If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal.
Corinth prized showy things: fluent speech, the gift of tongues, public display. Paul answers by pointing to a way that outranks every gift, and he asks what the finest speech is worth when love is missing.
One commentator warns against a common mistake. The better way Paul points to is not a better route to gifts:
At the same time Paul tells the saints to desire the greater gifts eagerly, but these gifts were for building up, not for show. And yet he points them to a far better way. It is not merely a way, however good, to get these gifts, as some suppose. It is a way for souls to feel and think, to walk and worship, beyond all gifts. It is the way of love, and he opens it out in the next chapter.
To prove the supreme value of love, the Apostle names three things the Corinthian believers were boasting about: their eloquent speech, their spiritual possessions, and their activities. They may try to lift themselves up by these things. But he shows that these things count for nothing in God's sight if love is not the motive.
Notice that Paul says "I." He does not point at anyone. And the speech he imagines is not bad speech:
Older English Bibles read "charity" here, which today suggests giving money away. The Greek word is the same one used elsewhere for God's own love:
Today people usually take the word "charity" to mean kind feelings toward others, or gifts of money to the poor. But that is not what the Greek word agapee means, the word Paul uses all through this chapter. The Revised Version and all good modern versions translate it "love." In 1 John 4:7-12 this same word agapee appears several times, and there too it is translated "love." To say "God is charity" (the same word) instead of "God is love" would shock our ears, and rightly so.
A cymbal was made of metal plates struck together:
Ancient musical instruments, made of metal plates struck together. On their own they made no tuneful sound, and they could only be played alongside other instruments… In Corinthians the cymbal is a picture of someone making a show in speaking without love in the heart.
Applied to a meeting, that means volume without result:
Whatever the estimate of the value of tongues in modern days, the apostle rates them, whether of men or of angels, to be, in the absence of love, no more than "a mere instrument of sound without sense, dead, mechanical, devoid of moral worth." There is much clangour and clatter, but no true ministry of the Spirit bearing witness to the spirits of the saints. No edification results, for it is love that builds up, while tongues like knowledge puff up.
The verse does not say the words become noise. It says I become noise. One writer pictures the scene:
A brother stands up in the meeting and speaks words of rare sweetness and thrill, though we cannot understand a word of them. We find that he has given a message from God in a language of heaven, one that angels use. How wonderful! How we would stare at him! Yes. But if he has done this without love, he might as well have brought an old brass pan into the meeting and hit it with a poker. That is all the good he has done for the Lord's interests in the assembly.
Not every Christian has a gift. But one writer points out what every Christian can do:
Love is what God is. If I do not have it, I am not born of God, and so I do not share His nature… You say, I have no gift. Maybe so, but you can love. Every Christian can do that. And it is worth more than the brightest gift, because love is the nature of God and seeks the blessing of others. It thinks of everybody but itself.
- Setting — The better way is not a way to get gifts. It is a way of feeling, walking and worshipping that stands above every gift.
- Motive — The three tests of verses 1–3 target Corinth's boasts: speech, possessions, activity. Without love as the motive, none of them counts with God.
- Word — "Charity" in older versions is the same word used for God's own love; "love" is the accurate rendering.
- Sound — Cymbals made no melody on their own. That is the picture of a person making a show in speaking with no love in the heart — clatter, but nothing built up.
- Reach — Gift is given to some; love is open to all, and is worth more than the brightest gift, because love is what God is.
And if I have prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.
Paul has just pointed a gift-obsessed church to something better than the gifts they were competing over. Now he tests the three biggest — prophecy, total understanding, mountain-moving faith — and each one, without love, leaves the man himself nothing.
The contrast in this chapter is not between a big gift and a small one.
Still, there was something more excellent than all gifts. Gifts were the displays of the power of God and of the mysteries of His wisdom; love was the display of His nature itself.
That is why the chapter follows straight on from Paul's teaching about gifts in the assembly.
As this is what 1 Corinthians 12 sets before us, so the apostle goes on to remind the Corinthians that there was one thing even better than gifts. This was love. Looking at God's nature, He is certainly Light, but what is the energy of that nature? It is love. It is love that actively comes to us from God and blesses us. Love is the energy of the divine nature. It is what Christ showed us God to be, and what the Spirit would now work in us.
The faith in this verse is not the faith that saves a person.
Of course, "all faith" in this verse has nothing to do with believing in the Son of God, for whoever believes has everlasting life. It means only faith as a miraculous power, which a man who is not born again might have (Matthew 7:22-23).
So what can this faith do?
The Apostle is not speaking of faith in Christ, for this faith works by love. He is speaking instead of faith which enables people to overcome great obstacles and do great exploits. And he says it is possible to have such faith without love.
The word "mysteries" here does not mean puzzles too deep to grasp. In Scripture it means truths God once kept back and has now told out.
God's mysteries mean those secret things which are now revealed, in contrast with what Israel had of old (Deuteronomy 29:29). They are not, as most people suppose, things too deep to understand. They are truths God kept back in Old Testament times, now displayed in Christ on high and made known by the Spirit in the New Testament.
So Paul is picturing a man with the fullest possible grasp of revealed truth — and still weighing him at zero.
Scripture already had examples of real spiritual power in people whose hearts were far from God. Balaam prophesied for money. Saul was Israel's first king. Caiaphas was the high priest who wanted Jesus dead. Judas was one of the twelve.
Saul the king could prophesy too. Balaam the prophet prophesied while loving the wages of unrighteousness. Caiaphas the priest prophesied while he was thirsting for innocent blood. Judas the apostle worked miracles while he carried the heart of a traitor. Each of them had received a new heart, or "another heart," as a gift for office, and in the Spirit they prophesied or worked miracles. But all this tells us that it is not gifts that make us what we should be, and that nothing will do if the heart is not with God.
Notice what Paul does not say. He does not say the prophecy is worthless or the knowledge false.
He not only reaches the heart of divine things; through his gift of prophecy he can also tell others what he knows. He also has faith of an almost miraculous power. Yet he has not love! We are not told that he is like a clanging piece of brass. It is possible that we may gain some help and understanding from what he says, and some inspiration from his remarkable faith. What we are told is that he himself is nothing. If we are unspiritual ourselves, we might imagine him to be a giant. Really he is less than a pygmy. He is nothing.
This verse deals with what a person has, and the emptiness traces back to motive.
Verse 1 deals with what I speak; verse 2 with what I have; and verse 3 with what I do. Where love is missing, the motive for using the gift is selfish; it is not genuine concern for others, or for the glory of God. So in my every effort to be something, "I am nothing."
- Nature. Gifts display God's power; love displays His nature. That is why love ranks above every gift.
- Gift. The "all faith" here is a gift of miraculous power, not saving faith. Saving faith works by love, so it could never be loveless.
- Reach. Prophecy, all mysteries, all knowledge — that is the widest grasp of truth anyone could hold. Without love, Paul rates it at zero.
- Proof. Balaam, Saul, Caiaphas and Judas show that power in the Spirit is no evidence of a heart with God.
- Verdict. Paul does not say the gift is nothing; he says I am nothing. Others may profit from what I say; God sees a nobody. Every effort to be something ends there.
And if I shall dole out all my goods in food, and if I deliver up my body that I may be burned, but have not love, I profit nothing.
Paul has already said that fine speech and deep knowledge are worthless without love. Now he raises the cost: if giving away everything you own, and even dying as a martyr, can leave you with nothing, what is he really measuring?
Older translations use the word "charity" here. Today that word means generous giving, and this verse shows the two are not the same.
This word appears often in the Authorised Version where the word "love" would be much better, and indeed the same Greek word is often translated "love." 1 Corinthians 13:3 shows that a person may be very charitable or benevolent but have no love.
Verses 1 and 2 weighed what a person says and what he knows. Verse 3 turns to what he does.
We may readily admit that a man can talk well without love, and boast in his spiritual knowledge without love. We may tell such a person to talk a little less and do a little more. But the apostle further warns us that it is also possible to do much without love. He says a man's good works may rise so high that he gives all his goods to feed the poor, and gives his body as a martyr to be burned. Yet the motive may not be love, and so all his activities profit him nothing.
Nobody can fault the acts themselves. So the test falls on why a person gives. A generous act can hide an ungenerous reason.
A philanthropist may give only to draw attention to how generous he is. Another may give freely to quiet a bad conscience, troubled because he did not gain his wealth honestly. But let the believer always be moved by love toward the Lord, and toward others.
Dying for a cause looks like final proof of faith. It is not, and the cause a person dies for may even be false.
Neither almsgiving nor self-sacrifice necessarily implies a living faith. Even the most lavish spending on causes that look "charitable" may spring from motives quite foreign to the life of God. In the same way, blind fanatical zeal may lead a person to die for a lie against the truth.
The same writer adds the positive side:
The lesson here is not that active zeal is a bad thing. It is that growing in divine love matters more than any single act.
The deed may still do real good to others. The loss falls on the person who did it.
So God may use words without love, knowledge without love and activities without love to do His own work. Yet they add nothing to the one who speaks and acts this way. Without love he will be nothing and profit nothing, whatever his words, his possessions and his activities.
So what is this love? It is not warm feeling or a generous temperament.
Love was conformity to the nature of God. It was the living expression of what He is, and the evidence that a person has been made a partaker of His nature. It was acting and feeling according to His likeness. This love develops in relation to others; but others are not the motive, though they are the object. Its source is within. Its strength does not depend on the people it is occupied with. So it can act where circumstances would stir irritation or jealousy in the human heart.
If love is the one thing that counts, why not simply work it up? Because love aimed at winning something is not love at all.
Love must be the driving power, or nothing counts. But we cannot love in order to gain something for ourselves by it. There is only one way to get it: as flame lights flame. So love alone kindles love: "We love because he first loved us."
One more note on the wording. Some old Greek copies read "that I may boast" in place of "to be burned." The two words differ by a single letter. Kelly keeps "burned": if the motive were already boasting, Paul's clause about not having love would add nothing (William Kelly).
- The deed — Giving away everything and dying as a martyr are the costliest acts named. Paul says both are possible without love.
- The motive — The acts are beyond criticism, so the test falls on the reason behind them: reputation, a guilty conscience, or zeal for a lie.
- The source — This love is a share in God's own nature, not a feeling worked up. It catches like flame from flame, because He loved us first.
- The profit — God may still use a loveless act to help others. It adds nothing to the person who did it.
- The aim — Zeal is not the problem. Growing in divine love comes ahead of any single act, however costly.