1 Corinthians 11:8–12

1 Corinthians 11:8 · Darby

For man is not of woman, but woman of man.

Paul is settling how men and women should appear when they pray together, and he does not argue from custom. He goes back to Genesis, to how the woman was made — which raises a question people still ask: does coming out of man make her worth less?

A fact, not an opinion

Paul is not giving an opinion. He states what God did, and one writer sees marriage resting on it.

In 1 Cor. 11:8-9 the apostle Paul sums up the truth of the case in a few words, and it carries God's authority: "For man was not made from woman, but woman from man; neither was man created for woman, but woman for man." Those who dare to dispute the fact must one day learn what it is to call God a liar. This is the ground of the sanctity of marriage: one woman for one man. From the beginning, He Who made her made her out of man, so that the two should be one flesh. People in general soon forgot it, and even Israel did. But there it stood, written and never erased, to instruct the faithful and shame the rebellious.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the argument reaches back to the beginning

Paul is not describing how things run now. That is why he goes back to the start.

Creation is the proof, not the ordinary course of things since. So no one can judge this rightly without looking to the beginning. If verse 7 refers to where man and woman each came from, verse 8 then shows the woman made for the man, and after him. That is the ground of woman's subordination to man. Where people deny creation, or even ignore it, they naturally reason and work for their equality.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Taken out of man — the proof of her worth

Does coming out of man make her lesser? One writer says the fact points the other way.

The very fact that woman was "taken out of man" proves her equality. She is not an inferior, but an equal, a helper suited to him. Between man and man there is similarity, sameness. Between man and woman there is equality, but with difference too.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

This truth protects women. Where it is not known, they are degraded.

This divine ordinance, if observed, is a great protection for woman. She needs it, because she is at a disadvantage compared with man in more ways than one. In the pagan world this ordinance is unknown, and so woman becomes a mere possession, bought and sold and misused by man. These errors, and the abuses that come from them, cannot survive in the light of the truth we have here. Woman is not only of the same species as man, but in her origin was of his very flesh and bone — taken out of man.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The debt runs both ways

One writer weighs the other side of the relationship.

No one should treat her as inferior to man, unfit to be his companion, unsuited to be his helper. For "as woman was made from man, so man is now born of woman." She was taken out of man at the first, and ever since man has owed his life on earth to her. If both thought these simple words of Scripture through, they would learn their true place in relation to each other.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

What Paul builds on it

The origin of the woman leads to a visible sign. More than human eyes watch it.

In creation the man did not come from the woman, as has been true ever since. The woman came from the man: God took Eve from Adam's side. He created her for the man, since He said it was not good for man to be alone. This was God's order in creation. So the woman should wear the sign of authority on her head — that is, she is under authority to her head, the man. Paul adds here, "because of the angels." Angels take a deep interest in the order God has set in His creation, and they care whether both man and woman obey.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A shadow of Christ and the church

One writer reads the same verse as a picture of Christ and the church.

He was given, it is true, in due time for the church, but the church from everlasting had been given to Him, and not He to the church. "For man was not made from woman, but woman from man" (1 Cor. 11:8).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Origin. Woman was formed out of man. Paul builds everything on that fact. It carries God's authority, and it makes marriage sacred.

- Order. The argument rests on the beginning, so no one can judge it rightly without looking there. Ignore creation, and people set out to win equality on their own terms.

- Equality. Taken out of man, she is of his own flesh and bone: equal, though different. That truth has protected women wherever it is known.

- Balance. She came from the man once; every man since has come by the woman, so neither may despise the other.

- Witness. The sign on the head shows this order, and angels watch it. Behind it stands a greater picture: the church is of Christ, given to Him.

1 Corinthians 11:9 · Darby

For also man was not created for the sake of the woman, but woman for the sake of the man.

Paul argues here from the start of the human race. The woman came out of man (v. 8), and she was made for him — but does that make her less, and does Eden still shape how Christians act when they meet?

A fact, not an opinion

Paul is not stating a cultural preference. One writer treats these words as carrying God's own authority, and rests marriage on them.

Paul sums up the truth of the case in 1 Cor. 11:8-9, and he does it with God's authority. Those who dare to dispute the fact must one day learn what it is to call God a liar. This is the ground of the sanctity of marriage: one woman for one man. That was the order from the beginning, laid down by Him who made her out of man, so that the two should be one flesh. Sadly, people in general forgot it far too soon, and even Israel forgot it. But there it was, written in a way that cannot be erased, to instruct the faithful and shame the rebellious.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "for the man" means

The word "for" answers a question of purpose. Adam's need came first, and that need explains why God made a woman rather than a second man.

All this has to do with the present, not with what is final, what is heavenly, what is eternal. It is God's order as He set it up, and we are bound to respect it. Nor was the man created for the woman, but the woman for the man. The man was created first, and it was not good for him to be alone. The woman was created to meet this need. But why a woman — why not another man? Because another man would not have brought the same help. He needs someone who pictures the dependence of the creature, rather than the kind of independence given to man. That very dependence appeals to him, and appeals to his heart, because she depends on him.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Put the other way round, the direction of the help is fixed and cannot be reversed:

"Man was not created for the woman, but woman for the man" (1 Cor. 11:9). So the woman was intended to supplement the man, not the man to supplement the woman.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Order without inferiority

Being made for someone is not the same as being made lower than them. The way she was made proves the opposite.

The very fact that woman was taken out of man proves her equality with him. She is not his inferior, but his equal, his helper. There is equality, but with it diversity. Woman was made for man and to be with him at his side. God never intended that woman should be an independent creature apart from man, but that she should be associated with him... Woman never shines more brightly than when fulfilling the object for which she was created, which first of all was to be man's helper.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

The practical conclusion Paul draws

Verse 9 feeds straight into the instruction about a covered head in verse 10.

"For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God" (v. 7). As such he represents God, and God is to be prominent, not covered. "But woman is the glory of man" — and the glory of man is not to be prominent. She was created for the man, for God had said it was not good for man to be alone. This was God's order in creation, and therefore the woman should have the sign of authority on her head — that is, that she is under authority to her head, the man.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

This order has an audience beyond the room:

There are other creatures who are intelligent and aware of the order of God's ways. In relation to them, the women were to be covered because of the angels. The angels watch the ways of God in redemption, and they watch what this wonderful work of His would produce.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The balancing truth two verses later

Paul does not let his argument turn into tyranny. He adds that the two belong together.

Verses 11 and 12 show, however, that the man and the woman complete one another. The man is not a dictator, and the woman is not a slave. Each is needed in his or her place to keep the human race going. The woman came from man in the beginning. Yet ever since, the man has come "by the woman." "But all things of God." His wisdom and work is supreme in every part of creation.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Christ and the church

The pattern set in Eden is not only about husbands and wives. One writer applies the same words to Christ and the church.

Is not the Church needful to Christ? Yes, truly. God said, "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him." And again, "Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man." So the question is no longer only whether God can save a poor, helpless sinner. He did not leave "the first man" without a helper fit for him; neither would He leave the "Second."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Origin. She was taken out of man — which is why commentators say this proves equality, not inferiority.

- Purpose. She was made for him, to meet a need God Himself named; another man would not have brought the same help.

- Sign. Because of that purpose, the woman wears a token of authority on her head, and men uncover.

- Audience. Angels watch this order kept, so a small visible act carries weight far beyond the room.

- Balance. The man and the woman complete one another — and the pattern of one made for another reaches its height in the church made for Christ.

1 Corinthians 11:10 · Darby

Therefore ought the woman to have authority on her head, on account of the angels.

The apostle has just traced a line of headship: God over Christ, Christ over the man, the man over the woman. His conclusion here raises two questions — what "authority on her head" means, and why angels come into it.

What "authority on her head" means

The wording is odd: she is told to have authority, when the point is that she stands under it.

The expression "authority on the head" has caused endless discussion. To have authority on the head unquestionably means to wear the sign of it in a covering or veil. On the other hand, in verses 11 and 12 the apostle is careful to insist that man and woman belong to each other. He denies that either is independent of the other. He affirms that God is the source of both, and of all things.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer reads the covering as a statement the woman makes about herself.

The apostle takes the state of the physical head as a sign. It shows the condition of the man or the woman in relation to their moral head. The woman's head — the man — is really her head, and she must cover her own head as a sign of her subjection. So she says in effect, "I have no head myself. The man is my head, and I am in subjection." The man could not do that, or there would be no visible head.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The reason reaches back to creation

"That is why" points back to creation, not to local custom in Corinth.

In creation the man did not come from the woman, though that has been the way ever since. The woman came from the man, as God took Eve from Adam's side. God made her for the man, for He had said it was not good for man to be alone. This was God's order in creation. So the woman should wear the sign of authority on her head — the sign that she is under authority to her head, the man.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The argument rests on the beginning, not on how things have gone since:

Creation is the proof — not, of course, the ordinary course of things since. It is therefore impossible to form a right estimate without looking to the beginning. It is easy to see what happens where people deny creation, or even ignore it. Men then naturally reason and labour for equality.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the angels are mentioned

Angels come into it because of what they are by nature.

Two things mark off the angels who never fell from those who did: perfect subjection, and ready obedience to the voice of their Creator. The angels who fell did not keep the place first given to them. And the power that sets true order in God's Church is the same life-giving Spirit who adorned the heavens. That Spirit set the chosen angels in their appointed places. These, then, whose very nature is order, ought not to see disorder in God's house.

Modernised from Andrew PridhamOriginal wording

One writer marks where this applies, and who is watching there:

The apostle is not speaking of wearing the sign of subjection at all times, though I believe it would be very fitting. She is in this a spectacle, with all present, to the angels. The whole subject is modesty, order, decency, and things in their right place... Angels should learn something in the church.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Readings that miss the mark

Commentators differ over who these angels are. One writer runs through the other answers and rejects them all, including the idea that these are evil angels.

Most commentators have missed this thought completely. Some have drifted into degrading ideas about bad angels. Others have lowered the word to mean the righteous themselves, or Christian prophets, or those who preside in the assemblies, or people appointed to arrange betrothals, or mere spies sent there by the unfaithful.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not inferiority but honour

Does this order make the woman less? One writer answers by pointing to Christ.

This shows us the woman's place in the natural sphere. Man is the head. This does not imply inferiority. If it did, Christ would be essentially inferior to God, His Father — a thought impossible to those who believe in His eternal Deity. But in position, and as Man, the blessed Son took the place of subjection and obedience to the Father.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

There is more here than subjection. One writer calls the covering the woman's honour.

The woman's veil is not only a badge of her subjection; it is also her ornament and her praise. For meekness is beauty in the sight of God, and praise belongs to those who stay willingly in their appointed place.

Modernised from Andrew PridhamOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The "that is why" reaches back past custom to creation: woman from man, and for man. So the instruction stands wherever creation stands.

- Sign. "Authority on her head" means wearing the token of the authority she is under. The visible head pictures the moral head.

- Speech. The covering makes a silent statement: I am not my own head. Uncovered, she would show a headship that is not hers.

- Spectators. Angels come into the verse because order is their very nature. The assembly is a classroom, where beings who never fell watch God's order kept on earth.

- Balance. Order is not ranking. The Son Himself took the place of subjection, and the veil is the woman's ornament as well as her sign. The next verses insist neither man nor woman exists without the other, since all things come from God.

1 Corinthians 11:11 · Darby

However, neither [is] woman without man, nor man without woman, in [the] Lord.

Paul has just been teaching the order set at creation: the man as head, and the woman formed from the man and for him. Then he turns with one word — "Nevertheless." The verse asks us to hold two things together: a real difference of place, and a real need of one another.

The Force of "Nevertheless"

The word marks a deliberate turn in the argument. He has pressed the difference of position. Now he sets beside it something both share.

He keeps the difference of place, but he also states that both have the same standing in the Lord. The woman was formed from the man and for the man. Yet the true Man had to be the woman's offspring. And the human race goes on in the earth only because the woman conceives and bears. Each is necessary to the other, and all of God, who frames the creature at His will, and for His praise.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Notice where the statement stands. It comes after the argument about the man's place, from the same writer who made it.

Nothing can be stronger than this. The apostle had been proving the official superiority of the man over the woman. Then he states that, even so, one was not without the other in the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"In the Lord" — Where the Dependence Is Taken Up

This need of each other is not just a fact of nature. It is taken up "in the Lord", and that runs against the way the world is going.

Still, this question of authority and subjection in the creation order in no way weakens the truth that the man and the woman depend on each other. But that mutual dependence is to be taken up in the Lord. In the world men and women are throwing off their allegiance to God, so they want to be more and more independent of one another. In Christianity we are brought back to depending on the Lord, and so on one another, and to owning that all things are of God. How can we be independent of the One from Whom we have our origin?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Two Origins, One Debt

The first woman came from the man. Ever since, every man has come through a woman. Neither side can look down on the other.

Yet she is not to be treated as inferior to the man, unfit to be his companion, unsuited to be his helper. For as the woman is of the man, so the man is by the woman. She was taken out of the man at the first, and ever since the man has owed his existence on earth to her. If both would weigh these plain statements of the Word, they would learn their true place towards each other. It would free the woman from the misdirected energy we see around us, and lead her to fill the place God intended for her.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The beauty of it shows when each keeps the place God gave.

There is a unity in God's creation, and it looks most beautiful when both man and woman keep their place and work as each is fitted to work. God gives each a dignity of their own, and each should act in the dignity that fits the place God has given.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Equality That Does Not Cancel Order

Equal standing in Christ and God's order on earth are not rivals. One does not cancel the other.

There is an equality they share, of the most perfect and highest kind. It can never be touched, never set aside, and it should be owned as fully as possible. On the other hand, that does not set aside God's order for the earth. In the place God has given to man and to woman here, the head of the woman is the man. The higher truth is shown in the lower one. There are not two heads in creation, but one. Two heads would mean division. God's thought is unity… The man and the woman together form man in the full sense of humanity, and so the woman is needed to make the man what he is.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What It Looks Like in Practice

You can see this where believers meet.

First, we see men and women seated together. This speaks of their equal and shared interest in Christ, where there is neither male nor female. As we read here, "in the Lord woman is not independent of man nor man of woman." As persons, they have the same standing in the church of God.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Nevertheless. The word comes after the argument for order, not before it. The same apostle who taught the difference of place denies that either sex stands alone.

- Place. The difference of place stands. What Paul denies is independence. Equal standing and different function belong together.

- Origin. The woman came from the man. Ever since, the man has come through the woman. The debt runs both ways, so neither can claim to be superior.

- Sphere. "In the Lord" is where this dependence is taken up. The world throws off allegiance to God, and then wants independence from one another. Christianity brings back both.

- Result. God gives each a dignity in the place He gave. It shows best when both fill that place, and both hold the same standing in the church of God.

1 Corinthians 11:12 · Darby

For as the woman [is] of the man, so also [is] the man by the woman, but all things of God.

Paul has just said that neither man nor woman stands alone in the Lord; now he gives the reason. The woman came from the man at the start, and ever since then every man has come through a woman — and both facts run back to one source, God Himself.

Dependence, not independence

The verse does not cancel the order set out earlier in the chapter. Authority and subjection still leave the two needing each other, and that need belongs in the Lord.

This question of authority and subjection in the creation order does not in any way weaken the truth that the man and the woman depend on each other. But that mutual dependence is to be taken up in the Lord. In the world men and women are throwing off their allegiance to God. So they seek more and more to be independent of one another. In Christianity we come back to depend on the Lord, and so on one another. We come to recognise that all things are of God. How can we be independent of the One from whom we have our origin?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the need runs both ways

Verse 8 said the woman came from the man. Verse 12 adds the other half, and it draws that half from ordinary birth.

Verse 12 both explains and develops this. God is the originator of all. Here it is not only the woman from the man as in verse 8, but also that every man (child) comes through the woman.

Modernised from Mark BestOriginal wording

This two-way need rules out one false picture of authority. It also explains the closing words about all things being from God.

Verses 11 and 12 show, however, that the man and the woman are the complement of one another. The man is not a dictator and the woman is not a slave. Each is necessary in his or her place for the human race to continue. "And all things are from God." His wisdom and work is supreme in every aspect of creation.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Different place, shared standing

Order and equal standing are not rivals here. Paul holds both, and the line that runs from the woman reaches all the way to Christ.

He keeps the difference of place, and he also states that both share one standing in the Lord. If the woman came from the man and for the man at the start, the true Man must also be the woman's seed. Also, mankind continues on the earth by the natural conception of the woman. Each is necessary to the other, and all of God, who frames the creature at His will, and for His praise.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

That shared standing is visible whenever believers gather.

First, we see men and women seated together. This tells of their equal and common interest in Christ, where there is neither male nor female, as we read here, "For neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man in the Lord"; for, personally considered, they have the same standing in the church of God.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Grace hidden in "born of woman"

The phrase "born of woman" carries more than biology. The woman was deceived first, yet the Saviour came into the world through her.

The heir, or governor, is also spoken of as born of the woman — that is, once man had fallen; so great is the grace in God's purpose. Made out of the man where evil was worked out, He was born out of the woman: marvellous grace. "Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man nor man of woman." Yet the man was created first, not the woman, and "the woman was deceived and became a transgressor." But as the woman is for the man, so the man is by the woman. Note this well: as we have said, it is marvellous grace.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Dignity in the place given

The verse ends in beauty, not competition. Each has a dignity the other does not have, and it goes with the place God gave.

God's creation has a unity, and it is most beautiful when both man and woman keep the place and function each is fitted for. For though the woman came from man to begin with, since that time man has come through the woman. Each has a dignity of its own, and both should act with the dignity that fits the place God has given.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Summary

- Origin. The woman came from the man at creation. Since then every man has come through a woman, so the need runs both ways.

- Dependence. Authority never means independence. In the Lord we come back to depend on Him, and so on one another.

- Standing. The two keep different places, yet they share one standing in the Lord.

- Grace. Man is now born of woman, and so the true Man came as the woman's seed. Grace worked through the one who was deceived first.

- God. All things are from God. He frames the creature at His will and for His praise, and the dignity of each lies in the place He gave.