1 Corinthians 12:1–3

1 Corinthians 12:1 · Darby

But concerning spiritual [manifestations], brethren, I do not wish you to be ignorant.

Paul's letter turns a corner here. He takes up a fresh question the Corinthians had sent him, and he refuses to leave them uninformed. Two things are at stake: what the word translated "spiritual" really covers, and why being ignorant of it is dangerous.

An answer to their letter

The words "now concerning" mark a turn. Paul stops dealing with the problems he has been correcting and starts answering the questions they wrote to him.

From the first verse of chapter 7 we gather that Paul sat down to write this letter as a reply. The Corinthians had sent him a letter of enquiry earlier. When he wrote, there were graver and more urgent matters to deal with first, and these fill up chapters 1 to 6. He now turns to their enquiries. We find the words "Now concerning" repeated at the start of 1 Cor. 8, 1 Cor. 12 and 1 Cor. 16. They had clearly written with questions about marriage, things offered to idols, spiritual gifts and collections.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The missing word

Many English Bibles add the word "gifts" after "spiritual." Commentators say translators supplied it, and that it narrows Paul's meaning.

Notice that the translators added the word "gifts." Nor is it correct. The subject includes gifts, but it goes further. It takes in what is of far deeper importance, as the source of it all: the presence of the Spirit, working in the sovereign power of a divine person in the church and through its members. Perhaps "spirituals" would give the idea if our language could bear it without any addition. If we must supply a word for clarity, it should be "manifestations" rather than "gifts."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That wider word changes what the chapter is about. Paul's subject is not only what the Spirit produces, but the Spirit Himself.

It is not only the effects produced, whether in the way of power or of grace. Above all there is the first, parent truth, the centre of it all: the Holy Spirit Himself, come down to be here for the glory of the Lord Jesus in the assembly. The apostle is not discussing the personal state of those who form part of that assembly. He is discussing the Spirit's action in each and all.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Person behind the gifts

This sets an order of importance. The gifts matter, but the Giver matters more, and He is a Person present among His people.

The presence of the Spirit is more important than even the gifts He distributes and directs. It is what forms the one body. The assembly is bound to own it and act on it — and that is exactly what the Christian world has in effect denied since the apostles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Paul wants them to know

Paul says plainly what he wants them to know. He traces it all back to its source and its purpose, and he starts by reminding them what they used to be.

So the apostle wants them to know the source, character, and purpose of all that flows from the Spirit in the assembly. He wants them to know how the Spirit shows Himself in each member of Christ. And first, he reminds them of the pitiful state they were in as pagans.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Their past matters because the same enemy is still at work. The answer is not better feelings but faith in who is present.

There was a danger for them, and there may be one for us, because we are members of that one body… The reality of Satan's power is a solemn lesson to all of us. The change was not merely from bad affections to kind and good ones. The spirit of the enemy is at work to lower His name. The Holy Spirit, on the other hand, is here for the express purpose of maintaining the glory of the Lord. We cannot enjoy this without faith… God looks for faith in the action of the Holy Spirit in the assembly.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A pattern in Paul's writing

This is not the only place Paul says it. He wrote the same to church after church.

There is no excuse for a Christian's ignorance in relation to the interests of Christ. Paul urged believers in Christ again and again to be intelligent and not ignorant (Rom. 1:13; Rom. 11:25; 1 Cor. 10:1; 1 Cor. 12:1; 2 Cor. 1:8; 1 Thess. 4:13). Paul prayed that the believers at Colossae might have "spiritual understanding" (Col. 1:9). Clearly a Christian should want this kind of understanding more than any other.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Summary

- Question. "Now concerning" signals a reply to a letter the Corinthians had sent; the same phrase opens chapters 7, 8, 12 and 16.

- Word. Translators supplied "gifts." Paul's own word is wider — "spirituals," or at least "manifestations."

- Person. Widen the word and the Giver comes into view. The Holy Spirit Himself is here for the glory of the Lord Jesus, and He counts for more than any gift He gives.

- Danger. Ignorance here is not harmless. The enemy who once led them still works to lower Christ's name.

- Duty. Paul refused to leave believers uninformed. Every Christian is meant to learn how the Spirit works. It is not optional.

1 Corinthians 12:2 · Darby

Ye know that when ye were [of the] nations [ye were] led away to dumb idols, in whatever way ye might be led.

Paul is about to explain how the Spirit of God works in the church. First he takes the Corinthians back to what they used to be. The verse remembers pagan Corinth: idols that could not speak, and worshippers driven by a power they never chose.

Why Paul starts with their past

One writer notes that Paul leads them back to what they were, and that the reminder is good for any reader.

Before His positive teaching on the Spirit and His workings, he leads them back in memory to what they once were by nature. It is good for us to be reminded of this often. A lazy familiarity with truth can tempt us to forget what kind of people we both were and are.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

"Mute idols"

Mute means the idols could not speak. Older wording in the quotes below calls them "dumb." That silence sets up the contrast. One commentator draws out both sides of it: what they were dragged into, and who God turned out to be.

He says "when you were pagans," not "that you were pagans." It told them nothing new to say they were pagans. In those days it was not merely a leading. It was a carrying away to what they would now look back on with pain, seeing its extreme folly and its boldness. It was Satan's direct opposition to the truth of God. They would learn that the true God is nothing like a dumb idol. He has spoken to us by His Son. And by His Spirit He opens mouths that were once silent, so that they speak for Jesus Christ the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"However you were led"

The phrase describes people moved along without knowing what moved them. Their ignorance of the true God left nothing to steady them.

They had no solid hope to rest their souls on, because they did not know the God who made them. So they gave way to their own delusions. His power and divine nature appealed to their consciences from almost every object they saw, yet they stayed in guilty ignorance of Him. So they were carried away to these dumb idols, however they were led. Their own natural instincts drew them, and behind that was the strong hand of the ruler of the darkness of this world.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Being led is not the problem. Blind following is. The same difference applies to how a Christian follows those who guide him.

Not a blind following of them, as when they were heathen (1 Cor. 12:2) following dumb idols. Are you to be led blindfold? No; you are to be led intelligently. "No one can say 'Jesus is Lord' except in the Holy Spirit."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why the reminder mattered at Corinth

Their old background made them easy targets for a counterfeit of the Spirit's power.

Most of the Christians at Corinth had been poor Gentiles. They had no discernment, and the enemy's delusions led them about like fools. So they were in greater danger of being deceived again the same way. The Spirit of God gives force to the truth in a man's heart and clears his moral sight. When a man is not filled with that Spirit, the enemy's seductive power dazzles his imagination. He loves marvels, however unbelieving he may be about the truth.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The mistake mirrors a sin recorded in the Gospels.

The Spirit of God worked in our Lord Jesus, and the Jews said the power came from Beelzebub, the prince of the demons (Matt. 12:22-32). That was the unpardonable sin. Today the danger is the opposite sin: calling the power of Satan the Holy Spirit of God. This glaring error was a danger in the early church too. In a pagan city like Corinth, believers were especially open to demons speaking among them as oracles.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

The people God chose

Paul is not shaming them. He is naming the raw material grace worked with.

And who are they? Men who had been worshippers of dumb idols (1 Cor. 12:2). Gentiles, distant outsiders. "Such were some of you," he adds, after describing many kinds of evildoers (1 Cor. 6:9-11). What a company! Surely the worst of Corinth! Totally unable to reform themselves, but described as "washed, sanctified, justified in the name of the Lord Jesus."

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

Summary

- Mute — the idols could not speak. The verse turns on that silence, and on a God who speaks.

- Dragged — they were not merely led but carried away, and would later look back on it with pain.

- Blind — they did not know the true God, so a power they never chose moved them along.

- Vulnerable — that same background left them open to counterfeits. The modern error is to credit Satan's power to the Spirit of God.

- Delivered — idol worshippers became "washed, sanctified, justified." God opened their mouths to call Jesus Lord.

1 Corinthians 12:3 · Darby

I give you therefore to know, that no one, speaking in [the power of the] Spirit of God, says, Curse [on] Jesus; and no one can say, Lord Jesus, unless in [the power of the] Holy Spirit.

Paul turns from food, worship and order in the church to what he calls "spiritual things." He opens with a test the Corinthians can use on the spot. In a city full of shrines and oracles the danger was real. How do you tell a voice moved by the Spirit of God from a voice moved by something else?

From Dumb Idols to a Speaking God

Verse 2 has just reminded these believers what they used to be — swept along to idols that could not speak a word back. One writer sets the true God against those idols:

They would learn that the true God is nothing like a dumb idol. He has spoken to us by His Son. And by His Spirit He opens mouths that were once dumb, so that they speak for Jesus Christ the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Paul Gives a Test

In the early meetings, men spoke as inspired. Not every one of them drew on the same source:

The enemy used the same tactics in the early days of the church. He brought men into the public meetings of believers who really did speak by inspiration — but their inspiration came from demons, not from the Holy Spirit. So Paul lays down the test in 1 Corinthians 12:3. The confession of Jesus as LORD is the test. Many accounts could be given to prove that this test always works. It never fails. In today's spiritist seances, demons often say things that sound noble and beautiful, but they will never own Jesus as Lord.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"Jesus Is Accursed"

The first half of the test raises a question. Jesus did bear a curse — so who put Him under it?

No such man calls Jesus "accursed." No one puts Him under the curse, except at the cross. God did it there, as we know, when Jesus died for our sins. But no man speaking by the Spirit of God calls Jesus Himself accursed. And no one can say that Jesus is Lord except through the Holy Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Weight of the Word "Lord"

"Lord" may sound like the smallest thing you could say about Christ. That is exactly the point:

He takes up the lowest way of honouring Christ. Of course, to say "Lord" is far from the highest way of naming Christ. It is what everyone is called to own when they part company with the world, repent and believe the gospel... So it was the very first confession all through Acts. No one was owned as a Christian until he owned Jesus as Lord... But "the Lord" means that He is the one God has exalted. God did not only raise Him from the dead; He set Him over everything.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

No Neutral Ground Between the Two

The verse names only two places for the name of Jesus. What about everyone who seems to stand in between?

If the name of Jesus is not given the highest honour, freely and sincerely, then its only other place is utter contempt... Between "accursed" and "Lord" there is no other place it can rightly hold. There seems to be a wide space between a living, worshipping faith and a deliberate, outright denial of that name. When the Spirit weighs a person's character, He treats that space as nothing and as a deception. For Him men are believers or unbelievers, confessors or deniers of the Lord.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Saying It and Meaning It

Anyone can say the words. One writer presses that on people who use the title every day:

But you say, "we say it all the time — that Jesus is the Lord. We are always talking about 'the Lord Jesus Christ.'" ... The flesh rebels against His Lordship over us. Our hearts are not willing to submit to His authority. We would rather choose our own path than walk in the one He has marked out for us.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

Where Commentators Differ

Commentators differ on how far this verse reaches. Some use it as a personal test of who is really a Christian. This writer says Paul's subject here is narrower:

An unclean spirit would not say "Lord Jesus," and the Spirit of God could not call Jesus accursed. But the question here is about spirits. It is not about conversion, and not about the need for grace to work in the heart before anyone can truly confess the name of Jesus. That need is very real, as we know, but it is not the subject here.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Lord over dumb idols — idols never spoke back. The true God has spoken by His Son, and He opens once-silent mouths to speak for Jesus Christ the Lord.

- Lord is the test — the enemy's voices never confess Jesus as Lord, however fine their words sound.

- Lord, not accursed — at the cross God laid the curse on Him for our sins. No one moved by the Spirit ever curses Him.

- Lord is least and first — it is the lowest way of naming Christ. Yet it was the first confession in Acts, and it marks Him as the One God has exalted over everything.

- Lord means no middle ground — the Spirit sees only confessors or deniers. Saying it truly means a heart that stops choosing its own path.