The wisdom of this world is mere craft, and it traps those who boast in it.
Worldly wisdom is folly anywhere. Paul aims the words at one place in particular.
But everywhere, outside even more than inside, "the wisdom of the world is foolishness with God"; yet nowhere is its character so exposed, nowhere is indulging it so dangerous, as in the temple of God — the church. So it is written in Job and in Psalm 94. Whether one looks back on past experience or forward to the kingdom, it makes no difference: least of all can human craft or clever reasonings suit God's temple, and those who trade in them there will not escape His judgment.
Another writer pictures the sentence as a notice carved over the entrance of that temple.
"The temple of God" is in view. As I come up to this building — and it is God's building — I see written over the entrance, as it were, these words: "He catches the wise in their craftiness." It says this to me: if you bring the wisdom of the world into this building, you will be found out. Remember, this is God's temple, and what is of the world — what is human — will all be found out and judged. Human wisdom is of no use there.
The warning of verse 18 names the trap the verse then explains.
It is possible, then, to deceive oneself that what is being taught is true, when, in fact, it is worthless. The great source of deception is trying to stand well with the world by fitting Christianity to the wisdom of this world. The servant who will stand for the truth must be content to become a fool in the eyes of the world; then, indeed, he will have the true wisdom according to God.
- Wisdom — "World" here is the whole ordered human system. Human wisdom arranged every part of it, and the result is the mess we see.
- Folly — God's verdict falls on man's cleverness, not his ignorance. By its wisdom the world never came to know God, or itself.
- Craft — The line Paul quotes from Job says the world's wisdom is mere craft, and craft is the net that catches those who boast in it.
- Temple — God's temple is the worst place of all to bring worldly wisdom. There it is found out and judged.
- Fool — The deception to avoid is making Christianity fit the world's thinking. Be content to look foolish, and you will have real wisdom.
And again, [The] Lord knows the reasonings of the wise that they are vain.
Paul ends his warning about God's temple by quoting Scripture back at a clever church. The word behind "thoughts" also means reasonings. Where the ESV says they are "futile," older translations say "vain." One writer shows how the world's wisdom defeats the people who trade in it:
The wisdom of this world wins respect from people who do not know God. At times it can look very attractive even to a Christian, as it did to the believers at Corinth. Still, it is foolishness with God. The very wisdom of the world becomes its undoing, for Scripture says, "He takes the wise in their own craftiness." The wisdom of this world is mere craft, and it traps those who boast in it. The Lord knows that the "reasonings" of the wise are vain.
People assume that what stays inside the head stays hidden. One writer answers that assumption, and points to the Son who came to bring hearts into the open.
Thoughts are hidden inside the heart, and one of man's strange delusions is that they are therefore hidden from God, who knows all things. Yet Scripture says, "The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise that they are vain" (1 Cor. 3:20; Ps. 94:11). The Son, come as man, had this same complete knowledge and showed it. Simeon told Mary that one purpose of His mission was that "the thoughts of many hearts might be revealed" (Luke 2:35).
Paul is not saying anything new here; he is repeating words already written in the Old Testament. Another writer shows where this wisdom does the most damage, and what makes boasting pointless.
Everywhere — outside the church even more than inside it — "the wisdom of the world is foolishness with God." Yet nowhere is its true character so exposed, and nowhere is giving in to it so dangerous, as in the temple of God — the church. Whether you look back at past experience or forward to the kingdom, it makes no difference. Human craft and clever reasonings least of all suit God's temple, and those who deal in them there will not escape His judgment. And why should people boast, when with Christ they have all things?
after_note: none
One writer names what prompted the warning.
The Corinthians were a clever people in this world, and they were beginning to bring their own cleverness and energy into the temple of God; they had not learned to become fools that they might be wise. Our own wise thoughts are our greatest hindrance.
The same instinct reappears wherever people feel qualified to sit in judgement on what God has said.
It is very important to remember this, because a spirit of mental arrogance is the special mark of the present age. Men have made such wonderful discoveries. They have solved such difficult problems and built such complex, highly imaginative philosophies, that they feel completely competent to set themselves up as masters of the Christian faith. They claim the liberty to criticise it and change it as they please. In the end they only give an excellent modern example of how true the inspired words are.
The verse leads straight to a command about boasting, and to what belongs to those who obey it.
So he says, "The Lord knows the reasonings of the wise that they are vain. So let no one boast in men" (1 Cor. 3:20, 21). Why? Because we have the Lord Himself whom men crucified to boast in; and we belong to Him. And since we are His, the Apostle adds, "All things are ours. You are Christ's, and Christ is God's."
- Known — the Lord knows the thoughts of the wise. Nothing we reason out inside our heads is hidden from Him.
- Futile — the world's wisdom is mere craft, and craft traps the people who boast in it.
- Exposed — nowhere is worldly wisdom more out of place, or more dangerous, than in God's temple, the church.
- Surrendered — the Corinthians carried their own cleverness into the church. Our own wise thoughts are our greatest hindrance.
- Enriched — the boast moves from men to Christ, and with Him all things are already ours.
So that let no one boast in men; for all things are yours.
Paul closes a long correction of party spirit at Corinth with a command: stop boasting in men. His cure is not a lower view of their teachers but a far bigger view of what already belongs to them.
The problem at Corinth was not that Paul, Apollos and Cephas were unworthy, but that believers had lined up behind favourites. One writer names the fault precisely:
So in 1 Corinthians the apostle meets an unspiritual preference for one servant of Christ over another. It was unspiritual because it shut the others out. Against it he presses the broad and blessed truth, "All things are yours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas." What Paul rebuked was a sectarian spirit about those who ministered.
The ban on boasting is not limited to bad leaders. It reaches the finest of them:
Let us not glory in men. Some of those in whom the Corinthians had been glorying may have been men of a very poor kind. But let us not glory in the best of men. On the one hand, no man is worth it, as 1 Corinthians 1 showed us. On the other hand, as emphasised here, grace has given us a place which should put us far above glorying in a mere man.
Choosing a name to rally under does not enlarge a believer's portion. It shrinks it.
Taking up the apostle's figure, those who said they were of Paul lost Apollos and Cephas. Those who said they were of Cephas lost Paul and Apollos. Why not benefit by all the gifts an ascended Lord has seen fit to give to His church? The church is a whole.
There is something worse than a narrowed portion.
So we as Christians are warned against glorying in men. To do so would put us in the false position of seeming to belong to those we glory in. As Christians we do not belong to men. All things belong to us, in the sense that we belong to Christ and are set above them all. The Corinthians were lining up under certain teachers as if they belonged to different gifted men. No, says the Apostle, they all belong to you.
"All things are yours" sounds too large to be literal. The next two verses trace it back through a chain of ownership.
How are they ours? Verse 23 answers that. They are ours because we are Christ's, and Christ is God's. All things are God's. No one can dispute that, and there we begin. But then God has His Christ, who is the Heir of all things. And, most wonderful to say, Christ plans to take real hold of His mighty possessions by putting His own people in possession of them.
The same reasoning explains a strange reversal. Those who own nothing in this world own everything.
The wealth of the world passes into the hands of the people of God. People outside of Christ have a right to nothing, and so they own nothing. In the end that is how it will turn out. Those who go out of the world as pilgrims still carry all the good of the world with them. The world that wants to enjoy it must hand it over to them. To him who belongs to the world the world cannot belong.
The list that follows in verse 22 includes things no one would call an asset.
While we belong to no one but Christ, all things belong to us. "Whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas," and so on. They are all in the place of servants to us, no longer as masters. Even death itself has lost the mastery. It is now to the believer, not a master, but a messenger of peace — his servant. It can no longer look on me as its prey; the world can no longer say I am its own.
The passage ends by turning ownership the other way. One writer warns against improving on it.
Before we reach the striking statement at the end, we are told, "All things are yours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or the present or the future—all are yours." Popular Christianity would crown this glorious wealth by saying, "And best of all, Christ is yours." But the Scripture does not say that at all. What it says is, "YOU ARE CHRIST'S, and Christ is God's."
- Cause. The boasting Paul rebukes is party spirit: preferring one servant of Christ so much that the rest are shut out.
- Cost. A party never adds; it subtracts. Claiming Paul loses you Apollos and Cephas, and it puts you in the false position of belonging to a man.
- Ground. All things are God's. God has given all to Christ the Heir, and Christ puts His people in possession. The chain runs God, Christ, you, all things.
- Reach. The list spares nothing: teachers, the world, life, death, present and future. Each one is demoted from master to servant.
- Result. The order is never reversed. Scripture does not end with "Christ is yours" but with "you are Christ's" — which is exactly why nothing else may own you.
Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or [the] world, or life, or death, or things present, or things coming, all are yours;
Paul ends his rebuke of the Corinthians' party spirit with a startling list: their teachers, the world, life, death, and all of time belong to them. How could quarrelling believers own such a list — and why did naming it cure their boasting in men?
The rebuke works by ownership. Attaching yourself to a favourite teacher makes you his; the truth runs the other way.
As Christians, then, we are warned against boasting in men. To do so would put us in the false position of belonging to the men we boast in. As Christians we do not belong to men. All things belong to us, in the sense that we are set above everything because we belong to Christ. The Corinthians were lining themselves up under certain teachers, as if they belonged to different gifted men. No, says the Apostle, they all belong to you.
When a teacher treats believers as his own following, jealousy follows. And the people lose the gifts God gave them through others.
Suppose that in our relationship to the Church of God we treat any people as our people. Then we will always be jealous about them. We will always be afraid of their listening to anybody but ourselves. We will always be anxious to shape their opinions to fit our own, perhaps very narrow, minds. In any case, no man — I do not care how great he is — no man has all the gifts... All things are ours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas. So anything that hinders the working of all the gifts God gives for God's people is false in principle.
Cephas is Peter. Naming him to readers who were not Jews carries its own point.
Writing to non-Jews, he wants them to know that they have the same interest in what Peter taught as in the words of their own God-inspired apostle. For Peter, the apostle to the Jews, was, like his "beloved brother Paul," a minister of Christ.
The world is on the list as well. The reason lies in Christ's victory, not in any advantage we hold now.
The Lord's chosen servants are not the only possession of His saints. The world too, and all it contains, is theirs, for Jesus has overcome the world... He is already crowned on high with all dominion. But so far He has only claimed this world; He has not yet enforced that claim... For this very reason, those whom the Spirit leads keep away from the world and its honours until its rightful owner comes.
Death appears on the list of a Christian's assets. What altered its standing was Christ's victory.
Christ's victory has completely changed how death looks to His believing people. It is no longer "the king of terrors" (Job 18:14) to us. On the contrary, death is ours, as the rejoicing apostle tells us in 1 Cor. 3:21-22. In other words, it is a servant that serves for our blessing.
More than my own dying is meant. Death as God has used it belongs to me as well.
Death is mine in the highest sense; not merely in the lower sense, that, as it is appointed to men once to die, I may have to die; but, in the highest sense, Death is mine; for death itself, in the divine use of it — in the way God has used it — has been, and is marvellously mine, my own: my boast and my song.
Owning the present does not promise pleasant circumstances. It means holding a claim over them.
For the believer who wants to walk godly in Christ Jesus, present things are more often painful than pleasant. Yet he carries peace within him, and by faith he already holds immortality and glory. While he suffers the troubles allotted to him, he knows that all things work together for his good... The man without Christ holds only an uncertain allowance from time. The believer holds the earth and all its fullness by his Redeemer's title.
The next verse gives the reason. Follow the ownership upward, and the huge list stops sounding extravagant.
How are they ours? Verse 23 answers that. They are ours because we are Christ's, and Christ is God's. All things are God's... But God has His Christ, who is the Heir of all things. And, most wonderful to say, Christ plans to take hold of His own mighty possessions by putting His saints into possession.
Notice which way the last clause runs — and what it asks of us.
Popular Christianity would crown this glorious wealth by adding, "And best of all, Christ is yours." But Scripture does not say that at all. What it says is, "You are Christ's, and Christ is God's." Christ was and is and always will be completely at God's disposal, the willing Servant of His good pleasure. In the same way, we are to be at Christ's disposal.
- Cause — Boasting in a favourite teacher puts you in a false position. You start to belong to a man, when you do not belong to men at all.
- Reversal — No one man has all the gifts. Every gifted servant belongs to all God's people, so blocking any gift is wrong in principle.
- Reach — The list runs outward: teachers, the world, life and death, present and future. Death stops being the king of terrors and becomes a servant.
- Anchor — All things are yours because you are Christ's, and Christ is God's. The Heir of all things takes possession by putting His people into possession.
- Result — Scripture never says "Christ is yours." It says "you are Christ's." The wealth is real, and it comes with being wholly at His disposal.